Category Archives: Trade Show Analytics

Intelligence Assessment: Global Military Tradeshows and Exercises (June 28 – July 4, 2026)

1.0 Executive Summary

The strategic, technological, and operational landscape observed across global military exercises and defense tradeshows during the June 28 to July 4, 2026 period indicates a shift toward integrated multi-domain operations, autonomous logistical sustainment, and unified command and control architectures.1 Global military postures are bifurcating based on regional threat assessments. In the Indo-Pacific theater, military exercises such as Valiant Shield 2026, Rim of the Pacific 2026, and Freedom Edge demonstrate large-scale force projection intended to deter peer adversaries.4 These maritime and aerospace operations focus on live-fire lethality, the expeditionary deployment of advanced air defense systems, and the integration of artificial intelligence for unmanned surface and subsurface operations.2

Conversely, in the European and Black Sea theaters, operations are influenced by the immediate realities of the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and the risk of direct, kinetic confrontation with the Russian Federation.1 Exercises such as Breeze 2026 in the Black Sea prioritize logistical mobility, terrain denial, and command-and-staff tabletop formats over visible naval deployments.1 This doctrine mitigates the risk of accidental escalation while navigating geopolitical constraints such as the Montreux Convention, which limits allied maritime access to the region.1 Concurrently, domestic operations in the United States and South America emphasize integrated airspace security and combined multinational air superiority.

Technologically, the reporting period is defined by the operationalization of autonomous systems and distributed manufacturing.3 The deployment of mid-tier intercept capabilities in Guam, synchronized through a unified command network, and the testing of autonomous resupply vessels during naval exercises highlight an effort by allied forces to close capability gaps in contested logistics and integrated air defense.2 Interoperability remains the primary operational hurdle across all theaters, requiring trilateral and multinational frameworks to ensure that disparate national assets can share targeting data, coordinate electronic warfare, and sustain forward-deployed forces in communications-denied environments.9

1.1 Summary Table of Key Events and Lessons Learned

Event NameEvent TypeLocation & DatesKey Lessons Learned
Africa Land Forces Forum (ALFF) 2026Tradeshow / ExpoPort Harcourt, Nigeria (July 4 – 6, 2026)African land forces require the integration of digital battlefield tools and sovereign unmanned aerial systems to counter asymmetric border threats.
Valiant Shield 2026Military ExerciseGuam, Marianas, Japan (June 22 – July 1, 2026)Unified command and control architectures successfully link disparate defense systems; stealth bombers demonstrate combined kill-web lethality.
RIMPAC 2026Military ExerciseHawaii, Pacific Ocean (June 24 – July 31, 2026)Autonomous surface vessels and distributed advanced manufacturing at the tactical edge provide solutions for sustaining contested logistics across maritime distances.
Combat Power 26Military ExerciseCroatia (June 23 – July 1, 2026)Allied ground forces integrate mechanized infantry and short-range air defense with host-nation coastal defense and aviation assets.
Freedom Edge 2026Military ExerciseEast Asia (Late June 2026)Trilateral integration of fifth-generation fighters and ballistic missile defense supports responses to regional nuclear and missile threats.
Breeze 2026Military ExerciseBlack Sea, Bulgaria (June 30 – July 30, 2026)High-threat environments necessitate a shift from physical surface fleet deployments to cyber-focused and command-staff exercises to prevent direct escalation.
Resolute Sentinel – Salitre 2026Military ExerciseAntofagasta, Chile (June 28 – July 12, 2026)Multinational air exercise validating combined operations, airspace control, and cyber defense across South American and allied forces.
Falcon VirgoMilitary ExerciseWashington D.C., USA (June 30 – July 2, 2026)Routine air defense and interception exercise testing airspace security over the National Capital Region.
Dacia 26Military ExerciseRomania (June – July 2026)National tactical-level exercises integrate land, air, and special operations forces to improve allied response capabilities on the eastern flank.

2.0 Details: Military Tradeshows and Defense Expos

2.1 Africa Land Forces Forum (ALFF) 2026

The third iteration of the Africa Land Forces Forum (ALFF), previously known as the International Defence Exhibition and Conference (IDEC), is being held in Port Harcourt, Nigeria, from July 4 to July 6, 2026. Hosted under the patronage of the Nigerian Army and aligned with the 163rd Nigerian Army Day Celebrations (NADCEL), the event serves as a major land forces gathering on the African continent. The event attracted delegates and senior military officials from more than forty countries, including the Nigerian Chief of Defence Staff and the Chiefs of the Army, Navy, and Air Staff.

The technological parameters of ALFF 2026 maintain a focus on systems tailored for asymmetric warfare, counter-insurgency, and the protection of critical national infrastructure.11 The exhibition emphasizes Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance platforms, highlighting the deployment of ruggedized unmanned aerial drones and satellite communication systems designed for austere environments.11 Demonstrations focus on digitized battlefield tools that provide rapid-response mechanisms for border enforcement and the mitigation of organized banditry.13 Cybersecurity and electronic warfare contractors present frameworks for developing resilient digital networks capable of countering unauthorized commercial drones frequently utilized by insurgent factions, integrating secure border governance and traveler identification biometrics.14

The primary intelligence takeaway from ALFF 2026 is the acceleration of force modernization across African land armies. Military leaders on the continent are shifting toward digitally integrated forces.13 There is a procurement priority for systems that offer real-time situational awareness and data-driven decision-making.11 Furthermore, the conference underscores a strategic shift toward defense industrial cooperation.11 Regional militaries are seeking technology transfer agreements to establish sovereign manufacturing and maintenance capabilities, attempting to reduce reliance on foreign supply chains for critical defense hardware.11

3.0 Details: Military Exercises

3.1 Exercise Valiant Shield 2026

Exercise Valiant Shield 2026, representing the eleventh iteration of the biennial training event, concluded within the reporting window on July 1, 2026.9 Directed by the United States Pacific Command, the exercise was conducted across the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, Japan, and the surrounding Mariana Islands Range Complex.4 The stated objective was to build proficiency in sustaining joint forces by detecting, locating, tracking, and engaging hostile units across sea, air, space, land, and cyberspace in a contested environment.9 The exercise integrated the United States military branches with allied forces, including Japan, incorporating the United States Space Command and United States Transportation Command.9

A prominent event of Valiant Shield was a coordinated live-fire sinking exercise targeting the decommissioned amphibious transport dock USS Juneau, conducted over two hundred nautical miles off the coast of Guam in the Philippine Sea.9 The sinking exercise demonstrated multi-domain kill-web integration.9 A United States Air Force B-2 Spirit stealth bomber deployed an AGM-158C Long Range Anti-Ship Missile, representing a publicly confirmed instance of the stealth bomber utilizing this specific standoff munition against a maritime target in a field exercise.18 Concurrently, a Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force submarine fired torpedoes at the vessel, while F-35C Lightning II aircraft and F/A-18 Super Hornets provided strike integration.16

Additionally, Valiant Shield 2026 featured the operational evaluation of the Medium-Range Intercept Capability air defense system by the Third Marine Expeditionary Force at the Mason Live Fire Training Range Complex in Guam.20 The system, utilizing Tamir interceptors derived from Israel’s Iron Dome and delivered to the Marine Corps in May 2026, was integrated into a unified command and control battlespace picture developed by Lockheed Martin’s Skunk Works.220 This architecture linked the Marine Corps system with United States Army Patriot batteries and Marine Air Defense Integrated Systems to protect military hubs.2 The exercise also executed a flight of the MQ-28 Ghost Bat unmanned aircraft, high-altitude balloon launches, and trilateral anti-submarine warfare drills.9

Diagram of the GAM defense system

The intelligence derived from Exercise Valiant Shield highlights advancements in joint force readiness.2 The deployment of the Medium-Range Intercept Capability addresses a vulnerability in expeditionary air defense, providing engagement capabilities for threats existing beyond the short range of standard man-portable systems but inside the optimal envelope of the Patriot system.20 The command and control integration demonstrates that isolated service-branch technologies can be fused to automate engagements against long-range missile and drone threats.2 The sinking exercise validated the doctrine of distributed lethality, indicating that allied forces can synthesize targeting data between high-altitude stealth aviation and subsurface assets to neutralize maritime threats.9

3.2 Exercise Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) 2026

The thirtieth iteration of the RIMPAC exercise commenced on June 24 and is actively operating through July 31, 2026.22Hosted by the Commander of the United States Third Fleet, operations are centered in and around the Hawaiian Islands.24The international maritime exercise features a deployment comprising thirty participating nations, more than forty surface ships, five submarines, over two hundred six aircraft, and thirty thousand military personnel.23Operating under the theme “Partners: Integrated and Prepared,” the objective is to foster cooperative relationships vital for maritime security while executing multi-domain warfighting scenarios.23The Australian Defence Force utilized the exercise to validate its 2026 National Defence Strategy aimed at protecting maritime approaches.28The Indian Navy deployed a P-8I long-range maritime reconnaissance and anti-submarine warfare aircraft to enhance interoperability.27For the first time in the history of the exercise, a South Korean admiral is commanding the combined naval component of the drills. South Korea deployed its newest Aegis destroyer, the ROKS Jeongjo the Great, alongside a submarine, frigate, and amphibious landing ship.

RIMPAC 2026 is testing autonomous combat integration and expeditionary logistics.26 The exercise features over thirty discrete experiments involving unmanned systems.26 The technology firm Havoc demonstrated collaborative autonomy by operating unmanned surface vessels to autonomously resupply allied warships.3 This multinational autonomous logistics operation allows an operator to supervise multiple assets across domains, adapting in communications-denied environments.3 Concurrently, the Naval Postgraduate School’s Consortium for Advanced Manufacturing Research and Education executed distributed advanced manufacturing experiments.3 This initiative links artificial intelligence and unmanned systems to produce and deliver replacement components directly to forces at the tactical edge.3

In the undersea domain, the United States Pacific Fleet Submarine Force integrated advanced unmanned undersea vehicles to extend the persistence of intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance operations.7 These autonomous platforms provided targeting data for manned submarines, which conducted precision long-range fires utilizing UGM-84 Harpoon anti-ship cruise missiles against surface targets from standoff ranges.7 Above the surface, Saildrone and Lockheed Martin demonstrated a Joint Air-to-Ground Missile launcher mounted on a Saildrone Surveyor unmanned surface vessel.32

Amphibious and urban combat integration also formed a core component.33 Indonesian Navy Marines conducted air assault and close-quarter battle drills alongside allied forces at the Bellows Marine Corps Training Area, simulating MV-22 Osprey infiltrations, urban area clearance, and tactical responses.35 Military medical professionals from partnering nations convened for a multinational medical symposium to enhance interoperability during mass casualty and disaster response scenarios.24

Diagram showing a military boat and a military boat

The strategic intelligence gathered from RIMPAC 2026 underscores the realization that future conflicts in the Indo-Pacific will heavily rely on logistics.3 The deployment of collaborative autonomy and distributed manufacturing technologies indicates that these platforms are viable operational tools capable of sustaining forces when centralized supply lines are contested.3 The employment of unmanned undersea vehicles as force multipliers demonstrates that navies are expanding the sensory network of their submarine forces.7 This allows manned vessels to maintain stealth while orchestrating strikes based on remote targeting data.7 However, integrating thirty disparate national navies highlights ongoing challenges in standardizing communications and tactical procedures during complex live-fire scenarios.34

3.3 Exercise Combat Power 26

Exercise Combat Power 26 took place across multiple military training areas in the Republic of Croatia and concluded on July 1, 2026.38 The high-intensity joint military exercise involved over three thousand members of the Croatian Armed Forces operating alongside approximately five hundred personnel from allied and partner nations.8 The exercise integrated the Minnesota National Guard, which maintains a State Partnership Program with Croatia.39 The primary objectives were to demonstrate joint maritime combat operations and train for the deterrence and defense of national territory.8

A documented phase of the exercise involved maritime combat operations at the Žirje naval training range near Primošten.8 Special Operations Forces from the Croatian Armed Forces and the Ministry of the Interior’s Special Police executed high-risk visit, board, search, and seizure operations.8 Naval combat integration included more than twenty-five Croatian Navy vessels utilizing naval guns to engage surface targets.8 This was complemented by live-fire artillery support from land-based PzH 2000 self-propelled howitzers.8

Air superiority and integrated air defense were central components.8 Croatian Air Force Rafale multirole fighter aircraft conducted live-fire attacks against maritime targets using internal cannons, operating in coordination with Black Hawk helicopters and naval assets.8 Ground-based air defense was tested utilizing the short-range Mistral 3 missile system, deployed to protect the landing ship-minelayer DBM-82 Krka.8 The Mistral system successfully achieved a direct hit against an aerial target simulator measuring one hundred twenty-eight millimeters in diameter.8 Concurrently, United States personnel from the Minnesota National Guard integrated with Croatian infantry, conducting mechanized maneuvers and maintenance on Bradley M2A2 Infantry Fighting Vehicles.39

Combat Power 26 provided validation of Croatia’s military modernization efforts.8 The operational integration of newly acquired Rafale fighters, Black Hawk helicopters, and Mistral 3 air defense systems signifies an enhancement of the nation’s multi-domain capabilities.8 The interoperability displayed between United States National Guard armored units and host-nation infantry demonstrates that localized allied forces can integrate into regional defense architectures.41 The precision demonstrated by coastal artillery and short-range air defense systems indicates that the Adriatic flank maintains a credible terrain denial capability.8

3.4 Exercise Freedom Edge 2026

Concluded in late June 2026 within the reporting window, Freedom Edge was a trilateral military exercise involving the United States, Japan, and the Republic of Korea.5 Operations were centered in the sea and airspace surrounding the Korean Peninsula and the broader Indo-Pacific region.42 The strategic objective was to promote trilateral multi-domain interoperability to safeguard freedom and ensure regional stability, focusing on countering ballistic missile threats.10

Freedom Edge required the integration of defensive architectures, incorporating fifth-generation fighter aircraft into a unified multi-domain defense network.5 Tactical maneuvers featured drills in ballistic missile defense, anti-submarine warfare, anti-surface warfare, and maritime interdiction.5 The operations utilized United States Marine and Air Force aerial assets alongside the maritime task flotillas of Japan and South Korea, requiring operational control and data sharing between the three distinct national commands.10 Defensive cyber training and medical evacuations were also integrated to test non-kinetic support functions and command resilience.5

The execution of Freedom Edge indicates a solidification of the security architecture in Northeast Asia.10 The ability to coordinate ballistic missile defense and anti-submarine warfare among three independent militaries shows that geopolitical frictions are being subordinated to the reality of regional threats.10 The integration of fifth-generation fighters reveals a strategic emphasis on maintaining air superiority and rapid interception capabilities against maneuverable missile threats.5 The exercise highlighted the necessity of systematic training plans to refine technical and procedural interoperability.10

3.5 Exercise Breeze 2026

Initiated on June 30 and continuing through late July 2026,Breeze is an annual multinational maritime operation led by the Bulgarian Navy in the Black Sea.1Coordinated under the Supreme Command of Allied Forces Europe, the stated objective is to enhance allied interoperability, maintain combat readiness, and ensure regional maritime security.45The 2026 iteration operates under a restricted framework.1Due to strict adherence to the Montreux Convention, which bars non-Black Sea warships from transiting the straits during wartime, the exercise relies exclusively on the core coastal states of the Black Sea: Bulgaria, Romania, and Turkey.1

Due to regional security sensitivities and the proximity of the conflict in Ukraine, the tactical format of Breeze 2026 was modified.1 The physical deployment of surface combatants was intentionally minimized, with organizers keeping the exact number of personnel and participating vessels classified to avoid provoking direct escalation.1 Instead, the exercise shifted toward a command-and-staff format, transitioning heavy operational elements into cyberspace.1 Physical operations were restricted to localized tasks within the national borders of the participating countries, focusing on anti-landing defense, port protection, mine clearance, and the programming of algorithms to ensure interaction between naval and government agencies.1 The exercise scenario involved collective retaliation against an adversary and the virtual blockade of the Crimean Peninsula.1

Exercise Breeze 2026 provides an intelligence indicator of the risk calculus regarding the Black Sea.1 The decision to conceal operational parameters highlights a concern over miscalculation.1 Russian air and coastal defense systems treat unidentified approaching assets as targets; this risk is compounded by the fact that the Ukrainian Armed Forces operate the exact same F-16 fighter aircraft utilized by allied nations, making aerial target deconfliction difficult.1 The exercise underscored the strategic impact of the Montreux Convention, forcing the alliance to rely on regional coastal states and cyber-simulated maneuvers to project deterrence rather than physical naval deployments.1

Map highlighting a location relevant to global

3.6 Exercise Resolute Sentinel – Salitre 2026

Operating from June 28 through July 12, 2026,(https://militaeraktuell.at/en/chile-brazilian-saab-gripen-e-aircraft-at-the-salitre-2026-exercise/) is a multinational multi-domain exercise hosted by the Chilean Air Force (FACh) at Cerro Moreno Air Base in Antofagasta, Chile. The exercise brings together air forces from Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, the United States, Paraguay, and Uruguay.

The tactical format features live-fly air operations integrated with ground, space, and cyber defense components. Participating aircraft include Brazilian Air Force Gripen E jets, U.S. and Chilean F-16 Fighting Falcons, A-29 Super Tucanos from Paraguay, and E-3D AWACS. Participants conduct combined air operations in the Atacama Desert to validate interoperability across airspace control, air superiority, ground force protection, civil support, and combat search and rescue missions.

The intelligence takeaway from Resolute Sentinel – Salitre 2026 highlights a strong commitment to standardizing NATO-level air operations and operational control in South America. The inclusion of space and cyber components alongside live-fly fighter integration underscores a regional modernization effort that mirrors broader global shifts toward multi-domain preparedness.

3.7 Exercise Falcon Virgo

Between June 30 and July 2, 2026, the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) conducted Exercise Falcon Virgo, a live-fly air defense exercise executed over the National Capital Region in Washington D.C. Operations were directed by the Continental U.S. NORAD Region and took place during overnight hours to test responses to airspace restriction violations and unknown aircraft.

The exercise integrated multiple aerospace assets, including U.S. Air Force F-16 fighter aircraft, a U.S. Coast Guard MH-65D Dolphin helicopter, a Navy King Air aircraft, and a Civil Air Patrol C-182. Falcon Virgo is a recurring component of Operation Noble Eagle, designed to enforce airspace security and refine interception protocols over critical infrastructure.

3.8 Dacia 26 and Romanian National Exercises

Occurring concurrently with efforts in Eastern Europe during June and July 2026, the Romanian Armed Forces are conducting a series of national training events, prominently featuringNATO.46 Dacia 26 is a multi-domain, tactical-level national defense exercise planned by the Joint Forces Command.46It involves the integration of land, air, and special operations forces across locations within Romania to test national and allied response capabilities.46This exercise is interconnected with the allied exercise Steadfast Defender 27.47

The Romanian exercise ecosystem also features Histria 26, an inter-agency strategic-level exercise, and Land Shield 26, focused on planning military operations for contingency situations.47 The Naval Component Command executed Sea Shield 26, while the Air Force utilized Exercise Burebista 26 to develop joint air operation capacities.47 The intelligence takeaway from this cluster of national exercises is the high operational tempo sustained by Eastern European militaries. By mobilizing personnel, nations like Romania are transitioning their armed forces to high-readiness warfighting configurations capable of supporting allied deployments.47


Please share the link on Facebook, Forums, with colleagues, etc. Your support is much appreciated and if you have any feedback, please email us in**@*********ps.com. If you’d like to request a report or order a reprint, please click here for the corresponding page to open in new tab.


Works cited

  1. NATO is attempting to seize the Crimean Peninsula?! – Vietnam.vn, accessed July 4, 2026, https://www.vietnam.vn/en/nato-tap-chiem-giu-ban-dao-crimea
  2. Lockheed Skunk Works C2 Unifies Guam Missile Defense Network, accessed July 4, 2026, https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2026/06/skunk-works-c2-ties-together-patriot-mric-and-madis-for-guam-defense-shield/
  3. Havoc to Demonstrate Autonomous Systems Alongside U.S. and …, accessed July 4, 2026, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/havoc-to-demonstrate-autonomous-systems-alongside-us-and-allied-forces-at-rimpac-2026-302806729.html
  4. Allies come together in the Indo-Pacific: Valiant Shield 26 – PACOM, accessed July 4, 2026, https://www.pacom.mil/Media/News/News-Articles/Article/4524880/allies-come-together-in-the-indo-pacific-valiant-shield-26/
  5. Japan-ROK-U.S conduct second Exercise Freedom Edge – PACOM, accessed July 4, 2026, https://www.pacom.mil/Media/NEWS/Article/3962934/japan-rok-us-conduct-second-exercise-freedom-edge/
  6. RIMPAC 26: Pacific Submarine Force efforts to preserve undersea domain advantage, accessed July 4, 2026, https://www.c3f.navy.mil/News/Article/4533240/rimpac-26-pacific-submarine-force-efforts-to-preserve-undersea-domain-advantage/
  7. RIMPAC 2026: U.S. Pacific submarine force to test unmanned …, accessed July 4, 2026, https://defence-industry.eu/rimpac-2026-u-s-pacific-submarine-force-to-test-unmanned-undersea-vehicles-and-harpoon-missile-strikes/
  8. Combat Power 26 at Žirje – Croatian Armed Forces Demonstrate …, accessed July 4, 2026, https://www.morh.hr/en/combat-power-26-at-zirje-croatian-armed-forces-demonstrate-joint-maritime-combat-operations/
  9. News – Valiant Shield 2026 concludes in Western Pacific – DVIDS, accessed July 4, 2026, https://www.dvidshub.net/news/569105/valiant-shield-2026-concludes-western-pacific
  10. Japan, ROK, and U.S. conclude Freedom Edge 24-2 – PACOM, accessed July 4, 2026, https://www.pacom.mil/Media/NEWS/Article/3966576/japan-rok-and-us-conclude-freedom-edge-24-2/
  11. IDEC – International Defence Exhibition & Conference 2026 | July 5–6 | Port Harcourt, Nigeria – Defense Advancement, accessed July 4, 2026, https://www.defenseadvancement.com/events/idec-2026-international-defence-exhibition-conference/
  12. Africa Land Forces Forum – Great Minds Event Management, accessed July 4, 2026, https://www.gmevents.ae/event/africa-land-forces-forum-2026/
  13. International Defence Exhibition & Conference (IDEC) 2026 – Unmanned Systems Technology, accessed July 4, 2026, https://www.unmannedsystemstechnology.com/events/international-defence-exhibition-conference-idec/
  14. Africa International Defence Exhibition | Biometric Update, accessed July 4, 2026, https://www.biometricupdate.com/202603/africa-international-defence-exhibition
  15. accessed July 4, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exercise_Valiant_Shield#:~:text=Exercise%20Valiant%20Shield%202026%20was,(MRIC)%20air%20defense%20system.
  16. Sinking Exercise Demonstrates Capabilities of Joint Force, accessed July 4, 2026, https://www.war.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/4530604/sinking-exercise-demonstrates-capabilities-of-joint-force/
  17. Multilateral, Joint Forces execute sinking exercise during Valiant Shield 2026, accessed July 4, 2026, https://www.cpf.navy.mil/Newsroom/News/Article/4530748/multilateral-joint-forces-execute-sinking-exercise-during-valiant-shield-2026/
  18. How a B-2 stealth bomber helped sink USS Juneau in SINKEX; shocking details revealed, accessed July 4, 2026, https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/us-news/how-a-b-2-stealth-bomber-helped-sink-uss-juneau-in-sinkex-shocking-details-revealed-101782848929364.html
  19. B-2 Fires Ship-Killing Cruise Missile, Air Force Reveals, accessed July 4, 2026, https://www.airandspaceforces.com/b-2-fires-ship-killing-cruise-missile-lrasm/
  20. Marines Bring Iron Dome Technology to Guam as Skunk Works …, accessed July 4, 2026, https://www.sofx.com/marines-bring-iron-dome-technology-to-guam-as-skunk-works-builds-unified-c2/
  21. III MEF Marines run MRIC simulation drills during Valiant Shield 26 [Image 6 of 7], accessed July 4, 2026, https://www.dvidshub.net/image/9777199/iii-mef-marines-run-mric-simulation-drills-during-valiant-shield-26
  22. U.S. Pacific Fleet announces 30th RIMPAC Exercise, accessed July 4, 2026, https://www.cpf.navy.mil/Newsroom/News/Article/4465055/us-pacific-fleet-announces-30th-rimpac-exercise/
  23. RIMPAC 2026 Kicks Off in Hawaii > U.S. Pacific Command > News Articles – PACOM, accessed July 4, 2026, https://www.pacom.mil/Media/News/News-Articles/Article/4527435/rimpac-2026-kicks-off-in-hawaii/
  24. RIMPAC (Rim of the Pacific) – U.S. Pacific Fleet – Navy, accessed July 4, 2026, https://www.cpf.navy.mil/rimpac/
  25. RIMPAC 2026 kicks off in Hawaii – U.S. Pacific Fleet – Navy, accessed July 4, 2026, https://www.cpf.navy.mil/Newsroom/News/Article/4527411/rimpac-2026-kicks-off-in-hawaii/
  26. World’s largest international naval exercise RIMPAC 2026 kicks off, accessed July 4, 2026, https://caliber.az/en/post/world-s-largest-international-naval-exercise-rimpac-2026-begins-in-pacific-ocean
  27. Indian Navy P-8i joins RIMPAC 2026 in Hawaii to boost Indo-Pacific ties, accessed July 4, 2026, https://www.indiatoday.in/world/story/indian-navy-p-8i-rimpac-2026-hawaii-indo-pacific-interoperability-ptag-2940293-2026-07-04
  28. Australia arrives for Exercise RIMPAC 26 – Defence, accessed July 4, 2026, https://www.defence.gov.au/news-events/releases/2026-06-24/australia-arrives-exercise-rimpac-26
  29. Indian Navy sends P-8I aircraft to Hawaii for Exercise Rimpac 2026, accessed July 4, 2026, https://www.indiasentinels.com/navy/indian-navy-sends-p-8i-aircraft-to-hawaii-for-exercise-rimpac-2026-7498
  30. Largest Advanced Manufacturing Demonstration in Department of War History Set for RIMPAC 2026 – Naval Postgraduate School, accessed July 4, 2026, https://nps.edu/-/largest-advanced-manufacturing-demonstration-in-department-of-war-history-set-for-rimpac-2026
  31. B-Roll: Italian Navy hosts lunch for allied partners – Vertical, accessed July 4, 2026, https://www.cpf.navy.mil/rimpac/news/?videoid=1013511&dvpmoduleid=114769&dvpTag=RIMPAC
  32. RIMPAC 2026: 30 Nations and 200 Aircraft Converge on Hawaii for …, accessed July 4, 2026, https://migflug.com/jetflights/rimpac-2026-30-nations-and-200-aircraft-converge-on-hawaii-for-the-worlds-largest-naval-exercise/
  33. Urban Operations with U.S. Marines and Partner Nations in Hawaii – YouTube, accessed July 4, 2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MgOPA_-wKIY
  34. B-Roll: 15th MEU and multinational service members train for urban operations during RIMPAC 2026, accessed July 4, 2026, https://www.7atc.army.mil/Media-News/Video/?videoid=1012649&dvpmoduleid=4969&dvpTag=A-26
  35. Indonesian marines join RIMPACdrills in Hawaii – ANTARA News, accessed July 4, 2026, https://en.antaranews.com/news/420757/indonesian-marines-join-rimpacdrills-in-hawaii
  36. RIMPAC News — U.S. Pacific Fleet – Navy, accessed July 4, 2026, https://www.cpf.navy.mil/rimpac/news/?videoid=1013414&dvpmoduleid=114769&dvpTag=prepared
  37. Videos – Training Command, accessed July 4, 2026, https://www.trngcmd.marines.mil/News/Videos?videoid=1012691
  38. Minnesota National Guard partners with Croatia for Exercise Combat Power 26 – DVIDS, accessed July 4, 2026, https://www.dvidshub.net/video/1012686/minnesota-national-guard-partners-with-croatia-exercise-combat-power-26
  39. Minnesota National Guard partners with Croatia for Exercise Combat Power 26 [Image 16 of 18] – DVIDS, accessed July 4, 2026, https://www.dvidshub.net/image/9778898/minnesota-national-guard-partners-with-croatia-exercise-combat-power-26
  40. President Milanović Observed Military Exercise “Combat Power 26”: The Exercise Demonstrated the Capabilities of the Croatian Armed Forces – President of the Republic of Croatia – Predsjednik.hr, accessed July 4, 2026, https://www.predsjednik.hr/en/news/president-milanovic-observed-military-exercise-combat-power-26-the-exercise-demonstrated-the-capabilities-of-the-croatian-armed-forces/
  41. Minnesota National Guard partners with Croatia for Exercise Combat Power 26 [Image 1 of 24] – DVIDS, accessed July 4, 2026, https://www.dvidshub.net/image/9779129/minnesota-national-guard-partners-with-croatia-exercise-combat-power-26
  42. US, South Korea and Japan open joint air and naval exercise | AP News, accessed July 4, 2026, https://apnews.com/article/south-korea-us-japan-freedom-edge-drills-6577be92c68446e02c10e67211db1aff
  43. The Freedom Edge exercise off the coast of Jeju Island, South Korea from September 15 to 19, 2025 – Institute for the Study of War, accessed July 4, 2026, https://understandingwar.org/map/the-freedom-edge-exercise-off-the-coast-of-jeju-island-south-korea-from-september-15-to-19-2025/
  44. U.S. sets stage for deepening defense engagement in 2026, accessed July 4, 2026, https://ipdefenseforum.com/2026/01/u-s-sets-stage-for-deepening-defense-engagement-in-2026/
  45. National Exercises and Activities – Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (SHAPE) – NATO, accessed July 4, 2026, https://shape.nato.int/exercises/allied-national-exercises
  46. NATO and EU National Exercises 2026 | Live Schedule & Details – Defence Press Agency, accessed July 4, 2026, https://www.defencepressagency.com/exercises-nato.html
  47. Exercises planned by the Romanian Armed Forces in 2026, accessed July 4, 2026, https://english.mapn.ro/cpresa/6676_Exercises-planned-by-the-Romanian-Armed-Forces-in-2026
  48. NATO Exercises 2026: The Complete Guide to Allied Readiness – Großwald, accessed July 4, 2026, https://www.grosswald.org/nato-exercises-2026/
  49. The Romanian Army will conduct over 100 training exercises in 2026, including mobilizations of reservists, to support defense on NATO’s Eastern Flank. – Informat.ro, accessed July 4, 2026, https://informat.ro/en/current-affairs/the-romanian-army-is-preparing-over-100-exercises-for-2026-101486

Global Military Trade Shows & Exercises – Week of 6/20-6/27/2026

1.0 Executive Summary

During the observation period of mid-to-late June 2026, the global strategic military landscape demonstrated an accelerated transition toward multi-domain integration, the proliferation of autonomous systems, and the rapid hardening of both Western and non-Western alliance structures. As observed through a convergence of international defense exhibitions and high-tempo military exercises, traditional operational doctrines are undergoing aggressive revision. Armed forces globally are restructuring to accommodate the exigencies of high-intensity, peer-level conflict, decentralized command and control (C2), and expeditionary operations within highly contested logistical environments.

In the defense industrial sector, the Eurosatory 2026 exhibition in Paris served as the primary indicator of shifting market priorities. The event highlighted a profound paradigm shift toward “Multi-domain Superiority,” prioritizing advanced counter-unmanned aerial systems (C-UAS), the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) for accelerated decision-making, and the urgent necessity for sovereign manufacturing capabilities.1 Eurosatory also functioned as a critical litmus test for European mobilization under the “ReArm Europe” initiative, which aims to inject approximately 800 billion euros into continental modernization over the next four years.1 Simultaneously, the exhibition exposed deepening fractures in global supply chains, evidenced by the French government’s politicized ban on Israeli defense contractors.2 This friction underscores a growing trend where geopolitical considerations interdict allied procurement, driving nations toward strategic autonomy. Conversely, Ukrainian and South Korean contractors achieved unprecedented market penetration, capitalizing on combat-proven, rapidly deployable asymmetric technologies.4

Complementing these industrial shifts, the global tempo of military exercises indicates a unified strategic pivot toward interoperability and distributed maritime operations. In the Indo-Pacific theater, the 30th iteration of the multilateral RIMPAC 2026 and the U.S.-Japan bilateral Resolute Dragon 26 showcased focused efforts to operationalize expeditionary advanced base operations (EABO), sub-surface autonomous integration, and long-range anti-access/area denial (A2/AD) capabilities.7 These drills function as direct rehearsals for distributed lethality and sea denial in complex archipelagic geographies.

Concurrently, exercises in Europe, Africa, and the Caucasus reflect a dual imperative: securing geographical vulnerabilities while reorienting non-aligned states toward NATO standards. Training events such as Gallant Boar-2026 in the Suwałki Corridor, Borbena moć 26 in Croatia, and African Lion 26 demonstrate an intense focus on Reception, Staging, and Onward Movement (RSOM) logistics.9 These stress tests confirm that planners view the supply chain as a primary center of gravity. Furthermore, the expansion of Eagle Partner 2026 in Armenia to include French and Greek forces indicates a systemic effort to dilute the Russian Federation’s security monopoly in the South Caucasus.12 In opposition, strategic rivals executed their own drills, including China-Russia-Iran naval maneuvers in the Gulf of Oman, signaling a competing architecture of non-Western cooperation.13

Overall, the intelligence takeaways from this observation period reveal a global military apparatus that is simultaneously racing to integrate autonomous AI technologies for tactical overmatch, while struggling to secure the vulnerable logistical frameworks and political supply chains required to sustain them.

1.1 Summary Table of Key Events and Lessons Learned

The following table provides a comprehensive overview of the defense exhibitions and military exercises analyzed during the mid-to-late June 2026 observation window, outlining the event type, geographical location, and primary intelligence takeaways.

Event NameEvent TypeLocation & DatesKey Lessons Learned
Eurosatory 2026Tradeshow/ExpoParis, France

(June 15–19, 2026)
AI-driven C-UAS and network-centric warfare dominate procurement; geopolitical friction restricts market access; combat-proven asymmetric technologies see high demand.
ILA Berlin 2026Tradeshow/ExpoBerlin, Germany

(Early-to-Mid June 2026)
Israeli defense exports pivot toward reliable European partners (Germany) emphasizing aerospace, Arrow 3 interceptors, and AI-driven command and control to bypass unreliable political markets.
Ventennale CTR (Industry Day)Tradeshow/ExpoFiumicino, Italy

(June 24, 2026)
AI, digitalization, and sustainability are paramount for modern military logistics; public-private partnerships are critical for maintaining operational readiness and minimizing downtime.
Naval Defense Philippines 2026Tradeshow/ExpoManila, Philippines

(June 17–19, 2026)
Growing regional demand for coastal security, maritime domain awareness, and asymmetric littoral defense in the Indo-Pacific to counter gray-zone maritime coercion.
TACS Expo 2026Tradeshow/ExpoManila, Philippines

(June 18–21, 2026)
Integration of tactical defense with emergency disaster preparedness; a focused regional market on individual survival, small arms modernization, and domestic security.
RIMPAC 2026Multilateral ExerciseHawaii, USA

(June 24–July 31, 2026)
Unmanned undersea vehicles (UUVs) act as critical force multipliers for ISR; long-range submarine fires (UGM-84 Harpoon) are essential for sea denial in contested environments.
Resolute Dragon 26Bilateral ExerciseKyushu & Okinawa, Japan

(June 20–30, 2026)
Rapid island defense requires seamless V-22 Osprey MEDEVAC logistics and decentralized Type 12 surface-to-ship missile (SSM) deployment; civil-military logistical friction remains a vulnerability.
African Lion 26Multilateral ExerciseMorocco, Ghana, Senegal, Tunisia

(April 20–May 8, 2026)*
Sustained AFRICOM capability building; critical focus on medical readiness, joint air rigging, and countering expanding Russian/insurgent influence in the Sahel and North Africa.
Borbena Moć 26Multilateral ExerciseCroatia / Adriatic Sea

(June 20–25, 2026)
Reception, Staging, and Onward Movement (RSOM) logistics are critical for allied reinforcement; successful execution of airborne infiltration drops and the enforcement of strict naval exclusion zones.
Eagle Partner 2026Multilateral ExerciseZar, Armenia

(June 17–25, 2026)
Armenian shift toward NATO interoperability accelerates; French and Greek inclusion expands the multinational scope of peacekeeping readiness in the Caucasus, diminishing Russian leverage.
Khaan Quest 2026Multilateral ExerciseUlaanbaatar, Mongolia

(June 20–July 3, 2026)
Continued viability of UN Chapter VII stability operations; Mongolia acts as a critical strategic buffer facilitating US-Indian military collaboration in Central Asia.
Gallant Boar-2026Multilateral ExerciseSuwałki Corridor, Poland/Lithuania

(June 16–26, 2026)
Multinational (France, Poland, Lithuania) rapid deployment and defensive maneuverability are essential to secure NATO’s most geographically vulnerable land bridge against conventional isolation.
BALTOPS 26Multilateral ExerciseBaltic Sea

(June 4–19, 2026)
Enhanced allied naval integration demonstrates the Baltic Sea’s transition into a highly contested but allied-dominated maritime theater; focus on freedom of navigation.
Laros-2026Bilateral ExerciseKommadam, Laos

(June 4–13, 2026)
Russian cultivation of Southeast Asian defense ties; emphasis on joint combat scenarios, FPV drone integration, and the demonstration of advanced Russian weaponry.
Joint Gulf of Oman ExercisesMultilateral ExerciseGulf of Oman / Strait of Hormuz

(June 2026)
Naval coordination (China, Russia, Iran) focused on protecting vulnerable trade routes; serves as strategic messaging against Western containment policies.

(Note: African Lion 26 concluded prior to the primary reporting window but remained highly referenced in ongoing strategic defense publications during mid-June regarding post-exercise lessons learned).

2.0 Details: Military Tradeshows and Defense Expos

The defense exhibition circuit in June 2026 provided profound insights into the procurement priorities of global militaries. The overarching theme across all events was a distinct movement away from exquisite, low-volume, highly expensive platforms toward scalable, attritable, and network-centric autonomous systems. Furthermore, the weaponization of the defense trade for political signaling has forced nations to reevaluate their reliance on foreign military sales (FMS) and prioritize domestic industrial capacity.

2.1 Eurosatory 2026

The Eurosatory 2026 exhibition, held from June 15 to 19 at the Paris Nord Villepinte exhibition center in France, served as the absolute center of gravity for the global land and air-land defense industry.15 Hosting innovations from more than 2,000 companies representing over 60 countries, the event was heavily defined by the strategic realities of the ongoing high-intensity conflict in Eastern Europe.1 Specifically, Eurosatory 2026 served as the first major industry gathering since the European Union officially adopted the “ReArm Europe” plan.1 This ambitious legislative and financial initiative is designed to mobilize approximately 800 billion euros over four years to drive the development, modernization, and sovereign expansion of European defense manufacturing.1 Consequently, procurement priorities at the exhibition were structurally shifted toward high-tech battlefield solutions, satellite communications resilience, critical infrastructure protection, and the deep integration of artificial intelligence.1

Participating Nations and Geopolitical Friction

A highly significant strategic takeaway from Eurosatory 2026 was the weaponization of defense trade access for geopolitical signaling. The French government executed a controversial, selective ban targeting the Israeli defense contractors.2 Initially, the French government informed Israel that it was entirely barred from official participation.2 This initial directive prohibited government representatives from attending, banned the establishment of an official Israeli national pavilion, and explicitly excluded all offensive military systems from display.2

Following a series of intense legal appeals and diplomatic escalations (mirroring a similar ban and subsequent court reversal that occurred prior to Eurosatory 2024), the policy was marginally amended.2 The French authorities permitted a restricted presence, allowing Israeli defense industries to display only air and missile defense products—such as components of the Arrow and David’s Sling systems, which are currently in high demand by European nations like Germany and Finland.2 However, on the opening day of the exhibition, the physical stands for these permitted systems were walled off, severely restricting visibility and commercial access.18

The Israeli Ministry of Defense vehemently condemned the move as a discriminatory violation of the established norms governing international defense exhibitions, asserting that France was applying political policies selectively.2 In retaliation, the IMOD suspended all defense procurement from France, citing an ongoing pattern of policies that compromised Israel’s national defense.3 This incident exposes a severe and growing vulnerability in Western allied defense supply chains: the increasing willingness of host nations to disrupt defense industrial cooperation over localized geopolitical or human rights disagreements. This unpredictability is likely to drive both importing and exporting nations to pursue absolute sovereign defense manufacturing capabilities to avoid future export controls or exhibition embargos. Despite the ban on official government participation, major Israeli contractors such as Elbit Systems and Rafael Advanced Defense Systems navigated the restrictions to maintain a presence, highlighting the commercial resilience of these major firms.17

Diagram of a computer system

Technological Debuts and Demonstrated Capabilities

The overarching technological theme of Eurosatory 2026 was “Multi-domain Superiority”.1 This doctrine dictates that modern militaries must achieve simultaneous control and tactical advantage across land, air, space, and cyberspace environments.1 A major focal point was the integration of AI to accelerate the sensor-to-shooter kill chain. Artificial intelligence systems were showcased that fundamentally alter military decision-making by improving real-time intelligence gathering, processing massive datasets from disparate sources, and increasing the accuracy of strikes against strategic targets.1

Ukrainian defense technology, highly refined and iterated by ongoing high-intensity combat, garnered unprecedented market attention. The Ukrainian defense technology company Phantom Defense debuted an integrated counter-drone ecosystem built entirely on a “Detect–Defeat” architecture.4 Rather than offering standalone point-defense jammers, the company demonstrated a fully networked Command and Control (C2) platform that fuses multi-spectral intelligence.4

The following table details the specific components of the Phantom Defense C-UAS ecosystem demonstrated at Eurosatory 2026:

Sub-System NameClassificationOperational Capability
SkydarixSensorActive Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radar utilizing AI-assisted target detection for 360-degree airspace surveillance.
StreamhunterSensorVideo interception system designed to tap into and disrupt hostile drone video transmission links.
Specter FamilyEffector (EW)Electronic warfare systems engineered to disrupt drone navigation, telemetry, and control links.
BladeEffector (Kinetic)Multirotor interceptor drones designed for physical collision or close-proximity neutralization.
BalabanEffector (Kinetic)Fixed-wing interceptor platform for longer-range or higher-altitude threat neutralization.
KarakurtEffector (Kinetic)Net-launching systems for non-destructive or localized drone capture.

The C2 platform processes data from these sensors to create a unified operational picture, subsequently guiding operators to deploy the optimal effector.4 According to battlefield data presented at the expo, iterations of this specific network have successfully neutralized over 7,000 hostile UAVs in urban environments.4

Additionally, the Ukrainian uncrewed ground vehicle (UGV) sector demonstrated deep market penetration. The Ravlyk UGV, heavily utilized by Ukrainian intelligence services for frontline logistics, mine clearance, and fire support, was licensed to the French construction firm Haulotte.5 Furthermore, the developers entered into strategic negotiations with the European defense conglomerate KNDS and demonstrated the platform to representatives from a dozen NATO countries.5 This represents a significant industry shift wherein frontline combat data is rapidly dictating NATO-standard procurement, bypassing traditional, decades-long defense acquisition cycles.

South Korean industry also demonstrated expanding global reach at the exhibition. The Hyundai Motor Group pavilion featured Hyundai Rotem and Kia showcasing AI-driven C-UAS systems capable of detecting, identifying, and neutralizing hostile drones.6 Hyundai also displayed the combat-proven K808 wheeled armored vehicle—a system recently selected by the Polish military as a new standard vehicle platform—highlighting its utility across Europe, the Middle East, and the Asia-Pacific.6 Kia highlighted its next-generation medium tactical vehicle (designed to carry 25 personnel or 10 tons of cargo) and its heavy tactical truck platform for logistics.6 This underscores South Korea’s aggressive strategy to fulfill European and global capability gaps with cost-effective, rapidly deployable platforms, cementing its status as one of the world’s fastest-growing arms exporters.

Intelligence Takeaways

Eurosatory 2026 confirmed that the defense industry is transitioning away from platform-centric warfare toward network-centric autonomous warfare. The United States Army underscored this priority at the exhibition by dispatching Secretary of the Army Dan Driscoll to sign a joint statement of intent with allied nations.19 This agreement dramatically expands the Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) and Counter-UAS Marketplaces, facilitating a unified, allied procurement pipeline for drone and anti-drone technologies.19 This signals a recognition that no single nation can produce the volume of autonomous systems required for modern conflict, necessitating a federated, allied supply chain.

2.2 ILA Berlin 2026

Occurring slightly prior to Eurosatory, the ILA Berlin trade fair served as a strategic counterbalance for Israeli defense exports.20 The Israel Ministry of Defense opened a prominent national pavilion, leading a 15-company delegation to one of the world’s largest aerospace and defense exhibitions.20

Participating Nations and Capabilities

The delegation, led by the International Defense Cooperation Directorate (SIBAT), included major defense contractors such as Elbit Systems, Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI), Rafael, BIRD Aerosystems, and Uvision.20 The Israeli delegation showcased advanced capabilities across aerospace systems, unmanned platforms, counter-UAS solutions, radar, electronic warfare, AI-driven command and control, and homeland security.20

Intelligence Takeaways

The robust participation in Berlin starkly contrasts with the friction experienced in Paris. SIBAT Director Brig. Gen. (Res.) Yair Kulas noted that Israel arrived at the exhibition supported by an all-time record in Israeli defense exports, which surpassed the $19 billion threshold in the previous year.20 A significant driver of this export success was the expansion of the Arrow 3 exoatmospheric hypersonic anti-ballistic missile defense deal with Germany.20 The intelligence takeaway is clear: facing political hostility in certain Western European markets, the Israeli defense establishment is aggressively pivoting to deepen defense and strategic cooperation with Germany, utilizing Berlin as a primary vector to expand business partnerships across Europe.20

2.3 Ventennale CTR (Industry Day)

On June 24, 2026, the Italian Air Force hosted the VENTENNALE CTR – Industry day at the Centro Tecnico Rifornimenti (Technical Supply Center) in Fiumicino, Rome.15 The event celebrated the 70th anniversary of the first Fiumicino Air Show (June 24, 1956) and the 20th anniversary of the CTR, but structurally functioned as a critical intersection between military stakeholders and the defense logistics industry.21

Technological Focus and Capabilities

The central doctrine explored at this event was that operational readiness and combat lethality are entirely dependent on resilient, modern supply chains. The technical-operational demonstrations focused intensely on the application of Artificial Intelligence, digitalization, and sustainability in military logistics.21 Military and industry partners engaged in specialized focus areas demonstrating how AI predictive maintenance, digital supply chain tracking, and sustainable green logistics frameworks can minimize downtime and reduce the logistical footprint of forward-deployed forces.21 The event featured a dynamic program, including an exhibition area where leading defense industry partners presented specialized logistical solutions, offering behind-the-scenes access to the base’s core supply operations.21 Recognizing the strategic value of the installation, local authorities proposed conferring honorary citizenship to the Air Force barracks.22

Intelligence Takeaways

The emphasis on logistics at the Ventennale CTR reflects a growing recognition within NATO that peer-level conflict will immediately target rear-echelon supply lines. The integration of AI into the Centro Tecnico Rifornimenti’s operational protocols suggests a doctrinal shift toward predictive, automated logistics. The goal is to replace reactive supply chains—which wait for components to fail before ordering replacements—with intelligent systems capable of anticipating materiel degradation before it impacts combat readiness, thereby ensuring sustained operational tempo.

2.4 Indo-Pacific Security Expos: Naval Defense Philippines and TACS Expo 2026

The Southeast Asian defense market demonstrated distinct regional priorities by hosting two concurrent events in Manila, Philippines: the 9th Naval Defense Expo 2026 expo (June 17–19) and the 26th Tactical, Survival and Arms Expo (Tactical, Survival and Arms Expo) (June 18–21).23

Focus and Capabilities

Naval Defense Philippines brought together global naval and coastal security leaders, expecting upwards of 9,000 attendees, to address innovations in maritime domain awareness, naval technology, and coastal defense.23 This directly aligns with the strategic requirements of archipelagic states facing increasing gray-zone pressure and territorial disputes in contested littoral zones, particularly the South China Sea.

Concurrently, the TACS Expo, organized by Armscor Global Defense Inc. and held at the SM Megamall, showcased tactical firearms, security solutions, and emergency disaster preparedness equipment.24 The expo catered to a broad demographic, including internal security forces, industry professionals, competitive shooters, and civilian survivalists, featuring extensive displays of pistols, pistol-caliber carbines (PCCs), and shotguns.25

Intelligence Takeaways

These concurrent events highlight the dual-track security concerns of Indo-Pacific nations. On a macro level, there is a strict requirement for advanced, state-level naval deterrence capabilities to protect exclusive economic zones (EEZs). On a micro level, there is a massive regional demand for decentralized, localized survival readiness and tactical small arms. The robust attendance at these expos indicates a regional realization that asymmetric, dispersed defense postures are essential for both national sovereignty and internal disaster resilience.

2.5 Defense Expo Future Planning and Market Expansion

While the June events dominated the immediate news cycle, defense ministries globally utilized this period to announce future procurement fairs, indicating where the defense market is expanding. Senior Lieutenant General Phung Si Tan of the Vietnam Ministry of National Defense chaired a working session regarding the planning for the Vietnam Defense Expo 2026, signaling Vietnam’s intent to modernize its forces and diversify its arms suppliers away from traditional reliance on Russian hardware.28 Similarly, industry analysts highlighted the upcoming DIMDEX 2026 (Doha International Maritime Defence Exhibition and Conference) in Qatar, expected to draw 13,000 visitors and 180 exhibitors, and the massive Singapore Airshow 2026, projected to host over 1,000 exhibitors and 139,000 visitors.29 These upcoming events confirm that the Middle East and the Asia-Pacific remain the most lucrative and rapidly expanding defense markets globally.

3.0 Details: Military Exercises

The global tempo of military exercises in June 2026 demonstrated a clear escalation in scale and complexity. Militaries are moving beyond simple diplomatic interoperability drills and are now actively testing complex, multi-domain combat scenarios designed to stress-test logistics, long-range fires, and decentralized command structures under simulated combat conditions.

3.1 Exercise Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) 2026

The 30th iteration of the biennial RIMPAC (Rim of the Pacific) commenced on June 24, 2026, in and around the Hawaiian Islands, and is scheduled to run through July 31.30 As the world’s largest international maritime exercise, RIMPAC 2026 represents a massive projection of allied maritime power. The exercise involves an unprecedented assembly of forces: approximately 30 to 31 participating nations, over 40 surface combatant ships, 5 submarines, 14 to 15 national land forces, more than 206 aircraft, and between 25,000 to 30,000 personnel, including 1,100 Marines.31

Participating Forces and Command Structure

The leadership architecture of RIMPAC 2026 serves as a deliberate strategic message regarding the depth and maturity of Indo-Pacific alliances. Hosted by the Commander of the U.S. Pacific Fleet, the exercise is tactically directed by a highly integrated Combined Task Force (CTF).

The following table details the multinational command structure of RIMPAC 2026:

Command RoleNationRepresenting Officer/Entity
Commander, Combined Task Force (CTF)United StatesCommander, U.S. 3rd Fleet (Vice Adm. Jeffrey T. Jablon)
Deputy Commander, CTFChileCommodore Andres Howard (Chilean Navy)
Vice Commander, CTFJapanRear Adm. Takuo Kobayashi (Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force)
Combined Forces Maritime Component CommanderSouth KoreaRear Adm. In-Ho Kim (Republic of Korea Navy)
Combined Forces Air Component CommanderCanadaBrig. Gen. J.S. Davis (Royal Canadian Air Force)

(Data sourced from 33)

This integrated command structure proves that allied forces are capable of executing complex, multi-axis naval operations under non-U.S. tactical control. The U.S. contingent provides the backbone of the exercise, deploying major assets including the aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt, as well as the guided-missile destroyers USS Paul Hamilton, USS Decatur, USS Wayne E. Meyer, and USS Carl M. Levin.34

Tactical Maneuvers and Multi-Domain Integration

RIMPAC 2026 is aggressively testing capabilities designed for high-end, peer-level maritime conflict. Vice Adm. Jeffrey Jablon outlined that participants are conducting anti-submarine and air defense operations, amphibious landing drills, coastal mine-clearing missions, humanitarian assistance activities, disaster response exercises, and search-and-rescue operations.34

A primary technological focus is the integration of advanced unmanned undersea vehicles (UUVs) with the U.S. Pacific Submarine Force.8 Between 30 and 35 experiments involving unmanned systems are scheduled throughout the exercise.34 The UUV platforms are acting as organic force multipliers, simulating autonomous intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) operations in highly denied areas.8 By extending the sensor reach of the submarine force, these unmanned systems provide critical targeting data, allowing manned submarines to maintain stealth while tracking and holding adversary assets at risk.8

Furthermore, the submarine force is conducting precision, long-range fires testing utilizing UGM-84 Harpoon anti-ship cruise missiles.8 These strikes demonstrate the capacity of the subsurface fleet to deliver lethal kinetic effects against surface combatants from standoff ranges, keeping critical assets protected.8 This validates a doctrine of rapid sea denial and the creation of localized operational windows for follow-on joint forces to exploit.8

Lessons Learned and Intelligence Takeaways

The integration of UUVs and long-range submarine fires indicates a definitive doctrinal shift toward Distributed Maritime Operations (DMO). By relying on autonomous sensors pushed forward into contested zones, the allied fleet is simultaneously reducing the risk to exquisite, highly manned platforms while expanding its lethal strike radius. The extensive participation and complex command sharing further suggest that the United States and its partners are actively operationalizing a unified containment architecture in the Pacific. As Adm. Jablon noted, the exercise puts 250 years of shared values and trust into practice, transitioning alliances from mere diplomatic partnerships to fully interoperable combat coalitions capable of securing sea lanes against peer competitors.34

3.2 Resolute Dragon 26

Concurrent with the naval operations of RIMPAC, the Japan Ground Self-Defense Force (GSDF) and the United States Marine Corps (specifically elements of the III Marine Expeditionary Force) executed the bilateral field training exercise Military drills by US, Japan fan tensions.7 Running from June 20 to June 30, 2026, the exercise took place across the southwestern Kyushu region and Okinawa Prefecture.7 Involving approximately 9,600 personnel, the exercise focused explicitly on the defense of remote islands, simulating a rapid response to an amphibious or airborne assault on the Japanese archipelago.7

Tactical Maneuvers and Multi-Domain Integration

Resolute Dragon 26 achieved several historical milestones in U.S.-Japanese interoperability and logistical coordination. The exercise simulated island defense across the Ryukyu arc. Key logistical and tactical operations included the inaugural deployment of a GSDF V-22 Osprey from Camp Saga in Kyushu to Miyako Island, followed by casualty evacuation simulations to Marine Corps Air Station Futenma in Okinawa. Furthermore, the exercise saw the forward deployment of Type 12 Surface-to-Ship Missile units.

The utilization of the V-22 Osprey to execute critical simulated casualty evacuation (MEDEVAC) training across vast ocean distances tests the highly vulnerable medical logistics chain required during contested Expeditionary Advanced Base Operations (EABO).7

The exercise also marked the inaugural participation of a newly established GSDF unit operating long-range missiles.7 This unit, deployed from Camp Kengun in Kumamoto, integrated the Type 12 Surface-to-Ship Missile (SSM) and the Type 03 Medium-Range Surface-to-Air Missile systems into the operational framework.7 The Type 12 SSM is currently undergoing upgrades to extend its range to approximately 1,000 kilometers, a massive increase from its legacy 200-kilometer range.44 The deployment of these systems alongside U.S. Marine Corps assets allows the joint force to establish potent A2/AD bubbles, capable of projecting kinetic effects deep into the maritime domain to deny adversary naval maneuvers. The exercise also featured the deployment of Type 88 launch systems and Type 10 tanks at the Hijudai training range (though the tanks refrained from live-fire main gun drills due to a prior safety incident).41

Furthermore, the logistical backbone of the exercise tested civil-military integration. For the first time, the SDF transport ships Nihonbare and Yoko—vessels belonging to a specialized unit focused on enhancing maritime logistics—were actively used in the military drills to move heavy materiel across the island chains.7

Lessons Learned and Intelligence Takeaways

Resolute Dragon 26 proves that Japan is aggressively shifting away from a strictly defensive, home-island posture toward a forward-deployed, expeditionary deterrence model. By pushing Type 12 SSMs and rapid Osprey logistics out to the Ryukyu island chain, the U.S. and Japan are operationalizing a strategy to interdict adversary naval forces operating within the first island chain.

However, the exercise also generated significant geopolitical friction. Chinese state media and military experts heavily criticized the drills, interpreting them—alongside reports of U.S. plans to deploy Typhon midrange missile systems to Japan—as provocative efforts aimed at countering China under the guise of the “China threat” narrative.46 Observers in Beijing noted that Tokyo is using these exercises to promote domestic political consolidation, advance constitutional revision, and justify its goal of increasing defense spending to 2% of GDP by 2027.44

Additionally, intelligence highlights domestic friction within Japan: the low-altitude Osprey flights triggered civilian protests and the submission of protest letters by residents in Yamato Town, Kumamoto Prefecture.7 This demonstrates that civil-military relations and domestic political sensitivities remain a critical vulnerability in Japan’s defense posture, potentially complicating rapid deployment in a crisis scenario.

3.3 Borbena Moć 26 (Combat Power 26)

In the Adriatic theater, the Armed Forces of the Republic of Croatia (OSRH), alongside allied forces including the Minnesota National Guard, executed the joint international military exercise Borbena moć 26 – vrhunske logističke sposobnosti OSRH i zračni desant padobranaca u Udbini (Combat Power 26) from June 20 to 25, 2026.10 The exercise was strategically bifurcated into complex logistical operations at the “Josip Jović” barracks in Udbina and intensive multi-domain combat operations in the central Adriatic Sea, specifically around the island of Žirje and the Šibenik Archipelago.10

Tactical Maneuvers and Multi-Domain Integration

Logistically, the exercise at Udbina functioned as a massive stress test for Croatia’s Reception, Staging, and Onward Movement (RSOM) capabilities.10 Operating under the “Host Nation Support” concept, multiple Croatian state ministries (Defense, Internal Affairs, Finance/Customs, and Transport) coordinated seamlessly to receive allied forces at ports of debarkation.10 These forces were processed through staging areas and Convoy Support Centers, where they received technical inspections and medical support, before being integrated into the battlespace.10

Additionally, the exercise featured a complex airborne infiltration. Croatian Armed Forces paratroopers, working in close coordination with the Minnesota National Guard, executed tactical jumps from a C-130 Hercules transport aircraft.10 This evolution demonstrated the capability of allied forces to rapidly deploy behind simulated enemy lines and immediately transition to assigned combat tasks upon landing.10 Concurrently, intensive multi-domain naval operations were held in the central Adriatic Sea, specifically around the island of Žirje and the Šibenik Archipelago, necessitating the implementation of strict maritime exclusion zones.47

Lessons Learned and Intelligence Takeaways

The flawless execution of complex RSOM operations validates Croatia’s strategic utility as a highly secure, efficient logistical hub for NATO reinforcements entering Southeastern Europe. The successful, coordinated airborne drops alongside U.S. National Guard elements demonstrate a high level of tactical interoperability.10 Furthermore, the strict maritime exclusion zones enforced around Žirje during the naval phase underscore the growing requirement to secure littoral waters against localized naval and subsurface threats, temporarily disrupting civilian nautical tourism to ensure operational readiness and safety during live evolutions.47

3.4 African Lion 26

While formally concluding prior to the immediate mid-June observation window (running from April 20 to May 8, 2026), the strategic ramifications and post-exercise analyses of African Lion 26 dominated military planning discussions during the week.9 Co-led by the U.S. Army Southern European Task Force, Africa (SETAF-AF), African Lion is U.S. Africa Command’s (AFRICOM) largest annual joint exercise.9

Participating Forces and Objectives

The 2026 iteration involved over 5,600 personnel from more than 40 nations, hosted across four primary nations: Morocco, Ghana, Senegal, and Tunisia.9 The exercise focused heavily on innovation, interoperability, and partner-led regional security, testing capabilities across land, air, maritime, space, and cyberspace domains.48 Specific maneuvers included U.S. Air Force Airmen from the 153rd Airlift Wing conducting air rigging training with Tunisian forces, and joint medical teams refining rapid, adaptable medical care in Senegal to increase readiness for large-scale combat operations.48

Lessons Learned and Intelligence Takeaways

African Lion 26 serves as the primary strategic counterbalance to expanding Russian and insurgent influence across the continent. Military analysts note that as the Russian Africa Corps shifts tactics in Mali and conflicts simmer in Sudan and Ethiopia, the U.S. must rely heavily on capable regional partners like Morocco and Senegal to maintain stability.49 The exercise’s focus on high-tech future warfare and resource-efficient medical care highlights the necessity of preparing African partners to operate autonomously in resource-constrained, high-threat environments.

3.5 Exercise Khaan Quest 2026

The 23rd iteration of Exercise Khaan Quest, a major multinational peacekeeping exercise, commenced on June 20, 2026, and is scheduled to conclude on July 3 at the Five Hills Training Area outside Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.51 Hosted by the Mongolian Armed Forces and co-sponsored by the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command, the exercise serves as a critical nexus for international military collaboration in Central Asia.51

Tactical Maneuvers and Objectives

Evolving from a bilateral U.S.-Mongolia exercise in 2003 into a premier multilateral event, Khaan Quest trains armies to execute United Nations (UN) peacekeeping and humanitarian operations.51 The exercise is strictly focused on preparing forces for UN Chapter VII mandates—the operational rules governing the maintenance of international peace.51 The drills are divided into a Command Post Exercise (CPX) focusing on decision-making and command coordination, and a Field Training Exercise (FTX) involving on-ground tactical drills.51 These FTX evolutions include checkpoint operations, perimeter security, counter-improvised explosive device (C-IED) clearance, cordon and search tactics, patrolling, and complex casualty extraction lanes under simulated pressure.51

The Indian Army deployed a specialized contingent from the JAT Regiment to train directly alongside U.S., Mongolian, and other international forces.51 This follows India’s participation with the Kumano regiment in the previous year and complements the dedicated India-Mongolia bilateral exercise “Nomadic Elephant”.51

Lessons Learned and Intelligence Takeaways

Khaan Quest remains one of the few global military forums that successfully bridges diverse geopolitical alignments under the banner of UN peacekeeping. For the United States, co-sponsoring a major exercise in landlocked Mongolia—wedged squarely between the strategic competitors of Russia and China—is a masterclass in defense diplomacy, maintaining a vital foothold and access point in a highly contested region. For India, participation enhances its stature as a premier contributor to UN operations and global peace while strengthening its strategic defense ties with Ulaanbaatar.55 This supports Mongolia’s “third neighbor” policy, which is designed to cultivate robust diplomatic and military relationships with democracies to resist total geopolitical reliance on Beijing or Moscow.

3.6 Eagle Partner 2026

From June 17 to 25, 2026, the Eagle Partner 2026 exercise was held at the Zar Training Center in Armenia.12 Originally established in 2023 as a bilateral U.S.-Armenian event, the fourth annual iteration expanded its multinational scope significantly.58 The exercise integrated 250 personnel from the Armenian Armed Forces Peacekeeping Brigade, 58 personnel from the U.S. Army Europe and Africa and the Kansas National Guard, 24 personnel from the French Armed Forces, and 11 personnel from the Hellenic (Greek) Armed Forces.12

Participating Forces and Stated Objectives

The primary stated objective of Eagle Partner 2026 was to support preparation for international peacekeeping operations and enhance interoperability among the multinational forces.12 Personnel engaged in the exchange of best practices in command and tactical communication, attempting to bridge the gap between legacy post-Soviet operational doctrines and modern NATO standards.12 The Armenian Ministry of Defense emphasized that the drill aimed to improve coordination in joint operations and deepen defense cooperation between participating nations.58

Lessons Learned and Intelligence Takeaways

While ostensibly framed as a peacekeeping readiness drill, the strategic and intelligence implications of Eagle Partner 2026 are profound. Armenia’s continued hosting of U.S. forces, now augmented by French and Greek military elements, solidifies a distinct and deliberate geopolitical reorientation away from the Russian Federation’s security umbrella (historically represented by the CSTO). The presence of NATO member forces in the South Caucasus is a direct effort to build institutional interoperability and defense capacity within the Armenian military. This signals a long-term strategic shift that will alter the balance of power in the region, providing Western nations a collaborative foothold in the Caucasus while diminishing Russian leverage.

3.7 Strategic Rival Drills: Will for Peace 2026 & Laros-2026

In response to expanding Western military integration, strategic competitors conducted their own coordination exercises during this period to signal alternative security architectures.

Joint Gulf of Oman Exercises & Maritime Security Belt: Defense analysts highlighted the ongoing strategic implications of recent joint naval exercises in the Gulf of Oman and the Strait of Hormuz, involving the naval forces of China, Russia, and Iran.14 Russian officials have explicitly noted that these participating navies practiced coordinating efforts to protect trade routes, which are becoming increasingly vulnerable, building on previous coordination drills such as the “Maritime Security Belt” and the BRICS “Will for Peace” exercise held earlier in the year in the South Atlantic.63 For China, these joint exercises support blue-water reach and normalize its presence along key sea lanes; for Russia, they signal relevance and reach amid Western diplomatic isolation; and for Iran, they demonstrate long-range capability and resistance to U.S. containment policies.14

Laros-2026: Similarly, joint Russian and Lao forces carried out the active phase of the Laros-2026 military exercise at the Kommadam training ground in central Laos from June 4 to 13.13 The drills featured coordinated combat scenarios including artillery strikes, FPV drone attacks, helicopter-borne assaults, and special operations missions against simulated armed groups.13 The exercise highlighted growing interoperability between Moscow and Vientiane, and functioned as a commercial showcase, demonstrating advanced Russian weapons—reportedly utilized in recent European conflicts—to prospective Southeast Asian buyers.13

3.8 European Eastern Flank Exercises: BALTOPS 26 and Gallant Boar-2026

NATO force posture along its Eastern Flank was heavily tested during the past week through the conclusion of the massive naval exercise BALTOPS 2026 concludes in Kiel, Germany and the initiation of the land-based Lithuania, Poland, and France began exercises in the Suwalki Gap.11 These exercises occurred against a backdrop of heightened Russian strategic signaling, including suddenly announced exercises of Russia’s strategic nuclear forces in May 2026, which were intended to rehearse responses to hypothetical external attacks following successful Ukrainian drone strikes on Moscow.65

BALTOPS 26: The 55th iteration of the premier maritime-focused exercise in the Baltic Region, BALTOPS 26, concluded in Kiel, Germany on June 19, 2026.64 Led by the U.S. Naval Forces Europe-Africa/Sixth Fleet, the exercise involved major flotillas, including 20 NATO Ally ships that originally departed from Gdynia, Poland.66 The exercise aimed to secure freedom of navigation, enhance allied response capabilities in the Baltic Sea, and coordinate with ongoing NATO enhanced vigilance activities (eVAs) such as Baltic Sentry.66 Intelligence Takeaway: The sheer scale of BALTOPS 26 reinforces the reality that the Baltic Sea is now effectively a “NATO lake,” especially following the accession of Finland and Sweden. The integration of naval assets ensures that maritime supply lines to the Baltic States remain open during a crisis, denying Russia localized maritime dominance from its Kaliningrad exclave.68

Gallant Boar-2026: Simultaneously, NATO ground forces addressed the alliance’s most critical geographic vulnerability. Organized by the Lithuanian and Polish Armed Forces, and featuring elements of the French military and the Lithuanian Butigeidis Dragoon Battalion, Gallant Boar-2026 took place on the Polish side of the Suwałki Gap.11 Running until June 26, the exercise focused purely on the protection and defense of the Suwałki Corridor—the narrow, 60-mile land border connecting Poland to Lithuania, situated precariously between the highly militarized Russian exclave of Kaliningrad and the Russian-aligned state of Belarus.11 Forces practiced joint operations, rapid interoperability, and the rapid movement of military equipment through this contested chokepoint, requiring the movement of materiel from Klaipėda toward Poland.11 Intelligence Takeaway: The Suwałki Gap represents a single point of failure for NATO ground reinforcement to the Baltic states. Exercises like Gallant Boar are critical deterrents, designed to prove to pacing threats that rapid, multinational mechanized forces can hold and secure the corridor against preemptive closure attempts, ensuring the territorial integrity of the alliance’s easternmost members.

3.9 Bilateral Naval Integration: Israeli-German PASSEX

Further cementing the growing defense relationship highlighted at the ILA Berlin expo, the Israeli Navy hosted a German Navy vessel for a port visit in Haifa, Israel, in late June 2026.70 During the visit, the navies conducted a joint sailing exercise, known as a PASSEX, aimed at enhancing operational coordination and knowledge-sharing.70 Professional meetings were held between Haifa Naval Base commander Rear Adm. Erez Ben Zion and German 4th Frigate Squadron commander Capt. Volker Kübsch to focus on expanding bilateral cooperation.70 This maritime engagement underscores that the political friction Israel experiences with certain European nations (e.g., France) is not universal, and strategic military-to-military cooperation with key partners like Germany remains robust and actively expanding.

4.0 Strategic Synthesis and Conclusion

The global military activity observed during mid-June 2026 presents a clear, overarching narrative: the era of uncontested logistical supremacy and unchallenged technological overmatch has ended. Across all observed tradeshows and exercises, armed forces and defense contractors are urgently adapting to a battlespace defined by pervasive multi-spectral surveillance, autonomous lethality, and highly contested supply lines.

First, the integration of Artificial Intelligence and autonomous systems is no longer conceptual; it is fully operational. The deployment of AI-driven C-UAS networks like the Phantom Defense ecosystem at Eurosatory, the integration of FPV drones into combined arms maneuvers in Croatia, and the utilization of UUVs for sub-surface intelligence gathering and targeting in RIMPAC demonstrate that the sensor-to-shooter loop is being aggressively shortened. Military forces are actively seeking capabilities that remove the human from the immediate data processing loop to achieve decision superiority in environments where reaction times are measured in seconds.

Second, the strategic importance of logistics and expeditionary sustainability has been elevated to the level of kinetic operations. Exercises like Resolute Dragon in Japan, Borbena Moć in Croatia, and African Lion across the African continent placed massive emphasis on moving heavy materiel, establishing Reception, Staging, and Onward Movement (RSOM) frameworks, and evacuating casualties over vast distances under simulated pressure. The recognition that rear-echelon support will be immediately targeted in a peer conflict requires highly distributed, resilient, and civilian-integrated supply chains, as evidenced by the focus of the Italian Ventennale CTR Industry Day.

Finally, the political dimension of defense procurement is increasingly volatile. The fracturing of defense market access seen at Eurosatory—where sovereign governments dictate market access based on political alignments—contrasted against the aggressive multinational interoperability witnessed in Armenia, Mongolia, the Suwałki Gap, and the Indo-Pacific, indicates a complex global environment. Alliances are simultaneously hardening militarily through complex joint exercises while facing severe stress tests politically regarding hardware supply chains. Future capability overmatch will ultimately belong to the nations that can successfully secure resilient, sovereign defense supply chains while seamlessly plugging their autonomous platforms into a unified, allied, multi-domain network.


Please share the link on Facebook, Forums, with colleagues, etc. Your support is much appreciated and if you have any feedback, please email us in**@*********ps.com. If you’d like to request a report or order a reprint, please click here for the corresponding page to open in new tab.


Sources Used

  1. From weaponry to cyber defense: the largest defense exhibition, Eurosatory-2026, kicks off tomorrow, accessed June 27, 2026, https://unn.ua/en/news/from-armaments-to-cyber-defense-the-largest-defense-exhibition-eurosatory-2026-kicks-off-tomorrow
  2. BREAKING: France Bars Israel from Europe’s Largest Defense Show, accessed June 27, 2026, https://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/articles/2026/6/1/breaking-france-bars-israel-from-europes-largest-defense-show
  3. France restricts Israeli presence at Europe’s biggest defense show, accessed June 27, 2026, https://www.defensenews.com/global/europe/2026/06/02/france-restricts-israeli-presence-at-europes-biggest-defense-show/
  4. Ukraine Showcases Complete Counter-Drone Network After …, accessed June 27, 2026, https://united24media.com/defense-tech/ukraine-showcases-complete-counter-drone-network-after-neutralizing-7000-enemy-uavs-20131
  5. This Ukrainian UGV is winning over NATO countries and global …, accessed June 27, 2026, https://euromaidanpress.com/2026/06/27/this-ukrainian-ugv-beloved-by-ukrainian-intel-is-now-winning-over-nato-countries-and-global-defense-giants/
  6. Hyundai Rotem, Kia at Global Defense Expo – AzerNews, accessed June 27, 2026, https://www.azernews.az/region/259783.html
  7. Military drills by US, Japan fan tensions – China Daily, accessed June 27, 2026, https://www.chinadailyasia.com/article/635564
  8. RIMPAC 2026: U.S. Pacific submarine force to test unmanned …, accessed June 27, 2026, https://defence-industry.eu/rimpac-2026-u-s-pacific-submarine-force-to-test-unmanned-undersea-vehicles-and-harpoon-missile-strikes/
  9. US, Royal Moroccan Armed Forces launch African Lion 26 in Morocco | Article – Army.mil, accessed June 27, 2026, https://www.army.mil/article/291986/us_royal_moroccan_armed_forces_launch_african_lion_26_in_morocco
  10. Borbena moć 26 – vrhunske logističke sposobnosti OSRH i zračni …, accessed June 27, 2026, https://www.morh.hr/borbena-moc-26-vrhunske-logisticke-sposobnosti-osrh-i-zracni-desant-padobranaca-u-udbini/
  11. Lithuania, Poland, and France began exercises in the Suwalki Gap, accessed June 27, 2026, https://nashaniva.com/en/397717
  12. Armenia Hosts Military Exercises With U.S., French and Greek …, accessed June 27, 2026, https://asbarez.com/armenia-hosts-military-exercises-with-u-s-french-and-greek-troops/
  13. WATCH | Russian And Lao Troops Unleash FPV Drones In High Intensity Laros-2026 Drills | APT, accessed June 27, 2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hk59hR0ellE
  14. Mosi-3 (“Will for Peace 2026”) — Strategic Implications for African Security and Geopolitics, accessed June 27, 2026, https://www.africansecurityanalysis.com/reports/mosi-3-will-for-peace-2026-strategic-implications-for-african-security-and-geopolitics
  15. Defence tradeshows around the world – Integris, accessed June 27, 2026, https://integriscomposites.com/events/
  16. 2026 Global Small Arms & Defense Trade Show Schedule – Ronin’s Grips, accessed June 27, 2026, https://blog.roninsgrips.com/2026-global-small-arms-defense-trade-show-schedule/
  17. Eurosatory ban on Israeli officials may hurt smaller firms, but majors still going to show, accessed June 27, 2026, https://breakingdefense.com/2026/06/eurosatory-ban-on-israeli-officials-may-hurt-smaller-firms-but-majors-still-going-to-show/
  18. Eurosatory Bars Israeli Offensive Systems, Permits Only Air and Missile Defence – Großwald, accessed June 27, 2026, https://www.grosswald.org/eurosatory-2026-bars-israeli-offensive-systems-air-missile-defence-permitted-stands-walled-off/
  19. News – U.S. Army, Allies and Partners to Expand Drone and Counter-Drone Marketplaces at Eurosatory Defense Exhibition, accessed June 27, 2026, https://www.europeafrica.army.mil/ArticleViewPressRelease/Article/4519491/news-us-army-allies-and-partners-to-expand-drone-and-counter-drone-marketplaces/
  20. Israel MoD Leads 15-company Delegation To The ILA Berlin 2026 Defense Exhibition, accessed June 27, 2026, https://www.i24news.tv/en/news/israel/defense/artc-israel-mod-leads-15-company-delegation-to-the-ila-berlin-2026-defense-exhibition
  21. VENTENNALE CTR – Industry day – Aeronautica Militare, accessed June 27, 2026, https://www.aeronautica.difesa.it/event/ctr-fiumicino-ventennale/
  22. Fiumicino, l’Aeronautica Militare celebra 20 anni del Centro Tecnico Rifornimenti, accessed June 27, 2026, https://www.ilfaroonline.it/2026/06/25/fiumicino-laeronautica-militare-celebra-20-anni-del-centro-tecnico-rifornimenti/641074/
  23. 9th Naval Defense Expo 2026 | Jun 2026 | Pasay – WebMobi, accessed June 27, 2026, https://www.webmobi.com/discovery/events/9th-naval-defense-expo-2026-20260617-qzvu
  24. TACTICAL, SURVIVAL AND ARMS EXPO – CENTREX Corporation, accessed June 27, 2026, https://centrex.ph/blog/tactical-survival-and-arms-expo
  25. Gun Shows Philippines 2026: Topspot guns Event Schedule, accessed June 27, 2026, https://www.topspotguns.ph/news/2026/2/27/gun-shows-philippines-2026-topspot-guns-event-schedule-amp-locations
  26. At the Tactical, Survival and Arms Expo 2026 – YouTube, accessed June 27, 2026, https://www.youtube.com/shorts/BfWwS1aTjFc
  27. TACS GUN EXPO 2026 – SHOOTERS ARMS – YouTube, accessed June 27, 2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jJl8Y9tp4-Y
  28. More information about Vietnam Defense Expo 2026 to be published, accessed June 27, 2026, https://en.qdnd.vn/military/intl-relations-and-cooperation/more-information-about-vietnam-defense-expo-2026-to-be-published-592212
  29. Defense Expo in 2026 – Calendar, Tickets, All dates on Expomap.ru, accessed June 27, 2026, https://expomap.ru/en/expo/tag/bezopasnost-defense/2026/
  30. RIMPAC (Rim of the Pacific) – U.S. Pacific Fleet – Navy, accessed June 27, 2026, https://www.cpf.navy.mil/rimpac/
  31. accessed June 27, 2026, https://www.dvidshub.net/news/568627/rimpac-26-pacific-submarine-force-efforts-preserve-undersea-domain-advantage#:~:text=Thirty%2Done%20nations%2C%20over%2030,June%2024%20to%20July%2031.
  32. U.S. Pacific Fleet announces 30th RIMPAC Exercise, accessed June 27, 2026, https://www.cpf.navy.mil/Newsroom/News/Article/4465055/us-pacific-fleet-announces-30th-rimpac-exercise/
  33. RIMPAC 2026 Kicks Off in Hawaii > U.S. Pacific Command > News Articles – PACOM, accessed June 27, 2026, https://www.pacom.mil/Media/News/News-Articles/Article/4527435/rimpac-2026-kicks-off-in-hawaii/
  34. World’s largest international naval exercise RIMPAC 2026 kicks off, accessed June 27, 2026, https://caliber.az/en/post/world-s-largest-international-naval-exercise-rimpac-2026-begins-in-pacific-ocean
  35. RIMPAC 2026 Kicks Off in Hawaii – 3rd Fleet – Navy, accessed June 27, 2026, https://www.c3f.navy.mil/News/Article/4527380/rimpac-2026-kicks-off-in-hawaii/
  36. accessed June 27, 2026, https://www.pacom.mil/Media/News/News-Articles/Article/4527435/rimpac-2026-kicks-off-in-hawaii/#:~:text=Hosted%20by%20Commander%2C%20U.S.%20Pacific,Ho%20Kim%2C%20Republic%20of%20Korea
  37. U.S. Pacific Fleet Announces 30th RIMPAC Exercise – PACOM, accessed June 27, 2026, https://www.pacom.mil/Media/News/News-Articles/Article/4463903/us-pacific-fleet-announces-30th-rimpac-exercise/
  38. RIMPAC 2026 kicks off in Hawaii – U.S. Pacific Fleet – Navy, accessed June 27, 2026, https://www.cpf.navy.mil/Newsroom/News/Article/4527411/rimpac-2026-kicks-off-in-hawaii/
  39. 30th Rimpac Kicks Off in Hawaii – War.gov, accessed June 27, 2026, https://www.war.gov/News/Feature-Stories/Story/Article/4525360/30th-rimpac-kicks-off-in-hawaii/
  40. RIMPAC 2026 Opening Statements [Image 2 of 4], accessed June 27, 2026, https://www.dvidshub.net/image/9771614/rimpac-2026-opening-statements
  41. Japan, US launch joint island defense exercise in Kyushu, Okinawa, accessed June 27, 2026, https://www.anews.com.tr/asia/2026/06/20/japan-us-launch-joint-island-defense-exercise-in-kyushu-okinawa
  42. 12th MLR Executes Resolute Dragon 25 – III Marine Expeditionary Force, accessed June 27, 2026, https://www.iiimef.marines.mil/Media-Room/Videos/?videoid=988462&dvpmoduleid=146437&dvpTag=LCT
  43. Japan, U.S. commence joint island defense drill in Kyushu, Okinawa, accessed June 27, 2026, https://japantoday.com/category/national/japan-u.s.-commence-joint-island-defense-drill-in-kyushu-okinawa
  44. Resolute Dragon sees inaugural deployment of U.S. defense systems to Japan, accessed June 27, 2026, https://ipdefenseforum.com/2025/09/resolute-dragon-sees-inaugural-deployment-of-u-s-defense-systems-to-japan/
  45. US, Japan launch large-scale exercises to defend remote islands – Ukrinform, accessed June 27, 2026, https://www.ukrinform.net/rubric-ato/4135933-us-japan-launch-largescale-exercises-to-defend-remote-islands.html
  46. US-Japan drills, planned Typhon missile deployments trigger Japanese domestic opposition, stir regional security concerns – Global Times, accessed June 27, 2026, https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202606/1364050.shtml
  47. Military Exercise Žirje: Restricted Areas for Skippers in June 2026, accessed June 27, 2026, https://www.sea-help.eu/en/news-general/military-exercise-2026-adriatic-croatia/
  48. African Lion 26: Airmen participate in largest Joint military exercise in Africa – Air Force, accessed June 27, 2026, https://www.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/4469937/african-lion-26-airmen-participate-in-largest-joint-military-exercise-in-africa/
  49. African Lion 26 Showcases High-Tech Future Warfare – Africa Defense Forum, accessed June 27, 2026, https://adf-magazine.com/2026/05/african-lion-26-showcases-high-tech-future-warfare/
  50. B-Roll: US Army physical therapists build readiness during MEDREX in Senegal – Test Page, accessed June 27, 2026, https://innovation.army.mil/Test-Page/?videoid=1005917&dvpmoduleid=93238
  51. Exercise KHAAN QUEST 2026: Indian Army Joins Drill in Mongolia, accessed June 27, 2026, https://utkarsh.com/current-affairs/national/defence/exercise-khaan-quest-2026-indian-army-joins-drill-in-mongolia
  52. Khaan Quest 2026: Extraction Under Pressure [Image 1 of 12] – DVIDS, accessed June 27, 2026, https://www.dvidshub.net/image/9769317/khaan-quest-2026-extraction-under-pressure
  53. Video – Khaan Quest 2026 – DVIDS, accessed June 27, 2026, https://www.dvidshub.net/video/1012076/khaan-quest-2026
  54. Video – Khaan Quest 2026 Training Lanes – DVIDS, accessed June 27, 2026, https://www.dvidshub.net/video/1011960/khaan-quest-2026-training-lanes
  55. Jat Regiment troops participate in a joint exercise with soldiers from 18 countries including US in Mongolia, accessed June 27, 2026, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/defence/international/jat-regiment-troops-participate-in-a-joint-exercise-with-soldiers-from-18-countries-including-us-in-mongolia/articleshow/131936681.cms
  56. Indian Army contingent participates in Exercise Khaan Quest 2026 in Mongolia, accessed June 27, 2026, https://www.aninews.in/news/world/asia/indian-army-contingent-participates-in-exercise-khaan-quest-2026-in-mongolia20260625123019
  57. Eagle Partner 2026 Kicks Off, Bringing Together Armenian, U.S., French, and Greek Forces, accessed June 27, 2026, https://massispost.com/2026/06/eagle-partner-2026-kicks-off-bringing-together-armenian-u-s-french-and-greek-forces/
  58. Armenia Concludes Eagle Partner 2026 Military Drills with US, France and Greece, accessed June 27, 2026, https://caspianpost.com/armenia/armenia-concludes-eagle-partner-2026-military-drills-with-us-france-and-greece
  59. Armenia hosts military exercise involving US, French, Greek personnel – Anadolu Ajansı, accessed June 27, 2026, https://www.aa.com.tr/en/eurasia/armenia-hosts-military-exercise-involving-us-french-greek-personnel/3969924
  60. Eagle Partner 2026 Military Exercise to Be Held in Armenia on June 17–25 – MassisPost, accessed June 27, 2026, https://massispost.com/2026/06/eagle-partner-2026-military-exercise-to-be-held-in-armenia-on-june-17-25/
  61. Eagle Partner 2026 military exercise officially kicks off – 1Lurer, accessed June 27, 2026, https://www.1lurer.am/en/2026/06/17/Eagle-Partner-2026-military-exercise-officially-kicks-off/1531594
  62. China, Russia, and Iran to Hold Joint Exercises in the Gulf of Oman, accessed June 27, 2026, https://militarnyi.com/en/news/china-russia-and-iran-to-hold-joint-exercises-in-the-gulf-of-oman/
  63. Russia, China, Iran deploy ships for joint exercises in Strait of Hormuz – Anadolu Ajansı, accessed June 27, 2026, https://www.aa.com.tr/en/asia-pacific/russia-china-iran-deploy-ships-for-joint-exercises-in-strait-of-hormuz/3832330
  64. BALTOPS 2026 concludes in Kiel, Germany, accessed June 27, 2026, https://www.c6f.navy.mil/Press-Room/News/Article/4522166/baltops-2026-concludes-in-kiel-germany/
  65. Russia’s Nuclear Signaling in 2026 and Implications for European Security, accessed June 27, 2026, https://dgap.org/en/research/publications/russias-nuclear-signaling-2026-and-implications-european-security
  66. BALTOPS 2026 Takes Sail from Gdynia, Poland – Navy.mil, accessed June 27, 2026, https://www.navy.mil/Press-Office/News-Stories/display-news/Article/4509758/baltops-2026-takes-sail-from-gdynia-poland/
  67. NATO Exercises 2026: The Complete Guide to Allied Readiness – Großwald, accessed June 27, 2026, https://www.grosswald.org/nato-exercises-2026/
  68. Russia holds naval drills in Baltic Sea during major NATO exercises, accessed June 27, 2026, https://english.alarabiya.net/News/world/2026/06/09/russia-holds-naval-drills-in-baltic-sea-during-major-nato-exercises-
  69. KALININGRAD WAR GAMES: France, Poland & Lithuania Launch Strategic Military Exercise Near Suwałki – YouTube, accessed June 27, 2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eS3kKDO_R00
  70. Israeli, German navies deepen cooperation in Haifa, accessed June 27, 2026, https://www.jns.org/news/israel-news/israeli-german-navies-deepen-cooperation-in-haifa

Intelligence Report: Global Defense Tradeshows and Military Exercises (June 14–20, 2026)

1.0 Executive Summary

The global military and defense industrial landscape observed during the week of June 14 to June 20, 2026, reflects a period of profound operational and technological recalibration. Data aggregated from the world’s premier land defense exhibition and a series of highly integrated multilateral military exercises indicates that allied forces and defense contractors are fundamentally restructuring their paradigms to address the realities of high-intensity, peer-level conflict. The overarching strategic theme dominating this period is the urgent transition from conceptual modernization toward the immediate scaling of production, the distribution of operational command, and the integration of asymmetric technologies into conventional force structures.

Technologically, the defense industrial base has pivoted decisively away from exquisite, low-volume legacy platforms toward modular, open-architecture, and highly attritable systems. Observations from Eurosatory 2026 demonstrate that artificial intelligence, unmanned systems, and Manned-Unmanned Teaming concepts have transitioned from experimental prototypes to mature, deployable, and mass-producible assets. The exponential proliferation of highly lethal, low-cost autonomous and remotely piloted systems—specifically First-Person View drones and loitering munitions—has forced a rapid evolution in ground-based air defense. The industry is currently prioritizing the rapid development of layered, sensor-agnostic counter-unmanned aerial systems that integrate kinetic interceptors, high-energy lasers, and wideband electronic warfare effectors into single, highly mobile platforms. Furthermore, the defense supply chain is undergoing a strategic realignment aimed at localized, resilient mass production to fulfill the requirements of the Eastern Flank Deterrence Initiative, recognizing that credible deterrence relies as much on industrial reconstitution capacity as on frontline combat power.

Operationally, the military exercises conducted over the past week demonstrate a comprehensive effort to harden allied interoperability and adapt to contested multi-domain environments. Naval exercises in the Baltic Sea and the Atlantic Ocean highlight an elevated prioritization of protecting critical undersea infrastructure and securing vulnerable Sea Lines of Communication against asymmetric subsea threats, while simultaneously validating the ability of decentralized NATO operational headquarters to command multinational maritime forces. In the air domain, the successful execution of Agile Combat Employment by fifth-generation stealth fighters operating from civilian highway infrastructure underscores a doctrinal recognition that traditional, fixed airbases are highly vulnerable to advanced long-range precision fires. Concurrently, exercises like Vigorous Warrior and Eagle Partner 2026 reveal that allied forces are actively expanding multinational interoperability to prepare for severe logistical realities, emphasizing that standardized procedural frameworks and the inclusion of non-traditional partners are critical force multipliers.

1.1 Summary Table of Key Events and Lessons Learned

Event NameEvent TypeLocation & DatesKey Lessons Learned
Eurosatory 2026Tradeshow / ExpoParis, France

(June 15–19, 2026)
Manned-Unmanned Teaming architectures and hybrid-propulsion autonomous ground vehicles have reached operational maturity. Counter-drone defense requires multi-layered, modular systems incorporating drone-on-drone kinetic interception. Defense supply chains must pivot to localized mass production to sustain protracted high-intensity conflicts. Geopolitical disputes can heavily restrict international market access for major defense contractors.
BALTOPS 2026Multilateral ExerciseBaltic Sea Region

(June 4–19, 2026)
The transition of command and control to Joint Force Command Brunssum enhances NATO’s operational cohesion. Protecting undersea infrastructure and integrating unmanned underwater vehicles for harbor defense are critical for maintaining maritime logistics and deterring subsea sabotage.
Ramstein Flag 26Multilateral ExerciseNorthern & Southern Europe

(June 8–19, 2026)
Agile Combat Employment is operationally viable for fifth-generation assets utilizing austere civilian infrastructure. Dispersed air operations require highly synchronized, multi-domain command networks to overcome Anti-Access/Area Denial environments.
Vigorous Warrior 2026Multilateral ExerciseEstonia

(June 2026)
Peer-level conflict scenarios demand highly interoperable Role 2 field hospitals capable of managing severe mass casualties, rapid pathogen identification, and logistical interruptions under contested environmental conditions.
Fleet Exercise (FLEETEX) 250Multilateral ExerciseUnited States East Coast & Atlantic

(June 14–29, 2026)
Rapid forward-deployed coalition aggregation is essential for layered homeland defense. Multi-domain training integration among allied marine forces sharpens collective maritime security and amphibious response capabilities.
Combat Power 26Joint Military ExerciseCroatia

(June 15–July 3, 2026)
The integration of newly acquired fourth-generation Western fighter aircraft alongside modern unmanned aerial systems signals a definitive break from legacy Soviet-era equipment, enhancing NATO’s southeastern flank deterrence posture.
Eagle Partner 2026Multilateral ExerciseArmenia

(June 17–25, 2026)
The inclusion of French and Greek forces alongside U.S. and Armenian troops highlights a strategic shift toward broader Western interoperability and the diversification of regional defense partnerships.

2.0 Details: Military Tradeshows and Defense Expos

2.1 Eurosatory 2026

Participating Nations and Major Defense Contractors Eurosatory 2026, officially recognized as the world’s premier land and air-land defense and security tradeshow, was held from June 15 to June 19, 2026, at the Paris Nord Villepinte Exhibition Centre in Villepinte, France.1 Organized by Coges Events, the biennial exhibition drew a massive global presence, featuring over two thousand international exhibitors representing sixty-one distinct sovereign nations.4 The event served as a critical convergence point for government defense procurement officials, military leadership, and the global defense industrial base. Major multinational defense conglomerates maintained expansive footprints, including Rheinmetall, General Dynamics European Land Systems, Thales, L3Harris Technologies, MBDA, IDV (a dedicated defense entity within the Leonardo corporate structure), and ST Engineering.5

A highly notable shift in international defense trade dynamics was the significantly expanded presence of the Indian defense industry. India deployed a unified national pavilion featuring thirty-one separate entities, heavily supported by the Indian Ministry of Defence.4 This aggressive posturing at a European tradeshow signals a strategic effort by New Delhi to pivot from its historical position as a primary importer of Russian military hardware toward establishing itself as a competitive exporter of indigenous defense technologies in the global arms market.4

However, the geopolitical environment surrounding the ongoing conflict in the Middle East severely disrupted the exhibition’s international inclusivity. The French government mandated strict limitations on the participation of Israeli defense firms, driven by political responses to the humanitarian situation resulting from Israeli military operations in Gaza.11 Initially, the French Ministry of Defense decreed that Israeli defense firms were prohibited from displaying any offensive weaponry, restricting their exhibitions exclusively to air defense products and anti-ballistic missile capacities.11 Furthermore, in a highly unprecedented move for an international trade exhibition, organizers physically boarded up and blocked access to the pavilions of several prominent Israeli defense contractors, including Elbit Systems, Rafael Advanced Defense Systems, and Israel Aerospace Industries, during the overnight hours preceding the exhibition.11

The Israeli Ministry of Defense issued formal condemnations of these actions, labeling the physical blockades as cynical, discriminatory, and unjustified, particularly asserting that the affected companies had fully complied with the French government’s demands to strictly display defensive systems.11 Senior executives from Israeli defense firms publicly suggested that the French government’s actions were motivated less by humanitarian concerns and more by commercial protectionism, arguing that the highly successful and combat-proven Israeli defense sector poses a significant market threat to domestic French and European defense conglomerates.11 This ongoing dispute highlights the increasing vulnerability of the global defense trade to host-nation geopolitical interference and the weaponization of trade exhibition access.

Key Technological Debuts, Systems Emphasized, and Capabilities Demonstrated The technological demonstrations at Eurosatory 2026 reflected a defense industry that has fully internalized the tactical lessons observed in recent high-intensity conflicts, specifically the ongoing war in Ukraine. The exhibition floor was dominated by the maturation of Manned-Unmanned Teaming architectures, the rapid advancement of hybrid-propulsion uncrewed ground vehicles, and the urgent prioritization of layered, highly mobile counter-drone systems.

Manned-Unmanned Teaming (MUM-T) and Autonomous Ground Platforms The integration of autonomous robotic systems with traditional armored cavalry units has transitioned from conceptual theory to tangible combat hardware. General Dynamics European Land Systems presented highly integrated Manned-Unmanned Teaming configurations designed to project lethal force forward while keeping human operators shielded in defilade.9 The company showcased an eight-by-eight wheeled PIRANHA Ground Based Air Defense vehicle equipped with Elbit Systems’ new UT-30 Mk.3 thirty-millimeter unmanned turret.9 Operating under a flexible command structure, this manned PIRANHA functions simultaneously as a tactical mother ship and a localized command node, networking with independent small-caliber effectors mounted on the autonomous BULLFROG eight-by-eight wheeled uncrewed ground vehicle.9 Furthermore, the General Dynamics EAGLE six-by-six Vehicle Control Unit was demonstrated networking seamlessly with a suite of unmanned ground and aerial vehicles from Alpha Robotics, including the highly mobile WOLF G1 tracked uncrewed ground vehicle equipped with a Valhalla Loki stabilized weapon station, the WOLF C1 surveillance platform, the HAWK fixed-wing drone, and the HUMMINGBIRD tethered quadcopter.9

Diagram of a military vehicle connected to

In parallel, IDV, a subsidiary of the Leonardo corporate group, introduced the next generation of its VIKING uncrewed ground vehicle and debuted the highly anticipated CL2X.6 The CL2X is a hybrid uncrewed light tank platform running on a tracked chassis.6 It utilizes an advanced series-hybrid propulsion system that allows the vehicle to achieve a maximum speed of seventy kilometers per hour and an operational range of five hundred kilometers.12 Crucially, the hybrid architecture enables a dedicated silent mode, permitting the vehicle to conduct low acoustic signature operations.12 This feature is a direct engineering response to the proliferation of acoustic ground sensors and the heightened multi-spectral sensor density of the modern battlefield, where noise emissions frequently invite rapid artillery suppression. Furthermore, VisionWave Holdings presented the VARAN Autonomous Ground System alongside the STRATUM AI operational management platform.13 This architecture utilizes a passive battlefield perception framework, processing raw data through a sophisticated optical and thermal computer vision sensing layer to navigate and identify targets without emitting active, detectable radar signatures.13

Layered Counter-Unmanned Aerial Systems (C-UAS) The absolute necessity of defending ground maneuver forces against the ubiquitous threat of First-Person View drones, loitering munitions, and quadcopter grenade-droppers has catalyzed a massive industrial effort toward layered Counter-Unmanned Aerial Systems. Defense contractors are recognizing that single-sensor or single-effector systems are insufficient; survival requires multi-layered architectures that combine electronic warfare, directed energy, and kinetic interception.

To this end, General Dynamics European Land Systems unveiled the PANDUR GBAD in a layered air defense configuration.9 The platform integrates a Valhalla Mangart 25 turret equipped with a high-velocity automatic cannon and missile launchers for medium-range threats, combined with a Cilas HELMA-P high-energy laser weapon designed for the instantaneous neutralization of small, short-range targets.9 The entire platform is networked through the company’s proprietary NEVA electronic architecture, allowing seamless integration into broader multi-domain sensor webs.9 Similarly, the technology conglomerate Rohde & Schwarz introduced the THORIS suite, a highly scalable multi-sensor counter-drone system.15 THORIS orchestrates active radar, electro-optical and infrared targeting, and radio-frequency sensors through a unified command and control layer to deliver continuous tracking and wideband electronic jamming.15

Perhaps the most significant strategic shift in the counter-drone sector is the acknowledgment that the most cost-effective method for neutralizing a hostile drone is often the deployment of a friendly interceptor drone. At Eurosatory, L3Harris Technologies signed a formal Memorandum of Understanding with the Turkish drone manufacturer Skydagger Technologies to co-produce First-Person View drone interceptors in the United States.8 These low-cost kinetic interceptors will be natively integrated into the L3Harris VAMPIRE system, an affordable, palletized intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance, and strike platform currently in high-volume production in Huntsville, Alabama.8 The VAMPIRE system utilizes WESCAM MX-10D stabilized targeting sensors and an artificial intelligence-driven Mission Management System to quickly detect and classify small, evasive threats.17 By incorporating Skydagger’s interceptors, L3Harris aims to significantly reduce the cost-per-effect ratio for allied militaries, allowing them to defeat incoming drones without expending million-dollar surface-to-air missiles on targets that cost only a few thousand dollars.16

Loitering Munitions and Networked Strike Architectures The offensive counterpart to the counter-drone systems was heavily represented by advancements in loitering munitions. Rheinmetall hosted the global premiere of its Containerized Missile Launcher, a multi-launch platform specifically engineered for the FV-014 loitering munition system.19 The launcher is housed within a logistically flexible, standardized twenty-foot shipping container format, allowing it to be covertly transported and deployed via civilian logistics chains, including commercial trucks, trains, and maritime cargo vessels.19 The autonomous launcher can hold up to eighteen FV-014 uncrewed aerial vehicles, which boast an operational range of up to one hundred kilometers and a flight endurance of seventy minutes.19

Crucially, the system utilizes advanced swarm technology, enabling a single human operator to launch and manage a coordinated salvo of multiple vehicles simultaneously.19 The entire apparatus is unified by the Rheinmetall Battlesuite, an open-architecture digital foundation that digitalizes platforms, sensors, and weapons, allowing commanders to network existing and future systems through standardized military interfaces.19 This approach to digitized firepower minimizes reaction times and significantly enhances the transparency of the operational area, bridging the historical gap between reconnaissance elements and artillery strike complexes.19 The strategic relevance of this capability was underscored by the announcement that the German Armed Forces recently executed a framework agreement to procure tens of thousands of FV-014 munitions, with initial deliveries scheduled to commence in the first half of the year 2027.21

Lessons Learned and Intelligence Takeaways The intelligence derived from the Eurosatory 2026 defense exhibition points toward several fundamental shifts in defense industry trends, supply chain management, and military procurement priorities.

First, the overarching theme among allied defense planners is the imperative to achieve “production at speed and scale”.24 Transatlantic military leadership and industry executives utilized the exhibition to emphasize that modern deterrence is not predicated solely on the technical superiority of frontline weapons systems, but equally on the resilience of the supporting industrial base.24 The intense focus on initiatives like the Eastern Flank Deterrence Initiative requires allied nations to rapidly rebuild stockpiles depleted by current conflicts and establish localized, highly redundant manufacturing capacity.24 Militaries are moving away from the procurement of exquisite, highly complex platforms that take years to manufacture, favoring systems that are affordable, modular, and capable of being mass-produced in the tens of thousands.

Second, the structural balance of the global arms trade is fragmenting. The robust presence of the Indian defense sector and the controversies surrounding the exclusion of Israeli firms demonstrate that nations are increasingly leveraging defense exhibitions as instruments of geopolitical statecraft.4 Sovereign nations are recognizing the immense strategic risk of relying on foreign supply chains that can be severed by sudden diplomatic shifts or unilateral trade restrictions. Consequently, intelligence indicates an accelerating trend toward domestic defense industrialization and the aggressive pursuit of technological sovereignty among both major powers and smaller regional actors.

Finally, the era of proprietary, closed-architecture military hardware is functionally ending. Procurement officers are demanding software-defined systems built on open standards, allowing for rapid field updates and the seamless integration of third-party capabilities. The tactical environment is evolving too rapidly for decade-long acquisition cycles; survival on the modern battlefield dictates that algorithms, sensor libraries, and threat signatures must be updated and deployed to frontline units in a matter of days or weeks.

3.0 Details: Military Exercises

3.1 Baltic Operations (BALTOPS) 2026

Participating Forces, Geographic Focus, and Stated Objectives The fifty-fifth iteration of the premier annual maritime exercise known as Baltic Operations, or BALTOPS 2026, was conducted from June 4 through June 19, 2026, across the geographically critical expanse of the Baltic Sea.26 The massive multilateral exercise mobilized approximately six thousand military personnel and a flotilla of twenty allied warships representing fifteen NATO allied and partner nations.27 Participating nations included the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Poland, Turkey, and the newly integrated Nordic alliance members, Sweden and Finland.28 The stated strategic objectives of the exercise were to demonstrate unwavering European leadership in defending the Baltic body of water, enhance multi-domain interoperability, and project a highly visible, credible deterrence posture against potential Russian aggression on NATO’s Eastern Flank.27

A profound structural milestone was achieved during this iteration of the exercise. For the first time since the year 1972, the command and control of the operation was not held exclusively by the United States 6th Fleet; instead, the exercise was commanded and controlled by the Allied Joint Force Command Brunssum.27 Operating out of the Netherlands, Joint Force Command Brunssum serves as one of NATO’s three operational-level headquarters, responsible for planning and conducting multinational military operations to ensure force readiness across the European theater.28

Tactical Maneuvers, Multi-Domain Integration, and Doctrinal Concepts Over the course of two weeks, the multinational force executed a rigorous spectrum of tactical maneuvers, including amphibious assault operations, coordinated air defense drills, and complex anti-submarine warfare tracking exercises.27 However, a paramount and highly elevated focus was placed on mine countermeasures and the physical protection of critical undersea infrastructure.29 The participating forces conducted extensive operations designed to safeguard vital power grids, subsea telecommunication data cables, and the broader Sea Lines of Communication that form the backbone of economic prosperity and energy security throughout the Baltic region.29

To achieve these objectives, the exercise leaned heavily into the experimentation and operational integration of advanced unmanned systems. The United States Navy’s Unmanned Undersea Vehicle Group One, supported by the Naval Surface Warfare Center Panama City, executed complex multinational harbor protection demonstrations.30 Operating out of the port of Liepaja, Latvia, the group deployed sophisticated Iver3 Unmanned Underwater Vehicles to conduct detailed subsea reconnaissance, route clearance, and anomaly detection.33 These operations were conducted in close tactical coordination with Netherlands Explosive Ordnance Disposal units, Latvian boat crews, and the United States Underwater Construction Team One, demonstrating the capability to rapidly identify and neutralize subsurface explosive threats.30

Lessons Learned and Intelligence Takeaways The successful execution of BALTOPS 2026 under the direct command of Joint Force Command Brunssum represents a highly significant validation of NATO’s evolving command architecture. By shifting the operational control from a national fleet command to an integrated NATO operational-level headquarters, the Alliance has proven its capability to seamlessly absorb, coordinate, and command massive multinational force packages in a highly localized theater of operations. This structural flexibility is an absolute prerequisite for managing the complex logistics and force deployments required in a potential Article 5 collective defense scenario.

Furthermore, the intense operational focus on mine countermeasures and the deployment of unmanned underwater vehicles highlights a sobering intelligence assessment regarding modern maritime vulnerabilities. The destruction of the Nord Stream pipelines in recent years fundamentally altered the threat calculus in the Baltic Sea, demonstrating that strategic sabotage of undersea infrastructure is a highly effective asymmetric warfare tactic. The lessons derived from the harbor protection drills in Latvia indicate that allied navies must aggressively scale their deployment of autonomous subsea sensors and mine-hunting drones. Securing the maritime logistical nodes and the Sea Lines of Communication is essential for enabling the resupply of land forces operating on NATO’s Eastern Flank; without uninterrupted maritime logistics, forward-deployed combat power cannot be sustained.

3.2 Ramstein Flag 26

Participating Forces, Geographic Focus, and Stated Objectives Ramstein Flag 26, characterized as NATO Allied Air Command’s premier live-fly exercise, took place from June 8 to June 19, 2026.35 The exercise constituted the largest and most ambitious air operation in the Alliance’s history, bringing together more than two hundred combat aircraft and support assets from eighteen allied nations.35 Generating over one thousand daily and cumulative sorties, the operational footprint was massive, spanning three distinct Joint Operations Areas that extended from the austere environments of northern Norway and Finland down to the southern reaches of Spain.35 The primary objective was to strengthen collective defense across NATO’s northern flank by executing Integrated Air and Missile Defense operations, testing rapid information sharing, and systematically dismantling simulated Counter Anti-Access/Area Denial networks.35 Command and control of this vast airspace was entrusted to the Combined Air Operations Centre Bodø, located in Norway, which oversaw mission planning and synchronized the daily Air Tasking Orders.35

Tactical Maneuvers, Multi-Domain Integration, and Doctrinal Concepts The defining doctrinal concept tested during Ramstein Flag 26 was Agile Combat Employment, a strategic framework designed to increase the survivability of air assets by dispersing them away from large, centralized airbases toward austere, unpredictable operating locations.35 The most critical manifestation of this doctrine occurred in the municipality of Tervo, Finland, where allied forces utilized a standard civilian highway strip as a forward operating base.35 In a historic milestone, United States Marine Corps F-35B Lightning II fifth-generation stealth fighters successfully executed vertical and short take-offs and landings from the Finnish highway, operating alongside conventional Spanish F/A-18 Hornets and Polish F-16 Fighting Falcons.35 Ground crews conducted rapid “hot-pit” refueling procedures, servicing the aircraft while their engines remained running to minimize turnaround times and maintain high sortie generation rates.40

The exercise also achieved unprecedented levels of multi-domain and airborne command integration. Advanced fifth-generation fighters from Denmark, Italy, Norway, and the United States operated in heavily contested synthetic and live environments, supported by an extensive intelligence and battle management network.35 A NATO E-3A Airborne Warning and Control System aircraft landed in Sweden for the first time in the Alliance’s history, marking a major integration milestone for operations in the High North.35 Concurrently, unmanned intelligence was provided by RQ-4D Phoenix high-altitude remotely piloted aircraft operating from Pirkkala Air Base in Finland, while the United Kingdom’s Carrier Strike Group, centered on the aircraft carrier HMS Prince of Wales, projected maritime-based combat air power into the operational theater.35

Lessons Learned and Intelligence Takeaways The successful execution of highway operations during Ramstein Flag 26 proves that the Agile Combat Employment doctrine is viable for highly complex fifth-generation assets. However, intelligence observations drawn from the exercise indicate that while dispersing aircraft significantly complicates an adversary’s ballistic missile targeting calculus, it simultaneously creates immense logistical vulnerabilities. Sustaining continuous combat sorties from a civilian highway requires a highly agile, vulnerable logistical tail capable of moving aviation fuel, complex munitions, and secure communications infrastructure across contested terrain. The exercise demonstrated that the primary limiting factor for distributed air operations is not the capability of the aircraft, but the survivability and speed of the ground-based resupply networks.

Additionally, the performance of the Combined Air Operations Centre Bodø validates NATO’s decentralized command architecture. Operating less than a year after its formal activation, the command center successfully managed the integration of live combat aircraft, airborne early warning platforms, air-to-air refueling tankers, and synthetic training crews operating in simulators.35 The ability to maintain a common operational picture and seamlessly direct complex kill webs across thousands of miles of airspace—regardless of distance, harsh climate, or domain—proves that the Alliance possesses the command maturity required to fight and win in a severely degraded electronic warfare environment.

3.3 Vigorous Warrior 2026

Participating Forces, Geographic Focus, and Stated Objectives Throughout the month of June 2026, the Baltic nation of Estonia hosted Vigorous Warrior 2026, officially recognized as NATO’s largest and most comprehensive multinational military medical exercise.43 Organized biennially by the NATO Centre of Excellence for Military Medicine in close coordination with the Estonian Defence Forces, the exercise mobilized approximately two thousand military medical professionals, specialized troops, and civilian experts representing thirty-two allied and partner nations.43 The core activities were physically dispersed across the heavily forested terrain of the Harju and Lääne-Viru counties.44 The overarching objective of the operation was to exhaustively test and evaluate the full spectrum of military medical support within a highly realistic, severe-attrition conflict scenario, focusing intensely on multi-national interoperability, medical readiness, and the seamless integration of civilian and military healthcare systems during a regional crisis.43

Tactical Maneuvers, Multi-Domain Integration, and Doctrinal Concepts Vigorous Warrior 2026 discarded the relatively secure medical evacuation models optimized during decades of counter-insurgency operations, instead plunging participants into the grim realities of high-intensity, large-scale combat operations. Operating under extremely variable weather conditions characterized by temperatures dropping to thirteen degrees Celsius and persistent rain, medical personnel were forced to establish and sustain complex Role 2 field hospitals in austere, muddy forest environments.46 For contingents such as the Hungarian Defense Forces Medical Center, the primary mission was to successfully navigate the rigorous evaluation protocols of the NATO MEDEVAL committee to obtain formalized NATO MEDEVAC certification for their Role 2 capabilities.46

The exercise subjected the medical teams to relentless waves of simulated frontline casualties requiring immediate surgical intervention. Personnel were required to rapidly triage, stabilize, and treat an array of devastating combat traumas, including severe hemorrhaging, complex amputations, penetrating abdominal wounds, and chemical poisonings.46 The operational tempo was intentionally chaotic, requiring field surgeons to operate highly realistic anatomical injury simulators while simultaneously managing the rapid transfer of stabilized patients to higher echelons of care via heavily contested evacuation routes.46 Furthermore, the exercise integrated advanced asymmetric threats; specialized Mobile Biological Laboratories were deployed and repeatedly alerted to suspected epidemic outbreaks, requiring teams to conduct rapid environmental sampling, execute complex pathogen identification, and implement strict quarantine protocols in the midst of simulated combat operations.46

Lessons Learned and Intelligence Takeaways The intelligence derived from Vigorous Warrior 2026 highlights a critical, often overlooked vulnerability within modern coalition warfare: the logistical and bureaucratic fragility of multinational medical supply chains. The exercise demonstrated that in a peer-conflict scenario characterized by contested airspace, the “golden hour” for medical evacuation by helicopter is largely obsolete. Forward-deployed Role 2 medical facilities must be prepared to hold, sustain, and treat critically wounded personnel for extended durations, necessitating significantly larger localized stockpiles of blood, oxygen, and surgical supplies.

Furthermore, the rigorous certification process revealed that the primary barriers to effective multinational medical response are not clinical competencies, but procedural discrepancies. Interoperability bottlenecks—specifically the standardization of digital medical documentation, the harmonization of patient hand-over protocols between different national militaries, and the maintenance of secure communications during severe electronic jamming—must be aggressively resolved. The ability to rapidly identify biological agents and manage mass-casualty events without collapsing the localized command structure is a critical force multiplier. Ultimately, the exercise underscores that standardizing battlefield medicine across the Alliance is paramount for sustaining combat power and preserving the morale of frontline combatants during protracted, high-attrition warfare.

3.4 Fleet Exercise (FLEETEX) 250

Participating Forces, Geographic Focus, and Stated Objectives Commencing with allied ship arrivals on June 14 and 15, 2026, and moving into a structured harbor integration phase from June 16 to June 21, Fleet Exercise 250—commonly designated as FLEETEX 250—represented a massive convergence of maritime combat power.49 Following the harbor phase, the exercise extended into an intense at-sea execution phase spanning June 22 through June 29.49 Concentrated primarily around Naval Station Norfolk in Virginia and the expansive operational waters of the Atlantic Ocean, the exercise was commanded by the United States 2nd Fleet.47 The operation brought together a formidable coalition force comprising thirty-one advanced warships, numerous multinational aircraft squadrons, and thousands of personnel representing seventeen allied and partner nations.47 Participating maritime forces included assets from Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Mexico, Morocco, the Netherlands, Norway, and the United Kingdom, among others.48 The stated objectives of the exercise were to test integrated forces in a dynamic, multidomain training environment, build operational cohesiveness, and validate the tactical procedures required to maintain maritime security and stability in the critical Atlantic theater.48

Tactical Maneuvers, Multi-Domain Integration, and Doctrinal Concepts Following the initial harbor phase dedicated to complex planning, pre-sail briefings, and systems integration, the combined fleets deployed into the Atlantic to execute a full spectrum of multidomain naval warfare operations.48 The at-sea execution phase required the multinational armada to conduct synchronized anti-air defense tracking, sophisticated anti-submarine warfare hunting patterns, and large-scale fleet formation maneuvering, all of which culminated in a highly unpredictable, scenario-driven free-play battle problem against a simulated dynamic adversary.48

Simultaneously, the exercise projected significant combat power into the littoral and ground domains, focusing heavily on coalition amphibious operations. At United States Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune in North Carolina, forward-deployed elements executed rigorous integration training. United States Marines from the 1st Battalion, 2nd Marine Regiment, and the 2nd Reconnaissance Battalion conducted complex military operations on urban terrain, live-fire demolition range clearing, and rapid aerial insertion exercises shoulder-to-shoulder with specialized marine infantry units from Spain and France.50

Lessons Learned and Intelligence Takeaways FLEETEX 250 served as a critical operational validation of the “Atlantic Bridge” concept, underscoring the strategic necessity of maintaining an unbroken maritime logistical and combat corridor between North America and Europe. By seamlessly aggregating seventeen diverse national navies under the unified command structure of the United States 2nd Fleet, the exercise proved the Alliance’s capability to rapidly assemble and deploy a lethal, cohesive maritime force in response to emergent threats.

Intelligence observations indicate that as peer adversaries increasingly attempt to contest the Atlantic and threaten the North American homeland with advanced long-range cruise missiles and quiet attack submarines, the ability to rapidly integrate international naval assets into a layered defensive shield serves as a primary strategic deterrent. Furthermore, the ground-level integration of multinational marine forces at Camp Lejeune highlights a continued doctrinal emphasis on contested littoral environments. The seamless execution of urban combat and aerial insertions by a blended force of American, Spanish, and French marines demonstrates that allied amphibious infantry units possess the procedural and linguistic interoperability required to conduct rapid, coordinated expeditionary strikes against fortified coastal objectives.

3.5 Combat Power 26

Participating Forces, Geographic Focus, and Stated Objectives Beginning its initial integration phases on June 15, 2026, and officially scheduled to conduct high-intensity live-fire maneuvers from June 22 through July 3, 2026, the Republic of Croatia is executing Combat Power 26 (Borbena moć 26). This event marks one of the most comprehensive joint military exercises undertaken by the Croatian Armed Forces in recent history. Operations are physically dispersed across several strategic locations, notably the Eugen Kvaternik Training Area near Slunj, the Josip Markić polygon in Knin, airbases in Zemunik and Udbina, and simultaneous maritime operations at the Žirje naval training range. The exercise mobilizes forces from the Croatian Army, Navy, Air Force, and Special Forces Command. The central objective is to validate the combat readiness of Croatia’s newly acquired weapon systems alongside allied and partner forces, demonstrating the military’s capability to execute highly lethal joint operations across the land, air, sea, and cyber domains.

Tactical Maneuvers, Multi-Domain Integration, and Doctrinal ConceptsCombat Power 26 serves as a critical operational testbed for several of Croatia’s most advanced strategic acquisitions. In a historic milestone for the nation’s aviation and precision strike capabilities, the exercise is slated to feature the first coordinated live-fire combat employment of newly acquired Bayraktar uncrewed aerial systems alongside modernized rotary-wing combat support from Kiowa Warrior helicopters and the recently delivered French-manufactured Dassault Rafale multi-role fighter jets.

In the ground domain, mechanized infantry and armored cavalry elements are integrating these aerial fires while utilizing modern, NATO-standard platforms to conduct aggressive maneuvers.53 Building on tactical concepts refined during previous iterations of the exercise, formations equipped with Patria thirty-millimeter Infantry Fighting Vehicles, Bradley Infantry Fighting Vehicles, and self-propelled howitzers are engaging targets to demonstrate overwhelming kinetic effectiveness across a heavily layered, multi-domain airspace.

Lessons Learned and Intelligence Takeaways The ongoing execution of Combat Power 26 signifies a major strategic milestone in the defense revival of the Western Balkans and the broader modernization efforts of NATO’s newer member states.53 The active integration of highly sophisticated fourth-generation Western fighter aircraft alongside modern unmanned strike systems marks a definitive, irreversible break from the region’s historical reliance on legacy Soviet-era equipment.53

The intelligence takeaway is profound: European militaries are not merely acquiring new hardware; they are actively absorbing and operationalizing advanced Western doctrine at an accelerated pace. By bypassing traditional, decades-long procurement timelines to equip their forces with highly effective, asymmetric capabilities like the Bayraktar and advanced fighter platforms, the Croatian military has fundamentally altered its combat potential. Consequently, the execution of this joint exercise signals a substantially enhanced regional deterrence posture, proving that modernized, medium-sized militaries are projecting highly credible, multi-domain combat power in defense of the Alliance’s southeastern flank.

3.6 Eagle Partner 2026

Participating Forces, Geographic Focus, and Stated Objectives From June 17 through June 25, 2026, the Republic of Armenia hosted the Eagle Partner 2026 military exercise. The nine-day operation was primarily conducted at the Zar peacekeeping training center in Armenia. The multilateral exercise brought together personnel from the Armenian Armed Forces Peacekeeping Brigade, the United States Army Europe and Africa, and the Kansas National Guard. Significantly, for the first time in the history of the Eagle Partner series, the exercise expanded its multinational scope to include participating forces from the military branches of France and Greece. The stated objectives of the exercise were to bolster the readiness of Armenia’s peacekeeping unit, increase the level of interoperability among units participating in international peacekeeping missions, and facilitate the exchange of best practices in tactical communication and management.

Tactical Maneuvers, Multi-Domain Integration, and Doctrinal Concepts The exercise heavily emphasized the procedural and tactical alignment necessary for seamless integration into international coalition operations. Operating under the framework of preparing for multinational peacekeeping deployments, Armenian troops trained alongside their American, French, and Greek counterparts in standardized tactical responses, command and control methodologies, and cross-communication protocols. The integration of newly participating European forces required the harmonization of distinct operational doctrines to ensure that diverse units could operate cohesively in complex, stability-focused environments.

Lessons Learned and Intelligence Takeaways The primary intelligence takeaway from Eagle Partner 2026 is rooted in the geopolitical signaling of its participant list. The inclusion of French and Greek armed forces alongside the United States and Armenia marks a deliberate and highly visible expansion of Armenia’s multilateral defense partnerships.

By successfully executing integrated exercises with multiple NATO member states, Armenia is demonstrating a sustained strategic shift toward western military interoperability. This action actively dilutes the nation’s historical reliance on singular regional security architectures and proves that smaller states are prioritizing diversified, broad-based military partnerships to enhance their strategic resilience and capability to participate effectively in global peacekeeping coalitions.


Please share the link on Facebook, Forums, with colleagues, etc. Your support is much appreciated and if you have any feedback, please email us in**@*********ps.com. If you’d like to request a report or order a reprint, please click here for the corresponding page to open in new tab.


Sources Used

  1. Eurosatory 2026 – 6/15/26 – MVG World, accessed June 20, 2026, https://www.mvg-world.com/en/agenda/eurosatory-2026
  2. Eurosatory 2026 | June 15-19 | Paris – Unmanned Systems Technology, accessed June 20, 2026, https://www.unmannedsystemstechnology.com/events/eurosatory/
  3. Eurosatory 2026 | 15-19 June | Paris, France – Defense Advancement, accessed June 20, 2026, https://www.defenseadvancement.com/events/eurosatory/
  4. India puts up strong show at Eurosatory, the world’s largest defence exhibition, accessed June 20, 2026, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/defence/international/india-puts-up-strong-show-at-eurosatory-the-worlds-largest-defence-exhibition/articleshow/131737520.cms
  5. The sights of Eurosatory 2026, from the show floor – Breaking Defense, accessed June 20, 2026, https://breakingdefense.com/2026/06/the-sights-of-eurosatory-2026-from-the-show-floor/
  6. IDV showcases its latest innovations in uncrewed land vehicles and autonomous systems at Eurosatory 2026, accessed June 20, 2026, https://www.idvgroup.com/2026/06/16/idv-showcases-its-latest-innovations-in-uncrewed-land-vehicles-and-autonomous-systems-at-eurosatory-2026/
  7. Eurosatory 2026: Thales launches new RapidStriker mobile C-UAS system – EDR Magazine, accessed June 20, 2026, https://www.edrmagazine.eu/eurosatory-2026-thales-launches-new-rapidstriker-mobile-c-uas-system
  8. Eurosatory 2026 – L3Harris and Skydagger partner to develop C-UAS interceptors, accessed June 20, 2026, https://www.unmannedairspace.info/counter-uas-systems-and-policies/eurosatory-2026-l3harris-and-skydagger-partner-to-develop-c-uas-interceptors/
  9. GDELS en Eurosatory 2026: Preparados para el Cambio – Entrega …, accessed June 20, 2026, https://tedae.org/en/defensa/gdels-en-eurosatory-2026-preparados-para-el-cambio-entrega-a-gran-escala/
  10. EUROSATORY 2026: India’s Mind-Blowing Military Hardware Leaves Rivals In Panic, accessed June 20, 2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w18fxG707xM
  11. Israeli MoD cries foul as Israeli booths ‘boarded up’ at Eurosatory …, accessed June 20, 2026, https://breakingdefense.com/2026/06/israeli-mod-cries-foul-as-israeli-booths-boarded-up-at-eurosatory-defense-show/
  12. IDV showcases the SUPERAV-based VBA and the hybrid-powered CL2X unmanned vehicle at Eurosatory 2026 – Zona Militar, accessed June 20, 2026, https://www.zona-militar.com/en/2026/06/19/idv-showcases-the-superav-based-vba-and-the-hybrid-powered-cl2x-unmanned-vehicle-at-eurosatory-2026/
  13. VisionWave Holdings Makes International Defense Debut at Eurosatory 2026, Unveiling VARAN™ Autonomous Ground System to the World’s Defense Community for the First Time, accessed June 20, 2026, https://www.nasdaq.com/press-release/visionwave-holdings-makes-international-defense-debut-eurosatory-2026-unveiling
  14. GDELS is showcasing new drone defense solutions at Eurosatory, accessed June 20, 2026, https://militaeraktuell.at/en/gdels-is-showcasing-new-drone-defense-solutions-at-eurosatory/
  15. Eurosatory 2026 | Rohde & Schwarz, accessed June 20, 2026, https://www.rohde-schwarz.com/ca/about-us/trade-shows/eurosatory-2026_229402-1611929.html
  16. Skydagger partners with L3Harris to integrate interceptors into VAMPIRE C-UAS system, accessed June 20, 2026, https://www.turkiyetoday.com/nation/skydagger-partners-with-l3harris-to-integrate-interceptors-into-vampire-c-uas-system-3222318
  17. VAMPIRE™ | L3Harris® Fast. Forward., accessed June 20, 2026, https://www.l3harris.com/all-capabilities/vampire
  18. L3Harris Delivering Counter-Drone Systems to US Army, accessed June 20, 2026, https://www.l3harris.com/newsroom/press-release/2026/06/l3harris-delivering-counter-drone-systems-us-army
  19. Rheinmetall unveils CML multi launcher for FV-014 loitering …, accessed June 20, 2026, https://defence-industry.eu/rheinmetall-unveils-cml-multi-launcher-for-fv-014-loitering-munition-with-networked-reconnaissance-and-strike-capability/
  20. Containerised Missile Launcher makes its debut at Eurosatory – Rheinmetall, accessed June 20, 2026, https://www.rheinmetall.com/en/media/news-watch/news/2026/06/2026-06-15-world-premiere-at-eurosatory-rheinmetall-presents-cml-multi-launcher-for-fv-014-loitering-munition
  21. Eurosatory 2026: FV-014 loitering munition system – Rheinmetall, accessed June 20, 2026, https://www.rheinmetall.com/en/media/news-watch/news/2026/06/2026-06-15-rheinmetall-at-eurosatory-fv-014-loitering-munition-system
  22. shownews – Eurosatory 2026: Rheinmetall Unveils Containerized Launcher for the FV-014 Loitering Munition – FW-MAG Future Warfare Magazine, accessed June 20, 2026, https://www.fw-mag.com/shownews/1125/eurosatory-2026-rheinmetall-unveils-containerized-launcher-for-the-fv-014-loitering-munition
  23. Eurosatory 2026: Battlesuite – digital reconnaissance and strike network, accessed June 20, 2026, https://www.rheinmetall.com/en/media/news-watch/news/2026/06/2026-06-15-rheinmetall-battlesuite-the-digital-foundation-for-reconnaissance-and-strike-network-new-at-eurosatory
  24. US Army Europe and Africa leader emphasizes production at speed and scale at Eurosatory 2026, accessed June 20, 2026, https://www.army.mil/article-amp/293325/us_army_europe_and_africa_leader_emphasizes_production_at_speed_and_scale_at_eurosatory_2026
  25. U.S. Army air defenders in Europe highlight the Eastern Flank Deterrence Initiative and innovation at Eurosatory 2026, accessed June 20, 2026, https://www.army.mil/article/293253/u_s_army_air_defenders_in_europe_highlight_the_eastern_flank_deterrence_initiative_and_innovation_at_eurosatory_2026
  26. National Exercises and Activities – Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (SHAPE) – NATO, accessed June 20, 2026, https://shape.nato.int/exercises/allied-national-exercises
  27. BALTOPS 2026 Takes Sail from Gdynia, Poland – US Naval Forces Europe, accessed June 20, 2026, https://www.c6f.navy.mil/Press-Room/News/Article/4508924/baltops-2026-takes-sail-from-gdynia-poland/
  28. BALTOPS 2026 Takes Sail from Gdynia, Poland – Navy.mil, accessed June 20, 2026, https://www.navy.mil/Press-Office/News-Stories/display-news/Article/4509758/baltops-2026-takes-sail-from-gdynia-poland/
  29. BALTOPS 2026 KICKS OFF: WHAT MAKES THE 55TH EDITION DIFFERENT?, accessed June 20, 2026, https://jfcbs.nato.int/page5964943/2026/baltops-2026-kicks-off-what-makes-the-55th-edition-different
  30. Technology plays a Crucial Role in Harbor Defense during BALTOPS 2026 – DVIDS, accessed June 20, 2026, https://www.dvidshub.net/news/printable/567534
  31. Department-Level Exercise (DLE) Series – Air Force, accessed June 20, 2026, https://www.af.mil/DLE/?videoid=1009950&dvpmoduleid=5710&dvpTag=1
  32. Unmanned Undersea Vehicle Group (UUVGRU) 1 conducts UUV operations during BALTOPS 2026 – DVIDS, accessed June 20, 2026, https://www.dvidshub.net/video/1010187/unmanned-undersea-vehicle-group-uuvgru-1-conducts-uuv-operations-during-baltops-2026
  33. Unmanned Undersea Vehicle Group (UUVGRU) 1 conducts UUV operations during BALTOPS 2026 [Image 1 of 7] – DVIDS, accessed June 20, 2026, https://www.dvidshub.net/image/9736153/unmanned-undersea-vehicle-group-uuvgru-1-conducts-uuv-operations-during-baltops-2026
  34. Unmanned Undersea Vehicle Group (UUVGRU) 1 conducts UUV operations during BALTOPS 2026 [Image 4 of 6] – DVIDS, accessed June 20, 2026, https://www.dvidshub.net/image/9745075/unmanned-undersea-vehicle-group-uuvgru-1-conducts-uuv-operations-during-baltops-2026
  35. NATO’s Ramstein Flag 26 ends after testing Allied air power across …, accessed June 20, 2026, https://defence-industry.eu/natos-ramstein-flag-26-ends-after-testing-allied-air-power-across-europe-from-northern-norway-to-southern-spain-over-two-weeks/
  36. Ramstein Flag 2026: NATO Launches Its Biggest Air Exercise Ever, accessed June 20, 2026, https://migflug.com/jetflights/ramstein-flag-2026-nato-biggest-air-exercise/
  37. Ramstein Flag 26 Demonstrates Agile Combat Employment Across NATO’s Northern Flank, accessed June 20, 2026, https://ac.nato.int/archive/2026/ramstein-flag-26-demonstrates-agile-combat-employment-across-northern-flank.aspx
  38. U.S. Air National Guard brings tactical airlift, bilateral training to NATO’s Ramstein Flag 2026, accessed June 20, 2026, https://ac.nato.int/archive/2026/us-air-national-guard-brings-tactical-airlift–bilateral-training-to-natos-ramstein-flag-26.aspx
  39. CAOC Bodø Leads NATO’s Most Ambitious Ramstein Flag, accessed June 20, 2026, https://ac.nato.int/archive/2026/caoc–leads-nato-ramstein-flag.aspx
  40. Ramstein Flag 26 strengthened Nordic Air Power as part of NATO – Ilmavoimat, accessed June 20, 2026, https://ilmavoimat.fi/en/-/ramstein-flag-26-strengthened-nordic-air-power-as-part-of-nato
  41. News – Liberty Wing strengthens NATO Alliance at Ramstein Flag 26, accessed June 20, 2026, https://www.dvidshub.net/news/568242/liberty-wing-strengthens-nato-alliance-ramstein-flag-26
  42. Stronger Together: RAF Personnel Deliver NATO Air Power from Land and Sea, accessed June 20, 2026, https://www.raf.mod.uk/news/articles/stronger-together-raf-personnel-deliver-nato-air-power-from-land-and-sea/
  43. NATO’s Largest Military Medical Exercise Vigorous Warrior 2026 Concludes in Estonia – Estonian Defence Forces, accessed June 20, 2026, https://mil.ee/en/news/natos-largest-military-medical-exercise-vigorous-warrior-2026-concludes-in-estonia/
  44. Estonia to host large-scale NATO medical exercise this month – news | ERR, accessed June 20, 2026, https://news.err.ee/1610047807/estonia-to-host-large-scale-nato-medical-exercise-this-month
  45. One of NATO’s largest medical exercises, Vigorous Warrior 2026, to take place in Estonia, accessed June 20, 2026, https://mil.ee/en/news/one-of-natos-largest-medical-exercises-vigorous-warrior-2026-to-take-place-in-estonia/
  46. Military Medics Put to the Test in Major NATO Exercise, accessed June 20, 2026, https://hungarytoday.hu/military-medics-put-to-the-test-in-major-nato-exercise/
  47. U.S. 2nd Fleet, International Partners Commence Fleet Exercise 250 – Department of War, accessed June 20, 2026, https://www.war.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/4518474/us-2nd-fleet-international-partners-commence-fleet-exercise-250/
  48. International partners join U.S. 2nd fleet for maritime exercises, accessed June 20, 2026, https://homelandprepnews.com/stories/84389-international-partners-join-u-s-2nd-fleet-for-maritime-exercises/
  49. U.S. 2nd Fleet and International Partners Commence Fleet Exercise 250 – Navy.mil, accessed June 20, 2026, https://www.navy.mil/Press-Office/News-Stories/display-news/Article/4517023/us-2nd-fleet-and-international-partners-commence-fleet-exercise-250/
  50. Fleet Exercise 250 | Spanish and French marines conduct aerial insert [Image 5 of 9] – DVIDS, accessed June 20, 2026, https://www.dvidshub.net/image/9761891/fleet-exercise-250-spanish-and-french-marines-conduct-aerial-insert
  51. Fleet Exercise 250 | Demolition Range [Image 6 of 11], accessed June 20, 2026, https://www.dvidshub.net/image/9760311/fleet-exercise-250-demolition-range
  52. Fleet Exercise 250 | Marines with V1/2 conduct urban terrain training with Spanish and French marines, accessed June 20, 2026, https://www.dvidshub.net/image/9760277/fleet-exercise-250-marines-with-v1-2-conduct-urban-terrain-training-with-spanish-and-french-marines
  53. Legacy factories, new tech: the Western Balkans defence revival | DSEI Gateway, accessed June 20, 2026, https://dsei-gateway.com/en/news/features/legacy-factories-new-tech-the-western-balkans-defence-revival/

Modernizing the Bundeswehr Small Arms: Insights from ILA Berlin 2026

1. Executive Summary

The International Aerospace Exhibition (ILA) Berlin 2026 serves as an indicator for measuring shifting operational priorities and procurement strategies within European defense architectures. While historically focused on commercial aviation and large-scale military aerospace platforms, the 2026 iteration reflects a systemic expansion into ground combat lethality, dismounted infantry systems, and cross-domain operational integration.1 Driven by Germany’s Zeitenwende—a major policy shift initiated in 2022 to increase national defense spending and modernize the Bundeswehr—the exhibition highlights an overhaul of the German military’s small arms arsenal and associated infantry support systems.1

This report provides a technical, mechanical, and strategic analysis of the small arms, infantry equipment, and specialized tactical networks displayed and discussed at ILA Berlin 2026. The analysis identifies three primary trajectories currently defining modern small arms development and procurement. First, the generational replacement of Germany’s standard and specialized infantry weapons is underway, transitioning the armed forces from aging legacy platforms to the Heckler & Koch G95 series assault rifles, the G210 precision marksman rifles, and the CZ P13 and Walther P14 secondary sidearms. Second, there is an industry-wide push for the integration of kinetic Counter-Unmanned Aerial Systems (C-UAS) at the tactical echelons, manifesting in computerized fire control sights, programmable fragmentation ammunition, and automated multi-barrel shotgun turrets.3 Third, the continued digitization of the dismounted soldier remains a priority, realized through programs such as the Infantry Soldier of the Future – Enhanced System (IdZ-ES) and the fielding of advanced laser-light modules.6

The responses from European and international defense manufacturers demonstrate a shift away from isolated firearm development. Instead, the industry is moving toward networked infantry systems designed to operate and survive in drone-heavy and electronically degraded environments.

2. Strategic Context: The Zeitenwende and the Evolution of Infantry Systems at ILA Berlin

The operational and strategic backdrop of ILA Berlin 2026 is defined by the ongoing war in Ukraine, tensions in the Middle East, and the Federal Republic of Germany’s ambition to establish itself as the conventional military backbone of European defense.1 The event hosted more than 750 exhibitors from 37 countries, featuring significant participation from international defense sectors, including a prominent Israeli national pavilion following a year of record-breaking total Israeli defense exports surpassing $19 billion.1

2.1 The Expansion into Ground and Cross-Domain Defense Networks

While historically focused on civilian aviation, space exploration, and large-scale military aerospace, ILA Berlin has evolved to reflect multi-domain warfare. The establishment of the Military Support Center (MSC) and the institutional presence of the German Federal Office of Bundeswehr Equipment, Information Technology and In-Service Support (BAAINBw) underscore the integration of ground forces into the broader aerospace narrative.2

Modern threat scenarios have blurred the traditional demarcations between the ground and air domains. Dismounted infantry squads, mechanized units, and logistics convoys are routinely targeted by airborne loitering munitions, micro-drones, and First-Person View (FPV) kamikaze systems, necessitating the deployment of organic, squad-level air defense capabilities.10 Consequently, the small arms displayed at the exhibition are assessed heavily on their capacity to interface with digital battlefield networks, host advanced electro-optics, and effectively defeat low-altitude aerial threats.3

2.2 Industrial Revitalization and Defense Spending

The influx of capital resulting from the Zeitenwende and the €100 billion special defense fund has accelerated procurement timelines and stimulated the domestic defense industrial base. Heckler & Koch, headquartered in Oberndorf am Neckar, spent a decade operating with struggling profitability.12

However, recent financial reports indicate that incoming orders in the first half of the year rose by 42.8 percent, reaching a volume of €282.5 million, while overall turnover increased to €179.5 million.12 This recovery is linked to the supply of the new HK416 A8 assault rifle to the Bundeswehr, as well as supplementary orders for submachine guns and machine guns from domestic and international entities.12 This financial stability ensures that the primary provider of German infantry weapons maintains the capital necessary for continued research and manufacturing.

3. System Sturmgewehr Bundeswehr: The Heckler & Koch G95 Series

The most significant small arms procurement program for the German Armed Forces is the System Sturmgewehr Bundeswehr (Bundeswehr Assault Rifle System). This program is tasked with the significant logistical challenge of replacing the legacy Heckler & Koch G36 assault rifle. Following a protracted procurement process that initially saw the C.G. Haenel MK556 selected before being disqualified over patent infringement disputes, Heckler & Koch secured the contract with their HK416 A8 platform.13

At ILA Berlin 2026, the finalized configurations of these rifles—officially designated by the military as the G95A1 and G95KA1—were central to discussions regarding future infantry lethality. The total contract encompasses the procurement of 118,718 rifles at an initial cost of approximately €209 million.14

3.1 Technical Architecture and Mechanical Specifications

The core architecture of the G95 series relies on a short-stroke gas piston operating system, which serves as its primary mechanical differentiator from the direct impingement (DI) system found in traditional U.S. AR-15 variants.15 The HK416 A8’s gas piston design utilizes expanding gases to drive a solid operating rod rearward, cycling the weapon. This mechanism keeps hot gas and fouling particulate matter away from the internal action, providing advantages in ease of maintenance and overall reliability during high-volume firing schedules or suppressed operations.15

The Bundeswehr is procuring the rifle system in two primary barrel lengths to satisfy differing operational requirements:

  • G95A1: The standard-issue infantry rifle, featuring a 16.5-inch barrel designed to maximize the ballistic coefficient and terminal velocity of the 5.56x45mm NATO cartridge for line infantry units.15
  • G95KA1: A compact carbine variant featuring a shorter 14-inch barrel, tailored specifically for mechanized infantry, airborne units, and specialized rear-echelon personnel who require a more maneuverable platform.15

An ergonomic evolution specific to the A8 variant is the inclusion of an ambidextrous fire selector lever configuration with an angle that mimics legacy Heckler & Koch platforms like the G36 and the MP5.14 This minimizes the retraining burden for personnel transitioning from the G36.14

SpecificationHeckler & Koch G95A1Heckler & Koch G95KA1
Platform BaseHeckler & Koch HK416 A8Heckler & Koch HK416 A8
Caliber5.56x45mm NATO5.56x45mm NATO
Operating SystemShort-stroke gas piston, rotating boltShort-stroke gas piston, rotating bolt
Barrel Length16.5 inches (419 mm)14.0 inches (355 mm)
Primary Combat OpticELCAN SpecterDR 1-4xELCAN SpecterDR 1-4x
Total Procurement VolumePart of 118,718 total riflesPart of 118,718 total rifles

Data compiled from Bundeswehr procurement records, testing documentation, and manufacturer specifications.15

3.2 Testing Protocols, Climate Validation, and Overcoming the G36 Legacy

The legacy G36 rifle reportedly suffered from point-of-impact shifts when subjected to extreme environmental heat, largely attributed to its polymer trunnion design. Consequently, defense authorities demanded high reliability from the successor platform.

In late 2022, defense authorities faced scrutiny after reportedly modifying the testing requirements to accelerate the fielding process, initially allowing testing in controlled laboratory environments using commercial-grade ammunition.15 A leaked classified report in early 2024 revealed that under these laboratory conditions, the weapon failed to provide sufficient accuracy parameters when loaded with combat ammunition.15

To validate the platform for global deployment, the Bundeswehr executed environmental stress tests facilitated by the United States Army.15 Test configurations of both variants were subjected to extreme arid conditions and abrasive dust at the Yuma Proving Ground (YPG) in Arizona, followed by evaluation at a Panamanian testing facility utilized by the U.S. Army Tropic Regions Test Center (TRTC) to assess performance in hot and humid jungle environments.15 Feedback from German personnel overseeing the trials indicated that the weapon systems functioned reliably in both environments, validating the HK416 A8’s thermal stability.15

3.3 Optic Integration, Handguards, and Modularity

The standard combat optic selected for the G95 series is the ELCAN SpecterDR 1-4x, allowing soldiers to switch between a 1x magnification red dot for close-quarters battle and a 4x magnified reticle for positive target identification.15 German Special Operations Command (KSK) utilizes a slightly different setup for their older G95 (HK416 A7) variants, preferring a non-magnifying EOTech EXPS3 holographic sight paired with a flip-to-side G33 1-3x magnifier.15

During testing in Panama, G95 rifles were observed configured with handguards utilizing the M-LOK accessory attachment system developed by Magpul, diverging from the proprietary HKey attachment system depicted in earlier promotional imagery.15 The presence of M-LOK indicates a shift toward a more universal, NATO-compatible accessory ecosystem for rapid integration of tactical lights and laser modules.15

4. Precision and Specialized Firepower: Snipers and Subcompacts

While the G95 addresses baseline requirements, specialized units require platforms tailored to specific tactical envelopes, including precision marksman roles, long-range interdiction, and acoustically mitigated operations.

4.1 The G210 Semi-Automatic Sniper Rifle (MR308A6)

To replace aging precision rifles in the short-to-medium range engagement envelope, the Bundeswehr selected the Heckler & Koch MR308A6, officially designated as the G210.17 Chambered in 7.62x51mm NATO, the G210 provides a ballistic advantage over 5.56mm platforms in kinetic energy transfer and effective range.17

The G210 features a 16.75-inch barrel and weighs approximately 4.4 kg without a loaded magazine.17 A key ergonomic upgrade specific to the A6 variant is the relocation of the charging handle to the side of the weapon, allowing operators to manipulate the action without breaking their cheek weld or encountering obstruction from sniper optics.17 The Bundeswehr contract dictates the delivery of up to 500 G210 systems dedicated to special forces, with fielding scheduled to begin in 2025.17

4.2 The G39 SD Suppressed Assault Rifle (HK437)

For direct action operations requiring a minimal acoustic and visual signature, the Bundeswehr contracted the Heckler & Koch HK437, officially designated as the G39 SD.17 This platform represents a notable doctrinal shift for German special operations, moving away from legacy 9x19mm submachine guns like the MP5SD toward the specialized.300 Blackout (7.62x35mm) cartridge.21

The G39 SD features a compact 9-inch barrel and utilizes an indirect gas-operated rotating bolt system.20 The.300 Blackout chambering offers dual-role capability. With 220-grain subsonic ammunition, the projectile avoids the supersonic ballistic crack, yielding acoustic mitigation similar to an MP5SD but with roughly double the muzzle energy (approximately 742 Joules versus 380 Joules).21 Operators can transition to high-velocity supersonic ammunition by changing the magazine, converting the weapon into a combat rifle capable of defeating body armor at intermediate ranges.21

Bar graph comparing subsonic muzzle energy for small arms systems

4.3 Long-Range Interdiction: G22A2 and G29 Bolt-Action Systems

Long-range precision is maintained by specialized bolt-action platforms. The German military tested the Accuracy International G22A2 and C.G. Haenel G29 sniper rifles alongside the G95 at the Panamanian facility.15

The G22A2, chambered in.300 Winchester Magnum, is a modernized variant of the standard Bundeswehr sniper rifle. The G29, chambered in.338 Lapua Magnum, serves as a medium-to-long-range anti-personnel and light anti-materiel platform.15 Subjecting these precision instruments to high humidity ensures that their tight tolerances and optical clarity remain functional in harsh environments.

5. Squad-Level Suppression: Machine Guns and Tactical Enhancements

A critical component of infantry maneuver warfare is the ability to establish suppressive fire. The Bundeswehr’s modernization extends to squad automatic weapons and general-purpose machine guns (GPMGs).

5.1 The MG4 and MG5 Systems

To replace the aging MG3, the Bundeswehr has invested in the Heckler & Koch MG4 and MG5 belt-fed machine guns. Both platforms were subjected to rigorous climate testing in Panama and Arizona.15

The MG4 is a light machine gun (LMG) chambered in 5.56x45mm NATO, designed for a single soldier to provide suppressive fire while sharing ammunition commonality with the G95.15 The MG5, chambered in 7.62x51mm NATO, operates as a medium machine gun fired from a bipod, tripod, or vehicle mount, delivering sustained heavy fire.15

5.2 FN Herstal Innovations: MAG Tactical Kits and the Minimi Mk3

FN Herstal unveiled a Tactical Modernization Kit for the legacy FN MAG 7.62mm GPMG, focusing on modernized accessory rails, improved bipod mechanisms, and adjustable buttstocks.24 The company also highlighted the Minimi Mk3 light machine gun, incorporating an adjustable stock with a hydraulic buffer to mitigate felt recoil and a feed tray designed for easier reloading.24

6. The New Sidearm Paradigm: System Pistole Querschnittlich and Spezialkräfte

A comprehensive modernization strategy requires addressing secondary weapon systems. The German military has initiated a complete replacement of its handgun inventory across both general-issue and specialized echelons, phasing out older hammer-fired platforms for modern, striker-fired, optics-ready systems.

6.1 The Standard Service Pistol: CZ P13 (P-10C OR)

The Bundeswehr has officially selected the 9mm CZ P-10C OR (Optics Ready) from Czech manufacturer Česká zbrojovka to serve as the new standard-issue secondary weapon, designated as the P13. This decision marks a historic shift, representing the first time in decades the German military has selected a standard-issue firearm not manufactured domestically.26 The striker-fired P13 will replace the legacy Heckler & Koch P8 and P8A1 models across the general forces. The framework contract accommodates the procurement of up to 200,000 pistols, which feature a Flat Dark Earth (FDE) finish and a slide cut to directly host a red-dot optic, reflecting the broader military trend toward pistol-mounted optics.

6.2 System Pistole Spezialkräfte: The Walther P14 and P14K

For the elite echelons of the German military, Carl Walther GmbH secured the System Pistole Spezialkräfte framework contract.26 The procurement targets the Special Forces Command (KSK), Naval Special Forces Command (KSM), and specialized military police units.29

The selected sidearms, designated as the P14 and P14K, are military variants of Walther’s Performance Duty Pistol (PDP).29 The Bundeswehr intends to procure 3,200 units of the full-size P14 and 3,300 units of the compact P14K.29 A mechanical characteristic of both models is the integration of Walther’s Performance Duty Trigger (PDT), engineered for a consistent 2,200-gram pull weight with a short reset, minimizing sight movement during the trigger press.29

6.3 Standardized Optics Integration and Suppressor Capabilities

The P13 and P14 programs represent a doctrinal shift by mandating slide-mounted red dot optics. The Walther P14 pistols are factory-milled to accept the Aimpoint ACRO P-2, an enclosed-emitter reflex sight resistant to environmental debris.27 To ensure redundancy, the pistols are fitted with suppressor-height iron sights for a lower one-third co-witness through the optic window.31 The threaded barrels (1/2″-28 UNEF) accommodate B&T Impuls-XM suppressors without requiring armorer modification.27

7. Target Acquisition and Digital Integration: The Rifle as a Sensor Node

A modern assault rifle is treated as a modular platform and a sensor node that relies on peripheral electronic enablers.

7.1 The Rheinmetall LLM-VarioRay

In conjunction with the G95 rifle rollout, BAAINBw finalized a follow-on order for Rheinmetall’s LLM-VarioRay Laser-Light-Modules, securing advanced tactical targeting systems for frontline soldiers through 2032.6

The LLM-VarioRay weighs approximately 250 grams and mounts to the G95A1’s STANAG 4694 rails.6 The module houses four selectable illumination and targeting capabilities:

  1. White Light LED: For close-quarters illumination.6
  2. Red-Light Laser Marker: Provides a visible aiming point.6
  3. Infrared (IR) Laser Marker: An aiming laser visible only through night vision devices (NVDs).6
  4. Focusable IR Illuminator: Acts as an invisible spotlight for NVD operations.6

The module features a factory-aligned internal laser block, allowing armorers to zero the primary optic and all laser systems simultaneously, reducing maintenance downtime.6

7.2 Network-Centric Infantry: IdZ-ES and Gladius

Rheinmetall’s presence at ILA 2026 underscored its focus on soldier systems through the Infanterist der Zukunft – Erweitertes System (IdZ-ES) program.6 BAAINBw awarded Rheinmetall a €1.04 billion order to deliver 237 additional IdZ-ES platoon systems between November 2027 and December 2029.7 This equips an additional 8,600 soldiers, bringing the Bundeswehr total to 353 fully digitized platoon systems.7

The IdZ-ES is a battle management system that networks the infantryman into the larger tactical picture.7 It digitally integrates the weapon’s LLM-VarioRay, thermal optics, and helmet-mounted displays, allowing leaders to share target data, designate threat sectors, and coordinate fires in real-time.

8. The Counter-UAS (C-UAS) Revolution in Infantry Arms

The threat posed by Class 1 Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) has prompted the defense industry to adapt standard infantry small arms to serve as localized C-UAS effectors.3

8.1 Smart Shooter SMASH Fire Control Systems

The SMASH family of computerized fire control systems by Smart Shooter utilizes integrated electro-optical sensors and image processing to detect, track, and lock onto small, fast-moving drones.3 Once the operator pulls the trigger, the system interrupts the firing sequence until its algorithms determine a guaranteed ballistic intercept, factoring in target speed, distance, and windage.36

The Bundeswehr has procured SMASH X4 and SMASH 3000SA systems to mount on rifles such as the G95K and G27P, transforming standard riflemen into mobile anti-aircraft assets.37

8.2 Programmable Fragmentation: Swiss P SHATTER4K Ammunition

Ammunition manufacturer Swiss P introduced the SHATTER4K cartridge to address the terminal ballistics of drone defense.5 Available in 5.56x45mm and 7.62x51mm, it requires no weapon modifications.5 The primary mechanical advantage of the SHATTER4K is a specialized polymer shell that separates after exiting the muzzle, releasing four lead effectors that travel in an expanding conical spread.5 When fired from a 5.56mm platform, the effectors exit at approximately 960 meters per second, delivering 267 Joules of energy per ball at close range to shatter drone components.40

8.3 High-Volume Kinetic Walls: The Beretta LIVET RCWS

For base defense against drone swarms, Beretta Defense Technologies showcased the LIVET Remote Controlled Weapon Station.4 The automated turret mounts eight Benelli M4 Drone Guardian semi-automatic shotguns onto a sensorized chassis, utilizing radar or electro-optical sensors to automatically track and engage targets.4 Firing 12-gauge Norma AD-LER tungsten shot at 405 meters per second, the system creates a dense pattern of heavy fragmentation, sustaining high rates of fire against coordinated swarm attacks without requiring immediate reloading.4

8.4 Hybrid Counter-UAS Systems: MBDA DEWS-L and DEFENDAIR

At ILA Berlin 2026, MBDA presented a hybrid air defense system that bridges the gap between infantry small arms and heavy surface-to-air missiles.35 The system integrates a high-energy laser weapon (DEWS-L) with the DEFENDAIR guided missile on a single anti-drone platform.35 This provides overlapping engagement envelopes: the laser offers a highly cost-effective, deep-magazine capability to neutralize close-range micro-drones and swarms, while the interceptor missile addresses larger, faster threats at greater distances.35

9. Heavy Infantry Firepower: Shoulder-Launched Systems and Smart Optics

The requirement for infantry to organically defeat fortified structures and armor remains critical.

9.1 The Dynamit Nobel Defence RGW110 HH-T

Developed by Dynamit Nobel Defence (DND), the RGW110 HH-T (High Explosive Anti-Tank / High Explosive Squash Head – Tandem) is the successor to the Panzerfaust 3.25 Operating as a recoilless grenade weapon, the RGW110 scales the existing RGW series up to a 110mm caliber.44

Weighing approximately 10 kg, the system is roughly 4 kg lighter than the Panzerfaust 3, reducing the physical burden while firing a tandem warhead capable of defeating up to 1,000 mm of rolled homogeneous armor (RHA).25 The system boasts an effective combat range of up to 800 meters and is designed to be fired from within enclosures (FFE).25 Hungary has secured a contract for the RGW110 to equip its modernizing forces.25

9.2 Precision Guided Infantry Weapons: MBDA Enforcer and HENSOLDT Dynahawk

The Bundeswehr utilizes the MBDA Enforcer (designated leichte Wirkmittel 1800+) as a lightweight, precision-guided, shoulder-launched missile system designed for engaging lightly armored targets at extended ranges. To maximize the first-round hit probability of both the Enforcer and the Dynamit Nobel RGW90 (Wirkmittel 90), the Bundeswehr recently finalized follow-on orders for the HENSOLDT Dynahawk fire control sight. The Dynahawk features a 5.5x optical magnification, an integrated laser rangefinder, and an environmental sensor suite (measuring temperature, air pressure, and angular rate). The sight’s ballistics computer automatically recognizes the loaded ammunition type and calculates the required ballistic offset, allowing for accuracy against both static and moving targets, as well as the programming of airburst munitions.

10. Airborne Small Arms Integration: Airbus H145M and the HForce System

The integration of small arms and medium-caliber automatic weapons onto light aviation assets bridges the gap between infantry maneuver tactics and close air support.

10.1 The H145M Light Combat Helicopter

The exhibition featured the Airbus H145M Light Combat Helicopter (LKH). The German armed forces ordered 82 units, with 72 destined for Army Aviation and 10 allocated to Luftwaffe special operations.49 The combat efficacy relies on traditional infantry-support calibers integrated via the Airbus HForce weapons management system.51

The modular HForce system allows the helicopter to attach specialized forward-firing gun pods:50

  • FN Herstal HMP400 Pod: Houses an FN M3P 12.7x99mm (.50 BMG) heavy machine gun, providing a rate of fire of 1,100 rounds per minute for anti-personnel suppression.52
  • Nexter NC621 Pod: Houses a 20x102mm cannon, firing at 800 rounds per minute to defeat light armored vehicles.52

Migrating heavy machine guns onto rotary-wing platforms delivers concentrated suppression from the vertical axis, supporting dismounted infantry elements on the ground.

11. Lessons Learned and Future Trajectories

The hardware, digital systems, and combat platforms displayed at ILA Berlin 2026 illustrate several actionable lessons absorbed by Western militaries.

First, military procurement processes must mandate rigorous environmental testing prior to fielding. The desert trials at Yuma Proving Ground and the tropical trials in Panama for the G95 series highlight a strict requirement that platforms must function flawlessly in deployment environments, rather than relying solely on laboratory parameters.

Second, infantry elements are adapting to serve as their own organic air defense. The proliferation of systems like the Smart Shooter SMASH sight, the Swiss P SHATTER4K fragmenting ammunition, and the Beretta LIVET shotgun turret demonstrate that kinetic small arms augmented with smart sensors are currently a viable defense against low-cost drone swarms.

Finally, hardware modularity and comprehensive digital integration are foundational requirements. Whether integrating M-LOK accessory rails or investing in the IdZ-ES soldier network, the modern firearm is increasingly viewed as the kinetic end-effector of a broader digital combat matrix, retooling small arms to meet complex multi-domain requirements.


Please share the link on Facebook, Forums, with colleagues, etc. Your support is much appreciated and if you have any feedback, please email us in**@*********ps.com. If you’d like to request a report or order a reprint, please click here for the corresponding page to open in new tab.


Sources Used

  1. Israel’s war-tested weapons are becoming Europe’s new obsession | The Jerusalem Post, accessed June 16, 2026, https://www.jpost.com/defense-and-tech/article-899072
  2. Defence | ILA Berlin, accessed June 16, 2026, https://www.ila-berlin.de/en/segmente/defence
  3. Drohnenschutz: SMASH DOME kombiniert Erkennung & Abwehr – CPM Defence Network, accessed June 16, 2026, https://defence-network.com/drohnenschutz-smash-dome-erkennung-und-abwehr/
  4. Eight Shotgun Barrels, One Turret: BDT Unveils Automated C-UAS Station | thefirearmblog.com, accessed June 16, 2026, https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/eight-shotgun-barrels-one-turret-bdt-unveils-automated-c-uas-station-44828611
  5. SHATTER4K — SwissP – a drone, accessed June 16, 2026, https://swiss-p.com/en/shatter4k
  6. Securing the Night: Bundeswehr Locks in Multi-Million Euro …, accessed June 16, 2026, https://www.defencestar.in/military/army/rheinmetall-wins-bundeswehr-order-laser-sight-for-german-military-assault-rifle/11660/
  7. Billion-euro contract for Rheinmetall: Bundeswehr calls off further IdZ-ES soldier-systems, accessed June 16, 2026, https://www.edrmagazine.eu/billion-euro-contract-for-rheinmetall-bundeswehr-calls-off-further-idz-es-soldier-systems
  8. In Berlin Four CCAs Face Off For Germany – Drone News & DJI Rumors, accessed June 16, 2026, https://dronexl.co/2026/06/14/berlin-four-ccas-face-germany/
  9. ILA Berlin 2026 Brings Leading International Expertise to the Stage, accessed June 16, 2026, https://ila-berlin.de/en/press/ila-berlin-2026-brings-leading-international-expertise-stage
  10. ILA 2026: Rheinmetall showcases its cutting-edge Skyranger air defence system, accessed June 16, 2026, https://www.rheinmetall.com/en/media/news-watch/news/2026/06/2026-06-10-rheinmetall-showcases-its-cutting-edge-skyranger-air-defence-system-at-ila-2026
  11. Smash – IEA Mil-Optics, accessed June 16, 2026, https://i-e-a.de/en/Daytime-Optics/Smart-Shooter/Smash/
  12. Heckler & Koch: Boom in orders and financial recovery – Aerospace & Defence, accessed June 16, 2026, https://www.aerospace-and-defence.com/heckler-koch-order-boom-financial-recovery-a-5f19d128c013189f58daa259e6e116e3/
  13. Here Is The Surprise Choice To Become Germany’s Standard Assault Rifle – The War Zone, accessed June 16, 2026, https://www.twz.com/36433/here-is-the-suprise-choice-to-become-germanys-standard-assault-rifle
  14. HK416 Finally Looks Set To Become Germany’s Next Service Rifle – The War Zone, accessed June 16, 2026, https://www.twz.com/the-hk416-finally-looks-set-to-be-germanys-next-standard-rifle
  15. Germany’s New HK416 Service Rifles Appear At Panama Test Site, accessed June 16, 2026, https://www.twz.com/news-features/germanys-new-hk416-service-rifles-appear-at-panama-test-site
  16. First G95A1 Carbines Enter Service with the Bundeswehr – MILMAG, accessed June 16, 2026, https://milmag.pl/en/first-g95a1-carbines-enter-service-with-the-bundeswehr/
  17. German Bundeswehr Selects Heckler & Koch MR308A6 as G210 Sniper Rifle, accessed June 16, 2026, https://soldiersystems.net/2024/08/29/german-bundeswehr-selects-heckler-koch-mr308a6-as-g210-sniper-rifle/
  18. German Army Selects Heckler & Koch’s MR308A6 for Special Forces Sniper Rifle Contract, accessed June 16, 2026, https://www.israeldefense.co.il/en/node/63046
  19. Heckler & Koch secures contract to supply new sniper rifle to German Armed Forces, accessed June 16, 2026, https://defence-industry.eu/heckler-koch-secures-contract-to-supply-new-sniper-rifle-to-german-armed-forces/
  20. HK437 – Heckler & Koch, accessed June 16, 2026, https://www.heckler-koch.com/en/Products/Military%20and%20Law%20Enforcement/Assault%20rifles/HK437
  21. A visit to Heckler & Koch, the new HK437 assault rifle in .300 Blackout caliber | all4shooters, accessed June 16, 2026, https://www.all4shooters.com/en/shooting/pro-zone/heckler-koch-the-new-hk437-assault-rifle-in-300-blackout-caliber-for-law-enforcement-and-special-forces/
  22. Heckler & Koch HK433 – Wikipedia, accessed June 16, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heckler_%26_Koch_HK433
  23. 24 – 26 FEBRUARY 2025 | NUREMBERG, GERMANY – CPM Defence Network, accessed June 16, 2026, https://defence-network.com/wp-content/uploads/cpmFORUM_SA_EnforceTac_RZ-4.pdf
  24. FN Herstal News – TURDEF, accessed June 16, 2026, https://turdef.com/tag/fn-herstal
  25. RGW110 HH-T: The Hungarians are the first – SPARTANAT.com, accessed June 16, 2026, https://spartanat.com/en/rgw110-hh-t-die-ungarn-sind-die-ersten
  26. List of modern equipment of the German Army – Wikipedia, accessed June 16, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_modern_equipment_of_the_German_Army
  27. Оживляясь:: nikolaj_s — LiveJournal, accessed June 16, 2026, https://nikolaj-s.livejournal.com/2433636.html
  28. Walther wins German Special Forces Tender, accessed June 16, 2026, https://carl-walther.com/defense/news/spezialkraefte-ausschreibung
  29. Walther P14 & P14K: New Sidearms for German KSK & KSM – Lowready Magazine, accessed June 16, 2026, https://lowreadymagazine.com/en/articles/modern-concepts-service-handguns-p14
  30. Walther PDP – Wikipedia, accessed June 16, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walther_PDP
  31. Walther P14: German Special Forces Duty Pistol with Factory Compensator at Enforce Tac 2026 – Rifle Configurator, accessed June 16, 2026, https://www.rifleconfigurator.com/articles/walther-p14-enforce-tac-2026
  32. Walther P14 and P14K: the new service pistols for the German special forces – Video presentation | all4shooters, accessed June 16, 2026, https://www.all4shooters.com/en/shooting/pistols/walther-p-14-and-p-14-k-of-the-german-armed-forces-all-details-and-video-of-shooting/
  33. Rheinmetall lands $1.2 billion German future soldier contract – Breaking Defense, accessed June 16, 2026, https://breakingdefense.com/2026/04/rheinmetall-lands-1-2-billion-german-future-soldier-contract/
  34. Rheinmetall Gladius Light – special networking for special operations forces – MILMAG, accessed June 16, 2026, https://milmag.pl/en/rheinmetall-gladius-light-special-networking-for-special-operations-forces/
  35. MBDA showcases hybrid high-energy laser, interceptor counter-drone system, accessed June 16, 2026, https://breakingdefense.com/2026/06/mbda-showcases-hybrid-high-energy-laser-interceptor-counter-drone-system/
  36. Smart Shooter to provide Israel’s Defense Ministry anti-drone SMASH Hopper, accessed June 16, 2026, https://www.jpost.com/defense-and-tech/article-896928
  37. Smart Shooter to Supply SMASH Hopper lightweight remote-controlled weapon stations, including spare parts and related services. – EDR Magazine, accessed June 16, 2026, https://www.edrmagazine.eu/smart-shooter-to-supply-smash-hopper-lightweight-remote-controlled-weapon-stations-including-spare-parts-and-related-services
  38. German Army procures Smart Shooter’s ‘SMASH’ anti-drone system | Israel Defense, accessed June 16, 2026, https://www.israeldefense.co.il/en/node/52015
  39. German defence ministry purchases C-UAS SMASH sights for army rifles, accessed June 16, 2026, https://www.unmannedairspace.info/counter-uas-systems-and-policies/german-defence-ministry-purchases-c-uas-smash-sights-for-army-rifles/
  40. Enforce Tac 2026 – Beretta Defense Technologies showcases its multi-layer extra short-range C-UAS portfolio and unveils the new Swiss P SHATTER4K round, accessed June 16, 2026, https://www.edrmagazine.eu/enforce-tac-2026-beretta-defense-technologies-showcases-its-multi-layer-extra-short-range-c-uas-portfolio-and-unveils-the-new-swiss-p-shatter4k-round
  41. 5.56×45 SHATTER4K — SwissP, accessed June 16, 2026, https://swiss-p.com/en/duty/p/5-56×45-shatter4k
  42. Beretta Develops Autonomous Weapon Station with Eight Shotguns for Drone Interception, accessed June 16, 2026, https://www.israeldefense.co.il/en/node/69182
  43. World is Shocked! Beretta Unveils 8-Barrel Drone-Killing Turret | Future of Anti-Drone Warfare – YouTube, accessed June 16, 2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ohRH54N7HkY
  44. Exhibitor Profile – Future Forces 2026 –, accessed June 16, 2026, https://future-forces.org/exhibitors/profile/141_dynamit-nobel-defence?lang=pr
  45. RGW110 Development Update – Dynamit Nobel Defence GmbH, accessed June 16, 2026, https://dn-defence.com/update-rgw110/
  46. RGW 110 – Dynamit Nobel Defence GmbH, accessed June 16, 2026, https://dn-defence.com/schulterwaffen/rgw-110-2/
  47. Are there targets for AT4/M72 kind of weapons any more? : r/WarCollege – Reddit, accessed June 16, 2026, https://www.reddit.com/r/WarCollege/comments/i9lrmm/are_there_targets_for_at4m72_kind_of_weapons_any/
  48. Hungary Orders RGW110 Anti-Tank Handguns – Defensemirror.com, accessed June 16, 2026, https://defensemirror.com/news/33261/Hungary_Orders_RGW110_Anti_Tank_Handguns
  49. ILA 2026 – Major boost the German Army’s armed H145Ms – EDR Magazine, accessed June 16, 2026, https://www.edrmagazine.eu/ila-2026-major-boost-the-german-armys-armed-h145ms
  50. Germany orders 20 additional Airbus H145M helicopters, accessed June 16, 2026, https://www.airbus.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2025-12-germany-orders-20-additional-airbus-h145m-helicopters
  51. H145M missions | Airbus, accessed June 16, 2026, https://www.airbus.com/en/products-services/helicopters/military-helicopters/h145m/h145m-missions
  52. Security & Defence European, accessed June 16, 2026, https://euro-sd.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/ESD_08_2017.pdf
  53. Airbus Helicopters H145M – The Latest in a Long Line, accessed June 16, 2026, https://forum.warthunder.com/t/airbus-helicopters-h145m-the-latest-in-a-long-line/9234
  54. Hisar-A Hisar-O: AND A Look at | PDF | Aviation | Military Science – Scribd, accessed June 16, 2026, https://www.scribd.com/document/458890822/5e01cfb1ee025-pdf
  55. MBDA at ILA 2026: New Anti-Drone, Deep Precision Strike and Space Solutions, accessed June 16, 2026, https://www.mbda-systems.com/mbda-ila-2026-new-anti-drone-deep-precision-strike-and-space-solutions

Defense Trends: Unmanned Aircraft and High-Intensity Warfare (June 13, 2026)

1.0 Executive Summary

The geopolitical and military operational environment observed during the defense tradeshows and military exercises of early to mid-June 2026 reflects a period of acute doctrinal transition and industrial realignment. Intelligence collected from open-source reporting across global defense exhibitions and multinational live-fire exercises indicates three dominant strategic shifts currently defining the international security architecture. First, the European defense industrial base is undergoing a significant fracturing and subsequent rapid reconstitution, most visibly highlighted by the total collapse of the Franco-German-Spanish Future Combat Air System manned fighter component. This political and industrial rupture has accelerated nationalized and alternative coalition efforts toward uncrewed collaborative combat aircraft and sixth-generation ecosystem development, fundamentally altering procurement timelines for the next two decades. Nations are actively abandoning the pursuit of singular, exquisite manned platforms in favor of scalable, software-defined systems of systems.

Second, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and allied forces globally have completely transitioned their operational focus from static deterrence and counter-insurgency operations to high-intensity, multi-domain combat against peer adversaries possessing advanced anti-access and area-denial capabilities. Exercises across the European theater over the past week demonstrate a total reliance on Agile Combat Employment doctrines. Air and naval assets are no longer relying on hardened main operating bases; instead, they are actively training to disperse across civilian infrastructure, reserve highway strips, and remote operational locations to ensure survivability against preemptive long-range ballistic and cruise missile strikes. This operational shift demands a complete overhaul of military logistics, requiring secure, redundant, and highly mobile support networks capable of sustaining advanced fifth-generation platforms in austere environments.

Third, the protection of critical civilian and military infrastructure—particularly subsea energy and data networks—has been elevated to a primary tactical objective for allied maritime forces. Driven by the proliferation of deniable hybrid warfare tactics, naval forces are reorienting their patrols and technological acquisitions toward persistent seabed surveillance and anti-submarine warfare. Simultaneously, the integration of advanced artificial intelligence algorithms for predictive electronic warfare, decentralized drone swarms, and synthetic training environments is no longer conceptual; these systems are currently being fielded, tested, and validated in live combat scenarios and major multinational exercises from the Baltic Sea to the Indo-Pacific. The events of the past week underscore a global military landscape racing to integrate autonomous logic, secure vulnerable supply lines, and demonstrate interoperable lethality across evolving geopolitical alliances.

1.1 Summary Table of Key Events and Lessons Learned

Event NameEvent TypeLocation & DatesKey Lessons Learned
HEMUS 2026TradeshowPlovdiv, Bulgaria (June 3-6, 2026)Eastern European defense sectors are prioritizing the rapid prototyping of counter-unmanned aerial systems and long-range tele-operated drone platforms to counter immediate asymmetric threats, seeking a larger role in continental rearmament.
BALTOPS 2026ExerciseBaltic Sea (June 4-19, 2026)Execution marks the transition of command to Allied Joint Force Command Brunssum; operations highlight a strategic reprioritization toward securing critical subsea infrastructure and energy lines of communication against deniable hybrid attacks.
Direct Action Ground Reconnaissance 2026ExerciseWest Java, Indonesia (June 7, 2026)Validation of tactical interoperability between United States special operations forces and Indonesian rapid reaction corps in austere environments, with a specific focus on airstrike target identification and combat medical evacuation.
Exercise Ramstein Flag 2026 (RAFL 26)ExerciseNorthern Europe to Spain (June 8-19, 2026)Successful mass dispersal of fifth-generation fighter aircraft using Agile Combat Employment concepts across austere reserve highway bases; formalizes the shift from peacetime air policing to collective multi-domain defense.
ILA BerlinTradeshowBerlin, Germany (June 10-14, 2026)Official confirmation of the termination of the Future Combat Air System manned fighter component; prompt formation of the German industrial coalition “Team Gen 6”; rapid acceleration of uncrewed collaborative combat platforms.
Eurosatory 2026TradeshowParis, France (June 15-19, 2026)Introduction of next-generation hybrid powertrains for heavy tracked vehicles designed to reduce logistical burdens and thermal signatures; deployment of software-defined, multi-domain active and passive sensor integration architectures.
MILEX 26ExerciseZaragoza, Spain (Spring – June 18, 2026)Practical validation of the European Union Rapid Deployment Capacity; stress-testing of multi-level command structures from the Military Planning and Conduct Capability in Brussels down to tactical battle groups deployed in the field.

2.0 Details: Military Tradeshows and Defense Expos

2.1 ILA Berlin 2026

The International Aerospace Exhibition (ILA Berlin 2026), held at the Berlin ExpoCenter Airport from June 10 through June 14, 2026, functioned as the epicenter for a major strategic realignment within the European defense aerospace sector.1 The event was opened by the German Chancellor, who utilized the platform to formally announce the termination of the manned Next Generation Fighter component of the Franco-German-Spanish Future Combat Air System.1 The collapse of this initiative stems from a profound and unresolved disagreement regarding program governance and intellectual property workshare distribution between the primary aerospace contractors, Airbus and Dassault Aviation.2 Dassault Aviation had increasingly sought an eighty percent workshare, citing its technical expertise in manned fighter design, while Airbus demanded adherence to initial agreements outlining an equal division of labor representing both German and Spanish industrial interests.2 Consequently, the program remained indefinitely stalled at Phase 1B, failing to transition to the development of a physical demonstrator, pushing any theoretical entry-into-service timeline well beyond the year 2045.2

In direct response to this policy shift and the resulting capability gap, the German Ministry of Defense is actively evaluating three immediate alternatives: procuring additional American-made F-35 Lightning II aircraft as a bridging solution, joining the United Kingdom-Italy-Japan Global Combat Air Programme, or launching an entirely new sovereign national effort headed by Airbus.2 Intelligence regarding the Global Combat Air Programme option indicates hesitation; the Chief Executive Officer of Leonardo, a key partner in the consortium, noted that while German financial capital and industrial know-how would be beneficial, integrating a new partner at this stage severely risks delaying the program’s strict 2035 delivery schedule—a delay that partner nations, particularly Japan, are reportedly unwilling to accept.2

Simultaneously, German industry utilized ILA Berlin to announce the formation of “Team Gen 6”.2 Acting as the lead entity, Airbus formed this new industrial coalition alongside Autoflug, Diehl Defence, Hensoldt, Liebherr, MBDA Deutschland, MTU Aero Engines, and Rohde & Schwarz.2 This collective signed a strategic positioning paper to assume responsibility for developing a sovereign European sixth-generation fighter aircraft architecture, matched by the formation of a complementary Spanish industrial group comprising Indra, Airbus, Grupo Oesia, GMV, ITP Aero, and Sener.2

Fighter jet diagram for global defense capability assessment

Technological debuts at the exhibition heavily emphasized uncrewed systems to offset the delays associated with manned fighter development. Airbus showcased its reorganized unmanned aerial systems portfolio, centralizing its drone operations under a new nomenclature powered by the MARS Autonomy Stack, which serves as a sovereign mission system layer.1 Debuts included the U760 Ravenstorm Uncrewed Collaborative Combat Aircraft, designed to operate collaboratively alongside fourth- and fifth-generation fighters.2 Analysis of the U760 Ravenstorm reveals a ten-meter wingspan, thirteen-meter length, top-mounted engine intakes, and a shovel-like nose configuration resembling the United States-made Kratos XQ-58A Valkyrie.2 The platform is engineered to carry medium- and long-range anti-aircraft missiles, such as the Meteor Beyond Visual-Range air-to-air missile, to execute offensive counter-air missions and the suppression of enemy air defenses via both kinetic strikes and non-kinetic electronic warfare jamming.2

Airbus also detailed the U680 Bird of Prey interceptor drone, a counter-unmanned aerial systems platform built upon a modified Do-DT25 target drone base.2 With a maximum take-off weight of one hundred and sixty kilograms, the system autonomously searches, classifies, and engages hostile kamikaze drones using a Mark I air-to-air missile developed by Frankenburg Technologies.2 The interceptor is designed for seamless integration into the North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s air defense architecture via the Airbus Integrated Battle Management System, functioning as a cost-effective kinetic effector within a layered air defense grid.2

Furthermore, Airbus confirmed ongoing development and upgrades to its support fleets, specifically the A330 Multi-Role Tanker Transport, which features Automatic Air-to-Air Refueling technology designed to optimize fuel transfer rates and reduce operator workload.2 The upgraded A330 MRTT+ variant, utilizing Rolls-Royce Trent 7000 engines, provides an increased maximum take-off weight of two hundred and forty-two tonnes, carrying up to one hundred and eleven tonnes of fuel alongside forty-five tonnes of cargo or up to three hundred passengers.2

Intelligence regarding the global context of sixth-generation platforms was also highlighted by tracking the parallel progress of the United States Air Force’s Next Generation Air Dominance program. Open-source tracking confirms that the Boeing F-47 conceptual fighter is currently beginning production at Boeing’s St. Louis facility in Missouri, leveraging the Advanced Coatings Centre and Advanced Assembly Facility.2 The United States platform is anticipated to feature a combat radius exceeding one thousand nautical miles, stealth capabilities surpassing the F-22 Raptor, and internal weapons bays optimized for the Joint Advanced Tactical Missile, with an operational fleet target of one hundred and eighty-five aircraft augmented by collaborative combat aircraft.2 The contrast between the rapid production commencement in the United States and the organizational collapse of the European Future Combat Air System underscores a critical intelligence takeaway: the European defense aerospace sector is compensating for diplomatic stalemates in manned fighter development by aggressively accelerating the deployment of autonomous, artificial intelligence-driven collaborative platforms to maintain parity in the airspace.

2.2 HEMUS 2026

The seventeenth International Exhibition of Defence Equipment and Services (HEMUS 2026) convened in Plovdiv, Bulgaria, from June 3 through June 6, 2026.4 Taking place against the backdrop of sustained, high-intensity conflict in Eastern Europe, the exhibition demonstrated how former Warsaw Pact nations are leveraging their established industrial infrastructure and historical manufacturing bases to secure highly lucrative roles in current European rearmament initiatives and joint weapons production programs.4

Participating firms focused intensely on the direct tactical lessons learned from the Ukrainian theater, specifically regarding the ubiquity of drone warfare, the necessity of counter-unmanned aerial systems, and the survivability of ground forces under constant aerial surveillance. Technological debuts reflected a strict prioritization of electronic warfare, robotic ground platforms, and localized artificial intelligence processing at the tactical edge.4 Avilus demonstrated the operational maturity of its Bussard unmanned aircraft by piloting the vehicle in North Sea airspace using a ground control station located eight hundred kilometers away in Munich, proving the viability of secure, long-range tele-operation in contested environments.5

Regional manufacturers also debuted operationalized solutions. Reactive Drone showcased its SHMAVIK and Kazhan unmanned aerial vehicle systems, highlighting drone technologies that have been iteratively developed through direct feedback from active modern defense missions.5 Turkish defense contractor ASELSAN exhibited a highly integrated drone defense network capable of coordinating multiple advanced detection and destruction subsystems specifically engineered to neutralize diverse micro-drone and loitering munition swarms.6 Furthermore, collaborative ventures resulting in rapid capability fielding were highly visible; the strategic partnership between Hypercraft and Fortem Technologies resulted in the debut of low-signature mobile platforms equipped with advanced radar for persistent, all-domain airspace denial at the tactical edge.6 Similarly, ARCYN Defense announced a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement with the United States Army DEVCOM Armaments Center to evaluate and mature its Iron Rain counter-drone technologies.6

The primary intelligence takeaway from HEMUS 2026 is the rapid democratization of advanced sensor and mitigation technology. Eastern European defense supply chains are shifting away from large, exquisite, multi-decade procurement programs in favor of agile, software-updatable platforms that can be mass-produced and iteratively improved based on real-time battlefield telemetry. The heavy emphasis on systems like the Iron Rain and ASELSAN networks indicates that ground forces globally anticipate operating continuously under hostile aerial surveillance, necessitating organic, highly mobile air defense systems integrated directly at the platoon and company levels.

2.3 Eurosatory 2026

Eurosatory 2026, scheduled for June 15 through June 19, 2026, at the Paris Nord Villepinte exhibition center, represents the largest land and air-land defense exhibition globally, anticipating over two thousand exhibitors from sixty-one countries and seventy-six thousand professional visitors.7 Pre-event intelligence and finalized exhibitor announcements released over the past week reveal major shifts in land warfare doctrine, specifically concerning battlefield logistics, power generation, and multi-domain sensor fusion.

A critical technological debut planned for the event is a new hybrid powertrain based on the highly successful mtu Series 199 engine architecture.9This system is being developed into a comprehensive powertrain platform spanning a power range from two hundred and sixty to one thousand three hundred and fifty kilowatts, utilizing six-, eight-, 10-, and twelve-cylinder configurations specifically optimized for heavy military tracked vehicles.9The transition to hybrid powertrains for heavy armor addresses critical tactical vulnerabilities observed in recent conflicts. Traditional diesel powertrains produce massive acoustic signatures, high thermal output easily detectable by overhead infrared sensors, and require an immense, highly vulnerable logistical tail for sustained fossil fuel delivery to the frontline. Hybrid systems offer critical “silent watch” capabilities—allowing systems and sensors to operate without the main engine running—and brief periods of silent mobility, drastically reducing the vehicle’s footprint across both the electromagnetic and thermal spectrums.9

In the sensor and electronic warfare domain, Hensoldt will debut its Battle Lab, a demonstration environment designed to prove the viability of software-defined, multi-domain networking that fuses sensors, effectors, and command levels in real time.11The system integrates data from passive arrays, such as the Twinvis radar, which detects hostile aircraft, cruise missiles, and drones by analyzing reflections from existing civilian communication transmitters without emitting its own trackable energy.11This is paired with active arrays like the TRML-4D, equipped with the latest active electronically scanned array radar technology for rapid target tracking and classification.11Hensoldt will also display the TAERVUS cross-domain system for modern electromagnetic reconnaissance and combat. This architecture highlights an emerging doctrinal shift toward “predictive jamming,” wherein integrated artificial intelligence autonomously supports signal analysis, prioritizes hostile transmissions, and optimizes electronic attack measures faster than human operators can calculate the required frequencies.11

Further demonstrating the push toward autonomous and miniaturized capabilities, Maris-Tech will introduce an ultra-compact platform integrating edge artificial intelligence, advanced video processing, and fiber optics connectivity specifically designed for loitering munitions and surveillance drones.13 Vizgard and Syzygy Integration will demonstrate localized artificial intelligence retraining capabilities, allowing algorithms to be updated and adapted to new battlefield environments in hours rather than weeks.13 Additionally, Alva Industries is scheduled to unveil new slotless motor innovations for defense applications, while Advanced Navigation and Team Defence Australia will exhibit precision guidance systems.13 Intelligence takeaways from the preparations for Eurosatory indicate that procurement priorities are shifting heavily toward systems that minimize logistical dependency through hybrid power while maximizing passive detection, automated electronic warfare execution, and real-time algorithmic adaptability.

3.0 Details: Military Exercises

3.1 Exercise Ramstein Flag 2026

Running from June 8 through June 19, 2026, Ramstein Flag 2026 constitutes the largest air exercise in the history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.15 Operating under the framework of the enhanced Vigilance Activity Eastern Sentry, the exercise integrates more than two hundred aircraft from eighteen allied nations, operating across a vast geographical expanse spanning three Joint Operations Areas from northern Finland to southern Spain.16 The primary strategic objective is to validate collective defense capabilities under Article 5 scenarios, heavily prioritizing Integrated Air and Missile Defence, Counter Anti-Access/Area Denial operations, rapid information-sharing, and Agile Combat Employment.17

The tactical maneuvers tested during Ramstein Flag represent a fundamental doctrinal abandonment of legacy peacetime air policing models in favor of survivable, distributed lethality required for peer-state conflict. The exercise utilized more than twenty operational locations, relying heavily on austere environments and civilian infrastructure.16 In the Nordic region, which served as a primary operational hub hosted jointly by Finland, Sweden, Norway, and Denmark, allied forces successfully executed Agile Combat Employment concepts by operating high-value assets directly from reserve highway strips.16 Specifically, the Finnish reserve road base at Tervo was utilized for dispersed basing operations.16 This decentralized basing strategy ensures that allied airpower cannot be systematically neutralized by a preemptive ballistic or cruise missile strike against a handful of known, centralized main operating bases.

Map showing major United States air traffic locations relevant to

The integration of fifth-generation stealth platforms was a major focal point of the exercise. F-35 variants from the United States, Italy, Norway, and Denmark synchronized operations across multiple locations. United States Marine Corps F-35B short take-off and vertical landing aircraft deployed to Rovaniemi in northern Finland alongside German Tornado and Eurofighter jets, while United States Air Force F-35A conventional take-off variants operated from Pirkkala in southern Finland.16 Concurrently, Italian, Norwegian, and Danish F-35s conducted operations from Ørland, Norway, while Spanish EF-18s and Polish F-16s operated from Tikkakoski in central Finland.16 These combat sorties, generating upwards of one hundred and fifty flights daily, were closely coordinated with high-altitude intelligence enablers, including NATO E-3A Airborne Warning and Control System aircraft and the RQ-4D Phoenix remotely piloted aircraft.16

The intelligence takeaway from Ramstein Flag highlights severe logistical and interoperability challenges inherent to executing Agile Combat Employment at scale. Dispersing aircraft to highway strips fundamentally fragments the logistical supply chain; it requires massive, secure, and highly redundant Host Nation Support to ensure that aviation fuel, specialized munitions, and maintenance personnel are constantly transported to unpredictable, austere locations via road networks rather than centralized pipelines.18 The exercise proves the alliance is actively transforming its logistical tail to survive in a highly contested electromagnetic and kinetic environment, shifting the burden from fixed infrastructure to mobile sustainment units.

3.2 Exercise BALTOPS 2026

The fifty-fifth iteration of Baltic Operations (BALTOPS 2026) commenced on June 4, 2026, as twenty allied ships departed the port of Gdynia, Poland.21 Scheduled to conclude on June 19 in Kiel, Germany, the exercise involves approximately six thousand personnel representing fifteen North Atlantic Treaty Organization member states operating across a massive maritime theater covering the western, southern, and central Baltic Sea, stretching from Skagen to the Gulf of Riga.23

A critical doctrinal shift observed in this year’s iteration is the fundamental transition of command and control architecture. For the first time since the exercise’s inception in 1972, the exercise is being specifically led and directed by the Allied Joint Force Command Brunssum.23 The Deputy Commander of Joint Force Command Brunssum, Lieutenant General John Mead, explicitly defined the strategic purposes as deterring threats, building readiness, and strengthening cohesion, emphasizing that “deterrence is not something we can simply talk about. We must demonstrate it”.23 This administrative and operational shift directly integrates the maritime exercise into the alliance’s broader Eastern Flank deterrence strategy.25

Tactically, while the exercise continues to drill traditional competencies such as amphibious operations, air defense, and anti-submarine warfare, the primary strategic focus has pivoted drastically toward the protection of critical subsea infrastructure.23 Driven directly by the context of recent deniable hybrid warfare attacks on the Nord Stream gas pipelines, electricity interconnectors, and telecommunications data cables linking Northern and Eastern Europe, naval forces are prioritizing the absolute safeguarding of these sea lines of communication.23 Offshore wind farms and their associated transmission cables have increasingly become central to Baltic security planning due to their inherent vulnerability to covert sabotage.23 The integration of unmanned maritime systems for mine countermeasures and subsea surveillance during the exercise underscores a primary intelligence takeaway: the Baltic Sea is now viewed as a highly vulnerable, active hybrid warfare zone. Naval tactical maneuvers and procurement priorities are heavily reorienting toward establishing persistent, autonomous surveillance over static, undefendable seabed assets to prevent severe economic and energy disruption orchestrated by adversary submersibles and remote underwater vehicles.25

3.3 Exercise MILEX 26 / RDC LIVEX 26

The European Union’s Crisis Management Military Exercise 2026 (MILEX 26), incorporating the Live Exercise deployment phase (RDC LIVEX 26), is currently culminating at the San Gregorio Training Centre in Zaragoza, Spain.28 Following months of strategic coordination, the physical deployment and combat enhancement training phases ran from late May through the Distinguished Visitors Day live-fire demonstration scheduled for June 18, 2026.29

MILEX 26 is specifically designed to stress-test the European Union’s Rapid Deployment Capacity, an ambitious initiative aimed at enabling the European Union to project a force of up to five thousand troops globally to manage crises outside its borders without relying on external sovereign logistical support, effectively replacing the previous EU Battlegroup concept.29 The exercise involves two thousand five hundred soldiers from thirteen member states, including Austria, Belgium, Croatia, France, Germany, Luxembourg, Latvia, Lithuania, Spain, Romania, Portugal, the Czech Republic, and Sweden.29

The validation of interoperability across three distinct command structures is central to the exercise. At the strategic level, the Military Planning and Conduct Capability in Brussels serves as the Operational Headquarters.28 At the operational level, Eurocorps personnel manage the Force Headquarters deployed directly at the Zaragoza training grounds.28 At the tactical level, Spain serves as the lead nation for the Central Battle Group, deploying over sixteen hundred personnel.28 The core unit of this force is the 16th Canary Islands Brigade.28

The tactical group deployed in Zaragoza integrates highly diverse assets to simulate a full-spectrum crisis response. Based on the 9th Soria Infantry Regiment, the force includes a Portuguese Army company, artillery units from RACA 93, engineer units from BZ XVI, and specialized combat logistics support.28 Aviation support is provided by BHELMA VI utilizing Super Puma and AB-212 helicopters, while an intelligence, surveillance, target acquisition, and reconnaissance tactical group features cavalry units equipped with Leopard 2A4 and Pizarro main battle tanks.28 Furthermore, the deployment integrates critical non-kinetic capabilities, including electronic warfare sections from the 31st Electronic Warfare Regiment, information operations teams, and border control units from the Guardia Civil.28

The intelligence takeaway from MILEX 26 centers on the European Union’s continued, aggressive pursuit of strategic autonomy. The exercise was preceded by a Main Planning Conference in Segovia, divided into specialized syndicates addressing steering issues, information and communications frameworks, and the logistics of moving multinational forces across the continent.29 By navigating these complex logistical hurdles and testing the capability of the Military Planning and Conduct Capability to function as a credible, unified command structure, the European Union is attempting to prove it can act as a cohesive geopolitical military actor.29 However, the necessity of the exercise highlights ongoing interoperability challenges regarding cross-border military transit, the secure integration of disparate national communications systems, and the establishment of a unified logistical backbone—hurdles the Rapid Deployment Capacity must definitively overcome before achieving true operational capability in a non-permissive environment.29

3.4 Exercise Direct Action Ground Reconnaissance 2026

On June 7, 2026, the Quick Reaction Corps of the Indonesian Air Force concluded a high-intensity bilateral exercise with the United States Air Force Special Operations Command in the Bandung District of West Java, Indonesia.32The drill, officially designated as Direct Action Ground Reconnaissance 2026, focused entirely on strengthening personnel combat readiness and establishing deep tactical interoperability between the two highly specialized units.32

Tactical maneuvers executed during the exercise emphasized speed, precision, and coordination in austere tropical environments. The operational scenarios focused on joint mission planning, the rapid identification of airstrike targets for close air support coordination, and complex combat medical evacuation procedures.32 This exercise highlights a continuing, critical strategic shift by United States Indo-Pacific Command to deepen tactical ties and interoperability with non-aligned Southeast Asian nations. The intelligence takeaway indicates that the United States is actively working to ensure its special operations forces can seamlessly integrate with regional partner militaries, establishing the foundational relationships required to deploy forward targeting nodes and conduct rapid personnel recovery operations in the event of a broader, high-intensity conflict within the first island chain.33

3.5 Preparatory and Ongoing Operations: African Lion and Valiant Shield

Intelligence collection over the past week also highlights major developments in ongoing and upcoming multi-domain exercises, reflecting a global synchronization of emerging tactical doctrines. In North and West Africa, the ongoing United States Africa Command exercise African Lion 2026—hosted by Morocco, Ghana, Senegal, and Tunisia—has heavily integrated autonomous warfare systems into its operational planning.34 Reports from the field indicate the execution of inaugural drone academics, focusing intensely on artificial intelligence-assisted targeting systems, counter-drone technologies, autonomous combat vehicles, and the adaptation of asymmetric warfare tactics directly observed in the Ukrainian and Iranian theaters.34 This rapid incorporation demonstrates a shortened tactical feedback loop where battlefield innovations from active global conflicts are immediately institutionalized into allied training doctrines.

Concurrently, preparations for the upcoming multilateral exercise Valiant Shield 2026, scheduled for June 22 through July 1 in the Indo-Pacific theater across Hawaii, Guam, and Japan, reveal a heavy reliance on decentralized, commercial space-based intelligence architecture.36 Notably, space monitoring firm LeoLabs announced that its new Scout-S transportable space tracking radar, developed via private investment and United States Space Force backing, became operational in June and will deploy directly to Hawaii to participate in the exercise.36 Fitting entirely within a standard twenty-foot shipping container, the radar utilizes direct radiating array technology to monitor low Earth orbit and very low Earth orbit objects.36 Furthermore, the United States Air Force is actively soliciting low-cost, commercially available space-based data platforms to provide downward-looking intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance data during Valiant Shield to enable rapid access to actionable data in highly contested electromagnetic environments.38

In a major infrastructural shift supporting Agile Combat Employment in the Pacific, Valiant Shield 2026 will also see the United States Air Force recommence operations from the historic North Field on the remote island of Tinian, following four years of intensive jungle clearing and rehabilitation.37 A detachment of two hundred and fifty personnel will support operations from this austere location to simulate high-intensity conflict.37 Finally, bilateral planning between the United States and Japan is heavily emphasizing synthetic training environments; stakeholders are establishing linked Exercise Control Facilities across Misawa and Iwakuni to integrate virtual training simulators directly into live exercises.39 The collective intelligence takeaway is highly significant: the United States is actively expanding its network of austere Pacific airfields to disperse high-value target sets, while simultaneously integrating mobile, commercial space-domain awareness radars and synthetic training links to ensure that satellite communication, reconnaissance capabilities, and command-and-control networks survive anti-satellite warfare and intense jamming in a peer-state conflict.36


Please share the link on Facebook, Forums, with colleagues, etc. Your support is much appreciated and if you have any feedback, please email us in**@*********ps.com. If you’d like to request a report or order a reprint, please click here for the corresponding page to open in new tab.


Sources Used

  1. shownews – ILA 2026: Germany’s airshow in a post-FCAS era, accessed June 13, 2026, https://www.fw-mag.com/shownews/1121/ila-2026-germany-s-airshow-in-a-post-fcas-era
  2. German Industry Announce “Team Gen 6” to Develop FCAS …, accessed June 13, 2026, https://theaviationist.com/2026/06/12/germany-team-gen-6-to-develop-fcas-alternative/
  3. Europe’s most versatile drone portfolio | Airbus, accessed June 13, 2026, https://www.airbus.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2026-06-airbus-showcases-europes-most-versatile-drone-portfolio-at-ila-berlin
  4. HEMUS 2026 Highlights Bulgaria’s Growing Role in … – ССBS, accessed June 13, 2026, https://www.ccbsnews.info/en/news/detail/7749
  5. HEMUS 2026 | June 3–6, 2026 | Plovdiv, Bulgaria – Unmanned Systems Technology, accessed June 13, 2026, https://www.unmannedsystemstechnology.com/events/hemus/
  6. HEMUS 2026 | June 3–6, 2026 | Plovdiv, Bulgaria – Defense Advancement, accessed June 13, 2026, https://www.defenseadvancement.com/events/hemus/
  7. Eurosatory 2026 – Electro Optic Systems, accessed June 13, 2026, https://eos-aus.com/events/eurosatory-2026/
  8. Events for June 2026 › Exhibition › – CET Sandbox, accessed June 13, 2026, https://cetsandbox.com/events/category/exhibition/
  9. Eurosatory 2026: Rolls-Royce is developing the mtu Series 199 into a powertrain platform for Europe’s land forces and unveiling a new hybrid powertrain, accessed June 13, 2026, https://www.rolls-royce.com/media/press-releases/2026/11-06-2026-rr-is-developing-the-mtu-series-199-into-a-powertrain-platform-for-europes-land-forces-and-unveiling-a-new-hybrid-powertrain.aspx
  10. Rolls-Royce Share Price Jumps as FTSE 100 Rally and Defence Update Put RR Stock Back in Focus, accessed June 13, 2026, https://www.bez-kabli.pl/rolls-royce-share-price-jumps-as-ftse-100-rally-and-defence-update-put-rr-stock-back-in-focus/
  11. HENSOLDT at Eurosatory 2026, accessed June 13, 2026, https://www.hensoldt.net/news/hensoldt-at-eurosatory-2026
  12. HENSOLDT auf der Eurosatory 2026, accessed June 13, 2026, https://www.hensoldt.net/de/news/hensoldt-at-eurosatory-2026
  13. Eurosatory 2026 | June 15-19 | Paris – Unmanned Systems Technology, accessed June 13, 2026, https://www.unmannedsystemstechnology.com/events/eurosatory/
  14. Meet our team at Eurosatory 2026 | Advanced Navigation, accessed June 13, 2026, https://www.advancednavigation.com/events-webinars/eurosatory-2026/
  15. NATO’s Largest Air Exercise Ever is Now Underway – High North News, accessed June 13, 2026, https://en.highnorthnews.com/politics/natos-largest-air-exercise-ever-is-now-underway/1113459
  16. NATO Holds Ramstein Flag 26 with Finland as Northern Hub …, accessed June 13, 2026, https://nordicdefencesector.com/en/article/nato-holds-ramstein-flag-26-with-finland-as-northern-hub
  17. RAMSTEIN FLAG 2026 is ready for Take-off … – Allied Air Command, accessed June 13, 2026, https://ac.nato.int/archive/2026/ramstein-flag-2026-is-ready-for-takeoff-18-nations–200-aircraft–and-more-than-20-operational-locations-all-over-europe
  18. Ramstein Flag 2026 begins today with more than 200 Allied aircraft across Europe, accessed June 13, 2026, https://ac.nato.int/ramstein-flag/news/news/ramstein-flag-2026-begins-today-across-europe-with-more-than-200-allied-aircraft-.aspx
  19. NATO’s Ramstein Flag 26 exercise reaches from Finland to Spain – Ilmavoimat, accessed June 13, 2026, https://ilmavoimat.fi/en/-/nato-s-ramstein-flag-26-exercise-reaches-from-finland-to-spain
  20. NATO fifth-generation fighters integrate across northern Europe during Ramstein Flag 2026, accessed June 13, 2026, https://ac.nato.int/archive/2026/nato-fifthgeneration-fighters-integrate-across-northern-europe-during-ramstein-flag-2026.aspx
  21. BALTOPS 2026 Takes Sail from Gdynia, Poland – Navy.mil, accessed June 13, 2026, https://www.navy.mil/Press-Office/News-Stories/display-news/Article/4509758/baltops-2026-takes-sail-from-gdynia-poland/
  22. BALTOPS 2026 Takes Sail from Gdynia, Poland – U.S. Naval Forces Europe, accessed June 13, 2026, https://www.c6f.navy.mil/Press-Room/News/Article/4508924/baltops-2026-takes-sail-from-gdynia-poland/
  23. BALTOPS 2026 launches from Gdynia under NATO command for …, accessed June 13, 2026, https://balticwind.eu/baltops-2026-launches-from-gdynia-under-nato-command-for-the-first-time/
  24. NATO launches its largest Baltic military exercise – Defence24.com, accessed June 13, 2026, https://defence24.com/armed-forces/navy/nato-launches-its-largest-baltic-military-exercise
  25. BALTOPS 2026 KICKS OFF: WHAT MAKES THE 55TH EDITION DIFFERENT?, accessed June 13, 2026, https://jfcbs.nato.int/page5964943/2026/baltops-2026-kicks-off-what-makes-the-55th-edition-different
  26. Nato’s flagship Baltic drill begins at half strength amid global tensions – The Times of India, accessed June 13, 2026, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/defence/international/natos-flagship-baltic-drill-begins-at-half-strength-amid-global-tensions/articleshow/131476122.cms
  27. Putin’s next move? Five Russian attack scenarios Europe must prepare for – Atlantic Council, accessed June 13, 2026, https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-research-reports/report/putins-next-move-five-russian-attack-scenarios-europe-must-prepare-for/
  28. Deployment is underway for the European exercise ‘MILEX 26 …, accessed June 13, 2026, https://emad.defensa.gob.es/en/prensa/noticias/2026/06/Listado/260601-ni-inicio-milex26.html
  29. MILEX 26 | EEAS, accessed June 13, 2026, https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/milex-26_en
  30. MILEX 26 / RDC LIVEX 26: Building EU Rapid Response through Multinational Planning and Deployment – Eurocorps, accessed June 13, 2026, https://www.eurocorps.org/livex-26-planning-conferences/
  31. MILEX 26 Underway: Preparing Europe’s Rapid Deployment Capacity – EEAS, accessed June 13, 2026, https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/milex-26-underway-preparing-europe%E2%80%99s-rapid-deployment-capacity_en
  32. Indonesia and US air force hold high-intensity joint military exercise – ANTARA News, accessed June 13, 2026, https://en.antaranews.com/news/418513/indonesia-and-us-air-force-hold-high-intensity-joint-military-exercise
  33. Indonesia and US air force hold high-intensity joint military exercise, accessed June 13, 2026, https://babel.antaranews.com/berita/565975/indonesia-and-us-air-force-hold-high-intensity-joint-military-exercise
  34. Autonomous Warfare Has Arrived | African Lion 2026 Exclusive with Gen. Anderson & Lt. Gasparri, accessed June 13, 2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B66Zl-Zd2DI
  35. African Lion 2026 – US Army Europe and Africa, accessed June 13, 2026, https://www.europeafrica.army.mil/What-We-Do/Exercises/African-Lion/dvpTag/A-26/
  36. LeoLab’s new, mobile space-watch radar to participate in Valiant Shield exercise, accessed June 13, 2026, https://breakingdefense.com/2026/06/leolabs-new-mobile-space-watch-radar-to-participate-in-valiant-shield-exercise/
  37. Historic Tinian airfield slated for debut flight operations as Pentagon expands Pacific network, accessed June 13, 2026, https://theaircurrent.com/defense/historic-tinian-north-field-pentagon-pacific-usaf-china/
  38. AMA: Call for Commercial ISR Solutions – Valiant Shield 2026, accessed June 13, 2026, https://apex-innovates.org/events/ama-call-commercial-isr-solutions-valiant-shield-2026
  39. Pacific Forces Unite: PMTEC Stakeholder Synchronization Accelerates Indo-Pacific Training Integration, Strengthening Joint Warfighter Readiness – DVIDS, accessed June 13, 2026, https://www.dvidshub.net/news/555029/pacific-forces-unite-pmtec-stakeholder-synchronization-accelerates-indo-pacific-training-integration-strengthening-joint-warfighter-readiness

DAIMEX 2026: Transforming Baltic Defense Strategies

1. Executive Summary

The inaugural Defence and Aerospace Industry Meeting and Exposition (DAIMEX) Baltic 2026, held from May 12 to May 14 in Vilnius and Pabradė, Lithuania, represented a defining moment in the military acquisition and strategic posture of NATO’s eastern flank. Organized by the defense industry associations of Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia, alongside the Lithuanian Riflemen’s Union, the event functioned as a critical convergence point for military leadership, defense policymakers, and international contractors.1 The gathering was designed to evaluate emerging operational threats, facilitate structural supply chain integration, and align regional procurement strategies with the harsh operational realities observed during the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.2

A central catalyst for the strategic dialogue at the event was the confirmed deployment of approximately €12.2 billion ($14 billion) in European Union Security Action for Europe (SAFE) loans.4 This unprecedented infusion of capital is driving a regional paradigm shift, moving the Baltic states away from reliance on foreign, off-the-shelf military purchases and toward localized manufacturing, deep technology transfers, and joint regional procurement initiatives.4 Major industrial agreements reinforced during the exhibition include Rheinmetall’s commitment to localized 155mm ammunition production in Lithuania, KNDS’s establishment of regional assembly hubs, and Lockheed Martin’s expanded maintenance footprint in Estonia.4

On a tactical level, the live-fire and mobility demonstrations held at the General Silvestras Žukauskas Training Area in Pabradė illuminated how the defense industry is adapting to the demands of dispersed, high-attrition, and drone-saturated warfare.6 The small arms sector, led heavily by FN Herstal, debuted mature variants of ultralight machine guns that successfully reduce squad burden while maintaining sustained fire capabilities.8 In the protected mobility domain, the launch of the Patria TRACKX all-terrain vehicle addressed the urgent requirement for low-ground-pressure troop transport capable of operating in the challenging, austere topographies of the Baltic region.10

Furthermore, the overwhelming presence of specialized Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS), loitering munitions, and kinetic Counter-UAS (C-UAS) platforms demonstrated a collective military consensus: control of the low-altitude tactical airspace is now a strict prerequisite for ground maneuverability.4 This report evaluates the new equipment announced, analyzes the tactical and operational doctrines shaping these acquisitions, and outlines the strategic supply chain mitigation efforts redefining the defense architecture of the Baltic states as observed at DAIMEX 2026.

2. Strategic Operating Environment and Doctrinal Realignments

The strategic operating environment dictating the proceedings at DAIMEX 2026 is entirely defined by the conventional warfare occurring in Eastern Europe. The conflict has systematically dismantled previous assumptions regarding deterrence, force design, and supply chain elasticity within the NATO alliance.12 Statements from senior leadership at the event, specifically Lithuanian President Gitanas Nausėda, established a new baseline for regional defense doctrine: industrial capacity is practically indistinguishable from battlefield capacity.5

The Realities of High-Intensity Warfare

Modern combat operations are currently consuming munitions, armored platforms, and specialized personnel at rates that outstrip the production capacity of the Western defense industrial base. For the Baltic states, which lack the geographic depth required to absorb and subsequently counterattack a prolonged initial assault, deterrence by denial requires highly responsive, localized defense architectures.4

The DAIMEX conference highlighted the rapid, continuous evolution of adversarial threat profiles. Adversaries are heavily investing in asymmetric capabilities, such as long-range loitering munitions, massed autonomous systems, and advanced electronic warfare (EW), which necessitates a continuous loop of tactical adaptation.12 Discussions held during the concurrent military engineering and logistics panels emphasized that effective terrain management remains the key to absorbing an adversary’s momentum and seizing the operational initiative.13 The operational tempo on modern battlefields has accelerated, rendering static positions highly vulnerable. The prevailing tactical doctrine requires extreme agility and dispersion, operating under the assumption that there are no safe rear areas; forces that remain stationary are quickly targeted by aerial ISR and precision fires.13

The Five Percent Defense Expenditure Mandate

To adequately resource this doctrinal shift, the Baltic nations are radically restructuring their fiscal priorities. President Nausėda articulated that Lithuania, alongside its regional partners, views elevated defense spending not as a temporary economic burden, but as the permanent price of sovereign survival and a potential engine for domestic industrial growth.5 While NATO currently mandates a 2% of GDP expenditure baseline, the Baltic states are actively pushing to meet and exceed a 5% GDP threshold for national defense spending, with Lithuania currently operating near or above this target.14

This level of sustained capital investment is effectively unprecedented in modern peacetime Europe and reflects the acute, existential threat perception along the Suwalki Gap and the broader eastern frontier. This capital is being directed toward multi-layered, redundant defense networks.4 To execute this, the defense industrial base is being asked to transition toward sustained, scaled production models, closing the gap between sensor detection and kinetic response.16

3. Fiscal Catalysts and the €12.2 Billion SAFE Loan Deployment

The primary financial mechanism enabling the rapid modernization of Baltic forces is the deployment of approximately €12.2 billion ($14 billion) in low-cost loans via the European Union’s Security Action for Europe (SAFE) initiative.4 The DAIMEX exhibition served as a primary venue for contractors to position themselves for these imminent contract awards.4

However, the deployment of these SAFE loans reveals highly divergent national priorities based on differing strategic geographies, existing force structures, and distinct tactical philosophies among the three Baltic nations.

Divergent National Procurement Strategies

Lithuania: Heavy Mechanization and Domestic Production Lithuania has secured the largest allocation of SAFE funding, totaling €6.38 billion.4 The Lithuanian Ministry of National Defence is prioritizing heavy conventional deterrence. A large portion of these funds is earmarked for the procurement of main battle tanks, specifically the Leopard 2A8, alongside new infantry fighting vehicles (IFVs) and massive stockpiles of 155mm artillery ammunition.4 Lithuania’s strategy relies on maintaining a robust, heavily armored maneuver force capable of contesting physical territory directly against armored incursions.

Latvia: Asymmetric Force Multipliers Latvia, operating with a €3.5 billion SAFE loan allocation, is pursuing a markedly different trajectory.4 Latvian defense officials noted that for a nation with a smaller population and industrial base, attempting parity in heavy armor is economically and demographically unfeasible. Instead, Latvia is heavily prioritizing unmanned aerial systems (UAVs), ground robotics, anti-drone defense matrices, and advanced missile systems.6 Drones and robotics are viewed as “asymmetric power” multipliers, allowing smaller formations to exert outsized lethality and surveillance over wide geographic areas.6

Estonia: Dominating the Low-Altitude Airspace Estonia, utilizing €2.34 billion in SAFE loans, recently executed a highly visible doctrinal pivot. The Estonian government opted to put its planned procurement of traditional infantry fighting vehicles on hold, choosing instead to rapidly shift capital toward the acquisition of UAS, extensive counter-drone measures, and layered air-defense systems.4 Furthermore, Estonia is in the final stages of selecting a new national missile defense system, evaluating competing architectures from U.S., European, and Israeli defense contractors.4 This shift represents a profound acknowledgment that heavy mechanized forces are increasingly vulnerable without absolute superiority in the low-altitude airspace.

Bar chart showing different types of loans

The detailed breakdown of these SAFE loan allocations underscores a dual-track approach within the Baltic alliance: maintaining a hard conventional anvil (Lithuania’s armor) against which adversary forces can be pinned and destroyed by an asymmetric, highly mobile hammer (Latvia and Estonia’s drone and missile forces).

4. Physical Infrastructure and Counter-Mobility: The Eastern Shield

A critical focal point of the DAIMEX 2026 conference was the deep integration of civilian industry capabilities into the physical defense architecture of the NATO frontier. The “Baltic Defense Line” and the interconnected Polish “Eastern Shield” initiatives represent a massive, multi-billion-euro investment in hard infrastructure, counter-mobility measures, and border fortifications spanning the entirety of the Russian and Belarusian borders.5

Implementing Physical Fortifications

The Baltic Defense Line is engineered as a continuous, interconnected network of physical barriers designed to deny enemy mobility, disrupt armored advances, and channel hostile mechanized forces into pre-designated, highly targeted engagement zones. DAIMEX 2026 provided a necessary venue for military procurement officials to evaluate the specialized materials, heavy machinery, and civil engineering services required to construct these defenses at a continental scale.17

The infrastructure overhaul features several core components:

  • Anti-Tank and Mobility Obstacles: The extensive deployment of reinforced dragon’s teeth, massive concrete tetrahedrons, and deep anti-vehicle trench systems designed to significantly slow mechanized advances, forcing adversaries to halt and deploy bridging equipment while under fire.18
  • Reintroduction of Mine Warfare: In a significant policy shift dictated by necessity, Lithuania and its Baltic partners confirmed comprehensive plans to utilize both anti-personnel and anti-tank mines along vulnerable border segments. These minefields will be heavily integrated into the broader counter-mobility doctrines to maximize friction against an advancing force.19
  • Underground Logistics and Hardened Structures: Recognizing that surface-level supply depots are highly vulnerable to deep-strike precision-guided munitions and long-range loitering drones, the Baltic states are initiating the construction of hardened, subterranean ammunition depots and supply caches.5

To support the rapid deployment of necessary infrastructure, companies like(https://kt-shelter.com/news-and-events/) showcased their rapidly deployable infrastructure systems. Highlighting the shared challenges of arctic and extreme-weather conditions, rapidly deployable hangars and command posts are vital for maintaining operational continuity and protecting high-value assets from aerial surveillance and harsh elements when underground facilities are unavailable.21

5. Multi-Layered Airspace Denial and the Baltic Drone Wall

Complementing the physical ground barriers of the Eastern Shield is the “Baltic Drone Wall,” a highly ambitious joint project spearheaded by Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia to create a unified, multi-layered aerial surveillance and interception network.4 Discussions held during the DAIMEX panel sessions revealed that the three nations are actively pooling their procurement resources to ramp up this eastern flank defense initiative.4

Map of the United States displaying a line

The Drone Wall concept moves far beyond localized, ad-hoc counter-UAS (C-UAS) point defense. It envisions a persistent, integrated sensor grid spanning the entire eastern border, capable of detecting, tracking, and neutralizing low-altitude threats using a highly integrated mix of electronic warfare (EW), kinetic interceptors, and directed energy systems.

The operational goal of the Drone Wall is to systematically prevent adversaries from utilizing commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) or military-grade drones for intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) or artillery spotting over sovereign Baltic territory. By denying the enemy the ability to safely operate ISR drones, the Baltic states effectively blind hostile artillery and rocket systems, mitigating the primary cause of casualties in modern trench and fortification warfare. Furthermore, the Drone Wall is designed to serve as an early warning apparatus, identifying the launch patterns of deep-strike loitering munitions aimed at critical civilian and military infrastructure.

6. Localized Industrial Integration and Strategic Mitigation

The vulnerability of modern, globally distributed defense supply chains was a dominant theme across the Business-to-Business (B2B) matchmaking sessions and the high-level conferences at DAIMEX 2026.1 Modern weapons platforms rely heavily on complex, transnational supply chains for microelectronics, specialized metallurgy, ballistic materials, and energetic chemicals.

Addressing Component Dependencies

Component dependencies create acute operational risks during a high-intensity conflict. If a nation cannot quickly repair battle damage or manufacture replacement munitions due to a lack of foreign-sourced parts, frontline forces will inevitably face critical shortages that degrade combat effectiveness. The Baltic states, acutely recognizing this exposure, utilized the DAIMEX B2B platform to explicitly target international partnerships focused on “supply-chain integration,” “technology transfer,” and “joint development and co-production”.1

To proactively address these vulnerabilities and incentivize foreign direct investment, Lithuania has successfully implemented a “Green Corridor” framework.6 This policy dramatically accelerates bureaucratic procedures, environmental permits, and zoning regulations for defense contractors willing to establish research and development (R&D) or actual manufacturing operations within Lithuanian borders.6

Executing Strategic Mitigation

Key examples of this strategic mitigation presented and formalized at DAIMEX 2026 include:

  • Repatriation of Energetics Production (Rheinmetall): Artillery ammunition production remains the most glaring bottleneck in the current European defense framework. Rheinmetall’s commitment to building a 155mm projectile plant in Lithuania directly mitigates the reliance on Western European manufacturing, which currently faces severe backlogs and extended delivery timelines.5 By producing heavy artillery shells domestically, Lithuania secures its own operational tempo and becomes a net provider of munitions to the regional alliance, rather than a mere consumer.
  • Localizing Maintenance and Repair Operations (KNDS & Lockheed Martin): The agreements with KNDS for Leopard 2A8 tank assembly and maintenance, and with Lockheed Martin for HIMARS sustainment, ensure that critical sub-components and repair depots are located directly within the operational theater.4 This significantly shortens the logistical tether, preventing situations where battle-damaged, highly complex systems must be shipped back to Germany or the United States via vulnerable rail lines for routine maintenance or repair.
  • Supply Chain Redundancy via B2B Networking: The DAIMEX industrial cooperation meetings aimed to connect massive prime contractors with local Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs).1 By integrating Baltic SMEs into the supply chains of global defense giants, contractors build redundant manufacturing capabilities. If a primary supplier in a different hemisphere is disrupted by geopolitical realignments or shipping interdictions, a secondary regional supplier can surge production to meet demand.
  • Specialized Component Partnerships (DEW Engineering): Companies such as(https://www.dewengineering.com/index.php/whatwedo/vehicle-services), Canada’s largest manufacturer of add-on-armor, actively participated in DAIMEX 2026 to offer strategic mitigation solutions.24 Demonstrating their expertise in providing ITAR-free armor solutions, including ballistic door panels and vehicle protection that meet STANAG mine-blast and Improvised Explosive Device (IED) standards, DEW Engineering highlights the necessity of localized armor integration.24 The presence of such firms—supported by initiatives like the Canada Pavilion, which offered a B2B venue at a €1000 co-exhibitor cost—facilitates the immediate transfer of survivability technologies to local Baltic vehicle fleets without relying on prolonged foreign military sales processes.1

7. Tactical Mobility Innovations: The Patria TRACKX

One of the most significant and highly anticipated vehicle debuts at DAIMEX 2026 was the Patria TRACKX, an all-terrain tracked armored personnel carrier (APC).7 Demonstrated in realistic, sandy terrain conditions during the driving exhibitions at Pabradė, the TRACKX is explicitly designed to replace aging cold-war legacy platforms like the American M113 and the Soviet-designed MT-LB.27 These older platforms are still widely used across Eastern Europe for utility and troop transport but severely lack the mine and ballistic survivability standards required on a modern battlefield.27

The FAMOUS Consortium

The TRACKX was developed under the European Union-backed FAMOUS (Future Highly Mobile Augmented Armoured Systems) program.10 Finland serves as the lead nation for this initiative, with Patria acting as the industrial coordinator alongside partners from over eleven member nations.10 The overarching objective of the FAMOUS program is to maximize synergies, interoperability, and standardization across European light armored vehicle fleets, thereby drastically reducing life-cycle costs and mitigating component dependencies across the NATO alliance.29

Operational Role and Specifications

The TRACKX fills a distinct and urgent operational gap in the Baltic and Nordic theaters. While modular wheeled APCs—such as the Patria 6×6, which was also showcased at DAIMEX—offer excellent on-road mobility and tactical capability for large fleet troop transportation, and heavy Infantry Fighting Vehicles (IFVs) like the CV90 offer intense firepower and armor, neither is perfectly suited for the challenging off-road conditions of the region.26 The soft bogs, thawing muskeg, dense forests, and deep snow prevalent in Northern Europe frequently immobilize wheeled vehicles and overly burden 35-tonne IFVs.10

The Patria TRACKX is optimized strictly for strategic and tactical mobility in these extreme environments, serving as a modern battle taxi and multi-role platform.31 By prioritizing a low and centrally positioned center of gravity and utilizing a nearly flat underside without traditional torsion bars, Patria has engineered a platform that can shadow frontline battle tanks or serve in vital secondary logistical roles in terrain previously deemed impassable by conventional armor.10 This capability significantly complicates adversary targeting calculations, as defensive lines can no longer rely on natural terrain barriers to funnel opposing forces.

The following table details the core technical specifications of the Patria TRACKX as demonstrated and published at the event:

Specification CategoryPatria TRACKX Baseline Metrics
Mass and Weight15.5 tonnes maximum combat weight; 11.5 tonnes empty weight (APC configuration).33
Crew Capacity2 crew members (driver and commander) + 10 dismounted infantrymen.33
Engine and PowertrainCaterpillar 7.1L inline-6 turbo-diesel engine generating 296 kW (approx. 360 hp).33
Mobility and Speed80 km/h maximum road speed; operational range of 500 km.33
Amphibious CapabilityFully amphibious with a 4 km/h swimming speed (propelled via tracks).33
Ground PressureExceptionally low 32 kPa (0.326 kg/cm²) at maximum combat weight.10
Track Dimensions56 cm wide Soucy composite rubber tracks (CRTs).33
Obstacle ClearanceCapable of traversing a 60% gradient and crossing a 2 m trench; 0.55 m ground clearance.33
Protection ProfileSTANAG 4569 Level 1 ballistic and mine protection (baseline), scalable to Level 2 optional.33

8. Next-Generation Infantry Support: Small Arms Evolution

The live-fire demonstrations held on May 13 at the Pabradė Training Area provided operators, tacticians, and procurement specialists direct access to the latest infantry weapon systems.7 The evolution of small arms showcased at DAIMEX 2026 clearly reflected a stringent operational mandate: to increase squad-level lethality and volume of fire while aggressively reducing the physical weight burden on the individual soldier.7

The FN Herstal EVOLYS System

Belgium’s FN Herstal dominated the small arms exhibition with a comprehensive live-fire demonstration of its portfolio, centering heavily on the FN EVOLYS ultralight machine gun (available in both 5.56x45mm NATO and 7.62x51mm NATO calibers).7

The EVOLYS represents a fundamental paradigm shift in the design of squad automatic weapons. Historically, belt-fed machine guns like the FN MAG (7.62mm) and the FN MINIMI (5.56mm/7.62mm) forced infantry commanders to accept severe compromises between firepower, total system weight, and operator ergonomics.36 The current in-service 7.62mm MINIMI, for instance, weighs approximately 8.8 kg unloaded.36 By contrast, the new EVOLYS 5.56mm variant weighs only 5.5 kg, and the 7.62mm variant weighs roughly 6.2 kg (13.67 lbs).8 This drastic weight reduction is achieved through the use of advanced lightweight materials, a monolithic one-piece aluminum receiver, and a patented lateral feed mechanism.8

Strategic Implications of Weight Reduction: In modern combat scenarios, infantry personnel are extraordinarily burdened. Soldiers routinely carry Level IV ballistic plates, specialized encrypted communication gear, night vision capabilities, heavy medical kits, and increasingly, portable drone-jamming equipment. Shedding over two to three kilograms from the squad automatic weapon significantly reduces operator fatigue and enhances tactical mobility. This directly addresses the contemporary doctrine of rapid dispersion, allowing machine gunners to relocate swiftly after firing to avoid precision artillery or FPV drone strikes.13

Key Features of the EVOLYS System Demonstrated at DAIMEX 2026:

  • Advanced Optics Integration: Traditional belt-fed machine guns require the operator to open a top cover to load or clear malfunctions, which severely interrupts the optic rail and compromises zero. The EVOLYS lateral feed mechanism allows for a monolithic, uninterrupted top rail.8 This permits the tandem mounting of primary day optics alongside clip-on thermal or night vision devices without removing iron sights—a critical necessity for 24-hour, all-weather operational capability.8
  • Suppressor Optimization: Observations from the Ukrainian theater indicate that muzzle flash and acoustic signatures instantly draw lethal drone and mortar counter-fire. The EVOLYS is factory-optimized for sustained, heavy volumes of fire with a sound suppressor attached, managing internal pressures to prevent excessive gas blowback to the operator and eliminating cyclic rate malfunctions common in older suppressed weapons.8
  • Operational Maturity: FN Herstal representatives revealed that since its initial evaluations, the EVOLYS has undergone several internal modifications directly based on end-user feedback, including the integration of a bipod and a revised M4-style adjustable buttstock.8 The weapon system is currently being evaluated by 15 countries and is certified and ready for scaled mass production.9

Heavy Support and Remote Weapon Stations

Beyond man-portable infantry systems, FN Herstal demonstrated the FN M3M WM (Weapon Mount) system and its FN DEFNDER medium-weight remote weapon station (RWS).7 The DEFNDER RWS is highly adaptable, capable of mounting a variety of heavy weapons up to the.50 caliber (12.7mm) M2HB heavy machine gun, which provides a firing rate of 600 rounds per minute.9 Furthermore, the system can accommodate the advanced M3R variant, which delivers an exceptional 1,100 rounds per minute.9 Controlled via an updated station with high-resolution imaging, remote weapon stations are becoming standard issue on both light ground vehicles and autonomous platforms, keeping human operators safely under armor or in defilade while delivering precise, overwhelming support fire.

9. Autonomous Systems and the Democratization of Aerial Strike

The pervasive, transformative impact of unmanned systems in modern conflict was unmistakable across the DAIMEX 2026 live demonstrations. The scenarios showcased a permanent shift in military thought: moving from viewing drones solely as auxiliary, high-echelon intelligence assets to establishing them as core, squad-level elements of the infantry strike matrix. Exhibitors demonstrated comprehensive, integrated drone ecosystems ranging from micro-reconnaissance platforms to highly lethal loitering munitions.6

Tactical Loitering Munitions

Rafael Advanced Defense Systems utilized the Pabradė live-fire ranges to demonstrate the L-SPIKE 1X Tactical Loitering Munition.7 The live engagement of a container-type target showcased the devastating precision capabilities of modern “kamikaze” drones. Loitering munitions like the L-SPIKE allow infantry operators to launch the weapon from a concealed position, survey the battlefield for targets of opportunity, and execute highly precise kinetic strikes on armored vehicles or fortified bunkers. Crucially, this is achieved without exposing the launch crew to direct line-of-sight counter-battery fire, fundamentally altering the geometry of infantry engagements.

Coordinated ISR and Strike Workflows

A significant operational advancement demonstrated at the exhibition was the deep integration of disparate, multi-role drone platforms to effectively compress the “kill chain” from identification to neutralization.

  • Vantor and Vytistech collaborated to demonstrate a highly coordinated target acquisition and autonomous strike workflow.7 The tactical scenario utilized a Parrot Anafi USA drone acting in a dedicated Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) capacity to locate and identify targets. Once identified, precise target coordinates were immediately transmitted to a Ripley eVTOL (electric vertical take-off and landing) drone, which functioned purely as the weapon carrier. The Ripley eVTOL subsequently flew to the designated coordinates to execute the kinetic attack.7 This strict separation of ISR and strike assets allows the cheaper, explosive-laden strike drone to be risked in contested airspace, while the high-value optics on the ISR platform remain safely loitering at a standoff distance.
  • Meridein Grupp in partnership with Ukrspecsystems demonstrated fixed-wing deep reconnaissance via the Shark-M UAV, actively coupled with First-Person View (FPV) target strikes utilizing explosive charges.7 The use of FPV drones, heavily refined and scaled in the Ukrainian theater, represents an exceedingly cost-effective method for delivering precision ordnance into the vulnerable top-armor of vehicles or the openings of fortified trenches.

Drone Ecosystems and Support Logistics

Companies also focused heavily on the logistical and infrastructural architecture required to sustain continuous, 24-hour drone operations in austere field environments:

  • Atlas Aerospace presented a comprehensive suite of tactical solutions, including the Atlas Pro (tricopter) and AtlasMICRO (quadcopter) for rapid reconnaissance, alongside the larger Atlas Storm 1000.7 More importantly, they demonstrated the AtlasNEST, an autonomous remote docking and charging station, and AtlasTETHER solutions.7 Tethered systems provide persistent, continuously powered flight for static surveillance, completely bypassing the severe battery limitations that typically ground commercial drones after 30 minutes of flight. Atlas Aerospace also showcased the AtlasROVER, an Unmanned Ground Vehicle (UGV), reflecting the rapid convergence and integration of air and ground robotic platforms.7
  • Eraser showcased highly specialized, purpose-built drone systems tailored to specific infantry needs, including the MK8 (a compact, ruggedized training drone designed to quickly onboard new pilots without risking expensive operational airframes), the MK12 (a dedicated reconnaissance platform), and the B19, which features a custom-integrated ammunition dropper mechanism for improvised bombardment.7

The following table summarizes the diverse array of UAS platforms and roles demonstrated at DAIMEX 2026:

Manufacturer / PartnerDrone Platform / SystemPrimary Tactical Role Demonstrated
RafaelL-SPIKE 1XTactical Loitering Munition (Kinetic Strike)
Vantor & VytistechParrot Anafi USAIntelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR)
Vantor & VytistechRipley eVTOLAutomated Weapon Carrier (Kinetic Strike)
Meridein & UkrspecsystemsShark-M UAVFixed-Wing Long Range Reconnaissance
Meridein & UkrspecsystemsStrike FPVFirst-Person View Precision Strike (Explosive Charge)
Atlas AerospaceAtlas Pro / AtlasMICROTricopter/Quadcopter Short Range Reconnaissance
Atlas AerospaceAtlasNEST / AtlasTETHERAutonomous Docking / Persistent Tethered Surveillance
EraserMK8 / MK12 / B19Training (MK8) / Reconnaissance (MK12) / Ammo Dropper (B19)
Quantum SystemsVector AI UAVFixed-Wing Flight / Artillery Position Detection

10. Kinetic Counter-UAS and Point Defense Systems

As the offensive capability and sheer volume of deployed drones have expanded, so too has the urgent military requirement for affordable, scalable counter-drone architectures. The current paradigm—utilizing multi-million-dollar surface-to-air missiles (SAMs) to intercept thousand-dollar commercial FPV drones—imposes an economically unsustainable cost-exchange ratio on the defending force. DAIMEX 2026 featured multiple, innovative systems aimed at restoring economic balance to tactical air defense.6

Kinetic Interception and Physical Neutralization

While electronic warfare (EW) and localized signal jamming remain the primary soft-kill tools for C-UAS, sophisticated adversaries are rapidly developing autonomous drones guided by inertial navigation or machine-vision optical recognition. Because these drones do not rely on GPS signals or constant operator datalinks during their terminal attack phase, standard EW jamming is rendered entirely ineffective. Consequently, there is a massive, renewed focus on physical, kinetic neutralization systems.7

  • Nexdef “GABIJA” System: Recognizing the threat of autonomous quadcopters, Nexdef demonstrated the GABIJA ground-to-air weapon system.7 Specifically engineered for the effective physical neutralization of highly maneuverable FPV and Mavic-style drones, systems like GABIJA offer a dedicated, localized kinetic capability. This allows infantry squads and critical logistics nodes to protect themselves from sudden, short-range drone ambushes without relying on scarce, higher-echelon air defense assets.7
  • Jet Drones Interceptor: Addressing the strategic threat of long-range, high-altitude loitering munitions (such as the Iranian-designed Shahed series, which have been used extensively against critical civilian and military infrastructure), the company Jet Drones demonstrated a highly innovative jet-driven lightweight interceptor.7 By utilizing a fast, relatively low-cost jet drone to physically intercept incoming Shaheds, defenders can efficiently neutralize the threat while preserving their exceedingly expensive, long-range Patriot or NASAMS interceptor missiles for high-value ballistic or hypersonic cruise missile threats.

The successful integration of these diverse kinetic hard-kill systems into the broader “Baltic Drone Wall” sensor grid exemplifies the required multi-layered approach to modern air defense: utilizing wide-area EW for soft-kill disruptions, localized kinetic systems for terminal FPV threats, and high-speed jet interceptors for long-range loitering munitions.4

11. Conclusion and Forward Outlook

The inaugural DAIMEX Baltic 2026 event clearly illustrated that the nations operating on NATO’s eastern flank are fundamentally restructuring their approach to national security, acquisition, and industrial policy. The era of peace-dividend defense budgets and the reliance on distant, vulnerable logistical hubs has definitively ended. The aggressive deployment of €12.2 billion in SAFE loans represents a massive, generational investment designed to establish a robust, localized, and technically superior forward defense posture.4

The exhibition and high-level conferences highlighted several core operational and industrial shifts:

  • The Primacy of Tactical Agility: The introduction of advanced platforms like the Patria TRACKX and the ultralight FN EVOLYS machine gun demonstrate that the defense industry is responding to the urgent need for highly mobile, self-sufficient infantry forces. Units must be capable of traversing difficult, austere terrain rapidly, delivering overwhelming firepower, and displacing immediately to avoid precision counter-strikes.
  • The Democratization of Aerial Strike: The staggering proliferation of FPVs, loitering munitions, and highly coordinated ISR/strike drone workflows confirms that control of the tactical airspace is no longer the exclusive domain of national air forces. Down to the platoon level, infantry units are now expected to deploy organic, precision aerial strike and reconnaissance capabilities.
  • The Necessity of Multi-Layered, Asymmetric Defense: Drones have entirely shattered the concept of conventional, safe rear areas. The active development of physical, terrain-altering barriers like the Eastern Shield, tightly coupled with the advanced sensor and interceptor networks of the Baltic Drone Wall, acknowledges that modern deterrence requires deep, overlapping layers of both physical and electronic infrastructure.
  • Sovereignty Through Supply Chain Integration: The absolute requirement for technology transfer and localized manufacturing—evidenced by the commitments from Rheinmetall, KNDS, and Lockheed Martin—highlights a grim strategic realization. True deterrence requires not just the financial capacity to purchase advanced weapons, but the sovereign industrial capacity to sustain, repair, and restock those weapons independently during a protracted, high-intensity conflict.

Moving forward, the ultimate success of the Baltic defense strategy will depend entirely on the successful execution of the industrial partnerships and B2B memorandums forged at DAIMEX 2026. If the Baltic region can rapidly transition these policy initiatives, SAFE loan allocations, and technical innovations into active factory floors and fully operational field deployments, it will secure a highly resilient, deeply integrated, and lethal forward defense line for the broader NATO alliance.


Please share the link on Facebook, Forums, with colleagues, etc. Your support is much appreciated and if you have any feedback, please email us in**@*********ps.com. If you’d like to request a report or order a reprint, please click here for the corresponding page to open in new tab.


Sources Used

  1. DAIMEX 2026 – Tradecommissioner.gc.ca, accessed May 18, 2026, https://www.tradecommissioner.gc.ca/en/trade-events-training/2026/05/daimex.html
  2. DAIMEX Baltic 2026, accessed May 18, 2026, https://daimex.lt/
  3. DAIMEX Baltic 2026 | Estonian Defence and Aerospace Industry Association, accessed May 18, 2026, https://defence.ee/events/daimex-baltic-2026/
  4. Baltic nations ponder biggest bang for their bucks in $14 billion arms spending spree, accessed May 18, 2026, https://www.defensenews.com/global/europe/2026/05/13/baltic-nations-ponder-biggest-bang-for-their-bucks-in-14-billion-arms-spending-spree/
  5. The President: We offer to the defense industry a government that moves fast, accessed May 18, 2026, https://lrp.lt/en/media-center/news/the-president-we-offer-to-the-defense-industry-a-government-that-moves-fast/47500
  6. THE EXHIBITION – DAIMEX Baltic, accessed May 18, 2026, https://daimex.lt/the-exhibition/
  7. Event Agenda | 2nd Day – EXHIBITION – DAIMEX Baltic 2026, accessed May 18, 2026, https://www.b2match.com/e/exposition-daimex-baltis-2026/components/68561
  8. FN EVOLYS® 5.56 – FN HERSTAL, accessed May 18, 2026, https://fnherstal.com/en/defence/portable-weapons/fn-evolys-556/
  9. FN Herstal Showcases Longstanding Expertise – Asian Defence Journal, accessed May 18, 2026, https://adj.com.my/2026/04/22/fn-herstal-showcases-longstanding-expertise/
  10. Patria TRACKX – Patria Group, accessed May 18, 2026, https://www.patriagroup.com/products-and-services/protected-mobility/patria-trackx
  11. The Patria TrackX – Finland’s New All‑terrain Carrier & the Quiet Return of the Light Tracked APC – forumNordic, accessed May 18, 2026, https://forumnordic.com/defence/the-patria-trackx-finlands-new-all-terrain-carrier-the-quiet-return-of-the-light-tracked-apc/
  12. Address by Gitanas Nausėda, President of the Republic of Lithuania, at the meeting with foreign ambassadors | February 17 d., 2026, accessed May 18, 2026, https://lrp.lt/en/news/address-by-gitanas-nauseda-president-of-the-republic-of-lithuania-at-the-meeting-with-foreign-ambassadors/46926
  13. Lessons From Ukraine And Eastern Shield Among Topics On Day #1 Of CEL 2026, accessed May 18, 2026, https://defenceleaders.com/news/lessons-from-ukraine-and-eastern-shield-among-topics-on-day-1-of-cel-2026/
  14. Address by Gitanas Nausėda, President of the Republic of Lithuania, at the DAIMEX Baltic 2026 Conference, accessed May 18, 2026, https://lrp.lt/en/news/address-by-gitanas-nauseda-president-of-the-republic-of-lithuania-at-the-daimex-baltic-2026-conference/47489
  15. Signal No. 59 · 892 Drones; Cotroceni – Großwald, accessed May 18, 2026, https://www.grosswald.org/signal-no-59-892-drones-cotroceni/
  16. Dispatch from Vilnius: Warfare is evolving rapidly. Here’s how NATO can keep up., accessed May 18, 2026, https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/dispatches/dispatch-from-vilnius-warfare-is-evolving-rapidly-heres-how-nato-can-keep-up/
  17. Panevėžys Surgeon Among First in Europe to Adopt Next-Generation Dental Implant Technology – Hiyastar.co.uk, accessed May 18, 2026, https://hiyastar.co.uk/panevezys-surgeon-among-first-in-europe-to-adopt-next-generation-dental-implant-technology/
  18. Baltic Security: SITREP, accessed May 18, 2026, https://euro-sd.com/2025/11/articles/exclusive/47694/baltic-security-sitrep/
  19. Poland and Baltic States to start mining borders in response to threats from Russia and Belarus – Army Recognition, accessed May 18, 2026, https://www.armyrecognition.com/news/army-news/2025/poland-and-baltic-states-to-start-mining-borders-in-response-to-threats-from-russia-and-belarus
  20. Lithuania to install anti-personnel mines on border with Russia and Belarus – Online.ua, accessed May 18, 2026, https://news.online.ua/en/lithuania-to-install-anti-personnel-mines-on-border-with-russia-and-belarus-891905/
  21. News and Events – KT-Shelter, accessed May 18, 2026, https://kt-shelter.com/news-and-events/
  22. B2B, B2G matchmaking – DAIMEX Baltic 2026, accessed May 18, 2026, https://daimex.lt/b2b-industrial-cooperation-meetings/
  23. Nauseda hopes for rapid launch of joint military production with Ukraine – Ukrinform, accessed May 18, 2026, https://www.ukrinform.net/rubric-economy/4122370-nauseda-hopes-for-rapid-launch-of-joint-military-production-with-ukraine.html
  24. Vehicle Services | DEW Engineering and Development, accessed May 18, 2026, https://www.dewengineering.com/index.php/whatwedo/vehicle-services
  25. Police Protection | DEW Engineering and Development, accessed May 18, 2026, https://www.dewengineering.com/products/police-protection
  26. Patria at DAIMEX Baltic 2026, accessed May 18, 2026, https://www.patriagroup.com/newsroom/news/2026/patria-at-daimex-baltic-2026
  27. The Patria TRACKX Armored Personnel Carrier | EXTREME MOBILITY – YouTube, accessed May 18, 2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-h9h-RzQt-s
  28. DSEI UK NEWS: Finnish Company Debuts Armored Vehicle for Arctic Conditions, accessed May 18, 2026, https://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/articles/2025/9/9/dsei-uk-news-finnish-company-debuts-armoured-vehicle-for-arctic-conditions
  29. FAMOUS programme – Patria Group, accessed May 18, 2026, https://www.patriagroup.com/famous-programme
  30. Patria-led FAMOUS consortium enters third phase with further €79 million EU grant to speed up combat capability development, accessed May 18, 2026, https://www.patriagroup.com/newsroom/news/2026/patria-led-famous-consortium-enters-third-phase-with-further-eu79-million-eu-grant-to-speed-up-combat-capability-development
  31. Patria Debuts New ‘TRACKX’ All-Terrain Tracked Vehicle at DSEI 2025, accessed May 18, 2026, https://nordicdefencereview.com/patria-debuts-new-trackx-all-terrain-tracked-vehicle-at-dsei-2025/
  32. Patria officially launches Patria TRACKX based on FAMOUS-concept : r/TankPorn – Reddit, accessed May 18, 2026, https://www.reddit.com/r/TankPorn/comments/1ncez46/patria_officially_launches_patria_trackx_based_on/
  33. DSEI 2025: Patria launches TRACKX, the company’s first tracked platform, accessed May 18, 2026, https://euro-sd.com/2025/09/articles/exclusive/46529/dsei-2025-patria-launches-trackx/
  34. The ultimate tracked all-terrain armoured vehicle designed to conquer the most challenging environments with ease PROTECTED MOBILITY – Patria, accessed May 18, 2026, https://www.patriagroup.com/download/patria-trackx
  35. EVOLYS | FN® Firearms, accessed May 18, 2026, https://fnamerica.com/evolys/
  36. FN details its EVOLYS super-light MGs – EDR Magazine, accessed May 18, 2026, https://www.edrmagazine.eu/fn-details-its-evolys-super-light-mgs
  37. FN EVOLYS™ | FN® Firearms, accessed May 18, 2026, https://fnamerica.com/products/machine-guns/fn-evolys-7-62/
  38. FN’s Ultra Lightweight EVOLYS Machine Gun | thefirearmblog.com, accessed May 18, 2026, https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/fns-ultra-lightweight-evolys-machine-gun-44819845

Defence24 Days 2026: Key Highlights from Warsaw

1. Executive Summary

The eighth iteration of the Defence24 Days conference, convened at the PGE Narodowy Stadium in Warsaw from May 6 to 7, 2026, reinforced its position as the premier defense and security forum in Central and Eastern Europe.1 Gathering defense ministers, senior NATO and European Union representatives, military commanders, and defense industry executives, the event functioned as a critical nexus for aligning allied security policies with accelerating technological advancements.3 Against the backdrop of the ongoing Russian aggression against Ukraine, the 2026 proceedings demonstrated a definitive pivot from theoretical capability planning to the rapid acquisition of battlefield-proven, highly automated combat systems.2

The primary analytical takeaways from the event center on three operational domains: the paradigm shift in frontline logistics and infantry doctrine based on Ukrainian combat data, the introduction of a massive new Counter-Unmanned Aerial Systems (C-UAS) architecture, and the modernization of infantry small arms.5

Key defense procurement announcements were dominated by the finalization and rollout of Poland’s historic $4.2 billion SAN anti-drone system, developed by a consortium of Polska Grupa Zbrojeniowa (PGZ) and Norway’s Kongsberg Defence & Aerospace.8 This layered defense matrix utilizes over 700 tactical vehicles and a combination of programmable artillery, heavy machine guns, and interceptor drones to seal NATO’s eastern flank against hybrid aerial threats.10

Simultaneously, the Polish domestic small arms industry, led by Fabryka Broni (FB) “Łucznik” Radom, utilized the event to demonstrate the maturity of the MSBS Grot modular rifle ecosystem, announcing significant export milestones and new variants tailored for both military and civilian markets.12 Furthermore, the conference served as a critical platform for analyzing the structural integration of the Polish and Ukrainian defense-industrial bases, highlighting the transition from political rhetoric to actionable joint ventures in artillery and unmanned systems manufacturing.14

This report provides a detailed analysis of the hardware unveiled, the doctrinal lessons assimilated from the Ukrainian theater, the specific mechanics of the newly acquired defense systems, and the strategic procurement shifts reshaping the defense-industrial base of the European continent.

2. Geopolitical and Strategic Context

To contextualize the capability requirements and hardware acquisitions presented at Defence24 Days 2026, it is necessary to examine the threat environment dictating Polish and NATO eastern flank defense spending. The modernization efforts showcased at the event are not occurring in a vacuum; they are a direct response to quantified strategic risks and are enabled by new European financial architectures.15

2.1 The Economic and Societal Imperative for High-Intensity Deterrence

Analyses presented during the conference framework by the Defence Institute and the Union of Entrepreneurs and Employers (ZPP) provided a sobering assessment of the economic cost of a potential full-scale Russian conventional invasion of Poland. The report calculates that such an event could exact a cost exceeding €1 trillion, virtually erasing 40% of the nation’s fixed capital and causing real GDP to collapse by more than half.15 The realization of these catastrophic estimates validates Poland’s current defense expenditure, which reached a record PLN 200 billion (approximately 4.8% of GDP) in the 2026 budget.16

Polish rearmament is driven by the strategic logic that the financial burden of high-intensity deterrence is a fraction of the cost of civilizational degradation.15 The ZPP analysis argues that Poland’s potential losses are proportionally higher than those experienced by Ukraine because Poland ranks among the world’s top 20 economies; the more developed a national infrastructure, the higher the financial and social cost of its destruction.15 Furthermore, the report emphasizes that even low-intensity hybrid attacks—such as regular drone incidents—could undermine Poland’s credibility as a secure destination for foreign direct investment, establishing a requirement for hermetic air defense systems.15

2.2 The Baltic 2035 Concept and Frontline Realities

Discussions at the conference heavily referenced the “Baltic 2035” security paradigm, which reclassifies the Baltic Sea from a quiet northern periphery to a highly contested “frontline sea”.15 Following Sweden’s accession to NATO, the region is now treated as an integrated strategic organism that combines military, economic, technological, and industrial facets.15

Vulnerabilities in this operational theater have shifted from purely military targets to critical civilian infrastructure, including undersea cables, energy pipelines, liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminals, and logistics corridors.15 The weaponization of economic interdependence and the persistent activity of Russia’s “shadow fleet” have forced NATO planners to prioritize multi-domain integration, rapid-response capabilities, and resilient supply chains.15 Strategic projects, such as the proposed deep-sea Ro-Ro port in Choczewo (Port Haller), are no longer viewed merely as commercial gateways but as critical national security architecture designed to enable faster allied reinforcement and military logistics.15

2.3 SAFE Funding and Defense Base Expansion

A critical enabler of Poland’s rapid procurement cycle is the European Union’s Security Action for Europe (SAFE) instrument. Poland has emerged as the largest beneficiary of this program, securing up to €43.7 billion in low-interest loans to finance urgent defense acquisitions and scale its domestic industrial base.16

The SAFE framework is specifically designed to boost industrial production capacity across the European defense technological and industrial base (EDTIB), making sure defense equipment is available when needed and addressing existing capability gaps.18 Polish Deputy Prime Minister Radosław Sikorski emphasized during his panel that procurement financed under SAFE will fundamentally alter the operational readiness of the Polish Armed Forces, allowing the nation to leverage funding to acquire the most advanced gear available to deter adversaries across the eastern border.16 This capital injection directly underpins the massive scale of the SAN anti-drone program and the broader recapitalization of the Polish land forces.17

3. Tactical Infantry Shifts and the WOT 2.0 Doctrine

The most significant intellectual output of Defence24 Days 2026 was the formal assimilation of tactical lessons derived from the war in Ukraine. The conference served to translate ad-hoc battlefield adaptations into formal NATO and Polish military doctrine, heavily scrutinizing the role of light infantry and territorial defense forces.19

3.1 Analyzing the First Decade of Territorial Defense

The role of light infantry was evaluated via a comprehensive report presented by the Eastern Flank Institute (EFI), titled “WOT 2.0: The Return of Light Infantry to the Polish Armed Forces”.19 Presented by EFI experts including Grzegorz Matyasik and Dr. Przemysław Wywiał, the report summarized the first decade of WOT (Wojska Obrony Terytorialnej) operations and established guidelines for its future development in the face of deep-strike capabilities and hybrid threats.19

Former Polish Ambassador to NATO Tomasz Szatkowski provided commentary on the study, noting that while WOT remains a vital achievement for national security, its foundational objectives and implementation methods require periodic review to address operational distortions and adapt to the changing character of war.20 The presence of WOT leadership at the conference facilitated a direct, public dialogue between strategic analysts and operational commanders.20

3.2 The Paradigm Shift to Universal Civic Service

A primary consensus emerging from the EFI panels is the pressing need to move beyond traditional concepts of military conscription. General Jarosław Gromadziński argued forcefully that the defense establishment must shift the public narrative from a narrow focus on compulsory military service toward a broader concept of “universal service to the state”.20

This doctrine posits that national security relies on a resilient society where every citizen has an obligation to act for the security of the state, whether through direct military service, the police, fire service, civil defense, or public administration.20 General Gromadziński emphasized that while the military fights the battle, the state as a whole fights the war. This requires the creation of a “system of state resilience” to protect critical infrastructure and the civilian population—duties that are administrative and governmental rather than strictly military.20

3.3 Human Capital versus Equipment Procurement

Furthermore, analysts such as Michał Dworczyk, Chairman of the EFI Program Council, emphasized that the Polish defense strategy must balance its heavy equipment procurement with human capital development. Dworczyk warned that the current state of Polish military reserves requires urgent attention, noting that the national defense posture is excessively focused on hardware acquisitions while neglecting the personnel required to operate it.20

Reiterating the foundational military principle that “reservists win wars, not professional armies,” Dworczyk criticized the disparity between Poland and other NATO Eastern Flank nations, pointing out that Poland remains the last bordering nation with the Russian Federation that has not restored some form of mandatory military training.20 This critique underscores the WOT 2.0 argument: hardware overmatch is insufficient if the demographic and training pipelines are not scaled concurrently to sustain a protracted, high-attrition conflict.

4. Small Arms Modernization: FB Radom and Mesko Portfolios

While heavy air defense systems dominated procurement headlines, Defence24 Days 2026 featured an extensive exhibition of modernized infantry small arms. The showcase was predominantly led by state-owned Polish Armaments Group (PGZ) entities, specifically Fabryka Broni (FB) “Łucznik” Radom and Zakłady Mechaniczne Tarnów (ZMT).21 The hardware displayed reflects a total phase-out of legacy post-Soviet equipment in favor of NATO-standard, modular ecosystems.

4.1 The MSBS Grot Modular Ecosystem

The Modułowy System Broni Strzeleckiej (MSBS) Grot assault rifle has matured significantly since its initial fielding. Combat experience gained by Ukrainian forces operating donated Grot rifles has fed directly into the system’s iterative development, validating its performance in austere, mud-heavy, and high-attrition environments.22

The latest iterations of the system emphasize its core design philosophy: absolute modularity. Built around a common upper receiver, the rifle can be rapidly converted between a standard layout (C16) and a bullpup configuration (B16).7 This structural commonality allows infantry armorers to tailor the weapon’s center of gravity and overall length for specific environments. For instance, mechanized infantry operating in the cramped troop compartments of KTO Rosomak vehicles benefit immensely from the reduced overall length of the bullpup configuration, while retaining the ballistic advantages of a full 16-inch barrel.7

Table 1: FB Radom Small Arms Technical Specifications 7

Weapon SystemCaliberOperating PrincipleWeight (Empty)Barrel LengthEffective RangePrimary Role
MSBS Grot C165.56x45mm NATOShort-stroke gas piston3.65 kg406 mm (16 in)500 mStandard Infantry Service Rifle
MSBS Grot B165.56x45mm NATOShort-stroke gas piston3.40 kg406 mm (16 in)500 mMechanized Infantry (Bullpup)
MSBS Grot 762N7.62x51mm NATOShort-stroke gas piston~4.50 kg508 mm (20 in)800 mDesignated Marksman Rifle (DMR)
VIS 1009x19mm NATOShort recoil, locked breech0.69 kg110 mm (4.3 in)50 mStandard Service Sidearm
MPS Pistol9x19mm NATOShort recoil, striker-fired0.65 kg102 mm (4.0 in)50 mTactical / Specialized Sidearm
UKM-2020S7.62x51mm NATOGas-operated, open bolt8.40 kg440 mm (17.3 in)1000 mGeneral Purpose Machine Gun

A major announcement coinciding with the conference period was the successful entry of the MSBS Grot into the United States civilian and law enforcement market, representing a significant export milestone for the Polish defense industry.12 FB Radom successfully secured certification from the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) for the MSBS Grot Pistol variant.12

Distributed by Arms of America, the platform will be available in 10.5-inch, 13-inch, and 14.5-inch barrel configurations.12 Within the highly competitive U.S. market, the MSBS Grot is positioned as an advanced, piston-driven alternative to standard direct-impingement AR-15 platforms.12 The short-stroke gas piston operating mechanism provides superior reliability when utilized with sound suppressors, as it vents excess gas at the gas block rather than directing carbon fouling back into the receiver—a tactical advantage increasingly demanded by special operations and tactical law enforcement end-users.7

4.2 Sidearms and Specialist Weaponry

FB Radom also exhibited its modernized sidearm portfolio, specifically designed to phase out legacy equipment such as the WIST-94 and P-83 Wanad.26

  • VIS 100: A 9x19mm semi-automatic pistol utilizing a traditional hammer-fired double-action/single-action (DA/SA) mechanism. It is currently entering widespread service with the Polish Land Forces, with tens of thousands of units already delivered.26
  • MPS (Modular Semi-Automatic Pistol): Unveiled for specialized tactical use, this 9x19mm striker-fired pistol represents a shift toward modern duty handgun designs. It functions on the principle of short barrel recoil with a locked breech and features a semi-DAO (Double Action Only) trigger system with initial tension.7 Equipped with automatic trigger and firing pin fuses, the MPS is fully ambidextrous with symmetrical controls, catering to the ergonomic demands of modern close-quarters engagements.7

Furthermore, Zakłady Mechaniczne Tarnów (ZMT) displayed the UKM-2020S machine gun.21 This weapon represents the latest iteration of the Polish effort to adapt the highly reliable, PK-pattern belt-fed machine gun to the NATO 7.62x51mm cartridge. The UKM-2020S features reduced weight, improved ergonomics, and integrated Picatinny rails for modern optical sights, ensuring Polish infantry retain heavy volume-of-fire capabilities while streamlining ammunition logistics within the NATO alliance.21

4.3 Ammunition Logistics and Remote Weapon Stations

The deployment of new small arms requires a concurrent scaling of ammunition production and logistics. Mesko S.A., Poland’s premier munitions manufacturer, confirmed extensive contracts to supply vast quantities of dedicated 5.56x45mm and 9x19mm ammunition specifically tailored to the ballistic profiles of the MSBS Grot and VIS 100 platforms.27

Beyond small arms ammunition, Mesko’s systems integration capabilities were highlighted through their partnership with Kongsberg. Mesko-produced armaments are being integrated directly into Kongsberg’s RS4 and RS6 remote weapon stations (RWS).28 This interoperability allows Polish-manufactured weapons to be mounted on advanced targeting gimbals, providing armored vehicle crews with stabilized, high-precision fire capabilities while remaining under armor—a critical survivability factor observed in the Ukrainian theater.28

5. The SAN Counter-UAS Architecture: Scale and Capabilities

The most strategically significant hardware development discussed at Defence24 Days 2026 was the formalization of the SAN anti-drone system. Prompted by Russian drone incursions into NATO airspace in late 2025, the Polish Armaments Agency finalized a PLN 15-16 billion (approximately $4.2 billion) contract with a PGZ-Kongsberg consortium in January 2026.10

The SAN system represents a paradigm shift in air defense doctrine. Traditional surface-to-air missile (SAM) systems, such as the Patriot (Wisła program) or CAMM (Narew program), possess highly unfavorable cost-exchange ratios when utilized against low-cost loitering munitions like the Shahed-136.30 The SAN program rectifies this imbalance by prioritizing cost-per-kill efficiency through high-volume kinetic effectors and localized electronic warfare, filling a critical gap in Poland’s multi-layered air defense network.31

5.1 System Structure and Network Deployment

The SAN program is not a single vehicle or weapon, but an interconnected, decentralized defensive shield. The acquisition constitutes the largest counter-drone program in Polish military history, with initial deployments expected to begin in 2026 and final batteries entering service by January 2028.6

The organizational structure of the SAN deployment is massive in scale, consisting of 32:

  • 18 Battery Modules
  • 18 Command Platoons (Housing communication nodes and data processing centers)
  • 52 Fire Platoons (Capable of autonomous detection, classification, and kinetic engagement)

The system’s modularity allows each of the 52 fire platoons to operate independently if communication with higher echelon command nodes is severed or degraded by hostile electronic warfare. This distributed lethality ensures that the air defense shield cannot be collapsed by striking a single centralized command post.34

5.2 Sensor Integration and Command Control

The backbone of the SAN system relies heavily on domestic Polish technology, integrated with Kongsberg’s proven command architecture. Advanced Protection Systems (APS), a Polish technology firm, serves as the primary subcontractor responsible for the sensor suite and local command framework.10

  • Sensor Matrices: APS provides the FIELDctrl Ultra and Follow radars, augmented by high-resolution electro-optical tracking stations.10 These sensors provide 3D track data on targets featuring exceptionally low radar cross-sections (RCS), such as commercial quadcopters or composite-built fixed-wing attack drones.35
  • SanView C2: The proprietary command-and-control software, SanView, serves as the digital brain of the system. It fuses data from multiple radar tracks, classifies the target using advanced algorithms, and automatically cues the most appropriate effector based on the target’s vector, speed, and the engagement cost.10 This reduces the cognitive load on operators and drastically decreases the sensor-to-shooter latency.

5.3 Platform Mobility: The Vehicle Fleet

The physical hardware of the SAN system will be mounted on a fleet of 703 tactical vehicles. This high degree of mobility is crucial; static air defense sites in Ukraine have proven highly vulnerable to suppression of enemy air defenses (SEAD) operations and loitering munition strikes.10

The fleet is divided into two primary domestic chassis types:

  1. Jelcz Platforms (approx. 400 units): These heavy-duty military trucks will carry the larger, more power-intensive systems, including the primary search radars, SanView command posts, and the heavier 35mm artillery modules.9
  2. Igwan Platforms (approx. 300 units): The Igwan is a lighter, highly mobile 4×4 tactical vehicle. Within the SAN architecture, the Igwan chassis functions as a rapid-response effector platform. It is specifically utilized to mount the Kongsberg PROTECTOR remote weapon stations paired with the 12.7mm WLKM rotary machine guns, allowing these units to quickly reposition and saturate localized threat vectors.10

6. Kinetic and Electronic Effectors within the SAN Matrix

The SAN system’s lethality is derived from a diversified portfolio of effectors, allowing commanders to match the weapon to the target precisely, thereby preserving high-end munitions for complex threats.6

6.1 Programmable Artillery and Rotary Machine Guns

  • SA-35 Cannon: Developed by PIT-RADWAR, this 35mm self-propelled anti-aircraft artillery system forms the heavy kinetic core of the SAN platoons.10 The critical technological advantage of the SA-35 is its use of programmable “smart” ammunition. As the projectile leaves the barrel, the fire control system magnetically programs a fuse within the shell to detonate at a precise point in space immediately in front of the target.6 This generates a dense cloud of tungsten sub-projectiles that shreds the drone, eliminating the need for a direct hit and drastically increasing the probability of kill (Pk) against small, evasive targets.6
  • WLKM 12.7mm Heavy Machine Gun: Designed by Zakłady Mechaniczne Tarnów (ZMT), this multi-barrel rotary weapon system provides intense localized point defense. The WLKM features a block of four 900mm barrels capable of firing up to 3,600 rounds per minute.10 Crucially, barrel rotation is driven by electric motors rather than gas operation.10 This ensures a consistent, highly reliable rate of fire that is unaffected by gas port fouling or ammunition inconsistencies. Weighing only 50 kilograms and measuring 130 cm in length, the weapon is compact enough to be easily integrated onto the Kongsberg PROTECTOR turrets mounted on the light Igwan vehicles, creating a dense stream of 12.7mm fire effective up to 2,200 meters.10

6.2 Precision Missiles and Drone Interceptors

  • APKWS II: The Advanced Precision Kill Weapon System converts standard unguided 70mm Hydra rockets into laser-guided precision munitions.6 By integrating a mid-body guidance section, the APKWS provides a low-cost, highly accurate intercept capability for engaging larger Group 3 drones, loitering munitions, and certain subsonic cruise missiles at ranges exceeding the reach of the 35mm cannons.6
  • Interceptor UAVs: Acknowledging that drone-on-drone combat is becoming a standard tactical reality, the SAN system integrates proprietary hunter-killer drones, such as the MEROPS system.10 These interceptors are launched from ground nodes and steered toward incoming threats by the system’s radar, physically colliding with or detonating near hostile UAVs to destroy them in mid-air.10

Table 2: SAN System Primary Kinetic Effectors 6

Effector SystemTypeEngagement MethodPrimary Target Profile
SA-35 Cannon35mm AutocannonProgrammable Airburst MunitionSwarms, Fixed-wing UAVs
WLKM 12.7mmRotary Machine GunKinetic Saturation (3600 rpm)Low-altitude Quadcopters, Loitering Munitions
APKWS II70mm Guided RocketLaser-guided Kinetic ImpactGroup 3 UAVs, Cruise Missiles
MEROPS / VertexInterceptor DronePhysical Ramming / Proximity DetonationEvasive, High-altitude UAVs

6.3 Non-Kinetic Systems and Analytical Critique

Beyond kinetic weapons, the SAN architecture incorporates electronic warfare (EW) capabilities. The system features the SKYstrl EW complex and directional microwave jammers designed to disrupt command data links, spoof GPS navigation signals, and fry drone circuitry via directed energy before kinetic engagement becomes necessary.6

Despite the impressive technical specifications, the SAN program was subject to analytical critique during the conference panels. Michał Dworczyk noted that while the program is a vital step, the current expenditure model may be inefficient based on empirical data from the Ukrainian conflict.20 Dworczyk highlighted that combat statistics show less than 10% of hostile drones in Ukraine are successfully destroyed by barrel-based anti-aircraft artillery.20 Despite this, three out of the five primary effector types in the Polish SAN program (the 35mm, 30mm, and 12.7mm systems) are barrel-based.20 He argued that a larger proportion of the $4.2 billion budget should be allocated to electronic warfare and automated interceptor drones, which have demonstrated a higher cost-to-kill ratio in actual combat operations.20

7. Unmanned Systems: Ground Logistics and Maritime Autonomy

The exhibition halls at PGE Narodowy Stadium provided a physical showcase of the unmanned systems expected to fulfill the doctrinal requirements established by the war in Ukraine.2 The focus has shifted from simple reconnaissance to heavy logistics, explosive ordnance disposal, and maritime intelligence.

7.1 Automating the Supply Chain: Unmanned Ground Vehicles (UGVs)

Ukrainian officials at the conference detailed an aggressive push to remove human soldiers from the most dangerous logistical routes. Defense Minister Mykhailo Fedorov’s stated goal is that 100% of frontline logistics and medical evacuations should be performed by robotic systems.36 To achieve this, Ukraine is procuring 25,000 Unmanned Ground Vehicles (UGVs) in the first half of 2026, more than double the acquisitions of the previous year.36

A prime example of this capability is the Bizon-L, recently codified under NATO cataloging standards. This UGV possesses a 300-kilogram payload capacity and a 50-kilometer operational range, allowing it to resupply entrenched infantry under heavy artillery fire without risking logistical convoys.36

In parallel, Polish domestic industry focused heavily on specialized UGVs for combat engineering. The Łukasiewicz PIAP Institute displayed its combat-proven pyrotechnic robots, notably the PIAP GRYF and PIAP PATROL.15 These tracked, modular systems feature highly articulate manipulator arms and are designed to detect, remove, and neutralize improvised explosive devices (IEDs) and unexploded ordnance (UXO).15 Deploying these platforms allows combat engineers to clear contested routes and breach minefields remotely.

7.2 The Proliferation of Drone Interceptors

A notable trend in the exhibition was the rapid evolution of dedicated “interceptor” drones. The Polish distributor UMO showcased the Vertex interceptor drone, a platform emblematic of this new class of weaponry.37

Designed to counter the proliferation of cheap commercial drones utilized for artillery spotting, the Vertex is constructed from a carbon filament reinforced with fine carbon fibers, providing the structural rigidity necessary to execute high-G maneuvers without airframe deformation.37 It features a 500-gram warhead, a 15-minute flight endurance, and a functional engagement range of 7 to 10 kilometers.37 The widespread deployment of platforms like Vertex and MEROPS indicates a tactical evolution where airspace denial at the squad and platoon level is achieved via drone-on-drone combat, augmenting the larger SAN umbrella.

7.3 Strategic Maritime Autonomy

Reflecting the “Baltic 2035” frontline sea concept, the maritime domain is also experiencing rapid automation. Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI) exhibited the BlueWhale uncrewed submarine.38 This autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) is designed for persistent intelligence gathering, maritime domain awareness, and anti-submarine warfare (ASW) operations.38 The integration of long-endurance AUVs allows navies to continuously monitor critical undersea infrastructure, such as the Baltic Pipe and communication cables, without risking manned submarine crews in the shallow, highly contested littoral zones of the Baltic Sea.38

8. Cross-Border Polish-Ukrainian Defense Integration

Defence24 Days 2026 dedicated significant bandwidth to the structural integration of the Polish and Ukrainian defense-industrial bases. Discussions highlighted a transition from political rhetoric to actionable joint ventures, though critical bottlenecks continue to impede rapid scaling.14

8.1 Joint Production and Technology Transfer

Ukrainian Deputy Foreign Minister Olexandr Mischenko stated that Ukraine is ready to share its tactical experience from the ongoing war to assist partners in developing more effective combat systems.14 This openness to technology transfer has facilitated several high-profile joint projects:

  • Bohdana Howitzer Production: A joint venture was announced to manufacture the Ukrainian-designed 155mm Bohdana wheeled self-propelled howitzer directly on Polish territory, combining a battlefield-proven design with Polish manufacturing capacity.14
  • Drone Fleet Initiative: A collaborative project has been launched to create a massive “drone fleet,” combining Polish state financing and industrial infrastructure with Ukrainian technical engineering and combat software.14

To accommodate this rapid integration, the Polish Ministry of National Defense issued Decision No. 123/MON, which significantly simplified the testing and procurement regulations for autonomous systems, allowing prototypes to reach the field faster.14

8.2 Overcoming Systemic Bottlenecks

Despite these advancements, defense executives warned that the primary barriers to scaling production are no longer political, but regulatory and administrative.14

A significant hurdle is the absence of a centralized framework for cross-border defense collaboration. Ukrainian defense firms struggle to identify appropriate industrial partners within Poland due to the lack of a unified state liaison or “centralized point of cooperation”.14 Furthermore, structural legal divergences actively impede rapid contracting. Polish procurement law requires strict documentation confirming the “non-criminal status” of corporate partners before contracts can be awarded. However, this legal concept does not exist for collective entities under Ukrainian law, leading to severe administrative paralysis during joint venture formations.14

To resolve these systemic frictions, industry leaders, such as Dmytro Shymkiv of AeroDrone, proposed adopting a framework analogous to the U.S.-Canada Defence Production Sharing Agreement (DPSA) to harmonize supply chains and procurement standards.14 Additionally, stakeholders advocated for the creation of a dedicated cross-border mobility scheme to allow engineers, soldiers, and defense specialists to move fluidly between the two nations, bypassing standard visa and immigration delays that currently throttle collaborative research and development.14

9. Future Trajectories and Strategic Mitigation

Defence24 Days 2026 underscored a stark reality for NATO’s eastern flank: deterrence can no longer rely solely on the promise of eventual allied reinforcement. Frontline nations must possess the immediate, decentralized, and highly automated capability to absorb and repel initial hybrid and conventional strikes.15

The procurement of the $4.2 billion SAN anti-drone shield, the aggressive modernization of basic infantry systems like the MSBS Grot and VIS 100, and the push toward autonomous ground logistics reflect a unified strategy to build this systemic resilience.8 Furthermore, the conceptual shift toward “universal service to the state” and the WOT 2.0 doctrine indicates a fundamental acknowledgment that future high-intensity conflicts will require the mobilization of the entire societal and industrial apparatus, not merely the professional military.20

As Poland continues to deploy the €43.7 billion in SAFE funding, its defense-industrial base is transitioning from a regional supplier to a primary pillar of European security architecture.16 The technologies, procurement strategies, and doctrinal lessons formalized in Warsaw in May 2026 will dictate the operational tempo, logistics networks, and survival metrics for NATO forces operating in contested environments for the next decade.


Please share the link on Facebook, Forums, with colleagues, etc. Your support is much appreciated and if you have any feedback, please email us in**@*********ps.com. If you’d like to request a report or order a reprint, please click here for the corresponding page to open in new tab.


Sources Used

  1. Defence24 Days 2026 – Tradecommissioner.gc.ca, accessed May 18, 2026, https://www.tradecommissioner.gc.ca/en/trade-events-training/2026/05/defence24-days.html
  2. Defence24 Days 2026: Warsaw to Host the Largest Defense …, accessed May 18, 2026, https://militarnyi.com/en/news/defence24-days-2026-warsaw-to-host-the-largest-defense-conference-in-central-and-eastern-europe-may-6-7/
  3. Defence24Days on the 6 & 7 of May in Warsaw, accessed May 18, 2026, https://defence24.com/geopolitics/defence24days-on-the-6-7-of-may-in-warsaw
  4. Defence24 Days 2026 – EOS-Aus.com, accessed May 18, 2026, https://eos-aus.com/events/defence24-days-2026/
  5. Europe’s setbacks in unmanned ground vehicles development – Defence24.com, accessed May 18, 2026, https://www.defence24.com/industry/europes-setbacks-in-unmanned-ground-vehicles-development
  6. Poland targets 2026 deployment for new “San” counter-drone system – cuashub.com, accessed May 18, 2026, https://cuashub.com/en/content/poland-targets-2026-deployment-for-new-san-counter-drone-system/
  7. MSBS GROT – Fabryka Broni Łucznik Radom, accessed May 18, 2026, https://fabrykabroni.pl/en/en/offer/military-market/rifles/msbs-grot
  8. Poland Orders SAN Anti-Drone System Based on Anti-Aircraft Artillery, APKWS, and UAV Interceptors, accessed May 18, 2026, https://militarnyi.com/en/news/poland-orders-san-anti-drone-system-based-on-anti-aircraft-artillery-apkws-and-uav-interceptors/
  9. Poland’s Historic $4.2 Billion SAN Anti-Drone System Contract to …, accessed May 18, 2026, https://united24media.com/latest-news/polands-historic-42-billion-san-anti-drone-system-contract-to-boost-defense-capabilities-15513
  10. Poland Orders SAN Counter-Drone System Based on Anti-Aircraft Guns, APKWS and Interceptor UAVs – Freedom, accessed May 18, 2026, https://uatv.ua/en/poland-orders-san-counter-drone-system-based-on-anti-aircraft-guns-apkws-and-interceptor-uavs/
  11. Anti-drone Revolution in Poland. Norway as a Key Partner – Moja Norwegia, accessed May 18, 2026, https://m.mojanorwegia.pl/en/antidrone-revolution-in-poland-norway-as-a-key-partner-26985.html
  12. Fabryka Broni Łucznik–Radom Announces Participation in SHOT Show 2026 in the United States – MILMAG, accessed May 18, 2026, https://milmag.pl/en/fabryka-broni-lucznik-radom-announces-participation-in-shot-show-2026-in-the-united-states/
  13. FABRYKA BRONI “ŁUCZNIK”– RADOM ANNOUNCES ITS PARTICIPATION IN SHOT SHOW 2026 IN THE USA, accessed May 18, 2026, https://fabrykabroni.pl/en/en/news/fabryka-broni-lucznik-radom-announces-its-participation-in-shot-show-2026-in-the-usa
  14. Polish-Ukrainian defence-industrial cooperation accelerates amid …, accessed May 18, 2026, https://defence24.com/defence-policy/polish-ukrainian-defence-industrial-cooperation-accelerates-amid-systemic-bottlenecks
  15. Impressive exhibition at Defence24 Days. [PHOTOS] – Defence24.com, accessed May 18, 2026, https://defence24.com/industry/impressive-exhibition-at-defence24-days-photos
  16. Deputy Prime Minister Radosław Sikorski takes part in Defence24 Days – Ministry of Foreign Affairs Republic of Poland – Gov.pl, accessed May 18, 2026, https://www.gov.pl/web/diplomacy/deputy-prime-minister-radoslaw-sikorski-takes-part-in-defence24-days
  17. Poland picks Kongsberg-PGZ consortium to build anti-drone ‘wall’ – Defense News, accessed May 18, 2026, https://www.defensenews.com/global/europe/2026/02/02/poland-picks-kongsberg-pgz-consortium-to-build-anti-drone-wall/
  18. Poland – Aerospace and Defense – International Trade Administration, accessed May 18, 2026, https://www.trade.gov/country-commercial-guides/poland-aerospace-and-defense
  19. The Eastern Flank Institute at Defence24 Days – Eastern Flank Institute, accessed May 18, 2026, https://easternflank.org/the-eastern-flank-institute-at-defence24-days/
  20. Eastern Flank Review, 06.05-12.05.2026 – Eastern Flank Institute, accessed May 18, 2026, https://easternflank.org/eastern-flank-review-06-05-12-05-2026/
  21. WDS 24: Polish arms industry with an offer for the Middle East – Defence24.com, accessed May 18, 2026, https://defence24.com/industry/wds-24-polish-arms-industry-with-an-offer-for-the-middle-east
  22. POTD: FB Radom MSBS Grot – U.S. Rifle & Pistol | thefirearmblog.com, accessed May 18, 2026, https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/potd-fb-radom-msbs-grot-u-s-rifle-pistol-44824996
  23. The reconstruction and new role of the defense industry in Central Europe – experiences from the war in Ukraine. – Stosunki Międzynarodowe – International Relations, accessed May 18, 2026, https://internationalrelations-publishing.org/articles/4-17
  24. FB MSBS Grot – Wikipedia, accessed May 18, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FB_MSBS_Grot
  25. Łucznik Arms Factory Radom, accessed May 18, 2026, https://fabrykabroni.pl/en
  26. List of equipment of the Polish Land Forces – Wikipedia, accessed May 18, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_equipment_of_the_Polish_Land_Forces
  27. AGREEMENT FOR THE SUPPLY OF SMALL-CALIBER AMMUNITION FOR THE POLISH ARMED FORCES FOR THE YEARS 2023-2026 WAS SIGNED – MESKO S.A., accessed May 18, 2026, https://mesko.com.pl/en/news/agreement-for-the-supply-of-small-caliber-ammunition-for-the-polish-armed-forces
  28. Defence24.com Industry, accessed May 18, 2026, https://defence24.com/industry
  29. KONGSBERG wins NOK 16 billion contract to deliver Counter-UAS solutions in Poland, accessed May 18, 2026, https://www.kongsberg.com/news/news-archive/2026/kongsberg-wins-nok-16-billion-contract-to-deliver-counter-uas-solutions-in-poland/
  30. Poland monthly briefing: Poland is the main beneficiary of the EU’s SAFE arms program, accessed May 18, 2026, https://china-cee.eu/2026/03/23/poland-monthly-briefing-poland-is-the-main-beneficiary-of-the-eus-safe-arms-program/
  31. SAN Air Defense: Poland’s Answer to Drone Warfare – YouTube, accessed May 18, 2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wBOaA87k3Jg
  32. Billion-dollar contract: Poland demonstrated the operation of the unified anti-theft SAN system – vpk.name, accessed May 18, 2026, https://vpk.name/en/1099002_billion-dollar-contract-poland-demonstrated-the-operation-of-the-unified-anti-theft-san-system.html
  33. Poland Moves to Seal Eastern Airspace with New Counter-Drone …, accessed May 18, 2026, https://defensemirror.com/news/40993/Poland_Moves_to_Seal_Eastern_Airspace_with_New_Counter_Drone_Shield
  34. SAN: The First Polish Contract under the SAFE Program – MILMAG, accessed May 18, 2026, https://milmag.pl/en/san-the-first-polish-contract-under-the-safe-program/
  35. Poland’s SAN Counter-Drone Air Defense System to Enter Service …, accessed May 18, 2026, https://militarnyi.com/en/news/poland-s-san-counter-drone-air-defense-system-to-enter-service-this-year/
  36. Ukraine to field 25,000 ground robots in push to replace soldiers for frontline logistics, accessed May 18, 2026, https://www.defensenews.com/unmanned/2026/04/24/ukraine-to-field-25000-ground-robots-in-push-to-replace-soldiers-for-frontline-logistics/
  37. Ukrainian Companies Present Interceptor Drones at Defence24 Days, accessed May 18, 2026, https://militarnyi.com/en/news/ukrainian-companies-present-interceptor-drones-at-defence24-days/
  38. Defense24 Days – IAI, accessed May 18, 2026, https://www.iai.co.il/event/defense24-days/

IDEB 2026: Transforming Central European Defense

1. Executive Summary

The International Defence Exhibition Bratislava (IDEB) Defence & Security, held from May 12 to May 14, 2026, at the Incheba Exhibition and Congress Centre in Slovakia, served as a definitive barometer for the rapidly maturing defense industrial base of Central and Eastern Europe.1As allied nations across NATO’s Eastern Flank accelerate the modernization of their land forces, the 2026 exhibition underscored a decisive paradigm shift.3Regional defense ministries are moving away from the direct procurement of foreign, off-the-shelf systems, prioritizing instead the development of sovereign, intra-regional joint ventures that retain intellectual property and capital within the local economic bloc.4

The technological reveals at IDEB 2026 demonstrated a clear doctrinal focus on strategic mobility, modular combat architectures, and layered platform survivability. Among the most significant announcements was the global premiere of the CFL-120 Karpat medium tank, representing a strategic partnership between the Czech Republic’s Czechoslovak Group (CSG) and Turkey’s FNSS.5 Concurrently, Poland’s Polska Grupa Zbrojeniowa (PGZ) debuted an export-configured variant of the Borsuk Infantry Fighting Vehicle (IFV), deliberately paired with the Slovak-manufactured Turra 30V9 unmanned turret to capture international market share.7 In the realm of indirect fire support, Konštrukta-Defence introduced the highly mobile EVA M3 6×6 self-propelled howitzer, reflecting a transition toward lighter, automated artillery systems capable of rapid displacement.9

Furthermore, the event highlighted sweeping modernization efforts within the Armed Forces of the Slovak Republic. These domestic initiatives range from the total adoption of AR-15 platform service rifles produced by local manufacturer Grand Power to a fundamental transition toward newly designed combat uniforms and advanced ballistic protection systems.10 The analytical takeaways from the exhibition indicate that the European ground warfare paradigm is adapting to the realities of high-intensity, sensor-rich environments. The historical reliance on raw armored mass is being supplemented by a critical demand for rapid deployment capabilities, active protection systems capable of defeating loitering munitions, and passive electronic warfare networks that shield friendly forces from electromagnetic detection. The industrial alignment witnessed at the exhibition points to a robust, increasingly independent regional supply chain that is highly capable of competing on the global export market.

2. Strategic Context: The Maturation of the Central European Defense Industry

The geopolitical landscape of the mid-2020s has forced a systemic reevaluation of supply chain resilience, force readiness, and technological sovereignty across NATO allied nations.13 The IDEB 2026 exhibition provided a physical manifestation of these shifting strategic policies.14 Historically, Eastern European militaries operated legacy Soviet-era equipment, gradually replacing these platforms with imports from Western European or North American manufacturers. However, the current phase of modernization is characterized by deep domestic production initiatives and bilateral industrial synergies designed to insulate the region from global logistical shocks.

The emphasis at IDEB 2026 was squarely on building competitive, European-developed defense solutions.8 This approach mitigates the risk of supply chain disruptions during extended conflicts and builds critical intellectual property within the local defense sector. By showcasing products developed through joint initiatives—such as the Polish-Slovak Borsuk export variant or the Czech-Turkish-Slovak CFL-120 Karpat—the regional defense industry signaled its intent to not merely supply its own armed forces but to aggressively pursue global defense export markets, with companies citing regions like the Middle East and Southeast Asia as promising avenues for expansion.5

The exhibition also served as an open forum for the Armed Forces of the Slovak Republic, acting under the professional auspices of the Ministry of Defence, the Ministry of Interior, and the Defence and Security Industry Association.16 Elite units, including the Rapid Response Police Unit, conducted live dynamic demonstrations emphasizing the integration of newly procured technologies in realistic intervention scenarios.16 One such event was the highly publicized “NO ESCAPE” demonstration, which simulated a realistic tactical intervention against an armed offender, showcasing the seamless integration of robotics, unmanned systems, and modern small arms.16

The broader regional commitment to integrated security was also highlighted by the introduction of the European SAFE initiative to Slovakia for the first time, signaling deeper alignment with European Union crisis management and civil protection frameworks.16 These strategic alignments indicate that the Eastern Flank is no longer a peripheral consumer of defense technology, but a central node of innovation and manufacturing.

3. Financial and Industrial Underpinnings: The CSG Model

The rapid development of advanced heavy armored platforms and artillery systems requires an industrial base with immense financial liquidity and operational momentum. The Czechoslovak Group (CSG), which maintained the largest presence at IDEB 2026 second only to the Slovak Ministry of Defence, serves as the primary case study for this industrial expansion.17

CSG’s strategic roadmap involves aggressive vertical integration and the acquisition of historic defense players across the European continent, including the Tatra truck manufacturing segment and Italian ammunition manufacturer Fiocchi.5 This consolidation strategy provides the capital required to fund complex research and development cycles, such as the CFL-120 Karpat project. According to the company’s Q1 2026 trading statement, CSG generated €1,544 million in revenue during the first three months of the year, representing a 13.8% year-over-year growth trajectory.18 This growth was disproportionately driven by the company’s core Defence Systems businesses, which saw a 26.5% operational increase.18

Bar chart displaying company investments related to IDEB

Perhaps the most critical indicator of future production capacity is CSG’s order backlog, which expanded by 15.1% to reach a staggering €17 billion, largely led by gains in the Land Systems sector.18 This financial security allows the group to execute long-term strategic plans aimed at reducing supply chain vulnerabilities. A primary example showcased alongside IDEB 2026 was the establishment of a new MACS artillery propellant charge facility in Slovakia.18 Formed as a joint venture between ZVS Holding and EURENCO, this facility represents a material step toward in-house propellant production. By deepening vertical integration across its distributed manufacturing network, CSG is scaling its own large-caliber (artillery and tank) ammunition production capacity to exceed 800,000 rounds, fundamentally shifting the company away from simple recommissioning activities toward sovereign, ground-up manufacturing.18 The presence of MSM Group holding companies at IDEB 2026—including ZVS, VOP Nováky, ZVI, and Fábrica de Municiones de Granada—further emphasized this expansive portfolio, displaying medium and large-caliber munitions meeting both NATO and Eastern standards.17

4. Land Mobility and Heavy Platform Evolution

The ongoing reevaluation of ground combat doctrine was highly visible in the armored vehicle segment at IDEB 2026. Military planners are currently balancing the traditional requirement for heavy, densely armored Main Battle Tanks (MBTs) with the urgent need for operational mobility, reduced bridge-weight classifications, and lower logistical footprints. The modern battlefield heavily penalizes slow, logistically demanding formations, pushing designers toward highly mobile, digitally networked platforms.

4.1 The CFL-120 Karpat Medium Tank

One of the most significant unveilings at the exhibition was the CFL-120 Karpat, developed through a strategic partnership between CSG and Turkish defense manufacturer(https://www.fnss.com.tr/en).5 Classified as a medium or light tank, the Karpat is engineered to deliver the striking power of a classic heavy MBT but with vastly superior strategic and tactical flexibility, reducing the immense logistical demands typically associated with armored brigades.11

The platform utilizes the combat-proven KAPLAN MT tracked chassis, an architecture originally developed by FNSS to meet the specific geographical and infrastructural constraints of the Indonesian armed forces.5 However, the Karpat significantly upgrades the vehicle’s lethality by integrating the Leonardo HITFACT Mk-II turret. This advanced turret module is armed with a highly capable 120/45 mm smoothbore gun that is fully compatible with all standard NATO 120 mm ammunition.5 This armament choice is critical; it ensures that the 34-ton Karpat can successfully engage and destroy enemy MBTs at extended ranges, matching the firepower of vehicles that weigh twice as much.5 Alternatively, the turret can be fitted with a less powerful but lighter NATO-standard 105/52 mm rifled gun depending on customer requirements.5

The engineering architecture of the CFL-120 Karpat deliberately deviates from standard Infantry Fighting Vehicle (IFV) conversions, which often place the engine in the front to allow for a rear troop ramp. Instead, the Karpat mirrors traditional MBT design by positioning the turbodiesel powerplant at the rear of the hull.5 This configuration allows for optimized frontal glacis protection geometry. Furthermore, the vehicle emphasizes survivability through a turret design that isolates ammunition storage strictly outside the primary crew compartment.5 In the event of an ammunition cook-off resulting from an enemy penetration, blowout panels direct the explosive force outward rather than into the fighting compartment, significantly increasing overall vehicle and crew survivability.5

Diagram of a modern tank with technological specifications

Tactical and operational specifications of the CFL-120 Karpat include an approximate combat weight of 34 tonnes, allowing for safe passage over standard civilian infrastructure and rapid deployment via tactical airlift, which heavier tanks like the M1A2 Abrams or Leopard 2 struggle to achieve.5 The vehicle boasts a top speed of 70 km/h and an operational range of 450 km.5 The fire control suite provides true fire-on-the-move capabilities against moving targets, supported by advanced hunter-killer and killer-killer target engagement protocols enabled by independent day/night, all-weather observation systems for both the commander and the gunner.5 Furthermore, the platform is designed to operate within fully networked modern operational environments, integrating seamlessly with various Battle Management Systems (BMS).5

The Karpat represents a deliberate industrial strategy rather than just a product launch. CSG’s agreement with FNSS focuses on technology transfer processes and the incorporation of the local Slovak supply chain, signaling an intent to establish domestic production lines within Slovakia.5 The Slovak Ministry of Defence is reportedly evaluating the platform to potentially form the backbone of its modernized armored fleet, operating in a complementary role alongside the heavy CV9035 MkIV IFVs recently procured from BAE Systems.11 By combining Turkish platform expertise with Czech and Slovak industrial manufacturing bases, the Karpat aims to offer a highly competitive alternative in the European market.6

4.2 The Borsuk IFV: Export Configuration

Another major development in the armored sector was the debut of the export-configured Borsuk Infantry Fighting Vehicle.7 Developed through a consortium led by Huta Stalowa Wola (a subsidiary of Poland’s state defense group, Polska Grupa Zbrojeniowa – PGZ), the Borsuk is Poland’s next-generation platform designed to replace thousands of aging, highly vulnerable Soviet-era BMP-1 and BWP-1 vehicles currently in Polish Army service.7

At IDEB 2026, PGZ presented the Borsuk integrated not with its standard domestic ZSSW-30 turret, but with the Slovak-manufactured Turra 30V9 unmanned turret from EVPÚ.7 This specific configuration represents Huta Stalowa Wola’s strategy to leverage its Universal Modular Tracked Platform (UMPG) hull into international sales by offering flexible, internationalized weapon and electronic architectures tailored to client specifications.7

The Borsuk chassis is constructed from advanced aluminum alloys layered with modular composite armor, achieving a delicate balance between ballistic protection and buoyancy.7 The vehicle remains fully amphibious without requiring extensive preparation—a critical tactical requirement for navigating the river-dense geography of Eastern Europe and the Baltic states.7 The internal compartment is designed to transport a crew of three and six fully equipped infantry dismounts.7

The presentation of the Borsuk-Turra 30 combination was highly calculated. By utilizing an unmanned turret system that has already been introduced into serial production and operational service within the Armed Forces of the Slovak Republic, PGZ offers potential export clients a technologically mature, low-risk solution with proven reliability.8 Arkadiusz Bąk, First Vice-President of PGZ, emphasized that this joint offering directly addresses the growing global demand for modular combat platforms and reflects a deep industrial partnership based on the exchange of competencies and technologies.4 The Polish Ministry of Defense has previously indicated that it views the Borsuk as a potential export hit, explicitly stating that international promotion of the vehicle is a primary objective for 2026.21

4.3 Wheeled Modular Platforms: Patria AMV XP 8×8

While tracked platforms dominated the heavy vehicle reveals, the wheeled segment was represented by ongoing developments in the Slovak 8×8 program. At IDEB 2026, the Finnish defense group Patria showcased the Patria AMV XP 8×8 armored modular vehicle, which was selected by Slovakia in 2022 to form the core of its mechanized infantry wheeled fleet.1

Patria’s presence highlighted the continued execution of its cooperation agreements with local Slovak industry, ensuring that the manufacturing and lifecycle sustainment of the vehicles generate domestic economic value.1 Alongside the vehicle platform, Patria presented its Sustainment Solutions business area, specifically the Patria OPTIME lifecycle service offering. This system covers comprehensive maintenance support for a wide range of platforms and integrates with the ILIAS Digital Defense Platform to provide data-driven predictive maintenance, ensuring that fleet readiness rates remain high while reducing long-term logistical costs.1

5. Advanced Unmanned Turret Systems and Active Protection

The survivability of armored platforms increasingly relies on keeping crews safe within heavily protected hulls while utilizing external, unmanned systems for target acquisition, situational awareness, and kinetic engagement. The Slovak defense company EVPÚ, headquartered in Nová Dubnica, demonstrated absolute dominance in this sector at IDEB 2026 by showcasing multiple generations of its remote-controlled weapon stations.7

5.1 The Turra 30 V9: Mature Hunter-Killer Architecture

The Turra 30 family of unmanned turrets allows vehicle designers to drastically reduce the overall volume and profile of the vehicle, as no crew members are seated within the turret basket.7 This architectural choice lowers the vehicle’s center of gravity and allows for all crew members to be seated low in the hull, maximizing their protection from direct fire and blast threats.

The Turra 30V9, prominently displayed atop the export Borsuk IFV, features a robust armament package centered around the modernized GTS-30/A automatic cannon. Produced by ZTS Špeciál, this cannon is chambered in the standard Eastern-bloc 30x165mm caliber, ensuring compatibility with existing ammunition stockpiles across the region.7 Secondary armament includes a PKT 7.62mm coaxial machine gun and a dual launcher for Rafael Spike LR2 Anti-Tank Guided Missiles (ATGMs), providing the vehicle with the capability to defeat heavily armored MBTs far beyond the effective range of the main 30mm cannon.7

Crucially, the V9 variant utilizes a sophisticated fire control system featuring a true hunter-killer protocol.7 In combat, the vehicle commander utilizes a highly stabilized, independent panoramic sight (such as the CMS-1) to search the battlefield, identify threats, and lase targets.7 Once a target is designated, the system automatically slews the turret and hands the target off to the gunner, who engages using the CRANE-XLR or CMS-1G targeting optics.7 Simultaneously, the commander returns to searching for the next threat. This parallel processing significantly reduces the engagement cycle time, increasing the vehicle’s lethality in fast-moving combat scenarios against multiple adversaries.7

5.2 The Turra 30 V10: Counter-UAS and Sensor Fusion

While the V9 represents a mature, fielded technology, EVPÚ used IDEB 2026 to push the boundaries of armored warfare even further, winning the GRAND PRIX IDEB 2026 award for its newly unveiled Turra 30 V10 remote-controlled turret.16 The V10 iteration is an aggressive modernization aimed squarely at defending against the proliferation of loitering munitions, anti-tank guided missiles, and First-Person View (FPV) drones that currently dominate the airspace in modern conflicts.22

The V10 upgrade introduces several key capability enhancements designed to create a localized protective dome around the host vehicle. The most significant integration is the Harpia Active Protection System (APS).22 Developed by EVPU Defence, the Harpia is an AI-driven hard-kill system designed to detect and physically defeat incoming ATGMs, rocket-propelled grenades, and hostile UAVs before they impact the vehicle’s armor.22

To augment situational awareness and offensive reach, the V10 incorporates a Multi-Canister Drone Launcher.22 This signals a massive leap in battlefield capabilities, allowing the vehicle crew to deploy their own loitering munitions or intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) drones directly from the turret.22 By launching organic drones, the crew can extend their sensor reach far beyond the line of sight, inspecting defilades, urban canyons, or reverse slopes without exposing the host vehicle to ambush. For layered close-in defense, the turret also mounts the Gladius TWIN Mini Remote Weapon Station, providing an independent secondary axis of fire against infantry and small drones.22

The effectiveness of these disparate systems is tied together by an advanced tactical situational awareness system. The V10 fuses data from a multi-mission radar, anti-tank firing detectors, and acoustic gunshot locators.22 Advanced AI-based algorithms synthesize this data, providing the crew with optimized engagement solutions and automating defensive responses to incoming threats.24 The main gun armament has also been upgraded, offering the battle-proven 30 mm 2A42 automatic cannon or the Western standard Mk44 Bushmaster II chain gun, delivering 550 rounds per minute fed through a dual-belt system.22 The integrated opto-electronic suite—featuring a cooled thermal camera, TV camera with zoom, and laser rangefinder—ensures targeting precision in all weather conditions.22

Subsystem CapabilityTurra 30 V9 ConfigurationTurra 30 V10 Configuration
Primary Armament30mm GTS-30/A30mm Mk44 Bushmaster II or 2A42
Secondary Armament7.62mm Coaxial MG7.62mm Coaxial MG + Gladius TWIN Mini RCWS
Anti-Tank CapabilityDual Spike LR2 ATGM LauncherIntegrated Dual ATGM Tubes
Active Protection (APS)Modular / Add-on compatibilityIntegrated Harpia AI-based APS
Organic ISR/StrikeNoneMulti-Canister Drone Launcher
Fire Control & SensorsHunter-Killer OptronicsAI-Fused Radar, Acoustic, and Optronic Data

The modularity of the Turra architecture was previously demonstrated at IDET 2025, where Rheinmetall and its partners exhibited a Boxer 8×8 fitted with the Turra 30 V10, proving that the system can be rapidly adapted to both tracked IFVs and heavy wheeled personnel carriers to turn them into multirole assault platforms.23

6. Next-Generation Artillery and Automation

The demand for highly mobile, long-range indirect fire has surged across NATO militaries in response to the static, artillery-heavy attrition warfare observed in recent conflicts. Modern artillery systems must be capable of rapid emplacement, delivering devastating volume of fire, and executing immediate displacement to avoid highly precise counter-battery fire.

6.1 The EVA M3 6×6 Self-Propelled Howitzer

At IDEB 2026, the Slovak defense sector introduced its newest artillery asset: the EVA M3 6×6 self-propelled howitzer, which serves as the new flagship product for(https://kotadef.sk/projekty/eva/?lang=en).9 The system was engineered specifically to provide a lighter, more rapidly deployable alternative to the heavier, fully armored Zuzana 2 8×8 howitzers currently in service with the Slovak Armed Forces.9

The EVA M3 marries the proven lethality of a 155 mm / 52 caliber weapon system with the extreme off-road mobility of the latest generation Tatra Force 3 truck chassis in a 6×6 configuration.9 The platform is designed around a highly automated firing process, enabling the crew of three to operate the system entirely from within a newly designed armored cabin located at the front of the truck.9 This cabin provides necessary protection against small arms fire, shell splinters, and CBRN (Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear) threats, ensuring the crew remains safe during high-intensity operations.28

The automation extends deeply into the ammunition handling system. The EVA M3 carries a ready-to-fire combat load of 20 projectiles and 20 propellant charges.9 The autoloader permits a sustained rate of fire of 5 rounds within the first minute, or 13 rounds over three minutes.27 This high initial burst capability is critical for “shoot-and-scoot” tactics. Furthermore, the advanced onboard fire control system supports Multiple Rounds Simultaneous Impact (MRSI) fire missions.28 During an MRSI mission, the onboard ballistic computer calculates varying barrel elevations and propellant charge increments to fire a sequence of shells along different trajectories so that they all arrive on the target at the exact same moment. This maximizes shock, lethality, and surprise before the enemy can seek cover.28

When deploying into a firing position from the march, the vehicle hydraulically lowers heavy anchor spades on each side at the rear of the chassis to stabilize the truck against the intense recoil forces generated by the 155mm gun.27 Firing modern Extended Range Full Bore – Base Bleed (ERFB-BB) ammunition, the EVA M3 can accurately engage targets at a maximum range of 41 kilometers.29 The system’s high strategic mobility, reduced combat weight of approximately 20.2 tonnes, and automated efficiency led the Slovakian armed forces to secure an initial procurement order of 16 units to replace older artillery assets.11

7. Infantry Modernization: Small Arms and Soldier Systems

While heavy armor, autonomous turrets, and automated artillery dictate the operational flow of large-scale combat, the ultimate tactical reality remains grounded in the capabilities, protection, and lethality of the individual infantry soldier. IDEB 2026 provided a detailed view of the Slovak Armed Forces’ comprehensive transition to new small arms ecosystems, ergonomic body armor, and advanced field uniforms.

7.1 Grand Power’s NATO-Standard Transition

For decades, many Eastern Flank militaries relied heavily on modernized variants of the Soviet-era AK platform, chambered in 7.62x39mm or 5.45x39mm. Maintaining non-standard calibers creates significant logistical friction during multinational NATO deployments. Slovakia used IDEB 2026 to publicly confirm its complete, systemic transition to the NATO-standard 5.56x45mm AR-15 architecture.11 The Ministry of Defense strategically selected domestic firearms manufacturer Grand Power to supply the new family of infantry weapons.11 This decision establishes a secure, localized supply chain for spare parts and maintenance, while enabling continuous, iterative development based on immediate, hands-on feedback provided by professional soldiers.11

The future standard service rifle of the Slovakian armed forces is the Grand Power M4M assault rifle.11 While Grand Power manufactures a standard direct-impingement M4 model, the M4M variant selected utilizes an innovative short-stroke gas piston operating system.30 In a direct-impingement system, hot expanding gases from the fired cartridge are blown directly back into the receiver to cycle the action, which can lead to rapid carbon fouling and overheating. The M4M’s short-stroke piston system mitigates this by tapping the gas near the front of the barrel to strike an operating rod, which then pushes the bolt carrier group rearward. This keeps the receiver significantly cooler and cleaner, drastically improving reliability, particularly when operating with sound suppressors.32 The M4M also features an adjustable gas block, nitride/QPQ treated barrels for enhanced longevity and corrosion resistance, and fully ambidextrous controls for bilateral operation.31

Graph illustrating Power M4M modular platform specifications for

The procurement strategy involves a tiered deployment of the M4M platform to support diverse tactical requirements. The standard rifle will be issued to regular infantry formations, while a shortened variant—the 11-inch barrel model—is being procured specifically for special operations units requiring compact firepower for close-quarters battle.11

Beyond the primary service rifle, the Grand Power contract encompasses a complete small arms ecosystem:

  • GP R10 Sniper Rifle: Designed to support long-range precision engagements at the squad and platoon levels.11
  • Stribog SP9 A3 Submachine Guns: Chambered in 9x19mm, these highly compact weapons are being issued to military police, special units, and specifically to tank and armored vehicle crews who require potent personal defense weapons within the confined spaces of vehicle interiors.11
  • Grand Power Q1 Pistol: The Q1 will serve as the new standard-issue sidearm.11 It features the company’s signature rotating barrel locking mechanism, which significantly reduces perceived recoil and muzzle flip compared to standard tilting-barrel designs, allowing for faster follow-up shots.34

Deliveries of this comprehensive weapons package are expected to commence in 2026 and continue over a structured two-year rollout program.11

7.2 Next-Generation Camouflage and Ballistic Protection

To complement the lethality of the new weaponry, the Slovak army used IDEB 2026 to reveal a fundamental overhaul of its combat uniforms and individual protection equipment. The military is formally abandoning its legacy VZ07 pixelated digital camouflage pattern, which has served as the standard for years.10 The replacement pattern, officially designated VZOR 25 (VZ25), relies on large, macro-pattern disruptions that closely resemble the classic British Disruptive Pattern Material (DPM).10 This aesthetic shift suggests a tactical refocusing toward effective concealment in the dense, organic woodland environments characteristic of Central and Eastern Europe, moving away from multi-terrain compromise patterns.

The uniform designs themselves have been upgraded to align with premium modern Western standards. The procurement includes two distinct sets designed for different operational profiles.10 The “Field Uniform” is designed for daily garrison service and standard field problems, featuring ergonomic, highly pocket-friendly layouts.10 The “Combat Suit,” conversely, is engineered for direct action. It integrates a breathable combat shirt designed specifically to be worn underneath heavy body armor and plate carriers without causing severe heat stress to the operator.10 The combat pants feature integrated knee protection and dynamic stretch panels, heavily mimicking high-end tactical designs popularized by manufacturers like Crye Precision.10 To balance economic constraints with material quality, the base fabric is sourced from specialized textile mills in Croatia, while the final assembly, cutting, and sewing are conducted domestically within Slovakia.10

In the realm of headborne protection, the Croatian manufacturer Šestan-Busch was awarded the PRIX IDEB 2026 award for its advanced ballistic helmets.16 Modern combat helmets are no longer simple shrapnel deflectors; they are complex platforms that must safely mount heavy night vision goggles (NVGs), communication headsets, strobes, and battery packs without fatiguing the operator’s neck over long patrols. Šestan-Busch’s designs are recognized for utilizing hybridized aramid material solutions that offer high-level ballistic resistance (often meeting NIJ IIIA standards against handgun threats) and blunt trauma protection, while aggressively reducing overall system weight.35 The inclusion of standardized ARC rails and NVG shrouds facilitates seamless integration with modern communication and optical systems, ensuring the infantryman remains a networked node on the battlefield.

8. Combat Engineering and Specialized Logistics

A recurring strategic lesson from contemporary high-intensity conflicts is that offensive maneuver and defensive fortification rely absolutely on robust combat engineering capabilities. Mechanized spearheads require engineers to breach obstacles, while defensive lines require rapid entrenchment to survive artillery barrages. At IDEB 2026, CSM Industries demonstrated its prowess in this vital sector, winning the PRIX IDEB 2026 award for its UDS4 VTV 4×4 exhibit.16

(https://www.uds.sk/), a highly experienced Slovakian firm with a history dating back to 1967 and over 30,000 machines produced, specializes in the Universal Finishing Machine (UDS) series of multi-purpose telescopic excavators.38 These heavy military excavator vehicles are highly specialized assets engineered for rapidly altering battlefield topography under extreme conditions.

During rigorous operational testing conducted by the Armed Forces at the Military Training and Testing area in Lešť, Slovakia, CSM’s platforms demonstrated exceptional performance metrics. The testing evaluated the excavator’s ability to construct infantry trenches, anti-tank obstacles, and massive tank trenches.40 The UDS system demonstrated the ability to construct a complete, precisely dimensioned tank trench—measuring 4.5 meters wide, 7 meters long, and 1.5 meters deep, complete with entry ramps—in just 50 minutes, significantly exceeding standard military engineering time limits.40

The integration of such specialized, high-power engineering equipment onto modern, off-road capable 4×4, 6×6, and 8×8 military truck chassis (often sourced from Tatra) ensures that combat engineering elements can maintain pace with rapid mechanized advances.41 This tactical mobility allows engineers to rapidly deploy anti-tank obstacles to channel enemy armor, dig infantry fortifications ahead of an assault, and clear urban debris under contested conditions without falling behind the main body of the force.

9. Electromagnetic Spectrum Dominance and Counter-UAS

The proliferation of cheap, highly capable unmanned aerial systems (UAS) has rendered traditional physical camouflage and concealment highly vulnerable. Ground forces are under constant, pervasive surveillance from the sky. Furthermore, the use of active radar emissions to detect these drones acts as a brilliant beacon for enemy anti-radiation missiles and electronic intelligence gathering, making the cure almost as dangerous as the disease. Surviving the modern battlefield requires dominating the electromagnetic spectrum without exposing one’s own position.

Addressing this critical vulnerability, the Swedish aerospace and defense company Saab showcased its Sirius Compact L24R at IDEB 2026.4 The Sirius Compact is a highly advanced, passive electronic warfare (EW) sensor designed for both strategic national security applications and tactical situational awareness.4

Unlike traditional air defense radar, which emits strong pulses of electromagnetic energy to illuminate and detect targets, passive sensors like the Sirius Compact emit absolutely zero signals.43 Instead, they act as highly sensitive listening devices across the electromagnetic spectrum. They detect, classify, and accurately geolocate the radio frequency (RF) emissions of enemy drones, data links, communication nodes, and hostile radar systems.13

This passive detection capability allows small tactical units or fixed strategic installations to build a comprehensive, real-time map of the airspace and ground environment without ever revealing their own physical location to enemy electronic intelligence.13 When integrated into broader battle management architectures—such as Saab’s scalable 9Air C4I system—the data gathered by passive sensors can instantly cue kinetic counter-drone engagements, direct precision artillery fire against enemy electronic nodes, or alert friendly units to seek hard cover before an enemy drone swarm arrives.13

10. Strategic Lessons Learned and Future Outlook

The 2026 iteration of the IDEB Defence & Security exhibition clearly articulated the technological, doctrinal, and industrial trajectory of NATO’s Eastern Flank. By analyzing the aggregate data from the exhibitions, product configurations, and executive statements, distinct macro-trends emerge regarding the future of defense procurement and ground combat operations.

First, the vulnerability of globalized supply chains during extended military crises has triggered a sharp, irreversible pivot toward regional industrial autarky. Poland, Slovakia, and the Czech Republic are no longer content to act solely as end-users of imported Western technology. The Borsuk export variant (combining a Polish chassis with a Slovak turret) and the CFL-120 Karpat (integrating Turkish/Czech intellectual property with Slovak production capacity) are prime examples of collaborative risk-sharing.5 By exchanging core competencies, these nations establish redundant, secure manufacturing nodes within European borders. This industrial strategy fulfills domestic political mandates to keep defense spending local while simultaneously creating highly competitive, export-ready products.21

Second, the hardware revealed in Bratislava reflects a highly pragmatic response to the tactical realities of contemporary conflict, characterized by a “light and lethal” paradigm shift. The prominence of the Karpat medium tank and the EVA M3 6×6 howitzer highlights a growing preference for strategic mobility over sheer mass. While heavy 70-ton MBTs and massive tracked self-propelled guns boast unparalleled physical survivability, they severely strain logistical infrastructure, consume immense quantities of fuel, and are notoriously difficult to transport rapidly across crumbling civilian bridges or muddy terrain. The new generation of ground platforms accepts a reduction in raw passive armor mass in exchange for the speed required to maneuver rapidly, strike decisively, and displace before the enemy can coordinate counter-battery fire.

Finally, with the deliberate reduction in passive armor, vehicle survivability is increasingly achieved through technological intervention and autonomy. The evolution from the Turra 30 V9 to the V10 demonstrates the rapid, non-negotiable adoption of Active Protection Systems and organic counter-UAS capabilities.22 The modern armored vehicle is no longer a standalone bunker; it is a digitally networked sensor node. By utilizing unmanned turrets, commanders keep their crews deep within the armored hull while AI-driven optronics, radar, and acoustic sensors identify and neutralize incoming threats automatically.7

Ultimately, IDEB 2026 proved that Central and Eastern European defense conglomerates are actively securing their national supply chains and positioning themselves not just as capable allies, but as primary architects of the next generation of European defense technology.


Please share the link on Facebook, Forums, with colleagues, etc. Your support is much appreciated and if you have any feedback, please email us in**@*********ps.com. If you’d like to request a report or order a reprint, please click here for the corresponding page to open in new tab.


Sources Used

  1. Patria at IDEB Defence & Security 2026, accessed May 20, 2026, https://www.patriagroup.com/newsroom/meet-patria-at-events/patria-at-ideb-defence-security-2026
  2. IDEB Defence & Security – Bratislava – Incheba.sk, accessed May 20, 2026, https://www.incheba.sk/en/fairs-and-exhibitions/ideb-defence-security-2/
  3. Invitation – Saab, accessed May 20, 2026, https://www.saab.com/globalassets/markets/slovakia/saab_invitation_ideb_2026_svk_generic.pdf
  4. PGZ unveils export version of Borsuk infantry fighting vehicle with Turra 30 turret at IDEB 2026 – Defence Industry Europe, accessed May 20, 2026, https://defence-industry.eu/pgz-unveils-export-version-of-borsuk-infantry-fighting-vehicle-with-turra-30-turret-at-ideb-2026/
  5. shownews – IDEB 2026: FNSS … – FW-MAG Future Warfare Magazine, accessed May 20, 2026, https://www.fw-mag.com/shownews/1078/ideb-2026-fnss-unveils-the-cfl-120-karpat-light-tank-and-signs-cooperation-agreement-with-csg
  6. CSG and FNSS Unveil Strategic Cooperation and Introduce the New CFL-120 Karpat Combat Vehicle | ASDNews, accessed May 20, 2026, https://www.asdnews.com/news/defense/2026/05/12/csg-fnss-unveil-strategic-cooperation-introduce-new-cfl120-karpat-combat-vehicle
  7. Poland debuts export Borsuk fighting vehicle at IDEB 2026 – The Defence Blog, accessed May 20, 2026, https://defence-blog.com/poland-debuts-export-borsuk-fighting-vehicle-at-ideb-2026/
  8. Attention! A New Predator in Bratislava – ASDNews, accessed May 20, 2026, https://www.asdnews.com/news/defense/2026/05/12/attention-new-predator-bratislava
  9. News from KONŠTRUKTA – Defence, a.s. | www.incheba.sk, accessed May 20, 2026, https://www.incheba.sk/en/novinky_na_veltrhu/news-from-konstrukta-defence-a-s/
  10. The new Slovak uniform | SPARTANAT, accessed May 20, 2026, https://spartanat.com/en/die-neue-slowakische-uniform
  11. IDEB 2026: Slovakian army presents its new weapons – Militär Aktuell, accessed May 20, 2026, https://militaeraktuell.at/en/ideb-2026-slovakian-army-presents-its-new-weapons/
  12. The new Slovak uniform – SPARTANAT.com, accessed May 20, 2026, https://www.spartanat.com/en/die-neue-slowakische-uniform
  13. Slovakia – Saab, accessed May 20, 2026, https://www.saab.com/markets/slovakia
  14. IDEB Defence &Security | www.incheba.sk, accessed May 20, 2026, https://www.incheba.sk/en/fairs-and-exhibitions/ideb-defence-security/
  15. Eastern Flank Review, 06.05-12.05.2026, accessed May 20, 2026, https://easternflank.org/eastern-flank-review-06-05-12-05-2026/
  16. Final Press Release IDEB Defence & Security 2026 | www.incheba.sk, accessed May 20, 2026, https://www.incheba.sk/en/news/final-press-release-ideb-defence-security-2026/
  17. CSG to Showcase Modern Vehicles and New Projects at the IDEB 2026 Defense Technology Exhibition in Bratislava | DEFENSEMAGAZINE.com, accessed May 20, 2026, https://www.defensemagazine.com/article/csg-to-showcase-modern-vehicles-and-new-projects-at-the-ideb-2026-defense-technology-exhibition-in-bratislava
  18. CSG Q1 2026 Trading Statement: Strong Start to the Year in – GlobeNewswire, accessed May 20, 2026, https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2026/05/20/3298164/0/en/CSG-Q1-2026-Trading-Statement-Strong-Start-to-the-Year-in-Q1-FY-2026-Guidance-Reaffirmed.html
  19. CSG and FNSS Unveil Strategic Partnership and CFL-120 Karpat at IDEB 2026, accessed May 20, 2026, https://www.defensemagazine.com/article/csg-and-fnss-unveil-strategic-partnership-and-cfl-120-karpat-at-ideb-2026
  20. Türkiye and Czech Republic Reveal CFL-120 Karpat Medium Tank as New NATO and M1A2 Abrams Alternative – Army Recognition, accessed May 20, 2026, https://www.armyrecognition.com/news/army-news/2026/tuerkiye-and-czech-republic-reveal-cfl-120-karpat-medium-tank-as-new-nato-and-m1a2-abrams-alternative
  21. Polish army receives first Borsuk fighting vehicles – The Defence Blog, accessed May 20, 2026, https://defence-blog.com/polish-army-receives-first-borsuk-fighting-vehicles/
  22. Slovakia’s TURRA 30 V10 Packs Lethal Punch with 30mm Autocannon RCWS ATGMs and Drones – MilitaryLeak.COM, accessed May 20, 2026, https://militaryleak.com/2025/07/14/slovakias-turra-30-v10-packs-lethal-punch-with-30mm-cannon-and-anti-tank-missiles/
  23. Boxer (armoured fighting vehicle) – Wikipedia, accessed May 20, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boxer_(armoured_fighting_vehicle)
  24. DSEI 2025 – FFG showcases its Condor future air defence vehicle – EDR Magazine, accessed May 20, 2026, https://www.edrmagazine.eu/dsei-2025-ffg-showcases-its-condor-future-air-defence-vehicle
  25. BOXER 8×8 Highly Protected Wheeled Armored Vehicle | DEFENSEMAGAZINE.com, accessed May 20, 2026, https://www.defensemagazine.com/article/boxer-8×8-highly-protected-wheeled-armored-vehicle
  26. News from Quantum Systems GmbH | www.incheba.sk, accessed May 20, 2026, https://www.incheba.sk/en/novinky_na_veltrhu/news-from-quantum-systems-gmbh/
  27. Konstrukta Defence of Slovakia unveils its EVA a new 6×6 155 mm self-propelled howitzer at IDET 1905155 – Army Recognition, accessed May 20, 2026, https://www.armyrecognition.com/archives/archives-land-defense/land-defense-2015/konstrukta-defence-of-slovakia-unveils-its-eva-a-new-6×6-155-mm-self-propelled-howitzer-at-idet-1905155
  28. EVA – KONŠTRUKTA – Defence, accessed May 20, 2026, https://kotadef.sk/projekty/eva/?lang=en
  29. 155 mm SpGH EVA – Wikipedia, accessed May 20, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/155_mm_SpGH_EVA
  30. GP M4 – GRAND POWER Ltd, accessed May 20, 2026, https://grandpower.eu/products/product-categories/law-enforcement-and-military/gp-m4/
  31. The GP M4M is a robust, reliable, short stroke piston operated, select fire rifle chambered in popular 5,56×45 NATO calibre. M, accessed May 20, 2026, https://grandpower.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/M4M-Datasheet.pdf
  32. GP M4 & GP M4M USER MANUAL Basic Description The GRAND POWER M4 / M4M is a modern semiautomatic rifle chambered in .5.56 NA – Trueaim, accessed May 20, 2026, https://trueaim.fi/kauppa/storage/2023/04/safety-manual-R15-rifles-EN.pdf
  33. GP M4M – GRAND POWER Ltd, accessed May 20, 2026, https://grandpower.eu/products/product-categories/law-enforcement-and-military/gp-m4m/
  34. GRAND POWER: High quality firearms, accessed May 20, 2026, https://grandpower.eu/
  35. Top 5 Ballistic Helmets in 2026 – ActionStreamer, accessed May 20, 2026, https://actionstreamer.com/blog/top-5-ballistic-helmets-in-2026
  36. SESTAN-BUSCH | Company – Enforce Tac, accessed May 20, 2026, https://www.enforcetac.com/en/exhibitors/sestan-busch-2547848
  37. Busch Protective awarded FBI ballistic helmet contract – Police1, accessed May 20, 2026, https://www.police1.com/police-products/duty-gear/helmets/busch-protective-awarded-fbi-ballistic-helmet-contract
  38. CSM Industry s.r.o. – FindIn.sk, accessed May 20, 2026, https://findin.sk/en/company/csm-industry-sro/b18201ec-9bcc-ee11-a854-fa163e0a3f57
  39. Company – CSM Industry s.r.o., accessed May 20, 2026, https://csm.sk/
  40. Rheinmetall UDS Multi-tool Heavy Military Excavator Vehicle – Tank Trench – YouTube, accessed May 20, 2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zxm29rDRJwk
  41. CSM Industry Debuts At IDEX With Its Military Exacavator Together With IGG UAE, accessed May 20, 2026, https://www.globaldefensecorp.com/2021/02/25/csm-industry-debuts-at-idex-with-its-military-exacavator-together-with-igg-uae/
  42. Azerbaijan orders 96 Slovak SAM120 mortars in €210 mln deal signed in Riyadh, accessed May 20, 2026, https://defence-industry.eu/azerbaijan-orders-96-slovak-sam120-mortars-in-e210-mln-deal-signed-in-riyadh/
  43. The passive sensor Sirius Compact from Saab – Militär Aktuell, accessed May 20, 2026, https://militaeraktuell.at/en/the-passive-sensor-sirius-compact-from-saab/
  44. Poland signs a record €17.2 billion contract for 1400 Borsuk armoured vehicles, accessed May 20, 2026, https://www.defensemagazine.com/article/poland-signs-a-record-eur172-billion-contract-for-1400-borsuk-armoured-vehicles