An Analysis of the Soviet AKM Rifle’s Rear Trunnions

Section 1: The Imperative for Change: From Milled Block to Stamped Steel

The story of the AKM’s front and rear trunnions is inseparable from the larger narrative of the Kalashnikov rifle’s evolution. This evolution was driven less by a desire for radical redesign and more by the dogged pursuit of a manufacturing concept that was ahead of its time. The AKM, introduced in 1959, was not so much a new rifle as it was the successful fulfillment of Mikhail Kalashnikov’s original, unrealized vision: a lightweight, inexpensive, and utterly reliable assault rifle built for unprecedented mass production. The trunnions were the key engineering solution that finally made this vision a reality.

1.1 The Original Vision: The Stamped Type 1 AK (1947-1949)

From its inception, the Kalashnikov rifle was designed to be simple, cheap, and producible on a massive scale using the most advanced methods available to the post-war Soviet Union [1]. The earliest production models, now known to collectors as the “Type 1,” featured a receiver fabricated from a stamped sheet of steel. This receiver body was then joined to a machined front barrel trunnion and a rear buttstock insert [1, 2]. This approach, in theory, offered immense advantages in speed and material efficiency over traditional machining.

However, the design encountered a critical and ultimately fatal obstacle: the state of Soviet welding technology in the late 1940s [1]. The process of attaching the critical internal guide rails and the ejector to the thin, 1.3mm stamped receiver shell proved exceptionally difficult [1, 3]. The available welding techniques of the era could not consistently produce strong, reliable joints without warping the receiver or creating metallurgical weaknesses. This resulted in unacceptably high rejection rates on the production lines, creating a severe bottleneck that threatened the entire program [1, 4]. This was not a flaw in the rifle’s mechanical design, but a failure of the manufacturing technology to keep pace with the design’s ambition. Key industrial welding processes, such as CO2 shielded arc welding and electroslag welding, were only just being invented or put into production in the Soviet Union during the 1950s, a decade after the Type 1’s initial run [5, 6, 7].

1.2 The Pragmatic Retreat: The Milled Receiver AK-47 (Type 2 & Type 3, 1951-1959)

Faced with the inability to mass-produce the stamped receiver, Soviet planners made a pragmatic but costly decision: they substituted a heavy, machined receiver for the stamped body [1, 4, 8]. This was a technological retreat, but a necessary one to get a functional rifle into the hands of the Red Army. This pivot allowed the Soviet arms industry to leverage its vast experience and existing tooling from the production of older weapons like the Mosin-Nagant bolt-action rifle, which were also built around machined receivers [8, 9, 10].

These milled-receiver rifles, known as the Type 2 (1951-1957) and the improved Type 3 (1955-1959), were fundamentally different in their construction. Instead of separate components joined together, the receiver was carved from a single, solid block of forged steel [2, 4, 11]. In this design, the features of the front and rear trunnions—the barrel socket, the bolt locking lugs, the stock attachment points—were not separate parts but were integral to the receiver itself, machined directly into the steel block [2, 11]. This entirely bypassed the problematic welding step. However, the process was incredibly slow, labor-intensive, and generated a tremendous amount of wasted steel, making the rifles significantly heavier and more expensive to produce [11, 12]. The Type 3 was an iterative refinement of the Type 2, featuring different lightening cuts and furniture mounting to reduce weight slightly, but it still adhered to the same costly manufacturing philosophy [1, 2].

1.3 The Vision Realized: The AKM (1959)

By the late 1950s, a decade of focused industrial development had equipped Soviet factories with the technology needed to finally execute the original stamped-receiver concept. The result was the Avtomat Kalashnikova Modernizirovanniy (AKM), or “Modernized Kalashnikov Automatic Rifle,” which entered production in 1959 [1, 13].

Designated the “Type 4” receiver, the AKM successfully returned to a lightweight body stamped from a 1.0mm sheet of steel [14, 15]. The crucial innovation that made this possible was the abandonment of structural welding in favor of a new assembly method centered on separate front and rear trunnions. These robust, machined blocks were inserted into the stamped receiver shell and permanently fixed in place with a series of high-strength rivets [14]. This system provided the necessary strength for the barrel and stock mounting points while allowing the rest of the receiver to remain light and thin. The trunnion-and-rivet system was the engineering breakthrough that solved the manufacturing puzzle of the Type 1. This new approach was so successful that it resulted in a rifle approximately 1 kg (2.2 lbs) lighter than its milled predecessor, a significant reduction that improved soldier mobility and handling [1, 14, 15]. The milled AK-47, while iconic, was ultimately an expensive and heavy detour from the intended path; the AKM, with its trunnion-based construction, was the rifle the Type 1 was always meant to be.

Table 1: Evolution of the Kalashnikov Receiver (1947-1959)

Model/TypeYears of ProductionReceiver MaterialManufacturing ProcessKey Identifying FeatureTrunnion DesignApprox. Weight
Type 1 AK1948–19491.3mm Stamped SteelStamping, Welding, RivetingStamped receiver with milled trunnion insertSeparate front trunnion, threaded barrel [1, 3]~4.65 kg (10.26 lb) [3]
Type 2 AK-471951–1957Forged SteelForging, MachiningMilled receiver with “boot” stock socket [1, 2]Integral to receiver, screwed-in barrel [2]~4.2 kg (9.3 lb)
Type 3 AK-471955–1959Forged SteelForging, MachiningMilled receiver, direct stock mount [2, 8]Integral to receiver, screwed-in barrel [2]3.47 kg (7.7 lb) [1]
Type 4 AKM1959–Present1.0mm Stamped SteelStamping, Riveting, Spot WeldingStamped receiver with small dimple [1, 4]Separate front/rear trunnions, pinned barrel [14]3.1 kg (6.8 lb) [1]

This next image is a blueprint of the rear trunnion:

This is a Soviet era drawing of the rear trunnion. The author would like to thank T. Mark Graham, of Arizona Response Systems, for sharing this with me.

Section 2: The AKM Rear Trunnion: Context and Manufacturing Doctrine

2.1. Functional Imperatives of the Rear Trunnion in a Stamped-Receiver Design

To comprehend the specific metallurgical requirements for the rear trunnion of the Avtomat Kalashnikova Modernizirovannyj (AKM), one must first appreciate the fundamental design shift it represents from its predecessor, the AK-47. The early production AK-47 (specifically the Type 2 and Type 3 variants) was characterized by a receiver machined from a solid billet of steel.1 This method, while producing an exceptionally robust and durable frame, was labor-intensive, time-consuming, and resulted in significant material wastage. The milled receiver was, in essence, a single, monolithic structure where the critical features—such as the guide rails for the bolt carrier and the anchoring points for the barrel and stock—were integral to the main body of the firearm.

The defining innovation of the AKM, introduced in 1959, was the transition to a receiver fabricated from a stamped 1.0 mm sheet of steel.2 This change was a triumph of Soviet mass-production philosophy, dramatically reducing manufacturing time, cost, and the overall weight of the rifle by approximately 1 kg.3 However, this new design paradigm created a significant engineering challenge. The thin, stamped sheet metal receiver shell, while reinforced with ribs and folds for rigidity, lacked the inherent strength to contain the violent forces generated during the firing cycle or to securely anchor the primary components of the rifle.2

This is where the front and rear trunnions become the absolute linchpins of the design. They are not merely components; they are the structural keystones upon which the integrity of the entire stamped-receiver system rests. The rear trunnion, the focus of this analysis, serves three critical functions that demand a material of exceptional strength, toughness, and fatigue resistance.

First, it is the rearmost point of impact for the bolt carrier assembly. During the firing cycle, the bolt carrier group travels rearward at high velocity, driven by expanding propellant gases. Its travel is arrested by the front face of the rear trunnion. This repeated, high-energy impact subjects the trunnion to immense compressive stress and shock loading. The material must be hard enough to resist deformation or peening from these impacts over tens of thousands of cycles, yet tough enough to absorb the shock without becoming brittle and fracturing.

Second, the rear trunnion serves as the primary interface and anchor for the buttstock. All forces exerted on the stock—the pressure of the shooter’s shoulder, impacts from using the rifle as a brace or in hand-to-hand combat, and the general stresses of field use—are transferred through the trunnion and into the receiver body. For the fixed-stock AKM, the trunnion features a tang that extends rearward, into which the wooden stock is secured.1 This tang must withstand significant bending and torsional moments without failing.

Third, and perhaps most critically, the rear trunnion distributes these concentrated loads into the comparatively fragile 1.0 mm receiver shell. The trunnion is secured in place by several large rivets that pass through it and the sheet metal.1 The steel of the trunnion must be strong enough to provide a rigid, unyielding foundation for these rivets. If the trunnion material were to deform or the rivet holes were to elongate under stress, the rivets would loosen, leading to a catastrophic failure of the receiver’s structural integrity. The trunnion, therefore, acts as a force-distribution block, taking the pinpoint stress of the bolt carrier’s impact and the leverage of the buttstock and spreading that load across a wider area of the receiver sheet metal via the rivet pattern.

Given these functional demands, the selection of steel for the AKM rear trunnion was not a trivial matter. It required a material that could be hardened to resist impact and wear, possess sufficient ductility and toughness to prevent fracture under shock loading, and maintain its dimensional stability over a long service life in the harshest imaginable conditions. The success of the lighter, cheaper, and more mobile AKM platform was directly dependent on the metallurgical quality of this single, critical component.

2.2. Soviet Production Philosophy: The Primacy of Forging (Поковка/Штамповка)

The material selection for the AKM rear trunnion cannot be separated from the Soviet Union’s overarching military-industrial doctrine, which prioritized extreme durability, reliability under adverse conditions, and suitability for massive-scale production.5 This philosophy dictated not only the

type of steel used but, just as importantly, the method by which it was formed. For a critical, high-stress component like a trunnion, the manufacturing process of choice was unequivocally die-forging, known in Russian as поковка (pokovka) or штамповка (shtampovka).

Direct inquiries with contacts at the original Soviet-era manufacturing plants, specifically the Kalashnikov Izhmash plant and the Molot factory, have confirmed that their trunnions were produced by die-forging a steel billet into a near-net shape, which was then machined to its final, precise dimensions.6 This information is further corroborated by a Russian technical manual on AK production printed in 2001, which explicitly specifies “forging” for the trunnion.6

The decision to forge these components was a deliberate engineering choice rooted in the principles of metallurgy. Forging is a process where metal is heated and shaped by compressive forces, typically using a hammer or a press. Unlike casting, where molten metal is poured into a mold, or simple machining from bar stock, forging fundamentally alters the internal grain structure of the steel. The process forces the steel’s crystalline grains to align with the flow of the metal as it fills the die cavity, conforming to the shape of the part. This continuous, aligned grain structure results in a component with dramatically superior mechanical properties compared to other manufacturing methods.

Specifically, a forged trunnion exhibits:

  • Increased Strength and Toughness: The aligned grain flow eliminates the random, potentially weak grain boundaries found in castings and provides strength in the directions where it is most needed. This makes the part highly resistant to both impact and fatigue.
  • Elimination of Porosity: The immense pressure of the forging process closes any internal voids or gas pockets that can occur in cast parts, which act as stress concentrators and potential points of failure.
  • Structural Integrity: Compared to a part machined from bar stock, which has a unidirectional grain flow, a forged part’s grain structure follows its contours. This is particularly important for a component like a trunnion with its complex geometry of holes, bosses, and tangs, ensuring strength is maintained throughout the part.

This doctrinal adherence to forging was not unique to the Soviet Union. High-quality AK-pattern rifles produced by other Warsaw Pact nations under Soviet license followed the same principle. For example, modern Polish WBP trunnions, noted for their high quality, are advertised as being “100% machined from forged steel like the originals”.7 Similarly, military surplus Romanian trunnions are described as being made from “hammer forged carbon steel”.8 This consistency across different national arsenals demonstrates that the use of forged steel for critical components was a core tenet of the original Soviet technical data package supplied to its allies.

Therefore, the fact that the AKM rear trunnion was forged is not a minor manufacturing detail. It is a direct manifestation of a military doctrine that demanded unparalleled ruggedness. The choice of forging ensured that this keystone component could withstand the rigors of combat and abuse far better than a cheaper, cast alternative or a potentially weaker machined part. Any analysis of the specific steel alloy used must be viewed through this lens: the Soviets required a steel that was not only strong but also eminently suitable for the forging process on an industrial scale.

Section 3: Identifying the Soviet Steel Specification (GOST)

3.1. Navigating the GOST Standards: A Process of Deductive Analysis

Pinpointing the exact steel used for the Soviet AKM rear trunnion requires a forensic metallurgical investigation, as no single available document, blueprint, or manual explicitly states, “The AKM rear trunnion is made from steel grade X.” The original technical specifications are closely held state secrets or have been lost to time. Therefore, the identification process must be one of deductive reasoning, systematically analyzing available data from Russian GOST (Государственный стандарт, or State Standard) documents, technical websites, and historical sources to eliminate incorrect candidates and build an evidence-based case for the most probable alloy.

The methodology employed in this report follows three logical steps:

  1. Identify and Eliminate False Leads: The first step is to address and authoritatively debunk common misconceptions or “red herrings” that arise from superficial keyword searches in Russian technical databases. This prevents the analysis from proceeding down an incorrect path.
  2. Determine the Correct Class of Steel: Based on the known functional requirements and manufacturing methods (forging, heat treatment, high-stress application), the next step is to identify the appropriate category of steel within the GOST system. This narrows the field from thousands of potential alloys to a manageable family of materials.
  3. Isolate the Specific Grade: Within the correct class of steel, the final step is to examine the properties and designated applications of individual grades to find the one whose characteristics and intended uses align perfectly with those of a high-strength, forged, critical firearm component like a trunnion.

This process moves from the general to the specific, using the known physical and doctrinal constraints of the AKM’s design to filter the vast landscape of Soviet-era metallurgy down to a single, highly probable specification.

3.2. A Critical Clarification: The “АКМ” Aluminum Alloy Red Herring

A significant potential pitfall in the investigation of the AKM’s materials is the existence of a Soviet-era alloy designated “АКМ” under GOST 1131-76. A direct search for terms like “состав стали АКМ” (composition of steel AKM) often leads directly to technical data sheets for this material, creating the false impression that the rifle and the alloy share a name and are therefore related.9 This is a critical point of confusion that must be clarified and dismissed.

The material designated АКМ under GOST 1131-76 is not a steel alloy. It is a деформируемый алюминиевый сплав (deformable aluminum alloy).12 The full title of the standard itself confirms this: “Сплавы алюминиевые деформируемые в чушках. Технические условия,” which translates to “Strained aluminium alloys in pigs. Technical requirements”.14 The standard’s scope is for aluminum alloys intended for manufacturing ingots or for use in alloying other aluminum products.12

The chemical composition of this АКМ alloy, consisting primarily of aluminum with alloying elements such as silicon, copper, and magnesium, renders it completely unsuitable for a firearm trunnion.9 Aluminum alloys, while lightweight and corrosion-resistant, lack the hardness, shear strength, and high-temperature stability required to withstand the impact of a steel bolt carrier and contain the pressures of the 7.62x39mm cartridge. While aluminum has been used in firearm construction for less-stressed components—such as some early Soviet “waffle” pattern magazines or modern aftermarket stock adapters—its use for a primary, load-bearing component like a trunnion in a military rifle of this era is a mechanical impossibility.16

The shared “АКМ” designation is purely coincidental. The acronym for the rifle stands for Avtomat Kalashnikova Modernizirovannyj, while the designation for the alloy likely derives from its constituent elements or an internal industrial code. Recognizing this distinction is a crucial exercise in expert vetting. A non-expert relying solely on keyword matching would likely fall into this trap, leading to a fundamentally incorrect conclusion. By examining the GOST standard itself and applying basic engineering principles, this aluminum alloy can be confidently dismissed as a red herring, allowing the investigation to focus correctly on ferrous alloys.

3.3. The Prime Candidate: Сталь 40Х (Steel 40Kh) per GOST 4543

With the aluminum alloy red herring dismissed and the requirement for a forged, hardenable steel established, the investigation can focus on the appropriate GOST standards for ferrous alloys. The most relevant standard is GOST 4543, which covers “Стали легированные конструкционные” (Alloyed Structural Steels).19 This class of materials is designed specifically for manufacturing high-strength, load-bearing parts for machinery, vehicles, and, critically, weaponry. Within this standard, one particular grade emerges as the prime candidate for the AKM rear trunnion:

Сталь 40Х (Steel 40Kh).

The evidence supporting 40Х as the correct specification is multi-faceted and compelling:

Designated Application: The most direct piece of evidence comes from a source detailing the applications of various Soviet steels. It explicitly lists “Производство оружия” (Production of weapons) as a primary use for 40Х steel. The source further specifies its suitability for “стволов, клинков и других критических компонентов оружия” (barrels, blades, and other critical weapon components) precisely because of its high strength and hardness after heat treatment.21 This provides a direct and authoritative link between this specific steel grade and the manufacturing of critical firearm parts in the Soviet industrial ecosystem. Its other listed applications—such as axles, high-strength bolts, gears, and shafts—are all components that, like a trunnion, are subjected to high torsional, compressive, and impact stresses, further reinforcing its suitability.22

Material Class and Properties: Steel 40Х is classified as an “улучшаемые стали,” a term that translates to “improvable steel” but is better understood as a quench-and-temper or hardenable steel.19 This means its mechanical properties can be significantly enhanced through heat treatment, a process known to be a key step in trunnion manufacturing. It possesses an excellent balance of strength and plasticity, meaning it can be made very hard to resist wear and impact while retaining enough ductility to prevent it from being brittle.19 Furthermore, it is described as “трудносвариваемая” (difficult to weld), which is entirely consistent with a component designed to be forged and riveted into place, not welded.24

Manufacturing Compatibility: As a structural alloy steel, 40Х is well-suited for pressure-based forming methods, including the die-forging process established as the Soviet standard for trunnions.6 Its chemical composition allows for consistent results in large-scale forging operations, a key requirement for the massive production numbers of the AKM.

The designation “40Х” itself provides insight into its basic composition. In the Soviet/Russian nomenclature, the “40” indicates a nominal carbon content of 0.40%, and the “Х” (the Cyrillic letter Kha, corresponding to “Kh” or “H” in Latin script) signifies that the primary alloying element is Chromium (Хром). This simple, robust chromium steel formulation aligns perfectly with the Soviet preference for effective, non-exotic, and cost-efficient materials.

The specific chemical and mechanical properties, detailed in the tables below, confirm its status as the ideal candidate material.

Table 2: Chemical Composition of Soviet Сталь 40Х (GOST 4543-71)

This table provides the specified elemental composition for Steel 40Х according to the relevant Soviet-era state standard. This chemical fingerprint is the basis for all further comparative analysis.

ElementSymbolMass Fraction (%)Source(s)
CarbonC0.36 – 0.4419
ChromiumCr0.80 – 1.1019
ManganeseMn0.50 – 0.8019
SiliconSi0.17 – 0.3719
NickelNi≤0.3019
CopperCu≤0.3019
SulfurS≤0.03519
PhosphorusP≤0.03519

Table 3: Key Mechanical and Physical Properties of Soviet Сталь 40Х

This table outlines the performance characteristics of Steel 40Х, demonstrating its suitability for the high-stress environment of a firearm’s action. Properties are state-dependent (e.g., annealed vs. hardened).

PropertyValueCondition / NotesSource(s)
Tensile Strength980 MPa (minimum)For a 25mm bar, quenched and tempered.24
Yield Strength785 MPa (minimum)For a 25mm bar, quenched and tempered.24
Hardness, Brinell≤217 HBAnnealed (softened for machining).24
Density≈7820−7850 kg/m³19
Critical Point (Ac1)≈743 °CTemperature at which austenite begins to form during heating.24
Critical Point (Ac3)≈782−815 °CTemperature at which transformation to austenite is complete.24
Spheroidize Annealing820 – 840 °CHeat treatment to prepare the steel for machining.19
Quenching Temperature840 – 860 °CHardening temperature, followed by oil quench.19

The sum of this evidence—the direct link to weapons production, the perfect match in material class and properties, and the compatibility with Soviet manufacturing doctrine—builds an overwhelmingly strong case. The analysis concludes with a high degree of confidence that the steel specified for the original Soviet AKM rear trunnion was Сталь 40Х (Steel 40Kh), manufactured in accordance with GOST 4543.

Section 4: Comparative Analysis and Modern Equivalents

4.1. A Survey of Modern Reproduction and Aftermarket Materials

Understanding the original Soviet specification is only half of the equation for a modern historian, gunsmith, or builder. It is equally important to understand how this historical standard compares to the materials used in the production of contemporary AK-pattern rifles and standalone components, particularly those available in the Western, and specifically the U.S., market. A survey of these modern materials reveals a range of different alloys being used, driven by factors such as domestic availability, cost, and established manufacturing practices.

One of the most frequently cited materials, especially in the context of home-building and receiver flats, is 4130 steel. This is a chromium-molybdenum (“chromoly”) alloy known for its good strength-to-weight ratio and weldability. Several U.S. vendors offer receiver blanks and flats made from 4130 steel, typically in an annealed (softened) state that requires the builder to perform the final heat treatment after the receiver is bent and assembled.28 Some aftermarket trunnions are also advertised as being made from 4130.30

A more common and generally higher-grade material used for modern, commercially produced trunnions is 4140 steel. This is also a chromoly steel but with a higher carbon content than 4130, allowing it to achieve greater hardness and strength after heat treatment. Numerous U.S. manufacturers, such as Occam Defense and Century Arms (for their BFT47 model), explicitly state that their trunnions are milled from solid blocks of 4140 steel.31 This alloy is a popular choice for high-strength machinery parts and is widely available in the U.S. industrial supply chain.

For even more demanding applications, 4150 steel is sometimes used. This alloy has a still higher carbon content and is often specified for barrels due to its excellent wear resistance and strength. At least one U.S. vendor offers a front trunnion machined from a 4150 steel forging, positioning it as a premium component.33

Another high-quality alloy seen in the U.S. market is 4340AQ (Aircraft Quality) steel. This is a nickel-chromium-molybdenum alloy known for its exceptional toughness and fatigue resistance. Prominent component manufacturers like Toolcraft and Palmetto State Armory use forged 4340AQ steel for their front trunnions, indicating its status as a top-tier material for this application.34

It is also noteworthy that many of the highest-quality European-made components, such as those from WBP in Poland, often emphasize the manufacturing process over the specific alloy designation. They are described as being “machined from forged steel” or “made to original Military specifications,” with the understanding that the combination of quality forging and proper heat treatment is what guarantees performance, echoing the original Soviet doctrine.7 This focus on process highlights that the specific alloy name is only one part of the quality equation.

This survey demonstrates that while a variety of high-quality alloy steels are used in modern AK production, there is no single standard. The most common choices in the U.S. market appear to be 4140 and 4130, with premium options like 4150 and 4340 also available. The next logical step is to determine which, if any, of these common modern steels is the true equivalent to the original Soviet 40Х.

4.2. Establishing the True Equivalent: 40Х vs. AISI/SAE Grades

The prevalence of 4130 and 4140 steels in the American AK building community has led to a widespread, albeit often implicit, assumption that one of these alloys is the correct modern substitute for the original Soviet steel. However, a direct, element-for-element comparison of the material chemistries reveals a different and more precise conclusion. While 4140 is a functionally excellent substitute, the closest chemical equivalent to Soviet Сталь 40Х is, in fact, AISI 5140 steel.

This conclusion becomes clear when the official specifications are placed side-by-side. The defining characteristic of Soviet 40Х is that it is a simple chromium-alloy steel. Its primary alloying element, beyond carbon, is chromium, which is added to increase hardness, strength, and wear resistance.19

Let us examine the American counterparts:

  • AISI 41xx series (e.g., 4130, 4140): These are chromium-molybdenum steels. The “41” designation in the AISI/SAE system indicates the presence of both chromium and molybdenum. Molybdenum is a powerful alloying agent that significantly increases a steel’s hardenability (the depth to which it can be hardened), high-temperature strength, and toughness. While this makes 4140 an outstanding material for a trunnion, the presence of molybdenum makes it chemically distinct from the simpler Soviet 40Х alloy.
  • AISI 51xx series (e.g., 5140): These are chromium steels. The “51” designation indicates that chromium is the principal alloying element. AISI 5140 steel was specifically developed to provide deep hardening and high strength through a simple chromium addition, without the need for other strategic elements like molybdenum or nickel.

The table below provides a direct comparison of the chemical compositions, making the equivalence undeniable.

Table 2: Comparative Analysis of Chemical Compositions: Soviet 40Х vs. Common AISI Grades

This table juxtaposes the elemental makeup of the identified Soviet steel with its potential American equivalents. The data clearly illustrates the near-identical formulation of 40Х and 5140, and the distinct addition of molybdenum in the 41xx series steels.

ElementSoviet Сталь 40Х (GOST 4543-71)AISI 5140 (The True Equivalent)AISI 4140 (The Common Substitute)AISI 4130 (Another Common Substitute)
Carbon (C)0.36 – 0.44%0.38 – 0.43%0.38 – 0.43%0.28 – 0.33%
Chromium (Cr)0.80 – 1.10%0.70 – 0.90%0.80 – 1.10%0.80 – 1.10%
Manganese (Mn)0.50 – 0.80%0.70 – 0.90%0.75 – 1.00%0.40 – 0.60%
Silicon (Si)0.17 – 0.37%0.15 – 0.35%0.15 – 0.35%0.15 – 0.35%
Molybdenum (Mo)Not specifiedNot specified0.15 – 0.25%0.15 – 0.25%
Phosphorus (P)≤0.035%≤0.035%≤0.035%≤0.035%
Sulfur (S)≤0.035%≤0.040%≤0.040%≤0.040%
19

As the table demonstrates, the composition of 40Х and 5140 are nearly identical across all major elements. Both are medium-carbon (around 0.40% C) steels alloyed with a similar percentage of chromium (around 0.8-1.0% Cr) and manganese. In stark contrast, both 4140 and 4130 contain a significant and deliberate addition of molybdenum, placing them in a different metallurgical family.

The reason for the prevalence of 4140 in the U.S. market is not one of historical fidelity but of industrial practicality. AISI 4140 is one of the most common and widely available through-hardening alloy steels in North America. It is a known quantity for machine shops and manufacturers, with well-understood heat treatment protocols. AISI 5140, while chemically simpler, is less common in the general supply chain. Therefore, manufacturers choose 4140 because it is a cost-effective, readily available material that meets or exceeds all the functional requirements of an AKM trunnion.

This distinction is crucial. For a builder or historian seeking the highest degree of authenticity in a reproduction, AISI 5140 is the technically correct choice as it most faithfully replicates the chemistry of the original Soviet steel. For a practical, functional build, a high-quality trunnion made from forged 4140 is an excellent, robust, and entirely appropriate option. The key is to understand that the common use of 4140 is a modern adaptation based on logistics, not a direct continuation of the original Soviet specification.

Section 5: Conclusion and Recommendations

5.1. Definitive Specification

The comprehensive analysis of Soviet-era state standards (GOST), manufacturing doctrines, and comparative metallurgy leads to a definitive conclusion. The investigation successfully navigated and dismissed a significant red herring related to a similarly named but materially inappropriate aluminum alloy (АКМ per GOST 1131-76). By focusing on the correct class of alloyed structural steels and cross-referencing their designated applications and properties with the known functional demands of the component, this report identifies the material used for the original, Soviet-produced AKM fixed-stock rear trunnion with a high degree of confidence.

The specified material was Сталь 40Х (Steel 40Kh), manufactured in accordance with GOST 4543. This is a medium-carbon, chromium-alloyed structural steel. Furthermore, the component was not machined from simple bar stock but was die-forged to create a superior grain structure, then machined to final dimensions and heat-treated to achieve the required hardness and toughness. This combination of a specific, robust alloy and a strength-enhancing manufacturing process was fundamental to the success and legendary durability of the AKM platform. All available credible evidence points to this specification, and no substantive evidence supports any other.

5.2. Guidance for Historians, Gunsmiths, and Collectors

Based on these findings, the following guidance is offered to individuals engaged in the study, construction, or restoration of AKM-pattern rifles. The choice of material should be dictated by the ultimate goal of the project, whether it be absolute historical accuracy or modern functional performance.

For Historical Accuracy:

For projects where the primary objective is to create a clone, restoration, or museum-quality reproduction that is as faithful as possible to the original Soviet design, the material of choice for the rear trunnion should be forged AISI 5140 steel. As demonstrated by the comparative chemical analysis (Table 3), AISI 5140 is the closest and most direct modern equivalent to the Soviet Сталь 40Х. It replicates the simple, effective chromium-alloy chemistry of the original material without the addition of other alloying elements like molybdenum. Sourcing a trunnion specifically made from forged 5140 and ensuring it is properly heat-treated will result in a component that is metallurgically almost identical to one produced in the Izhmash or Tula arsenals during the Cold War.

For Practical Application and Modern Builds:

For a functional rifle intended for regular use, where absolute historical accuracy is secondary to performance and availability, a high-quality trunnion made from forged and properly heat-treated AISI 4140 or 4340AQ steel is an excellent and entirely suitable choice. These chromium-molybdenum (4140) and nickel-chromium-molybdenum (4340) alloys are staples of the modern U.S. firearms industry for good reason.32 They offer outstanding strength, toughness, and hardenability that meet, and in some cases may exceed, the performance characteristics of the original 40Х steel. The prevalence of these alloys is a function of modern supply chain logistics and cost-effectiveness in the North American market. A builder can be confident that a trunnion from a reputable manufacturer using these materials will provide a safe, durable, and long-lasting foundation for their rifle.

The Importance of Manufacturing Method:

Finally, it must be reiterated that regardless of the specific alloy chosen, the manufacturing method remains a critical factor in the component’s quality. A forged trunnion will always be structurally superior to a cast component for this high-stress application. The forging process, a cornerstone of the original Soviet design philosophy, imparts a level of strength and fatigue resistance that cannot be replicated by casting.6 Therefore, when selecting a rear trunnion, priority should be given to those that are explicitly described as being machined from a forging, as this adheres most closely to the design intent and proven reliability of the Kalashnikov system.

Works cited

  1. Beginners Guide To AK-47 Parts And Function, accessed July 14, 2025, https://blog.primaryarms.com/guide/guide-to-ak47-parts/
  2. AKM – Wikipedia, accessed July 14, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AKM
  3. AKM Russian 7.62mm Automatic Assault Rifle – ODIN, accessed July 14, 2025, https://odin.tradoc.army.mil/WEG/Asset/81938b91ee77ceadcef64a66bf7c3f23
  4. AKM – I Like to Hear Myself Talk History, accessed July 14, 2025, https://www.hearmyselftalkhistory.com/featured-firearm/akm
  5. AK-47 – Wikipedia, accessed July 14, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AK-47
  6. Kalashnikov and Molot made AK trunnions – AK Operators Union …, accessed July 14, 2025, https://www.akoperatorsunionlocal4774.com/2017/03/kalashnikov-made-ak-trunnions/
  7. 7.62×39 WBP Polish AK47 Forged Front Barrel Trunnion – Arms of America, accessed July 14, 2025, https://armsofamerica.com/wbp-front-trunnion-762/
  8. Surplus Romanian Oversized Front Trunnion – Rifle Dynamics, accessed July 14, 2025, https://rifledynamics.com/surplus-romanian-oversized-front-trunnion/
  9. Сталь АКМ: характеристики, расшифровка, химический состав, accessed July 14, 2025, https://metal.place/ru/wiki/akm/337149/
  10. Сплав алюминиевый АКМ – Aloro, accessed July 14, 2025, https://aloro.org/grades/su/gr-akm
  11. Сплав АКМ — расшифровка, хим. состав – Алюминий – Scraptraffic, accessed July 14, 2025, https://scraptraffic.com/splav/akm
  12. АКМ – Алюминиевый деформируемый сплав Марочник стали и …, accessed July 14, 2025, http://www.splav-kharkov.com/mat_start.php?name_id=1613
  13. AKM / АКМ Aluminium wrought alloys, accessed July 14, 2025, http://www.splav-kharkov.com/en/e_mat_start.php?name_id=1613
  14. ГОСТ 1131-76 Сплавы алюминиевые деформируемые в чушках. Технические условия (с Изменениями N 1, 2) – docs.cntd.ru, accessed July 14, 2025, https://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200009669
  15. ГОСТ 1131-76. Сплавы алюминиевые деформируемые в чушках. Технические условия, accessed July 14, 2025, https://internet-law.ru/gosts/gost/34261/
  16. Identifying & Collecting the 7.62×39 AK-47/AKM Magazine – Small Arms Defense Journal, accessed July 14, 2025, https://sadefensejournal.com/identifying-collecting-the-7-62×39-ak-47akm-magazine/
  17. SAMSON MANUFACTURING CORP REAR TRUNNION FOLDING STOCK ADAPTER FOR AK-47 – Brownells, accessed July 14, 2025, https://www.brownells.com/gun-parts/rifle-parts/rifle-stocks-parts/rear-trunnion-folding-stock-adapter-for-ak-47/
  18. AK-47 1913 Rear Trunnion Folding Stock Adapter – Samson Manufacturing, accessed July 14, 2025, https://www.samson-mfg.com/ak-47-1913-rear-trunnion.html
  19. Сталь 40Х ГОСТ 4543-2018 характеристики полный обзор, accessed July 14, 2025, https://xn--50-6kct5aad3c.xn--p1ai/stal-40x/
  20. Сталь 40Х: расшифровка, характеристики и механические, accessed July 14, 2025, https://m-investspb.ru/poleznaya-informatsiya/stal-40kh
  21. Купить сталь 40Х калиброванную – Металлопрокат Ярославцев, accessed July 14, 2025, https://yametalloprokat.ru/steel-40h
  22. Сталь марки 40Х в России – характеристики, аналоги, свойства, accessed July 14, 2025, https://metatorg.ru/marki-stali-i-splavy/stal_konstruktcionnaya/stal_konstruktsionnaya_legirovannaya/stal_konstruktsionnaya_legirovannaya_40kh/
  23. расшифровка и характеристики | гост и применение марки стали 40Х – ТД «Ареал, accessed July 14, 2025, https://areal-metal.ru/spravka/marka-stali-40h
  24. 40Х – Сталь конструкционная легированная Марочник стали и сплавов, accessed July 14, 2025, http://www.splav-kharkov.com/mat_start.php?name_id=32
  25. Сталь марки 40Х – Центральный металлический портал, accessed July 14, 2025, https://metallicheckiy-portal.ru/marki_metallov/stk/40X
  26. Сталь 40х: характеристики, применение, таблица с маркировкой и расшифровкой, accessed July 14, 2025, https://www.atissteel.ru/stal-40h-harakteristiki
  27. Прокат калиброванный ст. 40Х ГОСТ 4543-71 характеристики, accessed July 14, 2025, https://metizorel.ru/calibr4543.html
  28. AK47 7.62 Flat With Trunnion Holes – AK-Builder.com, accessed July 14, 2025, https://ak-builder.com/index1.php?dispatch=products.view&product_id=29823
  29. AK-Builder Non FFL Prebent US AKM 7.62×39 Receiver Blank With Trunnion Holes, accessed July 14, 2025, https://ak-builder.com/index1.php?dispatch=products.view&product_id=31296
  30. AK47 Fixed Stock Rear Trunnion – Carolina Shooters Supply, accessed July 14, 2025, https://www.carolinashooterssupply.com/AK47-Fixed-Stock-Rear-Trunnion-p/css-ak47-rear-trunnion.htm
  31. 1913 Rear Trunnion – Occam Defense Solutions, accessed July 14, 2025, https://occamdefense.com/1913-rear-trunnion/
  32. BFT47 – Century Arms, accessed July 14, 2025, https://www.centuryarms.com/bft47-ri4317-n.html
  33. AK47 AKM Front Trunnion – Carolina Shooters Supply, accessed July 14, 2025, https://www.carolinashooterssupply.com/AK47-AKM-Front-Trunnion-p/css-ak47-front-trunnion.htm
  34. Trunnions | Builders Parts | Parts & Accessories | AK-47 – Palmetto State Armory, accessed July 14, 2025, https://palmettostatearmory.com/ak-47/ak-parts/ak-builders-parts/ak-trunnions.html
  35. Grade 5140 Steel Coil – SAE & AISI 5140 Steel | Siegal Steel Company, accessed July 14, 2025, https://www.siegalsteel.com/steel-grades/special-order-products/alloys/grade-5140
  36. AISI 5140 | 41Cr4 | DIN1.7035 steel round bars-Fuhong steel, accessed July 14, 2025, https://www.fuhongforge.com/aisi-5140-alloy-steel/

If you find this post useful, please share the link on Facebook, with your friends, etc. Your support is much appreciated and if you have any feedback, please email me at in**@*********ps.com. Please note that for links to other websites, I may be paid via an affiliate program such as Avantlink, Impact, Amazon and eBay.


An Analysis of the Soviet AKM Rifle’s Front Trunnions

Introduction

The 1959 introduction of the Avtomat Kalashnikova Modernizirovanniy (AKM) marked a pivotal moment in the history of Soviet small arms manufacturing and global military doctrine. This modernized rifle represented the culmination of a decade-long effort to refine the original AK-47 design, moving away from the costly and time-consuming milled receivers that characterized the Type 2 and Type 3 variants.1 The AKM’s design was revolutionary in its embrace of a mass-producible 1.0 mm stamped sheet steel receiver, a manufacturing approach that had proven problematic in the earliest Type 1 AK-47s but was now perfected.4 This fundamental shift in construction philosophy, from a solid block of steel to a lightweight folded sheet, necessitated the creation of a new, discrete component to bear the immense stresses of firing: the front trunnion.

Known in Russian technical literature as the передний вкладыш (peredniy vkladysh), or “front insert,” the trunnion is the functional heart of the AKM. While the stamped receiver provides the chassis, the trunnion performs the critical tasks previously handled by the forward section of the heavy milled receiver block. It is the structural hub that rigidly secures the barrel, provides the hardened locking abutments for the rotating bolt, contains the immense chamber pressures generated by the 7.62x39mm cartridge (The CIP maximum chamber pressure for the 7.62x39mm cartridge is 355 MPa, which is equivalent to 51,488 psi ), and transmits the violent recoil forces from the bolt carrier group to the receiver shell.6 The mechanical integrity, material composition, and manufacturing quality of this single component are therefore paramount to the safety, accuracy, and operational longevity of the entire weapon system. Its design and fabrication were not afterthoughts but central to the engineering solution that made the lightweight, ubiquitous AKM possible.

The enduring reliability of the AKM platform under the most adverse conditions is a direct testament to the material science and manufacturing doctrine behind its key components. This report seeks to provide a definitive, evidence-based analysis of the specific type of steel used for the front trunnion of the Soviet-era AKM, also commonly referred to by collectors as the AK-47 Type 4.1 By synthesizing data from Russian-language technical and historical sources, analyzing Soviet-era state material standards (GOST), and drawing comparisons to modern engineering practices, this investigation will forensically identify the specific steel grade, manufacturing process, and heat treatment protocols employed by the Soviet military-industrial complex to create one of the most robust and critical components in modern firearms history.

Section 1: The Engineering of the AKM Trunnion: Function and Fabrication

The journey to the AKM’s stamped receiver was neither simple nor direct. Initial attempts at producing a stamped receiver for the Type 1 AK-47 were plagued by manufacturing difficulties, particularly in welding the critical guide rails, leading to high rejection rates.5 The immense pressure to field a new service rifle forced a pragmatic but costly deviation. Soviet industry reverted to a more traditional and resource-intensive method: milling the entire receiver from a solid block of steel. This resulted in the heavy, durable, but slow-to-produce Type 2 (milled from a forging) and Type 3 (milled from bar stock) AK-47s.1 While effective, these rifles were antithetical to the Soviet doctrine of rapid, large-scale production for a mass-conscript army.

The introduction of the AKM in 1959 signaled that these production hurdles had been overcome.1 The design genius of the AKM was not merely in stamping a piece of steel into a U-shape; it was in the strategic isolation of stresses. The engineers recognized that 90% of the receiver was simply a housing, while all of the critical forces were concentrated at the front, where the barrel joined and the bolt locked. The solution was to concentrate the complex, high-strength requirements into a relatively small, precision-made front trunnion that could then be securely riveted into the simple, inexpensive, and rapidly produced stamped steel shell.3 This modular approach was a masterstroke of production efficiency. It allowed the receiver shell to be made quickly on massive presses, while the more complex trunnion could be manufactured on a separate, specialized line. This component was the enabling technology that made the lightweight, reliable, and globally prolific AKM a reality.

This is a Soviet era drawing of the front trunnion. The author would like to thank T. Mark Graham, of Arizona Response Systems, for sharing this with me.

Subsection 1.1: Anatomy of a Critical Component: Analyzing the Forces on the Front Trunnion

The front trunnion is a marvel of compact, multi-functional engineering, subjected to a brutal cycle of forces with every shot fired. A detailed mechanical analysis reveals its four primary roles:

  1. Barrel Mounting: The trunnion features a precisely machined journal into which the barrel is pressed and secured with a transverse pin.3 This interface is responsible for maintaining the rifle’s critical headspace—the distance from the bolt face to the cartridge seat—and ensuring a rigid, consistent alignment of the barrel with the sighting plane. Any failure or deformation here would be catastrophic.
  2. Bolt Lock-up: Inside the trunnion are two robust, precisely machined locking recesses. As the bolt rotates into battery, its two opposing lugs engage these surfaces. This lock-up must contain the full rearward thrust of the cartridge case upon firing. For the 7.62x39mm M43 cartridge, this involves peak chamber pressures that can exceed 51,000 psi. The trunnion lugs must withstand this force without shearing, deforming, or developing stress fractures over tens of thousands of cycles.
  3. Impact Absorption: The AKM operates on a long-stroke gas piston system, known for its powerful and violent action.5 At the rearmost point of its travel, the bolt carrier assembly slams into the front face of the trunnion to initiate the camming action that unlocks the bolt. The trunnion must absorb this high-energy, repetitive impact without cracking or peening.
  4. Recoil Transmission: As the central structural element, the trunnion serves as the bridge between the barrel/bolt group and the receiver. It transfers the entire recoil impulse from the point of firing into the receiver shell and, ultimately, to the shooter’s shoulder. Its riveted connection to the receiver must be strong enough to handle these shear and tensile loads without loosening over time.

Subsection 1.2: The Soviet Manufacturing Doctrine: From “Стальной Поковки” (Steel Forging) to Final Form

The method of manufacturing the trunnion was as critical as the material itself. Russian-language military and historical sources are unambiguous on this point: the AKM front trunnion was fabricated from a “стальной поковки” (stal’noy pokovki), which translates directly to “steel forging”.6 This was not a part cast from molten metal or machined directly from a simple bar of steel. The process began with a block of steel being heated to a plastic state and then hammered into a rough shape using a set of dies, a process known as die forging.10

The metallurgical advantages of this choice are profound and speak to a deep understanding of materials science within the Soviet design bureaus. Forging imparts several key benefits over other methods like casting:

  • Refined Grain Structure: The intense pressure of the forging process breaks down the coarse, random grain structure of the initial steel billet, refining it into a fine, uniform structure.
  • Oriented Grain Flow: Crucially, the forging process forces the metal’s internal grain to flow and align with the contours of the part. This creates continuous grain lines that follow the shape of the locking lugs and barrel journal, drastically increasing the component’s toughness, ductility, and resistance to fatigue and impact. It is analogous to the difference in strength between a piece of wood cut with the grain versus against it.
  • Elimination of Porosity: Forging physically compresses the steel, eliminating the microscopic voids, gas pockets, and inclusions that can be present in castings. These defects act as stress risers and are often the origin points for catastrophic fractures.

The explicit choice of forging over casting—a method used in some modern, lower-quality commercial AK variants which have demonstrated notable failures 11—is a foundational Soviet military principle in action. For a critical, high-load component like a trunnion, where reliability is paramount, the superior toughness and fatigue life of a forging was non-negotiable. After the initial forging process created the basic shape and optimized grain structure, the part was then subjected to precision machining operations to cut the final, critical dimensions of the locking lug surfaces, the barrel journal, and the rivet holes.10 This two-step method combined the raw strength of forging with the high precision of machining, creating a component optimized for its demanding role.

Section 2: Primary Evidence and Interpretation: Decoding Soviet-Era Documentation

Subsection 2.1: Analysis of the Key Descriptor: “Легированная Конструкционная Сталь” (Alloy Structural Steel)

The most significant piece of direct evidence regarding the trunnion’s material comes from the Russian military history publication dogswar.ru. It states that the primary load-bearing insert—the front trunnion—is manufactured from “легированная конструкционная сталь” (legirovannaya konstruktsionnaya stal’).6 A careful deconstruction of this technical term provides the primary vector for our investigation:

  • Сталь (Stal’): “Steel.” The base material is an alloy of iron and carbon.
  • Конструкционная (Konstruktsionnaya): “Structural.” This is a broad but important classification. It designates the steel as being intended for use in construction and machine-building applications where mechanical properties—such as tensile strength, yield strength, toughness, and fatigue resistance—are the primary design considerations. This immediately rules out tool steels (valued for hardness and wear resistance at the expense of toughness) and simple sheet steels.
  • Легированная (Legirovannaya): “Alloyed” or “Alloy.” This is the most critical descriptor. It confirms that the steel is not a simple carbon steel. Elements other than iron and carbon have been deliberately added to the melt in controlled quantities to achieve specific, enhanced properties that cannot be obtained with carbon alone.

This three-word phrase, therefore, narrows the field of potential materials from hundreds of possibilities to a specific class of steels defined under the Soviet standards system: alloyed structural steels. In the context of the Soviet Union’s focus on logistical simplicity and the use of widely available materials for mass production 5, this term does not imply a complex or exotic high-alloy steel (like a modern chrome-moly-vanadium specialty steel). Instead, it points toward a well-defined, economical, and extensively produced family of medium-carbon structural steels that contain key, but common, alloying elements.

Subsection 2.2: Contextual Clues from the Soviet Military-Industrial Complex

To further refine the search, it is instructive to examine the material specifications for other related components produced within the Soviet sphere of influence. This establishes a pattern of material selection and demonstrates the specificity of Soviet engineering.

For instance, analysis of the 5.45x39mm 7N6 cartridge, which replaced the 7.62x39mm, reveals that its mild steel penetrator core was made from Steel 10 (Сталь 10), a plain low-carbon steel.13 This shows that specific, numbered grades of steel were indeed called out in technical packages.

More directly relevant is the material used for Warsaw Pact AK magazines. High-quality Bulgarian steel magazines, produced to Soviet-era specifications, are explicitly documented as being manufactured from heat-treated, high-grade carbon steel compliant with GOST 1050-88.14 This provides a direct and powerful link to a specific Soviet state standard for a high-stress firearm component. The use of different steels for different parts—a soft, low-carbon steel for a bullet core designed to deform, a hardenable carbon steel for a magazine body requiring rigidity, and a tough, forgeable alloy steel for a trunnion—reveals a highly sophisticated and deliberate material selection process. It was not a crude, one-size-fits-all approach but a tailored engineering strategy based on the unique mechanical demands of each part. The evidence strongly suggests that the “alloy structural steel” of the trunnion would also be defined by a specific GOST standard, with GOST 1050-88 being a prime candidate.

Section 3: Identifying the Candidate Material: A Deep Dive into GOST 1050-88

Subsection 3.1: The GOST System: Understanding Soviet State Standards

The entire Soviet industrial base operated under the framework of the ГОСТ (GOST, an acronym for Gosudarstvennyy standart or State Standard). This all-encompassing system of technical standards ensured uniformity, interoperability, and quality control for everything from raw materials to finished products. For an engineer in a Soviet design bureau, specifying a material meant calling out a specific GOST standard and a grade within it. Based on the evidence from related components and the technical description of the trunnion material, GOST 1050-88: “Sized Bars Made Of High-Quality Structural Carbon Steel with A Special Surface Finish” emerges as the most probable governing standard.15 Although its title specifies “carbon” steel, the standard includes grades with significant manganese content, which are technically low-alloy steels and fit the description of “alloy structural steel” in the Soviet context.

Subsection 3.2: A Comparative Analysis of Primary Candidate Grades: Steel 40, 45, and 50

Within GOST 1050-88, several grades present as viable candidates for a forged and heat-treated trunnion. The key selection criteria are a medium carbon content (typically 0.30% to 0.60%), which is essential for achieving high hardness through heat treatment while retaining sufficient toughness, and known suitability for forging. The three most likely candidates are Steel 40, Steel 45, and Steel 50.17

  • Steel 40 (Сталь 40): A medium-carbon steel with a carbon content of 0.37–0.45%.
  • Steel 45 (Сталь 45): A medium-carbon steel with a carbon content of 0.42–0.50%. This grade is historically one of the most common and versatile structural steels in Russian and Eastern Bloc engineering.
  • Steel 50 (Сталь 50): A medium-to-high carbon steel with a carbon content of 0.47–0.55%.

The chemical compositions and baseline mechanical properties (in a normalized, pre-heat-treated state) of these grades are detailed in the tables below, with data drawn directly from the GOST 1050-88 standard.17

Table 1: Chemical Composition of GOST 1050-88 Candidate Steels (%)

Steel GradeCarbon (C)Silicon (Si)Manganese (Mn)Chromium (Cr)Sulfur (S)Phosphorus (P)
Steel 400.37 – 0.450.17 – 0.370.50 – 0.80≤0.25≤0.040≤0.035
Steel 450.42 – 0.500.17 – 0.370.50 – 0.80≤0.25≤0.040≤0.035
Steel 500.47 – 0.550.17 – 0.370.50 – 0.80≤0.25≤0.040≤0.035

Table 2: Baseline Mechanical Properties of GOST 1050-88 Candidate Steels (Normalized State)

Steel GradeYield Strength (σy​), min MPaTensile Strength (σu​), min MPaElongation (δ5​), min %Reduction of Area (ψ), min %
Steel 403355701945
Steel 453556001640
Steel 503756301440

These tables illustrate that while the grades are similar, increasing carbon content provides a modest increase in baseline strength but a notable decrease in ductility (elongation). This trade-off becomes far more pronounced after the decisive process of heat treatment.

Section 4: The Decisive Process: Heat Treatment and Final Performance Characteristics

Subsection 4.1: The Metallurgical Imperative: Balancing Hardness, Toughness, and Wear Resistance

The raw, normalized properties of the steel forging are insufficient for the final application. A trunnion must possess a complex combination of competing properties: the locking lug surfaces must be extremely hard to resist wear and deformation from the repeated impact and friction of the bolt lugs, while the core of the component must remain tough and ductile to absorb the shock of firing and bolt carrier impact without fracturing. A material that is uniformly hardened to an extreme degree will be brittle and prone to catastrophic failure. The method for achieving this critical balance of a hard, wear-resistant case and a tough, shock-resistant core is heat treatment.

Subsection 4.2: Analysis of GOST-Specified Heat Treatment Protocols

The appendices of GOST 1050-88 provide detailed protocols for the heat treatment of these steels to achieve their optimal mechanical properties.17 The process for a component like a trunnion would involve two key stages:

  1. Hardening (Закалка, Zakalka): The machined forging is heated to a specific austenitizing temperature, where its internal crystal structure transforms. For Steel 45, this is in the range of 820–860°C. Once uniformly heated, it is rapidly cooled (quenched) in a medium like water or oil. This rapid cooling traps the carbon in a very hard, brittle, needle-like crystal structure known as martensite.
  2. Tempering (Отпуск, Otpusk): The now-hardened but brittle part is reheated to a much lower temperature (for these steels, typically 550–600°C) and held for a period. This process allows some carbon to precipitate out of the martensite, relieving internal stresses and transforming the microstructure into tempered martensite. This crucial step reduces brittleness and restores a significant amount of toughness, sacrificing some of the peak hardness for a much more durable final product.

The precise control of the hardening and tempering temperatures, soak times, and quench media allows the engineer to dial in the final properties of the component to meet the exact requirements of the design.

Subsection 4.3: Determining the Final Hardness for Optimal Trunnion Performance

The goal of this controlled heat treatment is to achieve a specific final hardness. For components like the AKM trunnion, a target hardness in the range of 40-45 on the Rockwell C scale (HRC) is considered ideal by modern gunsmithing and engineering standards. This range provides excellent surface durability and compressive strength in the locking lugs while ensuring the core remains tough enough to prevent fracture under shock loading. The GOST 1050-88 standard provides specified hardness values for these steels after various treatments, typically in the Brinell scale (HB), which can be converted to HRC.

Table 3: Specified Hardness of Candidate Steels After Heat Treatment

Steel GradeTreatmentHardness (HB), maxApprox. Hardness (HRC)
Steel 40Annealed / High-Temp Tempered187~91 HRB
Steel 45Annealed / High-Temp Tempered197~93 HRB
Steel 50Annealed / High-Temp Tempered207~95 HRB
Steel 40Hard-Worked (Calibrated)241~23 HRC
Steel 45Hard-Worked (Calibrated)241~23 HRC
Steel 50Hard-Worked (Calibrated)255~25 HRC

Note: The GOST standard focuses on hardness after annealing or in a hard-worked state. The final hardness after quenching and tempering to a specific toughness would be a value determined by the firearm’s technical data package. However, the hardenability data within GOST 1050-88 shows that Steel 45 can achieve a hardness of 49-58 HRC immediately after quenching, which is then reduced during tempering to the desired final hardness (e.g., ~40-45 HRC).17

Section 5: A Comparative Framework: Soviet Steels vs. Modern International Equivalents

Subsection 5.1: An Examination of Modern Materials for AK-Pattern Trunnions

To contextualize the Soviet material choice, it is useful to examine the steels used in high-quality modern commercial and military production of AK-pattern rifles. These materials represent the current state-of-the-art and serve as a valuable performance benchmark. Across the industry, from Polish WBP to American manufacturers, the most commonly specified and respected materials for forged AK trunnions are chromium-molybdenum (chromoly) alloy steels.12

The two most prominent grades are:

  • AISI 4140 Steel: A medium-carbon chromoly steel renowned for its excellent balance of toughness, fatigue strength, and wear resistance after heat treatment. It is a go-to material for high-stress applications from firearm components to automotive axles.19
  • AISI 4150 Steel: Similar to 4140 but with a higher carbon content, allowing it to achieve greater hardness. It is often specified for military-grade barrels and other components requiring maximum durability.21

Other alloys like AISI 8620, a nickel-chromium-molybdenum steel, are also used, particularly for applications requiring case hardening (a very hard surface over a softer core).23 These modern choices validate the fundamental engineering requirements for a trunnion: a forgeable, medium-carbon alloy steel that responds exceptionally well to heat treatment.

Subsection 5.2: Drawing Parallels: How Modern Material Choices Validate Historical Soviet Engineering

When the chemical and mechanical properties of the likely Soviet candidates are placed alongside their modern counterparts, a clear picture of parallel technological development emerges. The Soviet engineers, working with the materials available to their massive industrial base, arrived at a solution that was functionally equivalent to the more complex alloys used today. The critical element for performance—the carbon content—is nearly identical between the Soviet and modern steels.

The primary difference lies in the alloying elements. Where modern AISI 4140/4150 steels use chromium and molybdenum, the Soviet GOST 1050-88 steels rely primarily on an increased manganese content. Chromium and molybdenum significantly improve a steel’s hardenability—its ability to harden deeply and uniformly through a thicker cross-section during quenching. For a relatively small component like an AKM trunnion, this enhanced hardenability is beneficial but not strictly necessary. The Soviets could achieve the required surface hardness and core toughness on their simpler manganese-alloyed steel through precise control of their forging and heat-treatment processes. This choice reflects a brilliant optimization of resources: they achieved a near-identical performance outcome using a simpler, more economical, and more widely available alloy, perfectly suited to the scale of their production.

Table 4: Comparative Analysis of Soviet GOST Steel 45 and US AISI 4140/4150 Steels

SpecificationSteel GradeCarbon (C) %Manganese (Mn) %Chromium (Cr) %Molybdenum (Mo) %Typical Hardness (HRC)
GOST 1050-88Steel 450.42 – 0.500.50 – 0.80≤0.2540-45 (est.)
AISI/SAE41400.38 – 0.430.75 – 1.000.80 – 1.100.15 – 0.2540-45
AISI/SAE41500.48 – 0.530.75 – 1.000.80 – 1.100.15 – 0.2542-47

This table serves as a “Rosetta Stone,” translating the Soviet specification into a familiar modern context. It demonstrates that the Soviet choice was not inferior, but rather a different and highly effective path to the same engineering destination.

Conclusion: A Definitive Finding on the Soviet AKM Trunnion Steel

The evidence, drawn from Russian technical descriptions, analysis of Soviet-era state standards, and comparison with modern engineering materials, converges to a clear and definitive conclusion. The manufacturing process for the Soviet AKM front trunnion began with the die forging of a steel billet, a method chosen to impart maximum toughness and fatigue resistance to this critical, high-stress component.

The material itself, described in primary Russian sources as an “alloy structural steel,” is not an exotic or complex alloy. Instead, all evidence points to a high-quality, medium-carbon, manganese-alloyed structural steel, manufactured in accordance with the Soviet state standard GOST 1050-88. This steel was then subjected to a controlled heat treatment process of quenching and tempering to achieve the final required balance of surface hardness and core toughness.

Based on a comparative analysis of the candidate grades within this standard, the specific material used can be identified with a high degree of confidence:

  • Primary Candidate: Steel 45 (Сталь 45) is the most probable material. Its carbon content of 0.42-0.50% provides the ideal combination of properties for this application. It can be heat-treated to a hardness sufficient to resist wear on the locking lugs (in the range of 40-45 HRC) while retaining the essential core toughness to absorb the repeated shock of firing without fracture. Its chemical and mechanical profile makes it the direct functional equivalent of the modern benchmark alloy, AISI 4140.
  • Secondary Candidate: Steel 50 (Сталь 50) is a plausible but slightly less likely alternative. With a higher carbon content (0.47-0.55%), it could be hardened to a greater degree, but at the cost of some ductility and toughness. Its use would represent an engineering choice prioritizing maximum wear resistance, making it a functional parallel to modern AISI 4150 steel.

In conclusion, the front trunnion of the Soviet AKM was a testament to a mature and sophisticated military-industrial complex. The selection of a common but high-quality forged steel like Steel 45, combined with a precisely controlled heat treatment process, created a component that was both economical for mass production and possessed the extraordinary durability required for a service rifle intended to function reliably through decades of use in the harshest environments on Earth.

If you find this post useful, please share the link on Facebook, with your friends, etc. Your support is much appreciated and if you have any feedback, please email me at in**@*********ps.com. Please note that for links to other websites, I may be paid via an affiliate program such as Avantlink, Impact, Amazon and eBay.


Works cited

  1. An Overview of the AK-47 Assault Rifle – Boot Camp & Military Fitness Institute, accessed July 14, 2025, https://bootcampmilitaryfitnessinstitute.com/2023/08/28/an-overview-of-the-ak-47-assault-rifle/
  2. AK-47 – Survival, accessed July 14, 2025, http://landsurvival.com/schools-wikipedia/wp/a/AK-47.htm
  3. AKM – Wikipedia, accessed July 14, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AKM
  4. AK47 Rifles for Sale | Nampa Idaho – Northwest Gun Supply, accessed July 14, 2025, https://www.northwestgunsupply.com/ak-47
  5. AK-47 – Wikipedia, accessed July 14, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AK-47
  6. 7,62-мм автомат Калашникова модернизированный АКМ (СССР …, accessed July 14, 2025, http://www.dogswar.ru/strelkovoe-oryjie/avtomaty/9146-762-mm-avtomat-kala.html
  7. Beginners Guide To AK-47 Parts And Function, accessed July 14, 2025, https://blog.primaryarms.com/guide/guide-to-ak47-parts/
  8. Suppressed Romanian Battlefield Pickup AK47 : r/GunPorn – Reddit, accessed July 14, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/GunPorn/comments/1fzr5df/suppressed_romanian_battlefield_pickup_ak47/
  9. Gunsmith Viktor Kalashnikov passes away – MercoPress, accessed July 14, 2025, https://en.mercopress.com/2018/03/28/gunsmith-viktor-kalashnikov-passes-away
  10. Kalashnikov and Molot made AK trunnions – AK Operators Union, Local 47-74, accessed July 14, 2025, https://www.akoperatorsunionlocal4774.com/2017/03/kalashnikov-made-ak-trunnions/
  11. Cast vs Forged AK Trunnions – YouTube, accessed July 14, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9NqxidFd7jU
  12. Question for AK guys… | The Armory Life Forum, accessed July 14, 2025, https://www.thearmorylife.com/forum/threads/question-for-ak-guys.12801/
  13. 5.45×39mm – Wikipedia, accessed July 14, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5.45%C3%9739mm
  14. M+M Industries Bulgarian Steel AK-47 Magazine 30-RD (AK47/AKM …, accessed July 14, 2025, https://mm-industries.com/product/mm-industries-bulgarian-steel-ak-47-magazine-30-rd-ak47-akm-m10x-7-62×39/
  15. GOST 1050 – 1988Sized Bars Made Of High-Quality Structural Carbon Steel with A Special Surface Finish – Global Fastener Platform, accessed July 14, 2025, https://www.globalfastener.com/standards/detail_20257.html
  16. GOST 1050-88 Gauged bars with special surface finishing of carbon structural quality steel: General technical conditions, accessed July 14, 2025, https://energosteel.com/en/library/standards/gost-1050-88/
  17. SIZED BARS MADE OF HIGH-QUALITY STRUCTURAL CARBON …, accessed July 14, 2025, https://www.tubemfg.com/files/GOST/GOST%201050-88.pdf
  18. 7.62×39 WBP Polish AK47 Forged Front Barrel Trunnion – Arms of America, accessed July 14, 2025, https://armsofamerica.com/wbp-front-trunnion-762/
  19. 1913 Rear Trunnion – Occam Defense Solutions, accessed July 14, 2025, https://occamdefense.com/1913-rear-trunnion/
  20. Manufacturing process of parts on the AK – Page 2 – AK-47 / AK-74 – Palmetto State Armory, accessed July 14, 2025, https://palmettostatearmory.com/forum/t/manufacturing-process-of-parts-on-the-ak/742?page=2
  21. Steel for Firearms: Alloys and Key Characteristics, accessed July 14, 2025, https://www.jadesterling.com/ask-the-metallurgist/steel-for-firearms-alloys-and-key-characteristics
  22. AK47 AKM Front Trunnion – Carolina Shooters Supply, accessed July 14, 2025, https://www.carolinashooterssupply.com/AK47-AKM-Front-Trunnion-p/css-ak47-front-trunnion.htm
  23. Office/Tech: 641-623-5401 – Brownells, accessed July 14, 2025, https://www.brownells.com/userdocs/Miscellaneous/catalog73/pdfs/73-Rifle-P156-198.pdf
  24. Is 5160 a good steel for gun parts? : r/gunsmithing – Reddit, accessed July 14, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/gunsmithing/comments/15pfom5/is_5160_a_good_steel_for_gun_parts/

AKs Around The World – The Proliferation of the Kalashnikov Design

Growing up in the 70s and 80s, I was patriotic and was mainly interested in American firearms. In 2006, I read an article about building your own AK by the late great Steven Matthews and I changed course dramatically. I’ve always liked history, machines and firearms and started reading books about Mikhail Kalashnikov and his AK designs. My business, Ronin’s Grips, was born along the way.

I though it might be interesting to share how the Kalashnikov design has proliferated around the world with everyone. Thus, I did some digging to create this.

1. Introduction

The Kalashnikov assault rifle, first introduced in the Soviet Union shortly after World War II, represents one of the most influential and widely proliferated firearm designs in history.1 Its simple design, rugged reliability, and ease of mass production contributed to its adoption by numerous armed forces globally and its appearance in countless conflicts.1 The original AK-47 and its subsequent iterations, including the AKM, AK-74, the AK-100 series, and the modern AK-12, have not only served as the standard armament for many nations but have also inspired a vast array of locally produced variants and derivatives worldwide.2

This report documents the countries that have manufactured Kalashnikov-inspired rifle designs. It aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the specific models produced, their calibers, approximate dates of production, and, where available, estimated production numbers. The scope encompasses rifles directly based on the Soviet/Russian lineage—AK-47, AKM, AK-74, AK-100 series, and AK-12—as well as notable derivatives that share the core Kalashnikov operating principle.

While extensive research has been conducted, it is important to acknowledge that precise production figures for many Kalashnikov-type rifles, particularly those from less transparent or state-controlled manufacturing environments, are often estimates or remain unavailable in publicly accessible records. Nevertheless, this report endeavors to present the most accurate and detailed information possible based on the available data.

2. The Soviet/Russian Kalashnikov Lineage: The Foundation for Global Variants

The evolution of the Kalashnikov rifle series within the Soviet Union and subsequently the Russian Federation laid the groundwork for its global adoption and adaptation. Each major iteration introduced refinements in design, manufacturing, or caliber, reflecting changing military doctrines and technological advancements. Understanding this original lineage is crucial for contextualizing the myriad of international variants.

2.1. AK-47 (Avtomat Kalashnikova obraztsa 1947 goda)

The AK-47, designed by Mikhail Kalashnikov, was officially adopted by the Soviet military in 1949, though its design work began earlier, around 1947.1 Initial production started in 1948.3 The rifle was chambered for the intermediate 7.62x39mm M43 cartridge, a defining feature that offered a balance between the power of full-sized rifle cartridges and the controllability of submachine gun rounds.3 Early models featured milled receivers (Type 1, Type 2, Type 3), which contributed to their durability.3 The AK-47 was designed for simplicity, reliability in adverse conditions, and ease of mass production using methods available in the post-war Soviet Union.3 Its long-stroke gas piston system became a hallmark of the Kalashnikov design.3 Approximately 75 million AK-47s are estimated to have been built, with the broader Kalashnikov family reaching around 100 million units.3 Key manufacturers included the Izhevsk Machine-Building Plant (Izhmash), now Kalashnikov Concern.3

Soviet AK-47, Type 2A made from 1951 to 1954/55. Image source is Wikimedia.5

2.2. AKM (Avtomat Kalashnikova Modernizirovannyj)

Introduced in 1959, the AKM was a modernized version of the AK-47, also designed by Mikhail Kalashnikov’s team.1 A pivotal change was the introduction of a stamped sheet-metal receiver, which significantly reduced manufacturing costs, lightened the rifle, and simplified mass production compared to the milled receiver of the AK-47.1 The AKM retained the 7.62x39mm caliber and the long-stroke gas piston system.4 Other improvements included a new muzzle brake (slant compensator) to reduce muzzle climb during automatic fire, an improved bayonet, and often, laminated wood furniture.6 Production of the AKM in the Soviet Union ran from 1959 to 1977, with an estimated 10,278,300 units built by Izhmash and the Tula Arms Plant.6 The AKM became the most prevalent variant of the Kalashnikov series globally, largely due to its widespread production and export by the Soviet Union and its allies.7

Photo of an AKM, manufactured in 1975. Picture taken in Managua, Nicaragua in a local firing range. Image source: Wikimedia.9

2.3. AK-74 (Avtomat Kalashnikova obraztsa 1974 goda)

The AK-74 was developed in the early 1970s and officially adopted in 1974 as a successor to the AKM.10 The most significant change was the adoption of a new, smaller caliber, high-velocity cartridge, the 5.45x39mm M74.4 This shift mirrored developments in NATO countries towards smaller caliber service rifles, aiming for lighter ammunition, flatter trajectory, and reduced recoil, thereby improving hit probability.10 The AK-74 retained the basic Kalashnikov long-stroke gas piston operating system and many AKM components, with some early models reportedly being re-barreled AKMs.10 It featured a distinctive, prominent muzzle brake to further mitigate recoil and muzzle rise.10 Manufactured by Izhmash (now Kalashnikov Concern) and Tula Arms Plant, production of the original AK-74 ran from 1974 to 1991, with over 5 million units built.10 The modernized AK-74M, featuring a side-folding polymer stock and a universal scope rail, entered full-scale production in 1991 and continues to be produced.4

A left side view of a 5.45mm Soviet AK-74 assault rifle, top, and a 5.45mm RPK-74 light machine gun, bottom. The RPK-74 is the light machine gun version of the AK-74 and has a longer, heavier barrel, a larger magazine, and an attached bipod. Image Source: Wikimedia.12

2.4. AK-100 Series (Export-Oriented Evolution)

Introduced in 1994, the AK-100 series, developed by Izhmash (now Kalashnikov Concern), is based on the AK-74M design but was primarily intended for export markets.13 This family of rifles is characterized by black polymer furniture, side-folding polymer stocks, and the use of AK-74M internal systems, ensuring a high degree of parts interchangeability.13 A key strategic development with the AK-100 series was the offering of multiple calibers to appeal to a wider international customer base. This demonstrated a shift from primarily arming domestic and allied forces with a standardized caliber to a more market-driven approach in the post-Cold War era. The availability of rifles chambered in NATO standard ammunition alongside traditional Soviet calibers was a significant step in maintaining the Kalashnikov’s global relevance. Production numbers for the entire series are substantial, with Deagel.com indicating over 30,000 produced (though this seems low for the entire series and may refer to a specific timeframe or subset) 14, while other sources suggest much larger overall Kalashnikov production from Izhevsk which would include these models.15 The AK-100M/200 series, introduced around 2017, represents further modernization with enhanced ergonomics and Picatinny rails for accessory mounting.13

  • AK-101: An export version of the AK-74M chambered in the NATO standard 5.56x45mm cartridge.4 Production began around 1995.16 Over 270,500+ have been built (this number likely includes other AK-100 variants or is a broader production figure).16
Russian AK-101. Image source: Wikimedia16
  • AK-102: A compact carbine version of the AK-101, also chambered in 5.56x45mm NATO, with a shorter 314mm barrel.4 Production: 2000-present.17 Indonesia reportedly acquired 5,000 AK-101 and AK-102 rifles.17
AK-102 at Interpolitex-2009. Image Source: Wikimedia. Note, this photo is by Vitaly V. Kuzmin. Vitaly is a military photo jopurnalist and takes amazing photos of Russian military and defense related subjects. Click here for his blog and the amazing photos he has there. 17
  • AK-103: A modernized AKM chambered in 7.62x39mm M43, incorporating AK-74M features like polymer furniture and a side-folding stock.4 Production: 1994-present, with over 250,000+ built.18 It has seen significant export success, including licensed production in Venezuela and Ethiopia.4
AK-103 with GP-34 Grenade Launcher. Image Souce: Wikimedia19
  • AK-104: A compact carbine version of the AK-103, chambered in 7.62x39mm M43, with a 314mm barrel.4 Production began in 1994.20
AK-104 assault rifle at Engineering Technologies 2012. Image Source: Wikimedia.21
  • AK-105: A compact carbine version of the AK-74M, chambered in 5.45x39mm M74, with a 314mm barrel. It is used domestically by Russian forces as a shorter alternative to the full-sized AK-74M, filling a role similar to the older AKS-74U but with improved ballistics due to a slightly longer barrel and more modern features.4 Production began in 1994.23
AK-105 at the International Military-Technical Forum “Army” in 2022. Image Source: Wikimedia 23

2.5. AK-12 Series (Fifth Generation)

The AK-12 represents the latest generation of Kalashnikov rifles, designed by a team including Vladimir Zlobin and Sergey Urzhumcev under the Kalashnikov Concern (formerly Izhmash).24 The project began in 2011, with serial production commencing in 2018 after undergoing trials and refinements.24 Over 150,000 units have been built, with a significant contract for 150,000 AK-12 and AK-15 rifles for the Russian Ministry of Defence between 2019 and 2021.24

The AK-12 series incorporates significant ergonomic and tactical improvements over previous generations. These include an integrated Picatinny rail on the receiver cover and handguard for mounting optics and accessories, a redesigned adjustable and side-folding telescoping stock, an improved pistol grip, and a new rotary diopter rear sight.24 Early versions featured a two-round burst mode, which was later omitted in the 2023 upgrade based on operational feedback.24 This iterative development, even post-introduction, underscores a responsiveness to user needs and battlefield experiences, a characteristic of successful military firearm evolution. The multi-caliber approach initiated with the AK-100 series continues, broadening the family’s potential applications and export appeal.

  • Models & Calibers:
  • AK-12 (6P70): Chambered in 5.45x39mm.4
  • AK-15 (6P71): Chambered in 7.62x39mm.4
  • AK-19: Chambered in 5.56x45mm NATO.4
  • AK-308: A battle rifle variant chambered in 7.62x51mm NATO.4
  • Carbine versions include the AK-12K and AK-15K.24
AK-12 from the Army 2020 Expo. Image Source: Wikipedia. 24
This is an AK-12 at the Army 2022 Expo. Compare it to the 2020 photo above from 2020 Expo. Note the different buttstock, handguard and pistol grip. The rear sight is more compact and the trigger guard was enalged to better accomodate gloves. Image Source: Wikimedia
This photo shows us the four variants – from the top: AK-12, AK-15, AK-19, and the AK-308 at the bottom. This was taken at the Army 2021 Expo. Image Source: Wikimedia

The Soviet/Russian Kalashnikov lineage showcases a remarkable evolution. The initial AK-47 prioritized ruggedness and mass producibility with its milled receiver. The AKM’s transition to a stamped receiver was a critical development, drastically reducing production costs and time, which was instrumental in its massive global proliferation.1 This ability to simplify for mass production without sacrificing core reliability is a key factor in the Kalashnikov’s enduring presence. The AK-74’s adoption of the 5.45x39mm cartridge reflected a broader military trend towards smaller, higher-velocity rounds, aiming for improved soldier loadout and hit probability.10 The AK-100 series marked a strategic pivot towards export markets, offering NATO calibers alongside traditional Soviet ones, demonstrating adaptability to global demands.13 Finally, the AK-12 series integrates modern modularity (Picatinny rails, adjustable furniture) while retaining the fundamental Kalashnikov operating system, indicating an effort to keep the platform competitive in the 21st century.24 The production numbers themselves tell a story: massive outputs of AK-47s and AKMs during the Cold War underscored Soviet military doctrine and global influence, while the export focus of the AK-100 series and the recent ramp-up of AK-12 production reflect current geopolitical realities and domestic military requirements.3 Throughout this evolution, a degree of parts and magazine compatibility (within calibers) has often been maintained, simplifying logistics for users of multiple Kalashnikov generations.18

3. Global Production of Kalashnikov-Inspired Rifles: A Country-by-Country Breakdown

The simplicity, reliability, and Soviet policy of sharing technical data packages with allied nations led to the widespread licensed and unlicensed production of Kalashnikov-type rifles across the globe. Many countries adapted the design to their specific manufacturing capabilities and operational requirements, resulting in a diverse array of variants.

3.1. Albania

  • Manufacturer(s): KM Poliçan & Gramësh factories; State Arsenal.27
  • Models & Details:
  • Automatiku Shqiptar 1978 model 56 (ASH-78 Tip-1): A copy of the Chinese Type 56 (itself an AK-47 derivative), chambered in 7.62x39mm. It often lacks magazine well dimples and features unique selector markings “A” (automatic) and “1” (semi-automatic).4 Production ran from 1978 to 1993, with over 100,000 estimated to have been made.27
Albanian ASH-78 Tip-1. Image Source: Wikipedia3
  • ASH-78 Tip-2: A heavy-barreled version, analogous to the RPK.4
  • ASH-78 Tip-3: Equipped with grenade launching capability.4
  • Tipi 1982 (ASH-82): Generally a copy of the AKS-47 (underfolding stock).4 However, some rifles designated ASH-82 and dated 1981 are fixed-stock Type 56 copies with extended barrels and grenade spigots, while others dated 1986 are Type 56 copies with underfolding bayonets.31 Caliber: 7.62x39mm.
  • Various other AKMS-pattern rifles, some with short barrels similar to the Soviet AKS-74U, were also produced.4
  • Notes: Albanian Kalashnikov variants were developed during a period of national isolation and were heavily influenced by Chinese designs due to close ties after Albania’s split from the Soviet sphere.27 Albania notably supplied 30,000 ASH-78 rifles to the Afghan National Army.27

3.2. Argentina

  • Manufacturer(s): FMAP-DM (Dirección General de Fabricaciones Militares).33
  • Model: FARA 83 (Fusil Automático República Argentina), also known as FAA 81.
  • Caliber: 5.56x45mm NATO.33
  • Production Dates: Designed in 1981, initial production ran from 1984 to 1990, with a brief resumption in 1990 before cancellation due to economic difficulties.33
  • Estimated Numbers Produced: 1,193 in the initial run; total production numbers are unknown but limited.33 Some sources suggest “a little over 1000” were made in total.34
  • Notes: The FARA 83 was primarily inspired by the Italian Beretta AR70/223, particularly in its magazine and some design features.33 It utilizes a gas-operated reloading system.33 While listed as a “similar rifle” to Kalashnikovs in some sources due to design influences from the Galil and Valmet Rk 62 4, its arguably more of an influenced design rather than a direct derivative. It features a folding buttstock and tritium night sights.33

3.3. Armenia

  • Manufacturer(s): Not specified, but likely domestic state facilities.
  • Model: K-3
  • Caliber: 5.45x39mm.4
  • Production Dates: First displayed in 1996, suggesting production around that period.4
  • Estimated Numbers Produced: Not specified.
  • Notes: The K-3 is a bullpup rifle based on the AKS-74U, designed for compactness.4
  • Wikimedia Photo Link: (A specific Wikimedia Commons link for the Armenian K-3 was not found in the provided snippets; image search required for report inclusion if available.)

3.4. Azerbaijan

  • Manufacturer(s): Ministry of Defence Industry of Azerbaijan (MODIAR).37
  • Models & Details:
  • Khazri: A licensed copy of the Russian AK-74M assault rifle. Caliber: 5.45x39mm. Production commenced in 2011 under a 10-year renewable license from Rosoboronexport, with a potential total production volume of up to 120,000 units for domestic use.4
  • Wikimedia Photo Link: 39 A representative image of an AK-74M could be used if a specific Khazri image is unavailable.
  • EM-14: An AK-101 clone. Caliber: 5.56x45mm NATO.37
  • AZ-7.62: An AK-103 clone. Caliber: 7.62x39mm.37
  • Notes: Azerbaijan’s production focuses on modern Kalashnikov variants for its armed forces.37

3.5. Bangladesh

  • Manufacturer(s): Bangladesh Ordnance Factories (BOF).4
  • Models & Details:
  • Chinese Type 56: Utilized by Bangladeshi forces, likely imported or assembled locally. Caliber: 7.62x39mm.4
  • BD-08: Listed as a “Similar rifle”.4 This is likely a locally produced version or derivative of the Chinese Type 81 assault rifle, as BOF manufactures the Type 81 under license.40 Caliber: 7.62x39mm.
  • Production Dates/Numbers: Specific dates and numbers for local Type 56 usage or BD-08/Type 81 production are not detailed in the provided sources.
  • Notes: The Type 81, while visually similar to AKs and sharing the same caliber, employs a distinct short-stroke gas piston system.41
  • Wikimedia Photo Link: (For BD-08, a specific image search is required. For Type 56, see China section.)

3.6. Bulgaria

  • Manufacturer(s): Arsenal AD (Kazanlak, formerly State Factory 10).4
  • Models & Details (Examples):
  • AKK / AKKS: Copies of the Soviet Type 3 AK-47 (milled receiver) and AKS (folding stock). Caliber: 7.62x39mm. Assembly from Soviet parts began in the early 1960s, with full licensed domestic production by the mid-1960s.4
  • AK-47M1: A Type 3 AK-47 variant with black polymer furniture.4
  • AR-M1 Series: A modernized derivative of the milled receiver AKK/AK-47, incorporating features from the AK-74 such as a flash suppressor and polymer stock. It is offered in both 5.56x45mm NATO and 7.62x39mm calibers. Production: 1998-present.4
  • Various AKS-74U pattern carbines, such as the AKS-74UF and the AR-SF (chambered in 5.56x45mm NATO).4
  • Licensed production of the AK-105 is also noted.22
  • Estimated Numbers Produced: Arsenal (Factory 10) is estimated to have produced over 1,000,000 Kalashnikov-type rifles in total.15 A specific model, the SA M-7 Classic (a clone of the AK-47 Type 3 by Arsenal), had a limited run of only 243 units.28
  • Notes: Bulgaria is a significant and highly regarded producer and exporter of Kalashnikov rifles. Mikhail Kalashnikov himself reportedly stated that the finest AKs were made in Bulgaria.45 The AR-M1 series is notable for retaining the durable milled receiver design.44
Bulgarian AR-M1. Image source: Wikipedia44

3.7. Cambodia

  • Manufacturer(s): Not specified; likely imported rather than locally manufactured in significant numbers.4
  • Models Used: Chinese Type 56, Soviet AK-47, and AKM.4
  • Caliber: Primarily 7.62x39mm.
  • Production Dates/Numbers: Not applicable for local production based on available information.
  • Notes: Cambodia has historically relied on external sources for its Kalashnikov-pattern rifles.
  • Wikimedia Photo Link: (Refer to links for Type 56 from China, AK-47 and AKM from Soviet Union/Russia sections.)

3.8. China

  • Manufacturer(s): State Factory 66, Norinco (China North Industries Group Corporation), PolyTech Industries.15
  • Models & Details:
  • Type 56 Assault Rifle: A licensed copy of the Soviet AK-47. Early versions (from 1956) featured a milled receiver (based on AK-47 Type 3), while mid-1960s production shifted to a stamped receiver, similar to the AKM.47 Chambered in 7.62x39mm. Many Type 56 rifles are distinguished by an integral folding spike bayonet (often called a “pig sticker”).48
Chinese Type 56. Image source: Wikimedia.
  • Variants: Type 56-1 (copy of AKS with underfolding stock), Type 56-2 (side-folding stock), QBZ-56C (short-barreled carbine version).48
  • Estimated Numbers Produced: Over 10,000,000 units.48
Chinese Type 56-1. Image Souce: Wikimedia.
  • Type 81 Assault Rifle: While visually resembling the AK series and chambered in 7.62x39mm, the Type 81 utilizes a distinct short-stroke gas piston operating system (similar to the SKS) and is not a direct Kalashnikov derivative.4 Production: 1983-present. Numbers: Approximately 400,000 of the basic Type 81 rifle.40 This rifle is noted as distinct due to its operating system.
Chinese Type 81. Image Source: Wikipedia.40
  • Type 84S: An AK variant chambered in 5.56x45mm NATO, visually similar to the AK-74.11
  • Norinco AK-2000: A copy of the Russian AK-101.16
  • CS/LR11, SDM AK-103: Clones of the Russian AK-103.18
  • Notes: China has been one of the largest producers and exporters of Kalashnikov-type rifles globally, with its Type 56 being particularly widespread.

3.9. Croatia

  • Manufacturer(s): Končar-Arma d.o.o (a subsidiary of ARMA-GRUPA Corporation).4
  • Model: APS-95
  • Caliber: 5.56x45mm NATO.51
  • Production Dates: Designed in 1993, produced from 1993/1995 until at least 2007.4
  • Estimated Numbers Produced: Produced in small quantities; large-scale procurement was halted due to budgetary constraints.51 One source mentions “a little over 1000” for a different rifle (Argentine FARA 83) in a similar limited production context, but this is not a direct figure for the APS-95.34
  • Notes: The APS-95 was developed based on the South African Vektor R4 (itself a Galil derivative, thus tracing lineage to the Kalashnikov via the Finnish RK 62). It features a stamped receiver (unlike the milled receiver Galil/R4), an integrated 1.5x optical sight in the carrying handle, and a distinctive handguard and front sight assembly.51

3.10. Cuba

  • Manufacturer(s): Unión de Industrias Militares (UIM) is the state entity responsible for military production.4
  • Model(s): Copies or derivatives of the AKM.4 Specific Cuban model designations are not widely publicized.
  • Caliber: Primarily 7.62x39mm.
  • Production Dates/Numbers: Details regarding the start dates, production volume, or specific factories involved in Cuban AKM production are not specified in the provided materials.53 Cuba was a known recipient of Soviet arms and also played a role in the supply chain for other groups in Latin America.54
  • Notes: Cuba has a long history of utilizing Kalashnikov-pattern rifles.
  • Wikimedia Photo Link: (Specific images of Cuban-manufactured AKM variants are not readily available in the snippets; a general AKM image may be used as a placeholder if necessary, noting the Cuban context.)

3.11. Czechoslovakia (Now Czech Republic & Slovakia)

  • Model: Vz. 58 (Samopal vzor 58)
  • Caliber: 7.62x39mm.4
  • Notes: The Vz. 58 is often mistaken for a Kalashnikov variant due to its external resemblance and shared cartridge. However, it employs a significantly different operating mechanism: a short-stroke gas piston and a striker-fired mechanism, as opposed to the Kalashnikov’s long-stroke piston and rotating hammer.4 Its parts are not interchangeable with AK-pattern rifles.56 Therefore, it is not a Kalashnikov-inspired design in terms of its core operating system and will be noted as such in the summary table.
Vz.58 Rifle – while it looks similar to an AK, it is not. Image Source: Wikipedia.

3.12. East Germany (German Democratic Republic)

  • Manufacturer(s): VEB Geräte- und Sonderwerkzeugbau Wiesa (GSW); Volkseigener Betrieb Fahrzeug- und Jagdwaffenfabrik “Ernst Thälmann” Suhl.15
  • Models & Details:
  • MPi-K / MPi-KS: Licensed copies of the Soviet AK-47 and AKS (folding stock), respectively. Caliber: 7.62x39mm. Production began around 1957-1959 and continued into the mid-1960s.4
  • MPi-KM: A licensed copy of the Soviet AKM, featuring a stamped receiver and often distinctive plastic furniture (buttstock, pistol grip, handguards) with a “pebble” or “dimpled” texture. Caliber: 7.62x39mm. Production: Circa 1966 into the 1980s.4
  • MPi-KMS-72: A version of the MPi-KM with a side-folding wire stock.4
  • MPi-AK-74N: A licensed copy of the Soviet AK-74. Caliber: 5.45x39mm. Production: 1983-1990.4
  • MPi-AKS-74N: Side-folding stock version of the MPi-AK-74N.4
  • MPi-AKS-74NK: Carbine version of the MPi-AKS-74N.4
  • Estimated Numbers Produced: Nearly 4 million MPi series rifles in total were produced by East Germany.60 Other estimates suggest 2 million from the Wiesa factory alone 15, or 3-4 million MPi-K/MPi-KM rifles.58 Initial production was slow; the 1958 target of 30,000 rifles took nearly three years to achieve.60
  • Notes: East Germany was a significant producer and exporter of Kalashnikov rifles. Production ceased with the reunification of Germany in 1990.60
MPi-KM assault rifles are in service of Vietnam People’s Army and used for training. Image Source: Wikimedia.62

3.13. Egypt

  • Manufacturer(s): Maadi Company for Engineering Industries (Factory 54).2
  • Models & Details:
  • AK-47 copies: Egypt began producing AK-47 pattern rifles from 1958 onwards.4
  • Misr: An AKM copy. Caliber: 7.62x39mm.4
  • Maadi ARM: An AKM copy, often seen with a distinctive laminated wood stock and pistol grip. Caliber: 7.62x39mm.
  • Other Maadi variants include rifles resembling the RPK (long barrel).
  • Production Dates: AK-47/AKM type production commenced in 1958.15 Semi-automatic “MISR S/A” rifles imported into the US bear manufacture dates from the late 1990s (e.g., 1997-1999).65
  • Estimated Numbers Produced: Not specified in the provided sources. The Maadi factory also produced around 70,000 Hakim rifles (a different Swedish-designed system) in the 1950s-60s.64
  • Notes: Egyptian Maadi rifles are well-known among collectors, particularly in the United States.

3.14. Ethiopia

  • Manufacturer(s): Gafat Armament Engineering Complex (GAEC), part of the Metals and Engineering Corporation (METEC).4
  • Models & Details:
  • AK-47 copies: GAEC initially produced AK-47 automatic rifles after its establishment in January 1986.67 Caliber: 7.62x39mm.
  • Et-97/1: This is the local designation for the AK-103 assault rifle, produced under license. Caliber: 7.62x39mm.4
  • Production Dates: GAEC began AK-47 production in 1986.67 Licensed production of the AK-103 is ongoing.14
  • Estimated Numbers Produced: Not specified.
  • Notes: There are reports suggesting North Korean advisors assisted Ethiopia with establishing its small arms manufacturing capabilities.67

3.15. Finland

  • Manufacturer(s): Valmet; SAKO.2
  • Models & Details:
  • RK 60 (Rynnäkkökivääri 60): The initial version of the Finnish Kalashnikov derivative, produced in 1960. It was internally almost a copy of the AK-47 but featured a metallic buttstock, plastic handguard and pistol grip, and notably lacked a trigger guard for easier use with winter mittens.68 Caliber: 7.62x39mm.
  • RK 62 (Valmet M62): The main production model, designed between 1957-1962 and produced from 1965 to 1994. It is a highly regarded AK-47 derivative known for its quality and accuracy, featuring a milled receiver, distinctive tubular stock on early models (later polymer), unique front sight/gas block combination, and aperture rear sight on the receiver cover.2 Caliber: 7.62x39mm.
  • Estimated Numbers Produced: Over 350,000 units of the M62 (RK 62) were jointly manufactured by Valmet and Sako.68
Valmet RK 62. Image Source: Wikimedia
  • Valmet M76 (RK 62 76): A version of the RK 62 with a stamped receiver, produced in both 7.62x39mm and 5.56x45mm NATO calibers.4
Valmet RK 62 76. Image Source: Wikimedia
  • Valmet M78: A light machine gun variant based on the RK 62 design.4
  • RK 95 TP (Sako M95): A further modernized version of the RK 62, featuring a side-folding stock and other improvements. Caliber: 7.62x39mm. Approximately 20,000 were made.4
RK 95 TP. Image Source: Wikimedia
  • Notes: Finnish Kalashnikov derivatives are renowned for their high manufacturing quality and design improvements over the basic Soviet models. The RK 62 notably served as the design basis for the Israeli Galil assault rifle.69

3.16. Hungary

  • Manufacturer(s): Fegyver- és Gépgyár (FÉG).4
  • Models & Details:
  • AK-55: A domestic copy of the Soviet 2nd Model AK-47 (milled receiver). Caliber: 7.62x39mm. Production started around 1956.4
  • AKM-63 (AMD-63 in the US market): A modernized version of the AK-55, featuring a distinctive sheet metal handguard with an integrated forward pistol grip, and a fixed wooden stock. Caliber: 7.62x39mm. Production estimated from circa 1963 to 2000.4
  • AMD-65M (Automata Módosított Deszantfegyver): A shorter-barreled version of the AKM-63 designed for paratroopers and armored vehicle crews, featuring a side-folding single-strut stock and often a shorter 20-round magazine. Caliber: 7.62x39mm. Production: 1965-1980.4 “Tens of thousands” were produced.73
This team has the distinctive AMD-65M rifles -note how Hungary used leather slings also. Image Source: Wikimedia
  • AK-63F / AK-63D (Military designations AMM / AMMSz): These models are closer copies of the Soviet AKM and AKMS (stamped receiver), featuring traditional wooden or later polymer furniture, but often retaining the straight pistol grip of the AKM-63. Caliber: 7.62x39mm. Production: 1977–2001.4 Approximately 7,700 AK-63s were modernized to the AK-63MF standard for the Hungarian Armed Forces.72 Around 7,000 semi-automatic SA-85M versions were imported into the US before the 1989 import ban.72
  • NGM-81: An export version chambered in 5.56x45mm NATO.4
  • Estimated Numbers Produced: Specific overall numbers for FÉG’s AK production are not available in 15 (“N/A”). However, “tens of thousands” of AMD-65s were made 73, and around 11,000 AK-63s were reportedly exported to Central America during the 1980s.72
  • Notes: Hungarian Kalashnikovs often feature unique ergonomic (or not so ergonomic_ and design choices, particularly the early models like the AKM-63 and AMD-65.

3.17. India

  • Manufacturer(s): Ordnance Factories Board (OFB); Armament Research and Development Establishment (ARDE) for design; Indo-Russia Rifles Private Limited (IRRPL) for AK-203 production.2
  • Models & Details:
  • INSAS (Indian Small Arms System) Rifle: While incorporating features from other rifles, the INSAS is primarily based on the Kalashnikov (AKM) operating system, utilizing a long-stroke gas piston and rotating bolt.78 Caliber: 5.56x45mm NATO. Development began in the mid-1980s, it entered service in 1990, with mass production starting in 1997.4 The rifle has faced criticism for reliability issues, particularly in extreme conditions.79 Design influences include the Galil and, at least indirectly, the Valmet RK 62..
Indian INSAS rifle. Image Source: Wikipedia.
  • AK-103: India has arranged for licensed production of the AK-103.13
  • AK-203: A significant contract was signed for the licensed production of over 600,000 AK-203 rifles in India by IRRPL, a joint venture between Indian OFB and Russian Kalashnikov Concern. An additional 70,000 rifles were to be imported directly from Russia.13 Caliber: 7.62x39mm.
  • Trichy Assault Rifle: An Indian-produced clone of the Bulgarian AR-M1 series (itself an AK derivative).44
  • Notes: India’s adoption of the INSAS marked a move to a NATO standard caliber, though its performance has been controversial. The recent large-scale adoption and licensed production of the AK-203 indicates a renewed reliance on the Kalashnikov platform.

3.18. Iran

  • Manufacturer(s): Defense Industries Organization (DIO).80
  • Models & Details:
  • KLS: A copy of the AK-47/AKM with a fixed wooden stock. Caliber: 7.62x39mm.4
  • KLF: A copy of the AKS/AKMS with an underfolding metal stock. Caliber: 7.62x39mm.4
  • KLT: A copy of the AKMS with a side-folding metal stock. Caliber: 7.62x39mm.4
  • AK-103 copies: Iran produces licensed versions designated AK-133 and unlicensed copies called KL-133. Additionally, some AK-103s were directly imported from Russia.13
  • Production Dates/Numbers: Specific production dates and quantities for the KLS/KLF/KLT series are not detailed, though these rifles typically feature seven-digit serial numbers.80
  • Notes: Iranian Kalashnikov variants are often based on Soviet and Chinese models.

3.19. Iraq

  • Manufacturer(s): Al-Qadissiya Establishments.4
  • Models & Details:
  • Tabuk Sniper Rifle: A designated marksman rifle (DMR) chambered in 7.62x39mm. It is a modified version of the Yugoslav Zastava M76 sniper rifle, which itself is an AK-pattern derivative. The Tabuk features a longer barrel than a standard AKM and is designed for semi-automatic fire only.4
  • Tabuk Assault Rifle: These are direct clones of the Yugoslavian Zastava M70 series of assault rifles (which are AKM derivatives), available with fixed or underfolding stocks. Caliber: 7.62x39mm.4
  • Production Dates: Production of the Tabuk Sniper Rifle began in 1978 and is reported as ongoing.84 The Tabuk Assault Rifles (M70 clones) were produced from 1978 into the 1990s.83
  • Estimated Numbers Produced: Not specified.
  • Notes: The machinery and technical assistance for establishing Iraqi Kalashnikov production were provided by Zastava Arms of Yugoslavia.84
Iraqi Tabuk Sniper. Image Source: Wikipedia.84

3.20. Israel

  • Manufacturer(s): Israel Military Industries (IMI), later privatized as Israel Weapon Industries (IWI).2
  • Models & Details:
  • IMI Galil: An assault rifle family developed in the late 1960s and adopted in 1972. The Galil’s design is heavily based on the Finnish RK 62 (Valmet M62), which is a high-quality AK-47 derivative. The first Galils were even manufactured using Valmet Rk 62 receivers.69 It features the Kalashnikov long-stroke gas piston system.86
  • Calibers: Primarily 5.56x45mm NATO and 7.62x51mm NATO.70
  • Production: IMI produced the Galil from 1972 to 1998; IWI continues to export and develop versions.70
  • Variants: ARM (Automatic Rifle Machine-gun, with bipod and carry handle), AR (Automatic Rifle), SAR (Short Automatic Rifle).70
  • IWI Galil ACE: A modernized and redesigned version of the Galil, introduced in 2008. It retains the core Galil/Kalashnikov mechanism but incorporates modern materials, Picatinny rails, and improved ergonomics.4
  • Calibers: 5.45x39mm, 5.56x45mm NATO, 7.62x39mm, and 7.62x51mm NATO.87
  • Estimated Numbers Produced: Specific numbers for the original Galil are not provided. The Galil ACE production is ongoing.
  • Notes: The Galil is a highly respected Kalashnikov derivative, known for its reliability, particularly in harsh desert environments, and improved ergonomics over basic AK models. It has been licensed for production to several other countries, including Italy, Colombia, South Africa (as the R4), and Vietnam.85
Comparison of the Hungarian AMD-65 (top), the American M16A1 with A2 handguard (middle) and the Israeli Galil ARM (bottom). Image Source: Wikipedia.

3.21. Italy

  • Manufacturer(s): Vincenzo Bernardelli S.p.A..4
  • Models: Bernardelli VB-STD / VB-SR
  • Caliber: Likely 5.56x45mm NATO, as Bernardelli produced the IMI Galil (which was available in this caliber) under license.86
  • Production Dates/Numbers: Not specified in the provided materials.
  • Notes: The Bernardelli VB-STD and VB-SR are listed as “similar rifles” to the Kalashnikov family.4 Given that Bernardelli held a license to produce the Israeli Galil 86, these models are almost certainly Galil derivatives, and therefore share the Kalashnikov-derived operating mechanism. The VB-SR is specifically noted as a modified Galil.

3.22. Nigeria

  • Manufacturer(s): Defence Industries Corporation of Nigeria (DICON).4
  • Models & Details:
  • OBJ-006: A Nigerian copy of the AK-47 assault rifle. Caliber: 7.62x39mm. Production began in 2006.4
  • Licensed Polish Beryl: DICON has acquired rights to manufacture a copy of the Polish FB Kbs wz. 1996 Beryl assault rifle.90 Caliber: 5.56x45mm NATO.
  • Production Dates/Numbers: OBJ-006 production started in 2006; specific numbers are not available. Timelines and quantities for the Beryl production are also not specified. DICON has partnered with a firm called D7G to enhance local defense production, including establishing AK-47 assembly lines.89
  • Notes: Nigeria is working to increase its indigenous small arms manufacturing capacity.
  • Wikimedia Photo Link (OBJ-006): 93

3.23. North Korea

  • Manufacturer(s): State Arsenals, including Factory 61 and Factory 65 in Chongjin.4
  • Models & Details:
  • Type 58 (A/B): A direct copy of the Soviet AK-47, specifically the Type 3 with a milled receiver. The Type 58A is the fixed-stock version, and the Type 58B (or Type 58-1) is the underfolding stock version (AKS equivalent).4 Caliber: 7.62x39mm. Production: 1958–1968.94
  • Estimated Numbers Produced: Approximately 800,000 units.94
  • Type 68 (A/B): A copy of the Soviet AKM (stamped receiver) and AKMS (stamped receiver, underfolding stock). Caliber: 7.62x39mm. Production began in 1968 to replace the more time-consuming Type 58.4 The Type 68-1 features a weight-reducing holed underfolding stock.94
  • Type 88: A copy of the Soviet AK-74 (primarily AKS-74 with side-folding stock). Caliber: 5.45x39mm.4 The Type 88 carbine is noted as a localized copy of the AK-105.23
  • Notes: Initial North Korean production of the Type 58 utilized Soviet-supplied components before transitioning to fully domestic parts.94 North Korean Kalashnikovs have been exported to various countries and non-state actors.94 Identifying marks include a five-point star in a circle and model designations in Hangul script.94
North Korean Type 58. Image Source: Wikipedia

3.24. Pakistan

  • Manufacturer(s): Pakistan Ordnance Factories (POF) for some models; numerous small workshops in the Khyber Pass region for unlicensed copies.4
  • Models & Details:
  • Khyber Pass Copies: A general term for a wide variety of often crudely made, unlicensed copies of Kalashnikov assault rifles (AK-47, AKM, and others). Quality and specifications can vary significantly. Caliber: Typically 7.62x39mm.4
  • POF PK-10: Listed as a POF product.4 Specific details are sparse in the provided material.
  • POF PK-21: An unlicensed clone of the Russian AK-103, manufactured by Pakistan Ordnance Factories.18 Caliber: 7.62x39mm.
  • Production Dates/Numbers: Production of Khyber Pass copies has been ongoing for decades and is decentralized, making numbers impossible to track. Specific production dates and numbers for POF’s PK-10 and PK-21 are not detailed.
  • Notes: The Khyber Pass region is notorious for its artisanal firearms production, including many Kalashnikov variants. POF produces a range of military hardware under license and develops indigenous designs.
  • Wikimedia Photo Link: (No specific links for PK-10/PK-21 found. Khyber Pass copies are too varied for a single representative image. An image of a POF-produced rifle would require a specific search.)

3.25. Poland

  • Manufacturer(s): Łucznik Arms Factory (Fabryka Broni “Łucznik” – Radom), formerly Factory 11.4
  • Models & Details:
  • pmK (kbk AK) / pmKS (kbk AKS): Licensed copies of the Soviet AK-47 and AKS (folding stock). Caliber: 7.62x39mm. Production started in 1957.4
  • kbk AKM / kbk AKMS: Licensed copies of the Soviet AKM and AKMS. Caliber: 7.62x39mm. Production: Circa 1965 until 1992, with a short additional run in 2000 primarily from leftover parts.4
  • kbk wz. 1988 Tantal: An assault rifle chambered in 5.45x39mm, based on the AK-74 but with distinct Polish design features, such as a unique fire selector mechanism allowing for semi-auto, full-auto, and 3-round burst fire, and a side-folding wire stock. Production: 1989–1994.4
  • Estimated Numbers Produced: Approximately 25,000 units.100
Kbk wz. 88 Tantal. Image Source: Wikipedia100
  • skbk wz. 1989 Onyks: A compact carbine version of the Tantal.4
  • kbs wz. 1996 Beryl: An assault rifle chambered in 5.56x45mm NATO, developed to meet NATO standards and replace the Tantal. Production: 1997–present.4
Polish Beryl wz. 96 (version C), made by Fabryka Broni “Łucznik”. Image Souce: Wikipedia92
  • kbk wz. 1996 Mini-Beryl: A compact carbine version of the Beryl.4
  • Estimated Numbers Produced: For the Tantal, around 25,000 units.100 The Radom factory had a capacity of 70,000 rifles per year in the late 1980s/early 1990s.99
  • Notes: Polish Kalashnikov derivatives are generally well-regarded. The Tantal and Beryl represent significant indigenous developments on the Kalashnikov platform.

3.26. Romania

  • Manufacturer(s): Cugir Arms Factory (now part of ROMARM), with some limited production outsourced to Uzina Mecanica Sadu.4
  • Models & Details:
  • PM md. 63 (Pistol Mitralieră model 1963): A licensed copy of the Soviet AKM. A distinctive feature of many md. 63 rifles is a forward-pointing laminated wooden vertical foregrip integrated into the lower handguard. Caliber: 7.62x39mm. Production: 1963–present.4
  • PM md. 65 (Pistol Mitralieră model 1965): The underfolding stock version, equivalent to the AKMS. To accommodate the folding stock, the vertical foregrip, if present, is often canted rearwards or is absent on some sub-variants. Caliber: 7.62x39mm. Production: 1965–present.4
A Romanian soldier armed with a PM md. 65 in 1989. Image Source: Wikipedia
  • PA md. 86 (Pușcă Automată model 1986): A Romanian derivative of the Soviet AK-74, chambered in 5.45x39mm. It features a distinctive side-folding wire stock (similar to East German designs) and sometimes a 3-round burst capability. It retained some AKM elements like the gas block design.4 Production: Late 1980s–present.
  • PM md. 80: A short-barreled AK variant, often with a unique side-folding stock and a combined front sight/gas block.4
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pistol_Mitralier%C4%83_model_1963/1965. Image Source: Wikipedia.
  • PM md. 90: A 7.62x39mm rifle that incorporates the side-folding wire stock of the PA md. 86.4 There is also a short-barreled carbine version of the md. 90.
PM md. 90. Image Source: Wikipedia.
  • Estimated Numbers Produced: “Several million” total PM md. 63/65 rifles have been produced.105 Over 400,000 were acquired by the Romanian armed forces.105
  • Notes: Romanian Kalashnikovs are widely exported, often under the designations AIM (for fixed stock md. 63 types) and AIMS (for folding stock md. 65 types).106 Versions marked with a “G” on the trunnion were semi-automatic rifles produced for the Romanian Patriotic Guards and are well-known in the US parts kit market as “Romy G’s”.104
US Air Force personnel with AIM md. 65s during a training exercise in 1985. Image Source: Wikipedia.

3.27. Serbia (formerly Yugoslavia)

  • Manufacturer(s): Zastava Arms (Kragujevac).4
  • Models & Details (Examples):
  • M64: An early Yugoslav Kalashnikov derivative, which led to the M70.
  • M70 (Automatska Puška M70): The standard issue rifle of the Yugoslav People’s Army, based on the AK-47/AKM design but with several distinct Yugoslav features. These often include a thicker RPK-style receiver (1.5mm stamped or milled on early versions), a longer handguard with three cooling slots, an integral grenade launching sight, and typically a non-chrome-lined barrel.4 Caliber: 7.62x39mm. Production: 1970–present.83
  • Variants: M70 (milled receiver), M70B1 (stamped receiver, fixed stock), M70AB2 (stamped receiver, underfolding stock).
  • Estimated Numbers Produced: Approximately 4,000,000 units of the M70 family.83
M70AB2 rifle. Image Source: Wikipedia108
  • M72: A light machine gun version, analogous to the RPK, based on the M70 design.4
  • M76: A designated marksman rifle chambered in 7.92x57mm Mauser, based on the long Kalashnikov action.4
  • M77: A battle rifle chambered in 7.62x51mm NATO, also using the Kalashnikov action.4
  • M85: A compact carbine chambered in 5.56x45mm NATO.4
  • M90: An assault rifle chambered in 5.56x45mm NATO.4
  • M92: A compact carbine version of the M70, chambered in 7.62x39mm (similar to AKS-74U in role).4
  • M21: A modern assault rifle system chambered in 5.56x45mm NATO, incorporating Picatinny rails and modern furniture, but still based on the Kalashnikov operating system.4
  • Notes: Yugoslavian/Serbian Kalashnikov derivatives are known for their robust construction and unique features tailored to Yugoslav military doctrine, such as integrated rifle grenade launching capabilities. They often differ significantly in receiver construction and furniture from Soviet models. We have posts on the M70 and M72 families of rifles.

3.28. South Africa

  • Manufacturer(s): Lyttelton Engineering Works (LIW), later Armscor, now Denel Land Systems.2
  • Models & Details:
  • Vektor R4: A licensed variant of the Israeli IMI Galil ARM (which is itself a derivative of the Finnish RK 62, tracing back to the AK-47). The R4 was adapted for South African conditions, featuring a longer stock made of high-strength polymer and other polymer components to reduce weight. Caliber: 5.56x45mm NATO. It entered service with the South African Defence Force (SADF) in 1980.2
  • Estimated Numbers Produced: Approximately 420,000 units.109
  • Vektor R5: A carbine version of the R4, similar to the Galil SAR, with a shorter barrel and handguard. It lacks a bipod.85
  • Vektor R6: An even more compact carbine version designed for paratroopers and vehicle crews.85
  • Truvelo Raptor: Mentioned as a “similar rifle” with AK-basis.4 Specific details are sparse in provided material.
  • Notes: The R-series rifles are a clear example of the Kalashnikov design’s adaptability, modified through several iterations (AK -> RK 62 -> Galil -> R4) to suit specific national requirements.
A South African soldier, part of the UN peacekeeping force, armed with an R4 during a training exercise in 2013 © MONUSCO/Sylvain Liechti. Image Source: Wikipedia

3.29. Sudan

  • Manufacturer(s): Military Industry Corporation (MIC).4
  • Model: MAZ
  • Caliber: Assuming its basis on the Chinese Type 56 4, that strongly suggests the 7.62x39mm cartridge.
  • Production Dates/Numbers: Not specified in the provided materials.110
  • Notes: The MAZ rifle is reported to be based on the Chinese Type 56 assault rifle and manufactured using Chinese-supplied machinery.4

3.30. Turkey

  • Manufacturer(s): Sarsılmaz Silah Sanayi A.Ş..4
  • Models & Details:
  • SAR 15T: Described as an AK-47 clone.4 Caliber is likely 7.62x39mm given its AK-47 clone designation.
  • SAR 308 (V2): Also listed as an AK-47 clone.4 The “308” in its name might suggest the 7.62x51mm NATO (.308 Winchester) cartridge, which would make it more of a battle rifle or DMR if based on the Kalashnikov action, rather than a standard assault rifle. 4 lists it as “SAR 15T/308(V2)”. Further clarification on caliber would be needed for precise classification.
  • Production Dates/Numbers: Not specified. Sarsılmaz is a major Turkish arms manufacturer founded in 1880 and exports to over 80 countries.112
  • Notes: Sarsılmaz produces a wide range of firearms for military, police, and civilian markets.

3.31. Ukraine

  • Manufacturer(s): State Space Agency of Ukraine (for Vepr); Interproinvest (IPI) / Krasyliv Assembly Manufacturing Plant (for Malyuk).4
  • Models & Details:
  • Vepr (“Wild Boar”): A bullpup conversion of the AK-74 assault rifle. Designed in 1993-1994 and announced in 2003. It retains the AK-74’s operating mechanism and 5.45x39mm caliber.4
Vepr Bullpup. Image Source: Wikipedia
  • Malyuk (“Baby” or “Vulcan”): Another Ukrainian bullpup assault rifle based on the Kalashnikov operating system (derived from AKM/AK-74 and lessons from the Vepr project). Development started in 2005, it debuted publicly in 2015, and has been in service with Ukrainian special forces since 2017.4
  • Calibers: Available in 5.45x39mm, 7.62x39mm, and 5.56x45mm NATO.117
Malyuk Bullpup. Image Source: Wikipedia
  • Production Dates/Numbers: Specific production numbers and detailed timelines are not extensively provided.
  • Notes: Both the Vepr and Malyuk represent efforts to modernize existing Kalashnikov-pattern rifles into more compact bullpup configurations, suitable for modern combat scenarios, particularly in confined spaces. The Malyuk notably features ambidextrous controls and improved ergonomics.117

3.32. United States

  • PSAK-47 series (e.g., GF3, GF4, GF5) in 7.62x39mm.4
  • PSA AK-556 in 5.56x45mm NATO.4
  • PSAK-74 in 5.45x39mm.4
  • PSAK-104 (semi-automatic clone of the AK-104 carbine).20
Author’s customized PSA AK-E. Image Source: Author.
    • Notes: The vast majority of US-produced Kalashnikov-pattern firearms are semi-automatic versions intended for the civilian market, complying with US firearms regulations (e.g., 922R compliance for imported parts). Quality and adherence to original Kalashnikov specifications can vary widely among manufacturers.

    3.33. Venezuela

    • Manufacturer(s): CAVIM (Compañía Anónima Venezolana de Industrias Militares).4
    • Model: AK-103 (produced under license from Russia)
    • Caliber: 7.62x39mm.4
    • Production Dates: The license agreement was made in 2006. Factories were officially opened in 2012, and initial deliveries of CAVIM-made AK-103s to the Venezuelan Army occurred in 2013. Full-scale production was planned to commence by the end of 2019, but the project faced significant delays and challenges, including issues with the Russian contractor and allegations of fraud, forcing CAVIM to attempt to complete construction themselves. The current operational status and output of the plant are unclear.119
    • Estimated Numbers Produced: The plant was planned to have an annual production capacity of approximately 25,000 rifles.119 However, actual numbers produced are not specified and are likely much lower than initially planned due to the aforementioned issues.
    • Notes: Venezuela also planned to produce over 50 million rounds of ammunition annually at an associated plant.119 The project has been a subject of scrutiny due to delays and costs.

    3.34. Vietnam

    • Manufacturer(s): Z111 Factory.4
    • Models & Details:
    • AKM-1 / AKM-VN: Local designations for AKM pattern rifles, possibly upgraded or locally assembled versions of the Soviet AKM [4 (STL-1A from AKM)]. Caliber: 7.62x39mm.
    • TUL-1: A light machine gun, likely based on the RPK.4 Caliber: 7.62x39mm.
    • STL-1A: An upgraded version of older AKM rifles, featuring new polymer handguards, a folding buttstock, an ergonomic pistol grip, an updated muzzle brake, and compatibility with M203-type grenade launchers.122 Caliber: 7.62x39mm.
    • STV Series (Súng Trường Việt Nam): A family of modern assault rifles based on the IWI Galil ACE design (itself a Kalashnikov derivative), chambered in 7.62x39mm and using standard AK-47/AKM magazines. These were revealed around 2019-2020 and are becoming standard issue for the Vietnam People’s Army.4
    • STV-215: Carbine version with a 215mm barrel.121
    • STV-380: Standard rifle version with a 380mm barrel.121
    • STV-410: Rifle with a 410mm barrel and adjustments to handguard/gas block for grenade launcher compatibility.121
    • STV-416: Similar to STV-410 but lacks Picatinny rails.121
    • Production Dates/Numbers: Production of older AKM types and upgrades is ongoing. The STV series entered production more recently (post-2019). Specific numbers are not provided.
    • Notes: Vietnam has a long history of using Kalashnikov-pattern weapons and has more recently moved towards producing modern derivatives like the Galil ACE-based STV series. Z111 Factory also produces the Galil ACE 31/32 under license.4

    4. Summary Table of Kalashnikov-Inspired Rifle Production by Country

    The following table summarizes the countries identified as producers of Kalashnikov-inspired rifle designs, along with key details for representative models. It is important to note that “Estimated Numbers Produced” are often broad estimates or refer to total production of all AK types by a specific factory or country, rather than individual models, unless specified. “N/A” indicates data was not available in the provided sources.

    CountryRepresentative Model(s)Caliber(s)Manufacturer(s)Production Dates (Period)Estimated Numbers ProducedNotes
    Soviet Union / RussiaAK-477.62x39mm M43Izhmash (Kalashnikov Concern), Tula Arms Plant1948–Present (family)~75 million (AK-47s), ~100 million (Kalashnikov family total) 3Original design, milled receiver initially.
    AKM7.62x39mm M43Izhmash, Tula Arms Plant1959–1977 (USSR)10,278,300 (Soviet production) 6Modernized, stamped receiver, widespread.
    AK-74 / AK-74M5.45x39mm M74Izhmash (Kalashnikov Concern), Tula Arms Plant1974–Present (AK-74M)5,000,000+ (AK-74) 10Smaller caliber, distinctive muzzle brake. AK-74M has folding stock, scope rail.
    AK-100 Series (e.g., AK-101, AK-103, AK-105)5.56x45mm, 7.62x39mm, 5.45x39mmKalashnikov Concern1994–PresentAK-103: 250,000+.18 AK-101: 270,500+ (may include others).16 Overall series numbers vary by source.Export-focused, polymer furniture, multi-caliber.
    AK-12 / AK-155.45x39mm, 7.62x39mmKalashnikov Concern2018–Present150,000+ (AK-12/15 combined by 2021) 245th Gen, improved ergonomics, Picatinny rails.
    AlbaniaASH-78 Tip-17.62x39mmKM Poliçan & Gramësh1978–1993100,000+ 27Copy of Chinese Type 56. Unique selector markings.
    ArgentinaFARA 835.56x45mm NATOFMAP-DM1984–1990 (limited)~1,193 (initial run) 33Inspired by Beretta AR70; Kalashnikov operating system lineage unconfirmed by sources.
    ArmeniaK-35.45x39mmNot Specifiedc. 1996Not SpecifiedBullpup design based on AKS-74U.
    AzerbaijanKhazri (AK-74M licensed)5.45x39mmMinistry of Defence Industry (MODIAR)2011–PresentPotential up to 120,000 (licensed production capacity) 37Licensed AK-74M for domestic use.
    BangladeshBD-087.62x39mmBangladesh Ordnance Factories (BOF)Not SpecifiedNot SpecifiedLikely Type 81 derivative (Type 81 uses distinct short-stroke piston).
    BulgariaAR-M15.56x45mm, 7.62x39mmArsenal AD1998–Present>1,000,000 (total Arsenal AK production) 15Modernized milled receiver AK, AK-74 features. Highly regarded.
    ChinaType 567.62x39mmNorinco, PolyTech, State Factory 661956–Present10,000,000+ 48AK-47 copy (milled then stamped receiver), often has spike bayonet.
    CroatiaAPS-955.56x45mm NATOKončar-Arma d.o.o1993/1995 – c. 2007Small quantities 51Based on Vektor R4 (Galil derivative), integrated optic.
    CubaAKM derivatives7.62x39mmUnión de Industrias Militares (UIM)Not SpecifiedNot SpecifiedLocal production details sparse.
    East GermanyMPi-KM7.62x39mmVEB GSW Wiesa, VEB Suhlc. 1966–1980s~3-4 million (total MPi series) 58AKM copy, distinctive plastic furniture.
    MPi-AK-74N5.45x39mmVEB GSW Wiesa, VEB Suhl1983–1990Part of total MPi series production.AK-74 copy.
    EgyptMisr / Maadi ARM7.62x39mmMaadi Company for Engineering Industries (Factory 54)From 1958 (AK types)Not SpecifiedAKM copy.
    EthiopiaEt-97/1 (AK-103 licensed)7.62x39mmGafat Armament Engineering Complex (GAEC)From 1986 (AK types), AK-103 ongoingNot SpecifiedLicensed AK-103 production.
    FinlandRK 62 (Valmet M62)7.62x39mmValmet, SAKO1965–1994350,000+ 68High-quality AK-47 derivative, milled receiver. Basis for Galil.
    HungaryAK-63 (AMM)7.62x39mmFegyver- és Gépgyár (FÉG)1977–2001~11,000 exported to C. America 72; 7,700 AK-63MF modernized.AKM copy with traditional furniture.
    AMD-657.62x39mmFegyver- és Gépgyár (FÉG)1965–1980“Tens of thousands” 73Shortened, folding stock, distinct foregrip.
    IndiaINSAS Rifle5.56x45mm NATOOrdnance Factories Board (OFB)1997–Present (Mass Prod.)Not Specified (700k replacements ordered for various rifles) 79AKM-based operating system, reliability issues noted.
    AK-2037.62x39mmIndo-Russia Rifles Pvt. Ltd. (IRRPL)Production starting/ongoing>600,000 planned (local prod.) + 70,000 imported 13Licensed modern Kalashnikov.
    IranKLS / KLF / KLT7.62x39mmDefense Industries Organization (DIO)Not SpecifiedNot SpecifiedAK-47/AKM/AKMS copies.
    IraqTabuk Assault Rifle7.62x39mmAl-Qadissiya Establishments1978–1990sNot SpecifiedClone of Zastava M70.
    Tabuk Sniper Rifle7.62x39mmAl-Qadissiya Establishments1978–PresentNot SpecifiedDMR based on Zastava M76 (AK-derived).
    IsraelIMI Galil ARM/AR/SAR5.56x45mm, 7.62x51mmIsrael Military Industries (IMI) / IWI1972–1998 (IMI)Not SpecifiedBased on Finnish RK 62. Highly regarded.
    IWI Galil ACEVarious (incl. 7.62x39mm)Israel Weapon Industries (IWI)2008–PresentNot SpecifiedModernized Galil.
    ItalyBernardelli VB-STD / VB-SR5.56x45mm NATO (likely)Vincenzo Bernardelli S.p.A.Not SpecifiedNot SpecifiedGalil derivative (licensed Galil production).
    NigeriaOBJ-0067.62x39mmDefence Industries Corp. of Nigeria (DICON)2006–PresentNot SpecifiedAK-47 copy.
    North KoreaType 587.62x39mmFactory 61/651958–1968~800,000 94AK-47 Type 3 copy (milled receiver).
    Type 687.62x39mmFactory 61/651968–PresentNot SpecifiedAKM copy (stamped receiver).
    PakistanPK-217.62x39mmPakistan Ordnance Factories (POF)Not SpecifiedNot SpecifiedUnlicensed AK-103 clone. Khyber Pass copies also prevalent (various makers).
    Polandkbk wz. 1988 Tantal5.45x39mmFB Radom (Łucznik)1989–1994~25,000 100AK-74 derivative with unique features.
    kbs wz. 1996 Beryl5.56x45mm NATOFB Radom (Łucznik)1997–PresentFactory capacity 70k rifles/yr (late 80s) 99Modern NATO-caliber rifle.
    RomaniaPM md. 637.62x39mmCugir Arms Factory1963–Present“Several million” (md. 63/65 total) 105; >400k for Romanian forces 107AKM copy, often with vertical foregrip.
    Serbia (Yugoslavia)Zastava M707.62x39mmZastava Arms1970–Present~4,000,000 (M70 family) 83Robust AKM derivative, RPK-style receiver, grenade sight.
    South AfricaVektor R45.56x45mm NATODenel Land Systems (LIW)1980–Present~420,000 109Licensed Galil variant, polymer furniture.
    SudanMAZ7.62x39mm (likely)Military Industry Corporation (MIC)Not SpecifiedNot SpecifiedBased on Chinese Type 56.
    TurkeySAR 15T / SAR 3087.62x39mm (likely for 15T)Sarsılmaz Silah Sanayi A.Ş.Not SpecifiedNot SpecifiedAK-47 clones. SAR 308 may be 7.62x51mm.
    UkraineVepr5.45x39mmState Space AgencyDesigned 1993-94, announced 2003Not SpecifiedBullpup AK-74.
    Malyuk5.45x39mm, 7.62x39mm, 5.56x45mmInterproinvest (IPI) / Krasyliv2017–Present (service)Not SpecifiedBullpup Kalashnikov derivative.
    United StatesVarious (e.g., PSAK-47, KR-103)Various (incl. 7.62x39mm, 5.56x45mm)Palmetto State Armory, Kalashnikov USA, Century ArmsOngoing commercialVaries by manufacturerSemi-auto civilian market versions.
    VenezuelaAK-103 (licensed)7.62x39mmCAVIMFrom 2012 (initial deliveries)Planned 25,000/year; actual output unclear due to delays 119Licensed Russian AK-103, production issues.
    VietnamSTV-380 / STV-2157.62x39mmZ111 Factoryc. 2019–PresentNot SpecifiedBased on Galil ACE design.

    Photo Sources

    Main photo of Mikhail Kalashnikov superimposed over a map with countries using or licensing firearms based on his designs highlighted was generated by Ronin’s Grips using Sora. It is release to the creative commons as long as blog.roningsgrips.com is cited as the source.

    The majority of photos were obtained from Wikimedia and Wikipedia and are unaltered. Links to their respective pages are included and they remain the copyright of their respective authors.

    Works cited

    1. AK-47 | Definition, History, Operation, & Facts – Britannica, accessed May 17, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/technology/AK-47
    2. The AK-47: the world’s favourite killing machine – Amnesty International, accessed May 17, 2025, https://www.amnesty.org/ar/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/act300112006en.pdf
    3. AK-47 – Wikipedia, accessed May 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AK-47
    4. Kalashnikov rifle – Wikipedia, accessed May 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalashnikov_rifle
    5. File:AK-47-Rifle.svg – Wikipedia, accessed May 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:AK-47-Rifle.svg
    6. AKM – Wikipedia, accessed May 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AKM
    7. The AKM Assault Rifle | PDF | Personal Weapons – Scribd, accessed May 17, 2025, https://www.scribd.com/document/137559756/The-AKM-Assault-Rifle
    8. AK Variants: A Closer Look – The Primary Source On PrimaryArms.com, accessed May 17, 2025, https://blog.primaryarms.com/guide/ak-variants-explored/
    9. File:AKM (rifle).jpg – Wikimedia Commons, accessed May 17, 2025, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:AKM_(rifle).jpg
    10. AK-74 – Wikipedia, accessed May 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AK-74
    11. Guns in Movies, TV and Video Games – AK-74 – Internet Movie Firearms Database, accessed May 17, 2025, https://www.imfdb.org/wiki/AK-74
    12. File:AK-74 RPK-74 DA-ST-89-06612.jpg – Wikipedia, accessed May 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:AK-74_RPK-74_DA-ST-89-06612.jpg
    13. AK-100 (rifle family) – Wikipedia, accessed May 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AK-100_(rifle_family)
    14. AK-100 – Weapon Systems, accessed May 17, 2025, https://old.weaponsystems.net/weaponsystem/AA04%20-%20AK-100.html
    15. Kalashnikov & Variant Factory Dataset (1947-present) – Audrey Kurth Cronin, accessed May 17, 2025, https://www.audreykurthcronin.com/p2p-pvid/p2p-pvid-kalashnikov/kalashnikov-variant-factory-dataset-1947-present/
    16. AK-101 – Wikipedia, accessed May 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AK-101
    17. AK-102 – Wikipedia, accessed May 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AK-102
    18. AK-103 – Wikipedia, accessed May 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AK-103
    19. AK-103 assault rifle with GP-34 grenade launcher at Engineering Technologies 2012.jpg- Wikimedia Commons, accessed May 17, 2025, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:AK-103_assault_rifle_with_GP-34_grenade_launcher_at_Engineering_Technologies_2012.jpg
    20. AK-104 – Wikipedia, accessed May 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AK-104
    21. Category:AK-104 – Wikimedia Commons, accessed May 17, 2025, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:AK-104
    22. AK-100 Series – Small Arms Survey, accessed May 17, 2025, https://www.smallarmssurvey.org/sites/default/files/SAS-weapons-assault-rifles-AK-100-series.pdf
    23. AK-105 – Wikipedia, accessed May 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AK-105
    24. AK-12 – Wikipedia, accessed May 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AK-12
    25. Russia’s Modernized AK-12 Assault Rifles Are Being Delivered This Year, accessed May 17, 2025, https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/russias-modernized-ak-12-assault-rifles-are-being-delivered-this-year
    26. What Are the Different Types of AKs? – Guns.com, accessed May 17, 2025, https://www.guns.com/news/what-are-ak-variants
    27. ASH-78 – Wikipedia, accessed May 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASH-78
    28. Shotgun news, accessed May 17, 2025, https://www.arsenal-bg.com/uploads/2016/06/583abffafca0f9dd4ae3c8ba685a074c.pdf
    29. ASH-78 – Customer Build, accessed May 17, 2025, https://akresources.childersguns.com/2024/03/ash-78-customer-build.html
    30. File:Ash-78.jpg – Wikimedia Commons, accessed May 17, 2025, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ash-78.jpg
    31. Centrefire automatic rifle – ASH-82 (Kalashnikov AKM) – dated 1981 | Collection Object | Royal Armouries, accessed May 17, 2025, https://royalarmouries.org/collection/object/object-282536
    32. Centrefire automatic rifle – Automatiku SHqiptar – Model of 1982 (ASH-82) – 1986 | Collection Object | Royal Armouries, accessed May 17, 2025, https://royalarmouries.org/collection/object/object-282534
    33. FARA 83 – Wikipedia, accessed May 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FARA_83
    34. Assault Rifles | PDF | Ammunition – Scribd, accessed May 17, 2025, https://www.scribd.com/document/145375992/Assault-Rifles
    35. Argentine indigenous assault rifle design FARA-83 : r/ForgottenWeapons – Reddit, accessed May 17, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ForgottenWeapons/comments/19cn75i/argentine_indigenous_assault_rifle_design_fara83/
    36. Category:FARA 83 – Wikimedia Commons, accessed May 17, 2025, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:FARA_83
    37. Azerbaijan PKM Production | thefirearmblog.com, accessed May 17, 2025, https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/azerbaijan-pkm-production-44818135
    38. Ministry of Defence Industry of Azerbaijan – Wikipedia, accessed May 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ministry_of_Defence_Industry_of_Azerbaijan#Products
    39. File:Khazri 2.jpg – Wikimedia Commons, accessed May 17, 2025, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Khazri_2.jpg
    40. Type 81 Assault Rifle – Wikipedia | PDF | History – Scribd, accessed May 17, 2025, https://www.scribd.com/document/665459028/Type-81-assault-rifle-Wikipedia
    41. Type 81 assault rifle – Wikipedia, accessed May 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_81_assault_rifle
    42. AR-M1, accessed May 17, 2025, https://wikipedia.nucleos.com/viewer/wikipedia_en_all/A/AR-M1
    43. Arsenal AD – Wikipedia, accessed May 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arsenal_AD#Products
    44. AR-M1 – Wikipedia, accessed May 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AR-M1
    45. What country produces the best variations of Ak. Personally I would say Poland, because the tantal, wbp, fox, and Beryl. What would you all say, and why. : r/ak47 – Reddit, accessed May 17, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ak47/comments/101jymx/what_country_produces_the_best_variations_of_ak/
    46. AR-M1 – Wikiwand, accessed May 17, 2025, https://www.wikiwand.com/en/articles/AR-M1
    47. Guns in Movies, TV and Video Games – AK-47 – Internet Movie Firearms Database, accessed May 17, 2025, https://www.imfdb.org/wiki/AK-47
    48. Type 56 assault rifle – Wikipedia, accessed May 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_56_assault_rifle
    49. Type 56 assault rifles – Wikimedia Commons, accessed May 17, 2025, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Type_56_assault_rifles
    50. The Chinese Type 81 Information | Total War Center, accessed May 17, 2025, https://www.twcenter.net/threads/the-chinese-type-81-information.175527/
    51. APS-95 – Wikipedia, accessed May 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/APS-95
    52. List of assault rifles – Wikipedia, accessed May 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_assault_rifles
    53. Cuban Revolutionary Armed Forces – Wikipedia, accessed May 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_of_Cuba#Infantry_weapons
    54. The Gun That Is in Almost 100 Countries: Why the AK-47 Dominates – The National Interest, accessed May 17, 2025, https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/75-million-guns-ready-war-why-the-ak-47-dominates-20561
    55. SAMOPAL vz. 58: A rifle that looks like an Soviet AK-47 but it is not – Combat Operators, accessed May 17, 2025, https://combatoperators.com/firearms/rifles/samopal-vz-58/
    56. Differences Between the VZ-58 and the AK – Firearms History, Technology & Development, accessed May 17, 2025, http://firearmshistory.blogspot.com/2015/01/differences-between-vz-58-and-ak.html
    57. vz. 58 – Wikipedia, accessed May 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vz._58
    58. East German MPiKM assault rifle | Imperial War Museums, accessed May 17, 2025, https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item/object/30029525
    59. East German Wieger STG Rifle – Small Arms Review, accessed May 17, 2025, http://archive.smallarmsreview.com/display.article.printable.cfm?idarticles=1382
    60. East German AK History – Faktory 47, accessed May 17, 2025, https://www.faktory47.com/blogs/kalashnikov/east-german-ak-history
    61. East German MPi-KM-72 (AKM) Operator’s Manual : r/milsurp – Reddit, accessed May 17, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/milsurp/comments/11l19wp/east_german_mpikm72_akm_operators_manual/
    62. File:MPi-KM.jpg – Wikimedia Commons, accessed May 17, 2025, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:MPi-KM.jpg
    63. File:MPI-KMS-74.JPG – Wikimedia Commons, accessed May 17, 2025, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:MPI-KMS-74.JPG
    64. Hakim rifle – Wikipedia, accessed May 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hakim_rifle
    65. Egyptian Maadi MISR S/A AKM 7.62×39 16″ Rifle AK-47 Romanian Dong, accessed May 17, 2025, https://lsbauctions.com/egyptian-maadi-misr-s-a-akm-7-62×39-16-rifle-ak-47-romanian-dong/
    66. File:Maadi Rifle.webp – Wikimedia Commons, accessed May 17, 2025, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Maadi_Rifle.webp
    67. Gafat Armament Engineering Complex – Wikipedia, accessed May 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gafat_Armament_Engineering_Complex
    68. AKs from Finland. Part 2: Valmet RK 62, Advanced AK Designed 62 Years Ago | thefirearmblog.com, accessed May 17, 2025, https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2024/04/18/aks-from-finland-part-2-valmet-rk-62-advanced-ak-designed-62-years-ago/
    69. RK 62 – Wikipedia, accessed May 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RK_62
    70. IMI Galil: An Israel’s derivative of legendary AK-47 – Combat Operators, accessed May 17, 2025, https://combatoperators.com/firearms/rifles/imi-galil/
    71. Valmet M62 – Wikimedia Commons, accessed May 17, 2025, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Valmet_M62
    72. AK-63 – Wikipedia, accessed May 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AK-63
    73. AMD-65 – Weaponsystems.net, accessed May 17, 2025, https://weaponsystems.net/system/816-AMD-65
    74. Fegyver- és Gépgyár – Wikipedia, accessed May 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fegyver-_%C3%A9s_G%C3%A9pgy%C3%A1r
    75. Place: Hungary | Collection Term – Royal Armouries, accessed May 17, 2025, https://royalarmouries.org/collection/facet/place_made/creation/Hungary
    76. Category:AK-63 – Wikimedia Commons, accessed May 17, 2025, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:AK-63
    77. Category:AMD 65 – Wikimedia Commons, accessed May 17, 2025, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:AMD_65
    78. INSAS rifle – Wikipedia, accessed May 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/INSAS_rifle
    79. Why is the INSAS rifle considered to be so bad? : r/WarCollege – Reddit, accessed May 17, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/WarCollege/comments/1knj4iv/why_is_the_insas_rifle_considered_to_be_so_bad/
    80. Identifying Small Arms and RPGs Produced in Iran, accessed May 17, 2025, https://irp.fas.org/world/iran/smallarms.pdf
    81. Defense Industries Organization – Wikipedia, accessed May 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_Industries_Organization#Small_Arms
    82. List of equipment of the Iranian Army – Wikipedia, accessed May 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_equipment_of_the_Iranian_Army
    83. Zastava M70 | Weaponsystems.net, accessed May 17, 2025, https://weaponsystems.net/system/376-Zastava+M70
    84. Tabuk Sniper Rifle – Wikipedia, accessed May 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tabuk_Sniper_Rifle
    85. Galil (& close derivatives) – Small Arms Survey, accessed May 17, 2025, https://www.smallarmssurvey.org/sites/default/files/SAS_weapons-assault-rifles-Galil.pdf
    86. IMI Galil – Wikipedia, accessed May 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IMI_Galil
    87. IWI Galil ACE – Wikipedia, accessed May 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IWI_Galil_ACE
    88. File:Bernardelli VB Practical 9mm (32795519385).jpg – Wikimedia Commons, accessed May 17, 2025, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bernardelli_VB_Practical_9mm_(32795519385).jpg
    89. DICON Partners With Firm On Military Hardware Production – Voice of Nigeria, accessed May 17, 2025, https://von.gov.ng/dicon-partners-with-firm-on-military-hardware-production/
    90. Defence Industries Corporation of Nigeria – Wikipedia, accessed May 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defence_Industries_Corporation_of_Nigeria
    91. Defence Industries Corporation of Nigeria – Wikipedia, accessed May 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defence_Industries_Corporation_of_Nigeria#Products
    92. FB Beryl – Wikipedia, accessed May 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FB_Beryl
    93. Nigerian made weapons, a complete list – World Defense, accessed May 17, 2025, https://world-defense.com/threads/nigerian-made-weapons-a-complete-list.7541/
    94. Type 58 assault rifle – Wikipedia, accessed May 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_58_assault_rifle
    95. List of military equipment manufactured in Pakistan, accessed May 17, 2025, https://wikipedia.nucleos.com/viewer/wikipedia_en_all/A/List_of_military_equipment_manufactured_in_Pakistan
    96. Bayonets of Poland – WorldBayonets.com, accessed May 17, 2025, https://worldbayonets.com/Bayonet_Identification_Guide/Poland/Poland_2.html
    97. Polish Radom (11) AKM Barreled Action/Rifle w/ original Polish Chrome Lined Barrel & Polish Imported Receiver – Arms of America, accessed May 17, 2025, https://armsofamerica.com/polish-radom-11-akm-barreled-action-rifle-w-original-polish-chrome-lined-barrel-polish-imported-receiver/
    98. FB “Łucznik” Radom – Wikipedia, accessed May 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FB_%22%C5%81ucznik%22_Radom
    99. BERYL TANTALSSON: THE SAGA OF THE POLISH KALASHNIKOV CONTINUES, accessed May 17, 2025, https://smallarmsreview.com/beryl-tantalsson-the-saga-of-the-polish-kalashnikov-continues/
    100. FB Tantal – Wikipedia, accessed May 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FB_Tantal
    101. en.wikipedia.org, accessed May 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FB_Radom
    102. Polish kbk AKM and AKMS rifles, 1991-2000. End of an era for the FB Radom AK Kalashnikov – YouTube, accessed May 17, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GRAXF6GmzLA
    103. Pistol Mitraliera model 1963 ( PM md. 63) AKM Variant – The Armoury, accessed May 17, 2025, https://www.wargm.org/armoury/index.php?mode=2&cat=Fully+Automatic+and+Self+Loading+Rifles+and+Carbines&item=121
    104. Pistol Mitralieră model 1963/1965 – Wikipedia, accessed May 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pistol_Mitralier%C4%83_model_1963/1965
    105. PM md. 63 – Weapon Systems, accessed May 17, 2025, https://old.weaponsystems.net/weaponsystem/AA04%20-%20PM%20md%2063.html
    106. Guns in Movies, TV and Video Games – PM md. 63 – Internet Movie Firearms Database, accessed May 17, 2025, https://www.imfdb.org/wiki/PM_md._63
    107. PM md. 63 – Weaponsystems.net, accessed May 17, 2025, https://weaponsystems.net/system/489-PM+md.+63
    108. Zastava M70 assault rifle – Wikipedia, accessed May 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zastava_M70_assault_rifle
    109. Vektor R4 – Wikipedia, accessed May 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vektor_R4
    110. Military Industry Corporation – Wikipedia, accessed May 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_Industry_Corporation_(Sudan)#Products_and_Services
    111. Category:Military of Sudan – Wikimedia Commons, accessed May 17, 2025, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Military_of_Sudan
    112. Sarsılmaz Silah, accessed May 17, 2025, https://sarsilmaz.com/public/uploads/1738761377en.pdf
    113. Sarsılmaz Arms – Wikipedia, accessed May 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sars%C4%B1lmaz_Arms
    114. Sarsılmaz Arms – Wikipedia, accessed May 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sars%C4%B1lmaz_Arms#Assault_Rifles
    115. Why Ukraine Special Ops Use This Bullpup. The Malyuk. – YouTube, accessed May 17, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fD8W7Ps6Yj8&pp=0gcJCfcAhR29_xXO
    116. Vepr – Wikipedia, accessed May 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vepr
    117. Malyuk – Wikipedia, accessed May 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malyuk
    118. AK Rifles – Century Arms, accessed May 17, 2025, https://www.centuryarms.com/ak-rifles
    119. Kalashnikov Venezuela Plant to Start AK-103 Production by 2019 End – Defense Mirror, accessed May 17, 2025, https://www.defensemirror.com/news/22279/Kalashnikov_Venezuela_Plant_to_Start_AK_103_Production_by_2019_End
    120. CAVIM – Wikipedia, accessed May 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAVIM#Firearms
    121. STV rifle – Wikipedia, accessed May 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STV_rifle
    122. Z111 Factory – Wikipedia, accessed May 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Z111_Factory#Products
    123. File:VD2022 STV380.jpg – Wikipedia, accessed May 17, 2025, https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:VD2022_STV380.jpg

    If you find this post useful, please share the link on Facebook, with your friends, etc. Your support is much appreciated and if you have any feedback, please email me at in**@*********ps.com. Please note that for links to other websites, I may be paid via an affiliate program such as Avantlink, Impact, Amazon and eBay.


    The Engineering History of the Not So Lowly AK-47 Rivet

    I’ve been involved with AK rifle building since 2006 and there’s something we take for granted – how rivets are used to secure the forged trunnions, and trigger guards to the sheet metal receiver. Not to mention the center support and side mount scope rail. Some have asked why rivets were even used thinking they were some low-end choice. The truth is quite different. Let’s move ahead and take a deeper focused look at the engineering behind the use of the rivet in the AKM rifle – it wasn’t a lowly choice by any means.

    Section 1: Introduction to the AKM Stamped Receiver and Rivet-Based Assembly

    The design of the 7.62mm AKM represents a pivotal moment in 20th-century small arms manufacturing. Its departure from the milled-receiver construction of its predecessor, the AK-47, in favor of a stamped-steel receiver assembly, necessitated a comprehensive and robust method for joining dissimilar components under significant operational stress. This report provides a detailed engineering analysis of the riveting system employed in the AKM, examining the materials, dimensions, geometry, and underlying mechanical principles that make it a successful and enduring design.

    1.1 The Evolution from Milled to Stamped: Engineering and Production Imperatives

    The original AK-47, while exceptionally reliable, was built upon a receiver machined from a solid forging of steel. This process was labor-intensive, time-consuming, and resulted in significant material waste. The primary engineering driver for the development of the AKM, introduced in 1959, was the optimization for mass production.1 Soviet engineers sought to reduce manufacturing complexity, cost, and the overall weight of the rifle without compromising the platform’s legendary reliability.2

    The solution was a paradigm shift from a milled receiver to one formed from a single 1.0 mm thick sheet of steel.1 This change dramatically reduced machine time and cost, allowing for faster production rates to meet the vast needs of the Soviet military and its allies. However, this created a new engineering challenge: a thin, U-shaped stamped steel shell lacks the inherent strength and rigidity to contain the forces of a firing 7.62x39mm cartridge and guide the bolt carrier group with the necessary precision.4 The AKM’s riveting system is the critical design element that solves this problem. The following table summarizes the four AK-47 types:

    Type DesignationWeapon ModelReceiver ConstructionDescription
    Type 1Early AK-47 (1948–51)StampedFirst design; lightweight stamped sheet metal with riveted trunnions. Abandoned due to reliability and tooling issues.
    Type 2AK-47 (1952–53)MilledFirst successful milled version; added a rear socket for the stock and heavier construction.
    Type 3AK-47 (1954–59)MilledRefined milled design with lighter weight and simplified manufacturing over Type 2. Most common milled AK-47.
    Type 4AKM (from 1959 onward)StampedStandardized modern AKM receiver; made from stamped sheet metal with riveted trunnions, very lightweight and economical.

    1.2 The Functional Role of Trunnions and Rivets in the AKM Design

    The AKM design cleverly separates the functions of pressure containment and component housing. The immense stress of firing is handled by two key high-strength components: the front and rear trunnions.6

    • The Front Trunnion: This is a precisely machined block of steel that serves as the heart of the rifle. It holds the barrel, provides the locking recesses for the bolt’s rotating lugs, and contains the peak chamber pressure upon firing. It absorbs the primary rearward thrust of the cartridge case.5
    • The Rear Trunnion: This machined steel block provides the mounting point for the buttstock and serves as the rear stop for the recoiling bolt carrier group, absorbing its kinetic energy at the end of each cycle.1

    The thin stamped receiver acts as a chassis, holding these trunnions and the fire control group in their correct spatial relationship. The rivets are the non-detachable fasteners that permanently join the high-strength trunnions to the receiver shell, transferring the operational loads and creating a unified, rigid structure from otherwise disparate parts.1 Alternative methods like screwing are unsuitable due to the risk of loosening under intense vibration, while welding could warp the thin receiver and create brittle heat-affected zones.7 Riveting provides a permanent, vibration-resistant, and mechanically sound solution.

    1.3 System Overview: Mapping the Primary Rivet Groups

    The rivet pattern on an AKM is not arbitrary; it is a carefully laid out system designed to secure components and reinforce the receiver. The primary rivet groups, which will be analyzed in detail in subsequent sections, are as follows 8:

    • Front Trunnion Rivets: A group of six rivets securing the front trunnion to the forward section of the receiver.
    • Rear Trunnion Rivets: Two long rivets (for a standard fixed stock) that pass through the receiver and the rear trunnion block.
    • Trigger Guard Rivets: A group of five rivets that attach the trigger guard assembly to the bottom of the receiver.
    • Center Support Rivet: A single rivet and internal sleeve located midway down the receiver that prevents the receiver walls and guide rails from flexing.

    The precise placement of these rivets is critical to the firearm’s function and is standardized across Warsaw Pact production, as can be seen in various build templates and diagrams.10

    Top: AKMS (older-style wood handguard typical of AK-47 fitted) with type IV receiver; bottom: AK-47 with type II receiver. Image Source: Wikimedia.

    Section 2: A Typology of AKM Rivets: Form, Dimensions, and Location

    The rivet set used in an AKM is not a homogenous collection of fasteners. It is a specific kit of components where the geometry and dimensions of each rivet type are engineered for its designated location and mechanical function.

    2.1 Rivet Geometry: A Detailed Taxonomy

    The rivets used in a standard AKM can be classified into several distinct geometric types, each with a specific purpose.

    2.1.1 The Swell Neck Rivet

    This is the most specialized and structurally critical rivet in the AKM design. Its geometry features a standard domed head, a shank of a specific diameter, and a distinctive conical flare, or “swell,” located directly beneath the head.9 This swell is designed to fit into a corresponding dimpled (countersunk) hole in the receiver sheet. This interface creates a mechanical interlock that provides superior resistance to shear forces, a concept that will be analyzed in detail in Section 4. These are used in the highest-stress locations, such as the trunnion attachments.8

    2.1.2 The Domed (Universal) Head Rivet

    This is a standard solid rivet with a semi-spherical head, often referred to as a universal or round head type.15 These are used in locations where the specialized shear-resisting properties of the swell neck are not required, but a secure clamping force is still necessary, such as the upper front trunnion holes and parts of the trigger guard assembly.9

    2.1.3 The Flat Head Rivet

    The center support rivet is unique in that it features a very low-profile, flat manufactured head.8 This is a design constraint dictated by clearance requirements. The bolt carrier group reciprocates along guide rails inside the receiver, and a standard domed rivet head in this location would interfere with its movement. The flat head ensures a smooth, unobstructed path for the carrier.18

    2.2 Rivet Specifications by Location

    The following table synthesizes data from military specifications, gunsmithing resources, and commercial rivet sets to provide a comprehensive reference for the dimensions and types of rivets used in a standard fixed-stock AKM. All imperial measurements have been converted to metric for engineering consistency.

    Table 2.1: AKM Rivet Dimensional and Type Specification

    Rivet LocationQuantityRivet Type/ShapeShank Ø (mm)Shank Length (mm)Factory Head Ø (mm)Factory Head Height (mm)Required Receiver Hole Ø (mm)
    Front Trunnion, Lower2Swell Neck, Domed Head4.09.5~7.1~2.14.0
    Front Trunnion, Middle2Swell Neck, Domed Head4.09.5~7.1~2.14.0
    Front Trunnion, Upper2Standard, Domed Head4.09.5~7.1~2.14.0
    Rear Trunnion, Long2Swell Neck, Domed Head4.8~50.8~7.4~2.84.8
    Trigger Guard, Front4Standard, Domed Head4.09.5~6.9~2.14.0
    Trigger Guard, Rear1Standard, Domed Head4.07.9~6.9~2.14.0
    Center Support1Standard, Flat Head4.0Varies~7.0Low Profile4.0

    Data compiled and converted from sources.9 Dimensions are nominal and may exhibit minor variations based on country of origin and production year. Shank length for the center support rivet varies with the sleeve used. Rear trigger guard rivet length can vary depending on the use of a reinforcement plate.17

    2.3 Analysis of National and Historical Variations

    While the core Soviet design established the standard, minor variations in rivet specifications and patterns exist among different national producers of the AKM and its derivatives.

    One of the most well-documented distinctions is in the front trunnion rivet pattern. Soviet/Warsaw Pact AKMs (Russian, Polish, Romanian, etc.) feature a parallel vertical alignment of the three rivets on each side of the trunnion. In contrast, many Chinese Type 56 rifles utilize a staggered or triangular rivet pattern for the front trunnion.12

    Furthermore, small dimensional differences in the rivets themselves have been observed. For example, measurements of demilled kits have shown that Romanian factory-formed rivet heads for the trigger guard average around 6.9 mm – 7.2 mm in diameter, while Chinese examples can be slightly larger, averaging around 7.4 mm in diameter with a greater head height.15 These differences, while minor, reflect distinct manufacturing practices and tooling but do not alter the fundamental engineering principles of the riveting system.

    Section 3: Metallurgy and Material Science of Soviet-Era Rivets

    The choice of material for the AKM’s rivets is a critical aspect of its design, reflecting a deliberate balance between manufacturability, strength, and cost. The material must be soft enough to be formed without fracture, yet strong enough in its final state to withstand the violent operational stresses of the firearm.

    3.1 Material Composition: Analysis of GOST Standard Low-Carbon Steels

    Based on an analysis of Soviet-era general-purpose fastener standards, such as GOST 10299-80, the rivets used in the AKM are made from a low-carbon, unalloyed, quality structural steel.20 These steels are not high-performance alloys but are cost-effective, readily available, and possess the specific mechanical properties required for cold-forming applications. The two most probable grades are

    Сталь 10 (Steel 10) and Сталь 20 (Steel 20).20 The number in the designation indicates the average carbon content in hundredths of a percent (i.e., 0.10% for Steel 10, 0.20% for Steel 20).22

    Table 3.1: Nominal Chemical Composition of Soviet Rivet Steels (GOST 1050)

    ElementSymbolSteel 10 (% Content)Steel 20 (% Content)
    CarbonC0.07 – 0.140.17 – 0.24
    ManganeseMn0.35 – 0.650.35 – 0.65
    SiliconSi0.17 – 0.370.17 – 0.37
    PhosphorusP≤ 0.035≤ 0.035
    SulfurS≤ 0.040≤ 0.040
    ChromiumCr≤ 0.15≤ 0.25
    NickelNi≤ 0.25≤ 0.30
    CopperCu≤ 0.25≤ 0.30
    IronFeBalanceBalance

    Data compiled from sources.22

    3.2 Mechanical Properties: The Engineering Balance of Malleability and Strength

    The selection of low-carbon steel is a masterstroke of process-integrated engineering. The material’s properties are ideally suited for both the installation process and the final application.

    • Malleability and Ductility: The extremely low carbon content makes these steels very soft and ductile in their annealed (as-supplied) state. For Steel 10, the hardness is approximately 143 HB, and for Steel 20, it is around 163 HB.22 This high ductility allows the rivet’s shank to be cold-formed (upset) into the buck-tail or formed head with a press, flowing to fill the hole completely without cracking.25 A harder, higher-carbon steel would be too brittle for this process.
    • Work Hardening and Final Strength: While the rivets are initially soft, the process of cold-forming induces significant work hardening (also known as strain hardening). As the steel is plastically deformed, dislocations are generated and rearranged within its crystal structure, which impedes further deformation. This has the effect of increasing the material’s tensile strength and hardness in its final, installed state. The rivet becomes substantially stronger than it was before installation. This elegant mechanism means that the assembly process itself is the final step in achieving the required mechanical properties, eliminating the need for a separate, costly heat treatment cycle for the millions of rivets produced.

    3.3 Heat Treatment and Surface Finishing

    It is critical to distinguish between the treatment of the rivets and the treatment of the receiver. The rivets themselves are not heat-treated after installation.27 Their final strength is a product of material selection and work hardening.

    In contrast, the 1.0 mm stamped receiver is selectively heat-treated. Specifically, the areas around the fire control group (hammer and trigger) pin holes and the tip of the integral ejector are hardened to prevent wear and elongation under repeated stress.4 A common specification for this spot-hardening is a Rockwell C hardness of 38-40.13 Attempting to use a non-heat-treated receiver will result in rapid failure, as the pin holes will stretch and deform, leading to malfunction.13

    The standard finish applied to military-issue rivets is a black oxide coating.9 This is a conversion coating that provides mild corrosion resistance and a durable, non-reflective black finish that matches the rest of the firearm.

    Section 4: Engineering Rationale and Stress Distribution Analysis

    The AKM’s riveting system is more than a simple collection of fasteners; it is an integrated system designed to manage and distribute the complex forces generated during the firing cycle. Understanding this system requires analyzing the stresses on the primary components and the specific design features created to handle them.

    4.1 The Trunnions as Primary Load-Bearing Structures

    As established, the trunnions are the true load-bearing elements of the AKM.

    • Front Trunnion Stress: The front trunnion bears the highest peak stress in the system. When a cartridge is fired, the expanding gases exert a force on the bolt face, which is transmitted directly to the locking lugs on the front trunnion. This force is on the order of thousands of pounds, corresponding to chamber pressures that can reach approximately 45,000 psi for the 7.62x39mm cartridge.5 The integrity of the trunnion’s locking lugs is paramount. This is why properly forged and heat-treated trunnions are essential; failures of substandard cast trunnions often manifest as cracks or complete shearing of the locking lugs.5
    • Rear Trunnion Stress: The rear trunnion experiences a different type of load: a high-energy impact. At the end of its rearward travel, the entire mass of the bolt carrier group (approximately 500 grams) slams into the front face of the rear trunnion. While the peak force is lower than the chamber pressure, it is a significant, repetitive shock load that must be absorbed and transferred into the receiver shell without causing deformation or failure.7 This repeated impact is why the rear trunnion rivets are often described as taking the most “abuse” in the system.7

    4.2 Analysis of Forces: Shear Stress on Trunnion Rivets

    The primary force that the trunnion rivets must resist is shear. The rearward thrust on the front trunnion and the impact on the rear trunnion create forces that try to slide the trunnions relative to the receiver skin. The rivets act as pins, resisting this shearing motion. The load is distributed among the rivets in a group, with each rivet carrying a fraction of the total shear force.

    4.3 The Swell Neck/Dimple Interface: A Design Solution for Maximizing Shear Resistance

    The most ingenious feature of the AKM’s riveting system is the use of swell neck rivets in conjunction with dimpled receiver holes. This is a specific design solution to the problem of transferring high shear loads into a thin (1.0 mm) sheet of metal.

    In a standard rivet joint, the shear load is borne by the bearing surface of the hole against the rivet shank. In a 1.0 mm receiver, this bearing area is minuscule, making the hole highly susceptible to elongation or “egging” under load, which would lead to a loose trunnion and catastrophic failure.

    The swell neck/dimple system fundamentally changes this dynamic. The process involves using a specialized die to press a conical countersink, or “dimple,” into the receiver hole.8 The front or rear trunnion must be in place behind the receiver to support the sheet during this process.8 When the swell neck rivet is installed, its conical swell nests perfectly into this dimple.13

    The basic formula for shear stress (τ) is τ = F/A, where F is the applied force and A is the area over which the force is acting. This formula calculates the average shear stress across the area. 

    Explanation:

    Shear Stress (τ): It’s a measure of the force acting parallel to the surface area of a material, causing it to deform or potentially fail by sliding or shearing. 
    Force (F): This is the component of the force that is parallel to the surface area. 
    Area (A): This is the cross-sectional area of the material that the force is acting upon. It’s the area of the surface where the force is applied, not the total surface area of the object. 

    So, as the area increases, the sheer stress decreases all things being equal.

    This creates a mechanical interlock. The shear load is no longer concentrated on the thin edge of the hole. Instead, it is distributed across the entire conical surface area of the dimple. This vastly increases the bearing surface, dramatically reduces the bearing stress on the receiver material, and effectively locks the trunnion and receiver together, preventing any relative movement.6 Gunsmithing guides explicitly warn against trying to achieve a flush fit by removing material from the receiver instead of dimpling; doing so defeats the entire purpose of the design, leaving only the rivet’s core to resist shear and guaranteeing eventual failure.6 This feature is the key to making a thin stamped receiver perform as if it were much thicker and stronger at these critical junctions.

    4.4 The Role of the Center Support and Trigger Guard Rivets in Receiver Rigidity

    While the trunnion rivets handle the primary firing loads, the other rivet groups serve a crucial structural reinforcement role, stiffening the inherently flexible U-shaped receiver.

    • Center Support: The center support consists of a rivet passing through a steel sleeve that bridges the two sides of the receiver.8 This assembly acts as a critical cross-member. It prevents the long, unsupported upper guide rails from flexing inward under the lateral forces exerted by the reciprocating bolt carrier, ensuring smooth and reliable cycling. It also prevents the receiver walls themselves from bowing or pinching.33
    • Trigger Guard Assembly: The trigger guard is not merely a safety feature. When its five rivets are properly installed, the entire stamped steel trigger guard assembly acts as a structural floor plate for the receiver.34 This significantly increases the torsional and latitudinal rigidity of the large magazine well opening, preventing the “U” from spreading or twisting under load.

    Together, these rivet groups transform the flexible stamped receiver shell into a strong, cohesive chassis capable of withstanding the rigors of military service.

    Section 5: The Riveting Process: A Technical Guide to Proper Formation

    Achieving the designed strength of the AKM’s riveted joints is entirely dependent on the correct installation process. This is a precision manufacturing operation that requires specialized tooling and meticulous adherence to procedure. Using improper methods, such as a hammer and a simple punch, will result in substandard joints that compromise the safety and reliability of the firearm.

    5.1 Essential Tooling: Jigs, Presses, and Forming Dies

    Modern, correct riveting practice relies on a set of specialized tools to ensure control and repeatability.

    • Hydraulic Press: A shop press, typically with a capacity of 12 tons or more, provides the slow, controlled, and immense force needed to properly form the rivets without impact shock.13
    • Riveting Jig: A purpose-built jig, such as those made by AK-Builder or Toth Tool, is essential. These jigs securely hold the receiver and trunnion assembly, ensuring it is square to the press ram. They have recesses to support the manufactured head of the rivet, preventing it from being flattened, and they align the forming tool perfectly coaxial with the rivet shank.8 Different jigs or configurations are used for short trunnion rivets, long rear trunnion rivets, and the trigger guard.33
    • Forming Dies and Tools: A set of hardened steel forming tools is used to shape the rivet. This includes cupped support dies for the manufactured head and various forming punches to create a correctly shaped, domed buck-tail on the other end.16

    5.2 Receiver and Component Preparation

    Proper preparation of the components is as important as the riveting itself.

    • Hole Location and Drilling: Rivet holes must be precisely located on the receiver blank. This is typically done using a plastic layout guide and a transfer punch to mark the hole centers.10 The holes are then drilled to the correct diameter (e.g., 4.0 mm for a 4.0 mm rivet) using a drill press and high-quality drill bits.37 An undersized hole will prevent the rivet from seating, while an oversized hole will result in a weak joint.
    • Deburring: After drilling, all holes must be carefully deburred on both sides. Any burrs or sharp edges will prevent the rivet from sitting flush against the receiver and trunnion, creating gaps that compromise the joint’s integrity.6
    • Dimpling: For all swell neck rivet locations, the receiver holes must be dimpled. This is done using a specialized dimple die in the hydraulic press, with the trunnion installed in the receiver to provide backing support. This forms the conical seat that the rivet’s swell neck will engage.8

    5.3 Step-by-Step Installation Protocol

    The general sequence for riveting an AKM receiver is as follows, using the appropriate jigs and press tools for each step 8:

    1. Trigger Guard Riveting: The trigger guard assembly is typically installed first, often with a dedicated jig. The four front rivets and the single rear rivet are pressed to secure the guard and magazine catch assembly.13
    2. Front Trunnion Riveting: The front trunnion is placed in the receiver, and the six short rivets are installed. Care must be taken to use swell neck rivets in the four lower and middle holes (which should be dimpled) and standard domed rivets in the two upper holes.8
    3. Rear Trunnion Riveting: The rear trunnion is installed using the two long rivets. This requires a specialized long-rivet jig to support the receiver and apply force linearly down the long shank of the rivet.8
    4. Center Support Installation: The center support sleeve is inserted, and the special flat-headed rivet is pressed into place, again using the long-rivet tool.8

    5.4 Inspection and Verification of a Correctly Formed Rivet

    A properly formed rivet must meet specific visual and mechanical criteria.

    • Visual Inspection: The manufactured head must be perfectly flush against the receiver surface with no visible gaps. A common field test is to hold the receiver up to a bright light source to check for light passing under the rivet head.39 The formed head (the buck-tail) must be symmetrical, well-rounded with a dome shape similar to the manufactured head, and centered on the rivet’s shank. It should not be flattened, cracked, or off-center.40
    • Mechanical Integrity: The finished rivet must be completely tight. There should be absolutely no detectable movement between the trunnion and the receiver when force is applied. The entire assembly should feel and behave as a single, monolithic component. A loose rivet is a failed rivet and must be drilled out and replaced.
    This is a Romanian Pistol Mitralieră model 1963/1965 (abbreviated PM md. 63 or simply md. 63) and is the Patriotic Guard or ‘Gardă’ version readily identifiable by the “G” on the rear sight block. Image source: Author.

    Section 6: Conclusion: The Engineering Elegance of the AKM Riveting System

    6.1 Synthesis of Findings: A Robust System for a Stamped Platform

    The comprehensive analysis of the AKM’s riveting system reveals a design that is far more sophisticated than its rugged appearance suggests. The transition from the milled AK-47 to the stamped AKM was a manufacturing revolution, and the riveting system is the lynchpin of its success. The key findings of this report can be synthesized as follows:

    • A Purpose-Engineered System: The AKM’s riveting system is a holistic solution to the engineering challenges posed by a thin, stamped-steel receiver. It successfully mates high-strength, load-bearing trunnions to a lightweight chassis, creating a firearm that is both durable and easy to mass-produce.
    • Specialized Components: The system does not rely on generic fasteners. It employs a heterogeneous set of rivets, each with a specific geometry (swell neck, domed head, flat head) and dimension precisely tailored to the mechanical requirements and spatial constraints of its location.
    • Optimized Material Science: The choice of low-carbon steel (such as Soviet Steel 10 or 20) is a deliberate act of engineering efficiency. The material’s initial ductility facilitates easy cold-forming, while the installation process itself induces work-hardening, providing the final required strength without the need for a separate heat-treatment process.
    • Advanced Structural Mechanics: The strength of the system is derived not merely from the clamping force of the rivets but from advanced mechanical principles. The swell neck/dimple interface is a brilliant solution for managing shear stress, while the center support and trigger guard rivets act as integral structural reinforcements, adding critical rigidity to the receiver.
    • Process-Dependent Integrity: The design’s success is inextricably linked to the correct installation methodology. Proper riveting is a precision process that requires specialized tooling and meticulous preparation. Deviations from this process directly compromise the mechanical integrity and safety of the firearm.

    6.2 Final Assessment

    The riveting system of the AKM is a testament to the Soviet design philosophy of elegant simplicity. It achieves maximum functional robustness with a minimum of manufacturing complexity and cost. By understanding the interplay between the stamped receiver, the machined trunnions, and the specialized rivets that join them, one can appreciate the AKM not just as a firearm, but as a masterclass in pragmatic and effective mechanical engineering. It is a system where every component, every dimension, and every step in the assembly process has a clear and logical purpose, resulting in one of the most successful and widely produced firearm designs in history.

    Works cited

    1. AKM – Wikipedia, accessed June 20, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AKM
    2. AK-47 vs AKM Performance: Insights from GunCreed® Experts, accessed June 20, 2025, https://guncreed.com/2025/03/12/how-does-the-ak47-compare-to-the-akm-in-terms-of-performance/
    3. AR & AK – Night Galaxy, accessed June 20, 2025, https://nightgalaxy.com/blog/ar-ak/
    4. How do I heat treat an AK receiver? [Archive] – The Firing Line Forums, accessed June 20, 2025, https://thefiringline.com/forums/archive/index.php?t-325374.html
    5. Ras47 Trunnion failure. : r/ak47 – Reddit, accessed June 20, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ak47/comments/abjwaa/ras47_trunnion_failure/
    6. AKM Build Project: From Poland With Love | RECOIL, accessed June 20, 2025, https://www.recoilweb.com/preview-build-your-own-akm-rifle-101413.html
    7. New Technique for AK Builds – SKSBOARDS.COM, accessed June 20, 2025, https://www.sksboards.com/smf/index.php?topic=8335.20;wap2
    8. Rivet Tool Instructions – AK-Builder.com, accessed June 20, 2025, https://ak-builder.com/index1.php?dispatch=pages.view&page_id=10
    9. AK-Builder AK Rivet Set, accessed June 20, 2025, https://ak-builder.com/index1.php?dispatch=products.view&product_id=29975
    10. Trigger Guard Rivet (AKM, AKMS, AK-74) Layout Guide – Childers Guns, accessed June 20, 2025, https://www.childersguns.com/Trigger-Guard-Rivet-Layout-Guide
    11. FCG (AK, AKM, AK74) Layout Guide – Childers Guns, accessed June 20, 2025, https://www.childersguns.com/FCG-Layout-Guide-1
    12. Вкладыш тульских АКМ 65-г. : История оружия – Guns.ru, accessed June 20, 2025, https://forum.guns.ru/forummessage/36/2680758.html
    13. AK Krink Build Part 3: Trigger Guard Riveting and Front Trunion Drilling – ITS Tactical, accessed June 20, 2025, https://www.itstactical.com/warcom/firearms/ak-krink-build-part-3-trigger-guard-riveting-and-front-trunion-drilling/
    14. AK47 AKM FIXED STOCK RIVET SET – Carolina Shooters Supply, accessed June 20, 2025, https://www.carolinashooterssupply.com/AK47-AKM-FIXED-STOCK-RIVET-SET-p/rivets-ak47-fixed.htm
    15. Making Your Own Rivets – The AK Files Forums – Scribd, accessed June 20, 2025, https://www.scribd.com/document/248364164/Making-Your-Own-Rivets-The-AK-Files-Forums
    16. AK-Builder Rivet Tool: MGW, accessed June 20, 2025, https://www.midwestgunworks.com/page/mgwi/prod/akb-t5-11
    17. Power Custom Rivet Set AK-47 AKM, PM90 Side Folding Stock, Model 65 – MidwayUSA, accessed June 20, 2025, https://www.midwayusa.com/product/100469512
    18. Easy AK47 Build “Homemade”: Center Support long rivet install ~ Step 3 of 6 – YouTube, accessed June 20, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pSCmhLgB4rE
    19. Centrefire automatic rifle – Kalashnikov ‘AKM SU’ – about 1977 | Collection Object | Royal Armouries, accessed June 20, 2025, https://royalarmouries.org/collection/object/object-275685
    20. Заклепка с полукруглой головкой ГОСТ 10299-80 – купить по выгодным ценам от производителя – Первый завод крепежных изделий, accessed June 20, 2025, https://pzki54.ru/product/zaklepki/zaklepka-s-potaynoy-golovkoy-gost-10299/
    21. Заклепка стальная ГОСТ 10299-80, DIN 660 с полукруглой …, accessed June 20, 2025, https://metizorel.ru/zak10299.html
    22. Сталь 10 (ст10) конструкционная углеродистая качественная, Купить прокат из стали марки ст10 – Металлобаза ‘АКСВИЛ’, accessed June 20, 2025, https://aksvil.by/klientam/materialy-po-prokatu/stal-10.html
    23. расшифровка и характеристики | гост и применение марки стали 20 – ТД «Ареал, accessed June 20, 2025, https://areal-metal.ru/spravka/stal-marki-20
    24. Сталь 20 – применение, состав, характеристики, аналоги, расшифровка, accessed June 20, 2025, https://aksvil.by/klientam/materialy-po-prokatu/stal-20.html
    25. Power Custom AK-47 Gas Piston Rivet – MidwayUSA, accessed June 20, 2025, https://www.midwayusa.com/product/1004693281
    26. 7 Key 1020 Steel Properties You Must Know, accessed June 20, 2025, https://jiyuansteel.com/7-key-1020-steel-properties-you-must-know/
    27. Pre-heating rivets?! – Van’s Air Force, accessed June 20, 2025, https://vansairforce.net/threads/pre-heating-rivets.70515/
    28. How do I heat treat an AK receiver? – The Firing Line Forums, accessed June 20, 2025, https://thefiringline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=325374
    29. akm rivet set *original polish military imported rivets – Arms of America, accessed June 20, 2025, https://armsofamerica.com/akm-rivet-set-original-polish-military-imported-rivets/
    30. AK cast trunnion fail on RAS47 – Boom! – AK Operators Union, Local 47-74, accessed June 20, 2025, https://www.akoperatorsunionlocal4774.com/2015/10/ak-cast-trunnion-fail-on-ras47-boom/
    31. Palmetto AK [Archive] – Michigan Gun Owners Community Forum, accessed June 20, 2025, https://www.migunowners.org/forum/archive/index.php/t-464626.html
    32. Rivets – ak builder – Arms of America, accessed June 20, 2025, https://armsofamerica.com/tools-to-build-an-ak/rivets/
    33. Ak-Builder Rivet Tool, accessed June 20, 2025, https://ak-builder.com/index1.php?dispatch=products.view&product_id=29972
    34. AK Trigger Guard Rivet Set – AK-Builder.com, accessed June 20, 2025, https://ak-builder.com/index1.php?dispatch=products.view&product_id=30650
    35. AK Builder Rivet Tool Instructions | PDF – Scribd, accessed June 20, 2025, https://www.scribd.com/document/531377426/AK-Builder-Rivet-Tool-Instructions
    36. AK47 Kitchen build Rear trunnion rivet installation Tothtool.wmv – YouTube, accessed June 20, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U2uiGKwnsyI
    37. ak build tools – Arms of America, accessed June 20, 2025, https://armsofamerica.com/shop-by-category/gunsmithing-tools/
    38. Таблица размеров заклепок: диаметры, длины, параметры установки и расчет зазоров, accessed June 20, 2025, https://inner.su/articles/tablitsy-razmerov-zaklepok-i-parametrov-ustanovki/
    39. Things To Look For When Buying A New AK – Thinline Weapons Wiki, accessed June 20, 2025, https://thinlineweapons.com/wiki/index.php/Things_To_Look_For_When_Buying_A_New_AK
    40. Easy AK47 Build “Homemade”: Front trunnion riveting ~ Step 2 of 6 – YouTube, accessed June 20, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MegvQzASrr4&pp=0gcJCdgAo7VqN5tD
    41. AK-47 Loose Rivet Rebuild Part 1 – YouTube, accessed June 20, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7qKa_yhEtw
    42. Комплект заклепок для боковых планок, Тула – Прицелы ПУ, accessed June 20, 2025, https://puscopes.ru/product/komplekt-zaklepok-dlya-bokovyh-planok-tula/
    43. Марка 10 – ТД «СпецСталь». Свойства, характеристики и применение, accessed June 20, 2025, https://tdspecstal.ru/assortment/spetsialnye-stali-i-splavy/10/
    44. Сталь 10 в России – характеристики, аналоги, свойства, accessed June 20, 2025, https://metatorg.ru/marki-stali-i-splavy/stal_konstruktcionnaya/stal_konstruktsionnaya_uglerodistaya_kachestvennaya/stal_konstruktsionnaya_uglerodistaya_kachestvennaya_10/
    45. Сталь 20: свойства, характеристики, аналоги – Метинвест-СМЦ, accessed June 20, 2025, https://metinvest-smc.com/ru/steel/stal-20/

    AISI 1020 Low Carbon/Low Tensile Steel – AZoM, accessed June 20, 2025, https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=6114


    If you find this post useful, please share the link on Facebook, with your friends, etc. Your support is much appreciated and if you have any feedback, please email me at in**@*********ps.com. Please note that for links to other websites, I may be paid via an affiliate program such as Avantlink, Impact, Amazon and eBay.


    How to insert spark plugs without a dedicated socket

    I was helping my brother in law do some basics on his 2020 Hyundai Kona – oil change, etc. One thing he wanted to do was to put new plugs in. So, we used a Craftsman 5/8″) spark plug socket to remove the plugs and lost the rubber insert along the way. Thus, he had a chance to see a few old school ways to insert a plug down into hole through the valve cover.

    You can use just about any socket to remove a plug – assuming it fits – again the Kona used a 5/8″ socket. With the rubber fitting in the stocket missing, there was nothing to hold the plug position as you lower it down into the opening through the valve cover. (By the way, old guy tip, if you have those rubber fittings, clean it, your socket and then glue it in place so it stays put – silicone glue, rubberized super glue, etc.)

    The teaching question for him was “how do you get the socket down there without hurting the ceramic insulator?” Well, let me tell you two ways and show you a third with a tool you can make.

    Option 1 – hold the plug in the socket and chase the plug down with the socket so it doesn’t have time to fall out. Pro – it works and all you need is the right size deep socket. Con – if you don’t know how to do it you will break the insulator. Not a great option for a newbee.

    Option 2 – use a magnetic pick up tool to start the plug. You literally dangle the plug off the top of one of the plugs by sticking it to one of the rare earth magnet pick up tools. I have done a ton of plugs this way. You lower it down, feel it squarely engage and turn the plug. You can usually just get the thread to start so you can then pull off the tool and use a deep well socket to do the test. Definitely start the plug with your hand and feel the fit to make sure it’s not cross threaded. Pro – a lot of folks have a pick up tool at home. They have saved my bacon many times over the years and want to say I have 3-4 different sized ones. Cons – you need enough experience to feel it is sitting square and start it. I showed my brother in law twice and he got it the second time.

    Option 3 – make an improvised out of fuel line to hold the spark plug and lower it into position. This is an old school trick. 3/8″ fuel line will slide over the insulator and hold the plug. You can then do what you need to do. I take it step further and slide metal shaft part way down to make it a little straighter.

    3/8″ ID fuel line, 3/8″ piece of scrap rod cut to length. I spray the inside with silicone and shove in the rod but stop so there is enough room for the spark plug to go part way in.
    Here it is all done. Use this to start the plug and then tighten down to the torque spec with a socket and torque wrench.

    In all cases, I would recommend you start the plugs by hand – literally use your fingers on the end of the extension shift from the socket to start the plug and make sure it isn’t cross-threaded. Then torque it down with a torque wrench to the published torque spec.

    Summary

    If you need to insert plugs and lack a true spark plug socket, I hope this gives you some options. There are some really nice magnetic sockets for plugs and I bought one later. I bought a Workpro and really like it.


    If you find this post useful, please share the link on Facebook, with your friends, etc. Your support is much appreciated and if you have any feedback, please email me at in**@*********ps.com. Please note that for links to other websites, I may be paid via an affiliate program such as Avantlink, Impact, Amazon and eBay.


    Want a really nice socket with a magnetic spark plug holder built in? I have a few sizes of WorkPro sockets and also Lexivon sockets that have worked great, I bought short and longer ones for those fun hard to reach places.

    Want to trigger me? Call a Romanian PSL a Dragunov!

    I guess we all have our pet peves. One of my many irks is when people call a Romanian PSL rifle a “Dragunov”. I see it all the time on Facebook and GunBroker. Honestly, it bugs the hell out of me. The PSL is an oversized AK for all intents and purposes. The Dragunov is a brilliant Designated Marksman Rifle (DMR) that is it’s own creature. With that said, let’s take a look at the two.

    I. Executive Summary

    The Russian SVD Dragunov and the Romanian PSL are both iconic semi-automatic rifles chambered in the 7.62x54mmR cartridge, designed to serve as Designated Marksman Rifles (DMRs) within Eastern Bloc military doctrines. A common misconception persists that the PSL is merely a direct clone or licensed variant of the SVD. However, a detailed examination reveals that while they share a similar operational role and external appearance, they are fundamentally distinct in their mechanical design and underlying philosophical approaches to firearms development.1

    Figure 1. This is a Russian Dragunov. Note the sleek lines, long handguard, milled receiver, and lack of a protruding rear sight block compared to a PSL. (Obtained from Wikimedia)

    The SVD, or Snayperskaya Vintovka Dragunova, emerged from a dedicated design competition in the Soviet Union, resulting in a purpose-built platform featuring a short-stroke gas piston system and a precisely machined (milled) steel receiver.3 This design reflects a focus on refinement, optimized performance, and a balance between accuracy and battlefield mobility for a squad-level marksman.7 In contrast, the Romanian PSL, or Puşcă Semiautomată cu Lunetă, was developed independently due to geopolitical tensions and Romania’s desire for self-sufficiency in arms production.1 It is essentially a scaled-up and reinforced adaptation of the Kalashnikov/RPK light machine gun platform, utilizing a long-stroke gas piston and a stamped steel receiver.1 This approach prioritized ruggedness, reliability, and cost-effective mass production over the SVD’s more complex and expensive manufacturing processes.9

    Figure 2. This is a PSL. Note the different flash hider, gas block, hand guards, rear sight block, stamped steel magazine, magazine stampong and buttstock design compared to the Dragunov. (Obtained from Wikimedia)

    These fundamental differences in design philosophy and mechanical execution lead to varied performance characteristics, particularly in terms of inherent accuracy and sustained fire capability. While both rifles are designed for engaging man-sized targets at extended ranges, the SVD generally exhibits a higher standard of quality control and consistent accuracy, whereas the PSL, though robust and reliable, may require aftermarket modifications to maximize its precision potential.10 The distinction between these two rifles is not merely academic; it highlights how military doctrine, political autonomy, and industrial capabilities shape the development of firearms, leading to distinct solutions for similar operational requirements.

    II. Introduction: The Role of Designated Marksman Rifles

    The evolution of infantry combat in the mid-20th century revealed a critical gap in the capabilities of standard small arms. While assault rifles, such as the ubiquitous AKM, proved highly effective for close-to-medium range engagements, typically up to 300-400 meters, targets appearing beyond this distance often remained unengaged or required specialized, slower-firing bolt-action sniper rifles.1 This tactical void necessitated an intermediate class of firearm: the Designated Marksman Rifle (DMR).

    DMRs are designed to bridge this gap, providing infantry squads or platoons with an organic capability for increased effective range and precision without resorting to highly specialized sniper teams. Their primary function is to enable engagement of targets beyond the capabilities of standard issue assault rifles, typically out to 600-800 meters, while maintaining a semi-automatic rate of fire to support dynamic battlefield scenarios.1 This role emphasizes “combat accuracy”—the ability to consistently hit man-sized targets quickly and effectively—rather than the extreme sub-Minute of Angle (MOA) precision often associated with Western sniper rifles.8

    The SVD Dragunov and the Romanian PSL stand as two prominent and historically significant examples of this DMR concept, both emerging from the Cold War era to fulfill similar roles within their respective military doctrines. Their development paths, however, diverged significantly, offering a compelling study in firearm design and geopolitical influence.

    III. Historical Development and Design Philosophy

    A. The SVD Dragunov: Soviet Precision and Doctrine

    The SVD Dragunov’s genesis lies in a Soviet military requirement for a new self-loading sniper rifle, initiated through competitive trials spanning from 1958 to 1963.6 This was the third significant attempt to equip Soviet infantry with such a weapon, following earlier efforts like the SVT-40.20 The competition ultimately saw the design by Yevgeny Dragunov emerge victorious, leading to its official adoption on July 3, 1963.6 Dragunov’s background as a factory machinist, senior armorer, and a competitive shooter with extensive experience in sports and target rifle design proved instrumental.20 His unique perspective, honed from years of working with and competing in precision shooting, allowed him to approach the challenge with a fundamentally different philosophy than his competitors, who were more rooted in automatic combat weapon design.20

    The core design philosophy behind the SVD was not to create a Western-style, extreme-precision sniper rifle, but rather a Designated Marksman Rifle (DMR) optimized for “combat accuracy”.8 This meant prioritizing the ability to score effective hits on man-sized targets rapidly, even against moving targets in dynamic battle scenarios, rather than achieving the absolute maximum possible accuracy.18 This doctrinal approach had a profound impact on the SVD’s design choices. For instance, the rifle was initially designed with a relatively thin, “pencil-profile” barrel to save weight, enhancing the marksman’s maneuverability and ability to keep pace with an infantry squad.6 While this design choice compromised some inherent accuracy, it aligned with the Soviet emphasis on a lightweight weapon system for squad support.8 Later, the modernized SVDM variant would feature a heavier barrel to enhance rigidity and harmonics, thereby improving accuracy, indicating a continuous refinement process.7

    Another significant design decision reflecting this doctrine was the change in rifling twist rate. Originally, the SVD featured a 320 mm (1:12.6 in) twist, optimized for heavier civilian ammunition.6 However, in 1975, this was increased to a standard 240 mm (1:9.4 in) twist. This modification, while reducing precision with the dedicated 7N1 sniper cartridge by approximately 19%, was a deliberate choice to allow for acceptable accuracy when using standard “light” ball steel core LPS Gzh ammunition, which was more readily available for general issue and machine guns.6 This adjustment underscores the Soviet emphasis on logistical commonality and battlefield practicality over achieving peak theoretical precision with specialized ammunition. The SVD’s design, therefore, represents a sophisticated balance of precision, reliability, and battlefield utility, tailored to a specific military doctrine that valued effective fire support at the squad level.

    B. The Romanian PSL: An Independent AK-Derived Solution

    The development of the Romanian PSL (Puşcă Semiautomată 7,62 mm cu Lunetă) was born out of a unique geopolitical context that diverged from the unified Warsaw Pact arms development strategy. In August 1968, Romania’s President Nicolae Ceaușescu publicly condemned the Warsaw Pact invasion of Czechoslovakia, a move that significantly strained relations with the Soviet Union and solidified Romania’s independent foreign policy.1 This political rift directly influenced Romania’s military industrial complex. To reduce its reliance on Soviet military equipment and foster national self-sufficiency, Romania accelerated the development of its own small-arms production capabilities.1

    When the Soviets proved hesitant to share the detailed specifications for their SVD Dragunov, Romania embarked on an independent project to develop its own semi-automatic designated marksman rifle.9 The PSL was officially launched in 1974, leveraging Romania’s existing and well-established small-arms manufacturing infrastructure.1 Critically, instead of attempting to reverse-engineer or replicate the SVD’s complex, purpose-built design, Romanian engineers opted for a pragmatic approach: adapting a proven domestic platform. The PSL’s design is fundamentally based on the PM md. 64 light machine gun, which itself was a licensed copy of the Soviet RPK, an enlarged variant of the AKM.1 This means the PSL belongs to the Kalashnikov family of weapons, sharing many of its core operational principles.17

    The Romanian design priorities for the PSL emphasized ruggedness, reliability, and cost-effective mass production.9 Unlike the SVD’s milled receiver, the PSL utilizes a stamped sheet steel receiver, similar to the RPK, but reinforced with a “bulged” front trunnion to accommodate the more powerful 7.62x54mmR cartridge.1 This choice of stamped construction made the PSL cheaper and easier to mass-produce compared to the SVD’s more labor-intensive milled design.9 The internal mechanism, being familiar to troops trained on AK-pattern rifles, also meant a shorter training period for designated marksmen.17 The PSL’s development therefore stands as a compelling illustration of how political autonomy and economic realities can drive distinct military hardware solutions, even when fulfilling a similar operational role and sharing a common cartridge type. The result is a robust, reliable, and widely distributed rifle that, while cosmetically similar to the SVD, is mechanically a different weapon system.

    IV. Technical Specifications and Mechanical Differences

    Despite their superficial resemblance and shared 7.62x54mmR cartridge, the SVD Dragunov and Romanian PSL exhibit profound mechanical differences that stem from their distinct design philosophies and manufacturing approaches. These divergences impact everything from their internal operation to their accuracy potential and logistical considerations.

    A. Operating Mechanism and Receiver Design

    The most fundamental mechanical distinction between the SVD and PSL lies in their operating mechanisms and receiver construction. The SVD employs a short-stroke gas piston system.3 In this design, a separate gas piston impacts a pusher, which in turn drives the bolt carrier rearward, but the piston itself does not travel the full length of the receiver with the bolt carrier.3 This approach minimizes the mass of reciprocating parts, contributing to reduced felt recoil and potentially better accuracy by reducing the disturbance to the rifle’s harmonics during the firing cycle.3 The SVD’s receiver is precisely machined from a solid block of steel (milled), providing a rigid and stable platform for the barrel and operating components.2 This manufacturing method, while more costly and time-consuming, enhances the rifle’s inherent precision and durability.

    In stark contrast, the PSL utilizes a long-stroke gas piston system, a hallmark of the Kalashnikov family of weapons.1 In this system, the gas piston is permanently attached to the bolt carrier, and the entire assembly travels the full length of the receiver during the operating cycle. While this design is renowned for its exceptional reliability and robustness, it involves a larger and heavier mass of reciprocating parts, which can introduce more vibration and impact accuracy, particularly during rapid fire.10 The PSL’s receiver is constructed from stamped sheet steel, similar to the RPK light machine gun, but it is “beefed up” and reinforced, particularly at the front trunnion, to handle the more powerful 7.62x54mmR cartridge.1 This stamped construction is significantly less expensive and faster to produce than a milled receiver, aligning with Romania’s emphasis on mass production and cost-effectiveness. The choice of these differing core mechanical architectures highlights the distinct design philosophies: the SVD as a purpose-built precision instrument, and the PSL as a pragmatic, robust adaptation of an existing, reliable platform.

    B. Barrel Characteristics

    Both rifles feature chrome-lined bores, a common practice in Eastern Bloc firearms to enhance corrosion resistance and extend barrel life, especially when using corrosive surplus ammunition.6 However, their barrel profiles and rifling twist rates present notable differences impacting accuracy.

    The original SVD was designed with a relatively thin, “pencil-profile” barrel to minimize overall weight, a crucial consideration for a rifle intended for squad-level mobility.6 While this contributed to a lighter weapon, it inherently limited the barrel’s rigidity and its ability to dissipate heat effectively during sustained firing, which can negatively affect accuracy. Recognizing this, later modernized variants like the SVDM incorporated a heavier barrel profile to enhance rigidity and improve barrel harmonics, thereby boosting accuracy.7 The SVD’s rifling twist rate also saw an evolution. Initially, it was 320 mm (1:12.6 in), optimized for heavier civilian ammunition.6 However, in 1975, the twist rate was standardized to 240 mm (1:9.4 in). This change, while reportedly reducing precision with the dedicated 7N1 sniper cartridge by 19%, allowed for acceptable accuracy with standard “light” ball steel core LPS Gzh ammunition, reflecting a pragmatic compromise for logistical commonality.6

    The PSL also features a chrome-lined barrel, typically with a 1:10 twist rate.9 However, a significant characteristic of the PSL’s barrel is its relatively thin profile.10 This design choice, likely influenced by weight considerations and manufacturing simplicity, has a direct and pronounced impact on its sustained accuracy. Reports indicate that the PSL’s thin barrel heats up rapidly, causing groups to widen considerably after firing as few as 3 to 5 rounds.13 This makes the PSL less suitable for prolonged rapid-fire engagements where consistent precision is paramount, highlighting a practical limitation of its design when compared to the SVD’s more robust barrel characteristics, especially in later variants.

    C. Magazine Design and Interchangeability

    Both the SVD and PSL are chambered for the same powerful 7.62x54mm Russian rimmed cartridge and are fed from 10-round detachable box magazines.1 This shared ammunition and capacity often leads to the mistaken assumption that their magazines are interchangeable. However, this is a critical point of divergence: the magazines are not interchangeable between the Dragunov and PSL without significant modification.1

    This incompatibility stems directly from their fundamentally different receiver designs and internal dimensions. The SVD, being a purpose-built design with a milled receiver, has a magazine well precisely machined to fit its specific magazines. In contrast, the PSL, as an enlarged AK/RPK variant, adapted its magazine well to accommodate its scaled-up Kalashnikov-style internals. Visually, PSL magazines are distinguishable by a characteristic X-shaped pattern stamped on their sides, whereas Russian and Chinese SVD magazines typically feature a waffle-style stamp.1 This seemingly minor detail carries significant logistical implications for military forces or civilian users who might operate both rifle types, as it necessitates separate supply chains for magazines despite the shared ammunition. The non-interchangeability of magazines serves as a tangible illustration of the deep mechanical differences between the two platforms, reinforcing that the PSL is not simply a “Romanian Dragunov” but a distinct weapon system.

    D. Optics and Mounting Systems

    Both the SVD and PSL were designed to be used primarily with optical sights, reflecting their role as designated marksman rifles. They share a common philosophy of side-mounted optics, a characteristic of Eastern Bloc firearms, which allows for the use of iron sights even when the optic is mounted.18

    The SVD is typically issued with the PSO-1 (or later PSO-1M2) optical sight.3 This 4x magnification scope features a distinctive reticle that includes a stadiametric rangefinder for estimating target distance, chevrons for bullet drop compensation (BDC) at various ranges, and horizontal marks for windage adjustments.22 The PSO-1 is designed to mount to a Warsaw Pact rail on the left side of the SVD’s receiver. This mounting system is engineered to allow for the optic’s removal and reattachment without a significant loss of zero, a crucial feature for field maintenance and transport.18 The SVD’s milled receiver provides a robust and stable base for this rail, contributing to consistent optic performance.

    The PSL is typically equipped with the LPS 4×6° TIP2 scope (Lunetă Pușcă Semiautomată Tip 2).1 This optic is a simplified version of the Russian PSO-1, sharing a similar basic design, 4x magnification, and the distinctive stadiametric rangefinder and BDC reticle features.1 It also mounts to a riveted side rail on the left side of the PSL’s stamped receiver.1 While the shared design philosophy of integrated rangefinding and BDC aims for rapid target engagement without complex calculations, there can be differences in optical quality and consistency. Some reports indicate that the LPS optics found on PSLs may be “dim and hazy” compared to the PSO-1.4 The PSL’s riveted rail on a stamped receiver, while functional, may not offer the same inherent rigidity and stability as the SVD’s integrated rail on a milled receiver, potentially impacting the consistency of zero retention over time, though the side rail concept itself is designed for repeatable mounting.18 The differences in optical quality and mounting stability reflect the differing manufacturing standards and the overall refinement levels of each nation’s arms industry.

    E. Other Key Distinctions

    Beyond the major differences in operating mechanisms, receivers, barrels, and magazines, several other mechanical distinctions contribute to the overall character and performance of the SVD and PSL:

    • Trigger Groups: The SVD features a more refined and easily removable trigger mechanism.3 This design contributes to a smoother and lighter trigger pull, which is beneficial for precision shooting. In contrast, the PSL, being derived from the AK platform, utilizes a fire control group that is more akin to the standard Kalashnikov design.3 While robust and reliable, these triggers are often characterized by a military-grade coarseness, with some creep and grittiness, which can be less conducive to achieving maximum accuracy.10
    • Gas Regulation: The SVD incorporates a two-position adjustable gas regulator.6 This feature allows the operator to fine-tune the gas system to compensate for varying environmental conditions (such as fouling in the gas port, extreme cold, or high altitude) or to optimize performance with different ammunition types. This adjustability helps maintain consistent recoil impulse and reliability. The PSL, however, typically has a non-adjustable gas system.1 This lack of adjustability can lead to issues, particularly when using heavier ammunition (147 grain or greater) or silencers, as the increased gas pressure can cause excessive wear, including bolt carrier cracking.1 To mitigate these issues, aftermarket adjustable gas pistons are a common and recommended modification for PSL owners.1 This difference underscores the SVD’s more optimized design for its cartridge compared to the PSL’s adaptation of an existing platform.
    • Bolt Hold-Open: The SVD features a last-round bolt hold-open mechanism, which keeps the bolt open after the last cartridge in the magazine has been fired.6 This is a valuable feature for military applications as it provides immediate feedback to the operator that the rifle is empty and facilitates faster reloads. While military-specification PSLs generally incorporate this feature, some civilian import versions may lack it due to modifications made to comply with import laws.1

    These cumulative differences highlight the engineering trade-offs inherent in each design. The SVD’s features reflect a commitment to optimizing performance and adaptability for its specific role, while the PSL’s design reflects a pragmatic approach of adapting existing, proven technology, even if it means some inherent limitations or the need for user-level modifications to achieve optimal performance.

    V. Performance Analysis: Accuracy and Operational Range

    The performance of the SVD Dragunov and Romanian PSL is best understood within the context of their intended role as Designated Marksman Rifles, rather than traditional precision sniper rifles. Both were designed for “combat accuracy”—the ability to consistently hit man-sized targets in dynamic battlefield conditions—rather than achieving minute-of-angle (MOA) groups typically expected from dedicated Western sniper platforms.9

    A. Accuracy at 500 meters and 1,000 meters

    Evaluating the accuracy of these rifles at 500 and 1,000 meters requires distinguishing between factory specifications, optimal conditions with match-grade ammunition, and practical performance with standard military ball ammunition.

    SVD Dragunov Accuracy:

    Factory inspection requirements for the SVD were stringent for its class, mandating a median deviation of no more than 0.7 MOA in three 10-shot groups when using the dedicated 7N1 sniper ammunition.6 This translates to an approximate overall accuracy of 3 MOA under factory test conditions.6 More specifically, with 7N1 sniper cartridges, the extreme vertical spread was required to be no more than 1.24 MOA (with a 240 mm twist rate barrel) or 1.04 MOA (with a 320 mm twist rate barrel) in 5-shot groups.22 However, when using standard 57-N-323S cartridges (light ball), the precision of the SVD is notably reduced to approximately 2.21 MOA extreme vertical spread.22 U.S. military tests and Soviet technical bulletins further indicate a requirement for the SVD to hold a 14.7-inch group at 600 meters (approximately 2.3 MOA) with standard ball ammunition.19 This level of accuracy is considered acceptable for engaging man-sized targets at these distances. While the SVD can achieve hits at 1,000 meters, its design is not optimized for consistent precision at such extreme ranges. An experimental prototype, the SVK, chambered in 6x49mm, was developed to offer nearly a fourfold accuracy improvement over the SVD at 1,000 meters, underscoring the SVD’s inherent limitations at that distance.7

    Romanian PSL Accuracy:

    The PSL is often cited as being capable of 1 Minute of Angle (MOA) or less under ideal conditions.1 However, this potential is frequently hampered by practical limitations. A significant issue is the PSL’s relatively thin barrel, which heats up quickly, causing groups to widen considerably after only 3 to 5 rounds.13 This makes sustained precision fire challenging. Furthermore, the lack of an adjustable gas system can lead to issues like bolt carriers cracking when using heavier ball (147 grain or greater) ammunition or suppressors, due to excessive gas pressure.1 Despite these challenges, with proper tuning, such as the installation of an aftermarket adjustable gas piston (like the KNS piston), and selection of specific ammunition (e.g., 150-grain or 180+ grain loads), the PSL has demonstrated the capability to make 500-yard shots with ease, with some reports indicating its accuracy can be “on par with the Drag”.12 It is consistently emphasized that the PSL, like the SVD, is a DMR intended for hitting man-sized targets, not a precision competition rifle.9 For example, tests at 300 yards showed the PSL capable of a 10-shot rapid-fire group, and with specific match ammunition, it could achieve groups near 1.5 MOA.11

    Comparative Assessment:

    At 500 meters, both rifles are capable of engaging man-sized targets. The SVD, particularly with 7N1 sniper ammunition, is generally more consistently accurate out of the box due to its higher quality control and more refined design.10 Its factory specifications and military requirements suggest a reliable capability for hits within 2-3 MOA at this range.19 The PSL, while capable of similar or even better initial accuracy with optimal ammunition and tuning, suffers from rapid barrel heating, which significantly degrades its sustained accuracy after a few shots.13 Therefore, for a single, well-aimed shot at 500 meters, both can perform, but the SVD offers greater consistency across multiple shots and varying ammunition types without modifications.

    At 1,000 meters, neither rifle is considered a true precision sniper rifle in the Western sense. While their optical sights (PSO-1/LPS) have bullet drop compensation markings up to 1,000 meters or beyond, and their cartridges possess the ballistic energy to reach these distances, achieving consistent, precise hits on man-sized targets becomes significantly more challenging.1 The SVD’s limitations at 1,000 meters are acknowledged by the development of the SVK prototype, which aimed for a fourfold accuracy improvement at this range.7 For the PSL, its thin barrel and inherent design limitations make consistent accuracy at 1,000 meters highly improbable without extensive modifications and specialized ammunition, even then it would be considered an extreme shot.10 In practical terms, neither rifle is reliably accurate for precision work at 1,000 meters, though engaging area targets or suppressing fire might be possible.

    B. Realistic Operational Range

    The realistic operational range for a designated marksman rifle is the distance at which a trained operator can consistently achieve effective hits on typical battlefield targets (e.g., a man-sized silhouette) under combat conditions.

    SVD Dragunov:

    The SVD’s sighting systems are graduated for considerable distances: 1,300 meters with the optical sight and 1,200 meters with the iron sights.27 However, its maximum effective range is widely cited as 800 meters.19 This 800-meter range aligns with Soviet sniping doctrine, which focused on accurate engagement of multiple high-profile targets within this distance.19 The SVD is designed for a muzzle velocity of 830 m/s with standard ammunition.27 The rifle’s “killing range” is theoretically listed at 3,800 meters, but this refers to the maximum projectile flight distance, not effective accuracy.15 For direct fire, the SVD has a direct fire range of 350m for a 30cm head figure, 430m for a 50cm chest figure, and 640m for a 150cm running figure.32

    Romanian PSL:

    The PSL’s effective firing range is generally stated to be between 800 and 1,000 meters.30 Its LPS 4×6° TIP2 optical sight features bullet drop compensation out to 1,000 meters.1 Similar to the SVD, the PSL has a theoretical maximum firing range (killing effect) of approximately 3,000 to 3,800 meters.15 With a muzzle velocity of 830 m/s using a 10-gram projectile (7N14) 30, its ballistic performance is comparable to the SVD. Romanian military doctrine for the PSL, like the SVD, focused on its role as a squad-level DMR to engage targets beyond the capabilities of standard assault rifles, typically between 400 and 800 meters.15

    Conclusion on Operational Range:

    Both the SVD and PSL are realistically effective at engaging man-sized targets out to approximately 800 meters under typical battlefield conditions. While their optics and ammunition allow for shots at greater distances, consistent hits on individual targets become increasingly difficult beyond this range due to ballistic limitations, rifle characteristics (like barrel heating in the PSL), and the inherent precision requirements for such shots. Their design and doctrinal role align with providing extended-range fire support within the capabilities of a standard infantry squad, rather than engaging targets at extreme “sniper” distances.

    VI. Design Superiority and Practicality

    Assessing the “superior design” between the SVD Dragunov and the Romanian PSL is nuanced, as each rifle represents a different set of design priorities and compromises. The determination of superiority often depends on the specific criteria being evaluated: refinement, reliability, manufacturing cost, and maintenance.

    Refinement:

    The SVD is widely considered the more refined design.2 Its purpose-built nature, featuring a precisely milled receiver and a short-stroke gas piston system, contributes to a smoother operation, reduced reciprocating mass, and better inherent accuracy potential.3 The SVD’s trigger mechanism is also noted for being more refined and easily removable.3 This level of engineering and manufacturing precision typically results in a weapon that feels more “tight” and consistent. The PSL, being an adaptation of the RPK/AKM platform, exhibits a “military-grade coarseness” in its construction.9 While robust, its stamped receiver and long-stroke gas system, though beefed up, operate closer to their mechanical limits when firing the powerful 7.62x54mmR cartridge, leading to less inherent refinement in its action.10

    Reliability:

    Both rifles are renowned for their reliability, a hallmark of Eastern Bloc small arms designs. The PSL, benefiting from its Kalashnikov heritage, has a well-earned reputation for ruggedness and reliability, performing well even in extreme field environments.10 Its simpler, more robust long-stroke gas system is inherently forgiving of fouling and harsh conditions. The SVD also boasts legendary reliability, having undergone rigorous torture testing in various climatic conditions to ensure flawless performance.42 While the PSL’s non-adjustable gas system can lead to issues with heavy ammunition or suppressors, requiring aftermarket modifications 1, its basic operating reliability remains high. In terms of sheer ability to function under adverse conditions, both are highly dependable, though the PSL’s simplicity might give it a slight edge in raw field ruggedness for the average soldier.

    Manufacturing Cost:

    The PSL is significantly less expensive to produce than the SVD.9 This cost difference is a direct result of their differing manufacturing methods. The SVD’s milled receiver and more complex, purpose-built components require more machining time and higher material costs.2 In contrast, the PSL’s stamped receiver and adaptation of existing AK/RPK tooling allowed for more cost-effective mass production, a key Romanian design priority.9 This cost advantage made the PSL a more accessible option for many nations and for civilian markets, especially when compared to the scarcity and high price of genuine SVDs.2

    Maintenance:

    Both rifles are designed for relatively easy field maintenance, a common characteristic of Soviet and Warsaw Pact firearms, often described as “Ivan-proof”.16 Disassembly and reassembly procedures for both are straightforward, allowing for routine cleaning and lubrication in the field.17 The PSL’s AK-derived design means its maintenance procedures are familiar to anyone accustomed to Kalashnikov-pattern rifles.9 The SVD’s trigger group is notably easy to remove for maintenance.3 The adjustable gas system on the SVD also simplifies maintenance by allowing the operator to compensate for fouling or extreme cold.6 While both are robust, the PSL’s inherent simplicity, being an enlarged AK, might be perceived as marginally easier to maintain for a general infantryman without specialized training.

    Overall Assessment of Superiority:

    There is no single “superior” design; rather, each excels in different areas based on its original intent.

    • The SVD Dragunov is generally considered the superior design in terms of inherent precision, refinement, and optimized performance for its designated role.2 Its purpose-built architecture and higher manufacturing standards contribute to more consistent accuracy and a more refined shooting experience. It represents a dedicated engineering solution to the DMR problem.
    • The Romanian PSL is superior in terms of cost-effectiveness, ease of mass production, and raw rugged reliability.9 It is a highly successful pragmatic adaptation of an existing, proven platform, making it a robust and widely available solution for forces requiring an extended-range semi-automatic rifle without the higher investment of the SVD.

    Therefore, if the priority is maximum inherent accuracy and refinement, the SVD is the superior design. If the priority is widespread issuance, cost-effectiveness, and robust reliability under demanding conditions, the PSL presents a highly effective and practical solution.

    VII. Global Adoption and Variants

    Both the SVD Dragunov and the Romanian PSL have seen extensive military service globally, particularly within the former Eastern Bloc and among nations that received Soviet or Romanian military aid. Their widespread use underscores their effectiveness in the designated marksman role.

    A. SVD Dragunov: Military Users and Variants

    The SVD Dragunov, having entered service with the Soviet Army in 1963, quickly became the standard squad support weapon for numerous countries, especially those of the former Warsaw Pact.6 Its robust design and effective performance ensured its continued relevance across decades of conflict.

    Current and Former Military Users:

    The SVD has been widely adopted by state forces across various regions.28 Notable users include:

    • Russia: Continues to use and upgrade the SVD, with newer SVDM variants being issued.45
    • Former Soviet Republics: Including Kazakhstan 46, Ukraine 45, and Moldova.
    • Eastern Europe: Hungary 46, East Germany (issued as SWD) 6, Czechoslovakia (entered service in the 1970s).6
    • Middle East & North Africa: Iraq 2, Syria 46, Egypt.
    • Asia: China (produced under license as Type 79 and 85) 6, Vietnam.
    • Other: Afghanistan.47

    The SVD has been used in numerous conflicts, including the Vietnam War, Soviet-Afghan War, Iran-Iraq War, Iraq War, Syrian Civil War, and the ongoing Russo-Ukrainian War.6 Non-state actors, such as the Islamic State and Lord’s Resistance Army, have also utilized SVDs.6

    Figure 3. Nigerien solider calling himself “Romeo” poses for VOA Africa at Camp Assaga, Diffa, Niger. Photo by the Voice of America and obtained via Wikimedia.

    Notable Variants:

    • SVD (Original, Russia): The foundational model, characterized by its skeletal stock and long, narrow profile.28
    • SVDS (Russia): A variant featuring a tubular, folding stock, designed for paratroopers.28
    • SVDK (Russia): Resembles the SVDS but is rechambered to fire a larger 9.3x64mm cartridge, intended for targets in heavy body armor or behind cover.28
    • SVU (Russia): A ‘bullpup’ version of the SVD, reconfigured with the magazine behind the trigger assembly to reduce overall length.22
    • Type 79 / NDM-86 (China): Chinese copies of the SVD, visually identical to the original; differentiation often requires checking manufacturer markings.2 The NDM-86 was also produced in 7.62x51mm NATO for export.3
    • Al-Kadesih (Iraq): An Iraqi variant distinguishable by a palm tree embossed on the magazine.28

    B. Romanian PSL: Military Users and Variants

    The PSL, introduced into Romanian military service in 1974, has also achieved significant global distribution due to its robust design and cost-effectiveness.1

    Current and Former Military Users:

    The PSL was adopted by all branches of the Romanian Army, internal troops, and police units.1 Its export success led to widespread use in various regions:

    • Romania: Primary user since 1974.1
    • Middle East & North Africa: Iraq (5,000 delivered to Republican Guards in 1978) 1, Iran 17, Libya (including Anti-Gaddafi forces) 1, Syria 17, Egypt.1
    • Africa: Eritrea 1, Ethiopia 1, Angola 17, Republic of Congo, Democratic Republic of Congo, Uganda.17
    • Asia: Afghanistan 1, Bangladesh 1, North Korea 17, Pakistan 17, Vietnam.17
    • Europe: East Germany 1, Republic of Moldova.17
    • Central America: Nicaragua.17 The PSL has been employed in numerous conflicts, including the Angolan Civil War, Iran-Iraq War, Gulf War, War in Afghanistan, Syrian Civil War, and the ongoing conflict in Donbas.17
    Figure 4, An Afghan National Army soldier uses a PSL rifle during a demonstration to display weaponry and communicatons capabilities at Camp Joyce, Afghanistan, Feb. 12, 2008. (U.S. Army photo by Spc. Jordan Carter) (Released). (Photo from Wikimedia)

    Notable Variants:

    • PSL 54 (Romania): The standard semi-automatic military version, chambered in 7.62x54R.1
    • PSL 51 (Romania): A semi-automatic version chambered in 7.62x51mm NATO, primarily for export.15
    • PL (Romania): A repeating (bolt-action) version chambered in 7.62x51mm NATO.15
    • PSL-54C / Romak III / FPK / FPK Dragunov / SSG-97 (Export): These are sporting versions intended for the export market, particularly the United States. They are largely identical to the military version but feature modifications to comply with import laws, such as the removal of the bayonet lug and receiver modifications (e.g., two trigger mechanism axis pin holes instead of three).1 The “FPK Dragunov” designation is purely commercial and does not imply mechanical commonality with the SVD.1

    VIII. Summary Table of Major Features

    The following table provides a concise comparison of the key features of the SVD Dragunov and the Romanian PSL, highlighting their similarities and fundamental differences.

    FeatureSVD Dragunov (Russia)Romanian PSL (Puşcă Semiautomată cu Lunetă)
    TypeDesignated Marksman Rifle (DMR), Sniper RifleDesignated Marksman Rifle (DMR)
    Place of OriginSoviet Union (Russia)Romania
    In Service1963–present 61974–present 30
    DesignerYevgeny Dragunov 21Romania – Cugir 31
    Operating MechanismGas-operated, Short-Stroke Gas Piston, Rotating Bolt 3Gas-operated, Long-Stroke Gas Piston, Rotating Bolt 1
    Receiver TypeMilled Steel 2Stamped Sheet Steel (RPK-type, reinforced) 1
    Caliber7.62x54mmR (original), 9.3x64mm (SVDK variant) 287.62x54mmR (original), 7.62x51mm NATO (export variant) 1
    Muzzle Velocity830 m/s 27830 m/s 30
    Weight (unloaded, with optical sight)4.3 kg 274.31 kg 30 (4.9 kg with mag & scope, no bayonet 15)
    Length (without bayonet)1220 mm 271150 mm 30
    Barrel Length620 mm 28620 mm 24
    Barrel ProfileOriginally thin, later heavier (SVDM) 6Relatively thin 10
    Barrel Rifling Twist240 mm (1:9.4 in) (since 1975) 61:10″ (254 mm) 24 (some sources 320mm 31)
    Magazine Capacity10 rounds, detachable box 2710 rounds, detachable box 1
    Magazine InterchangeabilityNot interchangeable with PSL magazines 1Not interchangeable with SVD magazines 1
    Standard OpticPSO-1 / PSO-1M2 (4x) 22LPS 4×6° TIP2 (4x) 1
    Gas SystemAdjustable (two-position) 6Non-adjustable 1
    Bolt Hold-OpenYes (last round) 6Yes (military spec), some civilian imports lack it 1
    Factory Accuracy (7N1 ammo)~1.04-1.24 MOA (5-shot groups, extreme vertical spread) 22Capable of 1 MOA or less (but with caveats) 1
    Effective Firing Range800 m 29800–1,000 m 30
    Max Sighting Range (optic)1300 m 271300 m 15
    Notable VariantsSVDS, SVDK, SVU, Type 79, Al-Kadesih 28PSL-54C, Romak III, FPK, SSG-97 (export) 1
    Countries Used In (Examples)Russia, Ukraine, Iraq, China, Hungary, Syria 6Romania, Iraq, Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Libya, Eritrea 1
    Manufacturing CostHigher (milled receiver) 43Lower (stamped receiver) 9

    IX. Conclusion

    The comparative analysis of the Russian SVD Dragunov and the Romanian PSL reveals two distinct yet functionally similar Designated Marksman Rifles, each a product of unique design philosophies and geopolitical circumstances. The common perception of the PSL as a mere “Romanian Dragunov” is a misnomer, as the rifles are mechanically dissimilar, sharing only their ammunition, optical philosophy, and a general aesthetic.1

    The SVD Dragunov stands as a testament to Soviet engineering, purpose-built from the ground up to fulfill a specific doctrinal role: providing squad-level marksmen with rapid, effective fire at extended ranges. Its short-stroke gas piston system and precisely milled receiver reflect a commitment to refinement and inherent accuracy, balancing these qualities with the need for battlefield mobility.3 The evolution of its barrel profile and twist rate further illustrates a pragmatic approach to optimizing performance across various ammunition types and operational conditions.6

    In contrast, the Romanian PSL emerged from a different set of imperatives. Driven by political autonomy and a desire to reduce reliance on Soviet military hardware, Romania leveraged its existing Kalashnikov/RPK manufacturing capabilities to create an indigenous DMR.1 The PSL’s long-stroke gas piston system and reinforced stamped receiver, while less refined than the SVD, embody ruggedness, reliability, and cost-effective mass production.1 This approach made the PSL a highly practical and widely distributed solution, demonstrating how economic and political factors can lead to distinct, yet effective, designs for similar military requirements.

    In terms of performance, both rifles are effective within their designated roles for engaging man-sized targets out to approximately 800 meters. While the SVD generally offers more consistent out-of-the-box accuracy due to higher quality control and a more stable design, the PSL, with proper ammunition and potential aftermarket modifications, can achieve comparable initial precision.10 However, the PSL’s thin barrel and non-adjustable gas system present limitations for sustained fire and use with heavier ammunition or suppressors, highlighting areas where its adapted design reaches its practical limits.1

    Ultimately, the SVD Dragunov represents a dedicated, optimized design for a designated marksman rifle, emphasizing a balance of precision and battlefield utility. The Romanian PSL, while often overshadowed by its Russian counterpart, is a highly successful and reliable adaptation, prioritizing affordability and robust performance through a pragmatic application of existing technology. Both rifles have proven their worth in numerous conflicts worldwide, solidifying their legacy as iconic examples of Eastern Bloc DMRs.

    In short, please don’t refer to a PSL as a Dragunov!

    Image Sources

    Main Image is “SVD and SVDS sniper rifles at Engineering Technologies 2012” Obtained from Wikimedia. Author is Mike1979 Russia. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:SVD_and_SVDS_sniper_rifles_at_Engineering_Technologies_2012.jpg

    Figure 1 is from Wikimedia and the authors is Hokos. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:SVD_Dragunov.jpg

    Figure 2 is from Wikimedia and the author is Verein der Freunde und Förderer der Wehrtechnischen Studiensammlung Koblenz e. V. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dragunow_sniper_rifle_at_Wehrtechnische_Studiensammlung_Koblenz.jpg

    Figure 3 is a Nigerien solider calling himself “Romeo” poses for VOA Africa at Camp Assaga, Diffa, Niger. Photo by the Voice of America and obtained via Wikimedia. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Nigerian_sniper.jpg

    Figure 4 an Afghan National Army soldier uses a PSL rifle during a demonstration to display weaponry and communicatons capabilities at Camp Joyce, Afghanistan, Feb. 12, 2008. (U.S. Army photo by Spc. Jordan Carter) (Released). Photo from Wikimedia.https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Afghan_National_Army_soldier_with_PSL_rifle.jpg

    Works Cited

    1. PSL (rifle) – Wikipedia, accessed May 26, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PSL_(rifle)
    2. PSL: Don’t Call This Dangerous Gun a ‘Sniper Rifle’ – The National Interest, accessed May 26, 2025, https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/psl-dont-call-dangerous-gun-sniper-rifle-163637/
    3. Dragunov – The Firing Line Forums, accessed May 26, 2025, https://thefiringline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=478192
    4. Opinions On The Dragunov – The Firing Line Forums, accessed May 26, 2025, https://thefiringline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=299050
    5. Gun Review: Romanian PSL-54C Rifle in 7.62x54R – Athlon Outdoors, accessed May 26, 2025, https://athlonoutdoors.com/article/romanian-psl-54c-7-62x54r/
    6. SVD (rifle) – Wikipedia, accessed May 26, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SVD_(rifle)
    7. Dragunov V-70, The Automatic SVD | thefirearmblog.com, accessed May 26, 2025, https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/dragunov-v-70-the-automatic-svd-44819068
    8. All the variants of the SVD Dragunov [686 × 888] : r/MilitaryPorn – Reddit, accessed May 26, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/MilitaryPorn/comments/dx7c75/all_the_variants_of_the_svd_dragunov_686_888/
    9. Review: Century Arms PSL 54 | An Official Journal Of The NRA, accessed May 26, 2025, https://www.americanrifleman.org/content/review-century-arms-psl-54/
    10. Rifle Dynamics PSL – SWAT Survival | Weapons | Tactics, accessed May 26, 2025, https://www.swatmag.com/article/rifle-dynamics-psl/
    11. Taking the PSL to the Next Level – Small Arms Review, accessed May 26, 2025, https://archive.smallarmsreview.com/display.article.cfm?idarticles=1449
    12. Which to get : Romanian PSL or a Russian Tigr? – Other AK Rifles – forum.Saiga-12.com, accessed May 26, 2025, http://forum.saiga-12.com/index.php?/topic/64742-which-to-get-romanian-psl-or-a-russian-tigr/
    13. Opinion on the PSL? : r/ak47 – Reddit, accessed May 26, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ak47/comments/1elizx6/opinion_on_the_psl/
    14. PSL – Drive A Tank, accessed May 26, 2025, https://www.driveatank.com/armory/psl/
    15. Pușcă Semiautomată Cu Lunetă | PDF – Scribd, accessed May 26, 2025, https://ro.scribd.com/document/365735386/Pu%C8%99c%C4%83-Semiautomat%C4%83-Cu-Lunet%C4%83
    16. Opinions on Dragunov rifle ? [Archive] – The Firing Line Forums, accessed May 26, 2025, https://thefiringline.com/forums/archive/index.php?t-185694.html
    17. Pușcă semiautomată cu lunetă – Wikipedia, accessed May 26, 2025, https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pu%C8%99c%C4%83_semiautomat%C4%83_cu_lunet%C4%83
    18. Concepts – RussianOptics, accessed May 26, 2025, https://russianoptics.net/Concepts.html
    19. Terrorist Snipers: What Are They Really Capable Of? – SWAT Survival | Weapons | Tactics, accessed May 26, 2025, https://www.swatmag.com/article/terrorist-snipers-really-capable/
    20. Первая в мире. Снайперская винтовка Драгунова | Оружейный …, accessed May 26, 2025, https://www.kalashnikov.ru/pervaya-v-mire-snajperskaya-vintovka-dragunova/
    21. Yevgeny Dragunov – Wikipedia, accessed May 26, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yevgeny_Dragunov
    22. SVD (rifle) – Wikiwand, accessed May 26, 2025, https://www.wikiwand.com/en/articles/SVD_(rifle)
    23. PSL /svd clone prices ever coming down, should I buy now? : r/guns – Reddit, accessed May 26, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/guns/comments/1aoek8c/psl_svd_clone_prices_ever_coming_down_should_i/
    24. ROMANIAN PSL 7.62X54R 7.62 x 54r-RI035-N – mahindra arms, accessed May 26, 2025, https://mahindra-arms.com/romanian-psl-762x54r-762-x-54r.html
    25. Century Arms PSL 54 Rifle – Shark Coast Tactical, accessed May 26, 2025, https://sharkcoasttactical.com/product/century-arms-psl-54-rifle/
    26. PSL-54c First Shots: Testing Accuracy – YouTube, accessed May 26, 2025, https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=JovqDsQQAY0&pp=ygUFI2w1NGM%3D
    27. 7.62-mm SVD DRAGUNOV SNIPER RIFLE. TECHNICAL …, accessed May 26, 2025, http://club.guns.ru/manual/svd/
    28. www.smallarmssurvey.org, accessed May 26, 2025, https://www.smallarmssurvey.org/sites/default/files/SAS_weapons-sniper-rifles-DragunovSVD.pdf
    29. Dragunov SVDS | Weaponsystems.net, accessed May 26, 2025, https://weaponsystems.net/system/487-Dragunov+SVDS
    30. PSL (rifle) – Wikiwand, accessed May 26, 2025, https://www.wikiwand.com/en/articles/PSL_(rifle)
    31. PSL | Weaponsystems.net, accessed May 26, 2025, https://weaponsystems.net/system/488-PSL
    32. Снайперская винтовка Драгунова – Википедия, accessed May 26, 2025, https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BF%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BA%D0%B0_%D0%94%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B3%D1%83%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0
    33. Снайперская винтовка Драгунова СВД – Стрелковое оружие, accessed May 26, 2025, https://jollyroger666.narod.ru/vintovki/svd.html
    34. PSL (винтовка) – Википедия, accessed May 26, 2025, https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/PSL_(%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BA%D0%B0)
    35. Ranging the SVD Sniper. Incase you already didn’t know. : r/ArmaReforger – Reddit, accessed May 26, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ArmaReforger/comments/1icw0tn/ranging_the_svd_sniper_incase_you_already_didnt/
    36. DRAGUNOV SVD – Military world – WordPress.com, accessed May 26, 2025, https://mysnipersworld.wordpress.com/2019/10/24/dragunov-svd/
    37. Getting a PSL, anything I should know besides it being century arms? : r/ak47 – Reddit, accessed May 26, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ak47/comments/zkq3sd/getting_a_psl_anything_i_should_know_besides_it/
    38. PSL 7.62x54r – The Firing Line Forums, accessed May 26, 2025, https://thefiringline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=465996
    39. SVD-63 – Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, accessed May 26, 2025, https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/SVD-63
    40. СВД – Sinopa.com, accessed May 26, 2025, http://www.sinopa.ee/sor/bo001/bo05sv/bo05sv01/svd001.htm
    41. Снайперские винтовки | Страница 127 | Форумы RusArmy.com, accessed May 26, 2025, https://www.rusarmy.com/forum/threads/snajperskie-vintovki.246/page-127
    42. SVD Rifle Factory Torture Testing | thefirearmblog.com, accessed May 26, 2025, https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2017/02/07/svd-rifle-factory-torture-testing/
    43. Why no American SVD’s/PSL’s – Shooters’ Forum, accessed May 26, 2025, https://forum.accurateshooter.com/threads/why-no-american-svds-psls.4141703/
    44. Prezentare pusca semiautomana Sadu (cunoscuta si sub numele de WUM) – arme vechi, accessed May 26, 2025, https://armevechi.com/2023/01/02/prezentare-pusca-semiautomana-sadu-cunoscuta-si-sub-numele-de-wum/
    45. Russian Military Snipers to Receive Upgraded Dragunov Rifle – The Defense Post, accessed May 26, 2025, https://thedefensepost.com/2021/11/12/russian-snipers-upgraded-rifle/
    46. SVD – Wikimedia Commons, accessed May 26, 2025, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/SVD
    47. PSL sniper rifle – Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, accessed May 26, 2025, https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/PSL_sniper_rifle
    48. SVDK – Wikipedia, accessed May 26, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SVDK
    49. Category:PSL rifle – Wikimedia Commons, accessed May 26, 2025, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:PSL_rifle
    50. Arms industry in Romania – Wikipedia, accessed May 26, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arms_industry_in_Romania

    History of Zastava Arms – A Summary of 170 Years

    Zastava Arms, or Zastava oružje (Застава оружје) as it is known in its native Serbia, stands as a monumental testament to the nation’s industrial and military history. With origins stretching back to the mid-19th century, this Kragujevac-based manufacturer has not only equipped generations of soldiers but has also been a significant contributor to Serbia’s (and formerly Yugoslavia’s) defense industry and a notable exporter on the global stage.1 Its story is one of resilience, adaptation, and an enduring role in the complex tapestry of Balkan and European history.

    A Tale of Two Zastavas: Arms and Automobiles

    It is crucial at the outset to distinguish Zastava Arms from its erstwhile sibling, Zastava Automobiles (Zastava Automobili / Застава Аутомобили). While both giants of Serbian industry sprang from the same foundational industrial complex in Kragujevac (Крагујевац), their paths diverged. Zastava Arms remained true to its martial origins, focusing on ordnance and firearms, whereas Zastava Automobiles carved its niche in vehicle manufacturing.1 The original cannon-casting plant, established in 1853, is the direct progenitor of the Zastava Arms we know today.1 Although an automobile section was inaugurated within the broader Zastava enterprise in 1904, and the entire complex was later known as Zavodi Crvena Zastava (Заводи Црвена Застава, Red Flag Factories) after World War II, a pivotal decision in 1953 saw a significant portion of the Zastava plant dedicate itself exclusively to automobile production. This bifurcation led to the emergence of Zastava Automobiles and Zastava Arms as distinct, specialized entities.1 This report will navigate the rich history of Zastava Arms.

    The parallel development and eventual separation of Zastava’s arms and automotive divisions reflect a broader pattern in state-led industrialization efforts, particularly in nations striving for self-sufficiency. Military requirements often served as the initial catalyst for heavy industry, with civilian applications and diversification emerging as secondary, albeit significant, outcomes. The foundational enterprise was a cannon foundry, driven by the Principality of Serbia’s defense needs.1 Early automotive activities also had military links, such as assembling Ford and Chevrolet trucks for the Yugoslav Army.8 This trajectory suggests that national security imperatives often paved the way for broader industrial capabilities. The eventual split signifies that both sectors achieved a scale and specialization warranting independent operation, but their shared genesis underscores a strategic, state-influenced approach to building national industrial capacity.

    The remarkable longevity of Zastava Arms, enduring through multiple state formations, devastating wars, international sanctions, and profound political transformations, highlights not only its intrinsic resilience but also its perceived indispensability to the Serbian state throughout its various iterations. The company’s existence spans the Principality of Serbia, the Kingdom of Serbia, the Kingdom of Yugoslavia, the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (SFRY), the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY), the State Union of Serbia and Montenegro, and the modern Republic of Serbia.4 It has weathered the storms of World War I, World War II (during which it sustained heavy damage), the turbulent dissolution of Yugoslavia, crippling UN sanctions, and direct NATO bombardment.4 Such persistence through extreme adversity implies a consistent level of state support, a deep-rooted institutional adaptability, and a continuous demand for its products, underscoring its strategic importance.

    Table 1: Key Milestones in Zastava Arms History

    YearMilestone
    1851Decision rendered to relocate the Gun Foundry from Belgrade to Kragujevac (Крагујевац).3
    1853 (Oct 27)First cannon barrels cast in Kragujevac; official founding of Zastava Arms, initially as the Topolivnica (Тополивница, Cannon Foundry).1 The broader institution was also known as the Vojno-Tehnički Zavod (Војно-технички завод, Military Technical Institute).8
    1880Major Kosta Milovanović designs the Mauzer Milovanović M.1880 repeating rifle, popularly known as the Kokinka (Кокинка).10
    1889The Gun Foundry wins several medals at the Large World Fair in Paris.3
    c. 1924-1928Ministry of the Interior signs contracts with FN Herstal (Belgium) for licensed production of M24 series Mauser bolt-action rifles; new factory for rifle and ammunition production established.4
    Post-WWIIThe factory complex is renamed Zavodi Crvena Zastava (Заводи Црвена Застава, Red Flag Factories).1
    1948Production of the M48 bolt-action rifle, based on the Mauser design, commences.3
    1953Significant portion of Zastava plant pivots to automobile production, leading to separation of Zastava Arms and Zastava Automobiles. Zastava Arms begins production of the M53 Šarac (Шарац) machine gun.1
    1964-1970Development of indigenous Kalashnikov-pattern assault rifle begins, culminating in adoption of Zastava M70 by Yugoslav People’s Army (JNA) in 1970.4
    1990sUnited Nations imposes economic sanctions on FR Yugoslavia due to Yugoslav Wars, impacting production and exports.4
    1999Zastava factory complex in Kragujevac sustains damage during NATO bombing.5
    2005Significant restructuring commences; Memorandum of Understanding signed with Remington Arms (USA) for export.4
    2019Zastava Arms USA established as exclusive importer for US market.4

    Forging an Arsenal: From Topolivnica to the Great War (1851 – 1918)

    The Birth of Serbian Arms Industry in Kragujevac

    The genesis of Zastava Arms lies in a strategic decision made in 1851 by the Principality of Serbia to relocate its Gun Foundry from Belgrade to the more centrally located city of Kragujevac.3 This move was a clear statement of intent: to establish an indigenous capability for arms production, thereby reducing reliance on foreign powers. On October 27, 1853, this ambition materialized with the casting of the first cannon barrels at the new facility.1 This date is not merely a historical footnote; it is celebrated as the official founding day of Zastava Arms and marks the dawn of Serbia’s domestic arms industry. The initial output consisted of four four-pound cannons and two short howitzers.4

    The foundry was initially known as the Topolivnica (Тополивница, Cannon Foundry).1 The critical task of organizing these early operations and training the first generation of Serbian arms craftsmen fell to a French engineer, Charles Loubry (referred to as Lubry in some Serbian sources), who oversaw the casting of a battery of six-pounder cannons. After Loubry’s departure in 1854, Milutin Jovanović assumed leadership, progressing to the production of twelve-pounder cannons.14

    The Kragujevac Cannon Foundry in its working days, originally built in 1856. The drawing is from Wikimedia – the exact date and author are unknown. It was contributed to Wikimedia by SimonKTemplar

    The establishment and early development of Zastava Arms were direct consequences of Serbia’s pressing need for military self-reliance in a volatile geopolitical neighborhood. This drive for sovereignty in defense procurement shaped its initial trajectory and institutional character, with the choice of Kragujevac being a deliberate strategic move for a national arsenal. The official narrative emphasizes the goal of achieving Serbia’s “own production of arms and equipment” 3, breaking dependence on foreign suppliers. The era was marked by frequent regional conflicts and the overarching influence of larger European powers, making an independent arms source vital for the Principality, and later Kingdom, of Serbia.

    Institutional Framework and Early Technological Prowess

    The Topolivnica was intrinsically linked to, and indeed formed the core of, the Vojno-Tehnički Zavod (Војно-технички завод, Military Technical Institute or VTZ) in Kragujevac.8 The VTZ itself was established by a decision of the Serbian government in 1850, with construction spanning from 1851 to 1853.14

    The Kragujevac facility rapidly became a beacon of technological advancement in 19th-century Serbia. It housed the nation’s first steam engines, witnessed the first electric light (the first electric bulb in Serbia was illuminated in the Čaurnica / Чаурница, Cartridge Casing Plant, a building within the VTZ complex, in 1884), established the first formal technical school for industrial training, and implemented the first recognized quality control systems.3 This commitment to quality and innovation garnered early international acclaim when the Gun Foundry was awarded several medals at the prestigious Large World Fair in Paris in 1889.3 Between 1856 and 1860, the facilities underwent significant upgrades, enabling the plant to produce weapons with full parts interchangeability, a hallmark of modern manufacturing.4 The Vojno-Tehnički Zavod was more than just an arms factory; it served as a significant catalyst for broader industrial and technological modernization within Serbia. The documented introduction of Serbia’s “first steam engines, first electric light, first technical school, first quality system” at the VTZ 3 highlights its role as an industrial vanguard. The lighting of the first electric bulb in Serbia within the VTZ complex 14 is a symbolic marker of this pioneering status. This indicates that the investment in defense production had spill-over effects, driving technological diffusion and contributing to the overall modernization of the Serbian economy and society.

    Pioneering Firearms: From Cannons to the Kokinka Rifle

    While cannons were the initial focus, the evolving nature of warfare demanded modern infantry firearms. By 1878, the Serbian military recognized that its existing “Piboduša“ Model 1870 Peabody rifles, with their large 14.9mm caliber, were becoming obsolete, prompting a concerted effort to modernize its armaments.4

    Following a research project and competitive tender in 1879, a new rifle design emerged. In 1880, Serbian Major Kosta “Koka” Milovanović, a key figure in Serbian ordnance, developed an updated version of the Mauser Model 1871 bolt-action rifle. This rifle, chambered in a unique 10.15x63mmR Serbian caliber and featuring Milovanović’s innovative “progressive rifling” (where the grooves reduced in diameter from breech to muzzle), became Serbia’s first domestically designed repeating rifle.4

    Known officially as the Mauzer Milovanović M.1880, it earned popular monikers such as the “Mauser-Koka” or, more affectionately, the „Kokinka“ (Кокинка).4 While initially manufactured in Germany by Mauser (as the Mauser-Milovanović M1878/80), Zastava Arms is also listed as a manufacturer, suggesting later production or assembly in Kragujevac.15 Approximately 110,000 of these rifles entered the Serbian arsenal and saw their first major combat use in the Serbo-Bulgarian War of 1885.15 The Old Foundry Museum (Muzej Stara Livnica / Музеј Стара Ливница) in Kragujevac prominently features this historic rifle.24 Zastava’s early operational model, characterized by the assimilation of advanced foreign technology (French engineering expertise for cannons, German Mauser rifle designs) coupled with indigenous innovation (Milovanović’s progressive rifling), established a foundational pattern of pragmatic technological development. The engagement of French engineer Charles Loubry for cannon production and training 14 demonstrates an openness to leveraging external expertise. The Mauser-Koka, while based on a German design, incorporated unique Serbian modifications 10, showcasing adaptive innovation. This blend of acquiring proven foreign technologies and adapting them to specific national requirements, while simultaneously nurturing local talent, proved to be a highly effective strategy for a smaller nation seeking to build a credible defense industry.

    Arming the Nation: The Balkan Wars and World War I

    The Mauser-Koka rifles, including variants converted around 1907 in Kragujevac to fire the 7x57mm Mauser cartridge from a 5-shot magazine (these conversions often referred to as Đurić Mausers / Ђурић-Маузер), were the mainstay of the Serbian infantry during the Balkan Wars (1912-1913) and World War I (1914-1918).15

    The Vojno-Tehnički Zavod in Kragujevac served as the primary arsenal, responsible for producing and maintaining weapons for the Serbian army throughout these critical conflicts.3 On the eve of the Great War, Kragujevac, with a population of nearly 17,000, was home to seven industrial enterprises, with the VTZ being by far the most significant.26

    During World War I, Serbia faced severe ammunition shortages, a common problem for many belligerents. The crisis was overcome through a combination of factors: crucial aid from Entente allies (primarily France and Russia), ammunition “borrowed” from then-neutral Greece, and, critically, the maximized efforts of domestic production at the Kragujevac works, where ingenuity and intense labor were applied to produce as many shells as possible.28 The Serbian army even had a permanent delegation at the Schneider factory in Creusot, France, to oversee ordnance matters.28 The co-location of a technical school with the foundry 3 points to a far-sighted strategy for developing the human capital necessary to sustain and advance this critical industry.

    Interwar Growth and Technological Assimilation (1919 – 1939)

    Post-WWI Rejuvenation and Expansion

    Following the devastation of World War I and the creation of the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes (later Yugoslavia), the Vojno-Tehnički Zavod (VTZ) in Kragujevac embarked on a period of significant reconstruction and modernization. The museum guide’s reference to “VTZ između dva rata | Obnova” (VTZ between the two wars | Restoration) underscores this phase of rebuilding and renewed development.3

    The factory underwent substantial expansion. By the late 1930s, on the eve of World War II, it had transformed into a veritable “industrial giant,” employing a workforce of nearly twelve thousand individuals and operating approximately ten thousand machines.3 This scale made it one of the largest and most important industrial enterprises in the Balkans. The massive expansion of Zastava’s workforce and machinery during this period cemented its role as a cornerstone of the regional economy in Kragujevac and a significant contributor to national employment and industrial output. Such a large workforce indicates that the factory was a primary economic engine for Kragujevac and the surrounding Šumadija (Шумадија) region. The demand for skilled and semi-skilled labor would have spurred vocational training and created a substantial industrial working class, extending its impact far beyond purely military considerations.

    Strategic Alliances: FN Herstal and the Yugoslav Mauser M24

    A pivotal development in the interwar period was the establishment of a close partnership with the renowned Belgian arms manufacturer, Fabrique Nationale d’Herstal (FN Herstal). Between 1924 and 1925, the Ministry of the Interior of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia concluded significant contracts with FN Herstal.4

    These agreements facilitated the licensed production of the M24 series bolt-action rifles, a Yugoslav variant of the Mauser 98 system, chambered in the standard 7.92x57mm Mauser caliber.4 Yugoslavia became a major adopter and producer of this Mauser pattern, which was a proven and respected military design.11

    Yugoslavian M1924 Mauser. Photo obtained from Wikimedia. Author is The Swedish Army Museum.

    To accommodate this large-scale production, a new, modern factory dedicated to the manufacture of rifles and infantry ammunition was constructed in Kragujevac. Ammunition production commenced on March 22, 1928, followed by rifle production on October 15, 1928—a date chosen to coincide with the 75th anniversary of the first cannon casting at Kragujevac, symbolizing continuity and progress.4

    The M24 rifle became a standard infantry weapon. Notable variants included the Sokolski karabin M.1924 (Соколски карабин М.1924, Sokol carbine M.1924), a slightly shorter version designed for youth paramilitary training and target practice, and the Jurišna puška M.1924 ČK (Јуришна пушка М.1924 ЧК, Assault rifle M.1924 ČK), designed for specialized assault units, featuring a bent bolt handle and additional sling swivels.16 Bayonets produced for these rifles at the Kragujevac arsenal were typically marked “BT3” (VTZ Cyrillic).30

    The interwar era was transformative for Zastava, marking its maturation into a large-scale industrial enterprise capable of mass-producing modern weaponry. This was achieved through a deliberate strategy of acquiring proven foreign technologies via licensing agreements. The contracts with FN Herstal for the M24 Mauser rifle were not merely for a design blueprint but involved establishing comprehensive production lines for both rifles and ammunition.4 This implies a significant transfer of manufacturing technology and quality control processes from a leading European arms maker, allowing for rapid modernization of the Yugoslav military’s arsenal.

    Diversification through Czechoslovakian Licenses

    Beyond the Belgian collaboration, Zastava also looked to other advanced European arms industries for technology. In 1930, the factory secured a license from Czechoslovakia to produce 26 mm M 1929 signal pistols.4

    Furthering this relationship, in July 1936, Zastava obtained a license from the prominent Czechoslovakian arms manufacturer Zbrojovka Brno (Збројовка Брно) to manufacture their highly regarded ZB vz. 26 light machine gun. This weapon, chambered in 7.92x57mm Mauser, was designated the M 1937 in Yugoslav service.4 Approximately 5,000 of these light machine guns were produced by Zastava.11 This strategy of “technology assimilation” allowed the Kingdom of Yugoslavia to equip its forces with reliable, contemporary weapons relatively quickly, enhancing its defense posture in an increasingly unstable Europe.

    Nascent Automotive Activities

    While this report focuses on Zastava Arms, it is pertinent to note that the broader Zastava industrial complex in Kragujevac also began to engage in automotive assembly during this period, primarily for military needs. In 1930, Ford trucks were assembled for the Yugoslav Army, and in 1939, assembly of Chevrolet military trucks commenced.8 These early forays into vehicle production laid the groundwork for what would eventually become the separate entity of Zastava Automobili.

    Under Fire: Zastava Arms in World War II (1939 – 1945)

    Cessation of Operations under Occupation

    The outbreak of World War II and the subsequent Axis invasion of Yugoslavia in April 1941 brought a sudden and brutal halt to the burgeoning operations at the Vojno-Tehnički Zavod in Kragujevac. Production ceased as the country was overrun and occupied.8

    The city of Kragujevac, home to this vital arsenal, suffered grievously under occupation. A particularly horrific event was the Kragujevac Massacre of October 20-21, 1941, where German occupation forces, as a reprisal for partisan attacks, executed thousands of civilian men and boys from the city and surrounding areas.31 While the sources do not explicitly state that Zastava workers were singled out, the massacre decimated the local male population from which the factory drew its workforce, casting a dark shadow over the city and the plant.

    Wartime Damage and Destruction

    Throughout the war, Zastava Arms (then VTZ) sustained heavy damage.3 As a key military-industrial asset, it would have been a strategic target for various warring factions.

    Liberation and Swift Resumption of Production

    The city of Kragujevac was liberated from Axis occupation on October 21, 1944, by Yugoslav Partisan forces.4 Demonstrating its critical importance to the newly emerging Yugoslav authorities, the Zastava weapons factory was rapidly repaired and brought back into working order within a matter of months following liberation.4

    Production recommenced almost immediately. The first firearm to be developed and produced in this new post-liberation phase was the 9mm M 1944 B2 submachine gun, a design initiated in the very same year as the liberation, 1944.4 This quick turnaround underscores the urgency of re-establishing arms production.

    The alacrity with which the Zastava factory was repaired and production restarted post-liberation, even amidst the widespread chaos and devastation of war’s end, underscores its paramount strategic value to the nascent communist-led Yugoslav state. This urgency was likely driven by the immediate need to arm the victorious Partisan forces, consolidate control, and lay the foundations for national defense in a volatile post-war European landscape. The phrases “repaired to working order within months” and “production began shortly after” 4 signify a high-priority effort. The immediate development of the M 1944 B2 submachine gun 4 points to a clear focus on equipping forces for ongoing or anticipated needs. This mirrors the factory’s original founding principle: the imperative of indigenous arms production for national security.

    The wartime experience of occupation, the brutal Kragujevac Massacre, and the extensive damage to the factory likely had a profound psychological and strategic impact, further solidifying Yugoslavia’s post-war commitment to military self-reliance. The trauma of events like the Kragujevac Massacre 31 and the vulnerability exposed by “heavy damage” 4 would have served as powerful motivators to ensure future defense capabilities were domestically controlled. This may have influenced design philosophies towards weapons that were robust, reliable, and suitable for mass production, as seen in some later Zastava products like the M70 rifle, known for its ruggedness.21

    The Red Star Rises: Zavodi Crvena Zastava in SFR Yugoslavia (1945 – 1991)

    A New Name for a New Era: Zavodi Crvena Zastava

    Following World War II and the establishment of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (SFRY) under Marshal Tito, the Zastava industrial complex in Kragujevac was nationalized and renamed Zavodi Crvena Zastava (Заводи Црвена Застава), meaning “Red Flag Factories”.1 This symbolic renaming, utilizing a potent communist emblem, reflected the new socialist political order and the factory’s integration into the state-controlled economy, emphasizing its role in serving the collective and the Jugoslovenska Narodna Armija (JHA / Југословенска народна армија, ЈНА, Yugoslav People’s Army).4

    Iconic Firearms Production

    The post-war era saw Zastava produce some of its most iconic and widely recognized firearms, becoming a cornerstone of Yugoslav defense and a significant exporter.

    • M48 Rifle: Building on its Mauser expertise, Zastava began production of the 7.92x57mm Mauser Model 1948 rifle.3 This rifle, based on the earlier M24 and the German Kar98k, became the standard service rifle of the JNA from the early 1950s until it was gradually replaced by the M59/66 semi-automatic rifle.38 Several variants were produced, including the M48 (all machined parts), M48A (incorporating some stamped parts like the magazine floor plate to speed production and lower cost), M48B (additional stamped parts, intended for export), and M48BO (bez oznake / без ознаке, unmarked, for export).11
    • M53 Šarac (Шарац) Machine Gun: In 1954, Zastava commenced production of the 7.9mm M53 Šarac machine gun.4 This weapon was a near-identical copy of the formidable German MG42 general-purpose machine gun from World War II. Yugoslavia utilized captured German machinery and technical data to produce the M53, retaining the original 7.92x57mm Mauser caliber, which remained in widespread Yugoslav service alongside Soviet calibers.12 A key modification was a reduction in the cyclic rate of fire to around 950 rounds per minute, compared to the MG42’s 1,200 RPM, making the M53 more controllable.12 Captured MG42s refurbished to this standard were designated M53/42.39
    • PAP M59 Semi-Automatic Rifle: As infantry doctrine evolved, Zastava began batch production of the 7.62x39mm Poluautomatska puška M59 (Полуаутоматска пушка M59, Semi-automatic rifle M59), commonly known as the PAP M59, in 1964.4 This rifle was a Yugoslav-produced version of the Soviet SKS carbine. A notable variant, the M59/66, incorporated an integral 22mm NATO-standard grenade launcher and a flip-up grenade sight.11
    • M70 Assault Rifle Family: Perhaps Zastava’s most famous product line, the M70 assault rifle family, emerged from Yugoslavia’s independent military development path. Development of an automatic rifle based on the Kalashnikov (AK-47) system began in 1964, initially designated the M67 in 1967.4 The Zastava M70, an unlicensed derivative of the Soviet AK-47 (specifically the Type 3 milled receiver variant), was subsequently developed in the 7.62x39mm caliber.4 Due to political differences between Yugoslavia and the Soviet Union, particularly Yugoslavia’s refusal to join the Warsaw Pact, Zastava was unable to obtain official technical specifications and instead reverse-engineered the AK design.17
      The JNA officially adopted the M70 assault rifle into its arsenal in 1970.4 The Yugoslav M70 incorporated several unique features distinguishing it from Soviet AKs, including a grenade launching sight bracket mounted on the gas block (which also functioned as a gas cut-off when raised for grenade launching), a thicker receiver (initially milled, later stamped), and often, teak wood furniture.17 Later versions, such as the M70B1 and M70AB2 (folding stock), featured stamped receivers, with some incorporating heavier RPK-style bulged trunnions for increased durability, especially for grenade launching.17 Zastava also produced derivatives of the M70 chambered in Western bloc ammunition, such as the M77 in 7.62x51mm NATO and models in 5.56x45mm NATO, for export.4
    • Other Military Arms: The factory’s output during this period also included the M56 submachine gun, which bore a close resemblance to the German MP40 and was chambered in 7.62x25mm Tokarev 4; the M49 submachine gun, a design that synthesized elements of the Soviet PPSh-41 and the Italian Beretta Model 38 11; the M57 pistol, a Yugoslav derivative of the Soviet Tokarev TT-33 pistol, also in 7.62x25mm 4; and the M70 pistol (distinct from the rifle), a compact handgun chambered in.32 ACP (7.65mm Browning).4
    The M53 Šarac Machine Gun. Image obtained from Wikimedia. The Author is Aleksej fon Grozni.
    Afghan Local Police (ALP) candidates practice basic rifle marksmanship at a Coalition Forces site in Arghandab district, Kandahar province, Afghanistan, Oct. 16, 2012. The candidates undergo a three-week course which covers basic marksmanship, patrolling, improvised explosive device recognition and security techniques. The ALP program allows Afghans to provide security for their home villages and districts. Note: These are a variant of the M70 rifle as they do not have the grenade launching sight found on the Yugoslav-era M70B1 rifles. Photo obtained from Wikimedia. The author is Petty Officer 2nd Class Ernesto Hernandez Fonte.

    Zastava’s arms production during the SFR Yugoslavia era clearly reflects the country’s unique non-aligned geopolitical stance. The decision to utilize and adapt both Eastern bloc (AK-47, SKS) and Western-influenced (Mauser, MG42 concepts) arms technologies, and even to develop unique hybrids or derivatives, demonstrates a pragmatic approach to defense procurement and industrial development. This strategy allowed Yugoslavia to avoid sole reliance on one superpower bloc, maintaining a degree of military autonomy. The production of the M70 as an unlicensed derivative, born out of political rifts with the USSR 17, particularly underscores Yugoslavia’s independent path. Furthermore, the development of weapon variants in NATO calibers 4 suggests a forward-thinking approach towards export markets or ensuring compatibility beyond Warsaw Pact standards, aligning with its non-aligned status and economic needs.

    Development of Hunting and Sporting Arms

    Alongside its military production, Zavodi Crvena Zastava significantly developed its line of hunting and sporting firearms. This diversification was likely a strategic move to utilize existing manufacturing capacity more fully, generate vital foreign currency through exports, and cater to a growing civilian market, thereby reducing the factory’s sole dependence on fluctuating military contracts.

    Production of air rifles and sporting rifles, often based on the robust M48 Mauser rifle action, began as early as 1953.3 In 1954, Zastava further expanded its civilian offerings to include shotguns and small-bore rifles.3

    The LK M70 hunting rifle (Lovački Karabin M70 / Ловачки Карабин М70), typically built on a Mauser 98-pattern action, became a particularly well-known and respected civilian product, offered in a variety of popular hunting calibers.4 Other sporting rifles, such as the M85 (a mini-Mauser action for smaller cartridges), were also developed and found success in domestic and international markets.22 The efficiency of basing many of these civilian arms on existing, proven military actions, like the Mauser, streamlined production and maintained a reputation for reliability. Exports of these hunting and sporting weapons became an increasingly important part of Zastava’s business.3

    Technology Transfer

    The official Zastava Arms website notes that “Years of experience in the field of development of products, technology and capacities created conditions for the transfer of technology to other countries”.3 While specific examples of Zastava Arms licensing its own designs for production in other countries during the SFRY period are not extensively detailed in the provided materials, the statement implies that such transfers were considered or occurred. The primary mode of technology interaction during this era appears to be Zastava receiving and adapting foreign technologies (e.g., Mauser, SKS, AK-47). However, the experience gained in mass-producing these adapted designs would have built considerable institutional knowledge and capacity, potentially laying the groundwork for later technology exports or licensed production agreements with other nations, particularly within the Non-Aligned Movement or other friendly states.

    Weathering the Storm: Dissolution, Sanctions, and Bombing (1991 – 1999)

    The Impact of the Yugoslav Wars (1991-1999)

    The violent dissolution of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, beginning in 1991 and continuing through a series of brutal conflicts until 1999 (and beyond in some aspects), created immense instability that directly and profoundly impacted Zastava’s operations, its traditional markets, and its supply chains.11 As the primary arms manufacturer for the JNA and a supplier to various republican territorial defense forces, Zastava weapons, particularly the ubiquitous M70 assault rifle and its variants, were widely used by all factions involved in the Yugoslav Wars.17 The M53 machine gun also saw widespread use during these conflicts.39 The breakup effectively shattered Zastava’s large, unified domestic market.

    UN Sanctions and Their Effect on Operations

    In response to the conflicts, the United Nations imposed comprehensive economic sanctions, including an arms embargo, on the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY), which then consisted of Serbia and Montenegro.4 These sanctions, which were in effect for significant periods during the Yugoslav Wars (notably Resolution 757 in 1992 and subsequent resolutions), severely hampered Zastava’s ability to legally export its products, import necessary raw materials or specialized components, and maintain its international business relationships.4 Production inevitably slowed as a result of these restrictions. The experience of Zastava Automobili, which saw exports halted and parts supply disrupted 8, would have been mirrored, if not amplified, at Zastava Arms due to the direct applicability of the arms embargo.

    This period represented an existential threat to Zastava Arms. The combination of losing its primary domestic market (the unified Yugoslav state), severe disruption to supply chains and export capabilities due to international sanctions, and ultimately direct physical destruction from NATO bombing, would have been insurmountable for most industrial enterprises. The fact that Zastava Arms continued to operate, and even managed to develop new products under such dire circumstances, speaks volumes about its deeply embedded strategic importance to the Serbian state and an almost wartime operational footing.

    NATO Intervention and Damage to the Kragujevac Facilities (1999)

    The Kosovo War, which escalated in 1998-1999, led to direct military intervention by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). From March 24 to June 10, 1999, NATO conducted an extensive aerial bombing campaign against military and strategic targets in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia.13

    The Zastava factory complex in Kragujevac, being a critical component of Yugoslavia’s defense industry, was specifically targeted and sustained significant damage from NATO airstrikes.4 Reports indicate that the Zastava kovačnica (Застава ковачница, Zastava Forge) was bombed on April 9, 1999.18 The company’s Shotgun Shop was also reportedly destroyed during the bombing and was not subsequently restored.11 The NATO bombing, while aimed at degrading military-industrial capacity, inadvertently created a situation where significant rebuilding and, consequently, opportunities for modernization would become a necessity for Zastava in the post-conflict era.

    Continued Product Development (Pre-Bombing/During Early Conflicts)

    Despite the immense turmoil of the early and mid-1990s, Zastava Arms managed to continue some level of product development. In 1992, as conflicts were already underway, the factory completed the development and initiated batch production of the 7.62x39mm M92 carbine. This compact weapon was based on the earlier M85 carbine (a 5.56mm AK variant) but chambered in the more common 7.62x39mm round.4

    Zastava M92 semi automatic rifle on display at “Partner 2011” military fair. Obtained from Wikimedia. Author is Srđan Popović.

    Additionally, leveraging its long experience with Mauser bolt-action mechanisms, Zastava developed the M93 Black Arrow (Crna Strela / Црна Стрела) long-range anti-materiel rifle during this period. This heavy rifle, typically chambered in 12.7x108mm or.50 BMG, was designed for engaging targets at extended distances.4 The development of such specialized weapons even under conditions of conflict and sanctions underscores the factory’s retained engineering capabilities and the ongoing demand from military forces.

    Zastava M-93 Black Arrow, 12.7 mm. Obtained from Wikimedia. Author is Marko M.

    Rebuilding and Rebranding: Zastava Arms in the 21st Century (2000 – Present)

    Restructuring and Modernization Efforts

    The dawn of the 21st century found Zastava Arms grappling with the aftermath of wars, sanctions, and bombing. A period of significant restructuring was initiated, formally lasting from 2005 to 2014, aimed at adapting the company to a new political and economic reality.4 The factory, damaged during both World War II and the 1999 NATO air raids, was largely rebuilt with substantial government assistance.19

    In a move to integrate it more formally within the national defense framework, Zastava Arms became part of the Defense Industry of Serbia in 2003, a decision by the Ministry of Defense that facilitated state support.7 On March 10, 2005, the Serbian government passed a decision to actively support the company’s restructuring process.7 A significant milestone in its international standing occurred on August 30, 2005, when Zastava Arms was placed on the United Nations list of proven suppliers of arms and military equipment.7

    Technologically, the company has sought to modernize its design and production processes. It employs CATIA (Computer-Aided Three-dimensional Interactive Application) software for product design, enabling a more agile response to evolving market demands.3 Furthermore, Zastava Arms applies a Quality Management System (QMS), holding SRPS ISO 9001:2008 and SNO 9000/05 certificates, to ensure product quality and process improvement.3

    Current Military Product Lines

    Zastava Arms continues to produce a wide array of military firearms. According to its 2019 military catalog and other company information, its current offerings include 4:

    • Assault Rifles: The M21 series chambered in 5.56x45mm NATO (the standard service rifle of the Serbian Armed Forces), the M05E series in 7.62x39mm (upgraded M70 versions), the classic M70 B3/AB3 in 7.62x39mm, and the M90 in 5.56x45mm.
    • Submachine Guns/Carbines: Compact versions of the M21 and the M92 carbine in 7.62x39mm.
    • Light Machine Guns: The M72 RPK-style LMG in 7.62x39mm.
    • Sniper Rifles: The M91 (7.62x54R Dragunov-style), the M07 (bolt-action, various calibers including 7.62x51mm and.308 Winchester), and the M17 (7.62x51mm).
    • Long Range/Anti-Materiel Rifles: The M12 Black Spear (Crno Koplje / Црно Копље) and the M93 Black Arrow (Crna Strela / Црна Стрела), both available in.50 BMG and 12.7x108mm.
    • Machine Guns: The M84 general-purpose machine gun (PKM derivative in 7.62x54R), the M87 heavy machine gun (NSV derivative in 12.7x108mm), and the M02 Coyote heavy machine gun (12.7x108mm).
    • Automatic Grenade Launcher: The M93 (BGA / БГА – Bacač Granata Automatski) in 30mm.
    • Underbarrel Grenade Launchers: The BGP 40x46mm and BGP 40mm (for M70 pattern rifles).
    • Pistols: The CZ 999, EZ 9, and EZ 9 Compact, available in 9mm Parabellum and.40 S&W.
    Zastava М21 rifle of Serbian Gendarmerie. Photo obtained from Wikimedia. The author is Boksi.
    Zastava M12 Black Spear on display during Partner 2013 arms fair, Belgrade. Photo obtained from Wikimedia. The authors is Proka89.

    Civilian Hunting and Sporting Arms

    Zastava maintains a strong presence in the civilian firearms market, particularly with its hunting and sporting rifles known for their Mauser-based actions and Kalashnikov-derived semi-automatics 22:

    • Hunting Rifles (Bolt-Action): The flagship LK M70 series (Lovački Karabin M70), based on the Mauser 98 action, is offered in a wide range of calibers (e.g.,.243 Win,.270 Win,.30-06,.308 Win,.300 Win Mag, 7×64, 8×57 JS, 9.3×62,.375 H&H Mag,.458 Win Mag). Other models include the LK M85 (mini-Mauser action for calibers like.223 Rem, 7.62x39mm), M808, and precision-oriented M07 Match and M12 models.
    • Sporting Rifles (Semi-Automatic): The PAP series (Poluautomatska Puška / Полуаутоматска Пушка, Semi-automatic Rifle), derived from the Kalashnikov action, is highly popular. Key models include the ZPAP M70 in 7.62x39mm and the PAP M77 in.308 Winchester/7.62x51mm. The M2010 is another semi-automatic offering. The ZPAP M70, particularly as imported by Zastava Arms USA, is noted for its robust construction, often featuring a heavier 1.5mm thick RPK-style receiver and a bulged front trunnion.21
    • Small Bore Rifles: Models like the MP22 (.22 LR) and MP17 (.17 HMR).
    • Pistols: A range including Tokarev-pattern pistols like the M57A and M70A (chambered in 7.62x25mm and 9mm Para respectively), the compact M88A (9mm Para), and modern double-action designs like the CZ 999 and EZ9/EZ40 series (9mm Para /.40 S&W).

    The product line demonstrates a dual strategy: maintaining and updating Kalashnikov-pattern weapons (M70, M05E, ZPAP series) for markets familiar with their robustness and reliability, while also developing more modern, modular systems (like the M19 Modular Rifle mentioned in some catalogs 54, and the M21) and precision long-range rifles (M07, M12, M93) to compete in different segments and meet evolving military and civilian marksmanship requirements. This diversification is crucial for a global exporter.

    Table 2: Overview of Current Zastava Arms Product Categories

    CategoryExamples
    Military Firearms
    Assault RiflesM21 series, M05 series, M70B3, M90, M19
    Submachine Guns / CarbinesM92, M21 (short barrel variants)
    Sniper & Long Range RiflesM91, M07, M93 Black Arrow, M12 Black Spear, M17
    Machine GunsM84 (GPMG), M02 Coyote (HMG), M72 (LMG)
    PistolsCZ 999, EZ9 / EZ40 series
    Grenade LaunchersM93 (Automatic Grenade Launcher), BGP 40mm (Underbarrel)
    Civilian Firearms
    Hunting Rifles (Bolt-Action)LK M70 series, LK M85 series, M808, M07 Match
    Sporting Rifles (Semi-Automatic)ZPAP M70, PAP M77, M2010
    Small Bore RiflesMP22, MP17
    PistolsM57A, M88A, CZ 999, EZ9 / EZ40 series, M70 (small caliber)

    Business Partnerships and Export

    Export remains the lifeblood of Zastava Arms, with the company stating that 95% of its product placement is through international sales.7 It exports hunting and sporting weapons to over thirty countries 3 and military products to over forty countries worldwide.4

    • Zastava Arms USA: A pivotal development was the establishment in January 2019 of Zastava Arms USA, based in Des Plaines, Illinois. This subsidiary serves as the exclusive importer and distributor of Zastava Arms products for the lucrative US market, also handling warranty, repair services, and parts.4 This move was partly aimed at exercising greater control over product quality and presentation in the US, addressing issues that had arisen with previous third-party importers who sometimes made modifications that caused reliability concerns.56 The establishment of Zastava Arms USA represents a critical strategic pivot, allowing direct management of its brand and quality in its most significant export market.
    • Yugoimport SDPR: Domestically, Yugoimport SDPR (Југоимпорт СДПР), the Serbian state-owned defense equipment company, is a key partner for Zastava Arms, often facilitating international defense contracts and joint participation in global defense exhibitions like IDEX in the UAE.7
    • International Golden Group (UAE): Zastava Arms lists International Golden Group, based in the United Arab Emirates, as an important international partner, indicative of its reach in the Middle Eastern market.7
    • Past Partnership with Remington Arms: In 2005, a memorandum of understanding was signed with the American company Remington Arms to export Zastava-made hunting and sporting firearms (often Mauser-action rifles) to the United States, Canada, and Mexico.4 However, this cooperation was later discontinued, reportedly at Remington’s initiative due to its own financial difficulties. Zastava then sought new US mediators, such as EA Armory, to maintain its presence in the US market prior to forming Zastava Arms USA.58
    • Key Export Markets and Contracts: Asia, Africa, and the United States are consistently cited as major destinations for Zastava’s products.4 Historically, Zastava rifles like the M48 were exported to countries including Burma, Egypt, Indonesia, Iraq, Syria, Algeria, and Chad.11 More recent specific export deals mentioned in news reports include contracts with Armenia 59 and a large announced contract for hunting and sporting arms to the US valued at $235 million (reported in 2021).60 In a notable instance of military aid, Canada supplied 35,000 Zastava M70 assault rifles to Ukraine in 2022 as part of support efforts during the Russo-Ukrainian War.62

    Recent Developments, Financial Status, Achievements, and Challenges

    Zastava Arms navigates a complex environment characterized by its strategic importance, historical legacy, financial pressures, and the demands of a competitive global market.

    • Financial Situation and Government Support: The company has faced persistent financial challenges. As far back as 2013, it was reported to owe over 80 million euros in unpaid taxes, the largest debt among Serbian defense industry companies.4 By June 2019, its total debt was estimated at around 145 million euros.4 A 2014 article in Privredni pregled (Привредни преглед, Economic Review) noted that Zastava Oružje was operating with significant losses.63 More recently, the Serbian news outlet Nova Ekonomija (Нова Економија, New Economy) reported in November 2023 that the factory had accumulated losses exceeding seven billion dinars (approximately 60 million euros) over the preceding six years under a controversial supervisory board.64
      Despite these financial burdens, the Serbian government continues to provide support, recognizing Zastava’s strategic role. An investment of 9.7 million euros was made in 2017 for factory modernization to meet defense industry needs.4 The Serbian state remains a major shareholder (the Wikipedia entry from May 2025 lists the Government of Serbia as 48% owner 4, although a 2025 company document regarding a shareholders’ meeting mentions a more complex structure involving social capital shares 66).
    • Production and Sales Performance: Notwithstanding its financial difficulties, Zastava Arms has reported periods of strong production and sales. For instance, firearm production reportedly increased by 20% in 2020, with deals concluded that year valued at $95 million, primarily with buyers from Asia, Africa, and the United States.4 The aforementioned $235 million US export contract announced in 2021 also points to significant market activity.60
    • Controversies and Allegations of Mismanagement: Zastava Arms has not been immune to controversy. Reports from Serbian media, including Nova Ekonomija 64, and discussions on international forums referencing articles from the Serbian weekly NIN (Недељне информативне новине, Weekly Informational Newspaper) 67, have detailed serious allegations of mismanagement by past leadership. These allegations include claims of unfavorable export contracts, particularly with Zastava Arms USA, where fixed prices for firearms were reportedly maintained despite sharply rising material and energy costs, to the detriment of the Kragujevac factory.67 There were also accusations of questionable deals with domestic private companies, resulting in further financial losses for Zastava Arms.67
      The Independent Trade Union at Zastava Arms filed criminal charges against the former president of the supervisory board, Ivica Marjanović, citing abuse of official position and responsibility for the factory’s decline.64 Concerns have also been voiced by users and observers about the condition of some of the factory’s machinery being worn out and an underpaid workforce potentially leading to occasional quality control issues in production, although export samples for the US market are often perceived to be of better finish.68 The entire supervisory board was eventually replaced in late 2023.64
    • Achievements and Ongoing Activities: Despite its challenges, Zastava Arms’ enduring legacy of over 170 years in continuous operation is a significant achievement in itself. It maintains a substantial export reach and continues to develop new products, such as the M19 Modular Rifle 54, to meet contemporary demands. The company remains a cornerstone of the Serbian defense industry.4 Zastava Arms actively participates in major international arms fairs, including SHOT Show in Las Vegas, USA, and IWA OutdoorClassics in Nuremberg, Germany, showcasing its products to a global audience.7 Recent company news includes the reopening of its “Old Gun Foundry” museum in Kragujevac in November 2023, emphasizing its rich heritage 69, and its participation in the “Zastava 2024” military capability display of the Serbian Army in June 2024.70

    Zastava Arms appears to operate in a precarious yet persistent balance: it is a strategically vital state-supported defense asset with an remarkable historical lineage, yet it is simultaneously burdened by significant accumulated debt and the shadow of past mismanagement allegations. Its future trajectory will likely depend on a confluence of factors: continued and effective state backing, successful and profitable penetration of competitive export markets (especially the US), and sustained improvements in internal governance and operational efficiency.

    Conclusion: Zastava Arms – A Legacy Forged in Steel

    The history of Zastava Arms is a compelling narrative of industrial ambition, technological adaptation, and national identity, forged over more than 170 years in the heart of Serbia. From its humble beginnings as the Topolivnica in Kragujevac, casting its first cannons for a nascent Principality of Serbia intent on self-reliance, the factory has evolved into a globally recognized arms manufacturer. Its journey mirrors the tumultuous history of the Balkan region and Serbia itself—a saga of nation-building, devastating wars, profound political transformations from monarchy through socialism to a modern republic, economic booms, and periods of acute crisis including sanctions and foreign bombardment.

    Throughout these epochs, Zastava Arms has demonstrated remarkable resilience. It armed Serbian and later Yugoslav forces through the Balkan Wars, two World Wars, and the tragic conflicts accompanying the dissolution of Yugoslavia. It assimilated and adapted technologies from both West and East, reflecting Yugoslavia’s unique non-aligned stance during the Cold War, producing iconic firearms like the Mauser-pattern M48, the MG42-derived M53 Šarac, and the Kalashnikov-based M70 family. This ability to absorb, modify, and mass-produce diverse weaponry underscores a deep-seated engineering capability and a pragmatic approach to fulfilling national defense needs.

    In the 21st century, Zastava Arms continues to be a pivotal entity in the Serbian defense industry and a significant exporter. The establishment of Zastava Arms USA signifies a strategic commitment to directly engage with its largest and most demanding civilian market, aiming to enhance its brand presence and profitability. However, the company also contends with substantial challenges. A legacy of financial debt and recent allegations of mismanagement have cast shadows, necessitating ongoing restructuring and a reliance on state support. The competitive nature of the global arms market demands continuous innovation, stringent quality control, and agile business practices.

    The story of Zastava Arms is, in many ways, a microcosm of Serbia’s own historical trajectory—a narrative defined by a persistent quest for sovereignty and agency on the world stage, often in the face of formidable external pressures and internal complexities. The inherent tension between its role as a strategically vital, state-influenced national asset and the commercial imperatives of the global arms market—including financial sustainability, technological competitiveness, and the ethical considerations of arms exports—will undoubtedly continue to shape Zastava’s path forward. Its enduring legacy, however, is already forged in steel: a symbol of Serbian industrial heritage and a testament to the enduring human endeavor of arms making.

    Image Sources

    The main photo is from Wikimedia and here’s how the author described it (translated into English from Serbian): “The SM-1 Zastava NTV drone command vehicle of the Serbian Armed Forces exhibited at the “Colonel Pilot Milenko Pavlović” military airport on the occasion of the “Zastava 2024″ display of the capabilities of the Serbian Armed Forces.” Author is Srdjan Popovic.

    The Kragujevac Cannon Foundry in its working days, originally built in 1856. The drawing is from Wikimedia – the exact date and author are unknown. It was contributed to Wikimedia by SimonKTemplar

    Yugoslavian M1924 Mauser. Photo obtained from Wikimedia. Author is The Swedish Army Museum.

    The M53 Šarac Machine Gun. Image obtained from Wikimedia. The Author is Aleksej fon Grozni.

    Afghan Local Police (ALP) candidates practice basic rifle marksmanship at a Coalition Forces site in Arghandab district, Kandahar province, Afghanistan, Oct. 16, 2012. The candidates undergo a three-week course which covers basic marksmanship, patrolling, improvised explosive device recognition and security techniques. The ALP program allows Afghans to provide security for their home villages and districts. Note: These are a variant of the M70 rifle as they do not have the grenade launching sight found on the Yugoslav-era M70B1 rifles. Photo obtained from Wikimedia. The author is Petty Officer 2nd Class Ernesto Hernandez Fonte.

    Zastava M92 semi automatic rifle on display at “Partner 2011” military fair. Obtained from Wikimedia. Author is Srđan Popović.

    Zastava M-93 Black Arrow, 12.7 mm. Obtained from Wikimedia. Author is Marko M.

    Zastava М21 rifle of Serbian Gendarmerie. Photo obtained from Wikimedia. The author is Boksi.

    Zastava M12 Black Spear on display during Partner 2013 arms fair, Belgrade. Photo obtained from Wikimedia. The authors is Proka89.

    Works cited

    1. Zastava Arms – Internet Movie Firearms Database – Guns in Movies, TV and Video Games, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.imfdb.org/wiki/Zastava_Arms
    2. Zastava Arms – Википедия, accessed May 13, 2025, https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zastava_Arms
    3. About us – Zastava oružje ad, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.zastava-arms.rs/en/about-us/
    4. Zastava Arms – Wikipedia, accessed May 13, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zastava_Arms
    5. Zastava Weapons Factory Kragujevac – TracesOfWar.com, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.tracesofwar.com/sights/148989/Zastava-Weapons-Factory-Kragujevac.htm
    6. History – Zastava Arms USA, accessed May 13, 2025, https://zastavaarmsusa.com/history/
    7. Profile – Zastava oružje ad – zastava-arms.rs, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.zastava-arms.rs/en/profile/
    8. Zastava Automobiles – Wikipedia, accessed May 13, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zastava_Automobiles
    9. History of Yugo, accessed May 13, 2025, http://freeweb.deltha.hu/zastava.in.hu/hist.htm
    10. Zastava Arms – Company – RouteYou, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.routeyou.com/en-yu/location/view/51445771
    11. Zastava Arms, accessed May 13, 2025, https://sadefensejournal.com/zastava-arms/
    12. The Yugoslavian M53 Machine Gun: Historical Lookback – Firearms News, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.firearmsnews.com/editorial/yugo-m53-machine-gun/488581
    13. Kosovo War – Wikipedia, accessed May 13, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kosovo_War
    14. Војно-технички завод у Крагујевцу — Википедија, accessed May 13, 2025, https://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%92%D0%BE%D1%98%D0%BD%D0%BE-%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%85%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%87%D0%BA%D0%B8_%D0%B7%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B4_%D1%83_%D0%9A%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B3%D1%83%D1%98%D0%B5%D0%B2%D1%86%D1%83
    15. Mauser-Koka – Wikipedia, accessed May 13, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mauser-Koka
    16. FN Model 24 and Model 30 – Wikipedia, accessed May 13, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FN_Model_24_and_Model_30
    17. Zastava M70 assault rifle – Wikipedia, accessed May 13, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zastava_M70_assault_rifle
    18. РТК | Застава ковачница – RTK, accessed May 13, 2025, https://rtk.co.rs/tag/%D0%B7%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B0-%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%87%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%86%D0%B0/
    19. Inside Serbia’s Booming Arms Industry – Radio Free Europe, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.rferl.org/a/24998852.html
    20. Zastava Arms USA – AT3 Tactical, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.at3tactical.com/collections/zastava-arms-usa
    21. Zastava ZPAP M70: An Authentic AK For The U.S. Market | An Official Journal Of The NRA, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.americanrifleman.org/content/zastava-zpap-m70-an-authentic-ak-for-the-u-s-market/
    22. Застава оружје — Википедија, accessed May 13, 2025, https://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%97%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B0_%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%83%D0%B6%D1%98%D0%B5
    23. Zastava oružje — Википедија, accessed May 13, 2025, https://sr.wikipedia.org/sr-el/%D0%97%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B0_%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%83%D0%B6%D1%98%D0%B5
    24. Old Gun Foundry Museum – European route of industrial heritage – ERIH, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.erih.net/i-want-to-go-there/site/old-gun-foundry-museum
    25. ВОЈСКА КРАЉЕВИНЕ СРБИЈЕ – ПРВИ СВЕТСКИ РАТ, accessed May 13, 2025, https://mikiprogramer.wordpress.com/%D0%B2%D0%BE%D1%98%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0-%D0%BA%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%99%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B5-%D1%81%D1%80%D0%B1%D0%B8%D1%98%D0%B5/
    26. Industrijalizacija Kragujevca: Od topova do automobila – Far, accessed May 13, 2025, https://far.rs/sr/2018/08/30/industrijalizacija-kragujevca-od-topova-automobila/
    27. Muzej Stara livnica, accessed May 13, 2025, http://www.muzej-topolivnica.rs/
    28. The Serbian Army and its Struggle with the Ammunition Crisis of 1914 – Časopis „Istorija 20. veka“, accessed May 13, 2025, https://istorija20veka.rs/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/2024_1_2_sar_19-44.pdf
    29. Yugoslavian Mauser M24/52-C 8mm Mauser (7.92×57) Rifle – Colorado Gun Sales, accessed May 13, 2025, https://cogunsales.com/product/yugoslavian-mauser-m24-52-c-8mm-mauser-7-92×57-rifle/
    30. WW1 WW2 Kingdom Of Yugoslavia M1924 Serbian Yugoslavian VTZ Bayonet With Scabbard – YuAntiques, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.yuantiques.com/ww1-ww2-kingdom-of-yugoslavia-m1924-serbian-yugoslavian-vtz-bayonet-with-scabbard
    31. The Kragujevac Massacre 1941| A Brutal Nazi Suppression at Yugoslavia – The Kootneeti, accessed May 13, 2025, https://thekootneeti.in/2017/10/20/the-kragujevac-massacre-1941-a-brutal-nazi-suppression-at-yugoslavia/
    32. Kragujevac massacre – Wikipedia, accessed May 13, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kragujevac_massacre
    33. How good is Zavasta : r/ak47 – Reddit, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ak47/comments/1ajvmg1/how_good_is_zavasta/
    34. TFA][AT] Zastava M70 (Cold War Series) – Steam Community, accessed May 13, 2025, https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3239065979
    35. Zastava Guns for Sale | Black Basin Outdoors, accessed May 13, 2025, https://blackbasin.com/zastava/
    36. Zastava M 98/48 – Wikipedia, accessed May 13, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zastava_M_98/48
    37. ZASTAVA M48 rifle – American Liberator, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.americanliberator.cz/en/gun/opakovaci-puska-crvena-zastava-m48
    38. Zastava M48 – Wikipedia, accessed May 13, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zastava_M48
    39. Zastava M53 | Weaponsystems.net, accessed May 13, 2025, https://weaponsystems.net/system/1673-Zastava%20M53
    40. M53 Machine Gun – The Recordist, accessed May 13, 2025, https://therecordist.com/product/m53-machine-gun/
    41. Застава М53 — Википедија, accessed May 13, 2025, https://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%97%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B0_%D0%9C53
    42. Yugoslavian M70 Assault Rifle. 7.62 cal – Live Firing – History in the Making, accessed May 13, 2025, https://history-making.com/product/yugoslavian-m72-assault-rifle-7-62-cal-heavy-barrel-live-firing-2/
    43. Застава М70 – Википедија, accessed May 13, 2025, https://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%97%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B0_%D0%9C70
    44. Zastava M70 (автомат) – Википедия, accessed May 13, 2025, https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zastava_M70_(%D0%B0%D0%B2%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%B0%D1%82)
    45. Штык-нож к пистолету-пулемёту М56 «Застава». – militaris, accessed May 13, 2025, http://militaris.ru/index.php/katalog/%D1%8E%D0%B3%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D1%88%D1%82%D1%8B%D0%BA-%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B6-%D0%BA-%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B5%D1%82%D1%83-%D0%BF%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BC%D1%91%D1%82%D1%83-%D0%BC56-%D0%B7%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B0-detail
    46. Застава М70А — Википедија, accessed May 13, 2025, https://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%97%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B0_%D0%9C70%D0%90
    47. Zastava oružje, accessed May 13, 2025, https://oruzje.net/zastava-oruzje
    48. Hunting and sporting firearms, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.armoran.ch/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Zastava_Arms_Zivil.pdf
    49. Sporting Rifle LK M70 – Zastava Arms USA, accessed May 13, 2025, https://zastavaarmsusa.com/product/sporting-rifle-lk-m70/
    50. Хронологија распада СФР Југославије – Српска енциклопедија, accessed May 13, 2025, http://www.srpskaenciklopedija.org/doku.php?id=%D1%85%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%B8%D1%98%D0%B0_%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%81%D0%BF%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%B0_%D1%81%D1%84%D1%80_%D1%98%D1%83%D0%B3%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%98%D0%B5
    51. НАТО бомбардовање Југославије – Википедија, accessed May 13, 2025, https://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9D%D0%90%D0%A2%D0%9E_%D0%B1%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%B1%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%9A%D0%B5_%D0%88%D1%83%D0%B3%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%98%D0%B5
    52. Югославская автоматическая винтовка «Застава» – боевой и гражданский варианты, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.militaryplatform.ru/10307-jugoslavskaja-avtomaticheskaja-vintovka-zastava-boevoj-i-grazhdanskij-varianty.html
    53. military guns catalogue® – zastava-arms.rs, accessed May 13, 2025, https://zastava-arms.rs/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/military_catalogue_2019_w.pdf
    54. Katalozi – Zastava oružje ad, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.zastava-arms.rs/katalozi/
    55. Успешан наступ фабрике „Застава оружје“ на изложби SHOT Show 2025. у Лас Вегасу, accessed May 13, 2025, https://rtk.co.rs/uspesan-nastup-fabrike-zastava-oruzje-na-izlozbi-shot-show-2025-u-las-vegasu/
    56. Review: Zastava ZPAP M70 Rifle | An Official Journal Of The NRA – Shooting Illustrated, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.shootingillustrated.com/content/review-zastava-zpap-m70-rifle/
    57. Отворен међународни сајам НВО “IDEX 2025”, Абу Даби – УАЕ – Yugoimport, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.yugoimport.com/aktuelnosti/dogadjaji/otvoren-17-medjunarodni-sajam-nvo-idex-2025-abu-dabi-uae
    58. “Zastava Arms” and “Remington” discontinued cooperation due to financial crisis – export to US market through new mediator – eKapija, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.ekapija.com/en/news/204951/where-to-invest/infrastructure%2525252525252525252Findex
    59. Government of Serbia approved export of “Zastava” arms to Armenia, arrangement worth 1.75m USD – eKapija, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.ekapija.com/en/news/86107/infrastructure/real-estate%252Finvestments
    60. „Заставино” оружје иде у Америку за 235 милиона долара – Politika, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.politika.rs/scc/clanak/479359/zastavino-oruzje-ide-u-ameriku-za-235-miliona-dolara
    61. „Застава оружје” уговорила извоз у САД вредан 235 милиона долара – Politika, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.politika.rs/scc/clanak/479728/zastava-oruzje-ugovorila-izvoz-u-sad-vredan-235-miliona-dolara
    62. List of military aid to Ukraine during the Russo-Ukrainian War – Wikipedia, accessed May 13, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_military_aid_to_Ukraine_during_the_Russo-Ukrainian_War
    63. Stanje i perspektive ekonomsko-finansijskih odnosa Srbije sa inostranstvom, accessed May 13, 2025, https://ndes.ekof.bg.ac.rs/downloadsakta/zbornik2014deo2.pdf
    64. Smenjeni dosadašnji članovi Nadzornog odbora “Zastava oružje” – Nova Ekonomija, accessed May 13, 2025, https://novaekonomija.rs/vesti-iz-zemlje/smenjeni-dosadasnji-clanovi-nadzornog-odbora-zastava-oruzje
    65. Defense industry of Serbia – Wikipedia, accessed May 13, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_industry_of_Serbia
    66. застава оружје ад надзорни одбор број: 28 – дана: 16.04.2025. године крагујевац – zastava-arms.rs, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.zastava-arms.rs/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Odluka-o-sazivanju-vanredne-sednice-Skupstine-12.05.2025.pdf
    67. Zastava USA: Its not about rifle, it is about factory | AfricaHunting.com, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.africahunting.com/threads/zastava-usa-its-not-about-rifle-it-is-about-factory.79578/
    68. Zastava LK M70 worth the money? | AfricaHunting.com, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.africahunting.com/threads/zastava-lk-m70-worth-the-money.81209/
    69. News – Zastava oružje ad – zastava-arms.rs, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.zastava-arms.rs/en/news/
    70. Вести – Zastava oružje ad, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.zastava-arms.rs/sr/%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8/
    71. Музеј “Стара ливница” – ГТО Крагујевац, accessed May 13, 2025, https://gtokg.org.rs/muzej-stara-livnica/

    Yugoslavia’s AK Path: The Venerable M72 RPK

    If you’ve ever held a military era Yugo M70B1, you know it’s heavy for an AK. If you thought that was heavy, now lift an M72B1 … now’s that’s heavy. The M70B1 and M72B1 are my favorite AK variants. I’ve owned and sold M76s, M77s, M92s and just keep returning to the M70B1 and M72B1. No, I’m not an underfolder fan so I am specifically talking about the fixed stock rifles. At any rate, let’s look into the history of the M72 specifically.

    1. Introduction: Yugoslavia’s Squad Automatic Weapon

    In the decades following World War II, the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia embarked on an ambitious program to establish a self-sufficient domestic arms industry. Spearheaded by the state-owned Zastava Oružje (Zastava Arms) factory in Kragujevac, Serbia, early efforts involved experimenting with captured German designs like the StG 44 before turning towards the globally influential Kalashnikov pattern.1 While Zastava initially faced challenges in reverse-engineering early AK-47 samples, their persistence laid the groundwork for a unique family of Yugoslav small arms.1

    Within the tactical doctrine of the Jugoslovenska Narodna Armija (JNA or Yugoslav People’s Army), a clear need emerged for a weapon capable of delivering sustained, accurate suppressive fire at the squad level. This requirement mirrored the Soviet military’s thinking, which led to the development of the RPK (Ruchnoy Pulemyot Kalashnikova or Kalashnikov Handheld Machine Gun) as a companion weapon to the standard AKM assault rifle. Yugoslavia’s answer to this challenge was the Zastava M72 Puškomitraljez (Light Machine Gun).2 Developed in the late 1960s and entering service around 1973, the M72 was undeniably rooted in the Kalashnikov operating system but, true to Zastava’s emerging tradition, incorporated distinct features reflecting Yugoslavian design priorities and manufacturing capabilities.2 The creation of the M72 was more than just filling a tactical niche; it was a statement of Yugoslavia’s growing industrial independence and its approach of adapting, rather than simply replicating, foreign weapon designs to meet its own specific military requirements.

    2. Foundation: From the M64 to the M70

    The journey to the M72 LMG begins with Zastava’s earlier work on Kalashnikov-type assault rifles. The M64 Automatska Puška (Automatic Rifle), Zastava’s first serious attempt at a domestic AK, served as a crucial, albeit limited-production, developmental stepping stone.1 Though not adopted in large numbers by the JNA, the M64 introduced several features that would become hallmarks of Yugoslav Kalashnikov derivatives. These included a milled receiver, heavily based on the Soviet AK Type 3 but with cosmetic differences like a raised step on the left side, a thicker (though not chrome-lined) barrel, and, significantly, an integral folding grenade sight mounted on the gas block.1 This sight, when raised, also acted as a gas cut-off, safely disabling the gas system for launching rifle grenades – a capability the JNA valued highly. Other M64 innovations included a unique latch mechanism to prevent the dust cover from being dislodged by grenade recoil and, on some prototypes, a bolt hold-open device.1

    Building on the M64 experience, Zastava developed the AP M70 (Automatska Puška Model 1970), which was formally adopted by the JNA in 1970.1 The M70 represented a refinement and simplification of the M64 design for mass production. While the complex bolt hold-open mechanism within the receiver was removed to cut costs, Zastava introduced proprietary magazines with follower plates designed to hold the bolt open after the last round, achieving a similar function.1

    The enlarged left lobe of the follower catches the bolt and locks the action open thus signalling the rifle is empty.

    Crucially, the M70 retained the vital grenade launching sight and gas cut-off system. Early M70s featured milled receivers like the M64, but production soon shifted towards using pressed and pinned barrels and, eventually, receivers made from stamped sheet steel.1 These stamped receiver models, designated M70B1 (fixed stock) and M70AB1/AB2 (underfolding stock), featured receivers notably thicker (1.5mm) than the standard Soviet AKM (1.0mm) and incorporated a distinctive bulged front trunnion.6 This added reinforcement was widely seen as necessary to withstand the repeated stresses of launching rifle grenades.1 The M70B1 also introduced a longer wooden handguard with three cooling slots, another visual identifier of Yugoslav AK variants.6

    The M70, particularly in its robust stamped receiver M70B1 configuration, provided the direct technical foundation upon which the M72 LMG was built.2 The M72 inherited the M70’s basic operating mechanism, receiver construction principles, and general layout. The emphasis on receiver strength in the M70, driven largely by the requirement to handle rifle grenades, inadvertently created an exceptionally sturdy platform. This inherent robustness proved highly advantageous when adapting the design for the M72’s intended role as a light machine gun, a role demanding durability under the heat and stress of sustained automatic fire, even though the M72 itself would dispense with the grenade launching capability.2

    3. The Birth of the M72: Adapting the RPK Concept

    Zastava’s objective in developing the M72 was clear: create a light machine gun based on the M70 assault rifle, mirroring the relationship between the Soviet AKM and RPK.2 Such an approach offered significant logistical advantages, ensuring commonality of ammunition (7.62x39mm M67), operating principles, and many internal parts between the standard issue rifle and the squad’s light support weapon. This simplified training, maintenance, and supply lines for the JNA.

    To fulfill the LMG role, Zastava incorporated several features standard to the RPK concept:

    • Longer, Heavier Barrel: The M72 was fitted with a significantly longer and heavier barrel than the M70 – typically cited as 542mm (approximately 21.3 inches) compared to the M70’s 415mm (16.3 inches).1 This increased the muzzle velocity from the M70’s 720 m/s to 745 m/s for the M72, enhancing effective range, and provided greater mass to absorb and dissipate heat during sustained fire.2
    • Integral Bipod: A folding bipod was mounted near the muzzle, providing a stable firing platform when deployed.2
    • Reinforced Receiver: The M72 utilized the robust receiver design principles established with the M70, whether milled in early versions or the heavy-gauge stamped type in later models.4
    • Modified Stock: While Soviet RPKs featured a distinct “clubfoot” stock for better support, early Zastava M72s used a fixed wooden stock shaped similarly to the standard AKM/M70 rifle.4
    • Windage Adjustable Rear Sight: The M72 has an elevation and windage adjustable rear sight but they are not nightsights. The M70 series has an elevation adjustable but fixed windage rear sight plus night sights front and rear.

    However, Zastava did not merely copy the RPK. The M72 incorporated distinctive Yugoslav elements:

    • Barrel Cooling Fins: The most visually striking and functionally significant Yugoslav innovation was the inclusion of prominent cooling fins machined into the exposed portion of the barrel, just forward of the handguard.2 These fins increased the barrel’s surface area, promoting more efficient air cooling during prolonged automatic fire sequences. This feature, absent on Soviet or Romanian RPKs, suggests that Zastava’s engineers specifically identified potential barrel overheating under sustained fire as a critical area for improvement in the LMG role and implemented a proactive engineering solution, even though it added complexity to barrel manufacturing. It points towards an independent design assessment focused on enhancing practical performance beyond simply adding barrel mass.
    • Omission of Scope Rail: Unlike many contemporary LMGs and later RPK variants, the standard M72 series typically lacked the side-mounted scope rail common on many Kalashnikov-pattern weapons.4 Optical sights required optional mounts.
    • No Grenade Launching Capability: In a departure from its M70 parent, the M72 design omitted the rifle grenade launching sight and the associated gas cut-off mechanism.2 This simplified the gas block and front sight assembly, focusing the weapon solely on its machine gun role. Also, the top cover lock found on the M70 series was not needed either.

    Early development reports also suggest that Zastava experimented with quick-change barrels for the M72, a feature common on heavier machine guns, but ultimately abandoned this complexity in favor of a simpler, fixed-barrel design for the production models.2

    4. The Milled Receiver M72: The First Generation

    The initial production version of the Zastava M72, entering service around 1973, featured a receiver machined from a solid block of steel, following the manufacturing techniques used for the M64 and early M70 rifles.2 These milled receivers adhered to the Zastava pattern, likely heavier than their Soviet counterparts and incorporating subtle differences in geometry.1 Evidence suggests there might have been minor variations even among these early milled M72s, sometimes retrospectively distinguished as M72A (potentially using M64-style receivers with threaded barrels and remnants of bolt-hold-open provisions) and M72B (using slab-sided receivers with pressed/pinned barrels).10 Common characteristics of this first generation included the heavy, finned 542mm barrel, a fixed wooden stock shaped like that of the M70, an integral folding bipod, standard adjustable iron sights graduated to 1000 meters, and chambering for the 7.62x39mm cartridge.2 The weight was substantial, around 5.0 to 5.5 kg empty.2

    Compared to the Soviet RPK of the era, the milled M72 stood apart due to its unique receiver details, the distinctive cooling fins, and the lack of the RPK’s characteristic clubfoot stock.4 Compared to its M70 sibling, the M72 was easily identified by its much longer and heavier finned barrel, the bipod, and the absence of the grenade sight.2 The decision to launch the M72 with a milled receiver likely stemmed from Zastava’s existing production infrastructure and perhaps an initial design emphasis on maximum possible durability, a common attribute associated with milled Kalashnikovs. The subtle variations noted within the milled production run hint at ongoing refinement and potential manufacturing adjustments even before the major shift towards stamped receivers occurred.7

    5. Evolution: The Stamped Receiver M72B1 and M72AB1

    Mirroring the global evolution of Kalashnikov manufacturing seen in the transition from the AK-47 to the AKM, Zastava eventually shifted M72 production from milled receivers to stamped sheet steel receivers. This move resulted in the M72B1, which became the most common and widely produced variant of the Yugoslav LMG.2 The primary drivers for this change were economic and logistical: stamped receivers are significantly faster and less expensive to manufacture than milled ones, allowing for higher production volumes.1

    Despite the shift to stamping, Zastava maintained a focus on robustness. The M72B1’s receiver was formed from a thicker 1.5mm steel sheet, compared to the 1.0mm standard for Soviet AKM and RPK rifles.6 It also incorporated the heavy, bulged front trunnion characteristic of the M70B1 assault rifle, providing extra support at the critical barrel-receiver interface.7 This commitment to heavier construction ensured the stamped M72B1 retained a high degree of strength and durability suitable for its role, even without the solid steel receiver block. Other features remained largely consistent with the earlier milled M72: the signature finned heavy barrel, fixed wooden stock (typically AKM/M70 pattern), and usually a fixed folding bipod.2

    Zastava M72B1 exhibited at the Partner 2015 show. The author is Srđan Popović. The photo is from Wikimedia.

    Recognizing the need for a more compact weapon for specialized troops, Zastava also developed the M72AB1 variant.2 The defining feature of the M72AB1 was its sturdy, steel underfolding stock, patterned after the one used on the M70AB2 assault rifle.2 This allowed the overall length of the weapon to be significantly reduced for easier storage and maneuverability within vehicles or for airborne operations.3 The M72AB1 is often noted as being quite unique, potentially the only mass-produced RPK-type light machine gun to utilize this style of underfolding stock, which is more commonly associated with assault rifles.2 Some sources also suggest that the bipod on the M72AB1 variant was designed to be detachable, unlike the typically fixed bipod of the M72 and M72B1, further enhancing its adaptability.4

    The evolution from the milled M72 to the stamped M72B1 and M72AB1 showcases Zastava’s ability to adapt modern manufacturing techniques for cost-effectiveness while preserving the core Yugoslavian design philosophy emphasizing robustness, evidenced by the heavy-gauge receiver and bulged trunnion. The development of the M72AB1 further demonstrates a tailoring of the basic design to meet specific operational requirements of the JNA, adding versatility to the M72 family.

    6. Foreign Production: The Iraqi Al Quds

    The Zastava M72’s reputation for robustness and reliability extended beyond Yugoslavia’s borders. Around 1978, Iraq secured a license from Zastava to manufacture the M72 domestically.2 Production was undertaken by the state-run Al-Qadissiya Establishments.2 The Iraqi-produced versions were designated Al Quds (Arabic: القدس), meaning “The Holy,” a reference to Jerusalem.2

    Iraq manufactured licensed copies corresponding to both the fixed-stock M72B1 and the underfolding-stock M72AB1 Yugoslav models.3 The Al Quds became a standard issue LMG within the Iraqi armed forces and saw extensive service. This licensing agreement stands as the most significant instance of foreign production for the M72 design. It not only highlights the international regard for the Yugoslav weapon’s qualities but also underscores the maturity and export success of Yugoslavia’s arms industry during that period. Yugoslavia, under Josip Broz Tito, cultivated relationships with many Non-Aligned Movement nations, including Iraq, positioning itself as an alternative arms supplier to the major Cold War blocs. The selection of the Zastava M72 design for licensed production, potentially over the Soviet RPK itself, may reflect specific Iraqi preferences for the M72’s features (like the cooling fins or heavier receiver) or simply more favorable terms offered by Zastava. The Al Quds production significantly contributed to the proliferation of the M72 pattern, particularly throughout the Middle East.2

    I think he is holding an Al Quds. When I zoomed into the rear sight block, there appears to be a good deal of script on it even though I can’t read it – more than I would expect to see on a Zastava manufactured M72B1. The image is from Wikimedia and the description is “Iraqi army soldiers assigned to 3rd Battalion, 52nd Brigade, 14th Iraqi Army prepare to assault an objective during a live fire exercise on Tealeaf Island near Basra, Iraq, Oct. 25, 2010. Iraqi forces conducted live fire exercises to better prepare them for real world situations with U.S. soldiers with 1st Infantry Division on hand to provide advice and assistance in support of Operation New Dawn.” The author is SSgt Michael Casteel.
    This Iraqi soldier is carrying a M72AB1 pattern rifle. Whether an Al Quds or a Zastava, I am not sure. Most likely an Al Quds. What is unknown is the barrel – it may just be the lighting but I am not sure there were the typical cooling fins between the handguard and the gas block. The photo was obtained from Wikimedia and the photo is attributed to James McCauley. Junly 17, 2005. The author noted “The Iraqi soldiers liked the idea of passing out teddy bears to kids. So, they attached them to their helmets like we did.”

    7. Comparative Overview: The M72 Family

    The Zastava M72 evolved through several distinct variants, primarily differing in receiver construction and stock configuration. While all shared the core LMG features of a long, heavy, finned barrel and bipod, understanding their key differences clarifies their development path and intended roles.

    The following table summarizes the main characteristics of the primary Yugoslav M72 variants:

    Zastava M72 Family Variants Comparison

    FeatureM72 (Milled)M72B1 (Stamped, Fixed Stock)M72AB1 (Stamped, Folding Stock)
    Receiver TypeMilled SteelStamped Steel (1.5mm thickness)Stamped Steel (1.5mm thickness)
    Stock TypeFixed Wood (AKM/M70 style)Fixed Wood (AKM/M70 style)Underfolding Metal (M70AB2 style)
    BarrelHeavy Profile, Finned, ~542mmHeavy Profile, Finned, ~542mmHeavy Profile, Finned, ~542mm
    Bipod TypeFixed FoldingFixed FoldingDetachable Folding (often cited)
    Approx. Weight~5.5 kg~5.0 kg~5.0 kg
    Overall Length~1025 mm~1025 mm~1025 mm (extended) / ~765 mm (folded)
    Key IdentifiersSolid milled receiver; fixed stockStamped receiver, bulged trunnion; fixed stockStamped receiver, bulged trunnion; underfolding stock

    Note: Weights and exact bipod configurations can vary slightly based on specific production runs and sources. 2

    This comparison highlights the M72 family’s clear lineage. The initial model prioritized ultimate durability via milling. The subsequent M72B1 adopted more efficient stamped construction while retaining robustness through heavier materials and design features like the bulged trunnion. The M72AB1 adapted this stamped platform for portability, catering to specialized military units. Throughout this evolution, the core concept – a squad automatic weapon built on the Yugoslav Kalashnikov pattern, distinguished by its heavy, finned barrel – remained consistent.

    8. Legacy and Conclusion

    The Zastava M72 proved to be a durable and effective light machine gun. It served as the standard squad automatic weapon for the Jugoslovenska Narodna Armija and continued in service with the armed forces of the successor states formed after Yugoslavia’s dissolution.4 Its ruggedness ensured its appearance in numerous conflicts across the globe, from the Balkan wars of the 1990s to conflicts in Iraq, Afghanistan, and various parts of Africa, often wielded by both state militaries and non-state armed groups.4

    Generally regarded as a high-quality Kalashnikov derivative, the M72 earned a reputation for reliability and solid construction.6 Its unique features, particularly the barrel cooling fins, set it apart visually and functionally from its Soviet RPK counterpart and other RPK-pattern LMGs. While perhaps heavier than some contemporaries due to its robust build, this contributed to its perceived durability under harsh conditions and sustained fire.

    In the vast family tree of Kalashnikov weapons, the Zastava M72 represents a significant and distinct branch. It exemplifies Yugoslavia’s successful approach to adapting a proven foreign design, enhancing it with unique engineering solutions born from independent assessment and national manufacturing capabilities. The M72 was not merely an RPK clone; it was a Yugoslav Puškomitraljez, tailored to meet specific requirements and built to last. Its enduring presence on battlefields decades after its introduction is a testament to the fundamental soundness of its Zastava M70-derived design, enhanced for the demanding role of a light machine gun, and a lasting symbol of Zastava Oružje‘s Cold War-era prowess in small arms development.

    Image Sources

    The main photo was obtained from Wikipedia and the exposure increased to show the M72 a bit better. The description of the photo is “U.S. Marine Corps Lance Cpl. Branden G. Cooper, left, with Security Cooperation Task Force Africa Partnership Station 2012, receives familiarization training on a foreign weapon system at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, N.C., May 18, 2012. The training was designed to educate the Marines in order to work effectively with foreign host nations during deployment. Africa Partnership Station is an international security cooperation initiative facilitated by Commander, U.S. Naval Forces Europe-Africa aimed at strengthening global maritime partnerships through training and collaborative activities in order to improve maritime safety and security in Africa.” The Author is SSgt Jemssy Alvarez Jr.

    Zastava M72B1 exhibited at the Partner 2015 show. The author is Srđan Popović. The photo is from Wikimedia.

    “Iraqi army soldiers assigned to 3rd Battalion, 52nd Brigade, 14th Iraqi Army prepare to assault an objective during a live fire exercise on Tealeaf Island near Basra, Iraq, Oct. 25, 2010. Iraqi forces conducted live fire exercises to better prepare them for real world situations with U.S. soldiers with 1st Infantry Division on hand to provide advice and assistance in support of Operation New Dawn.” The author is SSgt Michael Casteel. The image is from Wikimedia

    This Iraqi soldier is carrying a M72AB1 pattern rifle. Whether an Al Quds or a Zastava, I am not sure. Most likely an Al Quds. The photo was obtained from Wikimedia and the photo is attributed to James McCauley. Junly 17, 2005. The author noted “The Iraqi soldiers liked the idea of passing out teddy bears to kids. So, they attached them to their helmets like we did.”

    Works cited

    1. Zastava M70 assault rifle – Wikipedia, accessed May 12, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zastava_M70_assault_rifle
    2. Zastava M72 | Weaponsystems.net, accessed May 12, 2025, https://weaponsystems.net/system/377-Zastava+M72
    3. Zastava M72 — Википедија, accessed May 12, 2025, https://sr.wikipedia.org/sr-el/%D0%97%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B0_%D0%9C72
    4. Zastava M72 – Wikipedia, accessed May 12, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zastava_M72
    5. Застава М72 | Wiki | S.T.A.L.K.E.R Новая Зона. Amino, accessed May 12, 2025, https://aminoapps.com/c/stalkernovai873/page/item/zastava-m72/aPJM_6pc8IEXVBeWmrDqXez6r4bBnlgxr
    6. Zastava M70 | Weaponsystems.net, accessed May 12, 2025, https://weaponsystems.net/system/376-Zastava+M70
    7. What are the Differences between the yugo milled and stamped RPK other than the receivers? (Only yugo rpk) : r/ak47 – Reddit, accessed May 12, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ak47/comments/98wdmy/what_are_the_differences_between_the_yugo_milled/
    8. Zastava M72 | Weaponsystems.net, accessed May 12, 2025, https://development.weaponsystems.net/system/377-Zastava%20M72
    9. The Zastava M72 has arrived as per email from ZUSA. : r/ak47 – Reddit, accessed May 12, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ak47/comments/1hixbvo/the_zastava_m72_has_arrived_as_per_email_from_zusa/
    10. Was the zastava m72 ever produced in a milled version? It’s an original early M72? – Reddit, accessed May 12, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ak47/comments/sjejgv/was_the_zastava_m72_ever_produced_in_a_milled/
    11. Застава М72 — Википедија, accessed May 12, 2025, https://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%97%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B0_%D0%9C72
    12. Югославская автоматическая винтовка «Застава» – боевой и гражданский варианты, accessed May 12, 2025, https://www.militaryplatform.ru/10307-jugoslavskaja-avtomaticheskaja-vintovka-zastava-boevoj-i-grazhdanskij-varianty.html
    13. Just picked up the new M72 (low serial #). Here are my initial impressions. : r/zastavaarms101 – Reddit, accessed May 12, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/zastavaarms101/comments/1hx06ru/just_picked_up_the_new_m72_low_serial_here_are_my/

    If you find this post useful, please share the link on Facebook, with your friends, etc. Your support is much appreciated and if you have any feedback, please email me at in**@*********ps.com. Please note that for links to other websites, I may be paid via an affiliate program such as Avantlink, Impact, Amazon and eBay.


    When Strength and Quality Matter Most