Executive Summary

The European security architecture is currently navigating a period of profound structural erosion, characterized by the 62nd Munich Security Conference’s (MSC) theme of “Under Destruction”.¹ This week, ending February 14, 2026, has seen the convergence of systemic geopolitical shifts, escalating hybrid warfare in the Baltic region, and intense domestic unrest that threatens the administrative stability of the European Union (EU). The primary driver of insecurity remains a revanchist Russian Federation, which has transitioned from conventional aggression in Ukraine to a sophisticated campaign of “unpeace,” utilizing global positioning system (GPS) jamming and undersea sabotage to degrade the resilience of NATO’s Northern and Eastern Flanks.²

Concurrently, the transatlantic relationship is undergoing a tectonic realignment. The second Trump administration has moved from rhetorical skepticism of NATO to a posture of “ambiguous detachment,” tying the US security umbrella to explicit economic alignment and placing the primary responsibility for conventional deterrence on European allies.² This has prompted a frantic search for “strategic autonomy” among European leaders, exemplified by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s call to build “hard power” as the “currency of the age”.⁴ Military readiness is being tested through the launch of NATO’s “Arctic Sentry” mission and the conclusion of “Dynamic Front 26,” exercises designed to rehearse high-intensity, multi-domain conflict with peer adversaries.⁵

On the domestic front, the EU is besieged by a wave of agrarian and labor revolts. Thousands of farmers have blockaded Brussels and Paris, protesting the EU-Mercosur trade deal and environmental regulations that they claim threaten their livelihoods.⁷ In Belgium, the “Arizona” coalition government faces a crisis of governability as nationwide strikes against austerity measures cripple infrastructure.⁹ Economically, while energy markets show signs of oversupply in natural gas, the structural tightening of the carbon market and persistent high electricity prices continue to threaten the competitiveness of European industry.¹⁰ The intelligence community assesses that these internal divisions are being actively exploited by both state actors and far-right extremist networks to weaken European resolve and disrupt the implementation of long-term defense strategies.¹²

Geopolitical Assessment: The Munich Security Conference and the Breakdown of Order

The 62nd Munich Security Conference (MSC) has served as the epicenter of international diplomacy this week, providing a bleak diagnostic of the global order. The “Munich Security Report 2026,” titled “Under Destruction,” argues that the post-1945 international system is no longer merely under strain but is being actively dismantled by a new wave of “wrecking-ball politics”.¹ This destruction is not a byproduct of external shocks but a deliberate policy choice by actors who favor transactional deals over principled cooperation.¹

Transatlantic Realignment and the US Posture

The presence of US Secretary of State Marco Rubio at the MSC highlighted the stark divergence in transatlantic priorities. Rubio’s messaging centered on “The U.S. in the World,” emphasizing a global order where the US is freed from the constraints of traditional alliances to pursue its own prosperity.¹ This “ambiguous detachment” has left European capitals in a state of psychological limbo between denial and acceptance.² Washington has increasingly tied security guarantees to economic interests, signaling that the US defense umbrella is no longer a given but a conditional service.²

A particularly contentious point this week has been the US rhetoric regarding Greenland. The Trump administration’s renewed expressions of interest in “acquiring” the territory have outraged European leaders, leading Denmark’s intelligence services to assess that the US, while an ally, may also represent a potential security threat to European territorial integrity.² This has deepened the sense of insecurity, as Europe realizes it is being viewed by its primary guarantor not just as a partner, but as a theatre for geoeconomic exploitation.²

The European Response: A Turn Toward Hard Power

In response to the US retreat, European leaders have shifted their rhetoric toward military self-reliance. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz opened the MSC by declaring that the “old world order no longer exists” and calling for a fundamental repair of US-Europe ties, even as he urged Europe to strengthen its independent military power.¹⁴ Merz’s position reflects the reality that Europe can no longer take its freedom for granted and must invest heavily in deterrence.¹⁴

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s speech on Saturday, February 14, was perhaps the most forceful articulation of this new reality. Starmer argued that the road ahead is “straight and clear” and that Europe must build “hard power” to defend its values and way of life.⁴ This sentiment was echoed by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, who emphasized that Europe must stand on its own feet.⁴ This rhetorical shift is being backed by a 5% defense spending pledge among several allies, though experts remain skeptical as to whether these efforts can compensate for the erosion of “Pax Americana” in the short term.²

MSC 2026 Speaker	Key Message	Strategic Implication
Friedrich Merz (DE)	The old world order is dead; Europe must invest in its own defense.	Shift from security consumer to security provider.
Marco Rubio (US)	The US must be freed from alliance constraints to focus on domestic prosperity.	Transition to a transactional transatlantic relationship.
Keir Starmer (UK)	Hard power is the currency of the age; Europe must be ready to fight.	Push for strategic autonomy and military readiness.
Volodymyr Zelenskyy (UA)	Risk of US-Russia bilateral deals on Ukraine without Kyiv’s consent.	Fear of a “peace” on Russian terms that compromises EU security.
Wang Yi (CN)	China’s vision for a multipolar global order.	Strategic competition for influence in the Global South.

The Ukraine Conflict: Attrition and Escalation

The war in Ukraine, now entering its fifth year, remains the most significant and direct threat to European security.² This week has seen a “new height of brutality,” with Russia launching deadly strikes on Ukrainian cities ahead of the Munich summit.² President Zelenskyy warned at the MSC that there is a severe risk of the US and Russia striking bilateral deals over Ukraine’s future without involving Kyiv.¹⁷ Intelligence analysts suggest that a ceasefire on Russian terms is currently one of the most acute risks to European stability, as it would reward aggression and leave the EU with a permanently unstable frontier.¹⁶

Russia’s strategy is increasingly one of “erosion,” betting on the gradual exhaustion of European political resolve and the depletion of Western military stockpiles.¹⁶ While a direct NATO-Russia war is still considered unlikely in 2026 due to remaining US deterrent power, Moscow is focusing on military actions in non-NATO neighboring states and intensifying its hybrid campaign across the continent.¹⁶

Military and Intelligence SITREP: Exercises, Posture, and Command

NATO has significantly increased its operational tempo this week, launching new missions and concluding major exercises that reflect a return to high-intensity collective defense planning.

Arctic Sentry and Northern Flank Security

On February 11, 2026, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte announced the activation of “Arctic Sentry,” a new multi-domain activity led by Joint Force Command (JFC) Norfolk.⁵ This mission is designed to bolster security in the Arctic and High North, a region of increasing strategic competition where Russia has expanded its military footprint and China has sought to assert its interests.⁵

Arctic Sentry serves as an umbrella for existing exercises like Denmark’s “Arctic Endurance” and Norway’s “Cold Response,” bringing tens of thousands of personnel together under a single operational approach.⁵ This mission is explicitly intended to signal to Moscow that NATO possesses a unified and lethal response capability in the North Atlantic and Arctic.¹⁸ Rutte confirmed that the mission’s design was influenced by talks with the US administration, aimed at addressing American concerns about Arctic security while ensuring European allies take on a greater share of the burden.¹⁸

Dynamic Front 26: Rehearsing Multi-Domain Fires

In Romania, the US-led exercise “Dynamic Front 26” concluded this week, providing a critical demonstration of the “Eastern Flank Deterrence Line” (EFDL).¹⁹ This exercise, which involved Romanian, French, Italian, and German forces, focused on the integration of offensive and defensive fires in a distributed battlefield.¹⁹

The technological objectives of the exercise were ambitious. The US Army’s 56th Multi-Domain Command rehearsed the capability to engage 1,500 targets in a 24-hour period and shoot down between 600 and 1,200 ballistic missiles during the same timeframe.⁶ These drills incorporated several lessons from the Ukraine conflict, including the use of decoy drones to misdirect enemy fire and high-altitude drones to detect electronic warfare (EW) systems.⁶ The goal is to create a “relentless experience” for any adversary that chooses to aggress into NATO territory.⁶

NATO Exercise/Activity	Domain/Focus	Lead Command	Location
Arctic Sentry	Multi-domain Arctic Security	JFC Norfolk	High North/Arctic
Dynamic Front 26	Artillery and Multi-domain Fires	56th MDC	Romania
Steadfast Dart 26	Allied Reaction Force (ARF) Deployment	JFC Brunssum	Germany
Arctic Dolphin 26	Naval/Anti-Submarine Warfare (ASW)	Norway	Western Fjords
Cold Response 26	Nordic-Baltic High Intensity Defense	Norway	Norway, Finland, Sweden

Command Structure and Defense Production

A significant development in allied cooperation occurred on February 12, as NATO ministers agreed on a new distribution of senior officer posts in the Command Structure.⁵ This agreement ensures that European allies, including the newest members (Finland and Sweden), take on greater responsibility, which is viewed as a form of effective burden-sharing.⁵

In tandem with command changes, allies have launched new multinational capability initiatives. These include:

1. Ballistic Missile Defense: Belgium, Denmark, France, the Netherlands, Norway, Türkiye, and the UK committed to developing sensors, interceptors, and tactical control systems to strengthen defense against missile threats.²⁰
2. Drone-based Deep Precision Strike: Denmark, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Poland, and Türkiye will collaborate on innovative drone capabilities, involving non-traditional defense companies to accelerate production.²⁰
3. Air Power Resilience: Fifteen allies committed to enhancing air power readiness and interoperability to ensure the alliance can maintain air superiority in a contested environment.²⁰

Hybrid Warfare and Cyber Security: The “Unpeace” Domain

Europe is currently the primary target of a sustained hybrid campaign that aims to weaken political resolve and degrade critical infrastructure without crossing the threshold into conventional war.¹⁶

Baltic Sea GPS Jamming and Spoofing

This week, the “Baltic Sentry” mission and European intelligence agencies documented a significant escalation in Russian electronic warfare (EW) activity. On February 6, fourteen European states—including the UK, Germany, and the Nordic-Baltic nations—issued a formal warning about GPS interference originating from the Russian Federation.³ This interference is degrading the safety of international shipping in the Baltic and North Seas, affecting sat-nav positioning, AIS tracking, and emergency communications.³

The scale of the disruption is unprecedented. In 2025 alone, Sweden recorded 733 instances of satellite interference in its airspace, up from 495 in 2024.²² The disruption is attributed to Russian units in the Kaliningrad region, specifically the 841st Separate Electronic Warfare Center.²³ The EU has responded by imposing sanctions on individuals and organizations involved in these operations, noting that spoofing tracking data “undermines maritime safety and severely hampers rescue operations”.²¹

Undersea Infrastructure and the “Shadow Fleet”

The Russian “shadow fleet”—a decentralized network of aging tankers used to circumvent sanctions—is being utilized as a delivery mechanism for hybrid attacks.²⁴ The “Fitburg” case, involving a cargo ship that damaged an undersea cable in Estonia’s exclusive economic zone on New Year’s Eve, remains a focal point of investigation.²⁴ The ship was found to be transporting sanctioned Russian steel and military goods between Russia and Iran.²⁴ Intelligence reports suggest that Russia will continue to target undersea cables, which are essential for European data transmission and energy security.²⁴

The European Commission Cyberattack

The week was also marked by the revelation of a targeted cyberattack on the European Commission’s IT infrastructure. Traces of the attack were identified on January 30, specifically targeting the systems managing mobile devices for Commission staff.²⁵ While the Commission’s cybersecurity arm, CERT-EU, contained the incident within nine hours, it admitted that personal information, including names and phone numbers, may have been accessed.²⁵ This breach has accelerated the rollout of the EU’s “Cybersecurity Act 2.0,” which focuses on securing the ICT supply chain and mitigating risks from “high-risk suppliers”.²⁶

Hybrid Activity Type	Incident/Location	Impact/Risk	Attribution (Suspected)
GPS Jamming	Baltic Sea Air/Maritime	Navigational safety; air disasters.	Russia (Kaliningrad)
AIS Spoofing	Gulf of Finland	Shipping collisions; rescue failure.	Shadow Fleet/Russia
Undersea Sabotage	Estonia EEZ	Data transmission loss.	Shadow Fleet
Cyber Intrusions	European Commission (Brussels)	Data theft; institutional instability.	Unspecified (Under Investigation)
Weaponized Migration	Eastern/Southern Borders	Institutional strain; social friction.	Russia/Belarus

Economic and Energy Assessment: Strategic Brainstorming in Alden Biesen

The economic situation in Europe is characterized by a “valuation pause” as investors await key US inflation data, while EU leaders attempt to craft a new industrial strategy for competitive industries.²⁸

The Alden Biesen Retreat: Competitiveness and Autonomy

On February 12, EU leaders met for an informal “strategic brainstorming session” at Alden Biesen in Belgium.²⁸ The retreat focused on the “Draghi Report” priorities: reducing bureaucracy, completing the single market, and strengthening innovation.²⁸ A primary goal is to leverage the 33 trillion Euro in private savings across Europe to fund strategic needs, such as defense and the energy transition.²⁸

President António Costa emphasized the need to harness the full potential of the single market in a “new geoeconomic context,” which includes promoting a “Savings and Investment Union” and strengthening digital sovereignty.²⁸ However, internal divisions persist; for instance, France is promoting a “Buy European” policy for defense and space sectors, while smaller, export-driven states remain hesitant.²⁸

Energy Markets and Carbon Pricing

Energy markets enter mid-February in a relatively comfortable supply environment, though long-term structural pressures remain. Natural gas prices (TTF) are expected to average 30 EUR/MWh in 2026, driven by an expansion in global LNG supply from the US and Qatar.¹⁰ This oversupply is expected to persist through the second and third quarters of the year.¹⁰

However, the European carbon market (EU ETS) is tightening. Prices are projected to average 84 EUR/tonne in 2026 due to reduced supply from the Market Stability Reserve and the phase-out of free allowances.¹⁰ This creates a “price floor” that keeps electricity costs high for industrial users, leading to warnings from the steel and chemical sectors that high energy prices are threatening Europe’s economic competitiveness.¹¹

Market Indicator	Value (Feb 13, 2026)	Change	Sentiment
Euro Stoxx 50	5,984.66	-0.44%	Cautious
Brent Crude Oil	67.75 USD/bbl	Weekly Decline	Bearish (Surplus)
Dutch TTF Gas	32.89 EUR/MWh	+2.23%	Stable (Surplus)
EU ETS Carbon	~84.00 EUR/t	Structural Rise	Bullish (Supply Tight)
US S&P 500 (Futures)	6,879.00	-0.33%	Hesitant

M&A and Infrastructure Investment

The 2026 outlook for mergers and acquisitions (M&A) is one of “constructive caution”.³⁰ While deal values are strengthening, deal count remains fragile as boards focus on high-conviction transactions in strategic sectors like TMT, industrials, and energy.³⁰ Financing remains the primary “gating item,” as access to standard bank credit facilities is expected to be tighter in 2026 than in previous cycles.³⁰ There is a decisive tilt toward quality assets that support digital transformation and supply-chain resilience.³⁰

Domestic Governance and Socio-Political Unrest

The administrative core of the EU is facing a “crisis of governability” as widespread protests and strikes disrupt daily operations and institutional continuity.

The Agrarian Revolt: Brussels Under Siege

The week ending February 14 has seen some of the most intense farmer protests in Brussels since 2024. Over 10,000 farmers from all 27 member states descended on the Belgian capital on February 12, coinciding with the EU Council summit.³¹ Protesters used tractors to block major thoroughfares, including Rue de la Loi, and clashed with police near the European Parliament.⁷

The primary catalyst is the EU-Mercosur trade agreement, which farmers fear will flood the market with cheap meat and grains produced under lower standards than those required in the EU.⁸ Protesters set fires in Luxembourg Square and threw eggs and firecrackers at EU buildings, leading to the deployment of water cannons and tear gas by Brussels police.⁷ These demonstrations have climbed to the top of the political agenda, as far-right parties seek to exploit the “rural revolt” ahead of upcoming regional elections.³⁴

The Belgian Strike Crisis and the “Arizona” Reforms

In addition to the agrarian protests, Belgium is currently paralyzed by nationwide “interprofessional” strikes. The main union confederations (FGTB/ABVV, CSC/ACV, and CGSLB/ACLVB) confirmed strike actions for February 5, 10, and 12.⁹ These strikes are directed against the “Arizona” coalition’s socio-economic reforms, specifically:

• Increasing the pension age to 67.⁹
• An “index-jump” that suppresses wage growth relative to inflation.⁹
• 10 billion Euro in planned austerity cuts.⁹

The strikes have crippled the national rail network and city-center bus services in Brussels, Ghent, and Antwerp.⁹ For global mobility managers and diplomatic staff, these rolling strikes have made logistics and travel within the capital nearly impossible, with significant delays in municipal services and bank registrations.⁹

Far-Right Exploitation of Discontent

Intelligence analysts have identified a disturbing pattern of far-right and conspiracy theorist networks infiltrating and amplifying these protests. In Germany, local farmers’ protests have been linked to networks promoting “blood and soil” nationalist ideologies.¹³ These actors use Telegram and WhatsApp groups to organize blockades and spread narratives that portray the EU government as a “fascist dictatorship” serving the interests of “globalist elites”.¹³ This subversion aims to erode public confidence in democratic institutions and undermine long-term support for policies like the green transition and aid to Ukraine.¹²

Protest/Strike Event	Location	Participants	Demand/Greivance
Great Farmer March	Brussels (EU Quarter)	10,000 Farmers	Stop EU-Mercosur deal; CAP reform.
Interprofessional Strike	Nationwide Belgium	3 Major Unions	Withdrawal of pension age hike.
Tractor Blockades	Zeebrugge/Antwerp	200+ Tractors	Halt Mercosur competition.
Industrial Action	Paris (Landmarks)	French Farmers	Improve pay; reduce red tape.
Doctors Strike	Nationwide France	85% of GPs	Protest 2026 budget measures.

Counter-Terrorism and Internal Security Assessment

The internal security threat to Europe is increasingly multifaceted, moving away from traditional terrorist organizations toward lone actors and state-sponsored proxies.

The “Regicides” Trend: Threats to Elected Officials

A study by the National Centre for Terrorist Threat Assessment (NCT) indicates a persistent and evolving threat against European elected officials.³⁶ This “new regicides era” is characterized by far-right violent extremism and foiled plots against high-ranking leaders, including the Belgian Prime Minister.³⁶

Radicalization is occurring at an accelerated pace on social media and gaming platforms, often targeting young individuals.³⁷ Furthermore, state actors are using organized crime syndicates to gain access to weapons and carry out deniable actions on European soil.³⁷ The NCT assesses that the ideological motive is shifting from collective religious goals to individual, often idiosyncratic, narratives of violence.³⁷

UN and International Policy Frameworks

At the international level, the UN Security Council held a briefing on February 4 regarding the threat posed by ISIL, noting that terrorist exploitation of children is outpacing state responses.³⁸ The UN is currently reviewing its “Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy,” with a report on implementation progress due by February 2026.³⁹ This review represents a critical opportunity for EU member states to align their national strategies with emerging trends in hybrid and digital terrorism.³⁹

Strategic Conclusion

As of February 14, 2026, Europe faces a strategic landscape defined by “unpeace” and internal fragmentation. The successful launch of missions like Arctic Sentry and the commitment to new missile defense capabilities demonstrate that the military-technical level of NATO remains robust. However, this hard power is being undermined by a “crisis of governability” at the domestic level.

The intelligence community concludes that the current wave of agrarian and labor unrest is more than a simple economic dispute; it is a point of vulnerability that adversaries are actively probing. The intersection of hybrid warfare in the Baltic with socio-political polarization in Brussels creates a “perfect storm” that challenges the EU’s ability to project power externally while maintaining stability internally. The future outlook for 2026 suggests a prolonged contest of attrition, where deterrence will depend as much on societal preparedness and infrastructure redundancy as on traditional military instruments. Policy makers must prioritize the integration of economic security with traditional defense, while addressing the underlying social grievances that provide fertile ground for hybrid subversion.

END SITREP

---

Please share the link on Facebook, Forums, with colleagues, etc. Your support is much appreciated and if you have any feedback, please email us in**@*********ps.com. If you’d like to request a report or order a reprint, please click here for the corresponding page to open in new tab.

---

Sources Used

1. Agenda and Livestreams: Munich Security Conference 2026 …, accessed February 14, 2026, https://securityconference.org/en/msc-2026/agenda/
2. Europe: Detachment Issues – Munich Security Conference, accessed February 14, 2026, https://securityconference.org/en/publications/munich-security-report/2026/europe/
3. 14 European States Warn of Russian GPS Interference Threatening Baltic Shipping, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.polestarglobal.com/resources/14-states-russian-maritime-gps-interference/
4. UK’s Starmer says we must build ‘hard power’ at European security conference – Global Banking & Finance Review®, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.globalbankingandfinance.com/uks-starmer-we-build-hard-power-european-security-conference/
5. NATO Secretary General outlines new activity – Arctic Sentry – ahead …, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.nato.int/en/news-and-events/articles/news/2026/02/11/nato-secretary-general-outlines-new-activity-arctic-sentry-ahead-of-defence-ministers-meeting
6. US-NATO exercise rehearses taking out 1500 targets a day to ‘overwhelm’ an enemy, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.defenseone.com/threats/2026/02/us-nato-exercise-rehearses-taking-out-1500-targets-day-overwhelm-enemy/411396/
7. ABSOLUTE CHAOS in Brussels as farmers DESTROY town square over trade deal, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ivvBH7uLYlM
8. Farmers stage tractor protests across Belgium and Paris over Mercosur deal, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.belganewsagency.eu/farmers-stage-tractor-protests-across-belgium-and-paris-over-mercosur-deal
9. Nation-wide interprofessional strikes confirmed for 5, 10 and 12 February — unions warn of transport and school shutdowns – VisaHQ, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.visahq.com/news/2026-02-01/be/nation-wide-interprofessional-strikes-confirmed-for-5-10-and-12-february-unions-warn-of-transport-and-school-shutdowns/
10. Energy Outlook 2026 – ING Think, accessed February 14, 2026, https://think.ing.com/uploads/reports/2026_Energy_Outlook.pdf
11. Europe Daily News, 12 February 2026, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.mayerbrown.com/en/insights/publications/2026/02/europe-daily-news/europe-daily-news-feb1226
12. How Russia’s Hybrid Warfare Will Escalate in 2026 and What Europe Must Do? | GLOBSEC, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.globsec.org/what-we-do/commentaries/how-russias-hybrid-warfare-will-escalate-2026-and-what-europe-must-do
13. Chance or cultivation? Farmers’ protests in Germany and the far right – ISD, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.isdglobal.org/digital_dispatches/chance-or-cultivation-farmers-protests-in-germany-and-the-far-right/
14. Rubio and European leaders say global order has shifted as U.S.-Europe divide grows, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.nbcpalmsprings.com/2026/02/13/rubio-and-european-leaders-say-global-order-has-shifted-as-useurope-divide-grows
15. At Munich Conference, Merz Urges US, Europe To ‘Repair And Revive’ Transatlantic Trust, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.rferl.org/a/munich-security-conference-rubio/33676743.html
16. Global Risks to the EU in 2026: What are the main conflict threats for Europe?, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.iss.europa.eu/publications/commentary/global-risks-eu-2026-what-are-main-conflict-threats-europe
17. Ukraine war latest: Zelensky warns of ‘risk’ US, Russia could strike bilateral deals on Ukraine without Kyiv, accessed February 14, 2026, https://kyivindependent.com/ukraine-war-latest-2026-02-07-08/
18. Putin ‘trying to break the Ukrainian people – they will not be broken,’ says Nato’s Rutte – Europe live, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2026/feb/11/europe-live-latest-news-updates-eu-ukraine-russia
19. 1-57th ADAR Combines With NATO Partners for Dynamic Front 26 in Romania – U.S. Army, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.army.mil/article/290489/1_57th_adar_combines_with_nato_partners_for_dynamic_front_26_in_romania
20. NATO Allies launch new multinational capability cooperation initiatives, expand existing projects, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.nato.int/en/news-and-events/articles/news/2026/02/12/nato-allies-launch-new-multinational-capability-cooperation-initiatives-expand-existing-projects
21. Europe Threatens to Block Shadow Fleet Tankers as GPS Jamming Escalates | the deep dive, accessed February 14, 2026, https://thedeepdive.ca/europe-threatens-to-block-shadow-fleet-tankers-as-gps-jamming-escalates/
22. Baltic Sea Airspace Flooded With GPS Interference, Authorities Point to Russia – UNITED24, accessed February 14, 2026, https://united24media.com/latest-news/baltic-sea-airspace-flooded-with-gps-interference-authorities-point-to-russia-14982
23. Europe Announces Sanctions Over GPS Jamming in the Baltics, accessed February 14, 2026, https://militarnyi.com/en/news/europe-announces-sanctions-over-gps-jamming-in-the-baltics/
24. What Russia’s Baltic Cable Sabotage Tells Us About Its Shadow Fleet, accessed February 14, 2026, https://united24media.com/world/what-russias-baltic-cable-sabotage-tells-us-about-its-shadow-fleet-15819
25. European Commission Investigating Cyberattack – SecurityWeek, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.securityweek.com/european-commission-investigating-cyberattack/
26. Commission responds to cyber-attack on its central mobile infrastructure, accessed February 14, 2026, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_26_342
27. Commission responds to cyber-attack on its central mobile infrastructure, accessed February 14, 2026, https://europeansting.com/2026/02/09/commission-responds-to-cyber-attack-on-its-central-mobile-infrastructure/
28. Outlook for the 12 February 2026 retreat: Work on competitiveness …, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2026/774677/EPRS_BRI(2026)774677_EN.pdf
29. Euro Area Stock Market Index (EU50) – Quote – Chart – Historical Data – Trading Economics, accessed February 14, 2026, https://tradingeconomics.com/euro-area/stock-market
30. Europe – Resilience and caution (again) | Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer | Global law firm, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.hsfkramer.com/insights/reports/2026/global-ma-report-2026/regional-perspectives/europe
31. Farmers protest this week: 10,000 expected in Brussels to denounce EU policy, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.brusselstimes.com/1882789/farmers-protest-this-week-10000-expected-in-brussels-to-denounce-eu-policy
32. Armers Out on the Streets, Overnight Protests Against the European Union | WION, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KqXr5cHCkqI
33. Tractors on the streets in Brussels against cuts in agricultural policy and Mercosur agreement – Eunews, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.eunews.it/en/2025/12/18/tractors-on-the-streets-in-brussels-against-cuts-in-agricultural-policy-and-mercosur-agreement/
34. ‘They’re drowning us in regulations’: how Europe’s furious farmers took on Brussels and won | Farming | The Guardian, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/feb/10/theyre-drowning-us-in-regulations-how-europes-furious-farmers-took-on-brussels-and-won
35. Workers Struggles: Europe, Middle East & Africa – World Socialist Web Site, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2026/01/08/rgze-j08.html
36. A New ‘Regicides’ Era? Analyzing Trends in Terrorism Threats Against European Elected Officials, accessed February 14, 2026, https://ctc.westpoint.edu/a-new-regicides-era-analyzing-trends-in-terrorism-threats-against-european-elected-officials/
37. Assessment of the terrorist threat in 2026 – Säkerhetspolisen, accessed February 14, 2026, https://sakerhetspolisen.se/ovriga-sidor/other-languages/english-engelska/press-room/news/news/2026-02-12-assessment-of-the-terrorist-threat-in-2026.html
38. Security Council – Counter-Terrorism Committee (CTC) – the United Nations, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.un.org/securitycouncil/ctc/
39. United Nations Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.un.org/counterterrorism/en/un-global-counter-terrorism-strategy