Executive Summary
Over the past decade, the political economy of the United States has experienced an ideological shift, with the term “democratic socialism” reentering the mainstream political lexicon. This report provides an empirical analysis of this movement as of 2026. Data indicates a partisan divergence: while Republicans and Independents strongly favor capitalism, a majority of Democrats now view socialism favorably, driven largely by younger demographics. This shift has fueled the electoral rise of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), culminating in significant victories such as the 2025 mayoral election in New York City.
Macroeconomic assessments of the core socialist platform—including Medicare for All, the Green New Deal, wealth taxes, and rent control—reveal profound fiscal and economic challenges. Proposed policies require unprecedented federal expenditures and risk unintended consequences such as capital flight and housing supply contractions. Furthermore, proponents frequently conflate democratic socialism with the Nordic model, which relies on highly competitive capitalism and regressive taxation rather than socialist economic planning.
Comparatively, the economic collapse of Venezuela provides an empirical case study on the risks of excessive market intervention, strict price controls, and state centralization of industry. However, the American constitutional structure, particularly the Takings Clause and decentralized federalism, provides formidable institutional barriers against the implementation of such systemic centralization.
1. Introduction
The political economy of the United States is currently experiencing a notable discursive shift. The term “socialism” has gained traction under the banner of “democratic socialism.” This resurgence is primarily driven by systemic concerns regarding wealth inequality, healthcare accessibility, housing affordability, and climate change. Concurrently, critics of this movement point to historical and contemporary examples of socialist governance, most notably the economic collapse of Venezuela, as cautionary tales of market intervention, price controls, and the centralization of economic power.
This report examines shifting public opinion, the electoral ascendance of democratic socialist organizations, and the macroeconomic pros and cons of their core policy platforms. It delineates the distinctions between the Nordic model of social democracy and the tenets of democratic socialism, provides a comparative assessment of the Venezuelan crisis, and explores the structural, constitutional, and economic barriers that condition the implementation of socialist policies in the United States.
2. The State of Socialism in the United States
Empirical Trends in Public Opinion and Demographic Cleavages
Public polling regarding economic systems in the United States demonstrates a gradual and polarized transformation. Longitudinal data indicates an erosion of capitalism’s aggregate favorability, juxtaposed against a stabilization of support for socialism among specific demographic and partisan cohorts1.
According to a 2025 Gallup survey, 54% of American adults maintain a positive view of capitalism, representing a decline from 60% in 2021 and 61% in 20101. In contrast, the aggregate positive perception of socialism has remained relatively stable at 39%, while 57% of Americans continue to view it negatively1. This aggregate stability obscures a partisan divergence that has altered the ideological composition of the American left.
| Demographic / Partisan Group | Positive View of Capitalism (2025) | Positive View of Socialism (2025) | Net Capitalist Preference |
| All U.S. Adults | 54% | 39% | +15% |
| Republicans | 74% | 14% | +60% |
| Independents | 51% | 38% | +13% |
| Democrats | 42% | 66% | -24% |
| Democrats Under 50 | 31% | ~66% | -35% |
Democrats are currently the only major partisan group that views socialism more favorably than capitalism, marking a 24-point gap1. This represents a departure from 2010, when positive views of capitalism and socialism among Democrats were closely matched1. Conversely, Republican perceptions of socialism stand at a 14% favorability, as the term remains highly polarizing1.

Generational differences are notable: millennials and Generation Z are significantly more likely to hold positive views of socialism than older cohorts5. Among Generation Z, a slim majority (53%) express support for socialism compared to 45% for capitalism, and nearly a third support the gradual elimination of the capitalist system entirely6.
Qualitative polling reveals a divergence in semantic interpretations of the term “socialism.” Critics associate the term with state ownership of the means of production, stifled innovation, restricted individual freedoms, and historic failures of authoritarian regimes2. Proponents increasingly anchor their interpretation in social egalitarianism, defining socialism as a system designed to ensure basic human needs while mitigating wealth stratification2. A 2022 Pew Research Center survey found that only roughly 20% of Democrats believed the phrase “gives all people an equal chance to be successful” described capitalism well3.
Organizational Ascendance: The Democratic Socialists of America (DSA)
The shifting public sentiment has materialized into organizational power, spearheaded by the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA). Prior to 2015, the DSA operated with approximately 6,000 members as a pressure group within the Democratic establishment10. Following the 2016 and 2020 presidential campaigns of Senator Bernie Sanders, the organization’s membership surged to over 120,000 members by mid-202611.
The DSA’s strategic orientation shifted concurrently with its growth, adopting a “dirty break” approach focused on building an independent, working-class political apparatus capable of running openly socialist candidates10. In practice, this entails primary challenges against incumbent, moderate Democrats. By 2025, over 250 DSA members held elected office across 40 states, with 90% having been elected after 201910.
The organization faced temporary membership contraction between 2021 and 2024. Following a controversial vote regarding Israel by DSA-endorsed Representative Jamaal Bowman in late 2021, the DSA lost over 5,000 dues-paying members in a single month12. Nevertheless, the organization rebounded, surpassing 90,000 national members by December 2025, driven in part by electoral mobilization in urban centers12.
The 2025 New York City Mayoral Election: A Case Study
The apex of the democratic socialist electoral strategy occurred in November 2025, when Zohran Mamdani, a self-described democratic socialist, was elected Mayor of New York City15.
Mamdani’s victory—securing 50.78% of the vote against independent candidate Andrew Cuomo (41.32%) and Republican Curtis Sliwa (7.01%)—was driven by record youth turnout15. An estimated 28% of eligible voters ages 18-29 cast ballots, with 75% of them backing Mamdani18.
His platform tested the boundaries of municipal power, centering on initiatives such as making all city buses fare-free (an estimated $700 million annual cost), freezing rents for over one million rent-stabilized tenants, constructing 200,000 units of publicly owned social housing, and launching pilot programs for city-owned grocery stores19. To finance this, Mamdani proposed redistributive measures, including raising the minimum wage to $30 per hour by 2030 and increasing income taxes by 2% on residents earning over $1 million20.
3. Macroeconomic Assessment of the Democratic Socialist Platform
The contemporary American democratic socialist platform advocates for a mixed economy characterized by extensive industrial policy, taxation on concentrated wealth, and the decommodification of essential services10.
Medicare for All (Single-Payer Healthcare)
A central pillar of the platform is a transition to a government-run, single-payer healthcare system, effectively eliminating private health insurance, premiums, copayments, and deductibles24.
Proponents argue that healthcare is a fundamental human right25. Medicare for All (M4A) would theoretically guarantee universal coverage, eradicate medical bankruptcy, and increase labor mobility by untethering healthcare from employment24. Macroeconomically, advocates project savings in administrative overhead and leverage monopsony power to negotiate lower prescription drug prices and provider reimbursement rates26.
Critics focus on the fiscal magnitude required for implementation. Independent analyses from the Mercatus Center, the Urban Institute, and the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimate the ten-year cost to the federal government at between $28 trillion and $32.6 trillion26. This translates to roughly $3 trillion in new annual federal spending—an amount exceeding the combined current outlays for Defense, Medicare, Social Security, and Medicaid26.
| Health Policy Proposal | Estimated 10-Year Cost (Trillions) | Source of Estimate |
| Medicare for All (M4A) | $32.6 Trillion | Mercatus Center (2018) |
| Medicare for All (M4A) | $32.0 Trillion | Urban Institute (2016) |
| Medicare for All (M4A) | $28.0 – $32.0 Trillion | Comm. for a Responsible Federal Budget |
Financing M4A would necessitate systemic tax increases, pushing total U.S. tax receipts from historical averages of roughly 17% of GDP up to nearly 40% of GDP29. Critics warn that forcing provider reimbursement rates down to current Medicare levels could trigger hospital closures and lead to the rationing of care26.

The Green New Deal (GND) and Industrial Policy
The Green New Deal represents a state-directed industrial policy mobilization aimed at transitioning the U.S. economy to 100% renewable energy while guaranteeing high-wage union jobs and universal housing10.
Proponents argue that the GND addresses chronic demand shortfalls through aggressive public investment, mitigating the long-term economic damages of climate change34. The policy represents a shift toward active industrial policy to restructure the economy toward sustainable industries25.
Criticism of the GND rests on its cost and potential for economic disruption. Estimates for the total cost range from $11 trillion to $93 trillion over a decade32. The American Action Forum estimates that achieving the goals of the GND could cost a typical household upwards of $65,000 to $74,000 annually in the initial years of implementation32. Economists often criticize the command-and-control regulatory approach as less efficient than a market-based carbon tax33.
Wealth Taxes and Capital Confiscation
To fund expansive welfare programs, democratic socialists propose recurring taxes on accumulated net wealth20.
The theoretical justification centers on combating extreme wealth concentration, which proponents argue creates an oligarchic political system40. Advocates argue modern financial transparency can allow governments to capture assets that previously escaped taxation39.
Empirical evidence from Europe, however, presents challenges regarding broad-based wealth taxes. In 1990, roughly a dozen European OECD nations levied a wealth tax; by 2020, almost all had repealed them, leaving only Norway, Spain, and Switzerland as primary practitioners39. The driver for repeal was capital flight, as wealth taxes disincentivize domestic investment. In France, the Impôt de Solidarité sur la Fortune (ISF) led to an estimated €200 billion in capital flight before its repeal42. Furthermore, wealth taxes have historically generated low revenue—averaging just 0.2% of GDP in Europe—due to administrative valuation difficulties39.
Rent Control and Municipal Socialism
At the local level, democratic socialists champion universal rent control, seeking to cap annual rent increases strictly, paired with the mass construction of publicly owned “social housing”20.
Rent control provides immediate relief to incumbent tenants, increasing residential stability, which correlates with better health outcomes and community engagement45.
Despite popularity among renters, rent control is widely analyzed by economists as a price ceiling that reduces the aggregate supply of housing over the long term45. Empirical evidence from a Stanford study on San Francisco demonstrated that expanded rent control led to a 15% reduction in rental housing supply among treated buildings, coupled with an 8% increase in condo conversions, driving up market-rate rents for new entrants45.
4. The Nordic Paradox: Social Democracy vs. Democratic Socialism
A rhetorical strategy employed by American democratic socialists is to cite the Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden) as successful models of socialism2. However, comparative economic analysis indicates the Nordic model is highly embedded social democratic capitalism50.
Democratic socialism seeks the systemic replacement of capitalism54. The Nordic model relies on a deregulated, globally integrated free-market economy to generate wealth to fund its welfare state51.
The primary divergence lies in taxation. The American socialist platform focuses on progressive taxation of corporations and wealth. In contrast, Nordic countries fund their safety nets through broad, regressive consumption and labor taxes56.
| Tax Category | United States | Nordic Averages (Denmark, Sweden, Norway) |
| Value-Added Tax (VAT) / Sales Tax | ~7.5% (State/Local average) | 25.0% (National VAT) |
| Top Marginal Income Tax Threshold | Kicks in at very high incomes | Kicks in at ~1.6x the national average wage |
| Average Labor Tax Wedge (Single Worker) | 30.1% | 36.1% to 41.5% |
| Corporate Income Tax Rate | 21% (Federal) + State Taxes | 20.6% to 22.0% |
Nordic countries utilize a 25% VAT, generating roughly 9% of their GDP58. Nordic income taxes are less progressive than the U.S. system; top marginal rates apply to incomes at roughly 1.6 times the national average (equivalent to hitting the top tax bracket at roughly $96,000 in the U.S.)59. Denmark, Sweden, and Norway also possess highly competitive corporate statutory tax rates (between 20.6% and 22%)58.
5. Comparative Parallels: The Venezuelan Crisis
The economic collapse of Venezuela under Hugo Chávez and Nicolás Maduro is frequently cited as the endpoint of socialist policies. Assessing this comparison requires analyzing the specific mechanisms of Venezuela’s failure.
The Rise of Chavismo and the Capture of PDVSA
Hugo Chávez capitalized on anti-system sentiment and legitimate grievances regarding poverty60. Initially fueled by a boom in global oil prices, the “Bolivarian Revolution” implemented social spending programs that temporarily reduced poverty62.
However, the regime aggressively centralized the economy through mass expropriations of private property63. A major turning point was the politicization of the state-owned oil monopoly, Petróleos de Venezuela, S.A. (PDVSA). Following a national strike in 2002, Chávez fired roughly one-third of the workforce, including highly qualified technical personnel, replacing them with political loyalists65. Profits were diverted directly into social programs rather than reinvested in infrastructure65. When global oil prices collapsed, production plummeted from a peak of 3.5 million barrels per day to below 1 million barrels per day by 202165.

Price Controls, Hyperinflation, and Economic Collapse
Domestically, the government attempted to tame the economy through strict price and currency controls63. Setting price ceilings on staple goods below the cost of production severely impacted domestic manufacturing and agriculture64.
To maintain spending, the central bank printed fiat currency, triggering a hyperinflationary spiral64. The result was severe shortages of basic goods and a humanitarian crisis that saw over 7.7 million Venezuelans emigrate by 202463. While severe U.S. financial sanctions exacerbated the crisis, economists agree structural collapse was underway due to internal state mismanagement years prior64.
Assessing the Validity of the Parallel
The Venezuelan crisis provides an empirical case study on the dangers of microeconomic interventions, strict price controls, and rapid nationalization64. However, the comparison to the U.S. breaks down on institutional grounds. Venezuela’s collapse was facilitated by the dismantling of democratic checks and balances and the militarization of the state63.
6. Structural and Theoretical Barriers to American Socialism
The Theoretical Barrier: The Economic Calculation Problem
The debate over the viability of socialism often centers on the “Economic Calculation Problem,” formulated by Austrian economists Ludwig von Mises and Friedrich Hayek75.
Mises argued that rational allocation of resources is impossible in a purely socialist economy because the absence of private property means there are no market prices75. Prices are decentralized information systems that aggregate dispersed knowledge, signaling relative scarcity and demand75. Thinkers like Otto Neurath proposed that a socialist economy could rely on “calculation in kind”—measuring value in labor-hours or physical units—but Mises demonstrated this was inadequate for complex economies76. Without market prices, central planning devolves into arbitrary allocation and inefficiencies75.
The Institutional Barrier: Constitutional Safeguards and the Takings Clause
The realization of a socialist transformation in the United States faces deliberate institutional barriers. The U.S. Constitution was engineered to prevent rapid centralization of power81. The division of authority among branches and sovereign states creates friction against systemic change83.
The absolute constitutional barrier to classical socialism is the Fifth Amendment, which contains the Takings Clause: “nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation”86. While the government can exercise eminent domain—a power clarified by the 2005 Supreme Court decision Kelo v. City of New London—the state is constitutionally mandated to pay fair market value87. Consequently, uncompensated expropriation of private industries is constitutionally prohibited83.
Recognizing these impediments, segments of the socialist movement advocate for systemic constitutional reform—including abolishing the Senate, ending lifetime judicial appointments, and implementing national popular votes—as a prerequisite for deep economic restructuring84.
7. Conclusion
The resurgence of democratic socialism in the United States represents an evolving critique of contemporary capitalism. However, an empirical and macroeconomic assessment of the movement’s policy platform reveals practical limitations. The significant fiscal costs associated with proposals such as Medicare for All and the Green New Deal, the empirical data on wealth taxes triggering capital flight, the effects of price controls on housing supply, and constitutional barriers to capital expropriation present significant hurdles to systemic implementation. Furthermore, the conflation of democratic socialism with the Nordic model of social democracy complicates the policy debate, as the latter relies heavily on free-market capitalism and regressive taxation. While the United States possesses institutional safeguards that differentiate it from the authoritarian decay witnessed in Venezuela, the Venezuelan case remains a relevant historical example of the economic impacts resulting from state centralization and the abrogation of market pricing mechanisms.
Master Summary Table
| Topic / Policy Focus | Key Facts & Data Points | Proposed Macroeconomic Pros | Macroeconomic Cons & Risks |
| Public Opinion & Demographics | Democrats view socialism favorably (66%); Gen Z supports it at 53%. Overall U.S. preference remains +15% for capitalism. | Focuses political attention on egalitarian social outcomes and basic needs. | Highly polarizing; fundamental disconnect in defining the term across partisan lines. |
| DSA & Electoral Trends | DSA grew to >120k members by 2026. Zohran Mamdani elected NYC Mayor (2025) running on an explicit affordability platform. | Mobilizes young, working-class voters; challenges centrist political stagnation. | Platform implementation faces massive jurisdictional, fiscal, and institutional hurdles. |
| Medicare for All (M4A) | Est. 10-year cost: $28T–$32.6T. Would require raising total U.S. tax receipts to ~40% of GDP. | Universal coverage; eliminates medical bankruptcy; reduces administrative overhead. | Unprecedented tax hikes; potential rationing of care; risk of widespread hospital closures if reimbursement rates drop. |
| Green New Deal (GND) | Cost estimates range widely ($11T to $93T). Aims for 100% renewable energy and federal jobs guarantee. | Directs massive public investment to mitigate long-term climate damage and restructure industry. | Extreme inflationary pressure; capital destruction (stranded assets); command-and-control inefficiencies vs. carbon tax. |
| Wealth Taxes | Only 3 European nations retain broad wealth taxes (down from a dozen in 1990). Generates ~0.2% of GDP. | Directly targets extreme wealth concentration at the very top of the income distribution. | Severe capital flight (e.g., €200B in France); disincentivizes domestic investment; high administrative costs. |
| Rent Control | Capping rent increases. SF study showed a 15% reduction in treated rental supply and an 8% rise in condo conversions. | Provides immediate financial relief and residential stability to incumbent tenants. | Reduces aggregate housing supply; disincentivizes maintenance; drives up market-rate rents for new tenants. |
| Venezuelan Parallel | GDP contracted 73%; PDVSA output dropped from 3.5M to <1M bpd; hyperinflation; 7.7M refugees. | Initial massive social spending briefly reduced poverty and inequality metrics during the oil boom. | Price controls caused severe shortages; politicization of state industry destroyed expertise; authoritarian consolidation. |
| Institutional Barriers | 5th Amendment (Takings Clause) requires “just compensation” for expropriations. Decentralized federalism. | System limits rapid, autocratic centralization and preserves private property rights. | Thwarts systemic, rapid economic restructuring desired by revolutionary platforms. |
Please share the link on Facebook, Forums, with colleagues, etc. Your support is much appreciated and if you have any feedback, please email us in**@*********ps.com. If you’d like to request a report or order a reprint, please click here for the corresponding page to open in new tab.
Sources Used
- Image of Capitalism Slips to 54% in U.S. – Gallup News, https://news.gallup.com/poll/694835/image-capitalism-slips.aspx
- Modest Declines in Positive Views of ‘Socialism’ and ‘Capitalism’ in U.S., https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2022/09/19/modest-declines-in-positive-views-of-socialism-and-capitalism-in-u-s/
- What Americans think about socialism and capitalism, according to a new Gallup poll | The Associated Press, https://www.ap.org/news-highlights/spotlights/2025/what-americans-think-about-socialism-and-capitalism-according-to-a-new-gallup-poll/
- Socialism, Capitalism Ratings in U.S. Unchanged – Gallup News, https://news.gallup.com/poll/357755/socialism-capitalism-ratings-unchanged.aspx
- Public Opinion Review: Americans’ Reactions to the Word ‘Socialism’ – Gallup News, https://news.gallup.com/opinion/polling-matters/287459/public-opinion-review-americans-word-socialism.aspx
- New Poll: Nearly Half of Americans Don’t Know What America’s 250th Is Celebrating, https://www.cato.org/blog/new-poll-nearly-half-americans-dont-know-what-americas-250th-celebrating
- Socialism: A short primer – Brookings Institution, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/socialism-a-short-primer/
- 2020 Poll – Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation, https://victimsofcommunism.org/annual-poll/2020-annual-poll/
- In Their Own Words: Behind Americans’ Views of ‘Socialism’ and ‘Capitalism’, https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2019/10/07/in-their-own-words-behind-americans-views-of-socialism-and-capitalism/
- Democratic Socialists of America – Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Socialists_of_America
- List of Democratic Socialists of America public officeholders – Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Democratic_Socialists_of_America_public_officeholders
- DSA never recovered from Bowman – Tempest Collective, https://tempestmag.org/2025/01/dsa-never-recovered-from-bowman/
- Democratic Socialists of America Are Seeing Surge in Membership – NOTUS, https://www.notus.org/2026-election/democratic-socialists-of-america-primary-win-momentum
- DSA’s membership nearly doubled since start of Mamdani campaign – City & State New York, https://www.cityandstateny.com/politics/2026/01/dsas-membership-nearly-doubled-start-mamdani-campaign/410966/
- 2025 New York City mayoral election – Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_New_York_City_mayoral_election
- Live Results: New York City 2025 mayoral election | PBS News, https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/live-results-new-york-city-2025-mayoral-election
- Zohran Mamdani – Ballotpedia, https://ballotpedia.org/Zohran_Mamdani
- Young Voters Power Mamdani Victory, Shape Key 2025 Elections – Tufts CIRCLE, https://circle.tufts.edu/latest-research/young-voters-power-mamdani-victory-shape-key-2025-elections
- Can Mamdani Fulfill His Ambitious Campaign Promises? – TIME, https://time.com/7331036/mamdani-nyc-mayor-election-campaign-promises/
- Political positions of Zohran Mamdani – Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of_Zohran_Mamdani
- Zohran Mamdani Policies | Israel, Trump, Affordability, Immigration, & Policing | Britannica, https://www.britannica.com/topic/What-are-Zohran-Mamdanis-positions-on-key-policies
- Zohran Mamdani wants to make NYC buses free as mayor. How would that work? – City & State New York, https://www.cityandstateny.com/politics/2025/01/zohran-mamdani-wants-make-nyc-buses-free-mayor-how-would-work/402425/
- Zohran Mamdani pulled off a political upset running on affordability – The 19th News, https://19thnews.org/2025/06/zohran-mamdani-policies-affordability-housing-child-care/
- LOUISVILLE DSA, https://www.dsalouisville.org/
- What a Democratic Socialist Economic Agenda Looks Like – In These Times, https://inthesetimes.com/article/democratic-socialism-economy-sanders-mamdani-aoc
- How Much Will Medicare for All Cost? – Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, https://www.crfb.org/blogs/how-much-will-medicare-all-cost
- The American health care system is broken: Today in the United States, 112 million The pandemic has made a bad situation much wo, https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Medicare-for-All-2022-Fact-Sheet-FINAL.pdf
- How CBO Analyzes the Costs of Proposals for Single-Payer Health Care Systems That Are Based on Medicare’s Fee-for, https://www.cbo.gov/system/files/2020-12/56811-Single-Payer.pdf
- Medicare for All: Buyer Beware – Foundation – National Taxpayers Union, https://www.ntu.org/foundation/detail/medicare-for-all-buyer-beware
- Estimating the Cost of a Single-Payer Plan | Urban Institute, https://www.urban.org/research/publication/estimating-cost-single-payer-plan
- Estimating the Cost of a Single-Payer Plan | Urban Institute, https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/99151/estimating_the_cost_of_a_single-payer_plan_0.pdf
- Green New Deals Costs – Congressional Western Caucus, https://westerncaucus.house.gov/uploadedfiles/costs_of_the_green_new_deal.pdf
- The Economists’ Statement on Carbon Dividends and the Green New Deal – Bruegel, https://www.bruegel.org/blog-post/economists-statement-carbon-dividends-and-green-new-deal
- Expert Consensus on the Economics of Climate Change – Environmental Defense Fund, https://www.edf.org/sites/default/files/expertconsensusreport.pdf
- THE MACROECONOMIC CASE FOR A GREEN NEW DEAL – The Roosevelt Institute, https://rooseveltinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/RI_Macroeconomic-Case-for-the-GND_brief-201906.pdf
- What the Green New Deal Could Cost a Typical Household – Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty, https://will-law.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/what-the-green-new-deal-could-cost-a-typical-household.pdf
- Assessing the Costs and Benefits of the Green New Deal’s Energy Policies – The Heritage Foundation, https://www.heritage.org/sites/default/files/2019-07/BG3427.pdf
- Democratic Socialists on the rise – Tribune Chronicle, https://www.tribtoday.com/opinion/editorials/2026/06/democratic-socialists-on-the-rise/
- California can learn from European countries that tried wealth taxes – CalMatters, https://calmatters.org/commentary/2026/02/wealth-taxes-europe-countries-california/
- The case for G20 coordination on wealth taxes | New Economics Foundation, https://neweconomics.org/2026/07/the-case-for-g20-coordination-of-wealth-tax
- UN Tax Pillars to Address Capital Concentration (through Inheritance Levies) and Wealth Flight (through Exit Taxes) – Implications for the European Union – IBFD, https://www.ibfd.org/sites/default/files/2025-07/un-tax-pillars-to-address-capital-concentration-through-inheritance-levies-and-wealth-flight-through-exit-taxes-implications-for-the-european-union-ibfd.pdf
- Estimating the Economic Impacts of Wealth Taxation in France, https://econ.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/Wealth_Taxation_Honors_Thesis_Final.pdf
- The High Cost of Wealth Taxes – Tax Foundation, https://taxfoundation.org/research/all/eu/wealth-tax-impact/
- Full article: Globalization and the societal consensus of wealth tax cuts – Taylor & Francis, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13501763.2021.1992487
- What does economic evidence tell us about the effects of rent control? – Brookings Institution, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/what-does-economic-evidence-tell-us-about-the-effects-of-rent-control/
- Rent Control and the Supply of Affordable Housing – Rental Housing Association of Washington, https://www.rhawa.org/file/secure/shs-rent-control-and-the-supply-of-affordable-housing.pdf
- Some Studies Challenge Long-Held Views on Rent Control | Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning & Public Policy, https://bloustein.rutgers.edu/some-studies-challenge-long-held-views-on-rent-control/
- Rent Control – National Association of Home Builders | NAHB, https://www.nahb.org/advocacy/top-priorities/solving-the-housing-affordability-crisis/rent-control
- What we know about rent control and its impacts on rental housing – D.C. Policy Center, https://www.dcpolicycenter.org/publications/rent-control-lit-review-2025/
- The Global Hinterland of Social Democracy – Scandinavian University Press, https://www.scup.com/doi/10.18261/nwr.9.1.5
- The Myth of Scandinavian Socialism – Institute of Economic Affairs, https://iea.org.uk/blog/the-myth-of-scandinavian-socialism/
- Social democratic capitalism | Lane Kenworthy, https://lanekenworthy.net/social-democratic-capitalism/
- Would Democratic Socialism Be Better? – OAPEN Library, https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/87760/Democratic%20Socialism.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
- Democratic socialism – Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_socialism
- What’s the problem with (democratic) socialism?, https://web.eecs.umich.edu/~kuipers/opinions/socialism.html
- Nordic model – Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nordic_model
- Nordic social democracy in US politics, https://nordics.info/themes/nordic-social-democracy-in-us-politics
- How Scandinavian Countries Pay for Their Government Spending – Tax Foundation, https://taxfoundation.org/blog/how-scandinavian-countries-pay-for-government-spending/
- Why the U.S. Can’t Be Nordic | City Journal, https://www.city-journal.org/article/why-the-u-s-cant-be-nordic
- Chavismo, Liberal Democracy, and Radical Democracy – Annual Reviews, https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev-polisci-072314-113326
- Backsliding by surprise: the rise of Chavismo | Political Science Research and Methods, https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/political-science-research-and-methods/article/backsliding-by-surprise-the-rise-of-chavismo/3A5F7FAAFA69CA14B63411C1AE1E195F
- The Promise and Perils of Radical Left Populism: The Case of Venezuela. – Scholars Archive, https://scholarsarchive.library.albany.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1035&context=lacs_fac_scholar
- Socialism: A Case Study on Venezuela – The Policy Circle, https://www.thepolicycircle.org/minibrief/socialism-a-case-study-on-venezuela/
- Why did Venezuela’s economy collapse? – Economics Observatory, https://www.economicsobservatory.com/why-did-venezuelas-economy-collapse
- PDVSA – Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PDVSA
- Venezuela’s oil: evolution, scenarios and international repercussions – Real Instituto Elcano, https://www.realinstitutoelcano.org/en/analyses/venezuelas-oil-evolution-scenarios-and-international-repercussions/
- The Venezuelan Oil Industry Collapse: Economic, Social and Political Implications, https://www.iai.it/en/publications/c05/venezuelan-oil-industry-collapse-economic-social-and-political-implications
- Venezuela Case History: Natural Resources, Operational Collapse, and Impact on Global Energy Business – JPT/SPE, https://jpt.spe.org/twa/venezuela-case-history-natural-resources-operational-collapse-and-impact-on-global-energy-business
- Price Controls and Food Access: Lessons from Venezuela | ANH Academy, https://www.anh-academy.org/community/blogs/price-controls-and-food-access-lessons-from-venezuela
- Venezuela After Maduro: The Economic and Political Implications of Regime Change – WITA, https://www.wita.org/blogs/venezuela-after-maduro/
- Crisis in Venezuela – Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crisis_in_Venezuela
- The devastating Venezuelan crisis – PMC – NIH, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6744797/
- How Hugo Chavez killed Democracy in Venezuela – Democratic Erosion Consortium, https://democratic-erosion.org/2018/03/15/how-hugo-chavez-killed-democracy-in-venezuela/
- Debunking a Myth: Hugo Chavez & Venezuelan Socialism – LSE Government Blog, https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/government/2018/05/18/debunking-a-myth-hugo-chavez-venezuelan-socialism/
- Economic calculation problem – Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_calculation_problem
- Socialist calculation debate – Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist_calculation_debate
- Friedrich von Hayek: The Socialist-Calculation Debate, Knowledge Arguments, And Modern Economic Development – The Cupola: Scholarship at Gettysburg College, https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1033&context=ger
- Mises on the Impossibility of Economic Calculation under Socialism, https://oll.libertyfund.org/pages/mises-on-the-impossibility-of-economic-calculation-under-socialism
- Mises and Hayek on Calculation and Knowledge, https://cdn.mises.org/rae7_2_5_2.pdf
- What do you guys think about Mises’ “Economic calculation problem” : r/DebateCommunism, https://www.reddit.com/r/DebateCommunism/comments/fg66vc/what_do_you_guys_think_about_mises_economic/
- How the Constitution Prevents Socialism – PolicyEd, https://www.policyed.org/human-prosperity-project/how-constitution-prevents-socialism/video
- Key Takeaways | PolicyEd, https://www.policyed.org/human-prosperity-project/how-constitution-prevents-socialism/key-takeaways
- Socialism and The Constitution – Hoover Institution, https://www.hoover.org/research/socialism-and-constitution-0
- The Constitution and the Class Struggle – The Socialist Call, https://socialistcall.com/2018/11/27/the-constitution-and-the-class-struggle/
- Constitutional Safeguards Against Socialism | PolicyEd, https://www.policyed.org/human-prosperity-project/preventing-socialism-through-constitutional-design/video
- History of the Federal Use of Eminent Domain – Department of Justice, https://www.justice.gov/enrd/condemnation/land-acquisition-section/history-federal-use-eminent-domain
- eminent domain | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute, https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/eminent_domain
- Interpretation: The Fifth Amendment Takings Clause – The National Constitution Center, https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/amendments/amendment-v/clauses/634
- Amdt5.10.1 Overview of Takings Clause – Constitution Annotated – Congress.gov, https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/amdt5-9-1/ALDE_00013280/
- CPR Perspective: The Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment – Progressive Reform, https://cpr-2020.progressivereform.org/our-work/energy-environment/persptakings/
- Eminent Domain – The Institute for Justice, https://ij.org/issues/private-property/eminent-domain/
- The Socialist Party of America’s Constitutional Critique – Cosmonaut, https://cosmonautmag.com/2025/01/the-socialist-party-of-americas-constitutional-critique/









