German Leopard 2 tanks and Puma IFV on a training exercise.
Analytics and Reports, Military Analytics, Trade Show Analytics

Future Armoured Vehicles Central & Eastern Europe (FAVCEE) 2026: Strategic Modernization, Procurements, and Tactical Lessons Learned

1. Executive Summary

The 12th Annual Future Armoured Vehicles Central & Eastern Europe (FAVCEE) conference, convened on May 18–19, 2026, at the Vienna House Andel’s in Prague, served as the premier strategic forum for military commanders, procurement authorities, and defense industry leaders.1 Organized by(https://www.smgconferences.com), the event occurred at a critical inflection point for European land forces.1 Driven by the escalating demands of securing NATO’s eastern flank and the stark tactical realities illuminated by the ongoing high-intensity conflict in Ukraine, Central and Eastern European (CEE) nations have pivoted from theoretical capability planning to the active execution of large-scale fleet modernizations.1 Data presented at the conference projects the regional armored vehicle market will expand to a minimum of £7.51 billion by 2030, representing one of the most concentrated periods of capital expenditure in regional ground combat platforms since the Cold War.1

As an analyst observing the integration of small arms, remote weapon stations, and heavy maneuver platforms, it is evident that the doctrinal approach to armored warfare has fundamentally shifted. Analysis of the briefings, technological unveilings, and strategic panels at FAVCEE 2026 reveals three dominant macro-trends reshaping the defense landscape. First, survivability architectures are undergoing a generational overhaul; passive composite armor is no longer deemed sufficient, resulting in the mandatory inclusion of layered Active Protection Systems (APS) to defeat asymmetric, top-attack unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) threats.1 Second, multinational procurement blocs are accelerating, highlighted by the unprecedented Nordic initiative for a cross-border, standardized infantry fighting vehicle (IFV) procurement, aimed at eliminating logistical redundancies and unifying supply chains across the subarctic theater.8 Third, the integration of battlefield digitization, human-machine teaming (MUM-T), and organic uncrewed systems into mechanized infantry formations is radically altering how dismounted troops and vehicles engage targets.9

This comprehensive report details the technical capability requirements, specific national procurement strategies, product announcements, and tactical lessons learned that were disseminated during the May 2026 proceedings in Prague.

2. Macro-Strategic Drivers in the CEE Armored Market

The acceleration of defense modernization across Central and Eastern Europe is primarily dictated by the urgent, structural necessity to bolster NATO’s eastern boundaries against peer and near-peer adversaries.5 For the past three decades, the majority of CEE nations relied on inherited, legacy fleets of Soviet-era T-72 main battle tanks (MBTs) and BMP-series IFVs.11 While these platforms underwent various localized modernization programs (such as the Czech T-72M4 CZ), they suffer from systemic, unresolvable obsolescence.12 The core limitations lie in their lack of modularity, inadequate situational awareness architectures, ergonomic deficiencies, and critically, an inability to natively interface with modern Western command and control (C2) networks.10

The financial commitment required to rectify this generational gap is substantial. The projection that the regional market will reach £7.51 billion by the end of the decade is indicative of multi-year, locked-in budgetary cycles heavily focused on the acquisition of tracked and wheeled combat vehicles.1 This capital injection is not merely replacing aging hulls on a one-to-one basis; it is funding a complete doctrinal transition to digitized, multi-domain capable platforms.9 Consequently, military procurement offices are redefining the traditional “Iron Triangle” of armored vehicle design—balancing mobility, lethality, and protection—by adding a mandatory fourth pillar: network connectivity and battlefield digitization.1

Interoperability remains the overriding operational requirement. As joint exercises and integrated multinational commands—such as the NATO Multinational Brigade Latvia—become standard regional security constructs, allied vehicles must seamlessly share battlefield data in real-time.1 This requires standardized digital architectures, heavily favoring systems compliant with the NATO Generic Vehicle Architecture (NGVA).1 The proceedings in Prague demonstrated that future procurement decisions will heavily penalize isolated, proprietary digital architectures in favor of open-architecture, cross-compatible platforms capable of securely sharing sensor fusion data across national lines.6

Furthermore, transitioning from Soviet-legacy armor to Western platforms requires a fundamental logistical restructuring. Western MBTs, such as the Leopard 2A8, frequently exceed 65 tons, compared to the 45-ton weight class of the T-72 series.14 This increase in mass necessitates parallel investments in heavy equipment transporters (HETs), upgraded armored recovery vehicles (ARVs), modified bridge-laying equipment, and reinforced rail transport infrastructure. The £7.51 billion market projection implicitly encompasses these massive secondary logistical requirements, driving a comprehensive overhaul of regional military infrastructure.5

3. Lessons Learned from the Ukraine-Russia Conflict: Evolving Tactical Doctrine

The operational realities of the ongoing high-intensity conflict in Ukraine served as the analytical and doctrinal foundation for the technical discourse at FAVCEE 2026. Detailed insights provided by active combat commanders, notably Colonel Yevhen Shamataliuk, Deputy Commander of the LITPOLUKR Brigade (a trilateral brigade of Lithuanian, Polish, and Ukrainian forces), illuminated the profound and permanent ways in which drone-saturated environments have altered mechanized warfare.6

3.1 The Obsolescence of Uncontested Armor Maneuver

The primary tactical lesson extracted from the Eastern European theater is the near-impossibility of achieving strategic or tactical surprise when massing armor.6 The proliferation of low-cost, commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) reconnaissance UAVs, persistently linked to precision artillery batteries and loitering munitions, has created an unprecedentedly transparent battlefield.1 In this environment, static or slowly maneuvering armored columns face rapid detection and catastrophic attrition.

As a direct result of these observations, CEE military planners are shifting doctrinal focus away from massed armored spearheads designed for deep penetration, toward distributed, highly mobile, and dispersed operations.1 Armored vehicles are increasingly tasked with precision direct-fire support, rapid infantry insertion, and immediate repositioning to avoid counter-battery fire or swarm attacks by first-person view (FPV) drones.6 This operational tempo necessitates the procurement of vehicles with superior power-to-weight ratios capable of executing rapid “shoot-and-scoot” tactics. Furthermore, it demands advanced signature management—including multispectral camouflage and thermal exhaust diffusion—to reduce the vehicle’s acoustic, thermal, and radar cross-sections.1

3.2 The Asymmetric Threat of Loitering Munitions

The most disruptive technical challenge discussed throughout the conference was the persistent, lethal threat of UAVs and FPV drones executing top-attack flight profiles.1 Traditional armored vehicle design concentrates the thickest composite armor on the frontal 60-degree arc to defeat direct-fire kinetic energy penetrators (APFSDS) and shaped charges originating from opposing MBTs. Conversely, the top of the turret and the engine deck have historically remained lightly armored.7

The Ukraine conflict has definitively demonstrated that even the most heavily armored legacy vehicles can be immobilized or completely destroyed by inexpensive, payload-bearing munitions striking these vulnerable overhead zones.6 This dynamic has triggered a rapid, urgent reassessment of vehicle survivability requirements across all NATO commands.1 Procuring nations are now demanding immediate, organic counter-UAS (C-UAS) capabilities at the platoon or individual vehicle level, realizing that relying solely on theater-level or divisional air defense networks is grossly insufficient for protecting forward-deployed mechanized units from low-flying, low-radar-cross-section drones.1

4. Next-Generation Survivability: Active Protection and Passive Upgrades

To counter the lethal lessons observed in the current operational environment, FAVCEE 2026 showcased highly advanced survivability solutions that blend millimeter-wave radar, kinetic interception, electronic warfare, and next-generation composite materials.16

[Image: Conceptual diagram of a layered active protection system intercepting a top-attack munition on a modern main battle tank]

Diagram of a tank and its strategic components

4.1 The Dominance of Hard-Kill Active Protection Systems (APS)

The integration of hard-kill APS has decisively transitioned from an optional, high-cost capability enhancement to a strict baseline requirement for all new armored procurements.7 EuroTrophy, a prominent joint venture involving KNDS Deutschland, Rafael Advanced Defense Systems, and General Dynamics European Land Systems, presented significant integration updates regarding the Trophy APS.7 The Trophy system utilizes high-resolution flat-panel radars to detect incoming projectiles, rapidly calculating their trajectory and deploying an explosively formed projectile (EFP) to neutralize the threat before it contacts the vehicle’s armor. Having achieved over 90 percent interception effectiveness in dense urban operations conducted by the Israel Defense Forces, the system is now being rapidly adopted across CEE fleets.18

During the event, defense officials confirmed a multi-nation contract for EuroTrophy to supply the Trophy APS to four new Leopard 2A8 user nations: the Czech Republic, Lithuania, the Netherlands, and Croatia.7 This procurement signifies the standardization of APS across NATO’s MBT fleets. Furthermore, EuroTrophy highlighted successful integration efforts onto wheeled platforms, notably the Boxer 8×8 and the Patria AMV XP 8×8.7

The adaptation of hard-kill APS for lighter, 8×8 wheeled platforms represents a highly critical engineering milestone. Hard-kill systems impose significant size, weight, and power (SWaP) penalties.7 Additionally, the intense kinetic recoil forces generated during an interception can severely stress the structural integrity and suspension of wheeled chassis, which lack the rigidity of tracked MBTs.19 The successful integration on the Boxer demonstrates that CEE forces can now achieve MBT-level survivability on rapidly deployable, medium-weight infantry forces, fundamentally altering the survivability calculus for motorized brigades.7 EuroTrophy specifically emphasized the introduction of software and radar azimuth updates designed to track and intercept high-angle, top-attack threats, providing a direct, material response to the FPV drone crisis observed in current conflicts.7

4.2 Passive Protection and Spall Liners

Despite the heavy emphasis on APS technology, passive protection remains the ultimate fail-safe. When primary armor is overmatched by a kinetic penetrator or when an APS system has exhausted its countermeasures, internal spall liners act to mitigate catastrophic crew loss.20 When armor is struck, even without a full penetration, shockwaves can cause the interior face of the metal armor to fracture, sending a deadly spray of high-velocity fragments (spall) into the crew compartment.20

Turkish advanced materials firm CES Advanced Composite announced a strategic agreement with UAE-based Calidus to provide composite spall liners and pontoon systems for the Wahash 8×8 amphibious armored fighting vehicle.20 This partnership highlights the ongoing necessity of lightweight internal crew protection, particularly in amphibious platforms where heavy metallic armor must be minimized to maintain water buoyancy.20 Advanced composite materials, such as those utilizing Silicon Carbide matrices, allow for a significant reduction in vehicle weight without sacrificing ballistic resistance.21 This directly supports the mobility requirements of rapid reaction forces while providing critical containment against spallation.20

5. Lethality Enhancements: Main Guns, Remote Weapon Stations, and Small Arms

The lethality requirements for future armored vehicles discussed in Prague emphasized scalable firepower, modularity, and the critical need for integrated, mobile air defense to protect the dismount squad.1

5.1 Remote Weapon Stations (RWS) and Scalable Turrets

Leonardo presented a comprehensive overview of its modular turret systems, detailing the capabilities of the HITROLE (small caliber RWS), HITFIST (medium caliber for IFVs), and HITFACT (large caliber up to 120mm for light tanks and tank destroyers) architectures.23 The modularity of these systems allows defense ministries to procure a single baseline vehicle chassis and equip it for varied mission profiles.23 For example, a baseline 8×8 chassis acting as an armored personnel carrier (APC) may only require a 12.7mm HITROLE RWS for self-defense, whereas the identical chassis tasked with direct fire support can be fitted with a HITFACT 105mm or 120mm cannon.23

This modularity drastically reduces the logistical footprint and training burden, a critical factor for CEE nations operating with constrained defense budgets and limited maintenance depots.13 Furthermore, these turrets feature advanced digital architectures capable of rapidly integrating external targeting data.9 This enables “hunter-killer” engagements where the vehicle commander identifies a target on an independent panoramic sight and automatically slues the main gun for the gunner to immediately engage, drastically reducing the sensor-to-shooter timeline.23

5.2 Organic Counter-UAS Integration

The desperate need for organic, vehicle-mounted C-UAS resulted in the integration of specialized air defense turrets onto standard troop carrier chassis.1 The Calidus Wahash 8×8 AFV was prominently featured, integrated with the ASELSAN KORKUT 35mm air defense system (designated KORKUT 141/35 by the UAE).15

The KORKUT system utilizes 35mm airburst ammunition (particulate ammunition) to create a dense, lethal cloud of tungsten sub-munitions precisely in the flight path of incoming UAVs, cruise missiles, or attack helicopters.15 By mounting this heavy system on the highly mobile, amphibious Wahash 8×8, mobile mechanized columns gain a terrain-agnostic air defense umbrella that can keep pace with forward maneuvering elements.15 This negates the historical vulnerability of rapid armored columns outrunning their tracked, specialized air defense support.15

Similarly, Serbia’s Military Technical Institute (MTI) showcased the newest iteration of the Pasars-16 self-propelled anti-aircraft system.12 Upgraded with four Rada radars, a 40mm Bofors cannon, surface-to-air missiles, and anti-tank guided missiles (ATGMs), the Pasars-16 exemplifies the global trend toward heavily armed, multi-role SHORAD (Short-Range Air Defense) vehicles capable of engaging both aerial drone swarms and heavy ground armor simultaneously.12

5.3 Small Arms, Optic Integrations, and Dismount Synergies

While heavy caliber cannons dominate vehicle specifications, the ultimate efficacy of mechanized infantry relies on the seamless tactical transition between the vehicle and the dismounted squad. Small arms, squad-level lethality, and crew-served weapons received targeted analytical attention at FAVCEE 2026.24

The acquisition of a minority stake in the highly regarded Swedish optics mounting manufacturer Spuhr i Dalby AB by the Colt CZ Group (CZG) represents a strategic consolidation in the small arms accessories market directly impacting armored infantry.26 Spuhr is renowned for its ruggedized, highly precise ISMS (Ideal Scope Mount System) optical mounts, which are critical for both individual service rifles and heavier crew-served weapons mounted on external IFV pintles.27 When a 30mm or 40mm autocannon fires from an IFV, the resulting concussive force and vibration can easily shake inferior optical mounts out of zero. Spuhr’s unibody mounts prevent this zero shift, ensuring that dismounts and vehicle commanders maintain repeatable accuracy, directly increasing first-round hit probability in high-stress environments.27

Furthermore, Turkish manufacturer MKE displayed its expansion into advanced infantry systems, highlighting the MKE-300 Blackout rifle.24 Rifles chambered in.300 Blackout (7.62x35mm) provide mechanized infantry with a distinct tactical advantage.24 Traditional 5.56x45mm NATO rounds lose significant velocity and terminal effectiveness when fired from the short barrels required for maneuvering inside the cramped confines of an APC or IFV.25 The.300 Blackout cartridge utilizes heavier projectiles that achieve full powder burn in much shorter barrels, reducing blinding muzzle flash inside the vehicle and improving terminal ballistics.24 When paired with subsonic ammunition and suppressors, it allows dismounted troops to quickly and quietly secure urban environments or trench systems immediately upon exiting the vehicle ramps.24

6. National Procurement Profiles and Fleet Modernization Strategies

The defining feature of FAVCEE 2026 was the detailed, programmatic articulation of specific national procurement strategies. The data indicates a definitive rupture with Soviet-legacy equipment and a decisive, irreversible pivot toward interoperable, Western-designed platforms.5

NationLegacy PlatformFuture Platform ProcurementKey Milestones & Quantities
Czech RepublicT-72M4 CZLeopard 2A4 / Leopard 2A8, CV90Transition active; Leo 2A8 integration underway. 14
SlovakiaT-72Undisclosed MBT, CV90 MkIVProcuring 100+ MBTs (45 for 14 Tank Battalion by 2030). 11
SwedenCV90 / Stv 122Future IFV (Joint), Stv 123Subarctic upgrades active; Joint IFV target 2030-2040. 6
AustriaSteyr-legacyPandur 6×6 (Upgraded)Execution of “Military 2032+” modernization plan. 13
PortugalM113 / LegacyModernized Wheeled/TrackedComprehensive capability enhancements active. 6

6.1 The Czech Republic: The Hub of CEE Modernization

As the host nation, the Czech Republic detailed one of the most comprehensive modernization programs in the region. Major Kamil Balwar, serving as Desk Officer and Project Manager for MBTs in the Armaments and Acquisition Division of the Czech Armed Forces, outlined the strategic phase-out of the locally upgraded T-72M4 CZ.12 The approaching obsolescence of the T-72 platform—exacerbated by a critical lack of spare parts, main gun lethality limitations against modern composite armor, and severe vulnerability to modern top-attack anti-tank systems—necessitated a rapid transition.12

The Czech Army is currently fielding the Leopard 2A4 as an interim capability, a vital step that allows tank crews, logisticians, and maintenance battalions to transition their training pipelines to NATO-standard 120mm smoothbore logistics and heavier recovery operations.14 The ultimate objective, however, is the acquisition and integration of the state-of-the-art Leopard 2A8.14 Equipped with the aforementioned Trophy APS and advanced digitized C2 architectures, the 2A8 will serve as the heavy armored fist of the 7th Mechanized Brigade.7 Parallel to the MBT procurement, the concurrent integration of the CV90 IFV ensures that Czech mechanized infantry can maneuver at the exact same operational tempo and cross-country mobility as the Leopard 2 elements, facilitating true, integrated combined arms operations.14

6.2 Slovakia: Rapid Armored Expansion and Bilateral Procurement

Slovakia utilized the FAVCEE platform to confirm its ambitious intent to procure more than 100 main battle tanks.11 Currently operating a fleet heavily reliant on roughly 30 Soviet-era T-72s, the Slovak Ministry of Defence announced a rapid expansion program: by 2030, the 14 Tank Battalion (a unit of the 2 Mechanized Brigade) will operate 45 modern MBTs.11

This MBT expansion is brilliantly complemented by a strategic bilateral agreement with the Czech Republic for the joint procurement and operation of the CV90 MkIV IFV.29 Signed initially during the SIAF 2022 Air Show by Czechian Defence Minister Jana Černochová and Slovak counterpart Jaroslav Naď, this joint procurement demonstrates an exceptionally high level of regional defense integration.29 By operating the identical IFV platform, Prague and Bratislava can pool spare parts inventory, establish joint heavy maintenance depots, and conduct unified training programs.29 This bilateral strategy dramatically lowers the total lifecycle cost of the vehicle fleets while ensuring absolute, frictionless interoperability along NATO’s eastern frontier.29

6.3 Austria: “Military 2032+” and Engineering Pragmatism

Brigadier General Michael Janisch, Director of the Armaments and Defence Technology Agency (ARWT) for the Austrian Armed Forces, presented the “Military 2032+” plan.1 Austria’s approach to armored modernization is defined by rigorous, independent technical evaluation and bespoke engineering solutions tailored to modernize its current fleets.13

A prime example of this engineering pragmatism is the continuous enhancement of the Pandur wheeled armored vehicle. As wheeled vehicles are progressively up-armored to counter modern kinetic and IED threats, the resultant weight creep places immense, often critical stress on the drivetrain, suspension, and braking systems.19 Brigadier Gen. Janisch detailed how the ARWT, operating out of the Burstyn barracks test workshop and working in close collaboration with scientists from the Vienna University of Technology, successfully developed a custom brake disc system for the Pandur.19 This bespoke system drastically improves heat dissipation and wear resistance, handling the increased kinetic energy of the heavier vehicle.19 This level of sub-component engineering ensures that tactical mobility and safety are not compromised by the addition of heavy modular armor packages.19

6.4 Portugal and Switzerland: Targeted Capability Expansion

Other nations utilized FAVCEE to detail highly targeted upgrades. Switzerland outlined extensive plans for expanding its heavy forces through the integration of new artillery platforms, combat APCs, and specialized reconnaissance vehicles.6 This expansion ensures comprehensive capability across the operational spectrum, allowing Swiss forces to conduct everything from reconnaissance-in-force to heavy indirect fire missions.13 Portugal, represented by Brigadier General Antonio Jose Fernandes de Oliveira (Commander, Mechanised Brigade, Portuguese Army), discussed the modernization of its mechanized brigades, prioritizing enhancements to tactical mobility, situational awareness, and lethality across both legacy M113 replacements and modern wheeled fleets.6

7. The Nordic Bloc: Subarctic Dominance and Joint Procurement

The accession of Sweden and Finland into the NATO alliance has fundamentally and permanently altered the security architecture of Northern Europe and the Baltic Sea region.6 This strategic shift was heavily reflected in presentations by Major General Jonny Lindfors, Commander of the Swedish Army, and Major General Lars Lervik, Chief of Staff of the Norwegian Army.6

7.1 Stridvagn 123 Optimization

Sweden detailed its ongoing engineering efforts to optimize its Stridvagn 123 (Stv 123) MBTs for subarctic conditions.6 Operating heavy armor in extreme cold weather presents unique challenges: hydraulic fluids increase in viscosity, track pads lose adhesion on ice, and battery efficiency for sensitive C2 electronics plummets.6 Sweden’s modernization efforts ensure that extreme weather does not degrade tactical mobility, thermal sensor performance, or crew endurance during extended winter operations.6

[Image: Matrix visualization of the Joint Nordic IFV Procurement cross-border integration framework]

7.2 The Four-Nation Joint IFV Initiative

The most consequential strategic announcement from the Nordic representatives was the confirmation of active, high-level discussions between Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden for the joint procurement of a future IFV covering the 2030–2040 timeframe.8

Currently, all four nations operate highly localized, distinct variants of the BAE Systems Combat Vehicle 90 (CV90).8 While acquiring an advanced variant of the CV90 is a logical progression given the existing training infrastructure, the coalition is explicitly evaluating proposals from multiple manufacturers to ensure competitive capability advantages.8 The strategic doctrine underpinning this initiative, forcefully articulated by Maj. Gen. Lindfors, is the absolute requirement for “cross-development, cross-buying, and cross-use”.8

By strictly rejecting unique “national special requirements” in favor of procuring an identical baseline platform, the Nordic nations aim to create a fully interchangeable, region-wide supply chain.8 Maj. Gen. Lars Lervik highlighted that this will significantly lower procurement costs and ease complex maintenance issues.8 In a potential conflict scenario, a damaged Norwegian IFV could theoretically be repaired using sub-components from a Finnish depot, serviced seamlessly by Swedish mechanics. This level of granular interoperability acts as a massive force multiplier, drastically complicating adversary operational planning in the Baltic Sea and High North regions by presenting a unified, highly resilient logistical front.8

8. Command, Control, Communications, and Battlefield Digitization

Modern armored warfare is heavily and irrevocably reliant on data dominance.10 A vehicle possessing superior physical armor is strategically nullified if it operates in a communications blackout or lacks the digital architecture to share targeting data with adjacent maneuvering units.10

8.1 Software-Defined Radios and EW Resilience

Colonel Martin Hlavacek, Future CIS (Communication and Information Systems) Branch Head for the Czech MoD, emphasized the critical role of agile, highly adaptable communication networks in modernizing the Czech Armed Forces.31 The operational tempo across Europe requires forces capable of rapid movement while maintaining uncompromised command and control.31

The integration of modern, frequency-hopping, encrypted software-defined radios (SDRs) ensures that ground elements can maintain situational awareness even in severely degraded electronic warfare (EW) environments.31 Near-peer adversaries employ robust EW assets to jam traditional VHF/UHF communications. Modern SDRs counteract this by rapidly shifting frequencies and utilizing complex encryption algorithms, securing the C2 link.31 Seamless C2 is the non-negotiable prerequisite for multi-domain operations, allowing armored columns to instantaneously call in joint fires from fast air assets, attack helicopters, or naval surface fire support.6

8.2 Human-Machine Teaming (MUM-T) and Uncrewed Assets

The Prague conference highlighted a rapid doctrinal paradigm shift toward human-machine teaming (MUM-T), whereby manned armored vehicles operate in direct, synchronized concert with unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs) and uncrewed aerial systems (UAS).9

A prime example is Sweden’s defense materiel administration (FMV) purchasing the THeMIS UGV from Milrem Robotics.32 The contract, signed by Brig. Gen. Jonas Lotsne and overseen by Maj. Gen. Lindfors, integrates advanced robotic systems to handle highly hazardous tasks.32 By pushing UGVs like THeMIS ahead of the main armored force, commanders can conduct route clearance, execute casualty evacuation under fire, or utilize the UGV as a forward-deployed sensor node.32 Tactically, this forces adversaries to reveal their concealed defensive positions by engaging the attritable UGV, thereby preserving the highly valuable crewed MBTs.32

Furthermore, the integration of tethered drone systems, such as Elistair’s Khronos Dronebox, directly onto armored platforms was discussed as a mechanism to provide continuous, elevated intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) without relying on over-tasked satellite or fixed-wing assets.1 A tethered drone provides an IFV with an organic “eye in the sky,” securely transmitting high-definition thermal and optical data via a physical wire.1 This physical data link makes the ISR feed entirely immune to RF jamming and spoofing.1 Concurrently, systems like the UAV Navigation–Grupo Oesía VECTOR-300 represent the ongoing push toward integrating more robust, attritable UAS capabilities directly into the operational maneuver force, providing over-the-horizon targeting data for vehicle-mounted ATGMs.1

9. Industrial Base Capacity and Supply Chain Dependencies

The modernization programs detailed at FAVCEE 2026 are highly ambitious, but their physical execution is entirely contingent upon the resilience, capacity, and security of the European defense industrial base.6

9.1 Artillery Ammunition Production and Chemical Logistics

In the domain of heavy fire support, which must operate in tandem with armored maneuver elements to ensure their survival, the industrial base is receiving critical attention. PGZ (Poland) and Eurenco (Belgium) announced significant advancements in the production of 155mm modular charges, produced in cooperation with Sellier & Bellot (a Colt CZ Group company).26

The establishment of a new production line in Pionki, Poland, with a stated production target of 100,000 units annually, aims to alleviate the severe artillery ammunition bottleneck exposed by the expenditure rates in the Ukraine conflict.26 The chemistry and manufacturing of high-performance propellants and modular charges are incredibly complex, relying on secure supply chains for raw nitrocellulose and specialized energetic materials.25 The availability of reliable, mass-produced 155mm fires is an absolute prerequisite for armored maneuver, providing the sustained suppressive capabilities required to allow IFVs and MBTs to close with the enemy.26 Furthermore, systems like BAE Systems’ 155mm Multi-Domain Artillery Cannon System (MDACS) represent the next iteration of networked indirect fire support, requiring vast quantities of these precisely manufactured modular charges to function optimally.11

9.2 OEM Supply Chain Coordination

The transition to advanced platforms like the Leopard 2A8, CV90 MkIV, and Wahash 8×8 requires vast, synchronized supply chain coordination across multiple borders.14 Sub-tier suppliers providing thermal optics, specialized armor-grade steel, composite spall liners, and radiation-hardened microelectronics must rapidly scale production to meet the simultaneous demands of multiple defense ministries.20

The joint procurement strategies adopted by the Nordic bloc and the Czech-Slovak alliance represent a highly sophisticated administrative and strategic solution to this industrial bottleneck.8 By consolidating orders and standardizing requirements across multiple nations, these blocs provide Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) with the massive, long-term budgetary predictability required to justify investing in expanded manufacturing capacity, tooling, and workforce development.8 Without these joint procurements, fragmented national orders would likely result in prolonged delivery delays and significantly higher per-unit costs.

10. Strategic Conclusions

The 12th Annual Future Armoured Vehicles Central & Eastern Europe 2026 conference definitively demonstrated a region rapidly, and aggressively, adapting to the brutal, technologically dense realities of modern combat.10 The era of extending the life of obsolete Soviet-era armor through incremental upgrades has ended.12

Through the accelerated, multi-billion-pound procurement of NATO-standard fleets, CEE land forces are undergoing a generational capability leap.1 The mandatory integration of hard-kill Active Protection Systems acknowledges that armor alone can no longer defeat the proliferation of top-attack munitions.7 The adoption of organic C-UAS turrets ensures that mechanized infantry can maneuver under a mobile air defense umbrella.15 The doctrinal embrace of battlefield digitization and human-machine teaming ensures that these new vehicles will not fight as isolated units, but as nodes in a highly lethal, resilient network.9

Ultimately, the strategic intent broadcast from Prague is unambiguous: Central and Eastern European nations are fielding a highly mobile, networked, and uniformly interoperable armored deterrent, purpose-built to dominate the complexities of the future multi-domain battlespace.1

Please share the link on Facebook, Forums, with colleagues, etc. Your support is much appreciated and if you have any feedback, please email us in**@*********ps.com. If you’d like to request a report or order a reprint, please click here for the corresponding page to open in new tab.

Sources Used

  1. Future Armoured Vehicles Central & Eastern Europe 2026 | May 18-19, accessed May 20, 2026, https://www.defenseadvancement.com/events/future-armoured-vehicles-central-eastern-europe/
  2. Future Armoured Vehicles: Central and Eastern Europe 2026 – inicop, accessed May 20, 2026, https://www.inicop.org/conferences/item/future-armoured-vehicles-central-and-eastern-europe-2026
  3. Future Armoured Vehicles: Central and Eastern Europe on May 18-19, 2026 in Prague, Czechia – Conference Index, accessed May 20, 2026, https://conferenceindex.org/event/future-armoured-vehicles-central-and-eastern-europe-2026-may-prague-cz
  4. Industry Events – Security – Defence – Jorlio.com, accessed May 20, 2026, https://www.jorlio.com/Events/Category/Industry-Events-Security-Defence
  5. Defence Modernisation Accelerates in CEE: Who Will Shape the Future of Armoured Warfare? – aero-space.eu, accessed May 20, 2026, https://aero-space.eu/2026/02/05/defence-modernisation-accelerates-in-cee-who-will-shape-the-future-of-armoured-warfare/
  6. Insights from the Future Armoured Vehicles Conference 2026 – Defense Advancement, accessed May 20, 2026, https://www.defenseadvancement.com/news/insights-from-the-future-armoured-vehicles-conference-2026/
  7. EuroTrophy – The European hub for TROPHY APS, accessed May 20, 2026, https://euro-trophy.de/
  8. EXCLUSIVE: 4 Nordic nations in talks for joint procurement of infantry fighting vehicles, accessed May 20, 2026, https://breakingdefense.com/2024/10/exclusive-4-nordic-nations-in-talks-for-joint-procurement-of-infantry-fighting-vehicles/
  9. Future Armoured Vehicles Situational Awareness – SAE Media Group, accessed May 20, 2026, https://www.smgconferences.com/defence/uk/conference/Armoured-Vehicles-Situational-Awareness
  10. Future Armoured Vehicles 2026: Shaping the future of armoured warfare technologies, accessed May 20, 2026, https://www.zona-militar.com/en/2026/03/13/future-armoured-vehicles-2026-shaping-the-future-of-armoured-warfare-technologies/
  11. Slovakia intends to procure more than 100 main battle tanks – Defence Industry Europe, accessed May 20, 2026, https://defence-industry.eu/slovakia-intends-to-procure-more-than-100-main-battle-tanks/
  12. Articles by Christopher Petrov | Janes Journalist | Muck Rack, accessed May 20, 2026, https://muckrack.com/christopher-petrov/articles
  13. Future Armoured Vehicles Central and Eastern Europe – SAE Media Group, accessed May 20, 2026, https://www.smgconferences.com/defence/europe/conference/Armoured-Vehicle-Technology-Advancement-Forum
  14. Future Armoured Vehicles Central and Eastern Europe – SAE Media Group, accessed May 20, 2026, https://www.smgconferences.com/defence/archive/5-2025/conference/Armoured-Vehicle-Technology-Advancement-Forum
  15. IDEX 2025: KORKUT Integration on Wahash 8×8 AFV – TURDEF, accessed May 20, 2026, https://turdef.com/article/idex-2025-korkut-integration-on-wahash-8×8-afv
  16. Upcoming Events – Soldier Modernisation, accessed May 20, 2026, https://www.soldiermod.com/events
  17. Future Armoured Vehicles Survivability : Defence & Security : UK – SAE Media Group, accessed May 20, 2026, https://www.smgconferences.com/defence/uk/conference/Future-Armoured-Vehicles-Survivability
  18. Trophy APS: combat-proven system for NATO’s eastern flank forces, accessed May 20, 2026, https://defence-industry.eu/trophy-aps-combat-proven-system-for-natos-eastern-flank-forces/
  19. Amt für Rüstung und Wehrtechnik: The all-rounders – Militär Aktuell, accessed May 20, 2026, https://militaeraktuell.at/en/amt-fuer-ruestung-und-wehrtechnik-the-all-rounders/
  20. CES Advanced Composite Provides Armour Parts for Wahash 8×8 – TURDEF, accessed May 20, 2026, https://turdef.com/article/ces-advanced-composite-provides-armour-parts-for-wahash-8×8
  21. armour News – TURDEF, accessed May 20, 2026, https://www.turdef.com/tag/armour
  22. Wahash News – TURDEF, accessed May 20, 2026, https://turdef.com/tag/wahash
  23. Future Armoured Vehicles Central and Eastern Europe – SAE Media Group, accessed May 20, 2026, https://www.smgconferences.com/defence/archive/5-2024/conference/Armoured-Vehicle-Technology-Advancement-Forum
  24. MKE to unveil next-generation systems at SAHA 2026 – TURDEF, accessed May 20, 2026, https://www.turdef.com/article/mke-to-unveil-next-generation-systems-at-saha-2026
  25. Hybrid Electric Drive: Quietly Moving Closer – European Security & Defence, accessed May 20, 2026, https://euro-sd.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/ESD_12_2025_01_2026_WEB.pdf
  26. NOTEBOOK, accessed May 20, 2026, https://www.defense.gouv.fr/sites/default/files/dga/Calepin%20des%20entreprises%20international%202026%20VA.pdf
  27. Security & Defence European, accessed May 20, 2026, https://euro-sd.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/ESD_6-20-Eurosatory-lo-res.pdf
  28. Future equipment of the German Army – Wikipedia, accessed May 20, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Future_equipment_of_the_German_Army
  29. Slovakia and Czech Republic to Procure CV90 – TURDEF, accessed May 20, 2026, https://turdef.com/article/slovakia-and-czech-republic-to-procure-cv90
  30. Future Armoured Vehicles Situational Awareness 2026 | April 22–23 | London, UK, accessed May 20, 2026, https://www.unmannedsystemstechnology.com/events/future-armoured-vehicles-situational-awareness/
  31. Mobile Deployable Communications : Defence & Security – SAE Media Group, accessed May 20, 2026, https://www.smgconferences.com/defence/archive/1-2026/conference/mobile-deployable-communications
  32. FMV Purchases Demonstrator from Milrem Robotics – Nordic Defence Sector, accessed May 20, 2026, https://nordicdefencesector.com/da/article/fmv-purchases-demonstrator-from-milrem-robotics
  33. PUMA, CV90 MKIV, KF41 LYNX and ASCOD to be Discussed at the, accessed May 20, 2026, https://www.openpr.com/news/1539227/puma-cv90-mkiv-kf41-lynx-and-ascod-to-be-discussed-at-the-future-armoured-vehicles-central-and-eastern-europe-conference.html