Analytics and Reports, Country Analytics, Russian & Soviet Analytics

SITREP Russia-Ukraine Conflict – Week Ending February 14, 2026

Executive Summary

The military, political, and economic landscape of the Russia-Ukraine conflict during the week ending February 14, 2026, is defined by a paradox of high-intensity attritional combat and a maturing diplomatic framework under intense international pressure. As the war approaches its four-year mark, the Russian Federation maintains a grinding offensive across the Donbas, achieving marginal territorial gains at a cost in personnel and materiel that several assessments characterize as unsustainable for a major power in long-term decline.1 Russian forces have adopted a tactical pace reminiscent of early 20th-century trench warfare, advancing at approximately 15 to 70 meters per day in key sectors, yet managing to seize 182 square miles over the last thirty days—a notable increase from the previous month’s 79 square miles.1

Strategically, the Kremlin has shifted its focus toward the systematic destruction of the Ukrainian energy grid through an “islanding” campaign, targeting high-voltage substations to fragment the national power system.5 This has reduced Ukraine’s available generating capacity to 14 GW, forcing millions into sub-zero conditions with only hours of electricity daily.6 Concurrently, the 33rd Ramstein meeting secured a historic $38 billion assistance package for Ukraine for 2026, signaling a pivot toward long-term defense sustainability despite potential political shifts in the United States.8

On the diplomatic front, the announcement of high-level trilateral peace talks in Geneva for February 17–18, 2026, serves as a critical junction. With a reported U.S.-imposed deadline for a settlement by June 2026, both sides are maneuvering for leverage: Russia through continued territorial pressure and infrastructure warfare, and Ukraine through the expansion of its transnational drone industry and deep strikes against Russian oil and missile infrastructure.3 The involvement of North Korean troops in technical roles and the launch of NATO’s Operation Eastern Sentry further complicate the regional security architecture, as the conflict remains deeply embedded in a broader global competition between the West and a nascent Eurasian security framework.3

Operational Environment and Tactical Frontline Dynamics

The Donbas Theater and the Struggle for the “Fortress Belt”

The central gravity of Russian ground operations remains focused on the “Fortress Belt” of the Donetsk Oblast. This string of heavily fortified urban centers has anchored Ukrainian defenses for over a decade. Throughout the reporting week, Russian forces maintained a high operational tempo in the Pokrovsk and Slovyansk directions, utilizing approximately 150,000 personnel in the Pokrovsk sector alone.10 The tactical reality on the ground is one of agonizingly slow progression; while the Russian Ministry of Defense and President Putin claim confidence and momentum, the data suggests that these gains are being “ground down” rather than achieved through maneuver.1

In the Kupyansk direction, the situation has stabilized into a brutal exchange of attrition. Russian units in central Kupyansk are reportedly facing dire shortages of food, medicine, and water, compounded by Ukrainian electronic warfare efforts that have disrupted Russian communication and supply lines.10 Ukrainian forces have leveraged Starlink outages on the Russian side to conduct localized counterattacks, though the overall frontline remains largely static.10 To the south, in the Chasiv Yar sector, Russian forces achieved confirmed advances on February 12, continuing their efforts to seize the high ground overlooking the central Donbas industrial heartland.3

DateSectorNotable Tactical Developments
Feb 7, 2026DonbasRussian advances confirmed near Yampil, Bondarne, and Stepanivka.3
Feb 8, 2026PokrovskAdvances reported near Tykhe, Pryvillia, and in Vasyukivka.3
Feb 9, 2026KostyantynivkaMarginal Russian advance south of central Kostyantynivka; advances in central Pleshchiivka.10
Feb 11, 2026Luhansk/BorovaRussian forces advanced into central Bohuslavka; Ukrainian forces cleared Chuhunivka.10
Feb 12, 2026Chasiv YarDeepState OSINT confirms Russian advances near Chasiv Yar.3
Feb 13, 2026KupyanskReports of severe food and water shortages among Russian frontline units.10

Northern Axis and Cognitive Warfare

The northern border regions of Sumy and Kharkiv have seen a resurgence of activity that analysts classify as part of a Russian cognitive warfare campaign. By conducting small-scale cross-border attacks and seizing minor settlements like Komarivka and Sydorivka, the Kremlin seeks to portray a narrative of a collapsing Ukrainian defense.15 However, intelligence assessments indicate that the Russian military command has not yet redeployed the necessary forces to sustain a major offensive in the north, lacking the battlefield air interdiction (BAI) capabilities required to degrade Ukrainian defensive logistics.15

These raids serve the dual purpose of creating a “buffer zone” to mitigate Ukrainian shelling of Russian border towns and forcing Ukraine to divert elite reserves from the critical Donbas front. On February 9, Ukrainian forces successfully neutralized a 22-man Russian unit attempting to utilize a gas pipeline for infiltration near Yablunivka, illustrating the high-risk, low-reward nature of these northern operations.10

Southern Axis and Rear Area Conflict

The southern front, encompassing Zaporizhia and Kherson, remains characterized by static positions and intensive drone warfare. Ukrainian forces conducted limited clearing operations near Hulyaipole this week, reclaiming control of Ternuvate and Tsvitkove.10 In response, Russian forces are entrenching their long-term presence by constructing physical military infrastructure, including a large-scale base near occupied Myrne designed for the 291st Motorized Rifle Regiment and drone operator training.10

Ukrainian deep strikes have continued to target Russian command centers and logistics. On the night of February 11–12, Ukrainian forces utilized domestically produced FP-5 Flamingo cruise missiles to strike the Kotluban GRAU arsenal in Volgograd Oblast, roughly 320 kilometers from the border.18 This strike, which caused secondary detonations, highlights Ukraine’s growing capability to strike the Russian defense industrial base (DIB) asymmetrically.9

The Strategic Air Campaign and Infrastructure Systemics

The “Islanding” of the Ukrainian Power Grid

Russia has intensified its aerial campaign against the Ukrainian energy sector, transitioning from generalized strikes to a highly specific strategy of “islanding.” This approach focuses on destroying the 750kV and 330kV high-voltage substations and transmission lines that constitute the foundation of the national energy system.5 By breaking the grid into isolated pockets, Russian commanders prevent the redistribution of electricity from functioning generation sites, such as nuclear power plants, to areas of high demand or critical industrial hubs.5

As of early February 2026, the consequences of this strategy are catastrophic:

  • Generation Deficit: Ukraine’s total generating capacity has plummeted to approximately 14 GW, down from 33.7 GW prior to the full-scale invasion.6
  • Grid Resilience: Approximately 90% of thermal power generation and 50% of hydropower installations have been damaged or destroyed.6
  • Military Impact: Stable power is a requirement for the refurbishment of tanks and the production of artillery. The fragmentation of the grid has slowed military repair cycles, forcing reliance on decentralized generators that are less efficient and harder to sustain.5
Infrastructure TypeStatus as of February 14, 2026Percentage of Pre-War Capacity
Thermal Generation90% destroyed or disabled 6~10%
Hydropower50% damaged; 40% destroyed 6~50%
High-Voltage SubstationsSystematically targeted for “islanding” 5Fragile/Disconnected
Available Capacity~14 GW remaining from 33.7 GW 6~41.5%

Humanitarian and Social Consequences of Energy Warfare

The humanitarian situation in Ukraine has deteriorated as the conflict enters its fifth winter. With temperatures dropping to -15C/5F, the systematic outages of heating, water, and electricity have led to a rise in hypothermia-related deaths and mass internal displacement.6 In Kyiv, residents often face up to 16 hours a day without power, prompting an estimated 600,000 people to leave the capital for the countryside where wood and coal stoves are more reliable.7

The Amnesty International report released on February 10 emphasizes that these strikes are not merely collateral damage but a deliberate attempt to freeze the population into submission.19 This infrastructure warfare serves as a primary lever for the Kremlin in the lead-up to the Geneva peace talks, as it gambles that the humanitarian cost will eventually outweigh the Ukrainian national resolve.

The Socio-Economic Foundation of the Russian War Machine

Economic Stagnation and the Inflationary Spiral

The Russian economy is increasingly described by analysts as experiencing stagflation—a period of stagnant growth coupled with high inflation. Official forecasts for 2026 GDP growth have been revised downward to 2.2% or even 0.6% in some models, reflecting the exhaustion of the initial mobilization-driven boom.1 To curb an inflation rate that has remained stuck at 8.2%, the Russian Central Bank has maintained a key interest rate that, while stabilizing the ruble, has essentially “strangled” non-military sectors of the economy.10

The federal budget is under mounting strain due to the dual pressure of high defense spending (estimated at over 7% of GDP) and declining oil revenues.20 New sanctions regimes have successfully limited Russian hydrocarbon exports to primary buyers such as India and China. In January 2026, Russian oil and gas revenues fell to 393 billion rubles ($5.1 billion), a massive decline from the 1.12 trillion rubles ($14.5 billion) reported in January 2025.20

MetricFebruary 2025 DataFebruary 2026 DataImpact Assessment
Hydrocarbon Revenue1.12 Trillion RUB393 Billion RUB 2065% decrease in primary income
GDP Growth Rate4.9% (2024 avg)1.1% (Forecast) 20Approaching zero growth/recession
Inflation (Consumer)~10% (Peak)8.2% 20Sustained pressure on households
Interest RatesElevatedLowered slightly to support DIB 10DIB priority over civilian welfare

Labor Scarcity and Social Unrest

The requirement to send approximately 30,000 men to the front each month has created a labor market “tighter than ever”.21 This labor shortage is not only driving wage inflation but also leading to the neglect of essential public services. Regional authorities are bracing for prolonged slowdowns, and the risk of social instability is projected to rise throughout 2026.20 Average Russian citizens, particularly retirees on fixed pensions, are reporting significant distress as food prices, such as those for cucumbers and tomatoes, have risen by over in the first two months of the year alone.20

Furthermore, the Kremlin has established “A7,” a state-linked company that utilizes “monopoly money” and ruble-pegged stablecoins to bypass SWIFT and maintain international trade volumes.23 This shadow financial network reflects the increasing desperation of the Russian state to maintain the facade of economic normalcy while its actual liquid reserves in the National Wealth Fund (NWF) face potential depletion by the end of 2026 if oil prices do not recover.22

Technological Hegemony and the Drone Revolution

Ukraine as a Global Laboratory for Asymmetric Warfare

Ukraine has undergone a transformation from a marginal player in unmanned systems to the world’s largest producer of tactical and long-range drones by volume. In 2025, the country manufactured over 2 million first-person-view (FPV) drones, with a projected capacity of 4 to 8 million units annually by early 2026.24 This industry is no longer a collection of “garage startups” but a transnational defense enterprise. On February 8, President Zelenskyy announced that Ukraine would open ten weapon export centers in Europe to internationalize its arms production.16

The technological cycle in this conflict is accelerating rapidly, with key developments this week including:

  • Resistance to Jamming: Ukrainian forces have introduced fiber-optic controlled drones that are immune to radio-frequency electronic warfare, alongside AI-assisted autonomous navigation for GPS-denied environments.24
  • Strategic Deep Strike: Platforms like the Magura V5 maritime drone and deep-strike UAVs now reach ranges of up to 1,700 km, allowing Ukraine to systematically target Russian refineries and launch sites.24
  • C-UAS Interceptors: High-speed interceptor drones (>300 km/h) have emerged as a primary counter to Russian reconnaissance drones, shifting the aerial balance on the frontline.24

Russian Technical Adaptations and Resource Identification

Russian forces have responded to Ukrainian aerial dominance by modifying their own systems. Shahed drones are now being equipped with backward-facing R-60 air-to-air missiles, a tactical adjustment designed to threaten Ukrainian aircraft and interceptor drones that hunt them from the rear.16 Additionally, the Russian military has increasingly integrated UMPB-5R guided glide bombs with ranges of up to 200 kilometers, extending the standoff distance for Russian tactical aviation.14

Ukrainian intelligence (HUR) has been successful in identifying the specific Russian firms driving this production. A report released on February 9 named 21 companies, including LLC “Agency for Digital Development” and the “Mikrob” Design Bureau, as key nodes in the Russian drone supply chain.27 These companies rely heavily on foreign-produced industrial equipment and sophisticated smuggling networks, highlighting the need for more “strategically precise” sanctions to disrupt the Russian war machine.23

International Diplomatic Maneuvering and Peace Negotiations

The Path to Geneva: Feb 17-18, 2026

The trilateral peace talks in Geneva represent the most serious diplomatic effort since the failed Istanbul protocols of 2022. The negotiations will see the return of Vladimir Medinsky, a hawk who has previously pushed for maximalist Russian conditions, as the head of the Russian delegation.2 Ukraine will be represented by Rustem Umerov, Kyrylo Budanov, and other high-ranking security officials.11

The context of these talks is heavily influenced by a June 2026 deadline reportedly set by U.S. President Donald Trump, who has pressured both sides to reach a deal before the U.S. midterm elections.3 The core sticking point remains the future of the Donbas. Russia demands a total Ukrainian withdrawal from the occupied fifth of the Donetsk region, while Ukraine refuses unilateral concessions without ironclad Western security guarantees—something the Kremlin has consistently rejected.10

Domestic Political Pressures in Kyiv

President Zelenskyy faces an increasingly precarious domestic situation. To legitimize any potential “painful compromise” involving territorial loss, there is speculation that he may announce a wartime presidential election and a national referendum on a peace deal by February 24—the fourth anniversary of the full-scale invasion.3 While his office has denied some of these reports, the underlying pressure to renew his mandate while navigating the “garden snail” pace of the war is a primary driver of Ukrainian diplomatic strategy.2

Allied Security Posture and Regional Stability

NATO’s “Eastern Sentry” and the Baltic Sea

The security architecture of NATO’s eastern flank has been fundamentally altered by a series of Russian drone incursions into Polish and Romanian airspace in late 2025. In response, NATO launched Operation Eastern Sentry (or Eastern Sentinel) in September 2025, which has now transitioned into a permanent multi-domain security initiative.12 This operation establishes a collective policy for aerial defense along the eastern flank, moving away from the individual responsibility of member states.

Key Allied contributions to Eastern Sentry include:

  • Aviation: RAF Typhoons, French Rafales, German Eurofighters, and Italian F-35As are conducting 24/7 air policing and intercept missions.12
  • Maritime: Denmark has committed an Iver Huitfeldt-class frigate, and Poland has signed a $1.4 billion contract for Kongsberg counter-drone systems to secure its border regions.12
  • Missile Defense: Italy has deployed a SAMP/T missile system to Estonia, specifically to counter the threat of Russian drones and cruise missiles violating NATO airspace.12

The “Vassalage” of Belarus and the North Korean Contingent

Estonian intelligence’s 2026 report characterizes Belarus as a “Russian vassal state,” noting that the country has been fully integrated into Russia’s policy coordination and military-industrial supply chains.29 This integration has allowed Russia to replenish strategic reserves of artillery ammunition, even as it continues to import shells from Iran and North Korea—estimated at 5 to 7 million shells since 2023.29

The North Korean military presence in the Kursk region is a significant development. Approximately 10,000 North Korean combat troops and 1,000 engineers are currently deployed, with an estimated 6,000 casualties to date.3 These troops have moved into more advanced technical roles, including drone operations and demining.3 In exchange, Pyongyang is receiving technical assistance from Russia for its reconnaissance satellite program and is participating in a new “Eurasian security framework” alongside Belarus, Iran, and Myanmar—a direct challenge to the Western-led international order.30

Human Rights and Occupation Policy

Administrative Coercion and Document Nationalization

In the occupied regions of Kherson and Luhansk, the Russian state is utilizing administrative deadlines to force the “Russification” of the population. Residents have been given until July 1, 2026, to re-register property ownership under Russian law, a process that requires a Russian passport.17 Properties that are not re-registered will be designated as “ownerless” and seized by the state for redistribution to Russian citizens relocating to the region.17

Even more concerning is the March 1, 2026, deadline for the re-registration of Ukrainian guardianship and adoption documents.17 Failure to comply puts Ukrainian children at risk of being removed from their families and placed into the Russian state foster system or adopted by Russian families—a practice that international human rights groups have condemned as a component of a systematic campaign to dismantle Ukrainian national identity.17

Defense Assistance and Sustainability Metrics

The 33rd Ramstein meeting highlighted a pivot toward sustainable, long-term support. The $38 billion package for 2026 is distributed across several critical pillars, with a heavy emphasis on air defense and drone manufacturing.

Assisting Entity2026 Budgetary AllocationPrimary Focus Areas
European Union€90 Billion (Loan)€60B for defense; €30B for macro-finance 31
Germany€11.5 Billion€1B for drones; anti-drone shields for cities 8
Norway$7 Billion$1.4B for drones; $700M for air defense 8
United Kingdom£3 Billion£500M for air defense; PURL funding 8
Sweden€3.7 Billion24th aid package (€1.2B); maritime capabilities 8
Denmark$2 BillionIncreased military assistance budget 8

Through the PURL initiative, the United States makes high-priority defense materiel available to Ukraine, funded by a coalition of Allies including Sweden, the Netherlands, Norway, and the UK.32 This mechanism ensures that even if direct U.S. funding fluctuates, the pipeline of advanced U.S. technology remains open through European financing.

Conclusion and Strategic Forecast

The week ending February 14, 2026, marks a pivotal moment in the Russia-Ukraine conflict. On the battlefield, the Russian military remains committed to a strategy of attrition that yields minimal territorial gains at maximal human cost. However, the systematic “islanding” of the Ukrainian energy grid represents a sophisticated and dangerous evolution in Russian strategy, aimed at achieving the collapse of the Ukrainian industrial base and domestic morale before the June 2026 diplomatic deadline.5

Ukraine’s survival strategy has shifted toward asymmetric deep strikes and the internationalization of its defense industry. By opening export centers and striking Russian missile sites like Kapustin Yar, Kyiv is attempting to make the cost of the war “unbearable” for the Kremlin.9 The Geneva talks will serve as the first true test of whether either side is willing to deviate from their maximalist goals.

The most likely forecast for the coming quarter includes:

  1. Continued Infrastructure Pressure: Russia will likely maintain its focus on the 750kV grid to force a humanitarian crisis in major cities.5
  2. Spring Offensive Preparation: Intelligence indicates Russia is preparing a Summer 2026 offensive, possibly starting in late April, focused on the Slovyansk–Kramatorsk axis.3
  3. Diplomatic Brinkmanship: The lead-up to the June 2026 deadline will see increased volatility as both sides conduct high-profile military operations to improve their bargaining positions at the table.11

As the conflict matures into its fifth year, the sustainability of the Russian war economy—facing 8.2% inflation and potential reserve depletion—will be the ultimate check on the Kremlin’s “garden snail” progression.2 Concurrently, the unity of the NATO-led coalition, now formalized through missions like Eastern Sentry and multi-billion-euro loan packages, remains the indispensable anchor for Ukrainian resistance.12

Please share the link on Facebook, Forums, with colleagues, etc. Your support is much appreciated and if you have any feedback, please email us in**@*********ps.com. If you’d like to request a report or order a reprint, please click here for the corresponding page to open in new tab.

Sources Used

  1. Russia’s Grinding War in Ukraine – CSIS, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.csis.org/analysis/russias-grinding-war-ukraine
  2. A new round of US-brokered talks between Russia and Ukraine is set for Geneva next week, accessed February 14, 2026, https://lasvegassun.com/news/2026/feb/13/a-new-round-of-us-brokered-talks-between-russia-an/
  3. Russia in Review, Feb. 6–13, 2026, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.russiamatters.org/news/russia-review/russia-review-feb-6-13-2026
  4. The Russia-Ukraine War Report Card, Feb. 11, 2026, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.russiamatters.org/news/russia-ukraine-war-report-card/russia-ukraine-war-report-card-feb-11-2026
  5. Saving Ukraine’s Power Grid – CEPA, accessed February 14, 2026, https://cepa.org/article/saving-ukraines-power-grid/
  6. The Russia-Ukraine War Report Card, Jan. 14, 2026, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.russiamatters.org/news/russia-ukraine-war-report-card/russia-ukraine-war-report-card-jan-14-2026
  7. The Russia-Ukraine War Report Card, Feb. 4, 2026, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.russiamatters.org/news/russia-ukraine-war-report-card/russia-ukraine-war-report-card-feb-4-2026
  8. Ramstein Meeting Secures $38B in Military Aid for Ukraine in 2026 …, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.kyivpost.com/post/69990
  9. Ukraine secures nearly $38 billion in military aid after Ramstein meeting, accessed February 14, 2026, https://kyivindependent.com/ukraines-defense-minister-outlines-ukraines-military-priorities-ahead-of-ramstein-meeting/
  10. Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment, Feb. 13, 2026 | ISW, accessed February 14, 2026, https://understandingwar.org/research/russia-ukraine/russian-offensive-campaign-assessment-february-13-2026/
  11. Russia and Ukraine to hold new talks in Geneva next week, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.aljazeera.com/amp/news/2026/2/13/russia-and-ukraine-to-hold-next-round-of-talks-in-geneva-next-week
  12. Operation Eastern Sentry – Wikipedia, accessed February 14, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Eastern_Sentry
  13. SHAPE | Eastern Sentry, accessed February 14, 2026, https://shape.nato.int/operations/operations-and-missions/eastern-sentry
  14. Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment, February 9, 2026 | ISW, accessed February 14, 2026, https://understandingwar.org/research/russia-ukraine/russian-offensive-campaign-assessment-february-9-2026/
  15. Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment, January 14, 2026 | ISW, accessed February 14, 2026, https://understandingwar.org/research/russia-ukraine/russian-offensive-campaign-assessment-january-14-2026/
  16. Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment, February 8, 2026 | ISW, accessed February 14, 2026, https://understandingwar.org/research/russia-ukraine/russian-offensive-campaign-assessment-february-8-2026/
  17. Russian Occupation Update, February 12, 2026 | ISW, accessed February 14, 2026, https://understandingwar.org/research/russia-ukraine/russian-occupation-update-february-12-2026/
  18. Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment, February 12, 2026 – Institute for the Study of War, accessed February 14, 2026, https://understandingwar.org/research/russia-ukraine/russian-offensive-campaign-assessment-february-12-2026/
  19. Russia attacks on Ukraine energy grid cause severe harm, Amnesty Intentional says, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.jurist.org/news/2026/02/russia-attacks-on-ukraine-energy-grid-cause-severe-harm-rights-group-says/
  20. Guns Or Cucumbers: The Kremlin’s Wartime Economy Steers Into …, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.rferl.org/a/russia-war-economy-stagnating-wages-prices-unemployment/33675240.html
  21. Rough times for the Russian economy – Bank of Finland Bulletin, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.bofbulletin.fi/en/blogs/2026/rough-times-for-the-russian-economy/
  22. Russia’s economy in 2026: A rising deficit, regional depression, and the possible depletion of sovereign reserves, accessed February 14, 2026, https://theins.ru/en/economics/289363
  23. Russia Analytical Report, Feb. 2–9, 2026, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.russiamatters.org/news/russia-analytical-report/russia-analytical-report-feb-2-9-2026
  24. Evolution of Ukrainian Drone Systems Industry as a NATO-Aligned Asymmetric Warfare Laboratory (2022–February 2026) – https://debuglies.com, accessed February 14, 2026, https://debuglies.com/2026/02/08/evolution-of-ukrainian-drone-systems-industry-as-a-nato-aligned-asymmetric-warfare-laboratory-2022-february-2026/
  25. Ukraine to open 10 weapons export centers in Europe in 2026 in major wartime policy shift, accessed February 14, 2026, https://kyivindependent.com/ukraine-to-open-10-weapons-export-centers-in-europe-in-2026-zelensky-says/
  26. When Weapons Cross Borders, Data Follows: Ukraine’s Drone Expansion and the Compliance Reckoning to Come – ComplexDiscovery, accessed February 14, 2026, https://complexdiscovery.com/when-weapons-cross-borders-data-follows-ukraines-drone-expansion-and-the-compliance-reckoning-to-come/
  27. Ukrainian Intelligence Identifies 21 Russian Firms Behind Drones Used in War Against Ukraine – UNITED24 Media, accessed February 14, 2026, https://united24media.com/latest-news/ukrainian-intelligence-identifies-21-russian-firms-behind-drones-used-in-war-against-ukraine-15731
  28. NATO Launches Eastern Sentry To Boost Security – Defence Leaders, accessed February 14, 2026, https://defenceleaders.com/news/nato-launches-eastern-sentry-to-boost-security/
  29. Estonian intelligence: Belarus is a “Russian vassal state,” Moscow preparing for future wars, accessed February 14, 2026, https://en.belsat.eu/91529248/estonian-intelligence-belarus-is-a-russian-vassal-state-moscow-preparing-for-future-wars
  30. Korean Peninsula Update, February 10, 2026 | ISW, accessed February 14, 2026, https://understandingwar.org/research/china-taiwan/korean-peninsula-update-february-10-2026/
  31. Parliament approves €90 billion Ukraine support loan package | News, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20260206IPR33903/parliament-approves-EU90-billion-ukraine-support-loan-package
  32. Sweden strengthens Ukraine’s defence with a contribution of USD 100 million to US package, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.government.se/press-releases/2026/02/sweden-strengthens-ukraines-defence-with-a-contribution-of-usd-100-million-to-us-package/