The conflict in Ukraine has reached a critical stage where the sheer volume of human attrition is no longer an isolated military variable but has become the primary driver of Russian domestic and foreign policy. As of early 2026, the Russian Federation has crossed a psychological and structural threshold, with total casualties—comprising killed, severely wounded, and missing—exceeding 1.2 million personnel.1 This figure represents the highest loss sustained by a major power in any conflict since the conclusion of the Second World War.2 For a cross-functional assessment, this attrition must be viewed through a tripartite lens: military effectiveness, internal state stability, and long-term economic viability. The data collected through 2025 and into January 2026 indicates that while the Kremlin has successfully insulated its core political centers from the immediate shock of these losses, the cumulative secondary and tertiary effects are creating a state of systemic fragility. The transition to a “war of the old” and the “normalization of violence” are not merely social phenomena but are indicators of a state that is consuming its future human capital to maintain a marginal tactical presence in the present.3
Military Analysis: The Attrition of Tactical and Operational Capability
The Russian military’s operational tempo throughout 2025 has been defined by a paradox: a willingness to accept record-breaking casualty rates in exchange for geographically minute territorial gains. British intelligence and Ukrainian General Staff data confirm that in 2025, Russian forces suffered approximately 415,000 to 418,000 casualties, a slight reduction from the catastrophic peaks of 2024 but still maintaining a daily average loss of 1,130 to 1,145 soldiers.1 This attrition rate, equivalent to losing 35 divisions in a single calendar year, has forced a total reorganization of the Russian force structure and tactical doctrine.5
Tactical Transformation and the Meat Assault Doctrine
The depletion of the professional contract force that launched the initial invasion has necessitated a shift toward “small-unit warfare” and “infiltration tactics”.7 By 2025, large-scale armored maneuvers were largely abandoned in favor of dismounted infantry assaults.6 This evolution was not a choice of strategic preference but a requirement dictated by the saturation of the battlefield with first-person view (FPV) drones and the exhaustion of armored vehicle stockpiles.8 The tactical result is a “meat grinder” environment where Russian forces average approximately 70 to 100 casualties for every square kilometer of territory seized.8
The military significance of this shift is profound. By relying on expendable infantry—composed largely of volunteers, penal recruits, and mobilized personnel—the Russian High Command has managed to maintain pressure along the entire line of contact.7 However, the quality of these forces is in steep decline. The average age of the volunteer force is trending toward 50, with the most frequent age of death recorded in 2025 being between 46 and 52.3 From a military perspective, this “aging” of the force limits operational mobility and increases the burden on combat medical services, which are already struggling with a 1:1.3 KIA to WIA ratio.14
| Tactical Metric: Russian Battlefield Performance (2024–2025) | 2024 Average | 2025 Average | Trend Analysis |
| Daily Personnel Losses | 1,180 | 1,145 | Sustained Attrition 1 |
| Casualties per Sq. Km Gained | 59 (Fall 2024) | 71–99 (Early 2025) | Efficiency Decline 8 |
| Armored Vehicle Utilization | High (Regimental) | Low (Small Unit/Moto) | Resource Conservation 7 |
| KIA to WIA Ratio | 1:3 (Standard) | 1:1.3 (Sector Specific) | Medical Failure 14 |
| Daily Drone Sorties (Shahed/Decoy) | 80–100 | 150–200 | Technological Reliance 13 |
Degradation of the Junior Officer Corps and Command Stability
Perhaps the most damaging long-term military consequence is the systematic elimination of the junior officer corps. By January 2026, confirmed deaths among Russian officers exceeded 6,350.12 The loss of these tactical leaders has broken the chain of professional military education and mentoring.16 New officers are being pushed through “substandard and rushed” training cycles, leading to a rigid command structure that is incapable of complex, synchronized operations.16 This has resulted in unit-level failures, such as the 1st Guards Tank Army’s inability to seize Kupyansk despite suffering over 21,000 casualties in that sector alone.14
The lack of competent leadership has manifested in “abusive leadership, extortion, and poor treatment of wounded soldiers,” which in turn drives the desertion rates observed by intelligence agencies.17 Commanders, under pressure to show territorial gains, frequently commit wounded personnel back into assault operations without medical clearance, a practice that leads to further degradation of morale and the eventual collapse of unit cohesion.17
Intelligence Assessment: Force Generation and the Crisis of Internal Cohesion
From an intelligence standpoint, the primary concern is the sustainability of the Russian mobilization apparatus and the growing divergence between official narratives and the reality of human loss. The Kremlin has successfully utilized “covert mobilization” and high financial incentives to delay a second wave of formal mobilization, but the limits of this “voluntary” system are becoming visible as of early 2026.13
The Recruitment-Attrition Imbalance
In 2024 and early 2025, Russia was able to recruit approximately 30,000 to 40,000 new soldiers per month, a rate that roughly matched its casualties.16 However, by the end of 2025, recruitment figures began to dip. In 2025, approximately 422,000 people signed military contracts, a 6% drop from 2024, despite significantly increased bonuses.19 This indicates that the pool of “financially motivated” recruits is being exhausted. The Russian government has responded by targeting increasingly vulnerable groups, including defendants in pretrial detention and students at elite universities who are lured into contracts with “no way back”.3
The intelligence community has noted a “systemic practice of executions” for soldiers who refuse to follow assault orders, with over 30 such cases documented in 2025.20 This, combined with the “unbearable service conditions” and “rampant hazing,” has led to a record surge in desertion. More than 25,000 soldiers and officers deserted from the Central Military District alone between late 2024 and mid-2025.20 The total number of soldiers “on the run” is estimated to exceed 70,000 for the year 2025, a figure that threatens the strategic reserve intended for future offensives.20
Bureaucratic Erasure and the “Missing” Dead
A significant intelligence finding in late 2025 was the mass deletion of court records related to missing and deceased soldiers. Around December 2025, Russian court websites in 50 regions began removing records of lawsuits seeking to declare soldiers missing or dead.3 This process, following a “technical update,” saw the number of visible cases collapse from over 111,000 to roughly 41,000 overnight.3 This bureaucratic erasure is a deliberate attempt to conceal the scale of the “unrecovered dead,” which independent analysts estimate at over 180,000 personnel—bodies left on the battlefield that the Ministry of Defense refuses to acknowledge to avoid paying death benefits and to suppress public anxiety.3
| Force Generation and Discipline Metrics (2025) | Total Reported / Estimated | Source / Implication |
| Annual Contract Recruitment | 422,704 | 6% YoY Decrease 19 |
| Active Desertion / AWOL Cases | >184,000 (Cumulative) | Morale Collapse 20 |
| Lawsuits for Missing Soldiers | 90,000 | Concealed Mortality 3 |
| Prison Population Recruitment | 180,000 (Total Est.) | Penal Force Reliability 23 |
| Average Signing Bonus | 1.1M Rubles ($11k) | Fiscal Strain 24 |
Economic Analysis: The Fiscal and Labor Cost of Perpetual War
The economic impact of human attrition is two-fold: the immediate fiscal burden of maintaining a massive force and the long-term structural damage caused by the loss of prime-age labor. By early 2026, the Russian “war economy” has begun to stagnate, with GDP growth falling to an estimated 0.6%–0.8%, far below the rebounded levels of 2023–2024.11
Personnel Costs and the Rehabilitation Crisis
The cost of maintaining troop levels has reached a historic peak. In 2025, personnel costs—salaries, bonuses, and compensation—accounted for approximately 9.5% of all planned federal spending.27 The Kremlin is now spending nearly 2 billion rubles ($25 million) per hour on the war effort.28 A particularly acute economic pressure is the rising cost of rehabilitation. With hundreds of thousands of permanently disabled veterans, the state has been forced to triple its procurement of prosthetics, with the 2026 budget allocating 98.1 billion rubles for this purpose alone.29
The long-term obligations to these veterans, including disability pensions and social benefits, represent a “sunk cost” that will drain the Russian budget for decades. To manage this, the government has begun cutting transfers to the Pension and Social Insurance Fund by over 1.4 trillion roubles ($17 billion) in 2025, essentially trade-off civilian welfare for military maintenance.32
Labor Shortages and Demographic Collapse
The loss of over 1.2 million personnel to death or injury, combined with the emigration of nearly 1 million “best and brightest” young people, has created a labor deficit that is now the primary constraint on Russian industrial production.32 Unemployment has hit a record low of 2.3%, but this is not a sign of health; it is a sign of exhaustion. Approximately 73% of Russian enterprises report acute labor shortages, with an estimated 1.6 million to 4 million jobs remaining unfilled.24
This shortage has triggered a wage-price spiral. To retain staff, industries (especially in the defense sector) have increased wages by up to 33%, but these increases are not supported by productivity gains.24 The resulting inflation is eroding the living standards of the Kremlin’s core supporters—pensioners and public sector workers—whose benefits are tied to official inflation rates (~9%) while real household inflation for food and medicines exceeds 20%.24
| Economic Structural Indicators (2025–2026) | Value | Impact on Sustainability |
| Personnel Costs (H1 2025) | 2 Trillion Rubles | 9.5% of Federal Budget 27 |
| Defense & Security Share of Budget | 38% | Crowding out Social Policy 28 |
| Labor Force Shortage (Est. 2030) | 2.4M – 4M | GDP Loss of 1-2% Annually 24 |
| Real Household Inflation | >20% | Erosion of the Social Contract 24 |
| Oil & Gas Revenue (Nov 2025) | -34% YoY | Fiscal Crunch Indicator 9 |
Social and Cultural Impact: The Normalization of Violence and Internal Fragmentation
The war is fundamentally altering the Russian social fabric, creating what sociologists and intelligence analysts call the “normalization of violence.” The return of hundreds of thousands of combatants—officially termed “SMO Participants” (Участники СВО)—is injecting a new level of volatility into civilian life.4 This legal designation covers contract soldiers, mobilized reservists, volunteers, and private military company (PMC) personnel, and acts as the mechanism for granting them status as a “new elite” with priority legal and social rights. (For a full definition and breakdown of these categories, see the Appendix).
The Surge in Veteran Crime and Judicial Impunity
In 2025, Russia recorded its highest number of serious and especially serious crimes in 15 years.37 Nearly 8,000 veterans of the Ukraine war have been convicted of civilian crimes since 2022, with the number of convictions increasing exponentially each year: from 350 in 2022 to over 4,700 in 2024.38 These crimes are frequently gruesome, involving the murder and assault of family members or neighbors.38
The Kremlin’s response has been to grant “veteran status” as a legal shield. Courts are 2.5 times more likely to grant lenient or suspended sentences to SMO participants, even for violent felonies.38 This has created a sense of “impunity” among returnees, further radicalizing the veteran population and increasing the risk of domestic instability. The state’s concern is evident in its plans to bring 70–80 “war heroes” into the State Duma in 2026, an effort to co-opt and control potential leaders of a radicalized veteran movement.37
The Erosion of Local Stability and Regional Protest
The human cost of the war is felt most acutely in the peripheral regions. In regions like Kuzbass, coal revenues have collapsed from 46.7 billion rubles to just 1.8 billion in two years, leading to a “monstrous deficit” and the cutting of recruitment bonuses.19 In the Altai Republic and Bashkortostan, the war’s demands have intersected with local grievances over land rights and government reform, leading to protests and road blockades in 2025.40
The “Way Home” movement, led by the families of mobilized soldiers, represents the only consistent voice for demobilization. Despite being suppressed by the state, the movement’s existence highlights the “exhaustion” of the Russian public. Polls in early 2026 show a decline in support for continuing military operations, with 61% favoring peace negotiations, a significant shift from the early-war consensus.41
Foreign Policy and Diplomatic Posture: The “Axis of Autocracy”
Russia’s endurance is no longer self-sufficient; it is increasingly a byproduct of its transactional relationships with China, Iran, and North Korea. This “Axis of Autocracy” provides the material and political support necessary to withstand the human and economic costs of the conflict.42
- China as the Economic Anchor: China has replaced Western goods and provided an economic lifeline through renminbi-denominated trade.43 However, Beijing has maintained a strategic distance, viewing Russia as a “second-rate power” and a “junior partner” whose primary value is as a disruptor of Western interests.43
- North Korea and Iran as Munitions Hubs: These states provide the volume of low-tech and medium-tech systems—drones and artillery—that allow Russia to maintain its attritional pressure despite the degradation of its own military industry.42
The foreign affairs implication is clear: Russia is a “declining power” that has sacrificed its strategic autonomy for tactical survival in Ukraine.2 The reliance on North Korean personnel and Iranian technology indicates a state that has exhausted its conventional military toolkit.9
The Horizon of Sustainability: How Long Can Russia Last?
The cross-functional assessment of military, intelligence, and economic data suggests that the Russian Federation is approaching a “fiscal and equipment crunch” projected for late 2026 or early 2027.9
Equipment Depletion and the Hybrid Pivot
Russia is currently consuming its Soviet-era equipment reserves at an unsustainable rate. Leaked communications reveal that Moscow must establish a 10-year production line to replace the 4,000 tanks confirmed destroyed.9 By early 2027, the pool of restorable equipment is expected to be empty.9 This will force Russia into a “hybrid escalation”—using cyberattacks, sabotage in Europe, and political subversion—to compensate for the military capability it no longer possesses on the ground.9
The “Sunk Cost” Trap
As casualties mount, the Kremlin is increasingly trapped by “sunk costs.” To admit defeat or accept a strategic retreat would be to acknowledge that over 1.2 million lives were sacrificed for minimal gain, an admission that would likely lead to regime collapse.45 Consequently, the Kremlin is incentivized to reframe the war as “existential” and “patriotic,” effectively demanding that the Russian public accept perpetual hardship.45
Conclusions and Recommendations
The impact of human losses on the Russian Federation is not a single, catastrophic event but a “slow-motion grinding down” of the state’s structural integrity.
- Military Conclusion: The Russian army is becoming older, less professional, and more reliant on massed infantry. Its offensive potential is increasingly limited to “localized opportunities” rather than strategic breakthroughs.7
- Intelligence Conclusion: The regime is highly sensitive to the social impact of the dead and missing, as evidenced by the mass deletion of court records. The internal threat from radicalized, jobless veterans is now considered a primary risk to regime stability.2
- Economic Conclusion: The war economy is cannibalizing long-term productivity and demographic health for short-term military stimulus. The 2026 budget represents a pivot toward internal repression as a means of managing the social costs of the war.28
- Sustainability Forecast: Russia can likely sustain this level of attrition through the end of 2026, but only by further degrading its future as a global power. The convergence of equipment exhaustion, labor shortages, and fiscal deficits in 2027 represents the most likely window for a significant reduction in combat intensity or a shift in the conflict’s nature.9
Appendix: Legal Definition and Categories of “SMO Participants”
The term “SMO Participant” (Участники СВО) serves as the primary administrative and legal framework for the distribution of state benefits, judicial protections, and political status within the Russian Federation.
1. Eligible Personnel Categories
- Contract and Mobilized Forces: Includes professional contract soldiers and civilians drafted during the September 2022 mobilization.18
- Volunteers and PMC Personnel: Individuals in volunteer battalions and private military companies, including those integrated into state structures following the 2023 dissolution of the Wagner Group’s independent status.
- Defense Participants: As of August 2025, the status extends to “defense participants” in 11 territories adjacent to the conflict zone, including Crimea and the Belgorod, Bryansk, and Kursk regions.
- Foreign Volunteers: Foreign nationals and stateless persons who sign military contracts for at least one year are eligible for simplified Russian citizenship for themselves and their families.
2. Statutory Benefits and State Protections
- Financial Compensation: includes signing bonuses averaging 1.1 million rubles ($11,000) and federal insurance payouts for death or severe injury totaling approximately 14 million rubles ($150,000).
- Priority Rights: Defined as a “sacred duty” of the state, these provide priority access to medical care, land ownership, and subsidized housing.
- Tax and Fiscal Relief: Exemptions from land and property taxes in emergency zones, and additional transport tax relief for participants and their families.
- Elite Advancement Programs: The “Time of Heroes” (Vremya Geroev) master’s program provides selected veterans with management training and guaranteed job placement in the state apparatus to replace the liberal-technocratic “old guard”.
Image Source
The main blog image is computer generated and not based on a real location.
Please share the link on Facebook, Forums, with colleagues, etc. Your support is much appreciated and if you have any feedback, please email us in**@*********ps.com. If you’d like to request a report or order a reprint, please click here for the corresponding page to open in new tab.
Sources Used
- British Intelligence estimates Russian casualties in 2025 | UA.NEWS, accessed February 8, 2026, https://ua.news/en/war-vs-rf/britanska-rozvidka-nazvala-vtrati-rosiiskikh-okupantiv-za-2025-rik
- Russia’s Grinding War in Ukraine – CSIS, accessed February 8, 2026, https://www.csis.org/analysis/russias-grinding-war-ukraine
- Russian army in 2025. Record bloodshed, “meat grinder” continues …, accessed February 8, 2026, https://en.zona.media/article/2025/12/30/war_2025
- Crime surges in russia amid the war | Центр протидії дезінформації, accessed February 8, 2026, https://cpd.gov.ua/en/results/rf-en/crime-surges-in-russia-amid-the-war/
- Losses of the russian army in 2025: equivalent of 35 divisions of personnel, 14,000 artillery systems, 40,000 units of automotive equipment | MoD News, accessed February 8, 2026, https://mod.gov.ua/en/news/losses-of-the-russian-army-in-2025-equivalent-of-35-divisions-of-personnel-14-000-artillery-systems-40-000-units-of-automotive-equipment
- 2025 Was a Really, Really Bad Year to Be a Russian Soldier – The National Interest, accessed February 8, 2026, https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/2025-really-really-bad-year-to-be-russian-soldier-sa-011726
- How Did Russia’s War Effort Change in 2025? – The Moscow Times, accessed February 8, 2026, https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2025/12/30/how-did-russias-war-effort-change-in-2025-a91570
- Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment, September 9, 2025 – Institute for the Study of War, accessed February 8, 2026, https://understandingwar.org/research/russia-ukraine/russian-offensive-campaign-assessment-september-9-2025/
- Russia is Losing – Time for Putin’s 2026 Hybrid Escalation | Royal United Services Institute, accessed February 8, 2026, https://my.rusi.org/resource/russia-is-losing-time-for-putins-2026-hybrid-escalation.html
- Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment, February 3, 2025 | ISW, accessed February 8, 2026, https://understandingwar.org/research/russia-ukraine/russian-offensive-campaign-assessment-february-3-2025/
- Russia’s War in Ukraine: The Next Chapter – CSIS, accessed February 8, 2026, https://www.csis.org/analysis/russias-war-ukraine-next-chapter
- How many Russian soldiers died in the war with Ukraine – Mediazona, accessed February 8, 2026, https://en.zona.media/article/2026/01/30/casualties_eng-trl
- Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment, March 3, 2025 | ISW, accessed February 8, 2026, https://understandingwar.org/research/russia-ukraine/russian-offensive-campaign-assessment-march-3-2025/
- Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment, October 7, 2025 | ISW, accessed February 8, 2026, https://understandingwar.org/research/russia-ukraine/russian-offensive-campaign-assessment-october-7-2025/
- Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment, October 7, 2025 | ISW, accessed February 8, 2026, https://understandingwar.org/research/russia-ukraine/russian-offensive-campaign-assessment-october-7-2025
- Russian Military Performance and Outlook – Congress.gov, accessed February 8, 2026, https://www.congress.gov/crs_external_products/IF/PDF/IF12606/IF12606.6.pdf
- Russian Force Generation and Technological Adaptations Update, September 24, 2025, accessed February 8, 2026, https://understandingwar.org/research/russia-ukraine/russian-force-generation-and-technological-adaptations-update-september-24-2025/
- 2022 Russian mobilization – Wikipedia, accessed February 8, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_Russian_mobilization
- Russia’s New Military Recruits Dipped in 2025, Figures Show – The Moscow Times, accessed February 8, 2026, https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2026/01/16/russias-new-military-recruits-dipped-in-2025-figures-show-a91703
- Ukrainian Intelligence Reports Unprecedented Russian Desertion Rates. Here’s What We Know – UNITED24 Media, accessed February 8, 2026, https://united24media.com/latest-news/ukrainian-intelligence-reports-unprecedented-russian-desertion-rates-heres-what-we-know-12607
- Tracked down, coerced, threatened: How Russia hunts down deserters and forces them back to the front lines in Ukraine – The Insider, accessed February 8, 2026, https://theins.ru/en/confession/286662
- 3rd Assault Brigade records only 13 AWOL cases a month – Biletskyi, accessed February 8, 2026, https://english.nv.ua/nation/awol-in-ukrainian-armed-forces-biletskyi-on-systemic-solutions-and-return-of-soldiers-50581890.html
- From Front Line to Fault Line: Russia’s Challenge Managing Veteran Reintegration, accessed February 8, 2026, https://www.fpri.org/article/2025/12/from-front-line-to-fault-line-russias-challenge-managing-veteran-reintegration/
- Russia’s Economic Gamble: The Hidden Costs of War-Driven Growth, accessed February 8, 2026, https://carnegieendowment.org/russia-eurasia/politika/2024/12/russia-economy-difficulties
- The Russia-Ukraine War Report Card, Dec. 10, 2025, accessed February 8, 2026, https://www.russiamatters.org/news/russia-ukraine-war-report-card/russia-ukraine-war-report-card-dec-10-2025
- The Russian economy is finally stagnating. What does it mean for the war – and for Putin? | Russia | The Guardian, accessed February 8, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/world/ng-interactive/2026/feb/06/the-russian-economy-is-finally-stagnating-what-does-it-mean-for-the-war-and-for-putin
- Russian Military Personnel Costs Hit Record High – Analysis – The Moscow Times, accessed February 8, 2026, https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2025/07/10/russian-military-personnel-costs-hit-record-high-analysis-a89769
- Kremlin War Spending Surges 30% as Defense Outlays Hit Record Levels – Kyiv Post, accessed February 8, 2026, https://www.kyivpost.com/post/66135
- The Jump in Prosthetics Costs Reveals the Scale of russia’s Losses, Which the Authorities Are Concealing – Служба зовнішньої розвідки України, accessed February 8, 2026, https://szru.gov.ua/en/news-media/news/the-jump-in-prosthetics-costs-reveals-the-scale-of-russias-losses-which-the-authorities-are-concealing
- Russia to spend €1 bln on prosthetic limbs for disabled war casualties – TVP World, accessed February 8, 2026, https://tvpworld.com/89830059/russia-to-spend-1-bln-on-prosthetics-for-disabled-soldiers
- IISS: Over 180,000 amputee invalids return from Ukraine front – Radio Moldova, accessed February 8, 2026, https://radiomoldova.md/p/62711/iiss-over-180-000-amputee-invalids-return-from-ukraine-front
- Russia’s War Economy: Growth Built on Fragile Foundations – Vision of Humanity, accessed February 8, 2026, https://www.visionofhumanity.org/russias-war-economy-growth-built-on-unsustainable-foundations/
- Taylor Weighs In on the Impact of the Russia-Ukraine War on Russian Demographics, accessed February 8, 2026, https://www.maxwell.syr.edu/news/article/taylor-weighs-in-on-the-impact-of-the-russia-ukraine-war-on-russian-demographics
- Tragedy After Disaster? War in Ukraine and Demography – Institut Montaigne, accessed February 8, 2026, https://www.institutmontaigne.org/en/expressions/tragedy-after-catastrophe-demographic-impact-war-russia-and-ukraine
- The costs of war are driving the economy: Russia’s economic situation in 2024 – OSW, accessed February 8, 2026, https://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/osw-commentary/2025-02-28/costs-war-are-driving-economy-russias-economic-situation-2024
- Russia’s 2026 budget: mounting financial challenges and economic stagnation, accessed February 8, 2026, https://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/osw-commentary/2025-12-09/russias-2026-budget-mounting-financial-challenges-and-economic
- Armed, Traumatized, and Back Home—Russia Faces Record Surge in Serious Crime by Its Own Veterans, accessed February 8, 2026, https://united24media.com/latest-news/armed-traumatized-and-back-home-russia-faces-record-surge-in-serious-crime-by-its-own-veterans-15077
- War Comes Home: How Returning Veterans Are Driving a Surge in Violent Crime in Russia, accessed February 8, 2026, https://russiapost.info/society/war_comes_home
- Strangled In Siberia: Deep Inside Russia, The Violent Echoes Of Moscow’s War On Ukraine – Radio Free Europe, accessed February 8, 2026, https://www.rferl.org/a/russia-war-veterans-violent-crime-impunity-ukraine/33666867.html
- Wartime Protest across Russia’s Internal Borders – После – Posle Media, accessed February 8, 2026, https://www.posle.media/article/wartime-protest-across-russias-internal-borders
- Russia Analytical Report, Jan. 26–Feb. 2, 2026, accessed February 8, 2026, https://www.russiamatters.org/news/russia-analytical-report/russia-analytical-report-jan-26-feb-2-2026
- CHAPTER 3: AXIS OF AUTOCRACY: CHINA’S REVISIONIST AMBITIONS WITH RUSSIA, IRAN, AND NORTH KOREA Executive Summary, accessed February 8, 2026, https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/2025-11/Chapter_3–Axis_of_Autocracy.pdf
- The CRINK: Inside the new bloc supporting Russia’s war against Ukraine – Atlantic Council, accessed February 8, 2026, https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/content-series/russia-tomorrow/the-crink-inside-the-new-bloc-supporting-russias-war-against-ukraine/
- Putin’s longest war: Calling time on Russia’s endurance myth – European Council on Foreign Relations, accessed February 8, 2026, https://ecfr.eu/article/putins-longest-war-calling-time-on-russias-endurance-myth/
- Why Economic Pain Won’t Stop Russia’s War | Royal United …, accessed February 8, 2026, https://www.rusi.org/explore-our-research/publications/commentary/why-economic-pain-wont-stop-russias-war