The evolution of small arms aiming systems represents a continuous struggle to balance the seemingly diametric requirements of rapid target acquisition at close quarters and precision engagement at extended ranges. Historically, this dichotomy forced a mechanical and physiological compromise upon the combat operator: utilize non-magnified iron sights or reflex optics to maximize speed and peripheral vision, or utilize magnified telescopic sights for precision, which inherently demanded the closure of the non-dominant eye. This monocular approach to magnified optics severely restricted the operator’s field of view, blinding them to flanking threats, non-combatants, and the broader tactical environment, thereby degrading overall battlefield situational awareness.1
The Bindon Aiming Concept (BAC) emerged as a revolutionary paradigm shift in optical engineering and combat marksmanship. By leveraging the complex neurophysiological mechanisms of human binocular vision, the BAC permits an operator to utilize a magnified, illuminated optic with both eyes open.4 During dynamic weapon movement, the brain superimposes the illuminated reticle from the magnified optic onto the clear, unmagnified image processed by the unaided eye.5 Once the weapon stabilizes on the target area, the visual cortex seamlessly transitions to the magnified view, allowing for positive target identification and precision fire.5
This comprehensive analysis examines the historical genesis of the Bindon Aiming Concept, the aerospace engineering principles that facilitated its hardware, the intricate neurophysiology of binocular rivalry and image fusion that makes the concept possible, the optomotor limitations surrounding optical phoria, and the concept’s enduring tactical relevance in an era increasingly dominated by Low Power Variable Optics (LPVOs).
Historical Genesis and Optical Engineering Lineage
To understand the mechanical and theoretical foundation of the Bindon Aiming Concept, it is necessary to examine the engineering lineage of its creator, Glyn A. J. Bindon, and the subsequent development of the Advanced Combat Optical Gunsight (ACOG). The BAC is not merely a shooting technique; it is a physiological phenomenon that was discovered as a direct consequence of a highly specific set of optical engineering decisions.
The Aerospace Pedigree of Glyn Bindon
Glyn A. J. Bindon, born in Pretoria, South Africa in 1937, immigrated to the United States in the mid-1950s, bringing with him a profound aptitude for mechanical design and fluid dynamics.7 Graduating with a degree in aeronautical engineering from Parks College in 1958, Bindon’s early career was defined by solving extreme mechanical challenges.7 His initial engineering triumph involved developing a high-capacity shock absorber for the tail hook of the U.S. Navy’s F-8U Crusader.7 This specific innovation—managing massive kinetic energy and sudden deceleration—directly enabled the aircraft’s deployment in aircraft carrier operations and laid the groundwork for Bindon’s future understanding of recoil management in small arms optics.7
Bindon’s subsequent tenure as a Cognizant Engineer at Grumman Aerospace positioned him at the forefront of the Apollo space program during the 1970s.7 In this capacity, he engineered a critical fluid dynamics valve for the lunar module. This valve successfully operated far beyond its original design parameters during the Apollo 13 crisis, showcasing Bindon’s commitment to creating failsafe mechanical systems capable of surviving extreme environments.7
Following his aerospace career, Bindon joined the Ford Motor Company as a product design engineer, applying his expertise in fluid dynamics to resolve complex diesel engine injector malfunctions for Navistar.7 This rich background in resolving extreme mechanical stresses, shock absorption, and high-tolerance engineering directly informed his approach to designing small arms sights. Bindon did not view optical sights merely as fragile glass lenses; he viewed them as ruggedized mechanical systems required to survive immense kinetic forces without failing.4
The Armson OEG and the Foundation of Occluded Aiming
The conceptual foundation for the BAC was laid in 1980 when Bindon visited his native South Africa and encountered the creator of the Armson OEG (Occluded Eye Gunsight).7 The Armson OEG was a non-magnified, completely occluded sight utilizing a tritium-illuminated red dot housed within an opaque tube.10 The operator looked into the solid tube with the dominant eye, seeing only the glowing dot against a black background, while the non-dominant eye viewed the target and the surrounding environment.11 The visual cortex then merged these two distinct visual feeds, superimposing the glowing dot onto the target perceived by the unaided eye.11
While the overarching concept of occluded eye aiming was not entirely novel—having been famously utilized via the Singlepoint sight mounted on MACV-SOG rifles during the 1970 Son Tay prison rescue raid in Vietnam—the Armson OEG introduced self-illuminating tritium, completely removing the reliance on fragile batteries and electronics.10 Recognizing the potential of this technology, Bindon formed Armson Inc. in 1981 to import these sights to the United States commercial and law enforcement markets.8 By 1985, Bindon reorganized the enterprise as Trijicon—a portmanteau of “Tritium” and “Icon” (meaning image), with the internal “iji” mimicking the three-dot tritium night sights he was concurrently developing for military and police handguns.10
The Invention of the Advanced Combat Optical Gunsight (ACOG)
Bindon recognized the inherent tactical limitations of the completely occluded eye sight: because it provided zero magnification and blocked the dominant eye’s view of the target, it was entirely unsuitable for positive target identification, threat discrimination, and precision fire at mid-to-long ranges.4 A long search was initiated to combine the incredible close-quarters speed and battery-free reliability of the Armson OEG with the long-range precision of a traditional telescopic system.5
In 1986, Bindon theorized that the internal prism mechanisms utilized in field binoculars could be successfully adapted into a ruggedized rifle scope.9 By utilizing two roof prisms instead of a traditional, lengthy series of refracting lenses, Bindon effectively “folded” the light path.9 This optical engineering breakthrough resulted in the TA01 ACOG, released in 1987. The TA01 was a 4×32 magnified optic that was vastly shorter, lighter, and more compact than conventional rifle scopes of the era.9
Drawing heavily on his aerospace engineering background, Bindon housed the prism assembly in a solid, continuous forging of 7075-T6 aluminum—the exact same aerospace-grade alloy utilized in the M16 rifle receiver.4 Bindon intentionally omitted fragile, unnecessary moving parts, such as external adjustable diopter focus rings, to ensure the optic could survive extreme battlefield abuse, bomb blasts, and drops without losing its internal zero.9
However, the true genesis of the Bindon Aiming Concept occurred when Trijicon engineers integrated highly visible, self-illuminating reticles into the magnified prism sight. Trijicon utilized radioactive Hydrogen-3 (Tritium) gas isotopes for persistent nighttime illumination.6 Subsequently, they incorporated passive, external fiber-optic light pipes that gathered ambient sunlight, automatically adjusting the reticle’s brightness to match the surrounding daytime environment perfectly.6 The introduction of this intensely bright, self-regulating, battery-free reticle inside a short-barreled, magnified optic inadvertently created the precise physical conditions required for the Bindon Aiming Concept to manifest.4 The optic was subsequently submitted to the U.S. Army Advanced Combat Rifle program in 1989, where it demonstrated unprecedented durability and effectiveness, eventually leading to widespread adoption by United States Special Operations Command in 1995 and the United States Marine Corps in 2004.9
The Neurophysiology of Binocular Vision and Image Fusion
The Bindon Aiming Concept is not a mechanical lever or an electronic switch housed within the optic itself; it is an entirely physiological phenomenon facilitated by the ACOG’s specific design characteristics—namely, fixed magnification paired with a highly contrasting, intensely illuminated reticle.4 The concept relies comprehensively on how the human visual cortex processes, filters, suppresses, and merges competing visual stimuli in real-time.5
Binocular Single Vision and Retinal Correspondence
Human vision is fundamentally binocular in nature. The anatomical positioning of the eyes on the frontal plane of the skull provides an overlapping visual field, allowing the brain to process a continuous stream of visual evidence from two slightly disparate optical sensors.4 When an individual fixates on an object in the physical environment, the visual axes of both eyes converge so that the image falls directly onto the fovea centralis—the area of highest visual acuity—of each retina.21
Normal binocular single vision is a highly complex psych-optical reflex that requires three fundamental components: clear visual axes, sensory fusion, and motor fusion.21 Sensory fusion is the neurological ability of the retino-cortical elements in the occipital lobe to take two slightly dissimilar images (caused by the lateral spatial separation of the eyes) and blend them into a single, unified percept.21 This delicate process mandates that the images fall on corresponding retinal points (within Panum’s fusional area) and be relatively similar in size, brightness, clarity, and sharpness.21
Motor fusion is the physiological mechanism by which the extraocular muscles physically align and stabilize the eyes to maintain this sensory fusion, driven continuously by subconscious vergence, fixation, and refixation reflexes.21 When these sensory and motor systems operate in perfect harmony, the visual cortex compares the micro-disparities between the two retinal images to generate stereopsis, providing the human brain with true, three-dimensional depth perception.23

Dichoptic Stimulation and Binocular Rivalry
The Bindon Aiming Concept functions by intentionally and forcefully interrupting standard sensory fusion through a process known as dichoptic stimulation—presenting two vastly different, incompatible images to the left and right eyes simultaneously.24 When a shooter mounts a combat rifle equipped with a fixed 4x ACOG, the dominant eye looks directly through the optic and receives a magnified, highly restricted field of view. Simultaneously, the non-dominant eye remains open, receiving an unmagnified, wide-angle, 1x view of the surrounding environment.4
Because the images transmitted to the brain are entirely dissimilar in magnification, scale, and peripheral context, the visual cortex cannot fuse them into a single three-dimensional image.26 Unequal images present a severe physiological obstacle to fusion.21 This stark mismatch triggers a fascinating neuro-physiological response known as binocular rivalry.26
In a state of continuous, static binocular rivalry, the visual cortex struggles to resolve the conflicting data.26 Perception will alternate, seemingly at random, between the right eye’s image and the left eye’s image every few seconds.26 The observer might see the magnified view for a moment, then the unmagnified view, or experience “piecemeal rivalry” where fragmented patches of both images compete for dominance.29 During these transitions, the brain actively engages in suppressive vision, temporarily and subconsciously inhibiting the neural signals from one eye to prevent visual confusion and severe diplopia (double vision).21
The BAC Mechanism: Motion-Induced Suppression and the “Switch”
If binocular rivalry merely resulted in the brain randomly alternating between the magnified and unmagnified views, the concept would be utterly useless for combat marksmanship. The true genius of the Bindon Aiming Concept lies in how it exploits specific evolutionary traits of the visual cortex to predictably force the brain to select the correct image at the correct time. It achieves this by manipulating the brain’s acute sensitivity to motion.5
When the operator initiates a rapid, dynamic movement to acquire a target—such as swinging the rifle laterally across a room to address a close-quarters threat—the image presented to the dominant eye through the ACOG blurs violently.5 This optical blurring occurs because the 4x magnification multiplies the apparent speed of the panning motion across the optic’s focal plane, exceeding the eye’s ability to track the details.5 Concurrently, the non-dominant eye maintains a clear, stable, unmagnified view of the panning scene because it is observing the environment at a normal 1x scale.5
Confronted suddenly with one highly blurred, unusable image and one clear, stable image, the visual cortex makes an instantaneous physiological choice: it instinctively suppresses the blurred, magnified image and asserts total dominance over the clear, unmagnified image from the unaided eye.5 This automatic suppression allows the operator to maintain full peripheral vision and track the moving target seamlessly across the environment without experiencing visual disorientation.3
Crucially, however, because the ACOG’s reticle is brilliantly illuminated via ambient fiber optics and internal tritium, the reticle itself does not succumb to the motion blur affecting the background.4 It remains a sharp, high-contrast, focal point within the optic tube. The visual cortex processes this intensely bright stimulus independently of the suppressed, blurry background.4 As a result, the brain “lifts” the illuminated chevron, horseshoe, or dot from the suppressed dominant eye and superimposes it onto the clear, unmagnified scene provided by the non-dominant eye.4 The operator vividly perceives a glowing red dot floating seamlessly in their standard, 1x field of view, functioning identically to a non-magnified reflex sight.5
The critical phenomenon—often referred to as the “switch”—occurs the exact fraction of a second that the rifle’s dynamic movement ceases and the weapon settles onto the target area.5 Without the rapid panning motion, the magnified image in the dominant eye instantly comes back into sharp, high-resolution focus.5 The visual cortex, immediately recognizing the sudden availability of high-resolution, magnified detail precisely where the eyes have converged, breaks the suppression.5 The brain automatically and subconsciously “switches” dominance back to the magnified view, instantly replacing the 1x sight picture with a 4x magnified image, thereby allowing the operator to utilize the magnification for positive target identification, threat discrimination, and highly precise shot placement.5
Optomotor Limitations: Optical Phoria and POA/POI Shift
While the Bindon Aiming Concept provides a brilliant physiological workaround that permits operators to utilize magnified, mid-range optics for close-quarters engagements, it is not without significant biological limitations. The primary degradation of BAC accuracy stems from a condition known as optical phoria, which results in an unavoidable lateral shift between the weapon’s Point of Aim (POA) and the actual bullet’s Point of Impact (POI).13
The Mechanics of Dissociated Heterophoria
When both eyes look at a target naturally under normal binocular conditions, motor fusion reflexes ensure the visual axes remain perfectly parallel (for distant targets) or properly converged (for near targets).21 However, when an operator utilizes the BAC or any form of occluded eye aiming, the optic’s housing physically blocks the dominant eye from seeing the actual target in the physical space, providing it only with the illuminated reticle floating in the tube.11 This breaks the normal sensory stimulus required for motor fusion, leading the visual system into a state of dissociation.36
In the absence of a fusion stimulus to “lock” the eyes onto the exact same point in space, the extraocular muscles often fail to maintain perfect, rigid alignment.36 The occluded eye (the eye looking into the optic) will naturally relax and drift to its physiological resting muscular position.36 This latent deviation of the visual axes is clinically known as heterophoria, or simply phoria.36 Phoria manifests differently depending on the individual’s ocular anatomy:
- Orthophoria: The eyes remain perfectly aligned despite the dissociation. This is statistically relatively rare.
- Esophoria: The occluded eye drifts inward, converging in front of the actual target.11
- Exophoria: The occluded eye drifts outward, diverging past the actual target.11
The Geometry of Point of Aim Shift
Because the dominant eye is looking directly at the reticle while simultaneously drifting laterally out of alignment, the brain projects the superimposed reticle onto the target at an incorrect geometric angle.11 If an operator possesses esophoria, their visual axes cross prematurely. This causes the brain to project the reticle to the side opposite of the aiming eye. Consequently, when the operator aligns this “floating” dot with the center of the target and executes a trigger press, the actual barrel of the rifle is pointed laterally away from the target, resulting in a physical miss toward the non-aiming eye’s side.11 Conversely, exophoria results in a lateral miss toward the side of the aiming eye.11

The tactical reality of optical phoria is that it is strictly bound by distance. Because the muscular deviation is angular, the linear discrepancy between the point of aim and the point of impact is mathematically compounded as the distance to the target increases.34
| Engagement Distance | Phoria Deviation Impact | Tactical Viability using continuous BAC |
| 5 Yards | Almost zero difference between shot group and point of aim. Groups may actually tighten due to target focus. | Highly Effective. Ideal for rapid CQB clearance. |
| 15 Yards | Rounds begin to wander laterally off the point of aim. Grouping size remains reasonable, but shift is noticeable. | Marginal. Acceptable for center-mass engagements, poor for precision. |
| 25+ Yards | Severe lateral deviation. Depending on individual phoria severity, rounds may completely miss a human-sized target. | Ineffective. Operator must pause, allow the optic to settle, and utilize the magnified view. |
Empirical live-fire testing confirms this angular compounding. At close-quarters distances of 5 to 10 yards, the POA/POI shift is generally negligible, allowing for rapid, combat-effective hits on man-sized targets.34 However, as the engagement pushes out to 15, 25, or 50 yards, the rounds will wander significantly off the point of aim, potentially resulting in complete misses on the vital zones of a target.34
For this reason, industry analysts and combat marksmanship instructors strictly classify the Bindon Aiming Concept as a Close Quarters Battle stopgap rather than a universal aiming solution.35 If the operator needs to engage a target at 25 yards or beyond, they must consciously pause their movement to allow the optic to settle and the brain to execute the “switch” to the magnified view, thereby overriding the phoria effect and utilizing the optic’s true mechanical zero.5
The Complication of Cross-Eye Dominance
The efficacy of the BAC is also heavily dependent on the operator mounting the rifle to the shoulder that corresponds with their dominant eye.4 If a cross-eye dominant shooter (e.g., a shooter who is right-handed but left-eye dominant) mounts the weapon on their right shoulder, the right eye looks through the optic while the dominant left eye remains open.42
In this scenario, the brain will default to processing the visual feed from the dominant left eye. Because the left eye is looking at the bare environment and not through the optic, it will not perceive the intensely illuminated reticle.20 Consequently, the brain has no bright stimulus to superimpose, causing the entire BAC effect to fail.20 To maximize the potential of the BAC, operators must first diagnose their eye dominance using standard physiological tests—such as extending the arms, forming a triangle with the index fingers and thumbs, focusing on a distant fixed object, and alternately closing each eye to observe which eye maintains the object’s alignment within the triangle.4
Cross-eye dominant operators who wish to utilize the BAC must either transition to shooting from their weak-side shoulder to properly align the optic with their dominant eye, or forcefully train the brain to suppress the naturally dominant eye, often achieved by applying translucent tape or a physical occluder to the dominant eye’s safety lens during training.20
Tactical Implementation and USMC Marksmanship Doctrine
The physiological mechanics of the Bindon Aiming Concept translate directly into distinct tactical advantages on the battlefield, fundamentally altering how modern militaries approach intermediate-range engagements, target acquisition, and situational awareness.
Situational Awareness and the OODA Loop
In combat environments, survival often dictates the speed at which an operator can cycle through the Observation-Orientation-Decision-Action (OODA) loop.32 Closing the non-dominant eye to look through a traditional, high-magnification telescopic sight immediately eliminates fifty percent of the operator’s visual field.1 This self-induced monocular tunnel vision severely degrades the initial “Observation” phase of the OODA loop, blinding the operator to flanking threats, non-combatants, and alternative targets entering the battlespace.3
By explicitly demanding a “both eyes open” posture, the BAC preserves the operator’s peripheral vision and spatial orientation.1 This capability is particularly critical in CQB and urban operations, where threats can emerge rapidly from multiple, unpredictable vectors. The operator retains the ability to scan the broader environment naturally while simultaneously possessing the immediate capacity to engage a threat the moment it is identified.3
Target Acquisition Speed and Moving Target Engagements
The dual-image processing facilitated by BAC drastically reduces the time required to initially acquire targets. In a traditional scope setup, an operator must identify a target with the naked eye, mount the rifle, and then painstakingly search through the narrow, constrained field of view of the scope to relocate the target—a process that is notoriously slow and highly susceptible to losing the target entirely in complex terrain.19
With the BAC, the operator’s unmagnified eye remains locked on the target throughout the entire mounting process.32 As the rifle is raised, the superimposed illuminated reticle is simply “dragged” onto the target area within the operator’s natural field of view.5
This specific capability makes the BAC exceptionally effective against moving targets. The United States Marine Corps has heavily integrated the BAC into its formal marksmanship doctrine. MCRP 3-01A (Rifle Marksmanship) explicitly mandates training Marines to engage threats within 200 meters utilizing the Bindon Aiming Concept, exploiting the binocular presentation for rapid target acquisition.46
| Target Speed | Target Range | Required BAC Reticle Lead |
| Jogging (Approx. 6 mph) | 50 Meters | 0.5 Body Width |
| Jogging (Approx. 6 mph) | 100 Meters | 1.0 Body Width (11 Inches) |
| Running (Approx. 9 mph) | 100 Meters | 1.5 Body Widths (16.5 Inches) |
| Running (Approx. 9 mph) | 200 Meters | 3.0 Body Widths (33 Inches) |
Data Source: USMC MCRP 3-01A Marksmanship Tables.50
As demonstrated in the doctrinal tables above, tracking a target moving laterally at 9 mph at 200 meters requires a lead of nearly three feet.50 Attempting to track such a dynamic target through a narrow, occluded 4x field of view is exceptionally difficult. Tracking it seamlessly with the naked eye while the brain automatically superimposes the reticle into the proper lead position via BAC is highly efficient and significantly increases first-round hit probability.32
Comparative Analysis: Fixed Prism BAC vs. LPVOs and Red Dots
The small arms optics landscape has evolved dramatically since the invention of the ACOG. The tactical utility of the Bindon Aiming Concept is now frequently weighed against the performance of Low Power Variable Optics (LPVOs) and modern Reflex Sights coupled with magnifiers. Each system presents distinct advantages and compromises regarding weight, mechanical complexity, and visual physiology.
The Fixed Prism and BAC vs. The Red Dot Sight
Reflex or Red Dot Sights (RDS) project an illuminated LED dot onto a non-magnifying glass window. They possess infinite eye relief, absolute zero parallax at combat ranges, and are explicitly designed for both-eyes-open shooting.3 Because the RDS offers true 1x magnification, the eyes maintain perfect motor fusion, completely eliminating the phoria-induced POA/POI shifts inherent in the BAC.3 Within 50 yards, a high-quality open-emitter or tube RDS is unequivocally the fastest and most efficient optic available.53
However, the standalone RDS becomes a severe tactical liability at extended ranges. A 1x dot provides no optical enhancement for positive target identification, threat assessment, or precision holds beyond 100 meters.54 To compensate for this, operators frequently mount “flip-to-side” 3x or 6x magnifiers behind the RDS on the receiver rail. While this solves the magnification deficit, it introduces significant weight, bulk, and mechanical complexity to the rifle platform.41 A 4x ACOG utilizing the BAC provides the fixed magnification necessary for 300 to 800-meter engagements in a highly durable, streamlined package, while still offering acceptable, albeit imperfect, CQB speed via the BAC—making it a superior general-purpose compromise for standard infantry.9

The BAC vs. Low Power Variable Optics (LPVO)
In recent years, the Low Power Variable Optic has largely supplanted the fixed-prism ACOG in many modern military and competitive marksmanship applications.9 Scopes ranging from 1-6x up to 1-10x offer a true, unmagnified 1x setting for CQB, allowing them to function very much like a red dot, while granting the user the ability to dial up to high magnification for long-range precision.52 Because a high-quality LPVO set to 1x does not magnify the image, it does not trigger the severe phoria shifts seen with the BAC; both eyes receive an unmagnified image, maintaining proper motor fusion and ocular alignment.54
Despite this, the LPVO introduces its own set of distinct physical and mechanical disadvantages. Primarily, LPVOs are substantially heavier and bulkier than fixed prism sights; a typical LPVO and rigid mount setup can exceed 24.5 ounces, compared to a 14-ounce ACOG.52 Secondly, they suffer from complex mechanical reliance. Transitioning from a 400-meter target to a sudden 10-meter threat requires the operator to physically remove their support hand from the weapon to actuate a magnification throw lever—a mechanical step that costs critical fractions of a second in a dynamic firefight.55
Furthermore, true LPVOs sacrifice optical performance at the extremes of their magnification ranges. To achieve a 1x picture through a multi-lens erecting system, the optic sacrifices light transmission and eye box diameter at higher magnifications.58 Even at 1x, the eye box (the geometric cone of light behind the optic where the eye must be placed to see the image) is significantly tighter than an open reflex sight or an ACOG, heavily penalizing shooters who mount the rifle imperfectly from unconventional or compromised barricade positions.55
By contrast, the BAC requires zero mechanical adjustment. The optic is perpetually fixed at a functional mid-range magnification, and the transition from long-range precision to CQB speed is executed entirely inside the operator’s visual cortex simply by shifting focus and tracking motion.32 This total lack of mechanical manipulation keeps both hands securely on the weapon system and ensures the optic is never caught on the “wrong” setting during a sudden, close-range ambush.
To mitigate the eye-box and phoria issues of the BAC entirely, modern operators frequently adopt a hybrid approach: maintaining a fixed-magnification prism optic and mounting a miniature red dot sight (MRDS) either offset at 45 degrees or “piggybacked” directly on top of the primary optic.9 This layered system provides the mechanical speed and both-eyes-open capability of the BAC without the physiological POA shift, though at the cost of increased height over bore and training complexity.
Strategic Implications and Final Assessment
The Bindon Aiming Concept represents a masterclass in exploiting human neurophysiology to overcome the mechanical limitations of optical engineering. By substituting fine, etched crosshairs with brilliantly illuminated, high-contrast focal points, Glyn Bindon engineered a sighting system that successfully weaponized binocular rivalry, allowing the human brain to act as an automatic, instantaneous magnification throw-lever.
While the rapid rise of the Low Power Variable Optic has provided combat operators with mechanical alternatives to the BAC, the harsh physical realities of combat—severe weight constraints, extreme environmental stress, mechanical failure, and the sheer chaos of transitioning instantly between varied engagement distances—ensure that the fixed-magnification, BAC-enabled prism sight remains a highly relevant and trusted tool. The unparalleled tactical utility of maintaining full, unoccluded peripheral situational awareness while seamlessly snapping an illuminated chevron onto a moving target at close quarters cannot be overstated.
However, operators, trainers, and analysts must thoroughly acknowledge the strict physiological boundaries of the concept. The geometric divergence caused by optical phoria dictates that the BAC is not a universally precise aiming solution, but rather an emergency transitional technique designed to deliver rapid, combat-effective hits at room-clearing distances. Proper clinical diagnosis of eye dominance, rigorous dry-fire training focused on focal-plane switching, and an understanding of personal ocular drift are mandatory for the successful employment of the Bindon Aiming Concept. Ultimately, the BAC stands as a defining, foundational innovation in the small arms industry, seamlessly marrying the physics of light with the immense processing power of the visual cortex to fundamentally enhance infantry lethality.
Please share the link on Facebook, Forums, with colleagues, etc. Your support is much appreciated and if you have any feedback, please email us in**@*********ps.com. If you’d like to request a report or order a reprint, please click here for the corresponding page to open in new tab.
Sources Used
- There’s no room for your optics to have a bad day – Police1, accessed March 20, 2026, https://www.police1.com/police-products/firearms/accessories/articles/theres-no-room-for-your-optics-to-have-a-bad-day-ybFF3CZ9EFUfJAB3/
- Bindon Aiming Concept (BAC) | Trijicon® – Sourcehere, accessed March 20, 2026, https://sourcehere.com/resource/6212
- Open or Tube Reflex Sights—Which Type of Red Dot Sight Should I Buy? – Sightmark.com, accessed March 20, 2026, https://www.sightmark.com/blogs/news/open-or-tube-reflex-sights-which-type-of-red-dot-sight-should-i-buy
- Bindon Aiming Concept (BAC) | Trijicon®, accessed March 20, 2026, https://www.trijicon.com/our-story/bindon-aiming-concept
- Bindon Aiming Concept (BAC)™ | Trijicon®, accessed March 20, 2026, https://www.trijicon.com/community/post/bindon-aiming-concept-article
- Technical Glossary | Trijicon®, accessed March 20, 2026, https://www.trijicon.com/support/technical-glossary
- Trijicon: Four decades of excellence – ProtectionWeb, accessed March 20, 2026, https://www.protectionweb.co.za/partner-content/trijicon-four-decades-of-excellence/
- THE ORIGINS OF TRIJICON – Latest News – ECM Technologies, accessed March 20, 2026, https://www.ecmtech.co.za/latest-news/the-origins-of-trijicon.html
- The History of the ACOG Sight: Design, Development & Service – Monstrum Tactical, accessed March 20, 2026, https://monstrumtactical.com/guides/the-history-of-the-acog-sight-design-development-service/
- Trijicon® History, accessed March 20, 2026, https://www.trijicon.com/our-story/trijicon-history
- Myth of Bindon or Occluded Aiming – Dry Fire Training Cards, accessed March 20, 2026, https://dryfiretrainingcards.com/blog/myth-of-bindon-or-occluded-aiming/
- Trijicon History: Founding, Timeline, and Milestones – Zippia, accessed March 20, 2026, https://www.zippia.com/trijicon-careers-945179/history/
- Primary Arms Prismatic Proliferation – Recoil Magazine, accessed March 20, 2026, https://www.recoilweb.com/primary-arms-prismatic-proliferation-164138.html
- Trijicon – 40 Years of Innovation – Safari Club International, accessed March 20, 2026, https://safariclub.org/trijicon-40-years-of-innovation/
- The Binden Aiming Concept, does it still work? – YouTube, accessed March 20, 2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7PVjbqKxVHg
- Trijicon ACOG®, accessed March 20, 2026, https://www.trijicon.com/uploads/product-uploads/product-downloads/PML4036-1_Rev%283%29_ACOG_Family_Spec_Sheet_single.pdf
- Trijicon’s ACOG – 2024 Coolest Thing Made in Michigan – MMA News, accessed March 20, 2026, https://mimfg.org/Articles/trijicons-acog-2024-coolest-thing-made-in-michigan
- ACOG ® 6×48 Manual – Trijicon, accessed March 20, 2026, https://www.trijicon.com/uploads/page_content/MANUAL-6X48_ACOG_6x48_Manual_Booklet.pdf
- Advanced Combat Optical Gunsight – Wikipedia, accessed March 20, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Combat_Optical_Gunsight
- ACOG ® 4×32 & 3.5×35 BAC Manual – Trijicon, accessed March 20, 2026, https://www.trijicon.com/uploads/page_content/MANUAL-4x32_3.5x35_BAC_.pdf
- Tutorial: Binocular Vision – Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, accessed March 20, 2026, https://webeye.ophth.uiowa.edu/eyeforum/tutorials/bhola-binocularvision.htm
- The role of binocular vision in the control and development of visually guided upper limb movements – PMC, accessed March 20, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9745875/
- Binocular vision – Wikipedia, accessed March 20, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binocular_vision
- Foundation Volume 2, Chapter 24. Binocular Vision, accessed March 20, 2026, http://www.oculist.net/downaton502/prof/ebook/duanes/pages/v8/v8c024.html
- RECENT UNDERSTANDING OF BINOCULAR VISION IN THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT WITH CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS – PMC, accessed March 20, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8983798/
- Binocular rivalry – Wikipedia, accessed March 20, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binocular_rivalry
- ON BINOCULAR RIVALRY, accessed March 20, 2026, https://www.mpi.nl/world/materials/publications/levelt/Levelt_Binocular_Rivalry_1965.pdf
- Ring models of binocular rivalry and fusion – PubMed, accessed March 20, 2026, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32363561/
- How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry – PMC, accessed March 20, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3159595/
- Suppressed patterns alter vision during binocular rivalry – PubMed, accessed March 20, 2026, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16332541/
- Binocular rivalry and motion perception – PubMed – NIH, accessed March 20, 2026, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9526082/
- INTRODUCTION TO OBSERVATION THEORY AND NIGHT OPTICS W260007XQ STUDENT HANDOUT – Training Command, accessed March 20, 2026, https://www.trngcmd.marines.mil/Portals/207/W260007XQ%20-%20Observation%20Theory.pdf?ver=2017-01-24-161216-810
- Trijicon Advanced Combat Optical Gunsight (ACOG) – Police Magazine, accessed March 20, 2026, https://www.policemag.com/articles/trijicon-advanced-combat-optical-gunsight-acog
- Occluded Eye Aiming – Using Your Scope Like a Red Dot – Lucky Gunner, accessed March 20, 2026, https://www.luckygunner.com/lounge/occluded-eye-aiming/
- AR-15 Optics: Making the Best Choice for You – The Everyday Marksman, accessed March 20, 2026, https://www.everydaymarksman.co/equipment/ar-15-optics-guide/
- the changes in Phoria and convergence to divergence Peak Velocity ratio Are correlated – AWS, accessed March 20, 2026, http://cinotes.s3.amazonaws.com/flipped+classroom+articles/Advanced+Eye+Movements+/Eye+Therapy+Rehab/the+changes+in+Phoria+and+convergence+to+divergence+Peak+Velocity+ratio+Are+correlated.pdf
- Gaze-dependent phoria and vergence adaptation | JOV – ARVO Journals, accessed March 20, 2026, https://jov.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2486760
- The relationship between phoria and the ratio of convergence peak velocity to divergence … – PubMed, accessed March 20, 2026, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20335602/
- r/aimdownsights – What Bindon Aiming Concept (BAC) feels like – with a Trijicon TR24, accessed March 20, 2026, https://www.reddit.com/r/aimdownsights/comments/mjavax/what_bindon_aiming_concept_bac_feels_like_with_a/
- Does the ACOG Really Slow You Down? Part 1 – The Everyday Marksman, accessed March 20, 2026, https://www.everydaymarksman.co/equipment/acogs-vs-rds-part-1/
- [Optic Battle] Red Dot with Magnifier vs. Prism vs. LPVO – Pew Pew Tactical, accessed March 20, 2026, https://www.pewpewtactical.com/red-dot-magnifier-prism-lpvo/
- Overcoming Eye Dominance: A Down-and-Dirty Retraining Guide – Warrior Poet Society, accessed March 20, 2026, https://warriorpoetsupplyco.com/blog/overcoming-eye-dominance-a-downanddirty-retraining-guide/
- Archery eye dominance – Reddit, accessed March 20, 2026, https://www.reddit.com/r/Archery/comments/1f9lurj/archery_eye_dominance/
- Been shooting right handed for 3+ years but am left eye dominant; should I switch hands? : r/Archery – Reddit, accessed March 20, 2026, https://www.reddit.com/r/Archery/comments/18rac2p/been_shooting_right_handed_for_3_years_but_am/
- INTRODUCTION TO OBSERVATION THEORY AND NIGHT OPTICS B2A0221XQ/B2E0301 STUDENT HANDOUT – Training Command, accessed March 20, 2026, https://www.trngcmd.marines.mil/Portals/207/Docs/TBS/B2A0221XQ-B2E0301%20Introduction%20to%20Observation%20Theory%20and%20Night%20Optics.pdf
- threat identification • presentation • moving target engagement techniques, accessed March 20, 2026, https://www.trngcmd.marines.mil/Portals/207/Docs/wtbn/MPMS/0300-M16-1017_ENGAGE_MOVING_THREATS_Media.pdf?ver=2015-06-15-122248-243
- Target Acquisition Like the Pros – GearExpert, accessed March 20, 2026, https://www.gearexpert.com/2013/01/target-acquisition-like-the-pros.html
- Are Marines Using the Best Combat Optic? – U.S. Naval Institute Blog, accessed March 20, 2026, https://blog.usni.org/posts/2017/06/12/are-marines-using-the-best-combat-optic
- Best way to train with both eyes open – USCCA Community, accessed March 20, 2026, https://community.usconcealedcarry.com/t/best-way-to-train-with-both-eyes-open/2343
- INSTRUCTOR GUIDE – Training Command, accessed March 20, 2026, https://www.trngcmd.marines.mil/Portals/207/Docs/wtbn/MPMS/0300-M16-1017_ENGAGE_MOVING_THREATS.pdf?ver=2015-06-15-122009-423
- UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS – Training Command, accessed March 20, 2026, https://www.trngcmd.marines.mil/Portals/207/Docs/wtbn/1106%20Fundamentals%20of%20Rifle%20Marksmanship-RCO-LP-042110.doc
- Optics Test: LPVO vs Red Dot Sights – AmmoMan School of Guns Blog, accessed March 20, 2026, https://www.ammoman.com/blog/optics-test-lpvo-vs-red-dot-sights/
- Red Dot vs LPVO: What’s Best for Home Defense? – Shoot On, accessed March 20, 2026, https://shoot-on.com/red-dot-vs-lpvo-whats-best-for-home-defense/
- LPVO vs. Red Dot: Which is Best? – Warne Scope Mounts, accessed March 20, 2026, https://warnescopemounts.com/blog/lpvo-vs-red-dot-which-is-best/
- How to Choose an LPVO for CQB – GUNNR Optics, accessed March 20, 2026, https://gogunnr.com/blogs/news/how-to-choose-an-lpvo-for-cqb
- LPVOs vs Red Dot Optics | An Official Journal Of The NRA – Shooting Illustrated, accessed March 20, 2026, https://www.shootingillustrated.com/content/lpvos-vs-red-dot-optics/
- There’s no point to an lpvo with a red dot… change my mind. : r/ar15 – Reddit, accessed March 20, 2026, https://www.reddit.com/r/ar15/comments/1gh7mn7/theres_no_point_to_an_lpvo_with_a_red_dot_change/
- PSA: If you don’t use the 1x on an LPVO, you probably shouldn’t be using an LPVO. – Reddit, accessed March 20, 2026, https://www.reddit.com/r/tacticalgear/comments/v4cnt5/psa_if_you_dont_use_the_1x_on_an_lpvo_you/
- Is anyone faster up close with an LPVO than with a red dot? : r/ar15 – Reddit, accessed March 20, 2026, https://www.reddit.com/r/ar15/comments/14lnid7/is_anyone_faster_up_close_with_an_lpvo_than_with/
- Is there any point of putting a red dot (offset or piggyback) if I already have a LPVO that does 1x mag? : r/ar15 – Reddit, accessed March 20, 2026, https://www.reddit.com/r/ar15/comments/1mqhqv5/is_there_any_point_of_putting_a_red_dot_offset_or/





