Executive Summary

The reporting period ending February 14, 2026, represents a critical juncture in the strategic posture of the People’s Republic of China (PRC), characterized by a profound synchronization of domestic political consolidation, military restructuring, and a systemic pivot in industrial policy as the nation enters the inaugural year of the 15th Five-Year Plan (2026–2030).¹ This week is defined by the dual themes of “internal stabilization” and “external assertion,” occurring against the backdrop of the Year of the Horse Spring Festival and the associated “Chunyun” travel rush, which has set a historical record of 9.5 billion inter-regional trips.²

A watershed event in military-political relations occurred with the purge of the most senior uniformed members of the Central Military Commission (CMC), General Zhang Youxia and General Liu Zhenli. Their removal, ostensibly for “serious disciplinary violations,” signals President Xi Jinping’s intensified demand for absolute Party control over the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) as the 2027 centenary goal approaches.⁴ This internal hardening is mirrored by a significant leap in naval power projection capabilities, evidenced by the sea trials of the Type 076 Sichuan amphibious assault vessel. Equipped with electromagnetic catapults and designed as a dedicated “drone carrier” for the GJ-21 stealth UAV, the Sichuan fundamentally alters the tactical calculus in the Western Pacific by providing long-range, carrier-independent persistent surveillance and strike capacity.⁶

Economically, the PRC is navigating a “cautious consolidation” phase. Provincial governments have set conservative growth targets of 4.5% to 5% for 2026, reflecting a pragmatic acknowledgment of the structural drag caused by the ongoing property market slump and weak domestic consumption.⁷ However, this domestic caution is offset by a massive $1.2 trillion trade surplus for 2025, driven by the “China Shock 2.0″—a surge in high-tech and green energy exports.⁴ The introduction of EV export controls on January 1, 2026, demonstrates a strategic shift toward quality over quantity, aiming to mitigate international trade friction while maintaining technological dominance.¹

Technologically, the “DeepSeek shock” of early 2025 has fully matured into a new paradigm of “algorithmic sovereignty.” By demonstrating that frontier-level AI reasoning can be achieved through efficiency rather than brute-force hardware, China has successfully challenged the “Compute Hegemony” of the West, effectively bypassing semiconductor export controls.¹⁰ Diplomatically, Beijing has executed a “diplomatic surge,” receiving high-level delegations from the United Kingdom, Canada, and various Global South partners, positioning itself as a source of “rationality and stability” in a world order currently reeling from unilateralism and trade volatility.¹¹ As the Year of the Horse begins, the PRC is aggressively pursuing “New Quality Productive Forces” to insulate its economy from external shocks while preparing its military for the complexities of a potential “Justice Mission” contingency.¹

Political Stability and Military Leadership Consolidation

The Central Military Commission Purge and Party-Army Relations

The political environment of the week ending February 14, 2026, is dominated by the strategic restructuring of the highest echelons of the People’s Liberation Army. On January 24, 2026, the Ministry of National Defense confirmed that General Zhang Youxia, the Vice Chairman of the CMC and the most senior uniformed officer in the PRC, alongside General Liu Zhenli, the Chief of Staff of the CMC Joint Staff Department, are under investigation for “serious disciplinary and legal violations”.⁴ This event is not an isolated anti-corruption measure but represents a totalizing effort to align the military leadership with the political requirements of the 2027 centenary goals.⁴

The purge of Zhang and Liu is particularly significant given their historical influence and their roles as key arbiters of PLA modernization. Since 2022, Xi Jinping has removed five of the six uniformed members of the CMC, leaving only General Zhang Shengmin, the Secretary of the Discipline Inspection Commission.⁴ Analysts suggest that the investigation likely extends beyond traditional corruption to include political disagreements over the speed and direction of military training and development under the “New Era” framework.⁴ The PLA Daily emphasized that these removals are akin to “uprooting diseased trees” to ensure the purity of the military’s political and combat effectiveness.⁴

The second-order implications of this purge involve the systemic destabilization of the PLA’s traditional patronage networks. General Zhang Youxia, in particular, was viewed as a powerful figure with deep connections to the PLA’s Equipment Development Department, which has been the epicenter of recent anti-corruption investigations.⁴ By removing these “trees,” Xi Jinping is clearing the path for a new generation of officers—those “nurtured by Xi Jinping Thought”—who are deemed more trustworthy to execute the high-stakes joint operations required for a Taiwan contingency or far-seas power projection.⁴ The PLA Daily further underscored that the faster corruption is eliminated, the faster the military recovers its combat-readiness, suggesting that these purges are viewed by the leadership as an essential prerequisite for kinetic preparedness.⁵

The 15th Five-Year Plan: Institutionalizing Resilience

Coinciding with this military housecleaning is the finalization of the 15th Five-Year Plan (2026–2030), which is scheduled for formal ratification during the “Two Sessions” in March 2026.¹ The plan characterizes the coming five-year period as a “critical transitional phase” for basically achieving socialist modernization.¹ Central to this plan is the transition from quantity-based growth to “New Quality Productive Forces,” a concept that integrates advanced manufacturing, green technologies, and artificial intelligence into the structural core of the economy.¹

The plan identifies four major interrelated trends that will define industrial policy: Concentration, Securitization, Modernization, and Reorientation.¹

1. Concentration: Resources are being reallocated away from traditional manufacturing sectors like steel and aluminum toward designated strategic emerging sectors such as AI and quantum technology.¹
2. Securitization: Industrial policy is now explicitly aligned with national security, emphasizing indigenous innovation and supply chain resilience to counteract unilateralism and “de-risking” strategies from the West.¹
3. Modernization: Traditional backbone sectors are being upgraded through digitalization and greening, moving from a focus on output quantity to “quality and efficiency”.¹
4. Reorientation: A systemic shift is underway toward the “upstream” (R&D) and “downstream” (consumption) segments of the value chain, specifically moving away from the midstream production phases where overcapacity is most acute.¹

This institutional framework is designed to realize “Chinese technological self-reliance” and build an economy that is “innovative and high quality”.¹ The 15th Five-Year Plan explicitly mentions quantum technology, biological manufacturing, and the “low-altitude economy” (drones and air mobility) as new drivers of economic growth.¹ By 2030, the PRC aims to have resolved the “bottlenecks and weak links” that currently make its industrial base vulnerable to external geopolitical pressure.¹

Maritime Strategy and the “Sichuan” Paradigm Shift

The Type 076 LHD: Power Projection through Unmanned Systems

The commissioning and sea trials of the Type 076 Sichuan represent a significant inflection point in the People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) maritime strategy.⁶ Displacing approximately 50,000 tons, the Sichuan is significantly larger than previous amphibious assault ships and incorporates technologies previously reserved for top-tier aircraft carriers, most notably an electromagnetic catapult launch system (EMALS).⁶ This technological leap allows the Sichuan to function as a “drone carrier,” capable of launching fixed-wing, high-performance UAVs that are too large or heavy for traditional helicopter-centric landing decks.⁶

The primary aviation asset for the Sichuan is the GJ-21 naval stealth drone, a variant of the GJ-11 “Sharp Sword”.⁶ The GJ-21 features a stealth design intended to penetrate sophisticated air defense networks and is equipped with advanced radar for reconnaissance and intelligence gathering.⁶ With a range of at least 1,500 kilometers and a payload capacity of 2,000 kilograms, the GJ-21 allows the PLAN to conduct “shaping operations”—such as precision strikes on coastal defenses or carrier-independent situational awareness—from long distances.⁶

The Sichuan is specifically designed to address existing vulnerabilities in the PLAN’s current carrier fleet. Carriers like the Shandong and Liaoning lack catapults, limiting the weight and fuel capacity of the aircraft they can launch and precluding the deployment of large airborne early warning systems.⁶ By accompanying these carriers, the Sichuan and its GJ-21 drones can extend the “sensor horizon” of the entire task group, providing intelligence outside the range of land-based sensors and increasing the survivability of the fleet against US and partner forces.⁶

Gray Zone Operations and Maritime Militia Mobilization

Parallel to high-end naval modernization, the PRC has refined its “gray zone” toolkit through the coordinated mobilization of its maritime militia. In early 2026, analysis of AIS data revealed large-scale mobilizations of civilian fishing vessels in the East China Sea, specifically a 2,000-vessel formation on Christmas Day and a 1,400-vessel formation on January 11.⁴ These exercises appear to be a rehearsal for a future blockade or quarantine scenario, where civilian boats are used to “impede movement” and overwhelm the radar systems of opposing naval forces.⁴

The province of Fujian, directly across the Taiwan Strait, has been at the forefront of this mobilization, offering increased monetary benefits and social incentives for participating in maritime militia work.⁴ These civilian vessels are being trained to perform reconnaissance, mine-laying, and search-and-rescue operations.⁴ During the “Justice Mission 2025” drills, these boats operated in close coordination with the PLAN and China Coast Guard (CCG), validating command arrangements for a comprehensive blockade of Taiwan.⁴ The integration of civilian and military forces in this manner allows Beijing to maintain constant pressure while remaining below the threshold of formal military conflict, complicating the legal and tactical responses of international actors.⁴

Logistics and the “Over-The-Beach” Drone Strategy

A critical logistical weak point in any amphibious operation is the “over-the-beach” (OTB) resupply phase before a working port is seized.⁶ The PLA is increasingly relying on unmanned systems to solve this bottleneck. State media recently released footage of the YH-1000S transport drone, a hybrid electric-gas UAV with short takeoff and landing (STOL) capabilities and a large carrying capacity.⁶ This drone is intended to provide resilient resupply vectors for ground forces, diversifying away from vulnerable roll-on/roll-off ferries and commercial ships.⁶ By using drones like the YH-1000S, which could potentially launch from the Sichuan or smaller platforms, the PLA can sustain initial landing forces even in the face of Taiwanese interdiction efforts.⁶

Macroeconomic Landscape and “China Shock 2.0”

Provincial Targets and the Cautious National Outlook

Economic activity in the PRC for the week ending February 14, 2026, is characterized by a “year of consolidation”.⁸ As of early February, 22 of the 31 provincial-level regions have announced their growth targets for the year, with a clear trend toward caution.⁷ Major economic engines like Guangdong and Zhejiang have set growth targets as ranges rather than single numbers, signaling to the central government that flexibility is needed to manage structural transitions.⁷

This cautious stance is driven by the persistent property market slump, which historically accounted for 25% of China’s GDP.⁸ Property sales have dropped 65% from their peak, and construction activity shows no signs of bottoming out, with a 19.9% year-on-year decline.⁸ The resulting decline in household wealth has severely impacted consumer confidence, leading to fragmented consumption patterns where the middle class has shifted toward value-driven spending while luxury consumption remains resilient but niche.⁸

Trade Dominance and the “Green Economy” Driver

Despite the domestic slowdown, China’s export sector achieved a record $1.2 trillion trade surplus in 2025.⁴ This phenomenon, labeled “China Shock 2.0,” is fundamentally different from the labor-intensive export surges of the early 2000s.⁹ Today, the surge is concentrated in “new quality” sectors: electric vehicles, solar technology, and lithium-ion batteries.⁹ In 2025, clean-energy sectors contributed an estimated $2.1 trillion to the PRC economy, accounting for 11.4% of GDP.¹³ Without the growth provided by these sectors, China’s 2025 GDP would have expanded by only 3.5% instead of the reported 5.0%.¹³

The scale of this dominance is significant. In 2025, China’s total power capacity reached 3,890 GW, with solar and wind capacity eclipsing coal for the first time in history.¹³ Solar capacity alone rose 35% to 1,200 GW.¹³ This industrial boom has created a massive trade imbalance, particularly with the European Union and Latin America, which have threatened to impose tariffs to protect their own industries from the “Red Dragon’s” export model.⁹ Some analysts estimate that every percentage point of export-driven boost to the Chinese economy results in a 0.1 to 0.3 percentage point drag for competitors in high-tech manufacturing, such as the EU and Japan.⁹

Inflation Dynamics and the Renminbi

Domestic inflation remains at historically low levels, reflecting the “sticker shock” of the current economic environment. In January 2026, the CPI rose by 0.2% year-on-year, missing market expectations of 0.4%.¹⁴ The primary driver was a -0.7% decline in food prices, though this is partially a base effect from the shift in the Lunar New Year holiday.¹⁴

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) and Goldman Sachs have noted that the Renminbi (RMB) remains significantly undervalued, which contributes to the record trade surplus.⁴ However, President Xi has explicitly called for the RMB to become a “powerful currency” with global reserve status, suggesting that the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) may allow for gradual appreciation to facilitate RMB internationalization and attract foreign capital into the domestic financial market.⁴ This policy shift is expected to be a major component of the 15th Five-Year Plan as China seeks to transition from an “industrial powerhouse” to a “financial powerhouse”.⁴

Advanced Technology: AI, Quantum, and Space

The DeepSeek Revolution and the End of Compute Hegemony

The technological landscape of early 2026 is defined by the “DeepSeek legacy,” a fundamental shift in artificial intelligence development.¹⁰ In early 2025, the release of the DeepSeek-R1 model proved that near-human reasoning capabilities could be achieved through algorithmic innovations like Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) and Reinforcement Learning (RL), rather than through the massive, multi-billion-dollar compute clusters previously thought necessary.¹⁰ This “DeepSeek shock” led to a $500 billion single-day contraction in NVIDIA’s market value and initiated a global “democratization of intelligence”.¹⁰

By early 2026, this structural legacy has enabled China to effectively bypass US-led export controls on high-end semiconductors. Instead of acquiring forbidden top-tier silicon like the H100, Chinese firms have shifted focus to the massive parallelization of compliant, lower-spec chips and the use of cloud-based inference in neutral jurisdictions like Singapore and the UAE.¹⁰ This “Architectural Arbitrage” has allowed state-sponsored actors and private firms alike to automate zero-day exploit discovery and orchestrate hyper-personalized social engineering campaigns at a fraction of previous costs.¹⁰ The strategic “floor” for AI capability has been elevated worldwide, making “sovereign AI” a central pillar of China’s national security.¹⁰

Quantum Information Science and Cyber Warfare

China’s investment in Quantum Information Science and Technology (QIST) has moved from theoretical research to frontline application. In early 2026, the National University of Defense Technology revealed that it is testing over 10 experimental “quantum-based cyber warfare tools” in active missions.¹⁸ These tools are designed to extract high-value intelligence from public cyberspace and use quantum computing to process battlefield data in seconds, significantly improving the detection of stealth aircraft.¹⁸

The 15th Five-Year Plan explicitly identifies quantum technology as a “new driver of economic growth”.¹ China has already demonstrated the world’s largest trapped-ion quantum simulator (300 qubits) and is aggressively building a comprehensive quantum ecosystem that balances deep scientific discovery with practical technical know-how.¹⁹ This includes quantum communication, sensing, and “quantum AI,” which are viewed as essential for maintaining a “high level of security” in the face of international competition.¹⁹

Space Resources and the Shenzhou Program

China’s space program is transitioning toward long-term resource development. The China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation (CASC) has announced plans to ramp up research into “space mining” technologies, focusing on surveying and extracting materials from minor planets.²⁰ This aligns with the broader national goal of resource security and technological self-sufficiency.

Recent achievements in the Shenzhou program highlight this momentum:

• Shenzhou-20: Successfully returned to Earth after 204 days in orbit, the longest mission ever completed by a Chinese crew.²⁰
• Shenzhou-21: Currently in orbit, this mission has a greater focus on scientific output, including China’s first-ever in-orbit experiments involving live mice to study the biological effects of microgravity.²⁰
• Infrastructure: The orbital station has been fortified against space debris, and new generation spacesuits have been debuted for complex spacewalks.²⁰
• Satellite Communications: Experiments in satellite-to-ground laser communications have achieved data rates exceeding 100 Gbps, a critical step for high-capacity, secure global data transmission.²⁰

Diplomatic Surge and the “Source of Stability” Narrative

Xiplomacy and Re-engagement with the West

In early 2026, Beijing has executed what state media calls a “diplomatic surge,” positioning itself as a source of “stability and predictability” in a turbulent global order.¹¹ This wave of high-level engagement is seen as a tactical pivot to secure economic ties even as geopolitical tensions remain high. A notable example is the first visit by a British Prime Minister in eight years, Keir Starmer, which resulted in the signing of four major economic and trade cooperation documents.¹¹ Similarly, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney’s visit yielded a trade roadmap that significantly lowered tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles, effectively exempting them from 100% surtaxes imposed in 2024.¹¹

This “diplomatic surge” is characterized by President Xi briefing global leaders on the 15th Five-Year Plan, inviting them to “embrace the opportunities of the future” provided by China’s high-quality development.¹¹ By rolling out the “red carpet” for foreign dignitaries seeking a less chaotic economic environment, Beijing is attempting to peel away Western allies from a US-led containment strategy.¹¹

The Belt and Road Initiative and the Global South

The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has entered a record phase of investment, reaching $213.5 billion in total engagement in 2025.²¹ A fundamental shift in geographic priority is evident: investment in Africa nearly tripled in 2025 to $61.2 billion, while investment in Central Asia quadrupled.²¹ This shift toward Africa is partly driven by US tariffs, which are often lower for goods produced in some African regions compared to Southeast Asia.²¹

The sectoral composition of the BRI has also matured. Transport infrastructure, once the hallmark of the BRI, has dropped to a historical low of 6.2% of the portfolio.²¹ In its place, energy (43%), mining, and new technologies have become the dominant sectors.²¹ China is increasingly using the BRI to secure supply chain resilience and build alternative export markets for its high-tech goods, while yuan-based trade continues to expand with partners like Saudi Arabia, Brazil, and Indonesia.⁸

Socio-Cultural Stress Tests: The 2026 Spring Festival

Chunyun as a Barometer of Social and Technological Capacity

The 2026 “Chunyun” travel rush, running from February 2 to March 13, is being described as the world’s largest human migration, with an expected 9.5 billion inter-regional trips.² This gargantuan logistical feat serves as a barometer for the nation’s transport capacity and social organization. In the first week alone, over 1.4 billion inter-regional passenger trips were recorded.²

The scale of this movement is enabled by a massive expansion of “hard capacity”:

• Railways: 22 new high-speed lines totaling over 3,109 kilometers were opened ahead of the season, bringing China’s total high-speed rail mileage to over 50,000 kilometers.²³
• Aviation: Civil aviation is expected to handle 95 million passengers, with homegrown C919 aircraft now operating over 50 flights per day.²²
• Electric Mobility: Daily traffic of new-energy vehicles (NEVs) on expressways is expected to reach 9.5 million, supported by a network of over 20 million charging facilities.²³

Despite the technological and logistical successes, “sticker shock” remains a prominent social theme. Many workers are opting for slower, traditional trains over high-speed options to save money, citing a “bad economy” where “it’s getting harder to make money”.²² This disconnect between state-level infrastructure triumph and individual-level economic anxiety defines the social mood as the Year of the Horse begins.

Year of the Horse: Symbolism and National Identity

The Year of the Horse is being culturally framed as a symbol of “strength, perseverance, and vitality”.²⁵ In his New Year message, President Xi Jinping called on the nation to “charge ahead like horses with courage” to turn the “great vision into beautiful realities”.²⁶ The messaging emphasizes a “spiritual home” built on cultural development, with hit IPs like Wukong and Nezha becoming global symbols of Chinese soft power.²⁷ The 2026 festival also marks a surge in inbound tourism, with flight bookings to China jumping 400% as foreign travelers seek to experience an “authentic” Lunar New Year following the expansion of visa-free policies.³

Strategic Conclusions and Intelligence Outlook

The situation in China for the week ending February 14, 2026, reveals a nation in the midst of a high-risk transition. The internal purge of the CMC leadership indicates that the central government is unwilling to tolerate even a hint of dissent as it approaches the critical 2027-2030 window for military and economic parity with the West. The removal of Zhang Youxia and Liu Zhenli suggests that operational control of the PLA is being condensed into a smaller, more ideologically pure circle, likely in preparation for more assertive maritime actions.

Economically, the “China Shock 2.0” is creating a new set of international dependencies and frictions. While the $1.2 trillion trade surplus provides a buffer against domestic property woes, it also increases the risk of coordinated global protectionism. The success of the “DeepSeek strategy”—achieving high-level AI through efficiency—suggests that China has effectively countered Western semiconductor containment efforts for the near term, providing a major boost to its “New Quality Productive Forces.”

Strategic Outlook for Q2 2026:

1. Military: Following the CMC purge, look for a new round of appointments to the CMC and theater commands in March. The sea trials of the Sichuan will likely lead to more aggressive drone-led carrier group exercises in the Philippine Sea and deep Indo-Pacific.⁶
2. Economic: Expect a modest GDP growth target of 4.5% at the March Two Sessions, but with significant fiscal “non-budgetary” stimulus directed toward quantum, AI, and low-altitude economy sectors.¹
3. Regional: “Gray zone” pressure on Taiwan will likely incorporate more mass-mobilized civilian fishing vessels as a “quarantine” rehearsal, while the Philippines will push for a South China Sea code of conduct during its 2026 ASEAN chairmanship.⁴
4. Technological: The focus will shift from “frontier models” to “applied AI” and “quantum-based cyber tools,” with a continued emphasis on bypassing US tech restrictions through “architectural arbitrage”.¹⁰

The PRC is entering the Year of the Horse with a clear plan for “technological self-reliance” and “national rejuvenation.” While domestic consumption remains the “Achilles’ heel,” the state’s ability to mobilize industrial, military, and digital resources toward a single strategic end remains unparalleled. The international community must prepare for a China that is more consolidated at the top, more technologically agile, and more willing to leverage its newfound “drone carrier” and “quantum cyber” capabilities to reshape the regional order.

Works cited

1. Four trends to watch as China’s industrial policy evolves | World …, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.weforum.org/stories/2026/02/china-industrial-policy-four-trends-to-watch/
2. China sees over 1.4B inter-regional trips in first week of Spring Festival travel rush, accessed February 14, 2026, http://english.scio.gov.cn/pressroom/2026-02/10/content_118326374.html
3. Record-Breaking Reunion: China Braces for 9.5 Billion Trips During the 2026 Spring Festival – Travel And Tour World, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.travelandtourworld.com/news/article/record-breaking-reunion-china-braces-for-9-5-billion-trips-during-the-2026-spring-festival/
4. China Bulletin: February 4, 2026 | U.S.- CHINA | ECONOMIC and …, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.uscc.gov/trade-bulletins/china-bulletin-february-4-2026
5. Targeting Taiwan Under Xi: China’s Military Forest Flourishing Despite Toppling Trees, accessed February 14, 2026, https://fairbank.fas.harvard.edu/research/blog/targeting-taiwan-under-xi-chinas-military-forest-flourishing-despite-toppling-trees/
6. China & Taiwan Update, February 13, 2026 | ISW, accessed February 14, 2026, https://understandingwar.org/research/china-taiwan/china-taiwan-update-february-13-2026/
7. China Provinces Set Cautious 2026 Growth Targets | Global Neighbours GMBH/E.V., accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.globalneighbours.org/en/articles/china-provinces-set-cautious-2026-growth-targets
8. China Economic Consolidation and Strategic Shifts in 2026 – CKGSB Knowledge, accessed February 14, 2026, https://english.ckgsb.edu.cn/knowledge/article/china-economic-consolidation-and-strategic-shifts-in-2026/
9. How to Trade If China’s Economy Outperforms 2026 Forecasts – Blackwell Global, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.blackwellglobal.com/how-to-trade-if-chinas-economy-outperforms-2026-forecasts/
10. The 2026 Sovereign AI Proliferation and the DeepSeek Structural …, accessed February 14, 2026, https://debuglies.com/2026/02/13/the-2026-sovereign-ai-proliferation-and-the-deepseek-structural-legacy/
11. Xiplomacy: How to read China’s diplomatic surge in 2026? – The …, accessed February 14, 2026, http://en.brnn.com/n3/2026/0211/c414872-20424851.html
12. China pushes ahead in 2026 as Trump plays catch-up | East Asia Forum, accessed February 14, 2026, https://eastasiaforum.org/2026/02/02/china-pushes-ahead-in-2026-as-trump-plays-catch-up/
13. China Briefing 5 February 2026: Clean energy’s share of economy | Record renewables | Thawing relations with UK, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.carbonbrief.org/china-briefing-5-february-2026-clean-energys-share-of-economy-record-renewables-thawing-relations-with-uk/
14. China’s CPI inflation slowed in January amid Lunar New Year effect, accessed February 14, 2026, https://think.ing.com/snaps/chinas-cpi-inflation-slowed-in-january-amid-lunar-new-year-effect/
15. Inflation eases in January from December, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.focus-economics.com/countries/china/news/inflation/china-consumer-prices-10-02-2026-inflation-eases-in-january-from-december/
16. China reports narrower drop in factory gate prices in January 2026, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.trend.az/business/4153353.html
17. Eight ways AI will shape geopolitics in 2026 – Atlantic Council, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/dispatches/eight-ways-ai-will-shape-geopolitics-in-2026/
18. China Claims Over 10 Quantum-Based Cyber Weapons Are Being Tested for Warfare, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.hstoday.us/subject-matter-areas/cybersecurity/china-claims-over-10-quantum-based-cyber-weapons-are-being-tested-for-warfare/
19. Understanding China’s Quest for Quantum Advancement – CSIS, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.csis.org/analysis/understanding-chinas-quest-quantum-advancement
20. Breaking News, China News, World News and Video – CGTN, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.cgtn.com/newsletter/sci-tech.html
21. China Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) Investment Report 2025, accessed February 14, 2026, https://greenfdc.org/china-belt-and-road-initiative-bri-investment-report-2025/
22. China’s Lunar New Year travel rush begins with record 9.5 billion trips expected, accessed February 14, 2026, https://apnews.com/article/china-annual-migration-lunar-new-year-chunyun-55e004d9db4c75cd21c21df4baaabeda
23. Spring Festival travel surges as cross-regional trips continue to rise – Global Times, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202602/1355350.shtml
24. Commentary: China’s Travel Rush Is Back, and So Is the Sticker Shock – Caixin Global, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.caixinglobal.com/2026-02-13/commentary-chinas-travel-rush-is-back-and-so-is-the-sticker-shock-102414309.html
25. Ambassadors to China share with Global Times the symbolic meaning of horse in their culture, send Spring Festival greetings, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202602/1355346.shtml
26. Chinese President Xi Jinping’s 2026 New Year message_Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/eng/xw/zyxw/202512/t20251231_11796363.html
27. Full text: Chinese President Xi Jinping’s 2026 New Year message – China.org.cn, accessed February 14, 2026, http://www.china.org.cn/2025-12/31/content_118256296.shtml
28. Making hay while Trump shines: China’s tactical step back | The Strategist, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/making-hay-while-trump-shines-chinas-tactical-step-back/
29. South China Sea: Latest News and Updates, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.scmp.com/topics/south-china-sea

Executive Summary

The strategic landscape of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) during the reporting period ending February 06, 2026, is characterized by a high-stakes convergence of internal political consolidation and external strategic maneuvering. The primary development of the week is the comprehensive purge of the senior leadership within the People’s Liberation Army (PLA), specifically the formal investigation of Central Military Commission (CMC) Vice Chairman Zhang Youxia and Chief of the CMC Joint Staff Department Liu Zhenli.¹ This action, framed as a “political rectification” to ensure the military’s readiness for the 2027 centenary modernization goals, suggests a profound crisis of confidence in the high command’s ability to execute a high-intensity Taiwan contingency.² The removal of Zhang, a long-time confidant of President Xi Jinping, indicates that the “Chairman Responsibility System” is being enforced with unprecedented severity, prioritizing absolute political loyalty over operational experience as the risk of regional conflict increases.⁴

Diplomatically, Beijing has navigated a complex tri-polar interaction with Washington and Moscow. A wide-ranging phone call between President Xi and U.S. President Donald J. Trump on February 4 highlighted a transactional attempt to stabilize bilateral ties through energy and agricultural deals, even as the U.S. administration escalates its efforts to isolate Iran—a critical Chinese energy partner.⁷ Simultaneously, the expiration of the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (New START) on February 5 has introduced a period of significant strategic uncertainty. While Beijing expresses regret over the treaty’s collapse, it continues to reject any trilateral arms control framework that would include its own rapidly expanding nuclear arsenal.⁹

In the maritime domain, the PRC has unveiled a sophisticated new “gray zone” tactic involving the mobilization of over 2,000 maritime militia vessels to create “floating walls” in the East China Sea.¹² These maneuvers, alongside the “Justice Mission 2025” exercises and the first confirmed PLA drone violation of Taiwanese territorial airspace, signify a maturation of blockade tactics designed to isolate Taiwan while remaining below the threshold of conventional warfare.¹⁵ Economically, despite a record $1.2 trillion trade surplus, China faces an increasingly organized Western effort to decouple from its critical minerals supply chains, led by the newly established Forum on Resource Geostrategic Engagement (FORGE).¹⁹ The internal legislative environment is also tightening, with the 2026 Cybersecurity Law amendments granting the state sweeping extraterritorial powers to penalize foreign entities deemed to threaten national security.²²

Internal Political Stability and Military Governance

The Purge of the Central Military Commission

The internal stability of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) relationship with its military wing, the PLA, has entered a period of acute disruption. On January 25, 2026, the PRC announced formal investigations into General Zhang Youxia, the first-ranked Vice Chairman of the CMC, and General Liu Zhenli, the Chief of the Joint Staff Department.¹ This development is significant not only because of the rank of the individuals involved but because of their historical proximity to General Secretary Xi Jinping. Zhang Youxia, in particular, was widely considered one of Xi’s most trusted military allies, with a shared family history rooted in Shaanxi province and a career that bridged the gap between the revolutionary generation and the modern technocratic military.⁶

The official justification for these investigations centers on “political threats” and the failure to foster an environment conducive to the achievement of the 2027 modernization milestones.¹ Unlike previous waves of purges that targeted former CMC members such as He Weidong and Li Shangfu—who were explicitly accused of “job-related crimes” like bribery and the abuse of power—the charges against Zhang and Liu are notably abstract.¹ They are accused of fostering the “conditions” for corruption and “severely trampling” the Chairman Responsibility System.³ This shift in rhetoric suggests that the current purge is less about financial malfeasance and more about a strategic disagreement or a perceived failure to implement Xi’s specific directives regarding the readiness for a Taiwan invasion.¹

The implications of these purges extend to the core of the PLA’s command-and-control capabilities. By removing Zhang Youxia, one of the few senior officers with actual combat experience (from the 1979 Sino-Vietnamese War), Xi Jinping has significantly hollowed out the professional “command” knowledge of the CMC.³ The commission is now increasingly dominated by political enforcers rather than operational strategists. Intelligence assessments indicate that this may lead to a “confidence crisis” within the PLA, where lower-level officers become reluctant to provide honest assessments of combat readiness for fear that any identified weakness will be interpreted as political disloyalty.³

The 2027 Centenary Goal and Combat Readiness

The driving force behind this internal upheaval is the looming 2027 deadline, by which time the PLA is expected to have achieved the capability to execute a successful invasion of Taiwan.¹ The “Justice Mission 2025” exercises conducted in late December 2025 provided a window into the CCP’s dissatisfaction with the military’s progress.¹⁷ These exercises, while large in scale, revealed ongoing challenges in joint-theater operations and the integration of the various service branches under a single command structure.¹⁸

The purge of the high command is interpreted by some analysts as a “correction” designed to increase Xi’s control over the military ahead of this critical window.³ There are rumors that Xi became disillusioned with Zhang Youxia’s performance in rooting out deep-seated corruption in the equipment procurement chains, particularly after the Rocket Force scandals of 2023-2024 revealed that critical systems, including nuclear silos, were compromised by shoddy construction and embezzlement.² By making an example of his closest military confidant, Xi is signaling to the entire PLA that performance and loyalty are inextricably linked to personal survival.³

However, the “rebirth through changing feathers” program—as described in PLA media—carries significant operational risks.²⁶ The removal of senior generals creates a “churn” that disrupts the long-term planning required for a cross-strait campaign.³ Furthermore, it suggests that the PLA may currently be viewed as “unready” for major tasks, as the leadership transition period inevitably creates a period of tactical stasis.³

Diplomatic Strategy and External Relations

The Xi-Trump Virtual and Telephonic Engagement

On February 4, 2026, President Xi Jinping engaged in two critical diplomatic interactions: a virtual meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin and a subsequent wide-ranging phone call with U.S. President Donald J. Trump.⁸ The call with Trump was described by the U.S. side as “excellent,” “long,” and “thorough,” focusing heavily on the transactional aspects of the relationship.⁸ Trump’s social media readouts emphasized agricultural and energy deals, specifically pointing to China’s interest in increasing imports of American soybeans, oil, and gas.⁸

Despite the seemingly positive tone regarding trade, the underlying geopolitical friction remains acute. President Trump used the call to pressure Beijing to isolate Iran, following the 12-day conflict in June 2025 and the subsequent U.S. bombing of Iranian nuclear sites.⁷ Trump reiterated his threat to impose a 25% tariff on all imports from countries that continue to do business with Iran.⁸ Given that China conducted approximately $32 billion in trade with Iran in 2024, this poses a direct threat to Chinese energy security and its strategic interests in the Middle East.⁷

Xi Jinping’s response to these pressures emphasized “stability” and “red lines”.⁸ According to the Chinese readout, Xi stressed that the Taiwan question remains the “most important” issue in the relationship and urged Washington to handle arms sales with “extreme caution”.⁸ The Chinese statement notably omitted any confirmation of Trump’s planned visit to Beijing in April, suggesting that Beijing is withholding this high-profile symbolic win until it receives concrete assurances on tariff reductions or the easing of technology export controls.⁷

The Russia-China Strategic Alignment

The virtual meeting between Xi and Putin, held just hours before the Trump call, served to underscore the “no-limits” partnership that continues to define the anti-Western axis.⁸ Foreign Minister Wang Yi’s earlier meeting with Russian Security Council Secretary Sergei Shoigu on February 1 further cemented this, with Wang stating that bilateral relations could “break new ground” in 2026.³⁰ Russia has reaffirmed its “consistent and unwavering” support for China on the Taiwan issue, a critical diplomatic asset as Beijing faces increasing pressure from the G7.³¹

The strategic coordination between Beijing and Moscow is increasingly visible in their joint opposition to U.S.-led mineral and technology blocs. While the U.S. administration attempts to peel China away from its energy ties to Iran and Russia, Beijing is leveraging its economic “backfilling” of the Russian economy to ensure a stable supply of resources that are immune to Western sanctions.³¹ However, there are indications of mutual concern regarding the “unpredictability” of the second Trump administration, which has led both leaders to deepen their nuclear and high-technology coordination as a hedge against a potential breakdown in global strategic stability.⁶

The Expiration of New START and the Nuclear Order

February 5, 2026, marked the formal expiration of the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (New START) between the United States and Russia.⁹ China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs expressed “regret” over the treaty’s collapse, warning of negative repercussions for the international arms control regime.⁹ The expiration leaves the world’s two largest nuclear arsenals unconstrained for the first time in over fifty years.¹⁰

Beijing’s position on nuclear arms control remains a point of significant contention with Washington. The Trump administration has repeatedly insisted that any future nuclear framework must include China, citing the rapid expansion of the PLA’s nuclear forces, including the construction of hundreds of new ICBM silos.¹¹ Beijing, however, maintains that its arsenal is at a “minimum level” required for national security and that it adheres to a “no first use” policy.¹⁰ The U.S. State Department’s statement to the Conference on Disarmament on February 5 explicitly rejected this claim, arguing that China is expanding its arsenal at a scale and pace not seen in over half a century and that a bilateral treaty with only Russia is “inappropriate” in 2026.¹¹

Maritime Strategy and Cross-Strait Coercion

The “Floating Wall” of the Maritime Militia

One of the most striking developments of the reporting period is the deployment of a massive “floating wall” of fishing vessels in the East China Sea.¹² Geospatial data analysis by firms like ingeniSPACE and Starboard Maritime Intelligence confirmed that approximately 2,000 Chinese fishing boats—acting as part of the People’s Armed Forces Maritime Militia (PAFMM)—formed parallel barriers stretching over 460 kilometers.¹²

These formations were so dense that commercial cargo ships were forced to zigzag or divert entirely around the “maritime barrier”.¹² Experts suggest that these maneuvers were exercises to test the mobilization and command of civilian vessels for use in a future blockade or “quarantine” of Taiwan.¹² By using fishing vessels, which carry a civilian profile under international law, Beijing creates a “gray zone” that complicates the rules of engagement for the U.S. and Taiwanese navies.¹² If these vessels are used to blockade Taiwan’s ports, any military action against them by Western forces could be framed by PRC propaganda as an attack on “peaceful fishers,” providing a pretext for further escalation.¹²

Justice Mission 2025 and Blockade Simulation

The “Justice Mission 2025” exercises (conducted in late December and early January) represent a maturation of the PLA’s blockade strategy.¹⁷ These drills, which involved the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Rocket Force, focused on:

• Sea-Air Combat Readiness: Establishing regional air dominance and sea control in eight zones surrounding Taiwan.¹⁸
• Interdiction of Energy Imports: Simulating a blockade of Taiwan’s major port cities (Kaohsiung and Keelung) to choke off LNG and oil imports.¹⁸
• Decapitation Strikes: Practicing special operations raids to capture or eliminate Taiwan’s political leadership, integrated with lessons learned from recent global conflicts.¹⁶

A significant escalatory step occurred on January 17, when a PLA surveillance drone violated Taiwanese territorial airspace over Pratas (Dongsha) Island.¹⁵ This is believed to be the first such confirmed violation in decades and is seen as a “test” of Taiwan’s air defense response.¹⁶ By normalizing drone flights over outlying islands, the PLA is engaging in “lawfare,” attempting to erode Taiwan’s sovereignty through the creation of new de facto precedents.¹⁵

Political Subversion: The KMT Visit to Beijing

While the PLA exerts military pressure, the CCP is simultaneously intensifying its efforts to influence Taiwan’s internal politics. From February 2 to 4, 2026, a high-level delegation from the Kuomintang (KMT), led by Deputy Chairman Hsiao Hsu-tsen, visited Beijing.¹ This was the first such exchange since 2016 and represents a major push by the CCP to co-opt the Taiwanese opposition.¹

The delegation met with Wang Huning, the Chairman of the CPPCC and the CCP’s top official for Taiwan policy, and Song Tao, the TAO Director.¹ The meetings focused on the “1992 Consensus” and the “common family of the Chinese nation”.¹ The forum concluded with 15 recommendations for cross-strait cooperation in areas like tourism and industrial exchange.¹

The CCP’s strategy is to legitimize the KMT as the primary interlocutor for cross-strait peace, thereby bypassing and isolating the ruling DPP government.¹ This political warfare is having tangible effects in Taipei, where the KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have jointly blocked President William Lai’s version of the defense budget ten times, favoring a version that significantly cuts funding for asymmetric warfare systems, including drones and missile defense.¹

Economic Statecraft and the Resource War

China Shock 2.0 and the Trade Surplus

China’s economic strategy remains focused on export-led growth to offset a sluggish domestic economy. In 2025, the PRC recorded a trade surplus of $1.2 trillion, driven by a 5.5% increase in exports.¹⁹ While the U.S. administration’s tariffs have successfully reduced direct exports to the United States by 20%, Chinese manufacturers have effectively “pivoted” to other regions.¹⁹

The “China Shock 2.0” is causing significant friction with the EU, which is slated to eliminate its de minimis customs exemption in 2026 to curb the flood of low-cost Chinese goods.¹⁹ Beijing’s willingness to exploit the “America crisis”—the perception that the U.S. is withdrawing from global trade leadership—is tempered by the reality of its own demographic and debt woes.³⁵ However, in the short term, Beijing is hitting back hard against individual trade war measures, having seen the U.S. retreat in certain sectors in late 2025.³⁵

The Critical Minerals Conflict: FORGE vs. China Dominance

On February 4, 2026, the Trump administration launched a major counter-offensive against China’s dominance of the critical minerals market.²⁰ During a ministerial meeting in Washington, Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio unveiled the Forum on Resource Geostrategic Engagement (FORGE), a successor to previous mineral security partnerships.²⁰ The goal of FORGE is to create a preferential trade zone of allies that can guarantee supply chains immune to Chinese disruption.²⁰

FORGE intends to implement “border-adjusted price floors” to protect Western mining projects from China’s tactic of “market flooding,” where Beijing drops prices to bankrupt competitors before ratcheting them up once a monopoly is secured.²¹ Simultaneously, the U.S. has launched “Project Vault,” a plan for a strategic rare earth stockpile funded with $10 billion.³⁷ Beijing has responded by calling these moves the work of “small cliques” that undermine the international trade order.³⁷ In a retaliatory move, China has tightened its own export controls on dual-use items to Japan, leading to a significant search by Tokyo for alternative rare earth sources.¹

Regulatory Tightening: The 2026 Cybersecurity Law

The PRC’s internal legislative environment for foreign businesses has become increasingly hostile. On January 1, 2026, the first major overhaul of the Cybersecurity Law (CSL) since 2017 came into force.²² These amendments include:

• Massive Financial Penalties: Fines for violations involving “very serious consequences”—such as large-scale data leaks or loss of critical infrastructure function—can now reach RMB 10 million ($1.41 million).²²
• Streamlined Enforcement: Authorities no longer need to issue a warning before imposing fines, allowing for immediate financial penalties for even minor breaches.²²
• Extraterritorial Reach: The law now explicitly targets “overseas actors” whose activities are deemed to endanger China’s cybersecurity, including the power to freeze assets and revoke business licenses.²³
• AI Ethics and Surveillance: A new mandate for the state to improve ethical norms for AI and strengthen security risk monitoring, providing a legal basis for the further regulation of foreign AI models.²³

These changes reflect Beijing’s heightened focus on “data sovereignty” and its desire to control the digital landscape as part of its broader competition with the United States. Foreign firms, particularly in the biotechnology and high-tech sectors, face an increasingly complex compliance environment where “security” is defined broadly and enforced unilaterally.²³

Regional Security and Defense Proliferation

Submarine Proliferation in the Indian Ocean

China is aggressively expanding its naval footprint in the Indian Ocean through high-end defense exports to key partners. The Pakistan Navy is set to receive its first Chinese-designed Hangor-class (Type 039A derivative) submarine in 2026.⁴⁵ This $5 billion deal is the largest arms export agreement in Chinese history and includes the delivery of eight submarines by 2028.⁴⁵

This deal provides Beijing with a secondary foothold in the Indian Ocean, as the Hangor-class is significantly more sophisticated than the Russian Kilo-class submarines operated by India and Iran.⁴⁵ Similarly, Egypt is in advanced negotiations for the acquisition of Type 039A/B submarines, part of a “comprehensive strategic partnership” that includes the transfer of drone technology (Wing Loong-1D) and local manufacturing hubs for advanced radar systems.⁵⁰

Northeast Asian Friction and the Japan-Korea Pivot

The relationship with Japan has continued to deteriorate following remarks by Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi suggesting that a Chinese attack on Taiwan would be a “survival-threatening situation” for Japan.¹⁶ In response, China has utilized the maritime militia formations in the East China Sea as a show of force against Tokyo.¹⁶ South Korea and Japan, in a rare display of unity, have agreed to resume bilateral naval search-and-rescue exercises for the first time in nine years to counter the growing security threats from China and North Korea.⁵¹

Beijing’s use of trade as a weapon—specifically the suspension of dual-use goods to Japan—is part of a broader “coercive signaling” campaign.¹ While China has approved some Japan-bound exports of rare earths under tightened controls in January, observers believe this is a tactical maneuver to avoid pushing Japan too far into the U.S. orbit ahead of the April summit.⁴²

Intelligence Assessment and Strategic Outlook

Crisis of Command and the Risk of Miscalculation

The purge of the CMC senior leadership marks a critical inflection point for the PLA. The removal of professional commanders in favor of political loyalists suggests that Xi Jinping is more concerned with the internal stability of the military than its immediate operational efficiency.³ This “paranoia” at the top of the CCP structure could lead to a strategic shock, where decision-making becomes opaque and based on flawed or “filtered” reporting from a high command that is afraid to deliver bad news.³

In the short term, this instability likely decreases the probability of a deliberate, large-scale invasion of Taiwan, as the leadership churn degrades the complex planning required for such a campaign.³ However, it increases the risk of accidental escalation, as the lack of trusted intermediaries between the PLA and the political leadership means that a local incident (such as a drone violation or a maritime militia collision) could rapidly spiral into a conventional conflict.³

The Bifurcation of Global Supply Chains

The launch of FORGE and the expiration of New START signal the end of the post-Cold War era of global integration. China is successfully diversifying its export markets to ASEAN and the Global South, but it remains vulnerable to Western-led efforts to secure critical minerals and high-end technology.¹⁹ The next twelve to eighteen months will likely see a hardening of “bloc-based” economic policies, where China leverages its dominance in green technology (EVs, batteries) to create its own dependencies in Europe and Asia while the U.S. and its partners build a “fortress economy” for critical minerals.³⁵

Outlook for the April 2026 Summit

The upcoming visit of President Trump to Beijing in April 2026 is the most significant variable in the immediate term. Beijing is expected to maintain a “subdued” military posture near Taiwan—avoiding massive, named exercises—to facilitate a successful “business trip” for Trump.²⁴ However, the “floating wall” of the maritime militia demonstrates that China is not backing down; it is simply shifting its tactics to lower-profile “gray zone” operations that are harder for the U.S. administration to frame as a violation of the current truce.¹² The ultimate success of the summit will depend on whether Trump’s transactionalism can find common ground with Xi’s non-negotiable red lines on Taiwan and data sovereignty.⁸

Conclusion

The situation report for the week ending February 6, 2026, portrays a China that is aggressively fortifying its internal and external positions. The purge of the CMC senior leadership is a definitive sign of Xi Jinping’s move toward absolute, personalized control of the military, even at the cost of operational readiness. Externally, China is deploying sophisticated new maritime militia tactics to refine its blockade capability while using its record trade surplus to fund a global defense and resource strategy that bypasses Western-led orders. As the world enters a period of unconstrained nuclear arsenals and mineral-based trade blocs, the PRC is positioning itself as the central pole of an alternative global system, betting that Western domestic instability will provide the necessary opening for its final resolution of the Taiwan question.

Please share the link on Facebook, Forums, with colleagues, etc. Your support is much appreciated and if you have any feedback, please email us in**@*********ps.com. If you’d like to request a report or order a reprint, please click here for the corresponding page to open in new tab.

Sources Used

1. China & Taiwan Update, February 6, 2026 | ISW, accessed February 7, 2026, https://understandingwar.org/research/china-taiwan/china-taiwan-update-february-6-2026/
2. Xi’s military purges will make him wary of invading Taiwan – Lowy Institute, accessed February 7, 2026, https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/xi-s-military-purges-will-make-him-wary-invading-taiwan
3. PLA leadership crisis deepens- some “general takeaways”, accessed February 7, 2026, https://www.aninews.in/news/world/asia/pla-leadership-crisis-deepens-some-general-takeaways20260203082014
4. Why Xi Jinping has been purging China’s military leadership, and what may come next, accessed February 7, 2026, https://breakingdefense.com/2026/02/china-military-purge-why-xi-jingping-zhang-pla/
5. China’s Military Purge: Power, Paranoia and the Silence Before a Storm – Modern Diplomacy, accessed February 7, 2026, https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2026/02/06/chinas-military-purge-power-paranoia-and-the-silence-before-a-storm/
6. Xi’s military purge is not really about corruption – Asia Times, accessed February 7, 2026, https://asiatimes.com/2026/02/xis-military-purge-is-not-really-about-corruption/
7. Trump and Xi discuss Iran in wide-ranging call as U.S. presses nations to break from Tehran, accessed February 7, 2026, https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/trump-and-xi-discuss-iran-in-wide-ranging-call-as-u-s-presses-nations-to-break-from-tehran
8. ‘Excellent conversation’: Donald Trump, Xi Jinping discuss trade, Taiwan, Iran & Ukraine in ‘long and thorough’ phone call, accessed February 7, 2026, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/excellent-conversation-donald-trump-xi-jinping-discuss-trade-taiwan-iran-ukraine-in-long-and-thorough-phone-call/articleshow/127915118.cms
9. China Expresses Regret over Expiration of US-Russia “New Start” Arms Treaty, accessed February 7, 2026, https://qna.org.qa/en/News-Area/News/2026-2/5/china-expresses-regret-over-expiration-of-us-russia-new-start-arms-treaty
10. China expresses regret over expiration of New START Treaty between Russia and the US: FM spokesperson – Global Times, accessed February 7, 2026, https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202602/1354866.shtml
11. Statement to the Conference on Disarmament – United States Department of State, accessed February 7, 2026, https://www.state.gov/releases/2026/02/statement-to-the-conference-on-disarmament/
12. 2000 Chinese fishing vessels in ‘blockade’ | The Australian Naval Institute, accessed February 7, 2026, https://navalinstitute.com.au/2000-chinese-fishing-vessels-in-blockade/
13. Chinese Fishing Vessels Form 466-Km Maritime Barrier, accessed February 7, 2026, https://www.chosun.com/english/world-en/2026/01/19/MSNKKJV4BBA5DKQ3WCMATIYY7M/
14. China appears set on militarizing another reef in the South China Sea – Defense News, accessed February 7, 2026, https://www.defensenews.com/global/asia-pacific/2026/01/27/china-appears-set-on-militarizing-another-reef-in-the-south-china-sea/
15. Guermantes Lailari On Taiwan: Chinese Drone Overflies Taiwan’s Airspace: New Lawfare, accessed February 7, 2026, https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2026/02/02/2003851601
16. China & Taiwan Update, January 23, 2026 | ISW, accessed February 7, 2026, https://understandingwar.org/research/china-taiwan/china-taiwan-update-january-23-2026/
17. China & Taiwan Update, January 2, 2026 | ISW, accessed February 7, 2026, https://understandingwar.org/research/china-taiwan/china-taiwan-update-january-2-2026/
18. Special Report: Surprise PRC Military Exercise Around Taiwan | ISW, accessed February 7, 2026, https://understandingwar.org/research/china-taiwan/china-taiwan-special-report-december-31-2025/
19. China Bulletin: February 4, 2026 – U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, accessed February 7, 2026, https://www.uscc.gov/trade-bulletins/china-bulletin-february-4-2026
20. Project Vault and FORGE Signal Next Phase of U.S. Critical Minerals Policy | Brownstein, accessed February 7, 2026, https://www.bhfs.com/insight/project-vault-and-forge-signal-next-phase-of-u-s-critical-minerals-policy/
21. US marshals EU, Japan and Mexico in critical minerals push, accessed February 7, 2026, https://www.mining.com/us-marshals-eu-japan-and-mexico-in-critical-minerals-push/
22. China Finalises Amendments to the Cybersecurity Law What Businesses Need to Know Before 1 January 2026 – Mayer Brown, accessed February 7, 2026, https://www.mayerbrown.com/en/insights/publications/2025/12/china-finalises-amendments-to-the-cybersecurity-law-what-businesses-need-to-know-before-1-january-2026
23. CHINA: Amendments to Cybersecurity Law Effective 1 January 2026 | Privacy Matters, accessed February 7, 2026, https://privacymatters.dlapiper.com/2025/11/china-amendments-to-cybersecurity-law-effective-1-january-2026/
24. What to Expect in PLA Activities Near Taiwan Leading up to Trump and Xi Summit, accessed February 7, 2026, https://www.dailysignal.com/2026/02/06/what-to-expect-in-pla-activities-near-taiwan-leading-up-to-trump-and-xi-summit/
25. Beijing’s Coercive Signalling: ‘Justice Mission 2025’ and Cross-Strait Tensions, accessed February 7, 2026, https://www.sanskritiias.com/current-affairs/beijings-coercive-signalling-justice-mission-2025-and-cross-strait-tensions
26. Beijing Scrambles to ‘Retroactively Legalize’ Arrests of Zhang Youxia and Liu Zhenli, accessed February 7, 2026, https://www.visiontimes.com/2026/02/03/beijing-scrambles-to-retroactively-legalize-arrests-of-zhang-youxia-and-liu-zhenli.html
27. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China, accessed February 7, 2026, https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/
28. Trump And Xi Hold High Stakes Call On Trade And Taiwan, accessed February 7, 2026, https://evrimagaci.org/gpt/trump-and-xi-hold-high-stakes-call-on-trade-and-taiwan-526923
29. Trump and Xi discuss Iran in wide-ranging call as US presses China and others to break from Tehran, accessed February 7, 2026, https://apnews.com/article/us-china-trump-xi-iran-call-441425004d3d695df87f3f7c0b62492e
30. Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Lin Jian’s Regular Press Conference on February 2, 2026, accessed February 7, 2026, https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/eng/xw/fyrbt/202602/t20260202_11849336.html
31. China tells Russia’s security chief bilateral relations could ‘break new ground’ in 2026, accessed February 7, 2026, https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/east-asia/shoigu-says-russia-supports-chinas-position-on-taiwan
32. Sanctions having ‘significant impact’ on Russian economy, says EU special envoy, accessed February 7, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/feb/05/sanctions-significant-impact-russian-economy-interview-eu-special-envoy-david-osullivan
33. Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Lin Jian’s Regular Press Conference on February 5, 2026, accessed February 7, 2026, https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/eng/xw/fyrbt/202602/t20260205_11851974.html
34. Chinese Fishing Boats Have Been Making Some Unusual Moves Lately in the East China Sea, Satellite Images and Shipping Data Show – Andrew Erickson, accessed February 7, 2026, https://www.andrewerickson.com/2026/02/chinese-fishing-boats-have-been-making-some-unusual-moves-lately-in-the-east-china-sea-satellite-images-and-shipping-data-show/
35. Chinese Foreign Policy in 2026: Exploiting the ‘America crisis’ • Publications – oiip, accessed February 7, 2026, https://www.oiip.ac.at/en/publications/chinese-foreign-policy-in-2026-exploiting-the-america-crisis/
36. WATCH: Vance says U.S. wants to create critical minerals trading bloc to counter China, accessed February 7, 2026, https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/watch-live-vance-delivers-address-at-state-department-summit-on-critical-mineral-supply
37. US wants to create a critical minerals trading bloc with its allies to counter China, accessed February 7, 2026, https://apnews.com/article/trump-china-rare-earths-critical-minerals-tariffs-aa82fd4c065c9b62300ff7834b660cfb
38. 2026 Critical Minerals Ministerial – United States Department of State, accessed February 7, 2026, https://www.state.gov/releases/office-of-the-spokesperson/2026/02/2026-critical-minerals-ministerial
39. US hosts Critical Minerals Ministerial; Vance proposes trade bloc – Automotive Logistics, accessed February 7, 2026, https://www.automotivelogistics.media/supply-chain/us-government-proposes-international-trade-bloc-for-critical-minerals-signs-11-mous-including-with-the-uk-and-the-uae/2603068
40. China criticises US plan for critical minerals trade bloc | 1330 & 101.5 WHBL, accessed February 7, 2026, https://whbl.com/2026/02/05/china-criticises-us-plan-for-critical-minerals-trade-bloc/
41. ‘Don’t undermine global trade order’: China erupts over US push for critical minerals bloc – The Economic Times Video | ET Now, accessed February 7, 2026, https://m.economictimes.com/news/international/world-news/dont-undermine-global-trade-order-china-erupts-over-us-push-for-critical-minerals-bloc/videoshow/127929710.cms
42. Kyodo News Digest: Feb. 7, 2026, accessed February 7, 2026, https://english.kyodonews.net/articles/-/70056
43. China’s Cybersecurity Law Amendments Increase Penalties, Broaden Extraterritorial Enforcement – Latham & Watkins LLP, accessed February 7, 2026, https://www.lw.com/en/insights/chinas-cybersecurity-law-amendments-increase-penalties-broaden-extraterritorial-enforcement
44. China Cybersecurity Law Amendment in Effect January 1, 2026 – China Briefing, accessed February 7, 2026, https://www.china-briefing.com/news/china-cybersecurity-law-amendment/
45. Pakistan Eyes 2026 Chinese Submarine in $5 Billion Deal – Politics Today, accessed February 7, 2026, https://politicstoday.org/pakistan-eyes-2026-chinese-submarine-in-5-billion-deal/
46. Pakistan eyes 2026 launch for first Chinese submarine in $6.5 billion arms deal, accessed February 7, 2026, https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/east-asia/pakistan-eyes-2026-launch-for-first-chinese-submarine-in-6-5-billion-arms-deal
47. Pakistan eyes 2026 launch for first Chinese submarine in $5 billion arms deal, accessed February 7, 2026, https://www.tbsnews.net/world/south-asia/pakistan-eyes-2026-launch-first-chinese-submarine-5-billion-arms-deal-1275826
48. China Completes Production of Four Attack Submarines Expected to Carry Pakistan’s Maritime Nuclear Deterrent – Military Watch Magazine, accessed February 7, 2026, https://militarywatchmagazine.com/article/china-completes-four-attack-submarines-pakistan
49. Type 039A submarine – Wikipedia, accessed February 7, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_039A_submarine
50. Egypt Seeks Chinese Defense Tech, Manufacturing Base in Cairo …, accessed February 7, 2026, https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2026/02/07/egypt-seeks-chinese-defense-tech-manufacturing-base-in-cairo/
51. Taiwan detects one sortie of Chinese PLA aircraft, six PLAN vessels around its territory, accessed February 7, 2026, https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/world/taiwan-detects-one-sortie-of-chinese-pla-aircraft-six-plan-vessels-around-its-territory/