U.S. and Philippine flags flank a warship at sunset, symbolizing U.S.-Philippine defense relations.

The Strategic Evolution of U.S.-Philippine Defense Relations in the Trump 2.0 Era (2025–2026)

Executive Summary

The geopolitical landscape of Southeast Asia has undergone a fundamental transformation since the re-election of Donald Trump, characterized by a rapid institutionalization of the U.S.-Philippine defense alliance and a pivot toward an aggressive “Strong Denial Defense” posture.1 Guided by the 2025 National Security Strategy (NSS) and the 2026 National Defense Strategy (NDS), the United States has shifted its focus from labeling China a “pacing challenge” to a more nuanced framework of “Realistic Diplomacy” backed by devastating force projection capabilities.1 At the heart of this shift is the establishment of Task Force Philippines in October 2025, a dedicated 60-person joint command based in Manila designed to synchronize bilateral operations, enhance intelligence sharing, and re-establish deterrence in the South China Sea.2

This report examines the multi-domain buildup that has occurred over the past year, including the expansion of the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA) to nine strategic locations, the deployment of MQ-9A Reaper drones for persistent surveillance, and the integration of long-range fires such as the Typhon missile system.5 Furthermore, the financial underpinning of this alliance has reached unprecedented levels, with the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) authorizing $2.5 billion in security assistance through the Philippine Enhanced Resilience Act (PERA).8 The results of these initiatives are evidenced by the massive scale of Exercise Balikatan 2025 and more frequent Maritime Cooperative Activities (MCAs) that challenge China’s maritime claims.10 Beijing’s response has been an escalatory pattern of at-sea attrition, doubling its coast guard presence at flashpoints like Scarborough Shoal and conducting high-profile military maneuvers as the region approaches the critical “2027 Window” for potential conflict.13

The Strategic Framework: Realistic Diplomacy and the Strong Denial Doctrine

The return of the Trump administration has introduced a distinct strategic philosophy known as “Realistic Diplomacy,” codified in the 2026 National Defense Strategy.1 This doctrine seeks to de-escalate tensions with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) through “hardnosed realism” while simultaneously building the military capacity to deny China the ability to dominate the First Island Chain.1 Unlike the previous administration’s rhetoric, which emphasized a persistent “pacing challenge,” the 2026 NDS acknowledges that a “decent peace” is possible if the United States maintains a “strong denial defense” that makes the cost of aggression prohibitive.1

The Trump Corollary and Hemispheric Strategic Realignment

A pivotal element of the new strategy is the “Trump Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine,” which aims to restore American preeminence in the Western Hemisphere.16 While primarily focused on securing the U.S. “strategic backyard” and denying regional access to competitors like China and Russia, the corollary has profound implications for the Philippines.16 The strategy posits that a secure Western Hemisphere allows the United States to concentrate its overseas military power more effectively in the Indo-Pacific.16 The January 2026 intervention in Venezuela to capture Nicolás Maduro serves as a demonstration of the administration’s willingness to use overt military force to secure regional interests, a precedent that informs the U.S. approach to contested maritime borders in Asia.16 For the Philippines, this indicates a U.S. that is more transactional and focused on “burden-sharing,” but also more decisive in its regional interventions.16

The Fiscal Foundation: The $1.5 Trillion Defense Budget Goal

The administration’s vision for “peace through strength” is supported by a proposed defense budget topline of $1.5 trillion for fiscal 2027, an increase of more than $500 billion above 2026 levels.1 This massive influx of capital is intended to “supercharge” the defense industrial base and accelerate the production of the next generation of air and sea power.1 In the context of the Philippines, this budget provides the resources necessary to fund the “acquisition bow-wave” required for Re-Horizon 3, the Philippines’ primary military modernization initiative.1

Budget ComponentFY 2026 ProjectedFY 2027 Proposed (Trump Goal)Implications for Pacific Operations
Defense Topline~$850 Billion$1.5 TrillionAccelerated fleet renewal and base hardening 1
Air Force Share (20%)~$170 Billion$300 BillionProcurement of B-21s, F-35As, and E-7s 1
Space Force Share~$30 Billion$45 BillionDevelopment of the “Golden Dome” missile defense 1
Philippine Security Aid$500 Million (PERA)$500 Million (PERA Baseline)Persistent infrastructure and ISR support 8

Institutionalizing Command: The Birth of Task Force Philippines

In one of the most consequential organizational shifts in the history of the alliance, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth announced the establishment of “Task Force Philippines” on October 31, 2025.2 This joint task force represents a transition from episodic support to a “year-round commitment” of staff and resources designed to manage the complexity of a multi-domain theater.4

Structure, Leadership, and Mandate

Based at Camp Aguinaldo in Manila, Task Force Philippines is led by a U.S. Marine Corps one-star general or flag officer.3 The force comprises approximately 60 dedicated personnel from all branches of the U.S. military, working in lockstep with the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP).3 The task force’s mandate is broad, covering the entire archipelago and its maritime borders, with a focus on:

  • Operational Interoperability: Improving combined planning and executing joint maritime exercises.2
  • Crisis Response: Enhancing the ability to respond decisively to aggression or natural disasters.3
  • Information Sharing: Facilitating the flow of classified military information and intelligence to counter “gray zone” activities.3
  • Coordination of Activities: Converging all bilateral activities under a single command-and-control umbrella.20

The establishment of this unit signals that the U.S. presence is no longer merely rotational but has an “institutionalized” core that persists between major exercises like Balikatan.3 Critics and analysts suggest that China may test the cohesion of this task force through increased at-sea pressure to see if it truly enhances the Philippine defensive umbrella.3

Evolution from Task Force Ayungin

Task Force Philippines is an expansion of the more narrowly focused “Task Force Ayungin,” which was established in 2024 to support resupply missions to the BRP Sierra Madre at Second Thomas Shoal.4 While Task Force Ayungin was limited to providing intelligence, surveillance, and training support for these specific missions, the new Task Force Philippines is designed to address “all domains of warfare” across the entire Philippine Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ).20 This change reflects a realization that the Chinese threat is not confined to a single shoal but is a systemic effort to erode Philippine sovereignty across the West Philippine Sea (WPS).6

The EDCA Architecture: Expanding the Strategic Footprint

The Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA) serves as the primary legal and logistical framework for the U.S. military buildup.5 Since 2023, the number of agreed locations has expanded to nine, with four new sites strategically positioned to face Taiwan and the South China Sea.5

The Nine Strategic Hubs

The nine EDCA sites are distributed to provide a comprehensive defensive net across the First Island Chain.22 The four sites added in 2023—Naval Base Camilo Osias, Camp Melchor Dela Cruz, Lal-lo Airport, and Balabac Island—have been the focus of rapid modernization efforts throughout 2025 and early 2026.5

EDCA SiteLocationStrategic PurposeRecent Developments (2025-2026)
Naval Base Camilo OsiasSanta Ana, CagayanFacing Taiwan; Monitor Bashi ChannelInfrastructure upgrades for joint naval ops 5
Camp Melchor Dela CruzGamu, IsabelaNorthern Luzon defensePrepositioning of ground-based fires 5
Lal-lo AirportLal-lo, CagayanLogistics and Air support hubMultipurpose disaster/military facility 22
Balabac IslandPalawanSouthern flank of South China SeaCoastal defense and radar stationing 5
Basa Air BasePampangaCentral air operations hubMQ-9A Reaper deployment; Runway expansion 6
Fort MagsaysayNueva EcijaLarge-scale troop trainingEnhanced logistics and storage 27
Antonio Bautista ABPalawanProximity to SpratlysMaritime patrol and ISR hub 22
Benito Ebuen ABCebuCentral logistics nexusHumanitarian assistance/disaster hub 5
Lumbia AirportCagayan de OroSouthern surveillanceCounter-terrorism and ISR coordination 5

These locations allow the U.S. to rotate troops for extended stays and build facilities such as warehouses, runways, and fuel storage.5 Under President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., the Philippines has gravitated toward the U.S., allowing for this expansion despite domestic political sensitivities.5

The Taiwan Funding Proposal and Allied Burden-Sharing

In a novel development, the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission recommended in late 2025 that Taiwan help finance upgrades to EDCA sites in the Philippines.22 This proposal aims to strengthen the U.S. ability to defend Taiwan by using the Foreign Military Sales (FMS) program as a mechanism for Taiwan to pay for infrastructure and support services—but not weaponry—at Philippine bases.24 This would provide “political cover” for both nations while enhancing the deterrence capacity of the First Island Chain.24 This recommendation is part of a broader set of 28 proposals to help Manila counter Chinese “malign influence,” including investments in shipbuilding and cyber defense.24

Advanced Capability Deployment: Drones, Missiles, and ACE

The physical presence of U.S. troops is augmented by the deployment of high-end capabilities that significantly alter the tactical balance of the South China Sea.

The MQ-9A Reaper and Persistent Surveillance

In mid-November 2025, the U.S. Marine Corps temporarily deployed MQ-9A Reaper drones to Basa Air Base.6 Belonging to Marine Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Squadron (VMU)-1, these unarmed drones are designed to reinforce the Philippines’ Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) capabilities.6 The Reaper’s ability to remain airborne for over 27 consecutive hours makes it ideal for monitoring the vast waters of the South China Sea, documenting Chinese maritime coercion in real-time.6 This deployment aligns with the “distributed operations” concept of Force Design 2030, allowing the alliance to provide verified evidence of Chinese actions to the global community.6

The Typhon Missile System and the Strike Range Dilemma

The Typhon missile system, a land-based medium-range launcher capable of firing Tomahawk and SM-6 missiles, remains a critical and controversial fixture in the Philippines.7 First deployed to northern Luzon in April 2024, the system has a strike range of 500 to 2,000 kilometers, sufficient to cover China’s southeastern coast.31 Beijing has repeatedly warned that the prolonged deployment of this “offensive weapon” puts regional security at risk and urges Manila to withdraw it.32

Despite these warnings, the Philippine military has welcomed the system’s presence, with spokesperson Colonel Francel Margaret Padilla stating that “the more [assets] the merrier” for training purposes.34 The U.S. Army’s Third Multi-Domain Task Force is reportedly preparing a second Typhon battery for potential deployment in the Pacific theater, suggesting that land-based fires will be a permanent pillar of the “Strong Denial Defense”.31

Agile Combat Employment (ACE) and Passive Defense

To survive an “opening salvo” attack, the 2026 NDS emphasizes Agile Combat Employment (ACE).1 This concept involves small teams of airmen setting up ad-hoc airfields in remote locations to disperse airpower, making it more difficult for the PLA to mount accurate strikes.1 Experts such as retired Air Force Lt. Gen. David Deptula emphasize that these dispersed sites must be pre-positioned with weapons, fuel, and command systems.1 Passive defense measures, including robust reinforced hangars and hardened shelters, are also prioritized to ensure that U.S. and Philippine assets can withstand a surprise attack.1

High-Intensity Training: Balikatan and Maritime Cooperation

The operational readiness of the alliance is tested through increasingly complex military exercises that simulate real-world regional contingencies.

Exercise Balikatan 2025: All-Domain Readiness

Balikatan 2025 was the largest annual combined military exercise between the U.S. and the Philippines, involving over 14,000 service members from four nations (Philippines, U.S., Australia, and Japan).10 The exercise focused on air and missile defense, maritime security, and counter-landing operations.10 A key event was the sea denial training in the Luzon Strait, which included the deployment of the NMESIS (Navy/Marine Expeditionary Ship Interdiction System) to Batan Island.10 These drills are no longer symbolic; they are “real-world rehearsals” for scenarios involving the defense of Philippine territory and potential spillover from a Taiwan conflict.22

Maritime Cooperative Activities (MCAs) and the Scarborough Flashpoint

Since November 2023, the U.S. and the Philippines have conducted 11 Maritime Cooperative Activities (MCAs) in the South China Sea.37 The first MCA of 2026 took place on January 25-26 near Scarborough Shoal, involving the USS John Finn, the frigate BRP Antonio Luna, and Philippine Air Force FA-50 fighters.11 These activities emphasize interoperability through maneuver exercises and shared maritime domain awareness.12 During the January drill, U.S. carrier strike groups maintained a persistent presence off Western Luzon to provide a protective buffer for the joint maneuvers.11

Exercise/ActivityParticipating AssetsPrimary Mission Focus
Balikatan 202514,000+ troops; NMESIS; B-1 bombersAll-domain defense; Sea denial; Counter-landing 3
Salaknib 2025U.S. & Philippine Army unitsBilateral land-power interoperability; Urban/Jungle ops 27
MCA (Jan 2026)USS John Finn; BRP Antonio Luna; FA-50sFreedom of navigation near Scarborough Shoal 11
ALON 2025Philippine and U.S. MarinesCoastal defense and drone-integrated patrolling 26

Modernizing the AFP: The Re-Horizon 3 Initiative

The Armed Forces of the Philippines are currently undergoing a strategic shift from internal security to territorial defense, a process known as Re-Horizon 3.18 This program, approved by President Marcos Jr. in January 2024, allocates $35 billion over 10 years to procure advanced platforms.28

Procurement Priorities and U.S. Financial Support

The 2026 NDAA provides $2.5 billion in security assistance over five years through the PERA framework, including $500 million in direct grants and $1 billion in loan guarantees.8 This funding is prioritized for:

  • Coastal Defense and Long-Range Fires: Procurement of the Mid-Range Capability (Tomahawk) and HIMARS.8
  • Air Defense: Developing a credible umbrella against aerial incursions.8
  • Maritime Domain Awareness: Strengthening the ability to sense and share data across the archipelago.9

The AFP is also seeking multi-role fighters (likely F-16 C/D Block 70/72) and diesel-electric submarines to establish a sub-surface deterrent.18 The Philippine Navy has recently commissioned its first modern corvettes from South Korea and is integrating the BrahMos supersonic cruise missile into its coastal defense batteries.28

Performance of the TA-50 / FA-50 Light Attack Fleet

The Philippine Air Force (PAF) has focused on the South Korean-built TA-50 and FA-50 aircraft as the backbone of its current fleet. These aircraft are frequently used in MCAs and joint patrols with U.S. forces.11

Manila plans to potentially acquire up to 100 TA-50/FA-50 variants to achieve a high-volume, cost-effective air presence.8

The Adversary Perspective: China’s Escalatory Counter-Strategy

Beijing has viewed the U.S. buildup as a direct threat to its sovereignty and regional stability, leading to a “downward spiral” in bilateral ties.41

Doubling Down at Scarborough Shoal

In 2025, China more than doubled its patrol resources at Scarborough Shoal (Bajo de Masinloc).13 Automatic identification system (AIS) data shows that the China Coast Guard (CCG) recorded 1,099 ship-days at the shoal in 2025, up from 516 in 2024.13 This represents a nearly constant presence of at least three hulls on an average day.13

Feature2024 Ship-Days2025 Ship-DaysStrategic Intent
Scarborough Shoal5161,099Consolidation of control; Nature reserve claim 11
Sabina Shoal~200405Monitor Second Thomas Shoal resupply 13
Second Thomas Shoal288131Reduction due to blockade shift to Sabina 14
Thitu (Pag-asa) Island28151Strategic shift of resources elsewhere 14

In August 2025, a Chinese navy destroyer collided with a CCG vessel while pursuing a Philippine boat near Scarborough, the most severe maritime incident of the year.13 Furthermore, China has declared plans to turn the shoal into a “national nature reserve,” a move seen as a precursor to permanent reclamation.11

Retaliatory PLA Maneuvers and Cognitive Warfare

The PLA Southern Theater Command has begun conducting its own “combat readiness patrols” in direct response to U.S.-Philippine MCAs.11 These patrols involve H-6K bombers armed with anti-ship missiles flying over the shoal area, often crossing into Manila’s designated exercise zones.38 Beijing’s cognitive operations portray the U.S. as a source of instability and the Philippines as a “pawn” in Washington’s Indo-Pacific strategy.19 The MFA urges the Philippines to “take effective measures to undo the egregious impact” of their defense ties or bear the “consequences for their despicable moves”.41

Intelligence Forecast: The “2027 Window” and Alliance Risks

Intelligence analysts widely regard 2027 as a critical point of departure for regional security.15 This date marks the target year for the PLA to achieve the capability to forcibly unify Taiwan with the mainland, a directive allegedly issued by Xi Jinping.15

The Convergence of “Clocks”

The assessment that China may take military action by 2027 is driven by several “clocks” synchronizing for the first time:

  • The Modernization Clock: The PLA’s centenary goal of basic modernization and regional war-winning capability by 2027.15
  • The Political Clock: The end of Xi Jinping’s third term and the January 2028 presidential election in Taiwan, which may signal the end of peaceful unification prospects.15
  • The Deterrence Clock: The U.S. shift toward land-based forces and base hardening (the “Davidson Window”) which Beijing may feel a need to preempt before the U.S. posture becomes impregnable.42

The Stability-Instability Paradox

The alliance faces a stability-instability paradox. While the “Strong Denial Defense” and Task Force Philippines create macro-level stability by deterring a full-scale invasion, they simultaneously encourage China to increase “gray zone” provocations—such as water-cannoning and maritime swarming—to challenge the alliance without crossing the threshold of the Mutual Defense Treaty.3 The risk of a tactical miscalculation resulting in a broader conflict is currently higher than at any time since the 1950s.31

Conclusion: Strategic Resilience and Future Outlook

The U.S. military presence in the Philippines has entered a new phase of permanence and high-intensity integration. The combination of Task Force Philippines, the nine EDCA sites, and the $2.5 billion PERA funding framework provides the Philippines with the tools to transition into a credible regional defender. However, this buildup has also triggered a reciprocal escalation from Beijing, doubling its maritime presence and increasing the lethality of its maneuvers.

As the alliance navigates the “2027 Window,” its success will depend on:

  1. Institutional Continuity: Ensuring Task Force Philippines remains operational and staffed regardless of domestic political shifts in either country.3
  2. Infrastructure Hardening: Accelerating the construction of passive defenses at EDCA sites to survive a potential “opening salvo”.1
  3. Multilateral Expansion: Effectively integrating Japan and Australia into the “Quad Plus” or “SQUAD” frameworks to share the burden of regional security.20
  4. Managing Gray Zone Escalation: Utilizing advanced ISR, such as the MQ-9A Reaper, to document and expose Chinese actions while maintaining “Realistic Diplomacy” to prevent tactical skirmishes from becoming theater-wide wars.1

The U.S.-Philippine alliance is no longer a relationship of convenience but a central pillar of the First Island Chain’s defense architecture, poised at the front line of the most significant strategic competition of the era.


Please share the link on Facebook, Forums, with colleagues, etc. Your support is much appreciated and if you have any feedback, please email us in**@*********ps.com. If you’d like to request a report or order a reprint, please click here for the corresponding page to open in new tab.


Sources Used

  1. National Defense Strategy Prioritizes Western Hemisphere. Where …, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.airandspaceforces.com/experts-dissect-u-s-resolve-in-pacific-in-new-defense-strategy/
  2. Readout of Secretary of War Pete Hegseth’s Meeting With Philippine Secretary of National Defense – Department of War, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.war.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/4333084/readout-of-secretary-of-war-pete-hegseths-meeting-with-philippine-secretary-of/
  3. US-Philippine task force to reestablish South China Sea ‘deterrence’ – Defense News, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.defensenews.com/global/asia-pacific/2025/11/21/us-philippine-task-force-to-reestablish-south-china-sea-deterrence/
  4. U.S. Unveils Philippine Task Force to Deter Chinese Coercion – USNI News, accessed January 31, 2026, https://news.usni.org/2025/10/31/u-s-unveils-philippine-task-force-to-deter-chinese-coercion
  5. Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement – Wikipedia, accessed January 31, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enhanced_Defense_Cooperation_Agreement
  6. U.S. Deploys MQ-9A Reaper Drones to the Philippines as South China Sea Tensions Reach New High – Defence Security Asia, accessed January 31, 2026, https://defencesecurityasia.com/en/us-mq9a-reaper-drones-philippines-south-china-sea-tensions/
  7. Dangerous move by the US and Japan heightens the risk of regional confrontation, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202509/1343663.shtml
  8. Philippines Could Receive $2.5 Billion in Security Aid from U.S. Defense Bill – USNI News, accessed January 31, 2026, https://news.usni.org/2025/12/18/philippines-could-receive-2-5-billion-in-security-aid-from-u-s-defense-bill
  9. NDAA2026 makes available $1.5 billion for the Philippines – Pacific Island Times, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.pacificislandtimes.com/post/ndaa2026-makes-available-1-5-billion-for-the-philippines
  10. Philippines, U.S. conclude Exercise Balikatan 25 – PACOM, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.pacom.mil/Media/NEWS/News-Article-View/Article/4180743/philippines-us-conclude-exercise-balikatan-25/
  11. U.S. Destroyer Drills with Philippine Forces Near Scarborough Shoal, accessed January 31, 2026, https://news.usni.org/2026/01/28/u-s-destroyer-drills-with-philippine-forces-near-scarborough-shoal
  12. Philippines, U.S. conduct bilateral Maritime Cooperative Activity – Navy.mil, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.navy.mil/Press-Office/News-Stories/display-news/Article/4390339/philippines-us-conduct-bilateral-maritime-cooperative-activity/
  13. AMTI: China Coast Guard Focuses its Patrols on Scarborough Shoal, accessed January 31, 2026, https://maritime-executive.com/article/amti-china-coast-guard-focuses-its-patrols-on-scarborough-shoal
  14. China doubled patrols at Scarborough Shoal in 2025, new data shows, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2026/01/30/2504571/china-doubled-patrols-scarborough-shoal-2025-new-data-shows
  15. The Dragon and the Clock—2027 as the Turning Point Year Between China and Taiwan, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.inss.org.il/publication/china-taiwan-2027/
  16. Trump 2.0 National Security Strategy, Venezuela, And The …, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.eurasiareview.com/11012026-trump-2-0-national-security-strategy-venezuela-and-the-philippines-analysis/
  17. America’s Military Buildup Around Iran: What We Know and What It Means, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.meforum.org/mef-reports/americas-military-buildup-around-iran-what-we-know-and-what-it-means
  18. Philippines military modernisation: revamped but not resolved, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.iiss.org/online-analysis/military-balance/2025/062/philippines-military-modernisation-revamped-but-not-resolved/
  19. China & Taiwan Update, November 7, 2025 | ISW, accessed January 31, 2026, https://understandingwar.org/research/china-taiwan/china-taiwan-update-november-7-2025/
  20. New U.S.-Philippine military task force could evolve into multinational unit, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2025/11/28/world/politics/us-philippine-military-task-force/
  21. US media unveils composition of US military task force in Philippines; Chinese experts say it merely ‘placates’ Manila – Global Times, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202511/1349399.shtml
  22. U.S. report urges Taiwan to fund bases upgrades in the Philippines – Naval News, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2025/11/u-s-report-urges-taiwan-to-fund-bases-upgrades-in-the-philippines/
  23. New EDCA Sites Named in the Philippines – Secretary of the Air Force International Affairs, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.safia.hq.af.mil/IA-News/Article/3357767/new-edca-sites-named-in-the-philippines/
  24. US body wants Taiwan to quietly fund EDCA upgrades in …, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2025/11/21/2488700/us-congressional-panel-taiwan-could-fund-edca-upgrades-philippines
  25. Balikatan 2025 builds Philippine resilience, multinational military capacity, accessed January 31, 2026, https://ipdefenseforum.com/2025/10/balikatan-2025-builds-philippine-resilience-multinational-military-capacity/
  26. US Marines boosts Philippine maritime patrols with drones – Manila Standard, accessed January 31, 2026, https://manilastandard.net/news/314668144/us-marines-boosts-philippine-maritime-patrols-with-drones.html
  27. Philippine and US Army Soldiers commence Salaknib 25, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.usarpac.army.mil/Our-Story/Our-News/Article-Display/Article/4137299/philippine-and-us-army-soldiers-commence-salaknib-25/
  28. AFP Modernization Act – Wikipedia, accessed January 31, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AFP_Modernization_Act
  29. New EDCA Sites Named in the Philippines – Department of War, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.war.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/article/3350297/new-edca-sites-named-in-the-philippines/
  30. The U.S. Marines deployed their MQ-9A drones in support of surveillance tasks in the South China Sea – Zona Militar, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.zona-militar.com/en/2025/11/21/the-u-s-marines-deployed-their-mq-9a-drones-in-support-of-surveillance-tasks-in-the-south-china-sea/
  31. US expands deployment of Typhon system, stoking up tensions in Northeast Asia, accessed January 31, 2026, http://eng.chinamil.com.cn/2025xb/O_251451/16410639.html
  32. China warns Philippines of dangers of prolonged US missile system deployment, accessed January 31, 2026, http://english.scio.gov.cn/pressroom/2025-02/13/content_117710535.html
  33. US Typhon missile system in Philippines is a subtle headache for China – Defense News, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.defensenews.com/global/asia-pacific/2025/05/14/us-typhon-missile-system-in-philippines-is-a-subtle-headache-for-china/
  34. Why the deployment of American Typhon System in the Philippines is unsettling news for China ? – YouTube, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7bOy8f8D5Y
  35. Philippines, U.S. conclude Exercise Balikatan 25 > U.S. Pacific Fleet > News, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.cpf.navy.mil/Newsroom/News/Article/4181821/philippines-us-conclude-exercise-balikatan-25/
  36. The steady march of the AFP modernization | Inquirer Opinion, accessed January 31, 2026, https://opinion.inquirer.net/183717/the-steady-march-of-the-afp-modernization
  37. China conducts naval, air patrols around disputed South China Sea shoal, accessed January 31, 2026, https://whtc.com/2026/01/30/china-conducts-naval-air-patrols-around-disputed-south-china-sea-shoal/
  38. China conducts patrols around Scarborough Shoal, days after US-Philippine drills, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.scmp.com/news/china/military/article/3341949/chinese-military-patrols-scarborough-shoal-5-days-after-us-philippine-drills-area
  39. U.S. Navy Destroyer Joins Philippine Navy Near Contested S. China Sea Shoal, accessed January 31, 2026, https://maritime-executive.com/article/u-s-navy-destroyer-joins-philippine-navy-near-contested-s-china-sea-shoal
  40. Riding Unruly Waves: The Philippines’ Military Modernisation Effort – International Crisis Group, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.crisisgroup.org/sites/default/files/2025-08/349-philippines-military-modernisation.pdf
  41. Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Guo Jiakun’s Regular Press Conference on January 29, 2026_Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/xw/fyrbt/202601/t20260129_11847373.html
  42. House Select Committee Warns: “The Window to Deter War with China is Closing Fast”, accessed January 31, 2026, https://chinaselectcommittee.house.gov/media/press-releases/house-select-committee-warns-window-deter-war-china-closing-fast
  43. President’s Commentary: Two Countdowns to 2027: Cybersecurity and Indo-Pacific Readiness | AFCEA International, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.afcea.org/signal-media/test-signal-landing-page-format/presidents-commentary-two-countdowns-2027
  44. The Next Taiwan Crisis Won’t Be Like the Last | Council on Foreign Relations, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.cfr.org/reports/next-taiwan-crisis-wont-be-last