1. Executive Summary

The assassination of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on February 28, 2026, during the opening phases of the 2026 Iran War, triggered an unprecedented succession crisis within the Islamic Republic of Iran. The subsequent elevation of his second son, Mojtaba Khamenei, to the position of Supreme Leader by the Assembly of Experts on March 8, 2026, was engineered under intense pressure from the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). Since his appointment, Mojtaba Khamenei has not made a single verified public appearance, nor has he released any verifiable audio or video recordings. The regime has relied exclusively on written statements attributed to him and artificial intelligence-manipulated imagery to assert his ongoing governance.

This report evaluates the current status of Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei and assesses the operational dynamics of the Iranian state apparatus. Based on an exhaustive analysis of open-source intelligence (OSINT), intercepted communications, inner-circle disclosures, and historical authoritarian succession precedents, the analysis concludes with high confidence that Mojtaba Khamenei is alive but severely incapacitated due to injuries sustained in the February 28 decapitation strike. He is highly likely suffering from debilitating physical trauma, including severe facial burns and the amputation or severe disfigurement of lower extremities.

Consequently, the office of the Supreme Leader—the ultimate arbiter of the Iranian state under the constitutional doctrine of Velayat-e Faqih (Guardianship of the Islamic Jurist)—has been fundamentally hollowed out. The analysis indicates that the IRGC, led by figures such as Commander Ahmad Vahidi and Supreme National Security Council (SNSC) Secretary Mohammad Baqer Zolqadr, has orchestrated a silent, structural coup. The IRGC is currently operating the Iranian state as a “phantom franchise,” utilizing the nominal, inherited authority of the incapacitated Mojtaba Khamenei to legitimize a de facto military junta. This diffusion of power has resulted in a headless and highly factionalized regime, driving erratic strategic decision-making, stalling the implementation of the Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), and perpetuating a volatile “no war, no peace” equilibrium in the Middle East.

2. Strategic Context: The Escalation to the 2026 Iran War and the Decapitation Strike

The fundamental architecture of the Islamic Republic of Iran was destabilized in early 2026 following years of escalating tensions, economic stagnation, and regional proxy conflicts that ultimately culminated in a direct military confrontation between Iran, Israel, and the United States.

2.1. The Prelude to War and Regime Vulnerability

Prior to the outbreak of full-scale hostilities in early 2026, the Iranian regime was already facing severe internal and external pressures. Years of international sanctions, diplomatic isolation, and economic mismanagement had severely degraded the state’s social contract with its citizenry.¹ This friction peaked in January 2026, when mass anti-regime protests swept across the nation.¹ The state’s response was a brutal crackdown engineered by the hardline security apparatus and the judiciary. Under the leadership of Judiciary Chief Gholam-Hossein Mohseni Ejei—a figure long sanctioned by the US Treasury, the EU, and the UK for human rights abuses—the state utilized the Revolutionary Courts to execute a campaign of mass repression.⁴ Executions surged from 333 in 2021 to 582 in 2022, 834 in 2023, 975 in 2024, and an estimated projection of 1,639 to 2,159 in 2025, demonstrating the regime’s increasing reliance on lethal force to maintain domestic compliance.⁴

Simultaneously, the geopolitical environment deteriorated following the failure of the 2025–2026 Iran–United States negotiations. Despite indirect talks held in Muscat, Oman, mediated by Foreign Minister Badr bin Hamad Al Busaidi, hardliners in Tehran criticized the diplomatic efforts, and a 60-day deadline imposed by US President Donald Trump expired without a nuclear agreement.⁵ This failure directly precipitated the Twelve-Day War in June 2025, during which Israeli and US forces struck Iranian underground bunkers, forcing the already ailing 86-year-old Ali Khamenei into prolonged seclusion.⁵ The advanced capabilities of the adversary forces were highlighted by the deployment of the Israeli Tzayad digital army program, which detected an unprecedented 850,000 targets in real-time across multiple theaters between October 2023 and the end of 2025, overwhelming Iran’s traditional defensive postures.⁹

2.2. The February 28 Strike and the Eradication of the Old Guard

The fragile detente following the Twelve-Day War shattered in early 2026. On February 28, 2026, the first day of the renewed US-Israeli war with Iran (frequently referred to as Operation Epic Fury), a coordinated precision airstrike targeted a residential compound in Tehran.³ The strike achieved catastrophic success from the perspective of the allied forces, eliminating Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and severely degrading the regime’s central nervous system.⁶ Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard recently testified that US and Israeli objectives during these operations diverged: while Israel focused on disabling Iranian leadership, the US aimed to destroy Iran’s ballistic missile launching capability, their ballistic missile production capability, and their navy.

The collateral damage within the leadership’s inner circle was profound. The bombardment killed multiple members of the Khamenei family, including his eldest daughter, a 14-month-old granddaughter, a son-in-law, and the wife of his second son, Mojtaba Khamenei.¹² The initial decapitation strike was followed by subsequent targeted assassinations that further eroded the old guard. Most notably, on March 17, 2026, an Israeli strike eliminated Ali Larijani, a veteran political mastermind and the incumbent Secretary of the Supreme National Security Council, further compounding the leadership vacuum.¹⁵

This event marked the most significant systemic shock to the Iranian state since the 1979 Islamic Revolution. The elimination of Ali Khamenei removed the central pillar of the Iranian political system. For 37 years, Ali Khamenei had functioned as the ultimate arbiter of the state, meticulously balancing the competing factions of the clergy, the regular military (Artesh), the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), the judiciary, and the civilian political apparatus.¹⁰ Identified as a pragmatic hardliner, he had successfully sidelined leftist factions and moderate clerics while occasionally easing restrictions to preserve the regime’s stability.¹⁶ His sudden violent removal created an instantaneous, highly volatile power vacuum at the exact moment the state was under maximal external military assault.

3. The Succession Crisis and the Engineered Assembly of Experts Vote

The mechanisms for leadership succession in the Islamic Republic are constitutionally defined but inherently opaque. The sudden decapitation of the state forced an immediate test of these institutions, revealing the extent to which raw military power had eclipsed clerical authority.

3.1. Ali Khamenei’s Preparations and Alternative Candidates

Intelligence assessments indicate that Ali Khamenei was acutely aware of his mortality and the escalating threat matrix. Shortly before the Twelve-Day War in 2025, he had formally requested that the 88-member Assembly of Experts—the clerical body constitutionally tasked with selecting the Supreme Leader under Article 107 of the 1979 Constitution—prepare for the selection of his successor.⁶ Following the June 2025 strikes, he reportedly nominated three senior clerics to be considered in the event of his assassination: Judiciary Chief Gholam-Hossein Mohseni-Eje’i, Asghar Hijazi, and Hassan Khomeini, the grandson of the Islamic Republic’s founder.⁶

Notably, Ali Khamenei’s own will reportedly opposed the transfer of power to his son, Mojtaba.¹¹ To hand the supreme office to his son would constitute a hereditary succession, a move that directly contradicts the foundational anti-monarchical ideology of the 1979 revolution that ousted the Shah.¹⁰ Furthermore, prior to his death, Ali Khamenei had publicly stated that the selection must be made without regard for expediency, but rather based on “truth, the need of the country and God”.⁶

3.2. The IRGC Intimidation Campaign and the March 9 Vote

Despite the late Supreme Leader’s purported reservations, the constitutional process was rapidly subverted by the state’s military apparatus. According to intelligence disclosures, immediately following the February 28 assassination, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps attempted to bypass the formal electoral process entirely to rapidly install a new leader and project stability during the war.⁶ When this proved procedurally impossible, the IRGC Intelligence Organization pivoted to a campaign of intense psychological and political pressure.⁶

Beginning on March 3, IRGC commanders initiated repeated contacts and intimidation tactics against hesitant members of the Assembly of Experts, effectively forcing an online emergency session.⁶ The IRGC’s overwhelming preference for Mojtaba Khamenei was not rooted in his theological scholarship—which is widely considered modest and inferior to traditional candidates—but in his profound political utility.²⁰ Mojtaba had spent years acting as the powerful, behind-the-scenes gatekeeper to his father’s office.¹⁰ Crucially, he is deeply embedded within the IRGC’s hardline factions, specifically the “Habib Circle” forged during the Iran-Iraq War, and was instrumental in engineering previous hardliner victories, such as the suppression of the 2009 Green Movement.²¹

On March 8, 2026, the Assembly of Experts held an emergency session and appointed Mojtaba Khamenei as the third Supreme Leader, officially announcing the decision early on March 9 and claiming a unanimous vote.²² However, independent reporting from outlets such as The New York Times revealed that Mojtaba received only 59 out of 88 votes.²² While this cleared the two-thirds majority required, the fact that 29 senior clerics abstained or voted against him—despite explicit IRGC intimidation—highlights the deep ideological resistance to his appointment and the fragile nature of his foundational legitimacy.¹¹ By installing a politically dependent and theologically modest figurehead, the IRGC preserved the constitutional facade of the regime while effectively nakedly asserting themselves as the primary political actors in post-Ali Khamenei Iran.¹⁰

4. Evaluating the Status of Mojtaba Khamenei: The Proof of Life Deficit

The defining and most strategically significant characteristic of the post-Khamenei transition has been the absolute lack of verifiable proof of life regarding the new Supreme Leader. In a modern, highly digitized nation of 90 million people, the complete visual and auditory concealment of an authoritarian head of state during a wartime crisis is a profound anomaly. This absolute blackout strongly indicates severe physical incapacitation.²³

4.1. Analytical Probabilities: Assessing Survivability

In intelligence analysis, the evaluation of a closed regime’s leadership status requires balancing official state narratives against historical precedents, intercepted communications, OSINT, and the behavioral mechanics of the state apparatus.

The probability that Mojtaba Khamenei is deceased is assessed to be low. Historically, authoritarian regimes are highly effective at masking terminal illness or incapacitation for extended periods (e.g., the Soviet Union’s concealment of Yuri Andropov’s half-year absence in 1983-84, or the masking of Konstantin Chernenko’s declining health). However, the actual death of a supreme leader is exceedingly difficult to conceal beyond a few days (two to three days at most, as seen with Leonid Brezhnev or Kim Il-sung), even in tightly controlled information environments.²³ Once death occurs, the internal power vacuum necessitates immediate elite realignment, which inevitably leaks into the public domain.²³ If Mojtaba Khamenei had succumbed to the injuries sustained on February 28, the internal power vacuum would almost certainly have triggered visible, kinetic factional infighting among the oligarchic clans and IRGC factions vying to install a successor, or necessitated another emergency session of the Assembly of Experts.²⁴ The current operational continuity, albeit highly dysfunctional and militarized, suggests that a living figurehead remains in place to serve as the constitutional anchor.

The probability that Mojtaba Khamenei is alive but severely incapacitated is assessed to be highly likely. Multiple converging streams of intelligence, including disclosures from the United States Intelligence Community (USIC), Israeli intelligence, and independent sourcing from within the Iranian inner circle, confirm that Mojtaba was present during the February 28 strike and sustained massive trauma.¹⁷ Testifying before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in June 2026, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio confirmed that intelligence indicates Mojtaba is alive and “increasingly engaging at some level,” but noted crucially that “all of his communications have been in writing and through intermediaries”. This aligns with DNI Gabbard’s testimony that his exact condition is not fully known, but he was “injured very severely”.

Adding to the complexity, an intelligence assessment summarized in a leaked US-Israeli diplomatic memo revealed preparations to build a large mausoleum in Qom designed for “more than one grave.” This has sparked speculation that the regime is laying the groundwork for Mojtaba’s potential demise alongside his father.

4.2. Conflicting Medical Narratives and Physical Disfigurement

The Iranian state apparatus has engaged in a protracted, multi-layered deception campaign regarding the extent of the Supreme Leader’s injuries, setting up a sharp conflict between domestic propaganda and international intelligence collection.

The official narrative, propagated by the Iranian Health Ministry shortly after his appointment in March 2026, sought to project invulnerability. The state claimed that Mojtaba suffered only “superficial” cuts to the face, head, and legs, requiring minor suturing (described as “two or three stitches”), and explicitly stated that the injuries did not “deface his features and appearance”.²⁷ This statement was designed to preempt rumors of critical injury and reassure the domestic populace, but it has not been updated, amended, or withdrawn since its issuance, despite overwhelming contradictory evidence.²⁷

This state narrative directly contradicts exhaustive intelligence gathering. On-record confirmation of Mojtaba’s severe injuries first emerged from foreign governments in March 2026, when US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth publicly stated that Mojtaba was “wounded and likely disfigured”.¹⁴ Further validation emerged from DNI Gabbard, who testified that he was severely wounded, while concurrent reports highlighted facial injuries and a broken foot.²³

Crucially, corroboration also emerged from within the Iranian regime’s own diplomatic and political networks. In an interview conducted at the Iranian embassy compound in Nicosia, Alireza Salarian, Tehran’s ambassador to Cyprus, broke with the Health Ministry’s minimization strategy, confirming that Mojtaba was in the hospital with severe injuries to his legs, hand, and arm, admitting he was “lucky to survive”.¹⁷ Similarly, Yousef Pezeshkian, a top government adviser and son of Iran’s President, acknowledged the injuries on his Telegram channel, though he attempted to reassure followers that the leader was “safe and sound”.¹⁷

The most granular and clinically specific intelligence regarding his condition stems from deep-cover sourcing within the Iranian inner circle, subsequently reported by independent outlets between April and July 2026.²⁷ These sources confirm that the Supreme Leader’s face was severely disfigured by burns, requiring extensive, ongoing plastic surgery.²⁷ Furthermore, he suffered catastrophic injuries to his lower extremities; he has undergone at least three surgeries on his leg and is currently awaiting a prosthetic limb, with some sources suggesting total amputation of at least one leg and significant internal organ damage.¹⁴ The timeline of these assessments tracks a patient who was “critically ill and unconscious” in Qom in early April to a state of being physically impaired but “mentally sharp and engaged” by late April.²⁷

The regime’s refusal to project his image stems directly from the theological and political implications of this disfigurement. In the highly symbolic political culture of the Islamic Republic, the Supreme Leader must project an aura of divine protection and absolute, unyielding strength.¹⁴ Projecting an image of a physically shattered leader—missing limbs and bearing severe facial burns inflicted directly by an adversary’s airstrike—would fatally undermine the foundational mythology required to sustain the Velayat-e Faqih during a period of intense domestic instability and international warfare.¹⁴

4.3. The Strategic Absence: Missing the State Funeral

The ultimate and most damaging manifestation of the Supreme Leader’s physical incapacitation occurred during the marathon state funeral ceremonies for his father, Ali Khamenei, which culminated in a burial in Mashhad on July 9, 2026. Due to the exigencies of the ongoing war, the burial was delayed for four months.²⁹ When the uneasy truce allowed the ceremonies to proceed, they were designed as a massive, highly choreographed mechanism to project regime resilience, display social cohesion, and channel public anger into unyielding defiance against the United States.³ The funeral prayers were held at the Imam Khomeini Grand Mosalla in Tehran and led by 97-year-old Shiite cleric Ayatollah Jafar Sobhani, before the procession moved slowly through the crammed streets of Tehran, Qom, and finally Mashhad, drawing millions of mourners demanding revenge. During the ceremony, state-sanctioned emcees, including poet Mohammad Rasouli, actively stoked the crowds by calling for the direct assassination of US President Donald Trump.³⁰

Key political and military figures were prominently featured to demonstrate unity. Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, President Masoud Pezeshkian, Judiciary Chief Ejei, and IRGC Quds Force Commander Esmail Qaani were all highly visible, walking in full view of the public—an act that would have been inconceivable during the kinetic phases of the war earlier in the year.¹²

Crucially, three of Ali Khamenei’s sons—Mostafa, Meysam, and Masoud—were broadcast repeatedly by state television praying behind their father’s coffin and attending the burial.⁹ However, Mojtaba Khamenei, the sitting Supreme Leader of the nation, was entirely absent from the week-long events.

The Iranian security apparatus preemptively claimed his absence was necessitated by “security concerns” and the persistent threat of Israeli assassination.⁹ While the threat matrix in Tehran remains undeniably elevated, intelligence analysis assesses this justification to be a convenient cover for his physical inability to participate. Inner-circle reporting indicates that Mojtaba explicitly requested to attend his father’s burial in Mashhad, but Iranian security officials denied the request.²⁷ The prohibition of his attendance was driven by the operational reality that his severe physical disfigurement and reliance on mobility aids could not be concealed in a dynamic, public environment.¹⁴ The state security services actively limited his exposure to avoid projecting an image of vulnerability.¹⁴

This absence inflicted profound collateral damage upon his already fragile political legitimacy. To many Iranians, the failure to publicly mourn his father visibly left the transfer of personal, spiritual authority incomplete.¹⁹ As noted by regional analysts, Mojtaba may have inherited the office, but his physical inability to perform the most basic public duties of a Shia religious leader during a time of national mourning proves he has not inherited his father’s authority.¹⁹

5. The Information War: AI Manipulation and the Disinformation Campaign

To mask the Supreme Leader’s incapacitation and project an illusion of normalcy, the Iranian regime has deployed a sophisticated, yet ultimately transparent, information operations campaign. This campaign has heavily utilized emerging technologies, inadvertently exposing the regime to severe credibility losses.

5.1. The Facade of Written Governance

Since his appointment on March 8, 2026, the regime’s communication strategy regarding Mojtaba has relied exclusively on written statements.²³ The Supreme Leader has not delivered a single televised address, appeared on camera, or released an authenticated audio recording.¹⁹ Instead, the state issues written decrees in his name, which are subsequently read aloud by state television anchors or, in the case of his latest diatribe against the “malicious enemy,” read aloud by Tehran’s Friday prayer leader, Mohammad Javad Haj Ali Akbari.¹⁰ To supplement this, the regime has erected giant billboards around Tehran showing a triple image of Ruhollah Khomeini, Ali Khamenei, and Mojtaba Khamenei, visually enforcing a narrative of continuity that the physical reality contradicts.¹⁰ State media has also routinely broadcasted old, archived video footage of Mojtaba, attempting to pass it off as newly filmed material.²³

5.2. Weaponized Artificial Intelligence and the “Liar’s Dividend”

When international and domestic pressure mounted to provide verifiable visual proof of the Supreme Leader’s survival and governance, state-affiliated media released photographs purporting to show Mojtaba engaged in official duties. However, forensic visual investigations conducted by independent open-source intelligence (OSINT) entities, most notably the BBC Verify team, conclusively determined that these images were manipulated using artificial intelligence tools.²³

BBC Verify’s senior journalist, Shayan Sardarizadeh, along with OSINT researcher Tal Hagin, tracked a tidal wave of “AI slop” engulfing coverage of the Iran war.³⁶ The identification of digital artifacts exposed the regime’s fabrications. For example, widely circulated images of the aftermath of the bunker strike contained telltale signs of AI generation, such as rescue workers with duplicate limbs.³⁶ Open-source researcher Brady Africk similarly noted an increase in manipulated satellite imagery used by state-aligned actors, pointing out subtle visual giveaways such as cars parked in identical positions across both authentic and manipulated imagery.³⁸ The verification environment has been further muddied by Western AI models; tools such as Grok and Gemini have been documented falsely authenticating AI-generated wartime images as genuine. For instance, regarding a bird’s-eye view photograph of a mass burial of victims of the 2026 Minab school attack, Gemini falsely described it as depicting the burial of victims of the 2023 Turkey–Syria earthquakes in Kahramanmaraş, Turkey, whilst Grok claimed it showed a mass burial of COVID-19 victims at Rorotan Cemetery in Jakarta, Indonesia.

Recognizing that their AI fabrications were being systematically debunked, the regime attempted to weaponize AI detection against legitimate, independent reporting. On March 9, 2026, The New York Times published an authentic photograph documenting crowds gathering in Tehran following Mojtaba’s announcement. In response, a coordinated discrediting effort was launched. An X account linked to the “Empirical Research and Forecasting Institute” (ERFI)—operating as a proxy to launder disinformation—falsely claimed the Times image showed signs of digital manipulation and was manufactured.³⁷ State-affiliated photojournalists, such as Erfan Kouchari, also engaged in sharing doctored “original” and “edited” versions of photos to muddy the waters before deleting the posts when challenged.³⁷

The weaponization of AI content generation by the Iranian state represents a critical strategic vulnerability. While designed to reassure the domestic populace and deter foreign adversaries, the exposure of these fabricated images has yielded a “liar’s dividend.” When audiences cannot distinguish authentic evidence from manipulated propaganda, trust in all state communications evaporates.³⁷ This has accelerated the erosion of the regime’s institutional credibility and confirmed the profound extent of the leadership vacuum to international intelligence services.³⁷

6. The IRGC’s Silent Coup: Operating the Phantom Franchise

The incapacitation of Mojtaba Khamenei has catalyzed a profound structural inversion within the Islamic Republic. The regime is no longer governed by a centralized, absolute cleric acting as the final arbiter of factional disputes. Instead, the analysis reveals the crystallization of a de facto military dictatorship led by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), operating securely behind the veil of the Supreme Leader’s office.

6.1. The Hollowing Out of Velayat-e Faqih

The fundamental operating logic of the current Iranian regime is best characterized as a “phantom franchise”.²³ The ideological foundation of the state, Velayat-e Faqih, dictates that ultimate authority rests with a highly qualified Islamic jurist. Because Mojtaba Khamenei lacks the requisite theological scholarship—having been chosen for political expediency—and is now physically removed from the levers of power, the regime is effectively headless.¹⁹ Dr. Evaleila Pesaran, a specialist in modern Iranian power politics at the University of Cambridge, notes that the constitution theoretically entrenches the Supreme Leader’s power, but in reality, deep capillaries of power spread widely into Iranian society, propping up the Supreme Leader rather than him holding them tightly.³⁹

With the central pillar shattered, those capillaries have become autonomous. The IRGC—originally established in 1979 as an ideological praetorian guard designed to protect the revolution from a regular military coup—has systematically evolved into a vast military-industrial-political conglomerate.¹⁰ Under Ali Khamenei, the IRGC amassed massive economic empires and exerted immense influence over foreign policy, but Ali Khamenei retained the ultimate authority to act as the “balancer-in-chief” and check their power.⁸

With Mojtaba severely compromised, the IRGC no longer faces a balancing authority.¹⁰ Intelligence sources confirm that the balance of power has definitively shifted, and the IRGC is now controlling the Supreme Leader rather than the inverse.²⁶ The Guards are actively utilizing the inherited legitimacy of Mojtaba’s title to issue directives, set domestic crackdowns in motion, and dictate terms of war, all insulated from public accountability by the opaque walls of the Supreme Leader’s compound.³⁴ A written statement read by a news anchor in Mojtaba’s name carries the constitutional weight of divine law, providing the IRGC with the ultimate asymmetric advantage over civilian politicians who might attempt to negotiate moderation.²⁵ The regime has transitioned from a system where the Supreme Leader ruled over institutions, to one where the IRGC rules through the institution of the Supreme Leader.¹⁰

6.2. Key Power Brokers in the Post-Khamenei Junta

The exercise of power in Tehran is now highly diffuse, residing in an informal committee of senior IRGC commanders, security officials, and co-opted civilian politicians.¹⁰ Because highly visible targets are vulnerable to decapitation strikes, the real wartime decision-makers likely remain hidden, allowing public figures to signal continuity while possessing limited actual authority.³⁴ The analysis identifies three critical nodes of power orchestrating the state’s trajectory:

1. General Ahmad Vahidi and the IRGC Command: Despite absorbing severe leadership decapitations, including the loss of Commander-in-Chief Hossein Salami in the Twelve-Day War and Mohammad Pakpour in subsequent US-Israeli strikes, the IRGC remains highly resilient and in a state of constant activity.¹⁰ General Ahmad Vahidi, a former interior minister, has consolidated control and is viewed as the de facto chief of the Guards..¹⁰ He is heavily influenced by Office Counselor Mohsen Rezaee, a staunch hardliner and former IRGC commander-in-chief (1981–1997) who currently acts as the closest mentor to Vahidi and a highly influential adviser to Mojtaba. Vahidi’s faction is responsible for maintaining the operational tempo of the war, enforcing the de facto blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, and managing the brutal domestic security environment.¹⁰ The IRGC command operates with the understanding that a militarized state serves their ideological and economic interests, and they view any diplomatic concessions as an existential threat to their supremacy.³⁴

2. Mohammad Baqer Zolqadr and the Supreme National Security Council (SNSC): The appointment of Mohammad Baqer Zolqadr to replace the assassinated Ali Larijani as the Secretary of the Supreme National Security Council represents a major strategic victory for the hardline military faction.¹⁵ Zolqadr is a foundational member of the IRGC’s old guard, tied to the pre-revolutionary ‘Mansourun’ guerrilla network, and previously served as the Deputy Commander-in-Chief of the IRGC and the Secretary of the Expediency Discernment Council.¹⁵ Unlike his predecessor Larijani, Zolqadr possesses virtually no diplomatic experience; he views national security strictly through a militarized, ideological, and jihadi lens.¹⁵ His elevation to the head of the SNSC—the body theoretically responsible for shaping strategic foreign policy—ensures that the IRGC maintains absolute veto power over any negotiations with the United States.¹⁵

3. Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf: The Civilian Interlocutor: Operating at the intersection of the military and civilian spheres is Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf. A former IRGC aerospace commander, former mayor of Tehran, and the current Speaker of the Parliament, Ghalibaf has emerged as the most visible public face of the post-Khamenei regime and its chief diplomat.¹⁰ Ghalibaf is known to be fiercely ambitious, opportunistic, and a pragmatic bargainer, maintaining a high profile on social media.¹⁰ He recently led the Iranian delegation in indirect talks with the US in Oman, and direct talks with US Vice President JD Vance in Islamabad.⁵ US intelligence implies that officials view Ghalibaf as a possible interlocutor, reportedly instructing Israeli partners not to target him in decapitation strikes to preserve a diplomatic channel.²¹

However, Ghalibaf’s authority is highly conditional. He acts as the outward-facing liaison for the regime but remains entirely subordinate to the structural dictates of the IRGC and the “red lines” established in the name of Mojtaba Khamenei.¹⁰ Ghalibaf is forced to execute a precarious balancing act: attempting to negotiate an end to a war that is economically devastating Iran, while constantly signaling his loyalty to the hardline factions—such as warning adversaries to “Bring it on”—to avoid being purged.¹⁰

7. Oligarchic Factionalism and Economic Interests

While the state apparatus attempts to project unity against foreign adversaries, deep factional rifts are expanding beneath the surface. Analysis by Iran specialists Saeid Golkar and Kasra Aarabi indicates that the current internal struggle is not primarily driven by ideological differences regarding the future direction of the Islamic Republic.²⁴ All the major oligarchic clans are Islamist and committed to the survival of the regime.²⁵ Rather, the confrontation is a fierce struggle to protect and advance their vast economic interests and consolidate power in the vacuum left by Ali Khamenei, who had long balanced these competing groups.²⁴

This factional friction occasionally breaches the public domain. Recently, a statement issued in the name of Mojtaba Khamenei criticized the SNSC over its conduct in negotiations with Washington, declaring that “no official may act contrary” to the definitive view of the Supreme Leader.²⁵ In response, Vice President for Executive Affairs Mohammad-Jafar Ghaempanah boldly argued that the Supreme Leader’s views were subject to institutional review rather than automatic implementation.⁴⁶ Ultra-hardliners immediately accused Ghaempanah of attacking the core doctrine of Velayat-e Faqih, demonstrating the volatility of interpreting edicts from an incapacitated leader.⁴⁶

The financial logistics of the new regime also remain a critical battleground. The United States has actively targeted the economic lifelines supporting Mojtaba Khamenei’s faction. Recent sanctions targeted 13 individuals and entities, most notably Mojtaba’s key financier, Ali Ansari.⁴⁷ Ansari, the former owner of the bankrupt and shuttered Ayandeh Bank, was identified by the US Treasury as using numerous shell companies and bank accounts across multiple jurisdictions to accumulate millions of dollars in holdings.⁴⁷ Operating under the Saint Kitts and Nevis-based Smart Global Limited, established in 2011, Ansari invested heavily in real estate and commercial properties in Europe and the Gulf to bypass international sanctions and fund the supreme office’s operations.⁴⁷ Disrupting these financial networks is a primary mechanism by which adversarial intelligence services seek to constrain the IRGC’s operational reach.

8. Geopolitical Implications: The Islamabad MOU and Strategic Paralysis

The structural realities of the Iranian regime—a paralyzed figurehead and an ascendant, uncompromising IRGC—have directly dictated the erratic and stalling trajectory of international diplomacy, specifically regarding the ongoing 2026 Iran War.

8.1. The Fracture Over the Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding

On June 12, 2026, the United States and Iran reached a final agreed-upon text for a peace deal to end the war.⁴⁸ Subsequently, on June 17, 2026, the United States and Iran, through remote signatures by President Donald Trump and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, executed the Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding (MOU).⁴⁸ The signing, which featured French President Emmanuel Macron and French Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs Jean-Noël Barrot in attendance at the Palace of Versailles, was designed to establish a 60-day extension of a fragile ceasefire and provide a framework to negotiate a comprehensive peace accord.⁴⁸

The handling of the MOU within Tehran perfectly illustrates the dysfunction of the “phantom franchise.” President Pezeshkian and Parliament Speaker Ghalibaf actively pursued the agreement to alleviate the crushing economic and military pressure on the state.⁵⁰ However, the IRGC hardline faction, vehemently opposed to any concessions regarding nuclear development or sovereign control of the Strait of Hormuz, sought to sabotage the framework.³ Economic stakeholders within the regime also pressured the administration; Mohammad Mokhber, an adviser to the Supreme Leader, warned that the US “understands the language of economics and cost-benefit better” and threatened to halt energy flows if the deal failed to yield material relief, a stance echoed by Hamid Bovard, Deputy Oil Minister and CEO of the National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC).

To navigate this internal blockade, the civilian apparatus obtained a written statement, ostensibly from Mojtaba Khamenei, authorizing the signing of the MOU.¹ Crucially, however, the statement was drafted to simultaneously distance the Supreme Leader from the agreement. The statement claimed Mojtaba held a “different view” and opposed it “in principle,” but permitted it based solely on the assurances of the SNSC that it would protect the rights of the Iranian nation.¹ Subsequent statements issued in Mojtaba’s name warned against creating “pessimism” about the negotiations—an apparent rebuke to extreme critics—yet simultaneously set rigid red lines demanding US acquiescence.⁵⁰

This contradictory messaging is a symptom of severe internal factionalization.²⁴ By issuing ambiguous directives through the incapacitated leader, the competing oligarchic clans avoid a direct, violent confrontation. However, it renders the Iranian state fundamentally incapable of executing definitive strategic shifts. A regime that cannot agree on the interpretation of its own leader’s edicts cannot reliably commit to an international security treaty.⁴¹ As noted by the Washington Institute, the regime’s central assumption is that the United States seeks de-escalation more urgently than Iran does, leading Tehran to believe that uncompromising patience will eventually force American concessions.⁵²

8.2. The Collapse into “No War, No Peace”

The ambiguity of the MOU and the IRGC’s refusal to surrender control of critical maritime choke points led to the rapid deterioration of the ceasefire. Yoel Guzansky, a senior researcher at the Institute for National Security Studies, noted that the loosely written MOU was so vague that both sides interpreted it differently, leading to a “negotiation under fire” where both sides attempted to pressure the other.⁴⁹ The IRGC, operating under the stated directive that “the lever of blocking the Strait of Hormuz must definitely continue to be used,” resumed attacks on oil tankers and commercial shipping in the strait.⁴⁷

In response to these strikes, the United States military targeted approximately 90 Iranian assets to degrade their ability to threaten freedom of navigation.⁴³ The IRGC responded by launching drones and missiles at US bases in Kuwait and Bahrain.⁴³ On July 8, 2026, President Trump publicly declared at a NATO summit in Ankara that the ceasefire was “OVER,” citing Iranian attacks and accusing Tehran of violating the terms of the MOU, while simultaneously threatening to reimpose a total naval blockade on Iranian ports.⁴³

The current geopolitical environment has devolved into a mutually hurting, “no war, no peace” stalemate.³ The IRGC requires external conflict to justify its expansive domestic control and brutal suppression of dissent.⁷ Furthermore, analysis suggests the IRGC may decide that Iran must move quickly to obtain nuclear weapons to forestall future US and Israeli attacks.²⁰ Conversely, the civilian government recognizes the existential threat posed by a protracted war. This dynamic contrasts sharply with neighboring developments, where the US is attempting to back the Lebanese government in pursuing security arrangements with Israel to reclaim sovereignty from Hezbollah—a move Iran views as a direct threat to its regional security architecture.⁵⁵ Without a functioning Supreme Leader capable of acting as the final arbiter and forcing a domestic consensus, Iran will likely continue to pursue a strategy of asymmetric escalation, testing American red lines while avoiding conventional military capitulation.¹⁰

9. Evaluative Probabilities and Most Likely Scenarios

Based on the intelligence synthesis, the future trajectory of the Iranian regime will be defined by the permanence of Mojtaba Khamenei’s incapacitation and the IRGC’s ability to maintain the facade of his rule.

Scenario 1: The Permanent Figurehead (High Probability) The most likely scenario is the perpetuation of the current status quo. Mojtaba Khamenei remains alive but sequestered in a heavily guarded medical facility, potentially in Qom or a secure bunker in Tehran, undergoing continuous reconstructive surgeries and rehabilitation.²⁷ He will never resume the public, charismatic role required of a traditional Supreme Leader. The IRGC will continue to manage the state via the “phantom franchise,” issuing edicts in his name to legitimize their military and economic dominance.²³ This allows the regime to avoid the destabilizing shock of convening another Assembly of Experts vote during a war. Consequently, Iran will remain highly aggressive regionally, internally repressive, and diplomatically paralyzed, as the IRGC views de-escalation as detrimental to its internal power consolidation.²⁰

Scenario 2: Regime Fragmentation and Oligarchic Conflict (Medium Probability) If Mojtaba Khamenei’s health catastrophically fails, or if the civilian factions (aligned with Ghalibaf and Pezeshkian) ascertain that the economic toll of the IRGC’s perpetual war strategy threatens the complete collapse of the state, the informal junta could fracture. The competing oligarchic clans within the military, clerical, and political spheres are united only by self-preservation.²⁴ The removal of the Mojtaba figurehead would eliminate the mechanism for resolving their disputes, potentially leading to open, violent confrontation between IRGC factions and elements of the conventional military (Artesh) or civilian security apparatus.⁷ If the regime collapses entirely, hardliners would likely attempt to work with remaining loyalist IRGC and Basij elements to wage an insurgency and foil efforts to rebuild a democratic state.²⁰

Scenario 3: Civilian Resurgence and Diplomatic Breakthrough (Low Probability) A scenario wherein the civilian government manages to outmaneuver the IRGC, sideline Zolqadr and Vahidi, and secure a lasting peace agreement with the United States is assessed to be highly improbable in the near to medium term. The IRGC has systematically hollowed out all rival power centers and holds a monopoly on the application of domestic force.¹⁰ Former US officials, such as Richard Nephew, argue that Washington should let Iran defeat itself rather than bailing out the new hardline leaders with a premature peace deal.⁵⁶ However, finding indigenous Iranians who can lead a unified opposition is extremely difficult given decades of state-sponsored assassination and imprisonment of dissidents.² Any attempt by the civilian leadership to force capitulation without the explicit, verifiable backing of a healthy Supreme Leader would likely result in their immediate purging or assassination by IRGC hardliners.

10. Conclusion

The Islamic Republic of Iran has fundamentally altered its character in the aftermath of the February 28 decapitation strike. Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei is assessed with high confidence to be alive but profoundly physically incapacitated and disfigured. He is incapable of exercising the absolute, centralized authority demanded by the doctrine of Velayat-e Faqih.

Consequently, the Iranian state has been quietly subsumed by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. By operating a “phantom franchise” utilizing Mojtaba’s name, the IRGC has executed a structural coup, avoiding the optics of a military takeover while securing total dominance over state policy. This diffusion of power into a hardline military junta ensures that Tehran will remain a highly volatile, uncompromising, and dangerous actor on the world stage. The regime’s reliance on AI-manipulated imagery and forged written statements highlights deep institutional rot. The inability of the regime to produce a verifiable, functional leader guarantees that diplomatic efforts, such as the Islamabad MOU, will continue to be frustrated by an opaque, factionalized security apparatus that views perpetual conflict as the ultimate guarantor of its survival.

11. Appendix: Intelligence Methodology

The assessments within this report were derived using a multi-disciplinary intelligence synthesis approach, prioritizing the Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) to mitigate cognitive bias when evaluating the closed information environment of the Iranian regime.

1. Open-Source Intelligence (OSINT): Exhaustive monitoring of Iranian state media outputs, official pronouncements by the Assembly of Experts, the Ministry of Health, and the Supreme National Security Council provided the baseline regime narrative. This was contrasted against independent media reporting and regional diplomatic disclosures.
2. Imagery Intelligence (IMINT) and Forensic Analysis: Evaluation of visual media released by the regime was cross-referenced with independent forensic analyses (such as those conducted by BBC Verify). The identification of digital artifacts, duplicate geometries, and AI manipulation in purported “proof of life” imagery was highly weighted as a primary indicator of deception and physical incapacitation. Satellite imagery analysis of regime infrastructure and mass gatherings (such as funerals) was utilized to gauge state organizational capacity and public response.
3. Human Intelligence (HUMINT) Leakage Analysis: Reporting from independent journalistic entities citing anonymous inner-circle Iranian officials was evaluated for consistency, clinical specificity (e.g., details of prosthetics, burn treatments, and surgical interventions), and chronological alignment with known operational events (the Feb 28 strike). The transition of intelligence assessments over time (e.g., from “unconscious” to “mentally sharp but physically impaired”) provided a credible trajectory of recovery from severe trauma.
4. Historical Authoritarian Precedent: The behavioral patterns of the Iranian state were benchmarked against established historical models of authoritarian succession and crisis management. The understanding that closed regimes can mask chronic illness but struggle to conceal actual death beyond a few days formed the baseline for the probability assessment of the Supreme Leader’s survival.

The synthesis of these disciplines indicates that while the state claims nominal continuity, the structural indicators point definitively to leadership incapacitation and a subsequent, silent military ascendancy.

12. Glossary

• Artesh: The conventional military forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran, operating in parallel to, but often subordinate to, the IRGC.
• Assembly of Experts: An 88-member deliberative body of Islamic scholars constitutionally tasked with electing, supervising, and theoretically removing the Supreme Leader of Iran. Currently highly influenced by the IRGC.
• Basij: A paramilitary volunteer militia established in 1979 by order of Ayatollah Khomeini, subordinate to the IRGC, utilized primarily for internal security, moral policing, and suppressing domestic dissent.
• DNI (Director of National Intelligence): The United States government official serving as the head of the United States Intelligence Community.
• IRGC (Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps): The ideological branch of the Iranian Armed Forces, founded after the 1979 Revolution. It has evolved into a massive military, political, and economic conglomerate that currently dominates the Iranian state.
• MOU (Memorandum of Understanding): Specifically referencing the Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding signed remotely on June 17, 2026, aimed at establishing a 60-day ceasefire extension between the US and Iran.
• OSINT (Open-Source Intelligence): Intelligence collected from publicly available sources, including news media, social media, independent forensic analysis, and commercial data.
• Quds Force: The elite branch of the IRGC specializing in unconventional warfare and military intelligence operations, primarily responsible for extraterritorial operations and managing proxy networks (e.g., Hezbollah, Hamas).
• SNSC (Supreme National Security Council): The highest national security body in Iran, responsible for determining defense and national security policies within the framework of general policies determined by the Supreme Leader.
• USIC (United States Intelligence Community): The federation of executive branch agencies and organizations that conduct intelligence activities necessary for the conduct of US foreign relations and national security.
• Velayat-e Faqih (Guardianship of the Islamic Jurist): The foundational political and theological doctrine of the Islamic Republic of Iran, which grants absolute political and religious authority to a highly qualified Shia cleric (the Supreme Leader) during the occultation of the Mahdi.

---

Please share the link on Facebook, Forums, with colleagues, etc. Your support is much appreciated and if you have any feedback, please email us in**@*********ps.com. If you’d like to request a report or order a reprint, please click here for the corresponding page to open in new tab.

---

Sources Used

1. Iran’s new order takes shape after Khamenei burial, accessed July 10, 2026, https://www.ft.com/content/fee898fa-1888-4131-9e63-f3868cd3f176?syn-25a6b1a6=1
2. An Achievable Goal in Iran | The Washington Institute, accessed July 10, 2026, https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/achievable-goal-iran
3. Minefields Obstruct the Road to U.S.-Iran Peace – The Soufan Center, accessed July 10, 2026, https://thesoufancenter.org/intelbrief-2026-july-7/
4. Pick To Run Iran’s Judiciary Shows Repression Will Live on Long After Ali Khamenei’s Death, accessed July 10, 2026, https://www.fdd.org/analysis/2026/07/10/pick-to-run-irans-judiciary-shows-repression-will-live-on-long-after-ali-khameneis-death/
5. 2025–2026 Iran–United States negotiations – Wikipedia, accessed July 10, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025%E2%80%932026_Iran%E2%80%93United_States_negotiations
6. 2026 Iranian supreme leader election – Wikipedia, accessed July 10, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Iranian_supreme_leader_election
7. After Khamenei: Planning for Iran’s Leadership Transition | Council on Foreign Relations, accessed July 10, 2026, https://www.cfr.org/reports/leadership-transition-in-iran
8. Khamenei’s Eclipse: Absolute Rule Crumbles into Paralysis and Infighting in Iran, accessed July 10, 2026, https://www.stimson.org/2025/khameneis-eclipse-absolute-rule-crumbles-into-paralysis-and-infighting-in-iran/
9. Middle East crisis: Funeral procession for supreme leader Ali Khamenei begins in Iran – as it happened, accessed July 10, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2026/jul/06/iran-middle-east-crisis-funeral-supreme-leader-ali-khamenei-tehran-latest-news-updates
10. Mojtaba Khamenei absence signals shifting role for Iran leader, accessed July 10, 2026, https://www.al-monitor.com/originals/2026/07/mojtaba-khamenei-absence-signals-shifting-role-iran-leader
11. The son who never appears: Iran buries a Supreme Leader — and inherits a ghost, accessed July 10, 2026, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/middle-east/the-son-who-never-appears-iran-buries-a-supreme-leader-and-inherits-a-ghost/articleshow/132220312.cms
12. First Thing: Iran begins long farewell to former supreme leader with calls for Trump’s death, accessed July 10, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jul/06/first-thing-iran-supreme-leader-ali-khamenei-funeral-trump
13. Iran prepares for dayslong funeral for late Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, killed in war, accessed July 10, 2026, https://apnews.com/article/ali-khamenei-funeral-supreme-leader-iran-us-war-july-3-2026-554d4f05f43ebbb86f81821eb18c0927
14. Khamenei’s Funeral Is Meant to Project Strength. But Iran’s New Leader Has Yet to Appear, accessed July 10, 2026, https://time.com/article/2026/07/05/khamenei-s-funeral-is-meant-to-project-strength-but-iran-s-new-leader-has-yet-to-appear/
15. Iran Israel War | Mohammad Baqer Zolqadr appointed Iran’s new security chief – The Hindu, accessed July 10, 2026, https://www.thehindu.com/news/international/mohammad-baqer-zolqadr-iran-new-security-chief/article70779680.ece
16. Ali Khamenei – Wikipedia, accessed July 10, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ali_Khamenei
17. Mojtaba Khamenei was hurt in strike that killed his father, Iran’s Cyprus ambassador confirms – The Guardian, accessed July 10, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/mar/11/mojtaba-khamenei-was-hurt-in-strike-that-killed-his-father-irans-cyprus-ambassador-confirms
18. After Khamenei – Verfassungsblog, accessed July 10, 2026, https://verfassungsblog.de/after-khamenei/
19. What Mojtaba Khamenei’s Absence From Father’s Funeral Reveals …, accessed July 10, 2026, https://www.rferl.org/a/iran-mojtaba-khamenei-irgc-funeral/33800891.html
20. What Kind of Supreme Leader Would Mojtaba Khamenei Be? – The Washington Institute, accessed July 10, 2026, https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/what-kind-supreme-leader-would-mojtaba-khamenei-be
21. Iran’s Power Structure Adapts to War – The Soufan Center, accessed July 10, 2026, https://thesoufancenter.org/intelbrief-2026-march-26/
22. accessed July 10, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Iranian_supreme_leader_election#:~:text=Early%20on%209%20March%2C%20the,roughly%2050%20or%20more%22%20votes.
23. The Blogs: Flattering Iran: The Biggest Mistake Israel Can Make …, accessed July 10, 2026, https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/flattering-iran-the-biggest-mistake-israel-can-make/
24. Israel’s plan for a new Iran war, accessed July 10, 2026, https://www.spectator.com.au/2026/07/israels-plan-for-a-new-iran-war/
25. Iran’s elite locked in power struggle after Khamenei, analysis says, accessed July 10, 2026, https://middle-east-online.com/en/irans-elite-locked-power-struggle-after-khamenei-analysis-says
26. Mojtaba Khamenei alive but IRGC takes control of Iranian regime | The Jerusalem Post, accessed July 10, 2026, https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-890716
27. Mojtaba Khamenei’s Injuries and the MOU Authority Gap, accessed July 10, 2026, https://houseofsaud.com/mojtaba-khamenei-physical-incapacitation-mou/
28. Hiding, in Coma or Dead? Mystery Deepens Over Mojtaba Khamenei After Injury Claim; Trump Hints… |4K – YouTube, accessed July 10, 2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CE_GuzBP_wY
29. Iran uses Khamenei funeral to project regime strength – BICOM, accessed July 10, 2026, https://www.bicom.org.uk/iran-uses-khamenei-funeral-to-project-regime-strength/
30. Successor in hiding? Three of Ali Khamenei’s sons attend funeral, Mojtaba skips, accessed July 10, 2026, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/middle-east/where-is-mojtaba-irans-new-supreme-leader-skips-father-ali-khameneis-funeral/articleshow/132193516.cms
31. Where is Mojtaba Khamenei? Iran’s Supreme Leader still missing ahead of father’s burial, accessed July 10, 2026, https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/where-is-mojtaba-khamenei-iran-supreme-leader-missing-ahead-of-father-ayatollah-ali-khamenei-burial-mashhad-july-9-101783316015280.html
32. Mojtaba Khamenei – Wikipedia, accessed July 10, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mojtaba_Khamenei
33. Body of slain Iranian supreme leader arrives at Shi’ite shrine for burial, accessed July 10, 2026, https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2026/jul/09/body-of-slain-iranian-supreme-leader-arrives-at-sh/
34. If Mojtaba Khamenei Is Injured, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Is Running Iran, accessed July 10, 2026, https://www.meforum.org/mef-observer/if-mojtaba-khamenei-is-injured-the-islamic-revolutionary-guard-corps-is-running-iran
35. Iran Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei Missing – House of Saud, accessed July 10, 2026, https://houseofsaud.com/iran-supreme-leader-mojtaba-khamenei-missing-trump-dead/
36. A photo of Iran’s bombed schoolgirl graveyard went viral. Why did AI say it wasn’t real?, accessed July 10, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2026/mar/17/atrocity-ai-slop-verify-facts-iran-minab-graves
37. How AI Content Detection is Being Weaponized in the Iran War | TechPolicy.Press, accessed July 10, 2026, https://www.techpolicy.press/how-ai-content-detection-is-being-weaponized-in-the-iran-war/
38. US-Iran war: Fake AI satellite imagery spurs disinformation – Global News, accessed July 10, 2026, https://globalnation.inquirer.net/313115/us-iran-war-fake-ai-satellite-imagery-spurs-disinformation
39. Extra Edition: Iran mourns Khamenei united against Trump – and uncertain of its future, accessed July 10, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jul/09/iran-mourns-khamenei-united-against-trump-and-uncertain-of-its-future
40. Where Is Mojtaba Khamenei? Three Sons of Iran’s Late Ayatollah Appeared at His Funeral, but the Successor Was Missing – Reddit, accessed July 10, 2026, https://www.reddit.com/r/geopolitics/comments/1uohkc6/where_is_mojtaba_khamenei_three_sons_of_irans/
41. The Iranian Regime Is Fracturing; Open Conflict Could Be Next, accessed July 10, 2026, https://www.meforum.org/mef-online/the-iranian-regime-is-fracturing-open-conflict-could-be-next
42. The Islamic Republic 3.0: Who Holds Power In Iran? – Radio Free Europe, accessed July 10, 2026, https://www.rferl.org/a/iran-irgc-khamenei-qalibaf/33756085.html
43. U.S., Iran trade dozens more strikes in dangerous cycle, accessed July 10, 2026, https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2026/07/08/trump-declares-ceasefire-with-iran-has-ended/
44. Iran’s Post-Conflict Political Structure – Analysis – Eurasia Review, accessed July 10, 2026, https://www.eurasiareview.com/15062026-irans-post-conflict-political-structure-analysis/
45. Iran negotiator Ghalibaf says it’s ready for ‘all-out defense,’ won’t surrender, accessed July 10, 2026, https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/iran-negotiator-ghalibaf-says-its-ready-for-all-out-defense-wont-surrender/
46. The end of one-man rule? Iran tests life after Khamenei, accessed July 10, 2026, https://www.iranintl.com/en/202607070775
47. ‘Blatant corruption’: New US sanctions target Mojtaba Khamenei’s moneyman, accessed July 10, 2026, https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/blatant-corruption-new-us-sanctions-target-mojtaba-khameneis-moneyman/
48. Islamabad Memorandum – Wikipedia, accessed July 10, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamabad_Memorandum
49. Trump says U.S. and Iran will keep talking but declares ceasefire ‘OVER!’, accessed July 10, 2026, https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2026/07/10/trump-says-us-iran-will-keep-talking-declares-ceasefire-over/
50. Tehran divided over what Khamenei MoU message really meant | Iran International, accessed July 10, 2026, https://www.iranintl.com/en/202606195968
51. Fact check – CyberPeace Foundation, accessed July 10, 2026, https://cyberpeace.org/resources/fact-check?99fd07b9_page=6
52. Shifting from Diplomatic Urgency to Strategic Patience on Iran | The Washington Institute, accessed July 10, 2026, https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/shifting-diplomatic-urgency-strategic-patience-iran
53. No signs of life from new Iranian leader Mojtaba Khamenei | The Jerusalem Post, accessed July 10, 2026, https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/iran-news/article-889759
54. Tehran launches more strikes as Israel warns it is ready to strike Iran again ‘with even greater force’ – as it happened, accessed July 10, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2026/jul/09/iran-us-middle-east-strikes-centcom-bahrain-kuwait-qatar-strait-of-hormuz-latest-news-updates
55. Iran-US MoU draws praise and backlash across Tehran’s political spectrum, accessed July 10, 2026, https://www.iranintl.com/en/202606155980
56. Let Iran Defeat Itself | The Washington Institute, accessed July 10, 2026, https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/let-iran-defeat-itself
57. Election of Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei as the new Leader of Islamic Republic of Iran, accessed July 10, 2026, https://colombo.mfa.gov.ir/en/newsview/785539/election-of-ayatollah-mojtaba-khamenei-as-the-new-leader-of-islamic-republic-of-iran