Category Archives: Firearms Building and Gunsmithing

How to build and/or gunsmith on certain platforms.

Section 1: Introduction – Deconstructing the Myth of Soviet “Cosmoline”

For any collector of 20th-century military surplus firearms, the experience is a familiar one: opening a wooden crate or unwrapping a paper-and-oilcloth bundle to reveal a piece of history, entombed in a thick, sticky, amber-to-dark-brown grease. This ubiquitous substance, the bane of many an enthusiast, is the primary barrier between acquiring a historical artifact and rendering it a functional firearm.¹ In the United States and the broader Western world, this preservative is almost universally known by the genericized trademark “Cosmoline.” However, when dealing with arms originating from the former Soviet Union and its client states, this term is a misnomer. The waxy preservative slathered on everything from Mosin-Nagant rifles to SKS carbines and Kalashnikov parts kits is a distinct substance, developed and standardized under a completely different system to meet a unique set of strategic and environmental challenges.

The true subject of this analysis is the primary Soviet-era long-term corrosion inhibitor, known officially as Смазка защитная ПВК (Smázka zashchítnaya PVK), which translates to “Protective Grease PVK”.³ While this is its technical designation, it is far more widely known by its colloquial name:

пушечное сало (pushechnoye salo), or “cannon lard”.³ This evocative nickname is a critical first clue to understanding the material’s context.

The term ‘salo’ holds a deep cultural significance in Russia, Ukraine, and other Slavic nations. It refers to slabs of cured pork fatback, a traditional and enduring food staple, particularly valued for its high energy content and long shelf life.⁶ The preservative’s thick, greasy, and often off-white to yellowish-brown appearance bore a striking resemblance to this familiar food item, leading soldiers and depot workers to adopt the practical and descriptive moniker “cannon lard.”

This act of naming military equipment after a mundane, greasy object is not unique to the Soviet experience. It reveals a fundamental aspect of soldiering culture that transcends ideology and national borders. A striking parallel can be found in the American military’s nickname for the M3 submachine gun. Due to its simple, stamped-metal construction and resemblance to a common mechanic’s tool, the M3 was almost universally dubbed the “Grease Gun”.¹⁰ In both cases—”cannon lard” and “grease gun”—the premier military powers of the Cold War independently arrived at similar colloquialisms rooted in the practical, unglamorous, and greasy realities of their equipment. This is not a mere coincidence; it reflects a shared “grunt-level” perspective, where soldiers relate to the tools of their trade not through official nomenclature but through visceral, descriptive, and often slightly pejorative terms. Understanding this parallel provides a humanizing context for the technical analysis that follows, grounding the chemistry and doctrine in the everyday language of the men who used these weapons.

Section 2: A Comparative Analysis: Soviet ПВК vs. American Cosmoline

To fully understand pushechnoye salo, it is essential to analyze its specific formulation and properties, contrasting them with the American product that has lent its name to the entire category of military preservatives. This comparison reveals two parallel yet distinct technological solutions to the common problem of long-term metal preservation.

The Soviet Standard: ГОСТ 19537-83 and Смазка ПВК

The production and quality of pushechnoye salo were governed by a strict state standard, or ГОСТ (Государственный стандарт). The primary standard for this grease was ГОСТ 19537-83, which superseded earlier versions like ГОСТ 10586-63 and ГОСТ 3005-51.³ GOST standards were mandatory benchmarks in the Soviet Union, ensuring uniformity and quality control across its vast industrial base.

Chemical Composition: According to GOST 19537-83, Смазка ПВК is a carefully formulated compound, not a simple grease. Its primary components are ⁴:

Base: A fusion of петролатум (petrolatum), a semi-solid mixture of hydrocarbons also known as petroleum jelly, and a viscous mineral oil. The specific type of petrolatum used could affect the final color, with some batches appearing light-yellow rather than the more common brown.
Additives: To enhance its protective properties, two key additives were introduced. The first is 5% церезин (ceresin), a refined, hard mineral wax derived from ozokerite, which increases the grease’s melting point and consistency. The second, and more critical, is the corrosion-inhibiting additive МНИ-7 (MNI-7). Technical sources identify MNI-7 as an oxidized ceresin, which improves the grease’s ability to adhere to surfaces and provides active anti-corrosion properties.

Physical Properties: The formulation of ПВК resulted in a set of physical characteristics tailored for the Soviet military’s specific needs ⁴:

Appearance: A thick, highly adhesive, sticky ointment, typically brown in color.
Thermal Behavior: The grease has a relatively low melting point, beginning to soften and flow at temperatures above 50°C (122°F). This property is crucial for its application, which was typically done by dipping heated parts into a molten vat of the grease. The MNI-7 additive was particularly important for improving its thixotropic properties, helping it to cling to vertical surfaces without slumping off entirely.
Cold Weather Performance: This is arguably the most critical feature of ПВК. While the grease becomes extremely thick and loses all mobility below 10°C (50°F), making cold application nearly impossible, it crucially retains its protective, corrosion-inhibiting film integrity down to -50°C (-58°F). At these extreme temperatures, it does not crack or flake away, ensuring the metal beneath remains sealed.
Water Resistance: Like all hydrocarbon-based greases, ПВК is completely insoluble in water. Its formulation provides exceptionally high water resistance, physically blocking moisture from reaching the metal surface, which is the cornerstone of its preservative capability.

The American Counterpart: MIL-C-11796C and Cosmoline

The substance known as Cosmoline has its own distinct history and specifications. It was originally developed by the chemical company Houghton International in the 1860s or 1870s, not as a rust preventive, but as a pharmaceutical product. It was used as a versatile ointment for everything from disinfecting wounds and treating veterinary ailments to promoting hair growth.¹² Its transition to military use occurred when it received a government specification as a rust preventive, and it was subsequently used to protect equipment from the Spanish-American War through the Vietnam War.¹²

The modern standard for this type of preservative is U.S. Military Specification MIL-C-11796C, Class 3.

Chemical Composition: Chemically, Cosmoline is described as a homogenous mixture of oily and waxy long-chain, non-polar hydrocarbons. Its primary ingredient is a volatile aliphatic petroleum solvent.¹² This solvent keeps the compound in a viscous, grease-like state when fresh but is designed to slowly evaporate over time, leaving behind the more solid, waxy hydrocarbon protective layer.

Physical Properties:

Appearance: Cosmoline is consistently brown in color, though its viscosity can vary.¹²
Thermal Behavior: It has a melting point of 45–52°C (113–126°F), remarkably similar to its Soviet counterpart, ПВК. Its flash point is 185°C (365°F).¹² This similar melting range indicates that both the US and Soviet militaries arrived at a similar thermal window for a grease that was stable in most ambient conditions but could be easily liquefied with moderate heat for application and removal.

Table 1: Comparative Properties of Soviet ПВК vs. American Cosmoline

Property	Soviet Смазка ПВК	American Cosmoline
Official Designation	Смазка защитная ПВК (Protective Grease PVK)	Preservative and Sealing Compound
Governing Standard	ГОСТ 19537-83 ³	MIL-C-11796C, Class 3 ¹²
Colloquial Name	пушечное сало (Cannon Lard) ³	Cosmoline ¹²
Primary Chemical Base	Petrolatum and viscous mineral oil ⁴	Long-chain, non-polar hydrocarbons ¹²
Key Additives	Ceresin (mineral wax), MNI-7 (oxidized ceresin) ⁴	Aliphatic petroleum solvent (volatile) ¹²
Color	Brown or light-yellow ⁴	Brown ¹²
Melting Point	>50°C (122°F) ⁴	45–52°C (113–126°F) ¹²
Effective Low-Temp Range	Protects down to -50°C (-58°F) ⁴	Not specified, but used in global conflicts
Primary Application	Hot-dip immersion	Hot-dip, brushing, or spraying

Section 3: The Doctrine of Preservation: Why the Red Army Greased Everything

The ubiquitous presence of pushechnoye salo on Soviet-bloc military hardware was not a matter of simple maintenance preference. It was the direct, tangible result of a deeply ingrained military doctrine shaped by geography, history, and the existential threat of the Cold War. The grease itself is an artifact of a strategic philosophy that prioritized mass, endurance, and readiness for a conflict of unimaginable scale.

Strategic Depth and Long-Term Storage

Soviet military doctrine during the Cold War was fundamentally oriented toward preparing for a massive, protracted, and highly attritional ground war against the combined forces of NATO.¹⁵ This was not a strategy built around short, decisive conflicts, but one that anticipated a continent-spanning struggle that would require the total mobilization of the state’s resources over a long period. This doctrine of “deep operation” and continuous combat necessitated the production and storage of immense quantities of military materiel. For every tank, rifle, and artillery piece in active service, there were many more held in strategic reserve, ready to equip wave after wave of mobilized divisions.¹⁸

This created a colossal logistical challenge: millions of weapons, vehicles, and spare parts had to be preserved in a state of readiness for years, or even decades, awaiting the call to war. The primary enemy during this long wait was not a foreign power, but the slow, relentless process of corrosion. A rifle that has rusted in a depot is as useless as one destroyed in battle. Therefore, a cheap, effective, and reliable long-term preservative was not just a convenience; it was a cornerstone of Soviet strategic readiness.

Warfare in a Harsh Climate

The physical properties of Смазка ПВК were meticulously tailored to the geographic and environmental realities of the Soviet Union and its likely theaters of war. The operational landscape stretched from the humid shores of the Black Sea to the frozen tundra of the Arctic Circle. The disastrous experience of the German Wehrmacht during Operation Barbarossa served as a powerful, enduring lesson for Soviet planners. In the winter of 1941, standard German lubricants for everything from machine guns to tank engines froze solid, crippling their war machine at the gates of Moscow.¹⁹

The Soviets learned this lesson intimately. The specification that ПВК must maintain its protective integrity without cracking or flaking at temperatures down to -50°C (-58°F) was a direct response to this historical reality.⁴ It was a critical design requirement, ensuring that weapons pulled from a frozen Siberian depot would be protected from corrosion until they could be de-preserved and issued. This institutional focus on extreme cold-weather operations was evident in many areas of Soviet practice, such as the field-expedient technique of thinning engine oil with gasoline to start tanks and aircraft in sub-zero temperatures.²⁰

A System, Not a Substance: The ЕСЗКС

It is crucial to understand that Смазка ПВК did not exist in a vacuum. It was one component within a vast, highly structured, and state-mandated framework known as the ЕСЗКС (Единая система защиты от коррозии и старения), or the “Unified System of Corrosion and Ageing Protection”.²¹ This system, codified in a library of interlocking GOST standards, governed every aspect of material preservation for the entire Soviet state, from military hardware to industrial machinery.

The existence of numerous related standards, such as ГОСТ 9.054-75, which detailed the accelerated testing methods for preservative oils and greases, and ГОСТ 10877-76, which specified a different type of preservative oil known as К-17, demonstrates the system’s depth and complexity.²¹ The ЕСЗКС prescribed specific types of oils, greases, inhibited papers, and polymer films for different metals, alloys, and storage conditions. It was a holistic, centrally planned approach to defeating material degradation.

This systemic approach reveals the true significance of preservation in Soviet strategic thought. The development and rigid standardization of materials like ПВК were not mundane maintenance tasks. They were a direct expression of a military doctrine predicated on winning a long war through industrial endurance and the overwhelming force of mobilized reserves. In this context, the ability to store millions of rifles for fifty years in perfect condition was as vital to national defense as the ability to manufacture new tanks. The thick, stubborn grease found on a surplus Mosin-Nagant today is, therefore, more than just gunk; it is a physical remnant of Cold War strategic planning, a monument to a philosophy that equated preservation with power.

Section 4: The Aging Process: From Viscous Grease to Hardened Shell

The effectiveness of preservatives like Смазка ПВК and Cosmoline is finite. Over decades of storage, their physical and chemical properties change, transforming them from a pliable grease into the hardened, waxy shell that collectors know well. This aging process was an understood and accepted part of long-term storage doctrine.

Mechanisms of Aging: Evaporation and Oxidation

The hardening of these preservatives is primarily driven by two chemical processes:

Solvent Evaporation: American Cosmoline, in particular, is formulated with a volatile aliphatic petroleum solvent.¹² This solvent is designed to keep the preservative in a viscous, easily applicable state. Over time, especially with exposure to air, these volatile organic compounds (VOCs) evaporate.¹² As the solvent fraction dissipates, what remains is the much harder, wax-like hydrocarbon base, which solidifies on the metal’s surface.¹² This process can begin within a few years of air exposure.¹²
Oxidation: All petroleum-based lubricants, including the base oils in ПВК and Cosmoline, are susceptible to oxidation—a chemical reaction with atmospheric oxygen.⁵⁰ This process is accelerated by heat and the presence of metal contaminants, which act as catalysts.⁵⁰ Oxidation breaks down the lubricant’s base oil and depletes its protective additives, leading to an increase in viscosity, the formation of organic acids, and eventually sludge and varnish.⁵¹ While both preservatives contain antioxidant additives to slow this process, over many decades, oxidation contributes to the overall hardening and degradation of the protective film.⁵⁰

Intended Lifespan and the Reality of Strategic Reserves

Soviet military planners, operating under a doctrine of preparing for a prolonged, attritional war, intended for their equipment to be preserved for many decades.⁵³ The goal was not a commercial shelf life of a few years, but a strategic one that could last indefinitely until the materiel was needed.⁵³ Evidence from recent conflicts, where Russia has pulled tanks and artillery from storage that date back to the 1960s, ’50s, or even ’40s, confirms that the intended preservation period was at least 50 to 80 years.⁵⁵

While modern commercial rust preventatives often list a shelf life of 2 to 5 years, this is a guarantee for optimal performance under specified conditions.⁵⁶ The actual effective lifespan of military-grade preservatives, especially when hermetically sealed away from open air, is vastly longer.¹² The Soviets understood that the grease would age and harden, but this was an acceptable trade-off for multi-decade corrosion protection.⁵³

The Challenge of Hardened Preservative: Then vs. Now

The difficulty of removing these preservatives is directly related to their age and storage conditions. This creates a significant difference between the original Raskonservatsiya process and the task facing a modern collector.

Ideal Timeframe (Fresh Application): When freshly applied or removed from sealed storage, both ПВК and Cosmoline are in their intended viscous, grease-like state. In this condition, the preservative can be largely removed by simply wiping it off with a rag, with minimal need for aggressive solvents.¹² This is the scenario for which the simple Soviet field protocol was designed.
Modern Challenge (Aged Application): After decades of exposure to air, the preservative has solidified into a hard, waxy varnish.¹² This hardened shell does not wipe off easily and is resistant to simple manual cleaning. It requires laborious scraping or, more effectively, the application of heat to melt the wax and chemical solvents to dissolve the hardened hydrocarbons.¹² This is why modern removal methods involving heat guns, boiling water, solvents, and ultrasonic cleaners are not just for convenience—they are a necessity to overcome the chemical changes the preservative has undergone over 50+ years.

Section 5: The Official Soviet Method: Расконсервация per GOST 9.014-78

Just as the application of preservatives was rigidly standardized, so too was their removal. The official process, known as Расконсервация (Raskonservatsiya)—literally “de-preservation” or “de-mothballing”—was designed for simplicity, scalability, and execution by conscript soldiers with minimal specialized equipment. The general requirements for this process were laid out in the overarching standard ГОСТ 9.014-78, “Temporary corrosion protection of products. General requirements”.²⁴

Reconstructing the Official Protocol

By analyzing ГОСТ 9.014-78 and related Russian-language military and technical manuals, the official field-level procedure for bringing a preserved weapon into service can be reconstructed. It was a pragmatic, multi-step process:

Step 1: Mechanical Removal. The first and most intuitive step was the bulk removal of the preservative. Soldiers would use dry, clean rags (ветошью) or soft paper to wipe off as much of the thick, external layer of ПВК as possible.²⁸ This removed the majority of the material without the use of any chemicals.
Step 2: Solvent Application. For the thick, hardened grease that remained, especially in crevices and internal mechanisms, the use of a solvent was prescribed. The most commonly cited and widely available solvent for this task in the Soviet military was керосин (kerosene).²⁹ The procedure did not typically involve soaking the entire weapon. Instead, a rag would be moistened with kerosene and used to wipe down the remaining preservative, dissolving it for easy removal.
Step 3: Degreasing and Final Wiping. After the preservative was fully removed, the surfaces were wiped down with a degreasing agent (обезжиривателем) if available, and then thoroughly wiped with a clean, dry cloth to remove any solvent residue.²⁸ This step was critical to ensure the surface was clean and dry before re-lubrication.
Step 4: Re-lubrication. The final and most important step was the immediate application of a thin layer of standard-issue neutral gun oil (нейтрального оружейного масла).²⁸ A surface freshly stripped of its heavy preservative by solvents is highly susceptible to flash rusting, so this re-application of a light, protective oil film was essential to prepare the weapon for service and protect it from short-term corrosion.

The Doctrine of “Good Enough” in Practice

The striking feature of the official Raskonservatsiya protocol is its sheer simplicity. It eschews complex chemicals, specialized heating apparatus, or electricity-dependent tools. This was not an oversight but a deliberate and intelligent design choice, reflecting a core tenet of Soviet operational philosophy: dostatochno, or sufficiency. The system was not designed to be the most elegant, the fastest, or the most forensically perfect method possible. It was designed to be the most robust, reliable, and effective method for the specific context of the Soviet military.

In a mass mobilization scenario, a procedure requiring sophisticated technology would be a logistical bottleneck and a critical point of failure. A process based on rags, kerosene, and elbow grease, however, is almost infinitely scalable. It could be performed by millions of conscripts with minimal training, in depots, rail yards, or forward assembly areas, using commonly available materials.³² The official Soviet method was the epitome of pragmatism—a “good enough” solution that guaranteed that a preserved rifle could be made ready for battle, anywhere, anytime.

Section 6: The Modern Armorer’s Guide: Top 5 Removal Methods Evaluated

While the official Soviet method was effective for its time and purpose, the modern firearms collector has access to a wider array of tools and chemicals that can make the process of Raskonservatsiya faster, easier, and more thorough. The following analysis evaluates the top five modern methods, including the heated ultrasonic technique, providing a practical guide for today’s enthusiast.

General Principles for All Methods

Before undertaking any removal process, several universal principles should be observed to ensure safety and effectiveness:

Full Disassembly: For a thorough cleaning, the firearm must be completely disassembled. This allows access to all surfaces, including the bore, chamber, bolt internals, trigger group, and small pins and springs where preservative can hide and cause malfunctions.³³
Safety First: The work area must be well-ventilated, especially when using volatile solvents. Appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE), such as nitrile or other chemical-resistant gloves, is essential. When using flammable solvents like mineral spirits or kerosene, all ignition sources must be eliminated.³³
Proper Waste Disposal: The removed grease and solvent mixture is considered hazardous waste. It should never be poured down a drain or onto the ground. It will solidify and cause blockages, and it contaminates the environment. It should be collected and disposed of in accordance with local regulations for hazardous materials.¹²

Method 1: Heated Ultrasonic Cleaning

This method, employed by the user who initiated this query, combines heat, water, a degreasing agent, and high-frequency sound waves to achieve a deep clean.

Procedure: Disassembled metal parts are placed in the wire basket of an ultrasonic cleaner. The tank is filled with hot water and a water-based degreasing solution. Common choices include Simple Green, Zep Citrus Degreaser, or specialized gun cleaning concentrates like those from Hornady or Lyman.³⁴ A dilution ratio of 1 part degreaser to 5 or 10 parts water is typical.³⁴ The unit’s heater is engaged, and the ultrasonic transducer is run for several cycles (e.g., 5-15 minutes each), with parts being rearranged between cycles. The heat melts the
ПВК, while the ultrasonic cavitation creates microscopic bubbles that implode on the part’s surface, scrubbing away the liquefied grease from every corner, thread, and crevice. After cleaning, parts must be immediately and thoroughly rinsed with hot water, dried completely (compressed air is ideal), and coated with a water-displacing oil (like WD-40 or Brownell’s Water Displacing Oil) or a standard gun oil to prevent rapid flash rusting.³⁴
Analysis: This is arguably the most effective, efficient, and thorough method for cleaning metal parts. Its ability to penetrate and clean internal channels, such as firing pin holes and gas ports, is unmatched by manual methods.³⁴ It is a validation of the user’s preferred technique.
Caveats: This method requires a significant upfront investment in an ultrasonic cleaner of sufficient size and power; small, underpowered jewelry cleaners are not suitable.³⁴ It is not safe for wood or most polymer parts. While generally safe for durable military finishes like bluing and parkerizing, there is some anecdotal concern that overly aggressive chemical solutions or excessive cleaning times could potentially harm delicate or worn finishes.³⁷

Method 2: Solvent Immersion

This is a classic and highly effective chemical approach to dissolving the preservative.

Procedure: Disassembled metal parts are fully submerged in a bath of a suitable petroleum-based solvent. The most highly recommended and effective solvents are mineral spirits and kerosene.¹ Diesel fuel and even gasoline have been used, but their high flammability and noxious fumes make them significantly more hazardous.³⁹ For long parts like barrels and receivers, a popular and efficient setup involves using a section of PVC pipe, capped at one end and filled with solvent.¹ After a period of soaking, parts are removed and scrubbed with nylon brushes to remove the softened grease. Because solvents strip all oils from the metal, a thorough post-cleaning lubrication is absolutely critical.
Analysis: An extremely effective method that chemically breaks down the preservative. It is less expensive in terms of initial equipment cost compared to ultrasonic cleaning.
Caveats: This method involves the use of flammable and volatile chemicals, requiring extreme care regarding ventilation and ignition sources. It generates a significant volume of liquid hazardous waste that must be disposed of properly. The process is inherently messy.

Method 3: Thermal Application (Non-Immersion)

This method relies on heat to melt the preservative without submerging the parts in a liquid.

Procedure: This technique varies for metal and wood.

For Metal Parts: A heat gun on a low setting or a standard hair dryer can be used to gently and evenly heat disassembled parts, causing the grease to liquefy and drip off onto a collection surface like a cardboard box or aluminum foil.³³ Some users place parts on wire racks in an oven set to a low temperature (e.g., 200-250°F or ~95-120°C), with a drip pan below.⁴⁰
For Wood Stocks: This is the premier method for removing the grease that has soaked deep into the wood grain. The stock is wrapped in absorbent material like paper towels or brown paper bags, then placed inside a black plastic trash bag. This assembly is then left in a hot environment, such as the dashboard of a car on a sunny day, or inside a homemade “hot box” constructed from a metal trash can and a low-wattage incandescent light bulb.¹ The heat causes the grease to “sweat” out of the wood, where it is absorbed by the paper. The process is repeated with fresh paper until the wood no longer sweats grease.

Analysis: An excellent, low-cost method for removing the bulk of the preservative with minimal use of chemicals. It is the safest and most effective method for cleaning original wood stocks without damaging them.
Caveats: Poses a fire risk if parts are overheated with a heat gun or in an oven. Wood can be scorched or damaged if the heat is too intense or applied unevenly.³² The process can be slow and messy.

Method 4: Aqueous Immersion (Boiling Water)

This method uses the heat of boiling water to melt and separate the preservative.

Procedure: Disassembled metal parts are placed in a large pot or tray (a metal wallpaper tray or a section of rain gutter works well for long parts) and covered with boiling water.³² The heat melts the
ПВК, which, being less dense than water, floats to the surface where it can be skimmed off. Adding a small amount of dish soap can help emulsify the grease. After removal from the water, the residual heat of the metal parts causes the water to evaporate very quickly, aiding in the drying process.
Analysis: This is a very low-cost, effective, and non-toxic method. It uses readily available materials and avoids flammable solvents.
Caveats: This method is only suitable for metal parts that can be safely submerged in boiling water. There is an obvious risk of burns from the hot water and steam. Immediate and thorough drying and oiling are absolutely critical, as the bare, hot, wet steel will begin to flash rust almost instantly upon exposure to air.

Method 5: Manual Cleaning with Modern Degreasers

This is the most direct, hands-on approach, relying on “elbow grease” and modern cleaning agents.

Procedure: This method involves physically scrubbing the preservative off using shop rags, nylon brushes, toothbrushes, Q-tips, and pipe cleaners, aided by a spray-on cleaning agent. A wide variety of products have been used successfully, including citrus-based degreasers, Simple Green, Dawn Powerwash foam, and even foaming bathroom cleaners like Scrubbing Bubbles.³² Some users employ harsher chemicals like brake cleaner, but this must be done with caution.⁴⁰ The process is one of spraying, scrubbing, wiping, and repeating until the part is clean.
Analysis: This method requires the least specialized equipment and is well-suited for firearms with only a light coating of preservative or for targeted touch-up cleaning after an immersion method.
Caveats: It is by far the most labor-intensive and time-consuming method.¹ It is difficult to achieve the same level of thoroughness in hard-to-reach areas compared to immersion techniques. Harsher chemicals like brake cleaner can damage wood, plastics, and some painted or delicate metal finishes.⁴⁰

Table 2: Ranking of Modern Removal Methods

Method	Effectiveness	Safety	Cost (Initial)	Speed	Primary Application
Heated Ultrasonic Cleaning	5/5	4/5	1/5	5/5	Metal Parts
Solvent Immersion	5/5	2/5	3/5	4/5	Metal Parts
Thermal Application	4/5	3/5	4/5	2/5	Metal & Wood
Aqueous Immersion (Boiling)	4/5	3/5	5/5	3/5	Metal Parts
Manual Degreasing	3/5	4/5	5/5	1/5	Metal & Wood (Light)
Ratings are on a 1-5 scale, where 5 is highest/best.

Section 7: Conclusion and Recommendations

This analysis has deconstructed the substance colloquially known as “Cosmoline” in the context of Soviet-bloc firearms, identifying it correctly and placing it within its proper historical, chemical, and doctrinal framework. The investigation yields several key conclusions for the collector and historian.

Summary of Findings:

The primary long-term preservative used by the Soviet military was not Cosmoline, but a distinct substance designated Смазка ПВК, governed by ГОСТ 19537-83. Known colloquially as pushechnoye salo (“cannon lard”), it is a petrolatum-based grease fortified with ceresin wax and an oxidized ceresin corrosion inhibitor.
The development and widespread use of this specific preservative was a direct consequence of Soviet military doctrine. This doctrine anticipated a protracted, large-scale war, necessitating the long-term strategic storage of millions of weapons. The preservative’s exceptional performance in extreme cold was a critical requirement born from the harsh geography of the USSR and the hard-learned lessons of the Second World War.
Over decades, these preservatives age and harden due to the evaporation of volatile solvents and chemical oxidation. This hardening process is why modern, aggressive cleaning methods are necessary, as the original, simple field-cleaning protocols are insufficient for the solidified material found on surplus firearms today.¹²
The official Soviet removal procedure, Raskonservatsiya, was a model of pragmatic simplicity, designed for execution by conscript soldiers using common materials like rags and kerosene. Modern collectors, however, have access to a variety of more advanced and thorough techniques.

Final Verdict on the “Best” Method:

For the serious collector or armorer seeking the most thorough and efficient cleaning of disassembled metal firearm components, heated ultrasonic cleaning represents the current pinnacle of technology and effectiveness. It offers unparalleled deep-cleaning capabilities, especially for intricate parts and internal channels, validating the method preferred by the user who prompted this report.

However, no single method is universally perfect for all parts of a firearm. Therefore, the optimal strategy is often a hybrid approach:

Use the Thermal Application method (e.g., the “sun and black bag” technique) to safely sweat the preservative out of the wooden stock and handguards.
Use Heated Ultrasonic Cleaning for all disassembled metal parts to achieve a forensically clean state.
Follow up with a meticulous manual inspection and touch-up, immediate and thorough drying, and a proper application of high-quality gun oil to all metal surfaces.

This combined methodology leverages the strengths of each technique, ensuring that a historical artifact is not only cleaned but properly conserved for its next chapter of life in the hands of a collector.

Glossary of Key Russian Terms

Смазка ПВК (Smázka PVK): “Protective Grease PVK.” The official designation for the primary Soviet long-term firearms preservative.
пушечное сало (pushechnoye salo): “Cannon Lard.” The widespread colloquial name for Смазка ПВК.
ГОСТ (GOST): Государственный стандарт or “State Standard.” The system of mandatory technical standards in the Soviet Union.
ЕСЗКС (YeSZKS): Единая система защиты от коррозии и старения or “Unified System of Corrosion and Ageing Protection.” The comprehensive state-level system for material preservation.
Расконсервация (Raskonservatsiya): “De-preservation” or “De-mothballing.” The process of removing preservative grease to make equipment ready for service.
керосин (kerosín): Kerosene. The standard field solvent used for Raskonservatsiya.

If you find this post useful, please share the link on Facebook, with your friends, etc. Your support is much appreciated and if you have any feedback, please email me at in**@*********ps.com. Please note that for links to other websites, I may be paid via an affiliate program such as Avantlink, Impact, Amazon and eBay.

Works cited

How to Properly Remove Cosmoline from Military Surplus Firearms – Schafco, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.originalcosmoline.com/shop/how-to-properly-remove-cosmoline-from-military-surplus-firearms/
Gooey Gat Gunk Bustin’ Cosmoline Removal 101! [Guide] – YouTube, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rK1xoB1HzeQ
Смазка ПВК (пушечное сало) – Деловая сеть, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.ds37.ru/goods/1334060/
Смазка Пушечная (ПВК) ГОСТ 19537-83, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.bnhp.ru/catalog/smazki/smazka_pushechnaya_pvk_gost_19537_83/
Пушечное сало пвк гост 19537 74 купить – Яндекс Маркет, accessed July 30, 2025, https://market.yandex.ru/search?text=%D0%9F%D1%83%D1%88%D0%B5%D1%87%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B5%20%D1%81%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%BE%20%D0%BF%D0%B2%D0%BA%20%D0%B3%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%2019537%2074%20%D0%BA%D1%83%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%8C
Cured Pork Fat (Salo) – GastroSenses, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.gastrosenses.com/blog/cured-pork-fat-salo/
Salo – Gastro Obscura, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.atlasobscura.com/foods/salo-pork-ukraine
Salo (food) – Wikipedia, accessed July 30, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salo_(food)
Ukrainian Pork Lard (Salo) Dish – Etnocook, accessed July 30, 2025, https://etnocook.com/ukrainian-pork-lard-salo-dish/
M3 submachine gun – Wikipedia, accessed July 30, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M3_submachine_gun
The Controversial M3 Grease Gun – Warfare History Network, accessed July 30, 2025, https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/article/the-controversial-m3-grease-gun/
Cosmoline – Wikipedia, accessed July 30, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmoline
Dealing With Cosmoline – Firearms Legal Protection, accessed July 30, 2025, https://firearmslegal.com/dealing-with-cosmoline/
Cosmoline Rust Preventives, RP-342 Military-Grade Sprays & More, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.cosmolinedirect.com/
Seven Principles of Soviet Tactical Doctrine – Marine Corps …, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.mca-marines.org/gazette/seven-principles-of-soviet-tactical-doctrine/
The Soviet Army: Operations and Tactics – Intelligence Resource Program, accessed July 30, 2025, https://irp.fas.org/doddir/army/fm100-2-1.pdf
The Truth About the Evolution of Russian Military Doctrine – The National Interest, accessed July 30, 2025, https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/truth-about-evolution-russian-military-doctrine-203327
What military equipment did the Soviets have that was superior to it’s NATO counterpart?, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/history/comments/a71emp/what_military_equipment_did_the_soviets_have_that/
Operation ‘Barbarossa’ And Germany’s Failure In The Soviet Union – Imperial War Museums, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.iwm.org.uk/history/operation-barbarossa-and-germanys-failure-in-the-soviet-union
Is it true that Soviet infantry mixed kerosene with regular lubricants to allow their weapons to function in the frigid winter weather at Stalingrad, and that not doing this made the Germans’ weapons fail? – Quora, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.quora.com/Is-it-true-that-Soviet-infantry-mixed-kerosene-with-regular-lubricants-to-allow-their-weapons-to-function-in-the-frigid-winter-weather-at-Stalingrad-and-that-not-doing-this-made-the-Germans-weapons-fail
ГОСТ 9.054-75 ЕСЗКС. Консервационные масла, смазки, accessed July 30, 2025, https://online.budstandart.com/ru/catalog/doc-page.html?id_doc=97234
ГОСТ 9.054-75 Единая система защиты от коррозии и старения (ЕСЗКС). Консервационные масла, смазки и ингибированные пленкообразующие нефтяные составы. Методы ускоренных испытаний защитной способности (с Изменениями N 1, 2, 3, 4), accessed July 30, 2025, https://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200015029
ГОСТ 9.014-78 Единая система защиты от коррозии и старения (ЕСЗКС). Временная противокоррозионная защита изделий. Общие требования (С Изменениями N 1-6) – docs.cntd.ru, accessed July 30, 2025, https://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200004940
Скачать ГОСТ 9.014-78 Единая система защиты от коррозии и старения. Временная противокоррозионная защита изделий. Общие требования – Нормативные базы ГОСТ/СП/СНиП, accessed July 30, 2025, https://files.stroyinf.ru/Index2/1/4294848/4294848788.htm
ГОСТ 10877-76 Масло консервационное К-17 (с Изменениями …, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.tdesant.ru/info/item/222
ГОСТ 9.014-78. Единая система защиты от коррозии и старения. Временная противокоррозионная защита изделий. Общие требования – Интернет и Право, accessed July 30, 2025, https://internet-law.ru/gosts/gost/4681/
ГОСТ 9.014-78 «Единая система защиты от коррозии и старения (ЕСЗКС). Временная противокоррозионная защита изделий. Общие требования – Параграф, accessed July 30, 2025, https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=39708476
Как чистить оружие после покупки (расконсервация): пошаговый …, accessed July 30, 2025, https://kalashnikov.market/articles/reviews/kak-chistit-oruzhie-posle-pokupki-raskonservaciya
Уход за Оружием. Практические советы по чистке и смазке. – Рыболовный форум, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.bylkov.ru/forum/67-2960-1
Пушечное сало (для задувки), антикор – Автоклуб ВАЗ 2106, accessed July 30, 2025, http://vaz-2106.ru/forum/index.php?showtopic=11109&st=60
Чистка и смазка гладкоствольного оружия: инструкция и материалы – ТЕМП, accessed July 30, 2025, https://tempgun.ru/blog/sovety-okhotnikam-i-strelkam/chistka-i-smazka-gladkostvolnogo-oruzhiya-instruktsiya-i-materialy/
Buying my first SKS soon. Concern, cosmoline cleaning – Reddit, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/SKS/comments/sla53m/buying_my_first_sks_soon_concern_cosmoline/
What is Cosmoline and How to Remove It – Gunsmithing Journal, accessed July 30, 2025, https://kurtthegunsmith.com/what-is-cosmoline-and-how-to-remove-it/
Removing Cosmoline and grease from your M1 Garand – GarandGear, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.garandgear.com/cleaning-m1-garand-parts/
Can you clean cosmoline covered parts with an ultrasonic cleaner …, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/SKS/comments/rmkkms/can_you_clean_cosmoline_covered_parts_with_an/
Best Way to Clean Your Handgun with an Ultrasonic Cleaner – YouTube, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fHKigLYYUcA
Ultrasonic cleaners : r/guns – Reddit, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/guns/comments/mlpn8v/ultrasonic_cleaners/
www.originalcosmoline.com, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.originalcosmoline.com/shop/how-to-properly-remove-cosmoline-from-military-surplus-firearms/#:~:text=A%20lot%20of%20people%20swear,of%20the%20firearm%20and%20container.
What is the best/safest way to remove cosmoline? : r/guns – Reddit, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/guns/comments/6fwxg5/what_is_the_bestsafest_way_to_remove_cosmoline/
Best way to remove cosmoline? : r/Firearms – Reddit, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Firearms/comments/1cliyfn/best_way_to_remove_cosmoline/
PSA: Removing Cosmoline (Video) – Forgotten Weapons, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.forgottenweapons.com/psa-removing-cosmoline-video/
Cosmoline removal. WD40? – K98k Forum, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.k98kforum.com/threads/cosmoline-removal-wd40.26241/
What is the best way to get cosmoline off an old surplus rifle? – The Gun Club – Quora, accessed July 30, 2025, https://thegunclub.quora.com/What-is-the-best-way-to-get-cosmoline-off-an-old-surplus-rifle
Удаление консервационной смазки : r/guns – Reddit, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/guns/comments/7ka5kk/cosmoline_removal/?tl=ru
How far do you guys go about cleaning your surplus firearms after receiving them? – Reddit, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/milsurp/comments/pxfnrb/how_far_do_you_guys_go_about_cleaning_your/
Cleaning Cosmoline off Military Surplus – Part 1 – YouTube, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z0-D8mrE2jo
Cosmoline removal | Auto Geek Online Auto Detailing Forum, accessed July 30, 2025, https://autogeekonline.net/threads/cosmoline-removal.26357/
Technical Overview of Volatile Organic Compounds | US EPA, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.epa.gov/indoor-air-quality-iaq/technical-overview-volatile-organic-compounds
Systemic Exposures to Volatile Organic Compounds and Factors Influencing Susceptibility to Their Effects – Contaminated Water Supplies at Camp Lejeune – NCBI, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK215288/
Can Grease Become Oxidized? – Fluitec, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.fluitec.com/can-grease-become-oxidized/
Oxidation – The Lubricant’s Nemesis, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.machinerylubrication.com/Read/1028/oxidation-lubricant
Measuring Oil Chemistry: Nitration, Oxidation and Sulfation – Spectro Scientific, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.spectrosci.com/knowledge-center/test-parameters/measuring-oil-chemistry-nitration-oxidation-and-sulfation
During the Cold War, how long did the Soviets expect the service life of their hardware to be in a peacetime setting? : r/WarCollege – Reddit, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/WarCollege/comments/1auejwv/during_the_cold_war_how_long_did_the_soviets/
What is the average lifespan of weapons stored in a depot before they become unusable due to age or lack of maintenance? – Quora, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-average-lifespan-of-weapons-stored-in-a-depot-before-they-become-unusable-due-to-age-or-lack-of-maintenance
Russia Exhausts Soviet-Era Arms Storage Bases – The Jamestown Foundation, accessed July 30, 2025, https://jamestown.org/program/russia-exhausts-soviet-era-arms-storage-bases/
Cosmoline Rust-Veto 342 – Industrial Grade, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.cosmolinedirect.com/cosmoline-rust-veto-342-industrial-grade/
TECHNICAL DATA SHEET – Quaker Houghton, accessed July 30, 2025, https://home.quakerhoughton.com/technical-data-sheet-metal-protection-products/metal-protection/
Cosmoline Grease 1060 Rust Preventative – Available Now + FREE DELIVERY, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.flywheeldistribution.com/cosmoline-grease-1060/

Glocks

Installing a Overwatch Poly DAT Trigger and Vickers Tactical Slide Stop in My SCT17 Pistols

January 22, 2025 RoninsGrips

Well, I bought SCT17 frames to move my Polymer80 builds over to so they could have serial numbers and be tracked. The SCT 17 frames are nicely designed and molded so kudos there. I bought assembled/populated frames and wished I hadn’t. I have always changed the mag lock, slide stop and slide lock controls on a Glock because they are too small for me. The SCT triggers were pretty crude too – I did not like the feel of the shoe or the pull so I did some reading and changed the components out.

I found the SCT17 frames to be nicely done. I was surprised that even though they have the Glock grip angle I found them comfortable. One of my big reasons for using the Polymer80 frames was the angle felt better for me. It may be the straight wall design of the handle but the SCT17 feels good. I wear an XL glove and my pinky is right at the bottom of the grip so I knew I would need to add a flare both to have a shelf and to aid in mag feeding.

Glockish small slide lock, very flush slide lock, the mag catch barely sticks out, and the trigger shoe is rounded with a heavy long pull … they all needed to be replaced. If you like stock Glock stuff, great. I don’t.

Now, my original plan was to simply move the internals of my Polymer80s to the SCT frames. The problem I was running into was that none of my triggers just moved over – the slide was hanging up big time. I’m not a Glock guru and I read some about bending the cruciform at the back and finally decided screw it – I’d just buy new triggers.

I did some digging and guys reported the Overwatch Drop-In Poly-DAT triggers did just that – they went right in with no tweaking. Huh? Basically they designed an affordable trigger that should fit most Glocks based on their experience. It cuts pre-travel by about 20%, had their NP3 treated their Minus connector, and their exra power return spring but with an OEM trigger housing.

Okay, it was just before Christmas and I scored three of the Overwatch Precision Drop In PolyDAT triggers for $79.99/ea. I also picked up new Vickers Tactical Slide Stops for $21.56 and decided to also get new Strike Industries pins for $9.99 fom Primary Arms. My slide stops and pins were pretty beat up and I figured I’d go with new ones.

For the extended mag catches, I did just move the Vickers units over from the Polymer80s to the SCT17s.

Pics or it didn’t happen

Well, here are the controls so to speak. The SCT came populated because I got a great deal and figured I’d see if I liked them. I did not. The top is the SCT17 frame. The slide stop, lock and mag catch are all too short for me. The rounded trigger shoe and gritty trigger were pretty bad even by Glock-clone standards. The Polymer80 frame below has an extended slide lock, stop and magazine release plus a decent trigger. I don’t recall who now – Zev maybe. I had hope to move them all over but the trigger was a no-go.

This was a Zev G34 clone. Boy it shot nice but I wanted it on a serilized frame. (Note, I used a photo editor to remove the serial numbers from the paperwork.)

Another G34-ish clone with a Tyrant CNC compensator. The trigger might be an Overwatch Precision but no idea of the model.

Taking this Polymer80 apart made me sad. It was my last and the best one I made. It was their Compact Long model with a G17 slide on a G19 body. Boy, that was a smooth shooting pistol. I moved the upper over to a full size SCT17 frame. Pretty sure it was a Zev Fulcrum trigger.

This is the Overwatch Precision PolyDAT dropin trigger for Glocks. I wasn’t sure how I would like the polymer shoe but it feels just fine. The broad flat face of it makes for a nice feel.

There are a boatload of videos and pages about how to change Glock triggers. I want to point out one one often overlooked relationship that causes guys to brake out a hammer and punch unnecessarily. The grooved pin at the top is the hammer pin. The thing at the bottom is the slide stop. The hammer pin is not pressed into the frame very hard at all yet guys go banging on it with a pin punch to get it out. That’s not remotely needed. What is happening is the slide stop does dual duty to hold the hammer pin in place.

That spring pushes againt the locking block pin and pushes the slide stop down. This photo doesn’t show it because the pin is resting in the slide stop on my bench but when installed, the top of the slide lock pin hole is pushed down into the groove in the hammer pin thus locking it in place. Want to remove your hammer pin super easy? Lift the slide stop with one hand and press the hammer pin out with what ever pin removal tool you use in the other hand – done.

SCT makes a mag well flare that is absolutely worth it. It just snaps in place. It’s polymer and I wish it was aluminum but it is what it is.

Here they are with the extended controls and new triggers plus the SCT 17 mag wells.

Trigger Results

Average trigger pull weights for each pistol were 3# 11.7 oz, 3# 13.7oz and 4# 8.5oz. The triggers were lubricated and tested maybe 10-20 times each max. Pull testing was done using five sample pulls from each with care taken to postion the Wheeler digital gauge in the same place each time. The pistols were on a bench also to try and aid consistency.

Overall, the they feel much, much better with the Overwatch triggers – less travel and not gritty. I’d give them a 7 out of 10 and have no hesitation recommending them to someone looking for a very cost effective trigger improvement. If you have an SCT17 and want something that literally drops in – try this. I had to do zero tuning and would do it again.

Summary

I’m happy with the results. I need to get them to the range but they all function test fine.

I hope this helps you out.

Note, I have to buy all of my parts – nothing here was paid for by sponsors, etc. I do make a small amount if you click on an ad and buy something but that is it. You’re getting my real opinion on stuff.

Firearms, PTR

What is the history of PTR Industries and the HK91?

December 31, 2024 RoninsGrips

It seems like roller-locked firearms are having a resurgence as of late with a number of vendors making them. My first roller lock was from a company that is still around and I actually just bought a MP5 clone from them that I need to write about. Before I do that, let’s review how PTR came into existence.

Timeline

Origins (1997-2005): The story begins with Jose Luis Diaz, a Cuban-American entrepreneur with a passion for firearms. In 1997, he established JLD Enterprises in Connecticut, aiming to manufacture American-made versions of the G3 rifle. JLD’s PTR-91 (Precision Tactical Rifle) gained traction among enthusiasts seeking a domestic alternative to imported G3s.
Acquisition of FMP Tooling (2003-2005): A pivotal moment occurred when JLD acquired the original tooling and machinery from Fábrica Militar de Braço de Prata (FMP) of Portugal, a licensed manufacturer of H&K G3 rifles. This acquisition included blueprints, gauges, and thousands of parts, granting JLD the capability to produce rifles using the same equipment that produced the original G3s. To be clear, PTR did not license the designs and what not from H&K – they bought them from FMP.
Formation of PTR Industries (2006-Present): In 2006, Diaz partnered with P. Everett Weed, an experienced manufacturer, to form PTR 91 Inc. This marked a rebranding and expansion of JLD Enterprises who was folded into PTR. Diaz left in late 2010 and the direction of PTR changed from a focus on assembling firearms from surplus parts to one of new designs and innovation. Currently, PTR has the in-house capabilities to make all of the parts of their firearms.

I really like MP5 and MP5K-type weapons, so let’s add key dates in for them:

2017: PTR Industries first announced their plans to produce MP5 clones at the 2017 SHOT Show.
Late 2018 / Early 2019: PTR began shipping their first MP5 clones, the PTR 9CT pistol and the PTR 9KT pistol. These were essentially clones of the HK SP5K, a semi-automatic pistol version of the MP5K.
2020: PTR expanded their MP5 clone lineup with the release of the PTR 9R rifle, a clone of the HK94 carbine.
2021: PTR introduced the 5R rifle, a clone of the HK SP5, a semi-automatic rifle version of the MP5.

Key Individuals

Jose Luis Diaz: Was the founder of JLD Enterprises and the visionary behind bringing G3 rifle production to the United States. He left PTR in 2010.
P. Everett Weed: Instrumental in the formation of PTR 91 Inc. and the company’s growth through his manufacturing expertise and business acumen.

Conclusion:

PTR Industries has carved out a niche around the family of HK-related roller-locked weapons. Given the continued popularity of those types of firearms, they are well positioned. PTR is working on reselling and perhaps later making weapons such as the Archon B and D pistols and both Jack and Reacher shotguns.

So, PTR continues to evolve. I’ve found their products to be well done in the past and own a 9CT (MP5) currently. It will be interesting to see where the firm heads. I’ve owned a few PTR firearms over the years – a 91 clone, a 7.62x51PDWR and now the 9CT – I have no hesitation in recommending them.

Built an Aero M5 – An Interesting Take On The AR10 .308 Platform

December 30, 2024 RoninsGrips

I’d bought an Aero M5 lower receiver on sale a while back and decided to build it. Over the years, I’ve assembled a couple of M4s and one M5 where I bought an assembled lower and upper but this was my first actual build. I’ve always found the quality of the Aero parts to be good and they definitely made some unique tweaks to their M5 vs. their M4.

Rather than “yet another post about how to build an AR”, I decided to comment on the differences I noticed about the M5 lower. In general, the AR10-series of weapons aren’t standardized and you have no guarantee that parts from different vendors can interchange so you need to do some research and plan your build.

It is a DPMS Gen 2 pattern lower with Aero’s own spin on it. With that said, even though it is patterned after the DPMS, verify any other brand parts before you try to use them. I can tell you that AR grips and stocks work plus triggers.

I opted for a 16″ Aero upper, bolt, charging handle, recoil spring, buffer and lower parts kit. However, I had a Trigger Tech Duty trigger pack I wanted to try out plus I wanted to use a Magpul grip and UBR stock. The UBR has been on my radar for years but hadn’t tried one before now.

The pile was getting more organized. Huh … I had two LPKs – one with a Magpul MOE grip and one without. Well, spare parts never hurt … especially when the detents launch into orbit…

A Closer Look At The Aero M5 Receiver

It is a forged receiver using 7075-T6 aluminum and that is just fine. Now, arguing forged vs. billet will start all kinds of arguments about which is stronger, lasts longer, can solve world peace, etc.

Ignore the marketing and people weighing in on forums who have no idea. From a purely practical perspective, buy a receiver that you like the looks of from a reputable firm and have read reviews about. Honestly, forget about forged vs. billet. End of story.

There are plenty of other things to worry about rather than theory vs. practical reality. A receiver is just part of the puzzle that includes the other parts of the firearm, the ammo, the optics, you (the shooter), the environment, the situation, and far, far more.

It’s a gracefully executed design. You can see the large flared mag well,the stylized “A” for Aero symbol, the integral oversized trigger guard, a shoulder screw is used instead of a roll pin for the bolt catch, pictogram around the selector, the rear takedown pin is oversized, and the buffer tube has a flat area on the side. Everything is nicely machined and the anodized surface has a nicely done uniform finish.

The bolt catch having a shoulder screw makes that part of the assembly very easy not to mention lowering the odds of scuffing the receiver if someone lacks the proper tools. The M5 just requires a 1.5mm hex head bit. In this case, I am using one from my Strebito precision screwdriver set.

Ok, did not expect this. The front detent spring and pin go in through the boss. It’s not exposed like an AR15/M4 so none of my regular tools would work.

I used a 1/4″ clevis pin to go through the bosses, I pushed the pin and spring down with a thin hex key while sliding the pin forward. The pin then captured/retained the detent and spring. I then carefully slid in the front takedown pin while keeping the clevis pin pushed against it. Once the channel in the pin was over the detent, it sprang forward and everything was set. I carefull rotated the pin to make sure the detent was in the channel and then pushed it into the open position to make sure the takdown pin was correctly captured.

There are two changes I want to point out in the grip screw area. Just to the right of the grip screw hole is the bottom of the nylon tipped tensioning screw. Before you install everything, install your upper and adjust this screw to get the tension you want so the upper doesn’t rattle. Too much tension and you will not be able to disassembe the rifle without a punch if at all. Note, I have the selector detent in there. I dumped it out before I flipped it over to install the upper. The hole to the right of the selector detent is the takedown detent hole. Because the M5 lower is longer, putting it here makes sense. Aero does have it tapped for a 4-40 set screw so you can elegantly capture the detent spring if you want to. Note, you do need to trim the detent spring level with the receiver using some nippers before you install the set screw if you go this route. Oddly enough, my lower parts kit either did not have the set screw or I lost the set screw so I did not go that route.

Here’s the hylon-tipped top of the tensioning set screw.

I set the tensioning screw just enough so the upper didn’t rattle but also such that I could push out the takedown pin by hand. Since I lacked the 4-40 set screw to capture it, I just juggled both detent springs as I installed the pistol grip. It wasn”t too hard actually but the set screw would definitely have made it easier.

Summary

First off, kudos to Aero for another fine set of parts. I found the small differences with the Aero M5 interesting. Aero Precision turns out quality – I’ve owned various ARs and even have a .308 Solus bolt rifle from them right now. I have no hesitation recommending their products.

I hope this helps you out.

MAC/VMAC

Why is my bolt binding as it moves to the rear – How to Fit VMAC9 / MAC-11 9mm Uppers

December 26, 2024 RoninsGrips

As I mentioned in the first post, a fit of nostalgia over the MACs and then seeing the 3D printed firearms coming out using MAC uppers started me digging. What really cemented the deal is that you can build a VMAC9 very affordably. I’d argue it’s one of the best deals out there and at the end of the day, you have a modular firearm you can change over time as your needs change.

There are a number of companies that make complete uppers and I am only going to list the ones I heard good things about. Just remember that any person or business can produce a defect. I look for general trends, comments about customer service and how much money is being spent. The reason for this is that under a certain price level, I will gamble. Conversely, once somethings is over a certain level, I will not.

So, here’s the list if you are looking for MAC-type uppers and I’d recommend you do some research to here what folks are currently saying about a given company:

JC Arms – https://jc-arms.com
Lage Manufacturing – https://www.max-11.com/index_2020.php
Masterpiece Arms (MPA) – https://masterpiecearms.com/cat/defender-series/
Practical Solutions – https://macmachineguns.com/
Velocity Arms – https://www.velocityfirearms.com/product-category/vmac9/vmac9-upper-kits/

Velocity Firearms Uppers

Being new to building a MAC, I decided to one stop shop and buy the lower and upper parts kits from Velocity Firearms. I went with side cocking uppers because I wanted a Picatinny rail on top to mount optics. I bought their 5.5″, 11.25″ and 16.7″ complete uppers – they had their barrels installed and came with complete bolt and spring assemblies.

Up to this point, I had three assembled lower receivers. Once married with their respective uppers, I created two pistols and one rifle subject to the applicable regulations of the ATF and laws of Michigan. The two pistols had to be registered as such. Note, I am not a lawyer and this is not legal advice. I will tell you one thing – know what laws and regulations apply to whatever you build.

This is the 5.5″ pistol upper on a lower during test fitting. The magazine is a refinished Israeli 20 round Sten unit. You can get a barrel with either just the original 3/4″x10 rear threads or with the 1/2″x28 front threads also.

This is the 11″.25″ upper. They used an adapter on the barrel’s 3/4×10 threads to mount an AR handguard. What you see there is a free-floated handgurd where a ring is turned backwards to extend and lock the handguard in place and a set screw is tightened to secure it.

This is the 16.7″ upper and the cylindrical handguard you see mounts directly on the barrel’s 3/14×10 rear threads.

Fitting Will Likely Be Required

The front of the upper receiver has a trunnion that holds the front in position. The rear of the upper is held up by a spacer. I’ve seen it called the “Flat Rear Spring”, “Sear Spring Holder” and “Rear Spacer”. Regardless of the name, it’s height matters a great deal.

Velocity Firearms calls this rear spacer the “VMAC9 Flat Rear Spring”. It sets the rear height which is critical to smooth operation. This must be sitting flat at the rear and may need to be bent either closed or open a tad to set the height.

See those two holes on the right? The top is where the end of the recoil rod sits and the bottom is for the ejector rod. The upper receiver is sitting on top of the flat spring. The top hole is for the recoil rod and the bottom is the ejector rod.

This is the bolt but it is sitting on it’s side – the left side is face up and the bottom is in the shade. The important thing is to look at the rods – the recoil rod with the spring is at the top and would be at the top in the firearm. The bare steel is the ejector rod.

So here’s the problem – the bolt is moving front and back in the upper tube. It’s vertical travel is limited. The rods are vertically aligned at the rear by sitting in the holes in the receiver. If the upper, bolt and end of the rods aren’t sufficiently aligned then the bolt will bind as it moves towards the rear.

Why was my bolt binding?

Well, I hinted at the problem above. My flat springs were sitting on the bushing of my Practical Solutions 1913 rail adapters. When I racked the slide back, the alignment issue was so bad that the bolt would jam open at the rear plus the upper did not want to go back into the raised portion of the lower.

I write these posts after I build firearms and may seem like I have things figured out but let me assure you – at the time, I was having a WTF? moment. I somehow wound up talking to Sam Schneider, who owns Practical Solutions, who is a class 2 manufacturer specializing in MACs and Class III firearms. He has a wealth of knowledge about the MACs and explained the importance of getting the vertical spacing right. My “flat spring” sitting on the bushing of his adapter was throwing everything off when the bolt travelled backwards.

Ahhhh … That made sense. The bolt is at the mercy of the upper’s channel and it also rides the recoil and ejector rods that are spaceed by going into the back of the receiver. Of course it would make things bind up if they were off.

So, after talking to Sam, I knew I needed to fix this. I would cut a slot so the “flat spring” could sit flat plus it would cradle the oblong bushing so it could be tightened.

I used my calipers to find the center and then mark the offset on both sides so I cut out the notch with a Dremel. I deburred it when I was done.

I noticed some welds in the corners that I ground down out of the way.

Once the notch was done, and the welds were gone the spacer could sit flat.

At this point, it cycled better but I could still feel it binding just a bit. The last step was to crush the flat spring just a bit in my vise to lower the upper a bit further.

This took me three or four tries – I’d squish the flat spring just a bit and then test fit and cycle the VMAC. By the last time, it felt really good so I called it even. The trick is to not rush and just bend it a little bit followed by testing. I bought a couple of spare flat springs just in case.

Summary

There are a lot of MAC/VMAC upper options out there. Make sure your flat spring is seated on the bottom of the lower and is at the right height. If you feel binding, odds are it is too high and you can see this because the upper is hitting the top rear of the lower and not wanting to seat fully. Just take your time and bend the flat spring and test over and over until it fits.

I hope this helps you out.

MAC/VMAC

Glass Bedding a Practical Solutions 1913 Rail Adapter For a Solid Fit On A VMAC9 or MAC-11N

December 26, 2024 RoninsGrips

The defacto standard rear connector for braces and stocks on large format pistols is the 1913 Picatinny Rail adapter. The concept was pioneered by Justin McMillion and his firm JMAC. The idea exploded and now tons of companies offer adapters, stocks and braces to do just that. So, when I started planning my VMAC9 builds (they are basically MAC-11 9mm firearms), I knew I wanted a 1913 rear rail for flexibility.

Vendors of Adapters

A3 Tactical, Practical Solutions and Stormwerkz were all contenders because I used different products of their’s in the past. The A3 Tactical and Stormwerkz designs are similar – the are aluminum and cradle the rear to limit movement. The Practical Solutions model is a thick chunk of carbon steel welded at a right angle but does not cradle the rear.

I went with the Practical Solutions model because it is steel and I figured I could compensate if there was movement. Any design with a single mounting point is at risk of moving/working loose over time.

This is the Practical Solutions 1913 adapter for semi-auto pistols.

My Problem

Now, I did run into a challenge. The Practical Solution’s adapter needs to sit flat against the back of the receiver and that assumes the rear is at a right angle from the bottom. For whatever reason, none of my receivers had a rear at a right angle — all were slightly off.

The hole the bushing goes into is oversized presumably to allow for a wider range of fitment. Iou can move the adapter all over – left/right, front/back and angles but there is only the one screw/connection point.

Combine the loose fitting bushing on the botttom andthe back of my VMAC9s that weren’t square and the adapters would never stay tight.

Now, I did experiment and had two braces on each of the pistols and one stock on the carbine. They all acted like lever arms and I could easily get their mounts to turn. Let me show you what they looked like:

This is a carbine with a 16.7″ barrel and has a Midwest Industries 1913 to buffer tube adapter with a Magpul ACS stock. To be honest, that combo has a length of pull over 10.5″ that is just past the limit of what I like and I am exploring other options.

This is a pistol with an 11.25″ barrel and a SB Tactical TF1913 triangle folding brace. It makes for a nice setup at 9.5″ long.

This is a pistol with a 5.4″ barrel and a SB Tactical FS1913A aluminum strut brace that is 9.25″ long. I definitely like the length of this one too.

The Solution

I knew the primary issue as the irregularly shaped receiver back. The way to fix it was to mix up glass reinforced epoxy and “bed” the adapter so it could sit flat.

A second decision was whether to make this nearly permanent by epoxing the adapter directly to the receiver. I decided against that – at least for now – in case I decide to change or repair something. This decision to make what would more or less be a gasket between the two meant that I would spray release agent on the surfaces so the epoxy would cure but not adhere to the parkerizing.

Purely FYI – parkerizing makes an ideal surface for weapons finishes and epoxy due to all of the “nooks and crannies” it creates. If you don’t use some form of release agent, the bond is stunningly good and will only come off with heat.

For general epoxy work lately, I’ve been using PC Products’ Super Epoxy translucent model 502 dispensed from a 50ml cartridge. Cartridge dispensers are a bit more expensive but boy are they convenient. To use a cartridge, you need a gun and then tips – you can get everything off Amazon very cost effectively.

They do sell a black epoxy but I’ve been using the translucent epoxy and can dye it the color I want. Despite the gimmicky sounding name, I’ve been using it for a little over a year now. The working time before it hardens is 15 minutes and mostly cures in 3-4 hours with a complete cure of 4-7 days. This stuff has proven itself for me for general use.

By the way, In general, I would recommend you stick with a known brand of epoxy and the longer it takes to cure, the better it tends to hold up over time. Fast 5-15 minute cure epoxies tend the break down over time when exposed to repeated shocks – sometimes called “sugaring” where you can see the epoxy breaking down into small pieces.

The Steps

Apply the release agent to the receiver and adapter and let it dry. I use Mann’s Ease Release 200 – that’s what I use with the molds for my furniture also. If you read about release agents guys use when bedding rifle actions in stocks, you can see guys have used various forms of wax, etc.
To make the bedding compound, I put the epoxy and 1/32″ milled glass fibers in a cup and sti. The glass fibers help to reinforce the epoxy. You don’t need a lot of glass fibers – maybe 25% of the volume. As you increase the volume of glass fibers, the thicker the material is. In this case, I really just want the fibers to reinforce the epoxy so I went with about 25%.
To make it look decent, I added in black dye so it would blend in and not be so obvious.
I thoroughly mixed everything.
I apply the material using nitrile gloves and a plastic knife.
Acetone can be used to clean up any extra exposed epoxy until it cures.
Once everything is position correctly, I tightened down the screw on the bottom and let it cure. made sure everything stayed positioned correctly and checked for any runs or drips. Again, stuff like that can be cleaned up with a rag with acetone on it until it sets up.
Once the material has hardened, I put the part in a 150F degree oven to cure faster. With epoxy, hard to the touch does not mean fully cured.

The results seemed perfectly acceptable. If they loosen up again, then I’ll consider next steps. For now, they seem solid.

The results felt rock solid. Time will tell.

Summary

I like the Practical Solutions adapters. Bedding them made for solid connection points for braces of stocks.

MAC/VMAC

Assembling a VMAC9’s lower receiver’s internals – applies to many semi-auto Mac-11-type pistols

November 25, 2024 RoninsGrips

Please research and comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations before you undertake a build of any kind. I am very careful to understand what I must do to legally build pistols and rifles before I begin a project. I am not a lawyer and will not give legal advice. If you decide to build something, you accept all legal and regulatory liability. This post is for informational purposes only. Please be careful and please be legal. Do not attempt a build if you lack suufficient experience to do it safely.

Need to start this post with a reminder to be legal and safe.

By this point I had welded my receivers, parkerized them and also prepped some old Israeli Sten magazines. It was time to assemble the Velocity Firearms MAC 9 firearms. Two would be registered as pistols and one as a rifle. They all use the same internals in the lower receivers so I bought complete internal lower parts kits from Velocity Firearms plus complete uppers from them as well. Note, the grip assembly with the mag catch is a separate part. I just bought it from them pre-assembled.

Parts Identification

These are the lower parts for a Velocity Mac 9 (VMAC9):

Lower receiver / welded frame
Back grip assembly – includes the Plastic back grip housing, mag catch, mag catch spring and mag catch pin
Optional: This is a Practical Solutions rear 1913 adapter.
Wire retainer for the selector lever and trigger pin
Hammer pin retainer e-clip – it’s still in its bag so I wouldn’t lose it
Takedown pin assembly – tubular body and a hex socket button head screw.
Safety selector
Trigger bar – note bevel goes face up
Sear plate – This is positioned the right way – bevels go down, front slots to cradle the trigger bard are down.
Sear spring
Sear spring holder / spacer – bevel is at the top. This holds the upper in position
Trigger
Trigger pin – note the slot is set further back for the retainer wire
Hammer pin – note slot is out at the end for the retainer e-clip
This is both the hammer and the hammer spring – the spring is oriented properly. The hammer is resting striking face down.

The Practical Solutions 1913 Rear Rail Adapter

I knew I wanted a 1913 Picatiny rear rail for mounting braces or stocks to. I looked at a number and the Practical Solutions model received good reviews. I’ll tell you it is solidly made for sure.

The Practical Solutions unit is well made and easy to install. To create a solid mount that doesn’t flex, I would recommend bedding it with epoxy so there is no “wiggle” room between the rear of the receiver and the adapter.

For the most part I like it because it’s easy to install. You will probably want to bed the adapter in the rear or else it will likely move. I mixed up some epoxy, black dye and 1/32″ glass fibers to make a putty that I then applied between the adapter and the rear of the receiver. Both parts had release agent on them just in case. I did this later because I didn’t realize how easily it could move with a brace or stock acting like a lever arm.

There is a lot of adjustment room to accomodate a wide variety of builds. This is a pro and a con.

Also, the bushing will push the spacer up just a bit so you might want to grind/sand/cut a radius so the spacer can seat properly. Alternatively, just bend the spacer. I just bent the spacer until the upper would fit.

Either notch your spacer to avoid that bushing or bend the spacer to reduce the height enough.

Ok, I found out about this after I fully assembled the VMACs – the rear of the VMAC and the Practrical Solutions adapters do not sit perfectly flat against one another so the adapter could flex left and right. Honestly, not a big deal. I just mixed up some black glass fiber reinforced epoxy and created a filler/spacer between the adapter and the rear of the weapon. Problem solved. By the way, my intent was never to “glue” them. I applied release agent on both surfaces so they can be removed. If you don’t have a release agent like Mann Ease Release 200, use PAM cooking spray or a bit of shoe wax to the surfaces before you apply the epoxy. If you want to bond them directly, go right ahead.

Let’s step through the assembly

Install the plastic grip assembly taking care the mag catch’s half circle end sits outside of the mag well.
Take the sear plate, tip the rear up and lower the front forks down so they slide under the bullet guide’s arms. The beveled front and rear rails are face down. Another way of thinking of the orientation is that the trigger bar slides under the front of the forks and sits in the machined opening. Make sure the sear plate can slide all the way forward to the center support and all the way to the rear. If there are any welds in the way, grind them so everything slides smoothly.
At this point, I start lubricating as I go. If it slides, grease it. If it rotates, oil it. I use SuperLube grease applied with an acid brush to all surfaces that need greasing. Oiling was done with SuperLube oil. I like the two as they are synthetic and don’t get gummy plus they have PTFE (the generic acronym for Teflon) added to improve lubricity. The coarse parkerized surfaces will want to slow everything down while they wear in.
Slide the sear plate forward, install the spacer to the rear with the beveled face up. Try test installing an upper at this point. You may need to squish the spacer a tad in a vice to allow the upper to seat easily.
Slide the sear plate spring onto the sear and move the sear to the rear so it is all inside the sear spring holder / spacer.
Insert the trigger bar with the beveled face up. I used needle nose pliers to do this and slid it under the front of the sear plate.
Move the whole trigger bar and sear plate rearward so you can drop the trigger into the hole in the receiver and also such that the trigger is in front of the trigger bar.
Insert the trigger pin from left to right. This requires a little bit of manipulation to get the pin through both sides.
Install the hammer spring it it hasn’t been already. It should be oriented the way you see above.
Install the hammer in the rear. It sits like an AR hammer with the flat face forward. The spring legs rest between the sear plate’s legs.
Install the hammer pin
Put a daub of grease on the receiver around the hammer pin. This is an old trick and will hold the e-clip in position while you slide it on. I’d recommend using something non-marring to push the e-clip on and you’ll feel the cip snap into position. Another trick is to lower the pin such that the slot is even with the receiver so you don’t have to try and get the clip at the right height while fighting everything else.
Install the retaining wire by sliding the forward portion under the front reinforcement. The hooked portion sits in the groove on the right “ear” of the bullet guide. I’ll show photos below.
Technically, you are supposed to lift the retaining wire up and insert the selector under the wire. This is what adds the tension to lock the selector and trigger pins in place. Uhm .. there was no way I could do that. If you can get it together/ go for it. I was getting pissed off and needed to think of a different approach. So, if you were able to lift the wire up and install the safety selector lever then you are done with the lower. Speaking for myself, I had to add the following:
For the life of me, I could not get the selector lever in due to an elevated area on the inside and I couldn’t get the wire any higher. Instead, I backed off the trigger pin and inserted the selector because the tension was gone. The issue then became how to get the trigger pin in. What I did was to align the pin on the hole and used a grooved screwdriver (spanner bit) to forcefully push the pin and retaining wire down facing the hole while pushing from the other side so the pin would pop into the hole. That worked. One reason it worked was that I could see what I was doing and how to move things whereas with the selector lever and wire, I couldn’t see what was going on.
Note, you will need to help the sear plate and hammer to go into the cocked position before you install the upper.
I did a quick function test while controlling the hammer so it wouldn’t smack into things. Pulling the hammer back, the sear plate would grab it. Pulling the trigger back, the sear plate would release the hammer – again, I caught it vs. letting it fly free. I squeeze the trigger back, moved the hammer back, let go of the hammer while the trigger was squeezed and the sear plate grabbed it. I pulled the trigger and the hammer “fired”. I then made sure the safety worked. Everything was good.

Now For Photos

I find the sear plate fascinating. Yeah, I’m wierd. It’s almost like Ingram was designing a miniature bullpup. He had to create a trigger linkage that could bridge the distance from the trigger located in front of the mag well / grip to the rear where the hammer was. He came up with this design. Folks, this is pretty damned ingenious. First off, I have it flipped upside dowhn and the left would be to the front of the weapon and the top right would be facing the rear. A sear is what holds the bolt, hammer or striker back until enough pressure is applied that said device is released. In the case of the MAC, the sear plate is a forged piece of steel and let’s cover some of the unique design elements (remember it is inverted for this picture): 1) The hammer bar sits in the notches in the arms of the plate. 2) The plate has bevelled skates/runners/thingies that are bevelled to accomodate the radius of of the receiver bend and also reduce the surface area of the plate so there is less friction against the receiver plus they will probably push a fair amount of debris out of the way. 3) the plate is split into a fork to pass the left and right of the mag well. 4) the rear triangle is a lightening cut 5) the sear spring sits on/around the protruding “tail” at the rear of the plate.

Unless you like the fun of “where did that part go?” I’d recommend putting the parts in a magnetic parts tray.

The grip is installed on the steel mag well by keeping the bottom of the mag catch (the half moon shape) on the outside of the mag well so just the square “shelf” of the catch is inside. That half moon sits on the bopttom of the slot in this photo – which would be the top of the slot when the VMAC is upright. The grip is held on by one screw. If that screw doesn’t want to start or you do get it together and then can’t insert the mag, odds are that whole mag catch is accidentally inside the grip.

I did it the wrong way – see how the whole mag catch “arm” is in the mag well? I could install the grip but I could not insert mags. This photo is out of sequence so you can see the mag catch.

See how the squared off “shelf” of the mag catch is the only thing sticking into the mag well? That’s what we want – that is correct. I did not need to do any alterations for surplus or polymer mags. Both mag types lock up nice front to back but are loose left to right.

I welded the heck out of the sides. After looking at the plastic grips a tad bit more closely, I could have done a small weld on that rear tab and it would have cleared the grip. Look at the photo above – the top inside edge of the grip is hollow and would have cleared it. Live and learn I guess. That mag well will not budge given the weld I did on the sides and front corners but I would have done that rear tab had I known.

The intent of the photo is to show you the orientation of the trigger bar, sear plate, sear spring and the spring holder / spacer.

I don’t have a photo but make sure the sear place and trigger bar can slide unobstructed. If there are welds or anything in the way, grind them out, then blow out the receiver before you coat everything in grease.

Insert the sear plate with the rear tipped up at an angle. This will give you enough room to slide the front legs under the bullet guide. Yeah, I grease everything that slides.

Slide the sear platforward and insert the spacer. If your spacer has a bevel, it goes face up as shown in the photo. Since I installed the Practical Solutions adapter already you can see it is riding high. The solution is to cut a notch in the spacer and compress/crush/bend the spacer and trial fit the top. Bend a bit and test over and over until you can full seat the upper.

Slide the sear spring onto the sear plate and side it backwards. I went back later and cut the notch. It will drive you nuts if you leave it on top of the Practical Solutions adapter.

I use needlenose pliers to lower the trigger bar in place with the beveled edge to the front and face up.

Push the trigger bar, sear plate and what have you rearwards and insert the trigger forward of the trigger bar as shown.

To be clear, the top pin is the trigger pin. You can tell because it’s groove is further away from the end and that’s where the retaining wire will sit. The lower pin is for the hammer. The groove is right near the end because the retaining e-clip actually sits outside of the receiver. When looking down at the open receiver with it facing forward, the pins are inserted from the left to the right. In other words, the heads will be on the side opposite the ejection port.

Compared to an AR or AK, the hammer assembly goes in without a fight because the hammer can rest without spring tension during installation. The hammer pin can easily be pushed through.

Put a daub of grease on the pin and surrounding area. This will help hold the e-clip and keep it from flying into another dimension only to be found by the next person who owns your shop. I like to lower the pin so the groove and e-clip line up and then I use a non-marring surface to push the e-clip into position. You will feel it click into position.

Here is the pre-bent retaining wire. It was designed by someone who literally wanted to remove all the joy that is left in the world.

So the hook on the retaining wire rests on the bullet guide. You install it by sliding the far end first. There’s no tension yet. That comes when you install the safety selector. That’s also when the swearing starts. You can’t see or get ahold of that wire thanks to that tab that is there, in part, to make this a semi-auto receiver so I wasn’t about to cut it off or bend it.

You are supposed to lift the front of the spring up so this opening is more clear and slide the selector lever in.

Okay, so imagine you are sliding this into the hole. The spring hits that first shoulder to the right of the flat area in the shaft. I could not get the damn wire, which is now under tension, to clear that shoulder and go into the groove. In hindsight, bevelling that surface would probably have solved my problem. At the time, I was pretty pissed off after trying too convince it to go in, pulling up on the wire, etc.

My workaround was to back off the trigger pin and release the tension from the wire. I then installed the safety selector switch. I then used a spanner screw driver bit to push the trigger into the hole. Pushing it down also tensioned the wire so it took some force. The trick was controlling it.

The receiver is sitting with teh bottom cradled in my big woodworking vise. Note the safety selector is installed with the retaining wire in its groove. The trigger pin is lined up with the hole. What I did was push down with the spanner screw driver while pushing the pin to the right with my left hand. I had to use the vise because it took two hands but it worked. I did those for all three lowers and it works just fine.

Well, the retaining spring is installed.

You do need to manuall bring the hammer back and catch it because there is no upper to stop forward travel or bring it back. You absolutely can install an upper with the hammer all the way down and wonder why it’s not cocking. Look in the trigger well – if you see the hammer laying flat it’s because you forgot to cock it before installing the upper. When you see tips like that, it means I did it 🙂

Be sure to do the function testing outlined above. All weapons should be cautiously test fired to ensure safety.

Summary

I was actually impressed by the design other than my extreme dislike for the retaining wire. The trigger is better than I expected. Not great but not horrible either.

In the next post, I’ll take about the first upper and how I configured the firearm.

I hope this helps you out.

MAC/VMAC, Sten

Refinishing Sten 20 Round Israeli Mags and Magazine Loaders

November 23, 2024 RoninsGrips

Back in 2017, I planned to build a Sten Mk. V and actually am planning to move forward with it now that I have built some VMAC9s that use Sten magazines. Well, as part of the VMAC builds, I bought some of the new MPA Polymer Sten mags and also decided to refinish some incredibly flithy Israeli modified Sten mags and loaders just caked in ancient cosmoline.

The Magazines

The Israelis had many different weapons in use following WWII including British Sten guns. Somewhere along the way they realized they could improve reliability by limiting the magazinees to 20 rounds via long skirted followers, adding brass wire on the sides to better stabilize the followers and soldering the bullet count peepholes closed.

At some point in the late 1950s, they phased out the Stens put thousands of these modified Sten magazines into long term storage where the preservative dried out, some rusting started and they became just genuinely filthy.

Closer to modern day, a US importer bought them plus we had Sten kits coming from all kinds of places. I bought two ten packs of filthy Sten mags from Centerfire Systems for a song, I have had the kits and these mags sitting in a tub.

Cleaning Them Up

The surplus steel mags are way too filthy to be reliable out of the box plus they look ancient. So, I opened up one the bags of 10 plus an odd box of six and oh man, did they need cleaning. I fired up my Vevor Ultrasonic cleaner that is filled with Simple Green HD, heated it up and then put the mags in there. My fluid was old to begin with but chunks of who knows what were floating up the surface as I ran 3-4 15 minute cycles trying to clean the things up. I’d do one side a couple of times, flip the mags so the other side was then face up and do it again.

They were in tough shape. The mags in a box were on better shape than the ones in the plastic bag. One of the mags looked like it has been put away wet or something. The inside was very, very rusted.

The mag loaders were caked with old cosmoline.

The solution was about 150 degrees. This is after the first 15 minute cycke.

I took some of the magazines and just oiled them after cleaning vs refinishing. That’s an option for you if you want.

Manganese Parkerizing the Surplus Sten Mags

The mags were disassembled and I used a sanding mop to quickly score the surface of the mags. Abrasive blasting would have given a more consistent surface and better results. I hosed them down with brake cleaner, let them dry and put bodies, followers and base plates in my parkerization solution – click here for more info on how to make your own black manganese park solution and process to follow.

Everything was lubed with 10w30. I like to scrub with steel wool to remove any loose surface phosphate. Note, I did not park the springs or locking plates.

They came out pretty good – better than I had thought they would.

Here’s one of the in process VMAC9 pistols with one of the mags installed. Most of my mags had “character” marks including dings and some light rust. All except for one were salvageable.

Summary

With a VMAC9, you can either use the MPA polymer Sten mags or original steel Sten mags. I actually plan to test both. I like the looks and history of the 20 round Israeli Sten magazines. The steel Sten mags are out there and are affordable if you don’t mind doing a little cleaning.

I hope this helps you out.

Section 1: Introduction – Deconstructing the Myth of Soviet “Cosmoline”

Section 2: A Comparative Analysis: Soviet ПВК vs. American Cosmoline

The Soviet Standard: ГОСТ 19537-83 and Смазка ПВК

The American Counterpart: MIL-C-11796C and Cosmoline

Table 1: Comparative Properties of Soviet ПВК vs. American Cosmoline

Section 3: The Doctrine of Preservation: Why the Red Army Greased Everything

Strategic Depth and Long-Term Storage

Warfare in a Harsh Climate

A System, Not a Substance: The ЕСЗКС

Section 4: The Aging Process: From Viscous Grease to Hardened Shell

Mechanisms of Aging: Evaporation and Oxidation

Intended Lifespan and the Reality of Strategic Reserves

The Challenge of Hardened Preservative: Then vs. Now

Section 5: The Official Soviet Method: Расконсервация per GOST 9.014-78

Reconstructing the Official Protocol

The Doctrine of “Good Enough” in Practice

Section 6: The Modern Armorer’s Guide: Top 5 Removal Methods Evaluated

General Principles for All Methods

Method 1: Heated Ultrasonic Cleaning

Method 2: Solvent Immersion

Method 3: Thermal Application (Non-Immersion)

Method 4: Aqueous Immersion (Boiling Water)

Method 5: Manual Cleaning with Modern Degreasers

Table 2: Ranking of Modern Removal Methods

Section 7: Conclusion and Recommendations

Glossary of Key Russian Terms

Works cited

Share this:

Like this:

Pics or it didn’t happen

Trigger Results

Summary

Share this:

Like this:

Timeline

Key Individuals

Share this:

Like this:

A Closer Look At The Aero M5 Receiver

Summary

Share this:

Like this:

Velocity Firearms Uppers

Fitting Will Likely Be Required

Why was my bolt binding?

Summary

Share this:

Like this:

Vendors of Adapters

My Problem

The Solution

The Steps

Summary

Share this:

Like this:

Parts Identification

The Practical Solutions 1913 Rear Rail Adapter

Let’s step through the assembly

Now For Photos

Summary

Share this:

Like this:

The Magazines

Cleaning Them Up

Manganese Parkerizing the Surplus Sten Mags

Summary

Share this:

Like this:

When Strength and Quality Matter Most