Up until recently, if I wanted to tell you the general opinion of some company or product, I would either write about my own take, maybe factor in comments from a few friends, articles I have read or maybe even skim a few newsgroups. Well, there is another option now. There is a method known as “Sentiment Analysis” wherein you use a tool that can skim countless posts and return an overview of the “sentiment” or categorized opinions about a topic, product, company, etc. They are pretty cool and while I have access to them at work, I didn’t have one I could afford for the blog until now and guess what? I am a donkey on the edge and not afraid to use it and share the results.
So here is my first sentiment analysis of Zenith Firearms. The analysis looks at social media and excludes vendor posts. Here’s what we get:
You’re right, it’s important to look beyond curated marketing materials and see what real users are saying. Here’s a refined sentiment analysis of Zenith Firearms based on social media, excluding vendor posts:
Positive Sentiment:
Forums and Enthusiast Groups: Places like Reddit (r/MP5, r/GunPorn, r/NFA), AR15.com, and dedicated firearm forums show a strong positive sentiment. Users frequently praise Zenith’s:
Accuracy and Reliability: Many share their experiences with tight groupings and flawless operation, often comparing favorably to original HKs.
Authenticity: The “clone correct” aspect is a big plus for many, with detailed comparisons and appreciation for staying true to the MP5 design.
Customer Service: While less frequent, positive interactions with Zenith’s customer service are mentioned, especially regarding warranty issues or questions.
Social Media Platforms:
YouTube: Videos from independent reviewers and enthusiasts generally echo the forum sentiment. Accuracy tests, comparisons, and build quality overviews are common, usually with positive conclusions.
Instagram: Photos and short videos often showcase Zenith firearms in use, with comments reflecting pride of ownership and positive experiences.
Negative Sentiment:
While less prevalent, some criticisms do appear:
Price: This remains a common concern, especially compared to other clones or pistol caliber carbine (PCC) options.
Availability: Frustration with limited stock and long wait times is occasionally voiced.
Quality Control: While generally positive, isolated reports of minor issues (e.g., finish blemishes, canted sights) do exist. It’s important to note these seem infrequent compared to the volume of positive feedback.
“Elitism” perception: A small segment perceives Zenith owners as elitist or “fanboys” due to the brand’s premium pricing and association with the MP5 platform. This is more about brand perception than the firearms themselves.
Important Notes:
Filtering Vendor Posts: Identifying and excluding vendor-influenced posts (ads, sponsored content) is crucial for an unbiased view.
Subjectivity: Sentiment analysis on social media is inherently subjective. Enthusiast communities may have inherent biases.
Context Matters: Individual negative comments should be weighed against the overall volume of positive feedback and the specifics of the complaint.
Overall (this is from the tool):
Even after considering social media and filtering out vendor posts, the sentiment towards Zenith Firearms remains largely positive. They have a strong reputation for producing high-quality, accurate, and reliable firearms that appeal to MP5 enthusiasts and discerning gun owners. While price and availability are recurring concerns, the overall feedback suggests that many consider Zenith’s offerings worth the investment.
Summary
That is pretty impressive and it seems to generally agree with what I have read. I like Zenith Firearms in general but don’t consider myself a fanboy. For example, I was excited when I heard they were doing their own trigger packs with machined sidewalls vs. bent sheet metal because they said the resulting triggers would be so much better. The reality was a “meh” trigger that didn’t impress me and was replaced with a Timney. Other than that though, my Zenith ZF5-P is a nice weapon and has had great reliability so far.
At any rate, I will start sharing more of these so you can get more of an “overall view” of what folks are saying on forums, redit, etc.
I hope this helps you out.
If you find this post useful, please share the link on Facebook, with your friends, etc. Your support is much appreciated and if you have any feedback, please email me at in**@ro*********.com. Please note that for links to other websites, I may be paid via an affiliate program such as Avantlink, Impact, Amazon and eBay.
Zenith Firearms was founded in Afton, Virginia by Hanri and Kutlay Kaya. Hanri is the CEO and was originally from South Africa, Hanri met her husband Kutlay in the US. Her background wasn’t initially in firearms, but in international trade, which proved crucial to Zenith’s success.
Kutlay Kaya: An engineer from Turkey, Kutlay brought his knowledge of Turkish manufacturing and his connections in Turkey to the business.
Here’s a breakdown of their history:
Zenith Quest International (ZQI) Ammunition was founded in 2010 – Zenith Firearms Inc (ZFI) was not their first business venture. The couple had been importing other products from Turkey and were approached by Walmart to import ammunition during the 2012 ammo shortage from MKEK (Makina ve Kimya Endüstrisi Kurumu – “Mechanical and Chemical Industry Corporation”), a Turkish government-owned defense company that became the joint stock company MKE in 2021. That’s why you might recall seeing “ZQI” ammunition at Walmart back in the day.
In 2014, they structured their entities such that Zenith Quest Corporation (ZQC) was the holding company for both ZQI and ZFI. ZNT is Zenith Global that operates in Turkey.
The MKE Partnership (2014-2017):
MKE (Mechanical and Chemical Industry Corporation): This Turkish state-owned arms manufacturer has a long history, dating back to the Ottoman Empire. They’re known for producing a wide range of military equipment, including licensed copies of Heckler & Koch firearms like the G3 rifle and the MP5 submachine gun. The key here is that they were licensed and had the tooling, plans, etc. MKE was trained by HK back in the day to make these weapons so they had, and continue to have, deep knowledge about the designs. I own an MKE AP5-P, which is an HK MP5K clone, and it is very nicely done for example.
Zenith’s Role: Zenith Firearms became the exclusive importer of MKE’s MP5 clones for the US civilian market. They offered several variants, including pistols, short-barreled rifles (SBRs), and full-sized rifles.
Why it Worked: This partnership was initially successful because:
High Quality: MKE’s MP5s were known for their quality and faithfulness to the original HK design. Again, they were a licensed manufacturer.
Affordability: They were significantly cheaper than genuine HK MP5s, which were often prohibitively expensive for many buyers.
Strong Demand: There was a large, untapped market of enthusiasts and shooters who wanted an MP5 but couldn’t afford an HK.
Zenith’s Pivot to US Manufacturing (2017-Present):
Reasons for the Change: Several factors likely contributed to Zenith’s decision to manufacture in the US:
Relationship Rift: Due to a variety of factors, MKE and Zenith grew apart. Repeated promises of firearms shipping were missed, monies owed were not paid and finally there was a suit by MKE alleging trade secret theft that they lost. MKE wound up moving to Century Firearms to import their firearms.
Increased Control: Domestic production gave Zenith greater control over quality, production timelines, and product development.
“Buy American” Sentiment: Appealing to customers who prefer American-made products. In the HK-community this can actually be a con as well as some die hard HK advocates argue that only HK can make an HK-type weapon.
Potential Trade Issues: Relying on imports can be risky due to changing trade policies and international relations. There were, and continue to be, issues between the US and Turkey when it comes to trade.
The ZF-5: Zenith’s American-made MP5. They invested in tooling and machinery to produce these firearms in-house. They even made some improvements to the design, such as using a proprietary heat-treated barrel steel.
Expanding Product Line: Zenith has also introduced other roller-delayed firearms, like the Z-5RS, inspired by the HK53.
Summary
Zenith Fireams has a relatively short but lively history with entrepreneurship, politics and a drive to succeed on the parts of the founders. I’ve ordered direct from them a number of times and have found them great to deal with as a consumer. If you are looking for a roller locked firearm, take a look at what they have to offer.
Note, I have to buy all of my parts – nothing here was paid for by sponsors, etc. I do make a small amount if you click on an ad and buy something but that is it. You’re getting my real opinion on stuff.
If you find this post useful, please share the link on Facebook, with your friends, etc. Your support is much appreciated and if you have any feedback, please email me at in**@ro*********.com. Please note that for links to other websites, I may be paid via an affiliate program such as Avantlink, Impact, Amazon and eBay.
When I saw a MAC MP5 clone listed on a firearm website it immediately caught my eye mainly because of three key letters – “MAC”. When many folks see “MAC”, including me, they think Military Armaments Corporation and the iconic MAC-10 and MAC-11 submachine guns. But where did “MAC” come from? Had someone bought the brand or what? In typical firearm industry fashion, the brands are related by name but not by birth … at least that’s how I’m going to put it and let me explain why.
The Original Military Armaments Corporation (MAC)
The original MAC was founded in 1970 by engineer Gordon Ingram and businessman Mitchell WerBell III. MAC is best known for its iconic submachine guns (SMGs): the MAC-10 and MAC-11 that were featured in countless movies, TV series and video games.
The MAC SMGs were designed for military and law enforcement, these compact firearms quickly gained a reputation for their high rate of fire, affordability, and ease of concealment. While originally intended for professional use, their popularity soon extended to the civilian market.
Let’s sketch out a timeline:
1969: Gordon Ingram joins SIONICS as Chief Engineer.
1970: Ingram designs the original MAC-10 prototype.
1970s: MAC manufactures and markets the MAC-10 and MAC-11, primarily to the military and law enforcement.
1973: Production stopped due to internal politics
1975: Financial problems worsened including failure to pay creditors and filed for brankruptcy
1976: Bankruptcy sale of MAC assets including weapon and parts inventories (with some ATF-prohibited exceptions) and tooling
After that, various companies, including RPB, SWD and Cobray, manufactured versions of the MAC-10 and MAC-11. The MAC brand name kind of faded away and maybe for many reasons despite the iconic SMGs – the company failed, association with criminals, relatively low quality firearms, …. probably some combination but the MAC brand did die.
The Current Fate of the MAC Brand
As I’ve mentioned before, companies come and go but well known brands live on. Now MAC is an interesting case so someone email me if I am wrong because I am trying to string together nuggets of what I can find.
Let’s start with some background on the current owner – SDS Arms was founded in 2017 and is located in Knoxville, TN, and helps bring foreign firearms to the US market. Until October 2024, most us knew them as “SDS Imports” and the name change, according to them, was to better connect with their customers.
SDS Arms has a bevy of brands they import. The list includes: Tisas USA, Tokarev USA, Spandau Arms, Inglis Manufacturing and now, MAC.
In 2017, SDS revived the MAC name. They didn’t buy it from another firm – it would seem the MAC brand had fallen between the cracks in the industry brand ownership fabric and so SDS scooped it up. Well played SDS.
SDS has begun importing a number of firearms under the MAC brand name. The ones that caught my eye and caused me to want to find out more were the MAC-5 (MP5-clone) and the MAC-5K (MP5K-clone).
A quick comment on those two HK clones – they are made in Turkey but I think they are made by Mertsav. Interestingly, Mertsav is a subcontractor to MKE where they probably learned what they needed to know to pull this off.
Now who makes all of the parts that Mertsav is assembling from, that I do not know. There’s a lot of conjecture and not many facts. People seem to think that at least some of the components are from MKE while Mertsav builds up its capabilties.
So, the MAC brand lives having been resucitated by SDS Arms. The MP5 and MP5K clones are being made Mertsav in Turkey and imported here. MAC is also selling other firearms as well.
Note, I have to buy all of my parts – nothing here was paid for by sponsors, etc. I do make a small amount if you click on an ad and buy something but that is it. You’re getting my real opinion on stuff.
If you find this post useful, please share the link on Facebook, with your friends, etc. Your support is much appreciated and if you have any feedback, please email me at in**@ro*********.com. Please note that for links to other websites, I may be paid via an affiliate program such as Avantlink, Impact, Amazon and eBay.
It seems like roller-locked firearms are having a resurgence as of late with a number of vendors making them. My first roller lock was from a company that is still around and I actually just bought a MP5 clone from them that I need to write about. Before I do that, let’s review how PTR came into existence.
Timeline
Origins (1997-2005): The story begins with Jose Luis Diaz, a Cuban-American entrepreneur with a passion for firearms. In 1997, he established JLD Enterprises in Connecticut, aiming to manufacture American-made versions of the G3 rifle. JLD’s PTR-91 (Precision Tactical Rifle) gained traction among enthusiasts seeking a domestic alternative to imported G3s.
Acquisition of FMP Tooling (2003-2005): A pivotal moment occurred when JLD acquired the original tooling and machinery from Fábrica Militar de Braço de Prata (FMP) of Portugal, a licensed manufacturer of H&K G3 rifles. This acquisition included blueprints, gauges, and thousands of parts, granting JLD the capability to produce rifles using the same equipment that produced the original G3s. To be clear, PTR did not license the designs and what not from H&K – they bought them from FMP.
Formation of PTR Industries (2006-Present): In 2006, Diaz partnered with P. Everett Weed, an experienced manufacturer, to form PTR 91 Inc. This marked a rebranding and expansion of JLD Enterprises who was folded into PTR. Diaz left in late 2010 and the direction of PTR changed from a focus on assembling firearms from surplus parts to one of new designs and innovation. Currently, PTR has the in-house capabilities to make all of the parts of their firearms.
I really like MP5 and MP5K-type weapons, so let’s add key dates in for them:
2017: PTR Industries first announced their plans to produce MP5 clones at the 2017 SHOT Show.
Late 2018 / Early 2019: PTR began shipping their first MP5 clones, the PTR 9CT pistol and the PTR 9KT pistol. These were essentially clones of the HK SP5K, a semi-automatic pistol version of the MP5K.
2020: PTR expanded their MP5 clone lineup with the release of the PTR 9R rifle, a clone of the HK94 carbine.
2021: PTR introduced the 5R rifle, a clone of the HK SP5, a semi-automatic rifle version of the MP5.
Key Individuals
Jose Luis Diaz: Was the founder of JLD Enterprises and the visionary behind bringing G3 rifle production to the United States. He left PTR in 2010.
P. Everett Weed: Instrumental in the formation of PTR 91 Inc. and the company’s growth through his manufacturing expertise and business acumen.
Conclusion:
PTR Industries has carved out a niche around the family of HK-related roller-locked weapons. Given the continued popularity of those types of firearms, they are well positioned. PTR is working on reselling and perhaps later making weapons such as the Archon B and D pistols and both Jack and Reacher shotguns.
So, PTR continues to evolve. I’ve found their products to be well done in the past and own a 9CT (MP5) currently. It will be interesting to see where the firm heads. I’ve owned a few PTR firearms over the years – a 91 clone, a 7.62x51PDWR and now the 9CT – I have no hesitation in recommending them.
Note, I have to buy all of my parts – nothing here was paid for by sponsors, etc. I do make a small amount if you click on an ad and buy something but that is it. You’re getting my real opinion on stuff.
If you find this post useful, please share the link on Facebook, with your friends, etc. Your support is much appreciated and if you have any feedback, please email me at in**@ro*********.com. Please note that for links to other websites, I may be paid via an affiliate program such as Avantlink, Impact, Amazon and eBay.
S&B is one of the world’s largest ammunition companies and has changed hands a few times. In December 2023, Colt CZ announced it would acquire 100% of Sellier & Bellot from CBC of Brazil. for $703 million, excluding Sellier & Bellot’s net debt. The deal included cash and new Colt CZ common stock. It’s my understanding the deal closed in May 2024.
Okay, being an American, I saw “Colt” and immediately wondered if there was a relationship with the traditional Colt firearms brand in the US. As you often see in the firearms / defense industry, owners may come and go but established brand names rarely die and Samuel Colt’s name and brand continue to live on.
The brands continue to move around. Colt is owned by CZ who changed the holding company’s name to “Colt CZ”. They bought S&B in May 2024. So, Colt CZ has a formidable lineup and it’s always interesting to see “who owns whom” at a given time.
If you find this post useful, please share the link on Facebook, with your friends, etc. Your support is much appreciated and if you have any feedback, please email me at in**@ro*********.com. Please note that for links to other websites, I may be paid via an affiliate program such as Avantlink, Impact, Amazon and eBay.
I am a huge fan of S&B ammo, factory tour videos and Ian McCollum’s Forgotten Weapons series (If you don’t know about Ian, click here for his website and here for his Youtube channel.) So, when he posted this morning about his tour of the S&B facility in Vlašim, in the Czech Republic, I knew I had to watch it.
As usual, Ian does a great job. Larry Vickers created a video back in 2018 of his tour and it was interesting to compare what Larry saw six-plus years ago to what Ian just saw.
I learned three new things watching Ian’s video:
Literally every single round that ships from S&B is QC inspected at each step of manufacturing through various computerized methods – imaging, weight, etc. Literally, every single round – not samples – must pass their quality checks. No wonder their quality is so good.
It takes 2-3 days to change over from one to another caliber so they want long production runs to absorb all the setup costs. I can only imagine the fixed costs are enormous too. A facility like you see in the video costs millions and millions of dollars.
Civilian and military ammo both have their necks annealed. The only difference is that the military inspects want to be able to see that it happened whereas commercial/private shooters view seeing the discolored neck as defective so additional polishing is done to remove it. Other than the additional polishing – the process is the same.
The 100% QC capabilities are stunning. This machine will kick out any case that video inspection deems as being deffective. Literally every single case! All of my old school sampling and inspection methods from 30+ years ago sure seems dated now.
So, with no further to-do, here’s Ian’s S&B factory tour video:
Summary
This is S&B factory tour video is another great production by Ian. I have shot S&B for years – espectially 9mm, 10mm and .45ACP plus some .300 Win Mag and .338 Lapua and they continue to impress me.
I hope you find this interesting also.
Note: All screen shots are from Ian’s video and remain his property.
If you find this post useful, please share the link on Facebook, with your friends, etc. Your support is much appreciated and if you have any feedback, please email me at in**@ro*********.com. Please note that for links to other websites, I may be paid via an affiliate program such as Avantlink, Impact, Amazon and eBay.
I’d bought an Aero M5 lower receiver on sale a while back and decided to build it. Over the years, I’ve assembled a couple of M4s and one M5 where I bought an assembled lower and upper but this was my first actual build. I’ve always found the quality of the Aero parts to be good and they definitely made some unique tweaks to their M5 vs. their M4.
Rather than “yet another post about how to build an AR”, I decided to comment on the differences I noticed about the M5 lower. In general, the AR10-series of weapons aren’t standardized and you have no guarantee that parts from different vendors can interchange so you need to do some research and plan your build.
It is a DPMS Gen 2 pattern lower with Aero’s own spin on it. With that said, even though it is patterned after the DPMS, verify any other brand parts before you try to use them. I can tell you that AR grips and stocks work plus triggers.
I opted for a 16″ Aero upper, bolt, charging handle, recoil spring, buffer and lower parts kit. However, I had a Trigger Tech Duty trigger pack I wanted to try out plus I wanted to use a Magpul grip and UBR stock. The UBR has been on my radar for years but hadn’t tried one before now.
It starts with a pile of parts.
The pile was getting more organized. Huh … I had two LPKs – one with a Magpul MOE grip and one without. Well, spare parts never hurt … especially when the detents launch into orbit…
A Closer Look At The Aero M5 Receiver
It is a forged receiver using 7075-T6 aluminum and that is just fine. Now, arguing forged vs. billet will start all kinds of arguments about which is stronger, lasts longer, can solve world peace, etc.
Ignore the marketing and people weighing in on forums who have no idea. From a purely practical perspective, buy a receiver that you like the looks of from a reputable firm and have read reviews about. Honestly, forget about forged vs. billet. End of story.
There are plenty of other things to worry about rather than theory vs. practical reality. A receiver is just part of the puzzle that includes the other parts of the firearm, the ammo, the optics, you (the shooter), the environment, the situation, and far, far more.
It’s a gracefully executed design. You can see the large flared mag well,the stylized “A” for Aero symbol, the integral oversized trigger guard, a shoulder screw is used instead of a roll pin for the bolt catch, pictogram around the selector, the rear takedown pin is oversized, and the buffer tube has a flat area on the side. Everything is nicely machined and the anodized surface has a nicely done uniform finish.
The bolt catch having a shoulder screw makes that part of the assembly very easy not to mention lowering the odds of scuffing the receiver if someone lacks the proper tools. The M5 just requires a 1.5mm hex head bit. In this case, I am using one from my Strebito precision screwdriver set.
Ok, did not expect this. The front detent spring and pin go in through the boss. It’s not exposed like an AR15/M4 so none of my regular tools would work.
I used a 1/4″ clevis pin to go through the bosses, I pushed the pin and spring down with a thin hex key while sliding the pin forward. The pin then captured/retained the detent and spring. I then carefully slid in the front takedown pin while keeping the clevis pin pushed against it. Once the channel in the pin was over the detent, it sprang forward and everything was set. I carefull rotated the pin to make sure the detent was in the channel and then pushed it into the open position to make sure the takdown pin was correctly captured.
There are two changes I want to point out in the grip screw area. Just to the right of the grip screw hole is the bottom of the nylon tipped tensioning screw. Before you install everything, install your upper and adjust this screw to get the tension you want so the upper doesn’t rattle. Too much tension and you will not be able to disassembe the rifle without a punch if at all. Note, I have the selector detent in there. I dumped it out before I flipped it over to install the upper. The hole to the right of the selector detent is the takedown detent hole. Because the M5 lower is longer, putting it here makes sense. Aero does have it tapped for a 4-40 set screw so you can elegantly capture the detent spring if you want to. Note, you do need to trim the detent spring level with the receiver using some nippers before you install the set screw if you go this route. Oddly enough, my lower parts kit either did not have the set screw or I lost the set screw so I did not go that route.
Here’s the hylon-tipped top of the tensioning set screw.
I set the tensioning screw just enough so the upper didn’t rattle but also such that I could push out the takedown pin by hand. Since I lacked the 4-40 set screw to capture it, I just juggled both detent springs as I installed the pistol grip. It wasn”t too hard actually but the set screw would definitely have made it easier.
Summary
First off, kudos to Aero for another fine set of parts. I found the small differences with the Aero M5 interesting. Aero Precision turns out quality – I’ve owned various ARs and even have a .308 Solus bolt rifle from them right now. I have no hesitation recommending their products.
I hope this helps you out.
Note, I have to buy all of my parts – nothing here was paid for by sponsors, etc. I do make a small amount if you click on an ad and buy something but that is it. You’re getting my real opinion on stuff.
If you find this post useful, please share the link on Facebook, with your friends, etc. Your support is much appreciated and if you have any feedback, please email me at in**@ro*********.com. Please note that for links to other websites, I may be paid via an affiliate program such as Avantlink, Impact, Amazon and eBay.
My friend Scott Igert owns Michigan Gun Exchange and recently got in a bunch of out the front (OTF) automatic knives from Great Lakes Firearms and Ammunition (GLFA). This caught my attention for a couple of reasons – 1) I had never heard of GLFA. 2) The knives looked and felt decent 3) The 8″ model was only $45 at the time when Scott was introducing the model line. Well, I had to buy one right then and there to study it. At least, that would be my cover story if my wife asked.
Who is GLFA?
According to their “About Us” page – Great Lakes Firearms and Ammunition is located in Sparta, MI, and is a family owned business. They started in firearms retail in 2013 but noticed an opportunity for affordable AR rifles and started manufacturing. They now have over 30 CNC machines, do their own Cerakoting and are steadily expanding. They do not have any knife listings on their site – in general, their site is pretty light on products and details.
I’ll be honest, I did some reading on their ARs and they have mixed reviews. Some guys love their rifles and others don’t so I really can’t speak to them. The focus of this post is about the OTF knife I bought from Scott.
Opening The Box
At home, I took a hard look at the knife. It came in a box with a white label on it with a cheap sheath. It was pretty bare bones which immediately made me think it was made by somebody else – probably in China given the price point. I couldn’t think of any firms in the US being able to wholesale an OTF knife for under $45 (you can see the sticker on the box – that was what Scott was selling it for at the time).
The knife came in a bare bones package. The while label is pretty much a giveaway that another firm was the OEM.
I’m make my only real negative comment up front. It comes with a really cheap belt sheath that I would recommend replacing if you want a sheath. The stitching is light and I have zero faith in the velcro belt loop on the back.
I wouldn’t trust the velcro belt/equipment loop. I guess they felt they needed to include one but I would replace the sheath vs. ever use it *if* I wanted to carry the knife in a sheath.
Honestly, at the price point this sells at, this is the only thing I am going to ding them on and it’s not a big deal to get a good sheath. I’d rather they invested in the knife anyways.
The GLFA OTF Knife Itself
It’s just over 8″ open. It’s almost 8.5″ when you include the glass-breaker stud on the pommel. “GLFA” was engraved in the notched area on the handle below the thumb switch.
It comes with a decent belt clip that is secured by the glass breaker. It also serves to keep the halves together should the screws come loose.
The blade looks the same on both sides. You can see the grinding or milling “lines” on the blade. These are common on many knives and is an observation. Note the distinctively shaped lightening holes at the top. I think they are decorative but may have also been done to reduce mass.
Let’s Disassemble the Knife
To open up the knife, find a nice clear flat work area. The green work matt keeps small parts from rolling or bouncing away – it’s not just a decorative background. I’ve done my fair share of searching for small parts so I try to take some precautions now. Also, take lots of photos to remember how things go back together 🙂
By the way, you may need to do this some day if your knife gets dirty and will not cycle. You’ll need to open and clean it.
I removed the screws and then realized I needed to remove the glass breaker tip. I’d recommend you remove the tip first and then the screws. I just put my screwdrive in one of the holes and turned counterclockwise to remove it.
Lift the thin side where the screws were at off the thick part where the mechanism is. At this point, my moving things around ccased the spring clip on the left to slide up and snap back. Normally, it is all the was forward over that rectangular piece called the “lock actuator”
So the spring assemly is in the top middle. It’s sitting on the lock actuator. Under the top left of the actuator is the open lock and to the lower right is the closed lock. The locks look like small tabs seated in the handle.
Below the handle is the lock actuator. You can now see the two locks that remain in the handle. The blade could be slid out the end if so desired. By the way, my best guess is the handle is some zinc-aluminum alloy given the weight and color. Note, all of the maching is decent – even inside.
Here’s the blade – it just slides out. By the way, that funny looking piece of metal above it is the thumb stud/trigger. It’s upside down.
That little spring is what does the magic. Note the small tab is to the left and the longer one is to the right. They get stretched from the front to the end of the lock actuator. Given the size of the spring, you now also know why the blade needs to be clean and it doesn’t take much force to stop the forward momentum of the blade. I literally stopped the blade with a piece of 8.5×11″ 20 pound typing paper. The tip went through about an inch before it stopped. In this stalled state, the blade is “sprung”. You need to either pull it all the way forward to recock the spring or snap your wrist like a gravity knife to get it out and recock the spring.
I’d like to meet who figured out the combination of spring, locks and actuator. The formal name is the “machined lock actuator” and it has surfaces to depress the lock at one end or the other so the blade can spring forward or backward. It’s simple when you look at it but the person who first thought it up was pretty smart!!
To Re-Assemble
Stretch the spring from left with the short tab to the right end of the lock actuator witht he longest tab. Both tabs are face down. Yes, it takes a surprising amount of force to stretch that spring. Note the blade is in the handle and half way but not at one end or the other. You want it out of the way of the spring tabs or they will just pop up if they hit the stud on the blade.
So with the blade part way in, lay the actuator down on top. You then put the thumb switch back on the exposed vertical tab of the slide lock actuator.
Finally, put the other half of the handle on, reinstall the screws so they are snug and then the belt clip and glass breaker. Done. I definitely recommend the Strebito set if you need small screw driver bits.
As mentioned above, the blade will be sprung. You will need to either pull the blade out to recock the spring or flick it down like a gravity knife. I did the latter out of habit to recock the spring and then everything worked fine.
Here it is by a ruler for scale.
Note, a knife like this needs to break in / wear in as parts get smoother with use. If you need to lubricate it, use a dry lube and not oil. For example, Dupont’s Dry Film Lubricant spray.
Who made the knife?
Whomever built this knew what they were doing and had masws production capabilities to drive the price down. From my perspective, there was no way GLFA could produce a decent OTF knife like this, at such a low price point and still have time to make their rifles. Clearly they were OEM’ing them from someone. As mentioned earlier, I was almost certain it was a Chinese company.
I did some digging based on the four relatively unique design elements that I figured would be rare to see combined – the shape of the handle, profile of the blade, the distinctive successively larger lightening holes in the blade and the glass breaker tip.
I used Google Images and some industry trade sites I know of and narrowed it down to the most likely candidate who does OEM knife work including OTF knives: Yangjiang Honglin Industrial Co., Ltd of Guangdong, China. They claim to have been in business for more than 10 years, have over 20,000 square meters of manufacturing, over 10 production lines and several Chinese quality certifications. They can build a knifefrom the point of raw materials to finished goods.
Could I be wrong about the manufacturer? Yes, but nobody else had all of those design elements present in the photos of sample products I saw.
So, they are a legit knife maker and that then makes my best guess that the knife steel is the Chinese 8CR13MOV which is a perfect decent/average stainless alloy. The average hardness of 8CR13MOV is 58-60 HRC but that’s an industry average and no guarantee of what the Chinese company actually did.
In short, they did a decent job designing and building the knife. I doubt they used junk steel and it’s what you’d find in many sub $40 retail Chinese import blades from Kershaw and others.
By the way, this is not a negative post about GLFA. I was curious as to who made this. Finding and importing quality products takes effort and money.
Summary
For the price, you can’t beat the GLFA OTF knife. You can afford to buy one, use it, enjoy it and not worry about it getting lost or damaged. Speaking for myself, the more expensive a knife gets, the more inclined I am to baby it than use it. I’ll use this GLFA and not worry about it and I’m saying that in a good way.
If you are interested, you can order this and other models from Scott’s website or visit his Michigan Gun Exchange store in Saint Joseph, MI.
I hope this helps you out.
Note, I have to buy all of my parts – nothing here was paid for by sponsors, etc. I do make a small amount if you click on an ad and buy something but that is it. You’re getting my real opinion on stuff.
If you find this post useful, please share the link on Facebook, with your friends, etc. Your support is much appreciated and if you have any feedback, please email me at in**@ro*********.com. Please note that for links to other websites, I may be paid via an affiliate program such as Avantlink, Impact, Amazon and eBay.
