Tag Archives: Venezuela

Cuba’s Collapse: Understanding Terminal Entropy

Date: January 6, 2026

This is a time-sensitive special report and is based on information available as of January 6, 2026. Due to the situation being very dynamic the following report should be used to obtain a perspective but not viewed as an absolute.

1. Executive Intelligence Summary

1.1 The Strategic Verdict: State Lifecycle Stage 5 (Terminal Entropy)

The Republic of Cuba has definitively exited the phase of “Stagnation,” characterized by slow decay managed through repressive tolerance and migration valves, and has entered State Lifecycle Stage 5: Terminal Entropy. The assessment of the Geopolitical Risk Synthesis Cell, covering the predictive horizon of January 2026 through January 2029, indicates that the probability of systemic collapse now exceeds 65%.1 This collapse is not modeled as a clean transition to liberal democracy or a negotiated pacted transition, but rather as a fragmentation of central authority, a cessation of critical infrastructure function across the national territory, and the potential atomization of territorial control into localized fiefdoms. The Cuban state currently functions as a “Hollow State,” a condition where the bureaucratic shell—the ministries, the party congresses, the official gazettes—remains visually intact, but the internal machinery of service delivery, coercion, and resource allocation has structurally failed.2

The critical variable driving this assessment, forcing a recalibration of all previous stability models, is the January 2026 neutralization of the Venezuelan strategic lifeline.4 This event, combined with the irreversible physical degradation of the National Electric System (SEN), has triggered a positive feedback loop of ruin that the current leadership, paralyzed by internal succession anxieties and resource insolvency, lacks the fiscal capacity to arrest and the political capital to mitigate. The state has consumed its accumulated capital stocks—political, financial, and infrastructural—and now faces a void where its strategic reserves once stood.

The concept of Terminal Entropy in this context refers to the irreversible dissipation of the energy required to maintain the state’s ordering functions. In a complex system like a nation-state, survival requires a constant input of energy—in the form of economic value, political legitimacy, and coercive power—to counteract the natural tendency toward disorder. For six decades, the Cuban Revolution maintained this order through Soviet subsidies, then tourism, then Venezuelan oil, and finally the export of medical services. In 2026, all these inputs have simultaneously approached zero. The “Maduro Shock” of January 3, 2026, was not merely a supply chain disruption; it was the removal of the energetic floor of the Cuban economy.5 Without the 27,400 to 50,000 barrels per day of subsidized crude and fuel oil provided by the Bolivarian Republic, the Cuban state cannot generate the electricity required to power the industries that generate the foreign currency needed to buy food to feed the workforce that powers the industries. The cycle is broken.

Furthermore, the state’s response mechanisms have atrophied. The purge of Economy Minister Alejandro Gil in 2024 7 was not a corrective measure against corruption, but a symptom of elite predation in a shrinking resource environment. As the pie vanishes, the factions within the regime—specifically the technocratic wing of the Communist Party (PCC) and the military-financial conglomerate GAESA—have turned on each other, prioritizing the seizure of remaining liquid assets over the stabilization of the national grid. This internal fracturing, occurring precisely at the moment of maximum external pressure, accelerates the slide toward entropy. The demographic hemorrhage, with over 1.4 million working-age adults fleeing the island since 2021 2, has left the state with a dependency ratio that is mathematically unsupportable. There are simply not enough producers left to support the pensioners, the bureaucracy, and the security apparatus.

1.2 The “Hollow State” Phenomenon

The current operational status of the Cuban government can be best described as performative governance. The leadership continues to announce “Government Programs to Eliminate Distortions” and “Macroeconomic Stabilization Plans,” yet these announcements have zero correlation with implementation or reality.9 The delay in implementing the promised floating exchange rate—postponed repeatedly from 2024 into 2026—demonstrates a paralysis of decision-making.9 The state announces a policy, but the transmission belts to execute it—the banks, the ministries, the local enterprises—are jammed or broken.

This hollowness is most visible in the total disconnect between the official economy and the real economy. While the state maintains an official exchange rate of 24 CUP to the dollar for corporate accounting and 120 CUP for individuals, the street operates at rates exceeding 400 CUP.11 The state attempts to control prices, but goods simply vanish from formal markets and reappear in the informal sector at dollarized prices the state cannot regulate. The government passes laws to support agriculture, yet production of sugar, the nation’s historical lifeblood, has fallen to levels not seen since the Spanish colonial era.13 The Ministry of Agriculture issues directives, but the land remains barren because there is no fuel for the tractors and no fertilizer for the crops. The bureaucracy issues papers; reality ignores them.

This report analyzes the specific mechanics of this collapse through four integrated modules: Economic, Political, Societal, and External. It maps the feedback loops that connect the failure of a thermoelectric plant in Matanzas to the price of chicken in Havana, and the arrest of a dissident to the decision of a young engineer to migrate. It is a predictive analysis of a system in freefall.

2. Systems-Dynamic Analysis: The Economic Subsystem

The Cuban economic subsystem is no longer characterized by “crisis,” a term that implies a temporary deviation from a stable mean, but by decapitalization. The foundational stocks of the economy—human capital, physical infrastructure, and foreign reserves—are depleting faster than they can be replenished by the meager flows of tourism or remittances. The economy is shrinking not just in GDP terms, but in physical capacity.

2.1 The Energy-Production Feedback Loop

The central engine of Cuba’s collapse is the energy sector. In a modern economy, energy is the master resource; without it, no other value can be created. The feedback loop currently gripping Cuba is reinforcing and vicious, creating a “death spiral” that resists piecemeal intervention.

The dynamic begins with Input Failure. The seizure of PDVSA assets and the neutralization of the Maduro regime in January 2026 4 effectively halted the flow of Venezuelan oil. For nearly two decades, this oil was not just fuel; it was a budgetary subsidy, provided on credit terms that were rarely enforced and often written off. The sudden loss of this input, estimated at a reduction of over 50% of total fuel imports, exposed the fragility of the entire system.5 Russia and Mexico, while politically sympathetic, have engaged only in transactional support, demanding payment or providing token emergency aid that does not address the structural deficit.5

This input failure triggers Grid Collapse. The National Electric System (SEN) relies on large, Soviet-era thermoelectric plants (CTEs) like the Antonio Guiteras and the Felton plants. These facilities, built in the 1980s, have exceeded their operational lifespans by decades. They require high-sulfur heavy crude (which Venezuela provided) and constant maintenance. Without fuel, they cannot run; without money, they cannot be fixed. The system is currently operating at less than 40% of its installed capacity.16 The government’s stopgap measure—leasing floating power ships from the Turkish company Karpowership—has become a liability. These ships require upfront payment in hard currency and clean fuel, neither of which the state possesses in sufficient quantity. When payments are missed, the ships are disconnected, leading to immediate, catastrophic drops in generation.18

The grid collapse feeds directly into Production Halt. Electricity is the feedstock of industry. With blackouts averaging 12 to 18 hours daily in the provinces, and often reaching 20 hours in critical deficit periods, industrial activity has ceased.16 Factories cannot operate on intermittent power; cold chains for agriculture break down, causing spoilage of the little food that is produced. The sugar harvest, which requires continuous operation of the mills during the zafra, has been decimated because the mills have no electricity to grind the cane and no fuel for the transport trucks.14 This destroys the agricultural value chain, forcing the state to import processed food it cannot afford.

Finally, this leads to Revenue Destruction. Without production, there are no exports. Without exports, there is no foreign exchange. The sugar industry, once a source of billions, now generates almost zero revenue. The tourism industry, the other main pillar, is crippled because tourists do not want to visit a country with no air conditioning, no internet, and food shortages.21 The state generates zero foreign exchange to buy fuel, and thus the cycle restarts, but with a higher intensity of failure. The “Energy-Currency Death Spiral” is the fundamental mechanism of the collapse.

2.2 Currency Dynamics: The Triumph of the Informal Market

The monetary system of Cuba has undergone a complete chaotic deregulation. The “Task of Ordering” (Tarea Ordenamiento), launched in 2021 to unify the currency, has catastrophically failed, resulting instead in the total dollarization of the economy and the destruction of the Cuban Peso (CUP) as a functional store of value.1 The state has effectively lost monetary sovereignty.

As of early 2026, the exchange rate reality is stark. The informal market rate hovers between 400 and 450 CUP per USD.11 This represents a devaluation of thousands of percent since 2021. The dynamic driving this is known as “overshooting,” a phenomenon described by the Dornbusch model where exchange rates temporarily exceed their long-term equilibrium due to panic and sticky prices.24 In Cuba, however, the “temporary” spike has become the permanent floor. Every time the rate spikes due to a new crisis or rumor, it settles at a higher level, never returning to the pre-crisis baseline. The market absorbs the shock and prices in the new level of despair.

The state’s response has been the “bancarización” process—a forced digitalization of banking aimed at limiting cash withdrawals and tracking transactions.25 This policy was intended to bring the gray market back into the formal banking system. It achieved the exact opposite. By restricting access to cash, the state drove the dollar market completely underground. Private businesses (Mipymes) now conduct the vast majority of their import trade using street-sourced dollars, bypassing the central bank entirely to avoid having their funds frozen or seized.26 They operate in a parallel financial universe where the state’s rules do not apply because the state’s banks have no liquidity.

The Cuban Peso is now a “zombie currency.” It functions as a unit of account for state salaries and budget allocations, but it has ceased to function as a medium of exchange for critical goods or a store of wealth. No rational economic actor holds CUP for longer than the time it takes to convert it to USD, MLC, or goods. The result is hyperinflation in the cost of living, while state salaries remain fixed in the zombie currency, creating a profound impoverishment of the public sector workforce.28

2.3 The Sectoral Void: Agriculture and Industry

The physical economy of Cuba has reverted to pre-industrial levels in key sectors. The collapse is not just financial; it is material.

The Extinction of the Sugar Industry:

The data on the sugar industry is the most damning indicator of the de-industrialization of Cuba. Once the world’s sugar bowl, capable of producing 8 million tons in 1989, Cuba produced less than 200,000 tons in the 2024–2025 harvest.14 This figure is historically regressive; it is comparable to production levels in the mid-19th century, before industrial mechanization. The collapse is total: only 15 mills attempted to grind in the last harvest, and of those, fewer than half operated efficiently.20 The reasons are systemic: no fuel for the boilers, no spare parts for the machinery, no fertilizer for the cane fields since 2019, and no labor force willing to cut cane for worthless pesos.

The consequences are rippling through the economy. The country now imports sugar to meet the basic rationing book (libreta) requirements, spending scarce hard currency on a commodity it used to export to the world.13 Furthermore, the collapse of sugar threatens the rum industry, one of the few remaining functional export sectors. Authentic Cuban rum requires alcohol distilled from Cuban sugarcane molasses. With cane production down over 90%, the production of 96% ethyl alcohol has dropped by 70% since 2019.14 The industry is currently drawing down on aged reserves of alcohol, but once these are depleted, the “Havana Club” brand faces an existential supply crisis.

Food Dependency and Sovereignty Failure:

The “Food Sovereignty” laws passed by the National Assembly have proven to be dead letters. Domestic agriculture produces less than 20% of national consumption requirements. The remaining 80% is imported.30 The state relies on imports from the United States (under the TSREEA exemptions) for the bulk of its chicken and grains, paying cash up front.32 With the loss of foreign credit lines, the tightening of U.S. sanctions, and the evaporation of tourism revenue, the state’s ability to finance these imports is collapsing. Food insecurity has transitioned from “scarcity” (long lines, limited choice) to a “nutritional crisis” where caloric intake for the bottom deciles of the population is falling below healthy standards. The price of basic staples like rice and beans in the informal market has decoupled from the average state salary, making survival dependent on remittances.34

2.4 The Mipyme Paradox: Inequality as a Systemic Feature

The legalization of Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (Mipymes) in 2021 was a desperate attempt to stimulate supply. It succeeded in filling store shelves with imported goods, but failed to restart domestic production. Mipymes have become primarily import-commercial entities, bringing in finished goods (beer, candy, canned food) from abroad and selling them at market prices.26

This has created a starkly dual society. A small class of private owners and those with access to remittances can afford these goods. The remaining 80% of the population, dependent on state salaries (approx. $15–20 USD/month), faces destitution and exclusion from this new market.36 The political leadership views Mipymes with deep suspicion, seeing them as a Trojan horse for capitalism and a threat to state control. The new regulations introduced in late 2025, banning Mipymes from engaging in wholesale trade and forcing them to contract through state intermediaries, are an attempt to reassert control.38 However, because the state intermediaries are inefficient and bankrupt, these regulations will likely result in a contraction of supply and further shortages, rather than a redirection of trade. The regime is choosing control over survival.

3. The Political Subsystem: Anatomy of a Fracture

The political stability of the Cuban regime has historically relied on the seamless integration of the Communist Party (ideology and mobilization) and the Revolutionary Armed Forces (economy and coercion). For decades, these two pillars were united under the singular authority of the Castro brothers. Today, that integration is unraveling, revealing deep fissures in the monolithic structure of the state.

3.1 The Post-Raul Vacuum and Elite Fragmentation

The death of General Luis Alberto Rodríguez López-Calleja in 2022 was a seismic event for the internal dynamics of the regime.40 As the head of GAESA (Grupo de Administración Empresarial S.A.), López-Calleja was the “CEO” of the Cuban state, managing the conglomerate that controls an estimated 60–70% of the economy, including the tourism sector, remittances, and import-export logistics. He was the bridge between the military’s economic interests and the political leadership. His death left a vacuum that has not been filled. No successor has effectively consolidated control over GAESA, leading to a fragmentation of economic power into fiefdoms.

Raul Castro, aged 93, remains the ultimate arbiter of these disputes, but his physical frailty and increasingly sporadic public appearances 42 suggest his capacity to mediate is vanishing. He is the “dike” holding back the flood; when he passes, the containment mechanism for elite conflict disappears. A dangerous tension is emerging between the GAESA Oligarchy—the generals and technocrats who control the hotels, the bank accounts, and the hard currency—and the Party Bureaucracy, represented by President Miguel Diaz-Canel.

The Party cadres bear the public burden of the crisis. They are the ones who must explain the blackouts to the angry populace, who must manage the crumbling hospitals and schools. However, they do not control the resources to solve these problems. GAESA holds the hard currency, and they hoard it to recapitalize their tourism investments (building new luxury hotels even as occupancy rates plummet) rather than spending it on fuel for the grid or medicine for the hospitals.44 This resource misallocation has created deep resentment within the Party and the civilian government.

The purge of Alejandro Gil, the former Economy Minister and Deputy Prime Minister, in 2024 was a manifestation of this conflict.7 Gil was a technocrat, a “man of the system” tasked with implementing the failed “Task of Ordering.” His arrest and the subsequent corruption charges were likely a GAESA-directed move to scapegoat the civilian technocracy for failures caused by GAESA’s own hoarding of forex. It was a signal that when the resources shrink, the military-business complex will eat the civilians to survive. This predatory dynamic makes coherent policy-making impossible; every minister is now focused on survival, not problem-solving.

3.2 The Praetorian Guard Dilemma

The regime’s ultimate survival strategy relies on coercion. The Ministry of the Interior (MININT) and its special forces (the “Black Berets” or Avispas Negras) are the tip of the spear, tasked with repressing dissent.46 However, the reliability of the regular Revolutionary Armed Forces (FAR) conscripts is degrading. The FAR is a conscript army; the soldiers are the sons of the very people suffering from the blackouts and food shortages.

Reports from 2024 and 2025 suggest a growing hesitation among regular military units to engage in domestic repression.48 Commanders are wary of ordering conscripts to fire on their neighbors. This has forced the regime to rely increasingly on the highly paid, elite MININT units for crowd control. But this strategy has a cost. The police state is expensive. It requires fuel for the patrol cars, high salaries to buy loyalty, and specialized equipment. As the economy shrinks, paying the “loyalty premium” to the security forces becomes mathematically impossible. Tensions are rising between the FAR and MININT over shrinking budgets.49 The FAR sees itself as the defender of the nation; MININT is the defender of the regime. As the gap between the nation’s interests and the regime’s interests widens, the unity of the guns cannot be guaranteed.

4. The Societal Subsystem: Demographic Hemorrhage

The Cuban state is losing the biological capacity to reproduce itself. The societal contract—obedience in exchange for health, education, and security—has been voided by the state’s inability to deliver on any of these promises. The result is a society that is dissolving through exit.

4.1 The Great Exodus as Systemic Failure

The migration crisis facing Cuba is not cyclical; it is terminal. Between 2021 and 2024, Cuba lost an estimated 10% to 18% of its population.2 Official statistics are notoriously slow to reflect this, but independent demographers estimate the “effective population” (those actually resident on the island, as opposed to those on the registry) has fallen below 10 million, and potentially as low as 8.6 million.50 This is a demographic contraction of a scale usually seen only in wartime.

The qualitative loss is even more damaging than the quantitative loss. The exodus is skewed heavily toward the 18–45 age bracket—the most productive, reproductive, and innovative segment of society. This constitutes a permanent decapitalization of the nation. The dependency ratio is skyrocketing; the few remaining workers must support a growing mass of retirees. The effects are visible in the collapse of essential services. The education system faces a critical shortage of teachers, with over 12.5% of positions unfilled.51 The public health system, once the “jewel in the crown” of the Revolution, is hollow. Hospitals lack doctors, specialists, reagents, and basic medicines.52 The “medical power” that Cuba exported for diplomatic influence and revenue is evaporating because the doctors themselves are fleeing.

4.2 The Sociology of Dissent and Repression

The nature of dissent in Cuba has evolved. The protests of July 11, 2021 (11J), were a watershed moment, breaking the psychological barrier of fear.54 Since then, protests have changed in character. They are no longer just political demands for “freedom”; they are visceral, survivalist demands for electricity and food. The “cacerolazos” (pot-banging protests) that erupt during blackouts are spontaneous, leaderless, and widespread.55 They occur in the peripheral neighborhoods and rural towns that the regime has abandoned.

The state’s response has been the judicialization of terror. The “Social Communication Law” and the new Penal Code have criminalized almost all forms of independent expression.57 The regime holds over 1,000 political prisoners, including hundreds from the 11J protests.59 Organizations like “Justicia 11J” document the systemic abuse of these prisoners, serving as a constant reminder to the population of the cost of dissent.60 Yet, despite this repression, the protests continue because the underlying drivers—hunger and darkness—are stronger than the fear of prison. The social fabric is tearing; neighborhood solidarity is replacing state allegiance.

5. External Factors: The Geopolitical Vise

5.1 The “Maduro” Shock and the Energy Cliff

The most critical external variable in the 2026–2029 horizon is the status of Venezuela. The snippet referencing the January 3, 2026, capture of Nicolás Maduro by U.S. forces 4 serves as the catalyst for the terminal phase of the Cuban regime. While hypothetical in some contexts, within this predictive model, it represents the “Black Swan” event that breaks the system.

The immediate impact is the cessation of oil shipments. Venezuela provided between 27,000 and 50,000 barrels per day of crude and fuel oil.5 This represented the base load for the Cuban energy matrix. The removal of this supply eliminates 50% of Cuba’s fuel availability overnight. Unlike in previous crises, there is no Soviet Union to step in. Russia and Mexico have signaled they cannot fill this void gratuitously.5 Mexico’s Pemex has its own production struggles, and Russia is engaged in a costly war in Ukraine. The Cuban government has no hard currency to buy oil on the spot market. This guarantees a grid collapse affecting over 70% of the island, transitioning the energy crisis from “managed rotation of blackouts” to “permanent disconnection.”

5.2 United States: Maximum Pressure 2.0

The geopolitical environment has hardened. The return of a “Maximum Pressure” strategy by the U.S. administration 4 closes off the few remaining safety valves. The inclusion of Cuba on the State Sponsors of Terrorism (SSOT) list remains a formidable barrier to international banking. Banks in Europe and Panama, fearing U.S. Treasury fines, refuse to process transactions for Cuban entities.

Crucially, the new sanctions architecture targets the flow of remittances. By threatening secondary sanctions on banks that process transactions for GAESA-linked entities (like Fincimex or Orbit S.A.), the U.S. has effectively choked the formal flow of dollars.63 Remittances must now travel through informal “mules” or cryptocurrency, increasing transaction costs and reducing the net volume that reaches families. Similarly, the tourism sector remains depressed due to restrictions on U.S. travelers and the “chilling effect” on European visitors whose ESTA visa waivers for the U.S. are cancelled if they visit Cuba.21

5.3 China and Russia: Fair-Weather Friends

The narrative of a “multipolar rescue” is a myth. China and Russia treat Cuba as a geopolitical pawn, not a strategic ally worthy of infinite subsidy.

China: Beijing has integrated Cuba into its CIPS payment system, ostensibly to bypass the U.S. dollar, but this is a technicality, not a lifeline.65 The reality is that China has cancelled sugar import contracts because Cuba cannot deliver the sugar.66 Chinese companies like Yutong (buses) and Huawei are owed hundreds of millions in arrears and have halted credit. China’s aid is now tokenistic—70 tons of equipment here, a small donation there—rather than the structural investment Cuba needs.67 Beijing demands market reforms that the PCC refuses to implement.

Russia: Moscow’s engagement is equally transactional. While high-level visits continue, the financial support is limited to emergency credits (e.g., $60 million for fuel) that keep the lights on for a few weeks but solve nothing permanently.15 Russia has agreed to debt restructuring but demands payment discipline that Havana cannot provide. Furthermore, Russia’s own economic isolation means it cannot serve as the donor of last resort as the USSR did.

The Paris Club debt situation further illustrates this isolation. Cuba is in default on its renegotiated 2015 agreement. The “Group of Creditors of Cuba” has run out of patience, and new credits from Europe have ceased.44 The island is financially radioactive.

6. Integrated Predictive Scenarios (2026–2029)

Based on the systems-dynamic analysis, we project three potential trajectories for the Cuban state over the next 36 months.

Scenario A: The “Haitianization” (Probability: 55%)

Trigger: Continued inertia, the death of Raul Castro without a clear successor, and the failure to secure a new strategic oil supplier.

Timeline: Mid-2026 to 2028.

Description: The central government gradually loses the ability to project power and services into the provinces. The island fragments into de facto fiefdoms.

  • Dynamics: Havana remains under nominal PCC control, maintained by the elite police units. However, the interior provinces (Santiago de Cuba, Holguin, Guantanamo) become ungovernable due to permanent blackouts and food shortages. Local Party officials negotiate their own survival with the black market and local gangs, ignoring directives from Havana.
  • Security: Criminal gangs and corrupt local officials fill the power vacuum. Drug trafficking routes re-emerge as the state loses control of its airspace and waters. Migration becomes uncontrolled and chaotic, with mass raft exoduses overwhelming the U.S. Coast Guard.
  • Outcome: Cuba becomes a failed state in the Caribbean—a “Hollow State” with a zombified central government that holds international recognition but no domestic authority.

Scenario B: The “Palace Coup” / GAESA Consolidation (Probability: 30%)

Trigger: Massive social unrest that directly threatens the physical assets of the elite (e.g., mobs storming hotels in Varadero or Havana).

Timeline: Late 2026 to 2027.

Description: The military-business faction (GAESA), realizing that the Party bureaucracy is dragging them down, executes a soft coup.

  • Dynamics: They purge the “ideologues” and President Diaz-Canel, blaming them for the crisis. A military junta is formed, possibly led by a figure from the younger generation of generals or a Colonel-Manager from GAESA.
  • Policy: They implement a “Putin-style” authoritarian capitalism or a “Russian model” of oligarchic control. They immediately lift the ban on Mipymes and invite the Cuban diaspora to invest in exchange for political silence and property rights. They seek a transactional detente with the U.S., offering security cooperation in exchange for sanctions relief.
  • Outcome: A stable but repressive military kleptocracy that abandons socialist rhetoric for crony capitalism.

Scenario C: The Systemic Rupture (Probability: 15%)

Trigger: A “Black Swan” event—such as a total grid collapse (Zero Generation) lasting more than 10 days, combined with a refusal by the FAR to repress the resulting looting.

Timeline: Unpredictable (Critical window: Hurricane season 2026).

Description: The “Ceaușescu Moment.” Spontaneous, leaderless uprisings overwhelm the security forces in multiple cities simultaneously.

  • Dynamics: The lower ranks of the FAR fraternize with the protesters. The elite flee to friendly jurisdictions (Nicaragua, Russia). The central authority collapses completely within 72 hours.
  • Outcome: Chaos followed by a messy, volatile transition period. This scenario likely requires international humanitarian intervention to stabilize food and health supplies.

7. Strategic Conclusions and Watchlist

7.1 Lifecycle Assessment

Cuba is definitively in Stage 5: Terminal Entropy. The feedback loops are reinforcing; there are no balancing loops left in the system. The state has consumed its capital stocks and alienated its population. It survives only on momentum, the inertia of the bureaucracy, and the lack of an organized political opposition. However, entropy is not a political choice; it is a physical reality. Systems without energy input eventually cease to function.

7.2 The “Rule of Three” Watchlist

Analysts monitoring the Cuban situation should focus on these three indicators in the next 6 months to confirm the trajectory:

  1. The Grid: If the SEN suffers a total disconnection (Zero Generation) lasting more than 72 hours twice in one month, Scenario A (Haitianization) is active. The system will have lost the ability to “black start.”
  2. The Dollar: If the informal exchange rate breaches 600 CUP/USD, the resulting hyperinflation will trigger widespread looting of state stores and Mipymes, forcing a militarization of food distribution.
  3. The Elite: Any resignation, “health leave,” or sudden death of a top-tier military commander (within MININT or the Western Army) indicates the fracturing of the Praetorian Guard and the onset of Scenario B.

7.3 Final Insight

The collapse of Cuba will not be an event, but a process that has already begun. The 2026–2029 period will not be about “saving the revolution”—that project is dead. It will be about managing the humanitarian and security fallout of its disintegration. The “Maduro Shock” of January 2026 was the final structural blow to the post-1959 order. The countdown to zero has begun.


If you find this post useful, please share the link on Facebook, with your friends, etc. Your support is much appreciated and if you have any feedback, please email me at in**@*********ps.com. Please note that for links to other websites, we are only paid if there is an affiliate program such as Avantlink, Impact, Amazon and eBay and only if you purchase something. If you’d like to directly contribute towards our continued reporting, please visit our funding page.


Sources Used

  1. Cuba: Ten Consecutive Years of Macroeconomic Deterioration …, accessed January 6, 2026, https://horizontecubano.law.columbia.edu/news/cuba-ten-consecutive-years-macroeconomic-deterioration
  2. The Crisis of the Cuban Economy: Notes for an Evaluation | Cuba Capacity Building Project, accessed January 6, 2026, https://horizontecubano.law.columbia.edu/news/crisis-cuban-economy-notes-evaluation
  3. Is the Cuban Regime on the Brink of Collapse? – E-International Relations, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.e-ir.info/2025/09/14/is-the-cuban-regime-on-the-brink-of-collapse/
  4. Marco Rubio’s “Maximum Pressure” 2.0: Is a Post-Castro Cuba Finally Inevitable Under the Trump Administration? – https://debuglies.com, accessed January 6, 2026, https://debuglies.com/2026/01/06/marco-rubios-maximum-pressure-2-0-is-a-post-castro-cuba-finally-inevitable-under-the-trump-administration/
  5. Cuba struggles to ease power cuts amid reduced fuel supplies from Venezuela, Mexico, accessed January 6, 2026, https://whbl.com/2025/11/19/cuba-struggles-to-ease-power-cuts-amid-reduced-fuel-supplies-from-venezuela-mexico/
  6. Cuba on edge as U.S. seizure of oil tanker puts supply at risk – BNN Bloomberg, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/business/2025/12/12/cuba-on-edge-as-us-seizure-of-oil-tanker-puts-supply-at-risk/
  7. Cuba sentences former economy minister to life in prison for espionage | kens5.com, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.kens5.com/article/syndication/associatedpress/cuba-sentences-former-economy-minister-to-life-in-prison-for-espionage/616-2fd4e2d0-af89-49c7-81fa-d9b9e236a12d
  8. Cuba sentences former economy minister to life in prison following corruption, espionage conviction | 1450 AM 99.7 FM WHTC | Holland, accessed January 6, 2026, https://whtc.com/2025/12/08/cuba-sentences-former-economy-minister-to-life-in-prison-following-corruption-espionage-conviction/
  9. Cuba’s Promised Floating Exchange Rate Still Pending | elTOQUE, accessed January 6, 2026, https://eltoque.com/en/cubas-promised-floating-exchange-rate-still-pending
  10. Does Cuba have a Real Government Program for the Economy? – Havana Times, accessed January 6, 2026, https://havanatimes.org/features/does-cuba-have-a-real-government-program-for-the-economy/
  11. U.S. Dollar Hits 400 Cuban Pesos in Informal Market – elTOQUE, accessed January 6, 2026, https://eltoque.com/en/us-dollar-hits-400-cuban-pesos-in-informal-market
  12. informal foreign exchange market in cuba (real time) – elTOQUE, accessed January 6, 2026, https://eltoque.com/en/author/sumavoces
  13. Collapse in sugar production signals new economic crisis for Cuba – The Caribbean Council, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.caribbean-council.org/us-imposes-new-conditions-of-entry-on-shipping-and-cuban-ports-2-4/
  14. Sugar Industry Collapse in Cuba – Havana Times, accessed January 6, 2026, https://havanatimes.org/features/sugar-industry-collapse-in-cuba/
  15. Cuba expects prompt signing of contract with Russia on fuel – Prensa Latina, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.plenglish.com/news/2025/01/05/cuba-expects-prompt-signing-of-contract-with-russia-on-fuel/
  16. Power being restored to grid after western Cuba blackout: utility | International, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.bssnews.net/international/338493
  17. Cuba’s Most Important Power Plant to Close for Six Months – Havana Times, accessed January 6, 2026, https://havanatimes.org/features/cubas-most-important-power-plant-to-close-for-six-months/
  18. More than Half of Cuba Without Power – Havana Times, accessed January 6, 2026, https://havanatimes.org/features/more-than-half-of-cuba-without-power/
  19. 2024–2025 Cuba blackouts – Wikipedia, accessed January 6, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024%E2%80%932025_Cuba_blackouts
  20. Only Six of the 14 Sugar Mills Planned Are Grinding Sugar in Cuba, accessed January 6, 2026, https://translatingcuba.com/only-six-of-the-14-sugar-mills-planned-are-grinding-sugar-in-cuba/
  21. Tourism in Cuba – Wikipedia, accessed January 6, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tourism_in_Cuba
  22. Cuban tourism industry continues decline in 2025 – Latin America Reports, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.latinamericareports.com/cuban-tourism-industry-continues-decline-in-2025/12173/
  23. Reduced reforms fail to pull Cuba out of the crisis. Global Affairs. University of Navarra, accessed January 6, 2026, https://en.unav.edu/web/global-affairs/las-reducidas-reformas-no-logran-sacar-a-cuba-de-la-crisis
  24. Why the Dollar and the Euro Rise & Fall vs the Cuban Peso – elTOQUE, accessed January 6, 2026, https://eltoque.com/en/why-the-dollar-and-the-euro-rise-fall-vs-the-cuban-peso
  25. How to Exchange Currency in Cuba in 2025: What Travelers Need to Know | elTOQUE, accessed January 6, 2026, https://eltoque.com/en/how-to-exchange-currency-in-cuba-in-2025-what-travelers-need-to-know
  26. Employment, Wages, and Dynamism: Other Faces of the Private Sector for a Prosperous Cuba, accessed January 6, 2026, https://horizontecubano.law.columbia.edu/news/employment-wages-and-dynamism-other-faces-private-sector-prosperous-cuba
  27. Special Report on Cuba’s Private Sector, accessed January 6, 2026, https://cubastudygroup.org/white_papers/special-report-on-cubas-private-sector/
  28. What to Expect from Stabilization and Reforms: Lessons of Interest to Cuba, accessed January 6, 2026, https://horizontecubano.law.columbia.edu/news/what-expect-stabilization-and-reforms-lessons-interest-cuba
  29. How will inflation and the informal exchange rate behave in Cuba in 2025? Pavel Vidal, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zB6_qGJvF4A
  30. Cuba: Country File, Economic Risk Analysis | Coface, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.coface.com/news-economy-and-insights/business-risk-dashboard/country-risk-files/cuba
  31. How to Get Cuban Agriculture on Track | Cuba Capacity Building Project, accessed January 6, 2026, https://horizontecubano.law.columbia.edu/news/how-get-cuban-agriculture-track
  32. Cuba’s Food Dependence on the USA Grows – Havana Times, accessed January 6, 2026, https://havanatimes.org/features/cubas-food-dependence-on-the-usa-grows/
  33. U.S. Ag/Food Exports To Cuba Increased 8.6% In September 2025; Up 15.5% Year-To-Year., accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.cubatrade.org/blog/2025/12/20/pxhjhww97j5leuitipj3v3yip90u9a
  34. Cuba’s Economic Collapse: Inflation, Dollarisation, and a Nation at Breaking Point, accessed January 6, 2026, https://indepthnews.net/cubas-economic-collapse-inflation-dollarisation-and-a-nation-at-breaking-point/
  35. Cuba’s private sector demonstrates ability to stimulate growth – The Caribbean Council, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.caribbean-council.org/cubas-private-sector-demonstrates-ability-to-stimulate-growth/
  36. As Cuba’s private sector roars back, choices and inequality rise | Business and Economy News | Al Jazeera, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2023/7/19/as-cubas-private-sector-roars-back-choices-and-inequality-rise
  37. Independent businesses—known as ‘pymes’—are growing in Cuba, accessed January 6, 2026, https://news.miami.edu/stories/2023/10/independent-businessesknown-as-pymesare-growing-in-cuba.html
  38. Cuba, a decree on renewables in response to the energy crisis, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.esteri.it/en/sala_stampa/archivionotizie/diplomazia-economica/2025/02/cuba-un-decreto-sulle-rinnovabili-in-risposta-alla-crisi-energetica/
  39. MIPYMES Have 90 Days to Change Corporate Purpose Following Wholesale Trade Ban – Cubanet, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.cubanet.org/mipymes-have-90-days-to-change-corporate-purpose-following-wholesale-trade-ban/
  40. Luis Alberto Rodríguez López-Calleja – Wikipedia, accessed January 6, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luis_Alberto_Rodr%C3%ADguez_L%C3%B3pez-Calleja
  41. Cuba’s regime may be ‘shaken to its core’ by the death of powerful general Rodríguez López-Calleja | WUSF, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.wusf.org/us-world/2022-07-04/cubas-regime-may-be-shaken-to-its-core-by-the-death-of-powerful-general-rodriguez-lopez-calleja
  42. Raúl Castro – Wikipedia, accessed January 6, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ra%C3%BAl_Castro
  43. Raul Castro Reappears in Havana, Cuba, accessed January 6, 2026, https://havanatimes.org/opinion/raul-castro-reappears-in-havana-cuba/
  44. Cuba’s Umpteenth Negotiation With the Paris Club for Non-Payments, Meanwhile Luxury Hotels Multiply – Translating Cuba, accessed January 6, 2026, https://translatingcuba.com/cubas-umpteenth-negotiation-with-the-paris-club-for-non-payments-meanwhile-luxury-hotels-multiply/
  45. Cuba: Government Finally Charges Ex-Minister Alejandro Gil – Havana Times, accessed January 6, 2026, https://havanatimes.org/features/cuba-government-finally-charges-ex-minister-alejandro-gil/
  46. Cuba: SRFOE condemns state repression and calls for respect and guarantee of the rights to freedom of expression, association, and peaceful assembly – OAS.org, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.oas.org/en/iachr/jsForm/?File=/en/iachr/expression/media_center/preleases/2025/151.asp&utm_content=country-cub&utm_term=class-mon
  47. Treasury Sanctions Cuban Ministry of Interior Officials and Military Unit in Response to Violence Against Peaceful Demonstrators, accessed January 6, 2026, https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy0321
  48. Cuba: Over 50000 people protest against US military base in Guantanamo Bay, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.brasildefato.com.br/2025/03/03/guantanameros-over-50000-people-protest-against-us-military-base-in-cuba/
  49. World Report 2025: Cuba | Human Rights Watch, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2025/country-chapters/cuba
  50. More Details on Cuba’s Declining Population – dwkcommentaries, accessed January 6, 2026, https://dwkcommentaries.com/2024/07/20/more-details-on-cubas-declining-population/
  51. Cuba With Little Food or Electricity = School Absenteeism – Havana Times, accessed January 6, 2026, https://havanatimes.org/features/cuba-with-little-food-or-electricity-school-absenteeism/
  52. ‘We are dying’: Cuba sinks into a health crisis amid medicine shortages and misdiagnosis, accessed January 6, 2026, https://english.elpais.com/international/2025-12-14/we-are-dying-cuba-sinks-into-a-health-crisis-amid-medicine-shortages-and-misdiagnosis.html
  53. For the New School Year in Cuba, Everything is Missing and Some Schools Will Not Open Their Doors – Translating Cuba, accessed January 6, 2026, https://translatingcuba.com/for-the-new-school-year-in-cuba-everything-is-missing-and-some-schools-will-not-open-their-doors/
  54. 2021 Cuban protests – Wikipedia, accessed January 6, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2021_Cuban_protests
  55. Western Cuba faces blackout as government seeks to update …, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/12/3/western-cuba-faces-blackout-as-government-seeks-to-update-energy-grid
  56. Cuba: SRFOE condemns state repression and calls for respect and guarantee of the rights to freedom of expression, association, and peaceful assembly, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.oas.org/en/IACHR/jsForm/?File=%2Fen%2Fiachr%2Fexpression%2Fmedia_center%2Fpreleases%2F2025%2F151.asp
  57. Cuba: Freedom on the Net 2025 Country Report, accessed January 6, 2026, https://freedomhouse.org/country/cuba/freedom-net/2025
  58. New wave of repression hits independent press amid arrival of Cuba’s new communications law – LatAm Journalism Review, accessed January 6, 2026, https://latamjournalismreview.org/articles/new-wave-of-repression-hits-independent-press-amid-arrival-of-cubas-new-communications-law/
  59. Cuba: Freedom in the World 2025 Country Report, accessed January 6, 2026, https://freedomhouse.org/country/cuba/freedom-world/2025
  60. 2024 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices – Cuba, accessed January 6, 2026, https://cu.usembassy.gov/2024-country-reports-on-human-rights-practices-cuba/
  61. Cuba: One month after releases were announced, hundreds remain in prison, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2025/02/cuba-anuncios-de-excarcelaciones/
  62. The Unlikely Biden-Trump Throughline on Cuba | Council on Foreign Relations, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.cfr.org/blog/unlikely-biden-trump-throughline-cuba
  63. Contribution of Cuban Residents Abroad to the Cuban Economy: Tourism and Remittances 1 – ScienceOpen, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.13169/intejcubastud.16.1.0104
  64. GAESA loses 95% of remittance control: $1.89 billion hit in 2024 – Cubasiglo21, accessed January 6, 2026, https://cubasiglo21.com/gaesa-loses-95-of-remittance-control-1-89-billion-hit-in-2024/
  65. Cuba Announces Integration into Chinese Payment System – Havana Times, accessed January 6, 2026, https://havanatimes.org/features/cuba-announces-integration-into-chinese-payment-system/
  66. China Cancels Trade Agreements with Cuba Due to Lack of Market Reforms and Unpaid Debts – Fundación Andrés Bello, accessed January 6, 2026, https://fundacionandresbello.org/en/news/cuba-%F0%9F%87%A8%F0%9F%87%BA-news/china-cancels-trade-agreements-with-cuba-due-to-lack-of-market-reforms-and-unpaid-debts/
  67. China donates 70 tons of equipment to help Cuba restore its electric system, accessed January 6, 2026, https://socialistchina.org/2025/01/01/china-donates-70-tons-of-equipment-to-help-cuba-restore-its-electric-system/
  68. Cuba’s debt restructuring – clubdeparis, accessed January 6, 2026, https://clubdeparis.org/en/clubdeparis/accueil/actualites1/2025/cuba-17-01-2025.html

Impact of U.S. Control over Venezuelan Oil on Global Markets

This is a time-sensitive special report and is based on information available as of January 5, 2026. Due to the situation being very dynamic the following report should be used to obtain a perspective but not viewed as an absolute.

The geopolitical architecture of the Western Hemisphere underwent a seismic reconfiguration on January 3, 2026. The direct military intervention by United States forces in Caracas, resulting in the detention of Nicolás Maduro and the installation of a transitional administration under U.S. military oversight, marks the definitive end of the Bolivarian Revolution’s quarter-century dominance over the world’s largest proven oil reserves. This operation, termed “sovereign stabilization” by the White House, transcends a mere regime change; it represents the forced reintegration of 303 billion barrels of Venezuelan crude into the U.S. strategic energy sphere and the dismantling of the foremost Russian and Chinese geopolitical beachhead in the Americas.

This report provides an exhaustive analysis of the immediate and second-order consequences of this intervention. The disruption to global energy flows, sovereign debt structures, and regional security alliances is profound. The seizure of Petróleos de Venezuela, S.A. (PDVSA) and its subsequent placement under U.S. administrative control creates a distinct set of winners and losers, reshaping the fortunes of nations far beyond the Caribbean Basin.

Our analysis identifies the Republic of Cuba as the nation facing the most immediate and existential threat, confronting a total energy collapse that jeopardizes the continuity of the state itself. China and Russia face strategic defeats of the highest order, losing tens of billions in sunk costs and critical power projection capabilities. Conversely, the United States refining sector and India stand to gain significantly from the regularization of heavy crude flows, while Guyana sees its primary existential security threat neutralized.

The following dashboard summarizes the “Impact Severity” across the top ten affected nations, calculated based on energy dependence, financial exposure, and geopolitical realignment risks.

1. The Strategic Context: The Return of the Monroe Doctrine

The intervention of January 2026 was not an isolated law enforcement action but the culmination of a decade-long struggle for control over the Western Hemisphere’s energy resources. The stated justification—countering “narco-terrorism”—provided the legal framework for an operation with profound geoeconomic objectives: the decoupling of Venezuela from the Sino-Russian axis and the revitalization of its oil sector under American stewardship.1

1.1 The Status of the Prize: PDVSA in 2026

At the moment of intervention, Venezuela’s oil production stood at approximately 1 million barrels per day (bpd), a shadow of its 1998 peak of 3.5 million bpd.1 The infrastructure, eroded by years of mismanagement, corruption, and sanctions, requires an estimated capital injection of billions to restore functionality.4 However, the “prize” remains unequaled: 303 billion barrels of extra-heavy crude in the Orinoco Belt, a resource base that exceeds that of Saudi Arabia.6

Control of this resource allows the United States to dictate the pace of its return to the global market. By controlling the spigot, Washington can manage global heavy crude prices, ensuring domestic refinery profitability while denying adversaries (China) their preferential access.7 This strategic recalibration drives the ranking of impacted nations detailed below.

2. Comprehensive Country Impact Analysis

Rank 1: Republic of Cuba

Classification: Existential Systemic Threat

Impact Score: 98/100

No nation faces a more catastrophic immediate future than Cuba. The U.S. intervention in Venezuela is functionally a blockade of Cuba’s energy lifeline, presenting a threat scenario exceeding the severity of the “Special Period” of the 1990s.

2.1 Energy Dependency and Grid Collapse

Cuba’s energy matrix is structurally flawed, relying on fossil fuels for 83% of its electricity generation as of late 2025.9 The island’s domestic production of heavy crude is insufficient and high in sulfur, requiring lighter Venezuelan grades for blending and direct burning in thermal plants like the Antonio Guiteras facility.

Prior to the intervention, Venezuela supplied approximately 35,000 to 55,000 bpd of crude and refined products to Havana.10 This flow was not merely a commercial transaction; it was a political subsidy, often paid for through the exchange of medical and intelligence services rather than hard currency. The U.S. naval blockade of Venezuelan ports initiated in December 2025, culminating in the January takeover, has severed this flow completely.12

The immediate consequence is a deficit in generation capacity that the Cuban grid cannot absorb. With the loss of Venezuelan fuel oil, daily blackouts are projected to expand from 6-8 hours to 12-18 hours.14 This level of energy poverty threatens the refrigeration of food, the operation of hospitals, and the pumping of municipal water supplies, creating the preconditions for total social collapse.

2.2 Intelligence and Security Decoupling

Beyond oil, the intervention severs the intelligence umbilical cord. Cuban operatives were deeply embedded in the Venezuelan military (FANB) and intelligence services (SEBIN), providing regime security in exchange for economic support.10 The U.S. stabilization force’s dismantling of these networks forces the repatriation of thousands of Cuban agents. This represents a dual blow: the loss of hard currency remittances from these workers and the humiliating exposure of Havana’s inability to protect its most critical ally. The psychological impact on the Cuban Communist Party’s hold on power cannot be overstated; the narrative of “socialist solidarity” has been shattered by American hard power.

Rank 2: People’s Republic of China

Classification: Strategic Financial & Geopolitical Loss

Impact Score: 92/100

For Beijing, the fall of the Maduro regime is a strategic disaster, representing the potential vaporization of a massive financial investment and the loss of its primary foothold in the Caribbean.

2.3 The $60 Billion Debt Trap

China is Venezuela’s largest sovereign creditor, having extended over $60 billion in loans since 2007, primarily through the China Development Bank’s “Joint Chinese-Venezuelan Fund”.16 These loans were structured as “oil-for-loan” deals, where repayment was made in physical barrels of crude.

The U.S. takeover fundamentally threatens this repayment mechanism. A U.S.-administered Venezuela is likely to declare these debts “odious” or subordinate them to new financing required for reconstruction. Estimates suggest that between $12 billion and $20 billion of this debt remains outstanding as of 2026.18 If the new administration in Caracas, under U.S. guidance, defaults on these obligations or prioritizes Western creditors (such as U.S. bondholders and oil majors), China faces a total write-down of these assets.19 The precedent of Iraq’s debt restructuring in 2003 suggests that “dictator debt” is often erased or deeply discounted by new regimes backed by Washington.

2.4 Energy Security and the “Teapot” Refiners

In 2025, China imported approximately 85% of Venezuela’s crude exports, a trade flow that was vital for its independent “teapot” refineries in Shandong province.20 These refineries are specifically configured to process cheap, heavy Venezuelan crude, which allows them to operate profitably despite tight margins.

The U.S. intervention places the physical control of these barrels in American hands. President Trump’s assertion that the U.S. will “run” the country implies a redirection of these oil flows to the U.S. Gulf Coast to lower American domestic fuel prices.7 This forces Chinese refiners to source heavier grades from the Middle East or Canada at significantly higher market premiums, eroding their competitive edge and increasing China’s overall energy import bill.

2.5 Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) Reversal

Geopolitically, Venezuela was the crown jewel of the BRI in Latin America. Its loss signals a “rollback” of Chinese influence. The U.S. intervention demonstrates a revived capacity to enforce the Monroe Doctrine, potentially deterring other Latin American nations from deepening security or strategic ties with Beijing for fear of similar repercussions.22

Rank 3: United States

Classification: Strategic Beneficiary & Industrial Victor

Impact Score: 88/100

While the U.S. is the architect of this intervention, it is also deeply impacted as the primary beneficiary. The operation serves a dual purpose: national security (removing a hostile regime) and industrial strategy (securing feedstock for American refineries).

2.6 The Gulf Coast Refining Renaissance

The U.S. Gulf Coast (PADD 3) possesses the world’s most complex refining infrastructure, specifically engineered to process heavy, high-sulfur crude (API gravity < 22). Since the imposition of sanctions on Venezuela in 2019, these refineries have operated sub-optimally, relying on more expensive imports from Canada or unstable supplies from Mexico and Colombia.24

The return of Venezuelan “Merey 16” crude is the “perfect barrel” for this system. Access to this supply at stable, non-sanctioned volumes will significantly lower feedstock costs for U.S. refiners like Valero, Marathon Petroleum, and Phillips 66.7 Analysts project that this influx could widen the heavy-light differential, boosting refining margins and potentially suppressing U.S. retail gasoline prices, a key domestic political objective for the administration.8

2.7 Corporate Windfalls and the “Pay-to-Play” Model

U.S. oil majors are positioned to monopolize the reconstruction. Chevron, already operating under special licenses, is the de facto operator of the sector.7 Other majors like ConocoPhillips and ExxonMobil, which had assets expropriated by Hugo Chávez, now see a pathway to restitution.

However, the Trump administration has signaled a “pay-to-play” model: U.S. companies must front the capital to repair the “badly broken” infrastructure before they can recover past debts.26 This creates a high-stakes environment where U.S. corporate capital is the primary instrument of foreign policy. The integration of Venezuela’s reserves into the U.S. energy perimeter effectively creates a “Fortress Americas” energy independence, insulating the U.S. from Middle Eastern volatility.

Rank 4: Colombia

Classification: Humanitarian Shock & Economic Realignment

Impact Score: 82/100

Colombia, sharing a 2,200-kilometer border with Venezuela, faces a paradoxical impact: immediate humanitarian trauma followed by potential long-term economic bonanza.

2.8 The Migration Tsunami

The destabilization accompanying the regime change is expected to trigger a massive, albeit temporary, migration wave. Estimates suggest up to 1.7 million additional Venezuelans could flee to Colombia in the immediate aftermath of the intervention, fearing conflict or reprisals.27

This influx imposes a staggering fiscal cost. Based on previous models, the cost of hosting and integrating this population is estimated between $2.8 billion and $5.2 billion annually.28 This shock comes at a time when the Colombian economy is already strained, potentially forcing the Petro administration to divert funds from domestic social programs to crisis management.

2.9 Border Security and Trade

Conversely, the removal of the Maduro regime eliminates the safe haven historically enjoyed by Colombian armed groups, specifically the ELN and FARC dissidents, who operated with impunity from the Venezuelan state of Apure.29 The U.S.-led stabilization force will likely prioritize the neutralization of these “narco-terrorist” elements, directly improving Colombia’s internal security situation.

Economically, a stabilized Venezuela represents the reopening of Colombia’s natural export market. Historically, Venezuela was the second-largest buyer of Colombian goods. A U.S.-backed reconstruction effort would generate immense demand for Colombian cement, steel, food, and services, potentially driving a GDP boost that outweighs the short-term migration costs.30

Rank 5: Russian Federation

Classification: Strategic Asset Loss & Geopolitical Defeat

Impact Score: 79/100

For Moscow, the fall of Maduro is a geopolitical catastrophe comparable to the loss of Soviet influence in Eastern Europe in 1989. It represents the eviction of Russia from its only significant military and energy foothold in the Americas.

2.10 Rosneft’s Assets: A Total Write-Down

Russian state oil company Rosneft (and its vehicle Roszarubezhneft) holds an estimated $5 billion in assets within Venezuelan joint ventures, including Petromonagas and Boqueron.31 These investments were political bets, guaranteed by oil flows that are now under U.S. control.

Legal analysts predict that the new Venezuelan administration will nullify these contracts, citing corruption or “odious debt” principles. Unlike Western majors who can litigate in New York, Russian entities have no recourse in U.S. courts. The $30-$50 billion Russia has invested in loans, arms sales, and oil projects over two decades faces total erasure.33

2.11 Loss of Power Projection

Venezuela served as the primary host for Russian strategic bombers (Tu-160s) and naval vessels in the Western Hemisphere.35 The intervention explicitly aims to remove “extra-hemispheric” military influence.2 Moscow loses its ability to threaten the U.S. “near abroad,” significantly weakening its leverage in global negotiations regarding Ukraine or NATO expansion. The concept of a “multipolar world” with a Russian pole in Latin America has been physically dismantled.

Rank 6: India

Classification: Economic Beneficiary & Supply Diversification

Impact Score: 65/100

India ranks as a major beneficiary, uniquely positioned to recover lost capital and optimize its energy supply chain.

2.12 Unlocking the “Lost Billion”

ONGC Videsh Ltd (OVL), the overseas arm of India’s state-owned oil explorer, has approximately $1 billion in stuck dues (dividends and project costs) from the San Cristobal field, frozen since 2014.36 Under Maduro, these funds were inaccessible due to sanctions and state insolvency.

A U.S.-sanctioned restructuring offers the first viable pathway for OVL to recover these funds. The model likely involves “oil-for-debt” swaps, where OVL is permitted to lift cargoes of Venezuelan crude to offset the debt, similar to the licenses granted to Chevron.37 This recovery would be a significant balance sheet event for the Indian state firm.

2.13 Refining Economics

Indian refiners, particularly the private giants Reliance Industries (Jamnagar) and Nayara Energy (Vadinar), possess some of the world’s most complex coking units, designed to process extra-heavy crudes.38 These refineries were major buyers of Venezuelan oil before sanctions forced them to switch to more expensive Middle Eastern or Canadian grades.

The return of Venezuelan crude allows Indian refiners to diversify away from Middle Eastern suppliers, increasing their bargaining power and improving gross refining margins (GRMs). While state-owned refiners (IOC, BPCL) are less equipped for this grade, the private sector’s gain is a net positive for India’s energy security.38

Rank 7: Canada

Classification: Market Competitor & Pricing Risk

Impact Score: 60/100

Canada faces a direct commercial threat. The relationship between Canadian oil and Venezuelan oil is a zero-sum game for market share in the U.S. Gulf Coast.

2.14 The Battle of the Heavy Barrels

Western Canada Select (WCS) and Venezuelan Merey 16 are direct competitors. Both are heavy, sour grades valued by Gulf Coast refiners. For years, Canadian producers have enjoyed a “sanctions premium”—the lack of Venezuelan barrels meant Gulf refiners had to buy Canadian crude, keeping WCS price differentials relatively narrow relative to WTI.40

The return of Venezuelan oil changes this calculus. Venezuelan oil has a logistical advantage: it can reach the Gulf Coast via tanker in days, whereas Canadian oil requires constrained pipeline transit or expensive rail. Analysts project that an influx of Venezuelan crude could widen the WCS-WTI differential by $2-$4 per barrel or more.42 This “widening of the discount” represents a direct revenue loss for Canadian oil sands producers like Cenovus and CNRL, potentially costing the Canadian industry billions annually.

2.15 Pipeline Pressures

This competitive threat accelerates the urgency for Canada to utilize the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion to export crude to Asia, reducing its dangerous over-reliance on the U.S. market. The Venezuelan revival is a wake-up call for Canadian energy diversification.1

Rank 8: Guyana

Classification: Security Beneficiary & Territorial Integrity

Impact Score: 55/100

For Guyana, the U.S. intervention is a Deus ex machina event that neutralizes its primary existential threat.

2.16 The End of the Essequibo Crisis

Prior to the intervention, the Maduro regime had escalated its claim over the Essequibo region—comprising two-thirds of Guyana’s territory—to the brink of war. Venezuela had held a referendum to annex the territory and mobilized troops to the border.44 This created a massive risk premium for investors in Guyana’s booming oil sector.

The U.S. takeover effectively dissolves this threat. The U.S. government, now the guarantor of security in Caracas, will not permit the annexation of territory belonging to a key Western ally and host to massive ExxonMobil operations.45 The threat of a Venezuelan military incursion drops to near zero, allowing Guyana to proceed with the development of the Stabroek block without the shadow of invasion. The “Law for the Defense of Guayana Esequiba” passed by Maduro becomes a dead letter.46

Rank 9: Islamic Republic of Iran

Classification: Strategic & Economic Loss

Impact Score: 52/100

Iran’s inclusion in the top impacted nations stems from the loss of a critical sanctions-busting partner and a strategic destination for its own hydrocarbon exports.

2.17 The Condensate Trade Collapse

Under Maduro, Venezuela and Iran developed a symbiotic energy relationship. Venezuela’s extra-heavy crude requires dilution with lighter hydrocarbons (condensate) to be transportable via pipeline. Iran supplied millions of barrels of this condensate, which it could not easily sell elsewhere due to its own sanctions.47 In return, Iran received Venezuelan crude or gold.

The U.S. takeover halts this trade immediately. Iran loses a vital market for its condensate and a source of hard assets. Furthermore, the “Axis of Resistance” loses its bridgehead in Latin America. The logistical network Iran built—including tanker fleets and refinery repair contracts—will be dismantled by U.S. authorities, further isolating Tehran economically.48

Rank 10: Nicaragua

Classification: Regime Stability Risk

Impact Score: 48/100

Nicaragua, under Daniel Ortega, remains one of the last ideological holdouts in the region, but its survival was heavily subsidized by Venezuelan largesse.

2.18 The End of ALBA Subsidies

Nicaragua was a primary beneficiary of the ALBA (Bolivarian Alliance for the Peoples of Our America) arrangement, receiving Venezuelan oil on preferential terms. These funds were often diverted to private accounts controlled by the Ortega family or used to fund social patronage networks.50

The fall of Maduro cuts off this flow of funds and fuel. Without Venezuelan subsidies, Nicaragua faces an acute balance-of-payments crisis. Furthermore, the U.S. administration, emboldened by its success in Venezuela, may turn its “maximum pressure” campaign toward Managua, using secondary sanctions to prevent any other supplier from filling the void.52 The economic fragility induced by this energy shock poses a direct threat to the stability of the Ortega regime.

3. Global Energy Market Reconfiguration

The intervention triggers a structural shift in global oil markets, specifically concerning the availability and pricing of heavy crude.

3.1 The “Heavy” Barrel Correction

The global oil market has suffered from a quality mismatch: the U.S. shale revolution produced a glut of light, sweet crude, while the world’s complex refineries are built for heavy, sour crude. The removal of Venezuelan (and Iranian) barrels created a scarcity of heavy oil, forcing refiners to pay premiums for Canadian or Middle Eastern grades.8

  • Short-Term (0-12 Months): Volatility will rule. Production in Venezuela may initially dip due to the chaos of transition. The market will remain tight.
  • Medium-Term (12-36 Months): As U.S. capital repairs the upgraders in the Orinoco Belt, a flood of heavy crude will hit the market. This will depress heavy oil prices relative to light oil (widening the differential). This is bearish for heavy oil producers (Canada, Mexico, Iraq) but bullish for complex refiners (U.S. Gulf Coast, India).24

3.2 The OPEC+ Fracture

Venezuela is a founding member of OPEC. A U.S.-administered Venezuela creates a geopolitical anomaly: a “Trojan Horse” within the cartel. It is highly unlikely that a U.S.-led administration in Caracas will adhere to OPEC+ production quotas if those quotas conflict with the U.S. goal of lowering gasoline prices or maximizing reconstruction revenue.53 This could undermine OPEC’s ability to manage global supply, potentially leading to a market share war if Saudi Arabia attempts to discipline the new Venezuelan output.

4. The Sovereign Debt Quagmire

The restructuring of Venezuela’s external debt—estimated between $150 billion and $170 billion—will be the most complex sovereign bankruptcy in history, eclipsing the Argentine defaults.19

4.1 The Hierarchy of Claims

The U.S. strategy appears to favor a “Iraq-style” restructuring, where oil revenues are shielded from creditors to fund reconstruction. This sets up a titanic legal battle:

  • China & Russia: Hold bilateral loans backed by oil. They risk being subordinated or wiped out as “odious debt.”
  • Bondholders: Hold ~$60 billion in defaulted bonds. They will likely push for a debt-for-equity swap, potentially gaining ownership stakes in Venezuelan oil fields.19
  • Corporate Claimants: Companies like ConocoPhillips and Crystallex have arbitration awards for past expropriations. They will likely be at the front of the line in U.S. courts.12

The resolution of this debt crisis will set legal precedents for sovereign restructuring for decades to come, particularly regarding the treatment of debt accrued by authoritarian regimes.

5. Conclusion

The U.S. takeover of Venezuela’s oil sector is a singularity in modern geopolitical history. It reverses the trend of waning U.S. influence in Latin America and reasserts the primacy of the Monroe Doctrine with overwhelming force.

  • For Cuba, it is a potential death knell for the regime.
  • For China and Russia, it is a stark demonstration of the risks of investing in U.S. adversaries in the Western Hemisphere.
  • For the Global Energy Market, it promises a future of abundant heavy oil, effectively capping long-term prices and securing the U.S. refining advantage for a generation.

The speed at which the U.S. can transition from military occupier to industrial manager will determine whether this intervention stabilizes the region or plunges it into a protracted insurgency.

Appendix A: Methodology

To determine the ranking of the top 10 impacted countries, a weighted multi-variable scoring model was developed. The model assesses impact magnitude across four distinct dimensions.

1. Scoring Variables:

  • Energy Security Dependence (ESD) – Weight: 30%
  • Definition: Measures the reliance of a country on Venezuelan energy imports for critical national infrastructure (electricity, transport).
  • Scale: 0 (No reliance) to 10 (Critical reliance/Single point of failure).
  • Example: Cuba scores 10 due to 83% grid dependence.
  • Financial & Asset Exposure (FAE) – Weight: 25%
  • Definition: The total value of sovereign debt, direct foreign investment, or physical assets located in Venezuela that are at risk of seizure, write-down, or destruction.
  • Scale: 0 (No exposure) to 10 (>$50 Billion or strategic irrecoverability).
  • Example: China scores 10 ($60bn+ debt). Russia scores 8.
  • Geopolitical Strategic Impact (GSI) – Weight: 25%
  • Definition: The degree to which the regime change alters a country’s national security architecture, regional influence, or territorial integrity.
  • Scale: 0 (Neutral) to 10 (Fundamental security shift).
  • Example: Guyana scores 9 (Removal of invasion threat). USA scores 9 (Strategic dominance).
  • Market & Commodity Sensitivity (MCS) – Weight: 20%
  • Definition: The economic impact resulting from changes in global oil prices, refining margins, or trade competition caused by Venezuelan supply shifts.
  • Scale: 0 (Insulated) to 10 (High correlation to national GDP).
  • Example: Canada scores 8 (Direct competitor for heavy crude markets).

2. Calculation Formula:

Impact Score = (ESD x 3) + (FAE x 2.5) + (GSI x 2.5) + (MCS x 2)

(Result is normalized to a 0-100 scale)

3. Data Sources:

Data inputs were derived from International Energy Agency (IEA) reports, OPEC Annual Statistical Bulletins, IMF Sovereign Debt databases, and shipping/tanker tracking data (Kpler/Vortexa) as cited in the research material.


If you find this post useful, please share the link on Facebook, with your friends, etc. Your support is much appreciated and if you have any feedback, please email me at in**@*********ps.com. Please note that for links to other websites, we are only paid if there is an affiliate program such as Avantlink, Impact, Amazon and eBay and only if you purchase something. If you’d like to directly contribute towards our continued reporting, please visit our funding page.


Sources Used

  1. U.S. designs for Venezuelan oil industry put pressure on Canadian oil stocks, accessed January 6, 2026, https://pipelineonline.ca/u-s-designs-for-venezuelan-oil-industry-put-pressure-on-canadian-oil-stocks/
  2. Experts react: The US just captured Maduro. What’s next for Venezuela and the region?, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/dispatches/us-just-captured-maduro-whats-next-for-venezuela-and-the-region/
  3. What role could the US play in Venezuela’s ‘bust’ oil industry?, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/business/2026/jan/04/venezuela-oil-industry-bust-what-role-could-the-us-play
  4. Reviving Venezuela’s oil industry no easy feat: Update | Latest Market News, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.argusmedia.com/news-and-insights/latest-market-news/2772065-reviving-venezuela-s-oil-industry-no-easy-feat-update
  5. US energy stocks rise as Trump vows to unlock Venezuela’s oil, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/business/2026/jan/05/oil-price-dips-venezuela
  6. Top 10 countries with largest oil reserves in 2025: Venezuela leads the world, here’s where Middle East, US and India rank, accessed January 6, 2026, https://indianexpress.com/article/trending/top-10-listing/top-10-largest-oil-reserves-2025-venezuela-middle-east-us-india-rank-10457647/
  7. U.S. oil companies gain after Trump signals access to Venezuela’s reserves – BNN Bloomberg, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/business/2026/01/05/us-oil-companies-gain-after-trump-signals-access-to-venezuelas-reserves/
  8. The 4 Things Standing Between the U.S. and Venezuela’s Oil, accessed January 6, 2026, https://heatmap.news/energy/venezuela-blockade-sanctions
  9. Cuba – Countries & Regions – IEA, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.iea.org/countries/cuba/energy-mix
  10. Cuba braces for fallout as US action in Venezuela upends decades …, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.nationalheraldindia.com/international/cuba-braces-for-fallout-as-us-action-in-venezuela-upends-decades-old-alliance
  11. Cuba – International – U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.eia.gov/international/analysis/country/CUB
  12. US to blockade Venezuela oil flows: Trump, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.argusmedia.com/en/news-and-insights/latest-market-news/2766679-us-to-blockade-venezuela-oil-flows-trump
  13. US Tanker Seizure Sparks Energy Crisis In Cuba – Evrim Ağacı, accessed January 6, 2026, https://evrimagaci.org/gpt/us-tanker-seizure-sparks-energy-crisis-in-cuba-519862
  14. Toppling of Venezuela’s Maduro stirs fear in Cubans, accessed January 6, 2026, https://sg.news.yahoo.com/toppling-venezuelas-maduro-stirs-fear-224445718.html
  15. Cuba’s Electricity Crisis: What’s Happening and What Comes Next – The University of Alabama at Birmingham, accessed January 6, 2026, https://sites.uab.edu/humanrights/2025/10/10/cubas-electricity-crisis-whats-happening-and-what-comes-next/
  16. Trump’s attack leaves China worried about its interests in Venezuela …, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jan/05/venezuela-trump-attack-china-interests-analysis
  17. US military action in Venezuela: oil market & geopolitical impact, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.ig.com/en/news-and-trade-ideas/Intervention-Venezuela-implications-260106
  18. Maduro capture: What’s at stake for China’s economic interests in Venezuela, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/international/maduro-capture-whats-stake-chinas-economic-interests-venezuela
  19. Analysis-Venezuela debt rally belies complex creditor web, political quagmire By Reuters, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.investing.com/news/stock-market-news/analysisvenezuela-debt-rally-belies-complex-creditor-web-political-quagmire-4432094
  20. Venezuela’s Oil Export Rebound: 2025 and Beyond – Import Globals, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.importglobals.com/blog/venezuelas-oil-export-rebound-2025-and-beyond
  21. China’s oil investments in Venezuela – The Economic Times, accessed January 6, 2026, https://m.economictimes.com/news/international/world-news/chinas-oil-investments-in-venezuela/articleshow/126354640.cms
  22. Venezuela: the upending of values and another warning to Europe, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.bruegel.org/first-glance/venezuela-upending-values-and-another-warning-europe
  23. What the US capture of Maduro means for China’s interests in Venezuela and beyond, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.channelnewsasia.com/east-asia/us-venezuela-capture-maduro-china-latin-america-taiwan-implications-5817086
  24. Dense, sticky and heavy: why Venezuelan crude oil appeals to US refineries, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/business/2026/jan/05/venezuelan-crude-oil-appeals-to-us-refineries
  25. U.S. Seizure of Maduro and Venezuela Oil Assets Might Change The Case For Investing In Chevron (CVX) – Simply Wall St, accessed January 6, 2026, https://simplywall.st/stocks/us/energy/nyse-cvx/chevron/news/us-seizure-of-maduro-and-venezuela-oil-assets-might-change-t/amp
  26. U.S. pushes oil majors to invest big in Venezuela if they want to recover debts, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2026/jan/04/us-pushes-oil-majors-to-invest-big-in-venezuela-if/
  27. Colombia prepares for refugee influx after US strikes on Venezuela, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2026/1/6/colombia-prepares-for-refugee-influx-after-us-strikes-on-venezuela
  28. Neighbor nations can’t bear costs of Venezuelan refugee crisis alone – Brookings Institution, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/neighbor-nations-cant-bear-costs-of-venezuelan-refugee-crisis-alone/
  29. Tracking Trump and Latin America: Security—Trump Blockades Sanctioned Venezuelan Oil, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.as-coa.org/articles/tracking-trump-and-latin-america-security-trump-blockades-sanctioned-venezuelan-oil
  30. Venezuela’s Migrants Bring Economic Opportunity to Latin America, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.imf.org/en/news/articles/2022/12/06/cf-venezuelas-migrants-bring-economic-opportunity-to-latin-america
  31. Explainer: Status of Foreign Oil Companies in Venezuela After …, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.oedigital.com/news/534029-explainer-status-of-foreign-oil-companies-in-venezuela-after-maduro-s-arrest
  32. FACTBOX | Where global oil firms stand in Venezuela following Maduro’s capture, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.bairdmaritime.com/offshore/drilling-production/factbox-where-global-oil-firms-stand-in-venezuela-following-maduros-capture
  33. US Intervention in Venezuelan Oil Drives Global Energy Disruption, accessed January 6, 2026, https://discoveryalert.com.au/strategic-petroleum-2026-us-venezuela-oil-disruption/
  34. Rosneft’s Withdrawal amid U.S. Sanctions Contributes to Venezuela’s Isolation – CSIS, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.csis.org/analysis/rosnefts-withdrawal-amid-us-sanctions-contributes-venezuelas-isolation
  35. Russia Warns Citizens Against Travel to Venezuela After U.S. Ousts Maduro, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2026/01/05/russia-warns-citizens-against-travel-to-venezuela-after-us-ousts-maduro-a91609
  36. US control of Venezuelan oil may unlock $1 bn stuck dues for India, lift output, accessed January 6, 2026, https://m.economictimes.com/industry/energy/oil-gas/us-control-of-venezuelan-oil-may-unlock-1-bn-stuck-dues-for-india-lift-output/articleshow/126332919.cms
  37. Explained: Why US control of Venezuelan oil could free $1 bn owed to India, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.businesstoday.in/india/story/explained-why-us-control-of-venezuelan-oil-could-free-1-bn-owed-to-india-509325-2026-01-04
  38. Cheaper Venezuelan crude may benefit limited Indian private refiners, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.newindianexpress.com/business/2026/Jan/05/cheaper-venezuelan-crude-may-benefit-limited-indian-private-refiners
  39. Venezuela crisis seen having minimal impact on Indian oil flow, upstream developments eyed, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.hellenicshippingnews.com/venezuela-crisis-seen-having-minimal-impact-on-indian-oil-flow-upstream-developments-eyed/
  40. More oil production in Venezuela could hurt Canada’s oilpatch, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/venezuela-oil-canada-9.7034122
  41. Venezuela’s oil reboot could chip away at Canada’s heavy crude edge, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.benefitsandpensionsmonitor.com/investments/emerging-markets/venezuelas-oil-reboot-could-chip-away-at-canadas-heavy-crude-edge/392926
  42. U.S. designs for Venezuelan oil industry put pressure on Canadian oil stocks, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.ctvnews.ca/business/article/canadian-oil-stocks-down-after-us-forces-capture-maduro/
  43. Western Canada Select widens; Venezuela a longer-term risk, analysts say, accessed January 6, 2026, https://boereport.com/2026/01/05/western-canada-select-widens-venezuela-a-longer-term-risk-analysts-say/
  44. Venezuela: The Rise and Fall of a Petrostate | Council on Foreign Relations, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/venezuela-crisis
  45. The U.S.-Venezuela-Guyana Oil Triangle – Drilled Media, accessed January 6, 2026, https://drilled.media/news/guyana-venezuela
  46. Guyana–Venezuela territorial dispute – Wikipedia, accessed January 6, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guyana%E2%80%93Venezuela_territorial_dispute
  47. Its Allies’ Falls Continue the Destruction of Iran’s Financial Capital – Middle East Forum, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.meforum.org/mef-observer/its-allies-falls-continue-the-destruction-of-irans-financial-capital
  48. Venezuela Boosting Oil Exports With Iranian Light Crude Supplies | Iran International, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.iranintl.com/en/202205233767
  49. Why now is the right time for ‘maximum pressure’ on Iran’s oil exports – Atlantic Council, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/menasource/why-now-is-the-right-time-for-maximum-pressure-on-irans-oil-exports/
  50. The Consequences of Nicaragua’s Radicalization and Options for US Foreign Policy, accessed January 6, 2026, https://thedialogue.org/blogs/2025/10/the-consequences-of-nicaraguas-radicalization-and-options-for-us-foreign-policy
  51. Venezuelan oil fueled the rise and fall of Nicaragua’s Ortega regime – The World from PRX, accessed January 6, 2026, https://theworld.org/stories/2018/08/21/venezuelan-oil-fueled-rise-and-fall-nicaraguas-ortega-regime
  52. ‘Secondary’ Tariffs Target Countries Importing Venezuelan Oil – International Trade, accessed January 6, 2026, https://internationaltrade.btlaw.com/post/102k6tg/secondary-tariffs-target-countries-importing-venezuelan-oil
  53. Venezuela has the world’s most oil: Why doesn’t it earn more from exports? – Al Jazeera, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/9/4/venezuela-has-the-worlds-most-oil-why-doesnt-it-earn-more-from-exports
  54. Venezuela’s billions in distressed debt: Who is in line to collect? – Fox Business, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/venezuelas-billions-distressed-debt-who-line-collect

Venezuelan Oil Under US Control: Consequences for Cuba

This is a time-sensitive special report and is based on information available as of January 5, 2026. Due to the situation being very dynamic the following report should be used to obtain a perspective but not viewed as an absolute.

The geopolitical landscape of the Caribbean Basin underwent a cataclysmic shift on January 3, 2026, with the United States military intervention in Venezuela, specifically the capture of Nicolás Maduro and the subsequent assumption of operational control over the nation’s petroleum infrastructure. For the Republic of Cuba, this event represents a strategic shock of existential magnitude, comparable only to the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991. However, unlike the gradual decline of the “Special Period” in the 1990s, the current crisis unfolds with immediate, kinetic velocity due to the imposition of a strict US naval quarantine under Operation Southern Spear.

This report, prepared for national security and foreign affairs stakeholders, provides an exhaustive analysis of the cascading impacts on the Cuban state. The central finding is that the disruption of the Caracas-Havana energy axis is not merely a logistical bottleneck but a systemic termination of the economic model that has sustained the Cuban Communist Party (PCC) for a quarter-century. The symbiosis, wherein Venezuelan hydrocarbons were exchanged for Cuban intelligence and medical services, has been severed at the source.

The analysis projects a rapid, multi-sectoral collapse within Cuba. The electrical grid, already fragile, faces total structural failure as the 35,000–50,000 barrels per day (bpd) of subsidized Venezuelan crude and refined products are halted. This energy deficit will trigger a chain reaction: the paralysis of mechanized agriculture leading to acute food insecurity; the collapse of water sanitation systems dependent on diesel pumps; and the evaporation of hard currency revenues previously derived from re-exporting Venezuelan fuel.

Furthermore, the diplomatic and economic isolation of Havana is compounded by the “US Majors” strategy for Venezuela’s rehabilitation. The roadmap for Petróleos de Venezuela, S.A. (PDVSA) under US provisional authority prioritizes the commercial reintegration of Venezuelan crude into the US Gulf Coast refining complex, explicitly excluding subsidized political transfers to the Caribbean. Regional actors such as Mexico, constrained by their own economic entanglements with the US, lack the capacity to fill the void. Russia and China, while politically sympathetic, face insurmountable logistical and financial barriers to replacing Venezuela as a distinct energy patron.

Consequently, the outlook for Q1 and Q2 2026 indicates a high probability of severe internal instability in Cuba, characterized by nationwide blackouts exceeding 20 hours daily, the erosion of the regime’s internal security capacity due to fuel shortages, and a mass migration event potentially exceeding historical precedents. The Cuban regime has lost its strategic depth, creating a vacuum that threatens the continuity of governance in Havana.

1. The Strategic Decoupling: Anatomy of the Rupture

To understand the severity of the current crisis, one must analyze the depth of the dependency that has now been violently dismantled. The relationship between Venezuela and Cuba was not a standard bilateral trade agreement; it was an ideological and economic fusion designed to bypass market mechanisms and US sanctions. The dismantling of this architecture by US forces has left Havana with no fallback mechanism.

1.1 The Mechanics of the Caracas-Havana Axis

For over two decades, the survival of the Cuban state was predicated on the “Barrio Adentro” exchange. This agreement, forged by Hugo Chávez and Fidel Castro, structured the transfer of Venezuelan national wealth to Cuba in exchange for human capital. Specifically, Venezuela provided between 30,000 and 50,000 barrels per day (bpd) of crude oil and refined products to Cuba.1 In return, Cuba deployed thousands of doctors, educators, and sports trainers to Venezuela.

Crucially, beneath the surface of this humanitarian exchange lay a vital security cooperation framework. Cuban intelligence agencies, specifically the G2, provided the backbone of the Venezuelan state’s internal security, counter-intelligence, and presidential protection protocols.4 This integration went so far that Cuban advisors were embedded within the command structures of the Venezuelan military and PDVSA, effectively managing the oil flows to ensure Havana’s quota was prioritized over commercial clients or even Venezuelan domestic needs.

The US intervention on January 3, 2026, decapitated this structure. By physically removing the Maduro leadership and targeting the Cuban security apparatus within Venezuela, the US effectively blinded Havana and severed its control over the resource flows.5 The expulsion or neutralization of Cuban personnel in Venezuela means Havana has lost its forward operating base and its leverage over the oil spigots.

1.2 Operation Southern Spear and the Naval Quarantine

The physical mechanism enforcing this decoupling is Operation Southern Spear. Unlike previous sanctions regimes, which relied on financial designations and Treasury Department lists (OFAC), this operation utilizes the kinetic power of the US Navy and Coast Guard to enforce a physical blockade of energy transfers to Cuba.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has explicitly defined the operation as an “oil quarantine,” a terminology that evokes the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis but applies it to energy rather than nuclear armaments.6 The quarantine zone targets the “Dark Fleet”—vessels operating without transponders to evade sanctions—which had been the primary conduit for Venezuelan oil to Cuba in recent years.7

The operational reality of this quarantine is stifling. US naval assets, including the USS Gerald R. Ford Carrier Strike Group and the USS Iwo Jima Amphibious Ready Group, effectively dominate the maritime approaches between Puerto Jose (Venezuela) and Cienfuegos (Cuba).8 Any vessel attempting to run this blockade faces interception, boarding, and seizure. This has created a “risk wall” for global shipping; insurance premiums for voyages to Cuba have skyrocketed, and major insurers have withdrawn coverage for any vessel designated by the US as potentially violating the quarantine.7 The result is that even if Cuba could find a seller, it cannot find a bottom (ship) willing to make the voyage.

Complementing the naval blockade is a rigid legal framework established by the US provisional authority over Venezuelan assets. The US Treasury has revoked the licenses that previously allowed limited swaps and has instituted a new regime where Venezuelan oil is treated as a strategic asset under US administration.11

Under this new framework, US oil majors (Chevron, ExxonMobil, ConocoPhillips) are the authorized custodians of production rehabilitation. These entities operate under strict US law, which explicitly prohibits transactions with Cuba due to the ongoing embargo (LIBERTAD Act). Therefore, there is no legal pathway for a barrel of Venezuelan oil to be transferred to Cuba. The “oil-for-doctors” barter scheme has no legal standing in the new commercial reality of Venezuela. The contracts are void, and the debt is unrecognized. Cuba has transitioned overnight from a privileged partner to a sanctioned pariah in the eyes of the Venezuelan energy sector.13

2. The Energy Asphyxiation: Anatomy of a Collapse

The cessation of Venezuelan oil supplies is a catastrophic event for Cuba’s energy infrastructure. The island’s electrical grid is a chaotic patchwork of Soviet-era thermoelectric plants, floating Turkish power ships, and distributed diesel generators. This entire system was calibrated to run on a specific mix of domestic crude and Venezuelan imports. The removal of the Venezuelan component destabilizes the entire architecture.

2.1 The Mathematics of Deficit

To maintain a minimally functional society—keeping lights on in Havana, running essential industries, and powering hospitals—Cuba requires approximately 100,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day.4 Domestic production, primarily heavy, high-sulfur crude extracted along the northern coast (Varadero/Matanzas belt), contributes roughly 40,000 bpd.3 This leaves a structural deficit of approximately 60,000 bpd.

Historically, Venezuela filled the vast majority of this gap. Even in the diminished years of 2024-2025, shipments averaged 35,000 to 50,000 bpd.1 This imported volume was crucial not just for its quantity but its quality. Venezuelan lighter crudes and refined diesel were essential for blending with the sludge-like Cuban crude to make it combustible in thermoelectric plants, and for fueling the distributed generation network.2

With the US naval blockade reducing this inflow to near zero, the math becomes merciless. The 40,000 bpd of domestic production is insufficient to run the baseload plants at capacity, and it cannot be used in diesel generators or vehicles. The deficit is not 20% or 30%; it is a functional deficit of over 60% of liquid fuel needs, concentrated entirely in the transport and peak-generation sectors.

2.2 The Collapse of Distributed Generation

The most immediate impact falls on the “Distributed Generation” clusters. These are thousands of diesel and fuel-oil generators installed across the island during the “Energy Revolution” of the mid-2000s. They were designed to cover peak demand when the aging thermoelectric plants failed or underwent maintenance.

These generators rely exclusively on imported diesel and fuel oil. The domestic crude is too heavy and sulfurous for them. With the blockade halting refined product shipments from Venezuela, these generators are going offline en masse.15 The result is the loss of the grid’s “shock absorbers.” When a main plant trips offline, there is no backup to pick up the load, leading to frequency instability and total blackouts rather than managed load-shedding.

2.3 The “Zero Diesel” Scenario and Critical Infrastructure

The “Zero Diesel” scenario is the nightmare contingency for Cuban planners. Diesel is the lifeblood of the island’s critical infrastructure backup systems.

  • Hospitals: Cuban hospitals rely on diesel generators during blackouts. With 20+ hour blackouts becoming the norm, these generators must run almost continuously. Without fuel deliveries, hospital backup power will fail, leading to immediate loss of life in intensive care units, neonatal wards, and operating theaters.16
  • Water Supply: The vast majority of Cuba’s water pumping stations run on electricity or diesel. The blackout prevents electric pumps from filling reservoirs, and the lack of diesel prevents the backup pumps from operating. Over 2 million people were already without reliable water before the intervention.4 This number will likely encompass the entire urban population of Havana and Santiago de Cuba, precipitating a sanitation crisis and the risk of waterborne diseases.
  • Cold Chain and Food Preservation: In a tropical climate, the lack of refrigeration is devastating. Households will lose their meager food stocks within hours of a blackout. State cold storage facilities for imported meats and medicines will fail, leading to massive spoilage of strategic reserves.16

3. The Economic Implosion: Sectoral Impact Analysis

The energy crisis is the lead domino in a cascading economic failure. Energy is the primary input for every productive sector of the Cuban economy. The cessation of Venezuelan oil flows renders the current economic model viable.

3.1 Agriculture: The Threat of Famine

Cuban agriculture operates on a model that, while inefficient, is mechanized. Tractors prepare the land, diesel pumps irrigate the fields, and trucks transport the harvest to urban centers.

  • Production Collapse: The lack of diesel strikes at the heart of the planting and harvesting cycles. The sugar harvest (zafra), already at historic lows, will likely be abandoned entirely as the fuel cost to cut and transport cane exceeds the value of the sugar produced. Rice production and other staples will suffer similar fates, forcing the population into subsistence farming.
  • Distribution Paralysis: The most critical failure point is transport. Even if food is grown or imported as aid, it cannot be distributed. The “Acopio” state distribution system relies on a fleet of aging trucks that require diesel. Without fuel, produce rots in the fields of Artemisa and Mayabeque while the markets in Havana stand empty.4 The breakdown of the rural-urban food supply chain creates the conditions for localized famine.

3.2 Tourism: The Death of the Cash Cow

Tourism has historically been the regime’s primary source of hard currency, funding the import of food and fuel. However, the industry is energy-intensive. Hotels require air conditioning, desalination, and constant lighting to meet international standards.

To shield tourists from the reality of Cuban life, the regime has traditionally ring-fenced energy for the tourism sector, powering hotels with dedicated circuits or generators. The depth of the current fuel crisis makes this impossible. Hotels are now subject to the same shortages as the general population.

  • Reputational Destruction: The image of a “tropical paradise” cannot survive reports of 20-hour blackouts, food shortages at buffets, and lack of running water. Cancellations will spike, and new bookings will evaporate.
  • Revenue Spiral: The collapse of tourism revenue removes the government’s liquidity. Without tourism dollars, they cannot buy spot-market fuel (even if they could find a seller), which worsens the blackouts, which further kills tourism. This is a classic “death spiral”.4

3.3 The End of Re-export Revenue

A little-known but vital component of the Cuba-Venezuela relationship was the re-export of oil. Venezuela often shipped crude to the Cienfuegos refinery—a joint venture—where it was processed. Cuba would then consume what it needed and export the surplus refined products (diesel, jet fuel) to the international market, keeping the hard currency profit.17

This “middleman” trade was a major source of off-the-books revenue for the regime, often used to fund the military and intelligence services. The US control of PDVSA ends this completely. The Cienfuegos refinery, designed for Venezuelan crude, is now effectively a stranded asset. The loss of this revenue stream defunds the apparatus of the state just as internal security threats are rising.

4. Geopolitical Isolation: The Myth of the Alternative Patron

In previous moments of crisis, Cuba has relied on a geopolitical patron to counter US pressure—first the Soviet Union, then Venezuela. In the current crisis, the regime finds itself isolated. The specific mechanics of the US intervention and the global geopolitical environment preclude an effective rescue by China, Russia, or Mexico.

4.1 The Logistics of Distance and Cost

While Russia and China have issued diplomatic condemnations of the US action 18, material support faces the tyranny of distance and economics.

  • Russia: A tanker from Venezuela reaches Havana in 2-4 days. A tanker from Russian ports takes 30 to 45 days. The freight cost for such a voyage is significant. Russia, heavily sanctioned and focused on its war in Ukraine, utilizes a “shadow fleet” for its own oil exports to India and China. Diverting these vessels to supply Cuba for free (or on credit that will never be repaid) is strategically irrational for Moscow. Additionally, Russian crude grades may not be compatible with Cuban refineries designed for Venezuelan heavy sour crude.20
  • China: Beijing has historically been pragmatic in its relationship with Venezuela, prioritizing loan repayment over ideological subsidies. With the US controlling Venezuelan assets, China’s priority is negotiating the security of its existing investments with the new US-backed administration, not antagonizing Washington by breaking a blockade to support Havana.19 China’s economic interests lie in stability and access to global markets, which discourages high-risk adventures in the Caribbean.

4.2 The Mexican Dilemma

Mexico, under President Claudia Sheinbaum, initially signaled a willingness to provide humanitarian oil to Cuba.22 However, this support is structurally limited and politically vulnerable.

  • US Leverage: The US has enormous economic leverage over Mexico via the USMCA trade agreement and border policies. The Trump administration has explicitly linked Mexican cooperation on migration and drug interdiction to trade stability. Continuing to supply oil to Cuba in defiance of a US “quarantine” places Mexico at risk of secondary sanctions or tariffs.22
  • PEMEX Constraints: Petróleos Mexicanos (PEMEX) is the most indebted oil company in the world. Donating oil to Cuba is domestically controversial and fiscally damaging. Furthermore, Mexican crude production has been declining, limiting the surplus available for export.24
  • Operational Risk: Reports indicate that tankers departing Mexico for Cuba have faced US naval scrutiny. The risk of interdiction or being blacklisted by insurers makes the voyage commercially unviable for Mexican vessels.24

5. Regime Stability and Internal Dynamics

The energy and economic crises are rapidly metamorphosing into a political crisis. The Cuban regime relies on two pillars for stability: the “social contract” (subsidized basics in exchange for acquiescence) and the security apparatus. Both are being eroded by the loss of Venezuelan support.

5.1 The Breakdown of the Social Contract

The Cuban population is accustomed to hardship, but the current scenario breaches the implicit limits of the social contract. The “Special Period” of the 1990s had a narrative of shared sacrifice and national defense. The current crisis is viewed increasingly as a failure of management and a result of the regime’s geopolitical gambling.

Protests have evolved from isolated incidents to coordinated expressions of dissent. The “pot-banging” (cacerolazos) protests seen in late 2025 have intensified.25 The demands have shifted from “fix the lights” to broader political slogans (“Freedom,” “Patria y Vida”). As blackouts extend to 20+ hours, the population has little to lose. The fear of repression is outweighed by the existential dread of starvation and darkness.

5.2 The Erosion of Repressive Capacity

The regime’s ability to quell unrest is physically constrained by the fuel shortage.

  • Mobility: Police and military vehicles require fuel. In a “Zero Diesel” scenario, the rapid deployment of “Black Beret” special forces to hotspots becomes logistically difficult. The regime may be forced to concentrate forces in Havana, leaving the provinces in a state of semi-anarchy.
  • Surveillance: The sophisticated electronic surveillance state built with Chinese and Venezuelan assistance requires electricity. Frequent power cuts blind the digital monitoring systems that track dissent on social media and communications networks.
  • Internal Friction: The return of thousands of intelligence officers and military advisors from Venezuela creates a dangerous demographic within the security services.5 These personnel are witnessing the collapse of the project they dedicated their careers to. Discontent within the middle ranks of the military (FAR) and Interior Ministry (MININT)—who are suffering the same blackouts as the civilians—cannot be ruled out.

6. The Migration Event: Mariel 2.0

History demonstrates a direct correlation between economic distress in Cuba and migration surges to the United States. The 1980 Mariel boatlift and the 1994 Rafter Crisis were both precipitated by internal squeezes. The crisis of 2026 is poised to trigger a migration event of similar or greater magnitude.

6.1 The Mechanics of the Surge

The collapse of the grid and the food supply creates a “push” factor of unprecedented intensity. Unlike previous waves where economic aspiration was a driver, this wave is driven by survival.

  • State Complicity: In past crises, the Cuban government has used migration as a safety valve, effectively opening the borders to allow the most dissatisfied segments of the population to leave, thereby relieving internal pressure. It is highly probable that the regime will cease patrolling its own coasts, tacitly encouraging a mass exodus.26
  • Scale: With nearly 600,000 Cubans having already attempted to leave in recent years, the migration infrastructure (smuggling networks, raft building knowledge) is well-established.27

6.2 US Countermeasures and Humanitarian Crisis

The US response, however, differs from previous eras. The administration has signaled a “closed door” policy, implemented via strict naval interdiction.

  • Interdiction Saturation: The US Coast Guard (USCG) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Air and Marine Operations are tasked with holding the line in the Florida Straits. However, these same assets are currently tasked with enforcing the Venezuelan oil quarantine.28 This stretching of resources creates a vulnerability. A mass “swarm” event of thousands of rafts could overwhelm interdiction capacity.
  • Humanitarian Dilemma: The intersection of a starving population taking to the sea and a militarized blockade creates the potential for a massive humanitarian disaster in the Straits, with high loss of life and complex search-and-rescue demands placed on US forces.

7. Next Steps for the Venezuelan Oil Industry Under US Control

With the US acting as the de facto provisional administrator of Venezuela’s oil wealth, the path forward for PDVSA involves a rapid reintegration into the Western commercial sphere, explicitly bypassing Cuba.

7.1 The “US Majors” Rehabilitation Strategy

President Trump has outlined a strategy where “very large United States oil companies” will take the lead in rebuilding the sector.14 This is not merely rhetorical; it aligns with the technical realities of Venezuela’s infrastructure.

  • Western Capital Re-entry: Companies like Chevron, which maintained a foothold via joint ventures (Petroboscan, Petropiar), are positioned to scale operations immediately. They possess the technical data and the legal standing (via General License 41 modifications) to operate.11
  • Infrastructure Triage: The immediate focus will be on the “low hanging fruit”—repairing valves, pipelines, and compression stations in the Orinoco Belt to stabilize production, which currently sits at a fraction of its potential (~1 million bpd vs 3 million bpd historical peak).31
  • Supply Chain Rewiring: The most significant shift is the destination of the crude. Venezuelan Merey 16 (heavy/sour) is chemically ideal for the complex refineries of the US Gulf Coast (PADD 3), which were built to process it. The US strategy is to redirect these flows north to Texas and Louisiana, displacing imports from other regions and funding the Venezuelan reconstruction.21

7.2 The Explicit Exclusion of Cuba

The US-led roadmap for PDVSA contains no provision for the continuation of the Cuban subsidy.

  • Sanctions Compliance: US oil majors operate under strict adherence to the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) regulations. Any export of Venezuelan crude to Cuba would violate the US embargo (LIBERTAD Act) and trigger severe penalties. Corporate governance at Chevron or ExxonMobil precludes any “off-books” shipments.33
  • Commercial Imperative: The provisional Venezuelan government will require immediate cash flow to stabilize the country and pay down debt. Cuba cannot pay for oil. Selling to a non-paying customer while attempting to rebuild a bankrupt national industry is commercially impossible.
  • Strategic Intent: The cessation of oil to Cuba is not just a byproduct of the policy; it is a feature. The US administration views the energy starvation of the Castro regime as a strategic benefit, accelerating the possibility of political change in Havana.15

Conclusion

The US intervention in Venezuela and the subsequent control of its oil industry has effectively placed the Cuban regime in a stranglehold. By physically controlling the resource that powered the Cuban economy and policing the waters that transport it, the United States has achieved a level of pressure on Havana that decades of embargo legislation failed to deliver.

The chain of impacts is linear, rapid, and devastating:

  1. US Control of PDVSA ends the political will to subsidize Cuba.
  2. Operation Southern Spear physically prevents alternative supplies from reaching the island.
  3. The Energy Cliff leads to the collapse of the electrical grid and transport sector.
  4. Economic Paralysis triggers food insecurity and the collapse of the tourism revenue stream.
  5. Regime Destabilization ensues as the social contract fractures and the security apparatus loses mobility.

The Cuban leadership faces a narrowing set of options, none of which ensure the long-term survival of the status quo. The capture of Nicolás Maduro in Caracas has effectively removed the keystone of the Cuban geopolitical arch, leaving the structure to collapse under its own weight.


If you find this post useful, please share the link on Facebook, with your friends, etc. Your support is much appreciated and if you have any feedback, please email me at in**@*********ps.com. Please note that for links to other websites, we are only paid if there is an affiliate program such as Avantlink, Impact, Amazon and eBay and only if you purchase something. If you’d like to directly contribute towards our continued reporting, please visit our funding page.


Sources Used

  1. Venezuela’s Oil Industry in Global Market – January 2026 – Lodi 411, accessed January 6, 2026, https://lodi411.com/lodi-eye/venezuelas-oil-industry-in-global-market-january-2026
  2. Venezuela Sent Twice As Much Oil to the U.S. Than to Cuba in August, accessed January 6, 2026, https://translatingcuba.com/venezuela-sent-twice-as-much-oil-to-the-u-s-than-to-cuba-in-august/
  3. Maduro ouster leaves Cuba’s wobbling regime without a benefactor, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2026/01/05/world/politics/maduro-cuba-oil-benefactor/
  4. Maduro ouster leaves Cuban regime without a benefactor – Taipei Times, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2026/01/06/2003850109
  5. ​Is Cuba next after Maduro’s capture? – Asia Times, accessed January 6, 2026, https://asiatimes.com/2026/01/is-cuba-next-after-maduros-capture/
  6. Rubio says US is using oil quarantine to pressure Venezuela, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.indiatribune.com/public/index.php/rubio-says-us-is-using-oil-quarantine-to-pressure-venezuela
  7. Caribbean Shipping Confronts New Era of Risk After U.S. Raid in Venezuela, accessed January 6, 2026, https://gcaptain.com/caribbean-shipping-confronts-new-era-of-risk-after-u-s-raid-in-venezuela/
  8. U.S. Navy blockade off coast of Venezuela will continue despite Maduro’s capture – WHRO, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.whro.org/news/local-news/2026-01-04/u-s-navy-blockade-off-coast-of-venezuela-will-continue-despite-maduros-capture
  9. United States blockade during Operation Southern Spear – Wikipedia, accessed January 6, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_blockade_during_Operation_Southern_Spear
  10. U.S. Moves to Disrupt Venezuela-Cuba Oil Axis Explained – Discovery Alert, accessed January 6, 2026, https://discoveryalert.com.au/caribbean-energy-enforcement-regulatory-architecture-2025/
  11. Reversing the Biden Administration, OFAC Announces the Wind Down of Venezuela General License 41 – SmarTrade | Thompson Hine, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.thompsonhinesmartrade.com/2025/03/reversing-the-biden-administration-ofac-announces-the-wind-down-of-venezuela-general-license-41/
  12. OFAC Terminates License Authorizing Certain Petroleum-Related Activities in Venezuela | Insights | Holland & Knight, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.hklaw.com/en/insights/publications/2025/03/ofac-terminates-license-authorizing-certain-petroleum-related
  13. Former Chevron executive seeks $2 billion for oil projects in Venezuela, accessed January 6, 2026, https://americanbazaaronline.com/2026/01/06/former-chevron-executive-seeks-2-billion-venezuela-oil-472665/
  14. What role could the US play in Venezuela’s ‘bust’ oil industry? – The Guardian, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/business/2026/jan/04/venezuela-oil-industry-bust-what-role-could-the-us-play
  15. Trump Is Convinced That Without Venezuelan Oil the Cuban Regime Will Fall on Its Own, accessed January 6, 2026, https://translatingcuba.com/trump-is-convinced-that-without-venezuelan-oil-the-cuban-regime-will-fall-on-its-own/
  16. 11 Million Cubans Are Poised to Starve Without Venezuelan Oil. How Many Will We Allow to Die? – Jezebel, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.jezebel.com/cuba-collapse-struggles-power-starvation-food-venezuela-oil-maduro-trump-rubio-miguel-diaz-canel
  17. ‘Got free oil from Venezuela’: Why Cuba’s collapse looks inevitable after capture of Nicholas Maduro, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.wionews.com/photos/-got-free-oil-from-venezuela-why-cuba-s-collapse-looks-inevitable-after-capture-of-nicholas-maduro-1767531151243
  18. From Russia to Iran, Venezuela’s allies react to the capture of Nicolas Maduro, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/maduro-capture-world-reaction/mxpdbf7nx
  19. Trump’s attack leaves China worried about its interests in Venezuela, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jan/05/venezuela-trump-attack-china-interests-analysis
  20. With Maduro Gone, Putin Risks Being Pushed Out of the Western Hemisphere, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2026/01/05/with-maduro-gone-putin-risks-being-pushed-out-of-the-western-hemisphere-a91608
  21. Venezuelan oil output could reach 1.2 million bpd by end of 2026 if sanctions are lifted, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.thenationalnews.com/business/energy/2026/01/05/venezuelan-oil-output-could-reach-12-million-bpd-by-end-of-2026-if-sanctions-are-lifted/
  22. Mexican Oil, Cuba and Trump 2.0 – Global Americans, accessed January 6, 2026, https://globalamericans.org/mexican-oil-cuba-and-trump-2-0/
  23. In the wake of Venezuela, is Mexico next? A perspective from our CEO, accessed January 6, 2026, https://mexiconewsdaily.com/opinion/venezuela-mexico-ceo-perspective/
  24. 80000 barrels of Mexican oil sent to Cuba: Havana drawn into the US–Mexico clash, accessed January 6, 2026, https://english.elpais.com/international/2025-12-29/80000-barrels-of-mexican-oil-sent-to-cuba-havana-drawn-into-the-usmexico-clash.html
  25. Cuba on the Brink: Protests and Pot-Banging Over Blackouts, accessed January 6, 2026, https://havanatimes.org/features/cuba-on-the-brink-protests-and-pot-banging-over-blackouts/
  26. Cuban Immigrants in the United States – Migration Policy Institute, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/cuban-immigrants-united-states-2018
  27. U.S. Sanctions: A Root Cause of Cuban Migration – The Alliance for Cuba Engagement and Respect (ACERE), accessed January 6, 2026, https://acere.org/migration/
  28. Coast Guard Migrant Interdiction Operations Are in a State of Emergency | Proceedings, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2023/february/coast-guard-migrant-interdiction-operations-are-state-emergency
  29. Despite Trump’s hopes, big oil will be wary of rushing back to Venezuela, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/business/2026/jan/05/donald-trump-big-oil-venezuela
  30. Chevron jumps as Maduro’s fall puts US oil major in pole position for Venezuelan oil, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.tradingview.com/news/invezz:c88ca0cf9094b:0-chevron-jumps-as-maduro-s-fall-puts-us-oil-major-in-pole-position-for-venezuelan-oil/
  31. What US control over Venezuela’s oil could mean for geopolitics, climate, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.downtoearth.org.in/energy/what-us-control-over-venezuelas-oil-could-mean-for-geopolitics-climate
  32. Venezuelan Political Transition Reshapes Global Oil Market Dynamics – Discovery Alert, accessed January 6, 2026, https://discoveryalert.com.au/venezuelan-political-transition-oil-dynamics-2026/
  33. Treasury Issues Venezuela General License 41 Upon Resumption of Mexico City Talks, accessed January 6, 2026, https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy1127
  34. Cuban exiles: US control of Venezuelan oil flow to weaken communists’ grasp on power, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.local10.com/news/world/2026/01/05/venezuelan-oil-disruptions-weakens-cuban-communists/

US Control Over Venezuelan Oil: Implications for Russia

This is a time-sensitive special report and is based on information available as of January 5, 2026. Due to the situation being very dynamic the following report should be used to obtain a perspective but not viewed as an absolute.

The decisive execution of Operation Absolute Resolve in January 2026, culminating in the capture of Nicolás Maduro and the assertion of United States administrative control over Venezuela’s energy sector, constitutes a catastrophic strategic reversal for the Russian Federation.1 This event is not merely the displacement of a localized ally; it represents the systematic dismantling of Moscow’s primary forward operating base in the Western Hemisphere and the foreclosure of a multi-decade geopolitical project intended to challenge US hegemony in its “near abroad”.3

The ramifications for Russia are multidimensional and severe. Operationally, the failure of Russian intelligence and military advisors to secure the Maduro regime exposes a critical weakness in the Kremlin’s security guarantees, damaging its reputation among client states globally.3 Financially, the imposition of a US-backed interim administration places billions of dollars in Russian state-backed loans and energy assets—transferred to the state-owned entity Roszarubezhneft to avoid sanctions—at imminent risk of expropriation or devaluation.6

However, the most profound threat lies in the global energy markets. The US seizure of Venezuela’s oil infrastructure threatens to fundamentally reorder the heavy crude supply chain. As US majors move to rehabilitate the dilapidated Venezuelan sector, the reentry of “legitimate” heavy crude—specifically targeting refineries in the US Gulf Coast and eventually Asia—poses a direct competitive threat to Russia’s Urals export blend. The Urals blend, currently Russia’s economic lifeline amidst the war in Ukraine, faces displacement in key markets like India and China, forcing Moscow to deepen discounts and further erode its war chest.8

Furthermore, the operational precedent set by the US naval blockade and the pursuit of the Russian-reflagged tanker Marinera signals a new, aggressive interpretation of maritime law that endangers Russia’s “shadow fleet” globally.11 This report provides an exhaustive analysis of these impacts, mapping the chain of consequences from the loss of the Caribbean bridgehead to the fiscal shocks in Moscow and the likely asymmetric responses available to the Kremlin.

I. The Geopolitical Shockwave: The Revival of the “Don-roe” Doctrine

The extraction of Nicolás Maduro by US forces marks the most significant reassertion of American hard power in the Western Hemisphere since the Cold War era. For Moscow, this intervention is not a peripheral loss but a direct assault on its strategy of “reciprocal pressure.” Since the early 2000s, and accelerating under Hugo Chávez and Nicolás Maduro, Russia has utilized Venezuela as a symmetric counter-weight to US influence in Ukraine and Eastern Europe. The logic was explicit: if Washington could expand NATO into Russia’s “near abroad,” Moscow would cultivate a military and economic foothold in Washington’s “backyard”.4 The sudden and total removal of this lever forces a recalibration of Kremlin foreign policy.

The Collapse of the Forward Operating Base

The speed of Operation Absolute Resolve has inflicted severe reputational and operational damage on the Russian Federation. Moscow had invested heavily in the survival of the Chavista regime, deploying military advisors, S-300 air defense systems, and reportedly Wagner Group personnel to Venezuela to provide regime security.3 These assets were intended to serve as a tripwire against US intervention. Their failure to detect, deter, or repel the US operation exposes a critical weakness in Russian power projection capabilities.

The operational reality revealed by the January 2026 intervention is that Russia lacks the logistical capacity to sustain a high-intensity defense of its allies across the Atlantic while fully committed to the war in Ukraine. Russian military analysts have noted with alarm that the US operation was executed with a speed and decisiveness that contrasts sharply with the protracted nature of Russia’s own “Special Military Operation”.14 This failure resonates beyond Caracas. Client states relying on Russian security guarantees—from Syria to the Sahel—are witnessing a stark demonstration of Moscow’s limitations when confronted by direct US military resolve. The “invincibility” of Russian-backed authoritarian survival strategies has been pierced, potentially encouraging opposition movements in other Russian client states to test the Kremlin’s resolve.

The “Wild West” Precedent and Spheres of Influence

While the loss is acute, Russian strategists are attempting to salvage a diplomatic narrative from the wreckage. By framing the US intervention as a return to 19th-century imperialism—dubbed the “Don-roe Doctrine” by some analysts, a play on the Monroe Doctrine 15—Moscow aims to solidify its own claims to a sphere of influence in Eastern Europe. The Kremlin’s diplomatic messaging has focused on the “illegality” of the US action, arguing that if Washington can claim exclusive rights to manage political outcomes in the Americas, Russia has an identical right to dictate the political future of Ukraine and Belarus.4

However, this rhetorical pivot conceals a grim reality: the global order is shifting toward a raw transactionalist model where “might makes right.” While Russia has long championed this shift away from a rules-based order, it is now on the losing end of the equation in the Caribbean. The Kremlin’s silence and lack of substantive military counter-moves suggest a tacit acknowledgement that it cannot contest the US in the Western Hemisphere.16 The “strategic partnership” signed between Putin and Maduro in May 2025 has been rendered null and void, proving that diplomatic paper is worthless without the force projection to back it.5

II. The Energy War: Displacement of the Urals Blend

The most tangible and damaging impact on Russia will manifest in the global oil markets. The Russian war economy is predicated on the export of medium-sour Urals crude, primarily to India and China, often at a discount to Brent but above the Western price cap. The reentry of Venezuelan heavy crude into the open market, under US administration, poses a direct threat to this market share.

Crude Quality Competition: Heavy vs. Medium Sour

Venezuela possesses the world’s largest proven oil reserves, primarily heavy and extra-heavy crude in the Orinoco Belt.18 Historically, this oil was the ideal feedstock for complex refineries in the US Gulf Coast (USGC), which were specifically engaged to process heavy, high-sulfur barrels.8 Following the imposition of sanctions, this oil was diverted to China, where it competed directly with Russian Urals and Iranian heavy grades for market share among independent “teapot” refiners.9

With the US now controlling the flow, two scenarios emerge, both detrimental to Russia:

  1. The Repatriation of Barrels: The US administration has signaled an intent to direct Venezuelan output back to Gulf Coast refineries to lower domestic gasoline prices and fuel “reindustrialization”.8 This repatriation of barrels accomplishes a strategic dual purpose for the US: it lowers domestic energy costs and, critically, it removes Venezuelan supply from the “dark market.” Every barrel of Venezuelan crude that returns to the USGC is a barrel that is no longer available to Chinese independent refiners at a deep discount. This forces Chinese buyers to look elsewhere, potentially to Russia, but without the leverage of a cheap Venezuelan alternative, or conversely, it forces Russia to compete more aggressively against Iranian barrels for the remaining “dark” market share.
  2. The Asian Displacement: If production is ramped up significantly—Goldman Sachs estimates a potential, though slow, recovery 10—and sanctions are lifted for compliant buyers, Venezuelan oil becomes a legitimate alternative for India and China. Indian refiners, such as Reliance Industries, have historically been significant buyers of Venezuelan crude. They have struggled with payment mechanisms for Russian oil due to sanctions and currency risks.9 If US-controlled Venezuela offers a stable, legal supply of heavy crude, Indian refiners may prefer it over sanctioned Russian barrels, which carry the constant risk of secondary sanctions and logistical disruption.

The “Price Cap” Evasion Squeeze and Revenue Erosion

Russia’s ability to fund its war in Ukraine relies on the “shadow fleet” and the willingness of Asian buyers to skirt Western sanctions to buy oil. If Venezuela returns to the fold of the global energy market, it introduces a massive volume of “legitimate” heavy crude. This increases the supply elasticity for buyers like China and India.

According to market analysis, even a modest increase in Venezuelan output to 2 million barrels per day (bpd) could depress long-term oil prices by approximately $4 per barrel.10 For Russia, which operates on thin margins due to the high cost of transport, insurance, and the “war risk” premiums attached to its sanctioned oil, a $4 drop is magnified. Furthermore, to compete with legitimate Venezuelan barrels that carry no sanctions risk, Russia would be forced to offer even steeper discounts to Chinese and Indian buyers. This dynamic erodes the net revenue entering the Kremlin’s coffers, directly impacting the fiscal stability of the Russian state.9 The discount on Urals crude, which Russia has fought to narrow, would likely widen again as buyers gain leverage.

III. Next Steps for the Venezuelan Oil Industry: A Challenge to Russian Interests

The immediate post-intervention phase for the Venezuelan oil industry will be defined by a US-led reconstruction effort that systematically excludes Russian participation. The path to recovery for PDVSA (Petróleos de Venezuela, S.A.) is fraught with technical and financial challenges, but the direction of travel—toward Western integration—is unambiguous.

Assessment of Infrastructure Decay

The Venezuelan oil sector has suffered from a decade of catastrophic underinvestment, brain drain, and looting. Production capacity has collapsed from over 3 million bpd in the late 1990s to approximately 800,000–900,000 bpd at the time of the intervention.18 The physical infrastructure—pipelines, pumping stations, and the critical “upgraders” in the Orinoco Belt that convert extra-heavy crude into exportable blends—is in a state of advanced disrepair.20

Reports indicate that looting of equipment has been widespread, and the “asset specificity” of the heavy oil infrastructure means that simply throwing money at the problem will not yield immediate results. Restoring production to 2 million bpd is estimated to require tens of billions of dollars and several years of sustained effort.2 However, unlike the Maduro regime, the US administration can leverage the technical expertise and capital of US supermajors.

The Return of the US Majors

The US strategy is explicitly reliant on private enterprise to fund the reconstruction. President Trump has stated that US oil companies will “go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure… and start making money for the country”.20 This points to a rapid return of companies like Chevron, ConocoPhillips, and ExxonMobil, many of whom have outstanding arbitration claims against Venezuela for past expropriations.

  • Chevron: Already operating under a special license, Chevron is best positioned to lead the immediate stabilization of output.26
  • ConocoPhillips and Exxon: These companies, which left Venezuela under Chávez, may return under a new legal framework that swaps their debt claims for equity in new Joint Ventures.2

This “debt-for-equity” model is particularly dangerous for Russia. As US companies swap their arbitration awards for control of oil fields, they will likely displace existing operators—including Russian entities—whose contracts may be deemed illegitimate by the new administration.

Production Ramp-Up Scenarios

Analysts are divided on the speed of the recovery, but even a slow ramp-up impacts Russia.

  • Short Term (0-12 months): Production is likely to remain flat or dip slightly as the chaos of the transition settles and the US assesses the state of the facilities. The immediate focus will be on stabilizing the power grid and stopping the decline.29
  • Medium Term (1-3 years): With US capital and security, production could rise by 500,000 to 1 million bpd. JPMorgan analysts see a potential rise to 1.3–1.4 million bpd in two years.21
  • Long Term (3+ years): A return to 2.5–3 million bpd is possible but would require sustained political stability and investment exceeding $80 billion.2

OPEC+ Implications

Venezuela is a founding member of OPEC. Under US control, its relationship with the cartel—and specifically with the OPEC+ format led jointly by Saudi Arabia and Russia—becomes highly uncertain.

  • Quota Non-Compliance: A US-administered Venezuela is unlikely to adhere to OPEC+ production quotas designed to prop up oil prices. The US priority will be volume maximization to repay debts and lower global prices, directly undermining Russia’s efforts to restrict supply.2
  • Fracture of the Alliance: If Venezuela exits OPEC or simply ignores its mandates, it weakens the cartel’s cohesion. Russia relies on OPEC+ coordination to maintain the price floor for oil; a rogue producer with massive reserves under US tutelage disrupts this mechanism.

IV. Financial Exposure: The Roszarubezhneft Debacle

The financial linkage between Moscow and Caracas is deep, structural, and now largely toxic. Following the imposition of US sanctions on Rosneft in 2020, the Russian state created Roszarubezhneft, a 100% state-owned entity, to absorb Rosneft’s Venezuelan assets.6 This transfer was designed to protect the publicly traded Rosneft from sanctions, but it effectively concentrated the risk directly onto the Russian state balance sheet.

Asset Expropriation and “Odious Debt”

With the US vowing to “run” Venezuela and rebuild its infrastructure using US oil majors 20, the legal status of Roszarubezhneft’s Joint Ventures (JVs) is in extreme jeopardy. The new US-backed administration is likely to declare contracts signed under the Maduro regime as invalid or subject to renegotiation under terms unfavorable to Moscow.

  • The Debt Stack: Venezuela owes billions to Russia, consisting of sovereign debt and pre-payments for oil that was never delivered.31 Russian state media has estimated the value of stakes in ventures like Petromonagas, Petroperija, and Boqueron at around $5 billion.31
  • The Collateral Trap: Rosneft (now Roszarubezhneft) historically held liens on Venezuelan oil cargos and assets (such as the 49.9% stake in CITGO, though this has been the subject of complex litigation).33 With the US blockading exports and controlling the fields, there is no physical way for Russia to collect on these debts via oil shipments.24
  • Legal Warfare: The US administration has signaled that US oil companies must invest to rebuild the sector before they can recoup their own lost assets.28 In this queue of creditors, Russian state entities will undoubtedly be placed last. Legal scholars anticipate the US may designate Russian loans as “odious debt”—debt incurred by a despotic regime for purposes that did not serve the population—thereby nullifying Russia’s claims entirely.32

The loss of these assets is not just a paper loss; it is a destruction of capital that was intended to serve as a long-term strategic reserve and revenue stream for the Russian state.

V. The “Shadow Fleet” Crisis and Maritime Precedents

Perhaps the most dangerous development for Russia is not taking place on Venezuelan soil, but in the international waters surrounding it. The US pursuit and potential seizure of the tanker Marinera (formerly Bella 1) sets a legal and operational precedent that strikes at the heart of Russia’s ability to export oil globally.11

The Flag-State Immunity Challenge

The Bella 1, a known dark fleet tanker, attempted to evade US interdiction by re-flagging to Russia and renaming itself Marinera mid-voyage.36 Typically, a vessel flying a national flag is considered sovereign territory, and boarding it without the flag state’s consent is a violation of international law. However, the US has proceeded with the pursuit, treating the re-flagging as a fraudulent attempt to evade law enforcement rather than a legitimate sovereign act. US officials have argued that because the vessel was “stateless” or flying a false flag at the time the pursuit began, it does not enjoy retroactive protection from the Russian flag.37

If the US successfully seizes a vessel flying the Russian flag—arguing it is “stateless” due to fraudulent registration or engaged in “criminal” activity (narco-terrorism support via Maduro)—it creates a devastating precedent for Moscow.

  • Implication: The US could theoretically apply this legal logic to any vessel in Russia’s shadow fleet carrying oil above the price cap. If a vessel is deemed to be using deceptive practices (AIS spoofing, false documents), the US could argue it forfeits sovereign immunity.
  • Russian Reaction: Moscow has already filed diplomatic protests, viewing this as a test case.38 If they fail to protect the Marinera, the perceived security of the entire Russian shadow fleet will collapse. Insurance premiums for these vessels will skyrocket, and shipowners may refuse to carry Russian cargo if they believe US naval interdiction is a genuine risk.36

The Naval Blockade (Operation Southern Spear)

The implementation of a naval blockade (“quarantine”) on Venezuelan oil 39 demonstrates a US willingness to physically interdict energy flows. For Russia, which relies on narrow maritime chokepoints like the Danish Straits and the Bosporus for its oil exports, the normalization of naval blockades against major oil producers is an existential threat. It signals that the “freedom of navigation” for energy carriers is no longer guaranteed for US adversaries. The “quarantine” concept, famously used during the Cuban Missile Crisis, allows the US to filter traffic based on cargo content, effectively strangling a regime’s economic lifeline without declaring a formal war on the shipping nations.

VI. Second-Order Effects: The China Pivot and Eurasian Unity

The US control of Venezuela forces a difficult choice upon the People’s Republic of China, driving a potential wedge in the Sino-Russian “No Limits” partnership.

China’s Energy Pragmatism

China is the world’s largest importer of oil and has been the primary buyer of sanctioned Venezuelan crude, importing roughly 430,000 bpd in 2025.41 With the US now controlling the spigot, Beijing faces a stark dilemma:

  1. Confrontation: Continue buying “black market” Venezuelan oil (if any can slip the blockade) and risk secondary sanctions, naval interdiction, and a trade war with the US.
  2. Compliance: Accept US control, negotiate with the new administration for legitimate access to Venezuelan oil, and diversify away from “risky” suppliers.9

Evidence suggests China is pragmatic. Chinese refiners have already paused purchases of Venezuelan crude to assess the new reality, fearing US seizures.42 If the US successfully rehabilitates the Venezuelan oil sector and allows exports to China (to stabilize global prices and ensure Chinese neutrality), Beijing may reduce its reliance on Russian Urals. This would reduce Russia’s leverage over its most important economic partner. Russia needs China more than China needs Russia; if Venezuela offers a stable, high-quality heavy crude alternative, the “discount” Russia must offer to Beijing will deepen to maintain market share.18

The Fracture of the “Revisionist Bloc”

Venezuela was a key node in the “Axis of Resistance” (Russia, Iran, Venezuela, Cuba). The fall of Maduro isolates Cuba, which relied on Venezuelan oil subsidies for its economic survival.32 The likely economic collapse of Cuba would force Russia to either subsidize the island nation at a massive cost—something the strained Russian budget can ill afford—or watch another ally fall to US pressure. Furthermore, the perception that Russia could not save Maduro may lead other partners (Iran, North Korea) to question the value of Russian security assurances. They may prioritize their own nuclear deterrence over reliance on Russian diplomatic or conventional military support, leading to a more volatile and less coordinated anti-Western bloc.

VII. Russia’s Asymmetric Response Options

Cornered in the Caribbean and squeezed in the energy markets, Russia lacks the conventional projection capacity to reverse the situation in Venezuela. Direct military intervention is logistically impossible given the distance and the ongoing commitment in Ukraine.43 Therefore, Moscow’s response will be asymmetric, designed to inflict pain on US interests elsewhere and re-establish deterrence.

1. Escalation in Ukraine

The most likely venue for retaliation is Ukraine. Viewing the loss of Venezuela as a US escalation of the global conflict, the Kremlin may justify “total war” tactics in Ukraine. This could involve targeting energy infrastructure, leadership nodes, or logistics hubs with renewed intensity, mirroring the US “decapitation” of the Maduro regime.3 The logic of “reciprocal damage” suggests that if the US can topple a Russian ally, Russia must destroy a US ally.

2. The “Grey Zone” Maritime Campaign

Russia may intensify “grey zone” warfare at sea to challenge the US naval dominance asserted in the Caribbean. This could include:

  • Cable Cutting: Sabotage of undersea data cables in the Atlantic, claiming “unknown actors” are responsible, as a warning shot regarding US naval dominance and economic stability.
  • Shadow Fleet Harassment: Retaliatory harassment of Western commercial shipping in the Black Sea or Red Sea (via Houthi proxies), citing the Marinera precedent to justify boarding operations. If the US can board Russian-flagged ships, Russia may argue it can board Western-flagged ships suspected of carrying “contraband” for Ukraine.45

3. Cyber and Hybrid Warfare

The US plan to “run” Venezuela relies on the stability of the interim government and the physical security of the oil infrastructure. Russia retains significant cyber capabilities and human intelligence networks within Venezuela.13 We can expect a sustained campaign of sabotage, disinformation, and cyber-attacks aimed at the new Venezuelan administration and the US oil companies attempting to operate there. The goal will be to make Venezuela ungovernable and the oil unrecoverable, thereby denying the US the fruits of its victory and keeping global oil prices high.

Conclusion

The US assumption of control over Venezuelan oil is a watershed moment that significantly degrades the Russian Federation’s global standing. It strips Moscow of its most important asset in the Western Hemisphere, threatens the financial solvency of its state-owned energy vehicles, and introduces a potent competitor to its oil exports in critical Asian markets.

While the Kremlin projects an image of defiant silence, the strategic reality is one of containment. The “Don-roe Doctrine” has effectively closed the Caribbean to Russian power projection. Russia’s response will likely be defined by increased brutality in its near abroad (Ukraine) and disruptive hybrid warfare globally, but the loss of the Venezuelan bridgehead is irreversible. The era of Russia acting as a global spoiler in the Americas has, for the immediate future, been brought to a close by the realities of energy economics and American naval power.


If you find this post useful, please share the link on Facebook, with your friends, etc. Your support is much appreciated and if you have any feedback, please email me at in**@*********ps.com. Please note that for links to other websites, we are only paid if there is an affiliate program such as Avantlink, Impact, Amazon and eBay and only if you purchase something. If you’d like to directly contribute towards our continued reporting, please visit our funding page.


Sources Used

  1. 2026 United States strikes in Venezuela – Wikipedia, accessed January 6, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_United_States_strikes_in_Venezuela
  2. Q&A on US Actions in Venezuela – Center on Global Energy Policy, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.energypolicy.columbia.edu/qa-on-us-actions-in-venezuela/
  3. The Fall of Maduro: How Russia Lost an Ally but Gained a Like-Minded Thinker, accessed January 6, 2026, https://ridl.io/russia-has-no-allies/
  4. Analysis: Russia Loses Ally in Venezuela, Sees Opportunity in Trump’s ‘Wild West’ Realpolitik, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.kyivpost.com/analysis/67523
  5. Russia loses ally in Venezuela but hopes to gain from Trump’s ‘Wild West’ realpolitik, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.cnbcafrica.com/2026/russia-loses-ally-in-venezuela-but-hopes-to-gain-from-trumps-wild-west-realpolitik
  6. Venezuela Approves 15-Year Extension of Russia-Linked Oil Joint Ventures, accessed January 6, 2026, https://energynow.com/2025/11/venezuela-approves-15-year-extension-of-russia-linked-oil-joint-ventures/
  7. Rosneft’s Withdrawal amid U.S. Sanctions Contributes to Venezuela’s Isolation – CSIS, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.csis.org/analysis/rosnefts-withdrawal-amid-us-sanctions-contributes-venezuelas-isolation
  8. Dense, sticky and heavy: why Venezuelan crude oil appeals to US refineries, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/business/2026/jan/05/venezuelan-crude-oil-appeals-to-us-refineries
  9. TSG MARKET INSIGHTS | Venezuela, Russia, and the Oil Balance – The Signal Group, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.thesignalgroup.com/newsroom/market-insights-venezuela-russia-and-the-oil-balance
  10. Goldman Sachs sees bearish long-term oil risk after Venezuela | Seeking Alpha, accessed January 6, 2026, https://seekingalpha.com/news/4536508-goldman-sachs-sees-bearish-long-term-oil-risk-after-venezuela
  11. Tanker Evading Venezuela Blockade Paints Russian Flag as U.S. Pursuit Continues, accessed January 6, 2026, https://windward.ai/blog/tanker-evading-venezuela-blockade-paints-russian-flag-as-u-s-pursuit-continues/
  12. Report: U.S. Still Plans to Seize Fleeing Russian-Flagged Tanker – The Maritime Executive, accessed January 6, 2026, https://maritime-executive.com/article/report-u-s-still-plans-to-seize-fleeing-russian-flagged-tanker
  13. With Maduro Gone, Putin Risks Being Pushed Out of the Western Hemisphere, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2026/01/05/with-maduro-gone-putin-risks-being-pushed-out-of-the-western-hemisphere-a91608
  14. From grudging respect to unease: Russia weighs up fall of Maduro, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jan/05/russia-weighs-up-fall-of-nicolas-maduro-venezuela
  15. Making sense of the US military operation in Venezuela, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/making-sense-of-the-us-military-operation-in-venezuela/
  16. Decapitation Strategy in Caracas: The Logic, Timing, and Consequences of the U.S. Operation in Venezuela, accessed January 6, 2026, https://lansinginstitute.org/2026/01/03/decapitation-strategy-in-caracas-the-logic-timing-and-consequences-of-the-u-s-operation-in-venezuela/
  17. The ‘Putinization’ of US foreign policy has arrived in Venezuela – The Guardian, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jan/03/putin-russia-us-foreign-policy-venezuela
  18. Venezuelan Political Transition Reshapes Global Oil Market Dynamics – Discovery Alert, accessed January 6, 2026, https://discoveryalert.com.au/venezuelan-political-transition-oil-dynamics-2026/
  19. Trump move to cap oil, Venezuela output in focus, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.nationthailand.com/news/world/40060760
  20. Trump suggests US taxpayers could reimburse oil firms for Venezuela investment, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/business/2026/jan/06/trump-us-taxpayers-oil-firms-venezuela-investment
  21. Analysts predict that Venezuelan oil production will increase in the future and lower prices., accessed January 6, 2026, https://energynews.oedigital.com/oil-gas/2026/01/05/analysts-predict-that-venezuelan-oil-production-will-increase-in-the-future-and-lower-prices
  22. How Venezuelan oil factored into the US capture of Maduro, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.straitstimes.com/business/companies-markets/how-venezuelan-oil-factored-into-the-us-seizure-of-maduro
  23. Venezuela’s oil supply to rise in years ahead and depress prices, say analysts, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.cnbcafrica.com/2026/venezuelas-oil-supply-to-rise-in-years-ahead-and-depress-prices-say-analysts
  24. U.S. Oil Companies Face Significant Costs and Risks When Reentering Venezuela, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.asisonline.org/security-management-magazine/latest-news/today-in-security/2026/january/oil-companies-venezuela/
  25. Reviving Venezuela’s oil industry no easy feat: Update | Latest Market News – Argus Media, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.argusmedia.com/en/news-and-insights/latest-market-news/2772065-reviving-venezuela-s-oil-industry-no-easy-feat-update
  26. The Commodities Feed: Venezuelan and Russian oil supply risks …, accessed January 6, 2026, https://think.ing.com/articles/the-commodities-feed-venezuelan-and-russian-oil-supply-risks-push-the-market-higher181225/
  27. Houston oil companies react as Venezuela turmoil raises questions about energy markets, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.click2houston.com/news/local/2026/01/05/houston-oil-companies-react-as-venezuela-turmoil-raises-questions-about-energy-markets/
  28. U.S. pushes oil majors to invest big in Venezuela – Denver Gazette, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.denvergazette.com/2026/01/05/u-s-pushes-oil-majors-to-invest-big-in-venezuela/
  29. Goldman Sachs sees limited Venezuela oil recovery after U.S. action | Seeking Alpha, accessed January 6, 2026, https://seekingalpha.com/news/4536507-goldman-sachs-sees-limited-venezuela-oil-recovery-after-u-s-action
  30. Opec+ opts for caution as US takeover of Venezuela oil adds supply risks – The National News, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.thenationalnews.com/business/energy/2026/01/04/opec-opts-for-caution-as-us-takeover-of-venezuela-oil-adds-supply-risks/
  31. Factbox-What’s the status of international oil companies in Venezuela after Maduro’s capture? By Reuters – Investing.com, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.investing.com/news/commodities-news/factboxwhats-the-status-of-international-oil-companies-in-venezuela-after-maduros-capture-4430480
  32. Venezuela’s billions in distressed debt: Who is in line to collect?, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/venezuelas-billions-distressed-debt-who-line-collect
  33. 22 USC 9752: Concerns over PDVSA transactions with Rosneft – OLRC Home, accessed January 6, 2026, https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml;jsessionid=220ADD9E32B4922036C309D0C259AEDD?path=&req=granuleid%3AUSC-prelim-title22-section9752&f=&fq=&num=0&hl=false&edition=prelim
  34. Trump’s attack leaves China worried about its interests in Venezuela, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jan/05/venezuela-trump-attack-china-interests-analysis
  35. Treasury Targets Oil Traders Engaged in Sanctions Evasion for Maduro Regime, accessed January 6, 2026, https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0348
  36. Sanctioned Oil Tanker – Bella 1 – SOF News, accessed January 6, 2026, https://sof.news/news/bella-1-oil-tanker/
  37. Tanker chased by US Coast Guard gains Russian flag and new name – NYT, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2026/01/01/8014213/
  38. Russia files diplomatic request asking U.S. to stop pursuing oil tanker originally bound for Venezuela, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.ctvnews.ca/world/article/russia-files-diplomatic-request-asking-us-to-stop-pursuing-oil-tanker-originally-bound-for-venezuela/
  39. United States oil blockade during Operation Southern Spear – Wikipedia, accessed January 6, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_oil_blockade_during_Operation_Southern_Spear
  40. Venezuela on Notice: What Comes Next for Dark Fleet Enforcement, accessed January 6, 2026, https://windward.ai/blog/venezuela-on-notice-what-comes-next-for-dark-fleet-enforcement/
  41. China demands ‘immediate release’ of Venezuela’s Maduro | Latest Market News, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.argusmedia.com/en/news-and-insights/latest-market-news/2771768-china-demands-immediate-release-of-venezuela-s-maduro
  42. Chinese refiners seek alternatives to Venezuelan crude, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.argusmedia.com/en/news-and-insights/latest-market-news/2771875-chinese-refiners-seek-alternatives-to-venezuelan-crude
  43. Why Russia Intervening in a U.S.-Venezuela War Is Plausible, But It’s a Bad Idea – YouTube, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s0lPlgjfOP8
  44. Russia Demands Release of Maduro After U.S. Military Strikes Venezuela, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2026/01/03/russia-demands-release-of-maduro-after-us-military-strikes-venezuela-a91602
  45. US plans to intercept Venezuela-linked oil tanker claimed by Russia – Al Mayadeen English, accessed January 6, 2026, https://english.almayadeen.net/news/politics/us-plans-to-intercept-venezuela-linked-oil-tanker-claimed-by

US Control Over Venezuelan Oil: Implications for China

This is a time-sensitive special report and is based on information available as of January 5, 2026. Due to the situation being very dynamic the following report should be used to obtain a perspective but not viewed as an absolute.

The January 2026 execution of “Operation Absolute Resolve,” which culminated in the extraction of Nicolás Maduro by United States military forces and the subsequent imposition of a US-administered transitional authority in Caracas, constitutes a geopolitical event of the highest magnitude. While the operation was tactically confined to the Caribbean basin, its strategic shockwaves have registered with immediate and destabilizing force in Beijing. For the People’s Republic of China (PRC), the sudden removal of the Bolivarian government represents a dismantling of a critical node in its Western Hemisphere strategy, a direct threat to tens of billions of dollars in state-backed financial assets, and a forced, costly recalibration of its national energy security architecture.

This report provides an exhaustive analysis of the multi-dimensional impacts radiating from the US takeover of Venezuela. The analysis is anchored in the premise that the “loss” of Venezuela is not merely a diplomatic setback for China, but a systemic shock that challenges the viability of its “resources-for-loans” model, exposes the fragility of its “all-weather” partnerships in the face of American hard power, and creates acute energy supply vulnerabilities for its independent refining sector.

The most immediate operational consequence is the severance of the “shadow fleet” trade that has sustained China’s independent refiners—colloquially known as “teapots”—with deeply discounted heavy crude oil. The imposition of a US-enforced “oil quarantine” has effectively interdicted the flow of Venezuelan Merey 16 crude to Shandong province. This disruption forces Chinese buyers into the open market to compete for increasingly scarce heavy sour grades, such as Western Canadian Select (WCS) and Basra Heavy, thereby eroding the refining margins that underpin the global competitiveness of China’s petrochemical exports. The arbitrage window, closed by the sudden escalation of maritime insurance premiums and the physical diversion of tankers, has precipitated a feedstock crisis that will likely lead to run cuts and consolidation within China’s refining sector.

Financially, Beijing faces the precarious prospect of asset nullification. The China Development Bank (CDB) and other state entities hold an estimated $12 billion to $19 billion in outstanding sovereign debt, historically serviced through direct oil shipments. The US administration’s rhetoric regarding the “rebuilding” of Venezuela implies a legal strategy that may classify these Chinese loans as “odious debt”—liabilities incurred by a despotic regime for purposes contrary to the national interest. Such a classification would legally subordinate Chinese claims to new US capital injections and humanitarian obligations, setting a dangerous precedent for the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). If the “Venezuela Precedent” establishes that regime change can serve as a mechanism for debt erasure, the risk premium on China’s global lending portfolio will face upward revision.

Geopolitically, the operation serves as a forceful modernization of the Monroe Doctrine. The neutralization of the Maduro regime isolates Cuba, Venezuela’s primary regional client, placing Beijing in a strategic bind: it must either finance a massive emergency energy bailout for Havana at a time of domestic economic constraint or witness the destabilization of another socialist ally. Furthermore, while US and international analysts caution against drawing direct parallels to the Taiwan Strait, Chinese strategists will inevitably interpret the “decapitation” strike as a validation of unilateral force to resolve sovereignty disputes, a perception that may accelerate the hardening of China’s anti-access/area denial (A2/AD) capabilities.

Ultimately, while the US administration promises a swift revitalization of Venezuela’s oil sector, technical realities suggest a protracted recovery requiring over a decade and upwards of $185 billion in capital. This reconstruction phase offers China a narrow window for asymmetric response, likely leveraging its dominance in critical mineral supply chains to negotiate favorable terms for its stranded assets. However, the strategic reality remains that the US has successfully reclaimed the energy advantage in the Western Hemisphere, forcing China into a defensive posture.

1. Contextualizing Operation Absolute Resolve: The Collapse of a Strategic Anchor

To understand the magnitude of the shock to China, one must first appreciate the depth of the Sino-Venezuelan relationship prior to January 2026. Under the presidencies of Hugo Chávez and Nicolás Maduro, Venezuela served as China’s primary bridgehead in Latin America—a region traditionally viewed as Washington’s sphere of influence. This relationship was formalized in 2023 with the elevation of bilateral ties to an “All-Weather Strategic Partnership,” a diplomatic designation Beijing reserves for its most trusted allies.1

The partnership was underpinned by a strategic exchange: China provided diplomatic cover and liquidity (over $60 billion in loans since 2007) in exchange for secured access to the world’s largest proven oil reserves.2 This arrangement was designed to be sanction-proof, utilizing oil shipments to repay debts, thereby bypassing the US dollar system. The US military intervention has violently dismantled this architecture.

The operation itself, characterized by airstrikes on command-and-control nodes and the targeted extraction of the executive leadership, was executed with a speed that precluded any intervention by external powers.3 For Beijing, the surprise nature of the raid and the subsequent rapid installation of a US-backed transitional authority highlight a critical intelligence and capability gap in protecting its overseas interests. The immediate reaction from China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs—expressing “grave concern” and calling for Maduro’s release—reflects a diplomatic posture struggling to catch up with a new reality on the ground.5 The strategic anchor has been weighed, and China has been cut loose.

2. The Energy Dimension: Supply Shock and Market Realignment

The primary transmission mechanism of this geopolitical shock to the Chinese economy is the disruption of the physical oil trade. While Venezuela’s production had fallen significantly from its peak, it remained a vital, albeit opaque, source of heavy crude for China’s industrial engine. The cessation of these flows triggers a cascade of impacts across the global heavy oil market, with the pain concentrated in Shandong province.

2.1 The “Merey” Dependency and the Teapot Crisis

Venezuela’s flagship export grade, Merey 16, is a unique crude: extra-heavy, high in sulfur, and rich in metals. While these characteristics make it unattractive to many simple refineries, it is the ideal feedstock for complex refineries equipped with deep conversion capacity, such as cokers and asphalt plants. China’s independent refiners, the “teapots,” spent the last decade optimizing their kits to process exactly this type of discounted, “distressed” barrel.

Prior to the intervention, China was importing approximately 470,000 barrels per day (bpd) of Venezuelan crude, which constituted roughly 4.5% of its total seaborne crude imports.2 While this percentage might appear manageable in aggregate, the specific economic reliance was profound. Due to US sanctions, Merey 16 traded at a massive discount—often $10 to $15 per barrel below the Brent benchmark.8 This “sanctions discount” effectively subsidized the margins of independent Chinese refiners, allowing them to remain competitive against state-owned giants like Sinopec and PetroChina, and to export refined products like bitumen and diesel at aggressive prices.

The US takeover has effectively zeroed out this supply. The Trump administration has declared an “oil quarantine,” and the US Treasury has signaled that Venezuelan oil will henceforth be redirected to the US Gulf Coast.4 The Gulf Coast refining complex, comprising majors like Citgo, Valero, and Chevron, was historically designed to process Venezuelan heavy crude and has faced a structural shortage of heavy barrels since the imposition of sanctions in 2019. The redirection of Venezuelan flows to the US is therefore a strategic priority for Washington to suppress domestic gasoline prices, directly at the expense of Chinese buyers.10

The loss of Merey 16 forces Chinese teapots to scramble for substitutes. The only globally traded grades with similar yield profiles are Western Canadian Select (WCS), Mexican Maya, and Iraq’s Basra Heavy. However, these grades trade at market rates, without the deep discounts associated with sanctioned regimes.

As illustrated, the shift from a sanctioned discount to a market premium represents a catastrophic margin compression for the teapot sector. This “sovereignty premium” will likely force a wave of consolidation in Shandong, as smaller, less capitalized refineries fail to absorb the input cost shock.11

2.2 The Liquidation of the Shadow Fleet

The operational backbone of the China-Venezuela oil trade was a clandestine logistics network known as the “shadow fleet”—a flotilla of aging tankers with obscured ownership structures, registered in permissive jurisdictions, and operating often with disabled Automatic Identification Systems (AIS) to evade detection. This fleet facilitated the transfer of crude from Venezuelan ports to transshipment hubs off the coast of Malaysia, where the oil was blended and rebranded as “Malaysian Bitumen Blend” or “Singma Crude” to mask its origin before entering Chinese ports.7

The US “oil quarantine” has rendered this infrastructure toxic. The US Navy, operating under new, robust rules of engagement in the Caribbean, has begun interdicting vessels suspected of carrying “illicit” cargo. The boarding of the tanker “Skipper” and the designation of vessels like the “Nord Star” and “Lunar Tide” as blocked property have sent a shockwave through the maritime insurance market.4

The impact is binary: the trade has stopped. Mainstream protection and indemnity (P&I) clubs had already abandoned the trade, but now even second-tier insurers and “shadow” insurers are retreating due to the existential risk of vessel seizure. Insurance premiums for any vessel entering Venezuelan waters have spiked by 300-400%.14 For Chinese buyers, the logistical arbitrage—the ability to move sanctioned oil cheaply—has collapsed. The shadow fleet vessels, now marked liabilities, are effectively stranded assets, unable to trade in legitimate markets and too risky to deploy in the Caribbean.

2.3 Global Arbitrage and the Canadian Complication

The US seizure of Venezuelan reserves has a secondary, ironic effect on China’s energy security via the Canadian market. With the Trans Mountain Pipeline Expansion (TMX) coming online, China had begun aggressive purchasing of Canadian heavy crude as a diversification play. However, the redirection of Venezuelan crude to the US Gulf Coast alters the North American balance.

Historically, US Gulf Coast refiners relied on heavy crude from Venezuela, Mexico, and Canada. With Venezuelan volumes offline for years, they became increasingly dependent on Canadian imports. Now, if the US successfully restores Venezuelan production for domestic use, it might theoretically displace Canadian barrels in the Gulf, freeing them up for export to Asia.15

However, in the short-to-medium term (1-3 years), the opposite dynamic is more likely. The reconstruction of Venezuela’s oil sector will be slow (see Section 7), meaning the US Gulf Coast will continue to demand Canadian barrels. Simultaneously, Chinese refiners, starved of Merey 16, will bid aggressively for the same Canadian WCS barrels. This puts Chinese buyers in direct competition with US refiners for Canadian supply, driving up the price of WCS relative to WTI. The widening discount that Chinese buyers enjoyed on Venezuelan oil is replaced by a narrowing discount on Canadian oil due to heightened competition.16 The result is a structurally higher energy import bill for the PRC.

3. The Financial Black Hole: Sovereign Debt and Asset Forfeiture

Beyond the immediate flow of commodities, the US intervention poses a grave threat to China’s financial balance sheet. The “resources-for-loans” model, pioneered by the China Development Bank (CDB) in the mid-2000s, was predicated on the assumption that sovereign control of oil reserves provided the ultimate collateral. The US takeover challenges the validity of this collateral and places billions of dollars in outstanding debt at risk of erasure.

3.1 The “Odious Debt” Weapon

Estimates of Venezuela’s outstanding debt to Chinese entities range from $12 billion to $19 billion.17 This debt was being serviced, albeit inconsistently, through oil shipments that have now been halted by the US blockade. The critical question facing Beijing is not just when payment will resume, but if the legal obligation to pay will survive the transition.

The US administration, in its role as the architect of the post-Maduro order, has indicated a willingness to use “economic leverage” to reshape Venezuela.4 A potent tool in this arsenal is the legal doctrine of “odious debt.” This principle of international law posits that sovereign debt incurred by a despotic regime for purposes that do not benefit the population, and with the creditor’s full knowledge of these facts, is personal to the regime and not enforceable against the state after the regime falls.19

There is a high probability that the US-backed transitional government will argue that Chinese loans extended to the Maduro administration—particularly those post-2017, after the National Assembly was sidelined—constitute odious debt. They may argue these funds sustained an illegitimate “narco-terrorist” regime rather than funding national development.9 If successful, this classification would subordinate Chinese claims in any restructuring process.

Legal precedents from Iraq (post-2003) and Ecuador suggest that while wholesale repudiation is rare, the threat of odious debt classification is often used to force creditors to accept massive haircuts (reductions in principal). For the China Development Bank, this implies a potential write-down of nearly its entire Venezuelan portfolio—a loss that would eclipse any previous BRI failure.21

3.2 Stranded Equity: The Joint Venture Trap

In addition to debt, Chinese state-owned enterprises (SOEs) hold significant equity positions in Venezuelan upstream projects. CNPC and Sinopec are minority partners in joint ventures (JVs) such as Sinovensa, Petrozamora, and Petrourica. Sinovensa alone, a partnership with PDVSA, sits atop 1.6 billion barrels of reserves.22

These assets are now in a precarious position. The US administration has declared that “American companies” will be tasked with revitalizing the industry.3 While formal expropriation of Chinese assets might violate bilateral investment treaties and invite retaliation against US firms in China, the US can achieve a de facto expulsion through regulatory strangulation.

The mechanisms for this “soft expropriation” are manifold:

  1. Operational Paralysis: The US-controlled PDVSA board can suspend the operational licenses of Chinese JVs pending “corruption audits” or “environmental reviews,” effectively freezing the assets.
  2. Sanctions Compliance: The US Treasury can maintain sanctions on specific JVs involving Chinese entities, preventing them from accessing the US financial system or importing essential diluents, while granting waivers to US-partnered JVs.
  3. Capital Call Dilution: The reconstruction of these fields requires massive capital injection. The new PDVSA board could issue capital calls for repairs. If Chinese partners cannot transfer funds due to US financial sanctions or internal risk aversion, their equity stakes would be diluted, eventually rendering them negligible.23

This strategy forces China into a “wait and see” posture. Chinese firms are unlikely to abandon their stakes voluntarily, but they may be forced into a dormant status, holding paper titles to assets they cannot operate or monetize, while US firms like Chevron and potential returnees like ExxonMobil assume operational dominance.

4. Geopolitical Repercussions: The Monroe Doctrine Revived

The US operation represents a definitive reassertion of the Monroe Doctrine—the 19th-century policy opposing external intervention in the Americas—modernized for the era of great power competition. For two decades, China has cultivated Venezuela as a strategic partner to counterbalance US influence in the Asia-Pacific. The “loss” of Venezuela effectively pushes China back across the Pacific, dismantling its most significant foothold in the Western Hemisphere.

4.1 The Collapse of the “All-Weather” Partnership

In September 2023, President Maduro visited Beijing, where he and President Xi Jinping signed a joint statement elevating relations to an “All-Weather Strategic Partnership”.1 This diplomatic tier implies a relationship that remains stable regardless of the international landscape. The capture of Maduro fundamentally invalidates this status. It demonstrates to the world, and particularly to other “Global South” nations, that Beijing cannot guarantee the security or political survival of its partners in the US “near abroad.”

This creates a crisis of confidence for other nations in the region that have courted Chinese investment, such as Bolivia, Nicaragua, and even Brazil under leftist leadership. The message from Washington is unequivocal: economic alignment with Beijing offers no shield against US security interests. This chilling effect may stall the expansion of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) across Latin America, as governments reassess the political risk of antagonizing Washington. The “Venezuela Model”—high-risk lending for resource access—is now visibly broken.2

4.2 The Cuban Dilemma: A Crisis on the Doorstep

The impact on Cuba is collateral but catastrophic, presenting Beijing with an acute strategic dilemma. Venezuela has been Havana’s economic lifeline for two decades, providing roughly 50,000 to 60,000 barrels of oil per day at subsidized rates or in exchange for services (doctors, intelligence). This oil kept Cuba’s fragile power grid functioning and its economy afloat. The cessation of these shipments precipitates an existential energy crisis for the Cuban government, with experts predicting “total national blackouts” within weeks.25

China is the only power capable of filling this void, but the costs are prohibitive. To replace Venezuelan supply, China would need to ship oil halfway around the world, incurring massive logistical costs. Furthermore, any direct “bailout” of Cuba would almost certainly trigger US secondary sanctions on the Chinese entities involved, given the US administration’s aggressive posture.

Beijing faces a binary choice:

  1. Intervene: Provide emergency oil and credit to stabilize the Cuban regime. This preserves a strategic ally and signals reliability to partners, but risks a direct escalation with the US during a delicate transition period and strains China’s own slowing economy.
  2. Abstain: Allow the Cuban crisis to unfold. This avoids US retaliation but risks the collapse of another socialist ally and confirms the “paper tiger” narrative regarding China’s ability to project power in the Americas.

Analysts suggest China will likely pursue a middle path: providing limited humanitarian aid and symbolic support while avoiding a full-scale energy bailout, effectively ceding the strategic initiative to the US.26

4.3 Strategic Signaling and the Taiwan Question

While US officials and international scholars caution against drawing direct parallels between Venezuela and Taiwan due to vastly different historical, legal, and military contexts, the psychological impact on Beijing is profound.2 The operation demonstrates the US willingness to execute a “decapitation” strategy—removing a leadership circle to effect regime change—and to use military force against a sovereign state to secure resource interests.

In Beijing, this reinforces the “Fortress China” mentality. It validates the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) focus on anti-access/area denial (A2/AD) capabilities to prevent a similar projection of US power near its shores. It may also accelerate China’s efforts to sanction-proof its own economy and leadership, knowing now that the US toolkit includes direct physical abduction of heads of state.

However, contrary to fears of immediate escalation, China’s response regarding Taiwan is likely to be cautious. The speed and efficacy of the US operation in Venezuela highlight the risks of a conflict with the US military. This may lead Beijing to double down on “gray zone” tactics—coercion below the threshold of war—rather than risking a military adventure that could invite a decisive US counter-response. The “Venezuela shock” is likely to induce a period of strategic reassessment in Beijing rather than immediate aggression.28

Lacking the military capacity to challenge the US in the Caribbean, China represents its interests through diplomatic and legal channels. The battle for the narrative—defining the legitimacy of the US intervention and the status of Venezuela’s obligations—is now the primary front of resistance for Beijing.

5.1 The UN Security Council and the “Global South”

China has strongly condemned the US operation as a “blatant violation of international law” and the UN Charter.5 At the UN Security Council, China, likely in coordination with Russia, will block any resolution that attempts to legitimize the US-installed transitional government. While the US does not need a UN resolution to maintain control on the ground, the lack of international legal recognition complicates the new government’s ability to access Venezuelan assets frozen abroad (e.g., gold in London) or to participate in formal multilateral institutions.29

China will use this platform to rally the “Global South,” framing the US action as a return to imperialist gunboat diplomacy. This narrative is designed to damage US soft power and consolidate China’s standing as the defender of national sovereignty and non-interference—core tenets of its foreign policy. This diplomatic obstructionism serves to delegitimize the US presence and raise the reputational cost of the occupation.30

5.2 Asymmetric Response: The Rare Earths Option

If the US moves to fully nullify Chinese assets in Venezuela, Beijing retains asymmetric economic options. The most potent of these is its dominance in the critical minerals supply chain. China controls approximately 90% of global rare earth refining capacity, materials essential for US defense technologies (including the very precision-guided munitions used in Venezuela) and, ironically, for the catalysts used in oil refining.2

China could implement stricter export controls on processed heavy rare earths, citing “national security” or “environmental compliance.” This would be a direct tit-for-tat response: “You squeeze our energy access; we squeeze your technology supply chain.” This lever is one of the few direct economic tools China has that can inflict pain on the US industrial base without triggering a full-scale kinetic conflict.

6. Future of Venezuelan Oil: The US Quagmire and the Long Road to Recovery

The US administration’s narrative suggests a rapid revitalization of the Venezuelan oil sector, with US majors “fixing” the broken infrastructure and flooding the market with crude.3 However, technical and economic realities suggest a much slower, more difficult path—a reality that China is undoubtedly calculating.

6.1 The Technical Reality: Decay and Capital Intensity

Venezuela’s oil infrastructure is in a state of advanced decay. Production has collapsed from 3.5 million bpd in 1997 to roughly 900,000 bpd today.32 Pipelines are rusted, reservoirs have been damaged by poor management (e.g., shutting in wells without proper procedure), and the sector has suffered a massive brain drain of technical talent.

Restoring this capacity is a monumental engineering task. Analysis by Rystad Energy estimates that returning production to 3 million bpd would require 16 years of sustained effort and $185 billion in capital investment.33 In the short term—the next 12 to 24 months—production is actually likely to fall or stagnate. The new US administration will need to purge the sector of Maduro loyalists, audit operations, and secure facilities against sabotage. The “immediate windfall” is a political fiction; the reality is a decade-long slog.

Table 1: The Reality Gap in Venezuelan Oil Reconstruction

MetricUS Political NarrativeTechnical/Industry Forecast
Recovery TimelineImmediate (“months”)10-16 Years to reach 3M bpd
Capital Requirement“Self-funding” via oil sales$180B – $200B external injection needed
Production TrajectoryRapid V-shaped recoveryL-shaped or slow incremental growth
Key ConstraintsPolitical will (“regime change”)Infrastructure rot, labor shortage, reservoir damage
Investor Appetite“Billions” from US majorsCautious; demand for legal certainty & debt settlement

Data derived from Rystad Energy 33, Wood Mackenzie 4, and industry analyst consensus.31

6.2 The Reluctance of US Majors

While President Trump has called for US companies to “go in,” the majors themselves—ExxonMobil, ConocoPhillips, and Chevron—are cautious. Exxon and Conoco have outstanding arbitration claims against Venezuela totaling billions of dollars from the Chavez-era expropriations.35 They will likely demand that these “legacy claims” be settled—perhaps through “sweat equity” or favorable royalty terms—before committing fresh capital.

This creates a closed loop where early oil revenues are diverted to pay off old US debts rather than funding reconstruction or state services. For China, this delay is strategically relevant. It means the “flood” of Venezuelan oil to the US Gulf Coast will not happen overnight. The global oil market will remain tight, and prices—including the Canadian WCS prices China must now pay—will remain elevated. This buys China time to secure alternative supplies, but it confirms that Venezuelan oil will be locked into the US sphere of influence for the foreseeable future.

7. Strategic Conclusions and Future Scenarios

The US seizure of Venezuela is a watershed moment that forces a fundamental restructuring of China’s approach to the Western Hemisphere. The era of the “All-Weather Partnership” fueled by loans-for-oil is effectively over.

7.1 Scenario A: The “Odious Debt” Precedent

If the US successfully guides the new Venezuelan administration to repudiate Chinese loans using the “odious debt” doctrine, the ripple effects will be global.

  • Mechanism: Legal classification of 2017-2025 loans as illegitimate and non-beneficial to the state.
  • Impact: A $19 billion write-down for Chinese state banks. More critically, it forces China to tighten lending terms for all BRI projects globally, demanding sovereign immunity waivers and tangible collateral outside the borrower country (e.g., ports), potentially sparking political backlash in Africa and Asia.
  • China’s Move: Beijing blocks Venezuela from accessing assets in jurisdictions where it has sway and utilizes the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) to creating alternative norms that reject this classification.

7.2 Scenario B: The Asymmetric Standoff

China links energy access to technology access.

  • Mechanism: Beijing restricts exports of heavy rare earths or battery precursors to the US, citing the Venezuela intervention as a destabilizing act that requires “defensive” supply chain measures.
  • Impact: A potential “Grand Bargain” where China accepts a haircut on Venezuelan debt in exchange for continued access to certain mineral markets or US restraint in other theaters (e.g., tech sanctions).

7.3 Conclusion: The Defensive Pivot

Ultimately, China’s response will be defined by pragmatism. Unable to contest the US military fait accompli in the Caribbean, Beijing will pivot to damage control: securing what financial assets it can through international courts, diversifying its heavy oil sources to mitigate the price shock, and reinforcing its remaining partnerships in the Global South against similar “interventionist” risks. The “Caracas Pivot” marks the end of China’s offensive expansion in Latin America’s energy sector and the beginning of a defensive consolidation of its global supply lines.


If you find this post useful, please share the link on Facebook, with your friends, etc. Your support is much appreciated and if you have any feedback, please email me at in**@*********ps.com. Please note that for links to other websites, we are only paid if there is an affiliate program such as Avantlink, Impact, Amazon and eBay and only if you purchase something. If you’d like to directly contribute towards our continued reporting, please visit our funding page.


Sources Used

  1. Maduro’s downfall puts China’s relationship with Venezuela to the test, accessed January 6, 2026, https://english.elpais.com/international/2026-01-04/maduros-downfall-puts-chinas-relationship-with-venezuela-to-the-test.html
  2. What the US capture of Maduro means for China’s interests in Venezuela and beyond – CNA, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.channelnewsasia.com/east-asia/us-venezuela-capture-maduro-china-latin-america-taiwan-implications-5817086
  3. Trump’s plan to seize and revitalize Venezuela’s oil industry faces major hurdles – AP News, accessed January 6, 2026, https://apnews.com/article/venezuela-oil-prices-trump-0c2c6ede79d550af53e6d3ddb51bfa04
  4. Venezuela regime change: what it means for oil production, crude and product markets, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.woodmac.com/news/opinion/venezuela-regime-change-what-it-means-for-oil-production-crude-and-product-markets/
  5. Foreign Ministry Spokesperson’s Remarks on the U.S. Seizing Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and His Wife, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/eng/xw/fyrbt/202601/t20260104_11797389.html
  6. U.S.-Venezuela tensions: China says U.S. should immediately release Venezuela’s Maduro, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.thehindu.com/news/international/china-says-us-should-immediately-release-venezuelas-maduro/article70470228.ece
  7. China’s oil investments in Venezuela – The Economic Times, accessed January 6, 2026, https://m.economictimes.com/news/international/world-news/chinas-oil-investments-in-venezuela/articleshow/126354640.cms
  8. Venezuela forced to double discount on oil to Asia due to flood of sanctioned crude, accessed January 6, 2026, https://boereport.com/2025/12/10/venezuela-forced-to-double-discount-on-oil-to-asia-due-to-flood-of-sanctioned-crude/
  9. US imposes sanctions on 4 Venezuelan oil firms and 4 more tankers in Maduro crackdown, accessed January 6, 2026, https://apnews.com/article/sanctions-oil-tankers-venezuela-trump-maduro-9ffee61472d248aafdc9d9bef6195c2e
  10. US Refiners Win, China Loses in Trump’s Venezuela Oil Play – Offshore Engineer Magazine, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.oedigital.com/amp/news/534004-us-refiners-win-china-loses-in-trump-s-venezuela-oil-play
  11. Sanctions shake up $20B Chinese refinery, western partners pull out – The Economic Times, accessed January 6, 2026, https://m.economictimes.com/news/international/world-news/sanctions-shake-up-20b-chinese-refinery-western-partners-pull-out/articleshow/125588331.cms
  12. Why Did the United States Seize a Venezuelan Oil Shipment? – CSIS, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.csis.org/analysis/why-did-united-states-seize-venezuelan-oil-shipment
  13. Treasury Targets Oil Traders Engaged in Sanctions Evasion for Maduro Regime, accessed January 6, 2026, https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0348
  14. US Intervention in Venezuelan Oil Drives Global Energy Disruption – Discovery Alert, accessed January 6, 2026, https://discoveryalert.com.au/strategic-petroleum-2026-us-venezuela-oil-disruption/
  15. Western Canada Select widens; Venezuela a longer-term risk, analysts say – BOE Report, accessed January 6, 2026, https://boereport.com/2026/01/05/western-canada-select-widens-venezuela-a-longer-term-risk-analysts-say/
  16. Heavy sour Canadian grades feel pressure in N America | Latest Market News, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.argusmedia.com/en/news-and-insights/latest-market-news/2771891-heavy-sour-canadian-grades-feel-pressure-in-n-america
  17. Maduro capture: What’s at stake for China’s economic interests in Venezuela, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/international/maduro-capture-whats-stake-chinas-economic-interests-venezuela
  18. Maduro, Venezuela, the U.S.—and the oil shock China can’t price in | Probe International, accessed January 6, 2026, https://journal.probeinternational.org/2026/01/05/maduro-venezuela-the-u-s-and-the-oil-shock-china-cant-price-in/
  19. Systemic Illegitimacy, Problems, and Opportunities in Traditional Odious Debt Conceptions in Global, accessed January 6, 2026, https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1439&context=lcp
  20. Venezuela’s Economic Crisis: Issues for Congress – EveryCRSReport.com, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/R45072.html
  21. An Economic Framework for Venezuela’s Debt Restructuring – Harvard Kennedy School, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.hks.harvard.edu/sites/default/files/degree%20programs/MPAID/files/Moatti%2C%20Thomas%20and%20Muci%2C%20Frank%20SYPA.pdf
  22. China’s Oil Investments in Venezuela – Energy News, Top Headlines, Commentaries, Features & Events – EnergyNow.com, accessed January 6, 2026, https://energynow.com/2026/01/chinas-oil-investments-in-venezuela/
  23. Concerns over damage to investment in Venezuela are being cited as the background of China’s increas.., accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.mk.co.kr/en/world/11924858
  24. US actions signal a return to imperialism, colonialism – Opinion – Chinadaily.com.cn, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202601/04/WS695a2881a310d6866eb31d6c.html
  25. ‘Got free oil from Venezuela’: Why Cuba’s collapse looks inevitable after capture of Nicholas Maduro – WION, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.wionews.com/photos/-got-free-oil-from-venezuela-why-cuba-s-collapse-looks-inevitable-after-capture-of-nicholas-maduro-1767531151243
  26. China decries U.S. action in Venezuela – even as it guards billions at stake – CNBC Africa, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.cnbcafrica.com/2026/china-decries-u-s-action-in-venezuela-even-as-it-guards-billions-at-stake/
  27. U.S. strike in Venezuela unlikely to alter China’s Taiwan strategy: Scholars, accessed January 6, 2026, https://focustaiwan.tw/politics/202601040007
  28. ‘Dangerous Precedent’: Southeast Asia’s Response to US Venezuela Intervention, accessed January 6, 2026, https://thediplomat.com/2026/01/dangerous-precedent-southeast-asias-response-to-us-venezuela-intervention/
  29. Venezuela: Emergency Meeting : What’s In Blue, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.securitycouncilreport.org/whatsinblue/2026/01/venezuela-emergency-meeting.php
  30. U.S. Seizure of Maduro Challenges China’s Non-Intervention Diplomacy, accessed January 6, 2026, https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2026/01/06/u-s-seizure-of-maduro-challenges-chinas-non-intervention-diplomacy/
  31. What role could the US play in Venezuela’s ‘bust’ oil industry?, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/business/2026/jan/04/venezuela-oil-industry-bust-what-role-could-the-us-play
  32. President Trump Wants Investments in Venezuelan Oil: What Are the Challenges? – AAF, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.americanactionforum.org/insight/president-trump-wants-investments-in-venezuelan-oil-what-are-the-challenges/
  33. Dense, sticky and heavy: why Venezuelan crude oil appeals to US refineries – The Guardian, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/business/2026/jan/05/venezuelan-crude-oil-appeals-to-us-refineries
  34. Venezuela needs $183bn to revive oil output, Rystad says – Energy Voice, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.energyvoice.com/oilandgas/americas/589136/venezuela-needs-183bn-to-revive-oil-output-rystad-says/
  35. U.S. oil companies won’t rush to re-enter shaky Venezuela, experts say, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/venezuela-oil-maduro-chevron-exxon-mobil-conocophiillips/
  36. ConocoPhillips loses Venezuela compensation case | Latest Market News – Argus Media, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.argusmedia.com/es/news-and-insights/latest-market-news/1952532-conocophillips-loses-venezuela-compensation-case

Operation Absolute Resolve: Strategic Implications of US Control over Venezuelan Energy Assets

This is a time-sensitive special report and is based on information available as of January 5, 2026. Due to the situation being very dynamic the following report should be used to obtain a perspective but not viewed as an absolute.

The military intervention in Venezuela, designated operationally as “Operation Absolute Resolve,” marks a definitive inflection point in the geopolitical history of the Western Hemisphere. The seizure of President Nicolás Maduro and the subsequent assertion of a United States-led “trusteeship” over the nation’s energy infrastructure represents more than a regime change operation; it is a fundamental restructuring of the global energy architecture. By placing the world’s largest proven oil reserves under direct US administration, Washington has effectively removed a critical node from the geopolitical “Axis of Resistance”—comprising China, Russia, and Iran—and reoriented Venezuela’s economic gravity back toward the North American energy orbit.

This report, authored by a collaborative team of national security, foreign affairs, and energy market analysts, provides an exhaustive assessment of the cascading impacts of this intervention. Our analysis suggests that the immediate objective extends beyond the removal of a hostile governing clique. The operation serves as a forceful implementation of “Resource Realism,” a doctrine that prioritizes the physical control of strategic assets over traditional diplomatic engagement. The administration’s explicit goal to “reimburse” US intervention costs through Venezuelan oil revenue 1 creates a legal and financial precedent that subordinates sovereign debt obligations to the operational imperatives of the occupying power.

The most acute and immediate impact will be the existential crisis facing Cuba. With Venezuela previously supplying between 40% and 60% of the island’s energy needs through favorable barter arrangements, the abrupt cessation of these flows threatens to precipitate a total collapse of the Cuban electric grid within the current calendar year. This development raises the specter of a humanitarian catastrophe and a mass migration event of a magnitude not seen since the Mariel boatlift. Simultaneously, China faces a “sunk cost” dilemma of historic proportions, with an estimated $10–20 billion in oil-backed loans at risk of nullification under the “Odious Debt” doctrine.

Contrary to the optimistic political rhetoric suggesting a rapid recovery, our forensic analysis of the Venezuelan oil sector indicates a profound “Reality Gap.” The infrastructure of Petróleos de Venezuela, S.A. (PDVSA) suffers from catastrophic degradation. While political leadership suggests a recovery timeline of 18 months, industry consensus points to a requirement of nearly $100 billion in capital investment over a decade to restore production to pre-Chávez levels. Consequently, the “Venezuela Premium” in global oil markets will shift from a risk of supply disruption to a “Reconstruction Lag,” where the anticipated flood of new supply is delayed by technical and legal realities.

This report maps the chain of impacts across the globe, analyzes the legal mechanisms of the takeover, and forecasts the reshaping of the Western Hemisphere’s energy markets, including the displacement of Canadian crude and the nullification of Russian strategic depth in the region.

1. The Strategic Calculus of Operation Absolute Resolve

The transition from a decade-long policy of sanctions and diplomatic isolation to direct kinetic intervention and asset seizure represents a paradigm shift in United States foreign policy. While the operation was framed publicly as a law enforcement action to apprehend indicted “narco-terrorists,” the strategic underpinnings reveal a calculated effort to dismantle the economic lifelines of US adversaries in the Western Hemisphere.

1.1 The Doctrine of “Reimbursement” and Trusteeship

Central to the post-intervention strategy is the concept of “reimbursement,” articulated by President Trump immediately following the operation. The declaration that the US will “run” Venezuela until stability is achieved, and that American oil companies will be “reimbursed” for their investments and the nation’s reconstruction costs through oil revenue 1, introduces a de facto trusteeship model. This approach is distinct from nation-building efforts in Iraq or Afghanistan; it is explicitly transactional, treating the Venezuelan state’s primary asset as collateral for the intervention itself.

The “reimbursement” mechanism implies a rigid hierarchy of revenue distribution that fundamentally alters the sovereign risk profile of the country. Revenue generated from the rehabilitation of fields in the Orinoco Belt or the Lake Maracaibo basin will likely be ring-fenced within US-controlled escrow accounts. The prioritization of claims is expected to follow a specific order:

  1. Operational Expenditures (OpEx): Immediate payments to US operators (e.g., Chevron, Halliburton) to maintain flow assurance.
  2. Capital Recovery (CapEx): Repayment of new infrastructure investments required to resuscitate the grid and pipelines.
  3. Intervention Costs: Direct reimbursement to the US Treasury for the logistical and military costs of Operation Absolute Resolve.
  4. Sovereign Debt and State Budget: Only after these primary tranches are satisfied would residual revenue flow to the Venezuelan central bank or legacy creditors.

This structure explicitly subordinates the claims of existing creditors—most notably China and Russia—and creates a legal and financial firewall around Venezuelan production. It effectively treats PDVSA not as a national oil company (NOC) in the traditional sense, but as a distressed asset under administration.3

1.2 Intent Analysis: Deliberate Choking vs. Secondary Effect

A critical question posed by observers is whether the choking of oil flows—and the consequent starvation of hard currency to the Maduro regime—was a deliberate goal of the US government or a secondary outcome of the “narco-terrorism” operation. Our analysis of the timeline and enforcement mechanisms confirms that the economic strangulation was a deliberate, primary strategic objective.

The evidence for this intent is found in the escalation sequence preceding the kinetic operation. The US administration systematically tightened the blockade on the “shadow fleet”—the network of ghost tankers used by PDVSA to evade sanctions.4 By targeting specific vessels like the Nord Star and Lunar Tide, and sanctioning their registered owners just days before the operation 6, the US effectively severed the financial capillaries that kept the regime solvent.

Furthermore, the immediate post-operation blockade of tankers bound for Cuba and China 7 indicates a pre-planned effort to weaponize energy dominance. The goal was twofold: to degrade the regime’s ability to pay its security services in the final hours, and to deny US adversaries (China and Iran) a secure source of energy and revenue. The operation fulfills the administration’s stated geopolitical ambition that “American dominance in the western hemisphere will never be questioned again”.8 The dismantling of the oil-for-loans infrastructure was not collateral damage; it was the target.

1.3 The “Putinization” of US Foreign Policy?

International observers have noted a convergence in style between the US action and the spheres-of-influence strategies typically associated with Russia. Commentators have termed this the “Putinization of US foreign policy,” characterized by the use of overwhelming force to determine political outcomes in the “near abroad”.9 However, unlike the Russian approach in Ukraine, the US strategy in Venezuela relies heavily on the subsequent mobilization of private capital (US oil majors) to consolidate the gain, blending state military power with corporate industrial capacity.

2. The Asset: Forensic Audit of the Venezuelan Oil Industry

The “prize” secured by US forces—the world’s largest proven oil reserves, estimated at over 300 billion barrels—is, in immediate practical terms, a deeply distressed asset. There is a profound disconnect between the political rhetoric of immediate wealth generation and the industrial reality on the ground.

2.1 The Infrastructure Deficit

Decades of mismanagement, the “brain drain” following the 2002–2003 PDVSA strikes, and stringent sanctions have left the industry in a state of collapse. Production has fallen from a peak of approximately 3.5 million barrels per day (bpd) in the late 1990s to roughly 1 million bpd at the time of the intervention.10

Upstream Decay: The unique geology of Venezuela’s Orinoco Belt requires constant diligence. The extra-heavy crude produced there must be diluted or upgraded immediately to be transportable. Due to the lack of diluents (previously imported from Iran or the US) and the failure of upgraders, thousands of wells have been shut in. Once shut, these wells often suffer from reservoir damage that makes reactivation economically unviable; they do not simply turn back on.12

Downstream Paralysis: The refining sector is in equally dire straits. The Paraguaná Refining Center, once one of the largest in the world with a capacity of 940,000 bpd, is operating at roughly 10% capacity.13 Critical units for producing gasoline and diesel are offline due to a lack of spare parts and catalytic agents. Pipelines crossing Lake Maracaibo are riddled with leaks, creating an ecological disaster that complicates immediate reactivation.14

2.2 The Recovery Timeline and Cost: The Reality Gap

President Trump’s suggestion that oil production could ramp up significantly within “18 months” 15 stands in stark contrast to industry consensus.

  • Political Forecast: The administration envisions a rapid turnaround where US efficiency quickly restores output, funding the intervention and stabilizing the global market.
  • Industry Reality: Experts and analysts, including those from Rice University and Rystad Energy, estimate that restoring production to the 3–4 million bpd level will require between $80 billion and $100 billion in capital investment over a period of 7 to 10 years.11

This “Reality Gap” is substantial. Even under the most optimistic scenarios, where US firms assume immediate operational control, output is unlikely to exceed 1.5 million bpd within the first 2–3 years.17 The initial phase of “recovery” will likely consist of stabilizing current decline rates and repairing critical safety infrastructure rather than a boom in new exports.

2.3 The Role of US Majors

While the US President claims American oil companies are “prepared” to enter, the corporate reality is one of extreme caution.

  • Chevron: As the only US major currently operating in Venezuela (under previous OFAC waivers), Chevron is the linchpin of the immediate stabilization plan. They currently ship approximately 150,000 bpd to the US 18 and have the most up-to-date knowledge of the reservoir conditions.
  • ExxonMobil & ConocoPhillips: These firms were expropriated by Hugo Chávez and hold outstanding arbitration awards worth billions ($1.6 billion and $12 billion+, respectively).19 Their return is contingent not just on security, but on the settlement of these past debts. It is highly unlikely they will commit new shareholder capital without a “sovereign guarantee” or a mechanism that prioritizes their debt recovery from new production revenues.20

3. The Primary Casualty: Cuba’s Existential Crisis

The most immediate, severe, and potentially destabilizing impact of the US takeover of Venezuelan oil will be felt not in Caracas, but in Havana. For two decades, Venezuela has been the economic guarantor of the Cuban Revolution, a relationship that is now effectively terminated.

3.1 Energy Dependence and the mechanism of Collapse

Cuba relies on Venezuela for between 40% and 60% of its total oil consumption. This oil was not purchased on the open market but provided through favorable cooperation agreements, often involving the exchange of Cuban medical personnel, intelligence agents, and security advisors for crude oil and refined products.21

The mechanics of this trade have already been disrupted. In the months leading up to the intervention, Venezuelan exports to Cuba plummeted from ~80,000 bpd to near zero due to the US blockade and the seizure of tankers like the Liza and Sandino.22 With the US military now controlling the export terminals at Jose and Puerto Miranda, the possibility of resuming these “solidarity shipments” is non-existent.

Grid Failure: The Cuban electric grid is antiquated, fragile, and almost entirely dependent on floating Turkish power ships and obsolete Soviet-era thermoelectric plants that burn Venezuelan heavy fuel oil. The loss of this specific grade of fuel is catastrophic. Without it, the grid cannot function. Reports indicate that blackouts are already extending to 12–18 hours a day.23 A total collapse of the National Electric System (SEN) is projected within months.

3.2 Regime Stability and Mass Migration

The US administration explicitly views the collapse of the Cuban regime as a likely corollary to the Venezuelan operation. President Trump has stated, “I think it’s just going to fall”.24 The logic is cold but sound: without Venezuelan oil, Havana lacks the hard currency to purchase fuel on the open market, especially given its own economic crisis and US sanctions.

Migration Crisis: The inevitable result of a permanent blackout and economic paralysis is a mass migration event. We forecast a surge in maritime migration toward Florida in mid-to-late 2026 that could dwarf the 1980 Mariel boatlift and the 1994 rafter crisis. This poses a significant domestic political challenge for the US administration, which must balance its pressure campaign with the optics of a humanitarian disaster on its shores.

Regional Isolation: Mexico, which briefly provided emergency fuel shipments in late 2025, has signaled it cannot sustain Cuba. Faced with its own production constraints and the risk of antagonizing a belligerent US administration, Mexico has reduced its aid, leaving Cuba with no alternative lifeline.22

4. The Great Power Pivot: China and the Sunk Cost Fallacy

For the People’s Republic of China, the US intervention represents a massive financial loss and a significant strategic setback. Venezuela was one of the largest recipients of Chinese development finance in the world, a relationship built on the “loans-for-oil” model.

4.1 The Financial Blow: $20 Billion at Risk

China is Venezuela’s largest creditor, with outstanding loans estimated between $10 billion and $20 billion.25 These loans were structured to be repaid in oil shipments, a mechanism that functioned reasonably well until the intensification of sanctions.

Under the new US trusteeship, these debts are in jeopardy. The US strategy likely involves classifying these loans not as sovereign obligations of the Venezuelan state, but as distinct liabilities incurred by the Maduro regime to sustain its grip on power. This classification paves the way for the invocation of the “Odious Debt” doctrine (discussed further in Section 9), which would legally subordinate or nullify China’s claims in favor of US reconstruction costs and pre-Chávez creditors.26

4.2 Asset Vulnerability and Supply Chains

Chinese state-owned enterprises (SOEs), specifically China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC) and Sinopec, hold significant minority stakes in joint ventures such as Petrosinovensa.27

  • Operational Loss: While CNPC technically owns shares in these fields, their ability to lift oil or influence operations is now zero. The US occupation forces control the physical infrastructure. It is expected that these JVs will be placed under “administrative review,” effectively freezing Chinese equity.
  • Supply Diversion: Approximately 470,000 bpd of Venezuelan crude flowed to China in 2025, largely to independent “teapot” refiners in Shandong province who thrived on the discounted heavy crude.27 This flow has been severed. China must now replace this volume, likely by increasing imports from Iran or Russia. This tightens the “shadow market” and potentially raises costs for Chinese independent refiners, though the global impact is mitigated by weak demand growth in China.

4.3 Diplomatic Stance

Beijing has publicly condemned the US action, emphasizing the inviolability of sovereignty. However, China’s response is constrained by its own economic slowdown and the desire to avoid a direct military confrontation in the Western Hemisphere. China’s strategy will likely focus on “damage control”—using international courts and diplomatic leverage to try and salvage some financial value from its investments, though expectations of a total write-down are high.26

5. The Russian Retreat and Iranian Disconnect

The operation effectively dismantles the “Axis of Resistance” presence in Latin America, dealing a blow to Russian prestige and Iranian logistical networks.

5.1 Russia: Geopolitical Eviction

For Moscow, Venezuela was a strategic beachhead—a way to project power into the US “near abroad” in reciprocity for US presence in Eastern Europe.

  • Roszarubezhneft: This state entity was created specifically to take over Rosneft’s Venezuelan assets in 2020 to shield the parent company from sanctions.30 These assets, including stakes in the Petromonagas upgrader, are now under US control. The physical loss of these fields represents a write-off of billions of dollars in investment.12
  • Strategic Defeat: The intervention serves as a demonstration of Russia’s inability to protect its distant allies. The “Putinization” of US policy essentially beats Russia at its own game, using overwhelming force to secure a sphere of influence and evicting a rival power.9
  • Market Upside? Ironically, Russia may benefit marginally in the short term. The removal of Venezuelan oil from the “shadow market” reduces competition for Russian Urals crude in India and China, potentially allowing Russia to command a higher price from these buyers.31

5.2 Iran: Loss of a Strategic Node

The relationship between Caracas and Tehran was symbiotic, driven by mutual isolation.

  • Condensate Swaps: The trade mechanism involved Iran sending condensate (a light oil needed to dilute Venezuela’s sludge-like crude) in exchange for Venezuelan heavy oil.32 This allowed both nations to sustain production. With US control of the import terminals, this swap is impossible, furthering the degradation of whatever Venezuelan production capacity remains in the short term.
  • Sanctions Evasion Hub: Venezuela served as a “laundromat” for Iranian oil—a place to re-flag vessels, transfer cargoes, and obscure the origin of crude destined for global markets. The loss of PDVSA infrastructure removes a critical node in this network, forcing Iran to restructure its evasion logistics at significant cost.33
  • Financial Loss: Iran’s documented $2 billion in loans/projects (housing, car manufacturing) and undocumented military cooperation debts are likely unrecoverable.34

6. North American Energy Architecture

The re-integration of Venezuela into the US energy orbit is the most significant structural shift in the North American energy market since the Shale Revolution.

6.1 The US Gulf Coast: The Natural Home for Heavy Crude

The US Gulf Coast (USGC) refining complex is the world’s largest consumer of heavy, sour crude. These refineries (owned by Valero, Marathon, and Citgo) invested billions in “coking” capacity specifically to process Venezuelan oil. Since the sanctions in 2019, they have had to source suboptimal replacements from Russia (before 2022) or compete for limited Canadian barrels.

  • Refinery Optimization: The return of Venezuelan Merey crude is a massive boon for US refiners. It allows them to optimize their slates, producing higher margins of diesel and jet fuel. Citgo, a US-based subsidiary of PDVSA, is particularly well-positioned to reintegrate this supply chain.35
  • Citgo’s Fate: The ownership of Citgo is currently entangled in court battles over Venezuela’s defaulted bonds. A US-led “trusteeship” might pause the breakup of Citgo, preserving it as the downstream arm of the reconstructed Venezuelan oil industry to ensure refining capacity for the new production.

6.2 The “Loser”: Canadian Oil Sands

The primary economic casualty of Venezuela’s return, outside of the Axis of Resistance, is Canada.

  • Competition: Canadian Western Canadian Select (WCS) is a direct competitor to Venezuelan Merey. Both are heavy, sour crudes. Currently, Canada enjoys a near-monopoly on heavy crude imports to the US Midwest and Gulf Coast due to the absence of Venezuelan barrels.
  • Price Impact: As Venezuelan volumes ramp up (in the medium term), they will displace heavy crude currently imported from Canada via pipeline and rail. This increased supply competition at the Gulf Coast will likely widen the WCS-WTI differential, effectively lowering the price Canadian producers receive for their oil.36
  • Strategic Imperative: This development makes the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion (shipping Canadian oil to Asia) existentially important for the Canadian energy sector, as the US market becomes saturated with “reimbursed” Venezuelan oil.

7. European Ambivalence and the Atlantic Rift

The reaction from Europe highlights a growing rift in the transatlantic alliance, torn between adherence to international law and energy pragmatism.

7.1 Diplomatic Fracture

European leaders have been visibly uncomfortable with the unilateral nature of the US operation.

  • Spain: As the former colonial power and a major investor, Spain has led the condemnation. Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, along with leaders from Mexico and Colombia, issued a joint statement rejecting the military operation as a violation of international law.37 This reflects domestic political pressure from left-wing coalition partners but also genuine concern over the precedent of “gunboat diplomacy.”
  • United Kingdom: The UK response has been notably cautious. Prime Minister Keir Starmer has distanced London from the operation (“we were not involved”) but stopped short of condemnation, prioritizing the “special relationship” and potential energy security benefits.39
  • Italy: The Italian government, led by Giorgia Meloni, offered a more supportive stance, framing the action as “legitimate self-defense” against narco-trafficking, likely reflecting Italy’s own hardline stance on organized crime and desire for close ties with the US administration.37

7.2 The Energy Compromise: Repsol and Eni

The key variable for Europe is the fate of its energy majors, Repsol (Spain) and Eni (Italy). Unlike US firms, these companies maintained operations in Venezuela through “oil-for-debt” swaps authorized by the US State Department.

  • Debt Holdings: Eni is owed approximately $2.3 billion, and Repsol is owed roughly €586 million.40
  • Future Status: The US administration faces a choice. It can subordinate these claims (lumping them with China/Russia) or offer a “transatlantic compromise” where Repsol and Eni are allowed to remain as junior partners to US operators. Given the need for technical expertise and political cover, it is likely that the US will allow these firms to continue lifting oil, provided they adhere to the strict “trusteeship” revenue rules. This creates a wedge: Spain may condemn the invasion politically, but its flagship company will likely participate in the economic aftermath.

8. Regional Ripple Effects: Latin America

The intervention has shattered the unspoken norms of Latin American sovereignty, forcing regional powers to realign.

8.1 Colombia: The Border Crisis

Colombia faces the most complex fallout.

  • Short-term Crisis: The immediate aftermath involves a security crisis on the border. Remnants of the Maduro regime, armed “Colectivos,” and ELN guerrillas may flee into the porous border regions, destabilizing Colombian security.41
  • Long-term Gain: However, if the US-led stabilization succeeds, Colombia stands to gain the most. A recovering Venezuelan economy would reverse the migration flow, alleviating the burden of the 2.8 million Venezuelan refugees currently straining Colombia’s social services. The reopening of trade would also revitalize the Colombian border economy.42

8.2 Guyana: The End of the Essequibo Threat

For Guyana, the US intervention is an unmitigated security guarantee. The Maduro regime had increasingly threatened to annex the oil-rich Essequibo region. With the US military effectively guaranteeing the new Venezuelan government, this territorial threat vanishes. The US will likely broker a diplomatic freeze on the dispute to ensure stability for ExxonMobil, which operates massive offshore fields in both Guyana and Venezuela.

8.3 India: The Forgotten Stakeholder

India remains a silent but significant loser. Indian state companies ONGC Videsh and Indian Oil Corp have entitlements to Venezuelan oil.43 Like China, India invested in Venezuela to diversify its energy security. These assets are now in limbo. However, unlike China, India is a strategic partner of the US. We anticipate a diplomatic workaround where Indian firms may be compensated or allowed to retain passive stakes, provided the oil flows are transparent and do not support “Axis” interests.

9. The Financial Warfare Precedent: Mechanism of Control

The US strategy relies on a novel combination of domestic legal frameworks and raw power to reshape the Venezuelan economy.

9.1 The “Odious Debt” Weapon

To make the economics of rebuilding work, the US cannot service Venezuela’s existing ~$150 billion debt mountain. We anticipate the US will encourage the new transitional government to declare debts incurred by the Maduro regime (especially to China and Russia) as “Odious Debt”.

  • Legal Theory: The doctrine of Odious Debt holds that debt incurred by a despotic regime for purposes that do not serve the best interests of the nation should not be enforceable against the people of that nation after the regime falls.44
  • Application: Legal opinions will likely argue that loans from China and Russia sustained an illegitimate “narco-terrorist” regime and are therefore personal liabilities of the Maduro clique.
  • Impact: This would theoretically clear the balance sheet for US investors. However, it is a “nuclear option” in sovereign finance that would trigger years of litigation in New York and London courts and potentially chill Chinese lending to other developing nations.

Table 1: The Creditor Hierarchy Under US Trusteeship

Creditor CategoryEstimated DebtLikely Status Under TrusteeshipStrategic Rationale
US Majors (Exxon/Conoco)~$15 BillionPriority Recovery“Reimbursement” for expropriation; crucial for technical reentry.
Bondholders (Wall St)~$60 BillionRestructuredLikely hair-cut but recognized to maintain access to capital markets.
China (Loans-for-Oil)~$12-20 BillionAt Risk / “Odious”Viewed as sustaining the adversary; likely subordinated or voided.
Russia (Rosneft/State)~$3-5 BillionVoidedTreated as hostile state financing; total write-down expected.
Commercial Suppliers~$15 BillionCase-by-CaseEssential suppliers paid; others written off.

9.2 The Role of OFAC

The Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) will pivot from sanctions enforcement to being the gatekeeper of the Venezuelan economy.

  • Licensing: Instead of general licenses, OFAC will issue specific licenses to US-aligned firms to enter and operate.
  • Revenue Escrow: Oil revenues will likely be deposited into US-controlled escrow accounts (similar to the Iraq “Oil-for-Food” mechanism but more restrictive) to ensure funds are used strictly for approved “reimbursement” and humanitarian aid, bypassing any remaining Chavista bureaucracy.45

10. Conclusion and Future Outlook

The US operation in Venezuela signifies the end of the post-Cold War era of “soft power” in the Western Hemisphere and the beginning of an era of Resource Realism.

For the Venezuelan People: This intervention promises a potential end to the humanitarian disaster of the last decade, but at the cost of national sovereignty. The country faces a long, painful economic trusteeship where its primary resource is mortgaged to pay for its own “liberation.”

For Global Energy Markets: The “Venezuela Premium” (risk of supply disruption) is replaced by the “Reconstruction Lag.” The world will not be flooded with Venezuelan oil tomorrow. The technical reality of the degraded fields means supply will return slowly, over a decade. However, by 2030, a US-aligned Venezuela could act as a significant counterweight to OPEC+ discipline, cementing North American energy dominance for the mid-21st century.

For Geopolitics: The message to US adversaries is stark: economic investments in the US “near-abroad” are insecure and subject to forcible liquidation. China and Russia have learned that without the ability to project military force to protect them, their financial assets in the Western Hemisphere are vulnerable to the stroke of a pen—or the arrival of a carrier strike group.


If you find this post useful, please share the link on Facebook, with your friends, etc. Your support is much appreciated and if you have any feedback, please email me at in**@*********ps.com. Please note that for links to other websites, we are only paid if there is an affiliate program such as Avantlink, Impact, Amazon and eBay and only if you purchase something. If you’d like to directly contribute towards our continued reporting, please visit our funding page.


Sources Used

  1. Trump suggests US taxpayers could reimburse oil firms for Venezuela investment, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/business/2026/jan/06/trump-us-taxpayers-oil-firms-venezuela-investment
  2. Machado welcomes ‘huge step for humanity’ – as it happened, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2026/jan/05/venezuela-live-updates-trump-us-interim-president-collaborate
  3. US: Oil and energy companies’ shares rise after intervention in Venezuela, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/us-oil-and-energy-companies-shares-rise-after-intervention-in-venezuela/
  4. Chevron Resumes Exports of Venezuelan Oil to US fter Four-Day Pause – Marine Link, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.marinelink.com/news/chevron-resumes-exports-venezuelan-oil-us-534027
  5. US announces additional sanctions on four oil companies amid Venezuela tensions, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.jurist.org/news/2026/01/us-announces-additional-sanctions-on-4-venezuela-oil-companies-amid-maduro-crackdown/
  6. Treasury Targets Oil Traders Engaged in Sanctions Evasion for Maduro Regime, accessed January 6, 2026, https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0348
  7. Venezuela crude flows slow, Cuba feels sting | Latest Market News, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.argusmedia.com/en/news-and-insights/latest-market-news/2766638-venezuela-crude-flows-slow-cuba-feels-sting
  8. How Trump’s Venezuela Takeover Could Change the World, accessed January 6, 2026, https://time.com/7343019/venezuela-trump-oil-china/
  9. The ‘Putinization’ of US foreign policy has arrived in Venezuela, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jan/03/putin-russia-us-foreign-policy-venezuela
  10. Venezuela: The Post-Maduro Oil, Gas and Mining Outlook, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.americasquarterly.org/article/venezuela-the-post-maduro-oil-gas-and-mining-outlook/
  11. Venezuela oil plan: Donald Trump’s takeover idea unlikely to shift global prices soon; analysts flag hurdles, accessed January 6, 2026, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/international-business/venezuela-oil-plan-donald-trumps-takeover-idea-unlikely-to-shift-global-prices-soon-analysts-flag-hurdles/articleshow/126337786.cms
  12. Venezuela moves to cut oil output due to US export embargo, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/companies-markets/energy-commodities/venezuela-moves-cut-oil-output-due-us-export-embargo
  13. Why Venezuela Struggles to Produce Oil Despite Having the World’s Largest Reserves, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.investopedia.com/why-does-venezuela-struggle-with-oil-production-despite-having-the-worlds-largest-reserves-11879080
  14. Oil spills in Venezuela – pdvsa ad hoc, accessed January 6, 2026, https://pdvsa-adhoc.com/en/2025/06/oil-spills-in-venezuela/
  15. After U.S. military action in Venezuela, Trump talks about his future plans, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.local10.com/news/world/2026/01/05/after-us-military-action-in-venezuela-trump-talks-about-his-future-plans/
  16. U.S. seeks to tap Venezuela’s vast oil reserves after military strikes. Here’s what to know., accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/venezuela-oil-reserves-us-strike-trump-what-to-know/
  17. Why oil-rich Venezuela pumps under 1% of global crude and can Trump push it?, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.indiatoday.in/world/story/venezuela-oil-production-collapse-reasons-oil-rich-reserves-trump-us-companies-feasibility-investment-2846742-2026-01-05
  18. Explainer: Status of Foreign Oil Companies in Venezuela After Maduro’s Arrest, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.oedigital.com/news/534029-explainer-status-of-foreign-oil-companies-in-venezuela-after-maduro-s-arrest
  19. US Sets Terms for Oil Giants in Venezuela: Invest First, Get Paid Later – Gotrade, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.heygotrade.com/en/news/us-sets-terms-for-oil-giants-in-venezuela-invest-first-get-paid-later/
  20. Former Chevron executive seeks $2 billion for oil projects in Venezuela, accessed January 6, 2026, https://americanbazaaronline.com/2026/01/06/former-chevron-executive-seeks-2-billion-venezuela-oil-472665/
  21. Cuba is said to face potential breakdown as U.S. squeezes Venezuelan oil (CO1:COM:Commodity), accessed January 6, 2026, https://seekingalpha.com/news/4533853-cuba-is-said-to-face-potential-breakdown-as-u-s-squeezes-venezuelan-oil
  22. ​Is Cuba next after Maduro’s capture?, accessed January 6, 2026, https://asiatimes.com/2026/01/is-cuba-next-after-maduros-capture/
  23. Cuba hit with fifth blackout in less than a year with 10m people in the dark – The Guardian, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/sep/10/cuba-electricity-power-blackout
  24. Maduro’s capture puts Cuba’s Venezuelan oil-dependent economy at risk, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/maduros-capture-puts-cubas-venezuelan-oil-dependent-economy-risk
  25. For a long time, China has been Venezuela’s largest creditor | 破产哥励志重来 on Binance Square, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.binance.com/en-AE/square/post/34612653999042
  26. Markets Pivot as Venezuela Geopolitical Shock Triggers Massive Rotation into Defense and Energy, accessed January 6, 2026, https://markets.financialcontent.com/wral/article/marketminute-2026-1-5-markets-pivot-as-venezuela-geopolitical-shock-triggers-massive-rotation-into-defense-and-energy
  27. China’s oil investments in Venezuela | BOE Report, accessed January 6, 2026, https://boereport.com/2026/01/05/chinas-oil-investments-in-venezuela/
  28. Concerns over damage to investment in Venezuela are being cited as the background of China’s increas.. – MK, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.mk.co.kr/en/world/11924858
  29. China decries U.S. action in Venezuela – even as it guards billions at stake – CNBC Africa, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.cnbcafrica.com/2026/china-decries-u-s-action-in-venezuela-even-as-it-guards-billions-at-stake
  30. US Intervention in Venezuelan Oil Drives Global Energy Disruption, accessed January 6, 2026, https://discoveryalert.com.au/strategic-petroleum-2026-us-venezuela-oil-disruption/
  31. Trump’s plan to seize and revitalize Venezuela’s oil industry faces major hurdles, accessed January 6, 2026, https://apnews.com/article/venezuela-oil-prices-trump-0c2c6ede79d550af53e6d3ddb51bfa04
  32. Venezuelan supply and export scenarios under a US military intervention – Kpler, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.kpler.com/blog/venezuelan-supply-and-export-scenarios-under-a-us-military-intervention
  33. The US Venezuela operation could have major implications for the Middle East, accessed January 6, 2026, https://thejewishindependent.com.au/us-operation-venezuela-iran-implications
  34. What the fall of Maduro means for Venezuela’s vast debt to Iran, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.iranintl.com/en/202601055479
  35. Dense, sticky and heavy: why Venezuelan crude oil appeals to US refineries, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/business/2026/jan/05/venezuelan-crude-oil-appeals-to-us-refineries
  36. U.S. designs for Venezuelan oil industry put pressure on Canadian oil stocks, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.nsnews.com/the-mix/us-designs-for-venezuelan-oil-industry-put-pressure-on-canadian-oil-stocks-11696839
  37. Europe’s failure to condemn Trump’s illegal aggression in Venezuela isn’t just wrong – it’s stupid | Nathalie Tocci, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/jan/06/europe-venezuela-donald-trump-vladimir-putin
  38. Spain ‘strongly condemns’ violation of international law in Venezuela, PM says By Reuters, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.investing.com/news/world-news/spain-strongly-condemns-violation-of-international-law-in-venezuela-pm-says-4428569
  39. The Guardian view on Europe’s response to ‘America first’ imperialism: too weak, too timid | Editorial, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/jan/05/the-guardian-view-on-europes-response-to-america-first-imperialism-too-weak-too-timid
  40. FACTBOX | Where global oil firms stand in Venezuela following Maduro’s capture, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.bairdmaritime.com/offshore/drilling-production/factbox-where-global-oil-firms-stand-in-venezuela-following-maduros-capture
  41. Regime Change, Minimum Wage Hikes and AI Among the Forces Reshaping Investment in Latin America in 2026 – Ag Plus, Inc. -, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.agplusinc.com/news/story/36873102/regime-change-minimum-wage-hikes-and-ai-among-the-forces-reshaping-investment-in-latin-america-in-2026
  42. Venezuela: Focus on stability rather than regime change for now – Janus Henderson, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.janushenderson.com/en-us/advisor/article/venezuela-focus-on-stability-rather-than-regime-change-for-now/
  43. Foreign Claims to Venezuelan Oil in Doubt after US Intervention, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.rigzone.com/news/wire/foreign_claims_to_venezuelan_oil_in_doubt_after_us_intervention-05-jan-2026-182679-article/
  44. An Economic Framework for Venezuela’s Debt Restructuring – Harvard Kennedy School, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.hks.harvard.edu/sites/default/files/degree%20programs/MPAID/files/Moatti%2C%20Thomas%20and%20Muci%2C%20Frank%20SYPA.pdf
  45. Experts react: The US just captured Maduro. What’s next for Venezuela and the region?, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/dispatches/us-just-captured-maduro-whats-next-for-venezuela-and-the-region/