Tag Archives: Cuba

Cuba SITREP – Week Ending January 24, 2026

Reporting Period: January 17, 2026 – January 24, 2026

Executive Summary

The Republic of Cuba is currently navigating its most precarious existential crisis since the collapse of the Soviet Union in the early 1990s, precipitated by the tectonic geopolitical shift of January 3, 2026. The U.S. military operation in Venezuela (“Operation Absolute Resolve”), which resulted in the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and the deaths of 32 Cuban military personnel, has severed Havana’s primary economic lifeline and shattered its implicit security guarantee. The week ending January 24, 2026, has been characterized by a frantic internal consolidation of power, signaled by the indefinite postponement of the IX Congress of the Communist Party of Cuba (PCC), and a sharp escalation in external threats, specifically the Trump administration’s active consideration of a total naval blockade to interdict oil shipments.

The intelligence assessment indicates that the Cuban regime is operating in a “bunker mentality,” prioritizing regime survival over all other governance functions. The decapitation of the Chavista regime in Caracas has deprived Havana of its primary patron, effectively closing the oil spigot that has sustained the island’s energy grid for two decades. In response, the regime is attempting to pivot to Mexico for energy survival, but intense U.S. diplomatic and economic pressure on the Sheinbaum administration places this alternative supply chain at high risk of interdiction.

Key Judgments

1. Strategic Isolation and the Loss of Strategic Depth: The removal of Nicolás Maduro has fundamentally altered the regional balance of power. Venezuela provided Cuba with “strategic depth”—a source of subsidized energy, financial transfers, and a political counterweight to U.S. hegemony. With U.S. forces now controlling key nodes of the Venezuelan state apparatus and President Trump declaring an end to all oil shipments to Cuba, Havana faces an immediate energy famine. The regime’s attempt to frame the conflict as a broader “anti-imperialist” struggle is failing to generate material support sufficient to offset the loss of Venezuelan crude.1

2. Regime Fragility and Paralysis: The postponement of the IX PCC Congress, originally scheduled for April 2026, indicates deep paralysis within the ruling elite. It suggests that the leadership, under First Secretary Miguel Díaz-Canel and the shadow influence of Raúl Castro, lacks a unified strategy to address the crisis. There are credible indicators of factional rifts between “continuity” hardliners and technocratic reformists who favor a “Vietnam-style” market opening. The delay is a tactical maneuver to avoid exposing these rifts during a period of extreme vulnerability.4

3. Military Morale Crisis: The repatriation and burial of 32 elite Cuban combatants killed during the U.S. raid in Caracas has generated a complex psychological effect. While the state is leveraging the funerals for anti-imperialist propaganda, survivor testimonies describing the “vicious” efficiency of U.S. forces have permeated the ranks of the Revolutionary Armed Forces (FAR). The stark technological asymmetry displayed during the raid has eroded the myth of resistance and highlighted the futility of conventional confrontation with the United States.6

4. Operational Risk of Naval Blockade: Intelligence indicates the U.S. National Security Council is weighing a full naval blockade to enforce an energy quarantine. Such a measure, advocated by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, would likely trigger a total collapse of the national electrical grid (SEN), potentially sparking mass civil unrest reminiscent of the July 11, 2021 (11J) protests, but with higher volatility due to the desperation of the populace. The threat alone has already created a “shadow blockade,” deterring commercial shipping.9

5. Geopolitical Hedging Limits: Russia and China have offered rhetorical support and limited aid ($80 million from Beijing), but neither appears willing to forcefully challenge a U.S. naval cordon in the Caribbean. Russia’s naval visits serve as symbolic gestures rather than credible deterrents, exposing the limits of Havana’s “great power” alliance strategy in the face of determined U.S. action in its near abroad.11

1. Strategic Context: The Post-Operation Absolute Resolve Landscape

1.1 The Geopolitical Shock of January 3rd

The geopolitical architecture of the Caribbean Basin was fundamentally altered on January 3, 2026. The U.S. execution of Operation Absolute Resolve—a precision military strike in Caracas that extracted Nicolás Maduro—has removed the linchpin of Cuba’s regional strategy. For two decades, the Venezuela-Cuba nexus was the central artery of Havana’s survival, providing subsidized oil, financial transfers, and a strategic depth that allowed the island to resist U.S. pressure.

The operation itself, characterized by its surgical nature and the overwhelming technological superiority of U.S. forces, has had a chilling effect on the Cuban leadership. The rapid collapse of Maduro’s personal security detail—comprised largely of elite Cuban operatives—demonstrated that the security guarantee Cuba provided to Venezuela was hollow in the face of direct U.S. intervention. This failure has damaged Havana’s reputation as a security provider in the Global South and has likely triggered a comprehensive review of the regime’s own defensive capabilities.1

1.2 The U.S. Policy Pivot: “Maximum Pressure” to “Regime Change”

This week witnessed a decisive shift in Washington’s posture from containment to active rollback. Emboldened by the operational success in Venezuela, the Trump administration has signaled that Cuba is the next target in a campaign to “reorder” the Western Hemisphere. The administration’s rhetoric has moved beyond traditional diplomatic condemnation to explicit threats of regime extinction.

The Blockade Threat: Intelligence reports and administration leaks, particularly those cited by Politico and The Wall Street Journal, indicate that the White House is actively debating the implementation of a total naval blockade to halt all crude oil imports to the island. This proposal, reportedly backed by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, represents a significant escalation from the traditional embargo (el bloqueo). A naval blockade is an act of war under international law. The mere threat of this action has already begun to deter third-party shippers and insurers, creating a “shadow blockade” effect even before a single U.S. Navy vessel moves to intercept.9

The Ultimatum: President Trump’s public demand for Cuba to “make a deal… before it is too late,” coupled with the explicit threat that “there will be no more oil or money going to Cuba,” frames the current U.S. strategy as an ultimatum: capitulation or collapse. The administration appears to be calculating that the Cuban regime, deprived of energy and facing a starving population, will fracture from within or face a popular uprising that renders it ungovernable. This strategy aligns with the broader “National Security Strategy” presented by Secretary Rubio, which repositions U.S. policy to aggressively assert dominance across the Western Hemisphere.2

1.3 The “Domino Theory” Revisited

The successful removal of Maduro has revitalized a version of the “domino theory” within U.S. policymaking circles, albeit in reverse. The administration views the fall of the Chavista regime as the precursor to the fall of the Castro-Canel regime. This perception drives the accelerated timeline for pressure; U.S. officials believe that Cuba is uniquely vulnerable in this specific window, struggling with a 10.9% GDP contraction (2020) followed by a shallow recovery and a renewed recession in 2025.17 The synchronization of external pressure with internal economic exhaustion is the core of the current U.S. strategy.

2. Domestic Political Stability Assessment

2.1 The Postponement of the IX Party Congress

In a move that signals profound elite insecurity, the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Cuba (PCC) announced the indefinite postponement of its IX Congress, originally scheduled for April 2026. Officially, this decision was attributed to the need to “devote 2026 to recovering” from the economic crisis, a directive that reportedly came from General Raúl Castro himself. Analytically, this represents a “state of exception” within the party apparatus.4

  • Significance of the Delay: Party Congresses are the supreme mechanism for legitimizing leadership transitions, policy shifts, and five-year economic plans. By delaying the Congress, the leadership is admitting it lacks a consensus strategy to navigate the current crisis. It suggests that internal disagreements regarding the path forward—specifically between hardliners advocating for “continuity” (resistance and centralization) and reformists pushing for a “Vietnam model” of market opening—have reached an impasse.
  • The Shadow of Raúl Castro: The fact that the proposal for postponement was attributed to Raúl Castro indicates that despite his retirement, he remains the ultimate arbiter of regime survival. His intervention suggests a lack of confidence in the Díaz-Canel administration’s ability to manage a high-stakes political event amidst potential social combustion. It serves as a signal to the party cadre that unity and survival take precedence over procedural norms.5
  • Vietnam Comparison: Observers note the irony of the postponement given the frequent comparisons to Vietnam’s Doi Moi reforms. Unlike Vietnam, which used its 1986 Congress to launch radical economic liberalization during a crisis, the PCC appears paralyzed, opting to delay rather than decide. This hesitation increases the risk of a disorderly collapse, as the “gradualist” approach to reform has been overtaken by the speed of the economic deterioration.4

2.2 Elite Fracture and the Search for Negotiators

Reports from the Wall Street Journal suggest that the Trump administration is actively seeking “allies” within the Cuban government to negotiate a transition. While the Cuban Foreign Ministry publicly rejects such overtures, the existence of these backchannel efforts creates an atmosphere of paranoia within the Palace of the Revolution. The successful co-optation of Venezuelan elites (such as the reported cooperation of Delcy and Jorge Rodríguez prior to Maduro’s fall) serves as a terrifying precedent for the Cuban leadership.16

The regime’s counter-intelligence apparatus is likely in overdrive, scrutinizing the loyalty of senior officials in the military and economic ministries. Any official advocating for accommodation with the U.S. risks being labeled a traitor, further narrowing the space for internal debate and reinforcing the hardline stance of “resistance at all costs.”

The regime is operating on a hair-trigger alert for civil unrest. The memory of the 11J protests looms large, and the current convergence of blackouts, food shortages, and the Venezuela shock creates a more volatile mix than existed in 2021.

  • Preemptive Repression: The Prosecutor’s Office is seeking exemplary sentences (up to 9 years) for citizens involved in peaceful cacerolazos (pot-banging protests) in Villa Clara. The defendants, including independent journalist José Gabriel Barrenechea, are accused of “public disorder” for protesting blackouts. This harsh legal posture is designed to deter the population from translating energy frustration into street mobilization. The arrest of prominent opposition figure Guillermo “Coco” Fariñas while attempting to attend the trial further underscores the zero-tolerance policy.20
  • Digital Authoritarianism: A new report by Prisoners Defenders exposes the extent of the “digital authoritarianism” employed by Havana. The regime utilizes a sophisticated system of monitoring to track independent social networks, essentially criminalizing dissent before it manifests physically. This “Big Brother” logic is the regime’s primary firewall against a “color revolution.” The report details how the state uses 200 distinct testimonies to map out the dismantling of independent civic networks.11
  • Targeting of Journalists: The brief “kidnapping” of journalist Jorge Fernández Era by State Security and the harassment of others indicate a concerted effort to silence independent reporting on the crisis. The regime fears that independent media could serve as a catalyst for coordination among disparate protest groups.11

3. Security & Intelligence Assessment

3.1 The 32 Fallen: Repatriation and Psychological Impact

The return of the remains of 32 Cuban military and intelligence personnel killed during the defense of Maduro’s compound in Caracas has been the dominant narrative in state media this week. The regime has orchestrated a “March of the Combatant People” and elaborate funeral rites to frame these deaths as heroic sacrifices in the anti-imperialist struggle. The ceremony at the Ministry of the Revolutionary Armed Forces (MINFAR), attended by Raúl Castro and Miguel Díaz-Canel, was intended to project unity and resolve.6

However, beneath the propaganda, the incident has sent a shockwave through the Cuban security establishment (MININT and MINFAR).

  • The Myth of Invincibility: For decades, Cuban military doctrine has relied on the concept of the “War of All the People” and the proficiency of its special forces (the “Black Wasps” or Avispas Negras). The swift destruction of the Cuban security detail in Caracas by U.S. forces—described by survivors as “vicious” and “disproportionate”—has exposed a stark reality: Cuban conventional forces are technologically obsolete and defenseless against modern U.S. air superiority and drone warfare.7
  • Survivor Testimony: Accounts from survivors, such as Lieutenant Colonel Abel Guerra Perera, detail how U.S. Apache helicopters and drones operated with impunity, decimating the Cuban position before they could mount an effective defense. He described the attack as “ferocious,” noting that many were killed while sleeping or unarmed. Wilfredo Frómeta Tamayo, a civilian driver, recounted helicopters hovering just 100 meters away, raining debris down on them. These narratives are circulating within the barracks, potentially eroding the willingness of mid-level officers to engage in a suicidal conflict should U.S. pressure escalate to direct military action against the island.7

3.2 Asymmetric Capabilities and Threat Perception

While the conventional balance of power is overwhelmingly in favor of the U.S., the Cuban regime retains significant asymmetric capabilities. The “Big Brother” digital surveillance system remains a potent tool for internal control. Additionally, the regime maintains a capacity for irregular warfare, a doctrine that is now being re-emphasized in light of the failure of conventional defense in Venezuela.

Russian Naval Presence: The arrival of a Russian naval detachment, including the Admiral Gorshkov frigate and the Kazan nuclear-powered submarine, in Havana Bay earlier this month was intended as a signal of deterrence. However, the passivity of these assets during the Venezuela operation has reinforced the assessment that Moscow sees its Caribbean naval presence as performative rather than operational. Russia has failed to intervene to protect its “strategic partner” in Caracas, leading Cuban strategists to conclude that they cannot rely on the Kremlin for survival in a shooting war. The Russian ships, while visually imposing, are viewed by U.S. SOUTHCOM as vulnerable targets rather than credible threats in a contested environment.13

4. Economic & Infrastructure Assessment: The Meltdown

4.1 The Energy Zero Hour

Cuba’s economy is not merely in recession; it is in a state of metabolic failure due to energy starvation. The National Electric System (SEN) is operating with a deficit that frequently exceeds 1,750 MW, resulting in blackouts of up to 20 hours a day in the provinces and significant outages in Havana. This deficit represents nearly half of the national demand, which is estimated at 3,150 MW.25

  • The Venezuela Gap: Prior to January 3, Venezuela supplied approximately 50,000-55,000 barrels per day (bpd) of crude and fuel oil, covering roughly half of Cuba’s import needs (total requirement ~110,000 bpd). This supply has effectively hit zero following the U.S. seizure of PDVSA assets. The SEN, which relies heavily on obsolete oil-fired thermal plants (like the Antonio Guiteras plant), cannot function without this steady inflow of heavy crude.27
  • The Mexican Lifeline: In the absence of Venezuelan oil, Mexico has emerged as the supplier of last resort. The tanker Ocean Mariner, flying the Liberian flag, arrived in Havana on January 9 from the Pajaritos terminal in Coatzacoalcos, Mexico, carrying approximately 90,000 barrels of refined fuel. This shipment, while vital, serves as a mere palliative measure, providing only a few days of relief. The Ocean Mariner is one of the few vessels willing to run the gauntlet of U.S. sanctions, highlighting the extreme fragility of this supply chain.29
  • Grid Collapse Risks: The Antonio Guiteras Power Plant, the backbone of the grid, remains prone to failure. The combination of fuel shortages and lack of spare parts has created a cycle of breakdowns. The “Europalius” manufacturer has noted the dire state of the grid but is restricted in its ability to intervene due to payment issues and sanctions risk.25

4.2 Economic Indicators of Collapse

The energy crisis has catalyzed a broader economic paralysis, characterized by hyperinflation and sectoral collapse.

  • Currency Crisis: The informal exchange rate, tracked by independent outlet El Toque, continues to depreciate as confidence in the peso evaporates. The USD is trading at historic highs (approx. 400 CUP), while the official rate remains largely irrelevant for the average citizen. The partial dollarization of the economy has created a two-tier society, where access to foreign currency is the only buffer against starvation.34
  • Inflation & Scarcity: The cost of basic goods has skyrocketed. Gasoline prices in the informal market have reached 750 pesos ($1.50 USD) per liter, a staggering sum for a population with an average monthly salary of roughly 4,200 CUP (approx. $10-15 USD in real terms). A planned official fuel price hike of 500% was postponed due to a “cyberattack,” but the economic reality forces citizens to pay black market rates or go without.36
  • Sectoral Decline: Key industries are contracting at double-digit rates. Sugar, once the backbone of the economy, is down 68% over the last five years. Agriculture and fishing have collapsed by over 50%, exacerbating food insecurity. The government’s attempt to pivot to tourism is failing due to the inability to guarantee electricity and water for hotels, leading to a decline in occupancy rates despite aggressive marketing.17
  • GDP Contraction: Official figures show a GDP plunge of 10.9% in 2020, followed by anemic growth and a return to recession in 2023-2024. The UN Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean forecasts another 1.5% decline for 2025, placing Cuba alongside Haiti as the only regional economies in recession. The loss of Venezuelan subsidies in 2026 will undoubtedly deepen this contraction significantly.17

5. Foreign Relations & Geopolitical Dynamics

5.1 The Russian Federation: A “Fair-Weather” Ally?

Moscow’s response to the U.S. intervention in Venezuela has been characterized by high-volume rhetoric and low-impact action. The Russian Foreign Ministry has issued statements condemning the U.S. “blackmail,” “cowardice,” and violation of sovereignty, urging the release of Maduro. However, the Kremlin has taken no concrete steps to reverse the situation in Caracas or challenge the U.S. naval dominance in the Caribbean.12

  • Strategic Calculation: Analysts assess that Putin is prioritizing his campaign in Ukraine and is unwilling to open a second front in the Western Hemisphere. The “loss” of Venezuela and the potential fall of Cuba are viewed in Moscow as symbolic blows but acceptable costs to avoid a direct military confrontation with the U.S. Navy. The Russian warships in Havana, including the Admiral Gorshkov, serve as a “show of force” for domestic Russian consumption rather than a credible threat to the U.S. Southern Command (SOUTHCOM). The failure of Russian intelligence or military assets to prevent the capture of Maduro has tarnished Moscow’s reputation as a security partner.12

5.2 The People’s Republic of China: Cautious Sustainment

China remains Cuba’s most significant economic partner outside of the immediate region. The recent announcement of an $80 million aid package (including rice, aspirin, and electrical equipment) demonstrates Beijing’s commitment to preventing a total humanitarian collapse. The aid was confirmed during a meeting between the Chinese Ambassador and President Díaz-Canel.11

  • Limits of Support: However, Beijing is notably cautious. While it supports Cuba’s sovereignty diplomatically, there is no indication that China is willing to backfill the oil deficit left by Venezuela or extend massive new credit lines to a borrower that has repeatedly defaulted. China’s strategy appears to be one of “palliative care”—keeping the regime on life support without investing the capital required to cure its structural ills. The Chinese Foreign Ministry has emphasized “humanitarian” support rather than military or strategic commitments that would provoke Washington.40

5.3 Mexico’s Dilemma

Mexico finds itself in the crosshairs of the U.S. pressure campaign. President Claudia Sheinbaum has publicly stated that Mexico will continue to send oil to Cuba as an “act of solidarity,” emphasizing humanitarian reasons. However, reports indicate that her administration is internally reviewing this policy due to threats from the Trump administration regarding the upcoming USMCA trade review. The Ocean Mariner shipment has become a focal point of this tension. If the U.S. implements a naval blockade, Mexico will face a binary choice: defy the U.S. Navy and risk its own economic stability, or abandon Cuba.30

6. Humanitarian & Social Dynamics

6.1 The Migration Hemorrhage

The deterioration of conditions on the island is fueling a desperate exodus. Demographic data indicates that Cuba’s population has likely fallen below 8 million, a decline of over 25% in just four years (down from 11 million). This “demographic hemorrhage” is depriving the country of its working-age population and professional class. The exodus is driven by a total loss of hope in the future of the country, with 78% of Cubans surveyed expressing a desire to leave.1

  • U.S. Enforcement: In response to the potential for a mass migration event (a “Mariel 2.0”), the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and the Coast Guard have adopted an aggressive interdiction posture. Recent statistics show a continued high tempo of repatriations (e.g., 103 aliens repatriated in early FY2025). The U.S. message is clear: the maritime border is closed. This enforcement creates a “pressure cooker” effect on the island, as the traditional safety valve of emigration is throttled, increasing the likelihood of internal explosion.46

6.2 Health and Food Security Crisis

The humanitarian situation is reaching catastrophic levels.

  • Food Insecurity: A staggering 89% of Cuban families live in extreme poverty, and 7 out of 10 Cubans must forgo at least one daily meal. The collapse of domestic agriculture means the country is almost entirely dependent on imports it can no longer afford.1
  • Public Health: The once-renowned healthcare system is in ruins. Only 3% of citizens can obtain medicines at pharmacies. Reports of a possible Hepatitis outbreak in Ciego de Ávila and the spread of arboviruses like Oropouche, Zika, and Dengue are compounding the misery. The shortage of hygiene products and clean water (due to power outages affecting pumps) creates ideal conditions for epidemics.1

6.3 The Shadow of “11J” and Political Prisoners

The regime holds over 1,000 political prisoners, many from the July 11, 2021 protests. Organizations like Justicia 11J and Prisoners Defenders continue to document abuses in prisons, including torture and denial of medical care. The release of some prisoners in Venezuela has not been mirrored in Cuba; instead, the crackdown has intensified. The death of a Cuban migrant in U.S. custody (Geraldo Lunas Campos) has also been used by state media to discourage migration, but the internal repression remains the primary driver of discontent.17

7. Conclusions & Outlook

7.1 Scenario Analysis

The Cuban regime is currently trapped in a negative feedback loop: the energy crisis causes economic paralysis, which fuels social unrest, which necessitates increased repression, which further isolates the regime and deters foreign investment.

  • Scenario A: The “Special Period” 2.0 (Most Likely Short-Term): The regime survives the immediate shock by implementing draconian austerity measures, relying on harsh repression to quell dissent, and securing just enough oil from Mexico and the gray market to keep critical infrastructure (military, hospitals) running. The population descends into extreme poverty, but the security apparatus remains cohesive. The PCC postponement allows the elite to circle the wagons.
  • Scenario B: The Energy Triggered Collapse (Moderate Probability): A total failure of the SEN, lasting several days in Havana, triggers spontaneous, island-wide protests that overwhelm the security forces. Mid-level military commanders refuse to fire on civilians, leading to a fracture in the leadership and a chaotic transition or civil conflict.
  • Scenario C: U.S. Naval Blockade (Low to Moderate Probability): The Trump administration moves forward with a formal blockade. This would constitute an act of war. While it would accelerate the economic strangulation, it could also rally nationalist sentiment within the FAR and provide the regime with a clear external enemy to blame for the suffering, potentially prolonging its survival in a “bunker” mentality.

7.2 Indicators for Watchlist

Analysts should prioritize the monitoring of the following indicators in the coming week:

  1. Tanker Tracking: The movement of the Ocean Mariner and any other vessels attempting to breach the de facto energy cordon.
  2. Grid Stability: Frequency and duration of blackouts in Havana specifically.
  3. Military Movements: Any unusual deployment of the “Black Wasps” or special forces within urban centers, indicating anticipation of unrest.
  4. Diplomatic Cables: Signs of a break or strain in Mexico-U.S. relations over the oil issue.
  5. Health Alerts: Confirmation of the scope of the Hepatitis outbreak in Ciego de Ávila.

End of Report


If you find this post useful, please share the link on Facebook, with your friends, etc. Your support is much appreciated and if you have any feedback, please email me at in**@*********ps.com. Please note that for links to other websites, we are only paid if there is an affiliate program such as Avantlink, Impact, Amazon and eBay and only if you purchase something. If you’d like to directly contribute towards our continued reporting, please visit our funding page.


Sources Used

  1. The Geopolitics of Maduro’s Capture: Cuba’s Inflection Point, accessed January 24, 2026, https://www.csis.org/analysis/geopolitics-maduros-capture-cubas-inflection-point
  2. Trump tells Cuba to ‘make a deal’ or face the consequences – The Guardian, accessed January 24, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jan/11/trump-tells-cuba-to-make-a-deal-or-face-the-consequences
  3. 2026 United States intervention in Venezuela – Wikipedia, accessed January 24, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_United_States_intervention_in_Venezuela
  4. Cuba: Reform or Blackout, accessed January 24, 2026, https://havanatimes.org/opinion/cuba-reform-or-blackout/
  5. Agreement of the 11th Plenary Session of the Central Committee to postpone the holding of the 9th Party Congress, accessed January 24, 2026, https://www.radioguaimaro.icrt.cu/en/news/cuba/agreement-of-the-11th-plenary-session-of-the-central-committee-to-postpone-the-holding-of-the-9th-party-congress
  6. Cuba Brings Home 32 Special Forces Killed During US Capture of Maduro—Who Were They? – UNITED24 Media, accessed January 24, 2026, https://united24media.com/latest-news/cuba-brings-home-32-special-forces-killed-during-us-capture-of-maduro-who-were-they-15106
  7. “They were vicious against us,” says survivor of military aggression …, accessed January 24, 2026, https://www.radioangulo.cu/en/2026/01/17/they-were-vicious-against-us-says-survivor-of-military-aggression-against-venezuela/
  8. The weight of death / All that remains is the pain that we couldn’t stop them, accessed January 24, 2026, https://www.radioreloj.cu/features/the-weight-of-death-all-that-remains-is-the-pain-that-we-couldnt-stop-them/
  9. Is Cuba next? Trump team debates oil cutoff to topple Havana’s leadership, accessed January 24, 2026, https://www.indiatoday.in/world/story/after-venezuela-trump-eyes-cuba-as-oil-blockade-plan-fuels-regime-change-push-2857048-2026-01-24
  10. E&E News: White House weighs naval blockade to halt Cuban oil imports, accessed January 24, 2026, https://subscriber.politicopro.com/article/eenews/2026/01/23/trump-administration-weighs-naval-blockade-to-halt-cuban-oil-imports-pro-00744886
  11. Month: January 2026 – Translating Cuba, accessed January 24, 2026, https://translatingcuba.com/2026/01/
  12. The Geopolitics of Maduro’s Capture: What Does Operation Absolute Resolve Mean for Russia? – CSIS, accessed January 24, 2026, https://www.csis.org/analysis/geopolitics-maduros-capture-what-does-operation-absolute-resolve-mean-russia
  13. Russian warships arrive in Cuban waters for military exercises | PBS News, accessed January 24, 2026, https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/russian-warships-arrive-in-cuban-waters-for-military-exercises
  14. Prosecution of Nicolás Maduro and Cilia Flores – Wikipedia, accessed January 24, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prosecution_of_Nicol%C3%A1s_Maduro_and_Cilia_Flores
  15. ‘The acceleration of the inevitable’: What does the post-Venezuelan oil reality hold for Cuba?, accessed January 24, 2026, https://www.wlrn.org/government-politics/2026-01-20/cuba-venezuelan-oil-econony-miami
  16. Trump administration eyes Cuba regime change after Venezuela success: WSJ, accessed January 24, 2026, https://www.thestandard.com.hk/world-news/article/322390/Trump-administration-eyes-Cuba-regime-change-after-Venezuela-success-WSJ
  17. ‘History will tell’: as US pressure grows, Cuba edges closer to collapse amid mass exodus – The Guardian, accessed January 24, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2026/jan/10/cuba-regime-polycrisis-collapse-exodus-economy-migration-us-sanctions-trump
  18. Cuba’s communist party postpones congress, citing economic crisis – Indo Premier Sekuritas, accessed January 24, 2026, https://www.indopremier.com/ipotnews/newsDetail.php?jdl=Cuba_s_communist_party_postpones_congress__citing_economic_crisis&news_id=1714288&group_news=ALLNEWS&news_date=&taging_subtype=CUBA&name=&search=y_general&q=CUBA,%20&halaman=1
  19. Venezuela’s Delcy Rodríguez assured US of cooperation before Maduro’s capture, accessed January 24, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jan/22/delcy-rodriguez-capture-maduro-venezuela
  20. Cuba: Prosecutor Seeks 9 Years for Pots & Pans Protesters – Havana Times, accessed January 24, 2026, https://havanatimes.org/features/cuba-prosecutor-seeks-9-years-for-pots-pans-protesters/
  21. Cuba: Warning about the escalation of repression against activists and human rights defenders four years after the 11J protests – Race and Equality, accessed January 24, 2026, https://raceandequality.org/resources/cuba-warning-about-the-escalation-of-repression-against-activists-and-human-rights-defenders-four-years-after-the-11j-protests/
  22. Cuban Soldier Describes His Experience During Raid That Captured Maduro: ‘It Was Disproportionate’, accessed January 24, 2026, https://www.latintimes.com/cuban-soldier-describes-his-experience-during-raid-that-captured-maduro-it-was-disproportionate-593613
  23. Russian warships arrive in Cuba in show of force | BBC News – YouTube, accessed January 24, 2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YT42sUavVG8
  24. Cubans say Russian warships, including nuclear-powered submarine, will arrive in Havana next week – PBS, accessed January 24, 2026, https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/cubans-say-russian-warships-including-nuclear-powered-submarine-will-arrive-in-havana-next-week
  25. Europalius Addresses Energy Service Disruptions in Cuba Amid National Power Crisis – weareiowa.com, accessed January 24, 2026, https://www.weareiowa.com/article/news/local/plea-agreement-reached-in-des-moines-murder-trial/524-3069d9d4-6f9b-4039-b884-1d2146bd744f?y-news-28261022-2026-01-16-europalius-addresses-energy-service-disruptions-cuba-2026
  26. Cuba’s Electricity Crisis: What’s Happening and What Comes Next – The University of Alabama at Birmingham, accessed January 24, 2026, https://sites.uab.edu/humanrights/2025/10/10/cubas-electricity-crisis-whats-happening-and-what-comes-next/
  27. Trump Can’t Make Cuba Great Again. Only Cubans Can Do It., accessed January 24, 2026, https://time.com/7344661/cuba-trump-venezuela-oil-economy-crisis/
  28. Why Cuba Is Back on Washington’s Regime-Change Agenda – FPIF, accessed January 24, 2026, https://fpif.org/why-cuba-is-back-on-washingtons-regime-change-agenda/
  29. Mexico Oil Shipment Reaches Cuba, Increasing Tensions With US – gCaptain, accessed January 24, 2026, https://gcaptain.com/mexico-oil-shipment-reaches-cuba-increasing-tensions-with-us/
  30. Mexico becomes crucial fuel supplier to Cuba but pledges no extra shipments | AP News, accessed January 24, 2026, https://apnews.com/article/mexico-cuba-petroleum-oil-shipments-trump-venezuela-7ec85826c98f23226c2534954b2c2b6f
  31. Two oil tankers spotted entering Cuba bay over past 2 days, despite US restriction efforts, accessed January 24, 2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xuFVoQFCuFU
  32. OCEAN MARINER, Chemical/Oil Products Tanker – Details and current position – IMO 9328340 – VesselFinder, accessed January 24, 2026, https://www.vesselfinder.com/vessels/details/9328340
  33. 2024–2025 Cuba blackouts – Wikipedia, accessed January 24, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024%E2%80%932025_Cuba_blackouts
  34. Cuba’s Currency Crisis Deepens Amid Inflation and Shortages | Mayberry Investments Limited, accessed January 24, 2026, https://www.mayberryinv.com/cubas-currency-crisis-deepens-amid-inflation-and-shortages/
  35. Cuba Ups Its Official Purchase Rate for US Dollars by 500% | elTOQUE, accessed January 24, 2026, https://eltoque.com/en/cuba-ups-its-official-purchase-rate-for-us-dollars-by-500percent
  36. Gasoline Reaches 750 Pesos ($1.50 USD) per Liter in Havana, accessed January 24, 2026, https://havanatimes.org/news/gasoline-reaches-750-pesos-1-50-usd-per-liter-in-havana/
  37. Cuba postpones 400% increase in fuel prices following ‘foreign’ computer attack – EFE, accessed January 24, 2026, https://efe.com/en/latest-news/2024-01-31/cuba-postpones-400-increase-in-fuel-prices-following-foreign-computer-attack/
  38. Statement by Permanent Representative Vassily Nebenzia at a UNSC Briefing on Venezuela – Permanent Mission of the Russian Federation to the United Nations, accessed January 24, 2026, https://russiaun.ru/en/news/05012026
  39. Foreign Ministry statement concerning developments around Venezuela, accessed January 24, 2026, https://mid.ru/en/foreign_policy/news/2070938/
  40. Xi Jinping approves new round of aid from the People’s Republic of China to Cuba, accessed January 24, 2026, https://socialistchina.org/2026/01/22/xi-jinping-approves-new-round-of-aid-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china-to-cuba/
  41. Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Mao Ning’s Regular Press Conference on January 7, 2026, accessed January 24, 2026, https://www.mfa.gov.cn/eng/xw/fyrbt/202601/t20260107_11807882.html
  42. China underscores support for Cuba after new US threats | Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores de Cuba – CubaMinrex, accessed January 24, 2026, https://cubaminrex.cu/en/china-underscores-support-cuba-after-new-us-threats
  43. Mexico will continue sending oil to Cuba despite US blockade, Sheinbaum says, accessed January 24, 2026, https://www.aa.com.tr/en/energy/general/mexico-will-continue-sending-oil-to-cuba-despite-us-blockade-sheinbaum-says/54206
  44. The Trump administration turns attention to Mexico and Cuba’s oil relationship, accessed January 24, 2026, https://www.kbia.org/2026-01-19/the-trump-administration-turns-attention-to-mexico-and-cubas-oil-relationship
  45. Mexico Reviews Cuba Oil Shipments Amid US Pressure – FastBull, accessed January 24, 2026, https://www.fastbull.com/news-detail/mexico-reviews-cuba-oil-shipments-amid-us-pressure-4368278_0
  46. Coast Guard repatriates 5 aliens to Cuba, accessed January 24, 2026, https://www.news.uscg.mil/Press-Releases/Article/4192770/coast-guard-repatriates-5-aliens-to-cuba/
  47. Coast Guard repatriates 82 people to Cuba, accessed January 24, 2026, https://www.news.uscg.mil/Press-Releases/Article/3377581/coast-guard-repatriates-82-people-to-cuba/
  48. Cuba: Protesters Detail Abuses in Prison | Human Rights Watch, accessed January 24, 2026, https://www.hrw.org/news/2025/07/11/cuba-protesters-detail-abuses-in-prison
  49. Death of Cuban migrant in Texas facility officially classified as homicide, accessed January 24, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jan/23/cuban-migrant-death-texas-ice-homicide

Cuba Situation Report – For the week ending January 17, 2026

The geopolitical architecture of the Western Hemisphere has undergone a radical and potentially irreversible transformation in the second week of January 2026. Following the United States military’s Operation Absolute Resolve—the kinetic extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and the neutralization of his executive security apparatus on January 3—the Republic of Cuba finds itself navigating the most precarious existential crisis since the collapse of the Soviet Union. This report, generated by a joint task force of foreign affairs, military, and intelligence analysts, provides an exhaustive reconstruction and strategic assessment of the events transpiring between January 11 and January 17, 2026.

The events of this week confirm that the “strategic depth” Havana cultivated for decades via the Bolivarian Alliance has been shattered. The repatriation of 32 elite Cuban military officers killed during the raid on Caracas has forced the Cuban state to confront a dual crisis of military humiliation and domestic legitimacy. Simultaneously, the decapitation of the Venezuelan leadership has severed the energy artery that sustained Cuba’s failing electrical grid, pushing the island toward a thermodynamic collapse. While the arrival of a Mexican oil tanker offered a fleeting tactical reprieve, it has heightened diplomatic friction between Mexico City and Washington, threatening to regionalize the conflict.

The prevailing doctrine from Washington—now codified as the “Donroe Doctrine”—signals a shift from containment to active rollback. The notable silence from traditional great power patrons, Russia and China, suggests that Havana is strategically isolated. Domestically, the regime has pivoted to a “war economy” footing and mobilized mass ideological demonstrations to mask deep internal fragility, characterized by a “polycrisis” of demographic flight, economic destitution, and infrastructural failure.

1. Introduction: The Strategic Context

The crisis unfolding in January 2026 is not merely a bilateral dispute but the culmination of a decade-long deterioration in regional stability. To understand the gravity of the events of January 11–17, one must situate them within the broader trajectory of US-Cuba relations and the collapse of the “Pink Tide” 2.0.

For over two decades, the survival of the Cuban revolutionary project has been inextricably linked to the petro-diplomacy of Venezuela. The arrangement, forged by Fidel Castro and Hugo Chávez, exchanged Cuban intelligence and security expertise for subsidized Venezuelan crude oil. This symbiotic relationship allowed Havana to bypass the most severe effects of the U.S. embargo (blockade) and maintain social stability despite an unproductive domestic economy. The U.S. operation on January 3, 2026, which targeted the physical leadership of the Venezuelan state, effectively decapitated this alliance.

The week in review represents the “aftershock” phase of this geopolitical earthquake. Having lost its primary economic patron and suffered a direct military blow, Havana is now operating in a vacuum. The administration of U.S. President Donald Trump has seized upon this moment of vulnerability to apply maximum pressure, utilizing a hybrid strategy of diplomatic isolation, economic strangulation via naval enforcement, and psychological warfare aimed at fracturing the regime’s internal cohesion. The Cuban government’s response—a retreat into orthodox revolutionary mobilization and a desperate search for alternative energy suppliers—defines the operational tempo of the week.

2. The Military Crisis: Operation Absolute Resolve and Aftermath

The repatriation and burial of 32 Cuban officers this week serves as the focal point for analyzing the current state of Cuba’s military and intelligence capabilities. The events surrounding their deaths in Caracas reveal profound vulnerabilities in Havana’s forward-deployed defense strategy and have triggered a significant information operations battle between the state apparatus and leaking intelligence.

2.1 The “Avispas Negras” and the Failure of Elite Protection

The 32 officers killed during the U.S. Delta Force raid on President Maduro’s Fort Tiuna compound were not rank-and-file conscripts; they were members of the elite Avispas Negras (Black Wasps) and high-ranking officials from the Ministry of the Interior (MININT).1 Historically, this unit has been projected by Havana as a praetorian guard capable of asymmetric superiority, trained specifically to counter U.S. special operations forces. Their presence in Venezuela was governed by secretive “protection agreements” designed to insulate the Bolivarian leadership from internal coups and external decapitation strikes.2

The neutralization of such a significant detachment—32 killed and over a dozen wounded—during a raid that reportedly lasted only 2 hours and 28 minutes 1 represents a catastrophic failure of Cuban tactical doctrine. The Avispas Negras are tasked with the highest level of regime security; their inability to delay or deter the extraction of their principal protectee, Nicolás Maduro, suggests a severe degradation in readiness and intelligence anticipation.

2.2 The Information War: “Martyrs” vs. “Sleeping” Soldiers

A critical development during the week of January 11–17 was the unraveling of the Cuban government’s official narrative regarding the battle at Fort Tiuna. The regime, seeking to salvage morale, constructed a narrative of “epic resistance.” President Miguel Díaz-Canel and state media outlets asserted that the officers “fought to the last bullet,” framing their deaths as a heroic sacrifice in the anti-imperialist struggle.3 This narrative was essential to justify the loss of life in a foreign war to a domestic audience already weary of shortages.

However, intelligence analysis of survivor testimonies emerging this week contradicts this narrative entirely. In a remarkable breach of operational security, Colonel Pedro Yadín Domínguez, a high-ranking officer and survivor of the raid, provided testimony that undermined the state’s propaganda. In a broadcast interview, the Colonel—visible in a wheelchair—revealed that the Cuban detachment was “sleeping” and “resting in the early morning” when the operation commenced.4

Colonel Domínguez detailed that the unit “barely had weapons” available at the moment of contact and was “practically defenseless” against the “disproportionate” U.S. assault, which utilized advanced drones, Apache helicopters, and overwhelming air support.4 He described the mission itself as “opaque,” suggesting that the officers on the ground were ill-informed about the threat environment or the specifics of their engagement rules.

This testimony is devastating for the regime’s credibility. It paints a picture not of heroic martyrs holding the line against the empire, but of an unprepared, ill-equipped security detail caught completely off guard by a superior adversary. It implies a total failure of Cuban intelligence (G2) to detect the approaching U.S. force, leaving their most elite operators exposed and vulnerable.

2.3 Repatriation as Political Theater

The return of the remains was orchestrated to maximize political utility. On Thursday, January 15, the bodies arrived at José Martí International Airport. The regime opted for small urns rather than traditional caskets, a detail that grimly confirms reports of the high-kinetic nature of the strike.1

The funeral rites were bifurcated to manage both elite cohesion and public sentiment:

  1. The Inner Circle Tribute: A solemn, closed ceremony was held at the headquarters of the Ministry of the Revolutionary Armed Forces (MINFAR). This event was attended by the highest echelons of the Cuban state, including President Díaz-Canel and, crucially, General Raúl Castro.5 The presence of the 94-year-old Raúl Castro is a signal of the highest order; his public appearances are now reserved exclusively for moments of existential threat to the Revolution. His attendance was intended to signal continuity and demand absolute loyalty from the military brass during this period of humiliation.
  2. The Public Mourning: Following the elite ceremony, a “March of the Combatant People” was organized. The regime decentralized the final burials, sending the remains to “Fallen for the Defense” pantheons in the officers’ respective provinces.5 This dispersal strategy likely served a dual purpose: it allowed local party organs to organize smaller, more manageable tributes across the island, preventing a massive, potentially volatile concentration of grieving families in Havana, while simultaneously spreading the anti-American message to the rural provinces.

3. The Geopolitical Shockwave: The Donroe Doctrine

The week of January 11–17 has provided the clearest definition yet of the U.S. administration’s foreign policy framework for the Western Hemisphere, colloquially and increasingly officially termed the “Donroe Doctrine”.6 This policy represents a hyper-aggressive modernization of the 1823 Monroe Doctrine, asserting not just the exclusion of external powers, but the active right of the United States to intervene militarily to remove regimes deemed “illegitimate” or “destabilizing.”

3.1 The Ultimatum: “Make a Deal or Collapse”

On Sunday, January 11, President Donald Trump escalated the diplomatic pressure via a direct ultimatum issued on social media. His message to Havana was stark: “Make a deal, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE”.7 This demand was coupled with a definitive declaration that “no more oil or money” would be allowed to flow from Venezuela to Cuba.7

This rhetoric marks a fundamental departure from previous U.S. strategies of containment or gradual pressure. It is an ultimatum of regime extinction. The administration views the removal of the Venezuelan leadership not as an isolated event, but as the removal of the keystone in the arch of authoritarianism in the Americas. The threat is existential: capitulate to U.S. demands—which likely include the dismantling of the single-party state and the expulsion of Chinese/Russian intelligence assets—or face total economic strangulation and potential military consequences.

3.2 Diplomatic Isolation: The UN and OAS Battlegrounds

Cuba’s diplomatic corps launched a frantic offensive this week to garner international condemnation of the U.S. raid, but the results have highlighted Havana’s diminishing influence.

  • United Nations Security Council: At an emergency meeting in New York, Cuba’s Permanent Representative, Ernesto Soberón Guzmán, delivered a blistering denunciation of the operation. He characterized the capture of Maduro as a “kidnapping” and a “criminal act” that violated the UN Charter and the sovereignty of the Venezuelan state.8 He argued that the U.S. was imposing its domestic laws extraterritorially. While the representatives of Russia and China echoed these sentiments—warning against the precedent of “law of the jungle” 9—the Council failed to pass any binding resolution. The U.S. Ambassador, backed by veto power, effectively dismissed the complaints, framing the operation as a necessary law enforcement action against “narco-terrorists”.10
  • Organization of American States (OAS): The regional body remains deeply fractured. In a special meeting held to address the crisis, the polarization of the hemisphere was on full display. A bloc of leftist governments—led by Brazil, Colombia, and Mexico—condemned the U.S. action as a violation of international law and a dangerous precedent for regional stability.11 However, they were counterbalanced by the “Lima Group” nations and right-wing administrations in Argentina and Ecuador, which tacitly or openly supported the removal of Maduro.12 This division paralyzed the OAS, preventing the consensus statement of condemnation that Havana desperately sought.

3.3 The Great Power Void: Russia and China Stand Down

Perhaps the most alarming development for Havana this week was the lack of material support from its “strategic partners.”

The Russian Silence: President Vladimir Putin’s reaction to the dismantling of his Venezuelan ally was characterized by a “total silence”.13 In the week following the raid, the Kremlin issued no direct threats of retaliation. Analysts attribute this passivity to Moscow’s total strategic consumption by the war in Ukraine. Russia simply lacks the naval bandwidth or the logistical capacity to project power into the Caribbean to challenge a U.S. carrier strike group. The Kremlin’s support for Cuba is now exposed as purely rhetorical.14

The Chinese Retreat: Beijing’s response was equally cautious. While the Foreign Ministry expressed “shock” and condemned “power politics,” its primary concern was the safety of its investments and the repayment of Venezuelan debt.11 President Trump’s explicit warning to China to “stay away from the Americas” appears to have been effective. China, prioritizing its global trade stability and wary of a direct kinetic conflict with the U.S. in its own “backyard,” has opted to retreat to diplomatic platitudes rather than mobilizing naval assets.15

The geopolitical map has been redrawn: The U.S. has tightened a cordon around Cuba, backed by the threat of force, while Cuba’s traditional allies are either distant, distracted, or unwilling to pay the cost of intervention. The “Ring of Pressure” is complete, with the U.S. and its aligned OAS states forming a tightening noose, while Russia and China remain low-impact, distant observers.

4. The Energy War: Siege Economics

The most immediate and lethal threat to the Cuban state is not a marine landing, but the thermodynamic collapse of its national infrastructure. The events of January 11–17 have accelerated an energy crisis that was already critical, pushing the island toward a “zero energy” scenario.

4.1 The Venezuelan Cutoff

For two decades, Venezuelan oil has been the lifeblood of the Cuban economy. Prior to the U.S. raid, Venezuela supplied approximately 35,000 barrels per day (bpd) of crude oil and refined products to Cuba.16 This flow has now ceased completely. Shipping data analyzed this week confirms that no cargoes have departed Venezuelan ports for Cuba since the capture of Maduro.7

The U.S. blockade, combined with direct U.S. control over the Venezuelan oil export terminals (as implied by Trump’s statement that the U.S. would “run” the country’s oil sales), means this suspension is not temporary. It is a permanent structural shift. Cuba’s thermoelectric plants, many of which are specifically calibrated to process the heavy, sulfur-rich Venezuelan crude, are now starving for fuel.

4.2 The Mexican Lifeline and the Ocean Mariner Incident

In a desperate attempt to bridge the energy deficit, Havana turned to the only regional neighbor willing to defy the U.S. blockade: Mexico.

This week, the Liberian-flagged oil tanker Ocean Mariner arrived in Havana Bay (January 9/10), carrying a cargo of Mexican oil.17 This arrival was a major event, visible to thousands of Havanans who gathered along the Malecón to watch the ship dock, viewing it as a symbol of hope.18

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum has attempted to thread a geopolitical needle. She defended the shipment as “humanitarian aid” consistent with Mexico’s long-standing foreign policy of non-intervention and solidarity.19 In press conferences this week, she explicitly stated, “We are not sending more oil than we have sent historically,” and emphasized that the shipments were legal.20

However, this move places Mexico in the direct crosshairs of the Donroe Doctrine. The U.S. administration views the Ocean Mariner not as a humanitarian vessel, but as a blockade runner sustaining a hostile regime. President Trump’s rhetoric regarding Mexico—threatening to “hit land” to combat cartels and warning neighbors to “get their act together”—suggests that Mexico’s energy largesse could incur severe costs.21 The upcoming review of the USMCA trade agreement provides the U.S. with a powerful economic weapon to coerce Mexico into halting these shipments.22

4.3 Grid Collapse: The 50% Deficit

The arrival of the Ocean Mariner, while symbolically potent, is mathematically insufficient. The Mexican shipments (historically averaging ~5,500 bpd) cannot replace the 35,000 bpd lost from Venezuela.16

The impact on the ground has been immediate and devastating. During the reporting week, the Cuban Ministry of Energy and Mines reported an electricity generation deficit of approximately 50%.23 This translates to a shortfall of 1,500 to 1,700 megawatts during peak demand hours.

  • The “Asticar” Solution: In a scramble to add capacity, the regime has deployed a land-based power barge known as “Asticar” in Havana Harbor.24 While officials hope this will stabilize the capital, its output is a fraction of what is needed.
  • Blackout Reality: The population is enduring blackouts of up to 20 hours a day in the provinces and significant outages in Havana. The “energy island” strategy, where provinces are cut off to save the capital, is fracturing as the entire system destabilizes.25

The current situation is not merely a “Special Period” of scarcity; it is a systemic failure of the energy grid that threatens the water supply, food preservation, and hospital operations.

5. The Domestic Front: Polycrisis and Control

The convergence of military humiliation, diplomatic isolation, and energy famine has created a domestic environment characterized by what sociologists and analysts are calling a “polycrisis”.26

5.1 The “Polycrisis” Framework

The term “polycrisis” refers to the mutually reinforcing interaction of multiple catastrophic failures:

  • Demographic Collapse: New independent studies released this week indicate that Cuba’s population has plummeted by 25% in just four years, dropping below 8 million.26 This is the fastest population decline of any nation in the world not currently in a kinetic civil war. The exodus is comprised primarily of the youth and the working-age population, leaving behind a demographic structure heavily skewed toward the elderly and dependent.
  • Economic Destitution: The state has ceased to function as a provider of basic goods. The “libreta” (ration book), once the guarantor of minimal subsistence, has been decimated. This week, the government announced a reduction in the weight of the standard rationed bread roll from 80 grams to an even lower weight, following previous cuts.27
  • Hyper-Inflation and Dollarization: The informal economy has fully dollarized, rendering the state salaries (paid in Cuban Pesos) worthless.

5.2 The January 16 Demonstration: Orchestrated Mobilization

On Friday, January 16, the regime attempted to regain the narrative initiative by staging a massive demonstration at the José Martí Anti-Imperialist Tribune, located directly in front of the U.S. Embassy in Havana.28

  • The Mobilization: Tens of thousands of Cubans filled the plaza. The crowd was a mix of true believers, state employees whose jobs depend on attendance, and students mobilized by the Union of Young Communists.
  • The Rhetoric: President Díaz-Canel addressed the crowd, framing the moment as a struggle against “barbarism, plunder and neo-fascism”.28 The rhetoric was defensive and apocalyptic, designed to instill a siege mentality. “Independence is sacred, and we will defend it tooth and nail,” declared one protester, echoing the official line.28
  • The Reality: Despite the show of force, observers noted a disconnect. The “March of the Combatant People” 5 masked a deep underlying exhaustion. The youth, whom the regime relies on for future legitimacy, are largely disengaged or actively seeking to emigrate. The rally was a demonstration of the state’s logistical capacity to move bodies, not necessarily a demonstration of its popular legitimacy.

5.3 “War Economy” Measures

In response to the tightening siege, the government has effectively declared a “war economy.”

  • Price Hikes: The Prime Minister announced increases in the prices of fuel, electricity, and transportation.29
  • Resource Centralization: Critical resources (fuel, food) are being prioritized for the military (MINFAR) and the Ministry of the Interior (MININT) to ensure the loyalty of the security services. The civilian sector is being forced to absorb the entirety of the shortages.

6. Diplomatic Breakdown and Humanitarian Weaponization

The diplomatic channel between Washington and Havana, which had been tenuous, has now effectively collapsed into open hostility.

6.1 The Embassy Wars

The relationship has deteriorated significantly following the expulsion of U.S. diplomats in late 2025, a move cited by Havana as a response to espionage, which triggered reciprocal expulsions by Washington.30

  • Current Status: The U.S. Embassy in Havana is currently operating on a skeletal staff. During the week of January 11–17, it issued multiple “Demonstration Alerts,” warning U.S. citizens to avoid the area around the embassy due to the state-sponsored rallies.31 Visa services were suspended on Friday, January 16, further severing the few remaining legal links between the two nations.31

6.2 The Humanitarian Aid Trap

A critical narrative battle unfolded this week regarding disaster relief. The Trump administration announced a $3 million humanitarian aid package for the Cuban people to assist with recovery from Hurricane Melissa.32

  • The U.S. Condition: The State Department explicitly stated that the aid would be distributed through the Catholic Church and non-governmental organizations to “bypass the regime” and ensure it reached the people directly.33 This was a calculated political maneuver: offering aid that the regime cannot accept without admitting loss of sovereignty, or refusing aid and appearing cruel to its own suffering people.
  • The Cuban Rejection: Predictably, Cuban Foreign Minister Bruno Rodríguez rejected the offer, labeling it “opportunistic and politically manipulative”.2 The regime views the direct distribution mechanism as a Trojan horse designed to undermine its authority and empower civil society groups that it considers “mercenaries.”
  • The Warning: A senior U.S. State Department official, Jeremy Lewin, warned Cuba not to interfere with the shipment, implying that blocking the aid could trigger further punitive measures.34 This standoff perfectly illustrates the total breakdown of trust; even humanitarian relief has become a theater of asymmetric warfare.

6.3 Global Reaction Summary

The following table summarizes the key international reactions observed during the reporting period.

ActorStanceKey Actions/Statements (Jan 11-17)Strategic Implication
United StatesHostileRaid on Venezuela; “Make a deal” ultimatum; Aid conditionality.Strategy of regime suffocation and forced transition.
Venezuela (Interim)Aligned with USInterim Gov. signaling alignment; Oil exports to Cuba halted.Loss of Cuba’s primary economic and intelligence patron.
MexicoSupportiveShipment of oil via Ocean Mariner; Diplomatic defense of sovereignty.The sole remaining lifeline; risks triggering US trade retaliation.
RussiaPassivePutin silent; no military mobilization; bureaucratic condolences.Preoccupied with Ukraine; effectively abandoning Caribbean foothold.
ChinaPassiveRhetorical condemnation of “power politics”; focus on debt/assets.Unwilling to challenge US military dominance in the region.
OASFracturedSplit between Lima Group (US-aligned) and Leftist bloc.Regional paralysis prevents collective defense of Cuba.
European UnionAmbivalentFocus on Venezuela’s democratic transition; weak support for Cuba.No economic bailout forthcoming; alignment with US on democracy.

7. Intelligence Forecast: Scenarios for Q1 2026

Based on the intelligence gathered and analyzed during the week of January 11–17, the Task Force projects three potential scenarios for the immediate future.

Scenario A: The “Special Period” 2.0 (High Probability)

The regime survives the immediate shock by employing the “survival manual” of the 1990s: extreme repression, centralized rationing, and a pivot to a subsistence economy. The Mexican oil lifeline continues intermittently, providing just enough energy to power the security apparatus and the tourism enclaves, while the general population is left in the dark. The regime uses the U.S. aggression to rally the party core, framing the hardship as a “second blockade.” Dissent is crushed preemptively.

  • Indicators: Increased military presence in urban centers; successful arrival of subsequent Mexican tankers; further reductions in the ration book.

Scenario B: Grid Failure and Spontaneous Uprising (Moderate Probability)

The energy deficit proves unmanageable. A nationwide blackout lasting more than 72–96 hours triggers spontaneous, leaderless looting and protests in Havana and Santiago de Cuba. Unlike July 11, 2021, the security forces—demoralized by the Venezuela raid and lacking fuel for mobility—struggle to contain the unrest. The regime fractures from within, with mid-level officers refusing to fire on civilians.

  • Indicators: U.S. Navy interdiction of Mexican tankers; announcement of “zero energy” days; high-level defections or rumors of family members of the elite fleeing.

Scenario C: External Intervention (Low Probability, High Impact)

The U.S. administration, perceiving the Cuban regime as teetering, moves from blockade to active intervention. This could take the form of a naval blockade (quarantine) to stop “contraband” oil, or limited airstrikes against intelligence facilities if Havana attempts to retaliate asymmetrically. Alternatively, a mass migration crisis (tens of thousands of rafters) forces a U.S. military response to “secure the border” at the source.

  • Indicators: Movement of U.S. Carrier Strike Groups to the Florida Straits; explicit U.S. recognition of a Cuban government-in-exile; invocation of the Insurrection Act or similar domestic measures in the U.S. regarding the war.

8. Appendix: Methodology

Analytic Approach:

This report employs a multi-source fusion methodology, synthesizing Open Source Intelligence (OSINT), diplomatic communiqués, shipping logistics data, and military forensic analysis. The assessment relies on the “Red Team” approach, viewing the conflict from the perspective of the Havana regime to understand their constraints and likely reactions.

Data Sourcing:

  • Military Data: Derived from official Cuban Ministry of the Revolutionary Armed Forces (MINFAR) statements, U.S. Southern Command (SOUTHCOM) press releases, and verified survivor testimonies broadcast in regional media (specifically the interview with Col. Domínguez).
  • Economic Data: Energy sector analysis relies on shipping tracking of the Ocean Mariner, historical export data from PDVSA (Venezuela), and official Cuban National Electric Union (UNE) grid status reports.
  • Diplomatic Intelligence: Analysis of UN Security Council transcripts, OAS voting records/statements, and official state department press briefings from the US, Mexico, and China.

Verification Standards:

Information regarding the death of the 32 soldiers was cross-referenced between the official Cuban state narrative (heroism) and the contradicting survivor testimony (defenselessness) to establish a confidence interval regarding the raid’s tactical reality. Energy projections are based on hard data regarding daily barrel consumption vs. import capacity.

Persona Statement:

This report was drafted by a Joint Intelligence Cell comprised of senior analysts specializing in Latin American security dynamics. The team integrates expertise in military strategy, foreign affairs, and economic forecasting to provide a holistic assessment of the crisis. The tone is strictly objective and analytical, designed for decision-makers requiring an unvarnished view of the deteriorating stability in the Caribbean theater.


If you find this post useful, please share the link on Facebook, with your friends, etc. Your support is much appreciated and if you have any feedback, please email me at in**@*********ps.com. Please note that for links to other websites, we are only paid if there is an affiliate program such as Avantlink, Impact, Amazon and eBay and only if you purchase something. If you’d like to directly contribute towards our continued reporting, please visit our funding page.


Sources Used

  1. Cuba Brings Home 32 Special Forces Killed During US Capture of …, accessed January 17, 2026, https://united24media.com/latest-news/cuba-brings-home-32-special-forces-killed-during-us-capture-of-maduro-who-were-they-15106
  2. Remains of 32 Cuban officers killed during strike on Venezuela …, accessed January 17, 2026, https://www.mariettatimes.com/news/international-news-apwire/2026/01/remains-of-32-cuban-officers-killed-during-strike-on-venezuela-repatriated-as-u-s-threat-lingers/
  3. Cuba pays tribute to 32 soldiers killed in US attack on Venezuela – Al Jazeera, accessed January 17, 2026, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/1/15/cuba-pays-tribute-to-soldiers-killed-in-us-attack-on-venezuela
  4. A Survivor Contradicts the Official Cuban Gov. Account… – Havana …, accessed January 17, 2026, https://havanatimes.org/features/a-survivor-contradicts-the-official-cuban-gov-account/
  5. Cuban authorities paid tribute to 32 soldiers killed in Venezuela …, accessed January 17, 2026, https://www.plenglish.com/news/2026/01/16/cuban-authorities-paid-tribute-to-32-soldiers-killed-in-venezuela/
  6. Future Center – Unpacking Russia’s and China’s Calculations on the U.S. Attack on Venezuela, accessed January 17, 2026, https://futureuae.com/en-US/Mainpage/Item/10741
  7. Trump tells Cuba to ‘make a deal’ or face the consequences, accessed January 17, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jan/11/trump-tells-cuba-to-make-a-deal-or-face-the-consequences
  8. Statement delivered by the Republic of Cuba at the Security Council Emergency Meeting on the U.S. military aggression against Venezuela, accessed January 17, 2026, https://cubaminrex.cu/en/statement-delivered-republic-cuba-security-council-emergency-meeting-us-military-aggression-against
  9. US critics and allies condemn Maduro’s abduction at UN Security Council – Al Jazeera, accessed January 17, 2026, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/1/6/us-critics-and-allies-condemn-maduros-abduction-at-un-security-council
  10. Remarks at a UN Security Council Briefing on Venezuela, accessed January 17, 2026, https://usun.usmission.gov/remarks-at-a-un-security-council-briefing-on-venezuela-2/
  11. International reactions to the 2026 United States intervention in Venezuela – Wikipedia, accessed January 17, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_reactions_to_the_2026_United_States_intervention_in_Venezuela
  12. U.S. capture of Maduro divides Latin America, thrilling Trump’s allies and threatening his foes – PBS, accessed January 17, 2026, https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/us-capture-of-maduro-divides-latin-america-thrilling-trumps-allies-and-threatening-his-foes
  13. The Quiet Of The Kremlin: Upheaval In Iran, Venezuela Gets A Muted Moscow Response, accessed January 17, 2026, https://www.rferl.org/a/russia-iran-venezuela-upheaval-kremlin-reaction/33647996.html
  14. Venezuela shows Russia has lost the initiative in Trump’s global order, accessed January 17, 2026, https://www.chathamhouse.org/2026/01/venezuela-shows-russia-has-lost-initiative-trumps-global-order
  15. With Venezuela raid, U.S. tells China to keep away from the Americas, accessed January 17, 2026, https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2026/01/12/world/politics/venezuela-raid-us-china-americas/
  16. A battered Cuba braces for aftershocks as US seizures of oil tankers linked to Venezuela surge – AP News, accessed January 17, 2026, https://apnews.com/article/cuba-venezuela-us-oil-economy-outages-tankers-155b49ee43bffbbc750768fc2a3efce6
  17. Mexico Oil Shipment Reaches Cuba, Increasing Tensions With US – gCaptain, accessed January 17, 2026, https://gcaptain.com/mexico-oil-shipment-reaches-cuba-increasing-tensions-with-us/
  18. Two oil tankers spotted entering Cuba bay over past 2 days, despite US restriction efforts, accessed January 17, 2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xuFVoQFCuFU
  19. Cuba Seeks to Secure Energy Cooperation with Mexico – Radio Angulo, accessed January 17, 2026, https://www.radioangulo.cu/en/2026/01/10/cuba-seeks-to-secure-energy-cooperation-with-mexico/
  20. Mexico denies boosting oil shipments to Cuba | Latest Market News – Argus Media, accessed January 17, 2026, https://www.argusmedia.com/en/news-and-insights/latest-market-news/2772991-mexico-denies-boosting-oil-shipments-to-cuba
  21. What would Trump’s threatened strikes on Colombia, Mexico or Cuba achieve?, accessed January 17, 2026, https://www.chathamhouse.org/2026/01/what-would-trumps-threatened-strikes-colombia-mexico-or-cuba-achieve
  22. Mexico, in Trump’s sights over its oil exports to Cuba, accessed January 17, 2026, https://english.elpais.com/international/2026-01-11/mexico-in-trumps-sights-over-its-oil-exports-to-cuba.html
  23. Cuba producing only enough power for half its needs – CTV News, accessed January 17, 2026, https://www.ctvnews.ca/world/article/cuba-producing-only-enough-power-for-half-its-needs/
  24. Cuba’s Latest Attempts to Curb Worsening Power Outages – Havana Times, accessed January 17, 2026, https://havanatimes.org/features/cubas-latest-attempts-to-curb-worsening-power-outages/
  25. Cuba confirms partial improvement of the electrical system by 2026 – Cuban News Agency, accessed January 17, 2026, http://www.cubanews.acn.cu/cuba/27928-cuba-confirms-partial-improvement-of-the-electrical-system-by-2026
  26. ‘History will tell’: as US pressure grows, Cuba edges closer to collapse amid mass exodus – The Guardian, accessed January 17, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2026/jan/10/cuba-regime-polycrisis-collapse-exodus-economy-migration-us-sanctions-trump
  27. Cuban Government Reduces Weight of Rationed Bread Rolls – Havana Times, accessed January 17, 2026, https://havanatimes.org/news/cuban-government-reduces-weight-of-rationed-bread-rolls/
  28. Cuba launches mass demonstration to US attack on … – Daily Pioneer, accessed January 17, 2026, https://dailypioneer.com/news/cuba-launches-mass-demonstration-to-us-attack-on-venezuela-demand-maduros-release
  29. New Cuban Economic Measures Raise Prices On Island | Cigar Aficionado, accessed January 17, 2026, https://www.cigaraficionado.com/article/new-cuban-economic-measures-raise-prices-on-island
  30. Cuba Reinforces Diplomatic Ties Amid Rising Tensions with United States in 2026 – weareiowa.com, accessed January 17, 2026, https://www.weareiowa.com/article/news/local/plea-agreement-reached-in-des-moines-murder-trial/524-3069d9d4-6f9b-4039-b884-1d2146bd744f?y-news-25063611-2026-01-09-cuba-reinforces-diplomatic-ties-amid-rising-tensions-with-united-states-2026
  31. Demonstration Alert: U.S. Embassy Havana, Cuba – January 15, 2026, accessed January 17, 2026, https://cu.usembassy.gov/demonstration-alert-u-s-embassy-havana-cuba-january-15-2026/
  32. Delivering on Our Commitment: U.S. Disaster Assistance to the Cuban People, accessed January 17, 2026, https://www.state.gov/releases/office-of-the-spokesperson/2026/01/delivering-on-our-commitment-u-s-disaster-assistance-to-the-cuban-people
  33. U.S. Disaster Assistance to the Cuban People – U.S. Department of State, accessed January 17, 2026, https://www.state.gov/releases/office-of-the-spokesperson/2026/01/u-s-disaster-assistance-to-the-cuban-people
  34. Cuba to accept US aid as Washington warns against interference | The Mighty 790 KFGO, accessed January 17, 2026, https://kfgo.com/2026/01/15/cuba-to-accept-us-aid-as-washington-warns-against-interference/

Cuba’s Collapse: Understanding Terminal Entropy

Date: January 6, 2026

This is a time-sensitive special report and is based on information available as of January 6, 2026. Due to the situation being very dynamic the following report should be used to obtain a perspective but not viewed as an absolute.

1. Executive Intelligence Summary

1.1 The Strategic Verdict: State Lifecycle Stage 5 (Terminal Entropy)

The Republic of Cuba has definitively exited the phase of “Stagnation,” characterized by slow decay managed through repressive tolerance and migration valves, and has entered State Lifecycle Stage 5: Terminal Entropy. The assessment of the Geopolitical Risk Synthesis Cell, covering the predictive horizon of January 2026 through January 2029, indicates that the probability of systemic collapse now exceeds 65%.1 This collapse is not modeled as a clean transition to liberal democracy or a negotiated pacted transition, but rather as a fragmentation of central authority, a cessation of critical infrastructure function across the national territory, and the potential atomization of territorial control into localized fiefdoms. The Cuban state currently functions as a “Hollow State,” a condition where the bureaucratic shell—the ministries, the party congresses, the official gazettes—remains visually intact, but the internal machinery of service delivery, coercion, and resource allocation has structurally failed.2

The critical variable driving this assessment, forcing a recalibration of all previous stability models, is the January 2026 neutralization of the Venezuelan strategic lifeline.4 This event, combined with the irreversible physical degradation of the National Electric System (SEN), has triggered a positive feedback loop of ruin that the current leadership, paralyzed by internal succession anxieties and resource insolvency, lacks the fiscal capacity to arrest and the political capital to mitigate. The state has consumed its accumulated capital stocks—political, financial, and infrastructural—and now faces a void where its strategic reserves once stood.

The concept of Terminal Entropy in this context refers to the irreversible dissipation of the energy required to maintain the state’s ordering functions. In a complex system like a nation-state, survival requires a constant input of energy—in the form of economic value, political legitimacy, and coercive power—to counteract the natural tendency toward disorder. For six decades, the Cuban Revolution maintained this order through Soviet subsidies, then tourism, then Venezuelan oil, and finally the export of medical services. In 2026, all these inputs have simultaneously approached zero. The “Maduro Shock” of January 3, 2026, was not merely a supply chain disruption; it was the removal of the energetic floor of the Cuban economy.5 Without the 27,400 to 50,000 barrels per day of subsidized crude and fuel oil provided by the Bolivarian Republic, the Cuban state cannot generate the electricity required to power the industries that generate the foreign currency needed to buy food to feed the workforce that powers the industries. The cycle is broken.

Furthermore, the state’s response mechanisms have atrophied. The purge of Economy Minister Alejandro Gil in 2024 7 was not a corrective measure against corruption, but a symptom of elite predation in a shrinking resource environment. As the pie vanishes, the factions within the regime—specifically the technocratic wing of the Communist Party (PCC) and the military-financial conglomerate GAESA—have turned on each other, prioritizing the seizure of remaining liquid assets over the stabilization of the national grid. This internal fracturing, occurring precisely at the moment of maximum external pressure, accelerates the slide toward entropy. The demographic hemorrhage, with over 1.4 million working-age adults fleeing the island since 2021 2, has left the state with a dependency ratio that is mathematically unsupportable. There are simply not enough producers left to support the pensioners, the bureaucracy, and the security apparatus.

1.2 The “Hollow State” Phenomenon

The current operational status of the Cuban government can be best described as performative governance. The leadership continues to announce “Government Programs to Eliminate Distortions” and “Macroeconomic Stabilization Plans,” yet these announcements have zero correlation with implementation or reality.9 The delay in implementing the promised floating exchange rate—postponed repeatedly from 2024 into 2026—demonstrates a paralysis of decision-making.9 The state announces a policy, but the transmission belts to execute it—the banks, the ministries, the local enterprises—are jammed or broken.

This hollowness is most visible in the total disconnect between the official economy and the real economy. While the state maintains an official exchange rate of 24 CUP to the dollar for corporate accounting and 120 CUP for individuals, the street operates at rates exceeding 400 CUP.11 The state attempts to control prices, but goods simply vanish from formal markets and reappear in the informal sector at dollarized prices the state cannot regulate. The government passes laws to support agriculture, yet production of sugar, the nation’s historical lifeblood, has fallen to levels not seen since the Spanish colonial era.13 The Ministry of Agriculture issues directives, but the land remains barren because there is no fuel for the tractors and no fertilizer for the crops. The bureaucracy issues papers; reality ignores them.

This report analyzes the specific mechanics of this collapse through four integrated modules: Economic, Political, Societal, and External. It maps the feedback loops that connect the failure of a thermoelectric plant in Matanzas to the price of chicken in Havana, and the arrest of a dissident to the decision of a young engineer to migrate. It is a predictive analysis of a system in freefall.

2. Systems-Dynamic Analysis: The Economic Subsystem

The Cuban economic subsystem is no longer characterized by “crisis,” a term that implies a temporary deviation from a stable mean, but by decapitalization. The foundational stocks of the economy—human capital, physical infrastructure, and foreign reserves—are depleting faster than they can be replenished by the meager flows of tourism or remittances. The economy is shrinking not just in GDP terms, but in physical capacity.

2.1 The Energy-Production Feedback Loop

The central engine of Cuba’s collapse is the energy sector. In a modern economy, energy is the master resource; without it, no other value can be created. The feedback loop currently gripping Cuba is reinforcing and vicious, creating a “death spiral” that resists piecemeal intervention.

The dynamic begins with Input Failure. The seizure of PDVSA assets and the neutralization of the Maduro regime in January 2026 4 effectively halted the flow of Venezuelan oil. For nearly two decades, this oil was not just fuel; it was a budgetary subsidy, provided on credit terms that were rarely enforced and often written off. The sudden loss of this input, estimated at a reduction of over 50% of total fuel imports, exposed the fragility of the entire system.5 Russia and Mexico, while politically sympathetic, have engaged only in transactional support, demanding payment or providing token emergency aid that does not address the structural deficit.5

This input failure triggers Grid Collapse. The National Electric System (SEN) relies on large, Soviet-era thermoelectric plants (CTEs) like the Antonio Guiteras and the Felton plants. These facilities, built in the 1980s, have exceeded their operational lifespans by decades. They require high-sulfur heavy crude (which Venezuela provided) and constant maintenance. Without fuel, they cannot run; without money, they cannot be fixed. The system is currently operating at less than 40% of its installed capacity.16 The government’s stopgap measure—leasing floating power ships from the Turkish company Karpowership—has become a liability. These ships require upfront payment in hard currency and clean fuel, neither of which the state possesses in sufficient quantity. When payments are missed, the ships are disconnected, leading to immediate, catastrophic drops in generation.18

The grid collapse feeds directly into Production Halt. Electricity is the feedstock of industry. With blackouts averaging 12 to 18 hours daily in the provinces, and often reaching 20 hours in critical deficit periods, industrial activity has ceased.16 Factories cannot operate on intermittent power; cold chains for agriculture break down, causing spoilage of the little food that is produced. The sugar harvest, which requires continuous operation of the mills during the zafra, has been decimated because the mills have no electricity to grind the cane and no fuel for the transport trucks.14 This destroys the agricultural value chain, forcing the state to import processed food it cannot afford.

Finally, this leads to Revenue Destruction. Without production, there are no exports. Without exports, there is no foreign exchange. The sugar industry, once a source of billions, now generates almost zero revenue. The tourism industry, the other main pillar, is crippled because tourists do not want to visit a country with no air conditioning, no internet, and food shortages.21 The state generates zero foreign exchange to buy fuel, and thus the cycle restarts, but with a higher intensity of failure. The “Energy-Currency Death Spiral” is the fundamental mechanism of the collapse.

2.2 Currency Dynamics: The Triumph of the Informal Market

The monetary system of Cuba has undergone a complete chaotic deregulation. The “Task of Ordering” (Tarea Ordenamiento), launched in 2021 to unify the currency, has catastrophically failed, resulting instead in the total dollarization of the economy and the destruction of the Cuban Peso (CUP) as a functional store of value.1 The state has effectively lost monetary sovereignty.

As of early 2026, the exchange rate reality is stark. The informal market rate hovers between 400 and 450 CUP per USD.11 This represents a devaluation of thousands of percent since 2021. The dynamic driving this is known as “overshooting,” a phenomenon described by the Dornbusch model where exchange rates temporarily exceed their long-term equilibrium due to panic and sticky prices.24 In Cuba, however, the “temporary” spike has become the permanent floor. Every time the rate spikes due to a new crisis or rumor, it settles at a higher level, never returning to the pre-crisis baseline. The market absorbs the shock and prices in the new level of despair.

The state’s response has been the “bancarización” process—a forced digitalization of banking aimed at limiting cash withdrawals and tracking transactions.25 This policy was intended to bring the gray market back into the formal banking system. It achieved the exact opposite. By restricting access to cash, the state drove the dollar market completely underground. Private businesses (Mipymes) now conduct the vast majority of their import trade using street-sourced dollars, bypassing the central bank entirely to avoid having their funds frozen or seized.26 They operate in a parallel financial universe where the state’s rules do not apply because the state’s banks have no liquidity.

The Cuban Peso is now a “zombie currency.” It functions as a unit of account for state salaries and budget allocations, but it has ceased to function as a medium of exchange for critical goods or a store of wealth. No rational economic actor holds CUP for longer than the time it takes to convert it to USD, MLC, or goods. The result is hyperinflation in the cost of living, while state salaries remain fixed in the zombie currency, creating a profound impoverishment of the public sector workforce.28

2.3 The Sectoral Void: Agriculture and Industry

The physical economy of Cuba has reverted to pre-industrial levels in key sectors. The collapse is not just financial; it is material.

The Extinction of the Sugar Industry:

The data on the sugar industry is the most damning indicator of the de-industrialization of Cuba. Once the world’s sugar bowl, capable of producing 8 million tons in 1989, Cuba produced less than 200,000 tons in the 2024–2025 harvest.14 This figure is historically regressive; it is comparable to production levels in the mid-19th century, before industrial mechanization. The collapse is total: only 15 mills attempted to grind in the last harvest, and of those, fewer than half operated efficiently.20 The reasons are systemic: no fuel for the boilers, no spare parts for the machinery, no fertilizer for the cane fields since 2019, and no labor force willing to cut cane for worthless pesos.

The consequences are rippling through the economy. The country now imports sugar to meet the basic rationing book (libreta) requirements, spending scarce hard currency on a commodity it used to export to the world.13 Furthermore, the collapse of sugar threatens the rum industry, one of the few remaining functional export sectors. Authentic Cuban rum requires alcohol distilled from Cuban sugarcane molasses. With cane production down over 90%, the production of 96% ethyl alcohol has dropped by 70% since 2019.14 The industry is currently drawing down on aged reserves of alcohol, but once these are depleted, the “Havana Club” brand faces an existential supply crisis.

Food Dependency and Sovereignty Failure:

The “Food Sovereignty” laws passed by the National Assembly have proven to be dead letters. Domestic agriculture produces less than 20% of national consumption requirements. The remaining 80% is imported.30 The state relies on imports from the United States (under the TSREEA exemptions) for the bulk of its chicken and grains, paying cash up front.32 With the loss of foreign credit lines, the tightening of U.S. sanctions, and the evaporation of tourism revenue, the state’s ability to finance these imports is collapsing. Food insecurity has transitioned from “scarcity” (long lines, limited choice) to a “nutritional crisis” where caloric intake for the bottom deciles of the population is falling below healthy standards. The price of basic staples like rice and beans in the informal market has decoupled from the average state salary, making survival dependent on remittances.34

2.4 The Mipyme Paradox: Inequality as a Systemic Feature

The legalization of Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (Mipymes) in 2021 was a desperate attempt to stimulate supply. It succeeded in filling store shelves with imported goods, but failed to restart domestic production. Mipymes have become primarily import-commercial entities, bringing in finished goods (beer, candy, canned food) from abroad and selling them at market prices.26

This has created a starkly dual society. A small class of private owners and those with access to remittances can afford these goods. The remaining 80% of the population, dependent on state salaries (approx. $15–20 USD/month), faces destitution and exclusion from this new market.36 The political leadership views Mipymes with deep suspicion, seeing them as a Trojan horse for capitalism and a threat to state control. The new regulations introduced in late 2025, banning Mipymes from engaging in wholesale trade and forcing them to contract through state intermediaries, are an attempt to reassert control.38 However, because the state intermediaries are inefficient and bankrupt, these regulations will likely result in a contraction of supply and further shortages, rather than a redirection of trade. The regime is choosing control over survival.

3. The Political Subsystem: Anatomy of a Fracture

The political stability of the Cuban regime has historically relied on the seamless integration of the Communist Party (ideology and mobilization) and the Revolutionary Armed Forces (economy and coercion). For decades, these two pillars were united under the singular authority of the Castro brothers. Today, that integration is unraveling, revealing deep fissures in the monolithic structure of the state.

3.1 The Post-Raul Vacuum and Elite Fragmentation

The death of General Luis Alberto Rodríguez López-Calleja in 2022 was a seismic event for the internal dynamics of the regime.40 As the head of GAESA (Grupo de Administración Empresarial S.A.), López-Calleja was the “CEO” of the Cuban state, managing the conglomerate that controls an estimated 60–70% of the economy, including the tourism sector, remittances, and import-export logistics. He was the bridge between the military’s economic interests and the political leadership. His death left a vacuum that has not been filled. No successor has effectively consolidated control over GAESA, leading to a fragmentation of economic power into fiefdoms.

Raul Castro, aged 93, remains the ultimate arbiter of these disputes, but his physical frailty and increasingly sporadic public appearances 42 suggest his capacity to mediate is vanishing. He is the “dike” holding back the flood; when he passes, the containment mechanism for elite conflict disappears. A dangerous tension is emerging between the GAESA Oligarchy—the generals and technocrats who control the hotels, the bank accounts, and the hard currency—and the Party Bureaucracy, represented by President Miguel Diaz-Canel.

The Party cadres bear the public burden of the crisis. They are the ones who must explain the blackouts to the angry populace, who must manage the crumbling hospitals and schools. However, they do not control the resources to solve these problems. GAESA holds the hard currency, and they hoard it to recapitalize their tourism investments (building new luxury hotels even as occupancy rates plummet) rather than spending it on fuel for the grid or medicine for the hospitals.44 This resource misallocation has created deep resentment within the Party and the civilian government.

The purge of Alejandro Gil, the former Economy Minister and Deputy Prime Minister, in 2024 was a manifestation of this conflict.7 Gil was a technocrat, a “man of the system” tasked with implementing the failed “Task of Ordering.” His arrest and the subsequent corruption charges were likely a GAESA-directed move to scapegoat the civilian technocracy for failures caused by GAESA’s own hoarding of forex. It was a signal that when the resources shrink, the military-business complex will eat the civilians to survive. This predatory dynamic makes coherent policy-making impossible; every minister is now focused on survival, not problem-solving.

3.2 The Praetorian Guard Dilemma

The regime’s ultimate survival strategy relies on coercion. The Ministry of the Interior (MININT) and its special forces (the “Black Berets” or Avispas Negras) are the tip of the spear, tasked with repressing dissent.46 However, the reliability of the regular Revolutionary Armed Forces (FAR) conscripts is degrading. The FAR is a conscript army; the soldiers are the sons of the very people suffering from the blackouts and food shortages.

Reports from 2024 and 2025 suggest a growing hesitation among regular military units to engage in domestic repression.48 Commanders are wary of ordering conscripts to fire on their neighbors. This has forced the regime to rely increasingly on the highly paid, elite MININT units for crowd control. But this strategy has a cost. The police state is expensive. It requires fuel for the patrol cars, high salaries to buy loyalty, and specialized equipment. As the economy shrinks, paying the “loyalty premium” to the security forces becomes mathematically impossible. Tensions are rising between the FAR and MININT over shrinking budgets.49 The FAR sees itself as the defender of the nation; MININT is the defender of the regime. As the gap between the nation’s interests and the regime’s interests widens, the unity of the guns cannot be guaranteed.

4. The Societal Subsystem: Demographic Hemorrhage

The Cuban state is losing the biological capacity to reproduce itself. The societal contract—obedience in exchange for health, education, and security—has been voided by the state’s inability to deliver on any of these promises. The result is a society that is dissolving through exit.

4.1 The Great Exodus as Systemic Failure

The migration crisis facing Cuba is not cyclical; it is terminal. Between 2021 and 2024, Cuba lost an estimated 10% to 18% of its population.2 Official statistics are notoriously slow to reflect this, but independent demographers estimate the “effective population” (those actually resident on the island, as opposed to those on the registry) has fallen below 10 million, and potentially as low as 8.6 million.50 This is a demographic contraction of a scale usually seen only in wartime.

The qualitative loss is even more damaging than the quantitative loss. The exodus is skewed heavily toward the 18–45 age bracket—the most productive, reproductive, and innovative segment of society. This constitutes a permanent decapitalization of the nation. The dependency ratio is skyrocketing; the few remaining workers must support a growing mass of retirees. The effects are visible in the collapse of essential services. The education system faces a critical shortage of teachers, with over 12.5% of positions unfilled.51 The public health system, once the “jewel in the crown” of the Revolution, is hollow. Hospitals lack doctors, specialists, reagents, and basic medicines.52 The “medical power” that Cuba exported for diplomatic influence and revenue is evaporating because the doctors themselves are fleeing.

4.2 The Sociology of Dissent and Repression

The nature of dissent in Cuba has evolved. The protests of July 11, 2021 (11J), were a watershed moment, breaking the psychological barrier of fear.54 Since then, protests have changed in character. They are no longer just political demands for “freedom”; they are visceral, survivalist demands for electricity and food. The “cacerolazos” (pot-banging protests) that erupt during blackouts are spontaneous, leaderless, and widespread.55 They occur in the peripheral neighborhoods and rural towns that the regime has abandoned.

The state’s response has been the judicialization of terror. The “Social Communication Law” and the new Penal Code have criminalized almost all forms of independent expression.57 The regime holds over 1,000 political prisoners, including hundreds from the 11J protests.59 Organizations like “Justicia 11J” document the systemic abuse of these prisoners, serving as a constant reminder to the population of the cost of dissent.60 Yet, despite this repression, the protests continue because the underlying drivers—hunger and darkness—are stronger than the fear of prison. The social fabric is tearing; neighborhood solidarity is replacing state allegiance.

5. External Factors: The Geopolitical Vise

5.1 The “Maduro” Shock and the Energy Cliff

The most critical external variable in the 2026–2029 horizon is the status of Venezuela. The snippet referencing the January 3, 2026, capture of Nicolás Maduro by U.S. forces 4 serves as the catalyst for the terminal phase of the Cuban regime. While hypothetical in some contexts, within this predictive model, it represents the “Black Swan” event that breaks the system.

The immediate impact is the cessation of oil shipments. Venezuela provided between 27,000 and 50,000 barrels per day of crude and fuel oil.5 This represented the base load for the Cuban energy matrix. The removal of this supply eliminates 50% of Cuba’s fuel availability overnight. Unlike in previous crises, there is no Soviet Union to step in. Russia and Mexico have signaled they cannot fill this void gratuitously.5 Mexico’s Pemex has its own production struggles, and Russia is engaged in a costly war in Ukraine. The Cuban government has no hard currency to buy oil on the spot market. This guarantees a grid collapse affecting over 70% of the island, transitioning the energy crisis from “managed rotation of blackouts” to “permanent disconnection.”

5.2 United States: Maximum Pressure 2.0

The geopolitical environment has hardened. The return of a “Maximum Pressure” strategy by the U.S. administration 4 closes off the few remaining safety valves. The inclusion of Cuba on the State Sponsors of Terrorism (SSOT) list remains a formidable barrier to international banking. Banks in Europe and Panama, fearing U.S. Treasury fines, refuse to process transactions for Cuban entities.

Crucially, the new sanctions architecture targets the flow of remittances. By threatening secondary sanctions on banks that process transactions for GAESA-linked entities (like Fincimex or Orbit S.A.), the U.S. has effectively choked the formal flow of dollars.63 Remittances must now travel through informal “mules” or cryptocurrency, increasing transaction costs and reducing the net volume that reaches families. Similarly, the tourism sector remains depressed due to restrictions on U.S. travelers and the “chilling effect” on European visitors whose ESTA visa waivers for the U.S. are cancelled if they visit Cuba.21

5.3 China and Russia: Fair-Weather Friends

The narrative of a “multipolar rescue” is a myth. China and Russia treat Cuba as a geopolitical pawn, not a strategic ally worthy of infinite subsidy.

China: Beijing has integrated Cuba into its CIPS payment system, ostensibly to bypass the U.S. dollar, but this is a technicality, not a lifeline.65 The reality is that China has cancelled sugar import contracts because Cuba cannot deliver the sugar.66 Chinese companies like Yutong (buses) and Huawei are owed hundreds of millions in arrears and have halted credit. China’s aid is now tokenistic—70 tons of equipment here, a small donation there—rather than the structural investment Cuba needs.67 Beijing demands market reforms that the PCC refuses to implement.

Russia: Moscow’s engagement is equally transactional. While high-level visits continue, the financial support is limited to emergency credits (e.g., $60 million for fuel) that keep the lights on for a few weeks but solve nothing permanently.15 Russia has agreed to debt restructuring but demands payment discipline that Havana cannot provide. Furthermore, Russia’s own economic isolation means it cannot serve as the donor of last resort as the USSR did.

The Paris Club debt situation further illustrates this isolation. Cuba is in default on its renegotiated 2015 agreement. The “Group of Creditors of Cuba” has run out of patience, and new credits from Europe have ceased.44 The island is financially radioactive.

6. Integrated Predictive Scenarios (2026–2029)

Based on the systems-dynamic analysis, we project three potential trajectories for the Cuban state over the next 36 months.

Scenario A: The “Haitianization” (Probability: 55%)

Trigger: Continued inertia, the death of Raul Castro without a clear successor, and the failure to secure a new strategic oil supplier.

Timeline: Mid-2026 to 2028.

Description: The central government gradually loses the ability to project power and services into the provinces. The island fragments into de facto fiefdoms.

  • Dynamics: Havana remains under nominal PCC control, maintained by the elite police units. However, the interior provinces (Santiago de Cuba, Holguin, Guantanamo) become ungovernable due to permanent blackouts and food shortages. Local Party officials negotiate their own survival with the black market and local gangs, ignoring directives from Havana.
  • Security: Criminal gangs and corrupt local officials fill the power vacuum. Drug trafficking routes re-emerge as the state loses control of its airspace and waters. Migration becomes uncontrolled and chaotic, with mass raft exoduses overwhelming the U.S. Coast Guard.
  • Outcome: Cuba becomes a failed state in the Caribbean—a “Hollow State” with a zombified central government that holds international recognition but no domestic authority.

Scenario B: The “Palace Coup” / GAESA Consolidation (Probability: 30%)

Trigger: Massive social unrest that directly threatens the physical assets of the elite (e.g., mobs storming hotels in Varadero or Havana).

Timeline: Late 2026 to 2027.

Description: The military-business faction (GAESA), realizing that the Party bureaucracy is dragging them down, executes a soft coup.

  • Dynamics: They purge the “ideologues” and President Diaz-Canel, blaming them for the crisis. A military junta is formed, possibly led by a figure from the younger generation of generals or a Colonel-Manager from GAESA.
  • Policy: They implement a “Putin-style” authoritarian capitalism or a “Russian model” of oligarchic control. They immediately lift the ban on Mipymes and invite the Cuban diaspora to invest in exchange for political silence and property rights. They seek a transactional detente with the U.S., offering security cooperation in exchange for sanctions relief.
  • Outcome: A stable but repressive military kleptocracy that abandons socialist rhetoric for crony capitalism.

Scenario C: The Systemic Rupture (Probability: 15%)

Trigger: A “Black Swan” event—such as a total grid collapse (Zero Generation) lasting more than 10 days, combined with a refusal by the FAR to repress the resulting looting.

Timeline: Unpredictable (Critical window: Hurricane season 2026).

Description: The “Ceaușescu Moment.” Spontaneous, leaderless uprisings overwhelm the security forces in multiple cities simultaneously.

  • Dynamics: The lower ranks of the FAR fraternize with the protesters. The elite flee to friendly jurisdictions (Nicaragua, Russia). The central authority collapses completely within 72 hours.
  • Outcome: Chaos followed by a messy, volatile transition period. This scenario likely requires international humanitarian intervention to stabilize food and health supplies.

7. Strategic Conclusions and Watchlist

7.1 Lifecycle Assessment

Cuba is definitively in Stage 5: Terminal Entropy. The feedback loops are reinforcing; there are no balancing loops left in the system. The state has consumed its capital stocks and alienated its population. It survives only on momentum, the inertia of the bureaucracy, and the lack of an organized political opposition. However, entropy is not a political choice; it is a physical reality. Systems without energy input eventually cease to function.

7.2 The “Rule of Three” Watchlist

Analysts monitoring the Cuban situation should focus on these three indicators in the next 6 months to confirm the trajectory:

  1. The Grid: If the SEN suffers a total disconnection (Zero Generation) lasting more than 72 hours twice in one month, Scenario A (Haitianization) is active. The system will have lost the ability to “black start.”
  2. The Dollar: If the informal exchange rate breaches 600 CUP/USD, the resulting hyperinflation will trigger widespread looting of state stores and Mipymes, forcing a militarization of food distribution.
  3. The Elite: Any resignation, “health leave,” or sudden death of a top-tier military commander (within MININT or the Western Army) indicates the fracturing of the Praetorian Guard and the onset of Scenario B.

7.3 Final Insight

The collapse of Cuba will not be an event, but a process that has already begun. The 2026–2029 period will not be about “saving the revolution”—that project is dead. It will be about managing the humanitarian and security fallout of its disintegration. The “Maduro Shock” of January 2026 was the final structural blow to the post-1959 order. The countdown to zero has begun.


If you find this post useful, please share the link on Facebook, with your friends, etc. Your support is much appreciated and if you have any feedback, please email me at in**@*********ps.com. Please note that for links to other websites, we are only paid if there is an affiliate program such as Avantlink, Impact, Amazon and eBay and only if you purchase something. If you’d like to directly contribute towards our continued reporting, please visit our funding page.


Sources Used

  1. Cuba: Ten Consecutive Years of Macroeconomic Deterioration …, accessed January 6, 2026, https://horizontecubano.law.columbia.edu/news/cuba-ten-consecutive-years-macroeconomic-deterioration
  2. The Crisis of the Cuban Economy: Notes for an Evaluation | Cuba Capacity Building Project, accessed January 6, 2026, https://horizontecubano.law.columbia.edu/news/crisis-cuban-economy-notes-evaluation
  3. Is the Cuban Regime on the Brink of Collapse? – E-International Relations, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.e-ir.info/2025/09/14/is-the-cuban-regime-on-the-brink-of-collapse/
  4. Marco Rubio’s “Maximum Pressure” 2.0: Is a Post-Castro Cuba Finally Inevitable Under the Trump Administration? – https://debuglies.com, accessed January 6, 2026, https://debuglies.com/2026/01/06/marco-rubios-maximum-pressure-2-0-is-a-post-castro-cuba-finally-inevitable-under-the-trump-administration/
  5. Cuba struggles to ease power cuts amid reduced fuel supplies from Venezuela, Mexico, accessed January 6, 2026, https://whbl.com/2025/11/19/cuba-struggles-to-ease-power-cuts-amid-reduced-fuel-supplies-from-venezuela-mexico/
  6. Cuba on edge as U.S. seizure of oil tanker puts supply at risk – BNN Bloomberg, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/business/2025/12/12/cuba-on-edge-as-us-seizure-of-oil-tanker-puts-supply-at-risk/
  7. Cuba sentences former economy minister to life in prison for espionage | kens5.com, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.kens5.com/article/syndication/associatedpress/cuba-sentences-former-economy-minister-to-life-in-prison-for-espionage/616-2fd4e2d0-af89-49c7-81fa-d9b9e236a12d
  8. Cuba sentences former economy minister to life in prison following corruption, espionage conviction | 1450 AM 99.7 FM WHTC | Holland, accessed January 6, 2026, https://whtc.com/2025/12/08/cuba-sentences-former-economy-minister-to-life-in-prison-following-corruption-espionage-conviction/
  9. Cuba’s Promised Floating Exchange Rate Still Pending | elTOQUE, accessed January 6, 2026, https://eltoque.com/en/cubas-promised-floating-exchange-rate-still-pending
  10. Does Cuba have a Real Government Program for the Economy? – Havana Times, accessed January 6, 2026, https://havanatimes.org/features/does-cuba-have-a-real-government-program-for-the-economy/
  11. U.S. Dollar Hits 400 Cuban Pesos in Informal Market – elTOQUE, accessed January 6, 2026, https://eltoque.com/en/us-dollar-hits-400-cuban-pesos-in-informal-market
  12. informal foreign exchange market in cuba (real time) – elTOQUE, accessed January 6, 2026, https://eltoque.com/en/author/sumavoces
  13. Collapse in sugar production signals new economic crisis for Cuba – The Caribbean Council, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.caribbean-council.org/us-imposes-new-conditions-of-entry-on-shipping-and-cuban-ports-2-4/
  14. Sugar Industry Collapse in Cuba – Havana Times, accessed January 6, 2026, https://havanatimes.org/features/sugar-industry-collapse-in-cuba/
  15. Cuba expects prompt signing of contract with Russia on fuel – Prensa Latina, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.plenglish.com/news/2025/01/05/cuba-expects-prompt-signing-of-contract-with-russia-on-fuel/
  16. Power being restored to grid after western Cuba blackout: utility | International, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.bssnews.net/international/338493
  17. Cuba’s Most Important Power Plant to Close for Six Months – Havana Times, accessed January 6, 2026, https://havanatimes.org/features/cubas-most-important-power-plant-to-close-for-six-months/
  18. More than Half of Cuba Without Power – Havana Times, accessed January 6, 2026, https://havanatimes.org/features/more-than-half-of-cuba-without-power/
  19. 2024–2025 Cuba blackouts – Wikipedia, accessed January 6, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024%E2%80%932025_Cuba_blackouts
  20. Only Six of the 14 Sugar Mills Planned Are Grinding Sugar in Cuba, accessed January 6, 2026, https://translatingcuba.com/only-six-of-the-14-sugar-mills-planned-are-grinding-sugar-in-cuba/
  21. Tourism in Cuba – Wikipedia, accessed January 6, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tourism_in_Cuba
  22. Cuban tourism industry continues decline in 2025 – Latin America Reports, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.latinamericareports.com/cuban-tourism-industry-continues-decline-in-2025/12173/
  23. Reduced reforms fail to pull Cuba out of the crisis. Global Affairs. University of Navarra, accessed January 6, 2026, https://en.unav.edu/web/global-affairs/las-reducidas-reformas-no-logran-sacar-a-cuba-de-la-crisis
  24. Why the Dollar and the Euro Rise & Fall vs the Cuban Peso – elTOQUE, accessed January 6, 2026, https://eltoque.com/en/why-the-dollar-and-the-euro-rise-fall-vs-the-cuban-peso
  25. How to Exchange Currency in Cuba in 2025: What Travelers Need to Know | elTOQUE, accessed January 6, 2026, https://eltoque.com/en/how-to-exchange-currency-in-cuba-in-2025-what-travelers-need-to-know
  26. Employment, Wages, and Dynamism: Other Faces of the Private Sector for a Prosperous Cuba, accessed January 6, 2026, https://horizontecubano.law.columbia.edu/news/employment-wages-and-dynamism-other-faces-private-sector-prosperous-cuba
  27. Special Report on Cuba’s Private Sector, accessed January 6, 2026, https://cubastudygroup.org/white_papers/special-report-on-cubas-private-sector/
  28. What to Expect from Stabilization and Reforms: Lessons of Interest to Cuba, accessed January 6, 2026, https://horizontecubano.law.columbia.edu/news/what-expect-stabilization-and-reforms-lessons-interest-cuba
  29. How will inflation and the informal exchange rate behave in Cuba in 2025? Pavel Vidal, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zB6_qGJvF4A
  30. Cuba: Country File, Economic Risk Analysis | Coface, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.coface.com/news-economy-and-insights/business-risk-dashboard/country-risk-files/cuba
  31. How to Get Cuban Agriculture on Track | Cuba Capacity Building Project, accessed January 6, 2026, https://horizontecubano.law.columbia.edu/news/how-get-cuban-agriculture-track
  32. Cuba’s Food Dependence on the USA Grows – Havana Times, accessed January 6, 2026, https://havanatimes.org/features/cubas-food-dependence-on-the-usa-grows/
  33. U.S. Ag/Food Exports To Cuba Increased 8.6% In September 2025; Up 15.5% Year-To-Year., accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.cubatrade.org/blog/2025/12/20/pxhjhww97j5leuitipj3v3yip90u9a
  34. Cuba’s Economic Collapse: Inflation, Dollarisation, and a Nation at Breaking Point, accessed January 6, 2026, https://indepthnews.net/cubas-economic-collapse-inflation-dollarisation-and-a-nation-at-breaking-point/
  35. Cuba’s private sector demonstrates ability to stimulate growth – The Caribbean Council, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.caribbean-council.org/cubas-private-sector-demonstrates-ability-to-stimulate-growth/
  36. As Cuba’s private sector roars back, choices and inequality rise | Business and Economy News | Al Jazeera, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2023/7/19/as-cubas-private-sector-roars-back-choices-and-inequality-rise
  37. Independent businesses—known as ‘pymes’—are growing in Cuba, accessed January 6, 2026, https://news.miami.edu/stories/2023/10/independent-businessesknown-as-pymesare-growing-in-cuba.html
  38. Cuba, a decree on renewables in response to the energy crisis, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.esteri.it/en/sala_stampa/archivionotizie/diplomazia-economica/2025/02/cuba-un-decreto-sulle-rinnovabili-in-risposta-alla-crisi-energetica/
  39. MIPYMES Have 90 Days to Change Corporate Purpose Following Wholesale Trade Ban – Cubanet, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.cubanet.org/mipymes-have-90-days-to-change-corporate-purpose-following-wholesale-trade-ban/
  40. Luis Alberto Rodríguez López-Calleja – Wikipedia, accessed January 6, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luis_Alberto_Rodr%C3%ADguez_L%C3%B3pez-Calleja
  41. Cuba’s regime may be ‘shaken to its core’ by the death of powerful general Rodríguez López-Calleja | WUSF, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.wusf.org/us-world/2022-07-04/cubas-regime-may-be-shaken-to-its-core-by-the-death-of-powerful-general-rodriguez-lopez-calleja
  42. Raúl Castro – Wikipedia, accessed January 6, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ra%C3%BAl_Castro
  43. Raul Castro Reappears in Havana, Cuba, accessed January 6, 2026, https://havanatimes.org/opinion/raul-castro-reappears-in-havana-cuba/
  44. Cuba’s Umpteenth Negotiation With the Paris Club for Non-Payments, Meanwhile Luxury Hotels Multiply – Translating Cuba, accessed January 6, 2026, https://translatingcuba.com/cubas-umpteenth-negotiation-with-the-paris-club-for-non-payments-meanwhile-luxury-hotels-multiply/
  45. Cuba: Government Finally Charges Ex-Minister Alejandro Gil – Havana Times, accessed January 6, 2026, https://havanatimes.org/features/cuba-government-finally-charges-ex-minister-alejandro-gil/
  46. Cuba: SRFOE condemns state repression and calls for respect and guarantee of the rights to freedom of expression, association, and peaceful assembly – OAS.org, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.oas.org/en/iachr/jsForm/?File=/en/iachr/expression/media_center/preleases/2025/151.asp&utm_content=country-cub&utm_term=class-mon
  47. Treasury Sanctions Cuban Ministry of Interior Officials and Military Unit in Response to Violence Against Peaceful Demonstrators, accessed January 6, 2026, https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy0321
  48. Cuba: Over 50000 people protest against US military base in Guantanamo Bay, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.brasildefato.com.br/2025/03/03/guantanameros-over-50000-people-protest-against-us-military-base-in-cuba/
  49. World Report 2025: Cuba | Human Rights Watch, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2025/country-chapters/cuba
  50. More Details on Cuba’s Declining Population – dwkcommentaries, accessed January 6, 2026, https://dwkcommentaries.com/2024/07/20/more-details-on-cubas-declining-population/
  51. Cuba With Little Food or Electricity = School Absenteeism – Havana Times, accessed January 6, 2026, https://havanatimes.org/features/cuba-with-little-food-or-electricity-school-absenteeism/
  52. ‘We are dying’: Cuba sinks into a health crisis amid medicine shortages and misdiagnosis, accessed January 6, 2026, https://english.elpais.com/international/2025-12-14/we-are-dying-cuba-sinks-into-a-health-crisis-amid-medicine-shortages-and-misdiagnosis.html
  53. For the New School Year in Cuba, Everything is Missing and Some Schools Will Not Open Their Doors – Translating Cuba, accessed January 6, 2026, https://translatingcuba.com/for-the-new-school-year-in-cuba-everything-is-missing-and-some-schools-will-not-open-their-doors/
  54. 2021 Cuban protests – Wikipedia, accessed January 6, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2021_Cuban_protests
  55. Western Cuba faces blackout as government seeks to update …, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/12/3/western-cuba-faces-blackout-as-government-seeks-to-update-energy-grid
  56. Cuba: SRFOE condemns state repression and calls for respect and guarantee of the rights to freedom of expression, association, and peaceful assembly, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.oas.org/en/IACHR/jsForm/?File=%2Fen%2Fiachr%2Fexpression%2Fmedia_center%2Fpreleases%2F2025%2F151.asp
  57. Cuba: Freedom on the Net 2025 Country Report, accessed January 6, 2026, https://freedomhouse.org/country/cuba/freedom-net/2025
  58. New wave of repression hits independent press amid arrival of Cuba’s new communications law – LatAm Journalism Review, accessed January 6, 2026, https://latamjournalismreview.org/articles/new-wave-of-repression-hits-independent-press-amid-arrival-of-cubas-new-communications-law/
  59. Cuba: Freedom in the World 2025 Country Report, accessed January 6, 2026, https://freedomhouse.org/country/cuba/freedom-world/2025
  60. 2024 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices – Cuba, accessed January 6, 2026, https://cu.usembassy.gov/2024-country-reports-on-human-rights-practices-cuba/
  61. Cuba: One month after releases were announced, hundreds remain in prison, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2025/02/cuba-anuncios-de-excarcelaciones/
  62. The Unlikely Biden-Trump Throughline on Cuba | Council on Foreign Relations, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.cfr.org/blog/unlikely-biden-trump-throughline-cuba
  63. Contribution of Cuban Residents Abroad to the Cuban Economy: Tourism and Remittances 1 – ScienceOpen, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.13169/intejcubastud.16.1.0104
  64. GAESA loses 95% of remittance control: $1.89 billion hit in 2024 – Cubasiglo21, accessed January 6, 2026, https://cubasiglo21.com/gaesa-loses-95-of-remittance-control-1-89-billion-hit-in-2024/
  65. Cuba Announces Integration into Chinese Payment System – Havana Times, accessed January 6, 2026, https://havanatimes.org/features/cuba-announces-integration-into-chinese-payment-system/
  66. China Cancels Trade Agreements with Cuba Due to Lack of Market Reforms and Unpaid Debts – Fundación Andrés Bello, accessed January 6, 2026, https://fundacionandresbello.org/en/news/cuba-%F0%9F%87%A8%F0%9F%87%BA-news/china-cancels-trade-agreements-with-cuba-due-to-lack-of-market-reforms-and-unpaid-debts/
  67. China donates 70 tons of equipment to help Cuba restore its electric system, accessed January 6, 2026, https://socialistchina.org/2025/01/01/china-donates-70-tons-of-equipment-to-help-cuba-restore-its-electric-system/
  68. Cuba’s debt restructuring – clubdeparis, accessed January 6, 2026, https://clubdeparis.org/en/clubdeparis/accueil/actualites1/2025/cuba-17-01-2025.html

Venezuelan Oil Under US Control: Consequences for Cuba

This is a time-sensitive special report and is based on information available as of January 5, 2026. Due to the situation being very dynamic the following report should be used to obtain a perspective but not viewed as an absolute.

The geopolitical landscape of the Caribbean Basin underwent a cataclysmic shift on January 3, 2026, with the United States military intervention in Venezuela, specifically the capture of Nicolás Maduro and the subsequent assumption of operational control over the nation’s petroleum infrastructure. For the Republic of Cuba, this event represents a strategic shock of existential magnitude, comparable only to the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991. However, unlike the gradual decline of the “Special Period” in the 1990s, the current crisis unfolds with immediate, kinetic velocity due to the imposition of a strict US naval quarantine under Operation Southern Spear.

This report, prepared for national security and foreign affairs stakeholders, provides an exhaustive analysis of the cascading impacts on the Cuban state. The central finding is that the disruption of the Caracas-Havana energy axis is not merely a logistical bottleneck but a systemic termination of the economic model that has sustained the Cuban Communist Party (PCC) for a quarter-century. The symbiosis, wherein Venezuelan hydrocarbons were exchanged for Cuban intelligence and medical services, has been severed at the source.

The analysis projects a rapid, multi-sectoral collapse within Cuba. The electrical grid, already fragile, faces total structural failure as the 35,000–50,000 barrels per day (bpd) of subsidized Venezuelan crude and refined products are halted. This energy deficit will trigger a chain reaction: the paralysis of mechanized agriculture leading to acute food insecurity; the collapse of water sanitation systems dependent on diesel pumps; and the evaporation of hard currency revenues previously derived from re-exporting Venezuelan fuel.

Furthermore, the diplomatic and economic isolation of Havana is compounded by the “US Majors” strategy for Venezuela’s rehabilitation. The roadmap for Petróleos de Venezuela, S.A. (PDVSA) under US provisional authority prioritizes the commercial reintegration of Venezuelan crude into the US Gulf Coast refining complex, explicitly excluding subsidized political transfers to the Caribbean. Regional actors such as Mexico, constrained by their own economic entanglements with the US, lack the capacity to fill the void. Russia and China, while politically sympathetic, face insurmountable logistical and financial barriers to replacing Venezuela as a distinct energy patron.

Consequently, the outlook for Q1 and Q2 2026 indicates a high probability of severe internal instability in Cuba, characterized by nationwide blackouts exceeding 20 hours daily, the erosion of the regime’s internal security capacity due to fuel shortages, and a mass migration event potentially exceeding historical precedents. The Cuban regime has lost its strategic depth, creating a vacuum that threatens the continuity of governance in Havana.

1. The Strategic Decoupling: Anatomy of the Rupture

To understand the severity of the current crisis, one must analyze the depth of the dependency that has now been violently dismantled. The relationship between Venezuela and Cuba was not a standard bilateral trade agreement; it was an ideological and economic fusion designed to bypass market mechanisms and US sanctions. The dismantling of this architecture by US forces has left Havana with no fallback mechanism.

1.1 The Mechanics of the Caracas-Havana Axis

For over two decades, the survival of the Cuban state was predicated on the “Barrio Adentro” exchange. This agreement, forged by Hugo Chávez and Fidel Castro, structured the transfer of Venezuelan national wealth to Cuba in exchange for human capital. Specifically, Venezuela provided between 30,000 and 50,000 barrels per day (bpd) of crude oil and refined products to Cuba.1 In return, Cuba deployed thousands of doctors, educators, and sports trainers to Venezuela.

Crucially, beneath the surface of this humanitarian exchange lay a vital security cooperation framework. Cuban intelligence agencies, specifically the G2, provided the backbone of the Venezuelan state’s internal security, counter-intelligence, and presidential protection protocols.4 This integration went so far that Cuban advisors were embedded within the command structures of the Venezuelan military and PDVSA, effectively managing the oil flows to ensure Havana’s quota was prioritized over commercial clients or even Venezuelan domestic needs.

The US intervention on January 3, 2026, decapitated this structure. By physically removing the Maduro leadership and targeting the Cuban security apparatus within Venezuela, the US effectively blinded Havana and severed its control over the resource flows.5 The expulsion or neutralization of Cuban personnel in Venezuela means Havana has lost its forward operating base and its leverage over the oil spigots.

1.2 Operation Southern Spear and the Naval Quarantine

The physical mechanism enforcing this decoupling is Operation Southern Spear. Unlike previous sanctions regimes, which relied on financial designations and Treasury Department lists (OFAC), this operation utilizes the kinetic power of the US Navy and Coast Guard to enforce a physical blockade of energy transfers to Cuba.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has explicitly defined the operation as an “oil quarantine,” a terminology that evokes the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis but applies it to energy rather than nuclear armaments.6 The quarantine zone targets the “Dark Fleet”—vessels operating without transponders to evade sanctions—which had been the primary conduit for Venezuelan oil to Cuba in recent years.7

The operational reality of this quarantine is stifling. US naval assets, including the USS Gerald R. Ford Carrier Strike Group and the USS Iwo Jima Amphibious Ready Group, effectively dominate the maritime approaches between Puerto Jose (Venezuela) and Cienfuegos (Cuba).8 Any vessel attempting to run this blockade faces interception, boarding, and seizure. This has created a “risk wall” for global shipping; insurance premiums for voyages to Cuba have skyrocketed, and major insurers have withdrawn coverage for any vessel designated by the US as potentially violating the quarantine.7 The result is that even if Cuba could find a seller, it cannot find a bottom (ship) willing to make the voyage.

Complementing the naval blockade is a rigid legal framework established by the US provisional authority over Venezuelan assets. The US Treasury has revoked the licenses that previously allowed limited swaps and has instituted a new regime where Venezuelan oil is treated as a strategic asset under US administration.11

Under this new framework, US oil majors (Chevron, ExxonMobil, ConocoPhillips) are the authorized custodians of production rehabilitation. These entities operate under strict US law, which explicitly prohibits transactions with Cuba due to the ongoing embargo (LIBERTAD Act). Therefore, there is no legal pathway for a barrel of Venezuelan oil to be transferred to Cuba. The “oil-for-doctors” barter scheme has no legal standing in the new commercial reality of Venezuela. The contracts are void, and the debt is unrecognized. Cuba has transitioned overnight from a privileged partner to a sanctioned pariah in the eyes of the Venezuelan energy sector.13

2. The Energy Asphyxiation: Anatomy of a Collapse

The cessation of Venezuelan oil supplies is a catastrophic event for Cuba’s energy infrastructure. The island’s electrical grid is a chaotic patchwork of Soviet-era thermoelectric plants, floating Turkish power ships, and distributed diesel generators. This entire system was calibrated to run on a specific mix of domestic crude and Venezuelan imports. The removal of the Venezuelan component destabilizes the entire architecture.

2.1 The Mathematics of Deficit

To maintain a minimally functional society—keeping lights on in Havana, running essential industries, and powering hospitals—Cuba requires approximately 100,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day.4 Domestic production, primarily heavy, high-sulfur crude extracted along the northern coast (Varadero/Matanzas belt), contributes roughly 40,000 bpd.3 This leaves a structural deficit of approximately 60,000 bpd.

Historically, Venezuela filled the vast majority of this gap. Even in the diminished years of 2024-2025, shipments averaged 35,000 to 50,000 bpd.1 This imported volume was crucial not just for its quantity but its quality. Venezuelan lighter crudes and refined diesel were essential for blending with the sludge-like Cuban crude to make it combustible in thermoelectric plants, and for fueling the distributed generation network.2

With the US naval blockade reducing this inflow to near zero, the math becomes merciless. The 40,000 bpd of domestic production is insufficient to run the baseload plants at capacity, and it cannot be used in diesel generators or vehicles. The deficit is not 20% or 30%; it is a functional deficit of over 60% of liquid fuel needs, concentrated entirely in the transport and peak-generation sectors.

2.2 The Collapse of Distributed Generation

The most immediate impact falls on the “Distributed Generation” clusters. These are thousands of diesel and fuel-oil generators installed across the island during the “Energy Revolution” of the mid-2000s. They were designed to cover peak demand when the aging thermoelectric plants failed or underwent maintenance.

These generators rely exclusively on imported diesel and fuel oil. The domestic crude is too heavy and sulfurous for them. With the blockade halting refined product shipments from Venezuela, these generators are going offline en masse.15 The result is the loss of the grid’s “shock absorbers.” When a main plant trips offline, there is no backup to pick up the load, leading to frequency instability and total blackouts rather than managed load-shedding.

2.3 The “Zero Diesel” Scenario and Critical Infrastructure

The “Zero Diesel” scenario is the nightmare contingency for Cuban planners. Diesel is the lifeblood of the island’s critical infrastructure backup systems.

  • Hospitals: Cuban hospitals rely on diesel generators during blackouts. With 20+ hour blackouts becoming the norm, these generators must run almost continuously. Without fuel deliveries, hospital backup power will fail, leading to immediate loss of life in intensive care units, neonatal wards, and operating theaters.16
  • Water Supply: The vast majority of Cuba’s water pumping stations run on electricity or diesel. The blackout prevents electric pumps from filling reservoirs, and the lack of diesel prevents the backup pumps from operating. Over 2 million people were already without reliable water before the intervention.4 This number will likely encompass the entire urban population of Havana and Santiago de Cuba, precipitating a sanitation crisis and the risk of waterborne diseases.
  • Cold Chain and Food Preservation: In a tropical climate, the lack of refrigeration is devastating. Households will lose their meager food stocks within hours of a blackout. State cold storage facilities for imported meats and medicines will fail, leading to massive spoilage of strategic reserves.16

3. The Economic Implosion: Sectoral Impact Analysis

The energy crisis is the lead domino in a cascading economic failure. Energy is the primary input for every productive sector of the Cuban economy. The cessation of Venezuelan oil flows renders the current economic model viable.

3.1 Agriculture: The Threat of Famine

Cuban agriculture operates on a model that, while inefficient, is mechanized. Tractors prepare the land, diesel pumps irrigate the fields, and trucks transport the harvest to urban centers.

  • Production Collapse: The lack of diesel strikes at the heart of the planting and harvesting cycles. The sugar harvest (zafra), already at historic lows, will likely be abandoned entirely as the fuel cost to cut and transport cane exceeds the value of the sugar produced. Rice production and other staples will suffer similar fates, forcing the population into subsistence farming.
  • Distribution Paralysis: The most critical failure point is transport. Even if food is grown or imported as aid, it cannot be distributed. The “Acopio” state distribution system relies on a fleet of aging trucks that require diesel. Without fuel, produce rots in the fields of Artemisa and Mayabeque while the markets in Havana stand empty.4 The breakdown of the rural-urban food supply chain creates the conditions for localized famine.

3.2 Tourism: The Death of the Cash Cow

Tourism has historically been the regime’s primary source of hard currency, funding the import of food and fuel. However, the industry is energy-intensive. Hotels require air conditioning, desalination, and constant lighting to meet international standards.

To shield tourists from the reality of Cuban life, the regime has traditionally ring-fenced energy for the tourism sector, powering hotels with dedicated circuits or generators. The depth of the current fuel crisis makes this impossible. Hotels are now subject to the same shortages as the general population.

  • Reputational Destruction: The image of a “tropical paradise” cannot survive reports of 20-hour blackouts, food shortages at buffets, and lack of running water. Cancellations will spike, and new bookings will evaporate.
  • Revenue Spiral: The collapse of tourism revenue removes the government’s liquidity. Without tourism dollars, they cannot buy spot-market fuel (even if they could find a seller), which worsens the blackouts, which further kills tourism. This is a classic “death spiral”.4

3.3 The End of Re-export Revenue

A little-known but vital component of the Cuba-Venezuela relationship was the re-export of oil. Venezuela often shipped crude to the Cienfuegos refinery—a joint venture—where it was processed. Cuba would then consume what it needed and export the surplus refined products (diesel, jet fuel) to the international market, keeping the hard currency profit.17

This “middleman” trade was a major source of off-the-books revenue for the regime, often used to fund the military and intelligence services. The US control of PDVSA ends this completely. The Cienfuegos refinery, designed for Venezuelan crude, is now effectively a stranded asset. The loss of this revenue stream defunds the apparatus of the state just as internal security threats are rising.

4. Geopolitical Isolation: The Myth of the Alternative Patron

In previous moments of crisis, Cuba has relied on a geopolitical patron to counter US pressure—first the Soviet Union, then Venezuela. In the current crisis, the regime finds itself isolated. The specific mechanics of the US intervention and the global geopolitical environment preclude an effective rescue by China, Russia, or Mexico.

4.1 The Logistics of Distance and Cost

While Russia and China have issued diplomatic condemnations of the US action 18, material support faces the tyranny of distance and economics.

  • Russia: A tanker from Venezuela reaches Havana in 2-4 days. A tanker from Russian ports takes 30 to 45 days. The freight cost for such a voyage is significant. Russia, heavily sanctioned and focused on its war in Ukraine, utilizes a “shadow fleet” for its own oil exports to India and China. Diverting these vessels to supply Cuba for free (or on credit that will never be repaid) is strategically irrational for Moscow. Additionally, Russian crude grades may not be compatible with Cuban refineries designed for Venezuelan heavy sour crude.20
  • China: Beijing has historically been pragmatic in its relationship with Venezuela, prioritizing loan repayment over ideological subsidies. With the US controlling Venezuelan assets, China’s priority is negotiating the security of its existing investments with the new US-backed administration, not antagonizing Washington by breaking a blockade to support Havana.19 China’s economic interests lie in stability and access to global markets, which discourages high-risk adventures in the Caribbean.

4.2 The Mexican Dilemma

Mexico, under President Claudia Sheinbaum, initially signaled a willingness to provide humanitarian oil to Cuba.22 However, this support is structurally limited and politically vulnerable.

  • US Leverage: The US has enormous economic leverage over Mexico via the USMCA trade agreement and border policies. The Trump administration has explicitly linked Mexican cooperation on migration and drug interdiction to trade stability. Continuing to supply oil to Cuba in defiance of a US “quarantine” places Mexico at risk of secondary sanctions or tariffs.22
  • PEMEX Constraints: Petróleos Mexicanos (PEMEX) is the most indebted oil company in the world. Donating oil to Cuba is domestically controversial and fiscally damaging. Furthermore, Mexican crude production has been declining, limiting the surplus available for export.24
  • Operational Risk: Reports indicate that tankers departing Mexico for Cuba have faced US naval scrutiny. The risk of interdiction or being blacklisted by insurers makes the voyage commercially unviable for Mexican vessels.24

5. Regime Stability and Internal Dynamics

The energy and economic crises are rapidly metamorphosing into a political crisis. The Cuban regime relies on two pillars for stability: the “social contract” (subsidized basics in exchange for acquiescence) and the security apparatus. Both are being eroded by the loss of Venezuelan support.

5.1 The Breakdown of the Social Contract

The Cuban population is accustomed to hardship, but the current scenario breaches the implicit limits of the social contract. The “Special Period” of the 1990s had a narrative of shared sacrifice and national defense. The current crisis is viewed increasingly as a failure of management and a result of the regime’s geopolitical gambling.

Protests have evolved from isolated incidents to coordinated expressions of dissent. The “pot-banging” (cacerolazos) protests seen in late 2025 have intensified.25 The demands have shifted from “fix the lights” to broader political slogans (“Freedom,” “Patria y Vida”). As blackouts extend to 20+ hours, the population has little to lose. The fear of repression is outweighed by the existential dread of starvation and darkness.

5.2 The Erosion of Repressive Capacity

The regime’s ability to quell unrest is physically constrained by the fuel shortage.

  • Mobility: Police and military vehicles require fuel. In a “Zero Diesel” scenario, the rapid deployment of “Black Beret” special forces to hotspots becomes logistically difficult. The regime may be forced to concentrate forces in Havana, leaving the provinces in a state of semi-anarchy.
  • Surveillance: The sophisticated electronic surveillance state built with Chinese and Venezuelan assistance requires electricity. Frequent power cuts blind the digital monitoring systems that track dissent on social media and communications networks.
  • Internal Friction: The return of thousands of intelligence officers and military advisors from Venezuela creates a dangerous demographic within the security services.5 These personnel are witnessing the collapse of the project they dedicated their careers to. Discontent within the middle ranks of the military (FAR) and Interior Ministry (MININT)—who are suffering the same blackouts as the civilians—cannot be ruled out.

6. The Migration Event: Mariel 2.0

History demonstrates a direct correlation between economic distress in Cuba and migration surges to the United States. The 1980 Mariel boatlift and the 1994 Rafter Crisis were both precipitated by internal squeezes. The crisis of 2026 is poised to trigger a migration event of similar or greater magnitude.

6.1 The Mechanics of the Surge

The collapse of the grid and the food supply creates a “push” factor of unprecedented intensity. Unlike previous waves where economic aspiration was a driver, this wave is driven by survival.

  • State Complicity: In past crises, the Cuban government has used migration as a safety valve, effectively opening the borders to allow the most dissatisfied segments of the population to leave, thereby relieving internal pressure. It is highly probable that the regime will cease patrolling its own coasts, tacitly encouraging a mass exodus.26
  • Scale: With nearly 600,000 Cubans having already attempted to leave in recent years, the migration infrastructure (smuggling networks, raft building knowledge) is well-established.27

6.2 US Countermeasures and Humanitarian Crisis

The US response, however, differs from previous eras. The administration has signaled a “closed door” policy, implemented via strict naval interdiction.

  • Interdiction Saturation: The US Coast Guard (USCG) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Air and Marine Operations are tasked with holding the line in the Florida Straits. However, these same assets are currently tasked with enforcing the Venezuelan oil quarantine.28 This stretching of resources creates a vulnerability. A mass “swarm” event of thousands of rafts could overwhelm interdiction capacity.
  • Humanitarian Dilemma: The intersection of a starving population taking to the sea and a militarized blockade creates the potential for a massive humanitarian disaster in the Straits, with high loss of life and complex search-and-rescue demands placed on US forces.

7. Next Steps for the Venezuelan Oil Industry Under US Control

With the US acting as the de facto provisional administrator of Venezuela’s oil wealth, the path forward for PDVSA involves a rapid reintegration into the Western commercial sphere, explicitly bypassing Cuba.

7.1 The “US Majors” Rehabilitation Strategy

President Trump has outlined a strategy where “very large United States oil companies” will take the lead in rebuilding the sector.14 This is not merely rhetorical; it aligns with the technical realities of Venezuela’s infrastructure.

  • Western Capital Re-entry: Companies like Chevron, which maintained a foothold via joint ventures (Petroboscan, Petropiar), are positioned to scale operations immediately. They possess the technical data and the legal standing (via General License 41 modifications) to operate.11
  • Infrastructure Triage: The immediate focus will be on the “low hanging fruit”—repairing valves, pipelines, and compression stations in the Orinoco Belt to stabilize production, which currently sits at a fraction of its potential (~1 million bpd vs 3 million bpd historical peak).31
  • Supply Chain Rewiring: The most significant shift is the destination of the crude. Venezuelan Merey 16 (heavy/sour) is chemically ideal for the complex refineries of the US Gulf Coast (PADD 3), which were built to process it. The US strategy is to redirect these flows north to Texas and Louisiana, displacing imports from other regions and funding the Venezuelan reconstruction.21

7.2 The Explicit Exclusion of Cuba

The US-led roadmap for PDVSA contains no provision for the continuation of the Cuban subsidy.

  • Sanctions Compliance: US oil majors operate under strict adherence to the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) regulations. Any export of Venezuelan crude to Cuba would violate the US embargo (LIBERTAD Act) and trigger severe penalties. Corporate governance at Chevron or ExxonMobil precludes any “off-books” shipments.33
  • Commercial Imperative: The provisional Venezuelan government will require immediate cash flow to stabilize the country and pay down debt. Cuba cannot pay for oil. Selling to a non-paying customer while attempting to rebuild a bankrupt national industry is commercially impossible.
  • Strategic Intent: The cessation of oil to Cuba is not just a byproduct of the policy; it is a feature. The US administration views the energy starvation of the Castro regime as a strategic benefit, accelerating the possibility of political change in Havana.15

Conclusion

The US intervention in Venezuela and the subsequent control of its oil industry has effectively placed the Cuban regime in a stranglehold. By physically controlling the resource that powered the Cuban economy and policing the waters that transport it, the United States has achieved a level of pressure on Havana that decades of embargo legislation failed to deliver.

The chain of impacts is linear, rapid, and devastating:

  1. US Control of PDVSA ends the political will to subsidize Cuba.
  2. Operation Southern Spear physically prevents alternative supplies from reaching the island.
  3. The Energy Cliff leads to the collapse of the electrical grid and transport sector.
  4. Economic Paralysis triggers food insecurity and the collapse of the tourism revenue stream.
  5. Regime Destabilization ensues as the social contract fractures and the security apparatus loses mobility.

The Cuban leadership faces a narrowing set of options, none of which ensure the long-term survival of the status quo. The capture of Nicolás Maduro in Caracas has effectively removed the keystone of the Cuban geopolitical arch, leaving the structure to collapse under its own weight.


If you find this post useful, please share the link on Facebook, with your friends, etc. Your support is much appreciated and if you have any feedback, please email me at in**@*********ps.com. Please note that for links to other websites, we are only paid if there is an affiliate program such as Avantlink, Impact, Amazon and eBay and only if you purchase something. If you’d like to directly contribute towards our continued reporting, please visit our funding page.


Sources Used

  1. Venezuela’s Oil Industry in Global Market – January 2026 – Lodi 411, accessed January 6, 2026, https://lodi411.com/lodi-eye/venezuelas-oil-industry-in-global-market-january-2026
  2. Venezuela Sent Twice As Much Oil to the U.S. Than to Cuba in August, accessed January 6, 2026, https://translatingcuba.com/venezuela-sent-twice-as-much-oil-to-the-u-s-than-to-cuba-in-august/
  3. Maduro ouster leaves Cuba’s wobbling regime without a benefactor, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2026/01/05/world/politics/maduro-cuba-oil-benefactor/
  4. Maduro ouster leaves Cuban regime without a benefactor – Taipei Times, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2026/01/06/2003850109
  5. ​Is Cuba next after Maduro’s capture? – Asia Times, accessed January 6, 2026, https://asiatimes.com/2026/01/is-cuba-next-after-maduros-capture/
  6. Rubio says US is using oil quarantine to pressure Venezuela, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.indiatribune.com/public/index.php/rubio-says-us-is-using-oil-quarantine-to-pressure-venezuela
  7. Caribbean Shipping Confronts New Era of Risk After U.S. Raid in Venezuela, accessed January 6, 2026, https://gcaptain.com/caribbean-shipping-confronts-new-era-of-risk-after-u-s-raid-in-venezuela/
  8. U.S. Navy blockade off coast of Venezuela will continue despite Maduro’s capture – WHRO, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.whro.org/news/local-news/2026-01-04/u-s-navy-blockade-off-coast-of-venezuela-will-continue-despite-maduros-capture
  9. United States blockade during Operation Southern Spear – Wikipedia, accessed January 6, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_blockade_during_Operation_Southern_Spear
  10. U.S. Moves to Disrupt Venezuela-Cuba Oil Axis Explained – Discovery Alert, accessed January 6, 2026, https://discoveryalert.com.au/caribbean-energy-enforcement-regulatory-architecture-2025/
  11. Reversing the Biden Administration, OFAC Announces the Wind Down of Venezuela General License 41 – SmarTrade | Thompson Hine, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.thompsonhinesmartrade.com/2025/03/reversing-the-biden-administration-ofac-announces-the-wind-down-of-venezuela-general-license-41/
  12. OFAC Terminates License Authorizing Certain Petroleum-Related Activities in Venezuela | Insights | Holland & Knight, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.hklaw.com/en/insights/publications/2025/03/ofac-terminates-license-authorizing-certain-petroleum-related
  13. Former Chevron executive seeks $2 billion for oil projects in Venezuela, accessed January 6, 2026, https://americanbazaaronline.com/2026/01/06/former-chevron-executive-seeks-2-billion-venezuela-oil-472665/
  14. What role could the US play in Venezuela’s ‘bust’ oil industry? – The Guardian, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/business/2026/jan/04/venezuela-oil-industry-bust-what-role-could-the-us-play
  15. Trump Is Convinced That Without Venezuelan Oil the Cuban Regime Will Fall on Its Own, accessed January 6, 2026, https://translatingcuba.com/trump-is-convinced-that-without-venezuelan-oil-the-cuban-regime-will-fall-on-its-own/
  16. 11 Million Cubans Are Poised to Starve Without Venezuelan Oil. How Many Will We Allow to Die? – Jezebel, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.jezebel.com/cuba-collapse-struggles-power-starvation-food-venezuela-oil-maduro-trump-rubio-miguel-diaz-canel
  17. ‘Got free oil from Venezuela’: Why Cuba’s collapse looks inevitable after capture of Nicholas Maduro, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.wionews.com/photos/-got-free-oil-from-venezuela-why-cuba-s-collapse-looks-inevitable-after-capture-of-nicholas-maduro-1767531151243
  18. From Russia to Iran, Venezuela’s allies react to the capture of Nicolas Maduro, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/maduro-capture-world-reaction/mxpdbf7nx
  19. Trump’s attack leaves China worried about its interests in Venezuela, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jan/05/venezuela-trump-attack-china-interests-analysis
  20. With Maduro Gone, Putin Risks Being Pushed Out of the Western Hemisphere, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2026/01/05/with-maduro-gone-putin-risks-being-pushed-out-of-the-western-hemisphere-a91608
  21. Venezuelan oil output could reach 1.2 million bpd by end of 2026 if sanctions are lifted, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.thenationalnews.com/business/energy/2026/01/05/venezuelan-oil-output-could-reach-12-million-bpd-by-end-of-2026-if-sanctions-are-lifted/
  22. Mexican Oil, Cuba and Trump 2.0 – Global Americans, accessed January 6, 2026, https://globalamericans.org/mexican-oil-cuba-and-trump-2-0/
  23. In the wake of Venezuela, is Mexico next? A perspective from our CEO, accessed January 6, 2026, https://mexiconewsdaily.com/opinion/venezuela-mexico-ceo-perspective/
  24. 80000 barrels of Mexican oil sent to Cuba: Havana drawn into the US–Mexico clash, accessed January 6, 2026, https://english.elpais.com/international/2025-12-29/80000-barrels-of-mexican-oil-sent-to-cuba-havana-drawn-into-the-usmexico-clash.html
  25. Cuba on the Brink: Protests and Pot-Banging Over Blackouts, accessed January 6, 2026, https://havanatimes.org/features/cuba-on-the-brink-protests-and-pot-banging-over-blackouts/
  26. Cuban Immigrants in the United States – Migration Policy Institute, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/cuban-immigrants-united-states-2018
  27. U.S. Sanctions: A Root Cause of Cuban Migration – The Alliance for Cuba Engagement and Respect (ACERE), accessed January 6, 2026, https://acere.org/migration/
  28. Coast Guard Migrant Interdiction Operations Are in a State of Emergency | Proceedings, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2023/february/coast-guard-migrant-interdiction-operations-are-state-emergency
  29. Despite Trump’s hopes, big oil will be wary of rushing back to Venezuela, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/business/2026/jan/05/donald-trump-big-oil-venezuela
  30. Chevron jumps as Maduro’s fall puts US oil major in pole position for Venezuelan oil, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.tradingview.com/news/invezz:c88ca0cf9094b:0-chevron-jumps-as-maduro-s-fall-puts-us-oil-major-in-pole-position-for-venezuelan-oil/
  31. What US control over Venezuela’s oil could mean for geopolitics, climate, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.downtoearth.org.in/energy/what-us-control-over-venezuelas-oil-could-mean-for-geopolitics-climate
  32. Venezuelan Political Transition Reshapes Global Oil Market Dynamics – Discovery Alert, accessed January 6, 2026, https://discoveryalert.com.au/venezuelan-political-transition-oil-dynamics-2026/
  33. Treasury Issues Venezuela General License 41 Upon Resumption of Mexico City Talks, accessed January 6, 2026, https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy1127
  34. Cuban exiles: US control of Venezuelan oil flow to weaken communists’ grasp on power, accessed January 6, 2026, https://www.local10.com/news/world/2026/01/05/venezuelan-oil-disruptions-weakens-cuban-communists/