Analytics and Reports, China Analytics, Military Analytics

An Analysis of the Evolution of Chinese Special Operations Forces

The modern Special Operations Forces (SOF) of the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) are not a recent invention but the culmination of a long and evolutionary process rooted in the PLA’s foundational identity. The force’s origins as a guerrilla army instilled a deep-seated appreciation for the principles of infiltration, small-unit autonomy, and asymmetric tactics, which serve as the conceptual bedrock for contemporary special operations.1 However, the formal establishment of dedicated SOF was not a product of proactive innovation. Instead, it was a reactive development, forged in the crucible of battlefield setbacks and catalyzed by the observation of foreign military revolutions. The journey from elite infantry scouts to specialized operators was driven by the PLA’s gradual and often painful recognition of the changing character of warfare.

The Role of Elite Reconnaissance Units (Zhenchabing) in Early PLA Doctrine

The direct lineage of PLA SOF can be traced to its elite reconnaissance units, known as zhenchabing (侦察兵).3 From the PLA’s inception through its major conflicts—the Chinese Civil War, the Korean War, and border clashes—these units were composed of the most capable soldiers in the conventional force. They were selected for their superior physical fitness, mental resilience, and tactical acumen, and were tasked with the most hazardous missions.5

Doctrinally, the primary function of the zhenchabing was to serve as the “eyes and ears” of their parent formation’s commander.6 Their core tasks involved penetrating enemy lines to gather intelligence on troop dispositions, unit identification, logistical nodes, and defensive fortifications. This intelligence was critical for commanders to formulate operational plans. However, their role frequently extended beyond passive surveillance. These units were often tasked with direct action missions, including raids on enemy command posts, sabotage of key infrastructure, and the capture of high-value personnel.4 This dual-mission profile of reconnaissance and direct action led to them being widely regarded within the PLA as “the special forces of conventional units”.6

The operational methodology of the zhenchabing—deep penetration, long-duration missions with minimal support, and a reliance on individual fieldcraft and small-unit cohesion—established a cultural and practical foundation that would later be inherited by the first generation of formal SOF. The ethos of the reconnaissance soldier, emphasizing toughness, self-reliance, and the ability to operate in ambiguous and hostile environments, became the defining characteristic of the PLA’s nascent special operations capability.

Lessons from Conflict: The Sino-Vietnamese War as a Catalyst for Change

The 1979 Sino-Vietnamese War served as a profound strategic shock for the PLA and a critical catalyst for military modernization.8 The PLA, still largely configured for the “People’s War” doctrine of massed infantry assaults, suffered significant casualties against the battle-hardened and tactically adept People’s Army of Vietnam (PAVN).10 The conflict starkly revealed the deficiencies in the PLA’s command and control, logistics, combined arms coordination, and individual soldier equipment.

During this conflict, PLA reconnaissance units were deployed extensively, conducting deep-penetration missions behind Vietnamese lines to disrupt supply lines and gather intelligence.12 These operations highlighted the value of such specialized troops but also exposed the inadequacy of their equipment. In response to operational needs, reconnaissance units were among the first to receive specialized gear, including rudimentary camouflage uniforms. Ironically, due to China’s prior military aid to Vietnam, these uniforms were sometimes produced from the same fabric as those worn by PAVN reconnaissance troops, leading to dangerous instances of battlefield confusion.13

The war also served as a harsh testing ground for PLA small arms. The standard-issue Type 63 assault rifle, an ambitious but flawed attempt to combine the features of the SKS carbine and the AK-47, proved to be a failure in the field. Issues with quality control during mass production led to poor accuracy and reliability, forcing the PLA to withdraw it from service.14 This necessitated the rapid development of a “stopgap” weapon, the Type 81 assault rifle. The Type 81, a more robust and refined design, saw its first combat use in the latter stages of the border conflicts and proved to be a far more effective weapon.17 Specialized units also employed the Type 79 submachine gun for its compact size, though it too suffered from reliability issues in the harsh jungle environment.12

The cumulative lessons from Vietnam were clear: the PLA’s reliance on mass was no longer a substitute for quality, training, and technology. The conflict underscored the urgent need for smaller, more professional, and better-equipped units capable of executing complex missions with precision. This experience directly informed the PLA’s growing interest in Western special operations concepts throughout the 1980s and laid the groundwork for the formal establishment of its own SOF.4

The Doctrinal Shift: From “People’s War” to “Local Wars”

The operational lessons of the 1970s and 1980s, combined with a changing geopolitical landscape, prompted a fundamental re-evaluation of the PLA’s grand strategy. Under the leadership of Deng Xiaoping, the Central Military Commission (CMC) officially shifted the PLA’s guiding military doctrine in the mid-1980s. The focus moved away from preparing for an all-out, attritional “People’s War” against a potential Soviet invasion and toward the concept of fighting and winning “limited, local wars under modern conditions” (在高技术条件下打一场局部战争).19

This new doctrine acknowledged that future conflicts were unlikely to be total wars fought for national survival on Chinese soil. Instead, they were envisioned as short, intense, high-technology conflicts fought on China’s periphery to secure national interests.19 PLA planners recognized that the large, infantry-heavy formations of the past were ill-suited for this new paradigm, which demanded speed, precision, and rapid reaction capabilities.19 This doctrinal transformation was the single most important prerequisite for the birth of modern PLA SOF, as it created the strategic requirement and institutional justification for a new type of force—one that could provide the rapid, precise, and asymmetric capabilities needed to prevail in future “local wars.”

II. The Birth of Modern SOF: Establishment and Expansion (1988-2015)

The doctrinal shift of the mid-1980s created the strategic imperative for special operations forces, but the actual formation of these units was a deliberate, and later accelerated, process. It began with a single experimental unit, which served as a laboratory for developing tactics and training. The process was dramatically expedited by the 1991 Gulf War, which provided a shocking demonstration of the effectiveness of modern, high-technology warfare and the pivotal role of SOF within it. This period saw the rapid expansion of SOF from a niche army concept to a multi-service capability, with distinct units being established within the Navy, Air Force, and the paramilitary People’s Armed Police to address both external and internal security threats.

The First Unit: Guangzhou Military Region’s “South China Sword” (1988)

In 1988, the PLA took the first concrete step in creating a modern special operations capability by establishing its first official “special-mission rapid reaction unit” within the Guangzhou Military Region.21 This unit, which became known as the “South China Sword” (华南之剑) or “Sharp Sword of Southern China” (南国利剑), was the direct descendant of the elite reconnaissance groups that had proven their value in the preceding decades.22

The choice of the Guangzhou Military Region was significant. As one of China’s most economically developed regions and a key area for Deng Xiaoping’s “Reform and Opening Up” policy, the command had access to a higher quality pool of recruits and better technological resources than the more isolated inland regions.22 This allowed the “South China Sword” to serve as a testbed for the entire PLA. It became the incubator for developing the core doctrine, training methodologies, and operational concepts that would be disseminated throughout the force as other SOF units were established. Its initial missions were an evolution of the traditional reconnaissance role, focusing on special reconnaissance, direct action, and rapid response to regional contingencies.21

The Gulf War Shock: Accelerating the Creation of a Modern SOF Capability (1991-2000s)

If the Sino-Vietnamese War was a wake-up call, the 1991 Persian Gulf War was a seismic shock to the PLA’s strategic leadership. PLA observers watched in awe as a U.S.-led coalition dismantled the world’s fourth-largest army in a matter of weeks through the integrated use of precision-guided munitions, information dominance, and highly effective special operations forces.11 The performance of Coalition SOF, conducting deep reconnaissance, laser-designating targets for airstrikes, and hunting for Scud missile launchers far behind Iraqi lines, provided a powerful and undeniable demonstration of their role as a force multiplier in modern warfare.

This event was the primary catalyst that accelerated the PLA’s modernization and solidified the importance of SOF within its new strategic framework. The doctrinal concept of fighting “local wars under modern conditions” was rapidly updated to fighting “local wars under high-technology conditions” (and later, “informatized conditions”).20 In the wake of the Gulf War, the PLA embarked on a concerted, force-wide effort to establish SOF units. What had begun with a single experimental unit in 1988 became a military-wide priority. By the late 1990s, this expansion had progressed to the point where each of the PLA’s seven Military Regions commanded its own Army SOF or special reconnaissance group (dadui), each with a strength of approximately 1,000 personnel.24

Expansion Across the Services

The recognition of SOF’s importance was not confined to the ground forces. Throughout the late 1990s and 2000s, each of the PLA’s service branches, as well as the People’s Armed Police, established their own distinct special operations capabilities tailored to their specific domains and mission sets. This development followed a bifurcated path, with PLA units focusing on external military threats and PAP units focusing on internal security.

  • PLA Navy Marine Corps (PLANMC): The PLANMC’s premier SOF unit, the “Jiaolong Commandos” (蛟龙突击队, or “Sea Dragons”), was formally established in 2002, originating as the PLAN Special Operations Battalion.29 Tasked with maritime special operations including amphibious reconnaissance, direct action, combat diving, and Visit, Board, Search, and Seizure (VBSS), the Jiaolong Commandos gained international prominence with their first major public deployment in December 2008 as part of China’s inaugural anti-piracy task force in the Gulf of Aden.27
  • PLA Air Force Airborne Corps (PLAAFAC): The PLA’s airborne forces, organized under the 15th Airborne Corps, have long been considered a rapid reaction force, a designation made official in 1992.30 However, its dedicated SOF component, a unit known as the “Thunder Gods” (雷神), was not formally established until September 30, 2011.31 This unit specializes in airborne insertion, deep reconnaissance, and direct action missions in support of airborne campaigns.
  • PLA Rocket Force (PLARF): The branch responsible for China’s conventional and nuclear missile arsenal, the PLARF (formerly the Second Artillery Force), also created its own special forces. This regiment-sized unit, known as “Sharp Blade” (利刃), is primarily tasked with missions critical to the PLARF’s strategic role, including reconnaissance of potential launch sites, security for high-value missile assets, and terminal guidance for precision strikes.19
  • People’s Armed Police (PAP): Operating parallel to the PLA, the PAP is responsible for internal security, law enforcement, and counter-terrorism. It established its elite units well before the PLA’s main SOF expansion. The “Falcon Commando” (猎鹰突击队) was founded in 1982 as a specialized anti-hijacking unit, making it the PRC’s first modern special police force.32 Following the rise of global terrorism concerns after 9/11, the PAP established a second national-level counter-terrorism force, the “Snow Leopard Commando” (雪豹突击队), in December 2002.32 These units are explicitly focused on domestic hostage rescue, counter-terrorism, and other high-risk law enforcement missions.

This period of expansion solidified the role of special operations within China’s armed forces. The PLA’s approach was to develop SOF as a critical “force multiplier,” a high-precision tool designed not for independent strategic campaigns of unconventional warfare, but to be integrated into larger conventional operations to create decisive advantages on the battlefield.21

III. The Modern Force: Structure and Capabilities in the Theater Command Era (2015-Present)

The most transformative event in the modern history of the People’s Liberation Army began in late 2015 with the announcement of a sweeping series of military reforms under Chairman Xi Jinping. This reorganization was the most significant since the founding of the PRC, aimed at breaking down entrenched ground-force dominance, eliminating inter-service rivalries, and forging a military truly capable of conducting integrated joint operations in a high-tech, “informatized” environment.34 For the PLA’s Special Operations Forces, these reforms fundamentally altered their command structure, organizational size, and role within the broader warfighting system, elevating them from service-specific assets to key components of the PLA’s joint operational architecture.

Impact of the 2015 Military Reforms

The centerpiece of the 2015 reforms was the dissolution of the seven geographically-based, army-dominated Military Regions. In their place, the PLA established five joint Theater Commands (战区): the Eastern, Southern, Western, Northern, and Central Theater Commands.35 This restructuring was guided by a new central principle of command: “the CMC manages, the theater commands focus on warfighting, and the services focus on building [the forces]” (军委管总、战区主战、军种主建).35

This new philosophy fundamentally rewired the PLA’s command and control pathways. Previously, SOF units were largely under the administrative and operational control of their parent service and Military Region. Under the new system, the service headquarters (Army, Navy, Air Force, etc.) are primarily responsible for manning, training, and equipping their forces. However, operational command of these forces in a conflict is now vested in the joint Theater Commander.35 This means that SOF brigades are now assets to be employed by the Theater Commander as part of a unified, multi-service campaign plan, rather than as stovepiped service-specific units. The goal was to enable true integrated joint operations, where a PLAGF SOF team could, for example, be inserted by a PLAAF helicopter to designate a target for a PLAN vessel or a PLARF missile strike, all under the unified command of a single theater headquarters.26

In parallel with this command structure overhaul, the reforms also drove a significant organizational expansion. Most of the existing army SOF groups (dadui) and regiments were upgraded and expanded into full special operations brigades, typically comprising 2,000 to 3,000 personnel.24 This “brigadization” was part of a PLA-wide shift away from large, unwieldy divisions toward smaller, more agile, and modular combined-arms brigades (CA-BDEs).34 This indicates that SOF are now viewed not just as an elite niche capability, but as a core component of the PLA’s primary warfighting formations, with each of the PLA’s 13 Group Armies now having its own organic SOF brigade.19 While this structure is modeled on Western joint command systems, the PLA’s underlying command philosophy remains highly centralized, delegating less authority to junior leaders than is common in Western SOF and keeping these potent forces under the tight control of the theater commander.19

Current Order of Battle

The post-2015 reforms have resulted in a formidable and standardized SOF structure across the PLA and PAP. The brigade has become the standard unit of organization, providing a significant and scalable capability to each Theater Command and service branch.

Service BranchTheater Command / Command ElementParent FormationUnit DesignationUnit Nickname (Cognomen)Primary Mission Profile
PLAGFEastern Theater Command71st Group ArmySpecial Operations Brigade 71“Sharks” (海鲨)Ground DA/SR, Amphibious Operations
Eastern Theater Command72nd Group ArmySpecial Operations Brigade 72“Thunderbolts” (霹雳)Ground DA/SR, Urban Operations
Eastern Theater Command73rd Group ArmySpecial Operations Brigade 73“Flying Dragons of the East Sea” (东海飞龙)Ground DA/SR, Amphibious/Island Assault
Southern Theater Command74th Group ArmySpecial Operations Brigade 74“Southern Sharp Swords” (南国利剑)Ground DA/SR, Maritime/Jungle Operations
Southern Theater Command75th Group ArmySpecial Operations Brigade 75“Jungle Tigers” (丛林猛虎)Ground DA/SR, Jungle/Mountain Warfare
Western Theater Command76th Group ArmySpecial Operations Brigade 76“Snowy Maples” (雪枫) / “Sky Wolf Commandos” (天狼突击队)Ground DA/SR, Desert/High-Altitude Warfare
Western Theater Command77th Group ArmySpecial Operations Brigade 77“Southwest Cheetahs” (西南猎豹)Ground DA/SR, Mountain/High-Altitude Warfare
Northern Theater Command78th Group ArmySpecial Operations Brigade 78“Blood Wolves” (血狼)Ground DA/SR, Cold Weather/Forest Warfare
Northern Theater Command79th Group ArmySpecial Operations Brigade 79“Amur Tigers” (雄狮/东北虎)Ground DA/SR, Cold Weather/Forest Warfare
Northern Theater Command80th Group ArmySpecial Operations Brigade 80“Eagles” (雄鹰)Ground DA/SR, Amphibious Operations
Central Theater Command81st Group ArmySpecial Operations Brigade 81“Cheetahs” (猎豹)Ground DA/SR, Strategic Reserve
Central Theater Command82nd Group ArmySpecial Operations Brigade 82“Arrow” (响箭)Ground DA/SR, Strategic Reserve, Capital Defense
Central Theater Command83rd Group ArmySpecial Operations Brigade 83“Central Plains Tigers” (中原猛虎)Ground DA/SR, Strategic Reserve
Western Theater CommandXinjiang Military DistrictSpecial Operations Brigade 84“Kunlun Blade” (昆仑利刃)Counter-Terrorism, High-Altitude/Desert Warfare
Western Theater CommandTibet Military DistrictSpecial Operations Brigade 85“Highland Snow Leopards” (高原雪豹)High-Altitude Mountain Warfare
PLANMCSouthern Theater CommandPLA Navy7th Marine Brigade“Jiaolong Commandos” (蛟龙突击队)Maritime Interdiction, Amphibious Recon, VBSS
PLAAFAC(Strategic Reserve)PLA Air ForceSpecial Operations Brigade“Thunder Gods” (雷神)Airborne Insertion, Strategic Raids, Airfield Seizure
PLARF(Strategic Reserve)PLA Rocket ForceSpecial Operations Regiment“Sharp Blade” (利刃)Strategic Asset Security, Target Reconnaissance
PAP(Internal Security)1st Mobile CorpsSpecial Operations Detachment 1“Falcon Commando” (猎鹰突击队)National-Level CT, Anti-Hijacking, Hostage Rescue
(Internal Security)2nd Mobile CorpsSpecial Operations Detachment 1“Snow Leopard Commando” (雪豹突击队)National-Level CT, Urban Operations, Hostage Rescue
(Internal Security)Xinjiang PAP CorpsMountain Counter-Terrorism Detachment“Mountain Eagle Commando” (山鹰突击队)National-Level CT, Mountain/High-Altitude CT

Note: DA/SR refers to Direct Action/Special Reconnaissance. Unit nicknames and specific mission profiles are based on open-source reporting and official media portrayals.19

IV. Doctrinal and Tactical Evolution: From Guerrilla Roots to System-of-Systems Warfare

The evolution of PLA SOF doctrine and tactics mirrors the force’s broader technological and organizational transformation. Initial concepts were a direct extension of the traditional zhenchabing role, emphasizing infiltration and direct action with limited technological support. Over the past two decades, this has evolved into a sophisticated doctrine that positions SOF as a critical node within a complex, networked “system of systems.” This evolution is reflected in their expanding mission set, the increasing complexity of their training, and their formal integration into the PLA’s joint operations framework.

Mission Set Progression

The tasks assigned to PLA SOF have expanded significantly since their inception. In the 1990s, their missions were primarily an enhancement of the classic reconnaissance role: deep penetration for special reconnaissance, raids on high-value targets, sabotage of enemy infrastructure, and harassment of rear-echelon forces to disrupt enemy operations.24

By the 2000s and into the present day, this mission set has broadened to align with the PLA’s growing capabilities and strategic concerns. It now explicitly includes hostage rescue, counter-terrorism, and “decapitation” strikes against enemy political and military leadership.21 Perhaps the most significant evolution has been their integration into the PLA’s long-range precision strike complex. A primary role for SOF in a modern conflict is to act as forward sensors for the PLA Rocket Force and Air Force. Small, clandestine teams are tasked with infiltrating enemy territory to locate, identify, and provide terminal guidance for conventional ballistic and cruise missile strikes against critical targets.45 Furthermore, their role has expanded into the non-kinetic realm of information warfare. PLA texts describe SOF being tasked with seizing or destroying enemy media outlets and using captured facilities or prepositioned transmitters to broadcast propaganda, aiming to “disintegrate enemy resolve” and support broader psychological warfare campaigns.11

Training and Selection

To create operators capable of executing these demanding missions, the PLA has developed an exceptionally rigorous selection and training pipeline. The selection process has a high attrition rate, with some reports suggesting that 50% to 90% of volunteers fail to complete the initial training program.47

The training regimen is notoriously arduous, designed to push soldiers to their absolute physical and psychological limits. It incorporates elements common to Western SOF training, such as “Hell Week” style endurance tests where trainees must survive for days in the field on minimal sleep and rations while completing grueling physical tasks.48 Training also includes resistance to interrogation, preparing soldiers to withstand capture and exploitation.27 The curriculum is comprehensive, covering advanced individual combat skills, small-unit tactics, and proficiency with a wide array of both domestic and foreign weapon systems.44 A core competency for all PLA SOF is “triphibious” insertion—the ability to deploy by land, sea (including subsurface), and air—which is practiced extensively.24

Benchmarking through International Competitions

In the absence of modern combat experience since the Sino-Vietnamese border conflicts, the PLA has systematically used international military competitions as a substitute for battlefield validation and as a tool for military diplomacy. Since the early 2000s, teams from PLA and PAP special forces have become dominant fixtures at these events.27

They have consistently achieved top rankings at the Annual Warrior Competition in Jordan, an event considered the “Olympics” of special forces.19 They have also excelled at more specialized events, such as sniper competitions in Slovakia and Hungary and reconnaissance contests in Kazakhstan.19 While success in these competitions is a significant source of national and unit pride, heavily promoted by state media, their primary value is strategic. These events allow the PLA to benchmark its soldiers’ skills, tactics, and equipment against international peers, identify deficiencies, and absorb best practices in a highly competitive, if non-lethal, environment. This systematic approach represents a deliberate strategy to build proficiency and project an image of elite capability, mitigating a critical experience gap with Western counterparts.

Integration into Joint Operations

The ultimate goal of the PLA’s modernization is to achieve victory in “informatized” and, in the future, “intelligentized” warfare. Doctrinally, this is to be accomplished through “Integrated Joint Operations” (IJO), where effects from all services and domains are seamlessly combined to overwhelm an adversary.26 Within this framework, special operations are not seen as an independent activity but as a vital link in a “system of systems,” integrated with information warfare, firepower assault, maneuver, and psychological warfare.21

This doctrinal integration is put into practice through a series of large-scale joint training exercises. Exercises codenamed “Sharp Sword” (利刃) and “Cooperation” (合作) are specifically designed to test the joint command structures of the Theater Commands and practice the integration of SOF with conventional land, sea, and air forces.55 In these scenarios, SOF units are frequently tasked with missions that directly enable the main force, such as conducting reconnaissance for an amphibious landing, providing terminal guidance for artillery barrages, or seizing a critical bridge or airfield immediately prior to the arrival of conventional troops.44 This doctrinal emphasis on a supporting role, combined with their large brigade-level organization, indicates that the PLA’s primary conception of its SOF is as elite shock troops—akin to the U.S. Army Rangers—rather than as a force for clandestine, strategic-level unconventional warfare. They are the sharpest tip of the conventional spear, not a separate strategic instrument.

V. Armament and Technology: An Engineering Analysis of SOF Weaponry and Equipment

The evolution of small arms and individual equipment within the PLA’s special operations community provides a clear technical narrative of the force’s broader modernization. This progression can be analyzed in three distinct eras, moving from reliable but technologically simple Soviet-inspired systems to a proprietary small-caliber family of weapons, and culminating in the current generation of modular, networked systems designed for the “informatized” battlefield. This technological trajectory reflects a deliberate shift in design philosophy, increasingly prioritizing operator ergonomics, modularity, and systems integration in a manner that mirrors global SOF trends.

Era 1 (1970s-1980s): The Reconnaissance Soldier’s Kit

The equipment of the PLA’s elite zhenchabing during and after the Sino-Vietnamese War was pragmatic and robust, reflecting a design philosophy that prioritized reliability in harsh conditions over advanced features.

  • Primary Rifle: The Type 81 assault rifle, chambered in 7.62x39mm, was the workhorse of this era. Its key technical departure from the AK-47 platform was the use of a short-stroke gas piston system, in contrast to the AK’s long-stroke piston. This design change resulted in a smoother recoil impulse and reduced bolt carrier mass, contributing to significantly better practical accuracy than the Type 56 (AK-47 clone) it supplemented.17 The Type 81-1 variant, featuring a side-folding stock, was developed for paratroopers and other specialized units requiring a more compact weapon.18
  • Specialized Weapons: For close-quarters combat and infiltration, reconnaissance troops were issued the Type 79 submachine gun. A lightweight, stamped-steel weapon chambered in the high-velocity 7.62x25mm Tokarev cartridge, it was one of the first indigenous Chinese SMG designs. It utilized a gas-operated, rotating closed-bolt action, a complex mechanism for a submachine gun, intended to improve accuracy. However, it suffered from an excessively high rate of fire (around 1000 rpm) and reliability problems, particularly in jungle environments, and was eventually phased out of frontline military service.12 For clandestine operations requiring maximum sound suppression, units used the
    Type 67 integrally suppressed pistol. This weapon fired a proprietary 7.62x17mm subsonic cartridge and featured a slide-lock mechanism that allowed the operator to manually cycle the action for single shots, preventing any noise from the reciprocating slide and achieving maximum quietness.61

Era 2 (1990s-2010s): The 5.8mm Revolution

The 1990s marked a pivotal moment in Chinese small arms development with the introduction of an entirely new, indigenous cartridge and a family of weapons designed around it. This was a clear statement of China’s intent to break from Soviet-caliber dependency and develop a system tailored to its own doctrinal requirements.

  • The New Caliber: The PLA introduced the 5.8x42mm DBP87 cartridge, a small-caliber, high-velocity round intended to replace both the 7.62x39mm intermediate and 7.62x54mmR full-power cartridges in infantry use. Chinese sources claim the 5.8mm round possesses a flatter trajectory and superior penetration against body armor compared to both the NATO 5.56x45mm and the Russian 5.45x39mm rounds.65
  • Primary Rifle: The QBZ-95 (Type 95) assault rifle became the iconic weapon of this new generation. Its bullpup configuration, placing the action and magazine behind the trigger group, allowed for a full-length barrel in a compact overall package, a feature deemed advantageous for mechanized infantry, paratroopers, and special forces. First seen in public with the PLA Hong Kong Garrison in 1997, it was widely issued to SOF units.65 The later
    QBZ-95-1 variant addressed some of the original’s ergonomic shortcomings and added a small optics rail on the carrying handle. Customized versions with aftermarket rails and accessories were often seen in the hands of SOF operators, foreshadowing a demand for greater modularity.65
  • Designated Marksman Rifle (DMR): To provide precision fire at the squad level, the PLA adopted the QBU-88 (Type 88), the first dedicated DMR in its history. Also a bullpup chambered in 5.8x42mm, it was designed to fire a heavier, more accurate loading of the cartridge and was typically issued with a 3-9x magnified optic. Adopted in 1997, it gave SOF squads an organic capability to engage point targets beyond the effective range of their standard assault rifles.69
  • Sidearm: The standard sidearm became the QSZ-92 (Type 92) semi-automatic pistol. Uniquely, it was developed in two calibers for different roles. The military version, QSZ-92-5.8, is chambered in 5.8x21mm, a high-velocity, bottlenecked cartridge designed for armor penetration, and features a 20-round double-stack magazine. The police version, QSZ-92-9, is chambered in the ubiquitous 9x19mm Parabellum with a 15-round magazine.72

Era 3 (Present): The Modular and Integrated Generation

The current generation of PLA SOF equipment reflects a profound philosophical shift. Learning from two decades of experience with the QBZ-95 and observing global trends in small arms design, the PLA has moved away from a closed, proprietary system toward one that emphasizes modularity, ergonomics, and seamless integration with digital systems.

  • Primary Rifle: The QBZ-191 assault rifle represents a decisive return to a conventional rifle layout. This change addresses the inherent ergonomic limitations of the QBZ-95 bullpup, such as the awkward safety selector and difficulty for left-handed shooters. The QBZ-191 features a full-length Picatinny rail along the top of the receiver, an adjustable telescoping stock, and ambidextrous controls, allowing for a high degree of customization with various optics, lights, and lasers—a critical requirement for modern SOF.80 The weapon is being fielded as a complete family, including a standard 14.5-inch barrel rifle, a shorter carbine variant (
    QBZ-192), and a DMR variant (QBU-191), allowing units to tailor the weapon to the mission. True to form, SOF and other elite units are the first to receive the new rifle system.80
  • Precision Sniper Systems: The PLA has now fully embraced Western-style precision sniper systems. SOF snipers are no longer limited to semi-automatic DMRs. They are now equipped with high-precision, bolt-action rifles like the CS/LR4 (chambered in 7.62x51mm NATO) and its more advanced successors, which offer sub-MOA accuracy.85 For anti-materiel and extreme long-range engagements, units employ heavy semi-automatic rifles like the
    QBU-10, chambered in the powerful 12.7x108mm cartridge.49
Era / TimeframeWeapon TypeDesignationCartridgeAction TypeYear IntroducedKey Engineering/Tactical Characteristics
Era 1 (1970s-1980s)Assault RifleType 81-17.62×39mmShort-stroke gas piston, rotating bolt1981Improved accuracy and reduced recoil over AK platform; folding stock for compactness. 17
Submachine GunType 797.62×25mm TokarevGas-operated, rotating bolt1979Lightweight and compact for CQC; high rate of fire but suffered reliability issues. 12
Suppressed WeaponType 67 Pistol7.62×17mm Type 64Blowback, semi-auto w/ slide lock1967Integrally suppressed with manual slide-lock for maximum quietness. 61
Era 2 (1990s-2010s)Assault RifleQBZ-955.8×42mm DBP87Short-stroke gas piston, rotating bolt1995Compact bullpup design; proprietary small-caliber, high-velocity ammunition. 65
DMRQBU-885.8×42mm DBP87Short-stroke gas piston, rotating bolt1997Bullpup DMR for squad-level precision fire; fires heavier 5.8mm loading. 69
SidearmQSZ-92-5.85.8×21mm DAP92Short recoil, rotating barrel lock1998High-capacity (20 rds) military version with armor-piercing ammunition. 74
Era 3 (Present)Assault RifleQBZ-1915.8×42mm DBP191Short-stroke gas piston, rotating bolt2019Conventional layout with full-length Picatinny rail, adjustable stock, improved ergonomics. 80
Sniper RifleCS/LR47.62×51mm NATOBolt-action~2012High-precision bolt-action system for dedicated sniper role; sub-MOA accuracy. 85
Anti-Materiel RifleQBU-1012.7×108mmGas-operated, semi-auto~2010Semi-automatic rifle for engaging light vehicles, sensors, and other hard targets. 86

The Integrated Soldier Combat System

The culmination of this technological evolution is the PLA’s new Integrated Soldier Combat System (单兵综合作战系统), which is being fielded concurrently with the QBZ-191 rifle family. This system is designed to transform the individual soldier from a simple rifleman into a networked sensor and shooter, fully integrated into the PLA’s “informatized” command and control architecture.91

  • Helmet: The QGF-11 combat helmet is a modern, high-cut design made from advanced composite materials. It features an advanced “OPS-Core” style suspension system with a dial for precise fitting, ensuring stability when mounting accessories. The helmet is equipped with side rails and a front shroud for the seamless integration of night vision goggles, communication headsets, tactical lights, and video cameras that can transmit a soldier’s point-of-view back to command centers.75
  • Body Armor: The Type 19 Individual Carrying System is a modular plate carrier that replaces older, less adaptable vests. It features Kevlar lining and pockets for hard armor plates, providing protection against rifle threats. The system is covered in the new “Xingkong” (星空, or “Starry Sky”) family of digital camouflage patterns and includes a full suite of modular pouches for ammunition and equipment.75 A 2020 PLA procurement order for nearly 1.4 million sets of body armor plates signaled a commitment to making effective personal protection a standard-issue item for the entire ground force, not just elite units.96
  • Communications and C2: The system’s core is its digital component. Each operator is equipped with an individual soldier radio for voice and data transmission within the squad. This is linked to a chest- or wrist-mounted terminal, a ruggedized tablet-like device that displays a digital map with real-time position data for the operator and their teammates, fed by the Beidou satellite navigation system. This terminal can receive and display orders, intelligence updates, and imagery from command, giving the individual soldier unprecedented situational awareness. Conversely, it allows commanders to track the precise location and status of every soldier on the battlefield in real-time, enabling a highly centralized form of command and control.75 This heavy reliance on networked technology, however, also introduces a potential vulnerability to sophisticated electronic warfare or cyber-attack.

VI. Future Trajectory: The Intelligentized Operator in Multi-Domain Conflict

The future development of the People’s Liberation Army’s Special Operations Forces is inextricably linked to the PLA’s overarching strategic goal of becoming a “world-class” military capable of fighting and winning “intelligentized wars” (智能化战争) by mid-century.99 For PLA SOF, this means evolving beyond their current role as elite “informatized” units and becoming the vanguard of a new form of warfare characterized by the seamless fusion of human operators, artificial intelligence, and autonomous systems across multiple domains. Their future trajectory will be defined by their integration with unmanned platforms, their symbiotic relationship with the PLA’s new information-centric military branches, and their expanding role in protecting China’s global interests.

The Human-Machine Interface: Integration with Unmanned Systems

PLA doctrine explicitly anticipates that future conflicts will be increasingly “unmanned, intangible, and silent”.101 SOF, with their emphasis on small, technologically adept teams, are the natural pioneers for integrating unmanned systems at the tactical edge.

  • Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs): PLA SOF have already integrated small, tactical UAVs for reconnaissance and target acquisition missions.24 The future evolution of this capability will involve SOF operators not just receiving data from drones, but actively controlling them. This includes directing larger, armed UAVs for close air support, acting as forward controllers for “loyal wingman” type unmanned combat aerial vehicles (UCAVs) operating in conjunction with manned aircraft, and potentially deploying and directing autonomous drone swarms for reconnaissance or saturation attacks.102
  • Unmanned Ground Vehicles (UGVs): The PLA is actively developing a range of UGVs for logistics, reconnaissance, and direct-fire support roles. The indigenously developed “Lynx” (山猫) family of all-terrain vehicles, widely used by SOF, includes variants that can be remotely operated.104 This provides SOF teams with the ability to conduct “unmanned reconnaissance-in-force,” sending an armed robotic platform to probe enemy defenses, breach obstacles, or provide covering fire, all while the human operators remain in a secure position.105

The Information Domain: The Symbiotic Relationship with the Information Support Force

Perhaps the most significant development shaping the future of PLA SOF was the April 2024 reorganization of the Strategic Support Force (SSF). The SSF, created in 2015, centralized the PLA’s space, cyber, electronic warfare, and psychological warfare capabilities.106 Its dissolution and replacement by three new, more specialized arms—the Aerospace Force, the Cyberspace Force, and the Information Support Force (ISF)—represents a refinement of the PLA’s approach to multi-domain warfare.108

The ISF is now the PLA’s core strategic branch responsible for building, maintaining, and operating the network information systems that underpin all joint operations.110 This creates a direct, symbiotic relationship with SOF. In future conflicts, SOF will act as the premier forward sensors and kinetic effectors for the ISF. A SOF team, having infiltrated enemy territory, can provide the precise, on-the-ground intelligence needed for the ISF to execute a targeted cyber-attack against an enemy command node. Conversely, the ISF can provide direct support to a SOF mission by jamming enemy communications, disabling sensor grids, or conducting psychological operations through social media and broadcast networks to create confusion and deception that facilitates the SOF team’s success.107 This formalizes the integration of kinetic and non-kinetic effects, making SOF a key enabler for victory in the information domain.

From Regional Contingency to Global Projection

While the PLA’s primary modernization drivers remain regional contingencies, particularly a potential conflict over Taiwan or in the South China Sea, China’s expanding global economic and political interests are creating new requirements for military power projection.114 PLA SOF, particularly the PLANMC’s Jiaolong Commandos, are at the forefront of this shift.

The PLANMC is being explicitly designed and trained as an expeditionary force capable of operating far from mainland China to protect the country’s “overseas interests”.115 Their operational experience in anti-piracy missions in the Gulf of Aden and non-combatant evacuation operations in Yemen and Sudan demonstrates a growing capability for global deployment.29 As China’s global footprint continues to expand, potentially including more overseas military bases, PLA SOF will increasingly be called upon to conduct a wider range of missions abroad. These could include counter-terrorism operations to protect Chinese nationals, security for Belt and Road Initiative projects, and “gray zone” activities that fall below the threshold of conventional warfare.116

Concluding Assessment: Strengths, Challenges, and Implications

The evolution of the PLA’s special operations forces from humble reconnaissance scouts to technologically advanced, joint-capable brigades has been remarkable in its speed and scope. They represent the cutting edge of the PLA’s broader military modernization and provide the Chinese Communist Party with a potent and flexible tool of national power.

  • Strengths: PLA SOF are composed of highly disciplined, physically elite, and politically reliable soldiers. They are prioritized for the PLA’s most advanced individual weaponry and equipment, including the new Integrated Soldier Combat System. As a “new type” of combat force, they receive significant funding and political support from the highest levels of the CMC. The 2015 reforms have organizationally integrated them into a joint warfighting structure, theoretically enabling them to draw upon the full might of the PLA’s theater-level assets.
  • Challenges: The most significant weakness of PLA SOF is their profound lack of modern combat experience. Unlike their Western counterparts, who have been engaged in continuous combat operations for over two decades, the PLA’s last major conflict ended in the 1980s.27 Their rigid, top-down command culture may also stifle the initiative and adaptability at the small-unit level that is the hallmark of effective special operations.27 Finally, while their individual equipment is becoming world-class, they still lack the dedicated strategic airlift, specialized aviation support (like the U.S. 160th SOAR), and robust global logistics infrastructure that enable true long-range, long-duration special operations.21 Their increasing reliance on complex information networks also presents a critical vulnerability that a peer adversary with advanced EW and cyber capabilities could exploit.
  • Strategic Implications: The continued growth, professionalization, and technological advancement of Chinese SOF present a formidable capability for both regional conflict and global power projection. In a regional scenario, they are trained to be a decisive factor in the opening hours of a conflict, tasked with paralyzing an adversary’s command and control, disabling air defenses, and paving the way for a main assault. Globally, they provide Beijing with a scalable and deniable option for protecting its interests abroad. The evolution of these forces is a clear indicator of the PLA’s strategic ambitions, and their future development will serve as a key barometer of China’s progress toward its goal of becoming a world-class military power.

If you find this post useful, please share the link on Facebook, with your friends, etc. Your support is much appreciated and if you have any feedback, please email me at in**@*********ps.com. Please note that for links to other websites, we are only paid if there is an affiliate program such as Avantlink, Impact, Amazon and eBay and only if you purchase something. If you’d like to directly donate to help fund our continued report, please visit our donations page.

Works cited

  1. People’s Liberation Army | Chinese Military, Armed Forces, PLA – Britannica, accessed August 21, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/topic/Peoples-Liberation-Army-Chinese-army
  2. A brief noncredible overview of Chinese military history and doctrine for the last 75 years : r/NonCredibleDefense – Reddit, accessed August 21, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/NonCredibleDefense/comments/1htrzwo/a_brief_noncredible_overview_of_chinese_military/
  3. China’s Special Operations Forces: The cutting edge of the PLA – YouTube, accessed August 21, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ebVfd6s2o_8
  4. 敢入刀山火海的陆军特种部队 – 科普中国军事科技前沿, accessed August 21, 2025, https://junshi.gmw.cn/2022-07/29/content_35919348.htm
  5. 组图：解放军两栖侦察兵生存训练中生吃蛇胆 – 新华网, accessed August 21, 2025, http://www.xinhuanet.com/mil/2015-04/27/c_127736955.htm
  6. 侦察兵：常规部队里的“特种兵” (组图) – 新华网, accessed August 21, 2025, http://www.xinhuanet.com/mil/2015-11/25/c_128465882.htm
  7. 解放军报记者走进训练场体验侦察尖兵的“艰难一日” – 中国军网, accessed August 21, 2025, http://www.81.cn/2022zt/2022-03/28/content_10143952.htm
  8. Sino-Vietnamese War – Wikipedia, accessed August 21, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sino-Vietnamese_War
  9. Sino-Vietnamese War 1979 – Để gió cuốn đi, accessed August 21, 2025, https://tamdiepblog.wordpress.com/2019/02/17/sino-vietnamese-war-1979/
  10. THE CHINESE PEOPLE’S LIBERATION ARMY: “SHORT ARMS AND SLOW LEGS” Russell D. Howard – Nuke, accessed August 21, 2025, https://nuke.fas.org/guide/china/doctrine/ocp28.htm
  11. Chinese Special Forces: Dragons of the East – Grey Dynamics, accessed August 21, 2025, https://greydynamics.com/chinese-special-forces-dragons-of-the-east/
  12. Type 79 submachine gun – Wikipedia, accessed August 21, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_79_submachine_gun
  13. PLA 1979 (Sino-Vietnamese War) : r/Impression_Kits – Reddit, accessed August 21, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Impression_Kits/comments/1iajsmo/pla_1979_sinovietnamese_war/
  14. en.wikipedia.org, accessed August 21, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_63_assault_rifle
  15. When an SKS and an AK have a baby… ( Type 63 assault rifle ) – Reddit, accessed August 21, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ForgottenWeapons/comments/1bma74b/when_an_sks_and_an_ak_have_a_baby_type_63_assault/
  16. Type 63: China Makes an AK/SKS Hybrid – YouTube, accessed August 21, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ba7mDVZYpSM
  17. The Type 81 Rifle Tested China’s Arms Prowess—Did It Impress? – The National Interest, accessed August 21, 2025, https://nationalinterest.org/blog/reboot/type-81-rifle-tested-chinas-arms-prowess-did-it-impress-181199/
  18. Type 81 assault rifle – Wikipedia, accessed August 21, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_81_assault_rifle
  19. 中国人民解放军特种部队 – 维基百科, accessed August 21, 2025, https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-cn/%E4%B8%AD%E5%9C%8B%E4%BA%BA%E6%B0%91%E8%A7%A3%E6%94%BE%E8%BB%8D%E7%89%B9%E7%A8%AE%E9%83%A8%E9%9A%8A
  20. The Evolution of China’s Military Strategy – MIT, accessed August 21, 2025, http://web.mit.edu/fravel/www/fravel.2005.evolution.china.military.strategy.pdf
  21. How special are PLA special forces? – ANI News, accessed August 21, 2025, https://www.aninews.in/news/world/asia/how-special-are-pla-special-forces20200130120235/
  22. photo.81.cn, accessed August 21, 2025, http://photo.81.cn/jrfc/2014-12/16/content_6270918_5.htm#:~:text=%E5%B9%BF%E5%B7%9E%E5%86%9B%E5%8C%BA%E7%89%B9%E7%A7%8D%E9%83%A8%E9%98%9F%EF%BC%8C%E5%8F%88,%E9%83%BD%E6%AF%94%E5%85%B6%E4%BB%96%E5%86%9B%E5%8C%BA%E9%AB%98%E3%80%82
  23. 解放军特种部队的帅气别名 – 中国军网, accessed August 21, 2025, http://photo.81.cn/jrfc/2014-12/16/content_6270918_5.htm
  24. PLA Special Operations Forces: Organizations, Missions and …, accessed August 21, 2025, https://jamestown.org/program/pla-special-operations-forces-organizations-missions-and-training/
  25. Modernising China’s Military, 1997-2012 – OpenEdition Journals, accessed August 21, 2025, https://journals.openedition.org/chinaperspectives/5701
  26. The PLA’s Pursuit of Enhanced Joint Operations Capabilities, accessed August 21, 2025, https://www.nids.mod.go.jp/publication/chinareport/pdf/china_report_EN_web_2022_A02.pdf
  27. People’s Liberation Army Special Operations Forces – Wikipedia, accessed August 21, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People%27s_Liberation_Army_Special_Operations_Forces
  28. en.wikipedia.org, accessed August 21, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People%27s_Liberation_Army_Special_Operations_Forces#:~:text=8.2%20Sources-,History,Somalia%20on%2026%20December%202008.
  29. Special Operations Brigade (PLA Navy Marine Corps) – Wikipedia, accessed August 21, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_Operations_Brigade_(PLA_Navy_Marine_Corps)
  30. China Maritime Report No. 19: The PLA Airborne Corps in a Joint Island Landing Campaign, accessed August 21, 2025, https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1018&context=cmsi-maritime-reports
  31. People’s Liberation Army Air Force Airborne Corps – Wikipedia, accessed August 21, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People%27s_Liberation_Army_Air_Force_Airborne_Corps
  32. 中国人民武装警察部队猎鹰突击队- 维基百科，自由的百科全书, accessed August 21, 2025, https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-cn/%E4%B8%AD%E5%9B%BD%E4%BA%BA%E6%B0%91%E6%AD%A6%E8%A3%85%E8%AD%A6%E5%AF%9F%E9%83%A8%E9%98%9F%E7%8C%8E%E9%B9%B0%E7%AA%81%E5%87%BB%E9%98%9F
  33. 中國的21支特戰部隊 – 國防安全研究院, accessed August 21, 2025, https://indsr.org.tw/respublicationcon?uid=12&resid=727&pid=2799
  34. An Analysis of Chinese Military Reform – Towards the US Model? – RSIS, accessed August 21, 2025, https://rsis.edu.sg/rsis-publication/rsis/an-analysis-of-chinese-military-reform-towards-the-us-model/
  35. People’s Liberation Army Reforms and Their Ramifications | RAND, accessed August 21, 2025, https://www.rand.org/pubs/commentary/2016/09/pla-reforms-and-their-ramifications.html
  36. PLA Reforms and China’s Nuclear Forces – National Defense University Press, accessed August 21, 2025, https://ndupress.ndu.edu/Media/News/Article/969665/pla-reforms-and-chinas-nuclear-forces/
  37. Theater command – Wikipedia, accessed August 21, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theater_command
  38. Theater Commands – China Military – China’s Ministry of National Defense, accessed August 21, 2025, http://eng.mod.gov.cn/xb/TheaterCommands/index.html
  39. THEATER COMMANDS OF CHINA – ORCA | Organisation for Research on China and Asia, accessed August 21, 2025, https://orcasia.org/theater-commands-of-china
  40. 深化国防和军队改革 – 维基百科, accessed August 21, 2025, https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-cn/%E6%B7%B1%E5%8C%96%E5%9B%BD%E9%98%B2%E5%92%8C%E5%86%9B%E9%98%9F%E6%94%B9%E9%9D%A9
  41. (U) The PLA’s New Joint Doctrine: The Capstone of the New Era Operations Regulations System – CNA.org., accessed August 21, 2025, https://www.cna.org/archive/CNA_Files/pdf/the-plas-new-joint-doctrine.pdf
  42. An Introduction to China’s High-Mobility Combined Arms Battalion Concept, accessed August 21, 2025, https://www.benning.army.mil/infantry/magazine/issues/2020/Fall/pdf/5_Arostegui-HIMOB.pdf
  43. 中华人民共和国特种部队 – 维基百科, accessed August 21, 2025, https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-cn/%E4%B8%AD%E8%8F%AF%E4%BA%BA%E6%B0%91%E5%85%B1%E5%92%8C%E5%9C%8B%E7%89%B9%E7%A8%AE%E9%83%A8%E9%9A%8A
  44. PLA Special Operations: Forces, Command, Training and Future …, accessed August 21, 2025, https://jamestown.org/program/pla-special-operations-forces-command-training-and-future-direction/
  45. (U) CHINA: PLAA COMBINED-ARMS BRIGADE’S RECONNAISSANCE OPERATIONS, accessed August 21, 2025, https://g2webcontent.z2.web.core.usgovcloudapi.net/OEE/China%20Landing%20Zone/PLAA-Combined-Arms-Brigade-Reconnaissance-Operations.pdf
  46. China Maritime Report No. 18: Chinese Special Operations in a Large-Scale Island Landing, accessed August 21, 2025, https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1017&context=cmsi-maritime-reports
  47. PLA Army Special Operations Forces – Boot Camp & Military Fitness Institute, accessed August 21, 2025, https://bootcampmilitaryfitnessinstitute.com/elite-special-forces/chinese-elite-special-forces/pla-army-special-operations-forces/
  48. 【中国军队】空中鹰陆地虎水中龙——中国陆军特种部队纪实 – 央视新闻, accessed August 21, 2025, http://m.news.cctv.com/2017/07/20/ARTIVjf3tMJgZcWmKwFziGhO170720.shtml
  49. 【庆祝中国人民解放军建军90周年】中国军队：国之利刃中国陆军特种部队 – 央视网, accessed August 21, 2025, http://military.cctv.com/2017/07/20/ARTIXrjq1OiuX4OdDPzOpPy7170720.shtml
  50. 第十届“勇士竞赛”国际特种兵比武落幕 – 国防部, accessed August 21, 2025, http://www.mod.gov.cn/gfbw/zt/gfbwzt/2018_213791/lbbzdzjbjl/scdb/wj/4821156.html
  51. 巅峰对决丨雪豹突击队勇士载誉归来 – 国防部, accessed August 21, 2025, http://www.mod.gov.cn/gfbw/gfjy_index/xjdx/4818316.html
  52. 第七届“勇士竞赛”国际特种兵比武落幕 – 时政- 人民网, accessed August 21, 2025, http://politics.people.com.cn/n/2015/0426/c70731-26905057.html
  53. Real-life CS: Experience elite snipers’ POV at ‘Sharp Blade-2025’ – YouTube, accessed August 21, 2025, https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=uU5q43lqJlg&pp=0gcJCcwJAYcqIYzv
  54. The PLA’s New Joint Doctrine – CNA.org., accessed August 21, 2025, https://www.cna.org/analyses/2021/09/the-plas-new-joint-doctrine
  55. PLA Joint Training and Implications for Future Expeditionary Capabilities – RAND, accessed August 21, 2025, https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/testimonies/CT400/CT451/RAND_CT451.pdf
  56. 白皮书：中外联演联训十年超60次海陆空均获进展（图） – 时政- 人民网, accessed August 21, 2025, http://politics.people.com.cn/n/2013/0416/c362226-21154423.html
  57. 利刃演习特种部队不再“比武”全程嵌入体系作战-观察者网 – guancha.cn, accessed August 21, 2025, https://www.guancha.cn/military-affairs/2016_10_25_378267.shtml
  58. “利刃-2016·确山A”演习陆军特种部队全程嵌入体系作战 – 新华网, accessed August 21, 2025, http://news.xinhuanet.com/mil/2016-10/25/c_129336222.htm
  59. Type 79 submachine gun – Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, accessed August 21, 2025, https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_79_submachine_gun
  60. Type 79 SMG: China’s MP7 At Home – Forgotten Weapons, accessed August 21, 2025, https://www.forgottenweapons.com/type-79-smg-chinas-mp7-at-home/
  61. Type 67 (silenced pistol) – Wikipedia, accessed August 21, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_67_(silenced_pistol)
  62. Chinese Type 67 Integrally Suppressed Pistol : r/ForgottenWeapons – Reddit, accessed August 21, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ForgottenWeapons/comments/d0lrtd/chinese_type_67_integrally_suppressed_pistol/
  63. Type-67 – Wikipedia, accessed August 21, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type-67
  64. Steam Workshop::Type 64 and Type 67 Silenced Pistols(CWP) – Steam Community, accessed August 21, 2025, https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2180853978
  65. QBZ-95 – Wikipedia, accessed August 21, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QBZ-95
  66. QBZ-95 Chinese 5.8mm Assault Rifle – ODIN – OE Data Integration Network, accessed August 21, 2025, https://odin.tradoc.army.mil/WEG/Asset/QBZ-95_Chinese_5.8mm_Bullpup-Style_Assault_Rifle
  67. 95式自动步枪 – 维基百科, accessed August 21, 2025, https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-cn/95%E5%BC%8F%E8%87%AA%E5%8B%95%E6%AD%A5%E6%A7%8D
  68. 95步枪改进后令人眼睛一亮解放军特种兵用后都说好 – 新浪军事, accessed August 21, 2025, https://mil.sina.cn/sd/2017-12-13/detail-ifypnyqi4449881.d.html
  69. QBU-88 – Wikipedia, accessed August 21, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QBU-88
  70. QBU-88 Chinese 5.8mm Sniper Rifle – OE Data Integration Network, accessed August 21, 2025, https://odin.tradoc.army.mil/WEG/Asset/QBU-88_Chinese_5.8mm_Sniper_Rifle
  71. 88式狙击步枪 – 维基百科, accessed August 21, 2025, https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-cn/88%E5%BC%8F%E7%8B%99%E6%93%8A%E6%AD%A5%E6%A7%8D
  72. List of infantry equipment of the People’s Liberation Army of China – Wikipedia, accessed August 21, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_infantry_equipment_of_the_People%27s_Liberation_Army_of_China
  73. PLA Infantry Weapons: Small Arms of the World’s Largest Army, accessed August 21, 2025, https://sadefensejournal.com/pla-infantry-weapons-small-arms-of-the-worlds-largest-army/
  74. QSZ-92 – Wikipedia, accessed August 21, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QSZ-92
  75. List of equipment of the People’s Liberation Army Ground Force – Wikipedia, accessed August 21, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_equipment_of_the_People%27s_Liberation_Army_Ground_Force
  76. QSZ-92 (Type 92) Chinese 9mm/5.8mm Semi-Automatic Pistol – OE Data Integration Network, accessed August 21, 2025, https://odin.tradoc.army.mil/WEG/Asset/QSZ-92_(Type_92)_Chinese_9mm_Semi-Automatic_Pistol
  77. 92式手枪- 维基百科，自由的百科全书, accessed August 21, 2025, https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-cn/92%E5%BC%8F%E6%89%8B%E6%A7%8D
  78. 92式手槍- 維基百科，自由的百科全書, accessed August 21, 2025, https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-tw/92%E5%BC%8F%E6%89%8B%E6%A7%8D
  79. 详解中国92系列手枪外贸型畅销国际市场(组图) – 新浪军事, accessed August 21, 2025, http://mil.news.sina.com.cn/p/2007-02-02/0732429717.html?from=wap
  80. QBZ-191 – Wikipedia, accessed August 21, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QBZ-191
  81. QBZ-191自动步枪 – 维基百科, accessed August 21, 2025, https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-cn/QBZ-191%E8%87%AA%E5%8A%A8%E6%AD%A5%E6%9E%AA
  82. QBZ-191自動步槍- 維基百科, accessed August 21, 2025, https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-tw/QBZ-191%E8%87%AA%E5%8A%A8%E6%AD%A5%E6%9E%AA
  83. Standard-issue version of China’s QBZ-191 assault rifle revealed, accessed August 21, 2025, https://www.china-arms.com/2020/04/standard-qbz-191-rifle-revealed/
  84. 20式枪族各显神威狙击快狠准 – 大公网, accessed August 21, 2025, https://www.takungpao.com/news/232108/2023/0213/817884.html
  85. CS/LR4 – Wikipedia, accessed August 21, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CS/LR4
  86. 零距离揭秘中国高精度狙击步枪：狙击手训练细节曝光 – 央视网, accessed August 21, 2025, http://news.cctv.com/2019/05/18/ARTIxVO4wyC4cKJh80OcfGLT190518.shtml
  87. 中国特警装备新型高精度狙击步枪单价高达26万(图) – 新浪军事, accessed August 21, 2025, https://mil.sina.cn/sd/2019-08-13/detail-ihytcern0438416.d.html
  88. 央媒独家揭秘国产CS/LR4型高精度狙击步枪 – 新浪军事, accessed August 21, 2025, https://mil.sina.cn/zgjq/2021-09-16/detail-iktzqtyt6404492.d.html
  89. 独家揭秘国产CS/LR4型高精度狙击步枪 – 央视频- 央视网, accessed August 21, 2025, https://v.cctv.com/2021/09/16/VIDEcf56POcAkQNs4tq1WdvW210916.shtml
  90. QBU-10 – Wikipedia, accessed August 21, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QBU-10
  91. 聚焦单兵作战系统④未来战场的信息化与智能化 – 科普中国军事科技前沿, accessed August 21, 2025, https://junshi.gmw.cn/2020-06/24/content_33928532.htm
  92. 一线部队单兵作战装备曝光细节设计更趋人性化 – 央视网, accessed August 21, 2025, http://military.cctv.com/2019/10/05/ARTImmFWY3o5U3ioveFs3Y3F191005.shtml
  93. Chinese Army in Tibet Equips Individual Soldiers with Tactical Information Kits, accessed August 21, 2025, https://www.defensemirror.com/news/28643/Chinese_Army_in_Tibet_Equips_Individual_Soldiers_with_Tactical_Information_Kits
  94. QGF-03 – Wikipedia, accessed August 21, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QGF-03
  95. 我军换装新式头盔：曾做未来士兵标配可加挂各种设备 – 新浪军事, accessed August 21, 2025, https://mil.sina.cn/sd/2018-06-13/detail-ihcwpcmp9662572.d.html
  96. 解放军大规模采购防弹插板单兵防护达世界领先水平 – 新浪军事, accessed August 21, 2025, https://mil.sina.cn/sd/2020-02-24/detail-iimxxstf3973244.d.html
  97. 西藏解放军最新装备: 军官可远程启动士兵自毁？ – Radio Free Asia, accessed August 21, 2025, https://www.rfa.org/mandarin/yataibaodao/junshiwaijiao/gf1-01042021054458.html
  98. 单兵作战装备、通信指挥系统- CN1715823A – Google Patents, accessed August 21, 2025, https://patents.google.com/patent/CN1715823A/zh
  99. Testing the Waters: Modernization of People’s Liberation Army | Small Wars Journal by Arizona State University, accessed August 21, 2025, https://smallwarsjournal.com/2025/08/04/testing-the-waters-modernization-of-peoples-liberation-army/
  100. China’s Future Military Capabilities – Strategic Studies Institute – Army War College, accessed August 21, 2025, https://ssi.armywarcollege.edu/SSI-Media/Recent-Publications/Article/3944838/chinas-future-military-capabilities/
  101. The PLA’s Unmanned Aerial Systems – Air University, accessed August 21, 2025, https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/Portals/10/CASI/documents/Research/PLAAF/2018-08-29%20PLAs_Unmanned_Aerial_Systems.pdf
  102. 装备：特种部队必备配件 – MSS Defence, accessed August 21, 2025, https://mssdefence.com/zh/%E5%8D%9A%E5%AE%A2/%E7%89%B9%E7%A7%8D%E9%83%A8%E9%98%9F%E5%BF%85%E5%A4%87%E8%A3%85%E5%A4%87/
  103. 从“特殊兵种”加速走向“独立成军”——全球无人机作战力量建设呈现新趋势 – 新华网, accessed August 21, 2025, http://www.news.cn/milpro/20250109/1b247485db93487cb6b138a51ef0095b/c.html
  104. 山猫系列全地形车 – 维基百科, accessed August 21, 2025, https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-cn/%E5%B1%B1%E7%8C%AB%E7%B3%BB%E5%88%97%E5%85%A8%E5%9C%B0%E5%BD%A2%E8%BD%A6
  105. 无人系统将刷新未来战场补给方式- 解放军报 – 中国军网, accessed August 21, 2025, http://www.81.cn/jfjbmap/content/2019-10/15/content_245287.htm
  106. People’s Liberation Army Strategic Support Force – Wikipedia, accessed August 21, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People%27s_Liberation_Army_Strategic_Support_Force
  107. China’s Strategic Support Force: A Force for a New Era – Digital Commons @ NDU, accessed August 21, 2025, https://digitalcommons.ndu.edu/china-strategic-perspectives/6/
  108. Farewell to China’s Strategic Support Force. Let’s meet its replacements – Defense One, accessed August 21, 2025, https://www.defenseone.com/ideas/2024/04/farewell-chinas-strategic-support-force-lets-meet-its-replacement/396143/
  109. 专栏| 军事无禁区: 信息支援部队成立－解放军联合作战的开始 – Radio Free Asia, accessed August 21, 2025, https://www.rfa.org/mandarin/zhuanlan/junshiwujinqu/mil-04252024151006.html
  110. China Introduces People’s Liberation Army-Information Support Force | TRADOC G2 Operational Environment Enterprise, accessed August 21, 2025, https://oe.tradoc.army.mil/product/china-introduces-peoples-liberation-army-information-support-force/
  111. 中国人民解放军信息支援部队、军事航天部队和网络空间部队, accessed August 21, 2025, https://sgzz.lzre.edu.cn/info/1122/1429.htm
  112. Chinese information operations and information warfare – Wikipedia, accessed August 21, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_information_operations_and_information_warfare
  113. 透析信息化特种作战发展趋势 – 国防部, accessed August 21, 2025, http://www.mod.gov.cn/gfbw/jmsd/4822682.html
  114. Glimpses Of China’s New Air Combat Drones Emerge Ahead Of Massive Military Parade, accessed August 21, 2025, https://www.twz.com/air/glimpses-of-chinas-new-air-combat-drones-emerge-ahead-of-massive-military-parade
  115. The PLA Marine Corps (PLANMC) by Lt Gen P R Shankar (R) – Gunners Shot, accessed August 21, 2025, https://gunnersshot.com/2024/01/18/the-pla-marine-corps-planmc-by-lt-gen-p-r-shankar-r/
  116. Is it true the Chinese SOFs act more like “shock troops” compared to other SOFs who conduct unconventional warfare? And why is that? : r/WarCollege – Reddit, accessed August 21, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/WarCollege/comments/s8w4hk/is_it_true_the_chinese_sofs_act_more_like_shock/
  117. 未来特种作战发展趋势前瞻 – 中国社会科学网, accessed August 21, 2025, https://www.cssn.cn/jsx/jsx_xwzx/202401/t20240112_5727928.shtml