Tag Archives: Egypt

Analytics and Reports, Law Enforcement Analytics

Guardians of the Nile: An Assessment of Egypt’s Tourism and Antiquities Police in Cairo and Alexandria

October 24, 2025 RoninsGrips

The Tourism and Antiquities Police (TAP) of the Arab Republic of Egypt represents a critical instrument of state power, serving a dual function essential to national stability and economic survival. Its primary mission is the physical protection of the multi-billion-dollar tourism industry, a foundational pillar of the Egyptian economy. Concurrently, it serves a vital political purpose: projecting an image of absolute state control and enduring stability, a narrative central to the legitimacy of the current government under President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi. The TAP is not merely a specialized law enforcement branch; it is a key component of Egypt’s national security apparatus.

This report assesses that the TAP has evolved into a highly visible, para-militarized force whose doctrine and operational posture have been overwhelmingly shaped by two seminal events: the traumatic 1997 Luxor Massacre and the systemic collapse of state authority during the 2011 Revolution. The force’s effectiveness is consequently bifurcated. It demonstrates a high degree of success in deterring and preventing large-scale, coordinated terrorist attacks against high-profile tourist destinations in major urban centers like Cairo and Alexandria. This is achieved through a doctrine of overwhelming, visible security presence and hardened site defenses. However, this same model proves vulnerable to attacks by lone actors or small cells, as recent incidents in Alexandria have demonstrated. Furthermore, the force remains largely ineffective at stemming the systemic, low-level looting and illegal excavation of countless remote antiquities sites, a persistent drain on the nation’s cultural heritage.

A key judgment of this analysis is the existence of persistent friction and critical coordination failures between the Ministry of Interior (MOI), under which the TAP operates, and the Egyptian Armed Forces (EAF). This institutional seam creates significant operational risks, particularly in remote areas where jurisdictions overlap, as tragically demonstrated by the 2015 friendly fire incident in the Western Desert. The future challenges for the TAP will be defined by the need to adapt its security posture to counter evolving threats—shifting from large, organized groups to ideologically motivated lone actors—and to manage the inherent tension between providing robust security and avoiding the perception of an oppressive police state that could itself deter international visitors.

II. Historical Precedent: From the Medjay to the Modern Ministry

The existence of a specialized security force dedicated to protecting Egypt’s cultural and economic assets is not a modern phenomenon but a deeply rooted tradition of the Egyptian state. Understanding this historical context is crucial to appreciating the contemporary importance placed upon the Tourism and Antiquities Police. The concept of linking national security directly to the safeguarding of heritage is a foundational element of Egyptian statecraft.

The Pharaonic Legacy

The direct precursors to the modern TAP can be traced back thousands of years to the Pharaonic era, most notably to the elite units of the New Kingdom (c. 1570-1069 BCE) known as the Medjay.¹ Originally a nomadic people from Nubia, the Medjay were first integrated into the Egyptian state as desert scouts and mercenaries during the Middle Kingdom (c. 2040–1782 BCE).² Renowned for their loyalty, combat prowess, and knowledge of the desert, they evolved into an elite, multicultural paramilitary police force entrusted with the state’s most sensitive security tasks.¹

The Medjay’s mandate was remarkably similar to that of the modern TAP. They were the primary guardians of high-value sites, including the royal necropolises in the Valley of the Kings, temples that served as religious and economic centers, and state treasuries.² They also patrolled critical trade routes and protected caravans carrying gold and other precious goods.⁴ Beyond static guarding, the Medjay performed investigative duties. The detailed records of the Ramesside Tomb Robbery Trials (c. 1100 BCE) reveal their role in interrogating suspects, gathering evidence, and bringing criminals before the courts, where they also served as bailiffs.¹ This ancient force operated within a clear command structure, with the Chief of the Medjay being appointed by and accountable to the Vizier, the pharaoh’s highest official, ensuring that law enforcement was aligned with state policy.¹ This historical precedent establishes that the protection of heritage and its associated economic assets has been considered a core function of the central government in Egypt for millennia.

Formation of the Modern Police Apparatus

Following the Pharaonic period, law enforcement systems continued to evolve through the Greco-Roman, Islamic, and Ottoman eras, often with localized or military-led structures.⁵ The foundation of the modern Egyptian police, however, was laid in the 19th century. Mohamed Ali Pasha began to regulate and formalize a police system, creating specialized departments such as customs and secret police.⁶ The institutional structure we recognize today truly began to take shape under Khedive Ismail, who in 1863 brought in European officers to help organize the force and first officially introduced the word “police” into the Egyptian government lexicon.⁶

This period of formation is significant because it embedded within the Egyptian police an institutional culture derived from its colonial-era context. The police were established not just as a civil service to protect the public, but as a centralized, militarized tool for social control, intelligence gathering, and the protection of the ruling regime.⁸ This dual role—serving the public and serving the state’s political interests—has remained a defining characteristic of the Egyptian police apparatus to the present day.

Codification of the Modern Mandate

In the 20th century, as tourism became an increasingly vital component of the national economy, the need for a specialized security body became apparent. A key turning point was the government’s Five Year Plan of 1976, which formally recognized tourism as a central economic pillar and allocated significant state funds to its development.¹⁰ This economic prioritization directly led to the creation of the

General Administration of Tourism and Antiquities Police as a specialized directorate within the Ministry of Interior.¹⁰

The legal foundation for the “Antiquities” component of the TAP’s mission was solidified with the passage of Law No. 117 of 1983 on Antiquities Protection.¹¹ This landmark legislation established all antiquities as the property of the state, completely abolished the licensed trade and export of artifacts, and instituted harsh penalties for theft and smuggling.¹¹ The law provided the TAP with the unambiguous legal authority to pursue antiquities trafficking as a serious crime against the state. This law was subsequently strengthened by amendments in 2010 (Law No. 3 of 2010), which increased penalties and further criminalized the trade.¹² The combination of the force’s creation and this robust legal framework cemented the state’s doctrine that protecting heritage is a matter of national security, directly linking the actions of the TAP to the economic health and international prestige of Egypt.

III. The Modern Force: Structure, Mandate, and Doctrine

The contemporary Tourism and Antiquities Police is a formidable and highly specialized component of Egypt’s internal security architecture. Its structure, mandate, and training reflect the state’s prioritization of the tourism sector and the high-threat environment in which it operates.

Organizational Placement

The TAP is a directorate operating under the authority of the Deputy Minister for Special Police, one of four such deputies within the powerful Ministry of Interior.⁷ This organizational placement is significant, situating the TAP alongside other key national security units like the Central Security Forces (CSF), the Traffic Police, and the Presidential Police. It is not a minor or ancillary unit but a core part of the “Special Police” apparatus. The force is deployed nationally, with its command structure mirroring the country’s administrative divisions into 27 governorates. Each governorate with a significant tourism or antiquities presence, such as Cairo, Giza, Alexandria, Luxor, and Aswan, maintains its own TAP directorate responsible for all related police operations within its jurisdiction.⁷

Official Mandate

The official mandate of the General Administration of Tourism and Antiquities Police is comprehensive, extending beyond simple guard duties to encompass a wide range of security, law enforcement, and regulatory functions.¹⁰ Its duties can be broken down into four primary areas:

Physical Security: This is the most visible aspect of its mission. It includes the protection of tourists at hotels, on Nile cruises, and during transit between locations. It also involves securing the physical infrastructure of archaeological sites, museums, and other cultural facilities against threats of terrorism, vandalism, or public disorder.¹⁰
Antiquities Protection: The TAP is the lead law enforcement agency for combating the illegal trade in antiquities. This involves preventing theft from museums and registered sites, investigating and disrupting smuggling networks, and interdicting stolen artifacts. To this end, the TAP works with the Ministry of Tourism and Antiquities to staff specialized units at all of Egypt’s airports, seaports, and land border crossings to inspect suspicious items and prevent their illegal export.¹¹
Law Enforcement and Investigation: The force is responsible for investigating all crimes committed against tourists, ranging from petty theft and scams to more serious assaults. Officers are tasked with handling tourist complaints and providing assistance to foreign nationals who are victims of crime.¹⁰
Regulatory Oversight: The TAP has a regulatory function, overseeing tourism companies, hotels, and tourist-oriented shops to ensure they are operating in compliance with government regulations and licensing requirements.¹⁰ This includes addressing cases of trespassing on archaeological lands.¹⁰

This broad mandate creates an inherent doctrinal tension. TAP officers are required to function simultaneously as a welcoming, helpful presence for tourists and as a hardened, intimidating security force to deter terrorists and criminals. They must project an image of safety and accessibility while maintaining a high level of operational readiness and suspicion. This balancing act between the roles of “host” and “guardian” is a constant challenge for the force’s leadership and training programs, as an overemphasis on one role can critically undermine the other. An overly aggressive security posture can damage the tourist experience and harm the economy, while a lax approach invites attack. This dilemma shapes every tactical decision made on the ground, from the intensity of a checkpoint search to the proximity of an armed escort.

Recruitment and Training

All commissioned officers in the Egyptian National Police, including those who will serve in the TAP, are graduates of the National Police Academy in Cairo.⁷ The academy is a modern, university-level institution that offers a four-year program for high school graduates, culminating in a bachelor’s degree in police studies.¹⁵ The curriculum is extensive and has a distinct para-militarized character from its inception.⁸ Cadets receive training in security administration, criminal investigation, military drills, marksmanship, and counter-terrorism tactics alongside academic subjects like forensic medicine, sociology, and foreign languages (primarily English and French).⁷

This foundational training instills a military-style discipline and command structure common to all branches of the Egyptian police. Upon graduation, officers selected for the TAP would receive further specialized training relevant to their unique mission. This would include courses on cultural property law, protocols for interacting with foreign nationals, dignitary protection techniques, and site-specific security procedures for major archaeological zones. Some officers, particularly those in special operations or counter-terrorism roles, may also receive advanced training from the Egyptian Armed Forces at facilities like the Al-Sa’ka Military School.⁷

IV. Trial by Fire: The Luxor Massacre and the Securitization of Tourism

While the TAP existed prior to 1997, its modern form, doctrine, and operational posture were forged in the crucible of one of the most brutal terrorist attacks in Egypt’s history. The Luxor Massacre was a strategic shock that fundamentally and permanently altered the state’s approach to tourism security, transforming the TAP from a specialized police unit into a heavily armed, front-line force in the war on terror.

The 1990s Islamist Insurgency as a Prelude

The 1997 attack did not occur in a vacuum. Throughout the early and mid-1990s, Egypt was embroiled in a low-level insurgency waged by Islamist militant groups, principally al-Gama’a al-Islamiyya (the Islamic Group).¹⁶ A key tactic of these groups was to target the tourism sector, correctly identifying it as a vital artery of the Egyptian economy and a symbol of the secular Mubarak government’s ties to the West.¹⁷ This period saw a string of attacks on tourist buses and Nile cruise ships, particularly in southern Egypt, which served as a grim prelude to the events at Luxor.¹⁶

Case Study: The 1997 Luxor Massacre

On the morning of November 17, 1997, six militants from al-Gama’a al-Islamiyya, disguised as members of the security forces, launched a coordinated assault on the Mortuary Temple of Hatshepsut at Deir el-Bahri, one of Luxor’s most iconic archaeological sites.¹⁶ The attack was executed with chilling precision and brutality. After killing the two armed security guards at the entrance, the attackers systematically moved through the temple’s terraces for 45 minutes, trapping tourists and shooting them with automatic firearms before mutilating many of the bodies with knives and machetes.¹⁶

In total, 62 people were killed: 58 foreign tourists (including Swiss, Japanese, German, and British nationals) and 4 Egyptians.¹⁶ Among the Egyptian dead were three police officers and a tour guide who were caught in the assault.²¹ The attackers left behind leaflets demanding the release of Sheikh Omar Abdel-Rahman, the group’s spiritual leader imprisoned in the United States.²⁰ After the massacre, the terrorists hijacked a bus but were intercepted by a checkpoint of Egyptian police and military forces. Following a shootout, the attackers fled into the nearby hills, where their bodies were later found in a cave, having apparently committed suicide.²⁰

The attack exposed catastrophic failures in the prevailing security posture. It demonstrated the ease with which terrorists could impersonate official personnel, the inadequacy of the on-site armed response, and a delayed reaction from reinforcement units.

Strategic Impact and the Post-Luxor Doctrine

The Luxor Massacre was a watershed moment. The sheer brutality of the attack, particularly the mutilation of victims, provoked a wave of revulsion across Egyptian society, effectively destroying public support for the Islamist insurgency.¹⁶ The economic impact was immediate and devastating, as tourist arrivals plummeted, crippling the economies of Luxor and other tourism-dependent regions.¹⁷

The state’s response was swift and decisive. President Hosni Mubarak replaced his long-serving Interior Minister, General Hassan Al Alfi, with General Habib el-Adly, signaling a major shift in security policy.²⁰ A massive crackdown on Islamist militants was launched across the country.¹⁶ Most importantly for the TAP, the state abandoned its previous security model and adopted a new doctrine of

“security through overwhelming presence.” This doctrine, which remains in effect today, is characterized by a highly visible, heavily armed, and multi-layered security approach. Its key tactical and operational manifestations include:

Hardened Perimeters: The installation of permanent, hardened security infrastructure at the entrances to all major tourist sites, museums, and hotels. This includes blast walls, vehicle barriers, walk-through metal detectors, X-ray baggage scanners, and heavily armed static guard posts.²²
Mandatory Armed Escorts: The implementation of a now-standard policy requiring armed TAP escorts for all tourist convoys traveling by road between major cities (e.g., Cairo to Alexandria, Luxor to Aswan). For many tour operators, especially those with American clients, an armed officer is required to accompany the group at all times, even within a single city.²³
Increased Manpower and Firepower: A dramatic increase in the sheer number of security personnel deployed in and around tourist areas. It became common to see TAP officers openly carrying assault rifles in addition to their sidearms, a clear visual signal of a heightened state of alert.²⁴

The Luxor Massacre thus directly created the securitized environment that tourists in Egypt experience today. It transformed the TAP’s mission, shifting its focus from conventional policing to front-line counter-terrorism and force protection.

Table 1: Key Security Incidents Targeting Tourists/Sites (1992-Present)

Date	Location (City)	Target	Attack Type	Perpetrator	Casualties (Killed/Wounded)
Oct 1992	Dayrut	Tour Bus	Shooting	al-Gama’a al-Islamiyya	1 British tourist killed ¹⁸
Sep 1997	Cairo	Tour Bus (Egyptian Museum)	Grenade/Shooting	al-Gama’a al-Islamiyya	10 (9 German tourists, 1 Egyptian driver) killed, 8+ wounded ¹⁸
Nov 17, 1997	Luxor	Temple of Hatshepsut	Mass Shooting/Stabbing	al-Gama’a al-Islamiyya	62 (58 tourists, 4 Egyptians) killed, 26 wounded ¹⁶
Apr 2005	Cairo	Khan el-Khalili Bazaar	Suicide Bombing	Abdullah Azzam Brigades	3 (1 American, 1 French, 1 Egyptian) killed, 18 wounded ¹⁷
Jul 2005	Sharm El Sheikh	Hotels/Market	Coordinated Bombings	Abdullah Azzam Brigades	~88 killed, 150+ wounded ²⁰
Jun 2015	Luxor	Karnak Temple	Attempted Suicide Bombing	ISIS affiliate	2 terrorists killed, 5 Egyptians wounded; attack thwarted by police ²⁵
Oct 2023	Alexandria	Pompey’s Pillar	Shooting	Lone Actor (Police Officer)	3 (2 Israeli tourists, 1 Egyptian guide) killed ²⁶
May 2024	Alexandria	Tourist Site	Shooting	Unknown	1 Israeli-Canadian national killed ²⁶

V. The 2011 Revolution and its Aftermath: Collapse and Reassertion

If the Luxor Massacre defined the TAP’s counter-terrorism doctrine, the 2011 Revolution and its chaotic aftermath defined its role in state preservation and highlighted the catastrophic consequences of its absence. The period from 2011 to 2013 represented a near-total collapse of the security apparatus, followed by a forceful reassertion that has cemented the police’s central role in the post-revolutionary Egyptian state.

The Security Vacuum (2011-2013)

The 18 days of mass protests that began on January 25, 2011, were characterized by intense and violent confrontations between demonstrators and the police, who were widely seen as the primary instrument of the Mubarak regime’s repression.²⁷ In the face of overwhelming popular anger, the police infrastructure disintegrated. Across the country, an estimated 99 police stations were burned down, and police officers, including the TAP, effectively abandoned their posts and withdrew from the streets.²⁷

This withdrawal created an immediate and profound security vacuum, which had a devastating effect on Egypt’s cultural heritage.³⁰ With no police presence to protect them, archaeological sites, storerooms, and even museums became vulnerable. The period immediately following the revolution saw a dramatic and unprecedented spike in the looting of antiquities. This was not merely opportunistic theft; it was a multi-faceted assault on the nation’s heritage. Organized criminal mafias, some with international connections, exploited the chaos to plunder sites for the global black market. Simultaneously, local villagers, no longer fearing police intervention, began appropriating land on archaeological sites for farming or construction, often conducting their own illegal excavations in the process.⁷

Sites from Alexandria to Aswan were targeted, with areas in Middle Egypt that had always been minimally policed suffering the most.³⁰ Satellite imagery from this period reveals the shocking scale of the damage, with ancient cemeteries pockmarked by thousands of looters’ pits. The few civilian guards employed by the Ministry of Antiquities were left powerless; they were poorly paid, largely unarmed, and had no police backup to call upon, with several being killed in the line of duty.³⁰ This period stands as a stark illustration of the consequences of a security collapse and serves as a powerful justification, in the eyes of the current regime, for maintaining a robust police presence.

The Post-2013 Reassertion

The military’s removal of President Mohamed Morsi in July 2013 marked another pivotal moment. The new government, led by then-General Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, made the restoration of haybat al dawla—”the awe/prestige of the state”—its paramount objective.²⁷ This involved a massive, state-wide effort to re-empower and redeploy the police and security forces as the guarantors of order and stability.⁸

The TAP was a direct beneficiary of this policy. As security forces re-engaged across the country, often in coordination with the military, the protection of tourist sites and antiquities was prioritized.³⁰ The return of the TAP was framed not as a restoration of the old, repressive police state, but as a necessary action to protect Egypt’s national identity and economic future from the chaos that had engulfed it. This narrative proved politically potent. After years of instability and the visible plundering of their heritage, many Egyptians welcomed the return of a strong security presence.³¹

This dynamic created a symbiotic relationship between the security apparatus and the legitimacy of the post-2013 government. The visible presence of well-armed, disciplined TAP officers at the Pyramids or the temples of Luxor became a powerful propaganda tool. It signaled to both domestic and international audiences that the state was firmly back in control, capable of protecting its most valuable assets and ensuring the safety of foreign visitors. In this context, the TAP’s effectiveness is measured by the state not only in terms of thwarted attacks but also by its contribution to this broader political narrative of restoring order from chaos. This has made the force politically indispensable to the current regime and helps explain the significant resources allocated to it.

VI. Current Operational Posture in Cairo and Alexandria

The operational posture of the Tourism and Antiquities Police in Egypt’s two largest cities, Cairo and Alexandria, reflects the national doctrine of visible deterrence and layered security, but is tailored to the unique geography and threat profile of each metropolis.

Cairo

As the national capital, the primary port of entry for most tourists, and home to some of the world’s most iconic monuments, Cairo and the adjacent Giza governorate represent the area of highest concentration for TAP assets.³² The operational focus is on securing a handful of globally recognized, high-density sites that are considered prime targets for terrorism. These include the Giza Plateau (Pyramids and Sphinx), the Egyptian Museum in Tahrir Square and its eventual successor, the Grand Egyptian Museum (GEM), the historic Khan el-Khalili bazaar, and the major international hotel chains along the Nile.⁷

The tactics employed in Cairo exemplify a layered defense-in-depth approach:

Outer Cordon: Major tourist zones are often ringed by an outer layer of security, consisting of police checkpoints on approach roads that can stop and search suspicious vehicles.
Perimeter Control: The immediate perimeter of each major site is hardened. This involves a single point of entry and exit for tourists, controlled by walk-through metal detectors, X-ray baggage scanners, and a heavy presence of uniformed, armed TAP officers.²²
Internal Security: Inside the perimeter, security continues with roving patrols of both uniformed and plainclothes officers. These officers are tasked with monitoring crowds for suspicious behavior and responding to any incidents.²²
Convoy Security: Cairo is the starting point for most overland tourist travel. The TAP manages the legally mandated system of armed escorts for tour buses traveling to other destinations like Alexandria or Luxor. This involves daily paperwork filings by tour companies and checks at multiple police checkpoints along the route.²⁴

Alexandria

The security posture in Alexandria is similarly robust but adapted to a different set of sites and a distinct threat environment. The operational focus is on protecting key Greco-Roman and modern landmarks, such as the Qaitbay Citadel (built on the site of the ancient lighthouse), Pompey’s Pillar, the Catacombs of Kom El Shoqafa, and the modern Bibliotheca Alexandrina.⁷

Alexandria presents unique challenges. The city has a history of sectarian tensions and has recently become the location for a different kind of threat: the lone-actor insider attack.⁵ In October 2023, a police officer assigned to provide security services at a tourist site opened fire on a group of Israeli tourists, killing two of them and their Egyptian guide.²⁶ In May 2024, another shooting attack in the city killed an Israeli-Canadian national.²⁶ These incidents highlight a significant vulnerability in the Egyptian security model. While the layered defense is effective at stopping external assaults by organized groups, it is far less effective against a radicalized individual who is already part of the security apparatus or can operate without raising suspicion.

The tactical response in Alexandria to these attacks has likely involved an enhancement of counter-surveillance measures, including a greater deployment of plainclothes officers to monitor both crowds and other security personnel for signs of radicalization or suspicious behavior. There is also likely a heightened state of alert for officers guarding sites known to be frequented by specific nationalities that are high-profile targets for extremists.

VII. Armament, Equipment, and Training

The Tourism and Antiquities Police is an armed, para-militarized force whose equipment reflects the serious nature of the threats it is expected to counter. Its personnel are equipped with modern small arms and supported by a range of vehicles and communications systems consistent with a front-line security unit.

Small Arms

TAP officers carry the same standard-issue weapons as the broader Egyptian National Police, with armament varying based on role and assignment.⁷ The force’s arsenal is a mix of domestically produced and imported firearms.

Standard Sidearms: The most common sidearm for officers on general patrol is the domestically manufactured Helwan 920, a licensed copy of the Italian Beretta 92FS pistol, chambered in 9x19mm.³⁵ In recent years, the police have diversified their inventory, and it is also common to see officers carrying imported 9mm pistols such as the
CZ 75B, Glock 17, and various SIG Sauer models.⁷ A major purchase of 100,000 new 9mm pistols was approved in 2013 to upgrade and standardize the force’s sidearms following the revolution.³⁶
Long Guns: Reflecting the post-Luxor doctrine of visible deterrence and increased firepower, it is standard practice for TAP officers at static guard posts and on escort details to be armed with long guns. The most prevalent of these is the AKM-pattern assault rifle, most likely the Egyptian-made Maadi ARM variant chambered in 7.62x39mm.³⁵ For close-quarters situations or specialized units, the German-made
Heckler & Koch MP5 submachine gun in 9x19mm is also widely used.⁷

The use of military-caliber assault rifles as a standard tool for a police unit underscores the para-militarized nature of the TAP and the state’s perception of the threat level as being equivalent to a low-intensity conflict.

Table 2: Standard Issue & Available Small Arms of the Tourism & Antiquities Police

Weapon Type	Model(s)	Caliber	Origin	Typical User/Role
Pistol	Helwan 920 (Beretta 92FS)	9x19mm	Egypt/Italy	Standard Officer Sidearm ³⁵
Pistol	CZ 75B	9x19mm	Czech Republic	Officer Sidearm ⁷
Pistol	Glock 17	9x19mm	Austria	Officer Sidearm ⁷
Pistol	SIG Sauer P226	9x19mm	Switzerland	Officer Sidearm ³⁵
Submachine Gun	Heckler & Koch MP5 / MP5K	9x19mm	Germany	Static Guard, Escort Detail, Special Units, Close Protection ⁴⁹
Carbine / SMG	CZ Scorpion Evo 3 A1	9x19mm	Czech Republic	Law Enforcement Units, Special Units ⁵⁰
Assault Rifle	Maadi ARM (AKM variant)	7.62x39mm	Egypt/Soviet Union	Static Guard, Escort Detail, Checkpoints ³⁵

Vehicles and Communications

The TAP utilizes a fleet of vehicles appropriate for its diverse roles. Standard marked police sedans and SUVs are used for general patrols in urban areas like Cairo and Alexandria. For escorting tourist convoys, especially in more remote areas, pickup trucks with mounted machine guns or armored vehicles may be used. Open-source analysis has identified French-made Sherpa light armored vehicles bearing police license plates and markings in use by Egyptian security forces, including in counter-terrorism operations, suggesting their availability to high-risk police units.³⁸

Communications are tightly controlled by the Egyptian state. The private use of satellite phones and certain types of radio communications equipment is illegal without a specific permit from the Ministry of Communications and Information Technology.³⁹ This indicates that the police, military, and other state security bodies operate on their own secure, and likely encrypted, radio networks to prevent monitoring by hostile actors. The national emergency number for the Tourist Police is 126, a dedicated line for tourists to report crimes or request assistance.²⁶

VIII. The Military-Police Nexus: Cooperation and Conflict

The relationship between the Ministry of Interior’s police forces and the Egyptian Armed Forces is a critical, and often fraught, element of the national security landscape. While the two entities cooperate against common threats, they are also vast, powerful, and historically rivalrous institutions. This dynamic of cooperation and conflict directly impacts the security of tourists, particularly in areas where their jurisdictions overlap.

Delineation of Responsibilities

In principle, the division of labor is clear: the MOI and its police forces, including the TAP, are responsible for internal security and law enforcement, while the EAF is tasked with defending the nation from external threats.⁸ However, since the 2011 Revolution and the subsequent escalation of the counter-terrorism campaign, particularly after 2013, these lines have become significantly blurred. The Egyptian military is now deeply involved in internal security operations, most notably in the North Sinai governorate and the vast Western Desert, which borders Libya.²⁹ This creates a complex operational environment where police and military units must frequently interact and deconflict their activities.

Models of Cooperation

Formal mechanisms for cooperation do exist and are frequently utilized.

Joint Operations: In active counter-insurgency zones like North Sinai, it is standard practice for the army and police to conduct joint patrols, raids, and checkpoint operations.⁴² The very language used by the government to describe security actions often refers to a “joint police and army force”.⁴⁴
Jurisdictional Handoffs: A clear example of formal coordination relates to travel in restricted areas. For tourists to access Egypt’s sensitive border zones (with Libya, Sudan, or Israel) or to travel off-road in parts of the Sinai Peninsula, their tour operator must obtain permits and a pre-approved travel route from both Military Intelligence and the Tourist Police Headquarters.⁴⁵ This dual-approval process demonstrates a formal, high-level mechanism for deconfliction. On the ground, it is often military checkpoints that enforce these travel restrictions, turning back any tourist groups that lack the proper authorization.²⁴

Case Study: The 2015 Western Desert Incident

Despite these formal mechanisms, the potential for catastrophic failure in coordination remains a significant risk. This was tragically demonstrated on September 13, 2015, when Egyptian security forces—reportedly including an army helicopter—attacked a convoy of four-wheel-drive vehicles in the Western Desert, killing 12 people and injuring 10. The victims were not terrorists, but a group of Mexican tourists and their Egyptian guides.⁴⁴

The incident exposed a calamitous breakdown in command, control, and communications (C3) between the military and the police/tourism authorities. According to the chairman of the Tour Guides Syndicate, the tourist group had obtained all the necessary permits from the Interior Ministry for their trip, refuting initial government claims that they were in a restricted area.⁴⁴ This strongly implies that the military unit that ordered and executed the strike was operating without full situational awareness provided by their MOI counterparts. The failure was not a lack of policy, but a failure of execution. The deconfliction process, designed to prevent exactly this type of tragedy, broke down.

This incident cannot be dismissed as a simple accident. It is symptomatic of a deeper, systemic challenge rooted in the institutional cultures of Egypt’s two main coercive bodies. The military, which views itself as the ultimate guardian of national sovereignty, and the Ministry of Interior, which fiercely protects its own authority over internal security, are natural rivals for resources, influence, and prestige. This can lead to information hoarding, a lack of seamless interoperability, and a mindset where one service may act unilaterally in its designated zone of operations without fully integrating intelligence from the other. This underlying institutional friction remains one of the most significant latent threats to tourist safety in Egypt’s remote regions, where a fully vetted and officially approved tour group can still be caught in the crossfire of a poorly coordinated military action.

IX. Assessment of Effectiveness and Enduring Challenges

The Tourism and Antiquities Police has evolved into a central pillar of Egypt’s national security strategy. An overall assessment of its effectiveness reveals a force with significant strengths in its core mission of protecting high-profile targets, but one that is also beset by systemic weaknesses and faces an evolving set of future challenges.

Strengths

Deterrence of Mass-Casualty Attacks: The single greatest success of the TAP and the post-Luxor security doctrine has been the prevention of another large-scale, coordinated massacre at a major tourist hub. The combination of hardened perimeters, a heavy armed presence, and mandatory escorts has significantly raised the operational cost and complexity for any terrorist group attempting such an attack. This visible deterrence has been highly effective.³¹
High State Priority: Because tourism is inextricably linked to economic stability and the political legitimacy of the regime, the TAP receives a high degree of political attention and a commensurate allocation of resources. This ensures the force is generally well-manned and equipped to handle its primary responsibilities.²³
Improved Public Perception of Safety: Despite international travel advisories and concerns over police methods, the robust security measures have contributed to a tangible sense of safety for many tourists and a renewed confidence among the Egyptian public. Gallup’s 2018 “Law and Order Index” gave Egypt a high score, reflecting citizens’ confidence in local police and a feeling of safety, a stark contrast to the chaos of the immediate post-revolutionary years.³¹

Weaknesses and Enduring Challenges

Systemic Police Issues: The TAP is an integral part of the Egyptian National Police and is therefore not immune to the systemic problems that affect the entire institution. These include long-standing issues with corruption, accusations of brutality and human rights abuses in other contexts, and a general lack of independent accountability.⁹ Such issues can degrade professionalism, erode public trust, and create security vulnerabilities.
Vulnerability to Lone-Actor and Insider Threats: As the 2023 Alexandria shooting demonstrated, the current security model is optimized to defeat an external, conventional assault. It is far more vulnerable to the threat of a self-radicalized lone actor, particularly an insider who is already part of the security system. This type of threat bypasses the hardened perimeters and visible deterrents that form the core of the TAP’s strategy.
The Impossibility of Scale: While the state can effectively secure a few dozen high-profile sites in Cairo, Alexandria, and Luxor, it lacks the resources to provide the same level of protection to the thousands of archaeological sites scattered across the vastness of Egypt. These remote locations remain highly vulnerable to looting and illegal encroachment, a battle the TAP and the Ministry of Antiquities are consistently losing.³⁰
Military-Police Deconfliction: The 2015 friendly fire incident in the Western Desert remains the most potent example of a critical and potentially fatal weakness in the Egyptian security system. The risk of miscommunication and failed coordination between the MOI and the EAF in remote operational areas persists, posing a direct threat to any tourist activity in those regions.⁴⁴

Outlook

The primary threat to tourist security in Egypt has evolved. The danger posed by large, hierarchical insurgent groups like al-Gama’a al-Islamiyya in the 1990s has been largely supplanted by the threat from smaller, decentralized cells affiliated with transnational ideologies like ISIS, and, perhaps most acutely, from self-radicalized lone actors. The future challenge for the Tourism and Antiquities Police will be to adapt its doctrine accordingly. A strategy based on overwhelming static defense and brute force must evolve to become more intelligence-led, agile, and capable of identifying and neutralizing these more subtle and unpredictable threats. The force must do this while continuing to navigate the fundamental paradox of its mission: to be an effective, intimidating security force without creating an environment so visibly oppressive that it frightens away the very international visitors it is sworn to protect.

If you find this post useful, please share the link on Facebook, with your friends, etc. Your support is much appreciated and if you have any feedback, please email me at in**@*********ps.com. Please note that for links to other websites, we are only paid if there is an affiliate program such as Avantlink, Impact, Amazon and eBay and only if you purchase something. If you’d like to directly donate to help fund our continued report, please visit our donations page.

The author would like to personally thank the TAP for their courtesy and professionalism during his visit to Alexandria and Cairo in October 2025.

Sources Used

Ancient Egyptian Police: Facts, Medjay, Duties, Innovations & Legacy – Egypt Tours Portal, accessed October 4, 2025, https://www.egypttoursportal.com/en-gb/blog/ancient-egyptian-civilization/ancient-egypt-police/
The Police in Ancient Egypt: Guardians of Order and Justice, accessed October 4, 2025, https://egypttourmagic.com/the-police-in-ancient-egypt/
Police in Ancient Egypt: 10 Remarkable Facts Revealed, accessed October 4, 2025, https://egyptunitedtours.com/police-in-ancient-egypt/
96 – The police in ancient Egypt – Egypt Magic Tours, accessed October 4, 2025, https://egyptmagictours.com/egypt-magic-637-the-police-in-ancient-egypt/
Police in Ancient Egypt – From Medjay to Centurion DOCUMENTARY – YouTube, accessed October 4, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ASiDbLGezqg
Discover the Police Museum – A Unique Cairo Attraction – Ask Aladdin, accessed October 4, 2025, https://www.ask-aladdin.com/all-destinations/egypt/category/egypt-museums/page/the-police-museum
Egyptian National Police – Wikipedia, accessed October 4, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egyptian_National_Police
In Egypt, the Police are Soldiers for the Regime Building on traditions dating back to colonialism, Egyptian police today are more militarized, accessed October 4, 2025, https://rosaluxna.org/publications/in-egypt-the-police-are-soldiers-for-the-regime-building-on-traditions-dating-back-to-colonialism-egyptian-police-today-are-more-militarized/
Egyptian’s Stereotype of the Police, accessed October 4, 2025, http://www.ug-law.com/downloads/Police%20Study-En.pdf
Tourism in Egypt – Wikipedia, accessed October 4, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tourism_in_Egypt
Submitted by The Egyptian Delegation to the Conference Meeting of Open Membership Team of Governmental Experts Concerning – Protection from Illicit Trading in Cultural Property – United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, accessed October 4, 2025, https://www.unodc.org/documents/treaties/organized_crime/Egypt.pdf
Law No. 117 of 1983 as amended by Law No. 3 of 2010 promulgating the Antiquities Protection Law – UNESCO Database of National Cultural Heritage Laws, accessed October 4, 2025, https://www.unesco.org/en/cultnatlaws/law-no-117-1983-amended-law-no-3-2010-promulgating-antiquities-protection-law
LAW NO. 117 OF 1983 – African Archaeology, accessed October 4, 2025, https://www.african-archaeology.net/heritage_laws/egypt_law3_2010_entof.pdf
Establishing a Tourist Facilities in Egypt – Youssry Saleh Law Firm, accessed October 4, 2025, https://youssrysaleh.com/en/establishing-a-tourist-facilities-in-egypt/
Police Academy, Cairo (Egypt) – Office of Justice Programs, accessed October 4, 2025, https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/police-academy-cairo-egypt
Luxor massacre | Research Starters – EBSCO, accessed October 4, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/politics-and-government/luxor-massacre
Terrorism and tourism in Egypt – Wikipedia, accessed October 4, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorism_and_tourism_in_Egypt
Islamic Terrorism in Egypt: Challenge and Response – INSS, accessed October 4, 2025, https://www.inss.org.il/wp-content/uploads/systemfiles/Islamic%20Terroeism%20in%20Egypt%20Challenge%20and%20Response028403796.pdf
1997 Human Rights Report: Egypt – State Department, accessed October 4, 2025, https://1997-2001.state.gov/global/human_rights/1997_hrp_report/egypt.html
Luxor massacre – Wikipedia, accessed October 4, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luxor_massacre
1997 Global Terrorism: Africa Overview – State Department, accessed October 4, 2025, https://1997-2001.state.gov/global/terrorism/1997Report/review.html
Safety Guide For Travelers To Egypt (2025–2026) – Travel2Egypt, accessed October 4, 2025, https://travel2egypt.org/safety-guide-for-travelers-to-egypt/
Egypt Safety for Tourists Travel Guide, accessed October 4, 2025, https://www.inside-egypt.com/resources/travel-safety.html
Is Egypt Safe for Tourists? – Inertia Network, accessed October 4, 2025, https://www.inertianetwork.com/magazine/is-egypt-safe-for-tourists
Comment by the Information and Press Department on the terrorist attack in Luxor, Egypt – The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, accessed October 4, 2025, https://www.mid.ru/en/foreign_policy/news/1510219/
Safety and security – Egypt travel advice – GOV.UK, accessed October 4, 2025, https://www.gov.uk/foreign-travel-advice/egypt/safety-and-security
The resurgence of police government in Egypt – Project on Middle …, accessed October 4, 2025, https://pomeps.org/the-resurgence-of-police-government-in-egypt
Egypt in the Aftermath of the Arab Spring – ACCORD, accessed October 4, 2025, https://www.accord.org.za/conflict-trends/egypt-aftermath-arab-spring/
Counter-Terrorism Policies in Egypt: Effectiveness and Challenges – IEMed, accessed October 4, 2025, https://www.iemed.org/publication/counter-terrorism-policies-in-egypt-effectiveness-and-challenges/
The Loss and Looting of Egyptian Antiquities – Middle East Institute, accessed October 4, 2025, https://www.mei.edu/publications/loss-and-looting-egyptian-antiquities
Egyptians feel safer but at high cost for security forces | | AW – The Arab Weekly, accessed October 4, 2025, https://thearabweekly.com/egyptians-feel-safer-high-cost-security-forces
Is it safe to travel to Egypt? Safety & Security in Egypt, accessed October 4, 2025, https://egypttimetravel.com/safe-to-travel-to-egypt/
Is it Safe to Travel to Egypt?, accessed October 4, 2025, https://www.egyptadventurestravel.com/blog/is-it-safe-to-travel-to-egypt
Is It Safe to Travel to Alexandria? Safe Cities in Egypt – EgyptaTours, accessed October 4, 2025, https://egyptatours.com/is-it-safe-to-travel-to-alexandria/
List of equipment of the Egyptian Army – Wikipedia, accessed October 4, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_equipment_of_the_Egyptian_Army
Egypt will give police new guns – The Spokesman-Review, accessed October 4, 2025, https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2013/feb/17/egypt-will-give-police-new-guns/
Egyptian Rifles: FN49, Hakim, Rasheed, & Maadi – YouTube, accessed October 4, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XXv3K_Isl2A
Egyptian police and the french-made armored vehicles – Disclose.ngo, accessed October 4, 2025, https://disclose.ngo/en/article/egyptian-police-and-the-french-made-armored-vehicles
Egypt Travel Advice & Safety | Smartraveller, accessed October 4, 2025, https://www.smartraveller.gov.au/destinations/africa/egypt
useful information – Experience Egypt, accessed October 4, 2025, https://www.experienceegypt.eg/en/usefulinfo
Safety and Security in Egypt: A Complete Travel Guide – Memphis Tours, accessed October 4, 2025, https://www.memphistours.com/egypt/egypt-wikis/egypt-information/wiki/safety-and-security
If You Are Afraid for Your Lives, Leave Sinai! – Human Rights Watch, accessed October 4, 2025, https://www.hrw.org/report/2019/05/28/if-you-are-afraid-your-lives-leave-sinai/egyptian-security-forces-and-isis
World Report 2023: Egypt | Human Rights Watch, accessed October 4, 2025, https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2023/country-chapters/egypt
Egypt defends ‘mistake’ killing of 12 tourists – Dailynewsegypt, accessed October 4, 2025, https://www.dailynewsegypt.com/2015/09/14/egypt-defends-mistake-killing-of-12-tourists/
Egypt Travel Advisory | Travel.State.gov, accessed October 4, 2025, https://travel.state.gov/en/international-travel/travel-advisories/egypt.html
Egypt Traveler Information – AARDY.com, accessed October 4, 2025, https://www.aardy.com/blog/egypt-traveler-information-travel-advice/
Tragic Killing of Mexican Tourists in Egypt Sparks Criticism – Middle …, accessed October 4, 2025, https://mepc.org/commentaries/tragic-killing-mexican-tourists-egypt-sparks-criticism/
Effectiveness and Legitimacy of State Institutions in Egypt – GOV.UK, accessed October 4, 2025, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5d5553b3ed915d08e047cb8a/621_Legitimacy_of_the_State_and_Institutions_in_Egypt.pdf
MP5 – Heckler & Koch, accessed October 5, 2025, https://www.heckler-koch.com/en/Products/Military%20and%20Law%20Enforcement/Submachine%20guns/MP5

CZ Scorpion Evo 3 – Wikipedia, accessed October 5, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CZ_Scorpion_Evo_3

AK Analytics, Analytics and Reports, Egypt, History, Yugoslavia

Yugoslavia’s AK Path: Where Did the 2,000 Russian AK-47 Rifles Come From

May 14, 2025 RoninsGrips

So far, we have covered the history of Yugoslavian and Soviet relations and then the two Albanian defectors and early Yugo AK development leading to the M64 but we glossed over an enduring mystery that deserves its own post. In this artice, we dive into the riddle of what third world nation Yugoslavia purchased 2,000 Soviet AK-47 rifles from to reverse engineer and why it had to be covert.

A. The Core Question and Its Significance

This report addresses the question of the identity of the “Third World nation” from which the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia secretly procured approximately 2,000 Soviet-designed AK-47 assault rifles in 1959. This transaction, a relatively obscure event in the annals of Cold War arms proliferation, was nonetheless of considerable importance for Yugoslavia’s military development. The acquisition of these rifles proved pivotal for Zastava Arms, Yugoslavia’s premier weapons manufacturer, in its ambitious endeavor to independently develop and produce a domestic version of the Kalashnikov rifle. This effort culminated in the Zastava M70, a weapon that would become a mainstay of the Yugoslav People’s Army (JNA) and a significant export item.¹

The clandestine nature of this purchase and the persistent anonymity of the supplier nation underscore the intricate geopolitical landscape of the late 1950s. Yugoslavia, under Marshal Josip Broz Tito, navigated a complex path of non-alignment, maintaining independence from both the NATO and Warsaw Pact blocs. This unique position influenced its foreign policy and its methods of military procurement, often necessitating unconventional approaches to acquire advanced weaponry.

B. Methodology and Scope

The analysis herein is based on an examination of available research materials, encompassing English, Russian, Serbian, and Arabic language sources. A central piece of evidence for this specific arms deal is C.J. Chivers’ comprehensive work, The Gun: The AK-47 and the Evolution of War.¹ This report will critically assess the claim made by Chivers, situating it within the broader context of Soviet arms export policies of the era and Yugoslavia’s diplomatic and military relations. The objective is to evaluate the plausibility of potential candidate nations and, if the evidence permits, to identify the most likely intermediary.

C. Unraveling the Layers of Secrecy

The clandestine nature of the 1959 rifle purchase points towards a multi-faceted diplomatic maneuver. Yugoslavia, due to its political estrangement from the Soviet Union following the 1948 Tito-Stalin split, could not openly or directly procure sensitive military technology like the AK-47 from Moscow.¹ The term “secret purchase” strongly implies a deliberate effort to bypass official channels and to shield the transaction from public scrutiny, particularly from Soviet intelligence. A “Third World nation” already receiving Soviet military aid would have had legitimate access to such weapons. This intermediary role could have offered benefits to all parties: the supplier nation might have gained financially or strengthened its diplomatic ties with Yugoslavia; Yugoslavia would secure the much-needed rifles for its reverse-engineering program. The Soviet Union itself might have tacitly approved such a transfer if it served a broader, albeit unstated, strategic objective, such as subtly bolstering a non-aligned nation’s defense capabilities against Western influence without direct Soviet commitment. Alternatively, the Soviets might have been unaware of, or unable to prevent, a relatively small diversion of arms.

The specified quantity of “approximately 2,000” rifles is a critical detail. This number is substantial enough to provide a sufficient sample base for detailed reverse engineering, including disassembly, metallurgical analysis, live-fire testing, and comparison of components – a significant step up from the mere two rifles acquired earlier from Albanian defectors which proved insufficient.¹ Simultaneously, a batch of 2,000 units is arguably small enough to have been diverted from a larger consignment of Soviet military aid, or siphoned from existing stockpiles within the recipient nation, without triggering immediate alarm or major geopolitical fallout. Soviet aid packages to favored client states, such as Egypt or Iraq, were often extensive.² Diverting such a quantity, especially if oversight and record-keeping for every individual small arm were not meticulously stringent, would be more feasible and less likely to provoke a severe diplomatic crisis than, for example, the unauthorized transfer of tanks or combat aircraft.

II. Yugoslavia’s Pursuit of the Kalashnikov: A Non-Aligned Nation’s Arms Dilemma

A. The Political Context: Independence and Necessity

Yugoslavia’s foreign policy under President Tito was characterized by a resolute commitment to independence and non-alignment. This stance meant a refusal to join the Warsaw Pact, leading to periods of significant political tension with the Soviet Union, particularly in the aftermath of the 1948 Informbiro period.¹ While relations with Moscow experienced thaws and freezes, Yugoslavia could not depend on the Soviet Union for direct, licensed production of critical military hardware such as the AK-47 assault rifle.¹ Consequently, the nation adopted a pragmatic approach to arms procurement, seeking weaponry and military technology from both Eastern and Western sources as opportunities arose.⁶ The inability to secure technical specifications for the AK-47 directly from the USSR compelled Zastava Arms, the national arsenal, to embark on the challenging path of reverse engineering.¹

B. Early Steps: The Albanian Defectors’ Rifles

A significant, albeit insufficient, breakthrough occurred in 1959 when two Albanian soldiers defected to Yugoslavia, bringing with them their Soviet-manufactured AK-47s.¹ These weapons were promptly handed over to Zastava engineers for detailed examination. While the engineers were able to create metal castings from these two samples, they quickly realized that this limited number of rifles did not provide enough technical data to fully understand the design intricacies, material specifications, or manufacturing processes required to reproduce the weapon or its components accurately.¹ This initial encounter with the Kalashnikov highlighted the pressing need for a larger quantity of rifles to complete the reverse-engineering process successfully.

C. The Imperative for More Samples: The Road to the Zastava M70

The development of what would become the Zastava M70 assault rifle took place between 1962 and 1968, with the rifle officially entering service with the Yugoslav People’s Army (JNA) in 1970.¹ The acquisition of a more substantial batch of AK-47s in late 1959 would have been a critical enabler for this development timeline, providing Zastava’s engineers with the necessary physical examples for comprehensive study and analysis. The Zastava M70 was ultimately an unlicensed derivative, closely based on the Soviet AK-47 Type 3 variant.¹ The AK-47 Type 3, which featured a milled receiver, was produced by the Soviet Union from 1955 until 1959, when it began to be phased out in favor of the modernized, stamped-receiver AKM.⁸ This transition in Soviet production could have made surplus Type 3 models more readily available through third-party channels.

Russian AK-47 Type III (Photo by Gunrunner123 shared on Wikimedia)

Yugoslavia’s unique non-aligned status presented both challenges and opportunities. It constrained direct access to Soviet military technology but simultaneously allowed Belgrade to cultivate a wide network of relationships with numerous “Third World” nations, many of which were emerging from colonial rule or navigating their own paths between the Cold War blocs. Several of these nations became recipients of Soviet military assistance as Moscow sought to expand its global influence.² Yugoslavia’s prominent role within the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM), of which it was a founding member ⁴, provided a diplomatic framework that could facilitate discreet arms deals and technology transfers that would have been impossible through conventional East-West channels. This network of non-aligned partners became an invaluable asset for Yugoslavia’s unconventional procurement strategies.

The sequence of events in 1959 – the arrival of the Albanian defectors’ rifles early in the year, the rapid assessment by Zastava that these were insufficient, and the subsequent “secret purchase” of approximately 2,000 additional AKs “by the end of the year” ¹ – suggests a swift and opportunistic response by Yugoslav intelligence and arms procurement agencies. Once the limitations of the initial two samples became clear, an active search for more examples was likely initiated, leveraging existing diplomatic or intelligence contacts, or rapidly activating networks to locate and secure a larger quantity of the desired rifles. This was not a passive waiting game but a proactive effort to seize any available opportunity.

III. The 1959 Transaction: Corroborating the “Secret Purchase”

A. C.J. Chivers’ “The Gun” as the Primary Source

The specific assertion that “by the end of the year , however, the Yugoslav government had obtained more early pattern AKs from an unidentified Third World nation that was receiving Soviet military aid” is directly attributed to C.J. Chivers’ book, The Gun, published in 2011, on pages 250-251.¹ Chivers, a former Marine officer and Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist, produced a work generally acclaimed for its meticulous research into the history of automatic weapons, with a particular focus on the Kalashnikov.¹² His book meticulously documents the origins, global proliferation, and multifaceted impact of the AK-47 and its variants. The information provided indicates that this 1959 purchase was crucial, furnishing Zastava Arms with a sufficient number of AK-47s to “study and effectively reverse engineer the weapon type”.¹

B. Contextualizing the Purchase in Zastava’s M70 Development

The timeline and technical details surrounding the development of the Zastava M70 lend credence to Chivers’ account. The Zastava M64, an early prototype that directly led to the M70, incorporated design features heavily based on the Soviet AK-47 Type 3, which utilized a milled receiver.¹ Soviet production of the Type 3 AK-47 spanned from 1955 to 1959.⁸ This aligns perfectly with the claim that Yugoslavia acquired “early pattern AKs” in 1959, as these would likely have been Type 3 models. The successful reverse-engineering effort, facilitated by this larger batch of rifles, enabled Zastava to commence unlicensed production of its AK-47 derivative in 1964.¹ This production start date is consistent with a 1959 acquisition followed by several years of intensive research, development, and tooling.

The fact that the Soviet Union began to replace the AK-47 with the modernized AKM (Avtomat Kalashnikova Modernizirovanniy) in 1959 is also significant.⁸ The AKM featured a stamped sheet-metal receiver, making it lighter and cheaper to mass-produce than the milled-receiver AK-47 Type 3. This transition in Soviet small arms production could have rendered existing stocks of AK-47 Type 3s obsolescent in Soviet eyes, or at least less critical. Consequently, Soviet client states that had received Type 3s might have found it easier to re-transfer a portion of their inventory, perhaps in anticipation of receiving newer AKM models. Such a re-transfer, especially of older models, might have been viewed as less diplomatically sensitive by the Soviets or easier for the intermediary nation to justify. Thus, the “early pattern AKs” mentioned by Chivers were likely Type 3s, a plausible type of weapon to be involved in a clandestine deal of this nature at that specific time.

The absence of other readily available public sources explicitly naming the “Third World nation” involved in this specific 1959 transaction is noteworthy. This suggests that C.J. Chivers may have had access to unique primary sources, such as declassified intelligence reports, internal Zastava documents, or interviews with individuals directly or indirectly involved, which are not yet in the public domain or widely known to other researchers. Alternatively, the details of this transaction may remain obscure precisely because of the success of the secrecy that originally enveloped it. The conclusions drawn in this report must, therefore, rely on interpreting Chivers’ historically credible claim within the broader framework of circumstantial evidence regarding Soviet arms recipients and Yugoslav foreign relations during this period.

IV. Identifying Potential Supplier Nations: Soviet Arms in the “Third World”

A. Overview of Soviet Military Aid and AK-47 Proliferation (Late 1950s)

During the Cold War, the Soviet Union strategically employed military aid as a key instrument of its foreign policy, aiming to expand its influence, support ideologically aligned regimes, and counter Western power.¹⁰ The AK-47 assault rifle, renowned for its simplicity, reliability, and ruggedness, became a ubiquitous symbol of this policy. It was widely supplied to “developing countries,” nations espousing communist ideals, and various national liberation movements that Moscow sought to cultivate as allies or proxies.¹¹ By the late 1950s, a significant number of “Third World” nations across the Middle East, Asia, and Africa had become recipients of Soviet military assistance, which often included consignments of AK-47s.² The AK-47 (Type 3) was the standard Soviet rifle until the introduction of the AKM in 1959, meaning that AK-47s were already in circulation through Soviet supply lines to these recipient states prior to or during that year.⁸

B. Egypt: A Prime Candidate

Soviet-Egyptian Arms Deals: Egypt, under Gamal Abdel Nasser, emerged as a major recipient of Soviet bloc weaponry following the landmark Egyptian-Czechoslovak arms deal announced in September 1955.²⁵ This agreement, valued at over $83 million, effectively ended the Western monopoly on arms supplies to the Middle East and signaled a significant geopolitical shift.² The 1955 deal explicitly included small arms and munitions.²⁵ While the initial manifests detailed in the provided material do not itemize AK-47s specifically, subsequent Soviet military aid to Egypt was extensive and continuous. By 1966, the total value of Soviet military equipment extended to the United Arab Republic (UAR), of which Egypt was the dominant part, reached $1.16 billion, with approximately 90% of this aid reportedly delivered by that time.² This substantial aid program commenced in 1955.² Given the AK-47’s status as the standard Soviet infantry rifle during this period, it is highly probable that significant quantities were supplied to the Egyptian armed forces well before 1959. Russian sources confirm deliveries of various Soviet armaments to Egypt between 1955-1957, including tanks, artillery, and aircraft, though specific numbers for AK-47s are not provided in these particular texts.²⁶ The AK-47 was indeed being developed into the AKM by 1959, implying its prior establishment.²⁷
Yugoslav-Egyptian Relations: Relations between Yugoslavia and Egypt were exceptionally close during this period. Both countries were founding and influential members of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM), sharing a common vision of independence from superpower blocs.⁴ Diplomatic ties strengthened considerably following the 1948 Soviet-Yugoslav split and the 1952 Egyptian Revolution.⁴ The year 1959, the precise timeframe of the AK-47 purchase, was marked by high-level diplomatic exchanges: President Tito visited Egypt in February 1959, and President Nasser visited Yugoslavia in November 1959.²⁹ Such frequent top-level interactions indicate a robust and trusting political relationship, conducive to arranging sensitive, clandestine transactions. Furthermore, there is a documented instance from 1954 where Egypt is believed to have supported Yugoslav efforts to arm Algerian National Liberation Front (FLN) rebels by nominally purchasing Yugoslav-made weapons, which were then discreetly transferred to Algeria.⁴ This historical precedent suggests a pattern of cooperation in complex, covert arms movements involving both Egypt and Yugoslavia, making Egypt a very strong candidate.

The first ever meeting between Josip Broz Tito and Gamal Abdel Nasser – onboard the Yugoslav ship Galeb in the Suez Canal (1955). (Photo from the Online Museum of Syrian History, Shared on Wikimedia.

President Gamal Abdul Nasser and Yugoslavian President Josip Tito in Aleppo in 1959 / From left to right: United Arab Republic Vice President Akram al-Hawrani, the Aleppo industrialist Sami Saem al-Daher, director of Egyptian Intelligence Salah Nasr, President Josip Tito, his wife Jovanka Broz, President Gamal Abdul Nasser. The photo was taken in the home of Sami Saeb al-Daher, who was nationalized by President Nasser and left in bankrupcy in 1960 (Photo from the Online Museum of Syrian History, Shared on Wikimedia.

C. Iraq: A Plausible Alternative

Soviet-Iraqi Arms Deals: Iraq emerged as another significant recipient of Soviet military assistance following the 14 July Revolution in 1958, which overthrew the Hashemite monarchy and established a republic under Abd al-Karim Qasim.³⁰ The new Iraqi regime quickly pivoted away from Western alliances and sought closer ties with the Soviet bloc and non-aligned nations. In February 1959, the Soviet Union extended a substantial loan of $137.5 million to Iraq for economic and technical development, which likely included provisions for military hardware.³² The USSR became a major arms supplier to Iraq commencing in 1958.³ While specific quantities of AK-47s delivered to Iraq between 1958 and 1959 are not detailed in the available materials, it is highly probable that these rifles formed part of the initial arms packages supplied to the new revolutionary government. Later Iraqi consideration of replacing Kalashnikovs with M16s implies prior widespread adoption of the Soviet rifle.³³
Yugoslav-Iraqi Relations: Diplomatic relations between Yugoslavia and Iraq were formally established in 1958, in the immediate aftermath of the Iraqi revolution.³⁰ Crucially, a Trade and Cooperation Agreement between Yugoslavia and Iraq was signed and came into force on February 19, 1959.³⁰ This development aligns perfectly with the timeframe of the secret AK-47 purchase later that year. Yugoslavia would go on to become a major arms exporter to Iraq, particularly during the Iran-Iraq War in the 1980s ³⁰, indicating the foundation of a long-standing military-technical relationship that may have had its early, discreet origins in transactions like the one in question. The new Iraqi regime, eager to assert its independence and forge new international partnerships, might have been willing to facilitate such a transfer to Yugoslavia to build goodwill, for financial considerations, or as part of its broader realignment.

D. Other “Third World” Recipients (Brief Assessment)

Syria: Syria had been a recipient of Soviet military aid since the early 1950s.³⁴ However, early arms supplies from other Eastern Bloc countries like East Germany sometimes consisted of WWII surplus before transitioning to more modern Soviet-pattern weapons like the AK-47, typically in later periods (e.g., post-1967 for significant AK-47s from GDR).³⁴ While direct Soviet supply lines to Syria for AK-47s would have existed by 1959, the available information does not highlight the same degree of intimate political alignment or specific diplomatic activity with Yugoslavia in 1959 that is evident with Egypt or the nascent relationship with Iraq.
Indonesia: Indonesia began receiving Soviet arms, with initial deliveries noted in 1958 (such as GAZ-69 military vehicles).³⁵ The extent to which AK-47s were delivered and available in sufficient quantity for a 2,000-unit re-transfer by late 1959 is not clearly established by the provided sources.
India: India started to receive Soviet military technology and arms, including licenses for local manufacture, primarily in the 1960s, although some foundational agreements may have been laid earlier.²² The timeline for substantial AK-47 deliveries to India that could have been re-transferred by 1959 appears less probable compared to Middle Eastern recipients.
Cuba: The Cuban Revolution, led by Fidel Castro, triumphed in January 1959. Significant Soviet military assistance to Cuba commenced in the early 1960s, notably escalating around the time of the Bay of Pigs invasion and the Cuban Missile Crisis.³⁶ It is therefore highly unlikely that Cuba would have been in a position to act as a supplier of Soviet-made AK-47s to Yugoslavia in 1959.
African Nations (e.g., Angola, Ethiopia, Mozambique): While the Soviet Union did provide arms to various African states and liberation movements ³⁷, the large-scale proliferation of AK-47s to these specific sub-Saharan African nations is generally associated with independence struggles and post-colonial conflicts of the 1960s and 1970s, rather than a 1959 timeframe for re-export.

The political ideologies and strategic alignments of these potential Third World suppliers are crucial factors. A nation deeply enmeshed within the Soviet ideological sphere might have been less inclined to engage in an unauthorized or clandestine re-transfer of Soviet-supplied arms. However, many “Third World” recipients of Soviet aid, while benefiting from Moscow’s support, pursued their own distinct national interests. Egypt under Nasser, for instance, adeptly navigated the Cold War currents, leveraging relations with both East and West to its advantage.²⁵ Such a nation, particularly one like Egypt that shared leadership with Yugoslavia in the Non-Aligned Movement, might have viewed a discreet arms deal as a means of strengthening its own non-aligned credentials, assisting a fellow NAM state, or gaining diplomatic or economic leverage, even if it involved Soviet-origin weaponry. Iraq, with its new revolutionary government, was in a phase of actively seeking new international partnerships and asserting its autonomy, which could have provided a motive for such a transaction.

Furthermore, a secret arms purchase of this nature would necessitate a degree of trust and established communication channels. Yugoslavia, as a key architect and proponent of the Non-Aligned Movement, actively cultivated diplomatic, economic, and intelligence relationships with a wide array of nations within this group.⁴ This favors nations with which Yugoslavia had demonstrably active and positive diplomatic interactions in or before 1959, such as Egypt, and the rapidly developing ties with post-revolution Iraq.

Table 1: Assessment of Potential “Third World” Nations for the 1959 AK-47 Transfer to Yugoslavia

Candidate Nation	Recipient of Soviet Military Aid (incl. AK-47s) by 1959? (Evidence & Likelihood)	Nature & Strength of Yugoslav Relations by 1959 (Political, Diplomatic, Military)	Specific Chronological Markers Supporting/Contradicting 1959 Transfer	Plausibility as the “Unnamed Nation”	Key Supporting Snippets
Egypt	Yes. Major recipient since 1955. Highly likely to possess AK-47s in quantity.	Very Strong. Founding NAM members, frequent high-level visits (Tito Feb ’59, Nasser Nov ’59). Precedent of arms facilitation.	Supports: Close ties in 1959. Soviet arms flow well established.	High & Most Likely	²
Iraq	Yes. Recipient since 1958 revolution. Likely included AK-47s in early packages.	Developing. Diplomatic relations established 1958. Trade/Cooperation agreement effective Feb 1959.	Supports: New regime seeking partners. Trade agreement in place.	High, but second to Egypt	³
Syria	Yes. Recipient since early 1950s.	Moderate. Established relations, but less intimacy highlighted for 1959 specifically compared to Egypt/Iraq.	Possible, but less direct evidence of specific 1959 impetus.	Medium	³⁴
Indonesia	Yes. Initial Soviet arms deliveries in 1958.	Moderate.	Less clear if AK-47s available in sufficient quantity for re-transfer by late 1959.	Low-Medium	³⁵

V. The “Unnamed Nation”: Deciphering the Secrecy

A. Motivations for Anonymity

The enduring anonymity of the supplier nation in most historical accounts points to a convergence of interests in maintaining secrecy:

Yugoslavia’s Perspective: For Yugoslavia, discretion was paramount. The country meticulously maintained a delicate geopolitical equilibrium between the Eastern and Western blocs. Openly acknowledging a clandestine arms deal involving Soviet-origin weapons, even if acquired through a third party, could have unnecessarily strained its already complex relationship with the USSR. It might also have compromised its carefully cultivated image as a genuinely non-aligned nation, potentially inviting suspicion or pressure from either superpower.
The Supplier Nation’s Perspective: The intermediary country would have had strong reasons to ensure the transaction remained covert. Re-transferring military aid, particularly weapons as significant as assault rifles, without the explicit consent or knowledge of the original supplier (the Soviet Union) could have invited serious repercussions. These could range from a curtailment of future Soviet aid to diplomatic censure or other punitive measures. Protecting its own ongoing diplomatic and trade relationships with both the USSR and Yugoslavia, as well as other international actors, would have been a key concern.
Soviet Perspective (if aware or subsequently discovered): Even if Soviet intelligence became aware of the transfer, Moscow might have preferred the matter to remain quiet. If the USSR tacitly approved the deal for its own strategic reasons – for instance, to subtly aid Yugoslavia’s independent defense posture without direct involvement, thereby keeping it from leaning too heavily towards the West – publicity would be counterproductive. Conversely, if the transfer occurred without Soviet knowledge or approval, publicizing it would reveal a potentially embarrassing lack of control over its arms exports and the actions of its client states.

B. Weighing the Evidence: Egypt vs. Iraq

When comparing the two strongest candidates, Egypt and Iraq, both present compelling arguments:

Arguments for Egypt:

By 1959, Egypt had a well-established, deep, and multifaceted relationship with Yugoslavia. This included close personal ties between President Nasser and President Tito, shared leadership in the Non-Aligned Movement, and frequent high-level diplomatic consultations, including visits by both leaders to each other’s countries in 1959.⁴ Such a strong foundation of trust and mutual understanding would be highly conducive to arranging a secret arms transfer.
Egypt was a very significant recipient of Soviet arms from 1955 onwards and would have possessed substantial stocks of AK-47s by 1959.²
The precedent of Egypt reportedly facilitating the transfer of Yugoslav arms to Algerian rebels in 1954 demonstrates a historical willingness and capability to engage in complex, discreet arms movements in cooperation with Yugoslavia.⁴
Arguments for Iraq:

Iraq’s relationship with Yugoslavia was newer but developing rapidly in the crucial 1958-1959 period. The establishment of diplomatic relations in 1958 was quickly followed by a Trade and Cooperation Agreement that came into force in February 1959.³⁰ This formal framework for interaction was in place at the time of the AK-47 deal.
Following its 1958 revolution, Iraq became a recipient of Soviet arms and was actively seeking to diversify its international partnerships beyond its former Western patrons.³ A deal with a prominent non-aligned country like Yugoslavia would fit this new foreign policy orientation.
The new revolutionary government in Baghdad might have been motivated by political solidarity, financial gain, or a desire to quickly establish Iraq as an independent actor on the regional stage.

While both nations are strong candidates, Egypt appears to hold a slight edge. The depth and maturity of its political relationship with Yugoslavia by 1959, coupled with the precedent for cooperation in sensitive arms transfers, make it a particularly compelling possibility. However, the confluence of Iraq’s recent political transformation, its immediate embrace of Soviet military aid, and the formalization of ties with Yugoslavia in early 1959 make it an almost equally plausible source. The critical factors are the combination of access to Soviet-supplied AK-47s and a motive or willingness to transfer approximately 2,000 of them to Yugoslavia under conditions of secrecy.

Logistical considerations, though not detailed in the available materials, would also have played a role. The transfer of 2,000 rifles and their ammunition is not a trivial undertaking. Both Egypt and Iraq, being Middle Eastern nations, share maritime proximity with Yugoslavia via the Mediterranean Sea. Existing trade routes (e.g., Yugoslav timber for Egyptian cotton mentioned in ⁴, or the general trade agreement with Iraq ³⁰) could have provided cover for such shipments, perhaps disguised as other goods or moved through less scrutinized channels.

C. Limitations of the Provided Material

It is crucial to acknowledge that the available research documentation, while extensive, does not contain a definitive, explicit statement from an undeniable primary source (such as a declassified Yugoslav, Soviet, Egyptian, or Iraqi government document or a direct admission from a key participant) that unequivocally names the country involved in this specific 1959 AK-47 transfer to Yugoslavia. The identification process relies heavily on interpreting C.J. Chivers’ well-regarded but singular claim regarding this transaction, and then constructing a circumstantial case based on the known patterns of Soviet arms supplies and Yugoslav foreign relations during the specified period.

The successful execution of this secret purchase likely had a reinforcing effect on Yugoslavia’s broader strategy of acquiring foreign military technology through various means, including reverse engineering. It would have demonstrated the feasibility of such clandestine operations and underscored the value of cultivating diverse international relationships to achieve strategic defense objectives, ultimately contributing to the growth and capabilities of its significant domestic arms industry.⁶

VI. Conclusion: Assessing the Probabilities and the Lingering Mystery

A. Summary of Findings

The evidence strongly supports the claim, primarily advanced by C.J. Chivers, that in late 1959, Yugoslavia secretly purchased approximately 2,000 “early pattern” Soviet AK-47 assault rifles from an unnamed “Third World nation” that was itself a recipient of Soviet military aid.¹ This acquisition was a critical step for Zastava Arms, providing the necessary physical examples to successfully reverse-engineer the Kalashnikov design, leading directly to the development and subsequent mass production of the Zastava M70 assault rifle, a cornerstone of Yugoslav military armament.

B. The Most Plausible Candidate(s)

Based on a comprehensive analysis of Soviet arms distribution patterns in the late 1950s, Yugoslav foreign relations, and specific chronological markers, Egypt emerges as the most plausible candidate for the role of the unnamed intermediary.

Key factors supporting this assessment include:

Its status as a major recipient of Soviet weaponry, including AK-47s, by 1959.²
The exceptionally close political and diplomatic ties between Yugoslavia and Egypt, exemplified by their joint leadership in the Non-Aligned Movement and reciprocal presidential visits in 1959.⁴
A documented precedent of Egypt facilitating complex arms transfers involving Yugoslavia.⁴

Iraq stands as another strong contender. The 1958 revolution brought a new regime to power that rapidly sought Soviet military assistance and established diplomatic and trade relations with Yugoslavia in early 1959, making the timeline and political context feasible for such a transaction.³ The new Iraqi government may have seen this as an opportunity to solidify new alliances or gain other advantages.

Without more explicit, declassified documentary evidence directly naming the nation in the context of this specific 1959 AK-47 transaction, a definitive identification remains an educated deduction based on the available circumstantial evidence rather than an absolute certainty.

C. The Enduring Nature of the “Unnamed” Nation

The continued anonymity of the supplier nation in most historical accounts, with Chivers’ work being a notable exception in detailing the event itself, underscores the initial success of the secrecy surrounding the deal. This secrecy was vital for all parties involved: Yugoslavia needed to protect its non-aligned stance and its complex relationship with the USSR; the supplier nation needed to avoid Soviet repercussions for re-transferring arms; and the USSR itself may have preferred the transaction to remain unpublicized. This episode highlights the intricate and often opaque nature of Cold War diplomacy, where non-aligned nations frequently resorted to clandestine means to achieve their strategic security objectives while navigating the treacherous currents between the superpowers.

D. Implications for Yugoslav Arms Self-Sufficiency

This successful, albeit covert, acquisition of a significant quantity of AK-47s was a landmark achievement for Yugoslavia’s burgeoning defense industry. It directly enabled Zastava Arms to overcome the hurdles of reverse engineering and eventually mass-produce the Zastava M70. This rifle not only equipped the Yugoslav People’s Army but also became a notable export product, reflecting Yugoslavia’s determined pursuit of military self-reliance and its capacity for indigenous arms development.¹

The very fact that this inquiry is prompted by a specific passage in a relatively recent historical work (Chivers’ The Gun, published in 2011) suggests that this particular detail of Cold War arms proliferation may still be emerging from historical obscurity. The Cold War was characterized by extensive secrecy, and archives from that period are continually being declassified and re-examined by historians. It is plausible that the “unnamed” status of the intermediary nation persists simply because the specific documents, testimonies, or archival records that could provide definitive confirmation have not yet entered the public domain or been widely analyzed. Future archival research in Yugoslav (now Serbian and other successor states’), Russian, Egyptian, Iraqi, or other relevant national archives could one day yield a conclusive answer.

Ultimately, the story of Yugoslavia’s 1959 secret AK-47 purchase serves as a compelling microcosm of the broader phenomenon of Kalashnikov proliferation. It illustrates that the global spread of this iconic weapon was not solely due to direct state-to-state transfers from the Soviet Union or licensed production by its allies. Secondary and tertiary movements of these arms, through various overt and covert channels and involving a diverse range of state and non-state actors, played a crucial role in the AK-47 achieving its unparalleled global ubiquity.¹⁰ This particular transaction demonstrates the resourcefulness of a non-aligned state in securing vital defense technology and the complex, often hidden, networks that facilitated the movement of arms during the Cold War.

Author’s Comment

This question intrigued me because Yugoslavia needed more AK-47 Type III samples to reverse engineer their milled M70s. To investigate this question, I ran a number of searches and scenarios and it is my opinion based on what I found that the most likely country was Egypt with Iraq being a less likely second. To be clear, I can’t guarantee it, but the odds favor Egypt given the factors indentified. I was once told that “It’s surprising how little history we really know” and this is an example of an event in recent history where we may never know the details.

Image Sources

The map of the Middle East in 1959 was generated by the author using Sora. The intent was to mainly show Egypt, Saudia Arabia, Iraq and Iran to give some geographical context.

Russian AK-47 Type III (Photo by Gunrunner123 shared on Wikimedia)

The first ever meeting between Josip Broz Tito and Gamal Abdel Nasser – onboard the Yugoslav ship Galeb in the Suez Canal (1955). (Photo from the Online Museum of Syrian History, Shared on Wikimedia.

President Gamal Abdul Nasser and Yugoslavian President Josip Tito in Aleppo in 1959 / From left to right: United Arab Republic Vice President Akram al-Hawrani, the Aleppo industrialist Sami Saem al-Daher, director of Egyptian Intelligence Salah Nasr, President Josip Tito, his wife Jovanka Broz, President Gamal Abdul Nasser. The photo was taken in the home of Sami Saeb al-Daher, who was nationalized by President Nasser and left in bankrupcy in 1960 (Photo from the Online Museum of Syrian History, Shared on Wikimedia.

Works cited

Zastava M70 assault rifle – Wikipedia, accessed May 11, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zastava_M70_assault_rifle
SOVIET MILITARY AID TO THE UNITED ARAB REPUBLIC, 1955-66 (RR IR 67-9) – CIA, accessed May 11, 2025, https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/DOC_0000496350.pdf
Russia Reemerging as Weapons Supplier to Iraq – The Jamestown Foundation, accessed May 11, 2025, https://jamestown.org/program/russia-reemerging-weapons-supplier-iraq/
Egypt–Yugoslavia relations – Wikipedia, accessed May 11, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egypt%E2%80%93Yugoslavia_relations
Yugoslavia and the Non-Aligned Movement – Wikipedia, accessed May 11, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yugoslavia_and_the_Non-Aligned_Movement
60. Interdepartment Policy Paper Prepared by the Departments of State and Defense, Washington, undated. (7/5/73), accessed May 11, 2025, https://2001-2009.state.gov/r/pa/ho/frus/nixon/e15/107794.htm
YUGOSLAV MILITARY EQUIPMENT AND ITS SOURCES – CIA, accessed May 11, 2025, https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP79T00429A001100010022-0.pdf
Guns in Movies, TV and Video Games – AK-47 – Internet Movie Firearms Database, accessed May 11, 2025, https://www.imfdb.org/wiki/AK-47
AK-47 | Definition, History, Operation, & Facts – Britannica, accessed May 11, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/technology/AK-47
www.macalester.edu, accessed May 11, 2025, https://www.macalester.edu/russian-studies/about/resources/miscellany/ak47/#:~:text=Recognizing%20its%20demand%20in%20developing,being%20sold%20exclusively%20to%20governments.
AK 47 – Russian Studies – Macalester College, accessed May 11, 2025, https://www.macalester.edu/russian-studies/about/resources/miscellany/ak47/
The Gun (Chivers book) – Wikipedia, accessed May 11, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Gun_(Chivers_book)
The Gun by C.J. Chivers | Goodreads, accessed May 11, 2025, https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/7775851-the-gun
The Gun – CJ Chivers – Amazon.com, accessed May 11, 2025, https://www.amazon.com/Gun-C-J-Chivers/dp/0743270762
The Gun By C.j. Chivers Summary PDF – Bookey, accessed May 11, 2025, https://www.bookey.app/book/the-gun-by-c-j-chivers
The Gun | Book by C. J. Chivers | Official Publisher Page – Simon & Schuster, accessed May 11, 2025, https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/The-Gun/C-J-Chivers/9780743271738
THE GUN – Kirkus Reviews, accessed May 11, 2025, https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/cj-chivers/the-gun/
AK-47 History – C.J. Chivers The Gun Excerpt – Esquire, accessed May 11, 2025, https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/a25677/ak-47-history-1110/
ОРУЖИЕ ДЛЯ ПРОФИ – Українська Спілка ветеранів Афганістану (воїнів-інтернаціоналістів), accessed May 11, 2025, http://www.usva.org.ua/mambo3/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=337
AKM – Wikipedia, accessed May 11, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AKM
How did the Middle East get a hold of Russian firearms like the AK-47 and RPG-7? – Quora, accessed May 11, 2025, https://www.quora.com/How-did-the-Middle-East-get-a-hold-of-Russian-firearms-like-the-AK-47-and-RPG-7
The Avtomat Kalashnikov Model of Year 1947 – Sites at Penn State, accessed May 11, 2025, https://sites.psu.edu/jlia/the-avtomat-kalashnikov-model-of-year-1947/
Methodology: Kalashnikov & Variant Factory Dataset (1947-present) – Audrey Kurth Cronin, accessed May 11, 2025, https://www.audreykurthcronin.com/p2p-pvid/p2p-pvid-kalashnikov/kalashnikov-variant-factory-dataset-1947-present/methodology-kalashnikov-variant-factory-dataset-1947-present/
األسلحة الصغيرة – Small Arms Survey, accessed May 11, 2025, https://www.smallarmssurvey.org/sites/default/files/2021-09/SAS-HB-06-Weapons-ID-ch3-ARA.pdf
Egyptian–Czechoslovak arms deal – Wikipedia, accessed May 11, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egyptian%E2%80%93Czechoslovak_arms_deal
Группа советских военных специалистов в Египте – Википедия, accessed May 11, 2025, https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%93%D1%80%D1%83%D0%BF%D0%BF%D0%B0_%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%82%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D1%85_%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8B%D1%85_%D1%81%D0%BF%D0%B5%D1%86%D0%B8%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%B2_%D0%B2_%D0%95%D0%B3%D0%B8%D0%BF%D1%82%D0%B5
شاهد بالصور والفيديو: بعد وفاة مصممه “اليوم” ما هو سلاح الكلاشنكوف ومن هو ميخائيل كلاشنكوف القائل: “أنا لا اقتل ولكن يقتل من يضغط زنادي” – دنيا الوطن, accessed May 11, 2025, https://www.alwatanvoice.com/arabic/news/2013/12/23/476461.html
Odnosi Jugoslavije i Egipta — Википедија, accessed May 11, 2025, https://sr.wikipedia.org/sr-el/%D0%9E%D0%B4%D0%BD%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%B8_%D0%88%D1%83%D0%B3%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%98%D0%B5_%D0%B8_%D0%95%D0%B3%D0%B8%D0%BF%D1%82%D0%B0
العلاقات المصرية اليوغوسلافية – ويكيبيديا, accessed May 11, 2025, https://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%82%D8%A7%D8%AA_%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%B5%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%A9_%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%8A%D9%88%D8%BA%D9%88%D8%B3%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%81%D9%8A%D8%A9
Iraq–Yugoslavia relations – Wikipedia, accessed May 11, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq%E2%80%93Yugoslavia_relations
العلاقات العراقية اليوغوسلافية – ويكيبيديا, accessed May 11, 2025, https://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%82%D8%A7%D8%AA_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%82%D9%8A%D8%A9_%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%8A%D9%88%D8%BA%D9%88%D8%B3%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%81%D9%8A%D8%A9
Революция в Ираке 1958 г. И изменение ситуации на Ближнем Востоке – КиберЛенинка, accessed May 11, 2025, https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/revolyutsiya-v-irake-1958-g-i-izmenenie-situatsii-na-blizhnem-vostoke
القوة البرية العراقية – ويكيبيديا, accessed May 11, 2025, https://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%82%D9%88%D8%A9_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A8%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%A9_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%82%D9%8A%D8%A9
Syrian Civil War: WWII weapons used – wwiiafterwwii – WordPress.com, accessed May 11, 2025, https://wwiiafterwwii.wordpress.com/2017/06/27/syrian-civil-war-wwii-weapons-used/
Russia’s arms exports to Indonesia top USD 2.5 billion over 25 years – Army Recognition, accessed May 11, 2025, https://armyrecognition.com/news/army-news/army-news-2018/russia-s-arms-exports-to-indonesia-top-usd-2-5-billion-over-25-years
THE SOVIET-CUBAN CONNECTION IN CENTRAL AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN – CIA, accessed May 11, 2025, https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP88B00745R000100140026-6.pdf
Soviet Arms Transfers to Sub-Saharan Africa: What are they Worth in the United Nations? – DTIC, accessed May 11, 2025, https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA212065.pdf
YUGOSLAVIA, MIDDLE EAST AND CREATION OF THE NON-ALIGNED MOVEMENT Текст научной статьи по специальности – КиберЛенинка, accessed May 11, 2025, https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/yugoslavia-middle-east-and-creation-of-the-non-aligned-movement
The World’s Most Popular Gun – The New Atlantis, accessed May 11, 2025, https://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/the-worlds-most-popular-gun