The formation of the British Special Air Service (SAS) was not a preordained development but a pragmatic military innovation born from the unique strategic and tactical challenges of the Second World War’s North African Campaign. Its genesis was driven by the frustration of a few forward-thinking officers with the limitations of conventional military doctrine and a recognition that the vast, seemingly empty desert battlespace offered an undefended flank for a new form of warfare. The unit’s early years were characterized by a rapid and often brutal process of trial and error, which forged a doctrine of deep penetration raiding, tactical flexibility, and operator-level innovation that would define its ethos for decades to come.

1.1 The Stirling Vision: From Commando Frustration to Deep Penetration Raiding

The strategic situation in North Africa in 1941 was one of grinding attrition, with large conventional armies clashing along a narrow coastal strip.¹ For Lieutenant David Stirling, a junior officer serving with No. 8 (Guards) Commando, the existing structure of warfare was deeply inefficient.² He observed that large, cumbersome Commando raids, numbering in the hundreds of men, were being deployed to attack single, heavily defended objectives, often with high casualties and limited strategic impact. The majority of the force was consumed with its own protection, leaving only a small fraction to conduct the actual mission.⁴

Stirling’s core concept, refined while recovering from a parachuting injury, was a radical inversion of this principle.⁵ He reasoned that the mechanised nature of the war had created a critical vulnerability: the Axis forces’ long and exposed supply lines and, more importantly, their numerous rear-echelon airfields. These high-value targets were essential to the enemy war effort but were often lightly defended.¹ Stirling proposed that a small, highly trained team of four or five men, possessing the advantage of surprise, could infiltrate deep behind enemy lines and achieve strategic effects disproportionate to their size by destroying dozens of aircraft or vital supply dumps in a single night.²

Convinced that his idea would be stifled by mid-level bureaucracy, Stirling bypassed the conventional chain of command and gained an audience with the Deputy Chief of Staff, Major General Neil Ritchie, and subsequently the Commander-in-Chief Middle East, General Sir Claude Auchinleck.² Auchinleck endorsed the plan, authorizing Stirling to recruit a force of six officers and 60 enlisted men.² To deceive Axis intelligence, the new unit was given the deliberately misleading name “L Detachment, Special Air Service Brigade,” leveraging an existing deception plan to create the illusion of a full airborne brigade operating in the theater.⁹

The initial cadre was hand-picked from the remnants of the recently disbanded Layforce Commandos.² Stirling sought men who demonstrated independence, ingenuity, physical fitness, and a high standard of discipline.² Among the most critical early members were Lieutenant ‘Jock’ Lewes, who became the unit’s principal training officer and tactical innovator, and Lieutenant Paddy Mayne, a formidable combat leader who would later command the regiment.⁷ Together, these men established the foundational ethos of the SAS, encapsulated in the motto personally chosen by Stirling: “Who Dares Wins”.²

1.2 Tactical Evolution: The Failure of Parachutes and the LRDG Symbiosis

The initial doctrine for L Detachment centered on airborne insertion. The plan was to parachute teams into the desert, far behind enemy lines, from where they would proceed on foot to attack their targets.¹ This concept was put to the test in November 1941 with the unit’s first mission, Operation Squatter. The operation was designed to support the broader Operation Crusader offensive by attacking Axis airfields at Gazala and Timimi.¹³

The mission was a catastrophic failure. Launched into a severe desert storm, the parachute drops were widely scattered, and equipment containers were lost.⁴ Of the 53 men who jumped, only 21 returned; the rest were killed or captured, and not a single enemy aircraft was destroyed.⁷ This disastrous debut demonstrated the profound unreliability of parachute insertion in the desert environment with the technology of the time. The failure of its primary doctrine could have spelled the end of the nascent unit.

However, this initial catastrophe became the single most important catalyst in the SAS’s early development. It forced an immediate and pragmatic re-evaluation of tactics, demonstrating a core principle of the unit: doctrine is subordinate to battlefield reality, and failure is a data point for rapid adaptation. The survivors of Operation Squatter were picked up by the Long Range Desert Group (LRDG), a highly specialized British unit renowned for its expertise in deep desert navigation and reconnaissance.⁷ This encounter led to a symbiotic partnership that would define the SAS’s success in North Africa.

Abandoning the flawed airborne concept, the SAS adopted the LRDG as its primary method of transportation.¹ The LRDG’s specially modified trucks and expert navigators became the “Libyan Desert Taxi Service,” delivering SAS raiding parties to points near their objectives and, crucially, recovering them afterward.¹ This shift in tactics yielded immediate and spectacular results. Just one month after the failure of Operation Squatter, LRDG-transported SAS teams attacked three airfields in Libya, destroying over 60 Axis aircraft without a single SAS loss.¹⁰ The partnership proved that the core concept of deep penetration raiding was sound; it was only the method of insertion that had been flawed. The failure of the first mission directly led to the adoption of a superior tactic that became the new standard operating procedure.

1.3 The Rise of the Armed Jeep: Pioneering Mobile Firepower

The early successful raids conducted with the LRDG were typically dismounted operations. SAS teams would be dropped several miles from their target, approach on foot under the cover of darkness, place their explosive charges, and withdraw to a pre-arranged rendezvous point for extraction.⁸ While effective, this method was still reliant on stealth and limited the amount of ordnance that could be brought to bear.

Beginning in the summer of 1942, the SAS underwent another tactical evolution, acquiring its own fleet of American Willys Jeeps.⁷ This allowed the unit to develop a new and more aggressive tactic: the high-speed, vehicle-mounted raid. Instead of stealthily placing bombs, SAS patrols began to storm enemy airfields at night, driving in formation with guns blazing to strafe and destroy parked aircraft with concentrated machine-gun fire before rapidly withdrawing back into the desert.⁷ This represented a fundamental shift from sabotage to direct assault.

This new tactic was enabled by extensive in-theater modification of the Jeeps, a process that showcased the unit’s culture of operator-level innovation. The vehicles were stripped of non-essential parts like windscreens and rear seats to reduce weight and increase payload capacity for fuel, water, and ammunition.¹⁵ Water condensers were fitted to the radiators to conserve precious water in the arid environment.¹⁷ Most importantly, the Jeeps were transformed into heavily armed fighting platforms. Mounts were fabricated to carry scavenged aircraft machine guns, creating a light, fast, and exceptionally powerful weapon system that was perfectly suited to the hit-and-run tactics being developed.¹⁶

1.4 The Desert Arsenal: An Engineering Analysis of Key Weaponry

The effectiveness of the SAS in the desert was directly tied to its innovative application of specialized and often improvised weaponry. The unit did not simply use standard-issue equipment; it identified tactical needs and engineered immediate, effective solutions using available resources.

Vehicle-Mounted Weapons

The primary armament for the SAS Jeep was the Vickers ‘K’ Gas Operated (GO) machine gun, a.303 caliber weapon typically mounted in single or twin configurations.¹⁶ Originally designed as an aircraft observer’s gun, the Vickers K was scavenged from obsolete Royal Air Force aircraft like the Bristol Bombay and Fairey Battle.¹⁶ From an engineering perspective, it was an ideal choice for the SAS’s new vehicle assault tactic due to its exceptionally high cyclic rate of fire, estimated at 1,000−1,200 rounds per minute. This allowed a small number of Jeeps to deliver an immense volume of suppressive and destructive fire in a very short period, overwhelming defenders and maximizing damage during a high-speed pass. The Jeeps were also frequently armed with the American M2 Browning.50 caliber heavy machine gun, which provided a devastating anti-materiel capability against aircraft engines and light vehicles.¹⁷

The Lewes Bomb

For dismounted sabotage, the standard-issue demolition charges were often too cumbersome for a small team to carry in sufficient quantity.¹⁹ In a clear example of field-expedient engineering, Lieutenant Jock Lewes developed a purpose-built charge that became known as the Lewes Bomb.⁴ This device was a combined blast and incendiary weapon, weighing approximately 1 pound, making it light enough for a single operator to carry several.¹⁹

Its composition was a carefully formulated mixture designed for maximum effect against aircraft ¹⁹:

• Primary Charge: Approximately 1 pound (450 g) of Nobel 808 plastic explosive provided the blast component.
• Incendiary Agent: A mixture of roughly 1/4 pound (110 g) of thermite and a small amount of diesel oil or motor oil.
• Initiation: A two-ounce dry guncotton booster was inserted into the mass, initiated by a pencil detonator with a time delay (typically 30 seconds to 30 minutes).¹⁹

The device was designed to be placed directly on a vulnerable part of an aircraft, such as the wing root above the fuel tanks or inside the cockpit.¹⁹ Upon detonation, the plastic explosive would rupture the thin aluminum airframe and fuel tanks. The intense heat from the subsequent thermite reaction would then ignite the exposed aviation fuel, ensuring the complete destruction of the target.¹⁹ The Lewes Bomb was a simple, reliable, and devastatingly effective tool that perfectly embodied the SAS’s innovative and pragmatic approach to warfare.²³

Personal Weapons

For personal defense and close-quarters work during raids, SAS operators were equipped with the standard Allied small arms of the period. The American Thompson submachine gun was heavily favored for its firepower in close-range engagements.²³ The Colt M1911A1.45 caliber pistol was a common sidearm.¹⁷ For silent killing and utility, the Fairbairn-Sykes fighting knife was standard issue for British raiding forces, including the SAS.¹⁷

Section 2: The European Crucible (1943-1945)

Following the successful conclusion of the North African Campaign, the Special Air Service underwent a significant transformation. The operational environment shifted from the vast, open deserts of Libya and Egypt to the verdant, populated, and more restrictive terrain of Italy, France, and the Low Countries. This change necessitated a profound evolution in the Regiment’s structure, mission, and tactics. The SAS adapted from a small, semi-independent desert raiding force into a larger, multinational brigade formation, proving that its core principles of deep penetration and strategic disruption were not tied to a single environment. This period also saw the SAS develop skills in unconventional warfare and liaison with indigenous forces, foreshadowing its primary post-war role.

2.1 Expansion and Reorganization: The SAS Brigade

The proven effectiveness of the SAS in North Africa led to its expansion. In April 1943, the original 1st SAS was reorganized into the Special Raiding Squadron (SRS) under the command of the now-Major Paddy Mayne, while a second regiment, 2nd SAS, was raised in Algeria under the command of Lieutenant Colonel William Stirling, David’s brother.² These units conducted raids in Sicily and Italy throughout 1943.⁹

In early 1944, in preparation for the invasion of Northwest Europe, 1st and 2nd SAS returned to the United Kingdom and were formally grouped into a new, larger formation: the SAS Brigade.¹¹ This marked a significant step in the unit’s institutionalization, bringing it under the umbrella of the Army Air Corps.¹¹ The brigade’s composition was notably multinational, reflecting the Allied war effort. It comprised the two British regiments (1st and 2nd SAS), two Free French parachute regiments (redesignated 3rd and 4th SAS), and a Belgian Independent Parachute Company (which became 5th SAS).⁹ This expansion transformed the SAS from a maverick detachment into a formal military brigade of several thousand men, tasked with playing a key strategic role in the liberation of Europe.

2.2 New Battlefields, New Tactics: Sabotage, Liaison, and Reconnaissance

The operational environment of Europe was fundamentally different from that of North Africa. The dense bocage of Normandy, the forests of the Vosges, and the mountains of Italy rendered the large-scale, vehicle-centric raiding columns of the desert largely impractical.²⁸ The higher density of enemy troops and the presence of civilian populations demanded a shift towards more covert and precise methods.

The primary role of the SAS Brigade during and after Operation Overlord was to operate deep behind German lines to disrupt communications, delay the movement of enemy reinforcements toward the Normandy beachhead, and provide support and liaison to local resistance movements, particularly the French Maquis.²⁷ This led to a significant evolution in tactics:

• Insertion: Parachute insertion, which had proved disastrous in the desert, became the primary and most effective method of deploying teams deep into occupied territory.²⁷
• Mission Sets: The focus shifted from destroying aircraft on the ground to a broader range of unconventional warfare tasks. These included large-scale railway sabotage to paralyze German logistics (e.g., Operation Maple Driftwood in Italy, Operation Pistol in France), ambushing German road convoys and retreating columns (e.g., Operation Kipling), and gathering critical intelligence on enemy dispositions.²⁷
• Liaison and Unconventional Warfare: A critical new role was acting as a link between the Allied high command and local partisan groups. Small “Jedburgh” teams, often comprising British, French, and American personnel, were dropped in to arm, train, and coordinate resistance activities.²⁸ This experience in working with and through indigenous forces was a crucial development, laying the doctrinal groundwork for the Regiment’s future counter-insurgency expertise.
• Mobility: While many operations were conducted on foot, requiring immense endurance to cover long distances through hostile territory, the armed Jeep was not entirely abandoned. In areas where the terrain and tactical situation permitted, SAS squadrons used their heavily armed vehicles for reconnaissance and rapid “hit-and-run” attacks, particularly in the later stages of the campaign as Allied forces advanced through France, Belgium, and into Germany (e.g., Operation Howard, Operation Archway).²⁷

2.3 Adapting the Arsenal for Europe

The change in tactics and environment necessitated an adaptation of the Regiment’s equipment. While the core weaponry remained, it was augmented and modified to meet new threats and operational requirements.

• Vehicle Modifications: The Jeeps deployed in Europe were more robustly prepared for a higher-threat environment than their desert predecessors. They were frequently up-armored with armored glass shields for the driver and gunner, armored louvres to protect the radiator, and sometimes rear armor plates to protect the fuel tanks and crew from fire from the rear.¹⁸ The standard armament of multiple Vickers K guns and Browning machine guns was retained, providing formidable mobile firepower for reconnaissance and raiding tasks.¹⁸
• Heavier Support Weapons: The shift towards more static ambush operations and the need to engage fortified enemy positions required greater organic firepower than what individual soldiers could carry. Operational records from the Italian campaign, such as Operation Galia, show that SAS units were supplied by parachute drop with Vickers Mk I medium machine guns and 3-inch mortars.¹⁸ These crew-served weapons provided the sustained, indirect, and heavy direct fire capability needed for ambushing enemy columns and defending against counter-attacks. In the mountainous terrain of Italy, these heavy weapons and their ammunition had to be transported by mules, highlighting the logistical challenges of operating deep behind enemy lines.¹⁸ This adoption of heavier support weapons marked a significant evolution from the light raiding force of the early desert days.

The successful transition from a vehicle-centric desert force to a multi-faceted light infantry and reconnaissance force specializing in sabotage and unconventional warfare in Europe demonstrated the inherent adaptability of the SAS concept. It proved that the Regiment’s value lay not in a specific tactic, like the Jeep raid, but in its core principle: the deployment of small, elite teams behind enemy lines to achieve strategic effects.

Section 3: Reinvention – The Counter-Insurgency Era (1947-1980)

The end of the Second World War brought a temporary end to the Special Air Service. However, the geopolitical landscape of the Cold War, characterized by wars of decolonization and communist-backed insurgencies, created a new and urgent requirement for a force skilled in unconventional, low-intensity conflict. This period marked the most critical transformation in the Regiment’s history. It was functionally a second founding, leading to the establishment of the modern, regular army 22 SAS Regiment and forging its identity as the world’s preeminent counter-insurgency (COIN) force. The campaigns in the jungles of Malaya and the mountains of Oman were not merely deployments; they were crucibles that defined the Regiment’s primary skillset for the next half-century, shifting its focus from conventional raiding to the complex, population-centric art of defeating guerrilla movements.

3.1 From Disbandment to Rebirth: The Malayan Scouts and the Forging of 22 SAS

In the post-war drawdown of 1945, the British government saw no continuing need for a specialized raiding force, and the wartime SAS Brigade was summarily disbanded.⁹ The name and ethos, however, were preserved in 1947 when the Artists Rifles, a Territorial Army (TA) reserve unit, was re-designated as the 21st Special Air Service Regiment (Artists Rifles).⁹ For a time, the SAS existed only as a part-time reserve force.

The catalyst for its revival as a regular army unit was the Malayan Emergency, which began in 1948. The armed wing of the Malayan Communist Party, the Malayan National Liberation Army (MNLA), launched a guerrilla campaign targeting the economic infrastructure of the British colony.³² The British Army, trained for conventional warfare in Europe, found itself ill-equipped to combat an elusive enemy that operated from deep within the dense, trackless jungle.³²

This created an urgent need for a specialized deep-penetration jungle warfare unit. In 1950, Brigadier Mike Calvert, a veteran of the Chindits in Burma, was tasked with forming a new unit called the “Malayan Scouts (SAS)”.⁹ The unit had a multinational character from the outset, comprising ‘A’ Squadron, formed from volunteers already in the Far East; ‘B’ Squadron, which was a deployed squadron from 21 SAS; and ‘C’ Squadron, made up of 100 volunteers from Rhodesia.⁹

The immediate and profound success of the Malayan Scouts in taking the fight to the insurgents in their jungle sanctuaries demonstrated the clear need for a permanent, regular army SAS regiment. Consequently, in 1952, the Malayan Scouts were formally absorbed into the British Army’s order of battle and re-designated as the 22nd Special Air Service Regiment, the direct ancestor of the modern regular unit.⁹ This marked the only time in the British Army’s history that a regular unit has been formed from a Territorial Army unit.⁹ It was during this formative period that Lieutenant Colonel John Woodhouse, a key figure in the unit’s development, was tasked with establishing the formal, brutally demanding selection and training course that remains the gateway to the Regiment to this day.¹³

3.2 Mastering the Jungle: Deep Patrols and Counter-Insurgency in Malaya

The tactical problem in Malaya was how to defeat an insurgency that drew its strength from the civilian population (the Min Yuen network) and used the impenetrable jungle as its base and refuge.³² The SAS’s solution was to turn the jungle itself into a weapon against the insurgents. They pioneered the tactic of long-range, deep-penetration patrols, with small four- or five-man teams remaining in the jungle for weeks or even months at a time.¹³ The objective was to relentlessly hunt the MNLA in their own heartland, destroying their camps and disrupting their supply lines, thereby denying them the sanctuary they needed to survive.¹³

Mastering this environment required a complete re-engineering of the Regiment’s skills:

• Junglecraft and Tracking: Operators had to become masters of jungle survival, navigation, and patrol techniques. A crucial element of their success was the integration of indigenous trackers, primarily from the Iban people of Borneo, whose innate jungle skills were an invaluable asset in locating the elusive enemy.¹³
• Sustainment and Insertion: To support these extended patrols, the SAS developed novel techniques for aerial resupply by helicopter and parachute.¹³ This included the hazardous practice of “treejumping,” where a trooper would parachute into the high jungle canopy, allow his parachute to become entangled, and then lower himself to the ground on a rope.¹³
• “Hearts and Minds”: The SAS’s kinetic operations were a component of the broader British COIN strategy, famously articulated by General Sir Gerald Templer as a battle for the “hearts and minds” of the population.³² The goal was to isolate the insurgents from their civilian support base. SAS patrols often participated in this effort directly, with medics providing medical care to remote villages and establishing trust, which in turn generated valuable intelligence.¹³

3.3 Whispering in the Sands: Firqat Operations and COIN in Dhofar

The lessons learned in the jungles of Malaya were refined and adapted for a different environment in the mountains of Oman during the Dhofar Rebellion (1962-1976). There, 22 SAS squadrons were deployed to support the Sultan of Oman against a communist-backed insurgency, known as the Adoo, operating in the rugged Jebel of Dhofar province.³⁸

While the SAS conducted direct action missions, their most significant and enduring contribution was the development and implementation of the Firqat strategy.³⁸ This was a sophisticated expression of population-centric counter-insurgency. The SAS established a program to grant amnesty to surrendered enemy personnel (SEPs) and then recruit them into pro-government irregular tribal units, known as Firqats (Arabic for ‘unit’).⁴⁰

Small SAS teams, known as British Army Training Teams (BATTs), lived with, trained, armed, and led these Firqat units on operations against their former comrades.³⁸ This strategy acted as a powerful force multiplier. The Firqats possessed intimate knowledge of the local terrain, culture, and the enemy’s methods, providing unparalleled intelligence and legitimacy.⁴⁰ The SAS troopers acted as advisors, liaisons, and combat leaders, embedding with the local forces in a model of unconventional warfare that is now central to the doctrine of modern special operations forces worldwide.

As in Malaya, this military effort was fully integrated with a “hearts and minds” campaign. SAS-led Civil Action Teams (CATs) moved through the mountains, providing medical treatment to villagers and veterinary care for their livestock, helping to dig wells, and demonstrating the benefits of supporting the government.³⁸ The SAS’s success in Dhofar was a testament to its mastery of indirect warfare, understanding that the most decisive weapon in a counter-insurgency is often not a rifle, but the trust and support of the local population.

3.4 The Cold War Arsenal: Adapting to New Environments

The shift to jungle and mountain counter-insurgency drove an evolution in the Regiment’s small arms, prioritizing reliability in harsh conditions and, increasingly, lighter weight for long-duration patrols.

• L1A1 Self-Loading Rifle (SLR): The standard rifle for the SAS throughout much of this period was the 7.62x51mm NATO L1A1 SLR, the British-produced variant of the FN FAL.⁴⁴ It was a robust, reliable, and powerful weapon. Its hard-hitting cartridge was well-suited for penetrating jungle foliage and for engagements at longer ranges in the mountains of Oman.⁴⁶
• Sterling Submachine Gun: The 9x19mm Sterling SMG (designated L2A3) was a common weapon for patrol commanders and for close-quarters engagements.⁴⁷ Its suppressed variant, the L34A1, was a key tool for covert operations, used for silent sentry removal and reconnaissance during the Falklands War.⁴⁷
• Early Adoption of the AR-15: A significant development occurred during the Indonesian Confrontation in Borneo (1963-1966). The SAS, finding the L1A1 SLR heavy and cumbersome for long jungle patrols, became one of the first military units in the world to adopt and use the 5.56x45mm Colt Armalite AR-15 (specifically, the Colt 602 model).⁴⁹ The primary advantage was the significant weight savings of both the rifle and its ammunition. This allowed a trooper on an extended patrol to carry a substantially larger combat load of ammunition compared to the 7.62mm SLR, a critical factor in the deep jungle.⁴⁹ This early, independent adoption of a non-standard weapon system to gain a specific tactical advantage is a hallmark of the Regiment’s pragmatic approach to materiel.

Section 4: The Black Kit – Counter-Terrorism and Global Intervention (1980-2001)

The late 20th century saw the Special Air Service develop a dual identity. While continuing to hone its skills in counter-insurgency and special reconnaissance, the Regiment was tasked with confronting the rising threat of international terrorism. This led to the creation of a new, highly specialized capability in hostage rescue and counter-terrorism, a skillset that would thrust the unit from the shadows into the global spotlight. This era demonstrated the SAS’s unique institutional flexibility, proving its ability to maintain world-class proficiency in two almost entirely distinct forms of warfare: the short-duration, high-intensity violence of counter-terrorism and the sustained, arduous campaigning of conventional special operations.

4.1 A New Threat: The Formation of the Counter Revolutionary Warfare (CRW) Wing

The wave of international terrorism in the late 1960s and early 1970s, exemplified by aircraft hijackings and events like the 1972 Munich Olympics massacre, presented a new security challenge that conventional military and police forces were not equipped to handle. In response, the British government tasked the SAS with developing a dedicated domestic counter-terrorism capability.⁵¹

In the early 1970s, the Regiment established its Counter Revolutionary Warfare (CRW) wing.⁵¹ This specialized element was charged with developing the unique doctrine, tactics, techniques, and technologies required for hostage rescue operations.⁵¹ The CRW wing’s responsibility is to provide continuous, intensive training to the Regiment’s four Sabre Squadrons (A, B, D, and G), which rotate through the counter-terrorism (CT) standby role.⁵² One squadron is always held at high readiness to respond to a terrorist incident within the United Kingdom.⁵³

Training is relentless and realistic, centered around the “Killing House,” a specialized facility at the SAS headquarters in Hereford. This structure features movable walls and rubber-lined rooms, allowing assault teams to practice dynamic entry and room-clearing techniques using live ammunition to achieve the highest standards of speed and surgical precision.⁵³ The CRW wing’s curriculum covers a range of scenarios, including assaults on aircraft, trains, and buses (known as “tubular assaults”), as well as complex building clearances.⁵³

4.2 Operation Nimrod: The Siege that Defined Modern Counter-Terrorism (1980)

On April 30, 1980, the CRW wing’s secretive preparations were put to the ultimate test. Six armed men, members of the Democratic Revolutionary Movement for the Liberation of Arabistan, stormed the Iranian Embassy at Prince’s Gate, London, taking 26 people hostage.⁵⁵ After a tense six-day siege, negotiations broke down when the terrorists murdered a hostage and threw his body out of the embassy.⁵⁴ With the lives of the remaining hostages in imminent danger, Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher gave the order for the SAS to execute a rescue mission, codenamed Operation Nimrod.⁵⁵

The assault, which unfolded in the full view of the world’s media, was a clinical demonstration of the CRW doctrine of “Speed, Aggression, Surprise”.⁵⁷

• Simultaneous Entry: Multiple assault teams struck the building from all angles at once to overwhelm the terrorists. Teams abseiled from the roof to force entry through second-floor windows, while other teams blew their way through armored windows and doors at the rear of the building and stormed the front balcony.⁵⁵
• Shock and Disorientation: The assault was initiated with explosive breaching charges and the deployment of G60 stun grenades, or “flash-bangs”—a device developed by the SAS’s own Operations Research Unit.⁵⁹ The combined effect of the explosions, the blinding flashes, and the deafening noise was designed to disorient and paralyze the terrorists, creating a critical window of opportunity for the assaulters.⁵⁹
• Violence of Action: Moving with practiced speed, the assault teams cleared the 56-room embassy, systematically neutralizing the threat. The entire operation lasted just 17 minutes, from the first explosion to the securing of the last hostage.⁵⁷ In the end, 19 hostages were rescued, and five of the six terrorists were killed.⁵⁸

The equipment used was highly specialized for the Close Quarter Battle (CQB) environment. Assaulters were clad in black Nomex flame-retardant overalls and wore S6 respirators to protect against CS gas and the effects of their own stun grenades.⁵⁹ Their primary weapon was the German-made Heckler & Koch MP5 submachine gun, chambered in 9x19mm.⁵⁹ The MP5 was chosen for its compactness, controllability in full-automatic fire, and the lower risk of over-penetration from its pistol-caliber round in a crowded environment where hostages were present. Their sidearm was typically the Browning Hi-Power pistol (or its Canadian-made Inglis L9A1 variant).⁵⁹

Operation Nimrod was a resounding success that fundamentally and permanently altered the SAS’s public profile. It transformed the unit from an obscure entity into a household name, a symbol of lethal efficiency and national resolve.⁵⁵ While this brought immense prestige, it also shattered the Regiment’s anonymity, creating a public mystique that would at times conflict with the operational necessity for secrecy.

4.3 Return to Conventional Warfare: Reconnaissance and Raiding in the Falklands (1982)

Just two years after the urban counter-terrorism triumph in London, the Argentinian invasion of the Falkland Islands in 1982 plunged the SAS back into a conventional war, demanding a completely different set of skills. D and G Squadrons were deployed with the British Naval Task Force, tasked with missions that echoed the Regiment’s original WWII roles.⁶¹

The Regiment’s primary function in the conflict was deep-level special reconnaissance. Small, four-man patrols were inserted by helicopter onto the islands, often far from their objectives and in appalling weather conditions.⁶¹ Their mission was to establish covert observation posts (OPs) and report on Argentine troop strengths, dispositions, and movements. The terrain offered virtually no cover, forcing the troopers to dig shallow scrapes and endure extreme cold and wet for days on end.⁶¹ The intelligence they provided was invaluable to the commanders of the main British landing force.⁶¹

The SAS also conducted direct action raids. The most significant of these was the attack on the Argentine airfield on Pebble Island on the night of May 14-15. Approximately 45 men from D Squadron were landed by helicopter and, in a classic SAS-style raid, destroyed eleven enemy aircraft on the ground using explosive charges and fire from M203 grenade launchers and M72 LAW rockets.⁶¹ Later in the campaign, SAS squadrons fought a series of sharp skirmishes against Argentine special forces to seize and hold the vital high ground of Mount Kent ahead of the main British advance on Port Stanley.⁶¹

The weaponry used in the Falklands reflected the demands of conventional infantry combat. While the standard British L1A1 SLR was used, many SAS troopers preferred the American M16 rifle for its lighter weight, higher ammunition capacity, and full-automatic fire capability.⁶¹ Support weapons included the 7.62mm GPMG, mortars, and Milan wire-guided anti-tank missiles.⁶¹ Critically, the SAS was also equipped with the American-made FIM-92 Stinger, a man-portable air-defense system (MANPADS). Despite limited training on the new system, an SAS trooper successfully used a Stinger to shoot down an Argentine Pucara ground-attack aircraft, demonstrating the unit’s ability to quickly master and deploy new technology.⁶¹

4.4 Back to the Desert: Scud Hunting in the First Gulf War (1991)

The 1991 Gulf War saw the SAS return to the deserts of the Middle East, and in a remarkable historical echo, to its original mission of deep penetration vehicle-borne raiding. Following the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait, A, B, and D Squadrons of 22 SAS were deployed as part of Operation Granby.⁶⁴ When Saddam Hussein began launching mobile-launched Scud ballistic missiles at Israel, the SAS was given a critical strategic mission: to infiltrate western Iraq to find and destroy the elusive launchers, a task at which coalition air power had proven ineffective.⁶⁴

This mission precipitated a direct revival of the Regiment’s WWII desert tactics. A and D Squadrons were organized into “fighting columns” of up to a dozen heavily armed Land Rover 110 vehicles, supported by Unimog trucks for logistics.⁶⁴ These columns would drive deep into the Iraqi desert, traveling by night and establishing camouflaged lay-up positions (LUPs) during the day.⁶⁴ Their missions included ambushing Iraqi supply routes, destroying communications infrastructure, and, most importantly, locating Scud convoys and either attacking them directly or calling in coalition air strikes.⁶⁴

The Land Rovers were mobile arsenals, equipped with a formidable array of weaponry to provide overwhelming firepower. Typical armament included.50 caliber M2 Browning heavy machine guns, 7.62mm GPMGs, Milan anti-tank missile launchers, and Mk 19 40mm automatic grenade launchers.⁶⁴

While the vehicle columns were highly successful, the campaign also included foot-mobile patrols inserted by helicopter to conduct reconnaissance on main supply routes. One such patrol, B Squadron’s Bravo Two Zero, became infamous. Compromised deep in enemy territory and hampered by faulty communications and severe weather, the eight-man patrol was forced into a long escape and evasion operation that resulted in three members killed, four captured, and only one escaping to Syria.²⁷ The fate of this patrol highlighted the extreme risks of dismounted operations in the open desert and the critical importance of reliable mobility and communications.

Section 5: The Modern Regiment and its Small Arms (2001-Present)

The post-9/11 era has been defined by a global, persistent, and asymmetric conflict against transnational terrorist networks and insurgencies. For the 22 Special Air Service, this has meant over two decades of continuous, high-tempo combat operations, primarily in Afghanistan and Iraq. This period has driven a significant evolution in tactics, techniques, and procedures, focusing on intelligence-led, high-precision raids. This operational demand, in turn, has accelerated the development and procurement of highly modular, reliable, and specialized small arms, leading to a clear divergence between the equipment of UK Special Forces (UKSF) and that of the conventional British Army.

5.1 The Post-9/11 Landscape: Task Force Black and the Manhunting Mission

Following the September 11, 2001 attacks, the SAS was heavily engaged in the ensuing conflicts. Initial operations in Afghanistan in late 2001 (Operation Determine, Operation Trent) involved reconnaissance and direct action against Al Qaeda and Taliban command and control facilities.⁹ However, it was in Iraq from 2003 that the Regiment’s modern role was truly defined.

In Iraq, the SAS formed the core of a UKSF special missions task force, operating alongside US Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC) counterparts. This task force, known variously as Task Force Black and later Task Force Knight, was charged with a relentless “manhunting” mission: to counter the powerful Sunni and Shia insurgencies by systematically dismantling their networks.³¹ The primary method was the conduct of intelligence-driven, short-notice “capture/kill” raids targeting high-value individuals—bomb makers, financiers, and insurgent leaders.³¹

This mission set placed unique demands on the operators and their equipment. The operational tempo was exceptionally high, with teams often conducting multiple raids in a single night, moving rapidly from one target to the next as actionable intelligence was developed from captured personnel or materials.³¹ Operations took place in complex urban environments, requiring a mastery of Close Quarter Battle (CQB) and vehicle-borne tactics. This environment drove the requirement for weapon systems that were compact, ergonomic, supremely reliable, and, above all, modular, allowing an operator to configure his weapon perfectly for the specific demands of the next mission.

5.2 Current Armoury: A Detailed Technical Analysis of 22 SAS Small Arms

The modern SAS operator selects their equipment based on the principle of using the best available tool for the task, rather than adhering to a standardized inventory. This has led to the adoption of a suite of weapon systems, primarily of North American and European origin, that are optimized for special operations.

5.2.1 Primary Carbines: The L119A2 and SIG Sauer MCX

While the conventional British Army is issued the 5.56mm SA80/L85 bullpup rifle, UKSF has consistently preferred the ergonomics and modularity of the AR-15 platform.

• Colt Canada C8 (L119A1/A2): The primary carbine of the SAS is the L119, the British military designation for the Colt Canada (formerly Diemaco) C8 carbine.⁴⁹ The current in-service variant is the
  L119A2, which was adopted around 2014.⁶⁸

Technical Specifications:

• Caliber: 5.56x45mm NATO.⁶⁹
• Operating System: Direct Impingement Gas.
• Barrel Lengths: Typically issued in two configurations: a 10-inch barrel for CQB and a 15.7-inch barrel for general-purpose use.⁷⁰
• Key Features: The L119A2’s most distinctive feature is its monolithic upper receiver, where the handguard and receiver are a single, continuous piece of forged aluminum.⁷⁰ This design provides exceptional rigidity, ensuring that optics and laser aiming modules mounted on the handguard do not lose their zero, a critical requirement for precision shooting. The weapon also features ambidextrous controls, a cold-hammer-forged barrel for longevity and accuracy, and a reputation for outstanding reliability.⁷¹
• SIG Sauer MCX (L143A1): The SIG MCX is a newer, highly modular platform that has been adopted by UKSF, including the SAS, particularly for counter-terrorism and covert roles.⁷²

Technical Specifications:

• Caliber Options: 5.56x45mm NATO and.300 AAC Blackout.⁷² The.300 Blackout cartridge is optimized for short barrels and provides excellent performance when suppressed, making it ideal for discreet operations.
• Operating System: Short-stroke gas piston.⁷² This system prevents hot propellant gases from entering the receiver, making the weapon run cooler and cleaner than a direct impingement system, which can improve reliability during high-volume fire.
• Barrel Lengths: UKSF variants are typically short-barreled rifles (SBRs) with barrel lengths around 9 inches for.300 BLK and 11.5 to 12.5 inches for 5.56mm.⁷²
• Key Features: The MCX’s recoil system is fully contained within the upper receiver, allowing the weapon to be fired with the stock folded. This is a significant advantage for operations in extremely confined spaces or from within vehicles.⁷³ Its design allows for rapid changes of caliber, barrel length, and handguard configuration.

5.2.2 Sidearms: The Glock 17/19 Series

The SAS, along with the wider British military, has standardized on the Austrian-made Glock pistol, prized for its simplicity, reliability, and high magazine capacity.

• Glock 17 Gen 4 (L131A1): This is the full-size model, designated L131A1 in UK service.⁷⁴ It is the primary sidearm for overt operations.

• Caliber: 9x19mm Parabellum.⁷⁴
• Magazine Capacity: 17 rounds.⁷⁴
• Weight (Loaded): Approx. 905 g.⁷⁴
• Glock 19 Gen 4 (L132A1): This is the compact model, favored for its balance of size and capacity. Its smaller frame makes it easier to conceal, rendering it ideal for covert operations, close protection duties, or as a personal sidearm when a full-size pistol is not required.⁷⁴

• Caliber: 9x19mm Parabellum.⁷⁴
• Magazine Capacity: 15 rounds (also accepts Glock 17 magazines).⁷⁴
• Operating System (Both): Both pistols are short recoil-operated, striker-fired handguns with a polymer frame.⁷⁴

5.2.3 Sniper Systems: Precision and Power

SAS sniper teams are equipped with a range of specialized rifles to engage targets from medium to extreme long ranges and to defeat hardened targets.

• L115A3 Long Range Rifle: The standard long-range anti-personnel sniper rifle is the Accuracy International L115A3.⁷⁸

• Caliber:.338 Lapua Magnum (8.59×70 mm).⁷⁸ This cartridge offers significantly better long-range performance and resistance to wind deflection than the older 7.62x51mm NATO round.
• Action: Bolt-action.⁸⁰
• Effective Range: In excess of 1,100 meters.⁷⁸
• Anti-Materiel Rifles: To engage light vehicles, communications equipment, and targets behind cover, the SAS employs.50 BMG (12.7×99 mm) rifles. These include the Accuracy International AW50 bolt-action rifle and the semi-automatic Barrett M82.⁷⁹

5.2.4 Support and Specialist Weapons

• Machine Guns: For squad-level fire support, UKSF uses the FN Minimi in both 5.56mm (L108A1) and 7.62mm (L110A2) variants. The venerable 7.62mm General Purpose Machine Gun (GPMG) remains in service for vehicle-mounted and sustained-fire roles.
• Grenade Launchers: The standard 40mm underslung grenade launcher, fitted to the L119A2, is the Heckler & Koch AG-C / L17A2, which replaced the older M203.⁸¹
• Combat Shotguns: The current-issue combat shotgun is the Benelli M4 Super 90, a semi-automatic 12-gauge shotgun designated as the L128A1.⁸³ It is used primarily for dynamic entry (breaching doors) and in close-quarters battle.⁸³

The complete embrace of modularity is the defining characteristic of the modern SAS arsenal. The L119A2 and MCX are not just rifles but core platforms for a system of integrated accessories—optics, lasers, lights, suppressors, and grenade launchers—that allow the operator to tailor the weapon precisely to the mission. This philosophy is a direct consequence of the varied and high-tempo operational demands of the post-9/11 era.

Section 6: The Future Operator – A Speculative Analysis

The operational history of the Special Air Service is one of continuous adaptation. As the strategic focus of the United Kingdom and its allies pivots away from two decades of counter-insurgency and towards an era of renewed great power competition, the Regiment is poised for another significant evolution. The future battlespace will be defined by near-peer state adversaries, contested domains, and the pervasive influence of emerging technologies. For the SAS, this will likely mean a return to its foundational roles of deep reconnaissance and sabotage, but executed with 21st-century tools and in radically new operational environments.

6.1 The Shift from Counter-Terrorism to Near-Peer Competition

The prevailing defense strategies of Western nations are now primarily oriented towards deterring and, if necessary, confronting near-peer adversaries such as Russia and China.⁸⁶ This marks a fundamental shift from the counter-terrorism (CT) and counter-insurgency (COIN) missions that have dominated the last 20 years.

For the SAS, this strategic realignment implies a change in primary mission sets. While the high-readiness domestic CT role will remain, the focus of expeditionary operations will likely move away from “manhunting” insurgents and towards the “classic” SAS tasks envisioned by Stirling during WWII.⁸⁶ In a conflict against a sophisticated state adversary, the Regiment’s value will lie in its ability to conduct high-risk, high-gain missions deep within denied areas. These missions would include:

• Special Reconnaissance: Deploying small teams to provide persistent, clandestine observation of critical enemy assets, such as anti-access/area denial (A2/AD) missile systems, air defense nodes, and command and control centers.⁸⁸
• Sabotage and Direct Action: Conducting precision strikes against these high-value strategic targets to disrupt the enemy’s warfighting capability.
• Unconventional Warfare: In an occupied friendly nation, the SAS would leverage its historical expertise to train, advise, assist, and potentially lead local resistance movements, creating a guerrilla threat in the enemy’s rear.⁸⁶

6.2 The Digital Battlefield: Integrating Cyber, Space, and AI Capabilities

Future conflicts will not be confined to the physical domains of land, sea, and air. They will be fought across the electromagnetic spectrum and in the digital and space domains simultaneously. Special operations forces like the SAS are uniquely positioned to act as the critical human interface between these domains—the “physical-to-digital” link.⁸⁷

This integration will likely create new roles and capabilities for SAS teams:

• The “Space JTAC”: Building on the traditional role of the Joint Terminal Attack Controller (JTAC) who directs air strikes, future SAS operators may be trained to act as “Space JTACs.” A deployed team could provide terminal guidance for space-based assets, direct satellite reconnaissance to a specific target, or potentially designate targets for future space-based weapon systems.⁸⁹
• Cyber-Physical Operations: Operators could be tasked with missions that directly enable cyber warfare. This might involve physically accessing and planting exploitation devices on enemy infrastructure, such as fiber-optic cables, data centers, or air defense radars, allowing friendly cyber forces to gain access to closed networks.⁸⁹
• AI-Enhanced Operations: Artificial intelligence and machine learning will be critical force multipliers. AI algorithms will rapidly process vast amounts of intelligence data from multiple sources (satellite imagery, signals intelligence, etc.) to identify enemy patterns, predict movements, and cue reconnaissance teams to high-probability target locations. For the operator on the ground, AI-driven software in their tactical devices will enhance situational awareness and accelerate decision-making, drastically shortening the “sensor-to-shooter” link.⁹⁰

6.3 Evolving Threats and Environments: From the Arctic to Megacities

The new strategic focus will also force the SAS to adapt its skills to new and challenging physical environments.

• The High North: Renewed competition with Russia has brought the Arctic back into focus as a potential theater of conflict. The extreme cold, unique terrain, and vast distances of the High North demand specialized skills and equipment. The Regiment’s Mountain Troop, which specializes in Arctic and mountain warfare, will likely see its importance and resources increase, and the entire force will need to enhance its proficiency in extreme cold-weather operations.⁸⁹
• Urban Warfare in Megacities: The global trend of mass urbanization means that future conflicts are increasingly likely to occur within the dense, complex, and multi-layered environments of megacities. This will require an evolution of the CQB skills honed by the CRW wing, scaling them up from clearing a single building to operating across vast, populated urban landscapes, where distinguishing combatants from non-combatants is a supreme challenge.

6.4 Future Materiel: Next-Generation Weaponry and Soldier Systems

The SAS operator of the future will be an even more lethal, protected, and networked node on the battlefield.

• Next-Generation Weapon Systems: The trend towards modular, multi-caliber weapon systems will continue. The adoption of the SIG MCX, with its ability to rapidly switch between 5.56mm and.300 BLK, is a clear indicator.⁷² UKSF will closely monitor the development of next-generation ammunition, such as the 6.8mm cartridge adopted by the U.S. Army for its Next Generation Squad Weapon (NGSW) program, and will likely adopt similar intermediate-caliber, high-performance rounds to defeat advanced body armor.⁹¹
• Integrated Soldier Systems: The individual operator’s equipment will become a fully integrated system. This will include advanced night vision devices with augmented reality overlays that display navigation points, friendly force locations, and target data (similar to the American ENVG-B system).⁹² Personal-level ISR will become standard, with operators deploying nano-drones for immediate reconnaissance of buildings or routes ahead.
• Human-Machine Teaming: SAS teams will increasingly operate alongside autonomous and semi-autonomous systems. Robotic “mules” will carry heavy equipment on long-range patrols, and unmanned ground and aerial vehicles will be used for reconnaissance, perimeter security, and potentially direct action, allowing the human operators to be projected forward while minimizing their exposure to risk.⁹⁰

In essence, the future role of the SAS represents a return to its original strategic purpose, but updated for the information age. Stirling’s vision was to use small teams to attack an enemy’s industrial-age “centers of gravity”—airfields and supply lines. In a future conflict, those centers of gravity will be digital networks, satellite uplinks, and integrated air defense systems. The SAS’s enduring value will be its ability to provide the highly trained, adaptable human element that can physically access and disrupt these critical nodes in a way that remote assets cannot. The individual operator will evolve from a self-sufficient warrior into a hyper-connected node in a multi-domain network, whose primary value will be not just their skill with a carbine, but their ability to leverage the full spectrum of joint-force capabilities at the tactical edge.

Summary of Evolution

The following table provides a consolidated overview of the evolution of the 22 Special Air Service, tracking its primary roles, key tactics, and representative small arms across distinct historical eras.

Era / Key Conflict(s)	Primary Role / Mission	Key Tactics Employed	Key Small Arms / Weapon Systems
WWII North Africa (1941-43)	Deep Penetration Raiding	LRDG-transported infiltration; Vehicle-mounted assaults on airfields; Dismounted sabotage.	Vickers ‘K’ Machine Gun; M2 Browning HMG; Lewes Bomb; Thompson SMG.
WWII Europe (1943-45)	Sabotage & Unconventional Warfare	Parachute insertion; Railway and convoy ambushes; Liaison with local resistance forces (Maquis).	Armed Jeeps (Vickers K); Vickers MMG; 3-inch Mortar; Sten SMG.
Malayan Emergency (1948-60)	Jungle Counter-Insurgency	Long-range deep jungle patrols; “Hearts and Minds” civil action; Ambush and tracking operations.	L1A1 SLR; Sterling SMG; Bren Gun.
Dhofar Rebellion (1962-76)	Counter-Insurgency & Advisory	Training and leading indigenous Firqat forces; “Hearts and Minds”; Mountain warfare.	L1A1 SLR; GPMG; Browning M2 HMG.
The Troubles / CT (1970s-90s)	Domestic Counter-Terrorism; Hostage Rescue	Close Quarter Battle (CQB); Dynamic entry; Coordinated sniper overwatch.	HK MP5; Sig Sauer P226; Browning Hi-Power; G60 Stun Grenade.
Falklands War (1982)	Special Reconnaissance; Direct Action	Covert Observation Posts (OPs); Raids on airfields; Man-portable air defense.	M16/AR-15; L1A1 SLR; GPMG; FIM-92 Stinger.
First Gulf War (1991)	Strategic Reconnaissance; Search & Destroy	Vehicle-borne “Fighting Columns”; Scud hunting; Long-range desert patrols.	Land Rover 110 w/ M2 HMG, Mk 19 AGL, Milan ATGM; M16/M203.
Post-9/11 (2001-Present)	Counter-Terrorism; “Manhunting”	Intelligence-driven precision raids; High-tempo CQB; Direct Action against High-Value Targets.	L119A1/A2 (Colt Canada C8); Glock 17/19; L115A3 Sniper Rifle.
Future (Speculative)	Near-Peer Competition; Multi-Domain Ops	Deep reconnaissance of A2/AD systems; Cyber-physical enablement; Unconventional warfare.	SIG Sauer MCX (Multi-caliber); Next-Gen Squad Weapons (e.g., 6.8mm); Integrated soldier systems; Autonomous platforms.

---

If you find this post useful, please share the link on Facebook, with your friends, etc. Your support is much appreciated and if you have any feedback, please email me at in**@*********ps.com. Please note that for links to other websites, we are only paid if there is an affiliate program such as Avantlink, Impact, Amazon and eBay and only if you purchase something. If you’d like to directly donate to help fund our continued report, please visit our donations page.

---

Sources Used

1. How did the SAS transform the Second World War? | Imperial War …, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.iwm.org.uk/history/how-did-the-sas-transform-the-second-world-war
2. SAS: Owning The Desert – Warfare History Network, accessed September 6, 2025, https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/article/sas-owning-the-desert/
3. SAS Brigade in North-Africa – TracesOfWar.com, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.tracesofwar.com/articles/7109/SAS-Brigade-in-North-Africa.htm
4. The Special Air Service (SAS) Originals | Defense Media Network, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.defensemedianetwork.com/stories/the-sas-originals-daring-to-win/
5. David Stirling – Wikipedia, accessed September 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Stirling
6. Who Was David Stirling, Mastermind of the SAS? – History Hit, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.historyhit.com/who-was-david-stirling-mastermind-of-the-sas/
7. David Stirling: The Phantom Major | National Army Museum, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.nam.ac.uk/explore/david-stirling
8. Ukraine’s Long-Range Special Operations: Lessons from Desert …, accessed September 6, 2025, https://smallwarsjournal.com/2025/06/02/ukrainian-special-operations-sas-lessons/
9. Special Air Service – National Army Museum, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.nam.ac.uk/explore/SAS
10. Special Air Service – Wikipedia, accessed September 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_Air_Service
11. Wartime History – The official website of the Special Air Service Regimental Association, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.marsandminerva.co.uk/history/wartime-history-sas/
12. Origins of the Special Forces | National Army Museum, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.nam.ac.uk/explore/special-forces-origins
13. History of the Special Air Service – Wikipedia, accessed September 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Special_Air_Service
14. 28 August 1941: The birth of the SAS through previously unpublished photos, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.ww2wrecks.com/portfolio/28-august-1941-the-birth-of-the-sas-through-previously-unpublished-photos/
15. Secret Agents, Secret Armies: The Real Rat Patrol | The National WWII Museum | New Orleans, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.nationalww2museum.org/war/articles/secret-agents-secret-armies-real-rat-patrol
16. The SAS’s greatest weapon during WW2 – YouTube, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/shorts/dhXJ4Alf-0I
17. WWII special assault rifles built for the SAS only – Milsurps, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.milsurps.com/showthread.php?t=63461&page=2
18. Special Air Service – Vickers MG Collection & Research Association, accessed September 6, 2025, https://vickersmg.blog/in-use/british-service/the-british-army/special-air-service/
19. Lewes bomb – Wikipedia, accessed September 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lewes_bomb
20. Jock Lewes – Wikipedia, accessed September 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jock_Lewes
21. Soldier of Fortune 002: SAS Heroes – John ‘Jock’ Lewes – Warlord Community, accessed September 6, 2025, https://warlord-community.warlordgames.com/soldier-of-fortune-002-sas-heroes-john-jock-lewes/
22. WHO DARES WINS with a LEWES BOMB! – HazmatNation, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.hazmatnation.com/who-dares-wins-with-a-lewes-bomb/
23. Weapons of the SAS: A Legacy of Innovation in WWII – ROGUE HEROES Paddy Mayne, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=69dbgEoe_0A
24. LEWES, John Steel | ͏ – Commando Veterans Archive, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.commandoveterans.org/JohnLewesSAS
25. SAS WWII Combat Gear – YouTube, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jp4x2DSG7SU
26. List of World War II weapons of the United Kingdom – Wikipedia, accessed September 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_World_War_II_weapons_of_the_United_Kingdom
27. List of SAS operations – Wikipedia, accessed September 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_SAS_operations
28. SAS Special Air Service in Normandy – French resistance – DDay-Overlord, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.dday-overlord.com/en/battle-of-normandy/resistance/sas
29. The SAS’s Willys MB Jeeps A History of Stealth and Firepower – YouTube, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6VY4j3Qjcoc
30. SAS/Commando Jeeps in Europe – AFV WWII – Britmodeller.com, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.britmodeller.com/forums/index.php?/topic/235054946-sascommando-jeeps-in-europe/
31. Special Air Service (SAS) | History, Organization, & Operations – Britannica, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/topic/Special-Air-Service
32. Malayan Emergency | National Army Museum, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.nam.ac.uk/explore/malayan-emergency
33. A Successful Counterinsurgency – Jackson School of International Studies, accessed September 6, 2025, https://jsis.washington.edu/jsjournal/wp-content/uploads/sites/25/2017/04/Cynthia_Anna.pdf
34. Post War History – The official website of the Special Air Service Regimental Association, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.marsandminerva.co.uk/history/post-war-history-sas/
35. What tactics were used during the Malayan Emergency? – Quora, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.quora.com/What-tactics-were-used-during-the-Malayan-Emergency
36. Malayan Scouts (Special Air Service Regiment) – Wikipedia, accessed September 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malayan_Scouts_(Special_Air_Service_Regiment)
37. Take Risks Early: The SAS Mindset for Tracking – Recoil Magazine, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.recoilweb.com/take-risks-early-the-sas-mindset-for-tracking-166325.html
38. Dhofar rebellion – Wikipedia, accessed September 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dhofar_rebellion
39. David Murphy reviews “The Dhofar War: British Covert Campaigning in Arabia 1965-75” by Stephen Quick | Journal Of Military History and Defence Studies, accessed September 6, 2025, https://ojs.maynoothuniversity.ie/index.php/jmhds/announcement/view/30
40. The Dhofar War and the Myth of ‘Localized’ Conflicts – The Strategy Bridge, accessed September 6, 2025, https://thestrategybridge.org/the-bridge/2018/1/12/the-dhofar-war-and-the-myth-of-localized-conflicts
41. The Dhofar War – British Modern Military History Society, accessed September 6, 2025, https://bmmhs.org/the-dhofar-war/
42. The Firqat – Oman (Dhofar) 1969-1976 – Britain’s Small Wars, accessed September 6, 2025, https://britains-smallwars.com/campaigns/oman/page.php?art_url=firqat
43. A Proxy War in Arabia: The Dhofar Insurgency and Cross-Border Raids into South Yemen, accessed September 6, 2025, https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/ws/files/119638834/A_Proxy_War_in_HUGHES_Acc21Apr2014_GREEN_AAM.pdf
44. L1A1 Self-Loading Rifle – Wikipedia, accessed September 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L1A1_Self-Loading_Rifle
45. Centrefire self-loading military rifle – SLR, L1A1 – 1957 | Collection Object | Royal Armouries, accessed September 6, 2025, https://royalarmouries.org/collection/object/object-275474
46. Battle of Mirbat – Wikipedia, accessed September 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Mirbat
47. Sterling submachine gun – Wikipedia, accessed September 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sterling_submachine_gun
48. The Sterling Submachine gun: Cold War SMG – Guns.com, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.guns.com/news/2013/03/29/sterling-submachine-gun
49. SAS – Weapons – M16 & Variants – Elite UK Forces, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.eliteukforces.info/special-air-service/weapons/m16.php
50. M16 AR-15 Armalite 5.56 mm self-loading rifle, 1960 (c) | Online Collection, accessed September 6, 2025, https://collection.nam.ac.uk/detail.php?acc=1978-11-49-1
51. Special Air Service – Counter Revolutionary Warfare – SAS, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.sasregiment.org.uk/crw.html
52. International Counter-Terrorism: British Special Air Service (SAS) – jewish virtual library, accessed September 6, 2025, https://newsite.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/british-special-air-service-sas
53. SAS – Counter Terrorism – Elite UK Forces, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.eliteukforces.info/special-air-service/counter-terrorism/
54. Revisiting Operation Nimrod 45 years later – Crisis Response Journal, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.crisis-response.com/Articles/714909/Revisiting_Operation_Nimrod.aspx
55. Operation Nimrod: The Iranian Embassy Siege – Grey Dynamics, accessed September 6, 2025, https://greydynamics.com/operation-nimrod-the-iranian-embassy-siege-2/
56. en.wikipedia.org, accessed September 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iranian_Embassy_siege
57. Operation Nimrod: When the British SAS Rescued Hostages From Iranian Embassy Siege, accessed September 6, 2025, https://sofmag.com/operation-nimrod/
58. Iranian Embassy siege | National Army Museum, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.nam.ac.uk/explore/iranian-embassy-siege
59. Operation Nimrod: 17 Minutes to Freedom at Princes Gate • Spotter Up, accessed September 6, 2025, https://spotterup.com/operation-nimrod-17-minutes-to-freedom-at-princes-gate/
60. How do the SAS decide what equipment to use for specific missions, like the Iranian Embassy siege? – Quora, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.quora.com/How-do-the-SAS-decide-what-equipment-to-use-for-specific-missions-like-the-Iranian-Embassy-siege
61. SAS – History – Falklands – Elite UK Forces, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.eliteukforces.info/special-air-service/history/falklands/
62. That time two countries’ Special Forces squared off in combat – We Are The Mighty, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.wearethemighty.com/popular/that-time-two-countries-special-forces-squared-off-in-combat/
63. Falklands SAS – Re-enactment/Historic Airsoft, accessed September 6, 2025, https://airsoftpacific.com/viewtopic.php?f=50&t=41114
64. SAS – History – Desert Storm – Elite UK Forces, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.eliteukforces.info/special-air-service/history/desert-storm/
65. The SAS Operations | Gulf-war – Britain’s Small Wars, accessed September 6, 2025, https://britains-smallwars.com/campaigns/gulf-war/page.php?art_url=gulf-sas
66. SAS – Operations – Victor Two – Elite UK Forces, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.eliteukforces.info/special-air-service/sas-operations/desert-storm/
67. Equipment & Weapons – OoCities.org, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.oocities.org/sascentre/equipweap.html
68. British 22 SAS Sniper pictured here firing down on Taliban positions from a CH-47 Chinook helicopter armed with a Canadian Lapua 338. Sniper rifle [634×471] – Reddit, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/MilitaryPorn/comments/oz82h6/british_22_sas_sniper_pictured_here_firing_down/
69. Type-A L119A2 Rifle, 10.5″ Barrel | BG Defense, accessed September 6, 2025, https://bgdefense.com/product/l119a2/
70. L119A2: The New British SOF Rifle – Forgotten Weapons, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.forgottenweapons.com/l119a2-the-new-british-sof-rifle/
71. EMG Colt Canada L119A2 Gas Blowback Airsoft Rifle by Archwick, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.emgarms.com/13728/
72. SIG MCX – Wikipedia, accessed September 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SIG_MCX
73. UK Royal Marines Commandos Adopt SIG Sauer MCX – The Armourers Bench, accessed September 6, 2025, https://armourersbench.com/2025/03/28/uk-royal-marines-commandos-adopt-sig-sauer-mcx/
74. Glock 17 Pistol | UK Armed Forces – Elite UK Forces, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.eliteukforces.info/weapons/glock-pistol/
75. Why is the Glock 19 pistol the favorite of the world’s most elite forces? – Sandboxx, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.sandboxx.us/news/why-is-the-glock-19-the-favorite-pistol-of-special-forces/
76. The Modern UKSF (SAS/SBS) Kit List #1 – The Reptile House, accessed September 6, 2025, https://thereptilehouseblog.com/2019/11/10/uksf-inspired-impression-kit-list-by-john-danter/
77. Glock – Wikipedia, accessed September 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glock
78. L115A3 Long Range ‘Sniper’ Rifle | The British Army, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.army.mod.uk/learn-and-explore/equipment/small-arms-and-support-weapons/l115a3-long-range-sniper-rifle/
79. Gallery No 39b – Weapons – Rifles – British Armed Forces & National Service, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.britisharmedforces.org/pages/nat_rifles_.htm
80. SAS Weapons – L96A1 Sniper Rifle – Elite UK Forces, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.eliteukforces.info/special-air-service/weapons/l96.php
81. Special Air Service (SAS) Weapons – Elite UK Forces, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.eliteukforces.info/special-air-service/weapons/
82. List of sniper rifles – Wikipedia, accessed September 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_sniper_rifles
83. British Military Weapons – Combat Shotgun – Elite UK Forces, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.eliteukforces.info/weapons/combat-shotgun/
84. Shotgun Dits – Unconventional Soldier Blog, accessed September 6, 2025, https://unconventionalsoldier.uk/2022/11/18/shotgun-dits/
85. British Army Combat Shotgun | Military.com, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.military.com/video/guns/shotguns/british-army-combat-shotgun/2330479047001
86. How the Pentagon can use special operations … – Atlantic Council, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-research-reports/report/the-next-decade-of-strategic-competition-how-the-pentagon-can-use-special-operations-forces-to-better-compete/
87. Special Operations Force Must Build on Gains Made > U.S. … – DoD, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/4033945/special-operations-force-must-build-on-gains-made/
88. What would special forces do in a peer conflict? : r/WarCollege – Reddit, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/WarCollege/comments/15hqnq7/what_would_special_forces_do_in_a_peer_conflict/
89. Space and Ice: Envisioning Special Operations Forces’ Role in …, accessed September 6, 2025, https://irregularwarfare.org/articles/space-and-ice-envisioning-special-operations-forces-role-in-future-operational-environments/
90. Emerging Technology | Arms Control Association, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.armscontrol.org/blogs/emergingtech
91. The Royal Marines’ New Firearm: The Sig Sauer MCX – The National Interest, accessed September 6, 2025, https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/the-royal-marines-new-firearm-the-sig-sauer-mcx
92. Technology for the Next Generation of Special Forces | L3Harris® Fast. Forward., accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.l3harris.com/newsroom/editorial/2024/05/technology-next-generation-special-forces