The 1st New Zealand Special Air Service Regiment (1 NZSAS Regt) stands as the premier combat unit of the New Zealand Defence Force (NZDF) and is recognized internationally as a Tier 1 Special Operations Force (SOF).¹ Established on 7 July 1955, the unit was conceived from a direct strategic need and modeled explicitly on the British Special Air Service (SAS), adopting its uncompromising standards, clandestine operational methodology, and its iconic motto: “Who Dares Wins”.¹ The Regiment’s spiritual ancestry, however, extends further back to the Second World War and the Long Range Desert Group (LRDG), a British/Commonwealth unit that operated deep behind enemy lines in North Africa and was notable for the high proportion of New Zealand volunteers within its ranks.³ This heritage of long-range penetration, self-reliance, and unconventional thinking has remained a core tenet of the unit’s identity.

This report presents a comprehensive analytical history of the 1st NZSAS Regiment, documenting its evolution from a single counter-insurgency squadron into a multi-faceted special operations regiment. The core thesis of this analysis is that the history of the NZSAS is a continuous and deliberate cycle of adaptation. Operational experience gained in one conflict has directly informed and refined the tactics, training, and materiel for the next, fostering a culture of professionalism and an “unrelenting pursuit of excellence” that defines its modern capabilities.⁷ From the jungles of Malaya and Borneo, through the complexities of Vietnam and the demands of global peacekeeping, to the sustained, high-intensity combat of Afghanistan, the Regiment has consistently evolved to provide the New Zealand Government with a range of discreet, scalable, and highly effective military options to protect and advance the nation’s interests.

Section 1: Forging an Elite Force (1955-1962): The Malayan Emergency

The genesis of the NZSAS was not a peacetime exercise in military development but a direct, calculated response to a specific strategic dilemma confronting New Zealand in the mid-1950s. The unit was forged in the crucible of the Malayan Emergency, an experience that would permanently embed the principles of deep jungle warfare, small-unit autonomy, and strategic utility into its institutional DNA.

1.1 Strategic Imperative: The Far East Strategic Reserve

The formation of the NZSAS was a direct consequence of the New Zealand government’s decision to contribute to the British Commonwealth Far East Strategic Reserve. This commitment signaled a major shift in New Zealand’s defence policy, pivoting from a traditional focus on the Middle East to the growing strategic importance of Southeast Asia in the context of the Cold War.⁸ The government sought to provide a contribution to the ongoing counter-insurgency campaign in Malaya (1948-1960) that was both militarily effective and economically viable.² A conventional infantry battalion was a significant and costly undertaking; a small, highly trained special forces squadron, however, offered the ability to deliver a disproportionately large strategic impact for a minimal footprint.²

On this basis, the decision was made in February 1955 to raise a squadron explicitly modeled on the British 22 SAS Regiment.³ This was not a superficial imitation. The New Zealand unit adopted the British structure, its rigorous selection and training philosophy, and its core ethos.¹¹ The close association was physically manifested in the adoption of the maroon beret then worn by 22 SAS (changed to the now-iconic sand-coloured beret in 1985 to maintain commonality with other Commonwealth SAS units) and the authorization for NZSAS members to wear black rank insignia and web belts, symbols of the direct lineage that persist to this day.³

1.2 The Originals: Selection and Training

Command of the nascent unit was given to Major Frank Rennie, who was tasked with building it from the ground up.³ While a cadre of Regular Force personnel provided the foundation, the unit was unique in its decision to recruit heavily from the civilian population.³ The selection criteria were exceptionally stringent for the era: applicants had to be single, under six feet tall (183 cm), weigh less than 185 lbs (85 kg), possess their own teeth, have excellent eyesight, and hold no criminal record.³

The allure of joining this new elite force was immediate and widespread. Over 800 men applied, from which 182 were chosen to begin training in June 1955.³ After an arduous selection and training cycle conducted at Waiouru Military Camp, 133 men made the final cut to become the founding members, or “The Originals”.² This initial training was intensely focused on preparing the men for the specific and unforgiving environment they were about to enter: the Malayan jungle.³

1.3 Doctrine and Tactics: Deep Jungle Counter-Insurgency

Deploying to Malaya in November 1955, the 133-strong New Zealand squadron was attached to the British 22 SAS Regiment and began its operational tour.² The unit’s primary mission was to combat the guerrillas of the Malayan National Liberation Army (MNLA), the armed wing of the Malayan Communist Party.¹⁵ The core tactic employed was the deep jungle patrol, a physically and mentally demanding task that saw the squadron spend approximately 18 of its 24 months in-country operating in the jungle.¹³

These patrols were a key component of the wider British counter-insurgency strategy known as the “Briggs Plan,” which aimed to sever the connection between the MNLA guerrillas and their support base within the rural population.¹⁶ NZSAS operations often involved locating remote groups of indigenous peoples (the Orang Asli), winning their trust, and assisting in their relocation to fortified “New Villages”.¹³ This denied the insurgents critical access to food, intelligence, and new recruits, effectively starving them out of the jungle.

Patrols, typically lasting for weeks at a time, were exercises in extreme stealth and fieldcraft. Operators moved silently through the dense jungle, wearing no badges of rank or insignia to obscure the chain of command from a potential enemy observer.¹⁷ They were often led by highly skilled Iban trackers from Borneo, whose ability to read the jungle was indispensable.¹⁷ The fundamental tactical principle was “to see before they’re seen, and shoot before they’re shot at,” a philosophy that prioritized reconnaissance and surprise over direct confrontation.¹⁷ From April 1956, the squadron conducted highly successful operations, first in the Fort Brooke area on the Perak-Kelantan border and later in the mountainous region of Negri Sembilan.⁵ Over their two-year tour, NZSAS patrols were involved in 14 engagements, resulting in 15 enemy killed and another 10 captured or surrendered. This was achieved at the cost of two NZSAS members who lost their lives on operations.⁵

1.4 Small Arms of the Malayan Emergency

As the NZSAS squadron operated as an integral part of the 22 SAS Regiment, its armament was consistent with the standard British and Commonwealth small arms of the period, specifically selected for the unique challenges of jungle warfare.

• Primary Rifle: Lee-Enfield Rifle No. 5 Mk I “Jungle Carbine”: This was a shorter, lighter derivative of the standard-issue Lee-Enfield rifle, specifically modified for jungle combat.²⁰ Chambered for the powerful.303 British cartridge, its reduced length (1,000 mm) and weight (approx. 3.2 kg) made it more maneuverable in dense undergrowth compared to its full-sized counterparts.²¹ While it delivered significant firepower, the weapon was notorious for a heavy recoil, exacerbated by a narrow rubber buttpad, and a persistent accuracy issue known as a “wandering zero,” where the rifle would lose its point-of-aim calibration.²¹ Despite these flaws, its handiness made it a common choice for jungle patrols.
• Submachine Gun: Owen Machine Carbine: The Australian-designed 9mm Owen gun was a revelation in terms of reliability and became a highly favored weapon for SAS troops in Malaya.²⁵ Its unconventional top-mounted magazine and bottom-ejection port made it exceptionally resistant to jamming from mud, water, and dirt—a critical advantage in the jungle environment.²⁸ The Owen provided patrols with devastating, high-volume firepower for close-quarters engagements, such as breaking contact after an ambush.²⁰ Its ruggedness and dependability earned it a legendary reputation among the troops who used it.
• Other Arms: Patrols would have been supplemented with other Commonwealth weapons. The M1 Carbine, a lightweight American semi-automatic rifle, was also in use and offered a less powerful but lighter alternative to the Jungle Carbine.²⁰ For personal defense, the standard sidearm was the reliable 13-round
  Browning Hi-Power pistol.³⁰ Additionally, British forces specifically adopted shotguns like the
  Browning Auto-5 for their effectiveness in the extremely close ranges typical of jungle combat.³⁰

1.5 Disbandment and Re-establishment: Proving the Concept

Upon the squadron’s return to New Zealand in late 1957, the unit was officially disbanded, its operational role in Malaya being taken over by a conventional infantry battalion.² This decision, however, proved to be a short-sighted anomaly. The unique capabilities demonstrated by the unit, and the strategic value it provided, were quickly recognized as being irreplaceable.

Efforts from the veterans themselves, who formed the NZSAS Association in 1957 to lobby for the unit’s return and maintain comradeship, combined with the geopolitical realities of the Cold War, led to a swift reversal of policy.² In October 1959, the 1st New Zealand Special Air Service Squadron was formally re-established, this time as a permanent unit of the New Zealand Army, based at Papakura Military Camp.² This rapid sequence of disbandment and re-establishment is a critical marker in the unit’s history. It represents a brief failure of institutional foresight being corrected by the undeniable proof of concept provided by the “Originals.” The experience in Malaya had proven that a dedicated special forces unit was not a temporary requirement for a single conflict, but an essential, permanent component of a modern military, providing a strategic capability that conventional forces could not replicate.

Section 2: Trial by Fire (1963-1978): Borneo and Vietnam

The period from the mid-1960s to the early 1970s was a crucible for the NZSAS. Building upon the foundational skills forged in Malaya, the unit was tested in two consecutive and highly demanding jungle conflicts: the Indonesian Confrontation in Borneo and the Vietnam War. These campaigns saw the squadron mature from a purely counter-insurgency force into a sophisticated special reconnaissance and direct action unit. It was during this era that the NZSAS cemented its international reputation for excellence in jungle warfare and forged an enduring operational partnership with its Australian counterpart, the Special Air Service Regiment (SASR).

2.1 The Indonesian Confrontation (1965-1966): Covert Cross-Border Operations

In response to Indonesia’s policy of “Konfrontasi” against the newly formed Federation of Malaysia, New Zealand deployed NZSAS detachments to Borneo from February 1965.² Four separate detachments, each approximately 40 men strong, would rotate through the theater until October 1966.² Operating under the overall command of the British 22 SAS, the NZSAS role in Borneo represented a significant escalation in mission complexity and risk compared to their Malayan experience.⁵

The primary mission involved conducting highly classified, covert cross-border operations deep into Indonesian Kalimantan, under the codename “Operation Claret”.⁵ These were not counter-insurgency patrols against a non-state actor; they were offensive reconnaissance and ambush missions against the regular armed forces of a sovereign nation. The immense political sensitivity of these operations meant that they were deniable and authorized at the highest levels of government. Any compromise or capture of a patrol could have triggered a full-scale war between the Commonwealth and Indonesia.

Small, four-man NZSAS patrols would be inserted clandestinely, often by helicopter, to patrol up to 18 kilometers inside Indonesian territory.³² Their objective was to wrest the initiative from the Indonesians by gathering intelligence on their troop movements, locating their jungle bases, and, when authorized, ambushing their patrols before they could cross into Malaysia.³³ This proactive, offensive posture required an exceptional degree of fieldcraft, discipline, and tactical acumen. The foundational skills of stealth and self-sufficiency learned in Malaya were now applied to a far more dangerous and strategically significant mission set, demonstrating the unit’s doctrinal evolution and the high level of trust placed in its operators.³⁶

2.2 The Vietnam War (1968-1971): Long-Range Reconnaissance Patrols

In November 1968, New Zealand’s commitment to the Vietnam War was expanded to include a 26-man troop from the NZSAS (at the time designated 4 Troop, 1 Ranger Squadron NZSAS).² The troop was deployed to the 1st Australian Task Force (1ATF) base at Nui Dat in Phuoc Tuy province and was fully integrated into the Australian SASR squadron operating there.³⁹ This deployment institutionalized the deep operational bond between the two nations’ special forces.

The primary mission in Vietnam was the execution of Long-Range Reconnaissance Patrols (LRRPs).⁵ Typically operating in five-man teams, NZSAS patrols would be inserted by helicopter deep into enemy-controlled territory, often in the vicinity of the May Tao mountains, a known Viet Cong and North Vietnamese Army stronghold.⁵ The core task was intelligence gathering: patrols would remain covertly in position for days, observing enemy base camps, tracking troop movements, and identifying supply lines without being detected.² Based on the intelligence gathered, patrols could call in devastating air or artillery strikes, or, if the opportunity arose and the risk was acceptable, conduct swift, violent ambushes before melting back into the jungle.

The operational tempo was intense. Over their two-year deployment, the New Zealand troop participated in 155 patrols, a clear indicator of their value to the task force and the seamlessness of their integration with the SASR.⁵ The expertise in small-team jungle operations, fundamentally shaped in Malaya and honed to an offensive edge in Borneo, gave the ANZAC SAS squadrons a formidable reputation and made them a highly effective intelligence-gathering asset.⁴¹

2.3 Small Arms of the SLR and M16 Era

The weaponry of the NZSAS evolved significantly during this period, driven directly by the specific tactical requirements of their missions in Borneo and Vietnam.

• Primary Battle Rifle: L1A1 Self-Loading Rifle (SLR): As the standard service rifle for both New Zealand and Australian forces, the L1A1 was the workhorse of the Borneo campaign.⁴² This Commonwealth “inch-pattern” variant of the Belgian FN FAL was chambered in the powerful 7.62x51mm NATO cartridge. It was a robust, gas-operated, semi-automatic rifle renowned for its reliability and the ability of its heavy bullet to punch through the dense jungle foliage that could deflect lighter rounds.⁴² While heavy, its power and long-range effectiveness made it ideal for the ambush and direct action tasks of the Claret operations.
• The Shift to 5.56mm: M16 Assault Rifle: The nature of LRRPs in Vietnam presented a different tactical problem. The primary goal was stealth and evasion, not sustained combat. If a patrol was compromised, the priority was to break contact and escape, which required a massive volume of suppressive fire. The weight of the L1A1 and its 7.62mm ammunition limited the amount a soldier could carry on a long patrol.⁴⁷ Consequently, both the Australian and New Zealand SAS adopted the American M16 rifle for their Vietnam operations.⁴³ Chambered for the lighter 5.56x45mm cartridge, the M16 allowed an operator to carry significantly more ammunition. Its select-fire capability (both semi- and full-automatic) was crucial for generating the high rate of fire needed to break contact.⁵⁰ While early versions of the M16 (XM16E1) were infamous for reliability problems, these were largely rectified in the M16A1 model through the introduction of a chrome-lined chamber and proper cleaning protocols, making it a highly effective weapon for the specific needs of special operations reconnaissance teams.⁵⁰ This deliberate divergence in primary weapon systems—with SAS units using the M16 while conventional ANZAC infantry retained the L1A1—is a clear illustration of mission requirements driving materiel selection in a mature SOF unit.
• Support and Sidearms: Patrols in both conflicts were supported by a range of weapons. The American-made M60 served as the general-purpose machine gun, providing sustained suppressive fire.⁴⁷ The M79 grenade launcher, a single-shot “break-action” weapon, delivered 40mm high-explosive rounds for engaging area targets or enemy positions in cover.⁴⁸ The standard sidearm for NZSAS operators remained the 9mm Browning Hi-Power.⁴³

2.4 Organizational Changes: The Ranger Squadron

A notable, albeit temporary, organizational change occurred on 24 August 1963, when the unit was renamed ‘1 Ranger Squadron New Zealand Special Air Service’.³ This was done in formal recognition of the Forest Rangers, a specialist bush-fighting corps of colonial-era New Zealand known for its self-reliance and ability to operate in difficult terrain.⁴ While the unit reverted to its original name on 1 April 1978, this period reflects a conscious effort to build a unique national identity for New Zealand’s special forces, linking its modern capabilities to the nation’s own distinct military history.³

Section 3: A New Focus (1979-2001): Counter-Terrorism and Global Peacekeeping

The conclusion of the Vietnam War marked the end of the NZSAS’s formative era of jungle warfare. The subsequent two decades were characterized by a pivotal diversification of the unit’s mission set. Responding to a changing global security landscape, the NZSAS developed a sophisticated domestic counter-terrorism capability while simultaneously applying its unique skills to a wide spectrum of international peacekeeping, monitoring, and humanitarian operations. This period saw the unit expand significantly in size and structure, cementing its role as a versatile, multi-purpose tool of New Zealand’s national security policy.

3.1 The Rise of Counter-Terrorism (CT)

The 1970s saw a dramatic rise in international terrorism, with high-profile incidents like the 1972 Munich Olympics massacre and the 1977 Mogadishu hijacking demonstrating a new type of threat that conventional military and police forces were ill-equipped to handle. Following the lead of its parent unit, the British SAS, which gained worldwide fame after the televised 1980 Iranian Embassy siege rescue, the New Zealand government tasked the NZSAS with developing a national counter-terrorism capability in 1979.²

This was a fundamental strategic pivot, requiring a completely new set of skills and a different mindset from traditional “green” military operations. The unit had to master the arts of Close Quarters Battle (CQB), explosive and mechanical breaching, hostage rescue tactics, and precision marksmanship in complex urban environments.⁶ This new “black role” mission, conducted in support of the New Zealand Police at the government’s request, became a core task of the unit.¹ To facilitate this, dedicated training facilities were developed at Papakura and Ardmore military camps, a process of continuous improvement that would culminate in the opening of a state-of-the-art, purpose-built Battle Training Facility (BTF) in 2016.³ This dual-hatted responsibility—maintaining world-class proficiency in both conventional special operations and domestic counter-terrorism—is a defining characteristic of elite Tier 1 units and marked the NZSAS’s maturation into such a force.

3.2 Peacekeeping and “Unconventional” Deployments

The post-Vietnam era saw the NZSAS deployed to a series of complex, often non-combat, missions that showcased the adaptability of its core skills. These deployments demonstrated that the value of a special forces operator lay not just in their lethality, but in their advanced training in communications, medicine, planning, and their ability to operate effectively in small, autonomous teams under stressful conditions.

• Rhodesia (1979-1980): Seven NZSAS personnel deployed as part of the New Zealand contingent to Operation MIDFORD, a Commonwealth Truce Monitoring Force overseeing the transition to an independent Zimbabwe. This was a politically sensitive peacekeeping and monitoring role in a volatile, post-conflict environment.²
• Bosnia (1995-1996): As part of the United Nations Protection Force (UNPROFOR) during the breakup of Yugoslavia, small teams of NZSAS operators were deployed in a Close Personal Protection (CPP) role, providing security for key personnel in a high-threat environment.²
• Bougainville (1997-1998): The deployment to Bougainville for Operation BELISI was a clear example of the unit’s utility as a “soft power” instrument. Tasked with providing security, long-range communications, and medical support to the Truce Monitoring Group, the NZSAS teams were notably unarmed, carrying only pepper spray.⁵ Their success relied on de-escalation, negotiation, and building trust with local factions in a “hearts and minds” campaign, proving their effectiveness in missions where the application of force would have been counterproductive.
• Kuwait (1998): In a return to a more conventional military role, an NZSAS squadron was deployed to Kuwait on Operation Griffin. Their mission was to provide a Combat Search and Rescue (CSAR) capability in the event that coalition pilots were shot down during a potential air campaign against Iraq.²
• East Timor (1999-2001): During the crisis in East Timor, the NZSAS was at the absolute forefront of the Australian-led International Force East Timor (INTERFET). NZSAS operators were among the very first coalition troops to land, securing Komoro airfield and the port of Dili by fast-roping from helicopters.⁵⁶ This was a critical enabling operation, creating a secure beachhead that allowed the main body of conventional forces and humanitarian aid to arrive safely. It was a textbook special operations mission, demonstrating the unit’s ability to act as the tip of the spear in a major international intervention.⁵

3.3 Organizational Growth and Specialization

The significant expansion of the unit’s roles and responsibilities during this period necessitated a corresponding growth in its structure. In 1985, the NZSAS was expanded from a single squadron into the 1st NZSAS Group. This new structure included two Sabre (combat) Squadrons, a dedicated Support Squadron (handling intelligence, communications, and logistics), and a training school.²

This was arguably the most important organizational development in the unit’s history. Moving from a single squadron to a group (and later, regimental) structure transformed the NZSAS from a unit that could handle one major deployment at a time into a self-sustaining strategic asset. It allowed for a sustainable operational cycle of training, deployment, and recovery. It also enabled the development of greater specialization, with one squadron potentially deployed on operations while the other maintained a high-readiness state for the domestic counter-terrorism mission. This period also saw a deliberate focus on enhancing specialist infiltration skills, with significant advancements in amphibious, mountain, and advanced parachuting techniques, further broadening the unit’s operational capabilities.²

3.4 Small Arms for a New Era

The development of a dedicated counter-terrorism role drove the adoption of new weapon systems optimized for the unique demands of CQB. While specific procurement dates are not detailed in the provided materials, analysis of global SOF trends during this period points to the adoption of key weapon types. The Heckler & Koch MP5 submachine gun, chambered in 9mm, became the international standard for CT units due to its compact size, accuracy, and controllability in full-automatic fire.⁵⁹

The venerable Browning Hi-Power sidearm was likely replaced during this time by more modern 9mm pistols, such as the SIG Sauer P226, which offered features like a double-action trigger that were better suited for CT scenarios.⁶¹ For military operations, the M16 platform remained in use, likely evolving to more compact carbine variants for increased maneuverability.

Section 4: The Long War (2001-Present): Afghanistan and the Modern Era

The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, ushered in a new era of global conflict and marked the beginning of the 1st NZSAS Regiment’s most sustained, complex, and demanding period of combat operations. The war in Afghanistan defined a generation of NZSAS operators, testing them across the full spectrum of special operations in one of the world’s most challenging environments. This period saw the unit fully mature into a peer of the world’s most elite forces, operating as a highly valued component within the international coalition SOF network.

4.1 Deployment to Afghanistan: Operation Enduring Freedom

In the aftermath of 9/11, the New Zealand government committed the NZSAS to the US-led coalition in Afghanistan.¹ The unit would undertake multiple, demanding deployments over the next decade. The first phase, codenamed Operation Concord, involved three rotations between December 2001 and November 2005.¹ A second major commitment, Operation WATEA, saw the Regiment deployed again from 2009 to 2012.⁶⁴

The operational environment was a stark and brutal contrast to the jungles of Southeast Asia. Missions were conducted in all seasons, from the searing heat of open deserts to the thin, freezing air of the high-altitude Hindu Kush mountains.¹ The Regiment’s tasks covered the entire spectrum of modern special operations:

• Special Reconnaissance (SR): The NZSAS’s traditional expertise in long-range patrolling was immediately identified as a highly valued and unique skill within the coalition.¹ They conducted extended duration patrols, often lasting for 20 days or more, far from support. These patrols were executed both on foot, following helicopter insertion into mountainous terrain, and using specially equipped long-range vehicles.¹
• Direct Action (DA): The unit was frequently involved in direct action missions against Al Qaeda and Taliban forces. These high-risk operations, such as the raid codenamed “Operation Burnham” in August 2010, were complex, intelligence-led missions involving helicopter assaults to capture or kill key insurgent leaders.¹ These missions often resulted in intense combat, with casualties suffered on both sides.¹
• Support and Influence: During the later deployments (2009-2012), a primary mission for the NZSAS contingent (designated Task Force 81) was to partner with and mentor the Afghan Ministry of Interior’s Crisis Response Unit (CRU) in Kabul.⁶⁴ The CRU was an elite Afghan special police unit tasked with counter-terrorism operations. This “by, with, and through” approach focused on building the capacity of host-nation forces to provide their own security, a sustainable and strategically vital mission that became a hallmark of mature counter-insurgency doctrine.

The Regiment’s exceptional performance, professionalism, and seamless integration with American and other allied special forces did not go unnoticed. In 2004, the unit was awarded the prestigious United States Presidential Unit Citation for its “extraordinary heroism in action” during its first deployments, a rare and significant honor for a foreign military unit.¹ This award was formal, high-level recognition that the NZSAS was operating as a peer among the world’s very best special operations forces.

4.2 Regimental Status and Modern Structure

Reflecting its growth, complexity, and strategic importance, the 1st New Zealand Special Air Service Group was officially accorded Regimental status in 2013, becoming the 1st New Zealand Special Air Service Regiment.³ Its current structure is a clear reflection of its diverse and demanding mission set ³:

• A and B Squadrons: These are the two primary Sabre, or Assault, Squadrons. They are the core combat elements of the Regiment, capable of conducting the full range of special operations tasks. Each squadron is further divided into four troops, which specialize in different insertion methods: Air (parachuting), Amphibious (diving and small boats), Mobility (vehicles), and Mountain (climbing and alpine operations).
• D Squadron (Commando): This squadron provides a dedicated Commando capability, often considered a Tier 2 force, which can support the Sabre squadrons or conduct its own specific missions.
• E Squadron (Explosive Ordnance Disposal): This highly specialized squadron is responsible for Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and Explosive (CBRNE) and Improvised Explosive Device (IED) disposal. It provides support to both military operations overseas and civilian authorities, such as the NZ Police, domestically.
• Support Squadron: This is the enabling backbone of the Regiment, providing critical capabilities in intelligence, planning, logistics, and communications.
• Female Engagement Team (FET): Established in 2017, the FET is a small, specialized team of female personnel trained to support operations by engaging with local women and adolescents in environments where interaction with male soldiers would be culturally inappropriate.³ This capability enhances situational awareness and operational effectiveness in complex cultural settings.

4.3 Current Small Arms of the 1st NZSAS Regiment

The modern arsenal of the 1 NZSAS Regt reflects global Tier 1 SOF procurement trends, emphasizing modularity, multi-role capability, precision, and operator-level customization. The inventory is a family of specialized systems, allowing the unit to tailor its firepower precisely to the mission at hand.

• Assault Rifles & Carbines: The primary individual weapon is a carbine chambered in 5.56x45mm NATO. While the wider NZDF has adopted the Lewis Machine & Tool (LMT) MARS-L as its standard service rifle, the NZSAS has a long history of using Colt M4A1 variants.⁶¹ These are typically outfitted with Special Operations Peculiar Modification (SOPMOD) kits, which include a rail interface system allowing operators to mount a wide array of mission-specific accessories such as advanced optics (e.g., Trijicon ACOG, red dot sights), suppressors, laser aiming modules, and tactical lights.⁷¹ The LMT MARS-L, with its high-quality manufacturing and fully ambidextrous controls, is also used, providing logistical commonality with the parent force.⁷⁰
• Sidearms: The standard-issue sidearm is the Glock 17 (Gen4).⁵ Chambered in 9x19mm Parabellum, the Glock’s legendary reliability, simplicity of operation, and high-capacity magazine have made it the ubiquitous choice for special operations forces worldwide.
• Precision & Sniper Rifles: The Regiment employs a layered system of precision-fire weapons.

• LMT 308 MWS (Modular Weapon System): This semi-automatic rifle, chambered in 7.62x51mm NATO, serves as the Designated Marksman Rifle (DMR).⁶¹ It bridges the gap between the 5.56mm carbine and dedicated sniper rifles, providing rapid and accurate engagement of targets at extended ranges.
• Barrett MRAD (Multi-Role Adaptive Design): Adopted in 2018 as the Regiment’s primary sniper rifle, the MRAD is a state-of-the-art, bolt-action platform.⁶¹ Its most significant feature is its multi-caliber design, which allows operators to quickly change barrels and bolts to fire either 7.62x51mm NATO (primarily for training) or the powerful, long-range .338 Lapua Magnum cartridge for operational use. This provides exceptional tactical flexibility from a single weapon system.⁷²
• Barrett M107A1: This semi-automatic rifle is chambered in the formidable.50 BMG (12.7x99mm NATO) cartridge.⁶¹ It is an anti-materiel weapon, designed not just for extreme long-range anti-personnel sniping, but for destroying high-value enemy equipment such as light vehicles, communications arrays, and radar installations.

Support Weapons:

• FN Minimi 7.62 TR: This light machine gun, chambered in 7.62x51mm NATO, provides the infantry section with a high volume of accurate, sustained suppressive fire.⁵
• Grenade Launchers: For indirect fire support, the M203 40mm under-barrel grenade launcher can be fitted to carbines.⁵ For heavier, vehicle-mounted firepower, the Regiment uses the
  Heckler & Koch GMG (Grenade Machine Gun), a belt-fed, fully automatic 40mm grenade launcher.⁶⁸
• Anti-Tank Weapons: The venerable Carl Gustav M3, an 84mm reusable recoilless rifle, provides a versatile anti-armor and anti-structure capability.⁵ This is supplemented by the
  M72 LAW (Light Anti-armor Weapon), a lightweight, single-shot disposable 66mm rocket launcher.⁵

Table: Current Small Arms of the 1st NZSAS Regiment

Weapon Type	Name / Model	Caliber	Origin	Primary Role / Notes
Carbine	LMT MARS-L / Colt M4A1 SOPMOD	5.56x45mm NATO	USA	Primary individual weapon, highly modular for mission-specific configuration.
Sidearm	Glock 17 Gen4	9x19mm Parabellum	Austria	Standard issue pistol for personal defense and CQB.
Designated Marksman Rifle	LMT 308 MWS	7.62x51mm NATO	USA	Provides rapid, precision fire at the troop level beyond carbine range.
Sniper Rifle	Barrett MRAD	.338 Lapua Magnum	USA	Primary long-range anti-personnel system with multi-caliber capability.
Anti-Materiel Rifle	Barrett M107A1	12.7x99mm NATO	USA	Engages light vehicles, equipment, and hard targets at extreme range.
Light Machine Gun	FN Minimi 7.62 TR	7.62x51mm NATO	Belgium	Squad automatic weapon providing sustained suppressive fire.
Grenade Launcher	M203 / H&K GMG	40mm	USA / Germany	Under-barrel (individual) and automatic (vehicle-mounted) options.
Recoilless Rifle	Carl Gustav M3	84mm	Sweden	Reusable anti-armor, anti-structure, and anti-personnel weapon.

Section 5: The Future Operator (Speculative Analysis)

Projecting the future of any military unit is an exercise in informed speculation. However, by analyzing global strategic trends, emerging technologies, and the NZSAS’s own historical trajectory of adaptation, a credible forecast of its future evolution can be constructed. The Regiment of 2030 and beyond will likely be defined by a pivot to the Indo-Pacific, an increased emphasis on operations in the “gray zone” below the threshold of conventional conflict, and the integration of next-generation technologies.

5.1 The Evolving Strategic Environment: From COIN to Great Power Competition

The two-decade-long focus on counter-insurgency (COIN) in the Middle East and Central Asia is giving way to a new era of strategic, or “great power,” competition, primarily between the United States and its allies, and near-peer adversaries such as China and Russia.⁷³ For New Zealand, this global competition will manifest most acutely in its immediate neighborhood: the Indo-Pacific. The future operational focus of the NZSAS will almost certainly pivot towards this region, with missions designed to shape the strategic environment and counter threats to New Zealand’s interests in a contested maritime and littoral space.⁷⁴

5.2 Future Roles and Tactics: The Cognitive Operator

In this new environment, the nature of special operations is shifting. While the capacity for high-end direct action will always be retained, future missions are likely to be less focused on overt kinetic strikes and more on discreetly shaping the environment before a conflict begins.⁷³ This involves operating in the ambiguous “gray zone,” utilizing influence, intelligence, and partnership to achieve national objectives without triggering open warfare. The NZSAS is exceptionally well-positioned for this shift, building directly on its legacy of special reconnaissance and “Support and Influence” missions. Future tasks are likely to include:

• Partner Force Development: Deepening relationships and building the military capacity of friendly nations in the Pacific. This is a direct evolution of the successful CRU mentoring model from Afghanistan, applied to a new region.
• Strategic Reconnaissance: Deploying small, low-signature, technologically advanced teams to gather critical intelligence on adversary activities in politically sensitive areas.
• Information and Cyber Operations: The ability to operate and achieve effects in the “non-physical domains” of the information and cyber space will become as critical as physical maneuver.⁷³

This complex and ambiguous operating environment demands what the U.S. Marine Corps Forces Special Operations Command (MARSOC) has termed the “Cognitive Operator”.⁷⁵ This is an individual who is not merely a physically superior soldier, but a culturally astute, technologically literate, and highly adaptive problem-solver who can thrive under conditions of extreme uncertainty. This profile aligns perfectly with the attributes the NZSAS has always sought in its selection process: intelligence, self-discipline, and the ability to think independently.

5.3 Future Materiel and Weaponry

The shift towards near-peer competition is driving a revolution in military small arms technology. The NZSAS, as a key partner in the Western SOF community, will be at the forefront of evaluating and potentially adopting these new systems.

• Next Generation Squad Weapons (NGSW): The most significant development is the U.S. Army’s NGSW program, which is introducing a new family of weapons (the XM7 Rifle and XM250 Automatic Rifle) chambered in a revolutionary 6.8mm cartridge.⁷⁶ This new ammunition is designed specifically to defeat modern adversary body armor at ranges where current 5.56mm and 7.62mm rounds are ineffective.⁷⁶ As a close ally that prioritizes interoperability, the NZSAS will be closely monitoring the performance and adoption of this new caliber. While a complete and immediate replacement of 5.56mm is unlikely, the 6.8mm represents a future capability that could be adopted for specific high-end combat roles, creating a multi-caliber force tailored to different threats.
• Enhanced Connectivity and Signature Management: The future operator will be a node in a vast network. Weapons will be increasingly integrated with advanced fire control optics that automatically calculate ballistic solutions, connect to tactical data links, and share target information across the team. Simultaneously, as adversary sensor capabilities become more sophisticated, signature management will be paramount.⁷³ This means a greater emphasis on advanced sound and flash suppressors, thermal-blocking materials, and tactics designed to reduce a patrol’s electronic, thermal, and physical footprint to an absolute minimum. The future of special operations is not just about being effective; it is about being undetectable.

Conclusion

The seventy-year history of the 1st New Zealand Special Air Service Regiment is a remarkable study in military evolution. From its origins as a single jungle warfare squadron created for a specific counter-insurgency campaign, it has transformed into a multi-spectrum, globally respected Tier 1 special operations force. This journey was not accidental but the result of a deliberate and continuous process of adaptation, where hard-won lessons from one battlefield were meticulously analyzed and used to prepare for the challenges of the next.

The enduring success and elite status of the Regiment can be attributed to three foundational pillars. First, a relentlessly demanding selection process that identifies not just physically robust but mentally resilient, intelligent, and self-disciplined individuals. Second, an institutional culture that prizes professionalism, innovation, and the constant pursuit of excellence, allowing it to evolve its tactics and capabilities to meet new threats. Third, the cultivation of deep, symbiotic relationships with key international allies—principally the United Kingdom, Australia, and the United States—which ensures interoperability and access to the highest levels of training and intelligence.

Today, the NZSAS stands as a mature, highly capable strategic asset for the New Zealand government. It provides a range of discreet and powerful options, from domestic counter-terrorism to global special operations, that are outside the scope of conventional military forces. As it looks to the future, the Regiment’s deep expertise in reconnaissance, partner force development, and operating in complex littoral environments positions it perfectly to address the emerging strategic challenges in the Indo-Pacific. The NZSAS remains, as it was in 1955, a strategic instrument providing New Zealand with influence and security options far exceeding its small size, embodying the spirit of its motto: “Who Dares Wins.”

Table: Summary of 1st NZSAS Regiment Deployments and Evolving Roles (1955-Present)

Era	Key Deployments	Primary Role / Tactics	Key Weapon Systems
1955-1962	Malayan Emergency	Deep Jungle Patrol, Counter-Insurgency (COIN)	Lee-Enfield No. 5, Owen SMG
1963-1978	Borneo Confrontation, Vietnam War	Covert Cross-Border Raids (Claret), Long-Range Reconnaissance Patrol (LRRP)	L1A1 SLR, M16A1
1979-2001	Rhodesia, Bosnia, Bougainville, East Timor	Counter-Terrorism (CT), Peacekeeping, Close Protection, Enabling Operations	H&K MP5, SIG Sauer P226
2001-Present	Afghanistan (Operations Concord, WATEA)	Full Spectrum SOF: Special Reconnaissance (SR), Direct Action (DA), Support & Influence	M4A1/LMT MARS-L, Barrett MRAD
Future (Speculative)	Indo-Pacific, Gray Zone	Strategic Reconnaissance, Partner Force Development, Information Operations	Current platforms + potential adoption of Next-Gen systems (e.g., 6.8mm)

---

If you find this post useful, please share the link on Facebook, with your friends, etc. Your support is much appreciated and if you have any feedback, please email me at in**@*********ps.com. Please note that for links to other websites, we are only paid if there is an affiliate program such as Avantlink, Impact, Amazon and eBay and only if you purchase something. If you’d like to directly donate to help fund our continued report, please visit our donations page.

---

Sources Used

1. New Zealand Special Air Service (NZSAS) – Beehive.govt.nz, accessed September 6, 2025, http://www.beehive.govt.nz/sites/default/files/Medals%20factsheet.pdf
2. 1 NZSAS Regiment – 70 Years of Service – New Zealand Defence Force, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.nzdf.mil.nz/media-centre/news/1-nzsas-regiment-70-years-of-service/
3. New Zealand Special Air Service – Wikipedia, accessed September 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Zealand_Special_Air_Service
4. SAS – 65 years of our elite – National Army Museum Waiouru, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.armymuseum.co.nz/sas-65-years-of-our-elite/
5. The New Zealand Special Air Service: Who Dares Wins, accessed September 6, 2025, https://greydynamics.com/the-new-zealand-special-air-service-who-dares-wins/
6. New Zealand SAS – “Who Dares Wins” – The Melting Thought – WordPress.com, accessed September 6, 2025, https://themeltingthought2000.wordpress.com/2017/08/12/new-zealand-sas-who-dares-wins/
7. NZSAS | New Zealand Army – Defence Careers, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.defencecareers.mil.nz/army/careers/browse-roles/nzsas
8. Malayan Emergency – NZ History, accessed September 6, 2025, https://nzhistory.govt.nz/keyword/malayan-emergency
9. NZ and the Malayan Emergency – NZ History, accessed September 6, 2025, https://nzhistory.govt.nz/war/the-malayan-emergency
10. 1st NZSAS Regiment Marks 70th Anniversary – Scoop NZ, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO2506/S00035/1st-nzsas-regiment-marks-70th-anniversary.htm
11. Special Air Service – Wikipedia, accessed September 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_Air_Service
12. Discover The Storied Legacy Of NZSAS Regimental Association, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.nzsas.org.nz/history/
13. New Zealand Special Air Service soldiers in Malaya – NZ History, accessed September 6, 2025, https://nzhistory.govt.nz/media/photo/new-zealand-special-air-service-soldiers-malaya
14. History Of New Zealand’s Involvement In Malaya/Malaysia, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.malayavets.co.nz/history-of-new-zealands-involvement-in-malaya-malaysia/
15. Malayan Emergency – Wikipedia, accessed September 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malayan_Emergency
16. The Malayan Emergency – Ilankai Tamil Sangam, accessed September 6, 2025, https://sangam.org/2007/03/Malayan_Emergency.php?uid=2255
17. Jungle patrol by SAS squadron, 1956 – NZ History, accessed September 6, 2025, https://nzhistory.govt.nz/media/video/jungle-patrol-sas-squadron-1956
18. NZSAS Squadron. Malayan Emergency 1954-1957. : r/BattlePaintings – Reddit, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/BattlePaintings/comments/1hzjehw/nzsas_squadron_malayan_emergency_19541957/
19. The Malayan Emergency: How to Fight a Counterinsurgency War – Warfare History Network, accessed September 6, 2025, https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/article/the-malayan-emergency-how-to-fight-a-counterinsurgency-war/
20. THE MALAYAN EMERGENCY 1948-1960 | Imperial War Museums, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item/object/205212402
21. en.wikipedia.org, accessed September 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jungle_carbine
22. No.5 Mk.I Jungle Carbine: post-WWII use – wwiiafterwwii, accessed September 6, 2025, https://wwiiafterwwii.wordpress.com/2015/11/04/no-5-mk-i-jungle-carbine-post-wwii-use/
23. No5 MkI Enfield “Jungle Carbine” – YouTube, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P75mXWv_-0o
24. Collecting The Rare Enfield Jungle Carbine – Gun Digest, accessed September 6, 2025, https://gundigest.com/military-firearms/enfield-jungle-carbine
25. Owen Mark 1 [Mark 2/2] (Australian Army 1946) – Imperial War Museums, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item/object/30033491
26. Owen Mk I (or I/42) 9 mm sub machine gun, 1943 (c) | Online Collection, accessed September 6, 2025, https://collection.nam.ac.uk/detail.php?acc=1963-12-251-12
27. Owen Mark 2/3 | Imperial War Museums, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item/object/30029419
28. Owen gun – Wikipedia, accessed September 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Owen_gun
29. TBT: The Owen submachine gun — inventiveness from Oz – Military Times, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.militarytimes.com/off-duty/gearscout/tacticool/2020/01/30/tbt-the-owen-submachine-gun-inventiveness-from-oz/
30. List of weapons in Malayan Emergency – Wikipedia, accessed September 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_weapons_in_Malayan_Emergency
31. Forgotten Weapons: Malayan Emergency Edition! : r/ForgottenWeapons – Reddit, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ForgottenWeapons/comments/oy4mtq/forgotten_weapons_malayan_emergency_edition/
32. New Zealand’s response – NZ and the Confrontation in Borneo – Nation Dates, accessed September 6, 2025, https://nationdatesnz.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/MCH-2012o-1965.pdf
33. NZ and Confrontation in Borneo – NZ History, accessed September 6, 2025, https://nzhistory.govt.nz/war/confrontation-in-borneo
34. 1 Squadron, Special Air Service Regiment | Australian War Memorial, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.awm.gov.au/collection/U60458
35. Indonesian Confrontation | National Army Museum, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.nam.ac.uk/explore/indonesian-confrontation
36. The Platforms: An Examination of New Zealand Special Air Service Campaigns, accessed September 6, 2025, https://mro.massey.ac.nz/bitstreams/21f9d54b-455d-42b4-9032-516036f0b956/download
37. New Zealand Special Air Service Unit Arrives in Vietnam, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.vietnamwar50th.com/1968_tet_and_shifting_views/New-Zealand-Special-Air-Service-Unit-Arrives-in-Vietnam/
38. The Vietnam War – NZ History, accessed September 6, 2025, https://nzhistory.govt.nz/war/vietnam-war
39. On operations | VietnamWar.govt.nz, accessed September 6, 2025, https://vietnamwar.govt.nz/nz-vietnam-war/on-operations
40. New Zealand’s road to Vietnam | VietnamWar.govt.nz, accessed September 6, 2025, https://vietnamwar.govt.nz/nz-vietnam-war/new-zealands-road-to-vietnam
41. The Platforms: An Examination of New Zealand Special Air Service Campaigns, accessed September 6, 2025, https://mro.massey.ac.nz/bitstream/10179/1242/3/02whole.pdf
42. L1A1 Self-Loading Rifle – Wikipedia, accessed September 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L1A1_Self-Loading_Rifle
43. List of weapons of the Vietnam War – Wikipedia, accessed September 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_weapons_of_the_Vietnam_War
44. Belgian Made, British Applied · Military Technology In the Vietnam War, accessed September 6, 2025, https://unodigitalhumanitiesprojects.omeka.net/exhibits/show/militarytech/sources/fnfal
45. Armed with an L1A1 self loading rifle (SLR), and followed by an unidentified soldier, 61515 – Australian War Memorial, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.awm.gov.au/collection/C398890
46. FAL 7.62mm L!A! SLR (Self Loading Rifle) – 5th Battalion – The Royal Australian Regiment Association, accessed September 6, 2025, https://5rar.asn.au/7-62-slr/
47. Weapons and Equipment | Vietnam War | Pritzker Military Museum & Library | Chicago, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.pritzkermilitary.org/explore/vietnam-war/vietnam-equipment
48. australian weapons in vietnam, accessed September 6, 2025, https://straskye.tripod.com/deltasitepages/asweapons.html
49. Battle damaged M16 automatic rifle – NZ History, accessed September 6, 2025, https://nzhistory.govt.nz/media/photo/battle-damaged-m16-automatic-rifle
50. The M16’s Darkest Days: How the Rifle Failed Soldiers in Vietnam – 19FortyFive, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.19fortyfive.com/2025/02/the-m16s-darkest-days-how-the-rifle-failed-soldiers-in-vietnam/
51. M16 rifle – Wikipedia, accessed September 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M16_rifle
52. Colt M16 Semi Automatic Rifle – NRA Museums:, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.nramuseum.org/the-museum/the-galleries/wwii,-korea,-vietnam-and-beyond/case-67-modern-conflicts-vietnam-desert-storm/colt-m16-semi-automatic-rifle.aspx
53. The M-16 And The Vietnam War – History on the Net, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.historyonthenet.com/the-m-16-and-the-vietnam-war
54. Under the Hood: NZSAS Battle Training Facility – YouTube, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=funfIwBPCyo
55. New Zealand Special Air Service – Wikiwand, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.wikiwand.com/en/articles/New_Zealand_Special_Air_Service
56. Australian peacekeepers in East Timor (Timor Leste) from 1999 to 2013 – Anzac Portal, accessed September 6, 2025, https://anzacportal.dva.gov.au/wars-and-missions/peacekeeping/summaries/east-timor-1999-2013
57. First New Zealand troops arrive in East Timor – NZ History, accessed September 6, 2025, https://nzhistory.govt.nz/first-new-zealand-troops-arrive-east-timor
58. New Zealand service in Timor-Leste | Manatū Taonga | Ministry for Culture & Heritage, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.mch.govt.nz/news/new-zealand-service-timor-leste
59. Small arms of Australia’s Special Forces – by Mike Wellington – SSAA, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.ssaa.org.au/stories/political-small-arms-of-australias-special-forces.html
60. Special Air Service (SAS) Weapons – Elite UK Forces, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.eliteukforces.info/special-air-service/weapons/
61. List of individual weapons of the New Zealand Defence Force – Wikipedia, accessed September 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_individual_weapons_of_the_New_Zealand_Defence_Force
62. What guns does the Australian SAS use? – Quora, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.quora.com/What-guns-does-the-Australian-SAS-use
63. Chapter 2 – The deployment of the NZSAS to Afghanistan: political and constitutional dimensions | Operation Burnham, accessed September 6, 2025, https://operationburnham.inquiry.govt.nz/inquiry-report/chapter-2
64. TASK FORCE 81 (OP WATEA 2) OPERATIONAL DIRECTIVE 002 EMPLOYMENT OF TF 81 ON OPERATIONS IN, accessed September 6, 2025, https://operationburnham.inquiry.govt.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0022/19066/190807-0824-task-force-81-op-watea-operational-directive-002-employment-of-tf8….pdf
65. A 20 year commitment – New Zealand Defence Force, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.nzdf.mil.nz/army/what-we-do/peace-and-security/a-20-year-commitment/
66. Operation Burnham – Wikipedia, accessed September 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Burnham
67. New Zealand military misled ministers about civilians deaths in Afghanistan raid, report finds, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jul/31/new-zealand-military-misled-ministers-about-civilians-deaths-in-afghanistan-raid-report-finds
68. List of equipment of the New Zealand Army – Wikipedia, accessed September 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_equipment_of_the_New_Zealand_Army
69. New Zealand Rifle Platoon Organization (2017) – Battle Order, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.battleorder.org/nz-rifle-platoon-2019
70. Modular Assault Rifle System – Light (MARS-L) – New Zealand …, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.nzdf.mil.nz/nzdf/our-equipment/firepower/modular-assault-rifle-system-light-mars-l/
71. SAS war kit blows away military fans – NZ Herald, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/sas-war-kit-blows-away-military-fans/5T2S6SQ7T2EMVVBOS47XHXWDNM/
72. MRAD Sniper Rifle – New Zealand Defence Force, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.nzdf.mil.nz/nzdf/our-equipment/firepower/barrett-mrad-multi-role-adaptive-design-sniper-rifle/
73. Special ops expected to play key role in shaping future battlespaces in ‘non-physical domains’ | DefenseScoop, accessed September 6, 2025, https://defensescoop.com/2024/03/08/special-ops-role-shaping-future-battlespaces-non-physical-domains/
74. TE MAIA HEI TOA – New Zealand Defence Force, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.nzdf.mil.nz/assets/Uploads/DocumentLibrary/OIA-2023-4871-The-role-of-NZ-Special-Operations-Forces-in-modern-warfare-and-national-security.pdf
75. MARSOF 2030 – Marine Forces Special Operations Command, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.marsoc.marines.mil/About/Initiatives/MARSOF-2030/
76. Next Generation Squad Weapons (NGSW) Program – PEO Soldier – Army.mil, accessed September 6, 2025, https://www.peosoldier.army.mil/Equipment/Equipment-Portfolio/Project-Manager-Soldier-Lethality-Portfolio/Next-Generation-Squad-Weapons-Program/
77. taskandpurpose.com, accessed September 6, 2025, https://taskandpurpose.com/news/m7-pentagon-testing-office-list/#:~:text=The%20M7%20is%20part%20of,%2C%20safety%2C%20and%20sustainment.%E2%80%9D