The Islamic Republic of Iran is currently navigating the most acute existential crisis of its forty-seven-year history. As of 0800 Eastern Standard Time on January 13, 2026, the nationwide unrest that commenced on December 28, 2025, has metastasized from a localized economic grievance regarding currency devaluation and subsidy removal into a maximalist revolutionary movement aimed at the dismantling of the clerical system. The protests have successfully bridged historical sociopolitical divides, creating a “cross-class coalition” that unites the urban middle class, the traditional bazaar merchant class, industrial labor, and marginalized ethnic minorities in the periphery. This unification represents a fundamental failure of the regime’s long-standing “compartmentalization” strategy, which historically relied on pitting these demographics against one another to maintain control.

The security environment has deteriorated precipitously since the previous situation update on January 10. The regime, perceiving an immediate and credible threat to its survival, has shifted its operational posture from riot control to counter-insurgency. Intelligence indicates the deployment of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) Ground Forces to key urban centers and border provinces, utilizing military-grade weaponry against unarmed civilians. While a draconian information blackout remains in effect, triangulated data suggests fatalities have likely surpassed 600, with over 10,000 detentions. The intensity of violence, particularly in the Kurdish and Baluchi regions, has begun to resemble low-intensity armed conflict rather than civil disobedience.

In a significant strategic escalation, President Donald Trump announced on January 12 a unilateral 25% tariff on any nation continuing to conduct commerce with Iran. This “maximum pressure” trade policy is designed to sever Tehran’s remaining economic arteries, specifically targeting the People’s Republic of China and India. The move has elicited immediate diplomatic friction but signals a US willingness to weaponize the global trade architecture to accelerate the regime’s insolvency.

This report provides a granular analysis of the operational landscape, assesses the cohesion of both the regime and the opposition, and rigorously evaluates US strategic options ranging from cyber warfare to kinetic intervention. The Intelligence Community (IC) assesses that while the regime retains a formidable capacity for organized violence, its internal cohesion is showing unprecedented stress fractures. The refusal of isolated regular Army (Artesh) units to engage protesters has been noted, although the IRGC remains ideologically committed. Consequently, the probability of a transition event or a chaotic state collapse has risen to its highest level in decades, necessitating immediate, calibrated, and high-impact US policy decisions.

1. Strategic Context and Crisis Origins

To fully comprehend the velocity of the current uprising, one must contextualize the structural fragility of the Iranian state leading into January 2026. The unrest is not a singular event but the culmination of a “polycrisis” that has eroded the regime’s legitimacy and administrative capacity over the last decade.

1.1 The Economic Precipice

The proximate trigger for the December 28 outbreak was the collapse of the Iranian rial, which breached the psychological barrier of 1.4 million to the US dollar. This devaluation was not merely a fluctuating statistic; it represented the instant evaporation of the life savings of the middle class and the operational capital of the bazaar merchants. Coupled with an official inflation rate of 40%—with real inflation on foodstuffs estimated at nearly 72%—the economic misery index reached intolerable levels for the average Iranian household.¹

The government’s subsequent decision to remove fuel subsidies was the spark that ignited this volatility. For decades, cheap energy has been a primary component of the “social contract” in Iran, a tangible benefit provided by the state in exchange for political acquiescence. The removal of this subsidy, necessitated by a budget deficit exacerbated by sanctions and corruption, was viewed by the populace not as a necessary reform, but as a predatory act by a bankrupt regime looting its own citizens to fund regional proxies and security apparatuses.

1.2 The Legacy of Conflict

The strategic backdrop includes the lingering psychological and physical scars of the “12-Day War” with Israel in June 2025. While the regime survived the conflict, the destruction of air defense systems and nuclear infrastructure shattered the myth of the Islamic Republic’s military invincibility.² The subsequent failure to retaliate effectively, followed by a pivot to internal repression, exposed the leadership as weak abroad and tyrannical at home. This perception of vulnerability has emboldened the opposition, who no longer view the security forces as omnipotent.

Furthermore, the “Woman, Life, Freedom” movement of 2022-2023 left a dormant but highly organized network of grassroots resistance. While that movement was brutally suppressed, the networks of trust and communication established during that period have been reactivated. The current uprising effectively merges the cultural and gender-based grievances of 2022 with the desperate economic realities of the 2019 Aban protests, creating a “perfect storm” of discontent that appeals to virtually every sector of Iranian society.⁴

2. Operational Situation Update (January 10–13, 2026)

2.1 Geographic Dispersal and Intensity

As of January 13, protests have been confirmed in 512 distinct locations across 180 cities, encompassing all 31 provinces.⁵ The geographic footprint of the unrest is comprehensive, affecting the political capital, industrial hubs, and ethnic peripheries simultaneously.

Tehran and the Core Cities:

In the capital, the situation remains fluid and volatile. The Grand Bazaar of Tehran, the historic economic heart of the country and a traditional barometer of regime stability, remains shuttered. This strike by the bazaaris is politically significant; their financial support was crucial to the 1979 revolution, and their alienation signals that the conservative mercantile class has abandoned the clerical establishment.6 Protests have spread beyond the traditional university districts to working-class neighborhoods such as Naziabad and the affluent northern districts like Saadat Abad, stretching the security forces across a vast urban sprawl.7 In Isfahan and Mashhad, cities with significant religious populations, the burning of regime symbols and chants against the Supreme Leader indicate a deep ideological break even among the pious demographics.

The Periphery:

In the border provinces, the conflict has assumed the characteristics of an ethno-sectarian insurgency.

• Kurdistan and West Azerbaijan: In cities like Sanandaj and Mahabad, protesters have erected hardened barricades and established “liberated zones” at night. There are unconfirmed reports of armed resistance, with local youth engaging security forces with small arms seized from overrun police stations.⁸
• Sistan-Baluchestan: In the southeast, the Baluchi minority, long marginalized and repressed, has mobilized en masse. The “Mobarizoun Popular Front,” a coalition of local groups, claimed responsibility for killing a Law Enforcement Command (LEC) officer in Iranshahr, signaling a shift toward armed struggle in this region.⁹ The violence here is intense, with the regime utilizing heavy machine guns and indiscriminate fire to quell crowds.

Visualizing the Conflict Landscape:

Intelligence mapping reveals a distinct pattern of unrest intensity. “Red Zones” of high-intensity conflict—characterized by lethal clashes, the use of live ammunition, and martial law-style crackdowns—are concentrated in Tehran, the Kurdish corridor in the west, and the Sistan-Baluchestan region in the southeast. “Orange Zones,” indicating widespread strikes, street demonstrations, and sporadic clashes, cover the central plateau, including Fars (Shiraz), Isfahan, and Razavi Khorasan (Mashhad). Specific flashpoints include the industrial sectors of Khuzestan, where oil workers are striking, marked by industrial action icons on situational maps. This distribution confirms that the regime is fighting a multi-front war against its own population, stretching its suppression capabilities to the breaking point.

2.2 Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures (TTPs) of Protesters

The protesters have demonstrated a remarkable evolution in tactics, learning from previous crackdowns.

• Decentralized Swarming: Rather than gathering in single, massive crowds that are easy to corral and crush, protesters are forming smaller, mobile groups that “swarm” across multiple neighborhoods simultaneously. This tactic exhausts the mobile units of the Basij, who must constantly redeploy.
• Digital resilience: Despite the severe internet blackout, information continues to flow via “sneakernet” (physical transfer of data on drives), localized mesh networks, and the limited use of smuggled satellite uplinks, although the latter faces heavy jamming.
• Economic Sabotage: Beyond street marches, there is a coordinated campaign of economic non-cooperation. This includes the withdrawal of cash from banks to trigger a liquidity crisis, the non-payment of utility bills, and targeted strikes in critical infrastructure sectors.⁵

2.3 Regime Response: From Policing to Counter-Insurgency

The regime’s response strategy has shifted markedly between January 10 and 13.

• Escalation of Force: The Law Enforcement Command (LEC), initially the primary response force, has proven insufficient. Consequently, the IRGC Ground Forces—typically reserved for external defense or major insurrections—have been deployed to city centers.¹⁰ This escalation includes the deployment of armored vehicles and heavy weaponry.
• Rhetorical Reframing: State media and officials have ceased referring to protesters as “rioters” (aghteshashgaran) and have adopted the terminology of “terrorists” (terorist-ha) and “waging war against God” (moharebeh).⁸ This legalistic shift is a precursor to mass capital punishment. By categorizing dissent as terrorism/warfare, the judiciary can expedite death sentences without due process.
• Counter-Mobilization: On January 12, the regime attempted to stage a show of force by busing government employees and Basij members to Enqelab Square for a pro-government rally. While intended to demonstrate strength, the reliance on bussed-in supporters often highlights the lack of organic support in the capital.¹¹

3. Humanitarian Assessment and Casualty Analysis

The humanitarian situation is dire and deteriorating. The regime’s “kill switch” on the internet is designed not only to stop protester coordination but to hide the scale of the bloodshed from the international community.

Casualty Verification:

Obtaining precise casualty figures is complicated by the information blockade and the regime’s tactic of stealing bodies from morgues to prevent public funerals, which often serve as catalysts for further protests. However, a synthesis of available intelligence provides a grim picture.

• Confirmed Fatalities: The Human Rights Activists News Agency (HRANA) has documented at least 538 deaths as of January 12, including a significant number of minors.¹² Amnesty International has independently corroborated the use of unlawful lethal force, including metal pellets fired at close range and military-grade assault rifles.¹³
• Opposition Estimates: Groups such as the People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI/MEK) and Iran International claim the death toll could be as high as 12,000.¹⁴ While these figures are likely inflated for political effect, they reflect the scale of violence reported in isolated provinces where verification is impossible. The true number almost certainly lies between the conservative confirmed count and the opposition’s estimates, likely in the low thousands given the reports of mass shootings in Kurdistan and Baluchistan.
• Injuries and Detentions: Hospitals report being overwhelmed with wounded. Security forces have been documented raiding medical facilities to arrest injured protesters, forcing many to treat gunshot wounds in private homes to avoid detention. Over 10,600 arrests have been logged, with detainees facing torture and overcrowding in facilities like Evin Prison and the Greater Tehran Penitentiary.¹²

4. Political Dynamics: Regime and Opposition

The political landscape of Iran is fracturing. The monolithic image the Islamic Republic projects to the world is crumbling, revealing deep fissures within the ruling elite and a chaotic, yet increasingly unified, opposition.

4.1 Regime Cohesion and Fractures

The regime’s survival depends entirely on the cohesion of its security forces.

• The IRGC (Pasdaran): The Guard remains the regime’s praetorian bedrock. Deeply embedded in the economy and ideologically indoctrinated, the IRGC leadership views the protests as a foreign-backed plot that poses an existential threat to their own wealth and power. There are currently no signs of high-level defections within the IRGC command structure.
• The Artesh (Regular Army): In contrast, the Artesh is a conscript-heavy force with a nationalistic rather than ideological ethos. Intelligence reports suggest instances of friction where Artesh units have refused to fire on civilians, or have been kept in barracks by commanders wary of their reliability. This hesitation forces the regime to rely more heavily on the IRGC and Basij, stretching them thin.
• Political Infighting: The “moderate” faction, represented by President Masoud Pezeshkian, finds itself paralyzed. Pezeshkian has attempted to walk a tightrope, acknowledging economic grievances while condemning “rioters,” but he has been effectively sidelined by the hardline security establishment and the Supreme Leader’s office.¹¹ His irrelevance highlights the militarization of the state, where civilian government structures have become subordinate to the security apparatus.

4.2 The Opposition Landscape

One of the defining features of this uprising is the emergence of symbols of unity in a previously fragmented opposition.

The “Prince” Factor:

Reza Pahlavi, the exiled son of the last Shah, has consolidated his position as the primary figurehead of the resistance.

• Symbolic Power: In a rejection of the 1979 revolution, protesters across the country—including in religious cities like Qom—are chanting slogans such as “Reza Shah, Bless Your Soul”.⁶ This phenomenon is driven by a nostalgia for the developmentalist, secular era of the Pahlavis, contrasted against the current corruption and incompetence.
• Operational Role: Pahlavi has transitioned from a passive figure to an active coordinator, issuing specific calls for strikes and protests that are being heeded on the ground.¹⁵ However, his ascendancy creates friction with other opposition blocs, specifically the leftist groups and ethnic separatists who view the monarchy with suspicion.¹⁶

The Coalition Vacuum:

Despite Pahlavi’s popularity, a formal, unified “National Salvation Council” has yet to form. The “Georgetown Coalition” of 2022 has largely disintegrated due to infighting. This lack of a unified command and control structure remains the opposition’s critical weakness. Without a mechanism to coordinate the disparate elements—the Kurdish fighters, the striking oil workers, the student radicals, and the monarchists—the regime retains the advantage of organization. The opposition is currently “rhizomatic”—resilient and widespread, but lacking the “head” necessary to negotiate a transition or direct a decisive blow.4

5. Economic Warfare and The “Tariff Shock”

On January 12, the geopolitical dimension of the crisis expanded dramatically with President Trump’s announcement of a 25% tariff on any country doing business with Iran.¹⁷ This policy represents a shift from traditional Treasury-based sanctions (OFAC) to trade-based coercion (USTR), designed to force a binary choice on Iran’s trading partners.

The Mechanism of Action:

Unlike secondary sanctions which target specific banks or companies, this tariff applies a blanket penalty to the entire national export economy of the target country regarding their trade with the US.

• China: The primary target is Beijing, which purchases approximately 90% of Iran’s illicit oil exports. While China has publicly condemned the move as “economic coercion” ¹⁸, the economic calculus is stark. A 25% tariff on China’s $500 billion+ in exports to the US would be catastrophic for its fragile economy, far outweighing the benefit of cheap Iranian oil.
• India: New Delhi, a strategic partner of the US, is also in the crosshairs. India relies on trade with Iran for connectivity to Central Asia via the Chabahar Port. The tariff threat places India in a diplomatic bind, forcing it to likely curtail its remaining non-oil trade with Tehran to preserve its preferential access to US markets.¹⁹

Impact Assessment:

The immediate psychological impact has been a further crash in the rial. In the medium term (weeks), this policy aims to physically halt Iran’s oil exports by making them toxic to buyers. If successful, it would strip the regime of the hard currency needed to pay the security forces, potentially precipitating a collapse of the repressive apparatus from within. However, it also risks triggering a global trade war and alienating key allies in the process.

6. US Strategic Options and Probability Assessment

The United States currently possesses a spectrum of options to influence the trajectory of events in Iran. These range from passive containment to active intervention. The following analysis evaluates five distinct options based on operational feasibility, the probability of adoption by the current administration, and the probability of achieving the desired outcome (aiding the protesters/weakening the regime).

Option 1: Direct Kinetic Strikes (The “Punitive” Model)

Description: The US military conducts precision air and missile strikes against IRGC command centers, Basij bases, intelligence hubs, and potentially leadership compounds.

• Operational Logic: The goal would be to degrade the regime’s command and control (C2) capabilities and signal to the lower ranks of the security forces that loyalty to the regime is a death sentence. It fulfills the President’s threat to “hit them hard” if they kill protesters.²⁰
• Strategic Risk: Historically, external attacks can induce a “rally ’round the flag” effect, unifying the population against the aggressor. However, current intelligence suggests anti-regime sentiment is so profound that many Iranians might welcome the strikes if they are precise. The greater risk is regional escalation; Iran has threatened to retaliate against US bases and Israel, potentially igniting a wider Middle East war.²¹
• Probability of US Use: Medium (40%). While the President’s rhetoric is bellicose, the Pentagon and Intelligence Community will likely advise against actions that could draw the US into a protracted conflict, preferring “gray zone” measures.
• Probability of Success: Low to Medium (30%). While it would physically damage the regime, it allows them to shift the narrative from “internal failure” to “foreign aggression,” potentially saving them politically.

Option 2: Offensive Cyber Warfare (The “Blackout” Model)

Description: US Cyber Command (CYBERCOM) launches aggressive, sustained attacks to disable regime communication networks, power grids supplying IRGC bases, and the electronic banking system, while simultaneously attempting to open channels for protesters.²²

• Operational Logic: This targets the regime’s nervous system. Disrupting the “National Information Network” hinders the coordination of crackdowns. Freezing the assets of the elite and disrupting the electronic payroll of the security forces is a critical vulnerability; if the Basij are not paid, they do not deploy.
• Strategic Risk: Attacks on dual-use infrastructure like power grids affect civilians (hospitals, heating), potentially turning the population against the US.
• Probability of US Use: High (75%). This aligns with the “maximum pressure” doctrine while avoiding “boots on the ground.” It is a favored tool of modern asymmetric warfare.
• Probability of Success: Medium (50%). Iran has hardened its cyber defenses, likely with Russian assistance. Disrupting the intranet is technically challenging. However, targeting the financial distribution network for security forces could have immediate, high-impact results in inducing defections.

Option 3: Maximum Economic Strangulation (The Tariff & Sanctions Model)

Description: Rigorous enforcement of the new 25% tariff policy, combined with a push for “snapback” UN sanctions.

• Operational Logic: Bankrupt the state within months. By severing the oil revenue lifeline, the regime loses the resources to fund its patronage network and security apparatus.
• Strategic Risk: It is a blunt instrument that creates a humanitarian catastrophe (famine, medicine shortages) alongside regime bankruptcy. It relies on the compliance of third parties like China, which is not guaranteed.
• Probability of US Use: Already Active (100%). The policy was announced on Jan 12 and is currently being implemented.
• Probability of Success: Medium (45%). It is a slow-acting poison. The regime has strategic reserves and smuggling networks to survive in the short term. It may be too slow to save the current protest wave from suppression, but decisive in the long term.

Option 4: Information Dominance (The “Starlink” Model)

Description: A covert or overt effort to flood Iran with thousands of Starlink terminals and provide technical means to bypass the blackout.¹

• Operational Logic: Breaking the information monopoly is the single most effective force multiplier for the opposition. It allows for the coordination of complex protest actions and the documentation of atrocities to galvanize international support.
• Strategic Risk: The regime has demonstrated the capability to jam Starlink signals in major urban centers.²⁵ Furthermore, the logistics of smuggling hardware (dishes) into a denied environment are formidable and dangerous for the recipients.
• Probability of US Use: High (80%). There is bipartisan support for this, and the administration favors technological solutions.
• Probability of Success: Low (20%) in the short term. Due to effective jamming and the logistical bottlenecks of hardware distribution, this solution cannot be scaled fast enough to impact the operational picture in the next critical week.

Option 5: Covert Support to Opposition (The “Solidarity” Model)

Description: The CIA and State Department provide funding, intelligence, and secure communications equipment directly to strike committees and opposition figures. This includes the establishment of “Strike Funds”.²⁶

• Operational Logic: Labor strikes are the regime’s Achilles’ heel. Workers in critical sectors (oil, transport) want to strike but live paycheck to paycheck. A US-backed “Strike Fund” (delivered via crypto or hawala networks) solves this liquidity crisis, enabling a sustained general strike.
• Strategic Risk: If exposed, it validates the regime’s narrative that the protests are a “foreign plot.”
• Probability of US Use: Medium (50%). The administration is reportedly already in contact with opposition groups ²⁷, making this a logical next step.
• Probability of Success: High (65%). If successfully implemented, a general strike is the one mechanism that has historically toppled Iranian regimes (1979). It halts the economy and paralysis the state without destroying infrastructure or risking war.

Summary of Strategic Options

Option	Description	Prob. of US Use	Prob. of Success	Key Constraint
Kinetic Strikes	Airstrikes on IRGC/Regime targets	40%	30%	Risk of regional war; rallying effect.
Cyber Warfare	Disrupting regime C2 and Banking	75%	50%	Iranian cyber defenses; civilian collateral damage.
Economic (Tariffs)	25% Tariff on trade partners (China/India)	100% (Active)	45%	Slow impact; diplomatic fallout with China.
Info Dominance	Starlink/Satellite Internet	80%	20%	Effective jamming; hardware logistics.
Covert Support	Strike Funds/Intel Sharing	50%	65%	Risk of exposure; difficulty in transfer.

7. Geopolitical Implications

The US “Tariff Bomb” has globalized the Iranian crisis, forcing major powers to take a stance.

• China: Beijing is the critical variable. While it publicly supports Iran, it cannot afford to lose the American market. Intelligence suggests China may quietly signal Tehran to de-escalate or face a reduction in oil purchases, acting as a reluctant lever of US policy. However, there is also a risk that China, seeing this as a prelude to a wider assault on its sovereignty, deepens its support for Iran to prevent a US victory.
• Russia: Moscow, already aligned with Tehran militarily, is likely providing technical assistance in internet censorship and electronic warfare. The survival of the Islamic Republic is vital for Russia’s logistics in its own conflicts, and we can expect Putin to offer diplomatic cover and perhaps cyber support to the regime.²⁶
• Regional Actors: Saudi Arabia and the UAE are watching with extreme caution. While they despise the Iranian regime, they fear the chaos of a collapsed state or a lashed-out response from a dying regime targeting their oil infrastructure. They are likely urging Washington to ensure any action is decisive, not just disruptive.

8. Intelligence Outlook and Signposts

The next 72 hours are critical. The regime has committed its strategic reserves (IRGC Ground Forces). If the protests continue to grow despite this escalation, the regime will face a decision point: either commit mass slaughter on a scale not seen since the 1980s, or face disintegration as the security forces fracture under the strain.

Key Signposts to Watch:

1. Cracks in the Security Forces: Reports of LEC or Artesh units refusing orders or defecting.
2. Strike Expansion: The closure of critical oil facilities in the south, which would signal the regime’s impending bankruptcy.
3. Elite Flight: Movement of high-ranking officials’ families or assets out of the country, indicating a loss of confidence in the regime’s survival.
4. US Action: Any kinetic movement by US Central Command (CENTCOM) assets, or a sudden, unexplained outage of Iranian banking/communication infrastructure (Cybercom action).

The Islamic Republic is more vulnerable than at any point in its history. The convergence of economic collapse, popular fury, and international pressure has created a “perfect storm.” However, the regime’s will to survive is absolute, and it possesses the means to inflict catastrophic violence. The US strategy has shifted to “maximum economic lethality” via the new tariffs, but the window for a peaceful transition is closing rapidly, replaced by the specter of a bloody civil conflict or a revolutionary war.

---

If you find this post useful, please share the link on Facebook, with your friends, etc. Your support is much appreciated and if you have any feedback, please email me at in**@*********ps.com. Please note that for links to other websites, we are only paid if there is an affiliate program such as Avantlink, Impact, Amazon and eBay and only if you purchase something. If you’d like to directly contribute towards our continued reporting, please visit our funding page.

---

Main Image Source

The main blog image is computer generated based on reports of riots and unrest. It does not depict a specific scene/event.

Works cited

1. Geopolitcal and Economic Tensions Rachet Up as Iranian Protests Continue, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.asisonline.org/security-management-magazine/latest-news/today-in-security/2026/january/iran-protests/
2. The new Iranian revolution has begun, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-new-iranian-revolution-has-begun/
3. 2026 Iranian Protests | Cause, Events, Leaders, 12-Day War, Israel, & Trump | Britannica, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.britannica.com/event/2026-Iranian-Protests
4. Iran at a crossroads: Repression, resistance and scenarios, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.epc.eu/publication/iran-at-a-crossroads-repression-resistance-and-scenarios/
5. 2025–2026 Iranian protests – Wikipedia, accessed January 13, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025%E2%80%932026_Iranian_protests
6. Iran’s protests look like the first tremors of regime collapse, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.gisreportsonline.com/r/iran-protests-2026/
7. Day 14 Of Iran Uprising: Protests Expand To 190 Cities, Rallies Resume In Tehran And Other Cities – OpEd, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.eurasiareview.com/11012026-day-14-of-iran-uprising-protests-expand-to-190-cities-rallies-resume-in-tehran-and-other-cities-oped/
8. Iran Update, January 10, 2026 | ISW – Institute for the Study of War, accessed January 13, 2026, https://understandingwar.org/research/middle-east/iran-update-january-10-2026/
9. Iran Update, January 7, 2026 | ISW – Institute for the Study of War, accessed January 13, 2026, https://understandingwar.org/research/middle-east/iran-update-january-7-2026/
10. Iran Update, January 12, 2026 | ISW, accessed January 13, 2026, https://understandingwar.org/research/middle-east/iran-update-january-12-2026/
11. Iran holds pro-government rally as regime seeks to downplay protests, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2026/jan/12/iran-protests-crackdown-toll-foreign-minister
12. Iran warns US against attack as protest death toll reportedly soars – The Guardian, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jan/11/iran-arrests-protest-leaders-as-crackdown-intensifies-amid-threat-of-us-intervention
13. Iran: Deaths and injuries rise amid authorities’ renewed cycle of protest bloodshed, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2026/01/iran-deaths-injuries-authorities-protest-bloodshed/
14. At least 12000 killed in Iran crackdown as blackout deepens, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.iranintl.com/en/202601130145
15. Iran crossed a political threshold, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.iranintl.com/en/202601095873
16. Iranians Are Protesting. Reza Pahlavi Can’t Save Them, accessed January 13, 2026, https://time.com/7344936/iran-protest-reza-pahlavi-ayatollah/
17. Trump says countries doing business with Iran face 25% tariff on US trade, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jan/12/trump-tariffs-iran
18. China opposes Donald Trump’s tariff threat against nations doing business with Iran, accessed January 13, 2026, https://indianexpress.com/article/world/china-opposes-donald-trumps-tariff-threat-against-nations-doing-business-with-iran-10470309/
19. Basmati, tea, apples, kiwis: Breakup of India-Iran trade as Trump imposes 25% tariffs on Tehran’s trading partners, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.businesstoday.in/latest/economy/story/basmati-tea-apples-kiwis-breakup-of-india-iran-trade-as-trump-imposes-25-tariffs-on-tehrans-trading-partners-510621-2026-01-13
20. Trump hints at US military intervention in Iran as he weighs ‘strong options’ amid unrest, accessed January 13, 2026, https://m.economictimes.com/news/defence/trump-hints-at-us-military-intervention-in-iran-as-he-weighs-strong-options-amid-unrest/articleshow/126473473.cms
21. Iran Update, January 12, 2026, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.criticalthreats.org/analysis/iran-update-january-12-2026
22. A Cyberattack on the U.S. Power Grid | Council on Foreign Relations, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.cfr.org/report/cyberattack-us-power-grid
23. Strategic Shift in the Deterrence Equation: Assessing the Probability of U.S. Military Strikes on Iran Following the Early 2026 Protests | موقع عمان نت, accessed January 13, 2026, https://ammannet.net/english/strategic-shift-deterrence-equation-assessing-probability-us-military-strikes-iran
24. Probability of direct US military intervention in Iran remains low — French expert, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.ukrinform.net/rubric-polytics/4079128-probability-of-direct-us-military-intervention-in-iran-remains-low-french-expert.html
25. As Iranian regime shuts down internet, even Starlink seemingly being jammed, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.timesofisrael.com/iran-appears-to-jam-starlink-after-shutting-down-comms-networks/
26. As Iran protests continue, policymakers should apply these key lessons – Atlantic Council, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/menasource/as-iran-protests-continue-us-policymakers-should-apply-these-key-lessons/
27. Iran protests updates: Trump slaps US tariff on Iran’s trading partners, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/liveblog/2026/1/12/iran-protests-live-us-rhetoric-rises-as-tehran-announces-3-days-mourning
28. Iran Update, December 30, 2025 | ISW – Institute for the Study of War, accessed January 13, 2026, https://understandingwar.org/research/middle-east/iran-update-december-30-2025/
29. Is the Iranian regime on the verge of collapse?, accessed January 13, 2026, https://monocle.com/affairs/is-the-iranian-regime-on-the-verge-of-collapse/
30. New protests erupt in Iran as supreme leader signals upcoming crackdown, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2026/jan/09/iran-supreme-leader-harsher-crackdown-protest-movement-swells
31. Deaths during the 2025–2026 Iranian protests – Wikipedia, accessed January 13, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deaths_during_the_2025%E2%80%932026_Iranian_protests
32. Iran’s internet shutdown is chillingly precise and may last some time – The Guardian, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jan/10/irans-internet-shutdown-is-strikingly-sophisticated-and-may-last-some-time
33. Asian economies brace for fallout from Trump’s Iran-linked tariff – bne IntelliNews, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.intellinews.com/asian-economies-brace-for-fallout-from-trump-s-iran-linked-tariff-419668/?source=south-korea