Executive Summary

The internal and external stability of the Islamic Republic of Iran reached a critical inflection point during the reporting period ending February 06, 2026. Domestic conditions are defined by the aftermath of the most violent state-led crackdown in the history of the Islamic Republic, following nationwide protests that began on December 28, 2025.¹ While the regime has re-established a tenuous surface-level calm through a near-total telecommunications blackout and the deployment of lethal force that claimed between 6,000 and 36,500 lives, the underlying drivers of unrest—economic collapse and systemic delegitimization—remain unaddressed.³ Intelligence indicators, including significant capital flight and private admissions of fear among the clerical elite, suggest that the regime’s structural integrity is experiencing profound fatigue.⁶

On the strategic front, the week was characterized by a “coercive diplomacy” duality. Indirect negotiations between the United States and Iran concluded in Muscat, Oman, on February 6, marking the most significant diplomatic engagement since the resumption of hostilities in 2025.⁸ However, even as Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi signaled a willingness to discuss nuclear limitations, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) engaged in provocative military signaling, including the unveiling of the Khorramshahr-4 ballistic missile at a hardened underground facility and the harassment of U.S. naval assets in the Arabian Sea.⁹ The United States countered this posturing by imposing new sanctions on Iranian oil tankers and senior officials immediately following the Oman talks, reinforcing a policy of “Maximum Pressure”.¹¹ The confluence of a looming succession crisis for the 86-year-old Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and a “zero-trust” environment with Washington suggests that the risk of regional escalation remains high despite the ongoing diplomatic track.⁶

Domestic Security and Civil Unrest

The Genesis and Escalation of the 2026 Uprising

The current domestic crisis originated on December 28, 2025, sparked initially by the catastrophic collapse of the Iranian rial and the inability of the central government to mitigate hyperinflation.¹ What began as localized economic protests in Tehran quickly metastasized into a nationwide revolutionary movement, spreading to all 31 provinces.³ This transformation was driven by a sophisticated synergy between traditional grievances—such as unemployment and corruption—and a coordinated resistance infrastructure that had been developing since the 2017-2022 protest cycles.¹⁶ By early January 2026, the movement had shifted its focus from economic reform to the total removal of the clerical establishment, with chants of “Death to the Dictator” echoing from the Tehran Bazaar to the oil fields of Khuzestan.¹⁵

The scale of the 2026 uprising surpassed the 2009 Green Movement in both demographic breadth and geographic reach.¹⁵ Unlike previous unrest, the current movement saw significant participation from the traditional merchant class (Bazaaris) in Tehran, Tabriz, and Isfahan, who shuttered their businesses in a show of solidarity that paralyzed the commercial heart of the country.⁴ This economic paralysis, combined with the collapse of the currency to 1.6 million rials per U.S. dollar, created a “perfect storm” that the regime initially struggled to contain through standard riot control measures.²

State Response and the Mechanics of Repression

Faced with a threat perceived as existential, the Iranian security apparatus, led by the IRGC and the Ministry of Interior, initiated a three-phase crackdown strategy. The first phase involved localized disruptions and internet throttling to prevent coordination.⁴ The second phase, commencing on January 8, involved a nationwide telecommunications blackout and the deployment of lethal force on a massive scale.¹ The third phase, which continued through the current week, is defined by “Absolute Digital Isolation” and a campaign of mass arrests and judicial intimidation.⁴

Casualty and Detention Metrics	Estimated Figure (as of Feb 06, 2026)	Source Identifier
Minimum Confirmed Fatalities	6,000	1
Maximum Estimated Fatalities	36,500	3
Total Documented Arrests	51,251	17
Injured Civilians	11,021	17
Student Activists Detained	111	17
Security Force Fatalities	214	17
Executions (Specific Case)	1 (Hamidreza Sabet Esmailipour)	3

The violence was particularly acute in Gilan, Kermanshah, and Tehran provinces. In Gilan, IRGC units reportedly fired live ammunition at crowds of unarmed protesters attempting to flee a fire at the Rash bazaar.¹¹ In Kermanshah, the Law Enforcement Forces (LEF), under the command of Mehdi Hajian, utilized sexual violence and torture as tools of systematic intimidation against detainees.¹¹ The humanitarian situation in major urban centers has reached a breaking point, with reports of morgues being overwhelmed and bodies being stored in freight containers and pick-up trucks to hide the true scale of the massacre.¹¹ Despite these measures, the regime has failed to secure the voluntary submission of the population; instead, analysts suggest that the “wall of fear” has been replaced by a “boiling public anger” that may reignite upon any sign of regime weakness or external military strike.⁷

Telecommunications Blackout and Digital Sovereignty

The January 8 internet shutdown represented the most comprehensive digital isolation in the history of the Islamic Republic.⁴ Unlike previous shutdowns, which targeted mobile networks or social media platforms, the 2026 blackout included the total disconnection of Iran’s National Information Network (NIN), effectively severing internal communications for hospitals, banks, and businesses.⁴ This move was designed to provide the security forces with a “blind spot” in which to conduct mass killings without the risk of real-time footage reaching the international community.⁴

By the current reporting week, partial access has been restored, but under a regime of “Absolute Digital Isolation”.⁴ Government spokespersons have signaled that this shift is permanent, as the regime seeks to implement a model of digital sovereignty similar to the “Great Firewall”.⁴ However, the shutdown has had severe second-order effects on the economy, further devaluing the rial and complicating the operations of “Technocratic Survivalists” within the government who rely on global connectivity for trade and finance.⁴

Leadership Dynamics and Succession

Succession Paralysis and the Security-Clerical Divide

The governance of Iran is currently transitioning into a phase of “Critical State Deceleration,” characterized by systemic structural fatigue within the dual-governance model established by Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.⁶ At 86 years old, Khamenei’s health and eventual succession have become the primary focus of internal power struggles.⁶ The core tension lies between the “Executive-Administrative” wing, currently represented by President Masoud Pezeshkian and Foreign Minister Araghchi, and the “Security-Clerical” deep state, which includes the IRGC Intelligence Organization and the Office of the Supreme Leader (Beit-e Rahbari).⁶

This deep state is currently suffering from “Succession Paralysis”.⁶ No single candidate for Supreme Leader—including touted names like Mojtaba Khamenei—possesses the necessary consensus to maintain the shadow networks of patronage that keep the various IRGC factions loyal.⁶ Consequently, the IRGC is increasingly operating as a “State within a State,” controlling telecommunications, construction, and the shadow banking systems required to evade sanctions.⁶ Intelligence suggests that the IRGC may move to seize formal power in a “Security Junta” model (estimated 45% probability) following Khamenei’s death, potentially relegating the role of the Supreme Leader to a symbolic vestige.⁶

Elite Anxiety and Capital Flight

A high-confidence indicator of the regime’s internal instability is the surge in capital flight observed among mid-level and senior officials. Between December 2025 and January 2026, over $400 million in USDT (Tether) was moved through unregulated digital exchanges in Mashhad and Tehran.⁶ This movement of funds to financial hubs in Istanbul and Toronto suggests that members of the elite are preparing for a potential state collapse.⁶ Furthermore, digital forensics of IRGC-linked bot-nets show a shift in messaging away from clerical revolutionary rhetoric toward a more nationalist-military identity, signaling that the IRGC is preparing the public for a post-clerical era.⁶

Power Center	Primary Actor(s)	Strategic Objective
Beit-e Rahbari	Khamenei, Golpayegani	Preserve Velayat-e Faqih; secure a loyal successor.
Security State	IRGC-IO (Majid Khademi)	Maintain control over the economy and internal security.
Executive Wing	Pezeshkian, Araghchi	Secure sanctions relief to prevent economic implosion.
Technocrats	Ministry of Finance	Explore “Collective Leadership” models for stability.

Nuclear Capabilities and Strategic Deterrence

Infrastructure Hardening and Breakout Timelines

Despite the kinetic strikes on Natanz and Isfahan during the 12-Day War in June 2025, Iran’s nuclear program remains functionally lethal.³ The strikes successfully degraded industrial-scale enrichment, but they failed to eliminate Iran’s stockpile of highly enriched uranium (HEU) or its resilient scientific knowledge base.¹⁹ As of February 2026, Iran possesses approximately 409 to 440 kilograms of uranium enriched to 60% purity.¹⁹ This material represents a critical strategic asset, as it allows for a “breakout” to weapons-grade (90%) levels within a matter of months or even weeks.¹⁹

In response to the 2025 strikes, the regime has initiated an intensive program of infrastructure hardening. At the Parchin Military Complex, the Taleghan 2 facility—previously targeted by Israel—is being encased in a concrete “sarcophagus” to protect it from future aerial bombardment.²⁰ Simultaneously, new underground facilities are being constructed near Mount Kolang Gaz La, utilizing deep-mountain burrowing techniques that render them virtually immune to conventional bunker-buster munitions.¹⁹ This strategy of “geographic leverage” is intended to make any future military attempt to halt the program prohibitively costly for the United States and Israel.¹⁹

The Khorramshahr-4 and Missile Doctrine

On February 5, 2026, the IRGC Aerospace Force unveiled the Khorramshahr-4 ballistic missile at a newly commissioned underground site.¹⁰ This development is a key component of Iran’s strategy of “coercive signaling” ahead of diplomatic talks.¹⁰

Missile Specification	Metric	Strategic Implication
Range	2,000 Kilometers	Capable of striking Israel and regional U.S. bases.
Warhead Weight	> 1.0 Ton High-Explosive	One of the largest configurations in Iran’s arsenal.
Deployment Type	Hardened Underground Silo	Enhances second-strike capability and survivability.
Operational History	Used in June 2025 conflict	Proven combat effectiveness against modern defenses.

The regime’s insistence that its ballistic missile program is non-negotiable constitutes a primary obstacle to a diplomatic resolution.⁸ Iranian officials view these missiles as their primary conventional deterrent, essential for offsetting the air superiority of the United States and Israel.²³ During the Oman talks, Foreign Minister Araghchi reiterated that Iran would not accept constraints on its defense capabilities, describing them as “pillars of national defense” that are separate from the nuclear file.⁸

Military Posturing and Asymmetric Warfare

Naval Provocations in the Arabian Sea

The current week saw a dangerous escalation in the maritime domain, as Iran sought to test the resolve of the Trump administration. On February 3, 2026, a U.S. Navy fighter jet shot down an Iranian Shahed-129 drone that was aggressively approaching the USS Abraham Lincoln aircraft carrier in the Arabian Sea.⁹ Although the United States conducted de-escalatory measures, the drone continued its approach, necessitating a kinetic response.⁹ In a characteristic move, IRGC-affiliated media claimed the drone was on a “routine reconnaissance mission” and experienced a “loss of communication,” refusing to acknowledge the U.S. shootdown.⁹

Within hours of this incident, six IRGC armed speedboats harassed the Stena Imperative, a U.S.-flagged and crewed merchant vessel, in the Strait of Hormuz.⁹ The IRGC forces ordered the tanker to stop its engines and prepare for boarding, though the vessel was able to continue its transit after U.S. naval intervention.⁹ These actions are interpreted by intelligence analysts as an attempt by Tehran to demonstrate that the Persian Gulf will become a “theater of conflict” if the United States continues its pressure campaign.²³

The “Oversaturation” Strategy

The Iranian military doctrine has shifted toward an “offensive approach” following the 2025 Israel-Iran War.²⁴ Central to this doctrine is the use of one-way attack drones to “oversaturate” Western air defense systems.²³ While individual drones like the Shahed-139 are relatively slow and vulnerable, launching them in massive “swarms” alongside cruise and ballistic missiles is intended to overwhelm the target’s defensive capacity through sheer volume.²³ Experts characterize the drone as the “poor man’s cruise missile,” providing a low-cost method of punishment and deterrence.²³

Furthermore, the IRGC-linked Tasnim news agency published a “War Concept” this week that outlines a multi-front scenario.²⁴ This plan envisions a rapid Iranian counter-barrage against U.S. regional bases, the activation of “Axis of Resistance” proxies to ignite parallel fronts in Lebanon, Iraq, and Yemen, and the execution of cyber operations to disrupt global oil flows.²⁴ This “total war” rhetoric is designed to deter a U.S. strike by emphasizing the regional costs of such an action.¹³

Foreign Policy and Diplomatic Engagements

The Oman Indirect Talks (February 6, 2026)

The reporting week culminated in indirect negotiations between Iranian and U.S. delegations in Muscat, Oman.⁸ Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi and U.S. Special Envoy Steve Witkoff communicated via Omani mediators, attempting to define a framework for future discussions.⁸ Araghchi described the talks as a “good beginning,” yet the “deep mistrust” between the two nations remains the defining characteristic of the relationship.⁸

The primary obstacle to progress is the fundamental disagreement over the scope of the negotiations. Tehran insists that the talks remain strictly limited to the “nuclear file” and demands immediate, “effective and verifiable” sanctions relief.⁸ Washington, conversely, has adopted a broader agenda that includes Iran’s ballistic missile program, its support for regional proxies, and its domestic human rights record.⁸ Secretary of State Marco Rubio stated on February 4 that meaningful talks must address the “range of their ballistic missiles” and the “treatment of their own people,” positions that Tehran has labeled as “non-negotiable red lines”.⁸

Regional Mediation and the Non-Aggression Proposal

A coalition of regional powers—including Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Egypt, Oman, the UAE, and Pakistan—has proposed a “wider framework” for a US-Iran deal.²⁵ This proposal includes:

1. A Non-Aggression Pact under which Washington and Tehran agree not to target each other or their respective allies.²⁵
2. A Three-Year Enrichment Moratorium where Iran would halt all uranium enrichment for three years, followed by a limit of 1.5%.²⁵
3. The Transfer of HEU Stockpiles to a third country, with Russia signaling its readiness to receive the material.⁸
4. A Ban on First-Use of ballistic missiles and a commitment to cease weapon transfers to regional proxies.²⁵

While regional actors view this as the most viable path toward stability, the “Security-Clerical” deep state in Tehran remains highly skeptical. Hardliner lawmakers, such as Amir Hossein Sabeti, have attacked the diplomatic process, labeling it a “strategic mistake” and calling for “preemptive strikes” instead of concessions.⁹ This internal discord consistently derails Iranian diplomacy, as negotiators like Araghchi are often forced to harden their positions to satisfy domestic hardliners and the IRGC.²⁶

Economic Crisis and Sanctions Environment

Currency Collapse and the Rial’s Record Low

The Iranian economy is currently characterized by “Geopolitical Entropy”.⁶ On January 28, 2026, the rial hit an all-time low of 1.6 million per U.S. dollar, a collapse that has made basic goods unaffordable for much of the population.³ This economic breakdown is not merely a technical failure but a direct consequence of the “Maximum Pressure” campaign and the systemic corruption within the regime’s patronage networks.⁵ The weakening rial has triggered mass protests and strikes, as Iranians desperately attempt to convert their savings into foreign currencies, gold, or property.⁵

Oil Production and the New Tanker Sanctions

Despite the domestic crisis, Iran has maintained elevated levels of oil production, reaching 4.2 million barrels per day in late 2025.²⁷ However, the ability of the regime to monetize this production is being systematically targeted by the U.S. Treasury. On February 6, 2026, moments after the conclusion of the Oman talks, the United States announced new sanctions targeting 14 vessels involved in the transport of Iranian oil.¹² These ships, flagged from Turkey, India, and the UAE, are part of the “shadow fleet” that Iran uses to fund its regional proxies and domestic repression.¹²

Oil and Economic Indicator	Value/Status	Source
Current Rial Exchange Rate	1,600,000 IRR / 1 USD	3
Total Hydrocarbon Output (2025)	9.97 Million bpd	28
Annual Energy Export Revenue	$64 Billion	28
Floating Storage (at sea)	52 Million Barrels	5
New Sanctions (Feb 6)	14 vessels, 15 entities	12

The “Maximum Pressure 2.0” strategy is designed to drive Iranian oil exports to near-zero by targeting the intermediaries and digital asset exchanges that facilitate the regime’s financial flows.¹¹ For the first time, the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) designated two digital asset exchanges linked to Babak Zanjani, a notorious regime money launderer, for operating in the financial sector of the Iranian economy.¹¹ This signals a shift toward targeting the technological infrastructure of Iran’s shadow banking system.

Regional Proxy and Partner Dynamics

Syrian Consolidation and the SDF Integration

The strategic landscape in the Levant underwent a significant shift this week with the January 30 agreement between the Syrian government and the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF).²² Under this deal, the SDF will be integrated into the Syrian army as four distinct brigades, with the Syrian state assuming control over Hasakah and Qamishli.²² This consolidation under President Ahmed al Shara, facilitated by U.S. and Turkish mediation, reduces the risk of Kurdish-Turkish conflict but also presents a challenge to Iranian influence in Syria.²²

While the Syrian government has forced the SDF to capitulate, the integration process remains fragile. Hardline elements within the YPG may still launch a low-grade insurgency, potentially creating opportunities for Iranian-backed militias to reassert themselves in the vacuum.¹³ However, for the moment, the consolidation of the Syrian state represents a stabilization of Iran’s western flank, albeit one that is increasingly under the influence of regional actors rather than Tehran alone.²²

Hezbollah and the Lebanese Theater

In Lebanon, the situation remains “frail,” as the ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah is tested by continued IDF strikes against the group’s attempts to regenerate its military infrastructure.²⁴ Between January 26 and February 1, the IDF conducted numerous operations in the Zahrani and Nabatieh regions, targeting Hezbollah operatives who were allegedly violating understandings by restoring underground installations.³⁰

Date (2026)	Incident / Operation in Lebanon	Reported Outcome	Source
Jan 27	IDF Strike in Sidon District	1 Hezbollah operative killed	30
Jan 30	Drone strike near Tyre	Sheikh Ali Noureddine killed	30
Jan 31	Strike near Nabatieh	2 operatives killed in tunnel	30
Feb 06	Resignation of Wafiq Safa	Head of Liaison unit steps down	24

The resignation of Wafiq Safa, a senior security official and head of the Liaison and Coordination Unit, on February 6 is a significant indicator of internal pressure.²⁴ Safa was a key figure in coordinating with Lebanese security agencies and managing the group’s high-level negotiations.²⁴ His departure, coming amid U.S. and Israeli pressure on the Lebanese government to disarm Hezbollah, suggests a possible shift in the group’s internal dynamics or a reaction to the persistent Israeli assassination campaign that Safa narrowly survived in 2024.²⁴

Houthi Posture and the Red Sea Crisis

The Houthis in Yemen have largely maintained a pause in their maritime attacks since the October 2025 ceasefire in Gaza.³¹ However, the group remains a central part of Iran’s “War Concept,” with the capability to resume ballistic missile and drone strikes against Israel and Red Sea shipping if the United States attacks Iran.²⁴ The group continues to arbitrarily detain over 70 UN and NGO personnel, using them as political leverage in their ongoing conflict with the internationally recognized government of Yemen.³¹ The U.S. military has conducted over 260 strikes against Houthi targets over the past year, degrading their long-range weapon stockpiles but failing to decimate their leadership or rank-and-file.³²

Cyber Operations and Information Warfare

The “Infy” APT and Tactical Evolution

The Iranian state-sponsored hacking group Infy (aka Prince of Persia) resumed operations this week after a hiatus that coincided with the January internet blackout.³³ This correlation provides concrete evidence that the group is state-backed and its activity is synchronized with the regime’s internal security needs.³⁴ Infy has updated its operational methods to include the use of the “Tornado” malware (version 51), which leverages Telegram bots for command-and-control (C2) and data exfiltration.³³

The group is currently exploiting a zero-day vulnerability in WinRAR (CVE-2025-8088) to deliver payloads through self-extracting archives.³³ Their targets remain “laser-focused” on individuals, likely political dissidents or foreign intelligence assets, to gather environmental data, screenshots, and system information.³⁴ The use of Telegram as a C2 method indicates a shift toward utilizing popular, encrypted platforms to hide malicious traffic among legitimate user data.³³

Soft War and Foreign Influence Operations

Iran’s “Soft War” strategy continues to focus on eroding the public morale of its adversaries. During the domestic protests, the regime’s information warfare shifted from acknowledging grievances to framing the unrest as an external conspiracy.¹⁸ This strategy extends to influence efforts targeting the West and Israel. Official and semi-official channels have circulated videos of domestic unrest in the United States, such as protests in Minneapolis, to portray the U.S. as a failing state.¹⁸ In Israel, Iranian-affiliated channels have conducted direct influence operations, including threatening SMS messages designed to instill fear of an imminent aerial attack.¹⁸ This centralized information system ensures that the regime’s narratives are amplified across multiple languages and platforms, serving as a critical tool for both domestic survival and regional deterrence.¹⁸

Conclusion and Strategic Forecast

The reporting period ending February 06, 2026, confirms that the Islamic Republic of Iran is operating under a strategy of “Calculated Defiance.” Domestically, the regime has prioritised survival through a bloodbath that has permanently fractured its relationship with the Iranian people, leading to a state of “Critical Deceleration” where the clerical elite are increasingly preparing for a post-Khamenei era through capital flight and military consolidation.⁶

Strategically, Tehran is attempting to use the Oman diplomatic track to buy time for its infrastructure hardening while utilizing asymmetric maritime provocations to deter a U.S. strike.⁸ However, the Trump administration’s decision to impose new oil sanctions immediately following the Muscat talks indicates that Washington is not prepared to offer a reprieve without comprehensive concessions on missiles and regional proxies—demands that the IRGC views as a “strategic paradox” that would lead to regime collapse.¹²

For the forthcoming period, the following trajectories are assessed:

1. Diplomatic Stalemate: The Oman talks are likely to continue as a confidence-building exercise but will fail to reach a “Grand Bargain” due to the unbridgeable gap between nuclear-exclusive and comprehensive negotiation frameworks.⁸
2. Increased Asymmetric Friction: As the “Maximum Pressure” campaign intensifies, Iran is likely to escalate its harassment of merchant shipping and its “swarming” drone provocations to raise the global cost of sanctions.⁹
3. Succession Volatility: The “Succession Paralysis” within the leadership, combined with the collapse of the rial, creates a high risk of localized civil conflict or an IRGC-led move toward a “Security Junta” if Khamenei’s health further declines.⁶

The Iranian regime is at its most vulnerable state since 1979, but it remains a lethal regional actor with a resilient nuclear breakout capacity and a sophisticated “Axis of Resistance” that can be activated to ignite a region-wide conflict at any moment.⁶

---

If you find this post useful, please share the link on Facebook, with your friends, etc. Your support is much appreciated and if you have any feedback, please email me at in**@*********ps.com. Please note that for links to other websites, we are only paid if there is an affiliate program such as Avantlink, Impact, Amazon and eBay and only if you purchase something. If you’d like to directly contribute towards our continued reporting, please visit our funding page.

---

Sources Used

1. Iran protests 2026: UK and international response – House of Commons Library, accessed February 7, 2026, https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-10462/
2. Briefing on Protests in Iran : What’s In Blue – Security Council Report, accessed February 7, 2026, https://www.securitycouncilreport.org/whatsinblue/2026/01/briefing-on-protests-in-iran.php
3. Iran Summary January 2026 | JINSA, accessed February 7, 2026, https://jinsa.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/JINSA-Iran-Summary-January-2026-3.pdf
4. 2026 Internet blackout in Iran – Wikipedia, accessed February 7, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Internet_blackout_in_Iran
5. Iran Update January 2026 – Crude Oil Peak, accessed February 7, 2026, https://crudeoilpeak.info/iran-update-january-2026
6. The Iranian Succession Crisis – Sovereign Security & Financial Forensics 2026 – Debug, accessed February 7, 2026, https://debuglies.com/2026/01/31/the-iranian-succession-crisis-sovereign-security-financial-forensics-2026/
7. Iran fears US strike may reignite protests, imperil rule, sources say – Al Arabiya, accessed February 7, 2026, https://english.alarabiya.net/News/middle-east/2026/02/02/iran-fears-us-strike-may-reignite-protests-imperil-rule-sources-say
8. Iran Demands Sanctions Relief as US Talks End in Oman with …, accessed February 7, 2026, https://www.palestinechronicle.com/iran-demands-sanctions-relief-as-us-talks-end-in-oman-with-agreement-to-continue/
9. Iranian regime escalates hostilities with US, hardens negotiating …, accessed February 7, 2026, https://www.fdd.org/analysis/2026/02/04/iranian-regime-escalates-hostilities-with-us-hardens-negotiating-position/
10. Iran deploys advanced missile at newly revealed underground site – China Daily, accessed February 7, 2026, https://www.chinadailyhk.com/article/628560
11. Treasury Sanctions Iranian Regime Officials for Violent Repression and Corruption, accessed February 7, 2026, https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0375
12. US announces new Iran oil sanctions moments after concluding …, accessed February 7, 2026, https://m.economictimes.com/news/international/business/us-announces-new-iran-oil-sanctions-moments-after-concluding-talks/articleshow/128016551.cms
13. Iran Update, February 4, 2026 | ISW, accessed February 7, 2026, https://understandingwar.org/research/middle-east/iran-update-february-4-2026/
14. After crushing protests, Iran’s supreme leader Khamenei looks to avert a US attack, accessed February 7, 2026, https://www.timesofisrael.com/after-crushing-protests-irans-supreme-leader-khamenei-looks-to-avert-a-us-attack/
15. Lawfare Daily: Iran Protests and Internet Shutdown, accessed February 7, 2026, https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/lawfare-daily–iran-protests-and-internet-shutdown
16. Why Iran’s January 2026 uprising wasn’t spontaneous |, accessed February 7, 2026, https://english.mojahedin.org/article/why-irans-january-2026-uprising-wasnt-spontaneous/
17. Day 41 of the Protests: New Domestic and International Reactions to …, accessed February 7, 2026, https://www.en-hrana.org/day-41-of-the-protests-new-domestic-and-international-reactions-to-the-protests-and-the-continued-arrests/
18. Iran’s Information Warfare During the December 2025 – January …, accessed February 7, 2026, https://ict.org.il/irans-information-warfare-during-the-december-2025-january-2026-protests/
19. Significant achievements — Yet Iran’s nuclear challenge remains unresolved, accessed February 7, 2026, https://europeanleadershipnetwork.org/commentary/significant-achievements-yet-irans-nuclear-challenge-remains-unresolved/
20. Iran Update, February 2, 2026 | ISW, accessed February 7, 2026, https://understandingwar.org/research/middle-east/iran-update-february-2-2026/
21. U.S.-Iran Oil Diplomacy: Market Impact & Price Volatility, accessed February 7, 2026, https://discoveryalert.com.au/petroleum-chessboard-iran-strategic-market-position-2026/
22. Iran Update, January 30, 2026 | ISW, accessed February 7, 2026, https://understandingwar.org/research/middle-east/iran-update-january-30-2026/
23. ‘Still lethal’: As Tehran tests US resolve, Iranian drones pose a deadly threat, experts say, accessed February 7, 2026, https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/iran-news/article-885639
24. Iran outlines plan for war against US | The Jerusalem Post, accessed February 7, 2026, https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/article-885780
25. Why Tehran sees war as a survival strategy | Iran International, accessed February 7, 2026, https://www.iranintl.com/en/202602054833
26. How Iran’s infighting consistently derails diplomacy, accessed February 7, 2026, https://www.iranintl.com/en/202602048356
27. Iran Crude Oil Production (Monthly) – Historical Data & Tre… – YCharts, accessed February 7, 2026, https://ycharts.com/indicators/iran_crude_oil_production
28. Iran Sees Record Oil Export Growth Despite Sanctions, Data Show – Blooming, accessed February 7, 2026, https://www.bloominglobal.com/media/detail/iran-sees-record-oil-export-growth-despite-sanctions-data-show
29. Iran Update, January 31, 2026 | ISW, accessed February 7, 2026, https://understandingwar.org/research/middle-east/iran-update-january-31-2026/
30. Israeli operations in Lebanon against Hezbollah: January 26–February 1, 2026, accessed February 7, 2026, https://www.longwarjournal.org/archives/2026/02/israeli-operations-in-lebanon-against-hezbollah-january-26-february-1-2026.php
31. Yemen, February 2026 Monthly Forecast – Security Council Report, accessed February 7, 2026, https://www.securitycouncilreport.org/monthly-forecast/2026-02/yemen-87.php
32. The Siege of the Red Sea | Council on Foreign Relations, accessed February 7, 2026, https://www.cfr.org/articles/siege-red-sea
33. Iranian Infy APT evolves tactics, leverages Telegram for C2, accessed February 7, 2026, https://www.scworld.com/brief/iranian-infy-apt-evolves-tactics-leverages-telegram-for-c2
34. Infy Hackers Resume Operations with New C2 Servers After Iran Internet Blackout Ends, accessed February 7, 2026, https://thehackernews.com/2026/02/infy-hackers-resume-operations-with-new.html
35. Seven things to know about the potential for resumed Iran nuclear negotiations, accessed February 7, 2026, https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/dispatches/seven-things-to-know-about-the-potential-for-resumed-iran-nuclear-negotiations/