Executive Summary

The strategic situation of the Russian Federation for the week ending January 31, 2026, is characterized by a deliberate transition from short-term military surges into a permanent state of strategic continuum, where diplomatic activity and kinetic operations are leveraged as complementary instruments of a single policy objective.¹ Following the high-profile meeting between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and U.S. President Donald Trump in Florida in late December 2025, the Kremlin has recalibrated its narrative to emphasize its own persistence against what it views as cyclical Western political maneuvers.¹ This week, Russian diplomacy has intensified its focus on the “Great Eurasian Partnership” while simultaneously managing the fallout from unprecedented geopolitical developments in the Western Hemisphere, specifically the U.S.-led intervention in Venezuela.²

On the kinetic front, the Russian military continues a grinding war of attrition in Ukraine, prioritizing incremental gains in the Donetsk and Zaporizhia sectors.⁴ Despite immense casualty rates reaching nearly 1.2 million personnel since the full-scale invasion began, the Russian command maintains a posture of “grinding down” the opposition, betting on the eventual exhaustion of Western support.⁵ A significant development this week is the Kremlin’s acknowledgement of a temporary, week-long moratorium on strikes against Ukrainian energy infrastructure in Kyiv, ostensibly at the personal request of President Trump.⁴ However, intelligence suggests this is a tactical pause designed to allow for the replenishment of missile stockpiles and to serve as a cognitive warfare tool rather than a move toward a durable ceasefire.⁶

Economically, the Federation is entering a period of significant contraction. The International Monetary Fund has slashed Russia’s 2026 growth forecast to a mere 0.8 percent, as the “sugar rush” of 2024’s military spending fades.⁸ The private sector has begun adopting “tactical poverty” measures, including wage freezes and bonus cuts, to manage the combined pressure of rising taxes, high interest rates, and a 46 percent projected decline in oil and gas receipts for January 2026.⁸ Domestically, the state has further consolidated control through a new “Digital Sovereignty Doctrine,” which moves beyond cybersecurity into a model of total digital isolation and state oversight of artificial intelligence and personal devices.¹²

Strategic Indicator	Current Metric (Jan 2026)	Historical Context (2025)	Directional Trend
GDP Growth Forecast	0.8%	1.0%	Declining 8
Value-Added Tax (VAT)	22%	20%	Increasing 11
Oil/Gas Revenue Change	-46% (Jan projection)	-24% (Annual 2025)	Sharply Declining 8
Central Bank Interest Rate	16%	21% (Peak)	Stabilizing/High 11
Conscription Target	261,000 (Year-round)	Seasonal Campaigns	Structural Shift 13

Diplomatic and Foreign Affairs Analysis

The Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA), under Sergey Lavrov, has spent the final week of January 2026 attempting to define a post-“rules-based” international order.² The primary theme in Moscow’s rhetoric is the failure of Western efforts to isolate Russia, citing the successful 80th-anniversary celebrations of Victory Day in 2025 and the expanding reach of the BRICS association as evidence of a multipolar reality.²

The Venezuela Crisis and Global Narrative Competition

The capture and removal of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by United States forces in early January 2026 has provided the Kremlin with a powerful rhetorical weapon.² Moscow has characterized this intervention as a “blatant armed intervention” and a return to the “might is right” principle of international relations.² By framing the U.S. actions in Venezuela as a violation of sovereign equality, Russia aims to consolidate its standing among Global South nations that are wary of Western interventionism. The MFA’s emphasis on “universal norms of international law” in the context of Venezuela is a calculated attempt to highlight perceived Western hypocrisy, particularly as Russia continues its own operations in Ukraine.²

Russia’s diplomatic reaction to the Venezuela crisis is not merely about solidarity with a fallen ally; it is a defensive maneuver intended to signal to other partners in the Latin American and Caribbean regions—specifically Cuba—that Moscow remains a vocal, if not physically capable, defender of their sovereignty against “external interference”.¹⁵ This narrative is further bolstered by China’s rejection of U.S. tariffs on Cuba and continued oil shipments from Mexico, suggesting a growing non-Western consensus against U.S. regional policy.¹⁵

Strategic Realignment in the Middle East: The UAE Nexus

The arrival of UAE President Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan in Moscow on January 29, 2026, marks a critical inflection point in Russia’s Middle Eastern strategy.¹⁷ The relationship has evolved into a “multi-vector power broker” dynamic, where the UAE serves as a vital economic and diplomatic conduit for the Russian state.¹⁸

Russia-UAE Economic Cooperation	Metric (Jan 2026 Data)	Strategic Significance
Annual Trade Volume	>$12 Billion	Record growth despite sanctions 19
Registered Russian Companies	~4,000	Hub for sanctions circumvention 20
Russian Capital in UAE Economy	>$30 Billion	Diversification of sovereign assets 20
EAEU-UAE Trade Status	97% Duty-Free	Facilitates non-commodity exports 20

The UAE is now recognized as Russia’s primary “economic lung,” providing the financial infrastructure necessary to bypass G7 sanctions and the Magnitsky Act.¹⁸ The “Iranian track” within this relationship is particularly notable; Moscow and Abu Dhabi are increasingly utilizing Hawala networks and cryptocurrency mixers to facilitate transactions that avoid the SWIFT messaging system, involving actors as varied as the Quds Force and the Central Bank of Russia.¹⁸ Beyond finance, the UAE has institutionalized its role as a mediator in the Ukraine conflict, facilitating high-stakes prisoner exchanges and serving as a “neutral ground” for trilateral dialogues involving the United States.¹⁸

The Sino-Russian Comprehensive Partnership

As 2026 begins, the Russia-China relationship is described by both Moscow and Beijing as having reached “unprecedented” levels of depth.² This year marks the 30th anniversary of their strategic partnership and the 25th anniversary of the Treaty of Good-Neighborliness and Friendly Cooperation.²² The military-to-military cooperation has become a cornerstone of regional stability from the Kremlin’s perspective, with defense ministers conducting regular high-level video talks to enhance strategic coordination on “core interests”.²²

Chinese President Xi Jinping’s New Year messages to President Putin emphasized a “concrete step” in the partnership, citing reciprocal visa-free policies and the steady progress of the energy corridor.²⁴ For Russia, the alignment with China is not just a secondary option to the West; it is the material base for the “Great Eurasian Partnership,” a project designed to create an “equal and indivisible security” architecture across the continent that excludes NATO influence.²

Mediation and Power Projection in the Levant and Iran

Russian diplomacy in the Levant and the Gulf is characterized by a “conservative force” approach, aiming to contain centrifugal processes and maintain the territorial integrity of established states like Syria and Iraq.¹⁷ In Syria, Russia is performing a delicate balancing act, withdrawing forces from Qamishli airport to build goodwill with the Damascus government while planning the expansion of its Hmeimim air base and Tartous naval facility.¹⁷ This move signals to the Syrian government that Russia will not be drawn into localized fighting with Kurdish forces as Damascus seeks to reassert central authority.²⁷

Regarding Iran, Russia has positioned itself as the only major power capable of mediating between Tehran and Washington.²⁸ The Comprehensive Strategic Partnership Treaty signed in January 2025 has granted Moscow significant leverage, including a proposed role in monitoring the Iranian nuclear enrichment cycle.²⁶ By advocating for the temporary removal of enriched uranium to Russian territory, Moscow seeks to prevent a military solution by the U.S. or Israel while securing its own position as an indispensable regional security actor.²⁶

Intelligence and National Security Assessment

The intelligence picture for the week ending January 31, 2026, reveals a Russian military that is structurally committed to a long-war logic, despite clear evidence of tactical stagnation and internal command friction.¹

Frontline Dynamics and Command Investigations

Russian offensive operations during this period have remained focused on the Donetsk and Zaporizhia sectors, with confirmed advances noted near Lyman and the Kostyantynivka-Druzhkivka tactical area.⁴ However, the pace of these advances remains historically slow, with troops progressing at rates as low as 15 to 70 meters per day.⁵

Combat Sector	Status/Observation	Intelligence Implication
Vovchansk Direction	Investigation into lack of progress	Potential relief of command for Northern Grouping 4
Kupyansk Sector	Exaggerated claims of success	Disconnect between Gerasimov’s reports and ground reality 4
Lyman Axis	Recent geolocated advances	Sustained pressure on Ukrainian logistics 4
Western Zaporizhia	Seizure of Lukyanivske	Attempt to widen the Orikhiv salient 4

The Russian General Staff continues to project an image of confident advancement, with Valery Gerasimov claiming significant successes near Kupyansk-Vuzlovyi.²⁹ However, field reports indicate a more complicated reality, including the presence of “forgotten” Russian units in northern Kupyansk who are reportedly being misled by their own command about terrain control to prevent their surrender.⁴ In the Vovchansk direction, the appointment of a commission to evaluate the lack of progress suggests that the Russian Northern Grouping of Forces is under significant pressure to deliver results after months of static engagement.⁴

Infrastructure Strike Moratorium as Cognitive Warfare

The reported week-long moratorium on strikes against Kyiv’s energy infrastructure is a significant tactical development with deep strategic implications.⁴ While framed by the U.S. administration as a gesture of goodwill following a personal request from President Trump, intelligence analysts view the pause as a “cognitive warfare” maneuver.⁶

The mechanism of this moratorium serves three primary Russian interests:

1. Stockpile Replenishment: The pause allows Russian forces to amass drone and missile inventories for future combined strikes, effectively resetting their operational tempo.⁶
2. Political Signaling: It portrays the Kremlin as a “reasonable” actor capable of honoring requests from the U.S. presidency, thereby driving a wedge between various Western factions regarding the necessity of continued military support.⁶
3. Strategic Denial: By limiting the moratorium to a very short duration (until February 1) and rejecting any long-term ceasefire, the Kremlin ensures it maintains the ability to use energy strikes as a coercive tool during the harshest winter months.⁴

Technological Adaptation: Molniya Drones and Starlink

The Russian military’s rapid adoption of Molniya fixed-wing FPV drones represents a critical technological shift.⁶ These low-cost systems, now being equipped with Starlink satellite terminals, are being used for “battlefield air interdiction” (BAI).⁶ By targeting vehicles on Ukrainian highways at operational depths of 25 to 100 kilometers—specifically the E-50 Pokrovsk-Pavlohrad highway—Russia is attempting to paralyze Ukrainian logistics and troop rotations far behind the immediate contact line.⁶

This technological evolution is paired with a strategic recruitment drive. The Ministry of Defense is actively recruiting for its Unmanned Systems Forces (USF) at top Russian universities, offering massive salaries of up to 5.5 million rubles per year to students.⁶ This program targets both male and female students, indicating a desperate need to professionalize the drone operator corps and move away from reliance on poorly trained volunteers.⁶

Iskander Deployments and Escalation Capability

Satellite imagery from January 2026 has confirmed the establishment of at least nine new launch sites for Iskander missile systems near the Ukrainian border and in occupied Crimea.³⁰ These locations, including Klintsy and Molykino, feature fortified shelters and camouflaged hardware positions.³⁰

Iskander Launch Site Location	Status (Jan 2026)	Strategic Purpose
Shumakovo (Kursk)	Former base, unverified activity	Proximity to Sumy axis 30
Klintsy (Bryansk)	Fortified shelters identified	Threatening northern Ukrainian corridors 30
Molykino	Extensive permanent shelters	Primary deployment hub 30
Novoselivske (Crimea)	Active launch points	Strikes against southern logistics 30

The intelligence indicates that Russia conducted approximately 492 Iskander launches in 2025, and the current buildup suggests an intention to exceed this rate in 2026.³⁰ The flexibility of the Iskander-M and Iskander-K systems, capable of carrying at least seven different missile types, provides the Kremlin with a persistent “escalation ladder” that can be used to respond to any Western shifts in security guarantees.⁶

Economic Status and Fiscal Sustainability

The Russian economy in 2026 is described by analysts as moving from a “sugar rush” into “outright stagnation”.⁹ The fiscal deficit for 2025 reached $72 billion—five times the original forecast—forcing the Kremlin into a series of unpopular and restrictive economic measures.¹¹

The Emergence of “Tactical Poverty”

In the private sector, the term “tactical poverty” has become a shorthand for the survival strategies of Russian firms.⁸ As the government prioritizes defense spending (allocating 38% of the 2026 budget to security), civilian businesses are facing a severe credit crunch and falling demand.⁸

The primary mechanisms of “tactical poverty” include:

• Wage Indexation Freezes: Companies are no longer adjusting salaries for inflation, which remains high despite Central Bank efforts.⁸
• Bonus Reductions: Performance-based pay has been slashed across most sectors to preserve liquid capital.⁸
• Delayed Public Payments: In regional budgets dependent on federal transfers, wage payments to public sector workers are increasingly being deferred.⁸

This microeconomic contraction is a direct result of the Kremlin’s decision to maintain high interest rates (16%) to combat inflation, a policy that Finance Minister Anton Siluanov has acknowledged will hinder business activity throughout 2026.¹¹

Oil Revenue Collapse and Sanctions Efficacy

The week ending January 31, 2026, marks a critical low point for Russia’s energy sector. Oil and gas revenues for January are projected to decline by 46 percent year-on-year.⁸ This follows a 24 percent drop across 2025.⁸ The decline is attributed to a combination of falling global crude prices and the increased efficacy of U.S. sanctions targeting major entities like Rosneft and Lukoil.⁸

Energy Sector Metric	2024 Actual	2025 Estimated	Jan 2026 Forecast
Annual Oil/Gas Revenue	–	8.5 – 8.7 Trillion RUB	46% YoY Decline 8
Budget Deficit (% of GDP)	–	2.6%	Increasing 8
Planned Domestic Borrowing	–	–	$70.7 Billion (2026) 11

The widening discount on Russian crude—driven by the fact that nearly 70 percent of Russian exports are now under direct sanction—has severely limited the Kremlin’s ability to refill its “war coffers”.⁸ Consequently, the government has turned to the domestic population, raising the VAT to 22 percent as of January 1, 2026, and increasing minimum prices for alcohol (vodka reaching 409 rubles per bottle) to capture additional revenue from the lower and middle classes.⁹

BRICS Payment Rails and De-dollarization

To counter financial isolation, Russia is spearheading the development of a new BRICS payment system.³¹ The “blockchain-based architecture,” modeled after the BIS mBridge initiative, aims to link the digital ruble, yuan, and rupee.³¹

The strategic objective is to create a multilateral hub where “earned currencies” can circulate freely within the bloc, avoiding the “rupee trap” where Russian exporters were left with unusable balances of Indian currency.³² While legal harmonization and technical standards remain unresolved, the successful implementation of this system would provide a permanent alternative to the dollar-centric SWIFT network, potentially neutralizing one of the West’s most potent economic weapons.³¹

Domestic Policy and Internal Stability

The Kremlin’s domestic policy in late January 2026 is focused on total information control and the institutionalization of the war effort into everyday Russian life.¹²

The Digital Sovereignty Doctrine

The new version of the Information Security Doctrine, discussed at “InfoForum-2026,” represents a move toward total digital autarky.¹² Under this doctrine, Western IT technologies—including Starlink, mobile smartphones, and email services—are classified as instruments of “destructive influence”.¹²

The state now plans to exercise oversight over the creation and operation of all digital systems and AI “at all stages”.¹² This includes:

1. Legalized Preemptive Surveillance: The state can now justify the seizure of devices and data on “information security” grounds before any crime is committed.¹²
2. IT Sector Transformation: Independent IT development is effectively ending, as all code must be overseen by commissions from the FSB or the Security Council.¹² This is expected to accelerate the “brain drain” of Russia’s most talented programmers.¹²
3. Whitelisting the Internet: By 2028, the Kremlin envisions a “white list” system where Russian citizens can only access government-approved websites, mirroring the digital isolation models of North Korea or Turkmenistan.¹²

Mobilization and Social Control

The transition to year-round conscription, which began on January 1, 2026, allows the Russian military to maintain a constant pressure on the manpower pool.¹³ The military plans to conscript 261,000 men this year through a digital system that makes ignoring a summons nearly impossible.¹³ To manage the social fallout of this continuous mobilization, the Kremlin has also scrapped annual asset declarations for officials, a move that prevents the public from seeing how the elite are profiting from the war while the general population faces VAT hikes and rising utility costs.¹³

The Role of the Hawks: Ramzan Kadyrov

Chechen leader Ramzan Kadyrov has emerged as a key signal of domestic pressure on the Kremlin.³⁴ By publicly urging Russia to reject peace talks and “fight to the finish,” Kadyrov serves to narrow the political space for any potential concessions during the high-stakes talks in the UAE.³⁴ His rhetoric reminds both the Russian public and foreign negotiators that any leader attempting to compromise faces resistance from powerful internal constituencies who frame the war as existential.⁶ Kadyrov’s stance is a calculated move to ensure that if negotiations do proceed, they do so under the shadow of a domestic demand for total victory.³⁴

Hybrid Warfare and Regional Destabilization

Russia’s “Phase Zero” operations—informational and psychological condition-setting for future conflict—have intensified across Europe in late January 2026.⁶

Baltic Vulnerabilities and Cyber Sabotage

The Latvian Constitution Protection Bureau (SAB) reported that 2025 saw an all-time high in Russian cyber threats, with Moscow now viewing Latvia through a lens “eerily reminiscent” of its attitude toward Ukraine before 2022.³⁵

Baltic Hybrid Threat Profile	Mechanism	Strategic Goal
Election Interference	Propaganda and AI-generated content	Fracturing Western unity during 2026 elections 35
Operational Technology (OT) Attacks	Targeting energy and water systems	Proving vulnerability of NATO infrastructure 35
“Phase Zero” Balloons	Airspace violations in Lithuania/Poland	Testing NATO air defense response times 6
Cognitive Warfare	Discrediting pro-EU referendums	Undermining democratic legitimacy 35

The intelligence identifies a surge in Russian preparations for cyber-attacks targeting Industrial Control Systems (ICS) across Western Europe.³⁵ The Norwegian dam incident in April 2025, where hackers manipulated water pass-through levels, is cited as a template for future Russian-linked sabotage aimed at intimidating populations that support Ukraine.³⁵

The 2026 Winter Olympics Threat Model

As the Milano Cortina Games approach, the exclusion of Russia from the global stage has removed the traditional guardrails that once protected such events.³⁸ Intelligence suggests the Kremlin views the IOC not as a sports regulator, but as a political actor within a wider geopolitical framework.³⁸

Predicted hybrid scenarios for the 2026 Games include:

• Kinetic Cyber Effects: Malware targeting power grids in the Dolomites and snow-making equipment to cause physical disruption.³⁸
• VMS Hijacking: Taking control of variable message signs on transit routes to weaponize traffic patterns and cause gridlock.³⁸
• Weaponized Transparency: Strategic “hack-and-leak” operations targeting the private emails of anti-doping officials and high-profile attendees to manufacture scandals.³⁸

Defense Diplomacy and the Sarma MLRS

In a calculated geopolitical signaling maneuver, the Kremlin and Rostec have scheduled the debut of the Sarma MLRS at the World Defense Show in Riyadh in February 2026.³⁹ The Sarma is a high-mobility, precision-guided system designed specifically for the “transparent battlefields” of the 21st century.³⁹

The debut in Saudi Arabia serves multiple Russian interests:

1. Commercial Lifeline: Capturing a portion of the $12.3 billion global MLRS market to fund the defense industrial base.³⁹
2. Sanctions Bypass: Establishing new procurement fronts that avoid SWIFT by operating on “neutral ground”.³⁹
3. Technological Signaling: Demonstrating the integration of drone swarms via encrypted mesh networks for real-time targeting, challenging current NATO hybrid response frameworks.³⁹

Conclusion and Strategic Forecast

The Russian Federation at the end of January 2026 is a state fully reoriented toward a permanent state of high-intensity competition with the West. The “strategic continuum” identified in the Florida talks suggests that the Kremlin no longer expects a quick resolution to the war, but rather a long-term grinding down of Western resolve through a combination of military attrition, economic diversification via the UAE and China, and aggressive hybrid warfare.¹

The economic stressors—specifically the 46 percent collapse in energy revenue and the emergence of “tactical poverty”—are significant but currently insufficient to force a change in the Kremlin’s fundamental strategic logic.⁸ Instead, these pressures are being managed through increased domestic repression, year-round mobilization, and the creation of a “digital iron curtain”.¹²

In the coming weeks, the most critical indicators will be:

• The Termination of the Energy Strike Moratorium: On February 1, the resumption or extension of strikes against Kyiv will signal the Kremlin’s current assessment of its relationship with the U.S. administration.⁴
• The Vovchansk Command Investigation: Any relief of commanders in the Northern Grouping will provide insight into the level of internal desperation for a battlefield breakthrough.⁴
• The Evolution of the BRICS Payment System: Any concrete progress in the digital ruble-yuan settlement infrastructure will represent a major strategic victory for Moscow’s long-term financial resilience.³¹

For the professional peer group, the analytical priority remains the distinction between Russian diplomatic “theatre” and structural strategic change. While meetings in Florida, the UAE, and Riyadh proliferate, the underlying structure of the conflict remains stubbornly fixed on Moscow’s maximalist objectives.¹

---

If you find this post useful, please share the link on Facebook, with your friends, etc. Your support is much appreciated and if you have any feedback, please email me at in**@*********ps.com. Please note that for links to other websites, we are only paid if there is an affiliate program such as Avantlink, Impact, Amazon and eBay and only if you purchase something. If you’d like to directly contribute towards our continued reporting, please visit our funding page.

---

Sources Used

1. Diplomacy Without a Breakthrough: Ukraine, Russia’s Negotiating Logic, and the Road into 2026 – Fundacja im. Kazimierza Pułaskiego, accessed January 31, 2026, https://pulaski.pl/en/negotiating-the-same-war-russias-continuum-americas-cycles-and-why-momentum-still-isnt-change/
2. Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov’s remarks and answers to media questions during a news conference on the performance of Russian diplomacy in 2025, Moscow, January 20, 2026, accessed January 31, 2026, https://mid.ru/en/maps/us/2073858/
3. Speech and answers to media questions by Sergey Lavrov, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, during a press conference on the results of Russian diplomacy in 2025, Moscow, January 20, 2026 – embassylife.ru, accessed January 31, 2026, https://embassylife.ru/en/2026/01/20/80695/
4. Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment, January 30, 2026 …, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.criticalthreats.org/analysis/russian-offensive-campaign-assessment-january-30-2026
5. Russia’s Grinding War in Ukraine – CSIS, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.csis.org/analysis/russias-grinding-war-ukraine
6. Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment, January 29, 2026 | ISW, accessed January 31, 2026, https://understandingwar.org/research/russia-ukraine/russian-offensive-campaign-assessment-january-29-2026/
7. Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment, January 29, 2026 | Critical Threats, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.criticalthreats.org/analysis/russian-offensive-campaign-assessment-january-29-2026
8. Russian Businesses Adopt ‘Tactical Poverty’ Measures, Signaling …, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.fdd.org/analysis/2026/01/23/russian-businesses-adopt-tactical-poverty-measures-signaling-growing-economic-stress/
9. Russia’s Economy in 2026: More War, Slower Growth and Higher Taxes, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2026/01/02/russias-economy-in-2026-more-war-slower-growth-and-higher-taxes-a91579
10. Russia in Review, Jan. 16–23, 2026, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.russiamatters.org/news/russia-review/russia-review-jan-16-23-2026
11. The facts show Russia’s victory in Ukraine is far from inevitable: UK statement to the OSCE, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/the-facts-show-russias-victory-in-ukraine-is-far-from-inevitable-uk-statement-to-the-osce
12. Russia’s Digital Sovereignty Doctrine: From Cybersecurity to Total …, accessed January 31, 2026, https://lansinginstitute.org/2026/01/29/russias-digital-sovereignty-doctrine-from-cybersecurity-to-total-control/
13. What’s changing in Russia in 2026? Year-round conscription, higher taxes, rising utility costs, and AI surveillance – Meduza, accessed January 31, 2026, https://meduza.io/en/slides/what-s-changing-in-russia-in-2026
14. The price of stability: What awaits Russia’s economy in 2026?, accessed January 31, 2026, https://nestcentre.org/the-price-of-stability-what-awaits-russias-economy-in-2026/
15. Weekly crude prices edge 5% higher amid geopolitical risks, US supply disruptions, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.aa.com.tr/en/energy/oil/weekly-crude-prices-edge-5-higher-amid-geopolitical-risks-us-supply-disruptions/54400
16. Official statements – The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, accessed January 31, 2026, https://mid.ru/en/press_service/spokesman/official_statement/
17. Putin Seeks to Bolster Russia–Arab Strategic Ties in Kremlin Talks – Modern Diplomacy, accessed January 31, 2026, https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2026/01/30/putin-seeks-to-bolster-russia-arab-strategic-ties-in-kremlin-talks/
18. The Russia-UAE-USA Triad and the Strategic Realignment of Middle Eastern Power Dynamics (2026) – https://debuglies.com, accessed January 31, 2026, https://debuglies.com/2026/01/29/the-russia-uae-usa-triad-and-the-strategic-realignment-of-middle-eastern-power-dynamics-2026/
19. Russia–UAE trade surpasses US$12 billion as economic partnership gains momentum, accessed January 31, 2026, https://tvbrics.com/en/news/russia-uae-trade-surpasses-us-12-billion-as-economic-partnership-gains-momentum/
20. Putin calls UAE one of Russia’s key trade partners in Arab world during Kremlin talks with Al Nahyan, accessed January 31, 2026, https://tvbrics.com/en/news/putin-calls-uae-one-of-russia-s-key-trade-partners-in-arab-world-during-kremlin-talks-with-al-nahyan/
21. Russia-China ties reach unprecedented level, says Lavrov | Algérie Presse Service, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.aps.dz/en/world/world/mko3kdzq-russia-china-ties-reach-unprecedented-level-says-lavrov
22. Military spokesperson: China to enhance strategic coordination with Russia – CGTN, accessed January 31, 2026, https://news.cgtn.com/news/2026-01-29/China-to-enhance-strategic-coordination-with-Russia-1KkxhP2Yp56/share_amp.html
23. China says to enhance strategic coordination with Russia, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.chinadailyhk.com/hk/article/628055
24. Xi leads China’s diplomacy to usher in new chapter in turbulent world – China.org.cn, accessed January 31, 2026, http://www.china.org.cn/2026-01/25/content_118298689.shtml
25. Chinese and Russian Heads of State Exchange Messages of New Year Greetings_Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/eng/xw/zyxw/202512/t20251231_11795974.html
26. № 4 (13), 2026. The Middle East: Regional Security and the Role of Russia – PIR Center, accessed January 31, 2026, https://pircenter.org/en/editions/%E2%84%96-4-13-2026-the-middle-east-regional-security-and-the-role-of-russia/
27. Putin hosts Sharaa as Kremlin eyes deal on military bases – Newspaper – DAWN.COM, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.dawn.com/news/1969630
28. Russia urges US-Iran talks, warns against use of force, accessed January 31, 2026, https://english.alarabiya.net/News/middle-east/2026/01/29/kremlin-urges-usiran-talks-warns-against-use-of-force-
29. Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment, January 27, 2026, accessed January 31, 2026, https://understandingwar.org/research/russia-ukraine/russian-offensive-campaign-assessment-january-27-2026/
30. Russia Appears to Prepare Escalation Near Ukraine. What Satellite Images Reveal, accessed January 31, 2026, https://united24media.com/latest-news/russia-appears-to-prepare-escalation-near-ukraine-what-satellite-images-reveal-15519
31. BRICS Payment Settlement: The Quest and Implications – Modern Diplomacy, accessed January 31, 2026, https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2026/01/29/brics-payment-settlement-the-quest-and-implications/
32. BRICS to Lay First Tracks for New Global Payment System – Angel One, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.angelone.in/news/global-market/brics-to-lay-first-tracks-for-new-global-payment-system
33. BRICS laying first tracks for new global payment system, accessed January 31, 2026, https://asiatimes.com/2026/01/brics-laying-first-tracks-for-new-global-payment-system/
34. Kadyrov Urges Russia to Reject Ukraine Talks and Fight to the …, accessed January 31, 2026, https://waryatv.com/2026/01/31/kadyrov-urges-russia-to-reject-ukraine-talks-and-fight-to-the-finish/
35. Latvia Faces Rising Russian Hybrid Threats In 2026 – Grand Pinnacle Tribune, accessed January 31, 2026, https://evrimagaci.org/gpt/latvia-faces-rising-russian-hybrid-threats-in-2026-525893
36. Latvia says Russia remains its top cyber threat as attacks hit record high, accessed January 31, 2026, https://therecord.media/latvia-says-russia-remains-top-cyber-threat-record-attacks
37. How Russia’s Hybrid Warfare Will Escalate in 2026 and What Europe Must Do? | GLOBSEC, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.globsec.org/what-we-do/commentaries/how-russias-hybrid-warfare-will-escalate-2026-and-what-europe-must-do
38. Understanding the Russian Cyber Threat to the 2026 Winter Olympics – Unit 42, accessed January 31, 2026, https://unit42.paloaltonetworks.com/russian-cyberthreat-2026-winter-olympics/
39. Strategic Proliferation of the Sarma MLRS and Russian Kinetic-Cyber Hybrid Operations at World Defense Show 2026 – https://debuglies.com, accessed January 31, 2026, https://debuglies.com/2026/01/30/strategic-proliferation-of-the-sarma-mlrs-and-russian-kinetic-cyber-hybrid-operations-at-world-defense-show-2026/