Analytics and Reports, Law Enforcement Analytics, Uncategorized

Innovative Strategies for Rural Law Enforcement Success

The American law enforcement landscape is frequently analyzed through a metropolitan lens, where the challenges of high population density—violent crime spikes, complex gang hierarchies, and large-scale civil unrest—dominate the national policy discourse. However, a distinct, pervasive, and equally critical crisis exists within the nation’s rural jurisdictions. These agencies, which serve approximately 97% of the United States’ landmass but only about one-fifth of the total population, operate under a fundamentally different paradigm than their urban counterparts.1 The operational reality for a deputy in a frontier county bears little resemblance to that of an officer in a major metropolitan precinct; the former is defined by isolation, resource scarcity, and an expansive geography that turns time and distance into lethal adversaries.

This comprehensive research report, prepared for law enforcement command staff, policy analysts, and municipal stakeholders, provides an exhaustive dissection of the unique operational realities of rural policing. It moves beyond the superficial “Mayberry” myth to expose the gritty, high-stakes environment where small agencies fight to maintain public safety integrity against existential threats. Through an extensive review of Department of Justice (DOJ) publications, academic literature, field reports, and expert testimony, this assessment identifies the top ten systemic challenges that disproportionately affect rural agencies. Unlike urban departments that struggle with the volume of calls, rural agencies often struggle with the capacity to answer them at all—facing threats related to staffing continuity, biological survival during critical incidents, and the inability to access the modern tools of policing due to the digital divide.

For each of the ten identified problems, three evidence-based or field-proven mitigation strategies are analyzed in depth. These strategies are not theoretical constructs; they are the scrappy, innovative, and often community-centric solutions that rural chiefs and sheriffs have employed to bridge the gap between their mandates and their resources. From the use of “shared grant writers” to professionalize funding acquisition 2, to the deployment of Starlink satellite terminals to conquer cellular dead zones 3, this report documents the evolution of rural policing from a reactive posture to a resilient, networked model.

The analysis reveals that the primary vulnerability of rural law enforcement is the lack of redundancy. In an urban center, if one officer falls or one radio fails, the system absorbs the shock. In a rural county, the loss of a single deputy or a single grant cycle can destabilize the entire public safety apparatus. Consequently, the mitigation strategies highlighted herein focus on “force multiplication”—leveraging community volunteers, regional partnerships, and dual-purpose technology to create depth in a shallow system. The report concludes that the survival of rural policing depends on abandoning the attempt to mirror urban models and instead embracing a distinct doctrine of regionalization, technological leapfrogging, and deep community integration.

Introduction: The Operational Reality of Rural Policing

To understand the problems of rural law enforcement, one must first understand the environment. “Rural” is not merely a demographic designation; it is an operational constraint. The U.S. Census Bureau defines rural areas as those with low population density, yet these areas encompass the vast majority of the nation’s territory.4 Law enforcement in these regions is characterized by small agencies—about half of all law enforcement departments in the nation employ fewer than ten officers.1 This statistic alone frames the precarious nature of rural public safety. A department with ten officers cannot field a 24/7 patrol roster with standard shift rotations without risking burnout or leaving shifts uncovered during illness or training.

The economic backdrop of rural policing is often one of declining tax bases. As industries like agriculture, mining, and forestry have mechanized or moved, rural populations have stagnated or shrunk, leaving behind older, poorer populations.1 This “hollowing out” of the rural economy means that Sheriff’s Offices and Police Departments are funded by property taxes that are stagnant at best. They cannot simply “raise taxes” to buy body cameras or hire mental health clinicians. They must innovate or fail.

Furthermore, the cultural landscape of rural policing is distinct. Officers operate in a “fishbowl,” where anonymity is impossible.1 They police the people they grew up with, the people they worship with, and the people who teach their children. This lack of professional distance creates unique stressors but also unique opportunities for community policing that urban agencies spend millions trying to replicate. However, this intimacy can also be dangerous, leading to complacency or conflicts of interest that require robust policy frameworks to manage. The following sections detail the specific manifestations of these environmental factors into ten critical problems, offering a roadmap for resilience.

Problem 1: The Tyranny of Distance and Absence of Immediate Backup

The most visceral and dangerous difference between urban and rural policing is the physical environment itself. In a major city, “backup” is a concept measured in seconds and city blocks. If an officer initiates a traffic stop that goes bad, a radio call can summon ten additional units within two minutes. In rural jurisdictions, backup is measured in miles and minutes—often tens of miles and thirty to forty-five minutes. Officers in these areas routinely respond to high-risk calls—domestic violence in progress, armed subjects, or active shooters—completely alone.4

This isolation creates a unique psychological and tactical pressure cooker known as the “security dimension” of rural policing.1 The officer is acutely aware of their vulnerability. Every interaction has higher stakes because the “cavalry” is not coming. The “distance from assistance” is not merely a tactical inconvenience; it is a lethal variable. Data indicates that while overall crime rates may be lower in rural areas, the lethality of assaults on officers can be higher due to the inability to quickly mobilize tactical support or advanced medical care.5 An officer shot in a remote county may bleed out before a medevac helicopter can land, whereas an urban officer would be in a Level 1 Trauma Center within minutes.

Furthermore, the lack of cover—both physical (buildings) and human (other officers)—forces rural deputies to rely heavily on verbal de-escalation and command presence. They often lack the non-lethal tools (like 40mm launchers or tasers, if budgets are tight) or the overwhelming force options available to city police. This reality forces a different style of policing, one where the officer must de-escalate not just as a matter of policy, but as a matter of survival.

Mitigation Strategy 1.1: Volunteer and Reserve Force Multiplication

To bridge the dangerous gap between a lone deputy and necessary backup, successful rural agencies have aggressively expanded Reserve Deputy and Auxiliary programs. Unlike urban reserves who may primarily handle traffic control at parades or administrative tasks, rural reserve deputies are frequently fully sworn, POST-certified officers who volunteer their time to patrol alongside full-time staff.6 This is a critical distinction: these are not civilians in vests; they are trained law enforcement officers who provide a “second gun” in the car or a second unit on the road at zero labor cost to the agency.

Case Study & Implementation:

In East Baton Rouge Parish, which comprises significant rural sectors, the reserve deputy program has become a cornerstone of operational capacity. Reserve deputies contribute over 15,000 volunteer hours annually. If the agency were to pay full-time salaries for these hours, the cost would exceed $500,000 per year.6 These reserves are initially trained through a special part-time academy that meets state certification standards, ensuring they have the same legal authority and tactical competency as paid staff.

For a rural sheriff, the strategy involves recruiting local citizens—often former military, retired police, or community-minded professionals—and investing in their training. Once certified, they are mandated to work a minimum number of hours per month (e.g., 20 hours). Smart agencies schedule these volunteers during peak risk times, such as Friday and Saturday nights, to ensure that every patrol car is double-crewed. This effectively eliminates the “solo officer” risk during the most volatile shifts. The presence of a partner allows for contact/cover tactics that are standard in cities but rare in rural areas, significantly increasing officer safety.

Mitigation Strategy 1.2: Cross-Jurisdictional Take-Home Vehicle Policies

In urban environments, a take-home car is viewed primarily as a perk or a retention incentive. In rural policing, it is a fundamental deployment strategy. When an officer is off-duty but located 30 miles from the station, requiring them to drive their personal vehicle to headquarters to pick up a cruiser during an emergency (like an active shooter or a natural disaster) is tactically unsound and wastes critical time.

Operational Impact:

Agencies like the Sylva Police Department have recognized that take-home vehicles allow officers to respond directly to scenes from their residences, effectively turning every officer’s driveway into a satellite precinct.7 By updating policies to allow officers living in adjacent counties or within a specific radius (e.g., 30-40 minutes) to keep vehicles, departments drastically cut response times for emergency call-outs.

This strategy has a secondary mitigation effect: deterrence. The visibility of a marked police cruiser parked in a remote neighborhood or driving along rural backroads during a commute acts as a signal of police presence in areas that might rarely see a patrol car otherwise. This expands the “omnipresence” of the force without additional payroll hours. Furthermore, as noted in retention surveys, the take-home car is a massive financial incentive for officers, effectively increasing their disposable income by eliminating commuting costs, which aids in retaining staff in lower-paying rural jobs.8

Mitigation Strategy 1.3: Enhanced Tactical Training and “Buster” Technology

Recognizing that backup is likely unavailable, rural interdiction teams and patrol units have adopted technologies and tactics that allow for safer solo operations. If an officer stops a vehicle suspected of drug trafficking on a lonely stretch of interstate, they cannot wait 45 minutes for a K-9 unit or a search team. They need tools that allow them to validate suspicion quickly and safely.

Tactical Adaptation:

The Ohio State Highway Patrol and other rural interdiction units utilize density meters, such as the “Buster” contraband detector, to quickly scan vehicles for hidden compartments.10 This handheld technology allows a single officer to detect anomalies in tires, gas tanks, or door panels without physically dismantling the vehicle on the roadside, which leaves the officer vulnerable to traffic and ambush.

Tactically, training must shift from “team-based” entry tactics taught in standard academies to “single-officer response” methodologies. This includes specific training on utilizing the vehicle as cover, managing standoff distance, and “slowing down” engagements to buy time for distant backup to arrive. The use of K-9 units is also a critical force multiplier in this context; a dog can clear a building, track a fugitive in the woods, or control a suspect in ways that a solo officer cannot, providing a psychological deterrent that protects the handler when physical numbers are not on their side.10

Summary of Mitigation Impact: Officer Safety

StrategyPrimary BenefitSecondary Benefit
Reserve Deputy ProgramImmediate physical backup; 2-officer unitsSignificant budget savings; community engagement
Take-Home VehiclesDrastically reduced response times for call-outsIncreased police visibility; officer retention/morale
Solo-Officer Tech (K9/Buster)Safer independent operation; force multiplicationHigher contraband seizure rates; psychological deterrence

Problem 2: The Recruitment and Retention Crisis in “Flyover” Country

While the recruitment crisis is a national phenomenon, it is existential in rural America. Urban agencies may struggle to fill academy classes, but rural agencies struggle to field a single patrol shift. Small departments often serve as involuntary “farm teams” or “stepping stones” for larger agencies.11 A rural department will invest thousands of dollars and months of time vetting, hiring, and training a recruit, only to have them poached by a state police agency or a wealthy suburban department offering significantly higher pay, better benefits, and more specialized career paths within two years.11

The “fishbowl” effect further complicates retention. In a small town, an officer is never truly off duty. They arrest people they went to high school with; they see the people they ticketed at the grocery store; they are constantly scrutinized by their neighbors. This lack of anonymity leads to burnout and stress that urban officers, who can retreat to the suburbs after a shift, do not experience to the same degree.1 Combined with lower tax bases that restrict salary competitiveness, rural chiefs are in a constant cycle of hiring and losing personnel, which degrades institutional knowledge and community trust.

Mitigation Strategy 2.1: “Grow Your Own” and Local Cadet Pipelines

Successful rural agencies have stopped trying to compete for the generic pool of applicants who chase the highest bidder. Instead, they have shifted to cultivating local talent who have deep geographic and familial ties to the community. This is the “Grow Your Own” strategy.12

Implementation Mechanics:

This strategy involves identifying potential officers in local high schools or community colleges—individuals who want to stay in their hometown for lifestyle or family reasons—and creating a funded pathway for them. Programs like the Tennessee “Grow Your Own” initiative, though originally for educators, serve as the model here: agencies sponsor local candidates through the police academy in exchange for a multi-year service commitment.

By targeting individuals with deep community roots (family, land ownership, spouse’s employment), the agency reduces the likelihood of the officer leaving for a higher salary in a city three hours away. The officer’s “social capital” in the community becomes a retention asset.14 They are not just working for a paycheck; they are working for their neighbors. This creates a stable core of officers who are less transient than those recruited from outside the region.

Mitigation Strategy 2.2: Housing Incentives and “Officer Next Door” Programs

Since rural agencies often cannot compete on salary, they must compete on cost of living and lifestyle. Federal and local programs like HUD’s “Officer Next Door” (OND) allow officers to purchase homes at a 50% discount in designated revitalization areas.15 While often associated with urban blight, these zones frequently exist in rural areas and small towns struggling with economic downturns.

Strategic Value:

Rural agencies leverage this by working with local land banks, USDA Rural Development loans, or municipal housing authorities to offer housing assistance packages. If a Deputy can buy a home for half price, their lower salary goes significantly further, effectively equalizing their purchasing power with higher-paid urban officers. This ties the officer to the jurisdiction financially and physically. Some towns take this further by offering free plots of land or heavily subsidized rentals to officers who agree to live within the town limits. This ensures the officer is invested in the community’s long-term safety and provides the agency with resident officers who are available for rapid recall.16

Mitigation Strategy 2.3: Quality of Life and Non-Monetary Benefits

Agencies that cannot offer high pay are retaining officers by offering what urban departments cannot: freedom, autonomy, and work-life balance. Surveys of officers indicate that modern recruits increasingly prioritize stability, mental health, and lifestyle over raw salary.17

Policy Innovations:

Rural chiefs are aggressive in offering “lifestyle perks.” This includes flexible scheduling (e.g., 4 days on, 3 days off, or week-on/week-off models) that allows officers to pursue hobbies like hunting and fishing, which are major draws for rural living. Additionally, agencies are relaxing rigid paramilitary standards that do not impact performance, such as allowing beards or visible tattoos.8 The “selling point” becomes the culture: a department where the Chief knows your name, where you have the discretion to handle cases from start to finish, and where you are not just a cog in a bureaucratic machine. This human-centric approach counters the burnout associated with the high-volume, impersonal nature of urban policing.18

Problem 3: The Mental Health Desert and Crisis Response

Rural law enforcement officers are frequently the only mental health responders in their jurisdictions. Unlike cities with dedicated psychiatric emergency teams, plentiful hospital beds, and non-profit support networks, rural counties often lack basic mental health infrastructure. There are vast “mental health deserts” where no psychiatrists or crisis centers exist.19

When a rural citizen experiences a psychotic break, the deputy is often the first, last, and only line of response. This leads to a high rate of “criminalization of mental illness,” where individuals are arrested simply because there is nowhere else to take them to ensure their safety.20 Furthermore, the transport time to a facility that can accept a mental health hold might be several hours away, taking the county’s only deputy out of service for an entire shift to transport one patient. This creates a dangerous gap in public safety coverage for the rest of the county.

Mitigation Strategy 3.1: Telehealth and Virtual Crisis Care (VCC)

Because attracting mental health professionals to live and work in rural areas is difficult, agencies are bringing the professionals to the scene virtually. The “Virtual Crisis Care” (VCC) model equips deputies with tablets connected to behavioral health professionals via telehealth platforms.21

Operational Workflow:

When a deputy encounters a person in crisis, rather than immediately arresting them or transporting them to an ER, they can hand the tablet to the individual. A remote clinician conducts an immediate assessment via video. This strategy, used effectively in rural South Dakota and other regions, allows for real-time de-escalation and clinical evaluation.21 In many cases, the clinician can develop a safety plan that allows the person to stay home, or verify that they do not meet the criteria for involuntary commitment. This avoids the multi-hour transport to a hospital, keeps the deputy in their patrol sector, and provides the patient with specialized care that the officer is not trained to give.

Mitigation Strategy 3.2: Regional Mobile Crisis Teams and Co-Responder Models

While urban “co-responder” teams often have a clinician riding in the passenger seat of a patrol car, rural agencies have adapted this by using “mobile crisis teams” that cover multi-county regions. Instead of one clinician per department, which is financially unfeasible, a regional health authority provides a team that responds to calls across several jurisdictions.23

Shared Resource Model:

For example, the New River Valley Crisis Intervention Team covers four rural counties and one small city, pooling resources to ensure coverage.23 When a call comes in, the nearest available clinician is dispatched. Additionally, agencies are training officers in Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) protocols not just as a specialty, but as a baseline requirement. In a small agency, you cannot wait for the “CIT officer” to arrive; every officer must be the CIT officer. This “generalist” approach is necessary when specialized units are geographically impossible.

Mitigation Strategy 3.3: Mandatory Mental Health Check-Ins and Wellness Programs

The stigma of seeking mental health help is often amplified in the “tough-it-out” culture of rural communities. To combat this, and to catch issues before they result in officer suicide or misconduct, rural agencies are moving toward mandatory mental wellness visits.

Removing the Stigma:

As noted by Dr. Coghlan and Dr. Schlosser, these visits must be completely de-conflicted from fitness-for-duty assessments.24 By making the visit mandatory for everyone, from the Chief down to the rookie, the agency removes the suspicion that an officer is “broken” if they are seen going to the psychologist. These visits are confidential and non-evaluative. They serve to normalize the conversation around mental health. In Connecticut, policies have been developed to ensure that these check-ins are standard practice, helping officers process the unique trauma of policing in communities where they likely know the victims personally.25

Problem 4: Limited Specialized Units and Forensic Capabilities

Urban departments have Homicide divisions, Cyber Crime units, SWAT teams, Bomb Squads, and CSI labs. A rural sheriff’s office often has “the detective”—a single individual responsible for investigating everything from a stolen tractor to a complex triple homicide or a child sexual abuse case. The lack of specialization means that complex investigations can stall due to a lack of technical expertise or manpower.4

Small agencies lack the budget for high-end forensic equipment (like rapid DNA testers or advanced ballistics analysis) and the personnel to run them. When a major crime occurs, they are dependent on state bureaus of investigation, which may prioritize urban cases or have long backlogs. This delays justice and can allow offenders to remain free in the community, potentially committing further crimes.

Mitigation Strategy 4.1: Regional Task Forces and Multi-Jurisdictional Teams

The most proven solution is the formalization of regional task forces. By pooling personnel, five small counties can create one high-functioning drug task force or major crimes unit. This “force multiplier” effect allows an agency to contribute one officer but gain the resources of a ten-officer team.27

Case Example:

The Southern Armstrong Regional Police Department in Pennsylvania is a prime example of this evolution. It was formed by merging resources from multiple small municipalities, allowing them to provide better coverage and specialized services that none could afford alone.28 These regional bodies often have higher success rates in competing for federal grants than individual small towns because they serve a larger population and demonstrate regional cooperation. The task force model allows for the cultivation of subject matter experts (e.g., one deputy specializes in digital forensics, another in interviewing) that are shared across the region.

Mitigation Strategy 4.2: Contracting and Shared Services Agreements

Instead of trying to build a SWAT team or a full detective bureau, many rural villages contract these services from the county sheriff or a larger neighboring jurisdiction. This “pay-for-play” or inter-local agreement model allows a small town to maintain its local patrol identity and community connection while having access to “big city” resources during critical incidents.29

Structural Efficiency:

The Village of Milford, Michigan, successfully entered into a service agreement with a township to address staffing, effectively sharing the cost of police services.29 This can extend to sharing a detective, an evidence technician, or even a chief of police in some “circuit rider” models. It allows for the professionalization of services without the massive overhead of maintaining a full specialized division. This ensures that citizens in small towns receive the same level of investigative expertise as those in larger cities, without the tax burden of a large department.

Mitigation Strategy 4.3: Leveraging State and Federal Partnerships (Force Multiplication)

Smart rural agencies aggressively deputize their officers as federal Task Force Officers (TFOs) with agencies like the DEA, FBI, or US Marshals. While this takes the officer out of the county occasionally to work on federal cases, it gives the local agency access to federal databases, surveillance equipment, vehicles, and overtime funding that they could never afford independently.27

Additionally, rural agencies are utilizing the “Internet of Things” and remote forensic support. Instead of building a local crime lab, they use secure portals to upload digital evidence to Regional Computer Forensic Labs (RCFLs). They rely on state labs for physical evidence but maintain strict “triage” protocols to ensure only the most critical evidence is sent, preventing backlogs. This integration with federal power structures allows a 5-man department to project the investigative power of the Department of Justice when necessary.

Problem 5: The Digital Divide and Technology Gaps

While urban police monitor real-time crime centers (RTCCs) and utilize predictive policing algorithms, rural officers often patrol areas with zero cellular service. The “digital divide” is a literal public safety hazard. Without connectivity, mobile data terminals (MDTs) become expensive paperweights. Officers cannot run license plates, check for warrants, or file reports from the field, forcing them to rely on congested radio channels or return to the station to do basic tasks.30

Furthermore, the cost of enterprise technology—body-worn cameras (BWCs), cloud storage, and Record Management Systems (RMS)—scales poorly for small agencies. A server infrastructure that costs $50,000 serves 5 officers just as well as 50, but the cost per officer is astronomical for the rural agency, making modern tech financially out of reach.31

To conquer the dead zones where cellular towers are economically unviable for carriers to build, progressive rural agencies are bypassing terrestrial infrastructure entirely. The adoption of Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite internet, specifically Starlink, has been a paradigm shift. Agencies are installing Starlink terminals on mobile command posts and patrol vehicles to ensure high-speed data access in the most remote canyons and forests.3

Infrastructure Leapfrogging:

Simultaneously, the migration to FirstNet (the federal public safety broadband network) has provided rural agencies with “Band 14” spectrum that pushes farther into rural geography than commercial signals. In Ford County, Kansas, FirstNet provided connectivity in deep canyons where commercial signals failed, allowing for reliable communication for the first time.33 This connectivity is not just about convenience; it allows for the use of cloud-based dispatch and real-time mapping, which are essential for officer safety.

Mitigation Strategy 5.2: Shared/Hosted Record Management Systems (RMS)

Small agencies are abandoning on-premise servers for cloud-based, shared RMS platforms. By joining a “consortium” RMS hosted by the county or state, a small town with 5 officers gets access to the same data sharing and analytics capabilities as a large metro department.20

Data Intelligence:

This shared approach not only saves money on hardware but facilitates Intelligence-Led Policing (ILP). If a burglar hits three small towns in one night, the shared RMS flags the trend immediately across jurisdictions, whereas isolated paper logs would hide the pattern. The Pennsylvania “Five Category” cost-sharing method helps regional departments equitably distribute the costs of these systems, ensuring that small agencies pay a fair share based on usage rather than a flat fee they cannot afford.34 This democratizes data analytics.

Mitigation Strategy 5.3: Low-Cost/Open Source Intelligence (OSINT) Tools

Instead of buying million-dollar software suites for crime analysis, rural analysts (often a secondary duty for a patrol sergeant) utilize off-the-shelf and open-source tools. Google Earth and simple spreadsheets are used to map crime hotspots manually.35

Community as Sensor Network:

Social media has become the “poor man’s detective” in rural areas. Rural agencies have found immense success using community engagement on Facebook not just for PR, but for solving crimes. Because the community is tight-knit, posting a blurry surveillance photo of a truck often yields a suspect name within minutes. This “crowdsourced investigations” approach leverages the inherent nosiness of small-town neighbors as a forensic tool.36 It transforms the community into a massive sensor network that fills the gaps left by a lack of license plate readers (LPRs) or citywide camera grids.

Problem 6: The School Safety Dilemma in Remote Areas

School shootings in rural areas (like Uvalde, Red Lake, or Nickel Mines) present a terrifying tactical problem: the “golden hour” for response is often 30-45 minutes. A rural school might be 20 miles from the nearest deputy. If an active shooter strikes, the “wait for SWAT” doctrine is a death sentence. The assailant has unlimited time to act before law enforcement can intervene.

Rural schools often lack the hardened infrastructure (fences, secure vestibules, metal detectors) of urban schools due to budget constraints and a culture of community openness. The challenge is hardening these soft targets without turning the community school into a prison, all while knowing help is far away.37

Mitigation Strategy 6.1: The “Guardian” and Armed Staff Programs

Controversial but increasingly common, rural districts are adopting “Guardian” programs where select, anonymous staff members are trained and armed to defend the school until police arrive. In states like Texas and Florida, these programs are specifically designed for districts where police response times exceed 10-15 minutes.38

Implementation Standards:

The key to the success and safety of these programs is rigorous training standards. These are not simply teachers with concealed carry permits; they undergo psychological screening and tactical training often run by the local Sheriff’s Office. This creates an immediate, on-site armed response capability that bridges the temporal gap between the first shot and the arrival of the first deputy.38 It effectively places a covert security force inside the school at a fraction of the cost of hiring full-time School Resource Officers (SROs) for every campus.

Mitigation Strategy 6.2: Panic Button Apps and Direct-to-Officer Notification

Technology like “Hero911,” “Raptor Alert,” or “CatapultEMS” bypasses the traditional dispatch bottleneck. When a teacher presses a panic button on their phone, the alert does not just go to a 911 dispatcher who then radios a car; it alerts every on-duty and off-duty officer in the vicinity via their own smartphones.40

Crowdsourcing Response:

This is crucial in rural areas where an off-duty state trooper, game warden, or neighboring town officer might be physically closer to the school than the on-duty county deputy. It leverages the “whole community” of law enforcement. Legislative pushes like Alyssa’s Law have driven the adoption of these silent panic alarms, ensuring that the notification is instant, silent, and location-specific.42 This technology reduces notification latency to near zero.

Mitigation Strategy 6.3: Digital Mapping and Collaborative Response Graphics (CRGs)

Rural deputies often do not know the layout of every school in the county, and mutual aid responders from other counties certainly do not. To solve this, agencies are using Collaborative Response Graphics (CRGs). These are simple, gridded overlays of school floor plans—derived from military special operations “gridded reference graphics”—available on officers’ phones.43

Tactical Clarity:

When an incident occurs, a deputy from a neighboring town can look at the CRG and know exactly where “Hallway C, Room 204” is, rather than wandering blindly. This technology standardizes the “language” of location across different agencies (police, fire, EMS) that might respond to a mass casualty event in a remote area.45 It eliminates confusion during the chaotic initial phase of a response, allowing officers to move directly to the threat or the injured.

Problem 7: Agricultural and Wildlife Crime

Urban police deal with bodega robberies and street muggings; rural police deal with cattle theft, timber theft, and the theft of expensive GPS-guided farm machinery. “Ag crime” is high-value and low-risk for criminals because the “crime scene” is often a 500-acre pasture with no witnesses and no surveillance.46

Additionally, rural areas are plagued by wildlife crime (poaching), which is often tied to organized criminal networks. The victims (farmers and ranchers) operate on thin margins, so the theft of a $100,000 tractor or a herd of cattle can bankrupt a family business, devastating the local economy. This requires a specialized set of investigative skills that standard police academies do not teach.

Mitigation Strategy 7.1: “Smart Water” and Forensic Marking

To combat equipment theft, rural agencies are promoting the use of “Smart Water” and other forensic marking technologies. This involves a liquid containing a unique forensic code (a chemical fingerprint) that is invisible to the naked eye but glows under UV light.47

Deterrence through Traceability:

Farmers spray this on their equipment, tools, and even livestock. If the property is stolen and recovered across state lines, police can swab it, identify the owner immediately, and prove the theft. It acts as a massive deterrent because criminals know the property is “radioactive” with evidence that is hard to remove. Signage warning of Smart Water use is often enough to deter theft from a barn or field.47

Mitigation Strategy 7.2: Drone Surveillance and Aerial Patrol

Patrolling 1,000 square miles of farmland is impossible for a patrol car. It is trivial for a drone. Rural agencies are deploying thermal-equipped drones to patrol large tracts of land at night, looking for poachers or thieves.48

Force Multiplication in Terrain:

In places like Ohio, drones monitor traffic and remote corridors. Farmers themselves are using drones to check herds, and agencies are integrating this private surveillance into their investigations. A drone can clear a cornfield or a dense wooded area in 5 minutes; a deputy on foot would take hours and be at significant tactical disadvantage. This technology allows rural agencies to project power over vast, inaccessible terrain.

Mitigation Strategy 7.3: Specialized Ag-Crimes Units and Brand Inspectors

States like Texas, Oklahoma, and Colorado utilize “Special Rangers” or Ag-Crimes units—sworn officers who are also experts in livestock branding, agricultural law, and animal husbandry. These officers know how to read cattle brands, track livestock movement manifests, and identify stolen farm machinery.46

Subject Matter Expertise:

By having a specialized officer who speaks the language of the farming community, the agency builds immense trust. These units often run “Owner Applied Number” (OAN) programs, encouraging farmers to stamp equipment with traceable numbers. This creates a database that makes fencing stolen goods much harder and aids in the recovery of property.47 These units bridge the gap between the agricultural community and the criminal justice system.

Problem 8: The Opioid/Methamphetamine Crisis and Lack of Treatment Infrastructure

Rural America has been the epicenter of the opioid and methamphetamine epidemics. The rate of overdose deaths in rural counties often outpaces urban ones. The problem is compounded by a total lack of treatment infrastructure—detox centers, rehab facilities, or methadone clinics are often non-existent or located hours away.50

Rural police are not just arresting users; they are acting as emergency medical providers, reviving them with Narcan repeatedly. The cycle of arrest-release-overdose is faster in rural areas because the jail (often small and overcrowded) cannot hold low-level offenders, and there is no treatment center to divert them to.

Mitigation Strategy 8.1: Quick Response Teams (QRT) / Deflection

Originating in Colerain Township, Ohio, the Quick Response Team (QRT) model has become the gold standard for rural overdose response. This model pairs a police officer, a paramedic, and a peer recovery coach (often a civilian in recovery). They visit overdose survivors at their homes 3-5 days after the event to offer help, not handcuffs.50

Proactive Intervention:

This “deflection” strategy is proven to reduce repeat overdoses. In Huntington, West Virginia, QRTs contributed to a significant decline in overdose calls. The key to rural success is the “warm handoff”—the team drives the person directly to a treatment provider (even if it’s two counties away) immediately upon acceptance of help, rather than just giving them a phone number. This overcomes the transportation barrier that prevents many rural addicts from seeking care.51

Mitigation Strategy 8.2: Harm Reduction Vending Machines

In a radical shift from “Zero Tolerance” philosophies, some rural agencies have embraced harm reduction to keep their citizens alive. For example, the Saranac Lake Police Department in New York installed a “Harm Reduction Vending Machine” in their station lobby. This machine dispenses free Narcan, fentanyl test strips, and xylazine test strips 24/7, with no questions asked and no interaction required.53

De-stigmatization:

This strategy acknowledges the reality that users will not stop overnight. By providing the tools to prevent fatal overdoses, the police buy time for the person to eventually seek recovery. Placing it in the police lobby de-stigmatizes the help and builds a bridge to the population most at risk, signaling that the police prioritize saving lives over making arrests.

Mitigation Strategy 8.3: Law Enforcement Assisted Diversion (LEAD)

The LEAD program gives officers the discretionary authority to divert low-level drug offenders and sex workers to case managers instead of booking them into jail. In rural Colorado, LEAD pilot programs showed that social referrals (housing, food, treatment) were effective in reducing recidivism.55

Building the Safety Net:

In this model, officers act as gatekeepers to social services. For this to work in rural areas, agencies often have to “build” the service network from scratch, partnering with churches, food pantries, and non-profits to fill the gaps left by the absence of state social services. The success of LEAD in rural areas relies on the “community policing” ethos where the officer knows the offender personally and can leverage that relationship to encourage diversion.

Problem 9: Prisoner Transport and Jail Capacity

In a geographically large county, the logistics of arresting a suspect are a nightmare. The county jail might be 60 miles from the arrest scene. A deputy making a simple misdemeanor arrest effectively takes themselves out of service for 2-3 hours to transport the prisoner, book them, and return to their sector.57 This leaves the rest of the county unpatrolled.

Furthermore, many rural jails are aging, small, and lack the capacity to segregate populations (men/women, violent/non-violent, mental health crisis). This leads to overcrowding and massive liability issues. The “transport burden” eats up a significant percentage of rural patrol time and fuel budgets.

Mitigation Strategy 9.1: Civilian Prisoner Transport Officers

To keep sworn deputies on the street doing police work, agencies are hiring civilian Transport Officers. These are non-sworn (or limited commission) employees whose sole job is to drive the secure van.58

Efficiency Model:

When a deputy makes an arrest, they call the transport van. The civilian officer meets them at the scene or a halfway point, takes custody of the prisoner, and drives them to the jail. The deputy stays in their sector and returns to patrol immediately. This is a cost-effective force multiplier, as a civilian driver costs significantly less than a sworn deputy and requires less training, while maximizing the operational uptime of the highly trained sworn staff.

Mitigation Strategy 9.2: Regional Jails and Video Arraignment

Instead of every impoverished county trying to maintain a crumbling 19th-century jail, rural counties are regionalizing. One modern “Regional Jail” serves 3-4 counties. While this increases transport distance, it drastically lowers liability, staffing costs, and facility maintenance overhead.57

Virtual Justice:

To mitigate the increased driving time to these regional centers, facilities utilize Video Arraignment heavily. Judges sit in their local courthouses, and prisoners stay in the regional jail, appearing via Zoom or Cisco secure links. This eliminates the dangerous and time-consuming process of shuffling prisoners back and forth for 5-minute hearings, keeping officers and transport vans off the road.57

Mitigation Strategy 9.3: Field Release and Citation in Lieu of Arrest

Agencies are expanding the use of “cite and release” for non-violent misdemeanors that used to require physical booking. Technology plays a key role here—fingerprint scanners in patrol cars (mobile biometrics) allow officers to positively identify a subject, check for warrants, and issue a court date on the roadside without ever driving to the jail.17

Policy Shift:

This keeps the officer in the fight. It requires a cultural shift away from “the ride” as the primary punishment, focusing instead on the most efficient way to process the offense. It reserves expensive jail beds and transport hours for violent offenders who pose an immediate threat to the community.

Problem 10: Grant Writing and Funding Expertise

Urban departments have dedicated grant writing teams and civilian finance directors. Rural chiefs often write federal grant applications at their kitchen tables after working a 12-hour patrol shift. The federal grant system is complex, bureaucratic, and favors agencies that have the data and sophisticated language to prove “need”.27

Because rural crime numbers are low (even if rates are high), rural agencies often fail to qualify for grants designed for “high crime areas.” They lack the administrative capacity to manage the reporting requirements of federal funds, leaving millions of dollars in available funding on the table.

Mitigation Strategy 10.1: Shared Grant Writers

Towns and counties are innovating by hiring a single “Shared Grant Writer” who serves the municipality, the school district, and the police department simultaneously. Alternatively, multiple small police departments in a region chip in to hire one professional writer to serve them all.2

Return on Investment:

In Waupaca, Wisconsin, a shared grant writer position generated over $11 million in value for the community. This professionalizes the process, ensuring that narratives are compelling, data is presented correctly, and deadlines are met. It turns the grant process from a crushing administrative burden into a reliable revenue stream for equipment and training.

Mitigation Strategy 10.2: Regional Planning Commissions and Councils of Government (COGs)

Rural agencies are leaning on regional Councils of Government (COGs) to manage grants on their behalf. The COG acts as the administrative umbrella, applying for a large block of funding (e.g., for a regional radio system or body armor) and then distributing the goods to the member agencies.63

Administrative Shield:

This relieves the local chief of the administrative burden of federal reporting (Single Audits, SAM.gov registration maintenance, quarterly reports). The COG handles the paperwork; the chief gets the equipment. This is particularly effective for technology upgrades like digital mapping or interoperable radio systems that benefit the entire region.

Mitigation Strategy 10.3: Targeting “Rural-Specific” Funding Streams

Instead of competing with the NYPD or LAPD for generic DOJ grants, smart rural agencies are targeting USDA Rural Development grants, which are designed specifically for rural infrastructure. Police cars, stations, and radios often qualify as “essential community facilities” under USDA guidelines.64

Diversifying Revenue:

Agencies are also tapping into non-traditional sources like opioid settlement funds and private foundations focused on rural health. By reframing public safety needs as “community health” or “economic development” needs, they access pools of money that urban police agencies generally do not touch. This requires a strategic shift in how the agency defines its mission to potential funders.

Conclusion

The challenges facing rural law enforcement are not merely “scaled down” versions of urban problems; they are distinct structural vulnerabilities rooted in geography, demographics, and economics. The “tyranny of distance” dictates tactics, while the “fishbowl effect” dictates personnel management. The data confirms that while rural areas may seem idyllic, the law enforcement environment is fraught with higher fatality risks for officers and significant gaps in service for citizens.

The mitigation strategies highlighted in this report share a common thread: resourcefulness through regionalization and community integration. Rural agencies cannot survive in isolation. They succeed by blurring the lines—between civilian and sworn duties (Reserve Deputies), between neighboring county jurisdictions (Regional Task Forces), and between public safety and public health (QRTs). The “home guard” of reserves, the shared grant writer, the regional jail, and the multi-county crisis team are all manifestations of a survival strategy that prioritizes cooperation over territory.

For the rural police executive, the path forward lies in abandoning the attempt to mirror the urban policing model, which relies on density and volume. Instead, the most resilient rural agencies are those that embrace their specific reality, leveraging the intimacy of the small town and the flexibility of the rural officer to create a safety net that is distinct, efficient, and deeply embedded in the community it serves.

Appendix: Methodology

Research Design and Scope

This report was developed through a comprehensive synthesis of high-quality primary and secondary sources focused on American law enforcement. The objective was to isolate variables specifically correlated with “rural” or “non-metropolitan” policing contexts, filtering out generalized policing challenges that affect all agencies equally.

Data Sources

The analysis utilized a deep research process to process a wide array of documents, including:

  • Federal Government Reports: Publications from the Department of Justice (DOJ), Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS), National Institute of Justice (NIJ), and Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA).
  • Academic Literature: Peer-reviewed studies on rural criminology, officer safety, and police administration.
  • Industry White Papers: Reports from the International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP), Police Executive Research Forum (PERF), and specialized rural advocacy groups.
  • Field Reports: Case studies and “grey literature” documenting specific agency successes (e.g., outcomes of the LEAD program in Colorado, QRTs in West Virginia).

Analytical Framework

The “Top 10” problems were selected based on frequency of citation in the literature and severity of impact. Mitigation strategies were selected based on evidence of implementation; theoretical solutions were discarded in favor of tactics currently in use by identifiable agencies.

Source Verification

All claims regarding specific programs (e.g., FirstNet deployment, Starlink usage, specific grant outcomes) are cited using the provided source identifiers to ensure traceability to the raw research material.

If you find this post useful, please share the link on Facebook, with your friends, etc. Your support is much appreciated and if you have any feedback, please email me at in**@*********ps.com. Please note that for links to other websites, we are only paid if there is an affiliate program such as Avantlink, Impact, Amazon and eBay and only if you purchase something. If you’d like to directly contribute towards our continued reporting, please visit our funding page.

Sources Used

  1. REACHING RURAL POLICE: CHALLENGES, IMPLICATIONS, AND APPLICATIONS, accessed November 22, 2025, https://www.crisisjournal.org/api/v1/articles/36378-reaching-rural-police-challenges-implications-and-applications.pdf
  2. 2025 Summit Speakers – Wisconsin Rural Partners, accessed November 22, 2025, https://www.wiruralpartners.org/2025-Speakers
  3. Starlink in emergency Services: Always-On connectivity when it matters most, accessed November 22, 2025, https://www.clarus-networks.com/2025/09/02/starlink-in-emergency-services-always-on-connectivity-when-it-matters-most/
  4. Issues in Policing Rural Areas: A Review of the Literature. – ICJIA | Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority, accessed November 22, 2025, https://icjia.illinois.gov/researchhub/articles/issues-in-policing-rural-areas-a-review-of-the-literature
  5. The problem of ‘distance from assistance’: How a lack of backup and medical care impacts rural LEOs – Police1, accessed November 22, 2025, https://www.police1.com/rural-law-enforcement/articles/the-problem-of-distance-from-assistance-how-a-lack-of-backup-and-medical-care-impacts-rural-leos-lQVQAXKjPPpjH9T2/
  6. SafeBR Safety Assessment and Analysis by Baton Rouge Business Report – Issuu, accessed November 22, 2025, https://issuu.com/batonrougebusinessreport/docs/21cp_solutions–assessment_and_analysis_regarding_
  7. Sylva extends take-home vehicle policy for police – Issuu, accessed November 22, 2025, https://issuu.com/smokymountain/docs/smn_09_28_22/s/17011159
  8. (434) 455-3970 Addendum for RFP Pol – Lynchburg, VA, accessed November 22, 2025, https://www.lynchburgva.gov/DocumentCenter/View/1982
  9. Staffing Challenges in Small Law Enforcement Agencies – FDLE, accessed November 22, 2025, https://www.fdle.state.fl.us/getContentAsset/da4b8ca9-01a2-4fed-9c1d-64380c93fb33/73aabf56-e6e5-4330-95a3-5f2a270a1d2b/Vieno-Michael-paper.pdf?language=en
  10. Police Antidrug Tactics – Office of Justice Programs, accessed November 22, 2025, https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/Digitization/161233NCJRS.pdf
  11. 8 issues that keep rural police chiefs awake at night – Police1, accessed November 22, 2025, https://www.police1.com/rural-law-enforcement/articles/8-issues-that-keep-rural-police-chiefs-awake-at-night-okhIrlHggy6AItSf/
  12. Hiring for the 21st Century Law Enforcement Officer: Challenges, Opportunities, and Strategies for Success, accessed November 22, 2025, https://www.policeforum.org/assets/Hiring21stCentury.pdf
  13. LMU Student Dion Dykes Shares Grow Your Own Experience with VIPs, accessed November 22, 2025, https://www.lmunet.edu/news/2022/10/dykes_gyo
  14. Law Enforcement Recruitment, Why It Matters, and Key Management Decisions, Part Two – DigitalCommons@Cedarville, accessed November 22, 2025, https://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1372&context=history_and_government_publications
  15. “Reaching the Dream” Initiative – HUD User Archives, accessed November 22, 2025, https://archives.huduser.gov/periodicals/researchworks/pdf/ResearchWorks_Mar05.pdf
  16. HUD Resumes Sales of Discounted Homes to Officers and Teachers, accessed November 22, 2025, https://archives.hud.gov/news/2001/pr01-073.cfm
  17. PERF survey shows police staffing increased slightly in 2024 but still lower than 2019, accessed November 22, 2025, https://www.policeforum.org/trending5jul25
  18. Equal stress, unequal support: Rural officers speak out in ‘What Cops Want in 2024’ survey, accessed November 22, 2025, https://www.police1.com/what-cops-want/equal-stress-unequal-support-rural-officers-speak-out-in-what-cops-want-in-2024-survey
  19. Mental Health Training: Strategies for Small and Rural Law Enforcement Agencies – Bureau of Justice Assistance, accessed November 22, 2025, https://bja.ojp.gov/doc/mental-health-training-strategies.pdf
  20. Small & Rural Agency Crisis Response – National Policing Institute, accessed November 22, 2025, https://www.policinginstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Small-and-Rural-Agency-Crisis-Response_2022.pdf
  21. Virtual Partnership Addressing Mental Health Crises: Mixed Methods Study of a Coresponder Program in Rural Law Enforcement – NIH, accessed November 22, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10131937/
  22. Addressing Four OSW Pillars in Smaller and Rural Communities – Agency Portal, accessed November 22, 2025, https://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter/content.ashx/cops-p427-pub.pdf
  23. Crisis Response Systems Model – RHIhub Mental Health Toolkit, accessed November 22, 2025, https://www.ruralhealthinfo.org/toolkits/mental-health/2/access/crisis-response
  24. Mandatory Mental Health Visits – COPS Office – Department of Justice, accessed November 22, 2025, https://cops.usdoj.gov/html/dispatch/03-2023/mental_health_visits.html
  25. Department of Justice Report on Best Practices to Address Law Enforcement Officer Wellness, accessed November 22, 2025, https://www.justice.gov/d9/2023-05/Sec.%204%28a%29%20-Report%20on%20Best%20Practices%20to%20Advance%20Officer%20Wellness_FINAL.pdf
  26. Revised-91721-Final-Mental-Health-Wellness-Checks-Final-GN2011.docx – CT.gov, accessed November 22, 2025, https://portal.ct.gov/-/media/POST/GENERAL_NOTICES/2020/Revised-91721-Final-Mental-Health-Wellness-Checks-Final-GN2011.docx
  27. Conversations with Rural Law Enforcement Leaders … – Agency Portal, accessed November 22, 2025, https://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter/content.ashx/cops-w0892-pub.pdf
  28. As PA police departments regionalize, questions arise about gains, losses, accessed November 22, 2025, https://www.cityandstatepa.com/policy/2025/03/pa-police-departments-regionalize-questions-arise-about-gains-losses/404167/
  29. Shared services, stronger communities: The future of rural police departments – Police1, accessed November 22, 2025, https://www.police1.com/rural-law-enforcement/shared-services-stronger-communities-the-future-of-rural-police-departments
  30. Technology in Rural Criminal Justice Systems (Chapter 67) – The Encyclopedia of Rural Crime – Cambridge University Press & Assessment, accessed November 22, 2025, https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/encyclopedia-of-rural-crime/technology-in-rural-criminal-justice-systems/66106838564F0699080A3D88D9E044DA
  31. Research on the Impact of Technology on Policing Strategy in the 21st Century, Final Report – Office of Justice Programs, accessed November 22, 2025, https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/251140.pdf
  32. Connectivity you can count on: How T-Priority keeps first responders mission-ready – Police1, accessed November 22, 2025, https://www.police1.com/police-products/communications/connectivity-you-can-count-on-how-t-priority-keeps-first-responders-mission-ready
  33. Ford County Fire & EMS, Ford County Sheriff Customer Stories – FirstNet, accessed November 22, 2025, https://www.firstnet.com/content/dam/firstnet/case-studies/case-study-ford-county-fire-ems-sheriff.pdf
  34. Regional Police Study – Freedom Township, accessed November 22, 2025, http://www.freedomtownship.us/getmedia/6978eaae-6bfb-44fd-ba1a-0243ff2bfeda/Police-Study.pdf
  35. Department of Justice Announces Two New Publications Focused on the Needs of Rural Law Enforcement, accessed November 22, 2025, https://cops.usdoj.gov/pressrelease/department-justice-announces-two-new-publications-focused-needs-rural-law-enforcement
  36. Addresses the Challenges in Rural Policing – Zencity, accessed November 22, 2025, https://zencity.io/rural-policing-how-community-engagement-addresses-unique-challenges/
  37. Unpacking Arming Teachers Laws | Everytown Research & Policy, accessed November 22, 2025, https://everytownresearch.org/report/unpacking-arming-teachers-laws/
  38. The Guardian Plan – Active Shooter Events – SFA ScholarWorks, accessed November 22, 2025, https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1026&context=slr
  39. Rural Texas schools consider arming teachers in wake of Uvalde shooting – Fox News, accessed November 22, 2025, https://www.foxnews.com/us/texas-school-increase-police-arm-teachers
  40. SchoolGuard Active Shooter App & Mobile Panic Button With 60k Officers – Guard911, accessed November 22, 2025, https://guard911.com/services/schoolguard/
  41. Silent Panic Alert System for Schools | Raptor Technologies®, accessed November 22, 2025, https://raptortech.com/raptor-alert/
  42. School Safety: Alyssa’s Law & Alertus 911 Connect, accessed November 22, 2025, https://www.alertus.com/blog/school-safety-alyssas-law-911-connect
  43. Critical Response Group WhitePaper – Indiana Association of Chiefs of Police, accessed November 22, 2025, https://www.iacop.org/assets/docs/CRG_WhitePaper_FINAL_1-19-17.pdf
  44. Critical Incident Mapping™ Solutions for Schools – Critical Response Group, accessed November 22, 2025, https://www.crgplans.com/education/
  45. Law Enforcement – Critical Response Group, accessed November 22, 2025, https://www.crgplans.com/law-enforcement/
  46. Rural Crime and Rural Policing – National Institute of Justice, accessed November 22, 2025, https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles/rcrp.pdf
  47. CDQAP Ruminations: Preventing Rural Crime on Your Dairy, accessed November 22, 2025, https://cdqap.org/ruminations/cdqap-ruminations-preventing-rural-crime-on-your-dairy/
  48. An Examination of Livestock and Wildlife crimes in Agricultural areas of the UK. Dorothea Alice Brabner Delpech A thesis present – UCL Discovery, accessed November 22, 2025, https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/10093134/1/Dorothea%20Delpech%20-%20PhD%20Thesis%20Corrections%2010.03.2020%20E-Deposit.pdf
  49. Report Creating Smart Communities | A Guide for State Policymakers, accessed November 22, 2025, https://www.ncsl.org/energy/creating-smart-communities-a-guide-for-state-policymakers
  50. Quick Response Teams: Interdisciplinary Overdose Response and Prevention, accessed November 22, 2025, https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/quick-response-teams-interdisciplinary-overdose-response-and
  51. Full article: Evaluation of Quick Response Team: A Community Based Model to Provide Personalized Services for Individuals with Opioid Use Disorder – Taylor & Francis Online, accessed November 22, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10826084.2025.2567451?src=
  52. Quick Response Teams: Lessons Learned from a Review of Ohio’s Naloxone Plus Programs – JPHMP Direct, accessed November 22, 2025, https://jphmpdirect.com/quick-response-teams-lessons-learned-from-a-review-of-ohios-naloxone-plus-programs/
  53. MATTERS’ First Harm Reduction Vending Machine is LIVE, accessed November 22, 2025, https://mattersnetwork.org/harm-reduction-vending-machine-live-1023/
  54. First Narcan vending machine in state, outside of New York City, installed in Saranac Lake, accessed November 22, 2025, https://www.wamc.org/news/2023-10-24/first-narcan-vending-machine-in-state-outside-of-new-york-city-installed-in-saranac-lake
  55. Frederick LEAD Program Drives Dramatic Reductions in Calls for Service, accessed November 22, 2025, https://www.cityoffrederickmd.gov/CivicAlerts.aspx?AID=7769
  56. Colorado Law Enforcement Assisted Diversion (LEAD) Pilot Programs: Final Evaluation Report – Behavioral Health Administration, accessed November 22, 2025, https://bha.colorado.gov/sites/bha/files/documents/Colorado%20Law%20Enforcement%20Assisted%20Diversion%20%28LEAD%29%20Pilot%20Programs-%20Final%20Evaluation%20Report%20_PDF%20version.pdf
  57. Analysis of Establishing a Regional Jail Facility for Offenders with Mental Health or Co-Occurring Mental and Chemical Dependency Disorders – the Washington State Legislature, accessed November 22, 2025, https://leg.wa.gov/jlarc/AuditAndStudyReports/Documents/06-2.pdf
  58. $17-$50/hr Prisoner Transportation Jobs (NOW HIRING) Nov 25 – ZipRecruiter, accessed November 22, 2025, https://www.ziprecruiter.com/Jobs/Prisoner-Transportation
  59. Inmate Transport For Court Appearances & More | Oneida County Sheriff’s Office, accessed November 22, 2025, https://sheriff.oneidacountyny.gov/divisions/corrections/transport/
  60. staffing and operational plan of the metropolitan detention center – LA City Clerk – City of Los Angeles, accessed November 22, 2025, https://cityclerk.lacity.org/onlinedocs/2010/10-1046_RPT_BPC_06-14-10.pdf
  61. 1999 Web Amendments – Virginia State Budget, accessed November 22, 2025, https://budget.lis.virginia.gov/get/amendmentpdf/2784/
  62. special meeting – sturgis city commission thursday, january 4, 2007 conference room, accessed November 22, 2025, https://www.sturgismi.gov/Archive.aspx?ADID=168
  63. States Looking at Digital Maps to Keep Schools Safe – GovTech, accessed November 22, 2025, https://www.govtech.com/em/preparedness/states-looking-at-digital-maps-to-keep-schools-safe
  64. HB2072 Recommendations Regarding the Establishment of a Virginia “Good Neighbor Next Door” Program – Reports to the General Assembly, accessed November 22, 2025, https://rga.lis.virginia.gov/Published/2022/RD429/PDF