Section 1: Strategic Overview of Patrol-Level Technology Gaps and Officer Priorities

Executive Briefing

This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the top 25 high-technology capabilities and resources desired by United States-based patrol officers to enhance their effectiveness, efficiency, and safety. Based on a rigorous open-source intelligence methodology, the findings reveal a widespread and urgent demand for advanced technology, which officers view not as a luxury but as a mission-critical enabler for modern policing. The central conclusion of this assessment is the existence of a significant divergence in technological priorities between officers operating in metropolitan versus rural environments. This dichotomy is not merely a matter of preference but is dictated by the fundamentally different operational landscapes they face. For urban officers, technology is a tool to manage complexity, data overload, and high-density threats. For rural officers, technology is a lifeline to overcome geographic isolation, resource scarcity, and delayed backup. Understanding this distinction is paramount for developing effective national-level policy, procurement strategies, and grant allocation to address the most critical capability gaps facing American law enforcement at the patrol level.

The Core Tension

The analysis of officer discourse across professional forums and social media platforms reveals a core tension that defines the technological needs of modern patrol operations. Metropolitan officers consistently seek tools that can help them filter signal from noise in dense, data-rich environments. Their needs are oriented toward large-scale data integration, real-time intelligence analysis, and capabilities to counter technologically sophisticated urban crime.¹ They are inundated with information and require technology to process it effectively.

Conversely, rural officers confront the “tyranny of distance”.³ Their primary technological needs revolve around fundamental connectivity, situational awareness, and force multiplication. Where an urban officer may need AI to analyze city-wide camera feeds, a rural deputy needs a radio that works reliably across hundreds of square miles of varied terrain and a mobile computer that prevents a two-hour round trip to the station to run a license plate.⁵ Their challenge is not an excess of data, but a deficit of resources and an abundance of isolation.

Key Strategic Finding

The strategic implication of this analysis is that technology serves a different fundamental purpose in these two environments. For rural law enforcement, specific technologies—most notably reliable communications, mobile data terminals, and aerial surveillance drones—function as essential “force multipliers.” They directly compensate for limited personnel, vast patrol areas, and the inherent danger of working alone with backup potentially an hour or more away.⁴ In this context, technology is a direct substitute for manpower and a critical safety buffer.

For metropolitan agencies, technology is an indispensable tool for executing intelligence-led and predictive policing strategies in complex urban settings.² Capabilities like gunshot detection, integrated video surveillance networks, and automated license plate reader (ALPR) systems are not merely enhancements but foundational components of a proactive public safety posture. They enable agencies to move from a reactive to a preemptive model, a strategic necessity in areas with high crime rates and population density. A one-size-fits-all approach to technology procurement and policy will fail to address these divergent, yet equally critical, operational imperatives.

Section 2: Summary of Ranked Capabilities

The following table summarizes the 25 most desired high-technology capabilities for patrol officers, ranked according to their Patrol Technology Demand Index (PTDI) score.

Table 1: Patrol Technology Demand Index (PTDI) – Top 25 Ranked Capabilities

Rank	Capability/Resource	Primary Driver	Metropolitan Priority	Rural Priority	Key Provisioning Challenge
1	Reliable, Interoperable Communication Systems	Officer Safety	High	High	High Cost of Infrastructure
2	High-Quality Body Armor & Exterior Vests	Officer Safety	High	High	Budgetary Constraints for Replacement
3	Ruggedized In-Car Computers / MDTs	Efficiency/Safety	High	High	High Unit Cost / Poor Quality of Alternatives
4	Advanced Less-Lethal Options (e.g., TASERs)	Officer Safety	High	High	Cost of Devices and Consumables
5	Patrol Drones / Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS)	Force Multiplier	High	High	Cost, Training, and FAA Regulations
6	Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs)	Investigative	High	Medium	Cost, Data Policy, Privacy Concerns
7	Advanced BWC & In-Car Camera Systems	Investigative	High	High	Cost of Data Storage and Management
8	Gunshot Detection Technology	Efficiency/Safety	High	Low	High Subscription Cost
9	Night Vision & Thermal Imaging Optics	Officer Safety	High	High	High Unit Cost for Patrol Issuance
10	Armored Patrol Vehicles	Officer Safety	High	Medium	High Per-Vehicle Cost
11	Integrated Records Management Systems (RMS) / CAD	Efficiency	High	High	Cost and Complexity of System Migration
12	AI-Powered Crime Analysis/Predictive Policing	Investigative	High	Low	Cost, Data Requirements, Bias Concerns
13	Mobile Digital Forensics Tools	Investigative	High	Medium	Cost, Training, Legal Complexity
14	Officer Wellness & Ergonomic Gear	Officer Safety	High	High	Budgetary Prioritization
15	High-Lumen Weapon-Mounted Lights	Officer Safety	High	High	Lack of Universal Department Issuance
16	Patrol Rifles (AR-15/M4 Platform)	Officer Safety	High	High	Cost of Universal Issuance and Training
17	Resilient GPS & Navigation Systems	Efficiency/Safety	Medium	High	Lack of Non-GPS Dependent Options
18	“See-Through-Wall” Surveillance	Officer Safety	Medium	Low	Extreme Cost and Limited Availability
19	Rapid DNA Field Testing	Investigative	High	Medium	Cost, Legal/Policy Framework
20	Facial Recognition Technology	Investigative	High	Low	Privacy Concerns and Legal Restrictions
21	Cybersecurity Defense for Agency IT	Efficiency	High	High	Lack of Specialized Staff and Budget
22	Advanced Training Simulators (VR/AR)	Officer Safety	High	Medium	Cost and Lack of Local Accessibility
23	Mobile Reporting Tools (Voice-to-Text)	Efficiency	Medium	High	Lack of Integration with RMS Platforms
24	Patrol-Level Robotics	Officer Safety	Medium	Medium	High Unit Cost and Training
25	Biometric Field Identification Systems	Investigative	High	Medium	Cost and Network Reliability

Click on the following to download an Excel file copy of the above table.

Section 3: The National Perspective: Top 25 High-Technology Capabilities for Patrol Operations

The following section details the 25 most desired high-technology capabilities for patrol officers, ranked according to their Patrol Technology Demand Index (PTDI) score. Each entry provides a description of the technology, an analysis of the rationale behind officer demand, an assessment of the current provisioning gap, and representative officer commentary.

1. Reliable, Interoperable Communication Systems

• Capability Description: Digital, multi-band radio systems that provide clear, consistent voice and data transmission across expansive and varied geographic terrains, including urban canyons and remote rural areas. Critically, this includes the capability for seamless interoperability, allowing officers from one agency to communicate directly with units from neighboring jurisdictions, as well as with other first responders like fire departments and EMS.
• Officer Rationale & Discourse Analysis: This capability is the bedrock of officer safety and effective tactical response. The analysis of officer discourse reveals profound frustration and safety concerns stemming from inadequate radio systems. One officer lamented having “a portable radio that worked for more than 60% of the time and provides clear transmissions”.⁸ In rural settings, where backup can be geographically distant, a radio failure is a life-threatening event.⁴ In metropolitan areas, the inability to communicate with mutual aid units during a large-scale critical incident (e.g., active shooter, civil unrest) represents a catastrophic system failure. The demand is driven almost exclusively by
  Officer Safety.
• Current Provisioning Gap Assessment: The gap is significant and widespread, particularly affecting smaller and rural agencies. While larger metropolitan departments have often invested in modern P25-compliant systems, many smaller agencies are still using aging VHF or UHF analog systems with known dead zones.⁹ The primary barriers are the immense cost of infrastructure upgrades (towers, repeaters) and the political and technical challenges of achieving true regional interoperability across dozens of independent agencies.
• Representative Officer Commentary (Anonymized): “A portable radio that worked for more than 60% of the time and provides clear transmissions. Ugh.”.⁸

2. High-Quality, Department-Issued Body Armor & Exterior Vest Carriers

• Capability Description: Modern, lightweight, NIJ-rated ballistic-resistant body armor. This category also includes a strong demand for exterior vest carriers (load-bearing vests), which allow officers to move essential equipment (magazines, radio, TASER, etc.) from their duty belt to the vest, distributing the weight more ergonomically.
• Officer Rationale & Discourse Analysis: The demand for body armor is a fundamental Officer Safety issue. The fact that officers in any US agency report not being issued this basic piece of protective equipment represents a critical and alarming provisioning gap.⁸ The desire for exterior vests is driven by both long-term wellness and immediate operational comfort. Officers cite the need to “save my back” from career-ending injuries caused by overloaded duty belts and the practical benefit of being able to “cool off once in a 12-hour shift” in hot climates by temporarily unzipping the carrier.⁸
• Current Provisioning Gap Assessment: While most medium-to-large agencies issue body armor, the gap persists in smaller, underfunded departments. The cost of vests and their mandatory replacement every five years is a significant budgetary challenge. Exterior vest carriers are gaining popularity but are still not standard issue in many agencies, often due to traditional uniform appearance standards or cost. Federal grant programs have helped, but have not closed the gap entirely.
• Representative Officer Commentary (Anonymized): “Body armor. Seriously. They still haven’t provided any.” ⁸; “Exterior Vest because of the heat… would be nice to cool off once in a 12-hour shift”.⁸

3. Ruggedized In-Car Computers / Mobile Data Terminals (MDTs)

• Capability Description: Durable, vehicle-mounted laptops or tablets specifically designed to withstand the temperature extremes, vibrations, and rough handling inherent in patrol operations. These systems provide reliable, in-field access to Computer-Aided Dispatch (CAD), Records Management Systems (RMS), and critical state and federal databases (NCIC, N-DEx).
• Officer Rationale & Discourse Analysis: MDTs are a cornerstone of both Operational Efficiency and Officer Safety. Access to real-time information—such as a subject’s warrant status, criminal history, or a vehicle’s stolen status—before making an approach is a critical safety function. In rural areas, the MDT is a lifeline, eliminating the need for long drives back to the station to file reports or access information.⁵ Officer discourse shows immense frustration with agencies that provide cheap, consumer-grade laptops that fail frequently, contrasting them with the desired standard of purpose-built devices like Panasonic Toughbooks.¹⁰
• Current Provisioning Gap Assessment: The gap is one of quality more than complete absence. Many agencies have MDTs, but underfunded departments often opt for less durable, non-ruggedized models that have high failure rates, leading to significant downtime and officer frustration.¹⁰ The Department of Justice has identified in-car computer systems as a funding priority for rural agencies, acknowledging this persistent gap.⁹
• Representative Officer Commentary (Anonymized): “My dept is cheap though, so.. we got Lenovo laptops that have broke so often it isn’t funny… Really, toughbooks are the way to go”.¹⁰

4. Advanced Less-Lethal Options

• Capability Description: A wider and more effective array of less-lethal technologies to de-escalate violent encounters without resorting to firearms. This includes next-generation Conducted Energy Weapons (CEWs) like the TASER, as well as other tools such as high-effectiveness impact munitions (e.g., RCB batons) and emerging technologies.
• Officer Rationale & Discourse Analysis: The demand is driven by a dual desire for Officer Safety and for achieving better public interaction outcomes. Officers view tools like the TASER as “the best option to have in a variety of situations”.⁸ There is a clear call for more and better tools to fill the gap between verbal commands and lethal force. This is strongly echoed at the command level, with PERF surveys showing significant interest in federal investment for the research and development of new less-lethal technologies.¹¹
• Current Provisioning Gap Assessment: While TASERs are now common, they are not universally issued to every patrol officer, often due to cost of the device and recurring cartridge expenses. Furthermore, there is a perception that the innovation in this space has been slow, and officers are seeking a new generation of tools that are more effective against a wider range of subjects. The gap is not just in issuance, but in the variety and reliability of the options available.
• Representative Officer Commentary (Anonymized): “TASER, it simply is the best option to have in a variety of situations.”.⁸

5. Patrol Drones / Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS)

• Capability Description: Small, rapidly deployable drones, often with thermal imaging capabilities, for use by patrol officers in day-to-day situations. Applications include searching for missing persons in large areas, maintaining overwatch on a critical incident scene (e.g., a barricaded subject) before SWAT arrives, and documenting large-scale accident or crime scenes.
• Officer Rationale & Discourse Analysis: Drones are seen as a massive force multiplier that enhances both Officer Safety and Operational Efficiency. They provide an immediate aerial perspective that was previously only available via expensive helicopter units, if at all.¹³ For rural agencies, a drone can search a square mile of woods for a lost child far faster than officers on foot. For urban agencies, it can provide critical intelligence on a suspect’s location without exposing officers to gunfire.¹⁴ This is a high-priority technology at both the patrol and command levels.¹⁵
• Current Provisioning Gap Assessment: The adoption of drones is growing rapidly but is far from universal. Key barriers include cost (especially for thermal-capable models), FAA regulations, training and certification requirements for pilots, and public privacy concerns. Many agencies have a drone program, but the devices are often held by specialized units (SWAT, CSI) rather than being available for immediate deployment by patrol.¹³
• Representative Officer Commentary (Anonymized): “If it was financially feasible, I think every patrol officer should have one.”.¹⁴

6. Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs)

• Capability Description: Mobile or fixed camera systems that automatically capture and cross-reference license plate numbers against law enforcement databases (e.g., “hot lists” of stolen vehicles, wanted persons, AMBER alerts).
• Officer Rationale & Discourse Analysis: ALPRs are a powerful tool for Investigative Effectiveness and proactive policing. They automate the tedious and often unsafe process of manually running plates, allowing a single patrol car to check thousands of vehicles per shift.¹⁶ This technology transforms routine patrol into a continuous intelligence-gathering operation, generating leads and recovering stolen property with high efficiency.
• Current Provisioning Gap Assessment: ALPRs are widely used in major metropolitan areas but are less common in smaller and rural departments due to cost and a lower return on investment in low-traffic environments.¹⁷ Data sharing and retention policies are also significant challenges, with public debate over privacy concerns impacting deployment.¹⁸

7. Advanced In-Car and Body-Worn Camera (BWC) Systems

• Capability Description: High-definition video recording systems for both the vehicle (dashcam) and the officer’s person. Advanced features include automatic activation (e.g., when the patrol car’s emergency lights are turned on), pre-event recording buffers, and integration with cloud-based evidence management platforms that can use AI for redaction and analysis.
• Officer Rationale & Discourse Analysis: The primary driver from the patrol perspective is Investigative Effectiveness and personal protection from false complaints. Officers want a “personal video recorder… for evidentiary purposes” and to have an objective record of events.⁸ While often framed as a public accountability tool, officers see high-quality video as a way to accurately document evidence, capture confessions, and defend their actions during use-of-force reviews. In rural areas, the BWC is often the
  only impartial witness to an encounter.¹⁹
• Current Provisioning Gap Assessment: BWC adoption has accelerated dramatically due to federal funding and public demand.²⁰ However, significant challenges remain. The cost of video storage and data management is a massive, ongoing financial burden for agencies.²¹ Furthermore, many agencies are using older systems that lack advanced features, and policies around footage access and release are still highly contentious.²²

8. Gunshot Detection Technology

• Capability Description: A network of acoustic sensors deployed in a specific geographic area (typically a high-crime urban neighborhood) that can detect, verify, and pinpoint the location of gunfire in real-time, automatically alerting the police department.
• Officer Rationale & Discourse Analysis: This technology is primarily desired for Operational Efficiency and Officer Safety in high-crime urban areas. It allows for a much faster police response to shootings, which are often not reported to 911 for several minutes, if at all. This speed can lead to locating victims more quickly, apprehending suspects, and collecting evidence. PERF surveys indicate strong interest from chiefs in jurisdictions with high rates of gun violence.¹¹
• Current Provisioning Gap Assessment: This is an expensive, subscription-based service, which limits its deployment almost exclusively to larger, well-funded metropolitan agencies covering specific high-crime districts.²³ The cost makes it largely inaccessible for smaller and rural departments, where its utility would also be lower due to the dispersed nature of incidents.

9. Night Vision and Thermal Imaging Optics

• Capability Description: Handheld or weapon-mounted optical devices that allow officers to see in low-light or no-light conditions. Night vision (image intensification) amplifies ambient light, while thermal imaging detects heat signatures.
• Officer Rationale & Discourse Analysis: This is a critical Officer Safety and Investigative Effectiveness capability. These tools allow officers to search for a hidden suspect in a dark building, locate a missing person in a field at night, or identify a recently discarded weapon by its heat signature. The demand is high and direct, with officers simply stating they want “Night Vision glasses” or a “Thermal imaging camera”.⁸
• Current Provisioning Gap Assessment: High-quality thermal and night vision devices are expensive. While commonly issued to specialized units like SWAT and K9, they are rarely available to the average patrol officer. The gap is significant at the patrol level, leaving officers to rely on flashlights in many dangerous, low-light situations.

10. Armored Patrol Vehicles

• Capability Description: Standard patrol vehicles (e.g., sedans, SUVs) that are factory-equipped or retrofitted with ballistic panels in the doors and bullet-resistant glass, providing officers with a higher level of protection against gunfire.
• Officer Rationale & Discourse Analysis: The demand is driven purely by Officer Safety. With the increasing prevalence of rifle threats, officers recognize that a standard vehicle door offers no ballistic protection. The rationale is simple and stark: “Armored patrol cars since most of the time we use them for cover”.⁸ Officers desire a mobile form of cover that can protect them during traffic stops that turn violent or when responding to active shooter events.
• Current Provisioning Gap Assessment: While many agencies have large, armored rescue vehicles (e.g., MRAPs) for SWAT, the provision of ballistically protected patrol cars is still relatively rare. The additional cost per vehicle is a major barrier for most departments, creating a significant gap between the perceived threat and the level of protection provided.

11. Integrated Records Management Systems (RMS) & CAD

• Capability Description: A centralized digital platform that seamlessly integrates Computer-Aided Dispatch (CAD) data with the agency’s Records Management System (RMS). A modern, integrated system allows for efficient data entry, powerful searching across all agency records (incident reports, field interviews, citations), and data sharing with neighboring jurisdictions.
• Officer Rationale & Discourse Analysis: This is a foundational tool for Operational Efficiency and Investigative Effectiveness. Officers desire an RMS that is fast, intuitive, and allows them to “quickly find historical information about a location, person, or event”.¹¹ Clunky, outdated, and non-integrated systems create massive administrative burdens, keeping officers at their desks writing reports instead of on patrol.
• Current Provisioning Gap Assessment: Many agencies, especially smaller ones, are hampered by legacy RMS platforms that are decades old, difficult to use, and exist as information silos.⁵ The cost and complexity of migrating to a new, modern RMS is one of the largest technology challenges an agency can undertake, creating a major gap between needed and existing capabilities.¹¹

12. AI-Powered Crime Analysis & Predictive Policing Tools

• Capability Description: Software that uses artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms to analyze vast amounts of historical crime data (CAD logs, arrest records, etc.) to identify patterns, link cases, and forecast potential crime hotspots.⁷ This technology can act as a “force multiplier” for detectives and crime analysts.⁵
• Officer Rationale & Discourse Analysis: The demand is primarily from an Investigative Effectiveness standpoint. Patrol officers and detectives see this as a way to make sense of overwhelming amounts of data and generate actionable leads. For example, an AI system might suggest a link between burglaries in different precincts based on a common M.O. that a human analyst might miss.⁵
• Current Provisioning Gap Assessment: This is an emerging technology, primarily adopted by large, technologically advanced metropolitan departments (like the LAPD) with the data volume and analytical staff to support it.⁷ The technology is largely aspirational for the vast majority of small and mid-sized agencies due to cost, complexity, and concerns about potential algorithmic bias.⁷

13. Mobile Digital Forensics Tools

• Capability Description: Portable devices and software that allow patrol officers or detectives in the field to perform initial, triage-level forensic examinations of digital devices like smartphones. This can involve quickly extracting key data (e.g., recent calls, GPS locations) with proper legal authority.
• Officer Rationale & Discourse Analysis: This capability is about Investigative Effectiveness and speed. In a fast-moving investigation (e.g., a kidnapping), the ability to extract critical information from a suspect’s or victim’s phone immediately, rather than waiting days or weeks for a digital forensics lab to process it, can be the difference in solving the case.¹
• Current Provisioning Gap Assessment: This is a highly specialized and legally sensitive capability. While some detectives may have access to these tools, they are almost never in the hands of patrol officers. The gap is significant, as most agencies have a deep backlog in their digital forensics labs, creating long delays in investigations.²⁴

14. Officer Wellness & Ergonomic Gear

• Capability Description: Technology and equipment designed to mitigate the long-term physical and mental strain of policing. This includes ergonomic equipment like load-bearing vests and duty belt suspenders, as well as emerging technologies like biometric sensors to monitor stress and fatigue.
• Officer Rationale & Discourse Analysis: The driver is Officer Safety and long-term wellness. Officers recognize that chronic injuries and stress are a major threat to their careers. The desire for “hidden suspenders for my duty belt, to save my back” reflects a deep concern that “Injured backs kill more careers than bullets or crashes”.⁸ This is complemented by command-level interest in “officer wellness systems”.¹¹
• Current Provisioning Gap Assessment: The focus on wellness technology is a relatively new but growing trend. While ergonomic gear is becoming more common, advanced biometric monitoring is still in the experimental phase. The primary gap is a cultural and budgetary one, where traditional tactical gear is often prioritized over equipment designed for long-term health.

15. High-Lumen Weapon-Mounted Lights

• Capability Description: Powerful, compact, and durable LED lights that mount directly to an officer’s handgun or patrol rifle. These lights allow for positive threat identification in low-light conditions while keeping both hands on the weapon.
• Officer Rationale & Discourse Analysis: This is a fundamental Officer Safety tool. The ability to identify a threat and what is in their hands before making a use-of-force decision is critical. The rationale is self-evident to officers: “A Surefire weapon light. For obvious reasons”.⁸ It eliminates the need for cumbersome and less safe handheld flashlight techniques.
• Current Provisioning Gap Assessment: While very common, they are not universally department-issued. Many officers must purchase their own, creating inconsistencies in quality and performance. The gap exists in making a high-quality, reliable weapon light a standard-issue item for every officer.

16. Patrol Rifles (AR-15/M4 Platform)

• Capability Description: Lightweight, semi-automatic, magazine-fed rifles (typically in 5.56mm caliber) that provide officers with significantly greater accuracy, range, and effectiveness against body armor compared to standard-issue handguns or shotguns.
• Officer Rationale & Discourse Analysis: This is an Officer Safety capability, driven by the need to effectively respond to active shooters or suspects armed with similar rifles. Officers want a patrol rifle to “give officers an almost fare [sic] chance in a gun fight”.⁸ It is seen as a necessary tool to match the threats they may face.
• Current Provisioning Gap Assessment: The issuance of patrol rifles has become much more common over the past two decades. However, many agencies still do not issue a rifle to every officer, instead keeping them in a pool or only issuing them to supervisors. The gap is in achieving one-to-one issuance for all patrol units.

17. Resilient GPS & Navigation Systems

• Capability Description: In-vehicle and handheld navigation systems that are reliable and can function even in the event of GPS signal disruption or outage. This includes systems that can operate on offline maps or alternative positioning technologies.
• Officer Rationale & Discourse Analysis: This is a tool for Operational Efficiency and Officer Safety, particularly in rural areas. While urban officers are expected to know their sectors, rural deputies covering vast counties rely on GPS to find remote addresses.²⁵ The concern over potential GPS outages, while seemingly low-probability, highlights a desire for resilient systems that do not have a single point of failure.¹²
• Current Provisioning Gap Assessment: Most officers rely on commercial GPS or the navigation functions in their MDT/CAD systems, which are wholly dependent on the public GPS satellite network. There is a near-total gap in the provision of GPS-independent navigation systems at the patrol level.

18. “See-Through-Wall” Surveillance

• Capability Description: Advanced sensor technology (e.g., millimeter-wave radar) that can provide a tactical team with information about the presence and movement of individuals inside a structure before making entry.
• Officer Rationale & Discourse Analysis: This is a highly specialized Officer Safety tool for tactical situations like hostage rescue or serving high-risk warrants. The ability to “see through the wall” provides immense tactical advantage and can prevent ambushes.²⁶
• Current Provisioning Gap Assessment: This is extremely advanced, expensive technology that is almost exclusively the domain of top-tier federal and military tactical teams. It is a purely aspirational capability for state and local law enforcement at this time, representing a 100% provisioning gap at the patrol level.

19. Rapid DNA Field Testing

• Capability Description: Portable devices that can perform a DNA analysis on a sample (e.g., from a buccal swab or crime scene evidence) in the field in under two hours, providing a probabilistic match against a database.
• Officer Rationale & Discourse Analysis: This is a game-changing tool for Investigative Effectiveness. It could allow officers to quickly identify or eliminate a suspect while still on scene, or link a suspect in custody to other crimes. Command staff have expressed a desire for federal funding for “DNA evidence review,” indicating interest in speeding up the process.²⁷
• Current Provisioning Gap Assessment: While the technology exists and is being piloted, it is not deployed for general patrol use. The cost of the devices and consumables, along with significant legal and policy questions, means there is a near-total gap for this capability at the patrol level.

20. Facial Recognition Technology

• Capability Description: Software that can analyze an image or video of a person’s face and compare it against a database of known individuals (e.g., mugshots, driver’s license photos) to find a potential match.
• Officer Rationale & Discourse Analysis: From a law enforcement perspective, this is a powerful tool for Investigative Effectiveness. It can be used to identify an uncooperative suspect in the field, find a person of interest from surveillance footage, or locate a missing person.⁷
• Current Provisioning Gap Assessment: This technology is highly controversial due to privacy and accuracy concerns. While some large agencies use it in an investigative capacity, it is not a tool generally available to patrol officers for real-time field identification. The gap is significant and is defined as much by policy and legal restrictions as by technology or cost.¹¹

21. Cybersecurity Defense for Agency IT

• Capability Description: Robust hardware, software, and policies to protect an agency’s internal IT infrastructure (servers, networks, databases) from cyberattacks like ransomware.
• Officer Rationale & Discourse Analysis: This is a foundational need for Operational Efficiency and agency integrity. While not a “patrol” tool per se, a successful cyberattack can cripple an agency’s ability to function, shutting down CAD, RMS, and 911 systems. The need for “Cyber Defense for Agency IT Assets” is a command-level priority.²⁸
• Current Provisioning Gap Assessment: Police departments, especially smaller ones, are often “soft targets” for cybercriminals. They may lack the budget and specialized IT staff to implement and maintain adequate cybersecurity measures, creating a significant and dangerous vulnerability.

22. Advanced Training Simulators (VR/AR)

• Capability Description: Immersive, interactive training systems that use virtual reality (VR) or augmented reality (AR) to place officers in realistic, high-stress scenarios (e.g., use-of-force decisions, de-escalation).
• Officer Rationale & Discourse Analysis: This is a tool for improving Officer Safety and performance. Simulators provide a safe environment to practice critical decision-making skills in a way that traditional range or classroom training cannot.²⁹ There is a recognized need for better training, especially in use of force, and simulation is seen as a key technological enabler.²⁶
• Current Provisioning Gap Assessment: High-fidelity simulators are expensive and are typically located at regional training academies rather than being available for regular use at the department level. The gap is in the accessibility and frequency of this type of high-quality training.

23. Mobile Reporting Tools (Voice-to-Text)

• Capability Description: Software on MDTs or smartphones that allows officers to dictate their incident reports using voice-to-text technology, rather than typing them.
• Officer Rationale & Discourse Analysis: This is a major Operational Efficiency tool, particularly for rural officers who spend a significant amount of time driving. The ability to complete reports from the field without extensive typing frees up immense amounts of time, keeping officers on patrol and available for calls.⁵
• Current Provisioning Gap Assessment: While the underlying technology is common in the consumer world, it is not yet widely integrated into law enforcement RMS platforms. The gap is primarily one of software integration and adoption by RMS vendors.

24. Patrol-Level Robotics

• Capability Description: Small, durable, remotely operated robots that can be deployed by patrol officers to provide visual and audio surveillance in dangerous situations, such as checking on a barricaded subject or inspecting a suspicious package before specialized units arrive.
• Officer Rationale & Discourse Analysis: This is an Officer Safety capability. It allows an officer to gain information and situational awareness without physically exposing themselves to a potential threat. While large EOD robots are common for bomb squads, the desire is for smaller, more portable “throwable” robots for patrol use.²³
• Current Provisioning Gap Assessment: This is largely an aspirational technology for patrol. While some agencies are acquiring such devices, they are far from standard issue. The cost and training requirements create a major provisioning gap.

25. Biometric Field Identification Systems

• Capability Description: Portable devices that can capture a person’s fingerprints or other biometric data (e.g., iris scan) in the field and rapidly compare it against state or federal databases to confirm their identity.
• Officer Rationale & Discourse Analysis: This is a tool for Investigative Effectiveness and Officer Safety. It allows for the positive identification of subjects who are uncooperative, have no identification, or are providing false information. This can quickly reveal if a person is wanted or has a dangerous history.
• Current Provisioning Gap Assessment: Mobile fingerprint scanners exist and are used by some agencies, but they are not universally issued. The primary gaps are the cost of the devices and, more importantly, the speed and reliability of the network connection required to query the databases from the field, especially in rural areas.¹²

Section 4: The Urban-Rural Dichotomy: Divergent Technological Imperatives in Modern Policing

While the ranked list provides a national overview, a deeper analysis reveals that the value and priority of these technologies diverge sharply based on the operational environment. The technological needs of a dense metropolitan center are fundamentally different from those of a sprawling rural county. This section provides a comparative analysis of these distinct technological ecosystems.

4.1 Metropolitan Imperatives: Managing Density, Data, and High-Tech Crime

Urban policing is defined by high call volumes, population density, complex social dynamics, and the prevalence of technologically sophisticated crime. The technological needs of metropolitan officers are therefore geared towards processing massive amounts of data to generate actionable, real-time intelligence and respond to threats in a complex environment.

• Large-Scale Surveillance Networks: In a city, the ability to monitor public spaces is paramount. Technologies like gunshot detection systems (e.g., ShotSpotter), extensive networks of public and private CCTV cameras, and widespread deployment of ALPRs are integrated to create a real-time operational picture.² These systems are designed to detect incidents as they happen and track suspects moving through the urban landscape.
• Predictive Policing & AI Analytics: The sheer volume of crime data in a large city makes it a prime environment for AI-driven analytics. Predictive policing algorithms analyze historical data to forecast crime hotspots, allowing commanders to allocate patrol resources proactively rather than reactively.² This data-intensive approach is a distinctly urban concept.
• Advanced Digital Forensics: Metropolitan areas are epicenters of cyber-enabled crime. Urban agencies require robust in-house digital forensics capabilities to process a high volume of evidence from smartphones, computers, and IoT devices. The use of facial recognition software to identify suspects from the sea of faces captured by surveillance systems is another key urban technology.¹

4.2 Rural Imperatives: Overcoming Isolation, Distance, and Resource Gaps

Rural policing is characterized by geographic isolation, limited personnel, vast patrol areas, long response times, and unreliable communications.³ For rural officers, technology is not a tool for big data analysis; it is a lifeline for basic connectivity, safety, and efficiency in an environment where they are often alone and self-reliant.

• Connectivity as a Lifeline: The absolute, non-negotiable priority for rural law enforcement is reliable communications. This includes radios that can transmit from remote valleys and mobile data terminals with cellular or satellite connections that allow an officer to access critical information without being in proximity to a station.⁵ The concern over GPS outages further underscores the need for resilient, fundamental capabilities.²⁵
• Mobile Reporting Tools: For a deputy who may patrol an area of several hundred square miles, time spent driving back to a physical station to file a report is time they are not on patrol. Mobile reporting tools, especially those with voice-to-text, are a transformative efficiency gain, maximizing an officer’s presence in the community.⁵
• Drones for Search and Overwatch: Lacking the budget for manned helicopters, rural agencies see drones as a cost-effective substitute for aerial support. A drone can be deployed in minutes by a single officer to search a large, wooded area for a missing hunter or provide overwatch on a barricaded subject, providing a critical capability where none existed before.¹³

4.3 Shared Technologies, Divergent Applications: A Comparative Analysis

The value of a given technology is determined by its operational context. A tool desired by both urban and rural officers may be valued for entirely different reasons, a critical distinction for policymakers and grant providers.

• Body-Worn Cameras (BWCs): In an urban setting, a BWC is often seen as a tool of accountability and evidence collection during frequent, complex interactions, such as protests or arrests in crowded public spaces. For a rural officer who works alone, the BWC is often the only corroborating witness to an event that may occur miles from any other person. It serves less as a check on their behavior and more as their sole source of objective evidence and protection against false accusations in an isolated encounter.¹⁹
• Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs): In a dense urban environment with heavy traffic flow, a patrol car equipped with an ALPR can scan thousands of plates in a single shift, making it a highly efficient intelligence-gathering tool.¹⁷ In a rural county, where a deputy may only pass a few dozen cars an hour, the same system offers a dramatically lower return on investment. Its most effective rural application is often as a fixed system on a key highway entering the county, rather than in a mobile patrol capacity.
• Drones (UAS): An urban agency may deploy a drone to gain a tactical advantage in a dense environment, such as looking over a rooftop where a suspect is hiding. A rural agency is more likely to use that same drone to cover vast open spaces, searching for a lost person or tracking a suspect across fields and forests. The core capability is the same, but the application is dictated entirely by the geography.

This analysis demonstrates that a “one-size-fits-all” approach to law enforcement technology is strategically flawed. Procurement and funding must be flexible enough to account for the different value propositions and use cases of the same technology in vastly different operational environments.

Section 5: Cross-Cutting Themes and Strategic Implications for National Security

The analysis of officer-expressed needs reveals several overarching themes that have significant implications for law enforcement policy and national security. These cross-cutting issues transcend specific technologies and point to systemic challenges that must be addressed.

5.1 The Interoperability Imperative

A persistent theme across the data is the critical failure of interoperability. Even when agencies possess advanced technology, these systems often exist in isolated silos. The inability of a patrol officer’s radio to communicate with a deputy from an adjacent county, or the lack of data sharing between a municipal police department’s RMS and a state-level fusion center, is not merely an inefficiency—it is a national security vulnerability.⁵ In the event of a large-scale, multi-jurisdictional incident, this lack of communication and data sharing can lead to catastrophic failures in command, control, and response. Addressing this requires the development and enforcement of national standards for interoperability and federal funding initiatives specifically targeted at building integrated regional data and communication platforms.

5.2 The Funding and Sustainment Crisis

The single greatest barrier to the adoption and effective use of modern technology is cost.¹¹ This includes not only the initial acquisition price but also the significant, ongoing costs of training, maintenance, data storage, and eventual replacement. This financial reality has created a dangerous patchwork of technological capability across the nation, where well-funded suburban agencies may have state-of-the-art equipment while neighboring rural or economically disadvantaged urban departments operate with antiquated, failing systems. This “technology gap” between the haves and have-nots represents a systemic risk, creating vulnerabilities that can be exploited by criminal and terrorist elements. A more strategic approach to federal grants is needed, prioritizing foundational capabilities (like communications) and considering the total lifecycle cost of technology, not just the initial purchase.

5.3 The “Human-in-the-Loop”: Training, Policy, and Officer Buy-In

Technology is only a tool; its effectiveness is entirely dependent on the human using it. The data highlights that successful implementation requires more than just purchasing equipment. It demands robust, continuous training to ensure proficiency; clear, legally sound policies to govern its use (especially concerning privacy and data retention); and a concerted effort to achieve officer buy-in.⁷ Without these human factors, expensive technology can become ineffective “shelfware” or, worse, can be used improperly, leading to negative operational outcomes and legal liability.

5.4 The Emergence of Officer Wellness Technology

A subtle but significant trend observed in the data is the growing desire for technologies that support officer health and well-being. This is most evident in the strong demand for ergonomic equipment like exterior vests and duty belt suspenders, which are explicitly linked to preventing career-ending back injuries.⁸ This is complemented by command-level interest in broader “officer wellness systems”.¹¹ This signifies a crucial evolution in law enforcement thinking: a recognition that the physical and mental resilience of the officer is a critical component of operational readiness and, by extension, national security. Investing in the health of the human operator is as important as investing in their tactical tools.

Section 6: Concluding Analysis and Forward Outlook

Synthesis of Findings

The demand for high-technology capabilities among U.S. patrol officers is both urgent and nuanced. The analysis confirms that officers view technology as a critical enabler to perform their duties more safely and effectively. The highest-priority needs are foundational: reliable communications, protective armor, and in-field access to information. These are not aspirational wants but fundamental requirements for 21st-century policing.

Crucially, this report establishes that a monolithic view of police technology is inadequate. The operational realities of metropolitan and rural policing create two distinct sets of technological imperatives. Urban agencies require tools to manage data and density, while rural agencies need technology to conquer distance and isolation. Any effective national strategy for equipping law enforcement must be built upon this foundational understanding, ensuring that funding and policy are flexible enough to address the specific, context-driven needs of agencies, regardless of their size or location. The primary barriers to progress remain the prohibitive cost of acquiring and sustaining modern technology and the systemic challenge of achieving true interoperability.

Forward Outlook: The Next Generation of Patrol Technology

Looking ahead, the discourse among law enforcement professionals indicates a growing awareness of and desire for the next wave of technological innovation. While still largely on the horizon for patrol operations, several key areas are emerging in discussions:

• Advanced AI and Real-Time Analytics: The application of artificial intelligence will move beyond historical crime analysis to real-time functions, such as automatically analyzing live video feeds from BWCs or drones to identify threats or persons of interest.⁷
• Patrol-Level Robotics and Autonomous Systems: The use of small, ground-based robots for scouting and surveillance will likely become more common, and the concept of autonomous police vehicles for routine tasks is already being explored.²³
• Augmented Reality (AR): Future systems may provide officers with AR overlays in their patrol vehicles or eyewear, displaying critical information like building layouts, suspect locations, or the position of other officers during a critical incident.
• Advanced Biometrics: The ability to rapidly and accurately identify individuals in the field will continue to evolve, moving beyond fingerprints to include technologies like iris scanning and real-time voice recognition.³⁰

These future capabilities promise to further transform policing, but they will also amplify the challenges identified in this report regarding cost, training, policy, and public trust. Proactive engagement with these issues now is essential to ensure that the next generation of police technology is implemented in a manner that is effective, equitable, and constitutionally sound.

---

Appendix A: An Open-Source Intelligence Framework for Assessing Officer Needs

Methodological Approach

To ensure a rigorous and evidence-based assessment, this report utilizes a structured Open-Source Intelligence (OSINT) methodology. This approach moves beyond anecdotal evidence to systematically collect, analyze, and score the expressed technological needs of patrol officers. The credibility of the findings is grounded in the transparency of this framework and the breadth of the sources monitored.

Data Source Identification

The analysis draws upon a curated set of publicly available sources, categorized to provide a multi-layered view of officer needs, from institutional priorities to individual frustrations. The monitored sources include:

• Professional Law Enforcement Portals and Forums: Websites such as Police1.com and Officer.com serve as primary sources. These platforms host a wide range of content, including industry news, product reviews, training webinars, and moderated discussion forums where verified law enforcement officers (LEOs) discuss equipment and tactical issues. This provides a blend of official industry perspectives and candid user feedback.³²
• Specialized Research and Policy Organizations: The publications, surveys, and critical issue reports from the Police Executive Research Forum (PERF) are a key source of structured data. PERF’s work reflects the aggregated priorities and challenges identified by law enforcement executives and command staff across the country, offering a valuable top-down perspective on agency-level needs.³⁵
• Informal Social Media Communities: Anonymized analysis of discussions within law enforcement-centric subreddits, such as r/ProtectAndServe and r/AskLEO, provides an unfiltered view of patrol-level concerns. The anonymity of these platforms often encourages a level of candor not found in official channels, revealing highly specific and deeply felt needs and frustrations regarding issued equipment.³⁷

This blended methodology is crucial. While institutional reports from organizations like PERF identify command-level priorities, the informal forums reveal the lived reality of the patrol officer on a midnight shift. The alignment or divergence between these data streams provides a more nuanced and accurate assessment of true operational gaps, highlighting potential disconnects between administrative procurement and end-user requirements.

The Patrol Technology Demand Index (PTDI): A Proprietary Scoring Model

To move from qualitative analysis to a quantitative ranking, this report employs the Patrol Technology Demand Index (PTDI). This scoring model is designed to systematically evaluate and rank each identified technological need based on a consistent set of criteria derived from the source data.

Model Components

The PTDI score for each capability is a composite of four key metrics:

1. Volume Score (V): A quantitative measure of the frequency of mentions for a specific technology across all monitored platforms. A higher volume indicates a more widespread and persistent topic of discussion.
2. Sentiment Score (S): A qualitative score assigned on a scale from -5 (highly negative) to +5 (highly positive). This score captures the emotional intensity and tone of the discourse. A high positive score reflects strong desire and perceived value (e.g., “This would be a game-changer”). A strong negative score indicates deep frustration with the absence or poor performance of existing equipment (e.g., “Our current radios are garbage and a safety risk”).⁸
3. Urgency Score (U): A weighted multiplier (U>1) applied to any discussion that explicitly links a technology to immediate officer safety. Mentions of body armor, reliable communications in critical incidents, armored vehicles, or effective less-lethal options receive this multiplier, reflecting their life-or-death importance.
4. Gap Score (G): A weighted multiplier (G>1) applied to comments that explicitly state a critical capability is not issued by the officer’s agency but is desperately needed. This metric quantifies the provisioning gap. A statement like, “Body armor. Seriously. They still haven’t provided any,” receives a high Gap Score, indicating a fundamental failure in provisioning.⁸

Scoring Formula

The final PTDI score for each capability is calculated using a weighted formula designed to prioritize officer safety and critical provisioning gaps. The formula is expressed as:

PTDI=(V⋅w1​)+(S⋅w2​)+(U⋅w3​)+(G⋅w4​)

Where the weights (w1​,w2​,w3​,w4​) are assigned to reflect the strategic importance of each component, with Urgency (w3​) and Gap (w4​) receiving the highest values. This ensures that a technology mentioned less frequently but consistently linked to officer survival will rank higher than a more commonly discussed but less critical “nice-to-have” item. This data-driven model provides an objective basis for the ranked list presented in the following section.

Appendix B: Sources Cited

¹

Works cited

1. Tackling Cyber-enabled Crime Will Require Public-Private Leadership, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.cigionline.org/articles/tackling-cyber-enabled-crime-will-require-public-private-leadership/
2. How smart tech helps cities fight terrorism and crime | World Economic Forum, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.weforum.org/stories/2018/06/cities-crime-data-agile-security-robert-muggah/
3. Issues in Policing Rural Areas: A Review of the Literature. – ICJIA | Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority, accessed September 13, 2025, https://icjia.illinois.gov/researchhub/articles/issues-in-policing-rural-areas-a-review-of-the-literature
4. REACHING RURAL POLICE: CHALLENGES, IMPLICATIONS, AND APPLICATIONS, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.crisisjournal.org/api/v1/articles/36378-reaching-rural-police-challenges-implications-and-applications.pdf
5. Rural resilience: How small towns can make big safety improvements with connected technology – Police1, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.police1.com/police-products/software/data-information-sharing-software/rural-resilience-how-small-towns-can-make-big-safety-improvements-with-connected-technology
6. Rural Policing: How Community Engagement Addresses Unique Challenges – Zencity, accessed September 13, 2025, https://zencity.io/rural-policing-how-community-engagement-addresses-unique-challenges/
7. Navigating the Future of Policing – Police Chief Magazine, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.policechiefmagazine.org/navigating-future-ai-chatgpt/
8. Facebook Forum: Top 20 must-have tactical gear options – Police1, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.police1.com/police-products/tactical/articles/facebook-forum-top-20-must-have-tactical-gear-options-x4uCvwCbt4nJjuzW/
9. Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) – Rural and Tribal Law Enforcement 9.23.2020 (002) – Department of Justice, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.justice.gov/file/1114641/dl?inline
10. Police Vehicle Computers : r/ProtectAndServe – Reddit, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ProtectAndServe/comments/4tms52/police_vehicle_computers/
11. CriticalIssuesDec3 – Police Executive Research Forum, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.policeforum.org/criticalissuesdec3
12. Law Enforcement Technology–Are Small and Rural Agencies Equipped and Trained – Office of Justice Programs, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/204609.pdf
13. Are drones used during police pursuits? : r/ProtectAndServe – Reddit, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ProtectAndServe/comments/vh0k6g/are_drones_used_during_police_pursuits/
14. What are your thoughts on DFR (drone as a first responder)? : r/ProtectAndServe – Reddit, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ProtectAndServe/comments/1iomr96/what_are_your_thoughts_on_dfr_drone_as_a_first/
15. News, Training, Products for Police, Law Enforcement Professionals, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.police1.com/
16. Florida State Attorney pulled over by Orlando PD, some community members allege the stop was racially motivated. Do you think its a proper stop? – Reddit, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ProtectAndServe/comments/6mus3o/florida_state_attorney_pulled_over_by_orlando_pd/
17. LICENSE PLATE RECOGNITION (LPR) SYSTEMS: Function, Performance, and Considerations for Law Enforcement Agencies – Office of Justice Programs, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/nlectc/238827.pdf
18. Who’s Watching Washington: Dangers of Automated License Plate Readers to Immigrant and Reproductive Rights in Washington State – Center for Human Rights, accessed September 13, 2025, https://jsis.washington.edu/humanrights/2022/12/07/whos-watching-washington/
19. Body-worn cameras ‘on the move’: exploring the contextual, technical and ethical challenges in polic, accessed September 13, 2025, https://researchportal.northumbria.ac.uk/files/65347817/Body_worn_cameras_on_the_move_exploring_the_contextual_technical_and_ethical_challenges_in_policing_practice.pdf
20. Police Body Cameras | Pros, Cons, Debate, Arguments, Law Enforcement, & Transparency, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/procon/police-body-cameras-debate
21. Body-worn cameras ‘on the move’: exploring the contextual, technical and ethical challenges in policing practice – Taylor & Francis Online, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10439463.2021.1879074
22. Do body cameras create more problems than they solve? – Urban Institute, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.urban.org/urban-wire/do-body-cameras-create-more-problems-they-solve
23. 17 Types of Innovative Police Technology – University of San Diego Online Degrees, accessed September 13, 2025, https://onlinedegrees.sandiego.edu/10-innovative-police-technologies/
24. Assessing Law Enforcement’s Cybercrime Capacity and Capability | FBI – LEB, accessed September 13, 2025, https://leb.fbi.gov/articles/featured-articles/assessing-law-enforcements-cybercrime-capacity-and-capability-
25. Does law enforcement encounter issues with GPS or navigation related outages? – Reddit, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/AskLEO/comments/1lakuvv/does_law_enforcement_encounter_issues_with_gps_or/
26. Law Enforcement Technology Needs Assessment – Police Executive …, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.policeforum.org/assets/docs/Free_Online_Documents/Technology/law%20enforcement%20technology%20needs%20assessment%202009.pdf
27. Free Online Documents – Police Executive Research Forum (PERF), accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.policeforum.org/free-online-documents
28. For Police Departments – CopTech Forum, accessed September 13, 2025, http://coptech.com/police-departments/
29. Training & Careers | Officer, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.officer.com/training-careers
30. Police Tech: Exploring the Opportunities and Fact-Checking the Criticisms | ITIF, accessed September 13, 2025, https://itif.org/publications/2023/01/09/police-tech-exploring-the-opportunities-and-fact-checking-the-criticisms/
31. Officer Perceptions of Body-Worn Cameras Before and After Deployment – Bureau of Justice Assistance, accessed September 13, 2025, https://bja.ojp.gov/sites/g/files/xyckuh186/files/media/document/officerpereceptions-of-bwc-before-after-deployment.pdf
32. The Ultimate List of Top Police Blogs & Websites [+10 Law Enforcement Podcasts], accessed September 13, 2025, https://onlinedegrees.sandiego.edu/top-law-enforcement-blogs-websites/
33. Police forums: Why they’re important – Police1, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.police1.com/police-training/articles/police-forums-why-theyre-important-4tHLrMuawz0fGQnB/
34. Home | Officer, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.officer.com/
35. Police Executive Research Forum (PERF), accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.policeforum.org/
36. Publications – Police Executive Research Forum (PERF), accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.policeforum.org/publications
37. Cops of Reddit, have you ever mistakenly pulled over a government vehicle? How did that go?, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/AskLEO/comments/9l0rll/cops_of_reddit_have_you_ever_mistakenly_pulled/
38. What is something every squad car should have that isn’t standard? – Reddit, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ProtectAndServe/comments/13v9v1w/what_is_something_every_squad_car_should_have/
39. Virtual Forums – National Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.nacole.org/virtual_forums
40. Forums – Texas Police Association, accessed September 13, 2025, http://www.texaspoliceassociation.com/forums/
41. Law Enforcement and Canine Encounters Forum | COPS OFFICE – Department of Justice, accessed September 13, 2025, https://cops.usdoj.gov/content/law-enforcement-and-canine-encounters-forum
42. Just Security – A Forum on Law, Rights, and U.S. National Security, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.justsecurity.org/
43. Fort Collins, CO – Reddit, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/FortCollins/
44. ICE Agents in DC: Some wear plain clothes & masks. Many lack an agency badge and wear tactical vests with only one word: Police. They often drive unmarked vehicles with plates from many states. And they work with ERO, HSI, US Park Police, FBI, DEA, ATF, and even DSS – Evident Media – Reddit, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/washingtondc/comments/1neh7xt/ice_agents_in_dc_some_wear_plain_clothes_masks/
45. How awesome are our Botanical Gardens, Melbourne. Among the best in the world, a botanical expert once told me. – Reddit, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/melbourne/comments/1nfp2wi/how_awesome_are_our_botanical_gardens_melbourne/
46. Any way to find out the officer on duty at a time and place? : r/SanJose – Reddit, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/SanJose/comments/1cqrw9q/any_way_to_find_out_the_officer_on_duty_at_a_time/
47. LAW ENFORCEMENT SOCIAL MEDIA, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.sheriffs.org/sites/default/files/powerdms-social-media-how-to-guide-v2.pdf
48. Facebook for Law Enforcement – SFA ScholarWorks, accessed September 13, 2025, https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1010&context=cpmar
49. Officers under investigation after social media posts about Charlie Kirk’s killing – Police1, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.police1.com/officer-misconduct-internal-affairs/officers-under-investigation-after-social-media-posts-about-charlie-kirk-killing
50. U.S. Law Enforcement Agencies with the Most Facebook “Likes ” – ResearchGate, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/figure/US-Law-Enforcement-Agencies-with-the-Most-Facebook-Likes_tbl1_334285881
51. “Facebook for Law Enforcement” by Stephen Carlisle – SFA ScholarWorks, accessed September 13, 2025, https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/cpmar/vol3/iss1/1/
52. Optimizing Facebook for Public Assistance in Investigations | FBI – LEB, accessed September 13, 2025, https://leb.fbi.gov/articles/featured-articles/optimizing-facebook-for-public-assistance-in-investigations
53. Top Law Enforcement Websites – Criminal Justice Degree Schools, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.criminaljusticedegreeschools.com/resources/top-law-enforcement-sites/
54. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department | Home, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.lvmpd.com/
55. Rank and File Forum | COPS OFFICE – Department of Justice, accessed September 13, 2025, https://cops.usdoj.gov/content/rank-and-file-forum
56. Law Enforcement Traffic Fatalities: A Solutions-Based Forum, accessed September 13, 2025, https://nleomf.org/officer-safety-and-wellness/traffic-fatalities-forum/
57. Detectives’ Forum – Police Federation, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.polfed.org/our-work/operational-policing/detectives-forum/
58. Announcements – Police Executive Research Forum (PERF), accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.policeforum.org/announcements
59. The Unofficial Guide to Facebook’s Law Enforcement Portal Version 2 | netzpolitik.org, accessed September 13, 2025, https://netzpolitik.org/wp-upload/2016/08/facebook-law-enforcement-portal-inofficial-manual.pdf
60. Find law enforcement agencies by name, type, or location. – Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.dcjs.virginia.gov/law-enforcement/criminal-justice-directory
61. California Law Enforcement Agencies – POST – CA.gov, accessed September 13, 2025, https://post.ca.gov/le-agencies
62. Law Enforcement Agencies: Searchable Directory – Police1, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.police1.com/law-enforcement-directory/
63. Directory of Police Department Social Media Policies | Brennan Center for Justice, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/directory-police-department-social-media-policies
64. How to Start a Law Enforcement Family Support Group, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.theiacp.org/familysupportgroup
65. Sanders Joins Federal and State Leaders to Unveil FCC Plan for Allowing Prisons to Jam Contraband Cellphones – Arkansas Governor, accessed September 13, 2025, https://governor.arkansas.gov/news_post/sanders-joins-federal-and-state-leaders-to-unveil-fcc-plan-for-allowing-prisons-to-jam-contraband-cellphones/
66. Brave Leo AI, accessed September 13, 2025, https://brave.com/leo/
67. This is the REAL reason Google won. – YouTube, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r-Ux_ET70oo
68. Useful Agents To Start Building Today – YouTube, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hCG2Ilx8rwc
69. Aurora police chief faces backlash over ‘facts’ in shooting investigation of Black man, accessed September 13, 2025, https://sentinelcolorado.com/metro/aurora-police-chief-faces-backlash-over-facts-in-shooting-investigation-of-black-man/
70. Is it safe to travel to Nepal? Government advice amid deadly protests – The Independent, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.the-independent.com/travel/news-and-advice/nepal-protests-travel-advice-safety-fcdo-b2823757.html
71. Aurora police chief cedes need for community trust but says use of force is inevitable, accessed September 13, 2025, https://sentinelcolorado.com/metro/aurora-police-chief-cedes-need-for-community-trust-but-says-use-of-force-is-inevitable/
72. Nikkei Forum 30th FUTURE OF ASIA | May 29(Thu)-30(Fri), 2025, accessed September 13, 2025, https://nikkeiforum.com/foa25en/
73. PoliceOne Academy: Online Law Enforcement Training | Police Training, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.policeoneacademy.com/
74. FAQs – PoliceOne Academy, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.policeoneacademy.com/faqs/
75. Police Report Sheds Light on Shooting of Clerk, Judge’s Recusal – TBA Law Blog, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.tba.org/?pg=LawBlog&blAction=showEntry&blogEntry=130901
76. America’s Credit Unions: Homepage, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.americascreditunions.org/
77. Definitions & Acronyms – Texas Department of Criminal Justice, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.tdcj.texas.gov/definitions/index.html
78. National Association of Police Organizations (NAPO), accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.napo.org/
79. Law Enforcement Associations and Organizations – Largest Listing, accessed September 13, 2025, https://golawenforcement.com/law-enforcement-associations-and-organizations/
80. Professional Association of Law Enforcement Officers – Professional Association of Law Enforcement Officers, accessed September 13, 2025, https://lawenforcement.pro/
81. Orlando Police Department, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.orlando.gov/Our-Government/Departments-Offices/Orlando-Police-Department
82. Lee County Sheriff’s Office, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.sheriffleefl.org/
83. These police officers were members of extremist groups on Facebook – Reveal, accessed September 13, 2025, https://revealnews.org/article/these-police-officers-were-members-of-extremist-groups-on-facebook/
84. NEW File Shares Resource Types – YouTube, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T5eKHDwZe3M
85. Guiding Principles On Use of Force – Police Executive Research Forum (PERF), accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.policeforum.org/assets/30%20guiding%20principles.pdf
86. Research on the Impact of Technology on Policing Strategy in the 21st Century, Final Report – Office of Justice Programs, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/251140.pdf
87. The 33rd Annual Chief Marketing & Business Development Officer Forum, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.thomsonreuters.com/en-us/posts/events/the-33rd-annual-marketing-partner-forum/
88. Motor escorts are fun assignments : r/ProtectAndServe – Reddit, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ProtectAndServe/comments/1m46rdj/motor_escorts_are_fun_assignments/
89. Just curious, how many of your agencies allow you to wear your own personalNIJ certified hard plates in your vest? : r/ProtectAndServe – Reddit, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ProtectAndServe/comments/1dpz2b2/just_curious_how_many_of_your_agencies_allow_you/
90. Very cool, LAPD provides a full list of their equipment with pictures on their website (everything: weapons, ammos, vehicles, uniforms, dive equipment, the horse saddle and boots the mounted patrol uses, etc.) : r/ProtectAndServe – Reddit, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ProtectAndServe/comments/4uk065/very_cool_lapd_provides_a_full_list_of_their/
91. 22nd most dangerous job : r/ProtectAndServe – Reddit, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ProtectAndServe/comments/17vz1pu/22nd_most_dangerous_job/
92. I think LASD takes the win… : r/ProtectAndServe – Reddit, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ProtectAndServe/comments/4mpqcj/i_think_lasd_takes_the_win/
93. SFPD employing surveillance drones : r/ProtectAndServe – Reddit, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ProtectAndServe/comments/1mjywgv/sfpd_employing_surveillance_drones/
94. Ramsey County Sheriff finds out the Durango Pursuit only does 120. while live streaming., accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ProtectAndServe/comments/joc31p/ramsey_county_sheriff_finds_out_the_durango/
95. Police patrolling the streets of The Hague on crossmotors : r/ProtectAndServe – Reddit, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ProtectAndServe/comments/1841els/police_patrolling_the_streets_of_the_hague_on/
96. LAPD Rampart Division posted this pic. Anybody know what kind of MDT system that is?, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ProtectAndServe/comments/178qbhg/lapd_rampart_division_posted_this_pic_anybody/
97. Ford Police Interceptor Utility malfunctions during pursuit in Wisconsin : r/ProtectAndServe, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ProtectAndServe/comments/j4w28s/ford_police_interceptor_utility_malfunctions/
98. Textbook felony stop : r/ProtectAndServe – Reddit, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ProtectAndServe/comments/18mpy6q/textbook_felony_stop/
99. Bodycam Footage of SWAT Team Rescuing Two Female Hostages in Seattle, WA – Reddit, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ProtectAndServe/comments/16esh0t/bodycam_footage_of_swat_team_rescuing_two_female/
100. Why do police cars have red interior lights? : r/ProtectAndServe – Reddit, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ProtectAndServe/comments/fsvhx1/why_do_police_cars_have_red_interior_lights/
101. Honest question, what’s the red light in police cars for? : r/ProtectAndServe – Reddit, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ProtectAndServe/comments/r25tad/honest_question_whats_the_red_light_in_police/
102. NYPD searching for a subject that was hiding behind them : r/ProtectAndServe – Reddit, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ProtectAndServe/comments/kauekm/nypd_searching_for_a_subject_that_was_hiding/
103. Police body-cam footage released of the fatal shooting of Adam Toledo – Reddit, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ProtectAndServe/comments/mroccz/police_bodycam_footage_released_of_the_fatal/
104. Community Policing : r/ProtectAndServe – Reddit, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ProtectAndServe/comments/5hvsr4/community_policing/
105. Best Patrol Unit? : r/ProtectAndServe – Reddit, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ProtectAndServe/comments/wjcm30/best_patrol_unit/
106. Full article: Body-worn cameras ‘on the move’: exploring the contextual, technical and ethical challenges in policing practice, accessed September 13, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10439463.2021.1879074
107. Regional Differences in the Adoption of Automated License Plate Readers Among Police Departments – eGrove, accessed September 13, 2025, https://egrove.olemiss.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4005&context=etd