Analytics and Reports, Country Analytics

Global SITREP – Week Ending January 31, 2026

Executive Summary

The global security environment for the week ending January 31, 2026, is characterized by a radical departure from traditional multilateralism toward a transactional, privatized international order. This transition is underscored by the release of the 2026 National Defense Strategy (NDS), which formalizes the doctrine of “Restoring Peace Through Strength” and prioritizes hemispheric security and industrial capacity over integrated deterrence with long-standing allies.1 The aftermath of the January 3 abduction of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro continues to dominate the Western Hemisphere, as the interim government of Delcy Rodríguez navigates a precarious path between domestic military-intelligence hardliners and the economic imperatives of a U.S.-managed oil sector.3 In the Middle East, the launch of the “Board of Peace” (BoP) at Davos has introduced a corporate-led peace architecture for Gaza, overseen by Donald Trump as permanent chairman, effectively bypassing United Nations structures in favor of a membership-for-fee model.5

In the Eurasian theater, a fragile energy strike moratorium has provided temporary relief to the Ukrainian civilian population, though Russian forces have strategically reoriented their kinetic operations toward rail junctions and logistical hubs to degrade defensive sustainability ahead of the winter’s final months.7 Simultaneously, the geoeconomic landscape has been reshaped by the signing of the EU-India Free Trade Agreement, a $24 trillion trade bloc designed as a strategic hedge against both American protectionism and Chinese supply chain dominance.8 However, this economic integration is challenged by an unprecedented Russian cyber-offensive targeting the Polish power grid, marking the first major weaponization of distributed energy resources (DER) in hybrid warfare.10 As the week concludes, the “Simultaneity Problem” identified in the NDS remains the primary concern for intelligence analysts, as state and non-state actors exploit the current global transition to test the thresholds of a new, highly transactional international system.1

Strategic Posture: The 2026 National Defense Strategy

The formal release of the 2026 National Defense Strategy (NDS), entitled “Restoring Peace Through Strength for a New Golden Age of America,” represents a tectonic shift in U.S. military doctrine. The document, dated January 23, moves away from the “Integrated Deterrence” framework of the 2022 NDS, opting instead for a hierarchy of priorities that elevates homeland defense and hemispheric security to the highest strategic level.1 Central to this doctrine is the “Simultaneity Problem,” which assesses that adversaries—primarily China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea—may act in a coordinated or opportunistic fashion across multiple theaters to overwhelm U.S. responses.1 To counter this, the strategy mandates a fundamental redistribution of the burden of collective defense, demanding that allies and partners shoulder the primary responsibility for regional security while the U.S. focuses on high-end strategic assets and the defense of the American homeland.1

The NDS is notable for its reduction in emphasis on warfighting technology in favor of industrial production capacity. While previous strategies focused on the tactical adoption of artificial intelligence and emerging technologies, the 2026 NDS prioritizes “supercharging” the defense industrial base to out-produce adversaries.12 The strategy views manufacturing as a core deterrent, positing that the ability to scale production of commercially available capabilities is more critical than maintaining a technological lead that can be rapidly eroded.12 This shift is accompanied by the “Golden Dome” initiative, a massive expansion of missile and cyber defenses intended to shield U.S. territory and critical infrastructure from the evolving kinetic and digital threats posed by near-peer competitors and rogue actors.2

Table 1: Comparative Analysis of NDS Strategic Pillars

Strategic PillarObjectiveImplementation MechanismShift from 2022 Baseline
Homeland DefenseNeutralize domestic/hemispheric threats.Golden Dome; Border-to-Battlefield coordination.Elevated to Tier 1 priority over regional expeditionary goals.
Indo-Pacific DeterrencePrevent Chinese hegemony via “Strength, Not Confrontation.”Joint drone/counter-drone programs with Taiwan.Shift from integrated alliances to U.S.-led “Forward Strength.”
Burden-SharingForce allies to lead regional defense efforts.Mandatory GDP spending targets; Privatized security paths.Move away from U.S.-subsidized security umbrellas in Europe/Asia.
Industrial BaseRestore U.S. manufacturing dominance.Deregulation; Factory-level AI integration.Prioritization of production scale over boutique technological R&D.

The geostrategic implications of this posture are already manifesting in the North Atlantic and the Middle East. The deployment of a French aircraft carrier to the North Atlantic-Arctic corridor, alongside the arrival of a U.S. carrier strike group in the Middle East, underscores the “presence-based” signaling that now replaces long-term institutional commitments.13 Analysts suggest that the NDS’s emphasis on “reasonably conceived interests” over global democratic promotion signifies a period where the U.S. will remain willing to engage in short, decisive engagements with clear endpoints, as seen in recent operations in Venezuela, rather than protracted nation-building efforts.4

The Western Hemisphere: Venezuela and Regional Security Transitions

The situation in Venezuela remains the most volatile component of the U.S. “Homeland and Hemisphere” priority. Following the January 3 military operation that resulted in the abduction of President Nicolás Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores, the country has entered a state of dual governance.3 Delcy Rodríguez, formerly the Vice President, has been sworn in as Interim President, a move that has temporarily stabilized the civilian administration but has also exposed significant rifts within the “Madurismo” power structure.4 While Rodríguez has publicly condemned the U.S. “aggression” and characterized Maduro as a “hostage” held in New York, her administration has quietly accepted a $300 million injection from oil sales managed under U.S. oversight to shore up the failing bolivar.3

This pragmatic economic cooperation has alienated the hardline military and intelligence factions led by Diosdado Cabello and Vladimir López Padrino, who view any engagement with the U.S. as a capitulation.4 The U.S. naval blockade of Venezuelan oil, initiated in December, has already shuttered an estimated 70% of the country’s production, creating a humanitarian crisis that threatens to trigger mass migration or famine if not resolved.3 The Trump administration has signaled that it will “run” the country’s oil infrastructure indefinitely to ensure the flow of energy to global markets, a stance that has been criticized as a violation of international law but defended by the White House as an anti-narcotics and security necessity.3

Table 2: Venezuela Crisis Metrics and Leadership Rifts

Entity/MetricStatusStrategic AlignmentEconomic/Security Impact
Delcy Rodríguez (Interim Pres.)Operating from Caracas.Pragmatic “Madurismo”; Economic survival.Received $300M in U.S.-managed oil funds for bolivar stability.
Military/Intelligence (Cabello/Padrino)Active in security apparatus.Hardline Sovereignty; Anti-U.S. Resistance.Opposed to civilian-led cooperation; Risk of internal coup.
U.S. Naval Blockade70% Production cut.“Maximum Pressure” via Hemispheric Security.Dominant revenue source wiped out; Famine/Migration risk.
Oil InfrastructureU.S. Corporate Oversight.Strategic Resource Control.Indefinite management by U.S. firms; First tranche of 50M barrels.

Simultaneously, the U.S. has expanded its definition of national security threats within the hemisphere to include transnational criminal organizations like Tren de Aragua (TdA). The Department of Justice recently unsealed indictments against 87 members of TdA, charging them with a sophisticated “ATM jackpotting” scheme that utilized malware to drain millions from U.S. financial institutions to fund their global operations.17 These groups are now classified as “terrorist cartels,” allowing for the application of broad counter-terrorism authorities both at the border and within the U.S. interior.17 DHS reports that daily average southwest border encounters have dropped by over 1,900% compared to the previous administration, as the U.S. implements a “zero release” policy and moves quickly to obligate $46.5 billion in funding for border wall construction and waterborne barriers.19

The Eurasian Theater: The Ukraine-Russia Conflict and Energy Security

As the conflict in Ukraine approaches the four-year mark, the battlefield has reached a state of logistical deadlock punctuated by a significant, though fragile, diplomatic intervention. On Friday, January 30, a temporary moratorium on energy infrastructure strikes went into effect following a direct request from U.S. President Donald Trump.7 The Kremlin accepted the request to create “favorable conditions” for peace talks in Abu Dhabi, though the timeframe for the moratorium remains a point of contention; Moscow indicated the measure would end on February 1, while Kyiv suggested a one-week duration.7

Despite the halt on power grid targets, Russian forces have reoriented their kinetic strategy toward the destruction of rail junctions and logistical nodes.7 Ukrainian officials report a surge in drone and missile attacks targeting railway facilities, intended to paralyze the movement of troops and Western-supplied munitions.7 On the frontlines, Russian forces continue to execute a grinding advance in the Donetsk region, capturing the village of Lukianivske and advancing near Lyman and Kupiansk.21 The cost of these minimal territorial gains remains extraordinary, with combined Russian and Ukrainian casualties projected to reach 2 million by the spring of 2026.22

Table 3: Ukraine Conflict Logistical and Battlefield Status (Week Ending Jan 31)

Theater/SectorStatusTactical DevelopmentOperational Impact
Energy InfrastructureFragile Moratorium.U.S.-requested halt on grid strikes.Temporary respite from blackouts; Resilience remains low.
Logistics/RailActive Targeting.7 drone attacks on rail junctions in 24 hours.Paralysis of internal lines of communication; Resupply delays.
Donetsk (Lyman/Kupiansk)Russian Advance.Capture of Lukianivske; Infiltration of Petropavlivka.Incremental gains at high casualty cost; Eastern front pressure.
Kharkiv (Logistics)Kinetic Strikes.Ballistic missile damage to warehouses/hubs.Degradation of storage and distribution capability.

The sustainability of the Ukrainian defense is increasingly threatened by delays in the PURL weapons purchase program, as European allies struggle to finalize payments to the U.S..7 This has led to a depletion of Patriot air defense missiles, leaving major cities vulnerable to the reorientation of Russian strikes.7 Furthermore, the Kremlin has rejected the U.S. position that territorial control of Donetsk is the only unresolved issue, signaling that Moscow’s objectives still encompass a broader surrender of Ukrainian sovereignty and neutrality.20

Middle East Realignment: The Board of Peace and Iranian Instability

The launch of the Board of Peace (BoP) at the World Economic Forum in Davos represents the most significant shift in Middle Eastern diplomacy in decades. Chaired by Donald Trump for life, the BoP is designed to oversee the reconstruction and governance of Gaza while serving as a broader global alternative to the UN Security Council.5 The organization’s charter outlines a $30 billion development plan for “New Gaza,” which includes the construction of a skyscraper-lined coastline and the transition of governance to a technocratic National Committee for the Administration of Gaza (NCAG).6 Permanent seats on the board are available for a $1 billion fee, reflecting a transactional approach to international stabilization that favors wealthy state actors and private investment firms.6

In Gaza, the second phase of the ceasefire has stalled as Israel maintains control over more than half the territory, including the “Yellow Zone,” where demographics and residential structures are being reshaped.26 The Board of Peace is intended to oversee the decommissioning of Hamas weapons and the deployment of an International Stabilization Force (ISF), comprising troops from countries like Turkey, Azerbaijan, and Indonesia.25 However, Hamas continues to oppose “total decommissioning,” and the humanitarian situation is worsened by Israel’s recent blacklisting of dozens of international aid organizations.27

Table 4: Board of Peace Executive Leadership and Gaza Governance

NamePositionPrimary Mandate
Donald J. TrumpPermanent Chairman.Veto power; Global peace-building oversight.
Nickolay MladenovHigh Representative for Gaza.Head of Gaza Executive Board; NCAG coordination.
Jared KushnerExecutive Board Member.Oversight of $30B “New Gaza” Development Plan.
Marc Rowan (CEO, Apollo)Executive Board Member.Managing BoP investment funds and real estate.
Tony BlairExecutive Board Member.International diplomatic coordination.

Internal instability in Iran has reached a critical juncture. A dramatic collapse in the value of the rial sparked the most widespread protests since the “Women, Life, Freedom” movement of 2022, leading to government-ordered internet shutdowns and violent repression.27 Intelligence reports indicate that Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei has relocated to a fortified underground shelter amid fears of a U.S. or Israeli strike on Iran’s nuclear and missile facilities.14 The “maximum pressure” campaign has been tightened, with the U.S. threatening 25% tariffs on any nation doing business with Tehran, further isolating the regime as its regional proxy network, including Hezbollah and the Houthis, faces continued attrition.30

Cyber Warfare: The Polish Grid Offensive

The late-December 2025 cyberattack on the Polish power grid, attributed to the Russian-linked Sandworm group (also tracked as Electrum), has set a new precedent for the targeting of renewable energy infrastructure.10 This multi-stage offensive focused on Distributed Energy Resources (DER), including more than 30 wind and solar farms, as well as combined heat and power (CHP) plants.10 While defensive mechanisms prevented a national blackout, the attackers successfully “bricked” numerous remote terminal units (RTUs)—devices that interface between physical equipment and control systems—causing irreparable damage that required hardware replacement.10

The attackers utilized a sophisticated suite of malware, including “DynoWiper” for disrupting communication between facilities and operators, and “LazyWiper” for corrupting system files within manufacturing IT environments.11 Analysts at Dragos and ESET note that this operation lacked the coordinated sequencing of the 2015-2016 Ukraine attacks, appearing instead as a rushed, opportunistic probe of grid resilience in the dead of winter.10 The event serves as a critical warning for nations modernizing their grids with decentralized renewables, which expand the digital attack surface and often lack the centralized security protocols of traditional power plants.33

Table 5: Malware Toolkit Analysis: Polish Grid Attack

Malware CodeTarget EnvironmentFunction/MechanismOperational Status
DynoWiperOT/Control Systems.Disrupts RTU-to-Operator communication; Erases firmware.Thwarted prior to outage; Bricked hardware at 30+ sites.
LazyWiperIT/Manufacturing.PowerShell-based file corruption via pseudorandom sequences.Used in secondary attacks on manufacturing sector.
Mersenne TwisterPRNG Seeding.Initializing PRNG for file corruption in industrial controllers.Integrated into wiper initialization phase.
Static TundraNetwork Recon.Lateral movement within substation internal networks.Successful infiltration of substation networks.

Geoeconomics: The EU-India FTA and Monetary Realignment

The signing of the EU-India Free Trade Agreement (FTA) on January 27, widely referred to as the “Mother of All Deals,” marks a strategic recalibration of the global economic order.9 By bringing together economies representing 25% of global GDP and 2 billion people, the pact is designed to provide “strategic autonomy” for both Brussels and New Delhi.9 For the EU, the deal is a hedge against the increasingly transactional trade policy of the United States, particularly following threats of tariffs over Greenland and disputes regarding the phase-out of Russian energy.9 For India, the FTA offers a stable alternative to the “America First” agenda, which recently imposed combined duties of 50% on Indian refined oil exports.9

The FTA eliminates tariffs on 99% of Indian exports by trade value, with immediate duty removal for labor-intensive sectors like textiles, leather, and gems and jewelry.8 In return, India has opened its market to European carmakers, alcohol producers, and high-tech manufacturers, with 92.1% of tariff lines subject to elimination or phased reduction.8 The agreement is projected to double EU exports to India by 2032 and save European exporters €4 billion per year in duties.36

Table 6: EU-India FTA Sectoral Impact and Market Access

Industry SectorMarket Access StatusProjected Export GrowthPrimary Regional Hubs
Apparel & TextilesImmediate Zero Duty.+$4.5B annually (Indian share to 9%).Gujarat, Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh.
Leather & Footwear17% Tariff to Zero.Opening $100B EU market.Agra, Kanpur, Ranipet.
Engineering GoodsPreferential Access.Target $300B exports by 2030.Maharashtra, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu.
European AutomotivePhased Duty Reductions.Enhanced access to expanding 1.5B market.EU-wide manufacturing hubs.
Spirits & Agri-foodTariffs cut to 40%.Significant savings on fruit, oils, and wine.Mediterranean agriculture; Northern spirits.

Parallel to these trade shifts, global markets were roiled by the U.S. Federal Reserve’s nomination of Kevin Warsh as next chair.40 The announcement contributed to an 11% drop in gold prices, ending a 10-week rally as investors anticipated a stronger dollar and a “higher for longer” interest rate environment.40 This monetary shift is particularly acute for developing nations and commodity-importing countries, as the U.S. continues to use its currency and tariff policy as a primary tool of national security enforcement.13

Frontier Technology: AI and the Industrial Arms Race

The 2026 World Economic Forum in Davos has highlighted a deepening anxiety among Western technology leaders regarding China’s rapid closure of the artificial intelligence gap.43 While the U.S. remains the leader in large language models and creative AI (AIGC), China has pioneered “Small-Data AI” for industrial manufacturing.44 This approach allows for high-accuracy AI deployment on factory floors with minimal initial datasets, turning a traditional constraint into a competitive advantage for precision machining and robotics.44 In the Greater Bay Area, CNC machines are now utilizing “acoustic AI” to detect micro-fractures and tool breakage that vision-based systems miss, significantly improving yield and efficiency.44

To counter this, the Trump administration has implemented a 25% tariff on advanced AI chips, including Nvidia’s H200 and AMD’s rival models, to incentivize domestic production.42 However, the Commerce Department has maintained broad discretion to allow limited chip sales to China in exchange for a share of the revenue—a move criticized by some as providing an authoritarian regime with “capabilities akin to nuclear weapons”.42 As Davos concluded, the consensus among tech CEOs is that AI has become inseparable from geopolitics, and the six-month gap separating Western and Chinese capabilities is a “narrowing window that may soon close”.43

Table 7: U.S.-China AI Competition Matrix (January 2026)

Competitive DomainU.S. AdvantageChina AdvantageStrategic Implication
Computing PowerAccess to high-end Nvidia/AMD silicon.Mastery of massive “gray-market” clusters.Smuggling networks bypass U.S. export controls.
Model DevelopmentDominance in LLMs and AIGC (OpenAI/Anthropic).Leadership in “Small-Data” Industrial AI.China solidifies lead in hardware-integrated AI.
Funding StructureVast venture capital; Private debt.$912B Government-backed VC funds.China approach offers stability; U.S. faces “bubble” risks.
Policy FocusCreative frontiers and general intelligence.Systematic deployment in EV/Manufacturing.China generates immediate economic value from AI.

Regional Security: Somalia and the South China Sea

In Africa, the U.S. has intensified its counter-terrorism campaign, conducting a “wave of strikes” in Somalia targeting al-Shabab and ISIS-Somalia.46 AFRICOM reports that 38 strikes have been carried out since February 1, 2025, a significant rise attributed to the Trump administration’s expanded authorities.46 These operations, centered in the Golis Mountains and the Lower Juba River Valley, are designed to degrade the groups’ ability to threaten the U.S. homeland as they expand their footprint across the continent.46

In the South China Sea, the Chinese military conducted “combat readiness” drills near Scarborough Shoal, deploying H-6K bombers armed with YJ-12 anti-ship missiles and Type 055 destroyers.48 The drills follow the Philippines’ declaration of the Chinese Ambassador as persona non grata in parts of Palawan, signaling a sharp escalation in diplomatic and maritime friction.49 While China conducted search-and-rescue operations for the crew of the capsized Devon Bay, the presence of high-end naval assets suggests that Beijing is prepared to enforce its “Huangyan Dao” claims through increased surveillance and vigilance.50

Conclusion

The global landscape at the end of January 2026 is defined by the erosion of institutional internationalism in favor of a “New Golden Age” of transactional power. The U.S. 2026 National Defense Strategy sets the stage for a period of intensive burden-sharing, prioritizing domestic industrial strength and hemispheric security over global presence. The abduction of Nicolás Maduro, the launch of the Board of Peace, and the signing of the EU-India FTA are not isolated events but interconnected components of a world where economic and military security are increasingly fused. The emergence of distributed energy resources as a primary target for cyber warfare, alongside the divergence in U.S. and Chinese AI development, suggests that the next phase of global competition will be fought as much in the factory and the server room as on the traditional battlefield. For the international community, the challenge of the “Simultaneity Problem” will require a move away from long-standing alliances toward more fluid, tactical partnerships focused on immediate security and economic outcomes.

If you find this post useful, please share the link on Facebook, with your friends, etc. Your support is much appreciated and if you have any feedback, please email me at in**@*********ps.com. Please note that for links to other websites, we are only paid if there is an affiliate program such as Avantlink, Impact, Amazon and eBay and only if you purchase something. If you’d like to directly contribute towards our continued reporting, please visit our funding page.

Sources Used

  1. Trump Administration Releases 2026 National Defense Strategy …, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/trump-administration-releases-2026-national-defense-strategy
  2. The 2026 National Defense Strategy by the Numbers: Radical Changes, Moderate Changes, and Some Continuities – CSIS, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.csis.org/analysis/2026-national-defense-strategy-numbers-radical-changes-moderate-changes-and-some
  3. CEPR Sanctions Watch January 2026, accessed January 31, 2026, https://cepr.net/publications/cepr-sanctions-watch-january-2026/
  4. US to ‘run’ Venezuela after Maduro captured, says Trump: Early analysis from Chatham House experts, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.chathamhouse.org/2026/01/us-attacks-venezuela-and-maduro-captured-early-analysis-chatham-house-experts
  5. Board of Peace – Wikipedia, accessed January 31, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Board_of_Peace
  6. Welcome to the jungle: Trump’s Board of Peace goes global, accessed January 31, 2026, https://ecfr.eu/article/welcome-to-the-jungle-trumps-board-of-peace-goes-global/
  7. Russia and Ukraine halt energy strikes, but differences emerge on …, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2026/01/31/world/russia-ukraine-moratorium/
  8. FACTSHEET * INDIA AND EUROPEAN UNION TRADE AGREEMENT “MOTHER OF ALL DEALS” UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITIES EMPOWERING INDIA@2047 Ind, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.commerce.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Factsheet-on-India-EU-trade-deal-27.1.2026.pdf
  9. Why geopolitics, not just trade, finally sealed the EU–India deal – European Policy Centre, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.epc.eu/publication/why-geopolitics-not-just-trade-finally-sealed-the-euindia-deal/
  10. ICS Devices Bricked Following Russia-Linked Intrusion Into Polish Power Grid – SecurityWeek, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.securityweek.com/ics-devices-bricked-in-russia-linked-strike-on-polish-power-grid/
  11. Sandworm blamed for cyberattack against Poland’s energy grid. – CyberWire, accessed January 31, 2026, https://thecyberwire.com/newsletters/week-that-was/10/4
  12. New U.S. defense strategy ‘barely mentions technology’ – DefenseScoop, accessed January 31, 2026, https://defensescoop.com/2026/01/26/2026-national-defense-strategy-trump-hegseth-nds/
  13. Weekly Geopolitical News Bulletin: January 24-30, 2026, accessed January 31, 2026, https://mackinderforum.org/geopolitical-newsletter/weekly-geopolitical-news-bulletin-january-24-30-2026
  14. Iran Update, January 24, 2026 | ISW, accessed January 31, 2026, https://understandingwar.org/research/middle-east/iran-update-january-24-2026/
  15. The expert conversation: Should Trump strike Iran? What happens next if he does?, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/dispatches/the-expert-conversation-should-trump-strike-iran-what-happens-next-if-he-does/
  16. With Maduro Held ‘Hostage’ As US Prisoner, Delcy Rodriguez Becomes Venezuela’s Interim President, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TuGyZ6R6RW8
  17. Justice Department Highlights Nationwide Crackdown on Tren de Aragua, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-highlights-nationwide-crackdown-tren-de-aragua
  18. Investigation into International “ATM Jackpotting” Scheme and Tren de Aragua results in Additional Indictment and 87 Total Charged Defendants – Department of Justice, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/investigation-international-atm-jackpotting-scheme-and-tren-de-aragua-results-additional
  19. DHS Sets the Stage for Another Historic, Record-Breaking Year Under President Trump, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.dhs.gov/news/2026/01/20/dhs-sets-stage-another-historic-record-breaking-year-under-president-trump
  20. Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment, January 30, 2026, accessed January 31, 2026, https://understandingwar.org/research/russia-ukraine/russian-offensive-campaign-assessment-january-30-2026/
  21. ISW reports Russian advances in three Ukrainian oblasts, accessed January 31, 2026, https://english.nv.ua/russian-war/isw-reports-russian-advances-near-lyman-kupiansk-and-in-zaporizhzhya-50579945.html
  22. Russia’s Grinding War in Ukraine – CSIS, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.csis.org/analysis/russias-grinding-war-ukraine
  23. Ukraine hit by mass blackouts after grid disruption, accessed January 31, 2026, https://kyivindependent.com/ukraine-hit-by-mass-blackouts-after-grid-disruption/
  24. 5 Things to Know About Trump’s Board of Peace | AJC – American Jewish Committee, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.ajc.org/news/5-things-to-know-about-trumps-board-of-peace
  25. The Middle East, including the Palestinian Question: Quarterly Open Debate, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.securitycouncilreport.org/whatsinblue/2026/01/the-middle-east-including-the-palestinian-question-quarterly-open-debate-6.php
  26. Middle East Overview: January 2026 – ACLED, accessed January 31, 2026, https://acleddata.com/update/middle-east-overview-january-2026
  27. More Spasms of Violence Await the Middle East in 2026 • Stimson …, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.stimson.org/2026/more-spasms-of-violence-await-the-middle-east-in-2026/
  28. The Middle East, including the Palestinian Question, January 2026 Monthly Forecast, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.securitycouncilreport.org/monthly-forecast/2026-01/the-middle-east-including-the-palestinian-question-23.php
  29. What to know about Trump’s “Board of Peace” as world leaders sign founding charter in Davos – CBS News, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-board-of-peace-what-to-know/
  30. Iran’s Conflict With Israel and the United States – Council on Foreign Relations, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.cfr.org/global-conflict-tracker/conflict/confrontation-between-united-states-and-iran
  31. Iran Update, January 24, 2026 | Critical Threats, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.criticalthreats.org/analysis/iran-update-january-24-2026
  32. Weekly crude prices edge 5% higher amid geopolitical risks, US supply disruptions, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.aa.com.tr/en/energy/oil/weekly-crude-prices-edge-5-higher-amid-geopolitical-risks-us-supply-disruptions/54400
  33. Attack Against Poland’s Grid Disrupted Communication Devices at About 30 Sites, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.zetter-zeroday.com/attack-against-polands-grid-disrupted-communication-devices-at-about-30-sites/
  34. Poland Attributes December Cyber Attacks on Energy Sites to Static Tundra Group, accessed January 31, 2026, https://thehackernews.com/2026/01/poland-attributes-december-cyber.html
  35. Polish Electricity Grid targeted in Cyber Attack – Cybersplice, accessed January 31, 2026, https://cybersplice.com/polish-electricity-grid-targeted-in-cyber-attack/
  36. India-EU FTA: European beer, cars and food products set to get cheaper — details of the trade deal & what we know so far, accessed January 31, 2026, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/india-eu-fta-european-beer-cars-and-food-products-set-to-get-cheaper-details-of-the-trade-deal-what-we-know-so-far/articleshow/127593301.cms
  37. The EU-India trade agreement – European Commission, accessed January 31, 2026, https://commission.europa.eu/topics/trade/eu-india-trade-agreement_en
  38. India–EU FTA: Top winners and losers of the ‘mother of all trade deals’, accessed January 31, 2026, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/indiaeu-fta-top-winners-and-losers-of-the-mother-of-all-trade-deals/articleshow/127641711.cms
  39. FTA benefit to India: EU markets open exports worth Rs 6.4 lakh crore from various states, says Piyush Goyal, accessed January 31, 2026, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/fta-benefit-to-india-eu-markets-open-exports-worth-rs-6-4-lakh-crore-from-various-states-says-piyush-goyal/articleshow/127618156.cms
  40. Gold prices drop sharply after 10-week rally, silver also plunges amid Fed nomination news, accessed January 31, 2026, https://en.yenisafak.com/world/gold-prices-drop-sharply-after-10-week-rally-silver-also-plunges-amid-fed-nomination-news-3713971
  41. Why is gold price nosediving by over 12% and will it go below $4,724 or rise again? Gold crash explained., accessed January 31, 2026, https://m.economictimes.com/news/international/us/why-is-gold-price-nosediving-by-over-12-and-will-it-go-below-4724-or-rise-again-gold-crash-explained-heres-what-should-investors-do-now/articleshow/127809491.cms
  42. U.S.-China AI arms race increasingly becoming national security issue, Wolfe says, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.investing.com/news/economy-news/uschina-ai-arms-race-increasingly-becoming-national-security-issue-wolfe-says-4455666
  43. China narrows AI gap as Western tech leaders sound alarm at Davos 2026 – Ynetnews, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.ynetnews.com/tech-and-digital/article/bjmolexubl
  44. China’s Small Data AI Gains Edge in Manufacturing, as Industry Experts Debate U.S.-China AI Competition – PR Newswire, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/chinas-small-data-ai-gains-edge-in-manufacturing-as-industry-experts-debate-us-china-ai-competition-302668811.html
  45. AI Starts off 2026 Strong – Don’t Forget China | Schwab Network, accessed January 31, 2026, https://schwabnetwork.com/articles/ai-starts-off-2026-strong-dont-forget-china
  46. US launches wave of strikes in Somalia targeting ISIS, al-Shabab terror threats – Fox News, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.foxnews.com/world/us-launches-wave-strikes-somalia-targeting-isis-al-shabab-terror-threats
  47. U.S. Forces Conduct Strike Targeting ISIS-Somalia – Africom, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.africom.mil/pressrelease/36169/us-forces-conduct-strike-targeting-isis-somalia
  48. Chinese military holds ‘combat readiness’ drills in disputed South China Sea – Anadolu, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.aa.com.tr/en/asia-pacific/chinese-military-holds-combat-readiness-drills-in-disputed-south-china-sea/3816153
  49. Tip of the iceberg: Analysts see possible economic impact, security concerns amid ‘word war’ between PH, China | ABS-CBN News, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.abs-cbn.com/news/nation/2026/1/31/analysts-warn-of-possible-security-economic-impact-of-ph-china-word-war-1402
  50. China Ups Military Surveillance Around South China Sea – BusinessToday Malaysia, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.businesstoday.com.my/2026/01/31/china-ups-military-surveillance-around-south-china-sea/
  51. Chinese military conducts combat readiness patrols around Huangyan Dao – People’s Daily, accessed January 31, 2026, https://en.people.cn/n3/2026/0131/c90000-20421295.html
  52. At least 2 sailors dead after cargo ship sinks in disputed South China Sea – Al Jazeera, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/1/23/cargo-ship-capsizes-in-disputed-area-of-south-china-sea