• Overall Fragility Score: 8.5/10
• Lifecycle Stage Assessment: CRISIS
• Key Drivers of Fragility:

• Absolute Centralization of Power: The regime’s structure as a personalist dictatorship creates a “single point of failure” dynamic, where the sudden incapacitation of the Supreme Leader could trigger systemic collapse.
• Systemic Economic Dysfunction: An irreconcilable conflict exists between the moribund state-run command economy and the semi-tolerated informal markets (jangmadang) that are essential for the population’s survival but erode state control and ideology.
• International Isolation and Sanctions: The regime is caught in a self-perpetuating cycle where its pursuit of nuclear weapons for security guarantees triggers international sanctions, which in turn deepens its economic hardship and reinforces its paranoid worldview and reliance on the nuclear program.
• Succession Uncertainty: The absence of a designated, adult, and consolidated heir represents the single greatest vulnerability, creating the potential for a violent elite power struggle in a leadership contingency.
• Forecast Trajectory: The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) is assessed to be in a state of perpetual, managed crisis. Its stability is exceptionally brittle, but collapse within the 36-month forecast horizon is unlikely, barring a major internal shock such as a leadership contingency. The overall trajectory is static (↔), but this masks high underlying volatility and the potential for rapid, catastrophic state failure should a key tipping point be reached.

State Fragility Dashboard

Domain/Indicator	Current Score (1-10)	Trend (Δ)	Volatility	Weighted Impact (%)	Brief Rationale & Key Data Points
B.1 Governance & Elite Cohesion	9	↔	High	30%	Stability is entirely dependent on Kim Jong Un’s personal control. Purges are routine tools of consolidation, but succession remains the single greatest long-term vulnerability.1
B.3 Security Apparatus Cohesion	9	↔	Medium	25%	Absolute loyalty to the Leader is enforced by fear, surveillance, and coup-proofing. A highly effective system for preventing dissent, but one that concentrates all risk at the very top.3
A.1 State Finances & Illicit Revenue	7	↑	High	10%	The regime is highly adept at sanctions evasion and illicit revenue generation (cybercrime, arms sales), securing hard currency for priorities. Revenue streams are growing but remain volatile.4
A.2 Economic Structure & Jangmadang	8	↓	Medium	10%	The command economy is moribund; informal markets (jangmadang) are essential for survival but erode state control. Recent crackdowns signal the regime’s intent to reassert dominance.6
B.2 State Ideology & Information Control	8	↓	Medium	5%	The state’s ideological monopoly is eroding due to the influx of outside information via markets. The regime is responding with intensified border security and repression, but the trend is negative.8
C.1 Social Fragmentation (Songbun)	9	↔	Low	5%	The Songbun hereditary caste system effectively atomizes society and prevents the formation of collective opposition. It is a core, stable feature of regime control.10
D.1 Food Security & Climate Vulnerability	8	↔	High	5%	Chronic food insecurity is exacerbated by extreme vulnerability to floods and droughts due to environmental degradation. A major climate event can trigger a humanitarian crisis.12
A.3 Population Welfare	8	↔	Low	5%	Welfare is a tool of control, not a goal. “Engineered inequality” rewards elites and punishes others, preventing universal hardship that could foster solidarity. Chronic malnutrition is a systemic feature.14
OVERALL FRAGILITY SCORE	8.5	↔	High	100%	Assessed Lifecycle Stage: CRISIS

Detailed Domain Analysis

Module A: Economic Resilience and State Capacity (The “Palace Economy”)

The DPRK operates a bifurcated economy. The formal, state-run command economy is largely defunct and incapable of providing for the population. In its place, the regime relies on a “palace economy” funded by illicit activities to finance its core priorities—the military, the nuclear program, and the loyalty of the elite—while the general population subsists on a semi-tolerated informal market economy.

A.1. State Finances & Illicit Revenue

The solvency of the Kim regime is fundamentally detached from the health of the national economy. Its financial resilience is a direct function of its ability to bypass international sanctions and generate hard currency through a sophisticated, state-directed criminal enterprise.

• Current State: The regime has professionalized its illicit revenue generation to a remarkable degree. State-sponsored cybercrime has become a primary source of funds. The UN Panel of Experts reports that North Korean cyber actors, primarily under the Reconnaissance General Bureau (RGB), stole an estimated $3 billion in cryptocurrency between 2017 and 2023.⁴ This activity is accelerating; in 2024 alone, North Korean hackers stole an estimated $1.34 billion, a 103% increase from 2023, accounting for an unprecedented 60% of all crypto funds stolen globally.⁵ These funds are explicitly used to finance the country’s WMD programs.¹⁶ Beyond cyberspace, the regime continues to engage in arms trafficking, smuggling of sanctioned goods, and the production of counterfeit currency and narcotics, often using its diplomatic missions as cover.¹⁷ While comprehensive UN sanctions have reduced overt trade in items like small arms, covert transfers, particularly of munitions to partners like Russia, provide another revenue stream.¹⁹ This illicit economy is backstopped by China, which accounts for approximately 98% of the DPRK’s official trade and provides a crucial economic lifeline, largely as a strategic subsidy to prevent state collapse.²¹ Beijing’s inconsistent enforcement of sanctions is a primary reason for their overall ineffectiveness.²² Reliable estimates of the regime’s foreign currency reserves are unavailable; however, the emphasis is on the continuous flow of hard currency to fund immediate priorities rather than the accumulation of static reserves.²⁴
• Trajectory (Δ): The regime’s ability to generate illicit revenue is increasing (↑). Its cyber operations are growing in sophistication, targeting higher-value exploits and leveraging a global network of IT workers operating under false identities.⁵
• Volatility: High. Revenue streams are dependent on exploiting security vulnerabilities in the global financial system and the geopolitical cover provided by China and Russia, both of which are subject to change.

The “Sanctions Paradox” is a key dynamic. Rather than crippling the regime, decades of sanctions have forced it to perfect a pariah economy. This has empowered and enriched the very hardline institutions, such as the RGB, that are most ideologically opposed to reform and engagement. The regime’s pariah status has become profitable for its security elite, creating a powerful internal constituency whose interests are served by continued confrontation and isolation, thereby institutionalizing resistance to any potential for economic opening.

A.2. Economic Structure & the Jangmadang

The North Korean economy is defined by the profound and irreconcilable tension between the failed socialist command system and the dynamic, bottom-up market system that has replaced it in practice.

• Current State: The official command economy is moribund. The Public Distribution System (PDS), which once provided all necessities, collapsed during the 1990s famine and has never been restored for the general populace.²⁶ The country’s industrial infrastructure is in a state of advanced decay following decades of underinvestment and the prioritization of military spending under the Byungjin policy (simultaneous military and economic development).²⁸ In this vacuum, informal markets known as jangmadang have become the “real” economy.⁶ A majority of North Koreans—with some studies suggesting over 70% of households—now derive most of their income from market activities.³² These markets are the primary source of food, consumer goods, and, critically, illicit foreign media.³⁴ The regime’s posture toward the jangmadang is deeply contradictory; it levies taxes and fees on merchants for revenue, yet views the markets as a fundamental ideological threat to its monopoly on power.²⁶ This has led to recent, intensified crackdowns aimed at reasserting state control, including market closures and increased surveillance of merchants.⁷
• Trajectory (Δ): The dominance of the jangmadang over the command economy is an established fact, but the regime’s recent efforts to rein them in represent a negative trend (↓) for market autonomy and, by extension, the welfare of the population that depends on them.
• Volatility: Medium. The regime is unlikely to attempt a full-scale eradication of the markets, as this would risk mass starvation. However, the intensity of crackdowns can fluctuate based on the political climate, creating uncertainty for merchants and consumers.

This situation creates the “Market Dilemma.” The jangmadang function as a critical balancing feedback loop, a societal pressure valve that prevents total economic collapse and famine, thereby ensuring the regime’s survival. However, they also function as a reinforcing feedback loop of ideological decay. They create a nascent class of citizens with economic agency, foster a “Jangmadang Generation” with no memory of or loyalty to the socialist state, and act as the primary vector for outside information that contradicts state propaganda.⁶ The regime is thus trapped: it cannot survive without the markets, but its long-term ideological foundation is corroded by their very existence.

A.3. Population Welfare

For the DPRK regime, the welfare of the general population is not a measure of state performance but a tool of political control. Resources are distributed not based on need, but on political loyalty.

• Current State: Chronic food insecurity and malnutrition are the baseline conditions for a significant portion of the population. According to the World Food Programme (WFP), over 40% of the population, or 10.7 million people, are undernourished, with nearly one in five children suffering from stunting due to chronic malnutrition.¹⁵ The country faces a persistent annual food deficit of approximately one million tons.³⁵ The PDS is non-functional for most citizens, who must rely on the jangmadang for sustenance.²⁷ This hardship is not uniform but is deliberately stratified through the “Engineered Inequality” model. The Songbun socio-political classification system dictates access to all essential goods and services, creating a vast disparity in living standards between the privileged “core” class in Pyongyang and the “wavering” or “hostile” classes in the provinces.¹⁰ This is starkly reflected in the healthcare system, which has effectively collapsed for all but the elite. Defector testimonies confirm that ordinary citizens must pay for even the most basic medical supplies in hospitals that often lack electricity and heat.³⁷
• Trajectory (Δ): The state of population welfare is static (↔) at a very low level. The regime has no incentive to improve conditions for the general populace, as this would diminish one of its key levers of control.
• Volatility: Low. Widespread suffering is a stable feature of the system. Volatility would only increase if a crisis became so acute that it threatened the food supply for the security forces and Pyongyang elite.

The regime has weaponized austerity. By creating and maintaining a hierarchy of suffering based on political loyalty, it prevents the formation of horizontal solidarity that could arise from universal hardship. A population where everyone is equally desperate might unite in opposition; a population where people are divided by privilege, competing for the state’s favor to avoid falling to a lower rung of misery, will not. Therefore, chronic malnutrition in the provinces is not a sign of regime failure, but a key feature of its successful system of social control.

Module B: Political Legitimacy and Institutional Integrity (The Suryong System)

The DPRK is not a conventional state; it is the personal domain of the Supreme Leader (Suryong). Its stability is almost entirely a function of the leader’s absolute personal control and the unwavering loyalty of the coercive apparatus that enforces his will. This module carries the highest analytical weight.

B.1. Governance and Elite Cohesion

The entire state structure is designed for absolute control by one individual, creating a system that is both exceptionally stable and exceptionally brittle.

• Current State: Governance is synonymous with the personal rule of Kim Jong Un. The Suryong system establishes the leader as the infallible center of the party, state, and military, with his authority being absolute.¹ Elite cohesion is maintained not through consensus but through fear and patronage. Kim Jong Un has consolidated his power through frequent and ruthless purges, eliminating hundreds of senior officials, including his uncle Jang Song Thaek, to remove potential rivals and enforce discipline.² Recent disciplinary actions against officials in the Propaganda and Agitation Department demonstrate the ongoing use of this tool.³⁹ The top leadership bodies, such as the Workers’ Party of Korea (WPK) Politburo and the Central Military Commission (CMC), are not independent centers of power but extensions of the leader’s will.⁴⁰ The leader’s health is a critical variable and a source of high volatility; Kim Jong Un’s public absences and visible weight changes consistently fuel intense speculation, as his sudden death or incapacitation would create an immediate power vacuum.⁴³
• Trajectory (Δ): Kim Jong Un’s personal control appears absolute and stable (↔).
• Volatility: High. The system’s stability is entirely contingent on the health and survival of a single individual. The most significant vulnerability is the lack of a clear succession plan. While his sister, Kim Yo Jong, holds a powerful position, her ability to command the loyalty of the patriarchal military and security elite is unproven.42 The recent public promotion of his young daughter, Kim Ju Ae, is a long-term signal but provides no solution for a near-term contingency.46
  This structure creates a “Single Point of Failure” dynamic. The centralization of all authority provides unparalleled stability by preventing the formation of rival factions. However, it simultaneously eliminates any institutional mechanism for a peaceful transfer of power. The system is perfectly designed for continuity under one ruler but is completely unprepared for the transition to the next. A leadership contingency would not trigger a constitutional process but a raw, and likely violent, struggle for power among the top elite.

B.2. State Ideology and Information Control

The regime’s survival is existentially dependent on maintaining an “Information Blockade” to isolate its population from outside realities that contradict its official narrative.

• Current State: The state’s ideology is a syncretic blend of Marxism-Leninism and extreme ethno-nationalism, codified as Juche (self-reliance) and Kimilsungism-Kimjongilism.⁴⁷ This ideology portrays the Kim dynasty as the sole defender of the Korean race against a hostile outside world, particularly the United States. Absolute loyalty to the leader is enshrined as the highest civic duty in texts like the “Ten Principles for the Establishment of a Monolithic Ideological System”.⁴⁹ To maintain this ideological monopoly, the state exercises total control over all domestic media, with televisions and radios fixed to state channels.⁵⁰ However, this blockade is porous. A constant stream of outside information—primarily South Korean films, music, and news—is smuggled into the country on USB drives and memory cards, sold in the jangmadang.⁶ This creates a cognitive dissonance between the state’s narrative of a destitute, puppet South Korea and the reality of its prosperity and cultural vibrancy. In-country surveys confirm that a large majority of the population has been exposed to foreign media and finds it more relevant to their lives than government pronouncements.⁸ The regime has responded with an intensified crackdown, particularly after the COVID-19 pandemic, by fortifying the border and enacting draconian laws like the “Pyongyang Cultural Language Protection Act” to punish those who consume or mimic foreign culture.⁹
• Trajectory (Δ): The effectiveness of the state’s ideological control is decreasing (↓) as the influx of information continues to erode its credibility, especially among the younger “Jangmadang Generation.”
• Volatility: Medium. While the long-term trend is negative for the regime, its capacity for brutal repression can temporarily halt or reverse the flow of information, as seen with the post-COVID border lockdown.

The regime is engaged in a constant war of political immunology. Its ideology functions to identify foreign ideas as hostile pathogens requiring elimination. The jangmadang and associated technologies act as vectors, constantly introducing these “pathogens” into the body politic. The state’s response—heightened surveillance, new laws, and fortified borders—is an aggressive immune response to this perceived existential threat. While the regime is currently preventing any organized ideological opposition, its “immune system” is weakening, requiring ever more resource-intensive and repressive measures to manage what has become a chronic condition of ideological sickness.

B.3. Security Apparatus Cohesion

The absolute loyalty of the security apparatus is the regime’s center of gravity and the ultimate guarantor of its survival. This loyalty is not taken for granted but is ruthlessly engineered and enforced.

• Current State: The Korean People’s Army (KPA), the Ministry of State Security (MSS), and other coercive bodies are bound to the Supreme Leader through a multi-layered system of control. This includes pervasive surveillance by competing agencies, a vast network of informants, and the ever-present threat of brutal punishment for perceived disloyalty.³ The regime employs classic “coup-proofing” strategies, such as creating parallel security forces that spy on one another, promoting officers based on political loyalty rather than military competence, and frequently rotating key commanders to prevent them from building independent power bases.³ Kim Jong Un has also worked to reassert the WPK’s authority over the military, partially rolling back his father’s “military-first” policy to ensure the army remains the “army of the party”.⁵⁵ The security forces are the top priority for resource allocation, but the immense cost of the strategic nuclear and missile programs comes at the expense of the conventional forces, creating a potential source of friction.⁵⁷ The integrity of border security has been dramatically enhanced since 2020, with new fences, guard posts, and “shoot-on-sight” orders demonstrating the regime’s capacity for total control when it deems it necessary.⁹
• Trajectory (Δ): Cohesion and loyalty to the current leader remain absolute and stable (↔).
• Volatility: Medium. The system is stable under a single, clear commander. Volatility would spike to extreme levels in a leadership succession crisis, where competing security services could turn on one another.

This system represents the “Perfection of Tyranny” feedback loop. The interlocking mechanisms of surveillance and the threat of collective punishment create a state of pervasive fear that makes conspiracy or organized dissent virtually impossible. Any nascent threat is immediately identified and eliminated. This powerful balancing loop ensures stability. However, the system’s perfection is its weakness. It is optimized to defend against threats from below but is entirely dependent on a single command node at the top. It is not designed to manage a crisis of authority within the leadership itself. In such a scenario, the very mechanisms of coup-proofing—pitting agencies against each other—would likely accelerate a catastrophic failure as they engage in a violent conflict for control.

Module C: Social Cohesion and Human Development

In the DPRK, social cohesion is not a goal of the state but a threat to be managed. The regime’s primary tool of social control is the deliberate and systematic fragmentation of society.

C.1. Social Fragmentation (Songbun)

• Current State: North Korean society is fundamentally atomized by the Songbun system, a hereditary socio-political caste system that is the bedrock of the regime’s control.¹⁰ Every citizen is classified at birth into one of three main classes—”core,” “wavering,” or “hostile”—based on the perceived political loyalty of their ancestors.¹⁰ This status dictates every aspect of a person’s life, including where they can live, their access to education and employment, and their allotment of food and housing.¹¹ This system is reinforced by a pervasive surveillance network, including the inminban (neighborhood watches), which function as state-level informant systems, and severe restrictions on internal movement and communication.⁶¹ The explicit purpose of this structure is to prevent the formation of horizontal social bonds and collective identity outside of the state’s control. While the rise of the jangmadang has introduced wealth as a secondary factor influencing one’s life chances—allowing some with low Songbun to bribe their way to certain privileges—it has not dismantled the fundamental discriminatory structure of the system.⁶⁴
• Trajectory (Δ): The Songbun system remains a stable (↔) and core feature of the regime’s control architecture.
• Volatility: Low. The system is deeply entrenched and is a foundational element of the state.

The regime’s strategy is one of social control through engineered distrust. Unlike other authoritarian states that attempt to foster a unified national identity, the DPRK deliberately and permanently divides its people against each other. Songbun ensures that citizens view their neighbors not as potential allies, but as competitors for scarce resources or as potential informants. This institutionalized distrust is arguably the single most powerful stabilizing feature of the regime. It explains how the state survived the catastrophic famine of the 1990s without facing a large-scale, organized rebellion. Even under conditions of extreme universal hardship, the population remained fragmented, focused on individual survival, and incapable of the collective action necessary to challenge the state.

Module D: Environmental and Resource Security

Environmental factors in the DPRK are not merely background stressors but can act as direct triggers for acute humanitarian and economic crises, which the regime then incorporates into its cycle of political control.

D.1. Food Security and Climate Vulnerability

• Current State: The country is exceptionally vulnerable to environmental shocks. Decades of systemic mismanagement, including widespread deforestation for fuel and the creation of terraced farms on steep, unsuitable hillsides, have resulted in catastrophic soil degradation and erosion.¹² This has decimated the land’s natural resilience, making it highly susceptible to extreme weather events.⁶⁷ Combined with decrepit agricultural infrastructure, such as crumbling irrigation systems and dams, even moderate floods or droughts can have a devastating impact on crop yields.¹³ This pattern was the immediate trigger for the 1990s famine, when massive floods in 1995 washed away harvests and critical grain reserves.¹³ This vulnerability persists, with North Korea consistently ranking as one of the countries most at risk from climate-related disasters.¹⁵
• Trajectory (Δ): The country’s environmental vulnerability is static (↔) at a very high level, with no meaningful state-led efforts to address the root causes of deforestation and soil degradation.
• Volatility: High. The country’s food supply is subject to the high volatility of regional weather patterns.

This dynamic creates the “Famine Cycle,” a reinforcing feedback loop that the regime has learned to exploit. The cycle begins with systemic vulnerability caused by poor environmental and agricultural management. A climate shock, such as a typhoon or drought, then triggers a harvest failure. The state’s dysfunctional and corrupt distribution system fails to cope, leading to widespread malnutrition or famine. However, the regime uses the ensuing crisis as a political opportunity. It tightens domestic social controls under the guise of an emergency, blames external enemies (e.g., “hostile forces” and sanctions) for the hardship, and issues appeals for international humanitarian aid. When this aid arrives, it is not distributed equitably but is channeled through the PDS to reward the loyal elite and security forces, thus reinforcing the “Engineered Inequality” model and shoring up the regime’s power base. The underlying environmental vulnerabilities remain unaddressed, ensuring the cycle will repeat.

Synthesis and Predictive Outlook

The DPRK endures not because it is strong, but because it has perfected a unique system of control that turns its weaknesses into instruments of survival. It operates in a perpetual state of managed crisis, balancing on the knife’s edge between total control and catastrophic collapse. Its stability is an emergent property of interlocking feedback loops that reinforce the primacy of the Kim regime above all other state functions.

Analysis of Critical Feedback Loops

• The “Perfection of Tyranny” Loop (Balancing/Stabilizing): This is the regime’s core stabilizing mechanism. It begins with the state’s demand for absolute loyalty to the Suryong. To enforce this, the regime has built an unparalleled apparatus of mutual surveillance, comprising the Songbun system, the inminban informant network, and multiple, competing security agencies that monitor the population and each other.³ This creates a pervasive atmosphere of fear and distrust, which atomizes society and prevents the formation of any organized opposition.⁷⁰ The successful preemption of dissent reinforces the absolute power of the leader and the security organs, which in turn justifies even greater surveillance. This powerful balancing loop explains the regime’s remarkable resilience to internal pressures.
• The “Nuclear Trap” (Reinforcing/Vicious Cycle): This loop defines the DPRK’s foreign policy and economic strategy.

1. Initial Condition: The regime perceives an existential threat from the United States and South Korea and views nuclear weapons as the only absolute guarantee of its survival.⁵⁸
2. State Action: It diverts a massive portion of national resources to the nuclear and missile programs, starving the civilian economy and agricultural sector.⁵⁷
3. Systemic Reaction: This action triggers severe international sanctions, which cripple the formal economy and worsen the population’s welfare.²³
4. Political Consequence: The resulting economic hardship and international isolation reinforce the regime’s paranoid, siege mentality. It concludes that its hostile external environment makes the nuclear deterrent even more essential, justifying further investment in weapons over welfare. This creates a self-perpetuating cycle of militarization, isolation, and economic decay.

• The “Market Dilemma” (Balancing vs. Reinforcing): This loop represents the central contradiction of the modern DPRK economy. The collapse of the state’s command economy created a crisis (famine) that threatened the regime’s existence. The spontaneous emergence of the jangmadang acted as a crucial balancing loop, providing food and goods, preventing mass starvation, and relieving pressure on the state.⁶ However, these same markets have become a reinforcing loop of ideological erosion. They create economic independence, undermine the state’s role as provider, and serve as the primary conduit for illicit foreign information that delegitimizes the regime’s propaganda.⁸ The regime is thus caught: cracking down too hard on the markets risks triggering the very collapse they prevent, while allowing them to flourish cedes ideological and social control.
• The “Famine Cycle” (Reinforcing/Vicious Cycle): This loop demonstrates how the regime turns environmental crisis into political opportunity. Decades of poor agricultural planning and deforestation create extreme vulnerability to climate shocks.¹² A major flood or drought causes a harvest failure. The state’s dysfunctional distribution system fails to cope, leading to a food crisis. The regime then uses the crisis to tighten political control, blame external enemies, and appeal for international aid, which it diverts to shore up the loyalty of its elite, thus perpetuating the underlying vulnerabilities and ensuring the cycle’s repetition.¹⁴

Reasonable Worst-Case Scenario (36-Month Horizon): “The Succession Crisis”

Given the system’s design, a popular uprising is a low-probability event. The most plausible path to rapid state failure is an elite-driven crisis triggered by a leadership contingency.

• Trigger: The sudden, unexpected death or severe incapacitation of Kim Jong Un.
• Scenario Narrative:

1. Initial Power Vacuum: A small circle of top officials, including Kim Yo Jong and senior figures from the WPK Organization and Guidance Department, the Central Military Commission, and the Ministry of State Security, attempts to manage the situation in secret while they jockey for position.
2. Contested Regency: Kim Yo Jong, leveraging her Paektu bloodline and control over the propaganda apparatus, moves to establish herself as regent for a young heir. She issues directives through official party channels.
3. Factional Split: A hardline faction within the military and/or security services, deeply embedded in a patriarchal power structure and viewing Kim Yo Jong as an illegitimate or weak leader, refuses to accept her authority. Seeing a once-in-a-generation opportunity to seize power, they challenge her legitimacy, arguing for a collective leadership dominated by the military or promoting their own figurehead.
4. Breakdown of Command and Control: The “coup-proofing” architecture backfires catastrophically. Competing and contradictory orders are issued to different security units—for example, the KPA General Staff versus the Supreme Guard Command (Kim’s personal bodyguards). The agencies, long conditioned to view each other with suspicion, begin to act on their own interests.
5. Elite Violence in Pyongyang: The power struggle escalates from political maneuvering to armed clashes between rival security units for control of key locations in the capital—party headquarters, television stations, and leadership compounds.
6. State Fragmentation: As central authority collapses, provincial leaders and regional KPA commanders are forced to choose sides or act autonomously to secure their own territory, resources, and nuclear/conventional assets. This leads to the de facto fragmentation of the state, a cessation of central political authority, and a high risk of wider conflict and humanitarian disaster.

Concluding Assessment and Tipping Points

The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, assessed as being in a perpetual CRISIS state, maintains a high degree of stability against external pressures and internal popular dissent due to its perfected mechanisms of political and social control. Its primary fragility is internal, structural, and concentrated at the absolute apex of the power structure. The system is designed to be shock-resistant, but not resilient; it can withstand immense pressure but will shatter rather than bend if its central pillar is removed.

Therefore, the estimated probability of a regime-threatening instability event within the 36-month forecast period is LOW (10-15%). However, the impact of such an event would be catastrophic and rapid, with a high likelihood of leading directly to the Collapse stage of the state lifecycle.

The key tipping points that could trigger this rapid transition are:

1. Political Tipping Point (Highest Probability/Impact): The sudden death or incapacitation of Kim Jong Un without a designated and consolidated adult successor, triggering a violent power struggle between Kim Yo Jong and senior figures in the military and security services.
2. Security Tipping Point: A factional split within the senior command of the KPA or MSS, potentially triggered by a senior official launching a preemptive coup attempt to avoid being purged. This could lead to a situation where different security units receive conflicting orders, initiating the “Succession Crisis” scenario even with the leader still alive.
3. Economic/Humanitarian Tipping Point (Lowest Probability): A catastrophic famine on a scale surpassing that of the 1990s, caused by a confluence of a multi-year environmental disaster, a complete withdrawal of China’s economic safety net, and the simultaneous failure of illicit revenue streams. For this to become a regime-threatening event, the crisis would have to be so severe that it causes a systemic breakdown of the food supply chain for the military and provincial security forces, leading to large-scale desertions, localized mutinies, and a loss of the state’s monopoly on force outside of Pyongyang.

Works Cited

• Analysis from specialist outlets such as 38 North, NK News, and CSIS Beyond Parallel.
• Investigative journalism and defector testimony.
• Official reports from the UN Panel of Experts on DPRK sanctions.
• Reports from the World Food Programme (WFP) and Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO).
• Reports from human rights organizations and academic journals.

---

If you find this post useful, please share the link on Facebook, with your friends, etc. Your support is much appreciated and if you have any feedback, please email me at in**@*********ps.com. Please note that for links to other websites, we are only paid if there is an affiliate program such as Avantlink, Impact, Amazon and eBay and only if you purchase something. If you’d like to directly donate to help fund our continued report, please visit our donations page.

---

Sources Used

1. North Korea’s Political System*, accessed October 7, 2025, http://www.jiia.or.jp/en/pdf/digital_library/korean_peninsula/160331_Takashi_Sakai.pdf
2. Report: Kim Jong Un Has Purged a Confirmed 421 Officials – Radio …, accessed October 7, 2025, https://www.rfa.org/english/news/korea/nksc-purge-02222019182245.html
3. Keeping Kim: How North Korea’s Regime Stays in Power | The …, accessed October 7, 2025, https://www.belfercenter.org/publication/keeping-kim-how-north-koreas-regime-stays-power
4. UN probing 58 alleged crypto heists by North Korea worth $3 billion …, accessed October 7, 2025, https://therecord.media/north-korea-cryptocurrency-hacks-un-experts
5. 2024: A jackpot year for North Korea’s cyber criminals, accessed October 7, 2025, https://www.orfonline.org/research/2024-a-jackpot-year-for-north-korea-s-cyber-criminals
6. A Changing North Korea, accessed October 7, 2025, https://libertyinnorthkorea.org/learn-a-changing-north-korea
7. Beyond State Control: The Struggle Over North Korea’s Markets – 38 …, accessed October 7, 2025, https://www.38north.org/2025/09/beyond-state-control-the-struggle-over-north-koreas-markets/
8. Information and Its Consequences in North Korea – Beyond Parallel, accessed October 7, 2025, https://beyondparallel.csis.org/information-and-its-consequences-in-north-korea/
9. “A Sense of Terror Stronger than a Bullet” | Human Rights Watch, accessed October 7, 2025, https://www.hrw.org/report/2024/03/07/a-sense-of-terror/stronger-than-a-bullet-the-closing-of-north-korea-2018%E2%80%932023
10. Han Nam-su: Songbun | George W. Bush Presidential Center, accessed October 7, 2025, https://www.bushcenter.org/freedom-collection/han-nam-su-songbun
11. SONGBUN | Social Class in a Socialist Paradise – Liberty in North Korea, accessed October 7, 2025, https://libertyinnorthkorea.org/blog/songbun
12. Inside North Korea’s Environmental Collapse | NOVA | PBS, accessed October 7, 2025, https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/article/inside-north-koreas-environmental-collapse/
13. 1990s North Korean famine – Wikipedia, accessed October 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1990s_North_Korean_famine
14. Marked for Life: Songbun, North Korea’s Social Classification System | American Enterprise Institute – AEI, accessed October 7, 2025, https://www.aei.org/events/marked-for-life-songbun-north-koreas-social-classification-system/
15. DPR Korea | World Food Programme, accessed October 7, 2025, https://www.wfp.org/countries/democratic-peoples-republic-korea
16. An Overview of the Report of the UN Panel of Experts … – CCDCOE, accessed October 7, 2025, https://ccdcoe.org/incyder-articles/an-overview-of-the-report-of-the-un-panel-of-experts-established-pursuant-to-the-security-council-resolution-1874-2009-investigations-into-north-korean-cyberattacks-continue/
17. Treasury Targets Arms Trafficking Network and Financial Facilitators for DPRK Weapons Programs, accessed October 7, 2025, https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0264
18. Illicit activities of North Korea – Wikipedia, accessed October 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illicit_activities_of_North_Korea
19. North Korea’s Trading of Small Arms and Light Weapons: Open …, accessed October 7, 2025, https://www.38north.org/2022/09/north-koreas-trading-of-small-arms-and-light-weapons-open-source-information-analysis-of-sanctions-implementation/
20. Beyond Parallel – Bringing transparency to Korean Unification. – CSIS, accessed October 7, 2025, https://beyondparallel.csis.org/
21. CRINK Economic Ties: Uneven Patterns of Collaboration – CSIS, accessed October 7, 2025, https://www.csis.org/analysis/crink-economic-ties-uneven-patterns-collaboration
22. Sanctions against North Korea: An Unintended Good? – CSIS, accessed October 7, 2025, https://www.csis.org/analysis/sanctions-against-north-korea-unintended-good
23. Trading with Pariahs: North Korean Sanctions and the Challenge of …, accessed October 7, 2025, https://academic.oup.com/isagsq/article/4/2/ksae031/7668102
24. What the Estimates of the Balance of Foreign Exchange of North Koreans Would Tell Us, accessed October 7, 2025, https://www.kdi.re.kr/file/download?atch_no=7%2FPMLB%2BdGY7QLK2TW3cKOw%3D%3D
25. North Korean remote worker scheme – Wikipedia, accessed October 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Korean_remote_worker_scheme
26. The Emergence of a Hidden Market Economy in North Korea (Chapter 5) – Questioning Conventional Assumptions of Competition Dynamics, accessed October 7, 2025, https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/questioning-conventional-assumptions-of-competition-dynamics/emergence-of-a-hidden-market-economy-in-north-korea/618AF6BD97C1BE3E8D6FE403CC7AA379
27. North Korea’s antique food rationing « North Korean Economy Watch, accessed October 7, 2025, https://www.nkeconwatch.com/2005/01/15/north-koreas-antique-food-rationing/
28. North Korea’s Shackled Economy | NCNK, accessed October 7, 2025, https://www.ncnk.org/resources/briefing-papers/all-briefing-papers/north-koreas-shackled-economy
29. NORTH KOREA’S INFRASTRUCTURE CONDITIONS AND …, accessed October 7, 2025, https://www.hri.co.kr/upload/board/EVP200007_05.PDF
30. Economy of North Korea – Wikipedia, accessed October 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_North_Korea
31. Jangmadang (North Korea) – Global Informality Project, accessed October 7, 2025, https://www.in-formality.com/wiki/index.php?title=Jangmadang_(North_Korea)
32. Jangmadang – Wikipedia, accessed October 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jangmadang
33. Paradise Evaporated: Escaping the No Income Trap in North Korea – CSIS Beyond Parallel, accessed October 7, 2025, https://beyondparallel.csis.org/paradise-evaporated-escaping-no-income-trap-north-korea/
34. The Rise of the Jangmadang – Economics Declassified, accessed October 7, 2025, https://economicsdeclassified.wordpress.com/2022/02/15/the-rise-of-the-jangmadang/
35. [INSS] The Hidden Food Crisis in North Korea (Issue Brief 101).hwp, accessed October 7, 2025, http://www.inss.kr/upload/bbs/BBSA05/202306/F20230629171422140.pdf
36. dpr korea – needs and priorities – UNICEF, accessed October 7, 2025, https://www.unicef.org/dprk/media/296/file/DPR%20Korea.pdf
37. Health in North Korea – Wikipedia, accessed October 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_in_North_Korea
38. Kim Jong Un – Wikipedia, accessed October 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kim_Jong_Un
39. PAD-ing Out a Purge? | North Korea Leadership Watch, accessed October 7, 2025, https://www.38north.org/articles/affiliates/north-korea-leadership-watch/32781/
40. Central Military Commission of the Workers’ Party of Korea – Wikipedia, accessed October 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Military_Commission_of_the_Workers%27_Party_of_Korea
41. Central Committee of the Workers’ Party of Korea – Wikipedia, accessed October 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Committee_of_the_Workers%27_Party_of_Korea
42. Kim Jong-un and North Korea’s Power Structure, accessed October 7, 2025, https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/north-koreas-power-structure
43. Kim Jong-un: North Korean leader’s longest absence in seven years sparks new health rumours | The Independent, accessed October 7, 2025, https://www.independent.co.uk/asia/east-asia/kim-jong-un-health-update-north-korea-b1957006.html
44. Clickbait on Kim Jong Un’s Health – 38 North: Informed Analysis of …, accessed October 7, 2025, https://www.38north.org/2022/02/clickbait-on-kim-jong-uns-health/
45. Kim Yo Jong – Wikipedia, accessed October 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kim_Yo_Jong
46. Sister or daughter? A look at who could succeed North Korean …, accessed October 7, 2025, https://www.channelnewsasia.com/asia/north-korea-leader-succession-kim-jong-un-sister-daughter-5383386
47. en.wikipedia.org, accessed October 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juche#:~:text=It%20is%20summarized%20as%20%22the,of%20everything%20and%20decides%20everything%22.
48. Juche | North Korea, Ideology, Kim Dynasty, & Facts | Britannica, accessed October 7, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/topic/Juche
49. Ten Principles for the Establishment of a Monolithic Ideological System – Wikipedia, accessed October 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ten_Principles_for_the_Establishment_of_a_Monolithic_Ideological_System
50. Propaganda in North Korea – Wikipedia, accessed October 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda_in_North_Korea
51. Censorship in North Korea – Wikipedia, accessed October 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship_in_North_Korea
52. World Report 2024: North Korea | Human Rights Watch, accessed October 7, 2025, https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2024/country-chapters/north-korea
53. Mass surveillance in North Korea – Wikipedia, accessed October 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_surveillance_in_North_Korea
54. Pyongyang’s Survival Strategy: Tools of Authoritarian Control in …, accessed October 7, 2025, https://www.belfercenter.org/publication/pyongyangs-survival-strategy-tools-authoritarian-control-north-korea
55. North Korea Briefing – 38 North, accessed October 7, 2025, https://www.38north.org/wp-content/uploads/pdf/North-Korea-Briefing_2025-0731.pdf
56. Korean People’s Army – Wikipedia, accessed October 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_People%27s_Army
57. North Korea and weapons of mass destruction – Wikipedia, accessed October 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Korea_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction
58. NORTH KOREA – Defense Intelligence Agency, accessed October 7, 2025, https://www.dia.mil/Portals/110/Documents/News/North_Korea_Military_Power.pdf
59. Number of North Korean Defectors Drops to Lowest Level in Two …, accessed October 7, 2025, https://www.csis.org/analysis/number-north-korean-defectors-drops-lowest-level-two-decades
60. Marked for Life: Songbun, North Korea’s Social Classification …, accessed October 7, 2025, https://www.hrnk.org/documentations/marked-for-life-songbun-north-koreas-social-classification-system/
61. World Report 2025: North Korea | Human Rights Watch, accessed October 7, 2025, https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2025/country-chapters/north-korea
62. Inminban – Wikipedia, accessed October 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inminban
63. People’s Groups and Patterns in Neighborhood Surveillance …, accessed October 7, 2025, https://www.38north.org/2020/12/ddraudt121020/
64. North Korea’s Caste System | Human Rights Watch, accessed October 7, 2025, https://www.hrw.org/news/2016/07/05/north-koreas-caste-system
65. Songbun – Wikipedia, accessed October 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Songbun
66. Impact of Deforestation on Agro-Environmental Variables in Cropland, North Korea – MDPI, accessed October 7, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/8/1354
67. Environment of North Korea – Wikipedia, accessed October 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environment_of_North_Korea
68. Reckless deforestation blamed for flood damage in North Korea | IATP, accessed October 7, 2025, https://www.iatp.org/news/reckless-deforestation-blamed-for-flood-damage-in-north-korea
69. Natural Disasters and Food Shortages in North Korea: Disaster Justice, accessed October 7, 2025, https://ipus.snu.ac.kr/eng/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2022/01/%EC%9D%B4%EC%8A%88%EB%B8%8C%EB%A6%AC%ED%95%91%EC%A7%80%EC%8B%9D%EA%B3%BC-%EB%B9%84%ED%8F%89-9%ED%98%B8%EC%98%81%EB%AC%B8_%EC%B5%9C%EC%A7%84%EC%9A%A9.pdf
70. Shades of Parallel Oppression: South Africa’s Apartheid and North Korea’s Songbun as Crimes Against Humanity – NK Hidden Gulag Blog, accessed October 7, 2025, https://www.nkhiddengulag.org/blog/shades-of-parallel-oppression-south-africas-apartheid-and-north-koreas-songbun-as-crimes-against-humanity
71. Korea: The Enduring Policy Blindspot – Army War College – Publications, accessed October 7, 2025, https://publications.armywarcollege.edu/News/Display/Article/3974660/korea-the-enduring-policy-blindspot/