• Overall Fragility Score: 7.2/10
• Lifecycle Stage Assessment: STRESSED. The United States exhibits persistent negative trends across multiple critical domains, eroding institutional resilience and social cohesion. The state’s capacity to manage shocks is diminishing as chronic risks accumulate without effective mitigation. The system is characterized by increasing brittleness, driven by extreme political polarization, eroding institutional trust, and an unsustainable fiscal trajectory.

Key Drivers of Systemic Fragility:

1. The Polarization-Paralysis Trap: A reinforcing feedback loop where economic precarity fuels extreme political polarization, leading to legislative gridlock that prevents the state from addressing the root economic problems, which in turn deepens public anger and further entrenches polarization.
2. The Fiscal Doom Loop: A vicious cycle where structural deficits, driven by non-discretionary spending and rising interest rates, force unsustainable borrowing. The resulting debt service costs crowd out productive investment and necessitate politically toxic fiscal choices, further eroding state legitimacy and social cohesion.
3. The Collapse of Institutional Trust: A catastrophic decline in public confidence in nearly all core state institutions—including the legislature, judiciary, executive, and electoral system—is crippling the government’s ability to function effectively and command the voluntary compliance of its citizens.

• Consolidated Forecast Trajectory (36-Month Horizon): Deteriorating. The identified reinforcing feedback loops are accelerating the erosion of state resilience. Barring a significant shock or a fundamental shift in political dynamics, the system’s trajectory is toward a more fragile state, increasing the probability of a transition to the ‘Crisis’ stage within the forecast horizon.

State Fragility Dashboard

Module	Indicator	Current State	Trajectory (Δ)	Volatility	Assessment & Rationale (with Sources)
A. Economic Resilience	A.1. Public Finances
	Public Debt-to-GDP Ratio	125% (FY2025)	Deteriorating: Rising from 100% in FY2025.	High	Historic high, projected by CBO to reach 156% by 2055, indicating an unsustainable path.1
	Budget Deficit (% of GDP)	6.2% (2025)	Deteriorating: Rising from 5.6% in 2025 to 5.9% by 2035.	Moderate	Structurally high, far above the 50-year historical average of 3.7%, signaling a fundamental fiscal imbalance.2
	Cost of Borrowing (10-yr Treasury)	4.25% (Aug 2025)	Static/Elevated: Up significantly from post-2020 lows.	High	Elevated borrowing costs dramatically increase debt service payments, which are projected to exceed defense spending.2
	Currency Stability	Dominant reserve currency	Stable but weakening: Share of reserves has declined.	Moderate	The USD remains dominant, but diversification is a growing trend. Its status provides a critical buffer, but this is not guaranteed indefinitely.5
	Tax Revenue (% of GDP)	~17% (FY2024-25)	Static: Structurally insufficient to cover spending.	Low	Revenue remains below spending (~23% of GDP), highlighting a persistent political failure to address the fiscal gap.2
	Reliance on Foreign-Held Debt	$9.13 Trillion (Q2 2025)	Increasing	Moderate	Growing reliance on foreign capital to finance deficits creates a vulnerability to shifts in global investor sentiment.9
	A.2. Economic Structure
	Labor Productivity Growth	+3.3% (Q2 2025 annualized)	Improving (short-term) / Static (long-term)	Moderate	Recent quarterly growth is positive, but long-term trends show a slowdown compared to historical peaks, indicating underlying structural issues.10
	Unemployment (U3) / Underemployment (U6)	4.3% / 8.1% (Aug 2025)	Deteriorating: Both metrics have ticked up in 2025.	Moderate	The low U3 rate masks significant underemployment (U6 is nearly double U3), indicating a large, insecure workforce.12
	Labor Force Participation Rate	62.3% (Aug 2025)	Deteriorating: Down 0.4 percentage points over the year.	Low	Declining participation suggests workforce discouragement not captured by the headline unemployment rate.12
	Inflation Rate (CPI YoY)	2.9% (Aug 2025)	Static/Elevated: Persistently above the Fed’s 2% target.	Moderate	While down from recent peaks, inflation remains a top public concern, eroding real wages and household confidence.15
	Business Investment (CapEx)	Projected +4.7% in 2025	Improving	Moderate	Investment is driven by tech and reshoring, but it is unclear if gains are diffusing broadly enough to boost national productivity long-term.18
	Household Debt-to-GDP	Total Debt: $18.39 Trillion	Deteriorating: At an all-time nominal high.	Low	Record debt levels indicate consumption is heavily credit-fueled, making households vulnerable to economic shocks and interest rate hikes.20
	A.3. Household Health
	Public Concern over Inflation	63% see it as a “very big problem” (Feb 2025).	Static/High	Low	Persistent, high-level public anxiety over cost of living is a primary driver of political and social discontent.17
	Real Median Household Income	$83,730 (2024)	Static: No significant change from pre-pandemic 2019 levels.	Low	Stagnant real incomes for the median household, despite aggregate GDP growth, signifies a broken link between economic growth and broad prosperity.23
	Income/Wealth Inequality (Gini)	0.418 (2023, WB); 0.494 (2021, Census)	Deteriorating: Trending upwards over the long term.	Low	High and rising inequality erodes social cohesion and fuels perceptions of a “rigged” system.24
	Poverty Rate (Official)	10.6% (2024)	Improving slightly: Down from 11.5% in 2022.	Low	While the official rate has slightly improved, tens of millions remain in poverty, with high rates among specific demographics.27
	“Deaths of Despair”	Suicide, drug overdose, alcoholic liver disease deaths at or near record highs.	Rapidly Deteriorating	High	A critical indicator of systemic failure, reflecting deep socio-economic distress and contributing to declining national life expectancy.30
	Household Financial Fragility	37% cannot cover a $400 emergency expense with cash.	Static/High	Low	A vast portion of the population lacks basic financial resilience, creating a brittle society vulnerable to shocks.34
B. Political Legitimacy	B.1. Governance
	Judicial Independence (Perception)	Favorable view of Supreme Court near 30-year low (47%).	Deteriorating	High	Extreme partisan split in views (71% R vs 26% D) indicates the Court is widely seen as a political actor, undermining its role as a neutral arbiter.37
	Perception of Corruption	CPI Score: 65/100 (lowest ever); Rank: 28th.	Deteriorating: Score dropped 4 points in the last year.	Moderate	Declining score reflects an “erosion of ethical norms at the highest levels of power,” weakening public trust.38
	Erosion of Democratic Norms	Documented erosion of norms regarding elections, rule of law.	Deteriorating	High	Challenges to electoral processes and executive overreach create “dangerous cracks” in democratic institutions.41
	Elite Fragmentation/Gridlock	High levels of legislative paralysis (e.g., FEC).	Deteriorating	High	Extreme polarization renders government incapable of addressing major national problems, fueling a cycle of failure and disillusionment.44
	B.2. State Legitimacy
	Public Trust in Institutions	Average confidence near 46-year low. Trust in Congress is ~10%.	Deteriorating	Low	A catastrophic collapse of public trust across nearly all institutions cripples the state’s ability to govern effectively.46
	Perceived Electoral Integrity	Deeply partisan; confidence is contingent on election outcomes.	Deteriorating	High	The lack of a shared belief in the fairness of the electoral process is a fundamental breakdown of the social contract.48
	State’s Perceived Efficacy	53% believe democracy is “not working.” 67% see govt as “corrupt.”	Deteriorating	Low	Widespread belief that the state is incompetent and/or captured delegitimizes its authority and actions.50
	B.3. Security Apparatus
	Monopoly on Violence	Challenged by rise of domestic violent extremism (DVE).	Deteriorating	High	DVE is identified by DHS/FBI as a top threat; a significant portion of the public believes political violence may be necessary.52
	Public Confidence in Law/Military	Military: 62% confidence. Police: Deeply partisan divide.	Stable (Military) / Polarizing (Police)	Moderate	Military remains one of the few trusted institutions, but confidence in law enforcement is highly polarized, weakening its legitimacy.47
	Military Political Neutrality	High, but under strain from domestic deployments and politicization.	Deteriorating	Moderate	Increasing use of the military for domestic political purposes threatens its non-partisan status, a critical institutional guardrail.56
C. Social Cohesion	C.1. Social Fragmentation
	Affective Polarization	High and increasing; partisans view opponents as immoral, dishonest.	Deteriorating	High	Extreme animosity between political “tribes” prevents the formation of broad coalitions needed to solve national problems.57
	Societal Fault Lines	Deep divisions along urban-rural, racial, and educational lines.	Static/High	Low	Multiple, overlapping cleavages fragment society and are exploited for political gain, hindering national unity.59
	Social Mobility	Lower than most other wealthy nations; stagnant.	Static/Low	Low	The “American Dream” is perceived as unattainable for many, as 43% born in the bottom quintile remain there, undermining a core national narrative.61
	Interpersonal Trust	Low: 34% say “most people can be trusted,” down from 46% in 1972.	Deteriorating	Low	A decline in generalized trust atomizes society, making collective action and compromise exceptionally difficult.63
	C.2. Public Services
	Healthcare (Outcomes vs. Cost)	Low life expectancy (77.0) and high infant mortality (5.4) vs. OECD, despite highest per capita spending ($12,742).	Deteriorating	Low	The system delivers poor value for money, a tangible and delegitimizing failure of state capacity.65
	Education (PISA Scores)	Below OECD average in math (465 vs 472); above in reading/science.	Static/Mediocre	Low	Persistent mediocrity in math and large attainment gaps based on parental background indicate a failure to prepare the future workforce.68
	Infrastructure (ASCE Grade)	Overall grade: ‘C’. Investment gap: $3.7 trillion.	Improving slowly	Low	Decades of underinvestment have left critical infrastructure in a state of mediocrity, imposing hidden costs on the economy.70
D. Environmental Security	D.1. Climate Vulnerability
	Exposure to Climate Risks	High and increasing (wildfires, hurricanes, drought, heatwaves).	Deteriorating	High	NCA5 confirms all regions face growing threats, stressing infrastructure and the economy.73
	Critical Infrastructure Resilience	Low: Power grid faces a 100x increase in outage risk by 2030.	Deteriorating	High	The energy grid, in particular, is highly vulnerable to extreme weather and is not being built out fast enough to meet demand.75
	State Capacity for Adaptation	Low: Hindered by political gridlock and fiscal constraints.	Static/Low	Low	The state’s ability to make necessary long-term investments in resilience is severely hampered by the political paralysis detailed in Module B.
	D.2. Resource Stress
	Food Supply Chain Resilience	Moderate: Stressed by climate shocks, tariffs, and import dependency.	Deteriorating	Moderate	Multiple stressors are increasing costs and revealing vulnerabilities in the national food supply.78
	Water Security (Key Basins)	Colorado River & Ogallala Aquifer are in long-term, severe decline.	Rapidly Deteriorating	High	Unsustainable depletion of foundational water sources threatens agriculture in multiple states and is a source of future interstate conflict.81
	Biodiversity Loss / Land Degradation	High: 1.52 Mha of natural forest lost in 2024.	Deteriorating	Low	The “silent collapse” of foundational ecosystems represents a massive, unfunded long-term liability for the national economy.85

Detailed Domain Analysis: Systemic Fault Lines

Module A: Economic Resilience and State Capacity

A.1. Public Finances: The Path to Fiscal Dominance

The United States is on a fiscally unsustainable path where non-discretionary spending and debt service costs are beginning to dictate and constrain all other policy choices, a condition known as fiscal dominance. The public debt-to-GDP ratio has reached a historic high of 125% for fiscal year 2025, a level that signals significant difficulty in repayment.¹ Projections from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) indicate a deteriorating trajectory, with debt forecast to reach a record 156% of GDP by 2055.² This is driven by a structural mismatch between spending and revenue; federal spending stands at approximately 23.3% of GDP while revenues are only around 17.1%, resulting in a persistent annual deficit of 6.2% of GDP in 2025—well above the 50-year historical average of 3.7%.²

This structural imbalance is becoming critically dangerous due to the rising cost of borrowing. With the 10-year Treasury note yield at 4.25% as of August 2025, interest costs on the national debt are exploding.⁴ Net interest payments are projected to reach a record 3.2% of GDP in 2025, a figure that now exceeds federal spending on defense or Medicare.² The CBO projects these costs will surge to 5.4% of GDP by 2055, creating a massive and unavoidable drain on state capacity.² This situation severely constrains the government’s ability to respond to future shocks—such as another pandemic, a major war, or a financial crisis. The fiscal “dry powder” has been expended, and any new major spending initiative will directly compete with these ballooning interest payments, forcing politically toxic trade-offs.

The data reveals a self-reinforcing fiscal cycle. Projections show that mandatory spending on programs like Social Security and Medicare, combined with these escalating interest costs, is growing faster than the underlying economy.² The extreme political gridlock detailed in Module B makes the necessary fiscal adjustments through significant tax increases or entitlement reform politically impossible in the short term. Consequently, the state must issue ever-increasing amounts of debt to cover this structural deficit, which now relies on over $9.1 trillion in foreign-held securities.³ This increased supply of debt, coupled with persistent inflation risks, keeps borrowing costs elevated. Higher borrowing costs, in turn, mean that interest payments consume an even larger share of the budget, crowding out discretionary spending on infrastructure, R&D, and defense, and requiring even more borrowing to fill the gap. This is a classic “fiscal doom loop,” where the consequences of debt create the need for more debt, progressively stripping the state of its policy flexibility.

A.2. Economic Structure & Productivity: A Bifurcated Reality

The U.S. economic model is exhibiting signs of a structural crisis. While certain headline indicators appear stable or even positive, underlying factors reveal an economy that is failing to generate broad-based prosperity, creating a bifurcated reality for its citizens. Business investment (CapEx) is projected to rise by a healthy 4.7% in 2025, and labor productivity registered a strong 3.3% annualized increase in the second quarter of 2025, driven by investments in digital transformation, AI, and supply chain reshoring.¹⁰

However, these positive indicators mask deeper weaknesses. The headline U3 unemployment rate of 4.3% is low by historical standards, but the broader U6 measure of underemployment, which includes the jobless, marginally attached workers, and those working part-time for economic reasons, stands at 8.1%.¹² This nearly two-fold gap, combined with a labor force participation rate that has declined to 62.3% over the past year, points not to a universally tight labor market but to one characterized by a large, insecure “precariat” class whose economic anxiety is not captured by the headline unemployment number.¹² Furthermore, consumption appears increasingly debt-fueled rather than income-driven, with total household debt reaching a nominal all-time high of $18.39 trillion.²⁰ This makes a large portion of the economy highly vulnerable to interest rate changes and economic shocks.

Despite significant business investment in new technologies like AI, long-term national productivity growth remains sluggish compared to historical peaks.¹⁸ This suggests that the gains from new technology are not diffusing broadly across the economy. Instead, they appear to be captured by a narrow set of “superstar” firms and sectors, exacerbating inequality rather than lifting overall national productivity. This disconnect is a core feature of the modern U.S. economy, fueling the wage stagnation and financial distress detailed in the following section.

A.3. Household Financial Health: The Collapse of the American Dream

The financial health of the American populace is profoundly distressed, and this widespread precarity serves as the primary fuel for the social and political crises detailed in subsequent modules. Public concern over the economy is paramount, with 63% of Americans citing inflation as a “very big problem” in early 2025.¹⁷ This anxiety is rooted in tangible economic realities: real median household income has remained flat since before the pandemic, stagnating at $83,730 in 2024.²³ This stagnation has occurred alongside a dramatic rise in inequality. The U.S. Gini coefficient, a standard measure of income inequality, is high for a developed nation at 0.418, with other measures showing it trending even higher in recent years, indicating a growing concentration of wealth and income at the top.²⁴

This combination of stagnant wages and rising inequality has produced a level of financial fragility that represents a national security threat. According to the Federal Reserve’s Survey of Household Economics and Decisionmaking (SHED), a staggering 37% of American adults report that they could not cover an unexpected $400 emergency expense using cash or its equivalent.³⁵ With household debt service payments consuming over 11.2% of disposable income, a vast portion of the population is living paycheck-to-paycheck, lacking the basic financial cushion to absorb even minor shocks.⁸⁸ This financial brittleness makes the population less resilient to any systemic disruption—be it a recession, a supply chain crisis, or a climate disaster—and more susceptible to populist and extremist messaging that promises simple solutions to their economic pain.

The most tragic metric of this systemic failure is the rise in “deaths of despair.” These are not isolated individual tragedies but a statistical indicator of a deep-seated social and economic breakdown. The United States is experiencing epidemic levels of deaths from suicide, which have returned to peak rates; drug overdoses, with provisional data predicting over 76,000 deaths in the 12 months ending April 2025; and alcoholic liver disease.³⁰ Research explicitly links this phenomenon to economic stagnation, rising medical costs, and declining social cohesion.³¹ These deaths are a primary driver of the nation’s declining life expectancy and serve as the ultimate, lagging indicator of a system that is failing to provide hope, purpose, and stability for a significant segment of its population.

Module B: Political Legitimacy and Institutional Integrity

B.1. Governance and Rule of Law: The Polarization-Paralysis Dilemma

Extreme elite fragmentation and partisan gridlock have rendered the U.S. government increasingly incapable of addressing long-term structural problems, creating a vicious cycle of public disillusionment and deepening polarization. This paralysis is evident across government institutions. The Federal Election Commission (FEC), for example, is described as “paralyzed by partisan gridlock,” frequently lacking the quorum needed to enforce campaign finance law, symptomatic of a broader legislative dysfunction where bipartisan cooperation is now the exception rather than the rule.⁴⁴

This political decay is corroding foundational pillars of the rule of law. Public perception of the U.S. Supreme Court has fallen to near a three-decade low, with a stark partisan divide: 71% of Republicans view the court favorably, compared to just 26% of Democrats.³⁷ A majority of Americans (56%) believe the justices are failing to keep their political views out of their decisions, transforming the court in the public’s eye from a neutral arbiter into a political actor.³⁷ This erosion of trust in the judiciary is leading to a state where legal processes are no longer seen as neutral but as weapons to be wielded by one faction against another, turning the justice system from a stabilizing force into an accelerant of conflict.

This institutional decay is mirrored by a decline in ethical norms. The U.S. score on Transparency International’s Corruption Perceptions Index has fallen to 65 out of 100, its lowest level ever, with the decline explicitly linked to an “erosion of ethical norms at the highest levels of power”.³⁸ This combination of legislative paralysis and perceived corruption creates an active process of state decay. The government’s inability to solve major problems—such as the national debt (Module A) or failing infrastructure (Module C)—allows these chronic risks to worsen. The public observes this incompetence, and their faith in the system’s efficacy plummets, fueling anti-system sentiment and deeper polarization, which in turn makes gridlock even more intractable.

B.2. State Legitimacy and Public Trust: The Collapse of Consent

The United States is experiencing a catastrophic collapse of public trust across all major institutions, causing the state to lose its most fundamental asset: the voluntary compliance of its citizens. Polling data from Gallup shows that average confidence in U.S. institutions is near a 46-year low.⁴⁶ Only 33% of Americans trust the federal government, while 67% believe it is “corrupt” and 61% believe it is “wasteful”.⁵⁰ Confidence in Congress hovers around 10%, and trust in the Supreme Court and the presidency are at or near historic lows.⁴⁶

This collapse of trust extends to the bedrock of the democratic process: elections. Confidence in electoral integrity has become deeply partisan and is now largely contingent on which party wins an election.⁴⁹ Following the 2024 election, Republican confidence in the process rose sharply while Democratic confidence fell, demonstrating a breakdown in a shared, foundational belief in the system’s fairness regardless of outcome.⁴⁹ This lack of a shared factual basis for governance is a precondition for a state’s transition from ‘Stressed’ to ‘Crisis’. When large segments of the population operate with entirely different sets of “facts” regarding key issues like election outcomes, the state loses its ability to mount a collective response to any challenge, as every government action is viewed through a lens of extreme suspicion.

This loss of trust renders effective governance nearly impossible. A state with record-low public trust loses its most crucial and cost-effective asset: voluntary public compliance. It becomes incapable of mounting a unified response to any major crisis, as demonstrated by the deeply politicized and ineffective response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Every government policy, communication, and directive is filtered through partisan animosity, making the state appear illegitimate to a large portion of its own people. A majority of voters (53%) now believe the system of democracy itself is not working.⁵¹

B.3. Security Apparatus Cohesion: The Inward Turn

The state’s monopoly on the legitimate use of force is being challenged internally, forcing the security apparatus to pivot from external defense to internal control and straining its cohesion and political neutrality. The primary threat to public safety is now identified by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) as domestic violent extremism (DVE).⁵⁴ Data shows that right-wing extremist violence has been more frequent and lethal in recent years.⁵² This internal threat is compounded by a growing acceptance of political violence within the populace; one recent poll showed that nearly a third of Americans believe it may be necessary to “set the country on track”.⁹¹

Public confidence in the state’s instruments of force, while higher than for other institutions, is fracturing along partisan lines. The military remains one of the few institutions commanding majority confidence, at 62%.⁴⁷ However, this support is eroding among younger Americans, and the institution’s prized neutrality is under strain from its increasing use in domestic law enforcement and its entanglement in political agendas.⁵⁶ Confidence in law enforcement is even more polarized, with Republicans expressing far greater trust than Democrats.⁴⁷ Federal law enforcement agencies like the FBI are now viewed through a hyper-partisan lens, seen by one faction as a legitimate tool of the rule of law and by another as a weaponized “deep state.” This delegitimization cripples their ability to investigate domestic threats without triggering massive political backlash.

In a system where trust in all other political and civil institutions has collapsed, the military stands as the last widely perceived legitimate institution. In a severe constitutional crisis, such as a contested presidential election, immense pressure would fall upon the military leadership to act as the ultimate arbiter. Any action—or inaction—by the military in such a scenario would shatter its remaining neutrality and likely trigger a crisis of cohesion within its own ranks, representing a final and critical tipping point toward state failure.

Module C: Social Cohesion and Human Development

C.1. Social Fragmentation: The Atomization of Society

U.S. society is fracturing along multiple, overlapping fault lines, with partisan identity emerging as a “mega-identity” that subsumes other affiliations and drives intense animosity. Deep societal divisions exist along urban-rural, racial, and educational lines, creating a fragmented social landscape.⁵⁹ This fragmentation is supercharged by affective polarization—the tendency of partisans not just to disagree with but to dislike and distrust one another. Polling data shows that growing shares of Republicans and Democrats view those in the other party as more dishonest, immoral, and unintelligent than other Americans.⁵⁸ This dynamic is more severe in the U.S. than in Western Europe, partly because political identity has become “stacked” with other social identities, sorting the population into mutually hostile tribes.⁹⁴

This social atomization is exacerbated by a collapse in interpersonal trust and social mobility. The share of Americans who agree that “most people can be trusted” has fallen from 46% in 1972 to just 34% in recent surveys, a decline linked to rising inequality and political polarization.⁶³ Concurrently, the promise of upward mobility, a cornerstone of the American social contract, appears broken. Intergenerational economic mobility in the U.S. is lower than in many other wealthy nations; data shows that 43% of children born into the bottom income quintile remain there as adults.⁶¹

When the core national myth of upward mobility is proven false by lived experience and empirical data, it creates a profound crisis of legitimacy for the entire socio-economic system. This fuels powerful narratives that the “system is rigged,” which in turn drives the political polarization and anti-institutional anger that paralyze the state. The result is a society that has lost the ability to form the broad coalitions necessary to address complex national problems, creating a political environment of perpetual gridlock where compromise is nearly impossible.

C.2. Public Services and Welfare: The Broken Promise

The tangible and persistent failures of core public services serve as a direct and damning referendum on state competence, acting as a primary source of public anger and delegitimization. The post-war American social contract was built on the premise of rising living standards and a better future for one’s children. The visible failure to deliver on this promise is uniquely corrosive to the national psyche.

This failure is most stark in healthcare. The United States spends vastly more on healthcare per capita than any other developed nation—an estimated $12,742 in 2022, compared to an average of $6,850 for similarly wealthy countries.⁶⁷ Despite this massive expenditure, health outcomes are mediocre to poor. U.S. life expectancy at 77.0 years and its infant mortality rate of 5.4 deaths per 1,000 live births are both worse than the OECD averages of 80.5 years and 4.1 deaths, respectively.⁶⁵ This profound “value-for-money” crisis suggests a system that is not merely inefficient but systemically broken, reinforcing public perceptions of waste and corruption.

Similar underperformance is evident in other domains. In education, U.S. 15-year-olds score below the OECD average in mathematics on the PISA assessment, with 25 other education systems performing better.⁶⁸ Large and persistent gaps in educational attainment remain tied to parental education levels, undermining equality of opportunity.⁶⁹ In infrastructure, decades of underinvestment are reflected in the American Society of Civil Engineers’ (ASCE) 2025 Report Card, which assigned the nation an overall grade of ‘C’.⁷⁰ While this is an improvement from the previous ‘C-‘, nine of 18 critical categories remain in the ‘D’ range, and the total investment gap has grown to an estimated $3.7 trillion.⁷¹ These failing public goods are powerful, daily symbols of a state that is not delivering on its basic promises to its citizens.

Module D: Environmental and Resource Security

D.1. Climate Change Vulnerability: The Systemic Risk Multiplier

Climate change is not a standalone environmental issue but a powerful systemic risk multiplier that stresses every other part of the national system. The Fifth National Climate Assessment (NCA5) confirms that all U.S. regions are experiencing harmful and accelerating impacts, including more frequent and intense hurricanes, wildfires, droughts, and extreme rainfall events.⁷³ These shocks are not isolated incidents; they are powerful amplifiers that exacerbate vulnerabilities in the economic, social, and political domains.

The nation’s critical infrastructure is acutely vulnerable. The U.S. power grid, in particular, faces what a 2025 Department of Energy report describes as an unsustainable situation, with the retirement of reliable power sources and rising demand from AI and industry projected to increase the risk of power outages by a factor of 100 by 2030.⁷⁵ Extreme weather events directly threaten power plants, refineries, and transmission lines, with rising sea levels and storm surge posing an existential threat to dozens of coastal energy facilities.⁹⁶

The economic consequences are already materializing in the insurance market, which is acting as a “canary in the coal mine” for unpriced climate risk. Average homeowners’ insurance premiums have surged by over 30% nationwide between 2020 and 2023.⁹⁷ In high-risk states like Florida and California, major insurers are withdrawing from the market entirely, concluding that the risk of climate-driven disasters is becoming uninsurable at prices the market can bear.⁹⁸ This is creating a crisis of affordability and availability, forcing homeowners onto state-backed “insurers of last resort.” This process effectively socializes the risk, transferring a massive, unfunded liability onto state and, eventually, federal taxpayers. This is a leading indicator of a coming wave of climate-driven fiscal crises at the state level, which will ultimately require federal bailouts, further stressing the already precarious national budget. A state weakened by the political gridlock and fiscal constraints detailed in Modules A and B has a vastly diminished capacity to absorb and respond to these multiplying, climate-driven shocks.

D.2. Resource Stress and Environmental Degradation: The Silent Collapse

The slow, often invisible degradation of foundational natural systems represents a chronic risk of the highest order, creating vast, hidden liabilities that undermine long-term economic resilience and national security. This “silent collapse” is most evident in the nation’s water security.

Two of the most critical freshwater sources in the country are in a state of terminal decline. The Colorado River Basin, which supplies water to 40 million people and vast agricultural regions, is in a state of long-term drought, with system contents down significantly year-over-year and projections showing continued shortage conditions.⁸¹ Simultaneously, the Ogallala Aquifer—a massive underground reservoir that supports a quarter of all U.S. agricultural water supply—is being depleted at an unsustainable rate. Water levels in parts of Kansas, for example, dropped by more than a foot in 2024 alone, continuing a multi-decade trend of decline from which there is no recovery on a human timescale.⁸³

This slow-motion crisis is creating the conditions for severe future conflict. The water compacts governing the Colorado River were designed for a wetter climate and are now obsolete. As water levels continue to fall, federally mandated cuts will force zero-sum choices between states like Arizona, Nevada, and California, as well as between agricultural and urban users. This will inevitably trigger intense legal and political battles between states, stressing the federal system and potentially leading to a breakdown in interstate cooperation—a key indicator of weakening state integrity. Similarly, the depletion of the Ogallala Aquifer threatens the economic viability of a significant portion of the nation’s food supply, creating a hidden economic liability that will eventually come due. These processes represent the degradation of the foundational life-support systems of the country, undermining long-term security.

Synthesis and Predictive Outlook: Feedback Loops and Cascade Failure

Dynamic Weighting Rationale

In its current STRESSED state, the United States system is most vulnerable to the chronic, slow-burn indicators that are fundamentally eroding its resilience over time. Therefore, this analysis assigns a higher weight to factors in Module A (Public Debt, Inequality), Module C (Social Fragmentation, Stagnant Social Mobility), and Module D (Aquifer Depletion, Climate-driven Insurance Market Collapse). These are the deep structural weaknesses creating the preconditions for a more acute crisis. Should a tipping point be breached, the analytical weighting would immediately shift to the acute, fast-moving indicators that can trigger rapid state failure. These are primarily located in Module B, such as a full-blown crisis of electoral integrity or the politicization and fracture of the security apparatus, as these are the factors that would precipitate a non-linear transition to the CRISIS lifecycle stage.

Critical Reinforcing Feedback Loops (Vicious Cycles)

1. The Polarization-Paralysis Trap:

• Initial Condition: Decades of rising economic inequality and stagnant real incomes create widespread household financial precarity (A.3) and a pervasive sense that the economic system is unfair and the “American Dream” is unattainable (C.1).
• Societal Reaction: This economic distress and cultural anxiety fuels populist anger, resentment, and extreme affective polarization, sorting the population into mutually hostile political tribes who view each other as immoral and a threat to the nation (C.1).
• Political Consequence: This extreme polarization leads to legislative gridlock and institutional decay, as political actors are incentivized to obstruct opponents rather than engage in compromise or problem-solving. This renders the government incapable of addressing the root economic and social problems that are causing the public’s anger (B.1).
• Feedback: The state’s visible failure to solve problems further erodes public trust in institutions and deepens popular anger, which in turn fuels even greater polarization and anti-system sentiment, reinforcing the paralysis and worsening the initial conditions of economic distress and social fragmentation.

2. The Fiscal Doom Loop:

• Initial Condition: A structural deficit exists, driven by politically protected mandatory spending (e.g., Social Security, Medicare) that is growing faster than the economy (A.1).
• Political Consequence: Due to political polarization, there is no consensus to either raise revenues or reform entitlements to close the gap, forcing the state to finance the deficit through continuous, large-scale debt issuance (A.1, B.1).
• Economic Reaction: The increased supply of government debt and persistent inflation risks lead to higher borrowing costs (interest rates) demanded by investors (A.1).
• Feedback: These higher interest rates cause debt service payments to explode, consuming an ever-larger share of the federal budget. This crowds out productive public investment in infrastructure, education, and R&D (C.2), which weakens long-term economic growth and shrinks the future tax base. The resulting fiscal pressure forces politically toxic choices between austerity, tax hikes, or even more borrowing, all of which erode social cohesion and political legitimacy, thus deepening the initial crisis.

3. The Climate-Economic Stress Cascade:

• Initial Condition: A fiscally constrained and politically paralyzed state (A.1, B.1) faces an increasing frequency and intensity of climate-driven extreme weather events (D.1).
• Systemic Reaction: These events damage critical infrastructure (e.g., the power grid), disrupt agricultural output and supply chains, and impose massive, unfunded disaster relief costs on the federal government, further straining the budget (D.1, D.2, A.1).
• Economic Consequence: Private insurance markets in high-risk areas begin to collapse, withdrawing coverage and transferring enormous financial risk to state-backed “insurers of last resort” and, ultimately, the federal taxpayer. This threatens regional housing markets and creates new fiscal liabilities (D.1).
• Feedback: The cumulative economic damage from both direct disaster costs and the insurance crisis exacerbates household financial precarity (A.3), fuels social tensions over resource allocation, and further reduces the state’s already diminished capacity to manage the next, inevitable shock, accelerating a downward spiral.

Reasonable Worst-Case Scenario (36-Month Horizon): “The Crisis of Contested Legitimacy”

A highly contested presidential election occurs within the 36-month forecast horizon. The outcome is narrow and immediately marred by widespread, coordinated claims of fraud, which are amplified through polarized information ecosystems where trust in mainstream institutions is nonexistent. The losing side, citing a complete loss of faith in both electoral integrity and the judiciary (B.1, B.2), refuses to concede. This triggers a constitutional crisis as competing slates of electors are certified by partisan-controlled legislatures in several key states.

Mass protests, some of which turn violent, erupt in major cities and state capitals. These are met by an aggressive and heavily militarized law enforcement response, further inflaming tensions and creating martyrs for both sides. The Supreme Court agrees to hear a case related to the election, but its eventual ruling is seen as nakedly partisan by half the country and is openly defied by political leaders on the losing side, shattering the Court’s remaining legitimacy. As political paralysis in Washington deepens and the peaceful transfer of power is in doubt, global financial markets react. A major credit rating agency downgrades U.S. sovereign debt, citing extreme political instability. This causes a sharp spike in Treasury yields, triggering a financial panic and a sudden, severe economic downturn that magnifies the ongoing civil unrest (A.1). The incumbent President, facing what is framed as an insurrection, attempts to use the military for domestic law enforcement on a wide scale. This action leads to a crisis of command, with public debate over the legality of the orders and questions of loyalty circulating within the security apparatus (B.3), pushing the state from the ‘Stressed’ to the ‘Crisis’ lifecycle stage.

Tipping Points and Strategic Warning

The transition from a ‘Stressed’ to a ‘Crisis’ state is not likely to be gradual but will be triggered by a rapid, non-linear event. The key potential tipping points that could precipitate such a transition within the 36-month forecast horizon are:

• Political Tipping Point: A presidential election where the results are not accepted by a significant portion of the population and key state or federal institutions, leading to a constitutional crisis and a definitive breakdown in the peaceful transfer of power.
• Economic Tipping Point: A sovereign debt crisis triggered by a sudden loss of foreign investor confidence in the U.S. Treasury market. This could be precipitated by an act of extreme political brinkmanship, such as a failure to raise the debt ceiling that results in a technical default on U.S. obligations, causing a catastrophic spike in interest rates and a global financial panic.
• Social Tipping Point: A series of assassinations of high-profile political figures, judges, or law enforcement officials that leads to a cycle of retaliatory political violence that authorities are unable or unwilling to control, effectively ending the state’s monopoly on violence in certain regions.
• Security Tipping Point: A clear, public refusal by a significant element of the military or federal law enforcement (e.g., a service chief, a key combatant command) to obey a legal order from the civilian command authority during a domestic crisis, signaling a fracture in the chain of command and the collapse of a final institutional guardrail.

Works cited

1. fiscaldata.treasury.gov, accessed October 6, 2025, https://fiscaldata.treasury.gov/americas-finance-guide/national-debt/#:~:text=The%20average%20GDP%20for%20fiscal,difficulty%20in%20repaying%20its%20debt.
2. Analysis of CBO’s March 2025 Long-Term Budget Outlook, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.crfb.org/papers/analysis-cbos-march-2025-long-term-budget-outlook
3. An August 2025 Budget Baseline – Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.crfb.org/blogs/august-2025-budget-baseline
4. 10-Year Treasury Yield Long-Term Perspective: August 2025 – dshort, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.advisorperspectives.com/dshort/updates/2025/09/02/10-year-treasury-yield-long-term-perspective-august-2025
5. Dollar’s Share of Reserves Held Steady in Second Quarter When Adjusted for FX Moves, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.imf.org/en/Blogs/Articles/2025/10/01/dollars-share-of-reserves-held-steady-in-second-quarter-when-adjusted-for-fx-moves
6. US Dollar’s Shifting Landscape: From Dominance to Diversification, accessed October 6, 2025, https://am.gs.com/en-us/advisors/insights/article/2025/dollars-shifting-landscape-from-dominance-to-diversification
7. How much revenue has the US government collected this year? – U.S. Treasury Fiscal Data, accessed October 6, 2025, https://fiscaldata.treasury.gov/americas-finance-guide/government-revenue/
8. Federal Receipts as Percent of Gross Domestic Product (FYFRGDA188S) | FRED, accessed October 6, 2025, https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/FYFRGDA188S
9. Federal Debt Held by Foreign and International Investors (FDHBFIN) | FRED | St. Louis Fed, accessed October 6, 2025, https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/FDHBFIN
10. Productivity and Costs, Second Quarter 2025, Revised (PDF) – Bureau of Labor Statistics, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/prod2.pdf
11. Productivity Home Page : U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.bls.gov/productivity/
12. The Employment Situation – August 2025 – Bureau of Labor Statistics, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/empsit.pdf
13. Unemployment Rate (UNRATE) | FRED | St. Louis Fed, accessed October 6, 2025, https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/UNRATE
14. Total Unemployed, Plus All Persons Marginally Attached to the Labor Force, Plus Total Employed Part Time for Economic Reasons, as a Percent of the Civilian Labor Force Plus All Persons Marginally Attached to the Labor Force (U-6) (U6RATE) | FRED, accessed October 6, 2025, https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/U6RATE
15. Food Price Outlook – Summary Findings | Economic Research Service – ERS.USDA.gov, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/food-price-outlook/summary-findings
16. United States Inflation Rate – Trading Economics, accessed October 6, 2025, https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/inflation-cpi
17. Americans Continue to View Several Economic Issues as Top National Problems, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2025/02/20/americans-continue-to-view-several-economic-issues-as-top-national-problems/
18. The State of Equipment Investments | First American, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.faef.com/thought-leadership/2025-equipment-investments
19. Companies Plan To Ramp Up Capital Spending – LPL Financial, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.lpl.com/research/blog/companies-plan-to-ramp-up-capital-spending.html
20. Household Debt Rises to $18.39 Trillion in Q2 – dshort – Advisor Perspectives, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.advisorperspectives.com/dshort/updates/2025/08/06/household-debt-credit-report-q2-2025
21. Household Debt and Credit Report – FEDERAL RESERVE BANK of NEW YORK, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.newyorkfed.org/microeconomics/hhdc
22. Top Public Worries in the U.S. – Yale Program on Climate Change Communication, accessed October 6, 2025, https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/publications/top-public-worries-in-the-u-s/
23. No Significant Change in Estimated U.S. Median Household Income – U.S. Census Bureau, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2025/09/median-household-income.html
24. Income inequality in the United States – Wikipedia, accessed October 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Income_inequality_in_the_United_States
25. Gini index – United States – World Bank Open Data, accessed October 6, 2025, https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.POV.GINI?locations=US
26. Income in the United States: 2024 – U.S. Census Bureau, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2025/demo/p60-286.html
27. U.S. Poverty Statistics and Facts (Updated for 2025) – Debt.org, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.debt.org/faqs/americans-in-debt/poverty-united-states/
28. Poverty in the United States: 2024 – U.S. Census Bureau, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2025/demo/p60-287.html
29. What is the poverty rate in the US? – USAFacts, accessed October 6, 2025, https://usafacts.org/answers/what-is-the-us-poverty-rate/country/united-states/
30. Suicide Data and Statistics – CDC, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.cdc.gov/suicide/facts/data.html
31. Deaths of Despair: A Major and Increasing Contributor to United States Deaths, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.gavinpublishers.com/article/view/deaths-of-despair-a-major-and-increasing-contributor-to-united-states-deaths
32. Data Resources | Overdose Prevention – CDC, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.cdc.gov/overdose-prevention/data-research/facts-stats/index.html
33. FastStats – Alcohol Use – CDC, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/alcohol.htm
34. When the Unexpected Happens, Be Ready with an Emergency Fund, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.stlouisfed.org/publications/page-one-economics/2025/sep/when-unexpected-happens-be-ready-with-emergency-fund
35. Here’s How Many Americans Can’t Afford a $400 Emergency—The Numbers May Shock You – Investopedia, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/here-s-how-many-americans-can-t-afford-a-usd400-emergency-the-numbers-may-shock-you-11814788
36. 37% of Americans can’t afford an emergency expense over $400, according to Empower research, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.empower.com/press-center/37-americans-cant-afford-emergency-expense-over-400-according-empower-research
37. Favorable views of Supreme Court remain near historic low – Pew Research Center, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2025/09/03/favorable-views-of-supreme-court-remain-near-historic-low/
38. Corruption in the United States – Wikipedia, accessed October 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corruption_in_the_United_States
39. Transparency International Releases Latest Corruption Perceptions Index, accessed October 6, 2025, https://us.transparency.org/news/transparency-international-releases-latest-corruption-perceptions-index/
40. United States – Transparency.org, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.transparency.org/en/countries/united-states
41. Democratic erosion in the US | Brookings, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.brookings.edu/collection/democratic-erosion-in-the-u-s/
42. U.S. Democratic Backsliding in Comparative Perspective | Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, accessed October 6, 2025, https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2025/08/us-democratic-backsliding-in-comparative-perspective?lang=en
43. Threats to US Democracy: Dangerous Cracks in Its Pillars – Brookings Institution, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/threats-to-us-democracy-dangerous-cracks-in-us-democracy-pillars/
44. Partisan Gridlock and the FEC: 50 Years of Increasing Paralysis | Independent Voter News, accessed October 6, 2025, https://ivn.us/posts/partisan-gridlock-and-fec-50-years-increasing-paralysis-2025-05-19
45. What Gridlock and Polarization Mean for American Democracy | Bipartisan Policy Center, accessed October 6, 2025, https://bipartisanpolicy.org/event/what-gridlock-and-polarization-mean-for-american-democracy/
46. Institutions | Gallup Topic, accessed October 6, 2025, https://news.gallup.com/topic/category-institutions.aspx
47. Democrats’ Confidence in U.S. Institutions Sinks to New Low – Gallup News, accessed October 6, 2025, https://news.gallup.com/poll/692633/democrats-confidence-institutions-sinks-new-low.aspx
48. The Trump Administration’s Campaign to Undermine the Next Election | Brennan Center for Justice, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/trump-administrations-campaign-undermine-next-election
49. Tracking Attitudes About Voters’ Confidence in Elections – States United Democracy Center, accessed October 6, 2025, https://statesunited.org/resources/confidence-poll/
50. The State of Public Trust in Government 2025, accessed October 6, 2025, https://ourpublicservice.org/publications/the-state-of-public-trust-in-government-2025/
51. Nearly 8 In 10 Voters Say The United States Is In A Political Crisis, Quinnipiac University National Poll Finds; Optimism Sinks For Freedom Of Speech Being Protected In The U.S., accessed October 6, 2025, https://poll.qu.edu/poll-release?releaseid=3932
52. Analysis: What data shows about political extremist violence | PBS News, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/right-wing-extremist-violence-is-more-frequent-and-deadly-than-left-wing-violence-data-shows
53. Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Develops New Strategy to Counter Domestic Terrorism and Organized Political Violence – The White House, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2025/09/fact-sheet-president-donald-j-trump-develops-new-strategy-to-counter-domestic-terrorism-and-organized-political-violence/
54. Homeland Threat Assessment 2025, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/2024-10/24_0930_ia_24-320-ia-publication-2025-hta-final-30sep24-508.pdf
55. Survey: Americans’ Military Support is Growing | AUSA, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.ausa.org/news/survey-americans-military-support-growing
56. Military traditions of neutrality face strain as Trump drags U.S. military into his political agenda | Milwaukee Independent, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.milwaukeeindependent.com/newswire/military-traditions-neutrality-face-strain-trump-drags-u-s-military-political-agenda/
57. Political Parties & Polarization – Research and data from Pew Research Center, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.pewresearch.org/topic/politics-policy/political-parties-polarization/
58. Political Polarization – Research and data from Pew Research Center, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.pewresearch.org/topic/politics-policy/political-parties-polarization/political-polarization/
59. Creating a shared vision of rural resilience through community-led civic structures, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/creating-a-shared-vision-of-rural-resilience-through-community-led-civic-structures/
60. What everyone should know about rural America ahead of the 2024 election | Brookings, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/what-everyone-should-know-about-rural-america-ahead-of-the-2024-election/
61. Research Agenda for Improving Economic and Social Mobility in the United States, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.nationalacademies.org/our-work/research-agenda-for-improving-economic-and-social-mobility-in-the-united-states
62. Socioeconomic mobility in the United States – Wikipedia, accessed October 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socioeconomic_mobility_in_the_United_States
63. Americans’ Declining Trust in Each Other and Reasons Behind It | Pew Research Center, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.pewresearch.org/2025/05/08/americans-trust-in-one-another/
64. The Trust Tipping Point Report – Allstate Corporation, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.allstatecorporation.com/resources/allstate/attachments/allstatecorporation/trust-journal.pdf?_ga=2.24676474.1109282887.1750969881-1332804123.1750969881
65. International Comparison | 2022 Annual Report | AHR – America’s Health Rankings, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.americashealthrankings.org/learn/reports/2022-annual-report/international-comparison
66. International Comparison | 2023 Annual Report | AHR – America’s Health Rankings, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.americashealthrankings.org/learn/reports/2023-annual-report/international-comparison
67. How Does the U.S. Healthcare System Compare to Other Countries?, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.pgpf.org/article/how-does-the-us-healthcare-system-compare-to-other-countries/
68. United States – Student performance (PISA 2022) – Education GPS – OECD, accessed October 6, 2025, https://gpseducation.oecd.org/CountryProfile?primaryCountry=USA&treshold=10&topic=PI
69. Education at a Glance 2025: United States – OECD, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/education-at-a-glance-2025_1a3543e2-en/united-states_784df67f-en.html
70. Infrastructure’s upward momentum reflected in report card – ASCE, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.asce.org/publications-and-news/civil-engineering-source/civil-engineering-magazine/issues/magazine-issue/article/2025/03/infrastructures-upward-momentum-reflected-in-report-card
71. ASCE Issues 2025 National Infrastructure ‘Report Card’ – AASHTO Journal, accessed October 6, 2025, https://aashtojournal.transportation.org/asce-issues-2025-national-infrastructure-report-card/
72. ASCE Report Card Gives U.S. Infrastructure Highest-Ever C Grade, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.asce.org/publications-and-news/civil-engineering-source/society-news/article/2025/03/25/asce-report-card-gives-us-infrastructure-highest-ever-c-grade
73. Fifth National Climate Assessment Released | Science Societies, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.sciencesocieties.org/publications/csa-news/2024/january/fifth-national-climate-assessment-released
74. FACT SHEET: Fifth National Climate Assessment Details Impacts of Climate Change on Regions Across the United States | OSTP, accessed October 6, 2025, https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/ostp/news-updates/2023/11/09/fact-sheet-fifth-national-climate-assessment-details-impacts-of-climate-change-on-regions-across-the-united-states/
75. Department of Energy Releases Report on Evaluating U.S. Grid Reliability and Security, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.energy.gov/articles/department-energy-releases-report-evaluating-us-grid-reliability-and-security
76. Reliability – Department of Energy, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.energy.gov/topics/reliability
77. New Report Reveals U.S. Transmission Buildout Lagging Far Behind National Needs, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.cleanenergygrid.org/new-report-reveals-u-s-transmission-buildout-lagging-far-behind-national-needs/
78. The Grocery Supply Chain Wake-Up Call You Can’t Ignore, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.fmi.org/blog/view/fmi-blog/2025/07/09/the-grocery-supply-chain-wake-up-call-you-can-t-ignore
79. Supply Chain Disruptions In US Agriculture: 2025 Tariffs – Farmonaut, accessed October 6, 2025, https://farmonaut.com/usa/supply-chain-disruptions-in-us-agriculture-2025-tariffs
80. How Resilient Is America’s Food Supply Chain? – DeAngelis Review, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.deangelisreview.com/blog/how-resilient-is-americas-food-supply-chain
81. Colorado River Conditions Dashboard – Central Arizona Project, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.cap-az.com/colorado-river-conditions-dashboard/
82. Most Probable 24-Month Study: September 2025 – Bureau of Reclamation, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.usbr.gov/lc/region/g4000/24mo.pdf
83. Ogallala Aquifer Dropped More Than a Foot in Kansas in 2024 – Farm Policy News, accessed October 6, 2025, https://farmpolicynews.illinois.edu/2025/01/ogallala-aquifer-dropped-more-than-a-foot-in-kansas-in-2024/
84. Groundwater levels fall across western, south-central Kansas, accessed October 6, 2025, https://kgs.ku.edu/news/article/groundwater-levels-fall-across-western-south-central-kansas
85. Climate change leading cause of biodiversity loss in U.S. – The Wildlife Society, accessed October 6, 2025, https://wildlife.org/climate-change-leading-cause-of-biodiversity-loss-in-u-s/
86. Living Planet Report, accessed October 6, 2025, https://livingplanet.panda.org/
87. United States Deforestation Rates & Statistics | GFW – Global Forest Watch, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.globalforestwatch.org/dashboards/country/USA/?map=eyJjYW5Cb3VuZCI6dHJ1ZX0%3D
88. Household Debt Service Payments as a Percent of Disposable Personal Income (TDSP) | FRED, accessed October 6, 2025, https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/TDSP
89. GAO-25-107030, DOMESTIC TERRORISM: Additional Actions Needed to Implement an Effective National Strategy, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-25-107030.pdf
90. GAO-25-107030, DOMESTIC TERRORISM: Additional Actions Needed to Implement an Effective National Strategy, accessed October 6, 2025, https://files.gao.gov/reports/GAO-25-107030/index.html
91. New poll shows striking change in Americans’ views on political violence – YouTube, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y8oiCj1uUu8
92. Americans’ views of the US military | Pew Research Center, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2024/02/01/the-u-s-military/
93. Most say crime is a major problem in America’s cities, but few support a federal takeover of police departments – AP-NORC, accessed October 6, 2025, https://apnorc.org/projects/most-say-crime-is-a-major-problem-in-americas-cities-but-few-support-a-federal-takeover-of-police-departments/
94. Rising polarization in U.S. demands collaborative action – The Badger Herald, accessed October 6, 2025, https://badgerherald.com/opinion/column/2025/04/12/rising-polarization-in-u-s-demands-collaborative-action/
95. International Comparisons: Reading, Mathematics, and Science Literacy of 15-Year-Old Students – National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), accessed October 6, 2025, https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/pdf/2024/CNU_508c.pdf
96. Climate Change Impacts on Energy | US EPA, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.epa.gov/climateimpacts/climate-change-impacts-energy
97. How is climate change impacting home insurance markets? – Brookings Institution, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/how-is-climate-change-impacting-home-insurance-markets/
98. 4 ways climate change is impacting home insurance, putting us at risk | EDF, accessed October 6, 2025, https://www.edf.org/how-climate-change-impacting-home-insurance