Analytics and Reports, Law Enforcement Analytics

An Analytical Assessment of U.S. State-Level Law Enforcement Tactical Units

Executive Summary

This report provides a comprehensive analysis of law enforcement tactical units at the U.S. state level. The primary objective is to catalog these specialized teams and assess their capabilities through a data-driven comparative ranking. The evaluation framework is built upon four core criteria: Effectiveness, Training, Funding, and Resources.

The analysis identifies a landscape dominated by collateral-duty teams, where troopers perform tactical functions in addition to their primary assignments. However, a distinct upper tier of state-level capability is occupied by full-time tactical units. Teams from states such as Virginia, Massachusetts, Ohio, New Jersey, and Texas are distinguished by their dedicated personnel, higher operational tempo, and more intensive training regimens, which translates directly to superior performance and readiness.

While a comprehensive ranking of all 50 states is precluded by inconsistencies in publicly available data, this report provides a comparative scoring of several noteworthy units to illustrate the capability spectrum. The detailed methodology used for this assessment is documented in the Appendix. The report also examines the armament and technology employed by these units, identifying a clear trend toward the adoption of advanced small arms, optics, armored vehicles, and unmanned systems. This technological evolution enhances operational effectiveness but also underscores a growing capabilities gap between well-funded state teams and their local counterparts.

Section 1: The National Landscape of State-Level Tactical Law Enforcement

State-level police and highway patrol agencies across the United States maintain specialized tactical units to respond to critical incidents that exceed the capabilities of standard law enforcement personnel. These teams, known by various names such as Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT), Special Emergency Response Team (SERT), or simply Tactical Team, form a critical component of each state’s public safety infrastructure.

1.1: Operational Doctrine and Structure of State Tactical Units

The fundamental purpose of a state-level tactical team is to increase the likelihood of safely resolving high-risk incidents.1 Their core mission set is remarkably consistent across the country, focusing on scenarios involving barricaded subjects, hostage rescue, the service of high-risk arrest and search warrants, and responding to active shooter events.2 These units are designed to provide a level of weapon and tactical expertise not normally available to patrol troopers or investigators.4

The organizational structure of these teams typically falls into one of two models: full-time or collateral duty.

  • Full-Time Teams: A small number of states with significant resources or threat profiles maintain full-time tactical units. The Massachusetts State Police Special Tactical Operations (STOP) Team is one such example, whose members are assigned to the unit full-time, allowing them to dedicate themselves entirely to their specialized mission.6 Similarly, the Ohio State Highway Patrol’s Special Response Team (SRT) is a 29-member, full-time unit that responds to statewide missions.7 This model allows for a higher degree of readiness and more frequent, intensive training.
  • Collateral Duty Teams: The predominant model for state police agencies is the collateral-duty, or part-time, team. Members of these units have primary assignments as patrol troopers, detectives, or sergeants and are called upon for tactical duties as needed.3 The Maine State Police Tactical Team, for instance, consists of 34 members, but only three commanders and nine operators are full-time, with the rest serving in a collateral capacity.3 This approach is more cost-effective and allows for broader geographic distribution of tactical assets, but it presents inherent challenges in maintaining the same level of peak proficiency as a full-time unit.

A growing trend, particularly in states with numerous smaller law enforcement agencies, is regionalization. This involves multiple municipal, county, and sometimes state agencies pooling their resources to form a single, multi-jurisdictional team. The Verde Valley Regional SWAT Team in Arizona and the Weld County Regional SWAT Team in Colorado are prime examples of this model, which allows smaller departments to field a highly trained and well-equipped tactical asset that would be beyond their individual budgetary and staffing capabilities.9

The variance in team names—SWAT, SRT, STOP, SERT, Tactical Team, TEAMS—is not merely semantic. While the core functions are largely identical, the nomenclature often reflects departmental culture or a deliberate public relations strategy. In an era of increased scrutiny over the “militarization of police,” some agencies have moved away from the more aggressive-sounding “Special Weapons and Tactics” in favor of names that emphasize a more defensive or responsive posture, such as Pennsylvania’s “Special Emergency Response Team” or Virginia’s “Tactical Team”.11 This branding can impact public perception and political support for the units.

1.2: Compendium of State Police and Highway Patrol Tactical Teams

The following table provides a comprehensive catalog of the primary tactical units associated with each U.S. state’s main law enforcement agency. The data has been compiled from publicly available official sources. Intelligence gaps exist for several states where official information was not readily accessible.

StatePrimary State Law Enforcement AgencyTactical Unit Designation(s)Noted StructureSource(s)
AlabamaAlabama Law Enforcement Agency (ALEA)SWAT UnitCollateral13
AlaskaAlaska State Troopers (AST)SWAT TeamsCollateral15
ArizonaArizona Department of Public Safety (AZDPS)Special Operations Unit (SWAT)Collateral16
ArkansasArkansas State Police (ASP)Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) TeamCollateral2
CaliforniaCalifornia Highway Patrol (CHP)Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) TeamCollateral17
ColoradoColorado State Patrol (CSP)No dedicated statewide SWAT/tactical unit identifiedN/A19
ConnecticutConnecticut State Police (CSP)Emergency Services UnitN/A20
DelawareDelaware State Police (DSP)Special Operations Response Team (SORT)N/A21
FloridaFlorida Highway Patrol (FHP)Special Response Team (SRT)Collateral22
GeorgiaGeorgia State Patrol (GSP)Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) TeamCollateral5
HawaiiHawai’i Department of Law EnforcementNo dedicated statewide SWAT/tactical unit identifiedN/A25
IdahoIdaho State Police (ISP)No dedicated statewide SWAT/tactical unit identifiedN/A26
IllinoisIllinois State Police (ISP)Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) TeamsCollateral27
IndianaIndiana State Police (ISP)Emergency Response Team (SWAT) SectionCollateral29
IowaIowa State Patrol (ISP)Tactical UnitCollateral30
KansasKansas Highway Patrol (KHP)Special Response Team (SRT)Collateral32
KentuckyKentucky State Police (KSP)Special Response Team (SRT)N/A33
LouisianaLouisiana State Police (LSP)SWAT Operations (supported by Air Support Unit)Collateral35
MaineMaine State Police (MSP)Tactical TeamHybrid (Full-Time/Collateral)3
MarylandMaryland State Police (MSP)S.T.A.T.E. Team (SWAT)N/A4
MassachusettsMassachusetts State Police (MSP)Special Tactical Operations (STOP) TeamFull-Time6
MichiganMichigan State Police (MSP)Emergency Support (ES) TeamCollateral36
MinnesotaMinnesota State Patrol (MSP)Information Not AvailableN/A38
MississippiMississippi Highway Patrol (MHP)SWAT TeamCollateral39
MissouriMissouri State Highway Patrol (MSHP)SWATCollateral40
MontanaMontana Highway Patrol (MHP)Special Response Team (SRT)Collateral42
NebraskaNebraska State Patrol (NSP)SWAT TeamCollateral43
NevadaNevada State PoliceInformation Not AvailableN/A45
New HampshireNew Hampshire State Police (NHSP)Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) UnitCollateral46
New JerseyNew Jersey State Police (NJSP)T.E.A.M.S. UnitFull-Time47
New MexicoNew Mexico Department of Public SafetyTactical TeamN/A8
New YorkNew York State Police (NYSP)Special Operations Response Team (SORT)N/A48
North CarolinaN.C. State Bureau of Investigation (SBI)Special Response Team (SRT)Collateral49
North DakotaNorth Dakota Highway Patrol (NDHP)Participates in Regional Teams (e.g., Red River Valley SWAT)Regional50
OhioOhio State Highway Patrol (OSHP)Special Response Team (SRT)Full-Time7
OklahomaOklahoma Highway Patrol (OHP)Tactical Teams (East and West)Collateral51
OregonOregon State Police (OSP)SWAT TeamN/A52
PennsylvaniaPennsylvania State Police (PSP)Special Emergency Response Team (SERT)Collateral11
Rhode IslandRhode Island State Police (RISP)SWAT/Tactical TeamN/A54
South CarolinaS.C. Law Enforcement Division (SLED)SWAT TeamN/A56
South DakotaSouth Dakota Highway Patrol (SDHP)SWAT TeamsCollateral57
TennesseeTennessee Highway Patrol (THP)Special Operations Unit (SWAT)N/A58
TexasTexas Department of Public Safety (DPS)Ranger Special Operations Group (SOG)Full-Time59
UtahUtah Department of Public SafetySWAT TeamN/A60
VermontVermont State Police (VSP)Tactical Services UnitCollateral61
VirginiaVirginia State Police (VSP)Tactical TeamFull-Time62
WashingtonWashington State Patrol (WSP)SWAT TeamCollateral63
West VirginiaWest Virginia State Police (WVSP)Special Response Team (SRT)N/A64
WisconsinWisconsin State Patrol (WSP)Tactical TeamsRegional65
WyomingWyoming Highway Patrol (WHP)Special Response Team (SRT)Collateral67

Section 2: Comparative Analysis and Ranking of State-Level Tactical Units

While a comprehensive 50-state ranking is limited by data availability, it is possible to conduct a comparative analysis of several prominent state tactical units for which sufficient open-source information exists. This analysis reveals a clear tiering of capabilities, primarily driven by a unit’s operational status—full-time, hybrid, or collateral-duty. Full-time teams consistently demonstrate a higher degree of capability due to their ability to dedicate more time to training, maintain a higher state of readiness, and develop deeper expertise in specialized tactical disciplines.

2.1: Analysis of Noteworthy State-Level Capabilities and Specializations

While most state teams share a common mission, several possess unique capabilities, certifications, or mandates that elevate their status.

  • Advanced Certifications and Standards: The Arkansas State Police SWAT Team is recognized by the Department of Homeland Security as a Level 1 team, the most elite designation available.2 This indicates adherence to rigorous national standards for training, equipment, and operational readiness, setting it apart from teams that are not federally certified.
  • Integrated Force Multipliers: The Louisiana State Police demonstrates a high level of operational integration by embedding its Air Support Unit directly into SWAT operations.35 The availability of fixed-wing and rotary-wing aircraft equipped with advanced surveillance technology provides a significant tactical advantage in areas such as reconnaissance, command and control, and rapid deployment. Similarly, the Virginia State Police Tactical Team is a full-time, 70-person unit that integrates closely with its Search and Recovery Teams and Operational Medical Support unit, creating a comprehensive special operations capability.12
  • Specialized Mission Sets: Certain state teams have mandates that extend beyond typical SWAT duties. The California Highway Patrol SWAT team serves as a rapid deployment force and provides counter-assault team support to the Dignitary Protection Section and the Governor’s Protective Detail.18 This requires specialized training in protective services, a mission set not common to all state tactical units. The Maryland State Police S.T.A.T.E. Team is another example, with specific training and responsibility for waterborne operations and responding to CBRNE/WMD incidents.4
  • Full-Time Status as a Capability Indicator: The decision by states like Massachusetts, Ohio, New Jersey, and Virginia to field full-time tactical teams represents a significant investment in capability.6 The Ohio SRT, for example, trains two full days per month as a team, with individual squads training an additional day per week. This allows them to meet the National Tactical Officer’s Association (NTOA) recommendation that full-time teams train 25% of the time, a tempo that is unachievable for collateral-duty units.7 This sustained training regimen directly translates to higher proficiency and operational effectiveness.

The existence of state-level teams that serve as a resource for all law enforcement in their state, such as those in Georgia and Maine, establishes a de facto tiered response system.3 The state team is positioned as the top-level tactical asset, available when local agencies are outmatched. This structure, while efficient, can introduce complexities in command and control during multi-agency operations and can create funding tensions, as evidenced by legislative efforts in Maine to reimburse municipalities that maintain their own certified teams rather than relying solely on the state.68

2.2: Final Assessment and Ranking

Based on the analytical methodology detailed in the Appendix, the following table provides a comparative ranking of several prominent state law enforcement tactical units. The scoring reflects a comprehensive assessment of each unit’s mission, training, resources, and implied funding, based on available open-source information. The distinction between full-time and collateral-duty status is a primary driver of a unit’s capability and, consequently, its ranking.

RankUnitParent AgencyEffectiveness Score (40)Training Score (30)Resources Score (20)Funding Score (10)Composite Score (100)Key Justification
1Tactical TeamVirginia State Police (VSP)362719991Large, full-time team with an extremely high operational tempo (>1,000 calls/year) and integrated medical/search & recovery assets.62
2Special Tactical Operations (STOP) TeamMassachusetts State Police (MSP)342617986Full-time, dedicated unit with a broad mission set including high-risk warrants, dignitary protection, and active shooter training for other agencies.6
3T.E.A.M.S. UnitNew Jersey State Police (NJSP)332516882Full-time unit with an “all-threats” mission, including SWAT, rescue, underwater recovery, and counter-terrorism operations.47
4Ranger Special Operations Group (SOG)Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS)322417881Full-time, multi-component group with a focus on border security, counter-terrorism, and high-risk incidents statewide.59
5Special Response Team (SRT)Ohio State Highway Patrol (OSHP)312515778Full-time, 29-member team with a high training tempo meeting NTOA standards and a close relationship with the U.S. Marshals Service.7
6Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) TeamArkansas State Police (ASP)252014564Collateral-duty team with elite DHS Level 1 certification, indicating adherence to high national standards for training and readiness.2
7Tactical TeamMaine State Police (MSP)231813559Hybrid structure with a full-time core and collateral members; serves as the primary tactical resource for the state with a medium operational tempo (100-130 calls/year).3

Section 3: Armament, Technology, and Force Multipliers

The effectiveness of modern tactical units is intrinsically linked to the quality and sophistication of their equipment. From small arms to armored vehicles and unmanned systems, technology serves as a critical force multiplier, enhancing lethality, intelligence gathering, and officer safety.

3.1: Small Arms Profile: Sidearms and Carbines of US Tactical Teams

The selection of firearms for tactical teams reflects a focus on reliability, accuracy, and effectiveness under stress. A notable trend across law enforcement is the shift from.40 S&W back to 9mm for sidearms, driven by advancements in ammunition ballistics that provide comparable performance with higher capacity and lower recoil.69 The AR-15/M4 platform remains the dominant choice for carbines due to its modularity, ergonomic design, and effectiveness.

A significant doctrinal shift, transferred directly from the military special operations community, is the widespread adoption of pistol-mounted red dot sights (RDS). The Pennsylvania State Police recently adopted the Walther PDP series, with slides direct-milled for the Aimpoint ACRO P-2 RDS.70 Similarly, the Ohio State Highway Patrol SRT issues a customized Sig Sauer P320 AXG Legion equipped with a ROMEO-X RDS.72 This technology allows for significantly faster and more accurate target acquisition under duress compared to traditional iron sights. However, this adoption has major second-order effects, requiring agencies to overhaul firearms training programs, establish new qualification standards, and budget for the procurement and maintenance of these advanced optics.

The table below details known small arms for several prominent tactical units.

AgencyUnitStandard Issue SidearmCaliberStandard Issue Carbine/RifleCaliberNoted Optional/Specialty FirearmsSource(s)
Pennsylvania State PoliceSERTWalther PDP Compact / F-Series9mmN/AN/AN/A70
Ohio State Highway PatrolSRTSig Sauer P320 AXG Legion9mmAero Precision M4.223Sig Sauer P365XL73
Texas DPSRanger SOGSig Sauer (Model Varies).357 SigN/AN/AWilson Combat 191175

3.2: Specialized Equipment and Technological Capabilities

Beyond small arms, a suite of specialized technologies defines a modern tactical team’s capabilities.

  • Armored Vehicles: Armored personnel carriers, such as the purpose-built Lenco BearCat or repurposed military Mine-Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicles, are now considered essential.10 These vehicles provide ballistic protection during team insertion into high-threat areas and are critical for rescuing officers or civilians under fire.10
  • Robotics and Unmanned Systems: The use of tactical robots and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), or drones, has revolutionized tactical operations. Ground robots, like the one used by the Ohio SRT, can be deployed into buildings to provide real-time video intelligence without exposing officers to direct threats.7 Drones provide an invaluable aerial perspective for surveillance, command and control, and searching for suspects.60
  • Breaching and Less-Lethal Tools: A core capability of any tactical team is gaining entry to fortified structures. This is accomplished through a range of mechanical and explosive breaching tools.76 Equally important is a robust inventory of less-lethal options, including chemical agents (tear gas), diversionary devices (“flash-bangs”), and impact munitions (bean bag guns), which provide commanders with options to de-escalate incidents and resolve them with minimal force.77

The proliferation of this advanced technology, however, is creating a capabilities gap between well-funded state teams and smaller, less-resourced local units. Access to high-cost items like armored vehicles and robotics is heavily dependent on an agency’s budget and its ability to leverage grant programs or military surplus channels. This can lead to disparate outcomes in similar tactical scenarios, where officer safety and operational success are influenced as much by technology as by training.

Section 4: Conclusion and Strategic Insights

This analysis of U.S. state-level law enforcement tactical units reveals a complex and evolving landscape of specialized capabilities. The assessment confirms a distinct hierarchy among state teams, with a small number of full-time units representing the pinnacle of tactical proficiency. The Virginia State Police Tactical Team, in particular, stands out for its large size, high operational tempo, and comprehensive integrated support structure. Other full-time units in Massachusetts, New Jersey, Ohio, and Texas demonstrate a similar commitment to maintaining a high state of readiness that is difficult to replicate in a collateral-duty model.

The dominant organizational model remains the collateral-duty team, a pragmatic solution to budgetary and staffing constraints. However, the growing trend of regionalization and the existence of elite state teams with advanced federal certifications show a clear recognition that resolving modern critical incidents requires a level of training and resourcing that is difficult to achieve on a part-time basis. These state-level teams serve as the crucial top tier of tactical response within their respective states, providing essential support to local agencies that lack such capabilities.

Technologically, these units are in a period of rapid advancement. The adoption of military-grade equipment—from pistol-mounted red dot optics and advanced carbines to armored vehicles and robotic systems—is becoming the standard for high-level teams. This evolution enhances officer safety and operational effectiveness but also widens the capabilities gap between well-funded teams and their counterparts, a challenge that will require ongoing attention through grant funding and resource-sharing agreements.

Moving forward, these elite units will continue to face a dynamic threat environment, persistent budget pressures, and intense public scrutiny. Their ability to succeed will depend not only on their tactical prowess and technological superiority but also on their continued investment in rigorous training, disciplined application of force, and the institutional agility to adapt to the challenges of the future.

Appendix: Ranking Methodology for State Tactical Units

Overview

The following methodology was developed to provide a standardized, transparent, and defensible framework for the comparative assessment and ranking of U.S. state law enforcement tactical units. The scoring system is based on the four criteria specified in the user query: Effectiveness, Training, Resources, and Funding. Each criterion is assigned a weight reflecting its relative importance to a unit’s overall capability. Due to variations in publicly available data, this ranking focuses on a representative sample of teams to illustrate the methodology and capability spectrum.

Criteria, Weighting, and Scoring Metrics

1. Effectiveness (Weight: 40%)

This criterion measures a unit’s demonstrated ability to execute its mission. It is the most heavily weighted factor, as operational success is the ultimate measure of a tactical team.

  • Team Structure & Readiness (1-10 points): Scored based on the unit’s organizational model. Full-Time (8-10 points); Hybrid Full-Time/Collateral (4-7 points); Collateral Duty (1-3 points).
  • Operational Tempo (1-10 points): Scored based on the frequency of deployments, using available data. High (>500 calls/year = 8-10 points); Medium (100-500 calls/year = 4-7 points); Low/Unknown (<100 calls/year = 1-3 points).
  • Specialized Mandate/Certification (1-10 points): Points awarded for unique, high-level missions or certifications (e.g., DHS Level 1, CBRNE/WMD response, extensive dignitary protection) that go beyond standard SWAT duties.

2. Training (Weight: 30%)

This criterion assesses the quality, intensity, and specialization of a unit’s training regimen.

  • Training Regimen & Frequency (1-10 points): Scored based on the intensity and regularity of training. Full-time status, which allows for daily/weekly training and adherence to NTOA standards, receives the highest scores.
  • Advanced Skills & Instruction (1-10 points): Points awarded for documented advanced skill sets (e.g., integrated aviation/maritime operations, explosive breaching) and for serving as instructors for other agencies or at state academies.

3. Resources (Weight: 20%)

This criterion evaluates the tangible assets—personnel and equipment—that enable a unit to conduct its operations.

  • Personnel Strength (1-10 points): Scored based on the number of available tactical officers relative to other state teams (e.g., 70 members is high, <30 is average).
  • Specialized Assets (1-10 points): Points awarded for documented possession and use of high-value equipment, such as armored personnel carriers (BearCat, MRAP), tactical robotics/UAVs, and integrated air or maritime support.

4. Funding (Weight: 10%)

Direct budgetary data for individual tactical units is not publicly available. Therefore, this criterion is scored using proxies that indicate the level of financial investment. It is the least weighted factor due to its indirect nature.

  • Proxy Score (1-10 points): A composite score derived from indicators of significant financial support. Factors include: full-time operational status (implying a dedicated budget and salary line), large personnel numbers, and the acquisition and maintenance of high-cost assets (e.g., armored vehicles, helicopters).

If you find this post useful, please share the link on Facebook, with your friends, etc. Your support is much appreciated and if you have any feedback, please email me at in**@*********ps.com. Please note that for links to other websites, we are only paid if there is an affiliate program such as Avantlink, Impact, Amazon and eBay and only if you purchase something. If you’d like to directly donate to help fund our continued report, please visit our donations page.

Works cited

  1. SWAT – Wikipedia, accessed September 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SWAT
  2. Your Arkansas State Police, accessed September 7, 2025, https://dps.arkansas.gov/law-enforcement/arkansas-state-police/your-arkansas-state-police/
  3. Tactical Team | Maine State Police – Maine.gov, accessed September 7, 2025, https://www.maine.gov/dps/msp/specialty-units/tactical-team
  4. S.T.A.T.E. Team – Maryland State Police, accessed September 7, 2025, https://mdsp.maryland.gov/Organization/Pages/FieldOperationsBureau/STATETeam.aspx
  5. SWAT – Georgia Department of Public Safety, accessed September 7, 2025, https://dps.georgia.gov/swat
  6. Specialized Units | Mass.gov, accessed September 7, 2025, https://www.mass.gov/info-details/specialized-units
  7. Saving Lives – Ohio Department of Public Safety, accessed September 7, 2025, https://publicsafety.ohio.gov/links/5-4saferohio.pdf
  8. Law Enforcement Agencies (Federal, State, and Local) – Virginia State Police, accessed September 7, 2025, https://vsp.virginia.gov/public-resource-links/law-enforcement-agencies-federal-state-and-local/
  9. SWAT Team | Cottonwood, AZ, accessed September 7, 2025, https://cottonwoodaz.gov/346/SWAT-Team
  10. Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) – Weld County Sheriff’s Office, accessed September 7, 2025, https://www.weldsheriff.com/Divisions/Patrol/SWAT
  11. Law Enforcement Services | State Police | Commonwealth of …, accessed September 7, 2025, https://www.pa.gov/agencies/psp/programs/law-enforcement-services
  12. Special Operations Division – Virginia State Police, accessed September 7, 2025, https://vsp.virginia.gov/sections-units-bureaus/bfo/special-operations-division/
  13. adoc investigation results in hueytown arrest – Alabama Department of Corrections, accessed September 7, 2025, https://doc.alabama.gov/NewsRelease.aspx?article=ADOC+INVESTIGATION+RESULTS+IN+HUEYTOWN+ARREST
  14. Threat defused – Atmore News, accessed September 7, 2025, https://atmorenews.com/2024/10/23/threat-defused/
  15. AST Special Assignments – Alaska State Troopers Recruitment, accessed September 7, 2025, https://alaskastatetrooper.com/ast-special-assignments/
  16. Sworn – Arizona Department of Public Safety, accessed September 7, 2025, https://recruitment.azdps.gov/sworn
  17. Subdivisions – California Highway Patrol – Google Sites, accessed September 7, 2025, https://sites.google.com/view/calirp-chp/subdivisions
  18. Capitol Protection Section – California Highway Patrol – CA.gov, accessed September 7, 2025, https://www.chp.ca.gov/find-an-office/headquarters/assistant-commissioner-field/protective-services-division/capitol-protection-section/
  19. Branches, Sections and Units – Colorado State Patrol, accessed September 7, 2025, https://csp.colorado.gov/talk-with-us/branches-sections-and-units
  20. Office of Field Operation – Special Units – CT.gov, accessed September 7, 2025, https://portal.ct.gov/despp/division-of-state-police/_old/office-of-field-operation—special-units
  21. SPECIAL OPERATIONS RESPONSE TEAM (S.O.R.T.) – City of Dover Police Department, accessed September 7, 2025, https://doverpolice.org/special-operations-response-team-s-o-r-t/
  22. State Trooper, accessed September 7, 2025, https://beatrooper.com/career-opportunities/state-trooper/
  23. Unmanned Aerial System (SS-12249) – HigherGov, accessed September 7, 2025, https://www.highergov.com/sl/contract-opportunity/fl-unmanned-aerial-system-48667862/
  24. GSP – Specialized Assignments | Georgia Department of Public Safety, accessed September 7, 2025, https://dps.georgia.gov/gsp-specialized-assignments
  25. Department of Law Enforcement, accessed September 7, 2025, https://law.hawaii.gov/
  26. Welcome to Idaho State Police, accessed September 7, 2025, https://isp.idaho.gov/
  27. Special Operations Command – Illinois State Police, accessed September 7, 2025, https://isp.illinois.gov/CriminalInvestigations/SpecialOpsCommand
  28. Division of Criminal Investigation – Illinois State Police, accessed September 7, 2025, https://isp.illinois.gov/CriminalInvestigations
  29. ISP: Home – Indiana, accessed September 7, 2025, https://www.in.gov/isp/
  30. Tactical Unit | Iowa Department of Public Safety, accessed September 7, 2025, https://dps.iowa.gov/tactical-unit
  31. Iowa State Patrol Specialty Units – Iowa Department of Public Safety, accessed September 7, 2025, https://dps.iowa.gov/divisions-iowa-department-public-safety/iowa-state-patrol/specialty-units
  32. Troop S – Canine, SRT, HDU | Kansas Highway Patrol, KS, accessed September 7, 2025, https://kansashighwaypatrol.gov/find-a-troop/troop-location-map/special-operations/troop-s-canine-srt-hdu/
  33. Special Operations Division | Louisville Metro PD, KY, accessed September 7, 2025, https://www.lmpd.gov/208/Special-Operations-Division
  34. Special Response Team | Louisville Metro PD, KY, accessed September 7, 2025, https://www.lmpd.gov/228/Special-Response-Team
  35. Air Support Unit – Louisiana State Police, accessed September 7, 2025, https://lsp.org/about/leadershipsections/special-operations/air-support-unit/
  36. MSP Emergency Support Team training in UP for second time in 51 years – YouTube, accessed September 7, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vmFci7i_4Ag
  37. Michigan State Police Special Operations Division – YouTube, accessed September 7, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WPBrhFrJkEc
  38. accessed December 31, 1969, https://dps.mn.gov/divisions/msp/about-us/Pages/special-operations.aspx
  39. SWAT – | Mississippi Department of Public Safety, accessed September 7, 2025, https://www.dps.ms.gov/highway-patrol/SWAT
  40. Become A Trooper – Missouri State Highway Patrol, accessed September 7, 2025, https://statepatrol.dps.mo.gov/pages/becomeatrooper
  41. Trooper – Join the Missouri State Highway Patrol, accessed September 7, 2025, https://www.joinmshp.us/trooper
  42. Montana Highway Patrol – Wikipedia, accessed September 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montana_Highway_Patrol
  43. Arthur Kirk: The Investigation, accessed September 7, 2025, http://netwagtaildev.unl.edu/nebstudies/1975-1999/foreclosures-lead-to-violence/the-investigation/
  44. NSP SWAT arrests subject after lengthy standoff in Stratton | Central Nebraska Today, accessed September 7, 2025, https://www.centralnebraskatoday.com/2025/02/02/nsp-swat-arrests-subject-after-lengthy-standoff-in-stratton/
  45. accessed December 31, 1969, https://nhp.nv.gov/about/special_operations
  46. Special Weapons and Tactics – New Hampshire State Police – NH.gov, accessed September 7, 2025, https://www.nhsp.dos.nh.gov/our-services/field-operations-bureau/special-weapons-and-tactics
  47. Special Operations Section | New Jersey State Police – NJ.gov, accessed September 7, 2025, https://www.nj.gov/njsp/division/homeland-security/special-operations.shtml
  48. Join the State Police: Become a Trooper Home Page, accessed September 7, 2025, https://joinstatepolice.ny.gov/
  49. Special Response Team – NCSBI, accessed September 7, 2025, https://www.ncsbi.gov/Divisions/Special-Services-Unit/Special-Response-Team
  50. SWAT Team – City of Moorhead, accessed September 7, 2025, https://www.cityofmoorhead.com/departments/police/patrol/swat-team
  51. Oklahoma Highway Patrol – Wikipedia, accessed September 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oklahoma_Highway_Patrol
  52. SWAT | Eugene, OR Website, accessed September 7, 2025, https://www.eugene-or.gov/929/SWAT
  53. SERT/SWAT | Lower Makefield Township Police Department, accessed September 7, 2025, https://bucks.crimewatchpa.com/lowermakefieldtwppd/17384/content/sertswat
  54. Rhode Island State Police – Wikipedia, accessed September 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhode_Island_State_Police
  55. Become a Trooper – Rhode Island State Police, accessed September 7, 2025, https://risp.ri.gov/academy
  56. SWAT – South Carolina Law Enforcement Division, accessed September 7, 2025, https://www.sled.sc.gov/counterterrorism
  57. South Dakota Highway Patrol – Wikipedia, accessed September 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Dakota_Highway_Patrol
  58. Special Operations Unit – TN.gov, accessed September 7, 2025, https://www.tn.gov/safety/tnhp/specialop.html
  59. Texas Rangers Company – Special Operations Group | Department …, accessed September 7, 2025, https://www.dps.texas.gov/section/texas-rangers/company-sog
  60. Special Operations | Unified Police Department of Greater Salt Lake, accessed September 7, 2025, https://unifiedpoliceut.gov/special-operations/
  61. Special Teams | Vermont State Police, accessed September 7, 2025, https://vsp.vermont.gov/specialteams
  62. Tactical Team – Virginia State Police, accessed September 7, 2025, https://vsp.virginia.gov/sections-units-bureaus/bfo/tactical-team-program/
  63. Bureaus – Washington State Patrol, accessed September 7, 2025, https://wsp.wa.gov/about-us/bureaus/
  64. Special Response Team | Weirton, WV, accessed September 7, 2025, https://www.cityofweirton.com/202/Special-Response-Team
  65. Tactical Teams – Wisconsin State Patrol, accessed September 7, 2025, https://wsp.wi.gov/Pages/tacticalteams.aspx
  66. Sheboygan County S.W.A.T Team, accessed September 7, 2025, https://www.sheboygancounty.com/departments/departments-r-z/sheriff-s-department/special-teams/sheboygan-county-s-w-a-t-team
  67. Specialty Units – WHP.WYO.GOV, accessed September 7, 2025, https://whp.wyo.gov/troopers/specialty-units
  68. ME LD1600 – BillTrack50, accessed September 7, 2025, https://www.billtrack50.com/billdetail/1884017
  69. Kansas Highway Patrol – Wikipedia, accessed September 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kansas_Highway_Patrol
  70. Pennsylvania State Police selects Walther PDP as official duty handgun – Police1, accessed September 7, 2025, https://www.police1.com/police-products/firearms/pennsylvania-state-police-selects-walther-pdp-as-official-duty-handgun
  71. Walther USA selected to equip the Pennsylvania State Police with service pistols from the Walther PDP series | all4shooters, accessed September 7, 2025, https://www.all4shooters.com/en/shooting/pro-zone/walther-pdp-new-service-pistol-in-pennsylvania/
  72. OSP SRT Sig Sauer P320 AXG Legion Pistols – HigherGov, accessed September 7, 2025, https://www.highergov.com/sl/contract-opportunity/oh-osp-srt-sig-sauer-p320-axg-legion-pistol-36415027/
  73. 90th Anniversary Commemorative Weapon, accessed September 7, 2025, https://www.troopertotrooper.com/90th_Anniversary_Commemorative_weapon_flyer.pdf
  74. Ohio Attorney General’s Office Bureau of Criminal Investigation Investigative Report 2023-2008 Officer Involved Critical Incident, accessed September 7, 2025, https://www.ohioattorneygeneral.gov/getattachment/7e259e74-131b-48e0-a38f-4a9ebe711fd6/7e259e74-131b-48e0-a38f-4a9ebe711fd6.aspx
  75. Guns Of The Texas Rangers – Athlon Outdoors Exclusive Firearm Updates, Reviews & News, accessed September 7, 2025, https://athlonoutdoors.com/article/guns-of-the-texas-rangers/
  76. Fact Sheet – ATF, accessed September 7, 2025, https://www.atf.gov/file/11051/download
  77. Federal Tactical Teams – Every CRS Report, accessed September 7, 2025, https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/R44179.epub
  78. Special Weapons And Tactics (SWAT) Team – Burbank Police Department, accessed September 7, 2025, https://www.burbankpd.org/specialized-units/specialized-weapons-and-tactics-swat-team/