Tag Archives: M855A1

Ammunition Analytics, Analytics and Reports, AR Analytics

The M855A1 Enhanced Performance Round: Evolution and Analysis

Executive Summary

The M855A1 Enhanced Performance Round (EPR) represents a major mechanical and chemical overhaul of the standard 5.56×45mm NATO cartridge. The Department of Defense originally started the M855A1 program to remove heavy metals from the small arms supply chain and fix terminal ballistic inconsistencies in the legacy M855, and the M855A1 fundamentally changes how the projectile behaves internally, externally, and upon impact. This modern cartridge replaces the old lead core and mild steel tip with a three-piece assembly: a reverse-drawn copper jacket, a solid copper slug, and a prominent, hardened steel penetrator.

To keep high muzzle velocities from the M4 carbine’s 14.5-inch barrel, the M855A1 uses a temperature-stable propellant (SMP-842) that raises chamber pressures to about 62,000 psi. This redesign delivers a ballistic profile with yaw-independent terminal effects in soft tissue, steady trajectory through barriers, and hard-target penetration that actually surpasses the larger 7.62×51mm M80 ball ammunition. In testing, the EPR can penetrate 3/8-inch mild steel at 350 meters and punches through automotive glass without the severe deflection seen in older rounds.

While the EPR offers superior performance, its high thermodynamic output and unique geometry create new engineering challenges. The increased chamber pressure puts more mechanical stress on the M4 carbine, leading to faster bolt wear and bore erosion. Furthermore, the hardened steel tip can damage feed ramps when used with legacy aluminum magazines, which led to the adoption of redesigned polymer and modified metallic magazines. This report explores the development, technical specs, terminal performance, and the impact the M855A1 has on weapon systems.

1. Historical Context of the 5.56x45mm Cartridge

The history of the 5.56×45mm NATO cartridge is a story of constant refinement in bullet weight, velocity, and barrel twist rates. The M855A1 is the latest step in this evolution, designed to meet the demands of modern combat environments while maintaining compatibility with legacy ammunition.

1.1 The Small Caliber High Velocity Paradigm

The shift to 5.56×45mm was based on the Small Caliber High Velocity (SCHV) concept. Following World War II, research—most notably the 1952 Hall and Hitchman reports—showed that most infantry engagements happened at ranges under 300 meters. The theory was that a smaller, lighter bullet moving at high speed could match or even exceed the lethality of heavier calibers, like the .30-06, by rapidly tumbling and fragmenting in soft tissue. Also, lighter cartridges let soldiers carry more ammo, which greatly increased the firepower of their squads.

Early requirements for this intermediate round were ambitious: it needed to penetrate a steel helmet and stay supersonic at 500 yards while matching the accuracy of M2 ball ammo. The first version, adopted in 1963 as the M193, used a 55-grain bullet hitting 3,250 feet per second from a 20-inch M16 barrel. The M193 relied almost entirely on this high velocity to fragment upon impact.

1.2 Standardization and M855 Limitations

In 1980, NATO moved to standardize ammunition, choosing the Belgian SS109 design, known in the U.S. as the M855. This version used a heavier 62-grain bullet with a mild steel tip. It was specifically designed to penetrate a steel helmet at 600 meters, which required a heavier projectile and a lower muzzle velocity than the previous M193.

Though the M855 met hard-target goals, its performance against soft targets was often inconsistent. The bullet is highly dependent on yaw; it often travels several inches through a target point-first before destabilizing and tumbling. If the impact velocity is above 2,500 feet per second, the bullet usually fragments. However, at lower speeds or when hitting narrow targets, it can pass straight through like a solid needle. This often resulted in minimal energy transfer—a problem reported in Somalia, Afghanistan, and Iraq, where soldiers saw targets absorb multiple hits without being incapacitated.

1.3 The Transition to Carbine Platforms

The problems with the M855 became more obvious as the military transitioned from the 20-inch barrel M16 to the 14.5-inch M4 carbine. The M855 was ballistically optimized for the longer barrel, which produced velocities up to 3,110 feet per second.

In the shorter M4 barrel, the pressure curve is cut short, dropping muzzle velocity to around 2,900 feet per second. Since the M855 needs high velocity to fragment, this reduction effectively shortened the weapon’s lethal range. Beyond 150 meters, an M855 fired from an M4 often fails to fragment, resulting in simple punctures rather than effective stops.

2. The M855A1 Development Program

Beyond lethality concerns, the Department of Defense faced pressure to identify an environmentally friendly alternative to lead-core bullets to reduce contamination at training sites. The new program aimed to solve both the performance gaps of the M855 and its environmental footprint.

2.1 The “Green Ammo” Initiative

In 1995, the Army established a group to identify non-toxic ammunition. Driven by environmental mandates, they first tested a tungsten-nylon variant. This design used powdered tungsten and a polymer binder, but it ultimately failed to meet accuracy and lethality requirements.

Researchers then tried a bismuth-tin alloy, which was almost as dense as lead. While it showed promise, the program was cancelled in 2009 because the alloy proved unstable at high temperatures, making it unreliable for global use.

2.2 Finalization and Production at Lake City

After the bismuth-tin failure, engineers moved to a solid copper core with a larger steel penetrator, which solved the heat issues. This final design was designated the M855A1 EPR and began reaching combat zones in 2010.

The road to the M855A1 was expensive, with the Army spending roughly $100 million on research across the various phases. Today, it is produced for the government at the Lake City Army Ammunition Plant, with over 1.2 billion rounds manufactured so far. At $0.21 to $0.23 per round, it is only slightly pricier than the legacy M855.

3. Cartridge Architecture and Technical Specifications

The M855A1 is a carefully tuned system where the bullet, powder, and primer all work together. It is designed to maximize the M4 carbine while remaining compatible with the M16 and M249 SAW.

3.1 Projectile Composition and Metallurgy

The EPR uses a 62-grain projectile, matching the weight of the legacy M855. This ensures the bullet follows the same trajectory, meaning soldiers don’t have to change their sight settings. However, the interior of the bullet is entirely different.

The projectile consists of three discrete components:

  1. The Penetrator: A hardened steel tip that is exposed at the front. It is 45% heavier and 54% longer than the tip in the M855. Hardened to 58 HRC—similar to tool steel—this tip is coated in bronze to prevent corrosion.
  2. The Slug: A solid copper core sits behind the penetrator, replacing the old lead core and removing 32 grains of lead per bullet.
  3. The Jacket: A copper jacket that wraps the slug and the base of the penetrator. It uses a “reverse drawn” process, where the jacket is pulled from the base up, leaving the steel tip exposed.

This new shape makes the bullet slightly longer, improving its ballistic efficiency by about 6% and reducing wind drift by 8% at 600 meters.

Diagram comparing M855 and M855A1 bullets, showing internal components.

3.2 Propellant Formulation (SMP-842)

To achieve more speed out of the M4’s shorter barrel, the M855A1 uses SMP-842 propellant, with about 25.8 grains per round.

Old powders often didn’t burn completely in 14.5 inches, leading to lower speeds and more muzzle flash. SMP-842 burns faster to reach peak pressure sooner, maximizing energy before the bullet leaves the barrel.

Additionally, this powder is more stable in extreme heat, like during sustained automatic fire. It also includes additives to reduce muzzle flash, helping soldiers stay hidden in low light.

3.3 Chamber Pressure and Primer Interface

The combination of a harder bullet and faster powder changes the internal pressure. While the legacy M855 produced about 55,000 psi, the M855A1 pushes that to 62,000 psi. This 12.7% increase restores the muzzle velocity that was lost when switching to the shorter M4 carbine.

The M855A1 elevates this chamber pressure to 62,000 psi (427.5 MPa)3. This 12.7 percent increase generates a muzzle velocity of approximately 2,970 feet per second from the M4 carbine, restoring the velocity profile lost when transitioning away from the M169.

To handle this extra pressure, the primer was also redesigned. It uses a modified anvil for better ignition and a mechanical “stab crimp” to keep the primer from blowing out during the extraction cycle. This lead-free primer also supports the program’s environmental goals.

4. Terminal Ballistics and Target Defeat Mechanisms

The M855A1’s design completely changes its terminal ballistics. Instead of relying on speed to tear the bullet apart, it uses its mechanical assembly to ensure consistent damage.

4.1 Soft Target and Tissue Behavior

The M855A1 is “barrier blind” and yaw-independent. This means it creates a consistent wound channel regardless of the angle at which it hits a target.

On impact, the steel tip is pushed into the copper core, causing the bullet to fragment almost immediately. Because this is a mechanical process, it works even at lower speeds and longer ranges. The result is a larger wound cavity and fewer pass-throughs compared to the M855.

4.2 Hard Target and Armor Penetration

The EPR bridges the gap between standard and armor-piercing rounds. Its hardened tip can penetrate 3/8-inch steel at 350 meters—more than double the range of the M855 and even better than the larger 7.62mm M80 ball round.

It can also defeat Level III polyethylene armor at close range. However, it is still stopped by Level IV [link](https://blog.roninsgrips.com/state-of-the-art-2025-an-analysis-of-leading-edge-ballistic-armor-plates/) ceramic plates, which are designed to shatter these types of penetrators.

4.3 Intermediate Barrier Performance

Older bullets often deflected or deformed when hitting barriers like glass or wood. The M855A1’s exposed steel tip bites into the material, allowing the rest of the bullet to stay on track.

Barrier MaterialM855 (Legacy) PerformanceM855A1 (EPR) Performance
Auto Glass (Windshield)Deflects significantly upon entry33Penetrates cleanly; maintains trajectory33
Car Door (Sheet Metal)Passes through but fragments prematurely33Clean pass-through maintains integrity33
Interior Drywall (2 layers)Fragments on first layer33Penetrates both layers intact33
Plywood (3/4-inch)Penetrates with notable deformation33Clean penetration without deformation33
Concrete Masonry UnitFails to penetrate2Penetrates at 50m (M4) / 75m (M16)5

5. Companion Cartridges: Tracers and Training Ammunition

The move to the M855A1 also required a new tracer. The M856A1 was developed to match the EPR’s flight path exactly, ensuring that what a soldier sees through their sights matches where the ball ammo is landing.

The M856A1 is a 56-grain lead-free tracer with a red tip. It provides a visible trace out to 900 meters and is typically mixed with ball ammunition in a 4-to-1 ratio for machine guns.

For safe training, the military uses Short Range Training Ammunition (SRTA). These plastic-tipped rounds are very fast at the muzzle but slow down quickly, making them safe for use in urban training sites.

6. Weapon System Integration and Mechanical Impacts

The higher energy and harder materials of the M855A1 come with a mechanical cost. The Army discovered several issues with weapon durability and feeding that required new hardware solutions.

6.1 Feed Ramp Interface and Magazine Evolution

One major issue is [link](https://blog.roninsgrips.com/magpul-magazine-innovations-pmag-amag-and-tmag-analysis/) the wear on aluminum feed ramps. Because the bullet is longer and has an exposed steel tip, it can strike the ramps during loading.

In standard aluminum magazines, the angle of the cartridge causes the steel tip to gouge the softer aluminum of the receiver. Over time, this damage can lead to feeding failures.

To fix this, the Army introduced the Enhanced Performance Magazine (EPM), which changes the feed angle to 37-44.5 degrees. This lets the steel tip clear the ramps and go straight into the chamber. Modern polymer magazines, like the Magpul PMAG Gen M3, also solved this issue during official testing.

6.2 Chamber Pressure and Component Degradation

The 62,000 psi pressure also speeds up wear on the bolt. Testing showed microscopic cracks appearing on bolt lugs after about 6,000 rounds.

High heat from the new powder also increases throat erosion—the wearing down of the rifling where the chamber meets the barrel. Short-barreled Mk18 rifles, in particular, required more frequent barrel changes due to this stress.

6.3 Gas System Dynamics and Cyclic Rate

The M4’s gas port is closer to the chamber than the M16’s, meaning it taps gas at higher pressure—17,000 psi versus 10,000 psi. Firing the high-pressure M855A1 through this system makes the bolt move faster, which increases the cyclic rate and stress on the parts.

Researchers found that a “mid-length” gas system—moving the port further down the barrel—could lower this pressure and improve reliability.

M855A1 system stress: Carbine vs. Mid-Length gas systems show fewer malfunctions with mid-length.

Tests over 12,600 rounds showed that the mid-length system reduced malfunctions by more than half and slowed the cyclic rate by 127 rounds per minute.

7. Contemporary Alternatives and Future Paradigms

While the M855A1 is the current standard, the search for even better performance has led to alternative rounds and the development of entirely new calibers.

7.1 The USMC Mk318 Mod 0 (SOST)

In 2009, while the M855A1 was delayed, the Marines and Special Ops adopted the Mk318 Mod 0 (SOST) cartridge.

The Mk318 uses a different design with a lead core and a solid brass base. It offers similar performance against barriers and tissue without the need to be lead-free.

Crucially, the Mk318 doesn’t cause the same feed ramp damage or bolt fatigue as the M855A1 because it lacks the exposed steel tip and operates at lower pressure. While the Marines liked its durability, the Army chose the M855A1 for its superior armor penetration and environmental compliance, deciding that the extra weapon wear was a worthwhile trade.

7.2 The Next Generation Squad Weapon (NGSW)

Even with the improvements of the M855A1, the 5.56mm cartridge is reaching its limits. It is already running at extreme pressures and cannot penetrate modern Level IV body armor at standard combat ranges.

Research shows that defeating future armor at 600 meters requires a bigger, faster bullet and pressures up to 80,000 psi—beyond what brass cases can handle. This led to the Next Generation Squad Weapon (NGSW) program and the transition to 6.8×51mm.

The new 6.8mm round uses a design inspired by the M855A1. To handle the extreme pressure, Sig Sauer developed a bimetallic case with a steel base. With the Army now fielding the XM7 rifle and XM250, the M855A1 stands as the final evolution of the 5.56mm before the 6.8mm takes over.

Conclusion

The M855A1 EPR is a high-tech answer to the performance gaps of the M4 carbine. By using a mechanical fragmentation process instead of just speed, it delivers more consistent lethality. Its hardened steel tip gives 5.56mm better barrier and armor penetration than ever before.

While the high pressures required for this performance increase weapon wear, the parallel development of better magazines and gas systems has kept the fleet ready. The M855A1 maximizes the potential of the 5.56mm NATO round, serving as a vital bridge to the next generation of ammunition.

Master Summary Table

Metric / SpecificationM855 (Legacy)M855A1 (EPR)Operational Impact
Projectile Mass62 grain (4.0 g)62 grain (4.0 g)Exterior ballistic trajectory is matched; no re-zeroing or training transfer is required for infantry4.
Internal CompositionLead core, fully jacketed mild steel tip (40-45 HRC)Solid copper slug, exposed hardened steel tip (58 HRC)6Eliminates lead toxicity and shifts terminal performance from yaw-dependent to mechanical separation3.
PropellantStandard Rifle PropellantSMP-8425Flash-suppressed; optimized burn rate for 14.5″ M4 barrels; temperature stable during sustained fire27.
Chamber Pressure~55,000 psi (SCATP)~62,000 psi4Restores muzzle velocity but accelerates bolt lug wear, cam pin stress, and throat erosion4.
Soft Target BehaviorYaw-dependent, relies on >2500 fps to reliably fragment5Yaw-independent, consistent fragmentation at all combat ranges2Eliminates “through-and-through” punctures; provides highly lethal temporary cavitation consistently11.
Barrier PenetrationPenetrates 3/8″ mild steel at 160 yardsPenetrates 3/8″ mild steel at 350m21Outperforms 7.62x51mm M80 against steel; penetrates auto glass without severe deflection22.
System CompatibilityFunctions reliably in standard aluminum USGI magazinesHardened tip gouges aluminum M4 feed ramps due to feed angle38Necessitated the fielding of the Enhanced Performance Magazine (EPM) and PMAG Gen M310.

Please share the link on Facebook, Forums, with colleagues, etc. Your support is much appreciated and if you have any feedback, please email us in**@*********ps.com. If you’d like to request a report or order a reprint, please click here for the corresponding page to open in new tab.

Sources Used

  1. The Case for a New Military Calibre – UK Land Power, https://uklandpower.com/2017/11/29/the-case-for-a-new-military-calibre/
  2. M855A1 EPR: Enhanced 5.56mm Performance | PDF | Firearms – Scribd, https://www.scribd.com/document/510318179/Public-Release-EPR-Apr12
  3. 5.56×45mm NATO – Military Wiki – Fandom, https://military-history.fandom.com/wiki/5.56%C3%9745mm_NATO
  4. 5.56×45mm NATO – Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5.56%C3%9745mm_NATO
  5. 5.56×45mm NATO | PDF | Cartridge (Firearms) – Scribd, https://www.scribd.com/document/327586637/5-56-45mm-NATO
  6. What is the difference between M193 and M855? – Quora, https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-difference-between-M193-and-M855
  7. 5.56×45mm NATO – Vietnam War | Fandom, https://vietnamwar.fandom.com/wiki/5.56%C3%9745mm_NATO
  8. Small Caliber Lethality: 5.56mm Performance in Close Quarters Battle – Scribd, https://www.scribd.com/document/237789786/Small-Caliber-Lethality-5-56mm-Performance-in-Close-Quarters-Battle
  9. M4 carbine – Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M4_carbine
  10. Comparison of the AK-47 and M16 – Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_the_AK-47_and_M16
  11. On the pervasive belief that Civil War small arms produced uniquely destructive wounds : r/CIVILWAR – Reddit, https://www.reddit.com/r/CIVILWAR/comments/1vtnuy2/on_the_pervasive_belief_that_civil_war_small_arms/
  12. The M855A1 Cartridge: A Long Time Coming | An Official Journal Of The NRA, https://www.americanrifleman.org/content/the-m855a1-cartridge-a-long-time-coming/
  13. M855A1 Enhanced Performance Overview | PDF | Firearms | Projectile Weapons – Scribd, https://www.scribd.com/document/33481923/M855A1
  14. U S Military Equipment | PDF – Scribd, https://www.scribd.com/doc/267969185/u-s-Military-Equipment
  15. Ammunition – Justification Book, https://www.asafm.army.mil/Portals/72/Documents/BudgetMaterial/2023/Base%20Budget/Procurement/AMMO_ARMY.pdf
  16. Procurement of Ammunition Army – Justification Book, https://www.asafm.army.mil/Portals/72/Documents/BudgetMaterial/2024/Base%20Budget/Procurement/Procurement%20of%20Ammunition%20Army.pdf
  17. M855A1 Explained: Specs, Price, and Where to Buy in 2026 – Rifle Configurator, https://www.rifleconfigurator.com/articles/m855a1-explained
  18. ARCHIVED REPORT Small Arms Ammunition – Forecast International, https://www.forecastinternational.com/archive/disp_pdf.cfm?DACH_RECNO=1741
  19. M855A1: Will Your Armor Be Enough? – RMA Armament, https://rmadefense.com/m855a1-will-your-armor-be-enough/
  20. Comparison of Penetration Capability of Several Co | PDF – Scribd, https://www.scribd.com/document/771759421/Comparison-of-Penetration-Capability-of-Several-Co
  21. Ballistic Armor Glossary – Common terms, threats, and materials., https://www.ade.pt/ballistic-armor-glossary/
  22. Army vs. Marine Rifle Round or What Some Would Like You to Believe… – Spotter Up, https://spotterup.com/army-vs-marine-rifle-round-or-what-some-would-like-you-to-believe/
  23. Overview of 5.56×45mm NATO Cartridge – Scribd, https://www.scribd.com/document/909925002/5-56-45mm-Nato
  24. Ballistic Coefficient Interactive Calculator – Firgelli Automations, https://www.firgelliauto.com/blogs/engineering-calculators/ballistic-coefficient-calculator
  25. M855A1 accuracy test. – Weapon Evolution, http://www.weaponevolution.com/forum/showthread.php?9577-M855A1-accuracy-test
  26. I joined before the green tips, what difference has tungsten made in combat scenarios? Was it worth the switch? : r/army – Reddit, https://www.reddit.com/r/army/comments/exnu1s/i_joined_before_the_green_tips_what_difference/
  27. M855A1 5.56Mm Ammunition – Page 3 – Weapons other than Tanks (WOTTs) – tanknet.org, https://www.tanknet.org/index.php?/topic/39064-m855a1-556mm-ammunition/page/3/
  28. Understanding 5.56mm NATO Ballistics and Barrel Lengths, https://blog.roninsgrips.com/understanding-5-56mm-nato-ballistics-and-barrel-lengths/
  29. NDIA Armament Systems Forum, https://ndia.dtic.mil/wp-content/uploads/2016/armament/Gutierrez.pdf
  30. U.S. Army Touts M855A1 Round Performance – Defense Media Network, https://www.defensemedianetwork.com/stories/u-s-army-touts-m855a1-round-performance/
  31. Up-armor kit for ballistic helmet – Justia Patents, https://patents.justia.com/patent/10775137
  32. State of the Art 2025: An Analysis of Leading-Edge Ballistic Armor Plates – Ronin’s Grips, https://blog.roninsgrips.com/state-of-the-art-2025-an-analysis-of-leading-edge-ballistic-armor-plates/
  33. M855 Green Tip Ammo: Ballistics, Penetration Data & Performance Guide – Tatted Tacticals, https://tattedtacticals.com/m855-green-tip-ammo-guide/
  34. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for Public Release – AWS, https://cdck-file-uploads-us1.s3.dualstack.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/flex016/uploads/cartridgecollectors/original/3X/b/9/b92f8fd472e13b734ae4ee2b72f448820916cb9b.pdf
  35. procurement of ammunition, army, https://www.asafm.army.mil/Portals/72/Documents/BudgetMaterial/2012/base%20budget/justification%20book/ammo.pdf
  36. Blades and Edged Weapons Including Khukuris Archives – Ronin’s Grips, https://blog.roninsgrips.com/category/blades/
  37. Magpul Magazine Innovations: PMAG, AMAG, and TMAG Analysis – Ronin’s Grips, https://blog.roninsgrips.com/magpul-magazine-innovations-pmag-amag-and-tmag-analysis/
  38. M855A1 5.56mm NATO Penetrator Ammo Feed Ramp Issues: Real, Hype or just Overblown? – Defense Review, https://defensereview.com/m855a1-5-56mm-nato-penetrator-ammo-feed-ramp-issues-real-hype-or-just-overblown/
  39. Got my hands on some M855A1! I have a question though. : r/ar15 – Reddit, https://www.reddit.com/r/ar15/comments/g5rd5e/got_my_hands_on_some_m855a1_i_have_a_question/
  40. US12031790B2 – Firearm, bolt catch, and lower receiver – Google Patents, https://patents.google.com/patent/US12031790B2/en
  41. Performance Analysis: Hodge Defense Mod 2 – Ronin’s Grips, https://blog.roninsgrips.com/performance-analysis-hodge-defense-mod-2/
  42. AmmoOracle 061808 | PDF | Bullet | Rifle – Scribd, https://www.scribd.com/document/65614314/AmmoOracle-061808
  43. Is High Pressure the Future of 5.56? | Daniel Defense, https://danieldefense.com/wire/is-high-pressure-the-future-of-556
  44. NSWC-Crane Mid-Length Gas System Testing Shows Increased Performance & Service Life For M4 Carbines, https://soldiersystems.net/2018/05/14/nswc-crane-carbine-mid-length-gas-system-testing-shows-increased-performance/
  45. Archive for the ‘weapons’ Category – Soldier Systems, https://soldiersystems.net/category/weapons/page/127/
  46. This detailed report shows which M4 rifle design works the best – Army Times, https://www.armytimes.com/news/your-military/2018/06/01/this-detailed-report-shows-which-m4-rifle-design-works-the-best/?contentQuery=%7B%22includeSections%22%3A%22%2Fhome%22%2C%22excludeSections%22%3A%22%22%2C%22feedSize%22%3A10%2C%22feedOffset%22%3A115%7D&contentFeatureId=f0fmoahPVC2AbfL-2-1-8
  47. If the U.S. does change its main caliber of 5.56 to 6.8, would the 5.56 still have some sort of role? : r/WarCollege – Reddit, https://www.reddit.com/r/WarCollege/comments/tamwqy/if_the_us_does_change_its_main_caliber_of_556_to/
  48. Will the Next Generation Squad Weapon succeed where the OICW and XM8 failed? And what will the Marines do with the M27 when they adopt the Army’s 6.8 rifle? : r/WarCollege – Reddit, https://www.reddit.com/r/WarCollege/comments/dt02ri/will_the_next_generation_squad_weapon_succeed/
  49. The Army Has Finally Fielded Its Next Generation Squad Weapons – Military.com, https://www.military.com/daily-news/2024/03/29/army-has-finally-fielded-its-next-generation-squad-weapons.html
  50. Inside the Army’s Quest for a Revolutionary New Bullet – Military.com, https://www.military.com/daily-news/2019/10/27/inside-armys-quest-revolutionary-new-bullet.html
  51. The Marine Corps May Want a Version of Army’s Next-Gen Squad Weapon – Military.com, https://www.military.com/daily-news/2020/03/09/marine-corps-may-want-version-armys-next-gen-squad-weapon.html
  52. An Analysis of the NGSW-FC Program and the XM157 Fire Control System – Ronin’s Grips, https://blog.roninsgrips.com/an-analysis-of-the-ngsw-fc-program-and-the-xm157-fire-control-system/